HomeMy WebLinkAbout310035_Digester Influent/Effluent Sample Results_20220726envirochem
ANALYTICAL & CONSULTING CHEMISTS
Environmental Chemists, Inc.
6602 Windmill Way, Wilmington, NC 28405 • 910.392.0223 Lab • 910.392.4424 Fax
710 Bowsertown Road, Manteo, NC 27954 • 252.473.5702 Lab/Fax
255-A Wilmington Highway, Jacksonville, NC 28540 • 910.347.5843 Lab/Fax
info@environmentalchemists.com
Smithfield Hog Productions - Warsaw
Post Office Box 856
Warsaw NC 28398
Attention: Amy Elmore
Date of Report: Jul 12, 2022
Customer PO #:
Customer ID: 08110011
Report #: 2022-11365
Project ID: M & M
Lab ID
22-27543
Test
Sample ID:
Site: Influent
Method
Collect Date/Time
6/17/2022 9:05 AM
Matrix
Water
Results
Sampled by
Derek Brown
Date Analyzed
Sulfur
Copper
Zinc
Ammonia Nitrogen
Total Phosphorus
Fecal Coliform
Total Nitrogen (Calc)
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN)
Nitrate+Nitrite-Nitrogen
Total Nitrogen
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7, Rev 4 4, 1994
EPA 200.7, Rev 4.4. 1994
EPA 350.1, Rev 2.0, 1993
SM 4500 P (F-H)-2011
SM 9222 D-2015 MF
EPA 351.2, Rev 2.0, 1993
EPA 353.2, Rev 2.0, 1993
Total Nitrogen
122 mg/L
12.2 mg/L
21.1 mg/L
700 mg/L
204 mg/L
07/11/2022
07/08/2022
07/08/2022
06/30/2022
06/27/2022
6000000 Colonies/100mL 06/17/2022
1240 mg/L
0.18 mg/L
1240 mg/L
06/28/2022
06/22/2022
06/28/2022
Lab ID
22-27544
Test
Sample ID:
Site: Effluent
Method
Collect Date/Time
6/17/2022 9:10 AM
Matrix
Water
Results
Sampled by
Derek Brown
Date Analyzed
Sulfur
Copper
Zinc
Ammonia Nitrogen
Total Phosphorus
Fecal Coliform
Total Nitrogen (Calc)
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN)
Nitrate+Nitrite-Nitrogen
Total Nitrogen
EPA 200 7
EPA2007 Rev 44.1994
EPA 200.7. Rev 4 4. 1994
EPA 350 1, Rev 2 0. 1993
SM 4500 P (F-H)-2011
SM 9222 D-2015 MF
EPA 351.2, Rev. 2.0, 1993
EPA 353.2, Rev. 2.0, 1993
Total Nitrogen
47.9 mg/L
4.52 mg/L
5.72 mg/L
820 mg/L
131 mg/L
07/11/2022
07/05/2022
07/05/2022
06/30/2022
06/27/2022
72700 Colonies/100mL 06/17/2022
1100 mg/L
0.17 mg/L
1100 mg/L
06/28/2022
06/22/2022
06/28/2022
Comment:
Reviewed by: !]`\ (it(1"
Report # 2022-11365 Page 1 of 1
Environmental Chemist, Inc., Wilmington, NC Lab #94
ClientS,i,[R1 406
Sample Receipt Checklist
6602 Windmill Way
Wilmington, NC 28405
910.392.0223
Date: 17 oaa Report Number: oR a " I t 3(p 5'
Receipt
of sample: ECHEM Pickup Client Delivery ■
UPS • FedEx • Other •
• YES
• NO
N/A
1. Were custody seals present on the cooler?
• YES
• NO
N/A
2. If custody seals were present, were they intact/unbroken?
Original temperature upon receipt J (Ok. / °C (S .ram Corrected temperature upon receipt °C
How temperature taken: • Temperature Blank Against Bottles
IR Gun ID: Thomas
Traceable S/N 192511657 IR Gun Correction Factor °C: 0.0
• YES
• NO
3. If temperature of cooler exceeded 6°C, was Project Mgr./QA notified?
j 1 YES
• NO
4. Were proper custody procedures (relinquished/received) followed?
Xi YES
• NO
5. Were sample ID's listed on the COC?
O. YES
• NO
6. Were samples ID's listed on sample containers?
14 YES
■ NO
7. Were collection date and time listed on the COC?
M YES
• NO
8. Were tests to be performed listed on the COC?
tI YES
■ NO
9. Did samples arrive in proper containers for each test?
51 YES
■ NO
10. Did samples arrive in good condition for each test?
,7 YES
■ NO
11. Was adequate sample volume available?'
YES
■ NO
12. Were samples received within proper holding time for requested tests?
9 YES
■ NO
13. Were acid preserved samples received at a pH of <2? *
• YES
■ NO
14. Were cyanide samples received at a pH >12?
IJYES
• NO
15. Were sulfide samples received at a pH >9?
YES
• NO
16. Were NH3/TKN/Phenol received at a chlorine residual of <0.5 m/L? **
• YES
• NO
17. Were Sulfide/Cyanide received at a chlorine residual of <0.5 m/L?
■ YES
• NO
18. Were orthophosphate samples filtered in the field within 15 minutes?
* TOC/Volatiles are pH checked at time of analysis and recorded on the benchsheet.
** Bacteria samples are checked for Chlorine at time of analysis and recorded on the benchsheet.
Sample Preservation: (Must be completed for any sample(s) incorrectly preserved or with headspace)
Sample(s) were received incorrectly preserved and were
adjusted accordingly
by adding (circle one): H2SO4 HNO3 HCI NaOH
Time of preservation: If more than one preservative is needed, notate in
comments below
Note: Notify customer service immediately for incorrectly preserved samples. Obtain a new sample or
notify the state lab if directed to analyzed by the customer. Who was notified, date and time:
Volatiles Sample(s) were received with headsoacP
COMMENTS:
DOC. QA.002 Rev 1
:aNn0a1/Nanl
0
0
0
o
CD'
a
v 33
CD Iv
XJ
tD
3
.Q
rc
m
m
— 4
3
4 N
E
1
I
1'
R
-,
•
-I;
1
y
T.
LEfflluent
c
CD
v
^�
Relinquished By:
:-,-.1
,..)
o
..:4
,....
,
y.
Collection
Date Time Temp
s
.a
••
r
J
—0
0
Sample
Type
0
n
0
n
0
n
0
n
0
n
0
0
0
n
o
n
0
n
0
n
Composite
or
Grab
to
n
E
a4
0
73
0
0
0
0-0
0
13
0
13
0
13
0
10
0
10
Container
(P or G)
r
m
-I
-<
1/4.."--1
50
f _ _ Received By:
= Effluent, W = Well, ST = Stre,
PRESERVATION
Z J O o o O W
Z = = S Z ~O
X
X
X
s.
NV
X
N
.4
X
X
.
Copper, Sulfur. Zinc
TN, TP, NH3
-n
N
Fecal
TN, TP, NH3
Copper, Sulfur. Zinc
t.
v
CD
3
N
:ss]aaae
Client: Smithfield Hog Production
i 4
0
n
0
O
mesiemaaoug3 Aw :01.UOd38
:31/1It/N 13V1NO3
PROJECT NAME: Wastewater/Digester
3
2
0
Z
-n
0
Z
O
-MMMtI— :ON lUOd3a
3
7
0
c .11
fa
m _.
<•�a
3
w -
at Iv
S W c
3
N(O ra
i,
3
O
3 co Z
n
N A
A p
Vt