WV0700153_Monitoring (Information)_20220728

Environmental Chemists, Inc.
envirochem
sM
ANALYTICAL & CONSULTING CHEMISTS
6602 Windmill Way, Wilmington, NC 28405 • 910.392.0223 Lab • 910.392.4424 Fax
710 Bowsertown Road, Manteo, NC 27954 • 252.473.5702 Lab/Fax
255-A Wilmington Highway, Jacksonville, NC 28540 • 910.347.5843 Lab/Fax
[e-mail]
Town Of Nags Head Date of Report: Jul 12, 2022
PO Box 99 Manteo Report #: 22M-1329
Nags Head NC 27959 Report #: 2022-12192
Attention: Customer ID: 09020021
Project ID: NH Acres
Lab ID Sample ID: Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by
22-29495 Site: Effluent 6/29/2022 8:44 AM Water Client
Test Method Results Date Analyzed
Ammonia Nitrogen
Total Phosphorus
Chloride
Total Nitrogen (Calc)
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN)
Nitrate+Nitrite-Nitrogen
Total Nitrogen
EPA 350.1, Rev 2.0, 1993
SM 4500 P (F-H)-2011
SM4500 CI E-2011
EPA 351.2, Rev 2 0, 1993
EPA 353.2, Rev 2 0, 1993
Total Nitrogen
3.1 mg/L 07/01/2022
1.03 mg/L 07/07/2022
134 mg/L 07/01/2022
3.5 mg/L 07/07/2022
< 0.02 mg/L 07/05/2022
3.5 mg/L 07/12/2022
Lab ID Sample ID: M-1977 Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by
22-29496 Site: Effluent 6/29/2022 8:44 AM Water Client
Test Method Results Date Analyzed
Fecal Coliform
Idexx Colilert-18
5 MPN/100m1 06/29/2022
Comment:
Reviewed by:
f-f
Report #:: 2022-12192 Page 1 of 1

•
❑ NO
❑ NO
❑ NO
❑ NO
❑ NO
r, NO
O NO
Corrected temperature upon receipt
- Against Bottles
IR Gun Correction Factor °C: 0.0
3. If temperature of cooler exceeded 6°C, was Project Mgr./QA notified?
4.
Were proper custody procedures (relinquished/received) followed?
5. Were sample ID's listed on the COC?
6. Were samples ID's listed on sample containers?
7. Were collection date and time listed on the COC?
_7u u� me LOC? --- - -
❑ NO or each test?
11 �Ayas
❑ NO
YES 0 NO 13. - G✓ere acid n a
0 YES P eser -q samples received at a pH of <2? *
1❑ NO 114. Were cyanide samples received at a pH>12?
❑ YES 10 NO
Environmental Chemist, Inc., Wilmington, NC Lab #94
Client:
Receipt of sample:
O YES
O YES
O NO
O NO
How temperature taken:
CHEM Pickup 0
N/A
Original temperature upon receipt 3
Sample Receipt Checklist
Date: 1.0-a(� V---)
� Report Number:
Client Delivery 0
1. Were custody seals.present on thecooler?
6602 Windmill Way
Wilmington, NC 28405
910.392.0223
2022- I _1 c( Z
Fedcx ❑ Other ❑
2. If custody seals were present, were they intact/unbroken?
°C
0 Temperature Blank
IR Gun ID: Thomas Traceable S/N 192511657
MEM
IR' YES
vcc
, - YES
YES
YES
YES
10. Did samples arr-
ive in good condition f fJ; cacij tc �--
—• � _deaLr l car'p e volume
12. Were samples received within proper holding time for requested tests?
115. Were sulfide samples received at a pH >9?
0 NO 116. Were NH3/TKN/?,henol�received at a chlorine residual of <0.5 m/L? xY
0 NO 117. Were Sulfide C
0 YES 0 NO / Y,snide received at a chlorine residual of <0.5 m/L?
18. Were orthophosphate samples filtered in the field within 15 minutes?
* ** IOC/Voiatles are pH checked a: time o`anal'ys . aid recorded on
Bacteria samples are checked for Ch?o-ine at time 0' analysis al: _;_ the bn� ChSheet.
and recorded on the benchsneet,
(Must be completed for any sample(s) incorrectly preserved or with headspace)
were received incorrectly preserved and were adjusted accordingly
H2SO4 HNO; HCI NaOH
Iffmore than one preservative is needed, notate in comments below
y preserve:.
f s oCJ. " a rny]" !e Q•'O f/ :nn state. la:_a^- yzedo_ e d�s`oTe-.f,,..ha5 ..:',e", da:a a ✓olatiles Sample(s)
Sample Preservation:
Sample(s)
by adding (circle one):
Time of preservation:
were received with headspa:e
COMMENTS:
°C

CD
0
i
CD
CD
CD
Ao
1-3
CD
CD
N
z
CD
co
ro
II
T.ARID
OMBER
II
CD
d=
..f `�..r = .3I:
CD „?:
• 't o
= �.
cLD