HomeMy WebLinkAbout310039_Digester Influent/Effluent Sample Results_20220726envirochem
ANALYTICAL & CONSULTING CHEMISTS
Environmental Chemists, Inc.
6602 Windmill Way, Wilmington, NC 28405 • 910.392.0223 Lab • 910.392.4424 Fax
710 Bowsertown Road, Manteo, NC 27954 • 252.473.5702 Lab/Fax
255-A Wilmington Highway, Jacksonville, NC 28540 • 910.347.5843 Lab/Fax
info@environmentalchemists.com
Smithfield Hog Productions - Warsaw
Post Office Box 856
Warsaw NC 28398
Attention: Amy Elmore
Date of Report: Jul 12, 2022
Customer PO #:
Customer ID: 08110011
Report #: 2022-11366
Project ID: Benson Farm
Lab ID
22-27545
Test
Sample ID:
Site: Influent
Collect Date/Time Matrix
6/17/2022 7:55 AM Water
Method Results
Sampled by
Derek Brown
Date Analyzed
Sulfur
Copper
Zinc
Ammonia Nitrogen
Total Phosphorus
Fecal Coliform
Total Nitrogen (Calc)
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN)
Nitrate+Nitrite-Nitrogen
Total Nitrogen
EPA 200 7
EPA 200.7, Rev 4.4, 1994
EPA 200.7, Rev 4.4, 1994
EPA 350.1, Rev. 2.0, 1993
SM 4500 P (F-H)-2011
SM 9222 D-2015 MF
EPA 351.2, Rev 2 0, 1993
EPA 353.2, Rev. 2.0, 1993
Total Nitrogen
319 mg/L
86.4 mg/L
99.8 mg/L
920 mg/L
1190 mg/L
07/11/2022
07/08/2022
07/08/2022
06/30/2022
06/27/2022
5410 Colonies/100mL 06/17/2022
2510 mg/L
0.23 mg/L
2510 mg/L
06/28/2022
06/22/2022
06/28/2022
Lab ID
22-27546
Test
Sample ID:
Site: Effluent
Method
Collect Date/Time
6/17/2022 8:00 AM
Sulfur
Copper
Zinc
Ammonia Nitrogen
Total Phosphorus
Fecal Coliform
Total Nitrogen (Calc)
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN)
Nitrate+Nitrite-Nitrogen
Total Nitrogen
EPA 200.7
EPA 200 7 Rev 4 4, 1994
EPA2007 Rev44. 1994
EPA 350 1 Rev 2 0 1993
SM 4500 P (F-H)-2011
SM 9222 D-2015 MF
EPA 351.2, Rev, 2.0, 1993
EPA 353.2, Rev. 2.0, 1993
Total Nitrogen
Matrix
Water
Results
Sampled by
Derek Brown
71.9 mg/L
9.96 mg/L
8.94 mg/L
1200 mg/L
162 mg/L
Date Analyzed
07/11/2022
07/05/2022
07/05/2022
06/30/2022
06/27/2022
145000 Colonies/100mL 06/17/2022
1410 mg/L
0.36 mg/L
1410 mg/L
06/28/2022
06/22/2022
06/28/2022
Comment:
Reviewed by:
Report #.: 2022-11366 Page 1 of 1
Environmental Chemist, Inc., Wilmington, NC Lab #94
Client& fl \ ab
Receipt of sample:
6602 Windmill Way
Wilmington, NC 28405
910.392.0223
Sample Receipt Checklist
Date: ( J/7 icl()N Report Number: oR a —I( 3 Co
ECHEM Picku
. 7A -•._... ��.�...,y u '�� u reuc LJ utner u
• YES
• NO
N/A
1. Were custody seals present on the cooler?
• YES
• NO
N/A
2. If custody seals were present, were they intact/unbroken?
Original temperature upon receipt /5 , ► 'C J. C.Q_ Corrected temperature upon receipt "C
How temperature taken: •
Temperature Blank Against Bottles
IR Gun ID: Thomas
Traceable S/N 192511657 IR Gun Correction Factor'C: 0.0
• YES
• NO
3. If temperature of cooler exceeded 6*C, was Project Mgr./QA notified?
l 1 YES
• NO
4. Were proper custody procedures (relinquished/received) followed?
{K1 YES
• NO
5. Were sample ID's listed on the COC?
k YES
• NO
6. Were samples ID's listed on sample containers?
4 YES
• NO
7. Were collection date and time listed on the COC?
k, YES
• NO
8. Were tests to be performed listed on the COC?
kl YES
• NO
9. Did samples arrive in proper containers for each test?
51 YES
• NO
10. Did samples arrive in good condition for each test?
:Iltj YES
• NO
11. Was adequate sample volume available?'
21 YES
• NO
12. Were samples received within proper holding time for requested tests?
YES
0 NO
13. Were acid preserved samples received at a pH of <2? *
• YES
• NO
14. Were cyanide samples received at a pH >12?
• YES
• NO
15. Were sulfide samples received at a pH >9?
YES
• NO
16. Were NH3/TKN/Phenol received at a chlorine residual of <0.5 m/L? **
YES
• NO
17. Were Sulfide/Cyanide received at a chlorine residual of <0.5 m/L?
• YES
• NO
18. Were orthophosphate samples filtered in the field within 15 minutes?
* TOC/Volatiles are pH checked at time of analysis and recorded on the benchsheet.
** Bacteria samples are checked for Chlorine at time of analysis and recorded on the benchsheet.
Sample Preservation: (Must be completed for any sample(s) incorrectly preserved or with headspace)
Sample(s) were received incorrectly
preserved and were adjusted accordingly
by adding (circle one): H2504 HNO3 HCI NaOH
Time of preservation: If more than one preservative is needed, notate in comments below
Note: Notify customer service immediately for incorrectly preserved samples. Obtain a new sample or
notify the state lab if directed to analyzed by the customer. Who was notified, date and time:
Volatiles Sample(s)
were received with headsnara
COMMENTS:
DOC. QA.002 Rev 1
o CD
3 to
co F
• a
N co
Os
:DNnoaVNanl
4
m
.12
Q.
co
Q.
Transfer Relinquished By: Date/Time
1.
Efflluent
•
5
-
c
co
7
Sample Identification
I I c°" 1 G ICOPY TO:
Client: Smithfield Hog Production
ADDRESS:
•
cr-
v
v
at
Collection
Y
o
E
t
3CD
w
0
�-1
V
CD
3
3
.v
Sample
Type
REPORT TO: Amy Elmore/Warsaw
PROJECT NAME: Wastewater/Digester
CONTACT NAME:
0
n
0
0
0
n
o
n
0
n
0
n
0
n
0
n
0
n
0
n
Composite
or
Grab
w
y
E
(--
--.,-1
c
-
_....,
.....,
= Effluent, W = Well, ST = Stre;
PRESERVATION
o 3 0 o w
= N z Q x
z x x z I- o
X
X
X
N
X
N.
a
--F-
X
X
CD
3
lv
PHONE/FAX:
REPORT NO: Z2,-' 1
PO NO:
Fecal
TN, TP, NH3
Copper, Sulfur. Zinc
TN, TP, NH3
Copper, Sulfur. Zinc
m
0
0
PO
C)
0
m
0
Z
n
Z
0
C)
cn
--I
0
0
0
co
y
7 l
ci
0
(D
3
cn
m
Zz
o • <
z
00
mZm
• E
-I
-n
O • m
O - Z
z
A D
r
x `• ^
/
il
♦ 1