540120_Inspection_20220518

Facility Number
Di\ ision or Water Resources
01)h-ision of Soil and Rater Conservation
a Other Agency
Type orb hit: • Compliance inspection Operation Rrvic►s ❑ Strteclure Evaluation O'I'echnical Assistance
Reason for A isit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follor -up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
-14s-2Z
Arrival Time:
is Is- 1
Departure Time:
County: k^^u, v Region:
Farm N nw: W r Owner Email:
Owner Name: rtiq, G 1,� .Ci rti44 3
Mailing Address: 6.1.4 Lk 1\3' v l e\ NC_ 53_3
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Phone:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Rack -up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Title:
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
W'e n to Feeder
feeder to Finish
V 5
0
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Lints
Boars
Other
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator: _J_1IC-,C{-►
Certification lumber:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
1_a4er
\inn-l.;jti L r
Design Current
Dr► Poultr4. Ca acity Po
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1 is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (lt' yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (1f yes, notify L)WR) ❑ Yes ❑ N ❑ NA ❑ NE
2, Is There evidence ofa past discharge from any part of the operation? D Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
3, Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Cattle
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non- )airy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cove
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes El No CI NA ❑NE
D Yes ] No 0 NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
5/12l2020 Continued

Facility' Number: 1-JL - 4 0
[}ate of Inspection: br—/ - 22
Waste ('olleeti°n & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus stone storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. Ilyes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3
identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
75
Structure 4
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i-e-. large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes
waste management or closure plant?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Structure 5
D't'EQ JDNA ❑NE
Np ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement"?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, andior wet stacks)
9. Does any pan of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
14'aste Application
10. Are there any required buffers. setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
l 1. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? if yes. check the appropriate box below.
❑Yes Na ❑NA ❑NE
E(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
0 Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes "No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes p/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
O Yes Oh NA El NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > lb% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
D Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Typc(s): Cera1 C$ , 5i
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
l7. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Yes
▪ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Other:
[,(N o
allo
'N o
[(No
Ef;No
diNo
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
El NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
DNA ONE
21. Does record keeping need improvement? if yes. check the appropriate box below. IBlYes ❑ No
L� Y'r c' ir tee) Waste Analysis Soil Analysis Waste Transfers
asrc Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑ ys� ❑ Ys ❑
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ l20 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 0 Yes
23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑N
Page 2of3
❑ NA ONE
❑Weather Code
0 Sludge Survey
DNA ONE
❑NA ❑NE
5/22/2020 Confirmed

rFacility Number: 5Lr - Q
Date of Inspection: S- t - 2271
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? [I'm, check
the appropriate boxes) below,
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ['Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
Litt strucnsre(s) and date cif first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. raid the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 0 Yes a(No ❑ NA [] NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
if yes, Contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the 0 Yes No ❑ NA D NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
3 I . Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below, ❑ Yes o Q NA ❑ NE
D Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other_
❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
0 Yes No CI NA [] NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CA W41 P'' Q 1'4, ❑ 1,~l0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ i'es N 0 NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes Itio ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #).: Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better e+plain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
CbYcLA -e. L0 2. 2.
oc i7vt occ eor j
tA)
-t:.L ; s 3- - z1
5 AZ.. 09
,ti)O,a3
5m G rce,.er.„_ aP i)k r c. rti O t 2
Crck1 Grc_53 `'t \t CC )
ma . 5 J r A-o rnaNkt. 5,4 -EC - C lv e
c1 1,L
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/inspector Signature:
Page 3of3
k Vs i e Leh 202 l
Peon? y 7^o231
Date: 7—
2/4/2011