20221021 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20220727

Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 13, 2022 Ver 4.3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
OO Yes
O No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
OYes 0No
Change only if needed.
Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
6/27/2022
BIMS # Assigned*
20221021
Is a payment required for this project?*
0 No payment required
O Fee received
O Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office*
Asheville Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
Version#*
What amout is owed?*
0 $240.00
® $570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Andrew Moore:eads\awmoore3
la. Name of project:
UT to Smith Mill Creek Relocation
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Mr. Faison Hester
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
lc. Primary Contact Phone:*
[e-mail] [phone]
Date Submitted
7/27/2022
Nearest Body of Water
UT to Smith Mill Creek
Basin
French Broad
Water Classification
C
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.582657
A. Processing Information
Longitude:
-82.614314
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Buncombe
Is this a NCDMS Project
0Yes ONo
Is this project a public transportation project?*
0Yes ONo

la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
EI Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
❑ Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
0 Yes
O No
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
O Nationwide Permit (NWP)
0 Regional General Permit (RGP)
0 Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
0Yes ®No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
EO 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
0 Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
0 Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
27 - Restoration
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
If. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
O Yes O No
0 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
0 Riparian Buffer Authorization
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
O Yes O No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
O Yes O No
lh. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
O Yes O No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
OYes 0No
B. Applicant Information
0Yes ONo
OYes 0No
Id. Who is applying for the permit?
O Owner O Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
OYes 0No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
MB Haynes Corp.
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2c. Contact Person:
Mr. Faison Hester
2d. Address
Street Address
187 Deaverview Road
Address Line 2
City
Asheville
Postal / Zip Code
28806
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA

2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2f. Fax Number:
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Andrew Bick
4b. Business Name:
Headwaters Engineering, PC
4c. Address
Street Address
45 Lotus Place
Address Line 2
City
Asheville
Postal / Zip Code
28804
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
1. Project Information
1 b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
lc. Nearest municipality / town:
Asheville
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
962856533400000
2c. Project Address
Street Address
187 Deaverview Road
Address Line 2
City
Asheville
Postal / Zip Code
28806
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project: *
UT to Smith Mill Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water: *
C
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
French Broad
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
060101050901
4. Project Description and History
2b. Property size:
19.7
State I Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: *
The project reach flows through a wooded area on the north side of the MB Haynes property, 70 or more feet below the elevation of the MB Haynes facilities. A sanitary sewer main is
located along the northern property line and an aerial sewer lateral connects to this main from the south across the creek. Bank erosion and unstable conditions around the sewer lateral
are prompting MB Haynes to relocate the creek away from the southern hillside. Land uses in the immediate vicinity include commercial and light industrial, with residential around the
larger commercial and industrial tracts.

4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
0 Yes O No 0 Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
1300
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: *
The purpose of the project is to relocate the creek away from an eroding bank and hillside in order to protect sanitary sewer infrastructure and allow improvements to the stability of the
adjacent slope. Slope improvements will be performed as a separate phase.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used: *
The project is presented in detail on the attached plans. The project reach measures about 166 linear feet and will involve constructing an offline channel to the north of the existing
channel. Flow will be maintained in the existing channel until the new channel is excavated and stabilized with in -stream structures and erosion control matting. Conventional earthwork
equipment such as track -mounted excavators and dump trucks will be used to build the channel. The abandoned channel will be backfilled with excavated on -site material.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas? *
Yes No
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? *
0 Preliminary 0 Approved 0 Not Verified O Unknown 0 N/A
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
O Yes ® No
0 Unknown
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
0 Wetlands Off' Streams -tributaries
0 Open Waters 0 Pond Construction
3. Stream Impacts
0 Buffers
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.lmpact type*
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type*
(?)
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction*
3g. S. width
3h. Impact
length*
Si
relocation
Permanent
Relocation
UT To Smith Mill Ck
Perennial
Both
13
Average (feet)
226
(linear feet)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
226
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
226
3j. Comments:
The 226 feet of stream impacts is the length of existing channel to be abandoned after relocation.
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
0
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation

1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
The design makes use of natural channel design techniques to create a series of riffles and pools. Native trees and shrubs will be planted in buffer
areas.
lb. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Work will be staged during periods of dry weather. New channel excavation will take place off-line, allowing base flow to be maintained in the existing
channel until the new channel is stabilized and ready for flow to be routed to it. The contractor will be required to service and fuel equipment at least 100
feet from the stream. Silt fences will be placed on the stream side of all soil stockpiles.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
O Yes J No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
The project will result in net benefits to natural resources and water quality.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
O Yes O No
If no, explain why:
The project will not introduce new impervious surfaces nor will it create new stormwater runoff patterns.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250? *
0Yes ®No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
OYes 0No
Comments:
A stormwater management plan is not required for this stream restoration project.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
O Yes O No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
O Yes • No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
O Yes O No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project will be a discrete stream restoration effort.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
OYes ONo'JN/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
O Yes O No

5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
O Yes O No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
0 Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
0 Yes ® No
0 No O Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
OYes 0No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
0 Yes ® No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
OYes 0No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
0Yes Ca, No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
We reviewed the US FWS website for species information and several plant and animal species are listed for Buncombe County. Given the limited scope
of the project and the previous disturbance at the site associated with sanitary sewer line construction, we do not believe the project will adversely
impact endangered species or habitats.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
0 Yes O No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
NOAA fisheries website.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
O Yes O No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
The NC SHPO website does not indicate the nearby presence of any historic or archeological resources.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
O Yes O No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
NC FRIS website
Miscellaneous U
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or dreg and drop files here to attach document
Supplemental Information UT Smith Mill Creek.pdf 4.14MB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments
Supplemental information includes geomorphic data, watershed delineation map and project plans.
Signature
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Andrew Bick

Signature
Date
7/27/2022

Supplemental Information
UT to Smith Mill Creek Relocation at MB Haynes
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
GEOMORPHIC DATA
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
WATERSHED DELINEATION
STREAM RELOCATION PLANS
4
HEADWATERS
ENGINEERING

Department of the Army
Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers
Attn. Ms. Amanda Jones
151 Patton Avenue #208
Asheville, NC 28801
-and-
NC DWR, 401 and Buffer Permitting Unit
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
I, the current landowner/managing partner of the property identified below, hereby authorize
Andrew Bick of Headwaters Engineering,PC to act on my behalf as my agent during the processing
of jurisdictional determination requests and permits to impact Wetlands and Water of the US
subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the
Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. Andrew Bick is authorized to provide supplemental information
as needed at the request of the USACE or DWR.
Additionally, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, US Army Corps of Engineers
to enter upon the property herein described for the purposes of conducting onsite investigations and
issuing a determination associated with Wetlands and Waters of the US subject to Federal
jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors
Act of 1899. One property owner of record must accompany any said representative when the onsite
investigation is conducted.
Property Owner of Record: MB Haynes Corp.
Property Owner Address: 187 Deaverview Road, Asheville, NC 28806
Phone Number:
Email address:
Property Location:
828.225.5393
[e-mail]
187 Deaverview Road, Asheville, NC 28806
Owner/Managing partner Signature:
Owner/Managing printed name:
Date:

Longitudinal Slope Profile
0
w
2110
2109
2108
2107 -
2106 -
2105 -
2104 -
2103
South Creek Trib near Culvert
tbed water srf tbankfull o x-section o riffle crest • pool ■ run o glide x Road +
0
50
100
Channel Distance (ft)
150
slope (%) slope ratio length (ft) length ratio
reach i 1.8
233.0 (22.9 channel widths)
200
pool -pool spacing (ft) p-p ratio
250

0
as
as
a)
w
2110.0
2109.5
2109.0
2108.5
2108.0
2107.5
2107.0
2106.5
2106.0
2105.5
2105.0
UT to Smith Mill Creek - Riffle
0
5
Bankfull Dimensions
15.7 x-section area (ft.sq.)
10.2 width (ft)
1.5 mean depth (ft)
1.8 max depth (ft)
11.9 wetted parimeter (ft)
1.3 hyd radi (ft)
6.6 width -depth ratio
Bankfull Flow
6.0 velocity (ft/s)
93.9 discharge rate (cfs)
0.92 Froude number
10
15
20
Width
Flood Dimensions
24.8 W flood prone area (ft)
2.4 entrenchment ratio
low bank height (ft)
low bank height ratio
Flow Resistance
0.040 Manning's roughness
0.17 D'Arcy-Weisbach fric.
7.1 resistance factor u/u*
5.6 relative roughness
25
30
Materials
35
42 D50 Riffle (mm)
83 D84 Riffle (mm)
73 threshold grain size (mm):
Forces & Power
1.8 channel slope (%)
1.48 shear stress (Ib/sq.ft.)
0.87 shear velocity (ft/s)
10.4 unit strm power (Ib/ft/s)
40

Cross Section
0
a)
w
2115
2114 -
2113 -
2112 -
2111 -
2110 -
2109 -
2108 -
2107
0
UT to Smith Mill Creek - Pool
5
Bankfull Dimensions
21.9
13.8
1.6
3.1
17.3
1.3
8.7
x-section area (ft.sq.)
width (ft)
mean depth (ft)
max depth (ft)
wetted parimeter (ft)
hyd radi (ft)
width -depth ratio
Bankfull Flow
5.8 velocity (ft/s)
128.3 discharge rate (cfs)
0.92 Froude number
10
15
Width
20
Flood Dimensions
20.6 W flood prone area (ft)
1.5 entrenchment ratio
low bank height (ft)
low bank height ratio
Flow Resistance
0.040 Manning's roughness
0.17 D'Arcy-Weisbach fric.
7.4 resistance factor u/u*
5.8 relative roughness
25
30
Materials
42 D50 Riffle (mm)
83 D84 Riffle (mm)
70 threshold grain size (mm):
Forces & Power
1.8 channel slope (%)
1.42 shear stress (Ib/sq.ft.)
0.86 shear velocity (ft/s)
10.4 unit strm power (Ib/ft/s)
35

percent finer than
Riffle Surface Pebble Count, UT to Smith Mill Creek
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
cumulative % # of particles
J IIL/GIay
Jai IU
l9.I a VG I
tall IJIJIG
IJUU IU GI
I
1-
/
-
1
1
I
1
0.01
Size (mm)
0.1
1
10
particle size (mm)
Size Distribution
100
1000
Type
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
10000
saiowed jo Jagwnu
D16 9 mean 27.3 silt/clay 3% bedrock 1%
D35 27 dispersion 3.3 sand 4%
D50 42 skewness -0.19 gravel 64%
D65 57 cobble 26%
D84 83 boulder 2%
D95 140

Site Photographs—UT to Smith ill NC
Mill Creek at MB Haynes Facility
Asheve,
' �,f t'
a E ,,� ,
y
�s� ��'�5'r k �����x y a � Er y `xxe , 5ih' -�. - t�'� �
, . r7'-'-.-,.. ::_*W*'41i'.-1:AX:rsfit44-'7,,2VS,1. -.'
•
5 w
j�� r v r. t � rf� � i-
r^^= 41.
-44 k$ �� ri a any w ., - " d -ir 1.
- ✓"'" w¢r �'y • x '�= "du i 4k - "147e-' ,+o r@'. '..
,, ems - "b. .*, ' +r��- `� • . ''
_ vt _ d r , > h f op a_.,
4 - I,"- Y� s.a• 1�-.
Looking Downstream at Pool Cross Section
- _ � d a
L4 1 S i - �ati "
may v� n:�' /`, " � '. '.f e " ^� 4 `$
r -v `'' Ree- Y t SC `n
4.
,. ,- - #� gas ,-.,,, ,,A...!__....-,,...:,-.
yi i-
erg' �t n " � w..- -✓ S 4 ..
"Y x
h
te'. z 2 � ,`. tm _ :r E:: , i_
�,�y �y +� "ice- -_ _ �'� � _ �'
If "' l — S '9 - may, _ ',.L> ..` t`d- > "
Gt li
r .3 f l a • 4
Looking Downstream at Riffle Cross Section
Ilik
HEADWATERS
ENGINEERING

Site Photographs—UT to Smith Mill Creek at MB Haynes Facility
Asheville, NC
'4�^�� I tf° 1�I JAI, �,- a y, ' ' i i
tl?tl i r �• -q p.1 1i.�1 19,C �� . i . 'i-wit =h 'r - f--
°,I 1 i, , ky ' hti V - -I i k -, �e �,. ^-^- i {1S�y-r -.
•
,,,
_' YIMW '
• -
�� � 'b- I 4 �- *hk�Yt�# �A@' iz �5� 3y�• ea.�.� , r
4
•
1
ay-• •.P E - i L- r -� J #• * . / A --b -t ' k: y � �''Y� a h' i { .' ,, r � , 5%-4 ,yy
it
3 .!�-pi 't
A T 1 _
pt.,
Right Ban Ik and Hillside. Erosion
'r'"' A �1"A k�V " „�'RqY a I �,-�$ 'kl t�'li r �fr� 4 F•-�,,,c� � a4 } -,'fi if y
- pia" - `1' A ,'�r v � - } " :� '.
e,,,'vk_;4,,,i'',.''1-'4;4'"4,?,'A1'-'\'..'..-t,-r,---,:i,r.t,k:--„L--..1.'-_",1t4„':t;";',c.-2'4'_='.,ii'.'W..-'..-'.-•I';7''t4---'-7.j-::-,,-q'i„.-,,,-,,t-‘t,2''•'..",-6:?rr,.:,,*',.ta',''*•'-'Y-,''A.lk'.'‘i,i'j4.',Wt„1..,±Ar-..
141i,!,r,.-.
,-',_i_'...-..,..,
-3._'--'.I
Q r- - , kJ.y�` ��. 'ram f- w ' N2k• -'j' * . .
11A
�, .sue u.. t-ro .,�
.! r �6"r . fir„ -x°i x- �v . �, .3P
kt
4.
—, - 7 F.. _'�„ ', :Gay. • w ' ^ds..- "Fi .�. A
Existing Sanitary Sewer Lateral to be Relocated
Ilik
HEADWATERS
ENGINEERING

StreamStats Report
Region ID: NC
Workspace ID: NC20220527125137017000
Clicked Point (Latitude, Longitude): 35.58300, -82.61363
Time: 2022-05-27 08:51 :57 -0400
_
PI
County
Debra Lr177/
d
V." I
11721, i
mr3 '
9.,
L
2:
0 Collapse All
> Basin Characteristics
Parameter Code Parameter Description
Value Unit
DRNAREA Area that drains to a point on a stream 0.51 square miles
> Bankfull Statistics
Bankfull Statistics Parameters [Appalachian Highlands D Bieger 2015]
Parameter Code Parameter Name Value Units Min Limit Max Limit

Parameter Code Parameter Name Value Units Min Limit
DRNAREA Drainage Area 0.51 square miles 0.07722
Bankfull Statistics Parameters [Blue Ridge P Bieger 2015]
Parameter Code Parameter Name Value Units Min Limit
DRNAREA Drainage Area 0.51 square miles 5.459454
Bankfull Statistics Parameters [USA Bieger 2015]
Parameter Code Parameter Name Value Units Min Limit
DRNAREA Drainage Area 0.51 square miles 0.07722
Bankfull Statistics Flow Report [Appalachian Highlands D Bieger 2015]
Statistic Value
Bieger_D_channel_width 11.5
Bieger_D_channel_depth 0.924
Bieger_D_channel_cross_sectional_area 10.7
Bankfull Statistics Disclaimers [Blue Ridge P Bieger 2015]
Max Limit
940.1 535
Max Limit
125.999874
Max Limit
59927.7393
Unit
ft
ft
ft"2
One or more of the parameters is outside the suggested range. Estimates were extrapolated with unknown errors.
Bankfull Statistics Flow Report [Blue Ridge P Bieger 2015]
Statistic
Bieger_P_channel_width
Bieger_P_channel_depth
Bieger_P_channel_cross_sectional_area
Bankfull Statistics Flow Report [USA Bieger 2015]
Statistic
Bieger_USA_channel_width
Bieger_USA_channel_depth
Bieger_USA_channel_cross_sectional_area
Value Unit
13.8 ft
0.894 ft
12.8 ft"2
Value Unit
9.77 ft
1.04 ft
11.9 ft"2

Bankfull Statistics Flow Report [Area -Averaged]
Statistic
Bieger_D_channel_width
Bieger_D_channel_depth
Bieger_D_channel_cross_sectional_area
Bieger_P_channel_width
Bieger_P_channel_depth
Bieger_P_channel_cross_sectional_area
Bieger_USA_channel_width
Bieger_USA_channel_depth
Bieger_USA_channel_cross_sectional_area
Bankfull Statistics Citations
Value Unit
11.5 ft
0.924 ft
10.7 ft"2
13.8 ft
0.894 ft
12.8 ft"2
9.77 ft
1.04 ft
11.9 ft"2
Bieger, Katrin; Rathjens, Hendrik; Allen, Peter M.; and Arnold, Jeffrey G.,2015, Development and Evaluation of Bankfull Hydraulic Geometry Relationships for the
Physiographic Regions of the United States, Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty, 17p. (https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdaarsfacpub/1515?
utm_source=digitalcommons.unl.edu°%o2Fusdaarsfacpub°%o2F1515&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages)
USGS Data Disclaimer: Unless otherwise stated, all data, metadata and retated materials are considered to satisfy the quality standards relative to the purpose for which the data were collected. Atthough these data and
associated metadata have been reviewed for accuracy and completeness and approved for release by the U.S. Geotogicat Survey (USGS), no warranty expressed or imptied is made regarding the display or utility of the data
for other purposes, nor on all computer systems, nor shatt the act of distribution constitute any such warranty.
USGS Software Disclaimer: This software has been approved for release by the U.S. Geotogicat Survey (USGS). Atthough the software has been subjected to rigorous review, the USGS reserves the right to update the software
as needed pursuant to further analysis and review. No warranty, expressed or imptied, is made by the USGS or the U.S. Government as to the functionality of the software and retated material nor shatt the fact of release
constitute any such warranty. Furthermore, the software is released on condition that neither the USGS nor the U.S. Government shatt be held liable for any damages resulting from its authorized or unauthorized use.
USGS Product Names Disclaimer: Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not impty endorsement by the U.S. Government.
Application Version: 4.9.0
StreamStats Services Version: 1.2.22
NSS Services Version: 2.2.0

PROJECT SCOPE: STREAM RELOCATION
150 LF OF UNNAMED TRIBUTARY
PROJECT SITE
187 DEAVERVIEW RD.
ASHEVILLE, NC
LIST OF SHEETS
1. TITLE
2. NOTES & SYMBOLS
3. PLAN AND PROFILE
4. TYPICAL SECTIONS, DETAILS
5-6. DETAILS
CONSTRUCTION PLANS
UT TO SMITH MILL CREEK RELOCATION
MB HAYNES CORP.
ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
VICINITY MAP
�
PRELIMINARY PLANS
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
•
NTS
PREPARED FOR:
w
0
DESCRIPTION
0
REVISIONS
0010 u, an,,,,Anr'.
i
a
Lu
a
ul
2
ENGINEERING
E
0
0
0)
c
to
4)
1
co
U)
Z W 0
OLLI�
U —IO Z
OJCI) w
w
Lij
oO
I— F- H
DATE: JULY 2022
SCALE: AS SHOWN
PLAN AND
PROFILE
SHEET 1 OF 6

LEGEND
EXISTING PROPOSED
CONTOUR (1')
INDEX CONTOUR (5')
PROPERTY LINE
EASEMENT
STORM DRAIN
SANITARY SEWER
STREAM CENTERLINE
MONITORING WELL
STREAM CENTERLINE
TOP OF BANK
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
CHANNEL PLUG
PLANTED BUFFER LIMITS
TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
SILT FENCE
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS/HAUL ROUTE
CHANNEL EXCAVATION LIMITS
1+00
/ \
LOD LOD
-SF -SF-SF -
GENERAL NOTES:
1. TOPOGRPAHIC AND PLANIMETRIC SURVEY BY ED HOLMES &ASSOCAITES DATED 5/17/22.
2. AERIAL IMAGERY DATED 2019 FROM NC ONEMAP WEBSITE.
3. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE INSTALLED, INSPECTED AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS.
4. ALL EQUIPMENT MUST BE CLEANED REGULARLY AND MAINTAINED TO BE FREE OF FUEL, OIL AND LUBRICANT LEAKS.
5. FUELING SHALL BE PERFORMED AT LEAST 100 FEET FROM FLOWING WATER.
6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT SITE FEATURES BEYOND THE GRADING LIMITS. CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR ANY DAMAGE AND RETURN WORK AREAS TO PRE -PROJECT CONDITIONS.
7. EQUIPMENT SHALL OPERATE FROM THE TOP OF BANK AS MUCH AS PRACTICAL AND SHALL TAKE PRECAUTIONS TO LIMIT DOWNSTREAM SEDIMENT MIGRATION.
8. BASE FLOW SHALL DIVERTED AROUND WORK AREAS USING BARRIERS WHEN EQUIPMENT MUST WORK IN THE CHANNEL. WORK SHALL BE SCHEDULED DURING PERIODS OF LOW FLOW.
9. WORK SHALL BE STAGED SUCH THAT NO MORE STREAM BANK IS DISTURBED THAN CAN BE STABILIZED WITH SEED, MULCH AND MATTING AT THE END OF EACH WORKDAY.
10. DISTURBED UPLAND AREAS MUST BE STABILIZED WITH SEED AND MULCH WITHIN 7 DAYS OF REACHING FINAL GRADES.
11. SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE STREAM SIDE OF ANY STOCKPILES.
12. PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE INSTALLED DURING THE DORMANT SEASON, GENERALLY DECEMBER THROUGH MARCH.
CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER INSPECTIONS:
1. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR KEEPING DAILY RECORDS OF RAINFALL EVENTS IN AN ON -SITE PERMIT BOX.
2. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE INSPECTED AT LEAST ONCE PER 7 CALENDAR DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS OF ALL RAINFALL EVENTS GREATER
THAN 0.5 INCH PER 24 HOUR PERIOD.
3. NECESSARY MAINTENANCE OR REPAIRS MUST BE COMPLETED IMMEDIATELY UPON IDENTIFICATION OF THE PROBLEM.
4. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL CONTACTS DURING CONSTRUCTION: ; ANDREW BICK, HEADWATERS ENG. 828.606.0306
PRELIMINARY PLANS
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
w
0
DESCRIPTION
m
0
REVISIONS
i
a
LU
Lu
a
x
ENGINEERING
E
0
0
0)
c
to
1)
1
(3
m
0
0
t)
0
0
z
U
J
J
w
0
z
DATE: JULY 2022
SCALE: AS SHOWN
NOTES &
SYMBOLS
SHEET 2 OF 6

T
�/STING GCT/ON
MW-37 IiF� 1Y0
Fss
\ \ ` q� �<ONG
\
G
s
Otis ��`,c•\)•ti
PROTECT EXISTING
MONITORING WELLS;
MAINTAIN 5'
PROTECTION RADIUS
\
STA. 0+00;
BEGIN PROJECT;
CONFORM TO EXISTING
TOP OF BANK
STREAM SITE LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE = 0.40 AC.
MW-33
0'
PROTECT EXISTING
INTERCEPTOR TRENCH
30'
1\\y�\�/^\\ \\
\
/ //\ o�
\
STOCKPILE CUT SOILS FOR
USE IN CHANNEL BACKFILL ��
PROTECT EXISTING \\
ABOVE -GROUND TANK
ss
PIN 9628-56-6873
CHARLES H. MUSE
DB 1924, PAGE 503
ss-
LOD=�
1
a
111
\S \ �l ' I `gym
s\ \( f W
\\0\1
\v/
1
ss
�\.�\ss-
\N \A° \\�
ss
l / /l
STA. 1 +66;
END PROJECT;
CONFORM TOE sr NG
--- TOP OF BAND
0
-42-e
7
/- — — --_
7 / / /—
-__
// / --
J/7
7 /
■■, �.I- / / ice/ /isilicPci
//7 7:11
7 7 7 7
/ ///�% / \ i
/// / j /// / / \ Q-o Y//i
//// 77 / o`\'\,///�� 7 i�
// j�/J/ i' , J�/ i 7//7 /
60' 90'
—
I U IFFPg.L 727
7 A^ IPI CsYJ, 7i �sEi/// /�—�
8' W 7 7
7
— --PAR-EI' MJ.NARY PLANS
- -- -- .405-F¢R -CONSTRUCTION
PROFILE LEGEND
EXISTING GROUND AT DESIGN
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROFILE SCALES:
H:1"=30'
V: 1" = 10'
2114
2109
2104
0+00
•
0+50
1+00
PROFILE
1+50
2114
2109
2104
IJ
0
DESCRIPTION
m
0
REVISIONS
i
a
Lu
Lu
a
2
ENGINEERING
E
0
0
0)
c
U)
c3
m
0
0
t)
0
0
z
U
J
J
w
U
z
Z W
O W fY
UJO
J_ U.)O W
Eta
W co co
1-o1—
DATE: JULY 2022
SCALE: AS SHOWN
PLAN AND
PROFILE
SHEET 3 OF 6

SEE NOTE 4.
1I
VARIES 6 TO10
SEE NOTE 4.
13.5'
1
11_
1.5'
2.5 (TYP) }
6.0'
jr 1�
VARIES 6 TO 10
1 TYPICAL SECTION
4 RIFFLE
16.3'
11_
2
2.0'
2.6'
SEED, MATTING,
LIVE STAKING (TYP)
1
3.5
SEED, MATTING,
LIVE STAKING (TYP)
BACKFILL ABANDONED CHANNEL WITH EXCAVATED
CHANNEL MATERIALS. SALVAGE COARSE GRAVEL
AND COBBLE BEFORE BACKFILLING.
LEGEND
EXISTING
PROPOSED
PRELIMINARY PLANS
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
1
TYPICAL SECTION NOTES:
1. TYPICAL SECTION DRAWN LOOKING DOWNSTREAM.
2. BANK SLOPES AND DIMENSIONS SHALL BE TRANSITIONED SMOOTHLY
BETWEEN RIFFLE AND POOL SECTIONS.
3. BANKS AND GRADED SLOPES SHALL BE ROUGHENED
PERPENDICULAR TO SLOPE, COVERED WITH 3" LAYER OF TOPSOIL,
SEEDED, MULCHED AND MATTED WITH 780 G/M2 COIR FIBER MATTING.
4. EXCAVATE BANKFULL BENCH WHERE DEPTH TO THALWEG EXCEEDS
2.8' IN POOLS AND 1.7' IN RIFFLES.
5. BANKS SHALL BE LIVE -STAKED AT 3' O.C. DURING THE DORMANT
SEASON FOLLOWING GRADING.
6. PLANT TREES AND SHRUBS ALONG TOP OF BANK AS SPACE PERMITS.
SEE PLAN & PROFILE SHEET FOR BUFFER LIMITS.
0 5
10 15
ADD SILT FENCE AT CORNERS
WHERE APPROACHES SLOPE
TOWARD CSING
f
TIMBER BRIDGE MATS
m
r
0
1
PLAN
3
5 (TYP)
TIMBER BRIDGE MATS
SHALL FULLY SPAN CHANNEL WITH
NO GAPS BETWEEN MATS
SECTION
MAINTENANCE NOTES:
1. MAINTAIN SURFACE OF CROSSING FREE OF SOIL AND
DEBRIS.
2. SHOVEL OR SWEEP ACCUMULATED MUD AND SEDIMENT
FROM BRIDGE MATS AT LEAST ONCE PER DAY.
3. DRESS APPROACHES DAILY IN ORDER TO LIMIT RUTTING
AND MUD ACCUMULATION ON THE BRIDGE MATS.
TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING - MAT
4
NTS
w
a
DESCRIPTION
m
0
REVISIONS
i
a
Lu
Lu
a
x
ENGINEERING
0
0
t)
0
0
z
U
J
J
W
U
z
Z W 0
O��
<
-IO Z
OJUw
W
Lij
�02<
I— F- H
DATE: JULY 2022
SCALE: AS SHOWN
TYPICAL
SECTIONS;
DETAILS
SHEET 4 OF 6

m
r
O
TOE OF BANK;
RIFFLE EXTENDS
1' BEYOND TOE
)41PII (1/;I
•�`�A , t
SEE PLAN
FOR RIFFLE
LENGTH
A
I
1' (TYP)
PLAN
18" MIN.
SECTION A -A'
ELEVATION POINT ON PROFILE
EQUAL MIX OF CLASS 1 STONE
AND ON -SITE GRAVEL & COBBLE
12" +/- DIAMETER HARDWOOD
LOGS DRIVEN INTO TOE OF BANK;
GENERALLY 2 TO 4 LOGS PER
RIFFLE; FLUSH WITH BED
MEANDERING THALWEG AT
BASE FLOW
MICRO -POOL;
TYP. 6" - 12" DEEP
r
SCARIFY SUBGRADE
PRIOR TO STONE PLACEMENT
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
NTS
EXISTING GRADE
SEE TYPICAL
SECTIONS
12" COIR LOG ANCORED
W/ 18" WOODEN STAKES
BASE FLOW
2
SECTION
.a
Aim
III=-.allII II II—i�—Ii—II i
� _ ►►r- illy il►►'= n'�I�'= ►►'
WiIDl lmetalllhJli TII V
PRELIMINARY PLANS
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
i
LIVE STAKES AT 3' O.C.
18" WOODEN MATTING
STAKES AT 3' O.C.
COIR MATTING, 780 G/M2
2 1:..
COMPACTED SOIL
WITH 3-5% ORGANICS
CLASS 1 STONE
NOTE:
USE PUMP -AROUND TO PLACE CHANNEL
PLUG WHILE PREVENTING SOIL FROM
ENTERING THE LIVE STREAM.
8' +/-
SOIL BACKFILL; SPREAD IN
12" LIFTS AND COMPACTED
WITH TRACKED EQUIPMENT
PLAN
CHANNEL PLUG
5 NTS
ABANDONED CHANNEL C
COMPACTED SOIL
WITH 3-5% ORGANICS
w
a
DESCRIPTION
m
0
REVISIONS
i
a
Lu
a
ul
x
ENGINEERING
E
0
0
0)
c
U)
1)
1
(3
m
0
0
t)
0
0
z
U
J
J
W
m
U
z
DATE: JULY 2022
SCALE: AS SHOWN
DETAILS
SHEET 5 OF 6

a
o_
RIPARIAN SEED MIX - APPLIED TO STREAM BANKS AND BUFFERS
Seeding Rate = 20 lb/acre
Mulching: wheat or oat straw mulch applied at 2 tons/acre
Common Name
Scientific Name
Percentage
Indiangrass
Sorghastrum nutans
20
Big Bluestem
Andropogon gerardi
20
Virginia Wildrye
Elymus virginicus
20
Soft Rush
Juncus effusus
20
Beaked Panicgrass
Panicum anceps
10
Fox Sedge
Carex vulpinoidea
10
DISTURBED LAWN AREAS BEYOND BUFFERS:
Tall Fescue Mix at 25 lb/acre
Mulched at same rate as other areas
TEMPORARY SEED MIX
Application Dates
Common Name
Scientific Name
Rate (lb/acre)
Applied
Separately
Rate (lb/acre) Applied
w/ Riparian Mix
August 15 to May 1
Rye Grain
Secale cereale
120
60
May 1 to August 15
Browntop Millet
Panicum ramosum
40
20
I 1 SEED MIXES AND
6 BUFFER PLANTING
TREE AND SHRUB PLANTING (BARE ROOT OR 1 GAL)
COMMON NAME
SCIENTIFIC NAME
SPACING
(FEET)
River Birch
Betula nigra
12-18
Sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
12-18
Tag Alder
Alnus serrulata
8-12
Ninebark
Physocarpus opulifolius
8-12
Witch -hazel
Hamamelis virginiana
8-12
Pawpaw
Asimina triloba
12-18
Bitternut Hickory
Carya cardiformis
12-18
MIN. 2 NODES ABOVE GRADE
3' IN DIAMOND PATTERN
HARD SOIL OR STONE MAY
BE PRESENT SEE NOTE 1
2' TO FIRST ROW
BASEFLOW W.S.
I1 iitllii11lIII�IIIIIi1l11I,ll-"
3 NODES MIN.
SECTION
% 2)
LIVE STAKING
6 NTS
18" MIN.
TOP CUT AT 15°
AFTER
INSTALLATION
1 /2" TO 2"
BASE CUT
AT 45 DEG.
LIVE STAKE DETAIL
LIVE STAKE NOTES:
1. FORM PILOT HOLE THROUGH HARD SOIL OR STONE TO
PREVENT DAMAGE TO STAKE.
2. LIVE STAKE MIX TO INCLUDE AT LEAST TWO OF THE FOLLOWING
SPECIES: SILKY DOGWOOD, SILKY WILLOW, ELDERBERRY,
NINEBARK, BUTTONBUSH.
3. LIVE STAKING SHALL BE DONE DURING THE DORMANT SEASON.
MATTING SHALL BE
780 G/M2 COIR
— TOP OF BANK
F-1' MIN.
\� \ 12" WOOD STAKE PLACED IN
\\/O\\ /\\/\ 3' O.C. DIAMOND PATTERN
•
MATTING PLACED FLUSH WITH BANK
SURFACE, LAP OVER DOWN STREAM /
DOWN SLOPE SEAMS
REMOVE ALL DEBRIS,
SCARIFY SURFACE, PLACE
TOPSOIL AND SEED/MULCH
BEFORE PLACING MATTING
(\\ \>• \T
MATTING ANCHORED 1'
BELOW STREAM BED
EROSION CONTROL MATTING
6y' NTS
STEEL T-POST
FILTER FABRIC
WITH WIRE BACKING
COMPACTED BACKFILL
PRELIMINARY PLANS
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
J
CREEK
SIDE
III
24 MIN.
SECTION
SILT FENCE
NTS
8' MAX.
__— STEEL T-POST
18" MIN.
_ FILTER FABRIC WITH
WIRE BACKING
PROFILE
NOTES:
1. SILT FENCE SHALL BE PLACED ON STREAM SIDE
OF ALL STOCKPILES.
2. SILT FENCE SHALL BE REMOVED UPON
COMPLETION OF EARTHWORK.
3. REMOVE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT BEFORE HALF
OF THE SILT FENCE CAPACITY IS REACHED.
w
a
DESCRIPTION
m
0
REVISIONS
i
a
Lu
Lu
a
x
ENGINEERING
E
0
0
D)
c
to
1)
1
(3
m
t)
0
0
z
U
J
m
J
w
U
z
Z W
O��
UJO
OJ
W
Lij Z
CCa
LLJ
CC
nF-a
DATE: JULY 2022
SCALE: AS SHOWN
E&S AND
PLANTING
DETAILS
SHEET 6 OF 6