20021924 Ver 1_Closeout Report with Notes_20170516

i • s
MCINTYRE CREEK AT HORNETS NEST PARK
DMS ID (243)
USACE ACTION ED # SAW-2003-30326
DWQ 401# 0219-24
CLOSEOUT REPORT: STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT
Project Setting & Classifications
Site Coordinates: 35319972"N, 80.865133°W
County
Mecklenburg
General location
Hornets Nest Park on the
north side of Charlotte
Basin:
Catawba
Physiographic Region:
Piedmont
Ecoregion:
Southern Outer Piedmont
USGS Hydro Unit:
03050101170020
NCDWQ Sub -basin:
03-08-34
Wetland Classification
Ri arian
Thermal Regime:
Wart
Trout Water:
No
Project Performers
Source Agency:
NCDMS
Provider:
NCDMS
Designer:
KCI Associates of NC
Monitoring Firm
Axiom Environmental
Plant Remediation
United Construction
Approved for Transfer to
Stewardshi
Yes
Stewards
NCDE
Overall Project Activities and Timeline
Milestone
Month -Year
Institution Date
Aril 2002
Restoration Plan
December 2002 '
Construction Plans
March 2005
Site Construction and Planting
May 2008
As -built Construction Drawings
February 2008
RepEOConstruction
January 201
As -built Remediation Construction
Drawings
Novemb 009
Baseline MonitoringDocument
December 2410
Year 1 2010 MonitoringDocument
December
Year 2 2011 MonitoringDocument
December 2011
Year 3 2012 Monitoring Document
November 2012
Beaver Management
May 2013
Invasive Species Management
October 2013
Beaver Management
November 2013
Year 4 2013 Monitoring Document
December 2013
Beaver Management
February 2014
Invasive Species Management I,
Aril 2014
Beaver Management
May 2014
Beaver Management
November 2014
Year 5 2014 Monitoring Document
December 2014
Beaver Management
January 2015
Beaver Management
August 2015
Invasive Species Management f,
October 2015
Invasive Species Management
December 2015
Beaver Mana ement
January 2016
air onstruction Reach 1
March 2016
Year 2015 Monitoring Document
Aril 2016
Invasive Species Management
September 2016
Year 7 2016 Monitoring Docume
November 2016
Closeout Report
May 2017
Invasive Species Management
June 2017

a
Planning Context
The McIntyre Creek at Hornet's Nest Park stream restoration project was instituted April 16, 2002 and is therefore a pre-
2003 project. The project is located within the eastern portion of HUC 03050101170020, the Long Creek watershed,
which is listed as a Targeted Local Watershed (TLW) in the 2007 Catawba River Basin Restoration Priorities (RBRP)
plan (amended in 2013 as the Lower Catawba RBRP). The project is also located in the Charlotte Local Watershed Plan
(LWP). Currently, this is the only DMS project in this TLW. There are a total of 16 DMS projects in the LWP.
McIntyre Creek drains to Long Creek approximately three miles downstream of the project site. Following the publication
of the 2007 RBRP, Long Creek was identified on the 2008 NC Division of Water Resources (DWR) 303d Impaired
Waters list as exceeding criteria for turbidity and copper. Long Creek is also classified as a Water Supply Watershed
(WSW) by the DWR.
The 2003 Charlotte LWP identifies the eastern portion of the Long Creek Watershed along the I-77 corridor for its
dramatic population increases from 1990 to 2000. The Long Creek Watershed also contains 3 of 6 focus areas evaluated
in the Charlotte LWP (Belmeade Drive, Lawing School, and Long at 1-77). The 2007 RBRP states that lands in the eastern
portion of the Long Creek Watershed are 47% developed, with 42% of streams lacking adequately forested buffers. Goals
from the 2007 RBRP include: (1) improve management of stormwater runoff and help restore biology in the watersheds;
and (2) protection of the critical water supply reservoirs in the region and their immediate riparian zones
The goals of the McIntyre Creek at Hornet's Nest project are consistent with DMS watershed planning goals. The project
restores riparian buffers which increase roughness and mitigates the effects of stormwater runoff, reduces erosion by
stabilizing and vegetating the streambanks, improves aquatic habitat, and protects waters draining to a WSW through
restored riparian buffers and conservation easements.
Protect Settine and Background Summary
The McIntyre Creek Stream Restoration Site is located Catawba River Basin 03050101170020. Prior to construction, the
Site contained a degraded stream channel with a disturbed riparian buffer located within Hornets Nest Park. Site streams
were characterized by eroding banks, channel widening, high sediment inputs from construction occurring in the upstream
watershed and onsite bank erosion, and channel incision as indicated by bank -height -ratios ranging from 1.4 to 1.9.
Surrounding land uses include commercial and residential areas with narrow riparian corridors adjacent to streams. At
least 50 percent of the contributing watershed had been cleared and developed.
McIntyre Creek is a pre-2003 project that was instituted on April 16, 2002. The project mitigation plan (restoration plan)
was completed in December 2002, and site construction was completed in May 2008. As constructed, the project restored
5178 linear feet of stream using Priority I restoration by constructing a new meandering channel within the McIntyre
Creek floodplain, incorporating in -stream structures, installing grade control structures at the confluence with two
tributaries to McIntyre Creek, and planting with native forest species. Site activities provide 5129 Stream Mitigation Units
(49 linear feet of the restored channel is located within a utility easement and therefore was not included in the available
mitigation credit). Planting occurred within 10.75 acres of the 17-acre conservation easement including stream banks,
floodplain, and wetlands.
Repair efforts to reestablish structures, stabilize banks, provide grade control, and dissipate stormwater energy was
completed in January 2010. During years 1 (2010) through 5 (2014), bank erosion was in scattered areas across the site,
with those at the bottom of the project (Monitoring Reach 1) being the most concerning in that they represented active
mass wasting. As a result, DMS repaired Monitoring Reach 1 early in 2016. The areas in Monitoring Reaches 2 and 3
were less concerning in that they are dominated by surficial scour{8 and 5%, respectively) as opposed to mass wasting.
Additionally, these features developed earlier in the project and have not advanced in recent years. The bank erosion
percentages within these reaches have either remained the same or improved slightly compared to prior years. Erosion
was also observed in pool cross -sections 1 and 4 earlier in the projects history; however, these cross -sections have not
demonstrated any appreciable change even when exposed to multiple storm flows. The watershed is extremely flashy due
to the extensive amount of impervious surface in the contributing watershed and floods quickly even during modest rain
events. Therefore, the repairs focused on the bottom reach (Monitoring Reach 1) thereby avoiding unnecessary
disturbance of sections that appear to have equilibrated. Repair activities included bank grading, installing geo-lifts and
repairing structures. The repair has successfully stabilized the areas of concern throughout 1.5 growing seasons and has
withstood several bankfull events.

Since five years of monitoring data was collected prior to the repair in 2016, a modified monitoring schedule was
developed. The ten vegetation monitoring plots had an average density of 477 planted stems per acre surviving in year 5
(2014); therefore, the site has met the vegetation success criteria. Five years of profile data did not indicate any
significant areas of aggradation or degradation of the stream channel, so profile survey was discontinued. After the repair,
four temporary vegetation plots were established along Monitoring Reach 1 to assess the areas requiring supplemental
planting and three additional cross sections were installed. Monitoring for year 6 and 7 consisted of the four temporary
vegetation plots, four permanent and 3 additional cross sections, photo points and visual assessment.
Two groundwater gauges were installed within the site in wetland areas created because of stream restoration activities.
An additional gauge was placed just outside of delineated wetland. DMS is not seeking any wetland credit; however,
there are approximately 1.71 acres of wetland creation at the site.
Vegetation areas of concern at the site consist of multiflora rose, Chinese privet, Japanese honeysuckle and kudzu. The
site has received multiple invasive treatments throughout the project history. A treatment of all invasive species occurred
in late October 2013 and again in early 2014. Additional treatments occurred again in October and December of 2015 and
September 2016. DMS is working with City of Charlotte to treat kudzu outside the easement on park property.
Beaver activity has be evident throughout a majority of the monitoring years. Sixteen dams were removed in 2013,
eight dams in 2014, anin 2016. USDA -APHIS is continuing to monitor the site for beaver and beaver dam
removal through project closeout in 2017.
Goals and Obiectives
1. Restoring stable channel morphology capable of moving flows and sediments provided by the watershed.
2. Improving water quality by reducing soil and riparian vegetation loss resulting from lateral erosion and bed
degradation.
3. Improving aquatic habitat with bed variability and the use of in -stream structures.
4. Stabilizing tributaries draining into McIntyre Creek.
5. Providing educational opportunities through Mecklenburg County.
6. Improving the natural aesthetics of Hornets Nest Park.
7. Enhancing vegetation to provide habitat/food sources, shade the stream, filter overland runoff, and remove soil
particles and other nutrients from stormwater.
8. Protecting a Site identified in a watershed listed as impaired for elevated levels of copper and turbidity (NCDWQ
2010).

Success Criteria
Success Criteria
Measured Parameter
Criteria Met
Streams
• Cross-section measurements should
4 permanent cross -sections (2 riffle and 2
show little or no change from asbuiIt
pool); pebble counts (cross-section 2); 3
cross -sections.
monitoring reaches; and 10 permanent
• Stable bedform features with little
photo points; an additional 3 riffle cross-
Yes —Site streams are stable.
change from asbuilt survey.
sections were measured in years 6-7 (2 in
Monitoring Reach 1 and 1 in Monitoring
• Absence of significant aggradation or
Reach 2)
degradation of the channel.
Yes - Success criteria were
10 vegetation plots measured using the
met in year 5 with an average
Vegetation
CVS Level II protocol; 4 temporary plots
planted stems/acre
• Minimum of 260 stemsfacre in year 5.
were measured in years 6-7 along
(e clu n
(excluding temporary plot and
within temporary plots year
Monitoring Reach 1
7 with an average of 1427
2
stems per acre
Hydrology
Yes — Success criteria were
• Documentation of two bankfull channel
Documentation of bankfull events
met throughout the monitoring
period with a total of 19
events
documented bankfull events.

J
%
;aa
$kE
t�
»
m�■
,
WE
D
>/r2a
° ~
;
�
ft
-
/
g(}§
A 2� I ■
�E2
fD
ICE
E
/-#
/
kL

1�
4
d

d
ri- .or. . - *I

I opo 11np

Sons May

Remediation Man
Repair Construction January 2010
P
1
1�

Repair Construction January 2010 Cont.
r
�1Yn<yyt_M,WY� � JA `1
MOW
WTI
WiM :fie �M�wier - ruiYi�
w. .r
NNW—

Repair Construction March 2016 Reach 1
iEa. MU2
If -TVARIZIMIMI
werwrnau
n[sA�rs4 +no �Ll' My
xort.
wveco rlif +mu .K s

Cross Sections
C atan ba River I. Pool
99
99
91
96
t
95
--•PtmaPm.. qe.
—uraoatow
94
—xr-0; c torso
93
—>rra t67D11
4:
_
92
—xro� a xu
91
—scros z zx>,e
90
— ttraa;.wa
g9
—lrrm ttrxro
0 10 20
30 40
Alan "
Cahwba Rhea Radh. Mdahee Cmd . XS • 2. RMk
tot
---------------
too
99
96
9-
y
96
9s
9i
U
to :d
$iOPn11 t%!Nl
-------------
�arcaoa�ate
�rrm uu>•
� 11YQt to to't1
-LI'-0I /7e-17
-e11'95:7'N
Yr7r' N 7a7e

Cross Sections Cont.
Catawba Ricer Basta, Mkft fre Creep, n - 4, Pool
133
114
113
A —A..
11)-
-0061210
i 111
110
-01 i:10 w
1109
a 109
41t;1.v
107
U
4+3N13
106
45 r: h14
10 3
04
31016
103
471016.16
0 10 20 30
Station jest)
Catawba
L_\ sr4
River 13asla, McIntyre Creek, X5 - 5, Rlllle
Catawba
108
]07
106
105
x
�--Flood Prase Are
�----���
1 �
- -- \IY-0b 3 30 16
Nl' 0. 10:1 16
103
102
101
0 10 20 30 ,
Station Ueetl
110
] 09
]OB
307
106
103
S
& 100
fi
102
101
100
99
River Basin, \7clatyte Crock, %S - 6, Rlt11e104
--tlald.6
--- Floed Ra.• An.
-MY-0d 33616
0 10 20 30 40 SO
Srmtorlpleetl

Cross Sections Cont.

N
U
}
I I
8
a s a s a x s a
A

i

z
1 i 1m 7 0
n & a - u x �,
F.aiw '= 41 w V g A 4. M'4'I Aipv4R W Y O
RaL"'a ..kt, If: A0 �' 1
�
-'v rr ..oi,oYo P.
^• ^ R
o; 3 4 �ys oWo. y.N . .
W
1 • 77,8...4-7,I�a�
J..rr -Y0I oyo Q
30y1oL i .' 4-72.,y ,, o J
g ! ; om...:-- m
rrei.il
nog n
3 , Now oa' ,{
g[�c Fr '�io.wo m ��;'eao
TO 16 Y G j.w p-o
16
y A = aIo = , i3 Ia ya. y o5 l N4a 4. p..pN b0N,N,., O�
y pN Y,Gµ1,NP-0,^„�,
W-,'o n
lag 7 YOw,J. j�Jq. f$Zs "r .
a f ..-W" e 5 w
5 v ! ' y
a '
o,
aeA -o�
WoYY&V :Y,;,
ar 7, e..�i.+7ya
rU ry;;y;;or1oY„
2a YY }wyw7S
1
//, / p

Verification of Bankfull Events
Mclnytre Creek Restoration Site(DMS Project Number 243)
Date of Data Date of Method Photo(if
Collection Occurrence available)
Total of 2.14 inches*of rain reported to fall over 2 days(July 11-
September 23,2010 July 12,2010 12,2010),in addition to large wrack/debris piles and evidence of 1-2
overbank flows within the adjacent floodplain.
Total of 1.1 inches*of rain reported to fall over 2 days(August
September 23,2010 August 19,20f 0 18-19,2010)after a total of 4.43 inches*of rain the preceding 4 3
weeks,in addition to laid back vegetation and evidence of recent
standing water within the floodplain.
October 18,2010 September 29, Overbank event likely occurred after a total of 4.04 inches*of -_
2010 rain reported to fall over 6 days(September 25-30,2010).
October 21,2011 August 5,2011 Overbank event likely occurred after a total of 2.50 inches*of 4
rain reported to fall on August 5,2011.
August 6,2012 May 8,2012 Overbank event likely occurred after a total of 2.77 inches*of
rain reported to fall on May 8-9,2012.
August 6,2012 May 16,2012 Overbank event likely occurred after a total of 2.71 inches*of
rain reported to fall on May 13-16,2012.
Debris,wrack,and laid back vegetation observed on the
February 21,2013 January 17,2013 floodplain after a total of 2.38 inches*of rain reported to fall on 5-6
January 17,2013.
November 18,2013 April 28,2013 Overbank event likely occurred after a total of 2.73 inches*of
rain reported to fall on April 27-29,2013.
November 18,2013 May 6,2013 Overbank event likely occurred after a total of 2.13 inches*of
rain reported to fall on May 5-6,2013.
Overbank event likely occurred after a total of 2.52 inches*of
November 18,2013 June 3,2013 rain reported to fall on June 2-3,2013 with an additional 3.10 on --
June 4-13,2013.
Overbank event likely occurred after a total of 4.23 inches*of
November 18,2013 July 4,2013 rain reported to fall on July 4-11,2013 with numerous small rain --
events(0.1-0.9 inches)in the proceeding and following days.
Wrack and laid back vegetation observed on the floodplain after
May 7,2014 April 19,2014 a total of 2.80 inches*of rain reported to fall on April 18-19. --
2014.
November 10,2014 May 15,2014 Overbank event likely occurred after a total of 2.11 inches*of
rain reported to fall on May 15,2014
Wrack and laid back vegetation observed on the floodplain after
November 3,2014 August 1,2014 a total of 3.84 inches*of rain reported to fall July 31-August 1, --
2014
Overbank event likely occurred after a total of 2.65 inches*of
March 29,2016 April 19,2015 rain reported to fall on April 19,2015 after 2.00 inches were --
reported during the previous week.
Overbank event likely occurred after a total of 2.60 inches*of
March 29,2016 November 2,2015 rain reported to fall on November 2,2015 after 2.00 inches were --
reported during the previous week.
March 29,2016 December 30,2015 Overbank event likely occurred after a total of 3.25 inches*of
rain reported to fall over 2 days(December 29-30,2015).
October 17,2016 September 26, Overbank event likely occurred after a total of 3.89 inches*of --
2016 rain reported to fall on September 26,2016.
October 17,2016 October 8,2016 Sediment and laid-back vegetation observed after a total of 2.12 7
inches*of rain reported to fall on October 8,2016.

Verification of Bankfull Events Cont.
. -•.
Of -' ..„.. '
— . — • ..1- •••- .
+II
. ..
ugly ...N-. '''' '.. • .'-.3.4!•
. ....-- .--..
,_ ,- i•-..
.... , Photos 1-2: Evidence of overbank including
flow within adjacent floodplain,laid back
venerannn and lame dehn a/wrack nilea'•,s' -0,,' *"••0; • 1 ,ti , ,•
ilill E, r 0• ' .' . .
. '• ' ..t. '
• 1,4 ...,
0 ,
•
...
• - ^A Ar.4.1:
•
Photo 3: Evidence of overbank including , Photo 4: Evidence of overbank
laid back vegetation and recent standing including wrack within the
water within the floodplain. floodplain.
..
•
,,..: .''StillP;
,....... • ,• .....--,-,34A - - ...v,;7,1,,,,,•,;tifii. ,.;
-,.-7-....Y''' ' •\' ,.."1/4 -• \ •v...06.; -, ,..•.14 ,-' .' ip '.,•' 4
-r-r\\_.'it "-... -? .,,.., . •- . "".'smv,. "..
_44/.
0* ' ',At. '
.-. •,t.'.4!-•r" 24 , 7 . ' '`.-
t.....,:,..,
. ._ ..44- .,..,..,,
,..;&,,.. ,,
, .---- ,i,-..,.„...., .....,., :., ---
..,...
- _. .....
Photo 5: Evidence of overbank Photo 6: Evidence of overbank
including wrack and laid back including wrack and laid back
vegetation in the floodplain. vegetation in the floodplain.
Photo 7: Evidence of overbank
including wrack and laid back
vegetation on the TOB

a4O W . . . . . , . � /
_ ■ . ■
3 | g
k a
,
; ; � \ � §
& 1-
}
■
[ ! § § E
. '
= , @ � nE § � , ■ , �
}|
: . ; � � � , � � c ;
1§ [ r ! § ! � �
s: E
= : ; E . ... | ■
| �
; § ! § § 2 § KdN �
. ; _ ; " /
! E ! ! § ■ - ■ ! ■ {a ®
. ! „ £ e
� £
. § i § E § | §.§ |.¥�
8o � : , .
| ■
F.,1 ! ■ E | 1� §
. = � § Nm ■ n ■
-
_ , ] ■ L_!. ¥|
, ; ■ § | � | B | !� .
~
. J s y: ,r_a_r,
I it4 g § § j|

SLQ 6
�a C
F�
����IIIA��IIIII�IIIIIIAIAl1�111�11�1A�111f�
�A
���A111���11111�111111A1111�111�11�1�111�.
AA
�A���II�A111111AA11�11AAAAlAl11A1�AAA�AA�
�A����AAl1�AAA�Al1AAA�
IIAA��IF�1111�A.lAAAA�A�MI
�A��AIA�AIAAA��Al1��A1�1111AAA1�111A1A�A���
��
���IAAl1��A�1y11�A1111A�A111�111A1�AA�Al1A�
f"��Al1Al1�A��1■II�IIIINAl111�AN�l��ls�11�
���
SIISIISA��1�111111111�1111�111�11�11�11�
_
�!!
�IAAI��AA�I�A�A�A�AIAI�AwA��AAAAA�AAA�IAA

(
w w w
R ( / E an an
§qE§£ ƒ (
- \ I- 1� I-
§
\}
-
E
(
/ 2 �8 �( } . �.

n
n �2�(pD ai g. 2 9 < N m N W 9 w 5 -a' ;T '
�' N w 1 bo G fD � rn .ni• T. � y N
�. 'O"' coo � � `G ro w � v a, O p K o • � � �
_ .•n a �D
� O co O TJ N
O n Oh y O N
o p
�C N p A fD CD N m W � '00 � � �• �
O � � Opt V1 .1 � �•+�'d vwi � ,� .v'+ O w `�
.'!.CAN Apt- .••' y� N ry' A Wn co pt U
CD 4;r
m �. p' o_ p in; poi coo I� ctit G =.
W N m
�• O co O C c� A'rJ' • C. a+ � 'O 5a too O 7bS•
CD 0
m �• w C � n w C",3• n p
Q- �' � �i � �• 'C • ' �. can � cam' °Q � • � � w
00
moo •; 9 o RD
5. n
OH J rr
N n lio
" l9 O w• J ^ O O N ry+
tl
NOF, m
N�•y �p
C• !1 G. w w
� v' Fn � '+ .�. TJ O• G O
p w O 'DSO' < �. `� .wry • cyo
00
CD
O b b �. < w o
.o naa.
ram oOQ r y o 00 W ti
�a �4 �! CD W
g oo
Caro o y o '<a°a <• °'«°�, C°
co
CD 0 G G7Nw
y �• r p iD CD pp� p rT
p�q 0

rj

. .
Post-Construction Photos
,1164 ,...- il::- 1 IfT iII ‘"
4 *V'''' ' - iifirry.,...,,, ,1 ... .. _ ' ..r.: # ` . 'Y',-.."'.., 'I'Z't 4.:,-„C*# . •''
, ctittot .4.
* .
-..
•-0-'-':::' .."1- .A ita
- .
. ,o 4......-7-
•s*A''''''' .f.),?,414*. . .„
.1, •
.,r
I,:' '',, ,Z,. -Ii liOrtirg. 1, , '''' , , ' • •,-.
4."'
0 '0;1%1 t .4elt.
‘,' • • -" .4'A IP. . , .
4e. ' • ,
.- - .. f'. 4. - •
- ---- - .- . ••.,
—_. '... . .,.
% . .
i
" .
..P-", _,),L,,:,.4"1 ti,4 . 0- 1 )',',,,:• . ''"',„,1 s, ','.
,,,nr,"444if
i ,,
4 , N!,,11;':i,
N
• : ' --Nori+e- It , ,t" ., ,*„.1.4; I %Ii .,,,,_. ,,,,ii,.....t„,,,, , /..it• 1:--,-( ,,f.P .‘4.,Iv:ttoP-.....
' '4 - AP 4 Vt ?.):1 ''' ..-,1.i'li t•',`.,il. ...
y ..-' .'1.1 ;-• ,4-
;,,),,,„1 i.. ,df.
'J ,, •, .4,,e.ra474,,,,,,,i,.,.,,,,,,iirl...,,.,,,I/, ,
I. ...°,_ ,4- \
40t '-
,"i''''t. 71". i' 41 -.,;1
, .0).•,,F: ,-.1iial-, ..,,, 4' ' .!•),. ..1 -- L.. ,:
.. N'17.
.
'
P .r -..*sr'- I, t ''''' I IL:17 nplit... • _,.....-.0.1,..,
r

Post-Construction Photos Cont.
n i° ��I�l Y ri v't Q GF i 7!F' s 1,-1
,... l a�i ' I
;I.
� J
i { 1
i N �• '
S:. ,zS F
'
x ,
•
s '
` 'v ' it 4
_ 11ff #�. _ L `'qy,W 4`.

Appendix A: Property Ownership Information&Verification of Protection Mechanism
The site protection instrument for this mitigation project includes the following document(s),available at the specified
County Register of Deeds office,and is linked to the property portfolio at:
http://ncdenr.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-
public/Mitieation%20Services/Document%20Manaeement%20Library/Propertv/Property%20Portfolio/243 MclntvreCre
ekatHornetsNestPark PD 2006.pdf
Project Name County Grantor Name Deed Info ' Property Rights
McIntyre Creek Mecklenburg Mary Mowry DB 20412,P 857 Construction Easement
McIntyre Creek Mecklenburg Mecklenburg County DB 20987,P 694 Conservation Easement
McIntyre Creek Mecklenburg University Park Baptist Church DB 20052,P 680 Conservation Easement
McIntyre Creek Mecklenburg Paul David Blakey DB 19787,P 311 Conservation Easement
McIntyre Creek Mecklenburg Daniel E.Onisor DB 20021,P 124 Conservation Easement
McIntyre Creek Mecklenburg Lee Monroe Kerns Trust DB 21225,P 486 Conservation Easement
Long-term stewardship of this property is managed by the NC DEQ Stewardship Program.

Appendix B: Permits&Jurisdictional Determinations
Physical permits could not be located.
401 permit number: 0219-24
404 Action ID:2003-30326

a�0 Wa!'FRD a,rllla F Fa5Iey
>as xr
] Ueunrlrale 9 Dr.iretrrrtlr E li Waal 866ou.006
t? Y nt.rlwi,lw�rt
I Nvls 01 elwN6r Q�rL,tr
Jewary 7,2333
Mr.Ron Farrel
Wetlands Reatoration PIoptam
1819 MSC
Raleigh,NC 2709e-1919
Sudloot: Stream Reetoretion+Enhancement
blcintyre Creek
Mecklenburg County,NC
DVW(]ff 021924
Lear Mr.Ferrell:
This Office is in receipt of the plans for the stream restoration projects of approximately 5400 feet of Mclntryre
Creek in Hornet's Nest Park in the Catawba River Basin originally st.bmllted to:He Office on Diuember 23,
2002.OWO Staff reviewed the plane and determined that strum restoration andror enhancement would be
achieved.
The stream impacts associated with the project may proceed without written approve trot))the Division.Please
ne advised the;seven copes of a Complete,formal aopuoation and a$475.00 fee is required to projocts
intended for compensatory mitigation credit(see General Cnd'rficetion No.3353,;mooed March IS,2002).Any
requeet fcr mitigation credit shall be addressed under separate Cressr.
If you have any questions regarding this-natter,please contact Mr.Todd Si,John at(919)7334504.
rc
I,el'.
1
y rtwy
e cis dolt aer
Cap Mr.Todd St.John,Werland&lJrtl/
Jett Jurek,WRP
Mooresville Regional Office
Fde
NCM Centro re eel ci welol Giese.M,w,use r tARn\enlrr 1br,
I OM 1101rwvrw Cnrre'.0aw li.NC 2rr a-1a52(4W.ynreimsl
i:e I Gnnrr eon 116IC),NC 276Ce.22W(Lag xnl

J
ga
E.
T.
00
>
>
m
E
m
b
SL
d
o
3
m
m
m
A
CD
inA
v
O
O O
000000
O
O
O
y a.
3
R
ID
00
w
ro
0 0
rn l
0 0
to cn
0 4
to (o
O
w
O
w
O
w
N
3
[ 1
w
-
V W
N
00
"
7a
R •
O
a
w
-I
0)
(D01
wpppp
M W
W
W
�I
0) 0
m -I
00)
0 M
v W
Ow
CD .l
A
(O
-1
O
O
m
O
Z
O
.d..
O
t1
C
>
n
m
0
a
C
D
0
^
a
y
v
O
O
^)
0 0
OW
N
N
Is
ON
O O
W
tp0D
W
O
4
N
O (4O
W
O
W
O
W
O
(a
D
%
O
W
A0
C,
cD
W W
)
W&N
.tn
N
7
CA
(D
PQ
(D CA
O N
O
m
)10A
0M(N
O O
CT (D
o
(M
toT
to
m
{p
O
ONO
O
0
z
O
Dr—vrDZnrc��MrDzC�mf,)
to
N 3 0)
$ 0 n
d
M 0 000
N
Z
O
N O n
O
m
'o mo
z O
d— 0
3 m
ID
3
m
D
3 .<
m
w0—m
n WOE
£
a
v
m
n
D
o�i
.
aCIS
0
CL
n
N N
N -0
O
CD
j
cp
ry
y
N
d
tDCn
(D
pNp
N
N
<
N
O D
E]
.
MO
O
O
O
O
O
O pc
00
O O
c+
rn
O
61 A
. .
U 0
0 0
cc (NJ
. .
0 0
00
((A A
. .
13
O
m
N
W
O
O
m
�l
N
N
4
0
N
�+
0
tream Restorah
$treA
Enhancment
Stream
Enhancement ll
Stream
Preservation
Ripari
Restoratiotf
Riparian Creatiorr
Riparian
Enhancement
Riparian
Preservation
Nonnparian
Restoration
Nonnparian
Creation
Nonnparian
Enhancement
No riparian
Preservation
Coastal Marsh
Restoration
Coastal Marsh
Creation
Coastal Marsh
Enhancement
iL
Coastal Marsh
Preservation
Z
3
ID
z
r�