20221008 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20220725

Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 13, 2022 Ver 4.3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
OO Yes
O No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
OYes 0No
Change only if needed.
Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
6/24/2022
BIMS # Assigned*
20221008
Is a payment required for this project?*
0 No payment required
O Fee received
O Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office*
Mooresville Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
Version#*
What amout is owed?*
O $240.00
0 $570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Doug Perez:eads\djperez
la. Name of project:
Seefried Kings Mountain
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Joe Scarborough
lb. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
7/25/2022
Nearest Body of Water
Crowders Creek
Basin
Catawba
Water Classification
C
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.235827
A. Processing Information
Longitude:
-81.322111
lc. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Gaston
Cleveland
Is this a NCDMS Project
0Yes ONo
Is this project a public transportation project?*
0Yes ONo

la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
EI Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
O Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
0 Yes
O No
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
E✓ Nationwide Permit (NWP)
0 Regional General Permit (RGP)
0 Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
OO Yes 0 No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
EO 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
0 Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
0 Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
39 - Commercial/Institutional Developments
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
If. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
O Yes O No
O 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
0 Riparian Buffer Authorization
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
O Yes O No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
O Yes O No
lh. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
O Yes O No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
OYes 0No
B. Applicant Information
0Yes ONo
OYes 0No
Id. Who is applying for the permit?
0 Owner EO Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
OYes 0No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Kings Mountain DRE Holdings LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
4863/794
2c. Contact Person:
Joe Scarborough
2d. Address
Street Address
1300 Baxter Street, Suite 215
Address Line 2
City
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Code
28204
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA

2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2f. Fax Number:
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
Joe Scarborough
3b. Business Name:
Seefried Development Management Inc.
3c. Address
Street Address
3333 Riverwood Parkway NE, Suite 200
Address Line 2
City
Atlanta
Postal / Zip Code
30339
3d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
4b. Business Name:
Kimley-Horn and Associates
4c. Address
Street Address
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200
Address Line 2
City
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Code
28202
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
State / Province / Region
GA
Country
USA
3e. Fax Number:
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
1. Project Information
lb. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
lc. Nearest municipality / town:
Kings Mountain
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
301314
2b. Property size:
40

2c. Project Address
Street Address
Canterbury Road
Address Line 2
City
Kings Mountain
Postal / Zip Code
28164
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project: *
Crowders Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water: *
C
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Catawba
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030501011501
4. Project Description and History
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: *
Seefried Kings Mountain Site is a proposed 40-acre industrial park located in Kings Mountain, Cleveland and Gaston
County, NC comprised entirely of forest land. The project proposes the development of one (1) rear -load industrial building,
on -site roadway, truck/trailer parking, employee parking, and stormwater facilities. The site will be brought into compliance
with both state and local regulations for zoning, landscaping, and stormwater.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
0 Yes O No 0 Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.213
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
2,101
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: *
The purpose of this project is to construct an industrial park and associated infrastructure necessary to service the industrial
development.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used: *
Seefried Kings Mountain is a proposed 40-acre industrial park located in Kings Mountain, Cleveland and Gaston County,
NC. The project proposes the development of one (1) rear -load industrial building, on -site roadway, truck/trailer parking,
employee parking, and stormwater facilities. Permanent impacts include 77 LF/0.011-acre to streams.
General construction equipment includes, but are not limited to, bulldozers, excavators, front-end loaders, etc. used for
construction purposes.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
Yes
Comments:
,' No
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? *
) Preliminary O Approved 0 Not Verified O Unknown J N/A
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
6. Future Project Plans
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
Kimley-Horn & Associates
6a. Is this a phased project?*
Yes O No
0 Unknown

Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
D Wetlands yi Streams -tributaries
L1i Open Waters O Pond Construction
3. Stream Impacts
O Buffers
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.lmpact type*
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type*
(?)
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction*
3g. S. width
3h. Impact
length*
si
S1 - Impact 1
Permanent
Culvert
Stream 1
Perennial
Both
7
Average (feet)
70
(linear feet)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
70
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
70
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
0
3j. Comments:
The proposed development seeks authorization under NWP 39 for stream impacts associated with the installation of a culvert crossing at Stream 1
necessary to construct the industrial building. The proposed project will result in 70 LF/0.011-acre of permanent impacts to Stream 1.
• Stream 1 — Impact 1
o Two (2) 50 LF concrete box culverts (CBC) will be installed at the crossing of Stream 1. One CBC is 60-in by 48-in and one CBC is 84-in by 96-in. The
CBCs will be buried 1-ft to promote the passage of aquatic organisms. 10-ft of rip -rap inlet and 10-ft of rip -rap outlet protection will be installed.
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Avoidance and minimization efforts were implemented during development planning and design to the greatest extent practicable in order to reduce the
overall impacts on the aquatic environment while staying within nationwide permit thresholds. The final plan demonstrates maximum avoidance and
minimization efforts by reducing the proposed stream and wetland impacts. The rationale to support avoidance and minimization efforts include the
following:
• Avoidance of the remaining 2,031 LF of streams on -site
• Avoidance of all wetlands on -site
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Stormwater facilities are sized and positioned to minimize impacts to the greatest extents practicable. Temporary erosion control measures, including but
not limited to skimmer basins and silt fences will be implemented to minimize sediment laden runoff from exiting the site.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
O Yes O No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
The on -site development does not exceed stream and mitigation thresholds; therefore, mitigation is not proposed.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
O Yes ® No
If no, explain why:
The proposed project will not impact protected riparian buffers within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
O Yes ;�• No

2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
0 Yes ® No
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local govemment stormwater program?
O Yes O No
0 N/A - project disturbs < 1 acre
2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply:
O Local Govemment O State
Local Government Stormwater Programs
OO Phase II 0 NSW 0 USMP f i Water Supply
Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.
NCDEQ
Comments:
A wet detention pond will be used to reduce the amount of discharge as well as provide treatment to any runoff that is routed
to the pond via reinforced concrete pipes. An outlet control structure in the pond has been designed so that the discharge from
the pond will be less than predevelopment runoff conditions from the site.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
Yes O No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
O Yes No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
O Yes O No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project is designed to construct one (1) industrial building, on -site roadway, truck/trailer parking, employee parking, and stormwater facilities. No
additional or cumulative impacts are anticipated due to the construction of the proposed project.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
OYes 0No0N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a
treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
Wastewater generated from the proposed project will be routed to an existing gravity sanitary sewer network that exists on the proposed site.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
O Yes O No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS conceming Endangered Species Act impacts?*
O Yes 0 No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
0 Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
0Yes Co; No
O No 0 Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
® Yes 0 No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
0Yes @No

5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
OYes 4No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
0Yes ONo
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
A review of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) database on April 28, 2022, did not indicate known occurrences of threatened or
endangered species within the project boundary. Potentially suitable habitat for threatened and endangered species on -site was surveyed. A
concurrence request letter was submitted to the USFWS on June 22, 2022. As of the date of this permit application, a response has not been received.
A copy of the request is attached and a copy of USFWS's response will be provided upon receipt.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
O Yes
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
NCNHP element occurrence database did not indicate the presence of EFH within the project boundary.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
O Yes J No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
Kimley-Horn consulted the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) HPOWEB GIS service on May 18, 2022. No historical,
archeological, or cultural resources were identified within the site boundary. A request letter was submitted to SHPO to determine the presence of
archeological, cultural, or historic resources on June 22, 2022. SHPO responded on July 21, 2022, with no comment on the proposed project. A copy of
the request and a copy of SHPO's response are attached.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
O Yes O No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FIRM Panel 3710474700J
Miscellaneous
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
_20220725_Seefriend Kings Mountain_NWP39_PJD.pdf 39.95MB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments
Signature
RI By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Chris Tinklenberg
Signature
Date
7/25/2022

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID #: SAW -
Prepare file folder ❑
Begin Date (Date Received):
Assign Action ID Number in ORM
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Seefried Kings Mountain
2. Work Type:
Private 7Institutional
Government
Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form B3d and B3e]:
Seefried Industrial proposes to construct a rear load industrial building on an approximately 40-acre site located off Canterbury Road in
Kings Mountain, North Carolina.
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: Seefried Industrial Pro
3333 Riverwood Parkway NE, Suite 200, Atlanta, GA 30339 ; [phone] ; [e-mail]
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS (Kimley-Horn)
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form B5b]:
erties Inc. (POC: Joe Scarborough)
7. Project Location — Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Blb]:
The project is located off Canterbury Road in Kings Mountain, Cleveland & Gaston North Carolina.
Project Coordinates (decimal degrees): 35.235827, -81.322111.
8. Project Location — Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form Bla]: 301314
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Cleveland & Gaston
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Kings Mountain
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form B2a]: Crowders Creek
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form B2c]: Upper Catawba 03050101
Authorization: Section 10 fl Section 404 Section 10 and 404 ❑
Regulatory Action Type:
F7 Standard Permit
F7 Nationwide Permit #39
Regional General Permit #
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Pre -Application Request
n Unauthorized Activity
F7 Compliance
FINo Permit Required
Revised 20150602

Kimley»>Horn
July 25, 2022
Ms. Krysta Stygar
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District, Charlotte Regulatory Field Office
8430 University Executive Park Drive
Charlotte, NC 28262
Mr. Paul Wojoski
NC DWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: Joint Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination and Pre -Construction Notification (NWP #39)
Seefried Kings Mountain
Kings Mountain, Cleveland & Gaston County, NC
Dear Ms. Stygar and Mr. Wojoski:
On behalf of our client, Seefried Industrial Properties Inc., Kimley-Horn (KH) is submitting the enclosed
joint Section 404/401 Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination and Pre -construction Notification for the
above -referenced project for your review pursuant to Nationwide Permit #39 and Individual 401 Water
Quality Certification (WQC). The proposed project seeks to construct one (1) rear -load industrial
building totaling ±280,800 square -feet (SF), including access roads, utilities, and stormwater
management facilities. Authorization is requested under NWP 39 to permanently impact 70 LF/0.011-
acre of streams necessary for site development. The center of the project area is located at 35.235844°,
-81.320369°. The following information is included as part of this application submittal:
• Project Summary Sheet
• Pre -Construction Notification Form
• Agent Authorization
• Project Site Figures
• Figure 1 — Vicinity Map
• Figure 2 — USGS 7.5' Topo (Kings Mountain Quadrangle) Map
• Figure 3 — Cleveland & Gaston Co. SSURGO Soils and NWI Map (2022 Nearmap Aerial)
• Figure 4a — PJD Field Sketch/Existing Conditions (2022 Nearmap Aerial)
• Figure 4b — PJD Field Sketch/Existing Conditions (LiDAR)
• Permit Drawings
• Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
• Agency Correspondence
PROJECT BACKGROUND
The Seefried Kings Mountain Site is a proposed 40-acre industrial park located in Kings Mountain,
Cleveland and Gaston County, NC comprised entirely of undeveloped forest land. The project proposes
the development of one (1) rear -load industrial building, on -site roadway, truck/trailer parking, employee
parking, and stormwater facilities. The site will be brought into compliance with both state and local
regulations for zoning, landscaping, and stormwater.
kimley-horn.com
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200, Charlotte, NC 28202
704-333-5131

Kimley»>Horn
AGENCY CORRESPONDENCE
Page 2
CULTURAL RESOURCES
Kimley-Horn consulted the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) HPOWEB GIS
service on May 18, 2022. No historical, archeological, or cultural resources were identified within the
site boundary. A request letter was submitted to SHPO to determine the presence of archeological,
cultural, or historic resources on June 22, 2022. SHPO responded on July 21, 2022, with no comment
on the proposed project. A copy of the request and a copy of SHPO's response are attached.
PROTECTED SPECIES
A review of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) database on April 28, 2022, did not
indicate known occurrences of threatened or endangered species within the project boundary.
Potentially suitable habitat for threatened and endangered species on -site was surveyed. A
concurrence request letter was submitted to the USFWS on June 22, 2022. As of the date of this permit
application, a response has not been received. A copy of the request is attached and a copy of
USFWS's response will be provided upon receipt.
PROPOSED IMPACTS TO JURISDICTIONAL WATERS
The proposed development seeks authorization under NWP 39 for stream impacts associated with the
installation of a culvert crossing at Stream 1 necessary to construct the industrial building. The proposed
project will result in 70 LF/0.011-acre of permanent impacts to Stream 1.
• Stream 1 — Impact 1
o Two (2) 50 LF concrete box culverts (CBC) will be installed at the crossing of Stream
1. One CBC is 60-in by 48-in and one CBC is 84-in by 96-in. The CBCs will be buried
1-ft to promote the passage of aquatic organisms. 10-ft of rip -rap inlet and 10-ft of rip -
rap outlet protection will be installed.
Overall, impacts associated with the proposed development will result in 70 LF/0.011-acre of
permanent impacts to non -wetland waters of the US.
AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION
Avoidance and minimization efforts were implemented during development planning and design to the
greatest extent practicable in order to reduce the overall impacts on the aquatic environment while
staying within nationwide permit thresholds. The final plan demonstrates maximum avoidance and
minimization efforts by reducing the proposed stream and wetland impacts. The rationale to support
avoidance and minimization efforts include the following:
• Avoidance of the remaining 2,031 LF of streams on -site
• Avoidance of all wetlands on -site
COMPENSATORY MITIGATION
The on -site development does not exceed stream and mitigation thresholds; therefore, mitigation is not
proposed.
kimley-horn.com
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200, Charlotte, NC 28202
704-333-5131

Kimley»>Horn
Please feel free to contact me at [phone] if you have any questions or if additional information
is necessary.
Sincerely,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
Environmental Scientist
Attachments
kimley-horn.com
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200, Charlotte, NC 28202
704-333-5131

Kimley>>>Horn
Project Name: Seefried Kings Mountain
Project Summary Sheet
Applicant Name and Address: Seefried Industrial Properties Inc. (POC: Joe Scarborough)
3333 Riverwood Parkway NE, Suite 200, Atlanta, GA 30339
Telephone Number:[phone]
Type of Request:
Included Attachments:
® Nationwide PCN (NWP #39) ❑ Individual Permit Application
® Jurisdictional Determination ❑ Other:
® Project Plans
® Agent Authorization
® Data Forms (Up & Wet)
❑ NCDMS Confirmation
® Agency Correspondence
® USGS Map
® Delineation Sketch
❑ NCDWR Stream Forms
® Aerial Photo
❑ Other:
® NRCS Soil Survey
❑ Delineation Survey
❑ USACE Stream Forms
® Site Photos
❑ Other:
Check if applicable: ❑ CAMA County ❑ Trout County ❑ Isolated Waters
❑ Section 7, ESA ❑ Section 106, NHPA ❑ EFH
❑ Mitigation Proposed (❑ NC EEP ❑ On -Site ❑ Off -Site ❑ Other)
County: Cleveland and Gaston
Waterway: Crowders Creek
H.U.C.: 03050101
Property Size (acres): 40 acres
Site Coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Nearest City/Town: Kings Mountain
River Basin: Upper Catawba
USGS Quad Name: Kings Mountain
Approx. Size of Jurisdiction on Site (acres): 2,101 LF & 0.21-ac
35.235827°N-81.322111°W
Project Location: The project is located off Canterbury Road in Kings Mountain, Cleveland & Gaston County, North
Carolina.
Site Description: Seefried Kings Mountain Site is a proposed 40-acre industrial park located in Kings Mountain, Cleveland
and Gaston County NC comprised entirely of forest land. The project proposes the development of one (1) rear -load
industrial building, on -site roadway, truck/trailer parking, employee parking, and stormwater facilities. The site will be
brought into compliance with both state and local regulations for zoning, landscaping, and stormwater.
Impact Summary (if applicable): Impacts associated with the proposed development will result in 99 LF/0.016-acre of
permanent impacts to non -wetland waters of the US.
NWP
#
Open Water
(acres)
Wetland
(acres)
Stream Channel
Intermittent and/or Unimportant
Aquatic Function
Perennial and/or Important
Aquatic Function
Temp.
Perm.
Temp.
Perm.
Temp.
Perm.
Temp.
Perm.
if
ac
if
ac
if
ac
if
Ac
39
70
0.011
Total
70
0.011
Total Permanent (Loss) Impact to Wetland Waters of the U.S.
Total Permanent (Loss) Impact to Non -Wetland Waters of the U.S.
70 LF/0.011 ac
Kimley-Horn Contact: Chris Tinklenberg, PWS Direct Number: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
kimley-hom.com
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200, Charlotte, NC 28202
704-333-5131

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
10 Permit
0 Section 404 Permit ❑ Section
lb. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 39 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
0 Yes ❑ No
ld. Type(s) of approval sought from
the DWQ (check all that apply):
— Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
— Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
0 401 Water Quality Certification
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification
le. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes 0 No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter
fee program.
program proposed for mitigation
from mitigation bank or in -lieu
❑ Yes 0 No
lg. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties? If yes, answer
lh below.
❑ Yes 0 No
lh. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes 0 No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Seefried Kings Mountain
2b. County:
Cleveland and Gaston
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Kings Mountain
2d. Subdivision name:
N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
N/A
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Kings Mountain DRE Holdings, LLC
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
4863/794
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
1300 Baxter Street, Suite 215
3e. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC, 28204
3f. Telephone no.:
Joe Scarborough [phone]
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
[e-mail]
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent
0
Other, specify: Land purchaser
4b. Name:
Joe Scarborough
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
Seefried Development Management Inc.
4d. Street address:
3333 Riverwood Parkway NE, Suite 200
4e. City, state, zip:
Atlanta, GA 30339
4f. Telephone no.:
[phone]
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
[e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Kimley-Horn and Associates
5c. Street address:
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200
5d. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28202
5e. Telephone no.:
704-409-1802
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
la. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
301314
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.235827 Longitude: 81.322111
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
lc. Property size:
40 acres (Project Boundary)
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to proposed
project:
Crowders Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C
2c. River basin:
Upper Catawba (03050101)
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Seefried Kings Mountain Site is a proposed 40-acre industrial park located in Kings Mountain, Cleveland and Gaston
County, NC comprised entirely of forest land. The project proposes the development of one (1) rear -load industrial building,
on -site roadway, truck/trailer parking, employee parking, and stormwater facilities. The site will be brought into compliance
with both state and local regulations for zoning, landscaping, and stormwater.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.213 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
2,101 linear feet.
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of this project is to construct an industrial park and associated infrastructure necessary to service the industrial
development.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Seefried Kings Mountain is a proposed 40-acre industrial park located in Kings Mountain, Cleveland and Gaston County,
NC. The project proposes the development of one (1) rear -load industrial building, on -site roadway, truck/trailer parking,
employee parking, and stormwater facilities. Permanent impacts include 77 LF/0.011-acre to streams.
General construction equipment includes, but are not limited to, bulldozers, excavators, front-end loaders, etc. used for
construction purposes.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps
or State been requested or obtained for this property / project
(including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
Yes 4 No Unknown
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of
determination was made?
Preliminary Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Yes
Unknown
// No
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes
0 No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Which sections were
❑ Wetlands
❑ Open Waters
completed
a
❑
below for your project (check all that apply):
Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number -
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
(if known)
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of
jurisdiction
(Corps - 404, 10
DWQ - non-
404, other)
2f.
Area of impact (acres)
Impact
❑P❑T
❑ Corps
❑DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number -
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial
(PER) or
intermittent
(INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
(Corps - 404, 10
DWQ - non-
404, other)
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
Impact
a
1 - S1
P ❑ T
Culvert
S1
a
❑
PER
INT
a
a
Corps
DWQ
7
70
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
70 LF/0.011-acres
3i. Comments:
The proposed development seeks authorization under NWP 39 for stream impacts associated with the installation of a culvert
crossing at Stream 1 necessary to construct the industrial building. The proposed project will result in 70 LF/0.011-acre of
permanent impacts to Stream 1.
• Stream 1 - Impact 1
o Two (2) 50 LF concrete box culverts (CBC) will be installed at the crossing of Stream 1. One CBC is 60-in by
48-in and one CBC is 84-in by 96-in. The CBCs will be buried 1-ft to promote the passage of aquatic organisms.
10-ft of rip -rap inlet and 10-ft of rip -rap outlet protection will be installed.
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
- Permanent (P)
or Temporary
(T)
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody type
4e.
Area of impact
(acres)
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5a.
Pond ID
number
5b.
Proposed use or purpose of
p and
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Exeavat
Flooded
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Other:
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
Buffer impact
number —
Permanent (P)
or Temporary
(T)
6c.
Reason
for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1 impact
(square feet)
6g.
Zone 2 impact
(square feet)
❑P❑T
Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: The proposed project will not impact protected riparian buffers.
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Avoidance and minimization efforts were implemented during development planning and design to the greatest extent
practicable in order to reduce the overall impacts on the aquatic environment while staying within nationwide permit
thresholds. The final plan demonstrates maximum avoidance and minimization efforts by reducing the proposed stream
and wetland impacts. The rationale to support avoidance and minimization efforts include the following:
• Avoidance of the remaining 2,031 LF of streams on -site
• Avoidance of all wetlands on -site
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Stormwater facilities are sized and positioned to minimize impacts to the greatest extents practicable. Temporary erosion control
measures, including but not limited to skimmer basins and silt fences will be implemented to minimize sediment laden runoff
from exiting the site.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes 0 No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Stream
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
Compensatory mitigation will not be necessary due to minimal amounts of impacts.
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes 0 No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes // No
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
The proposed project will not impact protected riparian buffers within one of the NC
Riparian Buffer Protection Rules.
❑ Yes 0 No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
39%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
0 Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
A wet detention pond will be used to reduce the amount of discharge as well as provide treatment to any runoff that is routed
to the pond via reinforced concrete pipes. An outlet control structure in the pond has been designed so that the discharge from
the pond will be less than predevelopment runoff conditions from the site.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
0 Certified Local Government
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
NCDEQ
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
0 Phase II
NSW
❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes 0 No
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply):
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
❑ ORW
0 Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes 0 No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
use of public (federal/state) land?
Yes // No
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
❑ Yes ❑ No
lc. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
Comments:
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
❑ Yes 0 No
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes 0 No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
Yes // No
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project is designed to construct one (1) industrial building, on -site roadway, truck/trailer parking, employee parking,
and stormwater facilities. No additional or cumulative impacts are anticipated due to the construction of the proposed
project.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility:
Wastewater generated from the proposed project will be routed to an existing gravity sanitary sewer network that exists on
the proposed site.
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
habitat?
❑ No
0 Yes
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
impacts?
❑ No
0 Yes
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Raleigh
0 Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
A review of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) database on April 28, 2022, did not indicate known
occurrences of threatened or endangered species within the project boundary. Potentially suitable habitat for threatened
and endangered species on -site was surveyed. A concurrence request letter was submitted to the USFWS on June 22,
2022. As of the date of this permit application, a response has not been received. A copy of the request is attached and a
copy of USFWS's response will be provided upon receipt.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes
0 No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NCNHP element occurrence database did not indicate the presence of EFH within the project boundary.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
Yes //
No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Kimley-Horn consulted the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) HPOWEB GIS service on May 18,
2022. No historical, archeological, or cultural resources were identified within the site boundary. A request letter was
submitted to SHPO to determine the presence of archeological, cultural, or historic resources on June 22, 2022. SHPO
responded on July 21, 2022, with no comment on the proposed project. A copy of the request and a copy of SHPO's
response are attached.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑ Yes 0 No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FIRM Panel 3710474700J
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
—�
"�
7/25/2022
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Date
Page llof11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

Name:
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
Seefried Industrial Properties Inc. (Joe Scarborough)
Address: 3333 Riverwood Parkway NE, Suite 200, Atlanta, GA 30339
Phone: [phone] [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Project Name/Description: Seefried Kings Mountain Site
Date: 06/22/2022
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
Charlotte Regulatory Field Office
Attention: Krysta Stygar
Re: Wetland Related Consulting and Permitting
Joe Scarborough , hereby designates and authorizes Kimley-Horn and Associates,
Inc. to act in my/our behalf as my/our agent solely for the purpose of processing Jurisdictional
Determinations, Section 404 permits/Section 401 Water Quality Certifications applications and
to furnish upon request supplemental information in support of applications, etc. from this day
forward until successful completion of the permitting process or revocation by the owner.
In addition, I, the undersigned, under contract to purchase the property/properties identified
herein, do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site
investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal
jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and
Harbors Act of 1899.
Authorized this the 23rd day of June , 2022
Joe Scarborough
Authorized Representative Authorized Representative
(Print Name) (Signature)

FIGURES

arK
o Fulton St
Nalker St in
C7
rn
g • Morris St
U
Orr Ter
in aP
JC
st U °
z
12t,.1
Bake.
se
N Gaston St
Li .
a'
G
N
tnn a a Kings
c▪ " ▪ "Mountain
y co
t^ a Spruce St o
Oak Sl o
05 1 3
0
5 N
Pie q
°J§a
.0St
Or
ae _
,tl o°d erooklyo
Il °
Mays' v
U
Lynn st
Groves St
a
Or n \� ��/ \• r
Y
Bennett
H
\
° v — m rtl \ \ \ Stoenne
L N \ SSt
III St (1_.etc
V
O Y
U
E Parker St o
N z
Gill cl m
f O E Ridge St
U
z o
z EKrny St
O
Mountain F..st N
Cemetery
Slater St 5
o`
N
E Gold St
N C
na satlre Sl
nxSt IMauney Ave
Owe`
Bennett St,
D
tt-
Q'
can
of
of p`
O Q
0
rnost t En
Eantl Ave
Mm"``eaten
NA
Ike Bro0v /
0
2,000
Feet
4,000
Kimley )> Horn
Legend
Project Boundary
Figure 1
Vicinity Map
Seefried Kings Mountain Site
Kings Mountain, Cleveland and Gaston County, NC
July 2022

Kimley >>Horn
Figure 2
USGS Topographic (Kings Mountain) Map
Seefried - Kings Mountain Site
Kings Mountain, Cleveland and Gaston County, NC
July 2022

... \°vaL ] jid '.�4: '„. ', .a�'l �V 8 {r' S.l9 rA• !T 'i'7 tJ•a'v !F" '4
Legend 7_ 1N. ° ` �y w; ,. • .. 7 ,,,' ' \ :r N
wo,t
Project Boundary .�. • � �. ��s �� �. � �, x � :,,"'
�:7. �+, � .t ; ', n rpbl '4M 'Y, 4 p y
NWI Wetlands ,7 `7 a
SSURGO Soils ,,, : „Iv �"� ' ' wv �r + . , r.r +
Hydric Rating \,, ���^6 ' ` ` 110444e. « " y �:
6 Not Hydric (0%) G2 `;� � y� �' tA'
Hydric (1-32%) _, ...... ._ _,,,
� ' x
kio,.(\ „*. .
... - , ,..
Div
,.
® qt.
° .
} M^,�a • ill ' �9,� Iy- s"y, ; N: R., •,eM °y ..i-+. ' A t ,t -, Mw^ �3 fy 0 i at 4- ' ,l i
r.
4. 1' *daY _ y` --- w F ; > 'y" f. + ' +- * a ' i f a
•
• lp . In v 4,- intA T sy ' sP 0 $ a A - � 7' [ i`, " etit T 'yp 1 :+ � ;i dater A ' ` 4;4 , :n 1a,
Gold $t `%i4� F, tt, •
rul' , ,
\ � �' Via. — ?,,
Mauney "
r, . ki ti trft
t
,,., . -14N.,,,14,40\ l• ' ,,,, .11111:,,,::L: '
,fie qQ �` F a•.
f SR . yam.
FOOL 2 r A
r 5
4'.. ' , -. --/*****,%- ... . -
•
t ¢lam f Ql, K"` '�' ��r(.[►`$()I V,�O _ s
il, , \.,.. ...i. iiiiiiiki;-'-,,.. ...4. ....,,, ' ..,--4 4., .(g - y1/4),.5, • - 4. - • . I ,'%••• '. - ' -—7,•. . ' '-' --.
Sum b Map Un t Cleveland Cpunty,North Caml na(NC845J an p'r —--.v -.=am
®j S / **
_ `F f
9
ChA�p ry of Chewacla loam o to 2 percent slopes,freguently flooded 5 "sr....".8 0 n.r<e 0.8% � '_� '�°A
TaB Tatum-Mgntona comple.,2to8 percent slopes o 05 1.2% ✓.,�
TaC Tat omplev,a to 15 percent slopes o 1 e% �. �� :�'
UUB Uwnarr egs Iry glaY loam,2 to 8 percent snipes,mpaeratelY eroded 0 z.9 0J% y . - �V / .1
uvcz uwnarre Tatum wmple=,s tp is pe2ept elopes o os o.e% w : ♦
Subtotals for So I Survey Area 3.3 9:: ' '', ,':._ L. ,,✓''• t -
spmmary bvryap'n t caaron cogntr,Mgrm carol na(rvcon) nayeg,® ""+, `' r ''A ¢0
m Alamanre variant gmvellV loam,8 to 15 perrenslppes _ w #
ChB Chewacla loam,o to 2 pement slops,freguently flooded 5 5.7 SA.1%
TaB Tatum gravelly loam,2 to 8 percent slopes 0 12.3 30.5%
m gmye Ipam,B[g l5 permnt slopes a a.6% gone . 1 Feet
-rap
fur So l Survey Area 00.3 9U 2 ��e^,
Totals for Area of Interest 90.2 100.0% (��fiU 0 500 1,000
Figure 3
SSURGO Soils and NWI Map
Seefried Kings Mountain Site
Kim ey>.. Horn Kings Mountain, Cleveland and Gaston County, NC
July 2022

Legend ' " N
4 /R I #� 4�
•
1 /q y
0
. 1
- n
:
.
ProjectI.
Boundary
5P " A.a ,R �'' hoL t . ' -
t.5 Y "4 57r • .5 51 k p �; y 1....,
'4 5 r ,
i
Photo Locations Stream lb • , _ �t It 5�, A •
r Y. '5
rff
Data Forms ::IN ' , ��`,Po 'I ' ill i ,
• P
0 U �/, Wetland 2 �' ,� t � � _ ;�, +��, tt t�� ' .°{ � ."
y IA as* *-� r f,a ,�' :
,� Wet tf. - ,y,�, f111 •• '"tz It ,
rt
Wetlands Potential Wetland WoUS + �,. ; 'irei ,. ,_ , t ., 7
y
Streams (Potential Non-Wetland WoUS) Wetlandsli
" �'
K )yam ..
Perennialjek, ;i r 34. ,.• . t°.`" ,_
R
6.
4r
i d
4,t 4k3 -4P14_,_ ,
—
x k ti -
frAL
f }
r~ ,, '' .
4:'
iy
lc°
ii
' Y
k4 8:', A ,..., _ . .. .13:' 111•4 i 4 `
_"
_
w
5 s s• _ 7q» `u» , . r �..AI ! .. .'I i .: '1! , .fs + . ,xYri: c
.. �+: _ „ Aid. . � ". -'} ''SSA. $ °"F -�.i yw
gag
L
+l'd 9k. iF.. '� ,, . . in t. � _ x, . � 4. } r4' F }. _ .. _JAI ' '
_ 4..-.•T 4, .. ! . , � r- . ar ., .. ": Sr, - . :'r 1c IF'4• f :. ......
s :+�'!_- i '� +F - _
ry4�
tla ,
...� _ f 4 tr -� _ � .-� aR .. , .w � Ir..,
.art a�.,
.
r `
, ' 1, M y R , ,t t ' 3 , F f ! sl q'r=. 3 {iY #y,...i '- - 1
° a1 F i° - ,' .. 5. '° y'a_ �:* ! ., .. •'. , ♦ ° c ,: � L .A Ik i B= - . �i, .I -y� '?,41 # f��r
�.1• Y , , . ., - ,�, *r f., A r '1 2 4' IS- Y ` `'Y d. ''�• �iC ,
• - °'A {1 5id _ 'r 1» ma�yj; N as .-, ,{ Y ' Gf••
1 1 yr. *�';+ i .• ., ... Y 4 '�{ a 1,. ,. . J .
`=»'l, i } ▪ �, , � 'S. .� .'r
i
w
.. } +.° '- 4 R r. :. c. y.,: ice. y.o . .. , .. /4 l ...1, ° ... .R. .. F `" +•. Y�-.
d
I , r 7►� A f ��'. 7 4+ fit. y �
a r q�
_
s
74
• 6, AY-JY >�`F:5 r. - c k'" r, t F 5K. .. $`k. ,Y .,.: }., a. eiip11‘ Yt •-. .+ - a -
.,.. w» t. y * _'. ill1 #' 'it :, K d Stream 1a z .
` ,. + ! ! !4 s yr, '+,° T"
z„
•
i.
}, s »
� a , 1 �._ v � yr" •,.r - dr e�. » x 4 �- 1 ;M1� . � � �. ,,. _ ,/ ,. � ,F
L gy
... ' 4 �!• .. , ' y 'df.r 4. ptR',. 'r- +° ..:x 1 - yn
�6 J."
gyp, �
• i
yy
i• .
5 f�A- Y :�, '7� • y $ x _ i s 'i 3h.7"L •,0--'rh`!N -'#r,i..'Vt .r"/Ilk . 4 . 7 , '''. . "... it 1 "1°h , i'lltr ''A it' I- ' 'II'" ' P' ' -• • it.
%
•
t
• .a t y
ti , , , \
O 'S' {.�. 'LiA#. .1 skfi :`' .: ', �. °}'Y ; �",;'�ii,y�7.',x ,�'f> r `- � 5'} c��.+� Try
A.,;:, P:, y , Wetland 1!
r
r
,�• { ' a 5 Feet
. 0200
i!, , n • M + Fi i. a w'M4, 7 _ -
fi _,..
1
-
Figure 4a
PJD Field Sketch / Existing Conditions
Seefried Kings Mountain Site
Kirn ey*Horn Kings Mountain, Cleveland and Gaston County, NC
July 2022

Legend
Project Boundary
Photo Locations
Data Forms
0 Up
Wet
Wetlands (Potential Wetland WoUS)
Streams (Potential Non -Wetland WoUS)
Perennial
Elevation (ft)
High : 145.261
- Low : 129.036
A
Kimley>»Horn
Figure 4b
PJD Field Sketch / Existing Conditions (LiDAR)
Seefried Kings Mountain Site
Kings Mountain, Cleveland and Gaston County, NC
July 2022

PERMIT DRAWINGS

GRADING NOTES
401 - GRDG DRNG.dvd
3789 Seemed I
'32,0om K1C
t. C401 - GRDG DRNG OA June
AREA A
L
\
AREA C
E
',47////— vvvN „wSpaaa:�°P.an —
/ rr qN 1 C9ed e .✓y' j p// / v„ aex;y'u fl or.
/e pn Y� �paa As�Ne �� 416 �6' ��G�e�l//�H„"G,�^ax ���
---\905 —i— _ f���
II,
5„ 90.
�I 7
a7
C,'N [SRN 1s
0 AU
—
PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL
BUILDING
00 SF
dip
Y•'lnrt� 4..�✓U�aa✓r� �- � �/���aa vady��1���� ��iJ�a���9i$A 1.����,�11 21011�a���a�Pa4al�S��"01 �� �ngxe�d �ra��/y � ��d����d���a®���A a a�a��p���r�I�� �a��� / "/, �u�����,paq�d< ����r�� a�,ay..A�_,.,7,•KAaa�aH//¢k��nN"6a -�,:w,r//0i!g4q!A////Huf�a qAa _auaAagNdNb „H6// z'��-;,;a41yyfr 'I /y s�ydso��//�//g/a,/�'00 savo4ag479B �� ��4aa y�ati�/174f ���� g , fag®a�,pN,,.C/��,N�pfiarGG,a .,H�.../,� TM an s1
v_� i I
DRAINAGE DITCH_�4 \ \ / �I IL 1=� sue=
067' BOX CULVER-
SEE DESIGN SHEETS
THIS SET
AREA D
AREA B\
arl oxz \\
„9
asp �i s�4
irtamiw
a.o
8 6 ■
iilairkWer -Le
la���►� o Ub \
495 LF RETAINING WALL _ �� W/ / II
ir
A nii;Sl
nILI
— =y
\
u „ry s.�bp II
J
—=i
y1111 ; 15� 'RC RC%;//// 11) I\\
1 I I 11s1 A, �, \�
� /111T1 / / % r //
—
POD
-
/7
J
1. REFER TO THE GENERAL NOTES SHEET FOR NOTES PERTAINING TO PAVING, GRADING,
ACCESSIBILITY, AND STORM DRAINAGE.
1. EXISTING AND PROPOSED GRADE CONTOURS INTERVALS SHOWN AT 1 FOOT.
3. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS WITH EC: REPRESENTS THE FACE OF CURB AT THE GUTTER LINE. (ADD
0.50' FOR TOP OF CURB.)
4. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS WITH TC: REPRESENTS THE TOP OF CURB ELEVATION. (SUBTRACT 0.50.
FOR PAVEMENT OR ELEVATION OF GUTTER AT CURB LINE.)
S. RIM'. ELEVATIONS OF CATCH BASINS (CURB INLETS) EOUALS THE FLOW LINE OF THE GUTTER
RIM ELEVATIONS OF DROP INLETS, MANHOLES, AND CLEANOUTS EQUALS THE CENTER OF
GRATE OR LID ELEVATION.
6. ALL STRUCTURES SHALL BE ADJUSTED AS NECESSARY TO BE FLUSH WITH FIN AL PAVEMENT.
7. MANHOI FS WITHIN NON PAVED AREAS SHAI I RE BB ABOVE ADJACENT GRADES. UNI ESS
OTHERWISE SHOWN.
S. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SMOOTH TRANSITION BETWEEN PROPOSED PAVEMENT AND
EXISTING PAVEMENT AND STORM STRUCTURES
9. DIMING CONSTRI ICTION AND AFTER FINAL GRADING, Nn SI IRFACE WATER RUNOFF MAY BE
DIRECTED TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES, AND ALL SURFACE WATER RUNOFF MUST BE ROUTED
TO PROVED DRAINAGE FALB !TIES OR RE RETAINED ON SITE. AlRUNOFF EROI,I THE SITE,
BOTH DURING AND AFTER CONSTRUCTION. MUST BE FREE OF POLLUTANTS, INCLUDING
SEDIMENT, PRIOR TO DISCHARGE.
ADA COMPLIANCE:
A.
B.
D.
E.
F.
CURB RAMPS ALONG PUBLIC; STREETS AND IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-DE-WAV SHALL BE
CONSTRUCTED BASED ON THE CITY STANDARD CONSTRUCTION DETAILS AND. SPECIFICATIONS.
PRIVATE CURB RAMPS ON THE SITE (I. E. OUTSIDE PUBLIC STREET RICH =OF -WAY) SHALL
CONFORM TO THE ADA STANDARDS FOR ACCESSIBLE DESIGN AND SHALL HAVE A DETECTABLE
RNING SURFACE THAT IS FI ILL WIDTH OF THE CI IRB RAMP, NOT INCLI IDING FLARES.
ALL ACCESSIBLE ROUTES, GENERAL SITE AND BUILDING ELEMENTS. RAMPS, CURB RAMPS,
STRIPING. AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL CONFORM TO ADA STANDARDS FOR ACCESSIBLE
DESIGN, LATEST EDITION.
ANY COMPONENTS OF T-IE PROJECT SERVING MULTIFAMILY DWELLINGS IN BUILDINGS THAT
HAVE 4 OR MORE UNITS PER DWELLING SHALL ALSO CONFORM TO THE FAIR HOUSING ACT
(FHA). AND COMPLY WITH THE FAIR HOUSING ACT DESIGN MANUAL BY THE US DEPARTMENT OF
HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT.
BEFORE PLACING PAVEMENT. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THAT SUITABLE ACCESSIBLE
PEDESTRIAN ROUTES (PER ADA AND FHA) EXIST TO AND FROM EVERY DOOR AND ALONG
SIDEWALKS. ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES, ACCESS AISLES. A D ACCESSIBLE ROI ITES. INNn
CASE SHALL AN ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPE EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NO CASE
SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPE EXCEED 2.n PERCENT IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINAL
SIDEWALK SLOPE EXCEED E..0 PERCENT. ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES AND ACCESS AISLES
SHALL NOT EXCEED 1.0 PERCENT SLOPE IN ANY DIRECTION.
CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE FIELD SLOPE MEASUREMENTS ON FINISHED SUBGRADE AND FORM
BOARDS PRIOR Tn PLACING PAVEMENT Tn VERIFY THAT ACCESSIBLE SLOPE REOI IIREMENTS
ARE PROVIDED. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT ENGINEER PRIOR TO PAVING IF ANY
EXCESSIVE SLOPES ARE ENCOUNTERED. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE
ACCEPTED FOR ADA COMPLIANCE ISSUES.
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 50 100 200
Know what's below.
CaII before you dig.
a
0
w
K
K
K
K
K
K
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
w�
og;
Yr
00
SC4LE AS SHOWN
i
z
z
0
2
0
z
W
`a_`^
vJ
PREPARED FOR
NORTH CAROLINA
KINGS MOUNTAIN
SHEET NUMBER
C401
This document, together gith the concepts a Id designs presented here n as an instmment of service is inlaid. DIA, for the specific pumose a. cl ant for which it mos prepared. Reuse gl and improper reliance on this dom.ment without written authousation a. adaptation by Kirnley-l-on, and Assgmates Inc. s,el6e„iIwLiIliability m<Iml Hon,endAssoaeleInc.

AREA A
& C DBE218ION4
PG273NE, ING/
PIN: 154278
\
4 I\
d'111I ' y.0 .•r.•. :'iy �;�',i,i ':%';4',1, .,''�'�r.' .�2• s;'::.5:i'.i .r": z
111111111111111111111111111111111111
�ry qoncoyy/ .�I,''ST2iat.:o � ,,�_i,'% •�...�. r.�4:`• ,'%
I I Hv !.' .�i'J Ili �' e✓I!1/, „%: ;? +;�'
V��r3 ��.,i•. ..71�.9''.,' 1,'> •i �` '!t.' [ .r• e�'r. '.�. :.1. ,.t .!.:
111 N6 /L/ 5 t'), '},,� T \ \.T•, 5� :,, n 5'T; n?���,I J( T+d 1 1 I t� + h''e t.,
y��?��„Wr � ��'.: i'"r i� ,i, � :1•.111 �: i r !!: w� ,1
cB440, cep., ac •t a� ���e•/ 7 / NORYWN��i���O �I/lH..IIi i��P��H�� 9abp�ls"'.
14
awnurazl �i7.7�/ pn'�///////w//////QQ//r�/� yp/I���j /, p��r�rq// ® �� rn.y�a.°,'a `r J�`'~���p////;p �y���pnN b- =m
I��l�lll�Q1�r%mn d • ,®f/®itMil JV ffk,tvrd�'!: N���/J��N6��iIIHOH��NDA77�II NAI�NfioMO�.�� H
an I111 I` ���
� p ��� — — _ —`o.aIS" /,/��/,�/���� � � ,,�1®,r,1111121t� �� a
—i
RIM as
!!L2 ll�ll1 a R P
r
PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL
BUILDING
280,800 SF
. FFEa,hdd)
Ate
A 11 i 4(.4, .„./i,
8',7. BOX CULVERT
SEE DESIGN SHEETS
THIS SET
_
I /
1,
r'
— — t, —
// �— Tg`-,r�� —_ I ------ /�//i
/-- - 7s _ _ /,/i
/\S` racy -----.-7/ /
T.,;,3-77(
\ V \\ \ \ \ \ \ `\es, \ \� �\ 95
\\\ \\L \V esi\ T>r k 1—\ \ } \ \ \ T v v vA
CHARLES L. COD`( CET AL) Vv
DB 1289, PG 2205 \
PIN'. 3504587676
\ \ \ PROPERTY LINE I
$USAN NIHET$T N
RONNIE &
MB 55 PG 116
Dg 2283. PG279 604
PIN'.I15P
/ I
/ �� I , /
1/1/
// / A11 —6-6-'ems—_--_— _�Av —�v /------' i -•
_ % BQTTc
MATCH LINE SEE SHEET C404 - GRDG DRNG-AREA C-D
\/
roc ---
/ / ,1.
1T7--
\� \ —
895 -- - �i
J90
Impact 1 (81)
Culvert
70 LF10.011 ac - Permanent
LOT , & PORTION OF LOT 2
LOL A BUfiY INDUSTRIAL PARK
MB 55 PG 116
PERIES, LLC
Da 5315,PG20
PIN'. 306768
STONEWRIGNT PRO 39
�`JMm
III
es,
\yes, - —
•
LANDSCAPING BUFFER I \
ANIF
MPAMY
DUKE\POWER COs191 A
OB 1006, PG
PIN, 154273
r
/ r) 1
/�
IN
�\ ���—=
.10
M.E. BROWN ENTERPP. LLC
DB 5320, PG 1523
PIN. 154260
/ / / T -/—
ea Ir i
L' as, I _I — —
_1 I— — —
J
GRADING PLAN KEY NOTES
OUTLINED AREA REPRESENTS THE OUTLINE OF ADA SPACES (PAVEMENT SLOPES WITHIN
A THE LIMITS OF THIS ARE,. HAVE BEEN DESIGNED AT 1.8,6 MAXIMUM GRADE, CONTRACTOR
SHALL GRADE I HESE AREAS NO S I EEPER I HAN 2,0'/.)
B SI DEWALKANN(:R 9SWALKDR0599LOPESSHALL NOT EXC,EED.9l, fi" PER LINEAR FOOT
(MAX. 1'A, SEE DETAIL). 5°A MAX. LONGITUDINAL SLOPE.
G ADA ACCESSIBLE RAMP INE SIDEWALK TO CONFORM TO FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL
ACCESSIBILITY GUIDELINES.
❑ VARIABLE HEIGHT SEGMENTED RETAINING WALL. (SEE WALL NOTE)
E ) ALL SPOT GRADES DEPICT FINISH GRADE UNLESS OTHER VASE NOTED.
F NO EAR I HEN SLOPE SHALL BE GHEA I EH I HAN 3 UNLESS O HEHWISE NO I EO.
MATCH EXISTING ELEVATIONS AT THE PROPERTY LIMITS. GRADING ON ADJACENT
G J PROPERTY SHALL REQUIRE SLOPE PERMISSION CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT COMMENCE
P ORK ON ADJACENT PROPERTY UNTIL SUCH AGREEMENT IS IN PLACE.
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 25 50 100
Know what's below.
Call before you dig.
This document, together Nth the concepts a Id designs presented here n as au instrJment of service Mended Dilly forth: specific purpose and H eo,for which it„aa prepared. Reese of aed improper reliance on this doarmentwithout wode„ eatho,cation and adewatm by Kimley-rrr, and As ciatesInc. s,a1 be without liability m <irriIe,Hon, and A"so!1e,� I���.

MATCH LINE SEE SHEET C404 - GRDG DRNG-AREA C-D
C401 - GRDG D
K\CHL PR
- GRDG DRNG-AREA B
AREA B
NEW PARCEL
MB 89, PG 87
J N 5255,AEL PG 2110N
DB
PIN-- 301313
L
— sT3
/��/�f///NN3:6 � J `+ sss ~
1
WLU
1 3�
W II iiiy�- --
TT OD
1—
PIN: 154263
\ I PROPERTY LINE
7
,-e,
i 1 /i A A ���
';"1)
�I
���
;.0
>
' \ \ 30X16 EMERGENCY
CWAY INVERT `\
\ \Bo \ ELEVATION 88] \ S.
I \
In I
�II II I�1lMBES
fi
��, d"'�°: \ \\ ` g, ' — gfis N. \\\� \ '\ \
Borrow of — — ' N \
\ POND'. Sb9,E0'� _ \\ \ � \ \\ 'TN/
v T
es \
\
BOTTOMOF '\ \
OREBAV. So2',
\
\ \
VEGETATIVE SHELF
OHdI H �Nv �s��►w�r 1•• es �y
LsMI ryi" ' his° \ \ \ \\\ \\ \\ _>
9��/� N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ =I�
�b"��Aii9nd��\ \ \ \\\\ \• \ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ '--___
4141' nAa�laa° v \ v v v v \ 1 \ v v v• /
A®�j�_�/ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ \ 1 I 1 1 1 \ \\ \\ \ I $ \ \\\___— — 1 'r,
�991' �f� \ v !
e, %�'� \ 1 \I \ \ \ \ \ 1\ i ; \ 41 \\ \1 I i \ \ — --�/ 1'
9 I / / '/ J IJ Ik,, 1I f �It }1 T T _--../�� y -� -
-'' T L/9S` ��'�/ i JAI -1 -i 1 / l / PROPER, LINEI
1
/ / / /
/ / / / / ROGER DALE TREECE
/ / / DB 4457, PG 818
/ PIN: 154267
MOUNTAIN /
1746 1
'///1
\
"N
•
111
///
////
/////
/
\ \ \
J/fv vv v
-- %l%r1} 1//V r
\\ ItIij>-------
—\-----IIII�FIYIyy\I�I�II�`� 44
Wa \
\— \ I�SSK T \ \/ ` ' ��\ i�� I`11 y
SS
V 6
-
CITY OF KINGS
_Qg 4592, PG
L
MAINTENANCE PERM•r
•,•
fr
-
/
III \N6l11- —
•
/,B i •
/4Ik
tiw3
- f v - W�a
m
PROPERTY LINE
CITYDOB 340 SPG 336 AIN
PIN: 154264
80
46,
7
J
GRADING PLAN KEY NOTES
OUTLINED AREA REPRESENTS THE OUTLINE OF ADA SPACES (PAVEMENT SLOPES WITHIN
A `, THE LIMITS OF THIS AREA HAVE BEEN DESIGNED AT 1.81MAXIMUM GRADE. CONTRACTOR
SHALL GRADE THESE AREAS NO STEEPER THAN 2.00/,.1
Y 6 SIDEWALK AND CROSSWALK CROSS -SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 301 PER LINEAR FOOT
' (MAX. SY.. SEE DETAIL). 51/ MAX. LONGITUDINAL SLOPE.
C ADA ACCESSIBLE RAMP INE SIDEWALK TO CONFORM TO FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL
ACCESSIBILITY GUIDELINES.
p VARIABLE HEIGHT SEGMENTED RETAINING WALL. (SEE WALL NOTE)
E ALL SPOT GRADES DEPICT FINISH GRADE UNLESS OTHER WISE NOTED.
' F NO EARTHEN SLOPE SHALL BE GREATERTH AN 3.1, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
HATCH EXISTING ELEVATIONS AT THE PROPERTY LIMITS. GRADING ON ADJACENT
G PROPERTY SHALL REQUIRE SLOPE PERMISSION. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT COMMENCE
WORK ON ADJACENT PROPERTY UNTIL SUCH AGREEMENT IS IN PLACE.
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 25 50 100
l 11
Know what's below.
Call before you dig.
m
a
ZO
`Eel
K
K
K
K
K
K
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
N
N
SCALE AS SHOWN
tt
Q
GRDG DRNG-AREA B
PREPARED FOR
NORTH CAROLINA
KINGS MOUNTAIN
SHEET NUMBER
C403
This document, together eiIfithe concepts aIddesigns presented here as aninstEnreirtofseNice,isinIended=nMlorthespeeifiepurposeandelantf whhiIwas prepared. Reuse Eland improperrelia„ceo„thiadeeereer,IwiIhoulwdde„Bump;Ealionandadaptation KiniI0-ron, and Associates Inc. s,el°e„iIw,lliability to<IrriI HonlendAssoaeleInc.

GRADING PLAN KEY NOTES
\C401 -GRDG DRNG.dw
n\02 - DWC Pia as
VC404 - GRDG DRNG-AREA C-
AREA C
NG5 MGNUNENT 'SHEAR
NC GRID NA083
N=551319.T]
aty-92fi.54
AREA D
CAN6G 81R� I ,1
00 840,
MATCH LINE SEE SHEET C402 - GRDG DRNG-AREA A
PLasTlc 1TEBIALS, we
o54 51PG 939- � �cPIN54265
�v
,IOHN 0. PLONK JF
PAIRICIA N. PLANK
MATCH LINE SEE SHEET C403 - GRDG DRNG-AREA B
I
OUTLINED AREA REPRESENTS THE OUTLINE OF ADA SPACES JxAVEMENT SLOPES WITHIN
A �. THE LIMITS OF THIS AREA HAVE BEEN DESIGNED . 1.81/. MAXIMUM GRADE. CONTRACTOR
SHALL GRADE THESE AREAS NO STEEPER THAN 20%.1
B T SIDEWALK AND CROSSWALK CROSS -SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 3/ M) PER LINEAR FOOT
(MAX 2"h, SEE DETAIL). 5`h MAX LONGITUDINAL SLOPE.
c DA ACCESSIRI F RAMP IN SIOFWAI K TO CONEOR11 TO EFDERAI , STATE, AND I OCAI
ACCESSIBILITY GUIDELINES.
D VARIABLE HEIGHT SEGMENTED RETAINING /BALL. (SEE WALL NOTE)
E ALLSPO I GRADESOEPIC I FINISH GRADE UNLESS O I HEH WISE NO I ED.
F NO EARTHEN SLOPE SHALL BE GREATER THAN 31, UNLESS OTHER/VISE NOTED.
MATCH EXISTING ELEVATIONS AT THE PROPERTY LIMITS. GRADING ON ADJACENT
G PROPERTY SHALL REQUIRE SLOPE PERMISSION. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT COMMENCE
WORK ON ADJACENT PROPERTY UNTIL SUCH AGREEMENT IS IN PLACE.
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 25 50 100
Know what's below.
Call before you dig.
ISSUED FOR PERI,OIT
K
K
K
K
K
K
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
U p
W p
O m
a �
F N
❑o
SDRLE AS SHOWN
c0
5-
a
w
cc
ce
PREPARED FOR
NORTH CAROLINA
KINGS MOUNTAIN
SHEET NUMBER
C404
This document, together Ni,n,ne concepts a,d designs presented here n, as an inad,nrenlof service Mended Dilly for the specific purpose a. cI enllorwNm it„aa prepared. Reuse a1 aad improper reliance on this doaemen„without wnde„ ...Oho -cation a. adawa,m by KirnIey-For, and As cielesInc. s,al be without liability m <irriIe,Hon, and kssociale,� I���.

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION

Jurisdictional Determination Request
US Army Corps
of Engineers.
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http: //www. saw. usace. army. mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator. aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOIIL REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGHREGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: Canterbury Road
City, State:
Kings Mountain, North Carolina
County: Cleveland and Gaston
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 301314
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Chris Tinklenberg
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
Select one:
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200
Charlotte, NC
[phone]
[e-mail]
I am the current property owner.
I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION2
Name: Kings Mountain DRE Holdings, LLC (POC: Joe Scarborough)
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
3333 Riverwood Parkway NE, Suite 200
Atlanta, GA 30339
[phone]
[e-mail]
i Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
u
u
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
✓0
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
Size of Property or Review Area 40 acres.
The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017
Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: 35.235827
Longitude: -81.322111
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
• North Arrow
• Graphical Scale
• Boundary of Review Area
• Date
• Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
• Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
• Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
• Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
• Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Iv
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Deteuninations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.ainiy.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Pe
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'
Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
I r l Soil Survey Map
u
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
Other Assessment Forms
' www. saw.usace. a ny.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/regdocs/JD/RGL 08-02 App A Prelim JD Fofillable.pdf
' Please see http : //www. saw. usace. army mil/Missions/Regulatory -Permit-Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's web site
and onthe Headquarters USAGE web site.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Chris Tinklenberg, 200 S. Tryon St., Ste 200, Charlotte, NC 28202
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Cleveland and Gaston City: Kings Mountain
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 35.235827 Long.: -81.322111
Universal Transverse Mercator: 17N
Name of nearest waterbody: UT to Crowders Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
S 1 a
35.235807
-81.320077
1,981 LF
non -wetland
404
S 1 b
35.238165
-81.323719
51 LF
non -wetland
404
S2
35.237037
-81.321885
69 LF
non -wetland
404
W1
35.234487
-81.318489
0.003 ac
wetland
404
W2
35.237153
-81.321942
0.02 ac
wetland
404
W3
35.237874
-81.323605
0.19 ac
wetland
404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
• Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:
O Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
n Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
n Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
■❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
O USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑■ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1 : 1 2K - Kings Mountain
❑■ Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Cleveland and Gaston co. SSURGO Soils
• National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: NWI digital mapper
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
• Photographs: • Aerial (Name & Date): 2022 Nearmap Aerial
or ■❑ Other (Name & Date): Site photographs (04/27/2022)
n Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
n Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determi nations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
6/24/2022
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

Photo Pa-.e 1
'�� Ica i g i" f+,',• ; 4, .f `°°Lik
1 ; "
'k i e`rye
`4 if e� ?s 9
A
F
�ij€ d'� I' pa.
T-
v .:.."
.a
- - _ - .t
Photo 1 —Stream la(Sla)—Perennial stream
,, e
•
:" r } "
,A, <a
? �
_,... . 1r v . ,,,, ,_ - , , ,
Photo 2—Stream la(Sla)—Perennial stream
Title Photo Pages
Prepared For Seefried Kings Mountain Site Prepared B}
Seefried Project Kings Mountain,Cleveland&Gaston County,NC
Industrial
Date Project Number Kimley) Horn
Properties,
Inc. 02/09/2022&04/27/2022 019854007

Photo Page 2
. • FJ ti „ `e AIlb� 4 M n(I f 10r / .v, s
- Pi 1 s F j ✓ ��h
-- vo%, /-. . - :, .
t .. �k i:,*u
. -may wX;
9
y. 47Y4 ei. i es
s •Y �-
' ,,r _
Photo 3—Stream lb(Slb)—Perennial stream
d
.....- ,.,----,.,.-,.,,,,. ..:=„4,-; -;..h.,",`,". ...„.. 414*, .... :AI- .._,. , ' 1 --:-...- -...,..,:r. 2,..,,:f.„.te-,;"-:a',-
f d
- p'-,;,x,'
. i. a*. a Yam "
' ''.. ''''',"' 'O.' .`1'..'''-`'" ,r .. %;:,..' i' .k-""
W .£L 7 i.
Y
.» . c'1 r ,
,.. � .y� S � t yr, "%' �` my '''` _ .". � "s _`@tlt�a.
+?r ' t "
a
aitt rS 5 1 .1
J
am ,5� : 4 ; ", <, , '� i
Y,w i
4
. a ,wvk��� >♦ s
Photo 4—Stream lb(Slb)—Perennial stream
Title Photo Pages
Prepared For Seefried Kings Mountain Site Prepared DI:
Project Kings Mountain,Cleveland&Gaston County,NC
Industrial
Date Project Number Kimley) Horn
Properties,
Inc. 02/09/2022&04/27/2022 019854007

Photo Page 3
s • xs - r
- -
..„ -,7%00. 41V1
-,
i 410_,
,,t... ,:-..1,...,
.,. .
#,,,,„
., ,_
8
h¢ YPisv �.. J" d r l�� � .....t. ;:.. .",.,,. ,„,:.,,,,.. _.4„,;_,::.,,....
gyp- ram �a ; k :[ kp z -m ta £ F Yr I ., w :.T -,s ea
1147
•
Photo 5—Stream 2 (S2)—Perennial stream
•y=--'- ,-.=ci:11„,,,,,,:•;•:-:- ' ,.--: ,,,:i.....:"'-' ' ,..---=._,.,;___' IlIP,,.
�, :.ate :�„ � ��` 3
y
r .
ev.':
•
h ,1+-';- �, � r'� t N'• Yro M
'3 •, iY -k
�}f
e -•PA''-'447 `1li,210
Photo 6—Stream 2(S2)—Perennial stream
Title Photo Pages
Prepared For Seefried Kings Mountain Site
Industrial
Prepared B}
Seefried Project Kings Mountain,Cleveland&Gaston County,NC
Kimley) Horn
02/09/2022&04/27/2022
Properties, Date Project Number
Inc. 019854007

Photo Page 4
�t ., �
y C-4"
� a ter.- :. � � � '.
- * . --
n -
Photo 7—Representative vegetation community of Wetland I
\ . :i! ' 4,%,,..„ ....,
:Piety' swr - r4 :� a l. : i f rya % 1 v y
•
1 • c
} s +� r a ,
Ali r 5„; ,. a4 _
. t o w is",_ „w �,. fr
%d 1 , - '- .4:','*,
-' �Ay "we e .
dV } •. Agri - .r�` 4 1 .. _t,�F,
1� r �i'�-yam .
2,4411411,:l r:14%,ALIV V t
Photo 8—Resentative vegetation community of Wetland 1
Title Photo Pages
Prepared For preSeeifrin,edCl Kievengslan Mountain Site ,
ounty Prepared By
Seefried Projec t
Kings C NC
Industrial Kimley>>)Horn
Properties, Date Mounta Project Number
Inc. 02/09/2022&04/27/2022 019854007

Photo Page 5
Y,a' _ S,i o-,,0 ,'- •fig 4
h
r -`.- •j : '''' - # ,` fi
, 5 , s
i
J
ern. -- • „
x ti
�g �3ram' r2,K : 4 �V.k
f 1 A.- ll 3V�
' -I ,- -,�' 1,k . \% r• • .'fit
Photo 9—Representative vegetation community of Wetland 2
,
,,,,k4.
•_� °� t r 0. _J13 ': E . ly4 «' a F
•
''' 4,,k..._, - :_,„„ „,,, . .--:\.,04, .....,-
Y u Yit P..e1.EF* 'M1 L ....--
,4,,,-.:-:._- ,,..„..„--..,,t. - low
. 6s Zit t rr N - ..�"
ti r
�� • s ,
b `
01,
IPhoto 10—Representative soil profile of Wetland 1 &Wetland 2
Title Photo Pages
Prepared For Seefried Kings Mountain Site Prepared By
Seefried Project Kings Mountain,Cleveland&Gaston County,NC
Industrial Kimley>>)Horn
Properties, Date Project Number
Inc. 02/09/2022&04/27/2022 019854007

Photo Pale 6 _
gg..„,. r,:',,k-'-,0 : q
„ .tv,:, . ,rt., , d
.,w.....,.,,... , , .. . . ... ., ;k9 Ik g ,' ia t t 411 4/
Y \ $
te � •
„.,,,, r
...7...„44:,.:,,k,
..i....,,i1.
, „:„.;..,.., . . ,. , _ _i_ 14tit
I \.:./
,t,..4 . _ : _,- ...,,,,,,.,,, ---., , ,_.,_.., _ _, ,, 1.""-4 - 4 ' ',",:g,„„;. -
' b
-- ,4 _ �'�. - -d' °aw ism- A
n «
;fit ,,,,"--:-.:,..-Wt.:, ,L-:_.:1';'..c.- ..4^-:ryllpirrt,':, .i ' , ..,, :. .... ,, ,..,
b,'
---.,V 1..„..i;":.---;:.; --,,l'';':-:„ -.: ..':-.-,;-: . " „ : ,i;;T•„, '':;,- .1,:ii..;-41*--",:tit-,..%,,t'z'll,w_"7*----,s,,37.,-",,,--21,;."4",,,,,041*--.7..,,i),-;','
Photo 11 —Representative vegetation community of Wetland 3
�. Js#° pro-. / ly cr y
!! f 7` -,
it
, .y. i-; ' --, - ''ik...,.4.'i : . A' l'' ':yt.„7„, , , . ,--v,-- -.-v,,, k-,,,... - '
,, 4,.., t-,,,,,,. , .r.„,„, -.I.: . , ,,....„, , ,,,,--..„.., ...„:,...„..,„,,,„, . „.,.
,„..,,,, „,,,,, ...„ t ,.., , , _ .,.‘,.;. ,,,. : ,-,,c,-,,,,,,, ;,,, ,,, ,-,s.,.4, , ivi, A -
‘,.
r i s .rays
','"4.../47;,... 1 -''''' --.,-,,,,4 ir, _,
_,,, ,,. •, _ ,....„ , ,,...., i,i''
i -: --k 1.,
, ..„ .. , ,,
oil?,
,,
T'', -j '
)0p 1
Photo 12—Representative soil profile of Wetland 3
Title Photo Pages
Prepared For Seefried Kings Mountain Site Prepared B}
Seefried Project Kings Mountain,Cleveland
Properties, &Gaston County,NC
Industrial Kimley>>)Horn
Date Project Number
Inc. 02/09/2022&04/27/2022 019854007

Photo Page 7
i
•
a.
y
„.,'-4--; -a 2-gr, -4=1 ' Vi4' —'743 -41, %..V ,„,,.°'-.-- '-'74141V*i '•,)
- 1 w t 2 �f } aril .
it"
ke
4010
Photo 13—Representative vegetation community of%_13 and 1
pisIt, d
iiir
ti 4.
iF 3 - O t t
� j
�.� ` rig',1
r ` , , �}
gy�py+ ae#. i".744 y. ". F-J ' ° " 5
.01Va
�a:1
' I%'
Photo 14—Representative soil profile of Upland 1
Title
Prepared For
Photo Pages
Seefried Ki Min Prepared B}
Seefrled Project Kings Mountain,Cleveland&ountaGaston County,NC
Industrial Kimley>>)Horn
Properties, Date ProSiteject Number
Inc. 02/09/2022&04/27/2022 019854007

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Seefried - Kings Mountain
Applicant/Owner: Seefried Industrial Properties, LLC
Investigator(s):GB, DF
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Depression Toeslope
City/County: Gaston County Sampling Date: 2022-04-27
State: North Carolina Sampling Point: W2-Wet
Section, Township, Range:
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P 136 Lat: 35.2371722
Slope (%): 1
Long: -81.3219692 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: ChA - Chewacla loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: Riverine
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic?
No `/ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
1
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes ,/ No
Yes ,/ No
Yes ,/ No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes ✓ No
Remarks:
Sampling point W2-Wet is situated in a natural topographic depressional area. The data point was taken along the boundary of W2. It
appears that W2 is a headwater wetland and Stream 2 originates at the downslope end of W2. Hydrology of W2 is primarily influenced by
groundwater from seepage along the toe of slopes. According to the APT, the delineation was conducted during "wetter than normal'
conditions. W2 is representative of Wetland 1.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks
(B6)
Concave Surface (B8)
(B10)
(B16)
Table (C2)
(C8)
on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Plants (D1)
(D2)
(D3)
Relief (D4)
(D5)
_ Surface Water (A1) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) _ Sparsely Vegetated
_ High Water Table (A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) ✓ Drainage Patterns
_ Saturation (A3) ✓ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines
Water Marks (B1) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry -Season Water
_ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows
✓ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Saturation Visible
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Stunted or Stressed
_ Iron Deposits (B5) ✓ Geomorphic Position
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Shallow Aquitard
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) _ Microtopographic
Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ FAC-Neutral Test
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
✓
No
Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): 5
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspec ions), if available:
Remarks:
Primary and secondary hydrology indicators observed.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W2-Wet
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft r
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Liquidambar styraciflua
Acer rubrum
Liriodendron tulipifera
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
40 ✓ FAC
15 ✓ FAC
10 FACU
65%
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 32.5 20% of total cover: 13.0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft r
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Acer rubrum
Quercus prinus
Liriodendron tulipifera
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft r
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Liriodendron tulipifera
20
15
5
40%
✓ FAC
FACU
= Total Cover
20.0 20% of total cover: 8.0
Acer rubrum
Oxydendrum arboreum
Quercus prinus
Arundinaria gigantea
Juncus effusus
20
15
10
10
5
5
65%
FACU
FAC
UPL
FACW
FACW
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 32.5 20% of total cover: 13.0
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft r
1 Parthenocissus quinquefolia
2 Vitis rotundifolia
3 Smilax rotundifolia
4.
5.
35
35
10
80%
FACU
FAC
FAC
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 40.0 20% of total cover: 16.0
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 71.4 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
FACU species
UPL species
Column Totals:
0
10
135
70
10
225
Multiply by:
x1= 0
x2= 20
x3= 405
x 4 = 280
x5= 50
(A) 755 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.36
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation present due to dominance test.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: W2-Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist)
0 - 2 10YR 4/2 95
2 - 4 2.5Y 5/3 85
4 -12 2.5Y 5/2 70
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
5YR 3/4 5 C M Clay Loam High organic material
7.5YR 4/4 15 C M Clay Loam
5YR 4/6 30 C M Clay Loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Dark Surface (S7) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
✓ Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Depleted matrix observed. Refusal after 12 inches
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Seefried - Kings Mountain
Applicant/Owner: Seefried Industrial Properties, LLC
Investigator(s):GB, DF
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Upland, Hil!slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P 136 Lat: 35.2370680 Long: -81.3220719
City/County: Gaston County Sampling Date: 2022-04-27
State: North Carolina Sampling Point: W2-Up
Section, Township, Range:
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%):
Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: ChA - Chewacla loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic?
No ✓ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
Yes
Yes
No ✓
No ✓
No ✓
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes No ✓
Remarks:
Sampling point W2-Up is the representative upland point for the project area. W2-Up was taken on an adjacent
hillslope of W2-Wet. According to the APT, the delineation was conducted during "wetter than normal"
conditions.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks
(B6)
Concave Surface (B8)
(B10)
(B16)
Table (C2)
(C8)
on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Plants (D1)
(D2)
(D3)
Relief (D4)
(D5)
_ Surface Water (A1) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) _ Sparsely Vegetated
_ High Water Table (A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Drainage Patterns
_ Saturation (A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines
Water Marks (B1) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry -Season Water
Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows
Drift Deposits (B3) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Saturation Visible
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Stunted or Stressed
_ Iron Deposits (B5) _ Geomorphic Position
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Shallow Aquitard
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) _ Microtopographic
Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ FAC-Neutral Test
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
No
✓
Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspec ions), if available:
Remarks:
No hydrology indicators observed.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W2-Up
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft r
1. Quercus prinus
2. Oxydendrum arboreum
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
40 ✓
25 ✓ UPL
65%
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 32.5 20% of total cover: 13.0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft r
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Quercus prinus
Acer rubrum
Liquidambar styraciflua
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft r
1. Quercus prinus
15
10
5
30
✓ FAC
FAC
= Total Cover
15.0 20% of total cover: 6.0
2. Oxydendrum arboreum
3. Hexastylis minor
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
20
10
5
35%
✓ UPL
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 17.5 20% of total cover: 7.0
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft r
2.
3.
4.
5.
Vitis rotundifolia
5
5%
✓ FAC
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 2.5 20% of total cover: 1.0
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
FACU species
UPL species
Column Totals:
0
0
20
0
35
55
Multiply by:
x 1 = 0
x2= 0
x3= 60
x4= 0
x5= 175
(A) 235 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 4.27
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes No ✓
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation not observed.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: W2-Up
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist)
0-1
10YR 2/2 100
1 - 4 10YR 5/4 85
4 - 8 10YR 6/4 85
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
Sandy Clay Loam Uncontested said grains, high organic texture
7.5YR 6/8 15 C M Sandy Clay Loam Small rocks present
7.5YR 6/8 15 C M Sandy Clay Loam Small rocks present, refusal after 8 inches
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Redu
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
ced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Hydric soil not observed.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Seefried - Kings Mountain
Applicant/Owner: Seefried Industrial Properties, LLC
Investigator(s):GB, DF
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Depression Toeslope
City/County: Gaston County Sampling Date: 2022-04-27
State: North Carolina Sampling Point: W3-Wet
Section, Township, Range:
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P 136 Lat: 35.2373131
Slope (%): 1
Long: -81.3237746 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: ChA - Chewacla loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: Riverine
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic?
No `/ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
1
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes ,/ No
Yes ,/ No
Yes ,/ No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes ✓ No
Remarks:
Sampling point W3-Wet is situated in a natural topographic depressional area. The data point was taken along
the boundary of W3. Hydrology of W3 is primarily influenced by groundwater from seepage along the toe of
slopes. According to the APT, the delineation was conducted during "wetter than normal" conditions.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks
(B6)
Concave Surface (B8)
(B10)
(B16)
Table (C2)
(C8)
on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Plants (D1)
(D2)
(D3)
Relief (D4)
(D5)
_ Surface Water (A1) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) _ Sparsely Vegetated
✓ High Water Table (A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) ✓ Drainage Patterns
✓ Saturation (A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines
Water Marks (B1) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry -Season Water
Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ✓ Crayfish Burrows
Drift Deposits (B3) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Saturation Visible
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Stunted or Stressed
_ Iron Deposits (B5) ✓ Geomorphic Position
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Shallow Aquitard
✓ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) _ Microtopographic
Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ FAC-Neutral Test
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
✓
No
Water Table Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): 8
Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): 0
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspec ions), if available:
Remarks:
Primary and secondary hydrology indicators observed.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W3-Wet
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft r
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Liquidambar styraciflua
Liriodendron tulipifera
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
20 ✓ FAC
20 ✓ FACU
40%
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20.0 20% of total cover: 8.0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft r
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Nyssa biflora
Fagus grandifolia
Oxydendrum arboreum
Carya ovate
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft r
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Carex intumescens
15 ✓ FACW
10 ✓ FACU
10
5
40%
✓ UPL
FACU
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20.0 20% of total cover: 8.0
Woodwardia areolata
30
30
✓ FACW
✓ FACW
60% = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 30.0 20% of total cover: 12.0
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft r
2.
3.
4.
5.
Smilax rotundifolia
20
20%
✓ FAC
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 10.0 20% of total cover: 4.0
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 62.5 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
FACU species
UPL species
Column Totals:
0
75
40
35
10
160
Multiply by:
x1= 0
x2= 150
x3= 120
x4= 140
x5= 50
(A) 460
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.88
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
✓ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation observed.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: W3-Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0 - 2 10YR 4/2 50 Clay Loam
0 - 2 7.5R 3/3 50 Clay Loam This is the organic material
2 - 5 10YR 4/2 90 2.5Y 6/2 10 D M Clay Loam
4 -12 2.5Y 5/2 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M Clay Loam
12 -16 2.5Y 5/2 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M Sandy Clay Loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1) _ Dark Surface (S7) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3) _ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5) ✓ Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Depleted matrix observed.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
Date: 4/27/2022
d
Project/Site: S1- seefrounta -Kings
Mountain
Latitude:
35.235754
Evaluator: GB & DF
County: Gaston & Cleveland
Longitude:
-81.32014
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30
33.5
Stream Determination (cir e
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
Kings Mountain
Ephemeral Intermitte Perennial
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 18
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
la. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
2
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple-
pool sequence
0
1
2
3
2
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
3
5. Active/relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
2
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
2
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
1
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
0
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal =
8.5
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
0
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
C. Bioloav Subtotal =
7
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; Other = 0
0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
S1 originates offsite. Mapped USGS dashed blue line.
Few fish observed.

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
Date: 4/27/2022
d
Project/Site: S2- seefrounta -Kings
Mountain
Latitude:
35.237047
Evaluator: GB & DF
County: Gaston & Cleveland
Longitude:
-81.321876
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30
30.5
Stream Determination (cir e
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
Kings Mountain
Ephemeral Intermitte Perennial
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 16
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
la. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
1
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple-
pool sequence
0
1
2
3
2
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
3
5. Active/relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
1
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
0
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
2
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
1
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal =
8.5
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
0
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
C. Bioloav Subtotal =
6
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; Other = 0
0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
S2 originates at the downslope end of W2 at a small headcut.
Flows into S1.

Antecedent Precipitation vs Normal Range based on NOAA'
Daily Global Historical Climatology Network
Oct
2020
Nov
2020
Dec
2020
Jan
2021
Coordinates
35.237047, -81.321322
Observation Date
2021-04-27
Elevation (ft)
889.69
Drought Index (PDSI)
Mild drought
WebWIMP H2O Balance
Wet Season
Figure and tables made by the
Antecedent Precipitation Tool
Version 1.0
Written by Jason Deters
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Feb
2021
Mar
2021
- Daily Total
- 30-Day Rolling Total
30-Year Normal Range
Apr
2021
May
2021
Jul
2021
Aug
2021
30 Days Ending
30th %ile (in)
70th %ile (in)
Observed (in)
Wetness Condition
Condition Value
Month Weight
Product
2021-04-27
2.183858
4.113386
2.377953
Normal
2
3
6
2021-03-28
2.132284
3.923622
5.413386
Wet
3
2
6
2021-02-26
2.211417
4.069685
6.614173
Wet
3
1
3
Result
Wetter than Normal - 15
Weather Station Name
Coordinates
Elevation (ft)
Distance (mi)
Elevation A
Weighted L
Days (Normal)
Days (Antecedent)
GASTONIA
35.2672, -81.1436
700.131
10.242
189.559
6.55
10886
90
KINGS MOUNTAIN 1.6 SW
35.2277, -81.3703
903.871
2.839
14.181
1.318
30
0
KINGS MOUNTAIN 3.4 NNE
35.2886, -81.3309
933.071
3.603
43.381
1.778
36
0
GASTONIA 1.5 W
35.2503, -81.1986
784.121
6.985
105.569
3.881
19
0
GASTONIA 1.3 WSW
35.2421, -81.191
782.152
7.363
107.538
4.105
2
0
GASTONIA 4.1 SSW
35.1996, -81.2045
744.095
7.084
145.595
4.219
6
0
GASTONIA 0.8 W
35.2511, -81.1848
770.997
7.765
118.693
4.416
1
0
GASTONIA MUNI AP
35.1967, -81.1558
796.916
9.75
92.774
5.292
36
0
LINCOLNTON 4 W
35.4606, -81.3297
887.139
15.453
2.551
6.993
337
0

AGENCY CORRESPONDENCE

Kimley»>Horn
June 22, 2022
Asheville Field Office
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
Re: Seefried — Kings Mountain Site
Kings Mountain, Cleveland & Gaston County, North Carolina
Project Review Certification Letter
Dear USFWS Asheville Field Office,
On behalf of our client, Seefried Industrial Properties Inc., Kimley-Horn (KH) is submitting this letter
requesting concurrence regarding the results of the pedestrian surveys performed for the above -
referenced project in accordance with the methodologies recommended by USFWS. The pedestrian
surveys were conducted by KH staff Chris Tinklenberg on February 9th, 2022 and Gabby Barajas, and
Doug Fox on April 27th, 2022.
Background Information
The approximately 44-acre subject property is located along Canterbury Road in Kings Mountain,
Cleveland and Gaston County, NC. The subject property is bound by Canterbury Road and commercial
development to the north, 1-85 to the east, undeveloped forested land and residential development
to the south, and undeveloped forested land to the west.
The subject property is comprised of undeveloped forested land with a sewer easement bisecting the
site. Vegetation found within the site is mainly comprised of sweetgum (Liquidambarstyraciflua), red
maple (Acer rubrum), tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), muscadine (Vitis rotundifolia), and Virginia
creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia).
Seefried Industrial intends to construct an industrial development which may require future
authorization from the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE); therefore, our client contracted with KH
to perform the pedestrian survey within areas of potentially suitable habitat on the subject property
to identify and document occurrences of federally listed threatened and/or endangered species.
Methodology and Findings
As of April 28th, 2022, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) lists two (2) federally
protected species for Cleveland and Gaston County (Table 1). A brief description of each species'
habitat requirements follows, along with the Biological Conclusion rendered based on survey results
in the study area.
kimley-horn.com
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200, Charlotte, NC 28202
704-333-5131

Kimley»>Horn
Table 1: Federally protected listed species for Cleveland and Gaston County
Scientific Name
Common Name
Federal
Status
Habitat
Present
Biological
Conclusion
Myotis
septentrionalis
Northern Long-
eared Bat
T
Potential
MANLAA
Hexastylis
naniflora
Dwarf -flowered
Heartleaf
T
Potential
MANLAA
*E = Endangered, T = Threatened
Northern Long-eared Bat
USFWS Recommended Survey Window: June 1—August 15
Page 2
Habitat Description: In North Carolina, the Northern long-eared bat (NLEB) occurs in the mountains,
with scattered records in the Piedmont and coastal plain. In western North Carolina, NLEB
spends winter hibernating in caves and mines. Since this species is not known to be a long-
distance migrant, and caves and subterranean mines are extremely rare in eastern North
Carolina, it is uncertain whether or where NLEB hibernate in eastern North Carolina. During
the summer, NLEB roost singly or in colonies underneath bark, in cavities, or in crevices of
both live and dead trees (typically >_3 inches dbh). Males and non -reproductive females may
also roost in cooler places, like caves and mines. This bat has also been found, rarely, roosting
in structures like barns and sheds, under eaves of buildings, behind window shutters, in
bridges, and in bat houses. Foraging occurs on forested hillsides and ridges, and occasionally
over forest clearings, over water, and along tree -lined corridors. Mature forests may be an
important habitat type for foraging.
Biological Conclusion: May affect, not likely to adversely affect (MANLAA)
Potentially suitable summer roosting habitat for the NLEB may be present within forested
areas in the project area. The Final 4(d) rule (effective as of February 16, 2016), exempts
incidental take of NLEB associated with activities that occur greater than 0.25 miles from a
known hibernation site, and greater than 150 feet from a known, occupied maternity roost
tree during the pup season (June 1 — July 31). Kimley-Horn conducted a review of the most
current maps of confirmed/known hibernacula and maternity sites for the NLEB. The action
area for this project is located outside of the highlighted areas/red 12-digit HUCs. There will
be no blasting, pile driving, or other percussive activities associated with the construction of
the project; however, tree-cutting/removal will occur. Based on the review, the proposed
activities in the action area occur at a location where any incidental take that may result from
the associated activities is exempt under the Final 4(d) rule; therefore, the biological
conclusion of "may affect, not likely to adversely affect (MANLAA)" has been rendered for
NLEB for this project.
kimley-horn.com
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200, Charlotte, NC 28202
704-333-5131

Kimley»>Horn
Dwarf -flowered Heartleaf
USFWS optimal survey window: March — May
Page 3
Habitat Description: The dwarf -flowered heartleaf is a low -growing evergreen perennial plant with
beige to dark brown or purple flowers. The flowers are small and often found beneath leaf
litter. The species prefers acidic soils along bluffs and north -facing slopes. The dwarf -flowered
heartleaf grows in boggy areas next to stream heads, and along the slopes of nearby hillsides.
Biological Conclusion: May affect, not likely to adversely affect (MANLAA)
Potentially suitable habitat for dwarf -flowered heartleaf is present on the subject property
along the north -facing slopes of hills and streams. A review of the NCNHP records, updated
on January 20th, 2022, indicates no known occurrences within 1.0 miles of the subject
property. Pedestrian surveys were conducted by Kimley-Horn biologists throughout areas of
potentially suitable habitat on April 12, 2022. Hexastylis arifolia was observed. Although no
individuals of dwarf -flowered heartleaf were observed, the presence of potentially suitable
habitat in the project area results in a "May affect, not likely to adversely affect (MANLAA)."
Bald Eagle and Golden Eagle Protection Act
USFWS optimal survey window: November through March
Habitat Description: Habitat for the bald eagle primarily consists of mature forests in proximity to
large bodies of open water for foraging. Large dominant trees are utilized for nesting sites,
typically within 1.0 mile of open water. A desktop-GIS assessment of the project study area,
as well as the area within a 1.13-mile radius (1.0 mile plus 660 feet) of the project limits, was
performed on June 21', 2022 using 2021 color aerials. No bodies of open water large enough
or sufficiently open to be considered potential feeding sources were identified. In addition, a
review of the NCNHP database, updated on January 20th, 2022, revealed no known
occurrences. Due to the lack of known occurrences, or observed individuals or nests, it has
been determined that the proposed project will not affect this species.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
kimley-horn.com
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200, Charlotte, NC 28202
704-333-5131

Kimley»>Horn
Statement of Qualifications:
Investigator:
Education:
Experience:
and confirmed Schweinitz's sunflower community, York County, SC, October 2016; Performed
numerous (40+) protected species habitat assessments and/or surveys for protected species on
various public and private projects.
Responsibilities: Natural communities assessments, threatened and endangered species habitat
assessments and surveys, wetland and stream delineations, GPS, GIS, stream and wetland functional
assessments, tree surveys
Page 4
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
B.A. Geography, 2007; Certificate in Geographic Information Systems, 2007
Environmental Scientist, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., 2007-Present; Identified
Investigator: Gabby Barajas
Education: B.S. Environmental Sciences, 2021
Experience: Environmental Analyst, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., 2021-Present
Responsibilities: Natural communities assessments, threatened and endangered species habitat
assessments and surveys, wetland and stream delineations, GPS, GIS, tree surveys
Investigator: Doug Fox
Education: B.S. Environmental Sciences, 2021
Experience: Environmental Analyst, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., 2022-Present
Responsibilities: Natural communities assessments, threatened and endangered species habitat
assessments and surveys, wetland and stream delineations, GPS, GIS, tree surveys
Please provide concurrence regarding the survey results and biological conclusions as well as any
other possible issues that might emerge with respect to protected species as a result of the proposed
project. Thank you in advance for your timely response and cooperation. Please email
([e-mail]) a copy of your reply to my attention and/or send an original
copy by mail. Please feel free to contact me at [phone] if you have any questions or if
additional information is necessary.
Sincerely,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
Environmental Scientist
•
kimley-horn.com
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200, Charlotte, NC 28202
704-333-5131

4/28/22, 11:59 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
IPaC
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical
habitat (collectively referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's
(USFWS) jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced
below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but
that could potentially be directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area.
However, determining the likelihood and extent of effects a project may have on trust
resources typically requires gathering additional site -specific (e.g., vegetation/species
surveys) and project -specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the
USFWS office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to
each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI
Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that
section. lr
.406
Location
en° 0
Cleveland and Gaston counties, North Carolina
.
r•�
Local office
•
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
t. [phone]
fi [phone]
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/BUTMFTT6QVDO5DHZPWQBG21Y7Y/resources 1/13

4/28/22, 11:59 AM
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
IPaC: Explore Location resources
http://www.fws.gov/nc-es/es/countyfr.html
#ose
cp�
s"
FOB
\40,c
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/BUTMFTT6QVDO5DHZPWQBG21Y7Y/resources 2/13

4/28/22, 11:59 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis
of project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each
species. Additional areas of influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes
areas outside of the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in
that area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a fish population even if that fish does not occur at
the dam site, may indirectly impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow
downstream). Because species can move, and site conditions can change, the species on this
list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project area. To fully determine any
potential effects to species, additional site -specific and project -specific information is often
required.
00>k‘
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the
Secretary information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be
present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted,
funded, or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list
which fulfills this requirement can only be obtained by requesting an official species list from
either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC (see directions below) or from the local field
office directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC
website and request an official species list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Login (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed species1 and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown
on this list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction.
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also
shows species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for
more information. IPaC only shows species that are regulated by USFWS (see FAQ).
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/BUTMFTT6QVDO5DHZPWQBG21Y7Y/resources 3/13

4/28/22, 11:59 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office
of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
Mammals
NAME STATUS
Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis Threatened
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045
Reptiles
NAME STAT
Bog Turtle Glyptemys muhlenbergii SAT
1)°C°°‘4
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6962
13
Insects
NAME OC'S STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Flowering Plants
Candidate
NAME STATUS
Dwarf -flowered Heartleaf Hexastylis naniflora
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2458
Critical habitats
Threatened
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the
endangered species themselves.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/BUTMFTT6QVDO5DHZPWQBG21Y7Y/resources 4/13

4/28/22, 11:59 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS AT THIS LOCATION.
Migratory birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act1 and the Bald and Golden
Eagle Protection Acts.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and
consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gov/prograVmig y pecies
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds
https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/avoiding-and-miniOzing-incidental-take-
migratory-birds
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds
https://www.fws.gov/sites/defaultifiles/onents/nationwide-standard-conservation-
measures.pdf
,c\o‘'‘
at r-birds/s
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the
USFWS Birds of -Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project
location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is
generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor
a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact
locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your
project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range
and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and
models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are
available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important
information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your
migratory bird report, can be found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization
measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF
PRESENCE SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be
present and breeding in your project area.
NAME
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/BUTMFTT6QVDO5DHZPWQBG21Y7Y/resources 5/13

4/28/22, 11:59 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
BREEDING SEASON (IF A
BREEDING SEASON IS
INDICATED FOR A BIRD ON
YOUR LIST, THE BIRD MAY
BREED IN YOUR PROJECT AREA
SOMETIME WITHIN THE
TIMEFRAME SPECIFIED, WHICH
IS AVERY LIBERAL ESTIMATE
OF THE DATES INSIDE WHICH
THE BIRD BREEDS ACROSS ITS
ENTIRE RANGE. "BREEDS
ELSEWHERE" INDICATES THAT
THE BIRD DOES NOT LIKELY
BREED IN YOUR PROJECT
AREA.)
Eastern Whip -poor -will Antrostomus vociferus Breeds May 1 to Aug 20
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska. ir
Kentucky Warbler Oporornis formosus •\)\;4
Breeds Apr 20 to Aug 20
CI)11
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska. Vib
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Probability of Presence Summary
Breeds May 1 to Jul 31
Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 31
Breeds May 10 to Sep 10
Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/BUTMFTT6QVDO5DHZPWQBG21Y7Y/resources 6/13

4/28/22, 11:59 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely
to be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your
project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and
understand the FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before
using or attempting to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (■)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s)
your project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-
week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey
effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One
can have higher confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also
high.
1114
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps.
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events
for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted
Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in
week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of
presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence
at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of
presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season ( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds
across its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your
project area.
Survey Effort ( )
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of
surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The
number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data ( )
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/BUTMFTT6QVDO5DHZPWQBG21Y7Y/resources 7/13

4/28/22, 11:59 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are
based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
SPECIES
probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Eastern Whip- ++--
poor-will
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its
range in the
continental
USA and
Alaska.)
Kentucky
Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its
range in the
continental
USA and
Alaska.)
Prairie Warbler
gitC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its
range in the
continental
USA and
Alaska.)
'-1 __ 1111 Ib-
.0c\O
._._..IInn i�mrd��P
Go
--- +InuIIIIIIIII---
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/BUTMFTT6QVDO5DHZPWQBG21Y7Y/resources 8/13

4/28/22, 11:59 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Prothonotary ++--
Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its
range in the
continental
USA and
Alaska.)
Red-headed
Woodpecker
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its
range in the
continental
USA and
Alaska.)
Wood Thrush
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its
range in the
continental
Alaska.) r:fic,
USA and
1111
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds.
-+��
+11111-Ica GO
-
---- 1111111111111111
I I N1i_
III 1111 1111 IIII II__
,c1;s\O
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all
birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds
are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the
locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure.
To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of
Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity
you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) and other
species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/BUTMFTT6QVDO5DHZPWQBG21Y7Y/resources 9/13

4/28/22, 11:59 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge
Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science
datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid
cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because
they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a
particular vulnerability to offshore activities or development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area.
It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially
present in your project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially
occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by
the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and
citizen science datasets . t 4 )
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes
available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret
them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering,
migrating or year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All
About Birds Bird Guide, or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest there), the Cornell Lab of
Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season
associated with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point
within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in
\IPyour project are
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their
range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin
Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in
the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either
because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in
offshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or
longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in
particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of
rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and
minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/BUTMFTT6QVDO5DHZPWQBG21Y7Y/resources 10/13

4/28/22, 11:59 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and
groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data
Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to
you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal
maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird
Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the
year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional
information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact
Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
*444
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating
the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of
priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what
other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the migratory
birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability
of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project
footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black
vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is
the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as
more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a
lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there,
and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look
for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to
avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn
more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can implement
to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources
page.
Facilities
National Wildlife Refuge lands
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/BUTMFTT6QVDO5DHZPWQBG21Y7Y/resources 11/13

4/28/22, 11:59 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must
undergo a 'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the
individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns.
THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS AT THIS LOCATION.
Fish hatcheries
THERE ARE NO FISH HATCHERIES AT THIS LOCATION.
444:10111
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
i
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District.
v
WETLAND INFORMATION IS NOT AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME
This can happen when the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map service is unavailable, or
for very large projects that intersect many wetland areas. Try again, or visit the NWI map to
view wetlands at this location.
„Friwwk
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level
information on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of
high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A
margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular
site may result in revision of the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image
analysts, the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work
conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any
mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There
may be occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted
on the map and the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/BUTMFTT6QVDO5DHZPWQBG21Y7Y/resources 12/13

4/28/22, 11:59 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of
aerial imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or
submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and
nearshore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also
been excluded from the inventory. These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial
imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe
wetlands in a different manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or
products of this inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local
government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies.
Persons intending to engage in activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should
seek the advice of appropriate federal, state, or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory
programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such activities.
so-c
\#-"
o''s
FOB
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/BUTMFTT6QVDO5DHZPWQBG21Y7Y/resources 13/13

• ■■■
■■ • NC DEPARTMENT OF
■ ■•■E NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
• ■■■
April 28, 2022
Doug Fox
Kimley-Horn
200 South Tryon Suite 200
Charlotte, NC 28202
RE: SeefriedKings Mountain
Dear Doug Fox:
Roy Cooper, Governor
D. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Buchanan
Deputy Director, Natural Heritage Program
NCNHDE-17824
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project
boundary. These results are presented in the attached `Documented Occurrences' tables and map.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is documented within the project area or indicated within a one -mile
radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional
correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund
easement, or an occurrence of a Federally -listed species is documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at [e-mail] or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOVRCES
Q 121 W. JONES STREET. RALEIGH. NC 27603 • 16S1 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEIGH. NC 27699
OFC 'M9.707.9120 • FAX [phone]

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Intersecting the Project Area
Seefried_Kings _Mountain
April 28, 2022
NCNHDE-17824
No Element Occurrences are Documented within the Project Area
There are no documented element occurrences (of medium to very high accuracy) that intersect with the project area. Please note, however, that although the
NCNHP database does not show records for rare species within the project area, it does not necessarily mean that they are not present; it may simply mean that
the area has not been surveyed. The use of Natural Heritage Program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys if needed, particularly if the project
area contains suitable habitat for rare species. If rare species are found, the NCNHP would appreciate receiving this information so that we may update our
database.
No Natural Areas are Documented within the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within Project Area*
N7aed ,=71=111 Owner
City of Kings Mountain Open Space City of Kings Mountain
Owner Type
Local Government
NOTE: If the proposed project intersects with a conservation/managed area, please contact the landowner directly for additional information. If the project intersects with a Dedicated Nature Preserve
(DNP), Registered Natural Heritage Area (RHA), or Federally -listed species, NCNHP staff may provide additional correspondence regarding the project.
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/help. Data query generated on April 28, 2022; source: NCNHP, 01, April 2022. Please
resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 4

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Seefried_Kings _Mountain
April 28, 2022
NCNHDE-17824
No Element Occurrences are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Nam-IPII Owner Owner Type
City of Kings Mountain Open Space City of Kings Mountain Local Government
City of Kings Mountain Open Space City of Kings Mountain Local Government
City of Kings Mountain Open Space City of Kings Mountain Local Government
Crowders Mountain State Park NC DNCR, Division of Parks and Recreation State
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/help. Data query generated on April 28, 2022; source: NCNHP, Q1, April 2022. Please
resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 3 of 4

W King St
tain St
V Gold St
April 28, 2022
Managed Area (MAREA)
❑ Buffered Project Boundary
❑ Project Boundary
NCNHDE-17824: Seefried_Kings_Mountain
E Ridge St
E King St
Sources. Esri, Airbus DS. USGS. NGA. NASA, CGIAR. N Robinson. NOEAS.
NLS. OS, NMA. Geodatastyrelse , Rijkswaterstaat GSA, Geoland FEMA,
Intermap and the GIS user community
Sources. Esri, HERE. Garmin. FAO. NOAA, USGS. © OpenStreetMap
contributors, and the GIS User Community
Page 4 of 4

Bridges St
Lackey St
h rn c Fulton St
g• -se
P
� Walker St
be u
c • Morris St
V
Orr Ter
P° O
�a
aQ o
y
s/y D
G p^ ry
0
enix St
Q� a
B 2
OJ
O
si Lynn St
01 n \\�
ao_ . Bennett
G\c
%IISt °` -
° Y
N 5 °
T ° ax oc E Parker St o roa,
N z Z
Ellis St 3 j oil ct
2 $
m z o y jjj i. E Ridge St
Z O
z EKing st
fn
O Es
tkuntam F.st N
_emet.ry
10l
y
In a
Id St in a a Kings
o ▪ °Mountain
= Oa' a? ay Spruce St o
`' Oak h $
n $1
*Pg c O
G
0 5 ;n
7n!
$t ao .
a �
ae0 o S'
,St
a'!
Slater St c
o`
M"tY S t
\\ Ston is
E Gold St
Nd
as Sadie St
a "St I
��, III auney Ave
N
Owe,
Bennett Stl
IK
j Charles St
till dN
a
oa
10'
o a
� a
East End Ave
v0
/)Car,urY Rd g:
nN '
, Or"'
li
NA
Kimley >> Horn
Legend
Project Boundary
Figure 1
Vicinity Map
Seefried - Kings Mountain Site
Kings Mountain, Cleveland and Gaston County, NC
June 2022

Kimley >>Horn
Figure 2
USGS Topographic (Kings Mountain) Map
Seefried - Kings Mountain Site
Kings Mountain, Cleveland and Gaston County, NC
June 2022

.A 4 r � i is i V:i a UC r � 3
Legend ° • , , N g� �p yyq g�
•• - t ., _-.fie" `': , 35 **'• �'A`i.�
o Project Boundary },•, t
r�
Potential T/E Species Habitat R 4*' ✓ - ¢`rliar
Dwarf-Flowered heartleaf 5�
NLEB � 4 1► a• + \40
1''
- -'''- - 1 Irr—,„ipi.:,,;:?::'It-* ,,,,, ...,..1. ,40i,,,,,, ir."„....
.. ,„,
.,_ ,., _ ,1,,,,,, -,,
,,, , .
. , ,
,,,,,,;„ _ , 1,,,,
..
, ,4. , , ,
- . ,,, A., .
•'a yy • �4 ♦ ili < aft *AV* 4 . 4+ -N.
•
1 ' 7-ift -'
-' v:
•
.. .:'„1. , '-R �,,-ter - 1, iy 1
147
` wI a1•1 '� d °s „ 1,.E r ! }" t .
. :a r
•
,.• '[ ` T# 14. ,a%,f'.•` -44 *",`err ,f�' t.,:.
� °fit *� i' �. tr '' '.I'' '' - e. 7 .a.., '
X ;� M#',70-1}.�,4,,, �,. �,�' , 4 n its), 4. }}��__k hR]] 1 .rF' > 7 a , -�, -
i' +' • .- St �f•
5� !l .
.w••,A:•;,,,..•• 'A,=
l 1 1 'fir 1 YS - on° \
u
a k ytx tff 44y� At� : e .t lt;, \it; "' $'t
a
:'
Nrti
��i? ,R t`'\r '.- a sal. rf 'r 1' .ge 3 ,* t F •'t +., t
41(s
rr n ' a' i 'g t7t. T x k@
tt. 'yzy n
• � tp, Y st�.. ',�yr, 'a' ,�,Ti R �[S`'.�� . 0 � 1 a 'd� '1°' � �� �' �+ 1 � ,
r t � ^+ � ,,� •'�1�R{ �.,e w y �' t."- ti ,�. ,M! r et - r ti.t,X• 1.
41r al#if i''�' , .+ 4 ti _ 44 .. rsf k4�.. `' v,;' 'ijr�, �(`n .`°444(1.
.. °,, ,,��-pp ti `�, y . • s A ,� .tf ''''.t -4 t y .•.. \Q 1 4 r ' t. # J a ^'a`F
k.
' .-.r b _ • ,,,,, � n: ,i ,G *- its a l*Y.y ��]%
i
- r
tii
'4 «tom a '_�� t .,5 'S r `r ,} • +-' 94Lr ,.K # y qh ' --- '
iy ,r. M t K r
F, V
��y j. t 11 .CC �yyq. .,/I�F,
11 �r �, Alt "g,,,' 'S ''s� ♦ Iv, ik .� `� L'4 2 , 1F
i.'+' - #` A t, , 1 l', !� °3 #'... Ft y 4+ q) y�` r '' JJ 1'+Y. ,
' ;� .s ,. '6 a t k p; h' ,t 4 ` .}•�1 i .*/ 1,1 ii R to.6r 'V. ' ,'N,
E . i,„Hf 5S '• !Y }'C Y.J , If. 3 '�� '�fi ` • r ..
+ R .,' ,:.. . ,',t�, „ik a 4S ' 1` \ "',«.e - .'i'° ,c:..1, y a F :r ... r -% J•li��, Oa' .. . r ... J
,
rce****.k, '4)=-‘ - . .',...e0 ,t, ‘0;'.'''', ..., N-44-4.,,,' '' '-' '''' . ' ',' 'it'., 4.- ',--- •5 .. - c 40- .•- -.' -..„. , •-.••.44;`,.&744(.1.,',I
tt
or .. r„ ,ftr,k!,,*',N,',4..p `.., ...,?:„,,,, -" 4,(..`,..
,,,, : '-', ),:i.,,„kf, ::.i. ..-,77‘,V:'1,,..,..,,,;-,,.,,,-..-.,:p4,-„..0.-.`,,.. , :\'' - '14, ' ,.„ :-,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,, : ,\%,.,_, ''', .,,-
1,7 '.,
:/" ' f R !� 1Ab 1 '- / r. _s � e - j . P
,':
R .
•
t ' 9 fi
-
a k �. t
•
t "l�\o , 4• ,y,F �,.
v Feet
A. ?ati.f • ice"-�' ,.;a a�; R: +�i"
Figure 3
Potential Species Habitat Map
Seefried - Kings Mountain Site
Kim ley >> Horn Kings Mountain, Cleveland and Gaston County, NC
June 2022

Photo Page 1
f 4; '1 ti t J'i �{ 1
4 �' '�f ,110 ,,��� f • .,,., v ,f !, 1 '
iuv- � St �.-.Lif
ap.` i - -!_ o k
.,\
4
- 9�'� _ 4 a �`- ,..., - .''
''''f 1 $_ii.:L44 at* , `,
It
n +ram .>r- "-" ,t" p [ �;
i a „ads ,/ a lX�3 ate
f_44.,,,, 'AC
414
���vv J ° � y >+ g�
r.
"`�" R^•��" / + -� �.4€ � �'*?}c: *3"�,, � '�-s:�t �'t� + � lit P.
•
' s as- '1� s- a ,q � - iM ' '
,1 1 i. 1 1.,,, I . ! rt ,, Nre \. I t,:14c. V ,
'".'K .:4."s s '�6 ".d' a is iy x,. • t ,at.
• .:, ' � ., ,, AliB)su, ' ate;:.
Photo 1 —Potential Myotis septentrionalis(NLEB)summer roosting habitat(trees>3 in dbh).
-� i �1 a _ I� r '�d �1{ � r �t. :� �f� - ems.�" ,'.,� i� C Its
haolo
f:l �
eL r � iA i yA,c I*11\:!,e., i 1, 1:\,.*:40 f
lk , 1 h"To
7y T _ t
� I f(�' � f 4 14 # � 84;1 1l( #-,,,k , i 411111 q
swi � � �€ � � l % �s� lIr I A'z �
.w �,;, yam. �, " i.
f
J7' '�. $ - J'�;• ,,n yiy@ i, ' .b F, ,,'3 ''w -�a1 'a 31 : ��k
� . "' - .,��-1-E J#' . 'r :sue
,,,,,„,..„4„.. .4„.,,i* ....,... , , ,,,.41, .1- ,,,
i �, fd yT toy
Ir
y..
` ' to c. pi
cE g n n ,Y
is.
6 M ergs r
r'.170 r. x r s '�z ' I fni r 40.171, ti,
Photo 2—Potential Myotis septentrionalis habitat in forested areas on-site.
Title Photo Pages
Seefried Kings mountain. Site Prepared By
Project Kings Mountain,Cleveland and Gaston County,NC
Date Project Number Kim
»>Horn
02/09/2022&04/27/2022 019854007

Photo Page 2 . . ,. --.1 11,..- - - ., .1%.;::.; 'lip ,..,.,..,;„.,:,: . :. ,„.,:,. -„e.
.. ,.. ... : ,.. ../. ..,..0„..,..„:„..„4, i.. ,. ., :,,,, :, .,,, „. „::,,.0. : , :,...0......„,. . ,,:.
i .._ .
. . , , . . . „
... .....,,. ; , , ..
,. .. . .
,, 1 .
,.. :- :,:,...
: A /
.,:„..„......,.... :: .
: ....,..i. ...... .:: ,...,, „:-,.
.--._., :...*„.„. .
.:,. ...,„:7.1,'
r 4
''...-: •'. .1. -..,'''.-- 0.' - A-4:ilit. -7:".-....-^". '-'-:.-i,'..,..:-,,...;('-:,-, -e".-- "' '-.-,.., -,4 .,;:t.g.
pri-
may+ '/
Photo 3-Potential Hexastylis nanifl{ora habitat on northern facing slopes of streams.
ill
4
� f✓at t «�t� � � t $ s -.# 4t+ k -" U 3
K r c Y //,
M;r f
a k„�'H a' -v x?� i ',�.". 1 r
�:, # .7 x _
kip
y �r -_
- -. oy
`a + ;
Photo 4-Potential Hexastylis nan flora habitat on northern facing slopes of streams.
Title Photo Pages
Seefried Kings Mountain Site Prepared By
Project Kings Mountain,Cleveland and Gaston County,NC
Date Project Number Kimley»>Horn
02/09/2022&04/27/2022 019854007

Photo Page 3 {{q� u y
Il +r a I . 1s r 1
� , ) 1A
ri Ik S
i
it '• ' '1414- '..f' '''`' ,'' t ''"%7=4*''''' ``,. 1, 'f: ' 1/,, -
' , 'w .-1., 1
-.. r� as
Y r 3ry I : rS#w1 s-' .X a.5 .� a : rCti
,..,,,„.,,, . _,;(.11.•
... , .......„..
,,., , .„!
L.
4t4ec �i 1�
,
� ^re:: pry'^ k`,�.- `�s*. :1- ` +"-i �,•'`� "t
Yc:, ,e�. 4L-�' '"l-...'_41:48, '"=RNA $., 5a,1..� . ,, ,1 ,
� •t. ! q-- JDTI �N�4..MM1„ 5 M110- Y
Photo 4—Potential Hexastylis nanflora habitat on northern facing slopes of streams.
Title Photo Pages
Seefried Kings Mountain Site Prepared By
Project Kings Mountain,Cleveland and Gaston County,NC
Date Project Number '
02/09/2022&04/27/2022 019854007

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper Office of Archives and History
Secretary D. Reid Wilson Deputy Secretary, Darin J. Waters, Ph.D.
July 21, 2022
Doug Fox
Kimley-Horn
200 South Tryon Street Suite 200
Charlotte, NC 28202
[e-mail]
Re: Construct Seefried Kings Mountain Site industrial site, Canterbury Road, Kings Mountain,
Cleveland and Gaston Counties, ER 22-1702
Dear Mr. Fox:
Thank you for your email of June 22, 2022, regarding the above -referenced undertaking. We have reviewed
the submittal and offer the following comments.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected
by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579
or [e-mail]. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
Ramona Bartos, Deputy
1) State Historic Preservation Officer
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6898

Kimley»>Horn
June 22, 2022
Ms. Renee Gledhill -Earley
Environmental Review Coordinator
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-4617
Re: Seefried Kings Mountain Site
Kings Mountain, Cleveland & Gaston County, NC
Dear Ms. Gledhill -Earley,
Kimley-Horn is writing this letter on behalf of our client, Seefried Industrial Properties Inc., to request a review and
comment on any possible issues that might emerge with respect to cultural resource issues associated with the
proposed project in Kings Mountain, NC.
The proposed project site is located along Canterbury Road in Kings Mountain, Cleveland and Gaston County,
NC. (Figures 1-3). The proposed project seeks to construct industrial development.
We request that you review the site based on the attached information to determine the presence of any
archeological, cultural, or historic resources. If a response has not been received within 30 days, we will assume
that you have reviewed the project area and that there are no issues to address at the present time.
Thank you in advance for your timely response and cooperation. Please email ([e-mail])
a copy of your reply and/or send an original copy by mail. If you have any questions regarding this request, please
feel free to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Taylor Kiker
Environmental Scientist
kimley-horn.com
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200, Charlotte, NC 28203
704 333 5131

Bridges St
Lackey St
h rn c Fulton St
g• -se
P
� Walker St
be u
c • Morris St
V
Orr Ter
P° O
�a
aQ o
y
s/y D
G p^ ry
0
enix St
Q� a
B 2
OJ
O
si Lynn St
01 n \\�
ao_ . Bennett
G\c
%IISt °` -
° Y
N 5 °
T ° ax oc E Parker St o roa,
N z Z
Ellis St 3 j oil ct
2 $
m z o y jjj i. E Ridge St
Z O
z EKing st
fn
O Es
tkuntam F.st N
_emet.ry
10l
y
In a
Id St in a a Kings
o ▪ °Mountain
= Oa' a? ay Spruce St o
`' Oak h $
n $1
*Pg c O
G
0 5 ;n
7n!
$t ao .
a �
ae0 o S'
,St
a'!
Slater St c
o`
M"tY S t
\\ Ston is
E Gold St
Nd
as Sadie St
a "St I
��, III auney Ave
N
Owe,
Bennett Stl
IK
j Charles St
till dN
a
oa
10'
o a
� a
East End Ave
v0
/)Car,urY Rd g:
nN '
, Or"'
li
NA
Kimley >> Horn
Legend
Project Boundary
Figure 1
Vicinity Map
Seefried - Kings Mountain Site
Kings Mountain, Cleveland and Gaston County, NC
June 2022

Kimley >>Horn
Figure 2
USGS Topographic (Kings Mountain) Map
Seefried - Kings Mountain Site
Kings Mountain, Cleveland and Gaston County, NC
June 2022

:,..• •:- i-, . 1 'rr 'x ler-likiti# r flijr.:!": - /
Legend -or it
/ i 4,, ..
Project Boundary ' \'.." .p 's_f d R.11';-,4,„,..,-„,;,
.Y �. *_
{ 4 i
I..,,e,.'*'I f.#1,c .4,,,0.,,
•I A
Kings �' ' -i y, A.t
It-
-0ak " 1,
Cir
-='1 w'k + Tom, k. f r�i r K,
IV yt
F�I1,''1..4,,"6,-',,,t-s.,, .N-',',
:#t.",,.:111,:t_1':*
-.:l•:"-f,',*l-9y,..''
t :
,. -, •., ; .,.,,, .„t.'.,'''..,
,:.'1 .. .,i,r r,.,, ,-----','',,,,,,,'',,'‘..,.. -t,,
-.,,•.,, „.'_ ..*-"',"-,'+,,`,
'11..40.,\r 4'%'--'"'--44...-4-_:4--1--'':-1:-:6,.4:,.,'::‘..“..,,:':'
I,'*-t4l'iL,i,o.i•I t'_.:14;"4
4"'-e-'—
v'-g"-':4 stl_.-'li'I'kl4:,
11:'.v 6-'Ll,..'
a . r'_'r'r':I:t.t-'\.''..'4''\''
r.
.-4-i k:.°t:tlf.r's,:j.,i"r'P'g:.:'':•''144v"—:*'L:'4-'4.'-1'',t:.
4 f},
--' ' ' .'t ' ' '.'\' '''' ' : .ii:1;:17--''''''''4:''''':-r:k\.\\:k1,%'*/\:4''2'o''\''''
!14,..4-.k-,g ,,,
q .
4 1
I':*r:
T
t,r,1
**j,' ti. S, i, -z •,
fie °' X,. "'�666 '4J" 4 Y r Y
r ,�ylF K' `= i L a 4 , _ c f• a �' a �; �
iP+ ,
•
•
t r F a. �`Oil! rrr� e }*` •,,,,4, o
_ a ? ., , ,
f �FA o n
_ + A 29
JJ r. t
n. 7
F/ 3 , e .
'� V,
I.,'
Ct 4. , \ /e �,r*
41/44/if
" r h \ \, -
L '''''''
r . .,...:,.,,„..
, 1„, .
t, '� , 'ee tiw / 4'
IV .........111)11V „....4.; '
", .�� '144-1�►. '11.4. " v '*" ' `, Feet
Figure 3
Aerial Map
Seefried - Kings Mountain Site
Kim ey >> Horn Kings Mountain, Cleveland and Gaston County, NC
June 2022