20221032 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20220729

Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 13, 2022 Ver 4.3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
OO Yes
O No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
OYes 0No
Change only if needed.
Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
6/1/2022
BIMS # Assigned*
20221032
Is a payment required for this project?*
0 No payment required
O Fee received
O Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office*
Fayetteville Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
Version#*
What amout is owed?*
0 $240.00
O $570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Chad Turlington:eads\ccturlington
la. Name of project:
Magnolia Hills Subdivision
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Krissina Newcomb
lb. Primary Contact Email:*
lc. Primary Contact Phone:*
[e-mail] [phone]
Date Submitted
7/29/2022
Nearest Body of Water
Mash Branch
Basin
Cape Fear
Water Classification
C
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.322770
A. Processing Information
Longitude:
-79.126776
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Harnett
Is this a NCDMS Project
0Yes ONo
Is this project a public transportation project?*
0Yes ONo

la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
EI Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
O Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
0 Yes
O No
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
O Nationwide Permit (NWP)
0 Regional General Permit (RGP)
0 Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
0Yes ®No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
EO 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
0 Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
0 Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
29 - Residential Developments
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
If. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
O Yes O No
O 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
0 Riparian Buffer Authorization
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
O Yes O No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
O Yes O No
lh. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
O Yes O No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
OYes 0No
B. Applicant Information
0Yes ONo
OYes 0No
Id. Who is applying for the permit?
O Owner O Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
OYes 0No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Galt Land Development LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2c. Contact Person:
Shaun Gardner
2d. Address
Street Address
206 Shoreline Drive
Address Line 2
City
Raeford
Postal / Zip Code
28376
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA

2e. Telephone Number: 2f. Fax Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Krissina Newcomb
4b. Business Name:
Hal Owen & Associates, Inc.
4c. Address
Street Address
PO Box 400
Address Line 2
City
Lillington
Postal / Zip Code
27546
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
krissina@halowensoi I. com
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
1. Project Information
1 b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
Magnolia Hills
lc. Nearest municipality / town:
Cameron
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
9567-11-9495, 9567-22-1421, 9567-11-6329,
9567-20-9849
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Ponderosa Trail
Address Line 2
City
Cameron
Postal / Zip Code
28326
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project: *
Mash Branch
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water: *
C
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Cape Fear
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030300040203
4. Project Description and History
2b. Property size:
116
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: *
The site is currently wooded/vacant. Land use to the west and north is wooded and to the east and south is residential.

4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? *
Yes No Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
23
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
5830
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
a single-family residential subdivision connected by a road and utilities (104 Lots)
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used: *
At the proposed Mahogany Court road crossing (Sheet W-1), a 56.62 LF, 18" RCP @ 8.12% slope will be installed under the roadway. An rip -rap energy dissipator will be added at the
outlet of the culvert.
At the first proposed Persimmon Tree Drive road crossing (Sheet W-2), a 95.38 LF, 66" RCP @ 1.63% slope will be installed under the roadway. An rip -rap energy dissipator will be added
at the outlet of the culvert.
At the second proposed Persimmon Tree Drive road crossing (Sheet W-3), a 87.37 LF, 60" RCP @ 1.92% slope will be installed under the roadway. An rip -rap energy dissipator will be
added at the outlet of the culvert.
The roadways will be graded; culverts installed (burial depth below streambed equal to 20% of pipe diameter); the road bed backfilled, compacted, and paved; and shoulder slopes
stabilized with vegetative seeding.
Water utility lines will be concurrently installed in the road right-of-way.
The disturbed wetlands areas will be re -vegetated using a hydrophytic herbaceous seed mix.
Typical construction equipment such as excavators, loaders, dump trucks, and graders will be utilized.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
Yes
Comments:
No Unknown
wetlands delineated in 2020 by Southeastern Soil & Env Assoc, review with minor modifications and
data collection by Hal Owen & Assoc (2022)
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
Southeastern Soil & Env. Assoc. (2020)
Hal Owen & Assoc (2022)
Yes • No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
All anticipated wetland impacts for this development have been accounted. No future phases.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
Wetlands
Open Waters
2. Wetland Impacts
Streams -tributaries
Pond Construction
Buffers
2a. Site #* (')
2a1 Reason (?)
2b. Impact type* (')
2c. Type of W.*
2d. W. name
2e. Forested*
2f. Type of Jurisdicition*
(?)
2g. Impact
area*
1P
road crossing
P
Headwater Forest
C
Yes
Both
0.188
(acres)
1T
road crossing
T
Headwater Forest
C
Yes
Both
0.025
(acres)
2P
road crossing
P
Headwater Forest
C
Yes
Both
0.181
(acres)

2T
road crossing
T
Headwater Forest
C
Yes
Both
0.024
(acres)
3P
road crossing
P
Headwater Forest
C
Yes
Both
0.107
(acres)
3T
road crossing
T
Headwater Forest
C
Yes
Both
0.017
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.066
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.542
2i. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.476
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.Impact type*
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type*
(?)
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction*
3g. S. width
3h. Impact
length*
Si
road crossing
Permanent
Culvert
Mash Branch
Perennial
Both
3
Average (feet)
125
(linear feet)
S2
road crossing
Permanent
Rip Rap Fill
Mash Branch
Perennial
Both
3
Average (feet)
30
(linear feet)
S3
road crossing
Temporary
Other
Mash Branch
Perennial
Both
3
Average (feet)
15
(linear feet)
S4
road crossing
Permanent
Culvert
S-C1
Perennial
Both
4
Average (feet)
106
(linear feet)
S5
road crossing
Permanent
Rip Rap Fill
S-C1
Perennial
Both
4
Average (feet)
30
(linear feet)
S6
road crossing
Temporary
Other
S-C1
Perennial
Both
4
Average (feet)
15
(linear feet)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
291
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
321
3j. Comments:
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
30
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Wetlands, streams, and buffers were excluded from lots.
The road format was designed to maximize lot count while considering site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, and accessibility.
The road was sited perpendicular to the drainageway to minimize impacts.
Detention basins and other stormwater controls were sited completely outside of all regulated wetland areas.
The two culverts will be buried (1ft depth) to maintain aquatic passage and to maintain passage during drought or low flow conditions.
Shoulder slopes at road crossings are 3:1
Utilities will be grouped in the road right-of-way where possible to minimize impacts.
lb. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Sediment and erosion control measures will be used, such as silt fencing, to protect water quality. Construction limits will be clearly marked through
wetlands. No clearing will occur in wetlands outside of the proposed impact area. Construction and fill materials will be stored in upland areas.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
O Yes O No
2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
O DWR O Corps
2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project?
0 Mitigation bank O Payment to in -lieu fee program 0 Permittee Responsible Mitigation

3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
Middle Cape Fear Umbrella Mitigation Bank
3b. Credits Purchased/Requested (attach receipt and letter)
Type:
Stream
3c. Comments
Quantity:
291
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
UYes 0No
4b. Stream mitigation requested: 4c. If using stream mitigation, what is the stream temperature:
(linear feet)
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWR only):
(square feet)
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
0.952
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested: 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
(acres) (acres)
4h. Comments
6. Buffer mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWR
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? If yes, you must fill out this entire form - please contact DWR for more information.
Yes • No
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR) C^1
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes • No
If no, explain why:
Cape Fear River Basin (HUC 03030004) is not subject
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
U Yes 0 No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
• Yes No
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information C^.)
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
Yes • No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
Yes O No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)

3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
Yes • No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This residential development is relatively small and will not likely affect regional growth patterns.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
0 Yes 0 No 0 N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a
treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
onsite subsurface sewage waste disposal, each system designed to treat and dispose of 360 to 480 gallons of effluent per day.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
• Yes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
• Yes No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1.8?
Yes • No
• No Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S
OYes 0No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
0Yes ®No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
0Yes ®No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
0 Yes • No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
US FWS iPaC (https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/ ). NC Natural Heritage Program (https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/)
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
Yes • No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
https://www.habitat. noaa.gov/apps/efhmapper/
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
Yes • No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
NC State Historic Preservation Office (http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/)
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
0 Yes • No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
NC Flood Risk Information System (https://fris.nc.gov/fris/ )
Miscellaneous

Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or dreg and drop files here to attach document
Magnolia Hills SD_PCN attachments.pdf 29.33MB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments
Signature
,71 By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction' subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Krissina Newcomb
Signature
Date
7/29/2022

HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS
P.O. Box 400, Lillington NC 27546-0400
Phone [phone] / Fax [phone]
www.halowensoil.com
29 July 2022
Mrs. Liz Hair
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
Reference: Pre -Construction Notification for
Magnolia Hills Subdivision (Proposed)
Harnett County, North Carolina
Dear Mrs. Hair,
A Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) is being submitted for the above referenced
property. The subject site contains 116 acres and is located on the northern side of Ponderosa
Trail, Cameron, NC. The subject site is located in the Barbecue Creek Subwatershed (HUC
030300040203) in the Cape Fear River Basin. A wetland delineation was conducted for the 116-
acre tract by Southeastern Soil & Environmental Associates in 2020. Hal Owen & Associates
Inc. staff reviewed the delineation and collected wetland and stream data forms in June 2022.
The proposed development is for a 104 lot single family residential subdivision named
Magnolia Hills. The plan proposes three road crossings that will result in 0.476 acre of
permanent wetland impact, 0.066 acre of temporary wetland impact, 291 linear feet of stream
impact, and 30 linear feet of temporary stream impact. Compensatory mitigation is proposed
through payment to Daniels Creek Mitigation Bank and NCDMS. This pre -construction
notification is being submitted pursuant to USACE Nationwide Permit 29 and NCDWR Water
Quality General Certification 4256.
PCN Attachments include:
• Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Package
• Site Plans and Impact Maps
• Threatened\Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat Assessment
• NC Historic Properties map
If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact me at
your convenience.
Sincerely,
Krissina B. Newcomb
Environmental Scientist
CC: Shaun Gardner, GALT Land Development
Soil Science Investigations • Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting

HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
APPENDIX A
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION PACKAGE
Soil Science Investigations • Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting

Jurisdictional Determination Request
US Army Corps
of Engineers.
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www. saw.usace. army.mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator. aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Depaitiuent of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: Ponderosa Trail
City, State: Cameron, NC
County: Harnett
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 9567-11-9495, 9567-22-1421,
9567-11-6329, 9567-20-9849
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Krissina Newcomb
Mailing Address: PO Box 400
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
Select one:
o
❑
EI
o
Lillington, NC 27546
910-893-8743
[e-mail]
I am the current property owner.
I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION2
Name: Galt Land Development, LLC/ Shaun G
Mailing Address: 206 Shoreline Drive
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
Raeford, NC 28376
910-988-8172
[e-mail]
1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION3,4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Krissina B. Newcomb
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner fl Authorized Agent'
6/30/2022
Date
11601,;,c„ 11,/
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
nI intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
n I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
n I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
nI intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
nI intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
n A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
❑ I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
nI believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
n Other:
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
4 If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
n
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
Size of Property or Review Area 1 16 acres.
❑ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017
Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
z
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: 35.322770
Longitude: -79.126776
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x 17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
• North Arrow
• Graphical Scale
• Boundary of Review Area
• Date
• Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
• Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
• Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
• Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
• Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
n
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017
Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
0
Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Forma
Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/regdocs/JD/RGL 08-02 App A Prelim JD Form fillable.pdf
s Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federaljurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY INFORMATION
Project Name: Magnolia Hills
Address: Ponderosa Trail, Cameron,NC 28326
PIN: 9567-11-9495, 9567-22-1421, 9567-11-6329,
9567-20-9849
County: Harnett
APPLICANT INFORMATION
Name: Galt Land Development, LLC / Shaun Gardner
Mailing Address: 206 Shoreline Dr., Raeford,NC 28376
Telephone Number: 910-988-8172
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S.Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting
on-site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.
I, the undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified
herein, or acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
I hereby authorize Mrs. Krissina Newcomb of Hal Owen & Associates, Inc. to act on
my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
jurisdictional determinations, CWA Section 401 and 404 permits and certifications, and
any and all standard and special conditions attached.
This authorization will remain in effect for (5) five years unless revoked by the
undersigned in writing.
II �'I dwnel' 5-1(7 f Z Z
Authorized Signature t Title Date
(Please legibly print name here: S il ci u n 6 A 1'd ner )

m
N
O
I
M o
O LL
n
l0
N
01
C
M
0
V
0. - 0
GO 4
,
W
con
N In U
❑ 01 0
ao
z z m
❑
a
0
CREDENCE TO
DEPR. BUILDING VALUE - CARD
0
o re
C U
U U
W
O
W W J
7 J a
> > W
Z
m <
i
LU
are0
wa0
0 X "
J
OV
re C
U 1
W W
as
0 0
W W
• ti)re re
-I
as
as
as
FF
0 0
z J
aVw
J a d
w aa
• a
J 0
a W W
U1 w a
7W>
Few
J
W W
a>a
FI-I-
0 0 0
X
cc
0
z
a
0
0
V
ROUT: WTRSHD:
d
a
ce
O
re
0 0 0 0 0 0
0
WV
M
a w
Va
O▪ w
z▪ Q
In
0
O
313
10
a
O
>
>
a
W
U
U
U
X
W
OW
LU
0 F
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
W
O
N
O
N
10
N
N
n
00
N
0
5
M
N,
N
n
0
M
ti
n
0
0
V
W
0
C7
a
1D
0
0
01
0
In
0
n
0
R
0
01
0
o
0
0
0
01
0,1
O
•0
Lrl
O
O
1-1
1-1
0
0]
1-1
1-1
1D
O
10
0
00
0
01
O
HEATED AREA
In
0
z
New parcel for 2022, SW
`m
r
W
m
}
W
J
Y
H
MODEL DESCRIPTION
USE DESCRIPTION
1)
O
0
O
W
H
ce
f
z
O
U
BASE RATE
DESCRIPTION
W
0
CATEGORY
NB FACTOR
z
0
F
U
cc
0
CO
W
m
}
C7
0
J
m
1-
1-
J
F
z
0
U
DESCRIPTION
W
0
U
z
0
z
5
C
0
m
LAND INFORMATION
LAND NOTES
LU
O w
re J
W a
0
LAND VALUE
In
N
0V
UJ
tna
D
▪ Z
▪ 0
R
Q 0
f 013
a
0
a
Z }
Dr
U
0
Z H
-Jr
J Z
0
01
01
1-
zV
ce
za
a
0
Ln
v
O W
as
OFa'
o 1-
0
z0
O J
a
rea
IL
1-0
0
0
0
+
3,3
0
0r
0<
0 W
V
0
00
Z
= W
LU
O
0
2
a
c
FRONTAGE
J C 7
0z
O
0
0,1
se
W
W
"0
v
00
09
TOTAL MARKET LAND DATA
TOTAL PRESENT USE DATA
6/29/2022 3:15:33 PM.
09-9567- - -0003- -03- (7476695) Group:0

CREDENCE TO
DEPR. BUILDING VALUE - CARD
0 0
0 0
O O
00
0 0
O O
Lel In
J
0U
▪ i
U 1
W W
as
as
W
• &)
IIX
as
as
as
F F
00
0 0 0
0
.r.
X
i
a
tri
i
i
0
i
0
z
a
a
a
0
U
ROUT: WTRSHD:
0 0 0 0 0 0
In
N N
0 0
✓ �
a
W
W
W N
I--i
as
▪ 1_1
.z.Q
In
0
0
Lo
CO
N
0
00
0
00
0
O
03
V
a
a
w
w
U
U
❑
x
x
x
O W
Lu
a F
31
N
31
N
a
❑
❑
0
❑
r
O
Y
0
N
01
N
N
ti
N
N
(0
N
ti
N
01
01
01
co
01
O
5
O
W
co
00
00
co
M
0
i
0
U
W
i
0
C7
co
0
00
0
01
0
1D
0
0
0
00
0
1D
00
0
CO
CO
0
00
0
O
O
00
rn
co
co
0
N.
0
N
Ln
0
N
0
O
0
0
co
0
V
0
1D
O
1fl
0
CO
CO
HEATED AREA
In
r
0
z
W
0
w
❑ N
Q 00
W
NO
Q U
W LL
0_ J
00
V W Z
00
o
za�„
0 0 0
a U1 0
w
_
o.
0>
X
00
0
0z
Q
U
`m
r
m
}
W
`J
r
H
IA
0
0
0
U
0
zo
O_
F x
Q I-
J uJ
Q W w
w 0 0
W ¢ 00 z
❑ > .i
0
=ax031
F-W¢U0
O
-L,U U1
O LL 31¢w
U w0O1 U1
N Q Q 1O z
z ❑ J
J z m¢ 00 0
J U
Z - N 0
W 00.
X N N O
0. z O N
O .N
Jz OL.
W 0 ya
> W y
W S x 0
CU 12a
Q N O
Z F NO
¢a 0 L
J 0M io-o
1— W M } Vvi
J
0 ❑ 0 > Cl'Z O > 00
C7°� za
SONS MAP#2016-193
MODEL DESCRIPTION
O
O
0
USE DESCRIPTION
In
O
Ln
W
H
ce
f
z
O
U
BASE RATE
DESCRIPTION
W
C1
0
CATEGORY
NB FACTOR
z
O
F
U
cc
a
ce
i
O
m
W
F W
1„1 U
Z�
Da
In
1-
2
1-
2
H
J
H
z
O
U
DESCRIPTION
W
0
U
cn
z
0
1
z
f
0
U'
a
00
LAND INFORMATION
LAND NOTES
LU
CI W
W ▪ a
0
LAND VALUE
0
Lo
00
0
Lo
LU
DU
Ce
▪ z
0
Ln
F- tn
^
00
a
00
00
ra
z Y
=r
U
0
z�
-r
J z
0
01
1-
zU
ace
za
J
a
Lo
v
0r
0Q
� LL
0
as
z0
JF
i W
a "
0
0
0
FRONTAGE
J0
U'"
00
O
- N
0
N
0
N
W
W
UI0
=U
ti
LD
0
01
❑
O
O
WETLAND
TOTAL MARKET LAND DATA
TOTAL PRESENT USE DATA
6/29/2022 3:16:57 PM.
09-9567- - -0005- (7450394) Group:0

Parcel ID: 09-9567-
0
N
0I
N. N
tiN X
O Nta
N 10 ¢
❑ 01 O
ao 0
z m
7 _ m
a
0
0
01
O
N
N N
O N
O
r
W
x
CREDENCE TO
DEPR. BUILDING VALUE - CARD
0 0
0 0
M M
M
00
N N
0 0
M
M M
J
0U
▪ C
U 1
W W
as
> >
0 0
W W
I• r-I
IX IX
as
as
as
FF
00
0 0 0
0
M
rr.
X
a
C
z
O
re
0
z
aQ
0
U
ROUT: WTRSHD:
0 0 0 0 0 0
O O
✓ 0
W
W N
I--C
Qa
Fm
O lla
rz.Q
In
0
0
a
0
N
0
0
0
N
0
0
Cr
0
a
a
0
❑
w
>-
w
U
OW
tu
LU
0 F
0
V1
in
In
❑
a
0
0
a
r
co
ti
N
01
N
01
N
10
N
10
N
N
N
01
01
OD
01
O
5
a
O
ti
N
ti
a
0
z
0
U
W
ae
0
C7
u]
cr
0
1.
0
CO9-1
c01
cr
0
rl
CO
0
O
cr
0
0
0
0
0
0
00
DO
0
01
CO
CO
10
1n
O
VD
VD
O
N
0
a
10
O
W
O
1D
00
1.11
a
01
O
00
O
HEATED AREA
In
r
0
z
W
CC -I
0>
X
m
0
o 0
U
`m
W
m
}
W
`J
r
H
MODEL DESCRIPTION
O
0
USE DESCRIPTION
1)
O
W
f
BASE RATE
DESCRIPTION
W
0
CATEGORY
NB FACTOR
z
Q
r
rai
U
cc
0
ce
O
a=
W u
0 W
m
W
c7
0
J
0
U
DESCRIPTION
W
0
U
W
J
a
u-
X
CO
0
J
1-
0
F
tn
z
0
Z
f
0
U'
0
m
LAND INFORMATION
LAND NOTES
LU
0 W
C
W a
>
0
LAND VALUE
cr
a,
N
cr
O
M
0 U
W Ce
urea
D
Q ▪ Z
0
01
CO
4 IA
^
00
r Q
C3
n
ra
z Y
Dr
U
U
0
ZN
-r
J z
o
CO
CO
CO
CO
z U
0a
z
J
0
0
0
O W
as
0
C
0r
zQ
Q LL
v
0
N
0
10
0
Z0
JF
x W
""
W N
0
S0
O
0
0
x
a
0
FRONTAGE
Z
0z
J N
N
O
ce
se
Ce
W
W
IA0
D
ti
00
01
❑
O
O
WETLAND
TOTAL MARKET LAND DATA
TOTAL PRESENT USE DATA
6/29/2022 3:17:22 PM.
09-9567- - -0037- (7420751) Group:0

\co
�0
\
10
§ (
k /
§ ms
1 §
a / \(
CO
\\
\/ <
—CY \
D- 2
(
CORRELATION OF VALUE
)
z
CREDENCE TO
DEPR. BUILDING VALUE - CARD
CD CD
0S
et et
u LJ
§ §)
>
';L
03 2
oWJ
wo
02o
CD CD
uJ
z
0
u
ROUT: WTRSHD:
SALES DATA
\�
kq
�
>
>
>
\
0/
0
/
0
0
/
/
0
/
�
0
/
0
a
`71-
co
0
Lu
HEATED AREA
0
z
New parcel for 2022, SW
>-
Lei
\
z
§«
_1cc
r
k
MODEL DESCRIPTION
0
USE DESCRIPTION
k
/
/
1-
z
0
u
BASE RATE I
DESCRIPTION
0
0
CATEGORY
NB FACTOR
DEPRECIATION
0
cc
>
0
\
§L)
§O.
§
z
_
K
1-
z
0
u
DESCRIPTION
�
0
u
0
LU
LAND INFORMATION
LAND NOTES
LAND VALUE
LU§
§.
B§
0 o«
z
,
u
\�
0
1-
zw
§
§�
CD
CD
CD
e�
0'X
o�
z
�m
�
[
�
FRONTAGE
;
00
N
}
k0
\
TOTAL MARKET LAND DATA
TOTAL PRESENT USE DATA
6/30/2022 1:37:43 PM.

Harnett County
Map for reference only.
Not a survey.
x
0
u_
2,000 ft
I\
BRET
-v
0
z
0
rn
Hal Owen & Associates Inc.
PO Box 400, Lillington, NC 27546
www.halowensoil.com
919-893-8743
Magnolia Hills SD
Ponderosa Road, Cameron, NC
30 June 2022
Figure 1
Vicinity Map

- Legend
Boundary Q
Parcel Boundaries
Parcel Centrcids
Parcels
,
4 7
I
t S y 3
y
�_ 4
?` ,
V -
rt ;,� � •..
4
'4t.n II Ati 1 IF-p e
Forrfrn only. Notsurvey.
referenceasu e ,
Y• Y
Hal Owen &Associates Inc. Scale 1 inch = 200 feet Magnolia Hills SD Figure 2
PO Box 400, Lillington, NC 27546
www.halowensoil.com 0 500 1,000 ft Ponderosa Road, Cameron, NC Aerial Photograph
919-893-8743 -
30 June 2022 Google Earth 2022

For reference only. Not a survey.
Hal Owen & Associates Inc.
PO Box 400, Lillington, NC 27546
www.halowensoil.com
919-893-8743
Scale 1 inch = 200 feet
2,000
Magnolia Hills SD
Ponderosa Road, Cameron, NC
30 June 2022
Figure 3
USGS Topographic Map
Quads: Murchisontown, NC
and Olivia, NC

For reference only. Not a survey.
Hal Owen & Associates Inc.
PO Box 400, Lillington, NC 27546
www.halowensoil.com
919-893-8743
Scale 1 inch = 500 feet
500 1,000 ft
Magnolia Hills SD
Ponderosa Road, Cameron, NC
30 June 2022
Legend
Boundary Q
stream
Wetlands
Figure 4
Potential Streams and Wetlands
on Subject Site

For reference only. Not a survey.
Hal Owen & Associates Inc.
PO Box 400, Lillington, NC 27546
www.halowensoil.com
919-893-8743
Scale 1 inch = 500 feet
500 1,000 ft
WDDF 7
Photo D
WDDF 1
Magnolia Hills SD
Ponderosa Road, Cameron, NC
30 June 2022
Legend
Boundary Q
stream
Wetlands
Figure 4-b
Potential Streams and Wetlands
on Subject Site
w/data form and photo locations

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Magnolia Hills City/County: Harnett
Applicant/Owner: Galt Land Development
Investigator(s): Tyler Dye
Sampling Date: 7 June 2022
State: NC Sampling Point: 1
Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Valley Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): < 2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: Long:
Soil Map Unit Name: BnB - Blaney loamy sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Datum:
NWI classification: PSS4B
No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes X
No
Remarks:
Data taken at wetland flag B26
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑
❑
✓
❑
❑
❑
0
0
❑
✓
Surface Water (A1) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
High Water Table (A2) ❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Saturation (A3) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Water Marks (B1) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Drift Deposits (B3) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ,❑,
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ,❑✓
Iron Deposits (B5) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ,❑
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) .
. Water -Stained Leaves (B9) ,❑,
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
, Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 10„
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 1
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius
1 Pinus taeda
2. Quercus nigra
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
30 Yes FAC
10 No FAC
3 Acer rubrum 20 Yes FAC
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
60 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 30 20% of total cover: 12
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
30ft radius
1 Ilex opaca 40 Yes FAC
2. Liriodendron tulipifera 10 Yes FACU
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
50 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 25 20% of total cover: 10
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius
1 Arundinaria gigantea 10 Yes FACW
2. Ilex opaca 25 Yes FAC
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
35 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 17.5 20% of total cover: 7
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius
1 Smilax laurifolia 15 Yes FACW
2. Smilax rotundifolia
3 Vitis rotundifolia
4.
40 Yes FAC
10 No FAC
5.
65 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 32.5 20% of total cover: 13
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 88 (NB)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hyd rophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: 1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 2/1 CL
3-12 10YR 6/1 10YR 5/8 15 SCL
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
❑
❑
❑,
❑,
❑,
❑,
❑
.11
111
❑,
❑,
.111
.11
❑,
111
❑,
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
Histosol (A1) .❑
Histic Epipedon (A2) .❑
Black Histic (A3) .❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) .❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) .❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) .❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) .❑
Below Dark Surface (A11) .❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) .❑
Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) .❑
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Matrix (S6) .❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
✓ Depleted Matrix (F3) 0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Marl (F10) (LRR U) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Magnolia Hills City/County: Cameron, Harnett Co Sampling Date: 7 June 2022
Applicant/Owner: Galt Land Development LLC
Investigator(s): Tyler Dye
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hill Slope
State: NC Sampling Point: 2
Section, Township, Range:
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: Long:
Soil Map Unit Name: BnB - Blaney loamy sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes
Datum:
NWI classification: none
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
Upland dominated by Loblolly pine.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
0
0
❑
❑.
Surface Water (A1) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
High Water Table (A2) ❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Saturation (A3) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Water Marks (B1) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Drift Deposits (B3) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ,❑,
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ,❑,
Iron Deposits (B5) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ,❑
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) .
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) ,❑,
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No x Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Water Table Present? Yes No x Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No x Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 2
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius
1 Pinus taeda
2. Quercus nigra
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
30 yes FAC
10 yes FAC
40 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20 20% of total cover: 8
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius
1 Quercus falcata
2. Quercus alba
20 yes FACU
15
no
FACU
3. Juniperus virginiana
4 Vaccinium corymbosum
5 Ilex opaca
15
20
30
no
yes
yes
FACU
FACW
FAC
6.
7.
8.
100 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 50 20% of total cover: 20
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius
1 Aristida stricta
2. Quercus alba
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Quercus falata
60
10
10
yes
no
no
FAC
FACU
80 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 40 20% of total cover: 16
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius
1 Smilax rotundifolia 2 yes FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
2 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 1 20% of total cover: 0..4
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
7 (B)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 71 (NB)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hyd rophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: 2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 6/3 LS
6-18 10YR 6/4 LS Stripping at 17"
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
❑
❑
❑,
❑,
❑,
❑,
❑
.11
111
❑,
❑,
.111
.11
❑,
111
❑,
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
Histosol (A1) .❑
Histic Epipedon (A2) .❑
Black Histic (A3) .❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) .❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) .❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) .❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) .❑
Below Dark Surface (A11) .❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) .❑
Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) .❑
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Matrix (S6) .❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) 0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Marl (F10) (LRR U) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Magnolia Hills
Applicant/Owner: Galt Land Development LLC
Investigator(s): Tyler Dye
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Toe slope
City/County: Cameron/Harnett Sampling Date: 17 June 2022
State: NC Sampling Point: 3
Section, Township, Range:
Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): < 2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: Long:
Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Vaucluse loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes NWI classification: PFO4B
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic?
No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
1
❑
1
❑
❑
❑
0
0
❑
✓
Surface Water (A1) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
High Water Table (A2) ❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Saturation (A3) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Water Marks (B1) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Drift Deposits (B3) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ,❑,
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ,❑✓
Iron Deposits (B5) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ,❑
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) .
. Water -Stained Leaves (B9) ,❑,
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
✓ Drainage Patterns (B10)
1 Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
, Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 6
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 3
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 3
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
1 Liquidambar styraciflua
2. Liriodendron tulipifera
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Quercus nigra
50% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
1. Acer rubrum
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
15 yes FAC
10 yes FACU
10
yes
FAC
35 = Total Cover
17.5 20% of total cover: 7
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
20 yes FAC
20 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4
1 Osmundastrum cinnamomeum
2. Arundinaria gigantea
3 Woodwardia areolata
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
25
60
20
yes
yes
no
FACW
FACW
OBL
105 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 52.5 20% of total cover: 21
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1 Vitis rotundifolia 10 yes FAC
2. Smilax laurifolia 15 yes OBL
3 Smilax rotundifolia 25 yes FAC
4.
5.
50 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 25 20% of total cover: 10
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 8 (A)
9 (B)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 89 (NB)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hyd rophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: 3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-18 10YR 2/1 SL
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
❑
❑
❑,
❑,
❑,
❑,
❑
.11
111
❑,
❑,
.111
.11
❑,
111
❑,
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
Histosol (A1) .❑
Histic Epipedon (A2) .❑
Black Histic (A3) .❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) .❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) .❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) .❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) .❑
Below Dark Surface (A11) .❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) .
Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) .❑
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Matrix (S6) .❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) 0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Marl (F10) (LRR U) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
✓ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Magnolia Hills
Applicant/Owner: Galt Land Development LLC
Investigator(s): Tyler Dye
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P
City/County: Cameron/Harnett
Sampling Date: 7 June 2022
State: Sampling Point: 4
Section, Township, Range:
Local relief (concave, convex, none): None
Lat: Long:
Soil Map Unit Name: Vaucluse loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology
for this time of year? Yes X
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
NWI classification: none
Slope (%):
Datum:
5%
No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
Yes
Yes
No No
No No
No No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
No
Remarks:
Mixed hardwood and pine tree cover. Unobstructed understory, dominated by fern.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
0
0
❑
❑.
Surface Water (A1) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
High Water Table (A2) ❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Saturation (A3) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Water Marks (B1) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Drift Deposits (B3) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ,❑,
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ,❑,
Iron Deposits (B5) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ,❑
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) .
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) ,❑,
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 4
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
1 Quercus alba
2. Pinus taeda
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Quercus falcata
Acer rubrum
50% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
1 Ilex opaca
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
40 Yes FACU
20 Yes FAC
20 Yes FACU
20 Yes FAC
100 = Total Cover
50 20% of total cover: 20
2. Pinus taeda
15 Yes FAC
30 Yes FAC
3 Vaccinium corymbosum
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1 Aristida stricta
15 Yes FACW
60 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 30 20% of total cover: 12
2. fern
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
10
no
100 Yes
FAC
110 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 55 20% of total cover: 22
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
7 (B)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 71 (NB)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hyd rophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: 4
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 6/3 LS
4-18 10YR 6/4 LS
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
❑
❑
❑,
❑,
❑,
❑,
❑
.11
111
❑,
❑,
.111
.11
❑,
111
❑,
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
Histosol (A1) .❑
Histic Epipedon (A2) .❑
Black Histic (A3) .❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) .❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) .❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) .❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) .❑
Below Dark Surface (A11) .❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) .❑
Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) .❑
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Matrix (S6) .❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) 0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Marl (F10) (LRR U) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Magnolia Hills
Applicant/Owner: Galt Land Development LLC
Investigator(s): Tyler Dye
City/County: Cameron, Harnett County Sampling Date: 7 June 2022
State: NC Sampling Point: 5
Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): < 2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: Long:
Soil Map Unit Name: Vaucluse loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
Yes X
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Datum:
NWI classification: PFO4B
No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes X No
Yes X No
Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes X
No
Remarks:
Data captured near wetland flag K109
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
✓
❑
✓
❑
❑
❑
0
0
❑
✓
Surface Water (A1) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
High Water Table (A2) ❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Saturation (A3) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Water Marks (B1) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Drift Deposits (B3) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ,❑,
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ,❑✓
Iron Deposits (B5) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ,❑
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) .
. Water -Stained Leaves (B9) ,❑,
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
✓ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
, Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 5
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
1 Pinus taeda
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
40 Yes FAC
40 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20 20% of total cover: 8
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Acer rubrum
Ilex opaca
15 Yes FAC
30
yes
FAC
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1 Arundinaria gigantea
45 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 22.5 20% of total cover: 9
2. Osmundastrum cinnamomeum
3 Rubus allegheniensis
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
60 Yes FACW
30 Yes FACW
5
No
FACU
95 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 47.5 20% of total cover: 19
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1 Smilax laurifolia
2. Smilax rotundifolia
60 Yes OBL
20 Yes FAC
3.
4.
5.
80 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 40 20% of total cover: 16
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
7 (B)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (NB)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hyd rophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: 5
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-12 10YR 2/1 SL
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
❑
❑
❑,
❑,
❑,
❑,
❑
.11
111
❑,
❑,
.111
.11
❑,
111
❑,
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
Histosol (A1) .❑
Histic Epipedon (A2) .❑
Black Histic (A3) .❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) .❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) .❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) .❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) .❑
Below Dark Surface (A11) .❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) .
Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) .❑
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Matrix (S6) .❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) 0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Marl (F10) (LRR U) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
✓ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Magnolia Hills City/County: Cameron, Harnett County Sampling Date: 7 June 2022
Applicant/Owner: Galt Land Development LLC
Investigator(s): Tyler Dye
State: NC Sampling Point: 6
Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Toe slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): < 2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: Long:
Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Vaucluse loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes NWI classification: PFO4B
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑
❑
✓
❑
✓
❑
0
0
❑
✓
Surface Water (A1) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
High Water Table (A2) ❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Saturation (A3) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Water Marks (B1) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Drift Deposits (B3) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ,❑,
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ,❑✓
Iron Deposits (B5) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ,❑
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) .
. Water -Stained Leaves (B9) ,❑,
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
✓ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
, Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 14
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 10
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 6
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
1 Quercus alba
2. Acer rubrum
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
40 Yes FACU
30 Yes FAC
70 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 35 20% of total cover: 14
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
30 = Total Cover
Acer rubrum
Ilex opaca
20
10
Yes
Yes
FAC
FAC
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1 Arundinaria gigantea
50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover: 6
2. Osmundastrium cinnamoneum
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Ilex opaca
70 Yes FACW
50 Yes FACW
10 No FAC
130 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 65 20% of total cover: 23
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1 Smilax rotundifolia 20 Yes FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
20 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
7 (B)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 86 (NB)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hyd rophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: 6
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 3/1 SL
4-15 10YR 2/1 SL
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
❑
❑
❑,
❑,
❑,
❑,
❑
.11
111
❑,
❑,
.111
.11
❑,
111
❑,
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
Histosol (A1) .❑
Histic Epipedon (A2) .❑
Black Histic (A3) .❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) .❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) .❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) .❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) .❑
Below Dark Surface (A11) .❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) .
Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) .❑
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Matrix (S6) .❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) 0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Marl (F10) (LRR U) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
✓ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Magnolia Hills
Applicant/Owner: Galt Land Development LLC
Investigator(s): Tyle Dye
City/County: Cameron/Harnett
Sampling Date: 7 June 2022
State: NC Sampling Point: 7
Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Ridge top Local relief (concave, convex, none): None
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: Long:
Soil Map Unit Name: Gilead loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic?
NWI classification: none
Slope (%):
Datum:
2%
No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
Yes
Yes
No X
No X
No X
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes No x
Remarks:
Mixed tree cover of oaks and pine. Young long leaf present
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
0
0
❑
❑.
Surface Water (A1) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
High Water Table (A2) ❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Saturation (A3) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Water Marks (B1) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Drift Deposits (B3) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ,❑,
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ,❑,
Iron Deposits (B5) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ,❑
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) .
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) ,❑,
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 7
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius
1 Quercus falcata
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
30 yes FACU
2. Quercus alba 30 yes FACU
3 Pinus taeda 30 yes FAC
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
90 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 45 20% of total cover: 18
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius
1 Pinus palustris 20 yes FAC
2. Ilex opaca 10 yes FAC
3. Juniperus virginiana 10 yes FACU
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
40 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20 20% of total cover: 8
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius
1 Aristida stricta 40 yes FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
40 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius
1 Smilax rotundifolia 2 Yes FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
2 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 1 20% of total cover: 0.4
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 63 (NB)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
FACU species
UPL species
Column Totals:
0
0
102
70
0
172
x 1 =
x2=
x3=
x4=
x5=
(A) 586 (B)
306
280
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.4
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hyd rophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: 7
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 6/3 LS
4-18 10YR 6/4 LS
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
❑
❑
❑,
❑,
❑,
❑,
❑
.11
111
❑,
❑,
.111
.11
❑,
111
❑,
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
Histosol (A1) .❑
Histic Epipedon (A2) .❑
Black Histic (A3) .❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) .❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) .❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) .❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) .❑
Below Dark Surface (A11) .❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) .❑
Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) .❑
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Matrix (S6) .❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) 0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Marl (F10) (LRR U) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
SDF-A 1
Date: 6/7/2022
Project/Site: Magnolia Hills
Latitude: 35.320578
Evaluator: Tyler Dye
County: Harnett
Longitude: -79.125841
Total Ponts:
Stream is at least intermittent
if > 19 or perennial if > 30*
28.5
Stream Determination
(select one)
Ephemeral
Perennial
Other:
e.g. Quad Name:
Murchisonton
Intermittent
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 13
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
la. Continuous bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade Control
0
1
2
3
10. Natural Valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdrolo
Subtotal = 10
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biolo
Subtotal = 5.5
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundanc
0
0.5
1
1.5
21. Aquatic Molluskes
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75
OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
* perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
SDF-B
Date: 6/7/2022
Project/Site: Magnolia Hills
Latitude: 35.320661
Evaluator: Tyler Dye
County: Harnett
Longitude: -79.125791
Total Ponts:
Stream is at least intermittent
if > 19 or perennial if > 30*
24
Stream Determination
(select one)
Ephemeral
Perennial
Other:
e.g. Quad Name:
Murchisonton
Intermittent
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 12.5
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
la. Continuous bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade Control
0
1
2
3
10. Natural Valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdrolo
Subtotal = 7.5
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biolo
Subtotal = 4
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundanc
0
0.5
1
1.5
21. Aquatic Molluskes
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75
OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
* perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:

•C
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 6/7/2022
Project/Site: Magnolia Hills
Latitude:
Evaluator: Tyler Dye
County: Harnett
Longitude:
Total Ponts:
Stream is at least intermittent
if > 19 or perennial if > 30*
33.5
Stream Determination
(select one)
Ephemeral
Perennial
Other:
e.g. Quad Name:
Murchisonton
Intermittent
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 20
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
la. Continuous bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade Control
0
1
2
3
10. Natural Valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdrolo
Subtotal = 8.5
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biolo
Subtotal = 5
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundanc
0
0.5
1
1.5
21. Aquatic Molluskes
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75
OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
* perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD:
Krissina Newcomb, Hal Owen & Assoc, PO Box 400, Lillington, NC 27546
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES
AND/OR AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Harnett City: Cameron
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 35.322770 Long.: -79.126776
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Mash Branch
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination. Date(s):
1

TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT
TO REGULATORY JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount of
aquatic resource in
review area (acreage
and linear feet, if
applicable)
Type of aquatic resource
(i.e., wetland vs. non-
wetland waters)
Geographic authority to
which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section 404
or Section 10/404)
A
35.317645
-79.119433
0.25 ac
wetland
Section 404
B
35.321247
-79.123730
1.6 ac
wetland
Section 404
C
35.323883
79.123781
15 ac
wetland
Section 404
D
35.322802
-79.131303
1 ac
wetland
Section 404
E
35.324046
-79.130976
0.05 ac
wetland
Section 404
F
35.323580
-79.128252
3 ac
wetland
Section 404
G
35.324372
-79.125797
2 ac
wetland
Section 404
S-A
35.317617
-79.119372
170 LF
stream
Section 404
Mash
Branch
35.321077
-79.125457
2070 LF
stream
Section 404
S-C1
35.321525
-79.128003
2330 LF
stream
Section 404
S-C2
35.320990
-79.127776
560 LF
stream
Section 404
S-F1
35.323568
-79.128184
700LF
stream
Section 404
2

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply -
checked items should be included in case file and, where checked and requested,
appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
7.5 Minute Murchisontown, NC.
Z USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
Websoil Survey and NRCS Soil Survey of Harnett County, North Carolina.
® National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name :USFWS NWI.
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
Z FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of
1929)
Z Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date). Google Earth (2022)
or ❑ Other (Name & Date): Landscape Photographs 2022
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
' 1lee.70;4R,6— 7/6/2022
Signature and date of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining the
signature is impracticable)
3

For reference only. Not a survey.
Hal Owen & Associates Inc.
PO Box 400, Lillington, NC 27546
www.halowensoil.com
919-893-8743
Scale 1 inch = 200 feet
500 1,000 ft
Magnolia Hills SD
Ponderosa Road, Cameron, NC
30 June 2022
NRCS Soil Survey of Harnett
County, North Carolina
Sheets 8 and 9

USDA United States A product of the National Custom Soil Resource
Department of Cooperative Soil Survey,
Agriculture a joint effort of the United Report for
States Department of
RCS Agriculture and other Harnett County,
Federal agencies, State
Natural agencies including the North Carolina
Resources Agricultural Experiment
Conservation Stations, and local
Service participants Magnolia Hills
} n L
_._./ f fret Rd
,. .
-,
*
41
/ .�
0 ■■■■■■■■■■ 1,000 ft 4 Ve
June 30, 2022

Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nrcs/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
(https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nres) or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/contactus/?
cid=nres142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require
2

alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at [phone] (voice
and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or
call [phone] (voice) or [phone] (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.
3

Contents
Preface 2
Soil Map 5
Soil Map 6
Legend 7
Map Unit Legend 8
Map Unit Descriptions 8
Harnett County, North Carolina 10
Bb—Bibb soils, frequently flooded 10
BnB—Blaney loamy sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes 11
BnD—Blaney loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes 12
CaB—Candor sand, 0 to 8 percent slopes 13
GaB—Gilead loamy sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes 14
GaD—Gilead loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes 16
VaD—Vaucluse loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes 17
4

Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.
5

35° 19'43"N
35° 18'48"N
669400
Map Scale: 1:12,000 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.
6
Custom Soil Resource Report
Soil Map
0 150 300
E00
Meters
900
Feet
0 530 1000 2000 3000
Mapprojedion: Web Mercator Comerwordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84
6
6
5
5
5
35° 18' 48" N

Custom Soil Resource Report
MAP LEGEND
Area of Interest (AOI)
n Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
El Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
Special Point Features
• Blowout
Borrow Pit
• Clay Spot
• Closed Depression
• Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
▪ Landfill
A. Lava Flow
jda Marsh or swamp
• Mine or Quarry
CO Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
• Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
• Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
oa Sodic Spot
r=
6
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
▪ Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
am Aerial Photography
MAP INFORMATION
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:24,000.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Harnett County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 19, Jan 21, 2022
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Jul 28, 2019—Jul 30,
2019
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
7

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
Bb
Bibb soils, frequently flooded
6.4
5.6%
BnB
Blaney loamy sand, 2 to 8
percent slopes
38.8
33.9%
BnD
Blaney loamy sand, 8 to 15
percent slopes
0.4
0.3%
CaB
Candor sand, 0 to 8 percent
slopes
30.9
27.1%
GaB
Gilead loamy sand, 2 to 8
percent slopes
0.1
0.1 %
GaD
Gilead loamy sand, 8 to 15
percent slopes
13.6
11.9%
VaD
Vaucluse loamy sand, 8 to 15
percent slopes
24.1
21.1%
Totals for Area of Interest
114.2
100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
8

Custom Soil Resource Report
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha -Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
9

Custom Soil Resource Report
Harnett County, North Carolina
Bb—Bibb soils, frequently flooded
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3snw
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Bibb, undrained, and similar soils: 80 percent
Johnston, undrained, and similar soils: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Bibb, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Sandy and loamy alluvium
Typical profile
A - 0 to 6 inches: sandy loam
Cg1 - 6 to 60 inches: sandy loam
Cg2 - 60 to 80 inches: loamy sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95
in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: FrequentNone
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 5w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Description of Johnston, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Flood plains
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Sandy and loamy alluvium
10

Custom Soil Resource Report
Typical profile
A - 0 to 30 inches: mucky loam
Cg1 - 30 to 34 inches: loamy fine sand
Cg2 - 34 to 80 inches: fine sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Very poorly drained
Runoff class: Ponded
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95
in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 inches
Frequency of flooding: NoneFrequent
Frequency of ponding: Frequent
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 9.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
BnB—Blaney loamy sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3snx
Elevation: 160 to 660 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 52 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 245 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Blaney and similar soils: 90 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Blaney
Setting
Landform: Low hills
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Sandy and loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
A - 0 to 4 inches: loamy sand
E - 4 to 25 inches: loamy sand
11

Custom Soil Resource Report
Bt - 25 to 62 inches: sandy clay loam
C - 62 to 80 inches: loamy coarse sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 8 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high (0.20
to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 4.0 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3s
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Ecological site: F137XY002GA - Loamy Summit Woodland - PROVISIONAL
Hydric soil rating: No
BnD—Blaney loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3sny
Elevation: 160 to 660 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 52 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 245 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Blaney and similar soils: 85 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Blaney
Setting
Landform: Low hills
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Sandy and loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
A - 0 to 4 inches: loamy sand
E - 4 to 25 inches: loamy sand
Bt - 25 to 62 inches: sandy clay loam
C - 62 to 80 inches: loamy coarse sand

Custom Soil Resource Report
Properties and qualities
Slope: 8 to 15 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high (0.20
to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 4.0 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Ecological site: F137XY006GA - Loamy Backslope Woodland - PROVISIONAL
Hydric soil rating: No
CaB—Candor sand, 0 to 8 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3snz
Elevation: 160 to 750 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 52 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 245 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Candor, moderately wet, and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 8 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Candor, Moderately Wet
Setting
Landform: Low hills
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Sandy and loamy marine deposits and/or eolian sands
Typical profile
A - 0 to 8 inches: sand
E - 8 to 27 inches: sand
Bt - 27 to 39 inches: loamy sand
E' - 39 to 58 inches: sand
B't - 58 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
13

Custom Soil Resource Report
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 8 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Somewhat excessively drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 48 to 72 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 3.1 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Ecological site: F137XY001 GA - Dry Sandy Upland Woodland
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Ailey, moderately wet
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Low hills
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Head slope
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
Bibb, undrained
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Johnston, undrained
Percent of map unit: 1 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
GaB—Gilead loamy sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3sph
Elevation: 160 to 660 feet

Custom Soil Resource Report
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 52 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 245 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Gilead and similar soils: 90 percent
Minor components: 5 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Gilead
Setting
Landform: Low hills
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Loamy and clayey marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 5 inches: loamy sand
Bt1 - 5 to 8 inches: sandy loam
Bt2 - 8 to 42 inches: sandy clay
Bt3 - 42 to 52 inches: sandy clay loam
C1 - 52 to 76 inches: clay
C2 - 76 to 80 inches: gravelly sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 8 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Moderately well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to moderately
high (0.00 to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 18 to 30 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Bibb, undrained
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes

Custom Soil Resource Report
Johnston, undrained
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
GaD—Gilead loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3spj
Elevation: 160 to 660 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 52 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 245 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Gilead and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 5 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Gilead
Setting
Landform: Low hills
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Loamy and clayey marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 5 inches: loamy sand
Bt1 - 5 to 8 inches: sandy loam
Bt2 - 8 to 42 inches: sandy clay
Bt3 - 42 to 52 inches: sandy clay loam
C1 - 52 to 76 inches: clay
C2 - 76 to 80 inches: gravelly sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 8 to 15 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Moderately well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to moderately
high (0.00 to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 18 to 30 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
16

Custom Soil Resource Report
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Bibb, undrained
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Johnston, undrained
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
VaD—Vaucluse loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3sgk
Elevation: 80 to 660 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Vaucluse and similar soils: 80 percent
Minor components: 5 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Vaucluse
Setting
Landform: Low hills
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Loamy and sandy marine deposits
17

Custom Soil Resource Report
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 6 inches: loamy sand
E - 6 to 15 inches: loamy sand
Bt - 15 to 29 inches: sandy clay loam
Btx - 29 to 58 inches: sandy clay loam
BC - 58 to 80 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 8 to 15 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 15 to 35 inches to fragipan
Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to
moderately high (0.06 to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Very low (about 2.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Ecological site: F137XY006GA - Loamy Backslope Woodland - PROVISIONAL
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Bibb, undrained
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Johnston, undrained
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
June 30, 2022
Wetlands
❑ Estuarine and Marine Deepwater
▪ Estuarine and Marine Wetland
Magnolia Hills SD
❑ Freshwater Emergent Wetland ❑ Lake
❑ Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland ❑ Other
❑ Freshwater Pond ❑ Riverine
sh and Wildlife Setvice, National Standards any Suppo
etlands tea �!'_= s:gov _
This map is for general reference only. The US Fish and Wildlife
Service is not responsible for the accuracy or currentness of the
base data shown on this map. All wetlands related data should
be used in accordance with the layer metadata found on the
Wetlands Mapper web site.
National Wetlands Inventory (NW)
This page was produced by the NW mapper

N
AJun 30, 2022
•
t y w= 1.l Sy
�y. .t. F F'� • i V ryY��• M1at 5 y 1'
r •'. .'. I. "ram i.
' .i' . •* N 'w{..4 r 4 �..' �;'I'•- ,• .^ ,,•r`r 5s' ,H1 ;.-
• y i. fury .� ." , “ . . -Ll•pi:h fri'5 .
-
:, ''..: -7'1.'4 - .' \A-0.. '....,,- - ...I. .. . i 1 . • .•
.Y1. i • I • I 1 /:,
5"'a a ' I' ' � 1 ;- **:x ' NI {I
•
11..'2...2........i„AA! , . ....•.it.4........'. •......k. -.., : :''' .... . ' • .e. .,:,. . , . ..-
, ,. .
. . .. . . .. i. . ..
........,., ... ,.
...
. .....,. .. ....
. .d, ... .
, .41 ''.••• .
1 ' s
I
I . .. ANe 41iH' i iq .. . F ':....•
Legend North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program
Panels Flood Hazard Areas
PaliticalAreas AE
Stream Centerline Floodway(AE)
. . Cross Sections 0.2 % Chance Annual Flood Hazard ZIPS) c 2 •
r Levee Future Conditions 1%Annual Chance Flood Hazard mow;

Landscape Photographs
Photograph A(17 June 2022). Photo taken at Wetland Determination Data Form 2 (upland area).
* {—.. • ..,4... ',..r' . '-4 'r
• V,, . r+ l sue.',
Sy lai7. mow. •.
4.! 7
,. ..' -.,.*:§0 •..\ --.-444.'..P:-. ;'• .'!‘'- '- . 2•4,10'4, .i .
S A S c + `�i ) . .• .
f - `gym `� - • 4 - . J �+r ,z .r .:' r:f
�"�' d .�'l Y 'i.•' ��i' zI
7cN v4 \l A�k�'° -s •r r� l
•
�� - a'' S '� `v y` s•. y R .a - ;+L _ 5,• y � -, ma r"rS � ' .. � ,t � `. E x s - . '� ,,,; ,,
am' _i Lwti ?ztia �i ys. -S5:: e.4,,�`y,'i ,, , ,,-- `'..+.' ,-f •,. --
v deer ti - < /T k=} /, s . r
.77
a =x
xfy r,. •
t j
y. \ ii\it 1
0.1
S
Nr
e JJ
' � / A. .
Hal Owen &Associates, Inc. July 2022 Magnolia Hills SD, Harnett County NC

Landscape Photographs
Photograph B(17 June 2022). Photo taken at Wetland Determination Data Form 3 (wetland area).
-,ti
t 1 7 'F % ',dr� „
'1,r v 4 r I l� P•It .? Iris 1. '4'646.
<�t �i .' } $�� r' 1 It "'r �1:1 l�y f. i 1 ►��s►,t�4
�y" a •
A,� IC�, _`1 '• ,�' `J 7 ,�r4 • Y , �, �}`
ii, '°�
1K ",, • ,.ter::1,i a ''� r "$ ,,. ..1 , .
' ,y }}z��� zti 1.
.i r y 1�
t.
y`' x. ...6., 'a p\lit I ' '..''
r ' - wt% , i r. f c y 1::4 r p 0 a r r ."1 `1 '. ►, l `�' sir f .
1 ').7,' 7 ..* r f ^•A sf / kit-
tut,
/ J
4.
1 _. �
�y ::.,),'
y.i.: _.: _i i ,...i._.\,
_'',_'''':__ .;r.,..:•'_,,,,,::,'.1,;!`''S:f:4.•
/. =� � , 1%1 Mli ai a
ti i ,
e► ram, F, f a� a r' ,- o� I
A� . ,
. ,"fir —� i s"
it
Hal Owen &Associates, Inc. July 2022 Magnolia Hills SD, Harnett County NC

Landscape Photographs
Photograph C(17 June 2022). Photo taken at Wetland Determination Data Form 5(wetland area).
.d-1..,,y"A•.i",„._,....t...!
. L V ; '„may,. `.- r •' , --`- Yp, , 7 _ !:•y-. lK r .y 94
2'4 -•
'
;tile --:'1.1';:s.. :;::4" .e.,. . “ir - . ','''1:*111tA:**—::t' iii..:4''-'''1/14•:' 1 f
1
'$• 00i. as !..+ 4. a - ti Y`
rt`,. a .- - ` _ k•�4 t '''V t 1' ._ .f/ _ •, .s
z
GSA s _ :>< -'�# @i .- .. #° '�e
o - Sr f ? t of
'ilit
�- ` " " -�
v ".
•
-i
•
_ �•� •fix _ +. 'r\'. - ' C�.
.fi �
a/ � ' • �
x r � J -'' te._-,
a $
, ( mai
• . ti
� .AP
yam _� ..T� .W-
p} - T
ifr
:.� • t
i g. 1
Hal Owen &Associates, Inc. July 2022 Magnolia Hills SD, Harnett County NC

Landscape Photographs
Photograph D (17 June 2022). Photo taken at Wetland Determination Data Form 7 (upland area).
Hal Owen & Associates, Inc.
July 2022
Magnolia Hills SD, Harnett County NC

HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
APPENDIX B
SITE PLANS AND IMPACT MAPS
Soil Science Investigations • Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting

R30 ECT NUAMBER'.
0
R
J Z
J Q
aCC J
a
W W
O u)
PROJECT INFORMATION
DRAWING SCALE
HORIZONTAL: 1'
DATE RELEASED

/QJPa^,
I � , Lei MPACT
PONDEROSA TRAIL AREA
(SR1323)
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
LEGEND:
R/W — RIGHT OF WAY
INV — INVERT OF NEW PIPE
RCP — REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
PROPERTY LINE
— CREEK
WETLANDS
WETLANDS
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
RIP RAP AREA
`„_°: oFEss/o•%,,,,
•%
AL :
57
N,RISE`*
bi -22.22
I, SEAN R. SEEVER, CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS DRAWN
UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE
UNDER MY SUPERVISION. WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL
THIS 22 DAY OF JULY, A.D., 2022.
PROFESSI+NAL LAND SURVEYOR — L-4571
IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT (FILL): 8,039 SF
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT (RIP—RAP):15O SF
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT TOTAL:8,189 SF
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT: 1,108 SF
DESCRIPTION:
THE EXISTING WETLAND WILL BE IMPACTED BY
PLACING 1-18" PIPE AND THE FILL REQUIRED FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF THE ROADWAY AS SHOWN.
PIPE 6
56.62 LF ® 8.12% 18"
CLASS 3 RCP
1
4,
i •
325
320
315
310
Ln
1
W
I
W
X
W
• v-
W 'Y
W
v-
AU
AZ
AMA
AVZM
AZ %IIIIF
A%! %%%1 A
EE \ ■uDHEY/III
AN J%/ EMII,I/%r
Anr MGM.an
%//.ME.■L"■► °II/MAN
ENEMISENUFAVIIN
AOREMIINUFAMEN
%% 5�■I/t%%■■■I
■raI/%/■■■■
Iroprimm-
4 9I"J■l1f
0
IMPACT AREA 1
FINISH
GRADE
EXISTING GRADE
INV
315.60
#"�,
18" RCP
INV
56.62 LF ® 8.12%
O
in
N
311.00
co O
ao
d-
0+00
1+00
325
320
315
310
z
Wetland Impacts
1 P 0.188 ac (permanent)
1T 0.025 ac (temporary)
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0 50
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 50 ft.
4Dsite
solutions
civil engineering I Land surveying
409 Chicago Drive, Suite 112, Fayetteville, NC 28306
office 1910-426-6777 fax [phone] license number I C-2354
wwwADslbsolutbns.com
REVISIONS
PROJECT NAME
MAGNOLIA
HILLS
SUBDIVISION
WETLANDS
IMPACT MAP
CLIENT
GALT LAND
DEVELOPMENT LLC
206 Shoreline Drive
Raeford, North Carolina 28376
Phone: [phone]
PROJECT INFORMATION
SURVEYED BY:
MIKE
DRAWN BY:
ROBERT
CHECKED BY:
CHRIS
PROJECT NUMBER:
1631
DRAWING SCALE
HORIZONTAL: 1 "=50'
VERTICAL: 1 "=5
DATE RELEASED
JULY 22, 2022
SHEET NUMBER
w-1
OF 3

Lei MPACT
PONDEROSA TRAIL AREA
(SR1323)
RIGHT OF WAY
INVERT OF NEW PIPE
REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
PROPERTY LINE
— — CREEK
-- WETLANDS
WETLANDS
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
il
#,s0A "CAROB I'?
: oF�SSck- B•OA• cr, ��
: P457A : :
I, SEAN R. SEEVER, CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS DRAWN
UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE
UNDER MY SUPERVISION. WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL
THIS 22 DAY OF 1JULY, A.D., 2022.
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT (FILL): 7,755 SF
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT (RIP—RAP):150 SF
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT TOTAL: 7,905 SF
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT: 1,041 SF
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT: 155 LF
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT: 15 LF
THE EXISTING WETLAND WILL BE IMPACTED BY
PLACING 1-66" PIPE AND THE FILL REQUIRED FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF THE ROADWAY AS SHOWN.
PIPE 4
95.38 LF 0 1.63% 66"
CLASS 3 RCP
FINISH GRADE
7
1
95.38
y LF 0 1,63z,,
66„
/�i��/// RCP
_ ���
EXISTING
GRADE
I N V
�%��i�I'!�
lik
• 296.00
INV
294.45
297.37
296.1
Lo up
r
rn Q1
N N
(O N
rn °'
N N
N
al
N
Wetland Impacts
2P 0.181 ac (permanent)
2T 0.024 ac (temporary)
Stream Impacts
S1 125 (culvert, permanent)
S2 30 (rip -rap, permanent)
S3 15 (temporary)
4Dsite
solutions
civil engineering I Land surveying
409 Chicago Drive, Suite 112, Fayetteville, NC 28306
office 1910-426-6777 fax [phone] license number I C-2354
wwwADslbsolutbns.com
REVISIONS
PROJECT NAME
MAGNOLIA
HILLS
SUBDIVISION
WETLANDS
IMPACT MAP
CLIENT
GALT LAND
EVELOPMENT LLC
206 Shoreline Drive
Reaford, North Carolina 283796
Phone: [phone]
PROJECT INFORMATION
SURVEYED BY:
MIKE
DRAWN BY:
ROBERT
CHECKED BY:
CHRIS
PROJECT NUMBER:
1631
DRAWING SCALE
HORIZONTAL: 1 "=50'
VERTICAL: 1 "=5
DATE RELEASED
JULY 22, 2022
SHEET NUMBER
W-2
OF 3

rQJP a^,
�@ 1� Lei MPACT
PONDEROSA TRAIL AREA
(SR1323)
LEGEND:
R/W — RIGHT OF WAY
INV — INVERT OF NEW PIPE
RCP — REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
PROPERTY LINE
— — — — CREEK
— — WETLANDS
WETLANDS
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
RIP RAP AREA
I, SEAN R. SEEVER, CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS DRAWN
UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE
UNDER MY SUPERVISION. WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL
THIS 22 DAY OF, JULY, A.D., 2022.
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT (FILL): 4,602 SF
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT (RIP —RAP): 68 SF
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT TOTAL: 4,670 SF
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT: 734 SF
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT: 136 LF
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT: 15 LF
THE EXISTING WETLAND WILL BE IMPACTED BY
PLACING 1-60" PIPE AND THE FILL REQUIRED FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF THE ROADWAY AS SHOWN.
SJ \ Mi\■E►T'T` 6
ANONON INV
eaemPaRiiir
NONirrdONNIF
NNW CMOS'
ANSF ` X
n_
IMPACT AREA 3
PIPE 7
87.37 LF @ 1.92% 60"
CLASS 3 RCP
FINISH GRADE
-.\)
/
87'37
LF @ 7 2q
\
60, RCP
\
EXISTING GRADE
si
/�_/'/�
INV
40,40
300.68
I NV
\
299.00
O
M
M O
O lr)
M
301.40
300.4
300.44
299.3
299.30
Wetland Impacts
3P 0.107 ac (permanent)
3T 0.017 ac (temporary)
Stream Impacts
S4 106 LF (culvert, permanent)
S5 30 LF (rip -rap, permanent)
S6 15 LF temporary
4Dsite
solutions
civil engineering I Land surveying
409 Chicago Drive, Suite 112, Fayetteville, NC 28306
office 1910-426-6777 fax [phone] license number I C-2354
wwwADslbsolutbns.com
REVISIONS
PROJECT NAME
MAGNOLIA
HILLS
SUBDIVISION
WETLANDS
IMPACT MAP
CLIENT
GALT LAND
DEVELOPMENT LLC
206 Shoreline Drive
Raeford, North Carolina 28376
Phone: [phone]
PROJECT INFORMATION
SURVEYED BY:
MIKE
DRAWN BY:
ROBERT
CHECKED BY:
CHRIS
PROJECT NUMBER:
1631
DRAWING SCALE
HORIZONTAL: 1 "=50'
VERTICAL: 1 "=5
DATE RELEASED
JULY 22, 2022
SHEET NUMBER
W-3
OF 3

HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
APPENDIX C
ENDANGERED SPECIES AND DESIGNATED CRITICAL HABITAT
Soil Science Investigations • Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting

KYE.p T {Ds ry
-
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Project Code: 2022-0059428
Project Name: Magnolia Hills SD
June 30, 2022
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the
requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the
Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). If your project area
contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species on this species list, the proposed
action has the potential to adversely affect those species. If suitable habitat is present, surveys
should be conducted to determine the species' presence or absence within the project area. The
use of this species list and/or North Carolina Natural Heritage program data should not be
substituted for actual field surveys.
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered

06/30/2022 2
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having
similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological
evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may
affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended
contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.
If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that
listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the
agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service
recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed
within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7
consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered
Species Consultation Handbook" at:
http://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF
Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species
under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to
protect native birds from project -related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional,
resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more
information regarding these Acts see https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations.php.
The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally
killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to
comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within
applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan
(when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid
or minimize the production of project -related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and
their resources to the project -related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and
recommended conservation measures see hops://www.fws.gov/birds/bird-enthusiasts/threats-to-
birds.php.
In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies
to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities
that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures
that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both
migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of
Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations/
executive-orders/e0-13186. php.

06/30/2022 3
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of
this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit
to our office.
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List
• Migratory Birds

06/30/2022 1
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

06/30/2022 2
Project Summary
Project Code: 2022-0059428
Event Code: None
Project Name: Magnolia Hills SD
Project Type: Residential Construction
Project Description: SFR SD Ponderosa Tr, Cameron
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www.google.com/maps/@35.32104865,-79.12667225369614,14z
"14#exr1arr.!.
Counties: Harnett County, North Carolina

06/30/2022 3
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 5 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesl, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Birds
NAME
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Reptiles
NAME
STATUS
American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/776
Fishes
NAME
Endangered
STATUS
Similarity of
Appearance
(Threatened)
STATUS
Cape Fear Shiner Notropis mekistocholas
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6063
Insects
NAME
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Endangered
STATUS
Candidate

06/30/2022 4
Flowering Plants
NAME
Rough -leaved Loosestrife Lysimachia asperulaefolia
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2747
STATUS
Endangered
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

06/30/2022
Migratory Birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act1 and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Actz.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the
USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your
project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this
list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location,
nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact
locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project
area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species
on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing
the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to
additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your
migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be
found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
NAME
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types
of development or activities.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
BREEDING
SEASON
Breeds Sep 1 to
Jul 31
Breeds May 1
to Jul 31

06/30/2022 2
NAME
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
BREEDING
SEASON
Breeds May 10
to Sep 10
Breeds May 10
to Aug 31
Probability Of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the
FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting
to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (■)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week
months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see
below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher
confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for
that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee
was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is
0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence
in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12
(0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on
week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
Breeding Season ( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across
its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project
area.

06/30/2022
Survey Effort (I)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on
all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
SPECIES
Bald Eagle
Non -BCC
Vulnerable
Prairie Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Red-headed
Woodpecker
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Wood Thrush
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
• probability of presence breeding season 1 survey effort — no data
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
++++ +++I ++++ ++�+ ++++ ++++ +�++ ++�+ —++ ++++ ++++ +�++
i_ ===r 1
++++ ++++ ++++ +1+i Jill III! iii
--` -1--I--I--1- —++ -1--I--I--1--1--I--I--1-+--++
+++I +I++ I++I IA ++II 111+ 1+11
++ ++++ +I++ +I++
± ++ -1-11III11 ■III----
1
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds/species
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library/
collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-migratory-birds
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds hops://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf
Migratory Birds FAQ
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts
to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize
impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly
important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in
the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very

06/30/2022 4
helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding
in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits
may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of
infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified
location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCC) and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding,
and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as
warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act
requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your
project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list
of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds
potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data
provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing
collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information
becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and
how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my
project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding,
wintering, migrating or year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab
of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of
interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your
migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your
project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds
elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?

06/30/2022 5
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern
throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands,
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on
your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles)
potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities
(e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made,
in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC
species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles,
please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species
and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the
Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides
birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird
model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical
Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use
throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this
information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study
and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid
violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of
birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for
identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC
use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be
aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that
overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no
data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey
effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of

06/30/2022 6
certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might
be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you
know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement
conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell
me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.

06/30/2022 7
IPaC User Contact Information
Agency: Hal Owen & Associates
Name: Krissina Newcomb
Address: PO Box 400
City: Lillington
State: NC
Zip: 27546
Email [e-mail]
Phone: [phone]

■al■
■■ F` NC DEPARTMENT OF
is ■
N E INN NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
• ■■■
June 30, 2022
Krissina Newcomb
Hal Owen & Associates Inc
PO Box 400
Lillington, NC 27546
RE: SFR SD Ponderosa Tr, Cameron
Dear Krissina Newcomb:
Roy Cooper, Governor
D. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Buchanan
Deputy director, Natural Heritage Program
NCNHDE-18491
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Di rectory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally -
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rodney.butler(ancdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
fJ 121 W. JO tES STREET. Ri%LEi H_ NC 27603 - 1651 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. PALEiGH, NC 2769D
OFC 912.707.9120 • FAX 919,707212i

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
SFR SD Ponderosa Tr, Cameron
June 30, 2022
NCNHDE-18491
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last iir Element Accuracy Federal State Global State
Group Observation Occurrence Status Status Rank Rank
i i Date j Rank =
Dragonfly or 33751 Somatochlora
Damselfly georgiana
Coppery Emerald
2004-Pre
H? 5-Very
Low
Significantly G3G4 S1?
Rare
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name wner Owner Type
US Fish and Wildlife Service Easement US Fish and Wildlife Service Federal
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/help. Data query generated on June 30, 2022; source: NCNHP, Ql, April 2022. Please
resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

NCNHDE-18491: SFR SD Ponderosa Tr, Cameron
/
477 ft
/
/ A
c
a
ae`
a'"et
469ft
Ponderosa Golf
Club
eo060osa Trl
�yp�ess
C�Pek
Branch
a��
Gurn
5�N
0
vohnsonvllle
c.
0.6
1.5
187
belch Rd
o�
1.2 Miles
Pi
June 30, 2022
Managed Area (MAREA)
❑ Buffered Project Boundary
❑ Project Boundary
Sources: Esri, Airbus DS, USGS, NGA, NASA, CGIAR. N Robinson, NCEAS.
NLS, OS, NMA, Geodatastyrelsen, Rijkswaterstaat, GSA, Geoland, FFMA.
Intermap and the GIS user community
Sources: Esri. HERE, Garmin. FAO, NOAA, USGS, © OpenStreetMap
contributors. and the GIS User Community
Page 3of3

HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
APPENDIX D
STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE MAP
Soil Science Investigations • Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting

For reference only. Not a survey.
Hal Owen & Associates Inc.
PO Box 400, Lillington, NC 27546
www.halowensoil.com
919-893-8743
Scale 1 inch = 200 feet
0 500 1,000 ft
Legend
Site Boundary
SH PO
Local District Boundaries
NCHPO NR SL DOE Boundaries
NCHPOpoints
0
Magnolia Hills SD
Ponderosa Road, Cameron, NC
30 June 2022
State Historic Properties Office
Historic Properties Map