Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout310039_Digester Influent/Effluent Sample Results_20220726envirochem ANALYTICAL & CONSULTING CHEMISTS Environmental Chemists, Inc. 6602 Windmill Way, Wilmington, NC 28405 • 910.392.0223 Lab • 910.392.4424 Fax 710 Bowsertown Road, Manteo, NC 27954 • 252.473.5702 Lab/Fax 255-A Wilmington Highway, Jacksonville, NC 28540 • 910.347.5843 Lab/Fax info@environmentalchemists.com Smithfield Hog Productions - Warsaw Post Office Box 856 Warsaw NC 28398 Attention: Amy Elmore Date of Report: Jul 12, 2022 Customer PO #: Customer ID: 08110011 Report #: 2022-11366 Project ID: Benson Farm Lab ID 22-27545 Test Sample ID: Site: Influent Collect Date/Time Matrix 6/17/2022 7:55 AM Water Method Results Sampled by Derek Brown Date Analyzed Sulfur Copper Zinc Ammonia Nitrogen Total Phosphorus Fecal Coliform Total Nitrogen (Calc) Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN) Nitrate+Nitrite-Nitrogen Total Nitrogen EPA 200 7 EPA 200.7, Rev 4.4, 1994 EPA 200.7, Rev 4.4, 1994 EPA 350.1, Rev. 2.0, 1993 SM 4500 P (F-H)-2011 SM 9222 D-2015 MF EPA 351.2, Rev 2 0, 1993 EPA 353.2, Rev. 2.0, 1993 Total Nitrogen 319 mg/L 86.4 mg/L 99.8 mg/L 920 mg/L 1190 mg/L 07/11/2022 07/08/2022 07/08/2022 06/30/2022 06/27/2022 5410 Colonies/100mL 06/17/2022 2510 mg/L 0.23 mg/L 2510 mg/L 06/28/2022 06/22/2022 06/28/2022 Lab ID 22-27546 Test Sample ID: Site: Effluent Method Collect Date/Time 6/17/2022 8:00 AM Sulfur Copper Zinc Ammonia Nitrogen Total Phosphorus Fecal Coliform Total Nitrogen (Calc) Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN) Nitrate+Nitrite-Nitrogen Total Nitrogen EPA 200.7 EPA 200 7 Rev 4 4, 1994 EPA2007 Rev44. 1994 EPA 350 1 Rev 2 0 1993 SM 4500 P (F-H)-2011 SM 9222 D-2015 MF EPA 351.2, Rev, 2.0, 1993 EPA 353.2, Rev. 2.0, 1993 Total Nitrogen Matrix Water Results Sampled by Derek Brown 71.9 mg/L 9.96 mg/L 8.94 mg/L 1200 mg/L 162 mg/L Date Analyzed 07/11/2022 07/05/2022 07/05/2022 06/30/2022 06/27/2022 145000 Colonies/100mL 06/17/2022 1410 mg/L 0.36 mg/L 1410 mg/L 06/28/2022 06/22/2022 06/28/2022 Comment: Reviewed by: Report #.: 2022-11366 Page 1 of 1 Environmental Chemist, Inc., Wilmington, NC Lab #94 Client& fl \ ab Receipt of sample: 6602 Windmill Way Wilmington, NC 28405 910.392.0223 Sample Receipt Checklist Date: ( J/7 icl()N Report Number: oR a —I( 3 Co ECHEM Picku . 7A -•._... ��.�...,y u '�� u reuc LJ utner u • YES • NO N/A 1. Were custody seals present on the cooler? • YES • NO N/A 2. If custody seals were present, were they intact/unbroken? Original temperature upon receipt /5 , ► 'C J. C.Q_ Corrected temperature upon receipt "C How temperature taken: • Temperature Blank Against Bottles IR Gun ID: Thomas Traceable S/N 192511657 IR Gun Correction Factor'C: 0.0 • YES • NO 3. If temperature of cooler exceeded 6*C, was Project Mgr./QA notified? l 1 YES • NO 4. Were proper custody procedures (relinquished/received) followed? {K1 YES • NO 5. Were sample ID's listed on the COC? k YES • NO 6. Were samples ID's listed on sample containers? 4 YES • NO 7. Were collection date and time listed on the COC? k, YES • NO 8. Were tests to be performed listed on the COC? kl YES • NO 9. Did samples arrive in proper containers for each test? 51 YES • NO 10. Did samples arrive in good condition for each test? :Iltj YES • NO 11. Was adequate sample volume available?' 21 YES • NO 12. Were samples received within proper holding time for requested tests? YES 0 NO 13. Were acid preserved samples received at a pH of <2? * • YES • NO 14. Were cyanide samples received at a pH >12? • YES • NO 15. Were sulfide samples received at a pH >9? YES • NO 16. Were NH3/TKN/Phenol received at a chlorine residual of <0.5 m/L? ** YES • NO 17. Were Sulfide/Cyanide received at a chlorine residual of <0.5 m/L? • YES • NO 18. Were orthophosphate samples filtered in the field within 15 minutes? * TOC/Volatiles are pH checked at time of analysis and recorded on the benchsheet. ** Bacteria samples are checked for Chlorine at time of analysis and recorded on the benchsheet. Sample Preservation: (Must be completed for any sample(s) incorrectly preserved or with headspace) Sample(s) were received incorrectly preserved and were adjusted accordingly by adding (circle one): H2504 HNO3 HCI NaOH Time of preservation: If more than one preservative is needed, notate in comments below Note: Notify customer service immediately for incorrectly preserved samples. Obtain a new sample or notify the state lab if directed to analyzed by the customer. Who was notified, date and time: Volatiles Sample(s) were received with headsnara COMMENTS: DOC. QA.002 Rev 1 o CD 3 to co F • a N co Os :DNnoaVNanl 4 m .12 Q. co Q. Transfer Relinquished By: Date/Time 1. Efflluent • 5 - c co 7 Sample Identification I I c°" 1 G ICOPY TO: Client: Smithfield Hog Production ADDRESS: • cr- v v at Collection Y o E t 3CD w 0 �-1 V CD 3 3 .v Sample Type REPORT TO: Amy Elmore/Warsaw PROJECT NAME: Wastewater/Digester CONTACT NAME: 0 n 0 0 0 n o n 0 n 0 n 0 n 0 n 0 n 0 n Composite or Grab w y E (-- --.,-1 c - _...., ....., = Effluent, W = Well, ST = Stre; PRESERVATION o 3 0 o w = N z Q x z x x z I- o X X X N X N. a --F- X X CD 3 lv PHONE/FAX: REPORT NO: Z2,-' 1 PO NO: Fecal TN, TP, NH3 Copper, Sulfur. Zinc TN, TP, NH3 Copper, Sulfur. Zinc m 0 0 PO C) 0 m 0 Z n Z 0 C) cn --I 0 0 0 co y 7 l ci 0 (D 3 cn m Zz o • < z 00 mZm • E -I -n O • m O - Z z A D r x `• ^ / il ♦ 1