Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout310035_Digester Influent/Effluent Sample Results_20220726envirochem ANALYTICAL & CONSULTING CHEMISTS Environmental Chemists, Inc. 6602 Windmill Way, Wilmington, NC 28405 • 910.392.0223 Lab • 910.392.4424 Fax 710 Bowsertown Road, Manteo, NC 27954 • 252.473.5702 Lab/Fax 255-A Wilmington Highway, Jacksonville, NC 28540 • 910.347.5843 Lab/Fax info@environmentalchemists.com Smithfield Hog Productions - Warsaw Post Office Box 856 Warsaw NC 28398 Attention: Amy Elmore Date of Report: Jul 12, 2022 Customer PO #: Customer ID: 08110011 Report #: 2022-11365 Project ID: M & M Lab ID 22-27543 Test Sample ID: Site: Influent Method Collect Date/Time 6/17/2022 9:05 AM Matrix Water Results Sampled by Derek Brown Date Analyzed Sulfur Copper Zinc Ammonia Nitrogen Total Phosphorus Fecal Coliform Total Nitrogen (Calc) Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN) Nitrate+Nitrite-Nitrogen Total Nitrogen EPA 200.7 EPA 200.7, Rev 4 4, 1994 EPA 200.7, Rev 4.4. 1994 EPA 350.1, Rev 2.0, 1993 SM 4500 P (F-H)-2011 SM 9222 D-2015 MF EPA 351.2, Rev 2.0, 1993 EPA 353.2, Rev 2.0, 1993 Total Nitrogen 122 mg/L 12.2 mg/L 21.1 mg/L 700 mg/L 204 mg/L 07/11/2022 07/08/2022 07/08/2022 06/30/2022 06/27/2022 6000000 Colonies/100mL 06/17/2022 1240 mg/L 0.18 mg/L 1240 mg/L 06/28/2022 06/22/2022 06/28/2022 Lab ID 22-27544 Test Sample ID: Site: Effluent Method Collect Date/Time 6/17/2022 9:10 AM Matrix Water Results Sampled by Derek Brown Date Analyzed Sulfur Copper Zinc Ammonia Nitrogen Total Phosphorus Fecal Coliform Total Nitrogen (Calc) Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN) Nitrate+Nitrite-Nitrogen Total Nitrogen EPA 200 7 EPA2007 Rev 44.1994 EPA 200.7. Rev 4 4. 1994 EPA 350 1, Rev 2 0. 1993 SM 4500 P (F-H)-2011 SM 9222 D-2015 MF EPA 351.2, Rev. 2.0, 1993 EPA 353.2, Rev. 2.0, 1993 Total Nitrogen 47.9 mg/L 4.52 mg/L 5.72 mg/L 820 mg/L 131 mg/L 07/11/2022 07/05/2022 07/05/2022 06/30/2022 06/27/2022 72700 Colonies/100mL 06/17/2022 1100 mg/L 0.17 mg/L 1100 mg/L 06/28/2022 06/22/2022 06/28/2022 Comment: Reviewed by: !]`\ (it(1" Report # 2022-11365 Page 1 of 1 Environmental Chemist, Inc., Wilmington, NC Lab #94 ClientS,i,[R1 406 Sample Receipt Checklist 6602 Windmill Way Wilmington, NC 28405 910.392.0223 Date: 17 oaa Report Number: oR a " I t 3(p 5' Receipt of sample: ECHEM Pickup Client Delivery ■ UPS • FedEx • Other • • YES • NO N/A 1. Were custody seals present on the cooler? • YES • NO N/A 2. If custody seals were present, were they intact/unbroken? Original temperature upon receipt J (Ok. / °C (S .ram Corrected temperature upon receipt °C How temperature taken: • Temperature Blank Against Bottles IR Gun ID: Thomas Traceable S/N 192511657 IR Gun Correction Factor °C: 0.0 • YES • NO 3. If temperature of cooler exceeded 6°C, was Project Mgr./QA notified? j 1 YES • NO 4. Were proper custody procedures (relinquished/received) followed? Xi YES • NO 5. Were sample ID's listed on the COC? O. YES • NO 6. Were samples ID's listed on sample containers? 14 YES ■ NO 7. Were collection date and time listed on the COC? M YES • NO 8. Were tests to be performed listed on the COC? tI YES ■ NO 9. Did samples arrive in proper containers for each test? 51 YES ■ NO 10. Did samples arrive in good condition for each test? ,7 YES ■ NO 11. Was adequate sample volume available?' YES ■ NO 12. Were samples received within proper holding time for requested tests? 9 YES ■ NO 13. Were acid preserved samples received at a pH of <2? * • YES ■ NO 14. Were cyanide samples received at a pH >12? IJYES • NO 15. Were sulfide samples received at a pH >9? YES • NO 16. Were NH3/TKN/Phenol received at a chlorine residual of <0.5 m/L? ** • YES • NO 17. Were Sulfide/Cyanide received at a chlorine residual of <0.5 m/L? ■ YES • NO 18. Were orthophosphate samples filtered in the field within 15 minutes? * TOC/Volatiles are pH checked at time of analysis and recorded on the benchsheet. ** Bacteria samples are checked for Chlorine at time of analysis and recorded on the benchsheet. Sample Preservation: (Must be completed for any sample(s) incorrectly preserved or with headspace) Sample(s) were received incorrectly preserved and were adjusted accordingly by adding (circle one): H2SO4 HNO3 HCI NaOH Time of preservation: If more than one preservative is needed, notate in comments below Note: Notify customer service immediately for incorrectly preserved samples. Obtain a new sample or notify the state lab if directed to analyzed by the customer. Who was notified, date and time: Volatiles Sample(s) were received with headsoacP COMMENTS: DOC. QA.002 Rev 1 :aNn0a1/Nanl 0 0 0 o CD' a v 33 CD Iv XJ tD 3 .Q rc m m — 4 3 4 N E 1 I 1' R -, • -I; 1 y T. LEfflluent c CD v ^� Relinquished By: :-,-.1 ,..) o ..:4 ,.... , y. Collection Date Time Temp s .a •• r J —0 0 Sample Type 0 n 0 n 0 n 0 n 0 n 0 0 0 n o n 0 n 0 n Composite or Grab to n E a4 0 73 0 0 0 0-0 0 13 0 13 0 13 0 10 0 10 Container (P or G) r m -I -< 1/4.."--1 50 f _ _ Received By: = Effluent, W = Well, ST = Stre, PRESERVATION Z J O o o O W Z = = S Z ~O X X X s. NV X N .4 X X . Copper, Sulfur. Zinc TN, TP, NH3 -n N Fecal TN, TP, NH3 Copper, Sulfur. Zinc t. v CD 3 N :ss]aaae Client: Smithfield Hog Production i 4 0 n 0 O mesiemaaoug3 Aw :01.UOd38 :31/1It/N 13V1NO3 PROJECT NAME: Wastewater/Digester 3 2 0 Z -n 0 Z O -MMMtI— :ON lUOd3a 3 7 0 c .11 fa m _. <•�a 3 w - at Iv S W c 3 N(O ra i, 3 O 3 co Z n N A A p Vt