Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0029246_Permit (Issuance)_20040526NPDES DOCUMENT WCANNINC COVER SLEET NC0029246 Linwood Yard NPDES Permit: Document Type: Permit Issuance Wasteload Allocation Authorization to Construct (AtC) Permit Modification Complete File - Historical Correspondence Speculative Limits Instream Assessment (67b) Environmental Assessment (EA) Permit History Document Date: May 26, 2004 This document is printed on reuse paper - iaazore any content on the re'rerse side � � T NCDENR Mr. C.J. Wehrmeister V.P. Safety and Environmental Norfolk Southern Railway Company 110 Franklin Road SE, Box 13 Roanoke, Virginia 24042 Dear Mr. Wehrmeister: Michael F. Easley Governor William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director Division of Water Quality May 26, 2004 Subject: Issuance of NPDES Permit NC0029246 Linwood Yard Davidson County Division personnel have reviewed and approved your application for renewal of the subject permit. Accordingly, we are forwarding the attached NPDES discharge permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency dated May 9, 1994 (or as subsequently amended). Division personnel have reviewed your request to eliminate several parameters from the permit NC0029246. Based on applicable rules and policies the following modifications to the permit have been implemented: • Monitoring requirements for MBAS were eliminated from the permit. After the latest changes implemented during the Triennial Review, the MBAS standard only applies to waters classified as Water Supply. • The monitoring frequency for Phenols was reduced to monthly. • The monitoring frequency for Total Suspended Solids (TSS) was reduced to monthly. The request to eliminate Chronic Toxicity, Phenols and TSS from the permit cannot be granted. Phenols is a water quality limited parameter and should be monitored in accordance with 15A NCAC 2B.0508. However, due to the facility's low levels of Phenols and TSS, the Division has reduced the monitoring to monthly. As for Chronic Toxicity testing, in 15A NCAC 2B.0208 the Division is mandated to protect waters from toxic impacts. Further, toxicity test limits are applied to discharges of complex wastewater as per 15A NCAC 2B .0508. The minimum monitoring frequency for toxicity testing is defined as quarterly. If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30) days following receipt of this letter. This request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings N. C. Division of Water Quality / NPDES Unit 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us Phone: (919) 733-5083 fax: (919) 733-0719 DENR Customer Service Center. 1 800 623-7748 Issuance of Permit NC0029246 Page 2 (6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714). Unless such demand is made, this decision shall be final and binding. Please note that this permit is not transferable except after notice to the Division. The Division may require modification or revocation and reissuance of the permit. This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by the Division of Water Quality or permits required by the Division of Land Resources, the Coastal Area Management Act or any other Federal or Local governmental permit that may be required. If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Sergei Chernikov at telephone number (919) 733-5083, extension 594. Sincerely, Alan W. Klimek, P.E. cc: Central Files Winston-Salem Regional Office/Water Quality Section NPDES Unit Aquatic Toxicology Unit Permit NC0029246 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY PERMIT TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, Norfolk Southern Railway Company is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at the Spencer Yard I-85 Exit 88 Linwood, North Carolina Davidson County to receiving waters designated as High Rock Lake in the Yadkin Pee Dee River Basin in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III, and IV hereof. The permit shall become effective July 1, 2004. This permit and the authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on May 31, 2009 Signed this day May 26, 2004. ORIGINAL SIGNED BY SUSAN A. WILSON Alan Klimek, P.E. Division of Water Quality By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission Permit NC0029246 SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET All previous NPDES Permits issued to this facility, whether for operation or discharge are hereby revoked. As of this permit issuance, any previously issued permit bearing this number is no longer effective. Therefore, the exclusive authority to operate and discharge from this facility arises under the permit conditions, requirements, terms, and provisions included herein. Norfolk Southern Railway Company is hereby authorized to: 1. Continue to operate a 0.317 MGD industrial wastewater treatment system (Outfall 011) and a stormwater control system (Outfalls 001 through 010) at the Spencer Yard, located off I-85 (Exit 88) near Linwood in Davidson County. The industrial wastewater treatment system includes the following components: > Track collection pans > Bar screen > Grit chamber > Oil skimmers > Equalization basin > Chemical feed > pH adjustment > Dissolved air flotation unit > Flocculator > Clarifier > Aerated polishing pond > Flow meter > Sludge drying beds The stormwater control system includes the following components: > Grit chamber . > Stabilization basin > Effluent control structure 2. Discharge (at the location specified on the attached map) treated industrial wastewater (Outfall 011) from said treatment works into the South Potts Creek, currently a class C water in the Yadkin Pee Dee River Basin, and stormwater (Outfalls 001 through 010) into High Rock Lake, currently a Class WS-V water in the Yadkin Pee Dee River Basin. 1) •'r „ \L „ CI\ Latitude: 35° 4353" Nt Longitude: 80° 20' 40" USGS Quad #: El7NE River Basin N: 03-07-04 Receiving stream: South Potts Creek Streamm class: C Norfolk Southern Railway Co. Spencer Yard Davidson County NO30291=16 Permit NC0029246 A. (1) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS (011) Beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting through the expiration date, the Permittee is authorized to discharge treated industrial wastewater from outfall 011. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below: PARAMETER EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Monthly Average Daily Maximum Monthly Average, (Ibs/daft) Daily Maximum (Ibs/day) Measurement Frequency Sample Type Sample Location1 Flow 0.317 MGD Continuous Recording Influent or Effluent Oil and Grease 30.0 mglL 60.0 mglL 2/Month Grab Effluent BOD, 5-day, 20°C 36.0 mg/L 54.0 mg/L 95.2 142.8 Weekly Composite Effluent Total Suspended Solids 30.0 mg/L 45.0 mg/L 79.3 119.0 Monthly Composite Effluent Turbidity2 2/Month Grab U, D Phenols 0.032 mg/L 0.08 Monthly Grab Effluent Boron3 Quarterly Composite Effluent Dissolved Oxygen Weekly Grab Effluent, U, D Temperature Weekly Grab Effluent, U, D pH4 Between 6.0 and 9.0 standard units Weekly Grab Effluent Total Nitrogen (NO2 + NO3 + TKN) Quarterly Composite Effluent Total Phosphorus Quarterly Composite Effluent Chronic Toxicity5 Quarterly Composite Effluent Notes: 1. U: at least 100 feet upstream from the outfall. D: at least 300 feet downstream from the outfall. 2. The discharge shall not cause the turbidity of the receiving water to exceed 25 NTU. If the turbidity exceeds these levels due to natural background conditions, the discharge cannot cause an increase in the turbidity in the receiving water. 3. The following detection limits shall be met: boron (250 µg/1). 4. The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units. 5. Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) at 29%; March, June, September, and December; see A. (2). There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts. Permit NC0029246 A. (2) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS (001-010) Beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting through the expiration date, the Permittee is authorized to discharge stormwater from Outfalls 001 through 010. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below: PARAMETER EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Monthly Average Daily Maximum Measurement Frequency' Sample Type2 Sample Location3 Total Flow, MG4 Annually Grab RSDO Total Rainfall, inches4 Annually Storm Event Duration, minutes4 Annually Oil and Grease 30.0 mg/L Annually Grab RSDO Total Suspended Residue 100.0 mg/L Annually Grab RSDO Phenols Annually Grab RSDO pH5 Annually Grab RSDO Qualitative Monitoring6: Color Odor Clarity Floating solids Foam Oil sheen. Semi -Annually All SDOs Notes: 1. Measurement Frequency. Stormwater runoff shall be sampled once per year during a representative storm event, as defined in Part V of this permit. 2. Sample Type. If the stormwater runoff is controlled by a stormwater detention pond, a grab sample of the discharge from the pond shall be collected within the first 30 minutes of discharge. If the detention pond discharges only in response to a storm event exceeding a ten-year design storm, then no analytical monitoring is required and only qualitative monitoring shall be performed. 3. Sample locations: RSDO- Representative Stormwater Discharge Outfalls; these locations shall be the nearest point after final treatment but prior to actual discharge to or mixing with the receiving waters from stormwater outfalls 005 and 008. SDO- Stormwater Discharge Outfall; qualitative monitoring shall be performed at each SDO regardless of RSDO sampling (see footnote 6). 4. For each sampled representative storm event the total flow, total rainfall, and storm event duration must be monitored. Total flow shall be either: a) measured continuously; b) calculated based on the amount of area draining to the outfall, the amount of built -upon (impervious) area, and the total amount of rainfall; or c) estimated by the measurement of flow at 20 minute intervals during the rainfall event. 5. The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units. 6. Qualitative Monitoring requires a visual inspection of each stormwater outfall (SDO) for the purpose of evaluating the effectiveness of the SPPP and assessing new sources of stormwater pollution. No analytical tests are required. Qualitative monitoring does not need to be performed during a representative storm event. Semiannual monitoring shall be performed once in spring (April -June) and once in fall (September -November). There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts. Permit NC0029246 A. (3) CHRONIC TOXICITY PERMIT LIMIT (Quarterly) The treated industrial wastewater discharge shall at no time exhibit observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality to Ceriodaphnia dubia at an effluent concentration of 29%. The permit holder shall perform at a minimum, quarterly monitoring using test procedures outlined in the "North Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised February 1998, or subsequent versions or "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions. The tests will be performed during the months of March, June, September, and December. Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes. If the test procedure performed as the first test of any single quarter results in a failure or ChV below the permit limit, then multiple -concentration testing shall be performed at a minimum, in each of the two following months as described in "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions. The chronic value for multiple concentration tests will be determined using the geometric mean of the highest concentration having no detectable impairment of reproduction or survival and the lowest concentration that does have a detectable impairment of reproduction or survival. The definition of "detectable impairment," collection methods, exposure regimes, and further statistical methods are specified in the "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions. All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the months in which tests were performed, using the parameter code TGP3B for the pass/fail results and THP3B for the Chronic Value. Additionally, DWQ Form AT-3 (original) is to be sent to the following address: Attention: NC DENR / DWQ / Environmental Sciences Branch 1621 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621 Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Branch no later than 30 days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made. Test data shall be complete, accurate, include all supporting chemical/physical measurements and all concentration/response data, and be certified by laboratory supervisor and ORC or approved designate signature. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream. Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, the permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test form indicating the facility name, permit number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of the report with the notation of "No Flow" in the comment area of the form. The report shall be submitted to the Environmental Sciences Branch at the address cited above. Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, monitoring will be required during the following month. Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of Water Quality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits. NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism survival, minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last day of the month following the month of the initial monitoring. 111. Permit NC0029246 A. (4) Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan The Permittee shall develop a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan, herein after referred to as the Plan. This Plan shall be considered public information in accordance with Part II, Standard Conditions, Section E, Paragraph 10 of this individual NPDES permit. The Plan shall include, at a minimum, the following items: 1. Site Plan. The site plan shall provide a description of the physical facility and the potential pollutant sources which may be expected to contribute to contamination of stormwater discharges. The site plan shall contain the following: (a) A general location map (USGS quadrangle map or appropriately drafted equivalent map), showing the facility's location in relation to transportation routes and surface waters, the name of the receiving water(s) to which the stormwater outfall(s) discharges, or if the discharge is to a municipal separate storm sewer system, the name of the municipality and the ultimate receiving waters; and accurate latitude and longitude of the point(s) of discharge. (b) A narrative description of storage practices, loading and unloading activities, outdoor process areas, dust or particulate generating or control processes, and waste disposal practices. (c) A site map drawn to scale with the distance legend indicating location of industrial activities (including storage of materials, disposal areas, process areas and loading and unloading areas), drainage structures, drainage areas for each outfall and activities occurring in the drainage area, building locations, existing BMPs and impervious surfaces, and the percentage of each drainage area that is impervious. For each outfall, a narrative description of the potential pollutants which could be expected to be present in the stormwater discharge. (d) A list of significant spills or leaks of pollutants that have occurred at the facility during the 3 previous years and any corrective actions taken to mitigate spill impacts. (e) Certification that the stormwater outfalls have been evaluated for the presence of non-stormwater discharges. The certification statement will be signed in accordance with the requirements found in Part II, Standard Conditions, Section B, Paragraph 11. 2. Stormwater Management Plan. The stormwater management plan shall contain a narrative description of the materials management practices employed which control or minimize the exposure of significant materials to stormwater, including structural and nonstructural measures. The stormwater management plan, at a minimum, shall incorporate the following: (a) Feasibility Study. A review of the technical and economic feasibility of changing the methods of operations and/or storage practices to eliminate or reduce exposure of materials and processes to stormwater. Wherever practical, the permittee shall prevent exposure of all storage areas, material handling operations, and manufacturing or fueling operations. In areas where elimination of exposure is not practical, the stormwater management plan shall document the feasibility of diverting the stormwater runoff away from areas of potential contamination. (b) Secondary Containment Schedule. A schedule to provide secondary containment for bulk storage of liquid materials, storage of Section 313 of Title III of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) water priority chemicals, or storage of hazardous substances to prevent leaks and spills from contaminating stormwater runoff. If the secondary containment devices are connected directly to stormwater conveyance systems, the connection shall be controlled by manually activated valves or other similar devices [which shall be secured with a locking mechanism] and any stormwater that accumulates in the containment area shall be at a minimum visually observed for color, foam, outfall staining, visible sheens and dry weather flow, prior to release of the accumulated stormwater. Accumulated stormwater shall be released if found to be uncontaminated by the material stored within the containment area. Records documenting the individual making the observation, the description of the accumulated stormwater and the date and time of the release shall be kept for a period of five years. Permit NC0029246 (c) BMP Summary. A narrative description shall be provided of Best Management Practices (BMPs) to be considered such as, but not limited to, oil and grease separation, debris control, vegetative filter strips, infiltration and stormwater detention or retention, where necessary. The need for structural BMPs shall be based on the assessment of potential of sources to contribute significant quantities of pollutants to stormwater discharges and data collected through monitoring of stormwater discharges. (d) Locomotive Sanding Areas (applicable to Rail Transportation only). The plan must describe measures that prevent or minimize contamination of the stormwater runoff from areas used for locomotive sanding. The facility shall consider covering sanding areas, minimizing stormwater runon/runoff, appropriate sediment removal practices to minimize the offsite transport of sanding material by stormwater, or other equivalent measures. (e) Vehicle and Equipment Cleaning Areas. The plan must describe measures that prevent or minimize contamination of the stormwater runoff from all areas used for vehicle and equipment cleaning. The facility shall consider performing all cleaning operations indoors, covering the cleaning operation, ensuring that all washwater drain to the wastewater treatment system (i.e., not the stormwater drainage system), collecting the stormwater runoff from the cleaning area and providing treatment or recycling, or other equivalent measures. If connection to the wastewater treatment system is not available to the facility and cleaning operations take place outdoors, the cleaning operations shall take place on grassed or graveled areas to prevent point source discharges of the washwater into the storm drains or surface waters. Where cleaning operations can not be performed as described above and when operations are performed in the vicinity of a storm drainage collection system, the drain is to be covered with a portable drain cover during clean activities. Any excess ponded water shall be removed and properly handled by pump to the wastewater treatment system prior to removing the drain cover. Detergents used outdoors shall be biodegradable and the pH adjusted to be in the range of 6 to 9 standard units. (f) Remote Fueling Operations. If remote fueling (or other vehicle maintenance activities ) are conducted at off site locations but coordinated from the permitted facility, the plan shall include a component that describes the stormwater management practices and BMPs used to prevent and/or minimize the contamination of stormwater from such activities. 3. Spill Prevention and Response Plan. The Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP) shall incorporate an assessment of potential pollutant sources based on a materials inventory of the facility. Facility personnel (or team) responsible for implementing the SPRP shall be identified. A responsible person shall be on -site at all times during facility operations that have the potential to contaminate stormwater runoff through spills or exposure of materials associated with the facility operations. The SPRP must be site stormwater specific. Therefore, a SPCC plan may be a component of the SPRP, but may not be sufficient to completely address the stormwater aspects of the SPRP. The common elements of the SPCC with the SPRP may be incorporated by reference into the SPRP. 4. Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Program. A preventative maintenance program shall be developed. The program shall document schedules of inspections and maintenance activities of stormwater control systems, plant equipment and systems. Inspection of material handling areas and regular cleaning schedules of these areas shall be incorporated into the program. 5. Employee Training. Training schedules shall be developed and training provided at a minimum on an annual basis on proper spill response and cleanup procedures and preventative maintenance activities for all personnel involved in any of the facility's operations that have the potential to contaminate stormwater runoff. Facility personnel (or team) responsible for implementing the training shall be identified. 6. Responsible Party. The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan shall identify a specific position(s) responsible for the overall coordination, development, implementation, and revision to the Plan. Responsibilities for all components of the Plan shall be documented and position assignments provided. Permit NC0029246 7. Plan Amendment. The permittee shall amend the Plan whenever there is a change in design, construction, operation, or maintenance which has a significant effect on the potential for the discharge of pollutants to surface waters. The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan shall be reviewed and updated on an annual basis. The Director may notify the permittee when the Plan does not meet one or more of the minimum requirements of the permit. Within 30 days of such notice, the permittee shall submit a time schedule to the Director for modifying the Plan to meet minimum requirements. The permittee shall provide certification in writing (in accordance with Part II, Standard Conditions, Section B, Paragraph 11) to the Director that the changes have been made. 8. Facility Inspection Program. Facilities are required to inspect all stormwater systems on at least a semiannual schedule, once in the fall (September -November) and once during the spring (April - June). The inspection and any subsequent maintenance activities performed shall be documented, recording date and time of inspection, individual(s) making the inspection and a narrative description of the facility's stormwater control systems, plant equipment and systems. Records of these inspections shall be incorporated into the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. 9. Implementation. The permittee shall document all monitoring, measurements, inspections and maintenance activities and training provided to employees, including the log of the sampling data and of activities taken to implement BMPs associated with the industrial activities, including vehicle maintenance activities. Such documentation shall be kept on -site for a period of five years and made available to the Director or his authorized representative immediately upon request. a_ Permit NC0029246 PART V STORMWATER DEFINITIONS 1. Best Management Practices (BMPs) Measures or practices used to reduce the amount of pollution entering surface waters. BMPs may take the form of a process, activity, or physical structure. 2. Stormwater Bypass A bypass is the known diversion of stormwater from any portion of a stormwater control facility including the collection system, which is not a designed or established operating mode for the facility. 3. Bulk Storage of Liquid Products Liquid raw materials, manufactured products, waste materials or by-products with a single above ground storage container having a capacity of greater than 660 gallons or with multiple above ground storage containers located in close proximity to each other having a total combined storage capacity of greater than 1,320 gallons. 4. Stormwater Grab Sample An individual sample collected instantaneously. Grab samples that will be directly analyzed or qualitatively monitored must be taken within the first 30 minutes of discharge. 5. Overburden Any material of any nature, consolidated or unconsolidated, that overlies a mineral deposit, excluding topsoil or similar naturally -occurring surface materials that are not disturbed by mining operations. 6. Point Source Discharge of Stormwater Any discernible, confined and discrete conveyance including, but not specifically limited to, any pipe, ditch, channel, tunnel, conduit, well, or discrete fissure from which stormwater is or may be discharged to waters of the state. 7. Representative Storm Event A storm event that measures greater than 0.1 inches of rainfall and that is preceded by at least 72 hours in which no storm event measuring greater than 0.1 inches has occurred. A single storm event may contain up to 10 consecutive hours of no precipitation. For example, if it rains for 2 hours without producing any collectable discharge, and then stops, a sample may be collected if a rain producing a discharge begins again within the next 10 hours. 8. Representative Outfall Status When it is established that the discharge of stormwater runoff from a single outfall is representative of the discharges at multiple outfalls, the DWQ may grant representative outfall status. Representative outfall status allows the permittee to perform analytical monitoring at a reduced number of outfalls. 9. Secondary Containment Spill containment for the contents of the single largest tank within the containment structure plus sufficient freeboard to allow for the 25-year, 24-hour storm event. 10. Section 313 Water Priority Chemical A chemical or chemical category which: a. Is listed in 40 CFR 372.65 pursuant to Section 313 of Title III of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) of 1986, also titled the Emergency Planning and Community Right -to - Know Act of 1986; b. Is present at or above threshold levels at a facility subject to SARA title III, Section 313 reporting requirements; and c. That meet at least one of the following criteria: Permit NC0029246 (1) Is listed in appendix D of 40 CFR part 122 on either Table II (organic priority pollutants), Table III (certain metals, cyanides, and phenols) or Table IV (certain toxic pollutants and hazardous substances); (2) Is listed as a hazardous substance pursuant to section 311(b)(2)(A) of the CWA at 40 CFR 116.4; or (3) Is a pollutant for which EPA has published acute or chronic water quality criteria. 11. Significant Materials Includes, but is not limited to: raw materials; fuels; materials such as solvents, detergents, and plastic pellets; finished materials such as metallic products; raw materials used in food processing or production; hazardous substances designated under section 101(14) of CERCLA; any chemical the facility is required to report pursuant to section 313 of Title III of SARA; fertilizers; pesticides; and waste products such as ashes, slag and sludge that have the potential to be released with stormwater discharges. 12. Significant Spills Includes, but is not limited to: releases of oil or hazardous substances in excess of reportable quantities under section 311 of the Clean Water Act (Ref: 40 CFR 110.10 and CFR 117.21) or section 102 of CERCLA (Ref: 40 CFR 302.4). 13. Stormwater Runoff The flow of water which results from precipitation and which occurs immediately following rainfall or as a result of snowmelt. 14. Stormwater Associated with Industrial Activity The discharge from any point source which is used for collecting and conveying stormwater and which is directly related to manufacturing, processing or raw material storage areas at an industrial site. Facilities considered to be engaged in "industrial activities" include those activities defined in 40 CFR 122.26(b)(14). The term does not include discharges from facilities or activities excluded from the NPDES program. 15. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan A comprehensive site -specific plan which details measures and practices to reduce stormwater pollution and is based on an evaluation of the pollution potential of the site. 16. Ten Year Design Storm The maximum 24 hour precipitation event expected to be equaled or exceeded on the average once in ten years. Design storm information can be found in the State of North Carolina Erosion and Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual. 17. Total Flow The flow corresponding to the time period over which the entire storm event occurs. Total flow shall be either; (a) measured continuously, (b) calculated based on the amount of area draining to the outfall, the amount of built -upon (impervious) area, and the total amount of rainfall, or (c) estimated by the measurement of flow at 20 minute intervals during the rainfall event. 18. Vehicle Maintenance Activity Vehicle rehabilitation, mechanical repairs, painting, fueling, lubrication, vehicle cleaning operations, or airport deicing operations. 19. Visible Sedimentation Solid particulate matter, both mineral and organic, that has been or is being transported by water, air, gravity, or ice from its site of origin which can be seen with the unaided eye. 20. 25-year, 24 hour storm event The maximum 24-hour precipitation event expected to be equaled or exceeded, on the average, once in 25 years. rt_ PUBLIC NOTICE 570.1E OF NORTH CAROUNA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSIOWNPOES UNIT tell MAIL SERVICE CENTER RALEIGH, NC ZISGFua NOTIFICATION OF INTENT TO IMAM A HPDES WASTEWATER PERNR On de bob ddamyn stag mans tied applcaon01 NCDOW*MM. ove 14121. Funk law 92.600 and dnr 1s5L Mania* end regd. eons. the Norm Cage EnvIre mantel Memorised COrtnli Mon prO poses to sets a abeam Po30 ,a Dlmler5a EEMMbn 8/Nrn w.nwvar pemtble parrxl(rg bled bowel- .5 days1Ln OvaOW awe mug. Widen comet ' fe p0ppad pwll*IN3a mewled anti 30 days>!ataa embroil date Ada run.. 7la inwaae I seoaoadybr pMat date areeeed in Ms ueld•onri •bre3opeano le pro- mnN posed owint. The DaN]or m me NC Denson deals °ably mry de- cide b ho.da m.3c m,.dng kr mo dapnae perry shodd Ise 5,300, sgnedre degree el nab0c mei est. Copan of Ma drat own:r and 0:ller sl.ppanru Inbmton on TIN used to demure renditions prosen n mat mot perms ars avertable upon r - guest and payment of the con of repronuman M.0 Wnmants end/or requests Mr information to the NC [Person of Water outlay at the oleos ddress or ea11 Ms. Vabry Stephens a (dt9) 2.11cda, ue.nsan 520. Please include Ise NPDES perm. manner (etlachoolul aM curmuJs Iron. 1,00,3bd patrol, may also vet de Derision of Water DWNy at 512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh. NC 21004.1148 between 0A noun of 3.00 a m. and 5.00 p.m to nsaeo Inlxma9an of Ha. The City of nemnM. (P.O, Btu ]6q Tmintwds, NC 2I351) Mrs ap- p%eo or renewal of NPOE8 permit N(b024112 tor the Hoy Crook WWTP n Davidson Cartly. This permitted holey duchvoes tieaad waatwvoerto the Honey Creek et du Yadkin Pao.Dee Byer Basal. Cur. runtySOD. woman nitrogen. cadmium, lead, nickel, Wromwm. yule Surge nay Owl Ileum cyanide an! rotaoutal oro'0 Itew ort=el ,30. 4,0 ono. the pdrlatnd 07Yada,n PL. Davidson Cwrr21yy Semsea b Langton, ate sal &opted a renmd or WOES L00017 fav ts CLemItendBernwamy Sreod wane. rLchnnIMr �VILLA Lint 3, DsNdean Cary. 11131 p ey pig bear GI - Groan e?ue 9w RP. Dorm SOD. reemne�ns Io9pn5 am ILO neiael 08015 ea bread 1hy dal dOeliod .1.1100M II iglol Ir appal to d NPOE8 pm* BIP50 kr !MOIL Davbson Hon Shodwe.Rewe. ar 0arrleapbdo Mean.Caney The Lev,. taellydsehrges benln0 Mealeaaeb en warned trWuy to Node Pods Can, as ow Ya0Oam Pee Dee fiver Ruh Carmen,, ra wren.. l02,1eesda1 enamine, and 000laLier �f Hy annad itlcuch:ogemaYatle.l too n Darn County Schools IndP Lexington, NMe o bwC rat .o pad goal renewal cl FPOES pony NCOOa18pp or ,s Gerard Md00;Sonor Huh 5choo wastewater treatment pee In Davidson Canty. True perm0ad Iag0y msdrerga treated w.0wdtn to an unnamed OEuta7 b Abbate, 0nek n me YMke-Palo Dee Rear lrasln. Crnandy. vmlora Mown BOO, and total resEal chorine ar.water daisy laniard. Thisdisdarga Davidson courdtlyy Vocations chotoIn lhnsirq NC hassn *Marched. el NPDES perne300041002 for 1S Serer Valley Elementary School wars. ter trea;med pant In Drvil.on County. This NomadI.9Ny db. charges owed wastewater to an unnamed v0dary to FL Swamp k the YadkmP. Dee Rorer Bien. Currently room* nbog. , may aanur ar Mrre woolllens are b•a a, ninner ond0wlelted IL 0031,�dsdwge 510d.Pn County Sd,oal3In Lexington, NC gas eppl ed be IOW,010l NPOES oaten: t:CC0a2055 Ice as tyro Mrldle Sdmol waaa0ebn try, men G071:nC(I400n County 1h, permted tangy Oladtypstrated wastewater to an urcamed vedary b Hann Fogs Cnek atolls Yadk'n Pa. Doe Rver Bass. Duna inn. ..rune mongers. SOD, ar10oW men- tal chkcneare wa:era.ktyl tad Tn3 ease/mega ravelled Lem al - boar r salaM�_nrsa p,rorton el Its watershed 1N8 D.on County' Scheele In Lad NC has app0101e newel di NPDES perm NC2042022 tor a Nonanit Olemin ey Wool VLF! warn broth.. glare n Devidwn Canny. Lb plmpa0 at y L. rtar0ea ✓sated wadawvu b Huffily. C.wk b I e YaalhPa Or Pow Base. Currently. ammoal Loam and btdnald.leandna weern40e�y tms0ad. a den.Ne nuo Lace AOweaeaaaaa into TM Norton Sown. Rahway Comere (l10 Franklin Road SC Sea 13, Ranok.. VA 24042) has sep.a for rerowd d NPOE8 pan( N:A0292s0kr me uneven Yoe n DNdson Casey 13. pemet.L. c.!ly 3101uslW wastewatertoSouth Pees ill **Val len Pee -.ended rescue are wager and gnaw. BOO, ph.rm. and o dl quality P.M. This dl.muge nay a0ad Shoe aloca0ons n ms portion d the Yadkin Pape Rho Beets owasal County salmis In 12.0903, NC tat &op'ed br alas., of NPDES prate NC0042249 ley as So0AM.md El NMMW SdpdwOsla- water lamed pan in Davidson Canty. Tins pant ed lanky env Ch00av0e(M wastewater b an unnamed trbulryb Sweae0 Croak Wm of Huh took Lake in the YMkin.P. Deo seer Basin Downy. BOO ammea NUN., and rntdraidel chlorinev. water natty Sm- iled. Ttad3derge mayalhd lulus eln0a1nn, In Mit porton a Mews. tented. WSJ. Mum B.2001 WINSTON•SALEM JOURNAL PROOF Customer: Address: Ad Number: NCDENR/DWQ/NPDES Contact: FAX / VALERY Phone: 9197335083 1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER ATTN: VALERY STEPHENS RALEIGH NC 276991617 483712 2TH CAROLINA 2SYTH COUNTY AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION -re the undersigned, a Notary Public of said County and State, duly w personally �ttissioned, qualified, and authorized by la to administer oaths, p y ared D.H. Stanfield, who being duly sworn, deposes and says: that he is roller of the Winston-Salem Journal, engaged in the publishing of a newspaper rn as Winston-Salem Journal, published, issued and entered as second class mail e City of Winston-Salem, in said County and State: that he is authorized to this affidavit and sworn statement: that the notice or other legal advertisement, e copy of which is attached hereto, was published in Winston-Salem Journal on allowing dates: that the said newspaper in which such notice, paper document, or legal rtisement was published was, at the time of each and every such publication, a paper meeting all the requirements and qualifications of Section 1-597 of the !rill Statues of North Carolina and was a qualified newspaper within the meaning action 1-597 of the general statues of North Carolina. 9th day of March, 2004 (signature of perso4{ ntflking affidavit) it to and subscribed before me, this 9th day of March 2004 'ommission expires: September 2R. 2005 ! OFFICIAL SEAL ' Tt�,•1 l NOI..ny Ponhc NGr1R Carolina CU'JN1v UE FORSYIH KIMALEY„(OH S`O,,N� f Iy C:on.nnssron Expires . -i 2. $- biic PUBLIC NOTICE STATE OF NORTH CMOUNA ENNRONNENTAL MANAGEMENT CONNIS5101YNP0E5 UNIT gar MAIL MINCE CENTER RALEIGH. NC 27699t617 11I70FIG7ON OF MOW TO ISSUE A NODES WASTEWATER PERMIT Ono* LWdmerebt staff moral and appiennn oINCGred Said to te321. Pde IOe 92.520 v0 other Ina 5rear0t orb regale Wa, to NOB, Cn0Oa Bahone ebb Mva9r0n Crer,On Ira le Owe a NOM§ Petulant Oewg, EtmbEnn Sysam S)waleMa pemtboneaLlhodb8Ow'd- WW2 eS day, d llamled Malone, y700, commend Neeepeae0413000 a®Plad area 30 rut Le ale IL Li u Nmr*nevemO ode bauteocaL peamatn 00e an Sr NCdeelmiolWar sALma pat eeoMga303mere VWaadpannlaroW IIMYPs a QOve daps dp01c rea Gees aol tv rat arch anal esennoneg nevemben M ued b d0anw0 mnaae Pecan n 00lea penman mind neon re away NPrnrwra db•awb 0111.0da601 tad matey= MINIM ernam la On NC Ormial at Vaaat L ▪ ase or =, Levy ALL. • IE R TSN90women 520 Palo ndOFF HMO ca rananbse Imadwdl narrymmwes✓ Lev Inroad perms n*i 53 ILw Deem d War Ovally S12 N. SlwAl- ey . Raleigh NC 77E0.1141 ba0sea n Nun d (Mem am she pi, brwwseennew. m S. i3pa q290d5 asawat 33arTl aq gm Loa mr2Y, NC 29a Egnp %WM n Oigmmongrel d�5TePlisd Hoagellledurrpgm0:020,2 ter Ma treated erwernoae Hanby ant nay YadMP.DaRrwBann GP mamma cn& O IOWm,W WPr .id.'CMaaI m QwMr9 may abd Ma0 alooar. alma Leann dw YaTin P✓ Ow Ls edaon o Co nroy yy UA.d.ln LULL. NC Ms wow lor wawad NPOES wee NWP83a3lee a Chadian! Elsnuntry Scheel wed* odergacmaenad Ova n Oeasen Canty i7Mnweaned ILL dva hory Crsek all �smS Larvaver la an ewt Bpop new Sodle:den. .0610 and lave voila Tort. are wdr LAW 11a dal DavidsonCarry Sdbda L0AgM, rw%LILdb rwdd WOES pane NCRV 1950 b es Wen Oes.an Ugh School wabws ter reamrslLn nDeMsm Carry TINPNm 20J%4dwgai Ytlw1Pa goals MILL. E'Lsa7rm aMbge bolo dd• Lane. and BOO ow Ler Lao iota 1'Na OWa90mp aEed5 ve.lapmdabta peon d wYanna . ■ J .df� ,111411 PUBLIC NOTICE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION NPDES UNIT 1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER RALEIGH, NC 27699-1617 NOTIFICATION OF INTENT TO ISSUE A NPDES WASTEWATER PERMIT On the basis of thor- ough staff review and , application of NC Gen- eral Statute 143.21 Public law 92-500 and other lawful standards and regulations, the North Carolina Environ- mental Management Commission proposes to issue a National Pol- lutant Discharge Elimi- nation System (NPDES) wastewater discharge permit to the person(s) listed below effective 45 days from the pub- lish date of this notice. Written comments re- garding the proposed permit will be accepted until 30 days after the publish date of this no- tice. All comments re- ceived prior to that date are considered in the final determinations regarding the proposed permit. The Director of the NC Division of Wa- ter Quality may decide to hold a public meet- ing for the proposed permit should the Divi- sion receive a signifi- cant degree of public interest. The City of Thomasville (P.O. Box 368, Thomas- ville, NC 27361) has ap- plied for renewal of NPDES permit NC0024112 for the Hamby Creek WWTP in Davidson County. This permitted facility dis- charges treated waste- water to the Hamby Creek in the Yadkin - Pee Dee River Basin. Currently BOD, ammo- nia nitrogen, cadmium, lead, nickel, chromium, selenium, cyanide and total residual chlorine are water quality limit- ed. This discharge may affect future allocations in this portion of the Pee -Dee River Basin Davidson County Schools in Lexington, NC has applied for re- newal of NPDES permit NC00029947 for its Churchland Elementary School wastewater treatment plant in Da- vidson County. This permitted facility dis- charges wastewater to an unnamed tributary to South Potts Creek in the Yadkin -Pee Dee Riv- er Basin. Currently, BOD, ammonia nitrogen and total residual chlor- ine are water quality limited. This" discharge may affect future allo- cations in this portion of the watershed. Davidson County Schools in Lexington, NC has applied for re- newal of NPDES permit NC0031950 for its West Davidson High School wastewater treatment plant in Davidson Coun- ty. This permitted facili- ty discharges treated wastewater to an un- named tributary to North Potts Creek in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin. Currently, am - Davidson County Schools in Lexington, NC has applied for re- newal of NPDES permit NC41602 for its Silver Valley Elementary School wastewater treatment plant in Da- vidson County. This permitted facility dis- charges treated waste- water to an unnamed tributary to Flat Swamp Creek in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin. Cur- rently, nitrogen, total rently ammonia nitro - residual chlorine, and gen, BOO, and total re- BOD are water quality limited. This discharge may affect future allo- cations in this portion of the watershed. Davidson County Schools in Lexington, NC has applied for re- newal of NPDES permit NC0041599 for its Cen- tral Middle/Senior High School wastewater treatment plant in Da- vidson County. This permitted facility dis- charges treated waste- water to an unnamed tributary to Abbotts Creek in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin. Cur- rently, ammonia nitro- gen, BOD, and total re- sidual chlorine are wa- ter quality limited. This discharge may affect future allocations in this portion of the water- shed. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DAVIDSON COUNTY /i-&Orr/ s sidual chlorine are wa- ter quality limited. This discharge may affect future allocations in this portion of the water- shed. Davidson County Schools ' in Lexington, NC has applied for re- newal of NPDES permit NC0042056 for its Tyro Middle School wastewa- ter treatment plant in Davidson County. This permitted . facility dis- charges'. treated waste- water to an unnamed tributary ,to North Potts Creek in .the Yadkin -Pee Dee river Basin. Cur- rently, ammonia nitro- gen, BOD, and total re- sidual Chlorine are wa- ter quality limited. This discharge may affect future allocations in this portion of the water- shed. Davidson County Schools • in Lexington, NC has applied for re- newal of•NPDES permit NC0042072 for its Northwest Elementary School wastewater treatment plant in Da- vidson County. This permitted facility dis- charges treated waste- water to Huffmans Creek in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin. Cur- rently, ammonia nitro- gen and total residual chlorine are water qual- ity limited. This dis- charge may affect fu- ture allocations in this portion of the water- shed. The Norfolk Southern Railway company (110 Franklin Road SE, Box 13, Roanoke, VA 24042) has applied for renewal of NPDES per- mit NC0029246 for the Linwood Yard in David- son County. this permit- ted facility discharges industrial 'wastewater to ' the South Potts Creek in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin. Currently, oil and grease, BOD, phenols, and total sus- pended residue are wa- ter quality limited. This discharge may affect future allocations in this portion of the Yadkin - Pee Dee River Basin. 0 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Lexington, County and State which the attached is a true ((Pk (1k day of Lcxington,N.C. ek Davidson County Schools in Lexington, NC has applied for re- newal of NPDES permit NC0042749 for its Southwood Elementary School wastewater treatment plant in Da- vidson County. This permitted facility dis- charges treated waste- water to an unnamed tributary to Swearing Creek Arm of High Rock Lake in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin. Cur- rently, BOD, ammonia nitrogen, and total re- sidual chlorine are wa- ter quality limited. This discharge may affect future allocations in this portion of the water- shed. Copies of the draft per- mit and other support- ing information on file used to determine con- ditions present in the draft permit are availa- ble upon request and payment of the costs of reproduction. Mail com- ments and/or requests for information to the NC Division of Water Quality at the above address or call Ms. Va- Iery Stephens at (919) 733-5083, extension 520. Please include the NPDES permit number (attached) in any com- munication. Interested persons may also visit the Division of Water Quality at 512 N. Salis- bury Street, Raleigh, NC 27604-1148 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. to review information on file. I 2004 of THE DISPATCH, a newspaper published in the city of aforesaid, being copy, me, this duly sworn, says the foregoing legal of was published in said newspaper once the 2004. Publication \. My commission expires Lisir) imap://sergei.chernikov%40dwq.derv.ncmail.net@cros.ncmail.net:143... Subject: Draft Permit reviews (3) From: John Giorgino <john.giorgino@ncmail.net> Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 14:23:44 -0500 To: sergei chernikov <sergei.chernikov@ncmail.net> Sergei, I have reviewed the following: NC0024112 Hamby Creek WWTP NC0037834 Archie Elledge WWTP NC0029246 Norfolk Southern Railway I have no comments concerning the tox sections. Thank you for sending them to our unit for review. John Giorgino Environmental Biologist North Carolina Division of Water Quality Aquatic Toxicology Unit Mailing _address: 1621 MSC Raleigh, NC 27699-1621 Office: 19 733-2136 Fax: 919 73'-9959 Email: John.Giorgino@ncmail.net Web Page: ;ttp:!/www.esb.enr.state.nc.us 1 of 1 4/ 14/2004 10:44 AM NORFOLK SOUTHERN Norfolk Southern Corporation Environmental Protection 110 Franklin Road, S.E. Roanoke, Virginia 24042-0013 April 28, 2004 1-9-NC-LINW-3-1 Mr. Sergei Chernikov, Ph.D. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources NPDES Unit 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 RE: Permit Modification for NC0029246, Spencer Yard in Linwood NC Dear Mr. Chernikov: Norfolk Southern Railway Company (NSRC) requests to modify the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit number NC0029246 for the Spencer Yard in Linwood, North Carolina. A recent review of the Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) from January 2002 to present for permitted Outfall 011 yields the following observations: • Phenols: The installation of carbon filtration at the on -site wastewater treatment system in 0° 01.4) 2001 has significantly reduced the concentration of phenols in the treated effluent. Monthly -T,,x fF►?� concentration and mass has averaged 0.017 mg/L and 0.03 lbs/day respectively, both _ r;„ �°c:^' S approximately 'A the permitted effluent limitations. • pfrc Total Suspended Residue: Monthly concentration and mass has averaged 5.8 mg/L and 8.2 °) �-r lbs/day respectively, both significantly below the permitted effluent limitations. • MBAS: Quarterly concentration has consistently been significantly below the permitted Qm2M effluent detection limit of 500 ug/L. • Chronic Toxicity: All quarterly chronic toxicity tests have passed. 00 ups, wA ors N�� t � �d� Ew op, 1lt Gc�-1-120i�s+C. , Based on these observations and given a past history of compliance, NSRC requests that the monitoring requirements for phenols, total suspended residue, MBAS, and chronic toxicity at permitted Outfall 011 be dropped from NPDES Permit number NC0029246. Operating Subsidiary: Norfolk Southern Railway Company Mr. Sergei Chemikov, Ph.D. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources April 28, 2004 If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me at the letterhead address or by telephone at (540) 981-4239. Sincerely, 1 j i4/ Larry G. Western Engineer Environmental Design cc: K.R. Miller, NSRC K.G. Hauschildt, NSRC G.O. Turner, NSRC Adam Czaplinski, MM&A ,a NCDENR / DWQ FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT Norfolk Southern Railway Company NPDES No. NC0029246 Facility Information (1.) Facility Name: Norfolk Southern Railway- Spencer Yard (2.) Permitted Flow (MGD): 0.317 (6.) County: Davidson (3.) Facility Class: II (7.) Regional Office: Winston-Salem (4.) Facility Status: (New or existing) Existing (8.) USGS Topo Quad: EI7NE (Southmont) (5.) Permit Status: (i.e., New, Modification, or Renewal) Renewal Stream Characteristics (1.) Receiving Stream: South Potts Creek (2.) Subbasin: 030704 (8.) Drainage Area (mi2): 13.70 (3.) Index No.: (9.) Summer 7Q10 (cfs) 1.2 (4.) Stream Classification: C (10.) Winter 7Q10 (cfs): 2.4 (5.) 303(d) Listed: NO (11.) 30Q2 (cfs): 3.1 (6.) 305(b) Status: NA (12.) Average Flow (cfs): 13.00 (7.) Use Support: (13.) IWC (%): 29% Project Notes Overview. • This is a permit renewal for a railroad fueling/maintenance operation (SIC 4011) in Davidson County. Per application, runoff and drainage from diesel fueling area, locomotive service area (5 acres), AST containment area, and buildings is routed to the 0.317 MGD industrial WWTP. The 1993 staff report mentions boron -treated cooling water used in the locomotives is also discharged. Daily average process wastewater discharge is 0.069 MGD. • In addition, stormwater runoff from the yard as a whole is routed to ten stormwater outfalls (001-010). DMR Data • The facility has 3 Whole Effluent Toxicity test failures during the previous permit cycle. • DMR data has been reviwed ffor the period January 2001 thorugh December 2003. The following NOVs were issued during the reviewe period: 04/23/03 — phenols; 02/10/03 — flow; 4/17/01 —10 turbidity violations and 3 phenol violations; 10/2/01 — oil and grease; 4/30/01 — 11 phenol violations; 2/22/01 — toxicity test failure. • Last Compliance Evaluation Inspection that was conducted on 04/28/2003 did not reveal any violations or maintenance problems. NPDES PERMIT FACT SHEET Norfolk Southern Railway Company Page 2 NPDES No. NC0029246 Permit Issues. • Instream monitoring for turbidity has been retained, since high turbidity levels have been a concern in High Rock Lake and the facility violated turbidity limits on several occasions. Based on March 2003 Basinwide Water Quality Plan, the High Rock Lake was rated as impaired due to the high levels of nutrients, chlorophyll a, turbidity, and dissolved oxygen saturation. • Based on the application, the receiving stream for Outfall 011 has been changed to South Potts Creek (Class C). No changes are proposed with current renewal. Proposed Schedule for Permit Issuance Draft Permit to Public Notice: 3/3/04 Permit Scheduled to Issue: 5/17/04 State Contact If you have any questions on any of the above information or on the attached permit, please contact Sergei Chernikov at (919) 733-5038, extension 594. Copies of the following are attached to provide further information on the permit development: • Existing permit effluent sheets with changes noted (existing facilities only) • Draft Permit Regional Office Comments Talked to regional office on 03/02/2004. They stated that company has done major upgrades to their WWTP and their compliance record has improved. Regional Recommendation by: Signature Date Reviewed and accepted by: Regional Supervisor: Signature Date NPDES Unit Supervisor: Signature Date Page 2 Version: March 2, 2004 Whole Effluent Toxicity Testing Self -Monitoring Summary January 15, 2004 FACILITY REQUIREMENT YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC New Bern WWTP 24hr p/f ac lim: 90% fthd Y 2000 - - Fail Fail NR/Fail Fail Fail Pass Pass - - Fail NC0025348/001 Begin:2/1/2001 Frcqucncy Q + Mar Jun Sep Dec + NonComp Single 2001 Fail Fail Fail Pass - Fail Fail - 45.3 - - NR/63.4 County: Craven Rcgion: WARO Subbasin: NEUMO 2002 - - 49 - - 56.2 - - 36.3 - - 29.5 PF: 4.7 Special 2003 - - 69.1 35.4 - 90 >100(s) >100(s) Pass - - Pass 7QI0: TIDAL IWC(%;NA 2004 Ncw Hanover Co. Landfill 24hr p/f ac lim: 90% fthd NC0049743/001 Bcgin:5/1/2002 Frcqucncy Q + Mar Jun Sep Dec County: Ncw Hanover Region: WIRO Subbasin: CPFI7 PF: 0.05 Special 7Q10: TIDAL IWC(%;NA 2000 - NonComp Single 2001 - 2002 - 2003 - 2004 NR/Pass Pass Pass Fait Pa- ss - Pass - - Pass - - NR/Pass - Pass - - Pass - - H - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - Pass - - Pass - - New Ilanover County Airport WWTP 24hr p/f ac bin: 90% 2000 - - N - - N - - N - - N NC0081736/001 Begin:6/I/2002 Frcqucncy Q + Mar Jun Sep Dec NonComp Single 2001 - - N - - N - - N - - N County: Ncw Hanover Region: WIRO Subbasin: CPFI7 2002 - - N - - H - - H - - H PF: 4.0 Special 2003 - - H - - H - - H - - 7Q10: TIDAL IWC(% NA 2004 Newton WWTP chr lim: 56%; upon cap 7.5MGD chr lim 66% Y 2000 - NC0036196/001 Bcgin:4/I/2001 Frcqucncy Q Mar Jun Sep Dec + NonComp Single 2001 - County: Catawba Region: MRO Subbasin: CTB35 2002 - PF: 5.0 special 2003 >100 7Q10: 6.0 IWC(%; 56.32 2004 >100 Pass - - Pass Pass - NR Pass - Pass Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Fail Pass(s) - - Pass(s) - - Pass(s) - - Norfolk Southern Railway Co. chr lim: 29% Y 2000 Pass - Pass - - Fail >90 52 Pass - - Fail NC0029246/011 Bcgin:3/I/2000 Frcqucncy Q Mar Jun Sep Dec + NonComp Single 2001 36.1 73.5 Pass - - Fail 52 52 Pass - - Pass County: Davidson Region: WSRO Subbasin: YADO4 2002 - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass PF: 0.317 Special 2003 - _ Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass 7Q10: 1.2 1WC(%; 29.0 2004 North Carolina Outward Bound School chr lim 90% NC0040754/001 Begin:10/1/2000 Frcqucncy Q Mar Jim Sep Dec County: Burke Region: ARO Subbasin: CTB3I PF: 0.0075 Special 7Q10: IWC(%;100 + NonComp Single 2000 - - - - - - - - - - - NR 2001 NR NR Pass Fail Fait Pass - - Fail - - H 2002 - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - H 2003 - - Fail >100 >100 Pass - - Fail <45 92.5 2004 North Harnett Regional WWTP 24 hr Fthd p/f ac lim: 90% NC0021636/001 Bcgin:10/I/2001 Frcqucncy Q + Jan Apr Jul Oct County: Harnett Rcgion: FRO Subbasin: CPF07 PF: 0.6 Special 7Q10: 550.0 IWC(%; 0.17 North Wilkesboro WWTP chr lim: 1.5% NC0020761/001 Begin:5/1/1999 Frcqucncy Q P/F + Jan Apr Jul Oct County: Wilkcs Rcgion: WSRO Subbasin: YADOI PF: 2.0 Special 7Q10: 196.0 1 WC(%; 1.5 + NonComp Single + NonComp Single 2000 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass 2001 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass 2002 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass 2003 Fail,Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass 2004 2000 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass 2001 Pass - - Pass - - NR/Pass - - Pass 2002 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass 2003 pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass 2004 Norwood WWTP chr lim: 2.7% NC0021628/001 Begin:6/1/2000 Frcqucncy Q Mar Jun Sep Dcc + NonComp Single County:Stanly Region: MRO Subbasin: YADI4 PF: 0.75 Special 7Q10: 42.0 IWC(% 2.68 Y 2000 - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass 2001 - - NR/Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass 2002 - - Pass - - Pass - - Fail >10.8 >10.8 Pass 2003 - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass 2004 Oakboro WWTP-001 chr lim: 19% NC0043532/001 Bcgin:12/1/2000 Frequency Q Ian Apr Jul Oct County: Stan!), Rcgion: MRO Subbasin: YADI3 PF: 0.5 Special 7Q10: 3.3 IWC(%; 19 + NonComp Single Y 2000 Fail >76 >76 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - 2001 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - - - - 2002 - - - - - - - - - NR/H - - 2003 H - - H - - H - - H - 2004 Oakboro WWTP-002 chr lim: 4.6% NC0043532/002 Begin:12/1/2000 Frcqucncy Q Jan Apr Jul Oct County:Stanly Region: MRO Subbasin: YADI3 PF: 0.9 Special 7QI0: 29 IWC(%;4.6 + NonComp Single 2000 - 2001 - 2002 Pass 2003 Pass 2004 Pa- ss Pass - - Pa- ss - - Fail Pass > 18.4 >18.4 Pass - - Pass Pass - V Prc 2000 Data Availablc LEGEND: PERM = Pcrmit Requirement LET = Administrative Lcttcr - Targct Frcqucncy = Monitoring frcqucncy: Q- Quarterly; M. Monthly; BM- Bimonthly; SA- Scmiannually; A- Annually; OWD- Only when discharging; D. Discontinued monitoring requirement Begin =First month required 7Q10 •• Receiving stream low flow criterion (cfs + = quarterly monitoring increases to monthly upon failure or N Months that testing must occur - ex. Jan, Apr, Jul, Oct NonComp = Current Compliance Requirement PF = Permitted flow (MGD) I WC% = Instrcam waste concentrati P/F = Pass/Fail tcst AC = Acute CHR = Chronic Data Notation: f - Fathead Minnow; • - Ceriodaphnia sp.; my - Mysid shrimp; ChV - Chronic value; P - Mortality of stated perccntagc at highest concentration; at - Performed by DWQ Aquatic Tox Unit; bt - Bad test Reporting Notation: --- = Data not required; NR - Not reporte Facility Activity Status: 1- Inactive. N • Newly Issued(To construct); H - Active but not discharging; t•More data available for month in question; • = ORC signature needed 32 NORFOLK SOUTHERN Norfolk Southern Corporation Environmental Protection 110 Franklin Road, S.E. Roanoke, Virginia 24042-0013 January 19, 2004 1-9-NC-LINW-3-1 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality/NPDES Unit 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 Re: Spencer Yard NPDES Permit Application Dear Sir or Madame: JAN 2 2 2004 Enclosed please find the Norfolk Southern Railway Company Spencer Yard NPDES Permit Application. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 540-981-4239. Sincerely, 7;4 )r� Larry G. Western, Engineer Environmental Design enclosure cc: K. R. Miller, NSRC K. H. Hauschildt, NSRC R. G. Cundiff, NSRC G. O. Turner, NSRC S. Denson, MM&A A. H. Czaplinski, MM&A Operating Subsidiary: Norfolk Southern Railway Company LEGEND — RAILROAD TRACKS WATER LINE — SANITARY SEWER LINE 4 — FIRE HYDRANT — POWER LINE MAIN EXIT TO CLARK ROAD AND INTERSTATE 1-85 DRAINAGE FIELD 800 GAL. SEPTIC TANK 200' 0 200' APPROXIMATE SCALE: 1" = 200' NOTE: THE LOCATIONS AND DEMINSIONS OF FEATURES SHOWN ON THIS MAP HAVE BEEN DERIVED FROM VARIOUS SOURCES AND SUPPLEMENTED BY FIELD MEASUREMENTS. THOUGH SUFFICIENT FOR ITS INTENDED PURPOSE, NO CLAIM IS MADE AS TO THE DEGREE OF ACCURACY OF THIS DRAWING. — EVACUATION ROUTE — STORM DRAINS —YARD DRAINAGE — SHUT OFF VALVE — SLOPE DIRECTION DITCH f =311116 e 1 s cD m 8 a 0 N O 0 N II • Ol (n Z PROJECT NO.: 0 aW 0 Z Z >- v i • 0 IX - <0 1 }_ rr cc VO W ZZ 111 COO O O � 3 • Z J J 0 W CC O SITE PLAN DIAGRAM AND EVACUATION PLAN FIGURE NUMBER 3 NOTE: THE LOCATIONS AND DEMINSIONS OF FEATURES SHOWN ON THIS MAP HAVE BEEN DERIVED FROM VARIOUS SOURCES AND SUPPLEMENTED BY FIELD MEASUREMENTS. THOUGH SUFFlCIENT FOR ITS INTENDED PURPOSE, NO CLAIM IS MADE AS TO THE DEGREE OF ACCURACY OF THIS DRAWING. 1,200' 0 1,200' APPROXIMATE SCALE: 1" = 1,200' 0 5 >- z a J 0 gc pcc 360 ¢ }x cc z c cc 0 0 z zc00 0 0 co Y z J 0 u. cc 0 z 0 Z 0 e c z SITE PLAN DIAGRAM OVERVIEW FIGURE NUMBER - 2500 GAL. SEPTIC TANK DRAINAGE FIELD 200' 0 200' APPROXIMATE SCALE: 1" = 200' NOTE: THE LOCATIONS AND DEMINSIONS OF FEATURES SHOWN ON THIS MAP HAVE BEEN DERIVED FROM VARIOUS SOURCES AND SUPPLEMENTED BY FIELD MEASUREMENTS. THOUGH SUFFICIENT FOR ITS INTENDED PURPOSE, NO CLAIM IS MADE AS TO THE DEGREE OF ACCURACY OF THIS DRAWING. LEGEND — RAILROAD TRACKS WATER LINE — SANITARY SEWER LINE 011) — FIRE HYDRANT - — — - — POWER LINE --DITCH v.� 0 0 0 — EVACUATION ROUTE — STORM DRAINS —YARD DRAINAGE — SHUT OFF VALVE — SLOPE DIRECTION ROUTE TO HOSPITAL 1 TO BELMONT RD & INTERSTATE 1-85 ne g:ti ti>s 000 0 N 6 Z ›- 0- O • Z 0 C< d < M Q� • O W ZZ ILL! 0 �0 w Y Z - J 0 0 Z 0 0 IW) z d z U d' a Z 0 SITE PLAN DIAGRAM AND EVACUATION PLAN FIGURE NUMBER 8 • of f 200' 0 200' — ET APPROXIMATE SCALE: 1" = 200' NOTE: THE LOCATIONS AND DEMINSIONS OF FEATURES SHOWN ON THIS MAP HAVE BEEN DERIVED FROM VARIOUS SOURCES AND SUPPLEMENTED BY FIELD MEASUREMENTS. THOUGH SUFFICIENT FOR ITS INTENDED PURPOSE, NO CLAIM IS MADE AS TO THE DEGREE OF ACCURACY OF THIS DRAWING. i • 1 I - RAILROAD TRACKS WATER LINE - SANITARY SEWER cfb — FIRE HYDRANT - - - - - POWER LINE DITCH Al: { .q ffr i LEGEND LINE { + + — gt - EVACUATION ROUTE - STORM DRAINS -YARD DRAINAGE - SHUT OFF VALVE - SLOPE DIRECTION ! i f { or Yam+ - • --- ! - { 4 1 0 0 U N cn 0 O ›- 0. O • < O z C0� <0 < }err rQ cc• ZO Z LU n aai O 0 � 3 • Z J J 0 Q 0 0 IA Z O z a mod' N SITE PLAN DIAGRAM AND EVACUATION PLAN FIGURE NUMBER 7 FORWARDING YARD POND 004 SPRAY PAINT DRUM CYLINDER AREA - E iANICA L SHOP DITCH —� 200' 0 .FLAMABLE GASF SHOP • wl SOUTH POTTS CREEK (ULVERT MPTY STORAGE TANK 08 AIR COMPRESSOR ROOM TANKS 10&11 TANKS 02, 03, 04, 05 & 07 8500 GAL. SEPTIC TANK EQUALIZATION TANK WITH SKIMMER 200' 1 APPROXIMATE SCALE: 1" = 200' NOTE: THE LOCATIONS AND DEMINSIONS OF FEATURES SHOWN ON THIS MAP HAVE BEEN DERIVED FROM VARIOUS SOURCES AND SUPPLEMENTED BY FIELD MEASUREMENTS. THOUGH SUFFICIENT FOR ITS INTENDED PURPOSE, NO CLAIM IS MADE AS TO THE DEGREE OF ACCURACY OF THIS DRAWING. OIL WATER 0 SEPARATOR TANK 06 SLUDGE DRYBEDS SURGE BASIN - RAILROAD TRACKS WATER LINE 4 - FIRE HYDRANT SANITARY SEWER LINE - SLOPE DIRECTION EMERGENCY RESPONSE TRAILER AERATION POND DRUM STORAGE AREA- -_ TREATMENT PLANT GENERATOR LEGEND - POWER LINE - EVACUATION ROUTE - STORM DRAINS X - SHUT OFF VALVE - TRANSFORMERS DISCHARGE POINT SOUTH POTTS CREEK TO YADKIN RIVER 2500 GAL. SEPTIC TANK CULVERT - REGROUPING AREA - COMMAND POST POND 005 DRAINAGE FIELD Nta ■ TANK 01 ,000,000 GAL DIESEL FUEL TANK =11111111•311., • 1 liSi b � 000 1 AUGUST 2003 a w U 8 II 0, Z PROJECT NO.: d z M ✓ • z <o S J< W W I- co Z FIGURE NUMBER 6 1 200' 0 200' APPROXIMATE SCALE: 1" = 200' NOTE: THE LOCATIONS AND DEMINSIONS OF FEATURES SHOWN ON THIS MAP HAVE BEEN DERIVED FROM VARIOUS SOURCES AND SUPPLEMENTED BY FIELD MEASUREMENTS. THOUGH SUFFICIENT FOR ITS INTENDED PURPOSE, NO CLAIM IS MADE AS TO THE DEGREE OF ACCURACY OF THIS DRAWING. LEGEND — RAILROAD TRACKS — WATER LINE — SANITARY SEWER LINE — FIRE HYDRANT — POWER LINE DITCH CULVERT — EVACUATION ROUTE — STORM DRAINS —YARD DRAINAGE X — SHUT OFF VALVE — SLOPE DIRECTION TO CLARK ROAD AND INTERSTATE 1-85 MW OFFICE GRAVEL MAIL STORAGE ----7"----_,._______i____,Ll_-+-________,_____ __". IIIIIMIP- ano 4 ; o 0 m�� 8 a 8 a 0 z 0 >- 0 <cc <0 <}_ cc cc r— cc 00 w zZ 0 00 0 Z 0 z O II U m CO M 2 2 0 rc C 4 2 SITE PLAN DIAGRAM AND EVACUATION PLAN FIGURE NUMBER 5 r < Y n . LEGEND — RAILROAD TRACKS — WATER LINE — SANITARY SEWER LINE — FIRE HYDRANT - — -0- — POWER LINE 200' 0 200' arm � APPROXIMATE SCALE: 1" = 200' NOTE: THE LOCATIONS AND DEMINSIONS OF FEATURES SHOWN ON THIS MAP HAVE BEEN DERIVED FROM VARIOUS SOURCES AND SUPPLEMENTED BY FIELD MEASUREMENTS. THOUGH SUFFICIENT FOR ITS INTENDED PURPOSE, NO CLAIM IS MADE AS TO THE DEGREE OF ACCURACY OF THIS DRAWING. — EVACUATION ROUTE — STORM DRAINS —YARD DRAINAGE — SHUT OFF VALVE — SLOPE DIRECTION CULVERT ■oo d z rc a 8 U U AUGUST 2003 0 N z 01 1'] 211 O z } } Z a O • z -I 0 - p cc - < 0 < } Q cr cc 0 • O = W Z C/)O O O CO • Z O - J cc 0 Z SITE PLAN DIAGRAM AND EVACUATION PLAN FIGURE NUMBER 4 1 NORFOLK SOUTHERN Norfolk Southern Corporation Environmental Protection 110 Franklin Road, S.E. Roanoke, Virginia 24042-0013 April 28, 2004 1-9-NC-LINW-3-1 Sergei Chernikov, PhD. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources NPDES Unit 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699 Re: Spencer Yard Sludge Disposal Plan Dear Dr. Chernikov: MAY -32004 D R TER O!_!.ALIIY PONT SOURCE BRANCH Enclosed please find a Sludge Disposal Plan for the Norfolk Southern Railway Company Spencer Yard. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 540-981- 4239. Sincerely, Larry G. Western, Engineer Environmental Design Enclosure cc: K. R Miller, NSRC K. G. Hauschildt, NSRC G. O. Turner, NSRC A. H. Czaplinski, MM&A Operating Subsidiary: Norfolk Southern Railway Company Management Certification Norfolk Southern Railway Company 110 Franklin Road S.E., Box 13 Roanoke, VA 24042-0013 ALL CONCERNED RE: Spencer Yard Sludge Disposal Plan This plan outlines the procedures for proper handling, storage, treatment, and disposal of sludge at the Spencer Yard Facility. It is important to see that every operation takes place in a safe and responsible manner. This Sludge Disposal Plan was developed by the Norfolk Southern Railway Company (NSRC) Environmental Protection Department (EPD) to serve as a resource to prevent, manage and mitigate sludge spill incidents occurring at the Spencer Yard Facility. All designated employees are to review this Plan and follow it for proper handling, storage, disposal, and reclamation of waste -chemicals. The signature below indicates the commitment of NSRC management to the safe and environmentally responsible handling, storage, treatment, and disposal of sludge in accordance with this Plan. C.Wehrmeister, V.P. Safety and Environmental ate NSRC SLUDGE DISPOSAL PLAN DATE ISSUED: April 19, 2004 DATE REVISED: Spencer Yard Page I 1.0 FACILITY DESCRIPTION AND CHARACTERISTICS This Sludge Disposal plan is prepared for the Spencer Yard, located in Linwood, North Carolina. Figure 1 identifies the portion of the United States Geological Survey (USGS) quadrangle depicting the site location. The Facility is covered under NC NPDES Discharge Permit number NC0029246. The permit (provided in Appendix A) authorizes the discharge of acceptable industrial wastewater into South Potts Creek and unnamed tributaries of the Yadkin River, which feed into High Rock Lake. The Spencer Yard is a transportation Facility (Standard Industrial Classification [SIC] Code 4011) engaged in locomotive fueling, servicing and repair of railcars and locomotives. The Facility layout and drainage are shown on Figure 2. 1.1 Facility Information Facility information is provided in Table 1-1. Table 1-1 Facility Information Name and Location: Norfolk Southern Railway Company Spencer Yard I-85 and Belmont Road Extension, Exit #88 Linwood, North Carolina 27299 Facility Contact: M.T. Hammill General Foreman, Locomotive I-85 and Belmont Road Extension, Exit #88 Linwood, North Carolina 27299 (704) 638-4292 (work) / (704) 636-8934 (home) (336) 247-0109 (mobile) G.O. Turner Engineer Environmental Operations 312 West Liddell Street Charlotte, North Carolina 28206 (704) 378-3841 (work)/ (704) 578-1835 (mobile) (877) 821-7957 (pager) Name, Address and Telephone number of owner: C.J. Wehrmeister Vice President of Safety and Environmental Norfolk Southern Railway Company 110 Franklin Road, S.E., Box 73 Roanoke, VA 24042-0073 (540) 981-5373 NSRC SLUDGE DISPOSAL PLAN DATE ISSUED: April 19, 2004 DATE REVISED: Spencer Yard Page 1 Latitude and Longitude: Main Entrance: N Latitude 35° 44' 06" W Longitude -80° 20' 35" Type of Facility: Shop and support facility for fueling service and maintenance of locomotives and railcars. 1.2 Facility Characteristics The Spencer Yard is located in Linwood, Davidson County, North Carolina, off Interstate I-85 North between Salisbury and High Point, NC. Activities at this yard include locomotive fueling, servicing and repair of railcars. Due to these activities, sludge is accumulated and directed to the onsite drying beds. Figure 1 shows the topographical features in the vicinity of the Facility. Figure 2 provides a plan view of the site detailing the layout and site drainage. 1.3 Drainage Characteristics Storm water drainage patterns at the Facility are influenced by ground surface features which include pavement, gravel, tracks, vegetation, ditches and catch basins. Storm water flow is generally away from the centerline of the Yard (towards the southeast and northwest). There is a system of storm drains at the Facility for the collection and diversion of storm water runoff. Most storm water is routed through the subsurface system to surface ditches that drain to a series of retention ponds. The storm water drainage system in the mechanical area at the center of the Yard transfers storm water to the OWS/grit chamber. From the OWS, wastewater flows to a surge basin. Additional oil is skimmed from a pump pit in the surge basin by a rope skimmer before the water in the surge basin is pumped to the equalization tank. Oil is again skimmed from the water in the equalization tank before the water feeds to the WWTP. Recovered oil is stored in Tank 6. The treated water flows from the WWTP to an aeration pond, and the water in the aeration pond is pumped through a final filtration system before being discharged to South Potts Creek. There are also four septic systems/drainfields at the site which handle the Facility's sewage. NSRC SLUDGE DISPOSAL PLAN DATE ISSUED: April 19, 2004 DATE REVISED: Spencer Yard Page 2 Prepared by. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY - SPENCER YARD SECTION OF USGS 7.5' SOUTHMONT, N.C. QUADRANGLE k kARSHALL k kILLE SOCITES Prepared for: 2,000' 0 SCALE 1:24,000 VICINITY MAP FIGURE 1 2,000' NORTH CAROLINA QUADRANGLE LOCATION 1,200' 0 1,200' APPROXIMATE SCALE: 1"=1,200' NOTE: The location and dimensions of features shown on this map have been derived from various sources. Though sufficient for Its Intended purpose, no claim is made as to the degree of accuracy of this drawing. S 1 0 0 z APRIL 2004 yW 0 PROJECT NO.: NS1500E/94 >- Z a v z_ > 0 Ocr <0 cc¢ O reZ CA O O CO Z J J 0 u. 0 Z SLUDGE DISPOSAL PLAN FIGURE NUMBER 2 POND 006 200' 0 200' I APPROXIMATE SCALE: 1" = 200' NOTE: The location and dimensions of features shown on this map have been derived from various sources. Though sufficient for its intended purpose, no claim is made as to the degree of accuracy of this drawing. LEGEND — RAILROAD TRACKS — ROADS — WATER LINE — SANITARY SEWER LINE DITCH --a--a— — POWER LINE — STORM DRAINS —YARD DRAINAGE — MANUAL VALVE — SLOPE DIRECTION — SURFACE WATER FLOW DIRECTION 000 b'5 x� 411 ! o00 11 14 Too APRIL 2004 Y0 2 U 8 PROJECT NO.: NS1500E/94 u u 4 a v 2 2 Z g Z —J >- 0 0 Q. d<0 <}cc ¢� 0 W ZZ = W IS O G9O GO Y Z J J 0 u. re 0 Z SLUDGE DISPOSAL PLAN FIGURE NUMBER 7 200' 200' APPROXIMATE SCALE: 1" = 200' NOTE: The location and dimensions of features shown on this map have been derived from various sources. Though sufficient for its intended purpose, no claim is made as to the degree of accuracy of this drawing. LEGEND — RAILROAD TRACKS — ROADS WATER LINE — SANITARY SEWER LINE DITCH CULVERT POWER LINE ° — STORM DRAINS —YARD DRAINAGE X — MANUAL VALVE — SLOPE DIRECTION — SURFACE WATER FLOW DIRECTION TO CLARK ROAD AND INTERSTATE 1-85 MW OFFICE MAIL STORAGE .itm—gro 111/11P- 8 w co b 16• . 2,4 O 00 git Y � s 000 N CO 0 z 0 W U APRIL 2004 0 PROJECT NO.: N51500E/94 2 d O Z !. 0 < ace J <0 cc Q - re 0 W ZZ 2 W 0 �0 CO Z —1 U. CC 0 Z SLUDGE DISPOSAL PLAN FIGURE NUMBER 5 FORWARDING YARD POND 004 SPRAY PAINT DRUM CYLINDER AREA 4 1yj HANICAL SHOP DIE, EL --SHOP yF ! 1 —f f+-lam—��i——. _ r—,—�- £}I TLH --- 1�� ACTIVE PETROLEUM STORAGE EQUAUZA E N TAN WITH SKIMMER 5500 GAL. SEPTIC TANK CONTAINER CAPACITY GAL. CONTENTS 01 2.000,000 DIESEL 02 3.000 USED OIL 03 5.639 DIESEL 04 9.159 LUBE OIL 05 14 798 CAR OIL 05 4 004 USED OIL 07 14,798 LUBE OIL' 08 500 GASOLINE 10 500 LUBE COIL 11 500 LUBE DIL DRUMS 550 VARIOUS TRANSFORMER 300 DIELECTRIC FLUID CAPACITY 10 TANKS 10 DRUMS. 1 TRANSFORMER TOTAL PETROLEUM STORAGE 2.053,741E gal. RETIRED PETROLEUM STORAGE CONTAINER 09 CAPACITY GAL. 300 CONTENTS CAR OIL 1 TANK TOTAL RETIRED PETROLEUM STORAGE CAPACITY 300 gal. TOTAL PETROLEUM STORAGE CAPACITY 11 TANKS. 10 DRUMS, 1 TRANSFORMER TOTAL STORAGE CAPACITY 2,054,044 gal. SOUTH POTTS CREEK I TANK 09 (RETIRED) ULVERT Lit DRUM STORAGE AREA TANKS 02, 03. 04, 05 Se 07 + NFLUENT LINE"—�+ ANSFORMERS SLUDGE DRYBEDS.-__] DAF �t RESPONSE TRAILE• SURGE BASIN BERM UMP PIT +MTh ROPE SKIMMER AERATION POND FILTRATION SYSTEM TREATMENT PLANT ENERATOR TO WE DISCHARGE POII'-IT - - SOUTH POTTS CREEK LEGEND - RAILROAD TRACKS - ROADS WATER UNE - SANITARY SEWER LINE TO YADKIN RIVER o. 2500 GAL SEP11C TANK--- CULVERT - - POWER LINE - STORM DRAINS -YARD DRAINAGE - MANUAL VALVE - SLOPE DIRECTION - SURFACE WATER FLOW DIRECTION 20n' POND 005 DRAINAGE FIELD 0 �9 200' APPROXIMATE SCALE.. 1" - 20D' NOTE The location and dtnenalona of feoturea shown on this mop have been lived from various source,. Though sufficient for its intended purpose, no clam in made as to the degree of accuracy of thin dnoeing• oe 00 00 io FIGURE NUb 200' 0 200' APPROXIMATE SCALE: 1" = 200' NOTE: The location and dimensions of features shown on this map have been derived from various sources. Though sufficient for its intended purpose, no claim is made as to the degree of accuracy of this drawing. LEGEND — RAILROAD TRACKS — POWER LINE — ROADS — STORM DRAINS —YARD DRAINAGE WATER LINE — MANUAL VALVE — SANITARY SEWER LINE ►-- — SLOPE DIRECTION — SURFACE WATER FLOW DIRECTION CULVERT w� $z 000 APRIL 2004 0 ` 8 0 PROJECT NO.: NS1500E/94 Z a v z } 0 G cc 3 <0 }Z CC CC CC w ZZ COO O 0 CO Y Z J0 J CC 0 Z SLUDGE DISPOSAL PLAN FIGURE NUMBER 4 DRAINAGE FIELD EXIT TO CLARK ROAD AND INTERSTATE 1-85 LEGEND - RAILROAD TRACKS - ROADS - WATER LINE - SANITARY SEWER LINE 7111/1111M=MIP MMINNIMMEllge 800 GAL. SEPTIC TANK - POWER LINE - STORM DRAINS -YARD DRAINAGE - MANUAL VALVE - SLOPE DIRECTION - SURFACE WATER FLOW DIRECTION DITCH 200' 0 200' APPROXIMATE SCALE: 1" = 200' NOTE: The location and dimensions of features shown on this map have been derived from various sources. Though sufficient for its intended purpose, no claim is made as to the degree of accuracy of this drawing. ill=r311111156 in ■00 m�� 1 z 5 O Z 0▪ . 0 z >' O pcc <0 < }_ ix H W Z• O Z TWO O O a) Y J J 0 0 ag GI N PROJECT NO.: NS1500EJ94 SLUDGE DISPOSAL PLAN FIGURE NUMBER 3 LOCKER ROOM 2500 GAL. SEPTIC TANK DRAINAGE FIELD 200' 0 200' _ I APPROXIMATE SCALE: 1" = 200' NOTE: The location and dimensions of features shown on this map have been derived from various sources. Though sufficient for its intended purpose, no claim is made as to the degree of accuracy of this drawing. LEGEND — RAILROAD TRACKS — POWER LINE — ROADS — STORM DRAINS —YARD DRAINAGE WATER LINE — MANUAL VALVE — - — SANITARY SEWER LINE ►--- — SLOPE DIRECTION — SURFACE WATER FLOW DIRECTION —DITCH ROUTE TO HOSPITAL TO BELMONT RD & INTERSTATE 1-85 a LL Y tg- 4,21 000 i Sip- 1 ooa s raw` d' •00 0 U APRIL 2004 8 PROJECT NO.: c 2 4 } Z a O z < cc cc 3 <0 < }_ cc� W Zz • 090 O 0 Y Z - J 0 CC 0 Z SLUDGE DISPOSAL PLAN FIGURE NUMBER 8 2.0 SLUDGE MANAGEMENT 2.1 Sludge Generation Numerous collection pits are located around the Facility for retaining residual oil from the fueling rack and other areas where petroleum products are utilized. The pits are routinely pumped out by NSRC personnel with a pump truck, and the recovered fluids are transferred to the onsite sludge drying beds. Sludge is also generated by the onsite OWS/WWTP and transferred to the drying beds as part of the treatment process. 2.2 Sludge Storage and Disposal Sludge is stored onsite within the sludge drying beds. The sludge beds cover approximately 2,400 square feet. However, the sludge is not stored long-term at the Spencer Yard, which reduces the potential for a spill (see Section 4.0 for Emergency Response Information and Spill Reporting Procedures). The onsite sludge drying beds are cleaned annually by R&R Service, Inc., and the waste is properly disposed of in accordance with Section 405 of the Clean Water Act, as amended, and Subtitles C and D of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, as amended. Copies of manifests are kept in Appendix B of this plan. NSRC SLUDGE DISPOSAL PLAN DATE ISSUED: April 19, 2004 DATE REVISED: Spencer Yard Page 11 3.0 BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Best Management Practices (BMPs) are the processes, activities, or physical structures that reduce the potential release of sludge to the environment. These practices can range from keeping work areas clean to the installation of a new wastewater treatment system. 3.1 Good Housekeeping Good housekeeping practices are those that keep outdoor work areas clean, orderly and free of materials that could contaminate storm water. Good housekeeping practices include the following: • Use a drip pan during product transfers; • Maintain clean pavement and ground surfaces in work areas; • Clean up spills and stained soils and dispose of properly; • Do not overfill waste containers, and keep containers covered; • Train employees on spill clean-up procedures and disposal of spent clean-up materials; • Store containers, drums, and bags of materials away from direct traffic to avoid spills, and follow manufacturer's instructions for proper storage practices; • Store drums or containers on pallets to avoid direct contact with pavement or ground which can lead to container corrosion; and • Properly label all containers, including waste containers. 3.2 Preventive Maintenance A preventative maintenance program identifies areas and equipment that need to be maintained to prevent the possibility of impact to the environment. Onsite personnel must ensure that preventative maintenance practices are utilized. Maintenance activities applicable to this facility include the following: NSRC SLUDGE DISPOSAL PLAN DATE ISSUED: April 19, 2004 DATE REVISED: Spencer Yard Page 12 • Routinely clean drains and other conveyances of storm water to prevent debris and silt accumulation; • Remove settled sludge from drying beds on a regular basis; • Routinely inspect and/or clean out grit chamber/OWS and WWTP equipment; • Replace or repair waste collection bins if damaged or leaking; and • If indications of leaks, spills, or drips are evident, find and correct the problem. 3.3 Visual Inspections A routine facility inspection program is a regulatory requirement and is held in conjunction with the Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Plan (SPCC). The site's General Foreman or designee who is familiar with the intent and goals of this Sludge Disposal Plan shall conduct the inspection. A facility inspection checklist is provided in Appendix C of this plan. If conditions are discovered which could cause uncontrolled dispersal of sludge, the General Foreman shall arrange for corrective action or designate an individual to make such arrangements. The complete checklist, along with any records of corrective actions, must be maintained for a minimum of six years. It is recommended that these inspection records be maintained with the Sludge Disposal Plan. 3.4 Spill Prevention and Response All employees should receive initial and refresher training in spill response and related pollution prevention issues (see the Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure Plan for Training Logs). All employees are responsible for the cleanup of any spill. Small, routine drips and spills may be cleaned by applying loose absorbent to the spill and then disposing of the absorbent properly. Should a spill have the potential to leave the site or be discharged from the facility, the spill must be reported immediately to (refer to Section 4 of this Plan for Emergency Response Information): • Piedmont Division Chief Dispatcher - (864) 255-4202 • M.T. Hammill, General Foreman — (704) 638-4292 NSRC SLUDGE DISPOSAL PLAN DATE ISSUED: April 19, 2004 DATE REVISED: Spencer Yard Page 13 3.5 Runoff Management Practices Outfalls discharge to South Potts Creek and unnamed tributaries of the Yadkin River, which feed into High Rock Lake. Runoff management practices prevent runoff to these outfalls from becoming contaminated. Runoff management practices in use at this facility include: • A catch basin system for the collection and/or diversion of storm water runoff; • Storm water storage tanks for collection of storm water; and • A WWT Facility to treat storm water prior to discharge. 3.6 Employee Training Environmental Awareness Training is provided to all NSRC employees on an annual basis. The training includes many environmental topics with focus on identification of the environmental impact that can be caused by improper management (i.e., storage, handling, and/or usage) of significant materials. Training in regards to the proper storage, handling, and disposal of sludge may be conducted concomitantly with any other pollution prevention and response training schedules as outlined in the Facility's SPCC Plan. However, the training form provided in Appendix C must be filed in Appendix D of this Plan. 3.7 Record Keeping and Reporting All records pertinent to this Sludge Disposal Plan, including records of spills, monitoring, inspection, and maintenance activities, will be retained. These records must be maintained for a minimum of six years. It is suggested that these records be kept on -site in Appendix D of this Plan. 3.8 BMP Summary Table 3-1 BMPs to be Implemented BMP Description of Action(s) Required for Implementation Target Completion Date On -going Quarterly Housekeeping Maintain site cleanliness. Inspections Perform quarterly facility inspections using the Inspections Perform annual Sludge Disposal Plan evaluation using the Annual Evaluation Form in Appendix C. Annually Training Train new employees on storm water pollution prevention. At hire Training Provide refresher training to all employees. Annually Sludge Tracking Maintain all records of sludge disposal On -going NSRC SLUDGE DISPOSAL PLAN DATE ISSUED: April 19, 2004 DATE REVISED: Spencer Yard Page 14 4.0 EMERGENCY RESPONSE INFORMATION Spill prevention and response procedures are addressed in the SPCC Plan. This section lists the appropriate information for responders, including Facility contact information, Division contact information, emergency contacts, and response equipment available on -site. Refer to the SPCC for further information. 4.1 Information for Responders Owner/Operator Name: Norfolk Southern Railway Company Facility Name: Spencer Yard Location (Street Address): I-85 and Belmont Road Ext., Linwood Road Exit #88 City: Linwood State: North Carolina Zip Code: 27299 County: Davidson Phone Number: (704) 638-4295 (Mechanical), (704) 638-4272 (Tower) Mailing Address: Box 310, Belmont Road Extension, Linwood, NC 27299 Facility Contact Name/Title: M.T. Hammill Work Phone Number: (704) 638-4292 PIEDMONT DIVISION RAILROAD OPERATIONS DEPT. Environmental Operations Engineer: G.O. Turner Work Phone: (704) 378-3841 Home Phone: (704) 548-1988 Mobile Phone: (704) 578-1835 Pager: (877) 821-7957 Piedmont Division Chief Dispatcher Work Phone Number: (864) 255-4202 Piedmont Division Superintendent of Transportation Work Phone Number: (864) 255-4250 Piedmont Division Manager of Mechanical Operations Work Phone Number: (404) 792-5070 Piedmont Division Engineer Work Phone Number: (864) 255-4251 General Superintendent of Transportation, Operations Control Center, Atlanta, GA: (404) 529-1785 NSRC SLUDGE DISPOSAL PLAN DATE ISSUED: April 19, 2004 DATE REVISED: Spencer Yard Page 15 NSRC 24-hour Emergency Hazardous Materials Number: (800) 714-4482 National Response Center: (800) 424-8802 In -plant Treatment Capability: In -ground, permanent oil/water separator/grit chamber, surge basins, equalization tank, wastewater treatment including sedimentation, flocculation, skimming of floating solids, and sludge drying beds. In the event of a catastrophic release, the following departments should be notified: 1. Alcoa Power Generating, Inc. Badin, NC Mr. Gene Ellis (704) 422-5606 2. City of Albermarle, Utilities Department Mr. Gary Smith (704) 984-9630 3. Town of Norwood, Water Treatment Plant Mr. Greg Morris (704) 474-3618 4. Montgomery County- Water Treatment Plant American Water Services John Everett, Project Manager (910) 439-6197 5. Duke Power, Buck Steam Plant (704) 382-6112 6. City of Denton, Water Plant (336) 859-3139 4.2 Emergency Call List Fire Departments: Fire Marshall -Davidson County (Perry Tyler) Police Departments: North Carolina Highway Patrol (Lexington Post) Davidson County Sheriff 911 or (336) 242-2281 (336) 249-0247 911 or (336) 242-2100 Emergency Response Contractors: A&D Environmental Services (800) 434-7750 HEPACO (800) 888-7689 NSRC SLUDGE DISPOSAL PLAN DATE ISSUED: April 19, 2004 DATE REVISED: Spencer Yard Page 16 4.3 Emergency Response Equipment Available Onsite • Sorbent booms; • Sorbent pads; • Portable pump; • Spill pan; and • Safety Glasses, Protective Boots, Protective Coveralls, Protective Gloves. 4.4 Incident Response Checklist This section includes an incident response checklist to provide guidance for making the initial assessment of an oil discharge and deciding what emergency response actions to take. The Division Chief Dispatcher and Transportation and Mechanical Officers are the ones most likely to use the checklist. It is designed to focus on the questions that need to be answered, as well as the responsibilities that need to be addressed when an incident occurs. It also helps develop the information needed to complete NSRC Memo Form 2090-0, as well as to respond to federal Department of Transportation, Environmental Protection Agency and National Transportation Safety Board (US DOT, US EPA, NTSB, etc.), state, and local emergency management agencies. Following each incident, a copy of the completed checklist should be retained by the site and Division as part of the official incident report. The checklist and guidelines are important and should be reviewed at safety meetings as well as during post -incident evaluations to keep them up-to-date and make sure they remain useful when emergencies occur. Blank copies of the checklist should be made by Chief Dispatchers, and Transportation and Mechanical Officers, and kept readily available when needed. The checklist is divided into four sections: • Section 1— identifies the incident by date, time, location and tank/car number(s). • Section 2 — identifies the materials involved and the quantity discharged. • Section 3 — lists safety and environmental concerns which could have a significant impact on how and what kind of emergency response actions might be required. • Section 4 — lists the specific job responsibilities for the Responsible Supervisor. NSRC SLUDGE DISPOSAL PLAN DATE ISSUED: April 19, 2004 DATE REVISED: Spencer Yard Page 17 SLUDGE DISPOSAL PLAN INSPECTION SCHEDULE FOR SPENCER YARD Inspection Frequency Inspector Inspection Description Follow-up Actions Quarterly General Foreman or designee Inspect Facility for conditions that could adversely impact storm sewers, OWS, WWTP, sludge drying beds. Correct any unsatisfactory conditions. Complete Facility Inspection Checklist and maintain with plan. Annual General Foreman or designee Inspect the facility and review the Sludge Disposal Plan and all Sludge related records to determine if the Sludge Disposal Plan is effective. Complete the Annual Evaluation Form and maintain with plan. NOTE: Inspection forms follow this page.