20140773 Ver 1_401 Application_20140714

Letter of Transmittal
S &ME, Inc-
9751 E
9751 Southern Pine Blvd. -
Charlotte, NC 28273
(704) 523 -4726
(704) 525 -3953 fax
N.C. Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permittina Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27699 -1617
WE ARE SENDING YOU: ® Attached
❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints
❑ Copy of letter ® Report
DATE: July 23, 2014 I JOB NO: 4226 -14 -030
ATTENTION: Ms. Karen Higgins
RE: Ethanol Pipeline Project
❑ Under separate cover via the following items:
❑ Plans ❑ Draft ❑ Specifications
COPIES
DATE
NO
DESCRIPTION
Pre - construction Notification for Nationwide Permit No. 12 & Water Quality
5
7.23.2014
1
Certification No. 3884
7.23.2014
2
Check No. 023572 in the amount of $240.00 (Processing fee)
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW:
® For approval ❑ For your record
❑ As requested ❑ For review and comment ❑
❑ FORBIDS DUE: _I_!_ ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS: Please contact Ron Walker at 864- 574 -2360 if you have questions regarding this application, Thank you.
- Darrin Peine
SIGN:
COPY TO: File, USACE, Motiva En
�v t
JUl 2.4 L01�
auA�tr
IF ENCLOSURES ARE NOT AS NOTED, PLEASE NOTIFY US AT ONCE.
This Letter of Transmittal and the documents accompanying this Letter of Transmittal contain information from S &ME, Inc., which is confidential and legally
privileged. The information is intended only for use of the individual or entity named on this Letter of Transmittal. If you are not the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on these documents is strictly prohibited.
S &ME SFG -001
(Rev. 04/04)

PRECONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION
AND PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION REQUEST
Ethanol Pipeline Project
Motiva Enterprises LLC
Old Mount Holly Road
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
S &ME Project No 4226 -14 -030
Submitted to
U S Army Corps of Engineers
Mr William Elliott
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801 -5006
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Ms Karen Higgins
401 Buffer and Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1617
Prepared by
S &ME, Inc
301 Zima Park Drive
Spartanburg, South Carolina 29301
(864) 574 -2360
July 23, 2014

Ethanol Pipeline Project SWE Project No 4226 -14 -030
Preconstruction Notification July 23, 2014
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page
1 Project Description 1
2 Site Description and Surrounding Land Use 2
3 Jurisdictional Waters 3
4 Protected Species 4
5 Historical Resources 6
6 Proposed Project Impacts 6
7 Avoidance and Minimization 7
8 Mitigation 8
FIGURES
Figures Title
1 Vicinity Map
2 USGS Topographic Map
3 Soil Survey Map
4 Approximate Waters of the U'S Map
5 Approximate Jurisdictional Waters and Wetland Impact Map
6 Typical Stream Crossing Detail
7 Typical Wetland Crossing Detail
APPENDICES
Appendix Title
PCN and Agent Authorization Form
II Representative Site Photographs
III Request for Preliminary JD
IV Copy of State Historic Preservation Office Map
V Project Restoration Plan

Ethanol Pipeline Project SWE Project No 4226 -14 =030
Preconstruction Notification July 23, 2014
1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
S &ME has been contracted by Motiva Enterprises LLC ( Motiva) to assist with project
requirements in accordance with Sections 404 and 401 of the Clean Water Act
Accordingly, S &ME hereby submits this application for impacts to Waters of the U S in
accordance with the conditions of Nationwide Permit (NWP) No 12 and the corresponding
North Carolina Water Quality Certification (WQC) No. 3884 The project will involve
construction of approximately 5,200 linear feet (If) of 12 -inch steel pipeline to transport
ethanol The proposed pipeline will be located within a 50 -foot wide combined temporary
and permanent maintenance corridor, of which 25 feet will be permanently maintained over
the proposed pipeline
This Pre - construction Notification (PCN) is being provided to the U S. Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE) for approval, and complies with all applicable conditions of NWP No
12 Wntten concurrence from the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR)
is also required in part because the proposed project does not meet condition numbers 10,
16, and 17 of WQC No 3884, as specified below
• Condition No 10 The proposed ethanol line will not cross all streams within the
project corridor at a near - perpendicular angle Adjacent existing refined petroleum
storage tanks and an existing CSX railroad limit this crossing angle at one location.
Condition No 16- The proposed pipeline construction corridor will exceed 40 feet
through wetlands and streams. A 50 -foot wide construction corridor is proposed in
order to accommodate equipment, timber mats, and facilitate the installation of the
pipeline
Condition No 17 The proposed project will require a permanently - maintained
right -of -way (ROW) that exceeds 15 feet in width The WQC includes an
exemption for pipelines, so long as mitigation is provided for wetland fills To meet
their operational requirements, Motiva is requesting an additional 5 feet for a total
maintained width of 25 feet at stream and wetland crossings Please note, however,
that permanent placement of fill material will not be required
Impacts due to pipeline activities and installation are minimal in nature and are attributable
to the clearing of new ROW over the proposed pipeline It should be noted that project
impacts will not result in the loss of Waters of the U S , and no fill will be placed
permanently in jurisdictional waters A completed PCN and Agent - Authorization are
attached as Appendix I
Motiva is proposing to construct the pipeline from a CXS Rail Yard to its facility located at
410 Tom Sadler Road, in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina (Figures 1 -4) Currently,
ethanol is transported to the Motiva facility via tanker trucks The proposed pipeline will
eliminate the need for trucking the ethanol, reduce safety concerns associated with
transporting ethanol in this manner, and increase the efficiency and cost effectiveness of fuel
transport to the Motiva facility

Ethanol Pipeline Project S &ME Project No 4226 -14 -030
Preconstruction Notification July 23, 2014
This PCN is for authorization of temporary and permanent impacts to Waters of the U S.,
including wetlands The pipeline origin is located Just south of an existing CSX rail line
(35 2748 °N, -80 9299 °W) on an existing CSX rail yard The pipeline will be installed via
Horizontal Directional Drill (HDD) for approximately 750 if beneath the railroad and will
exit on City of Charlotte property north of Fred D Alexander Blvd The pipeline will then
turn west for approximately 535 If, crossing a wetland and stream complex At the adjacent
Marathon terminal, the pipeline will run above ground on pipe racks, eventually terminating
at the Motiva facility The pipe for the HDD pullback will be staged and welded within
temporary workspace (TWS) which will be located on the City of Charlotte property The
pipeline is depicted on a Site Vicinity Map (Figure 1), USGS Topographic Map (Figure 2),
Soil Survey Map (Figure 3), and Approximate Waters of the U.S. Map (Figure 4), attached
Project -wide impacts to wetlands and streams are limited to 0.26 acre of wetlands and
199 If of stream Permanent impacts are limited to 0.02 acre, and will result from
establishment of new permanent easement through a forested wetland Two streams will
be temporarily impacted as a result of pipeline activities, however, affected banks will be
returned to original grade and contour, stabilized with coir matting, and seeded with a
native riparian seed mix During design of the pipeline, the alignment was adjusted to
reduce impacts to the extent practicable. Please note that no loss of Waters of the U S
will occur as a result of this project
2. SITE DESCRIPTION AND SURROUNDING LAND USE
S &ME personnel visited the site on March 19th �and,June 17th 2014 to evaluate the
proposed route for jurisdictional features and review the corridor for protected species or
their habitat Jurisdictional features were limited to the southern portion of the route, and
representative photos of jurisdictional features and the project corridor are attached as
Appendix II.
The City of Charlotte property, which includes the subject wetlands, is bisected by a
southwest -to- northeast historic roadway embankment that falls adjacent to and along the
parcel boundary, and extends from the CSX railway ROW on the southern site extent to
the Marathon property at the northern extent. A majority of the site is wooded and
largely undeveloped, but is located adjacent to multiple developed industrial properties
Tree species identified during the reconnaissance include loblolly pine (Pinus taeda),
sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), white oak (Quercus alba), willow oak (Q phellos)
northern red oak (Q rubra), American elm (Ulmus americana), eastern red cedar
(Juniperus virginiana), pignut hickory (Carya glabra), shagbark hickory (C ovata),
flowering dogwood (Corpus florida), and American holly (Ilex opaca) Understory
vegetation include poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), Japanese honeysuckle
(Lonicerajaponica), grape (Vitas sp ), Chinese privet (Ligusrum sinense), and Nepalese
browntop (Microstegium vimineum)
The surrounding land use is largely wooded and is surrounded by commercial, industrial,
and residential development in the immediate vicinity
2

Ethanol Pipeline Project S &ME Project No 4226 -14 -030
Preconstruction Notification July 23, 2014
3. JURISDICTIONAL WATERS
S &ME visited the project corridor on March 19th and June 17th 2014 to determine the
presence or absence of Waters of the U S within the pipeline corridor For identification
of wetlands, S &ME followed guidance set forth in the, 1987 USACE Wetlands
Delineation Manual as amended by the Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional
Supplement Guide. Field conditions were documented using USACE Routine Wetland
Determination Data Forms, as appropriate. Stream features were classified following
guidance described in the 2010 NCDWR Stream Identification Methodology of
Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins ver. 4.11 The delineation revealed
the presence of two jurisdictional wetlands and two jurisdictional streams within or near the
proposed pipeline corridor, referenced herein as Stream 1, Stream 2, Wetland 1, and
Wetland 2 Representative photographs of these features are attached to this application
as Appendix H.
Stream 1 (Photos 1 and 2) is an approximate 710 -1f, intermittent stream that originates
within the site and flows west to a culvert located near the southern site extent at the ,CSX
railroad embankment Stream 1 is a jurisdictional stream that flows to an unnamed
tributary of Paw Creek Stream 1 is characterized by bed material comprised of sand and
artificial substrate, weak in- channel structure and moderate depositional and alluvial
deposits Recorded field score for Stream 1 was 28 (Intermittent)
Stream 2 (Photos 3 and 4) is an approximate 120 -1f, intermittent stream that originates
within the site and terminates at it confluence with Stream 1 Characteristics of Stream 2
include weak channel bed and bank continuity, weak in- channel structure and
development, and limited to no sinuosity of channel thalweg Recorded field score for
Stream 2 was 22 (Intermittent)
Wetland 1 (Photos 5 and 6) is located at the headwaters of`Stream 2 and is connected to
Stream 2 through the culvert located at the historic road embankment Soils within
Wetland 1 exhibited hydric soil indicator F3 (Depleted Matrix) as evidenced by a higher
value, low - chroma soil within the upper six inches of the soil surface Canopy vegetation
included sweetgum, swamp chestnut oak (Quercus michauxu), and American elm. Sub -
canopy vegetation included Japanese honeysuckle, common elderberry (Sambucus
canadensis), Chinese privet, deertongue (Dichanthehum clandestinum), and Nepalese
browntop Wetland 1 is approximately 0 33 acre in size and is classified as a palustrine
unconsolidated bottom system
Wetland 2 (Photo 7) abuts Stream I along a majority of its southern bank within the site
with its geomorphic position within the floodplain of Stream 1 Soils within Wetland 2
exhibited hydric soil indicator F3 (Depleted Matrix) as evidenced by a higher value, low -
chroma soil within the upper six inches of the soil surface Overstory and understory
vegetation included species similar to those identified in Wetland 1 Wetland 2 is
approximately 0 30 acre in size and is classified as palustrine unconsolidated bottom
system

Ethanol Pipeline Project S &ME Project No 4226 -14 -030
Preconstruction Notification July 23, 2014
The necessary supporting documentation, including supportive data forms for the USACE
and the DWR, for a Preliminary JD Request is attached as Appendix III
4. PROTECTED SPECIES
To comply with applicable sections of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973 (16
USC 1531- 1543), S &ME initially consulted with the U S Fish & Wildlife Service
( USFWS) and the North Carolina Natural Hentage Program ( NCNHP). S &ME reviewed
the NCNHP and USFWS webpages for records of federally protected threatened or
endangered species that are known to have current or historic populations within
Mecklenburg County, N C Listed species and their respective Federal and County
record status are identified in Table 1 A pedestrian review of the corridor was
performed on March 19, 2014 Please note that aquatic species were not reviewed as part
of the pedestrian reconnaissance No habitat or individuals were noted for the plant
species listed below For the mollusk, while potentially suitable habitat may exist, this
mussel species occurs in drainages of Duck Creek and Goose Creek The streams
delineated drain to Paw Creek, which drains to the Catawba River.
Table 1: Protected Species Summary
3W °- `.1� `NT 'fA\ e si ..Y-s,T� �� 5:�,
Species z ` r _ �u % s '�;
..�✓�a',J� ,
" ^4 Federal "Status -- i
'�a'`'�!,�,
. N Record Statds"k_
6
rh ¢�J 7 '^„ -gw�' r%d
Y� e��e ,.430
.
-
Lasmigona decorata
Endangered
Current
Carolina heelsplitter (mollusk)
Helianthus schweindzu
Schweinitz's sunflower (vascular plant)
Endangered
Current
Rhus michauxo
Endangered
Current
Michaux's sumac (vascular plant)
Echmacea laevigata
Endangered
Current
Smooth coneflower (vascular plant)
Current — the species has been observed in the county within the past 50 years
S &ME personnel additionally reviewed available supporting information to identify
topography, soil types, level of disturbance, and plant community types in the study area
Portions of the pipeline corridor that matched descriptions of preferred habitat for
protected species listed in Table 1 were classified as potential habitat for protected
terrestrial species Please note, a survey for aquatic species was not conducted. A
description of these species, and typical habitat associated with each species are provided
below
Carolina heelsplitter— Federally Listed Endangered
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION NO EFFECT
The Carolina heelsplitter is most often found in small to large streams with shaded banks in
4

Ethanol Pipeline Project SWE Project No 4226 -14 -030
Preconstruction Notification July 23, 2014
a variety of substrates The shell covenng of this mollusk is typically yellowish, greenish
brown, and may have greenish brown or black rays The general shape of the shell is
trapezoidal. There are two lateral teeth in the left valve and one in the right valve
The Carolina heelsplitter mussel is known from two streams in the Yadkin -Pee Dee basin
in North Carolina, Goose Creek and Duck Creek in Union County Jurisdictional waters
in the study area are limited to two unnamed tributaries of Paw Creek, which does not
drain into the headwaters of Duck or Goose Creeks Accordingly, no impacts to Carolina
heelsplitter are anticipated to result from the proposed project
Schwe►nitz's sunflower— Federally Listed Endangered
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION NO EFFECT
Schweinitz's sunflower is a perennial that regularly grows approximately 6 5 feet tall
(though it can be shorter,if young or injured) and can occasionally reach heights of
16 feet. It has thickened roots that are specially designed to store starch. The stem is
purple, and the upper third bears secondary branches at 45- degree angles The leaves are
arranged in pairs on the lower part of the stem but usually occur singly on the upper part
Leaves grow out from the stem at a right angle, and the tips of the leaves tend to droop
The leaves are thick and stiff, with a rough upper surface They have broad spiny hairs
that are directed toward the tip, and soft white hairs cover the underside The plant
produces small yellow flowers. Schweinitz's sunflower blooms from late August until
frost It occurs in full to partial sun and is found in areas with poor soils, such as thin
clays that vary from wet to dry This preference for poor soil helps minimize competition
from other species. The habitat of Schweinitz's sunflower is open woods, roadsides, and
power line rights -of -way, often on basic soils with bare spots or a gravel component The
preferred sites are characterized by abundant sunlight and little competition in the
herbaceous layer Schweinitz's sunflower is listed as a current record for Mecklenburg
County
The property does not contain suitable habitat for Schweinitz's sunflower Forest
margins and the railroad right -of -way, which may be considered appropriate habitat for
Schweinitz's sunflower on some sites, were dominated by competitive species that are
prevalent on sites that are disturbed at a frequency or level that is not consistent with the
moderate level and occasional frequency of disturbance associated with Schweinitz's
sunflower No individuals of Schweinitz's sunflower were observed during field review
Accordingly, potential future development of the property is not expected to impact this
species
Michaux's sumac — Federally Listed Endangered
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION NO EFFECT
Michaux's sumac is a non - poisonous, low - growing, deciduous, densely hairy shrub The
erect stems grow from an underground rhizome to a height of one to three feet The
compound leaves are alternate and divided into long rows of 9 to 13 stalk less leaflets
The leaflets are 1 6 to 3 5 inches long, oblong, winged at the base, dull on the top, hairy
on the bottoms, with toothed edges The terminal leaflet has a two -inch long winged
petiole Flowers grow at the top of the plant in a dense, erect cluster, colored greenish-
5

Ethanol Pipeline Project SWE Project No 4226 -14 -030
Preconstruction Notification July 23, 2014
yellow to white, and are four -to five -parted Fruit are hairy reddish drupes, each
containing one seed. This plant is listed as a current record in Mecklenburg County
The property does not contain suitable habitat for Michaux's sumac. Michaux's sumac
prefers sandy, loamy swales and depressions, acidic and circum - neutral uplands, and
rocky open woods It grows best where disturbance has maintained an open area
Michaux's sumac has been found along roadsides, in powerline clearings, and areas
where forest canopies have been opened up by blowdowns and /or hurricane damage.
Episodic fires accentuate habitat for this species and reduce hardwood encroachment,
recycle nutrients, and aid regeneration of longleaf pine /wiregrass communities No
individuals of Michaux's sumac were observed during field review Accordingly,
potential future development of the property is not expected to impact this species
Smooth coneflower— Federally Listed Endangered
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION NO EFFECT
Smooth coneflower is a perennial herb that grows up to 3 3 feet tall from a vertical root
stock The large basal leaves may reach 8 inches in length and 3 0 inches in width and
taper into long petioles toward the base They are smooth to slightly rough in texture The
stems are smooth, with few leaves The mid -stem leaves are smaller than the basal leaves
and have shorter petioles. Flower heads are usually solitary. Flowering occurs from late
May through mid -July and fruits develop from late June to September The fruiting
structures often persist through the fall
The property does not contain suitable habitat for the Smooth coneflower as optimal sites
are characterized by abundant sunlight and little competition in the herbaceous layer The
Smooth coneflower is typically found in open woods, glades, cedar barrens, roadsides,
clearcuts, dry limestone bluffs, and power line nghts -of -way, usually on magnesium and
calcium rich soils Smooth coneflower occurs in plant communities that have been
described as xeric hardpan forests, diabase glades of- dolomite woodlands. This plant is
listed as a current record in Mecklenburg County. No individuals of the Smooth
coneflower were observed during field review. Accordingly, potential future
development of the property is not expected to impact this species
5. HISTORICAL RESOURCES
S &ME reviewed the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) GIS
website for historical resources near,or within the °project corridor The results of this
review indicated the presence of one�eligible site,'Thrift Mill, located approximately one
mile west of the project corridor As such, it is not anticipated that archaeological or
historical resources will be impacted as a result of pipeline activities A copy of the
website map depicting the location of the Thrift Mill and approximately location of
pipeline disturbance is attached as Appendix IV
6. PROPOSED PROJECT IMPACTS
The proposed project involves temporary wetland impacts that will occur as a result of
trench excavation, temporary side casting of material and placement of timber mats for the
2

Ethanol Pipeline Project S &ME Project No 4226 -14 -030
Preconstruction Notification July 23, 2014
equipment crossings The project will result in conversion of forested wetlands to
herbaceous wetlands within permanent maintained ROW, but will not result in a loss of
Waters of the U S Work in wetlands and streams will be limited to a 50 -foot wide corridor
throughout the project, except where additional workspace is needed for the HDD staging
areas Cleanng of new permanent easement (permanent conversion) will be limited to the
amount necessary to establish a 25 -foot wide permanently maintained easement throughout
the project A summary of project impacts are outlined below in Tables 2 and 3
Table 2: Stream Impacts
Table 3: Wetland Impacts
•a
h
;Impact Amount
Crossing,
�2�-�
°Features ID
FlowlRegime �
Type of Impact =
,� , ,
. IYiethodology /Pipeline
�� - 3 s P ,��F
��' �� , -r�,'
g' �` -
fi,� �I� f�,'
-;iLActivity y I
Stream 1
Intermittent
Temporary
115
Open -cut Installation
Stream 2
Intermittent
N/A
N/A
N/A
Total:
115
Permanent Maintained
Table 3: Wetland Impacts
•a
h
Im act Amount-
Crossing,
�2�-�
Feature IDS .
;Cover Type
> °Type,of'Impact,°
3 �° A
Methodology/Pipelme
�� - 3 s P ,��F
��' �� , -r�,'
g' �` -
.op (ac) ° ?�,
°'°:Activi -
Wetland 1
Forested
Temporary
022
TWS
Wetland 2
Forested
Temporary
0 -02
TWS, Bridging
Permanent Maintained
Wetland 2
Forested
Permanent
002
ROW
Total
026
The project will result in temporary impacts to 115 if of stream through placement of
equipment bridges and isolation crossing methods (dam and pump or flume) around a
segment of stream that will be temporarily excavated for pipe installation. Stream 1 will
be returned to original grade, dimension and profile, and affected banks will be stabilized
with coir'mattmg and a native riparian seed mix No riprap or hard armoring will be
used.
As previously stated, project -wide impacts (combined temporary and conversion) will be
0.26 acre Of those total impacts, maintenance of the new ROW project wide will result in
conversion of 0.02 acre of forested wetland to herbaceous wetlands All wetlands impacted
by construction will be seeded with a native wetland, mix
Proposed project impacts are depicted on Figure 5, attached Typical stream and wetland
crossings details are depicted on Figures 6 and 7 Following construction, temporarily -
disturbed wetlands within the permanent ROW will be restored to an herbaceous state.
7. AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION
The applicant has minimized impacts to Waters of the U S to the extent practicable The
project as proposed will result in impacts to two wetlands and two streams, project -wide
Additionally, affected areas will be returned to original grade and contour and stabilized

Ethanol Pipeline Project SWE Project No 4226 -14 -030
Preconstruction Notification July 23, 2014
using native seed mixes, per the attached Restoration Plan (Appendix V)
Where streams are trenched for pipe installation, impacts will be minimized by
stabilizing the temporarily- affected banks with coir matting and seeding with a native
riparian seed mix Stream sedimentation impacts will be minimized through the use of
the dry-ditch construction methods, such as bypass pumping though silt bags or
temporary de- watering structures, or by use of dam and flumes. Wetland impacts will be
minimized during construction through the use of equipment mats at crossings and trench
plugs to prevent alterations to wetland hydrology
Additionally, construction equipment operating within the wetland will be limited to that
equipment necessary for clearing, excavation, pipe installation and restoration activities
Wetland vegetation will be cut at ground level, leaving existing root systems in place to
promote re- growth. To the extent practicable, wetland topsoil will be segregated from
the underlying subsoil in areas disturbed by trenching, except in areas with standing
water or saturated soils, or where no topsoil is evident Total disturbance through streams
and wetlands is limited to a 50 -foot corridor within the pipeline corridor and an area
where clearing of trees will be necessary for the drill rig set up
No grubbing or below - ground vegetation removal will occur within wetlands or along
stream banks outside of the construction corridor Where the pipe will be installed
conventionally (e g. "open- cut "), grubbing will be limited, to the extent practicable, to the
trench line Select portions of the ROW may require rough grading to facilitate safe
passage of equipment, and to prepare a suitably -level work surface Appropriate
sediment and erosion control measures will be installed following initial soil disturbance
as the project progresses Within wetland areas where extensive rutting or soil
disturbance may occur, timber mats are planned for use to provide work and travel space
for equipment
Following construction, all affected stream and wetland crossings will be restored to
original grade and contour. The proposed project will not result in permanent changes in
pre - construction elevation contours or stream dimension, pattern or profile. Excess
material will be removed to a high ground disposal area
All work within Waters of the U S. will be conducted in accordance with the applicable
permits Best Management Practices (BMPs) will be employed at all stream and wetland
crossings to prevent an inadvertent discharge to a Waters of the U S.
8. MITIGATION
Although the project will not result in a loss of Waters of the U S , conversion of forested
wetlands to herbaceous wetlands will occur as a result of ROW establishment It should
be noted that permanent conversion is limited to 0 02 acre of wetland S &ME does not
anticipate compensatory mitigation because the impact is less than the 0 10 acre threshold
requiring mitigation for wetland loss and due to the very limited nature of permanent
impact
9

Ethanol Pipeline Project SWE Project No 4226 -14 -030
Preconstruction Notification July 23, 2014
Stream impacts associated with the project are also temporary, therefore it is anticipated
that compensatory mitigation will not be required The bed and banks of temporarily -
affected stream channels will be restored to their original dimension and profile, and
stabilized with coir matting Riprap will not be employed. At both stream crossings and
wetlands, Motiva will use native seed mixes to provide soil stabilization. The
Restoration Plan submitted with this PCN outlines the seed mixes and application
methods (Appendix V)
Mitigation has also been provided by avoidance and minimization procedures
implemented during the design phase of the proposed project Impacts to streams and
wetlands within the project corridor have been reduced by route selection and by
eliminating temporary workspace through wetlands and streams where possible
0

V
r
mm
E
;P
N
V;
v
76
H"te
ad
J r
log
T
:R7
Ilk
1�4
J.
Approximate Location of the Proposed Ethanol Pipeline
REFERENCE:
GIS DATA LAYERS WERE OBTAINED FROM ESRI PLEASE NOTE THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL k 0 4,000__•'
2�000 000
PURPOSES ONLY IT IS NOT MEANT FOR DESIGN, LEGAL OR ANY OTHER USES THERE ARE NO
GUARANTEES ABOUT ITS ACCURACY S&ME INC ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DECISION Feet
MADE OR ANY ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE USER BASED UPON THIS INFORMATION. Copyright 2013 National Geog raphic SOCIetY, - CUbed"
SCALE. 1 FIGURE NO
V
2.000
GS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
DATE 07-21-14 #S&ME USETHANOL PIPELINE PROJECT I-u
DRAWN BY CJF WWWSMEINC MOTIVA ENTERPRISES, LLC
. .COM 2
PROJECT NO OLD MOUNT HOLLY ROAD
L A,),) A-1 A-n�n I ENGINEERING LICENSE NO F-0176 CHARLOTTE. NORTH CAROLINA

OMP SIOVdWI ONVl13M 31VWIXO8d&A0AA( \eAljOA OEO- VL-9ZZV\VLOZ\OCt Z\ D filed OWMeiO

N
W
H
O
z
J
W
z
W
0
ziro
AS a3Ha3
al3
tiVsVL
W
F W = ¢ ¢
? 0 Wu 3: U)0
xwwwm
OT 00 D °co
0 3 0 0 Q of
�wo'zxwLL
7UZ U)0�0
5 Q M U Z Q m
z ZOzwlx
W aawHOam0
a0 wUF-00-
wUW�_cr°wcr
wzam�a'¢ °v
°0 Y00U)
<zZQUWZO
w.< WWOWH
m Q m F L= w m Z)
DUJU ~ZrJ_Ir
�U 00O='3UU))
O ¢ F- w
Fw
u)(LL)TC) zOU
U)F,Z f- W¢ W W
z W'LL LL UF-F-
foxJOLL -U)
OWmOOU),
O O,z 0
wF U',zSZIX
2 2 -- F p Z z
v)wc)mmUOa
W
J P a x z�- w W
a U)U)00 U)fna
UW-3 W03'3N13WS'MMM
3SN3311 0 Ia33NION3
0£0 -tib
ON 133 3WWS
o3road
SIN
31vos
Wm
w
Q
z
a
U
U)
m o7a
a a�
O
F
ow
WO
Wz
LL
Ua
mLL
z 0
U)
it w
O,
Z
FW-
a
w
w
F-
U)
z
O
0
moo_
L
U) a
z0
OU
U
w
U)
O
x
z
O
w
w
O
a
W
Y �
z F
¢ w
m
0
CL
O
F
w
m
O
x
0 Z
Y x
U
Z
w
m w¢
0
a-
01
Q U-
m Y O
J O
C,
z
m r
� I
I
BMp Na1711ejaa Bulsso)o we8l ;S \VMa1eAl;0W 0E0- 4�-9ZZC\0E4Z101 3 41ed BuFMe)a
VNIIONVO H1NON 'JNf18N31A031N
AVON A110H 1Nnon ai0
011 S3SINdN31N3 VA110N
3N113dld '1ONVHl3
IMUCI JNISSOM3 WV3M.LS 1V3IdA.L
I�
I �
I �r
I
'
� I
.�`.^
z
(6 z
°
0
j �z0
¢
ZO
w
OX
J W W
U)
U
w0
2U` ¢w
?
�NOui0W
wFn
-OW
�w
WaU-
U0
0
w
w
0,04Qm
d? UI J¢
�z0
LL F
0`FF
Z, WT Q
U)F W
D p?
W
= W N LL
0d
a
~
co
0
XU)¢a�
wcnwF -Z-
O`a
FIr
U, 0
U-�w
U'wx
t=mZO >
J C7
az
O
It
a
O
z
mLL0
OJ,za
U
O J
z-
JO,F
Z =),
7a
Oz
¢UO_aw
>W=OFm
Ow
2o'
LL0p
FJW
0,
w ~�¢
UO,wtr
�O
pJ
0
W
o
J,S LL J
~��
¢ O
�nW
F-,Z
❑- W
¢ x¢
~
p
LL
Z
O
W m
>'
FF- Zm
J Z
Ora Z
�
rw0
aJ w
w�,w0
Ww
w
ap
z
UOpu5Z,z
a
UztY
W2U
mW<wW
0a
a�
LLWQz(1)
WLL
CD F-
WF
F-0
mD
fn
�OUYir
W
J W Y
a
0 <wU
F2sU) Of F-
= J
Z,F
0 ,'z W
wJ, >a
JU
¢'=O
JZw0p
W
w
�J
to
Ua
o zW0
w W - mU
U)
0Z0
F ¢ww
�_�=
1: U)
minZ
=L0 -¢
W FY) U)
wr-
mJ
03
W
wz
Z¢
� -iZ-iW
TWO!
0� -
zwoJ
pmu maw
JU
�-
�z
m�
m-
LL W
WU)ia
w
F
m w
°wwao
0<
~o
w
a�
xY0(no
amw 0
zUUwnwi
Xm�
w,O0
Uoo3z
wF.m0
mOaF
<>-
Pine)
WF(D
Jo: =z
U>�
c9'a
J W wa
av)2
20
Wz
Z
W =
mxN
JZO¢
J��¢
UOZ
>�a
u0<¢,(n<
ZF W J
�xp¢�
ZF-
I>--m
U>
ILI
aNzUw
r)
InwwU)
LL
Uw�
0)
xw
Za
0pa
w2
W(r
0mzpa
w w W 3 w
= z
U) 3 x
Z F a z
¢ a V)
aau�u�Q
U
w Z m 2
2 U) 0
w
U)
W F 0 w ix
UU' a-3
zm
W w,V z
>O Z a
2wU
(dw
� U -1 0
-gawa
w W Q
Z)
F F
Z w
JFFW
wQ of C)
(/) U)
p�F-
UQ¢O
awU
min
� W ct Oz U'
aJJ
U)LL ¢
U2
ow
Or
~ W
u_FUOJ
Z) U) a' W J
0U0
a' W U
JCi >J
JOZO
W (nQQ
x¢-�2
F W am
0¢=x7
J W F
J=am
(�a'
F
LL
OLL
(n z a_0a
N
Uz0
Cl)
aJaLL
7
F-Wa
Ln
z3F-U U)
co
a'r
p-
oD
as
0)
Wm
w
Q
z
a
U
U)
m o7a
a a�
O
F
ow
WO
Wz
LL
Ua
mLL
z 0
U)
it w
O,
Z
FW-
a
w
w
F-
U)
z
O
0
moo_
L
U) a
z0
OU
U
w
U)
O
x
z
O
w
w
O
a
W
Y �
z F
¢ w
m
0
CL
O
F
w
m
O
x
0 Z
Y x
U
Z
w
m w¢
0
a-
01
Q U-
m Y O
J O
C,
z
m r
� I
I
BMp Na1711ejaa Bulsso)o we8l ;S \VMa1eAl;0W 0E0- 4�-9ZZC\0E4Z101 3 41ed BuFMe)a
VNIIONVO H1NON 'JNf18N31A031N
AVON A110H 1Nnon ai0
011 S3SINdN31N3 VA110N
3N113dld '1ONVHl3
IMUCI JNISSOM3 WV3M.LS 1V3IdA.L
I�
I �
I �r
I
'
� I
J
a r \7
a
Of O 0` w
F
Q ¢LuZ
FLL
O
0 gUo
x a O a
U W m LL
Z W 0 LL
uj U Q U U
w FWL
J
m
a
a
a
Y
Q
m
z
0
z
0
a
7
m
z
0;
Fn U)
'Z
�a
a
w7
a
U) w
w 3
/ O
U LL
W
J_
x
W �
Oa
W W
C7 �
Z
W W
> S
Z_
O�
zW
Z
Z W
T
U
D
�W
Z =
Z �
Q
to F-
W Z
W
m W
U)
z0
° x
Z F-
< CL
00
J
Z CO CO
Q m W
a °
W > Z
m J
a
a
CL U) LIJ
mWQ
ODO
UM ) F- Z LLI
W
2 LU CL
H a
QHw
N
o
ui
LL
LL a.
.�`.^
U)
U
LLJ
J
U
QaU)
Lij
J
a r \7
a
Of O 0` w
F
Q ¢LuZ
FLL
O
0 gUo
x a O a
U W m LL
Z W 0 LL
uj U Q U U
w FWL
J
m
a
a
a
Y
Q
m
z
0
z
0
a
7
m
z
0;
Fn U)
'Z
�a
a
w7
a
U) w
w 3
/ O
U LL
W
J_
x
W �
Oa
W W
C7 �
Z
W W
> S
Z_
O�
zW
Z
Z W
T
U
D
�W
Z =
Z �
Q
to F-
W Z
W
m W
U)
z0
° x
Z F-
< CL
00
J
Z CO CO
Q m W
a °
W > Z
m J
a
a
CL U) LIJ
mWQ
ODO
UM ) F- Z LLI
W
2 LU CL
H a
QHw
N
o
ui
LL
LL a.
0
w
U)
1
J
U
QaU)
w w
a
w F,z
Ca
az
�w
z-
w
U
w0
2U` ¢w
?
m0
7a
U) U)
m mIx
F 70
m U)
LLw W
o
0_0
0
0: m
a 0 a J
J w
zz
w F
Q Q
J
a r \7
a
Of O 0` w
F
Q ¢LuZ
FLL
O
0 gUo
x a O a
U W m LL
Z W 0 LL
uj U Q U U
w FWL
J
m
a
a
a
Y
Q
m
z
0
z
0
a
7
m
z
0;
Fn U)
'Z
�a
a
w7
a
U) w
w 3
/ O
U LL
W
J_
x
W �
Oa
W W
C7 �
Z
W W
> S
Z_
O�
zW
Z
Z W
T
U
D
�W
Z =
Z �
Q
to F-
W Z
W
m W
U)
z0
° x
Z F-
< CL
00
J
Z CO CO
Q m W
a °
W > Z
m J
a
a
CL U) LIJ
mWQ
ODO
UM ) F- Z LLI
W
2 LU CL
H a
QHw
N
o
ui
LL
LL a.
F- U)
Q
1
U
pgaa
> J
F�o'a
aU)
ZO°7°
az
�w
z-
a
07
U
w0
2U` ¢w
?
S-U
~
O-
LLw W
o
0_0
0
0: m
a 0 a J
J w
zz
w F
Q Q
ca
z
w°=xx
wuFiF-
r3
a=w
aiw
U' LL FN
azLL
U)0
wwa
w� in
U))wZ�
a =0
w Z
(7LL
WmZ
w
<w
x
zz - Oa
mLL0
-
%ao
�F
OLL
¢ U)
o¢W�
JO,F
Z =),
7a
Oz
(n J0
wMW
wU
Z(n n�
p�w
if
0 0 F
z
m�0cr
<cr
7t
U7
F_U
0<0
O-
Q7
0aai
Woz
U>
LLJ
ix D: >-
UO
LLJ
CO jY U-'
x
W S>
Z'm
=
w
OH0
O rn
wF
w
-J L)
W
Uaa
wZ)
a
UztY
it
'n _j
dZU) pz
WLL
CD F-
WF
F-0
W Wp
m<
xx
U
U W
J W Y
¢
Q
U) C/)
C,
00'3-10-
�zH
3w
cxna�
Qw
w U Z z
Y Z m
w 0 ir
W F x
a 0
O
mWw ?U
¢UJ
~
m Wz
FUEn
�70
UFU
ZzU
>H¢ZU
w
zU
O
002
�N U
O
QUO
Wc7,a��
W F_ z,v ) ¢
cn�U),m
a ¢ W,J
LL W
Oro �
w
0 Z�zDZ
7ZZ)T
�miIr
LLW Z
W°J°z
Z dw,w JO
J�¢F-
Q¢F-
gsx�
F¢w
CL OXx¢ W
awF -�U)
J W wa
av)2
x W
LL U)
#U¢
a¢O
Fx0
a(no
ILI
N
r)
a
n
OQ o
W w
wmx >o
wz¢0 0
LU w
¢ 0 F- ¢
Ow
L
u 0 w w
U) >za °w0
OOw wo
O a U J Z¢
F
2
2
w¢0
� C7�z
��0 w w0
Ow a TOO
0 Q� 0 F-
LU LL
-2 G m W U
F Ej m O W
7JwF J¢ U)
m W, m 0 t
0(n IX 7 2wm
Uazp <Zz
CO mxLD of wPa
H
O °ow- LL0z
�w O Fn
8 0 W = W 0
0 o:¢wz S2 ¢w
Ir FwLOaw xdz
W LL Z p U w W w
U. O a z w x O a-
W Ucnam F¢a
O
U r N
of
w
z
i

:A6 (13)I03HO
al0
:AS NMVHO
b L-5 L-L
:31VO
9L LO-=l
3SN3011 ONIU33NION3
0£0-b L-9ZZb
'ON 1O3rOdd
SIN
�3lVOS
z
0
U
crI
crZ
�w
zw
oy
UQ
Ow
0
BMP'1IV130 VNISSOHO UNVl13M \JM0 \emoW OCO-4l•9ZZC\OChZ10 \ :3 :41ed Bupeejp
VNIIO2JVO Hi2JON `oan9N3IIN031N
WOO'ON13WS'MMM ad06 ,MOH 1NnoW 010
WVS* Ml SdSlbd2iD1NH `dAIlOW
3 3N113dld IONVH13
11V130 ONISSONo aN` 113M IVOld
z
O
U
n�
z
O
H
U
7
F-
Z
O
U
c�
Z
Z
O
H
U
U)
Z
O
U
W
lY
a
OIA
Z
U)
(n
O
U
0
Z
J
f-
w
W
Z
w
C7
o
z
U
i D
al
ED m =
z J F- l i1LkJ JI B
1
Q
W (n
z ¢ zw(n
O w mQ
U z J Z
Q O 0 ¢
Z 1= of
U U x w (6
U` ❑ p � ?� O
O w ¢ ❑ ¢
O wuw)� cn
w
❑ U (n F
w w }=(n Z
0 F < F . 2
LLI
U) F- O ¢ F
cr Q 0- a (n
m J W Z> w
U = O OU
¢ ❑ F_ ¢
= z ?� 0 _� w
(n � LU
pW 0- ¢
W F- W ❑
z X J
z a aOf Q¢ o
U) U � w U) (f)
z � � w Z O
U LL ¢�wa (�
z J Qm(nW ¢
¢ (n Wpffw
- J IX WWLL J
w J ¢ > > Z O
w ¢ 000w
tr F-
ai co 0 (0 z
o w jQ�z O
F-x0p
J
2E 0 ❑0OX (n
0 F zw�W O
U Q Q 0 V) w
Cl) U
ZU ao 0� 0-0 U
o¢ zU) �z ~ WO
Cr WU) z¢
Ofa a0 0 ¢m >
Of a� OFF-
U) a
U
OF _ZZ Z_��p ¢
U x � ¢ w ❑ �
O
U W O w O J J❑ Z
OF_ O� OQa jj ❑
f�Q c6 ¢ a) (n
w ❑
N OF w(n¢
❑ S F_ ¢
_ Fr 2 2❑ < U) Z
CL (n LU F- ❑
vi 0� ❑U) f w
¢
w C) LLmmQ ZF O
Z ❑ JZ ¢W F-
w F- �HJ� Fr � (n
O � W a U m
0 U Q cr W- � W O
¢ p J ❑} ly 2 D
� Q wam OJ O
2 r J �(()D0 0� U)
m () F- LL ::) O w W F- J S
Q U) 0 w U Q O O z
zw
fr of F �Oly F �U aw
O >a ¢ 2U00 V)Z OF
LL W 2 Z zW� p0 F-
mwa ZF- �C7
p
F- _ W ¢¢ O Z
¢ =2 U) g t- w J
IW- �¢ W ZOZO ��U) z
❑ ¢ U
r W w O 1L,<ix� _�¢ ~m
�Q (~j �w0�tYH �w
o =_ CC QZ0� o0� WLL
J FL (n w =-W C) co ¢J
Q �� o ¢F ❑x g J¢ >-
¢ a _ L
o F� W ❑ZU) -jZ wcno Xa
¢U = ¢ WF-- CO W w0
°o aoF- J - w ❑ -j p (D F-
0 w5; - Jo� -
¢ 0� ~ 3: -? w W T 0 a<
O 00W Q Z)Q�w �_ O Ya
z w 0 0 p � a " 0 o O
g T-= z� �U(n0 QQZ wm
w mF xom W
o z� w� F ;QN O0U) �w
w W 0- U) ZO W❑ w W J m
C- CLC� w(n ¢ULLQ U) CO Oz_
0 �- Z Z O J J 2 ¢
O (gym W w❑QZO 0=Z 0Z
J� �O �F�a uicn= W¢
¢ U¢ - a W W o w (D F- F-
w =g ¢z ¢Ow0 ¢ww �T
W U W F- F- W (. Q F- C7 w
2 LL Z w ? S X_ Z w U Q
NO chU 4 W �� .❑OJ c62

of w A rEq
Office Use On
0 2 0 1 4 0 7 7 3 Corps action ID n PAID
�. i o < DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑Q Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 12 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes Z No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑x 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes El No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑x No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes ❑x No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
❑ Yes ❑x No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑Q No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Ethanol Pipeline Project
5
2b.
County:
Mecklenburg
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Charlotte ° ` -''- ' - L U 17'
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
3.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: W . �€$�OM, L-&anch
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Blanchard Terminal Company LLC (BTC) & City of Charlotte (City)
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
BTC Parcel 28042, 285 City Parcel 11630, 340
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
BTC Parcel - 539 S Main St / City Parcel - 600 East 4th Street
3e.
City, state, zip:
BTC Parcel - Findley OH 45840 / City Parcel - Charlotte NC 28202
3f.
Telephone no.:
BTC - (419) 422 -2121 / City (704) 336 -7600
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a
Applicant is
❑ Agent ❑Q Other, specify Owner of proposed ethanol pipeline
4b
Name
Squire Elliott
4c
Business name
(if applicable)
Motiva Enterprises LLC
4d
Street address
910 Louisiana Street
4e
City, state, zip
Houston TX 77002
4f
Telephone no
(731 241 -0621)
4g
Fax no
4h
Email address
Squire Elliott@motivaent com
5
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a
Name
Ronald Walker
5b
Business name
(if applicable)
S &ME Inc
5c
Street address
281 Fairforest'Way
5d
City,,state, zip
Greenville, SC 29607
5e
Telephone no
(864) 297 -9944
5f
Fax no
(864) 297 -0462
5g
Email address
rwalker @smeinc com
Page 2 of 10

B Project,lnformatton and Prior Project History
1 Property Identification
1a Property "identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID)
BTC Parcel - 05724302 / City Parcel - 05721208
1 b 'Site coordinates (in decimal degrees)
1, Latitude 35 27677 Longitude =80 -93007
1c 'Property site
5 acres
2 Surface Waters
2a Name of nearest body of °water to proposed protect
Paw Creek
2b Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water
Class C
2c River basin
Catawba
3 .Protect Description
3a Describe the existing conditions on the slte4and the,general land use In the vicinity of the protect at the time of this
application
The sitelisi bisected by a southwest,to northeastJhistonc roadway embankment that,falls adjacent to<<and along the parcel boundary, and 'extends from
the CSX railway right -of -way on the southem,site extent to'the Marathon property atthe northern extent A majority of the siteas wooded and largely
undeveloped but is located adjacent multiple developed "industrial properties
3b Li'st,the total estimated acreage of all existingMetlands on the property 1
3c `List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (rntermittent,and perennial) on the property 830
,3d `Explain the purpose,of the proposed protect
The, purpose of the project is,to allow for the,transport,of ethanol from rad,cars to a Motiva facility
3e Describe the overall, protect in detail, including the type of equipment to be used
The:proect,Hnll be'theplacement,of 12- inch,steel pipeito transport ethanol fromrthe radiyard to`the,Motroa facility Ddectional bore and'open cut method
4 Jurisdictional Determinations
4a Have tunsdictlonalwetland orsstream determinations by the
Corps or State, been requested or obtained'for this property /
project (including all prior teases in the ast?
❑'Yes ❑ No 0 Unknown
Comments
r
4b If'the Corps madwthe�turisdictional determination, what type
of determination,was,made?
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final,
4c If yes, who, dellneated'theuturisdictional areas?
Name (if, known)
"Other Consultant Company
Ad Iflyes, list the dates,of the Corps'tunsdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
5 Project History
56 Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this protect (including all,pnor phases) in the past?
❑ Yes X, °No, ❑ Unknown
5b If yes, explain in' detail,according to "'help file" Instructions,
6 Future Project Plans
6a Is,this a phased protect?
❑ Yes ❑z No
6b If yes, explain
'Page -3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 14 January 2009

C Proposed Impacts Inventory
1 Impacts Summary
la Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
® Wetlands ❑x Streams —tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2 Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted
2a
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
2b
Type of�impact
2c
Type of wetland
2d
Forested
2e
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 T
Land Clearing
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
022
W2 P
Permanent ROW
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps
002
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
-
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
-
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
-
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
-
2g Total Wetland Impacts
026
2h Comments
Wetland 2 will be,cleared within a 50 -foot construction, corridor (0 04,acre) of that 0 02,wd1 be permanently maintained Impacts to Wetland 1 are
temporary only and it will be seeded with wetland seedmix and allowed to revegetate naturally
3 Stream - impacts
If "there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including,temporary Impacts) proposed,on the site, then complete this
question for'all stream sites Impacted
3a
Stream Impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b
Type ofimpact
3c
Stream name
3d
Perennial (PER) or
Intermittent (INT)?
3e
Type of
jurisdiction
3f
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 T
Installation of Pipeline
Stream 1
INT
Corps
3
115
S2 -
Choose one
-
-
S3 -
Choose one
-
-
S4 -
Choose one
-
-
S5 -
Choose one
-
-
S6 -
Choose one
-
-
3h Total stream and tributary impacts
115
31 Comments
Stream 1 vnll be returned to original profile and dimension and no hard armoring will be applied to banks
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

4 Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U S then indivii Wally list all open water impacts below
4a
Open,water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary l
4b
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c
Type of impact
4d
Waterbody
type
4e
Area of impact (acres)
01 -
Choose one
Choose
O2 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f Total open water impacts
4g Comments
5 Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below
5a
Pond ID number
5b
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
0
P2
Choose one
5f Total
5g Comments
5h Is a dam high hazard permit required
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no
51 Expected pond surface -area (acres) -
5j Size of pond watershed (acres)
5k Method of construction
6 Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete,the chart below If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below If any impacts require miticiation. then vou MUST fill out Section D of this form
6a Project;is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other
6b
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c
Reason for impact
6d
Stream name
6e
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet )
6g
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1 -
Yes /No
B2 -
Yes /No
B3 -
Yes /No
B4 -
Yes /No
B5 -
Yes /No
B6 -
Yes /No
6h Total Buffer Impacts
61 Comments
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1 Avoidance and Minimization
1a Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project
The layout of the pipeline was routed`to cross the wetland at its narrowest point
lb Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques
Route selection and limiting permanent,ROW,width
2 Compensatory Mitigation for Im acts,to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State
2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ❑x No
2b If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply)
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3 Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a Name of Mitigation Bank
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type Choose one
Type Choose one
Type Choose one
Quantity
Quantity
Quantity
3c Comments -
4 Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a Approval letter from'in -lieu fee program is attached
❑ Yes
4b Stream mitigation requested
linear feet
4c If using stream mitigation, stream temperature
0
4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)
square feet
4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4f Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested
acres
4h Comments
5 Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
`Page 6 of''10
PCN Form —Version 1 4 January 2009

6 Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a Wil[the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
Yes ❑x No
6b If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
amount of mitigation required
Zone
6c
Reason for impact
6d
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1 5
6f Total buffer mitigation required
6g If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type,of mitigatiomis proposed (e g , payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an,approved in -lieu fee fund)
6h Comments
Page 7 of 10

E
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a
Does the project Include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers Identified
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
❑ Yes Q No
lb
If yes,'then Is a diffuse flow plan Included If no, explain why
❑'Yes ❑ No
2
Stormwater Management Plan
2a
What Is the overall percent Imperviousness of this project?
%
2b
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes 0 No
2c If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why
Sediment and Erosion Control measures will be installed in accordance with the NCG01
2d
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide,a brief, narrative description of the plan
2e
Who will'be responsible?for the review,of,the Stormwater Management Plan?
3
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a
In which local government's jurisdiction is this projecO
3b
Which of the following locally - Implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply)
❑ Phase II
El NSW
❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other
3c
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑Yes ❑ No
4
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
4a
Which of the following state - Implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply)
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
❑ORW
❑Session Law 2006 -246
❑Other
4b
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5
DWQ 401 Unit,Stormwater Review
5a
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 14 January 2009

'F
Supplementary Information
1
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a
Does the, project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ❑x No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter)
Comments
2
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ❑x No
or Riparian Buffer-Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)?
2b
Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑Yes ❑Q No
2c
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above, questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s)
3
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ❑Q No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description
Piping is for,the transportation of ethanol and will not,attract additional development
4
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, for available capacity of the subject facility
Waste water will not be generated as a result of this protect
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 14 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes Q No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ❑x No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
0
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Please review the attached Summary of Site Assessments for details SBME reviewed the NCNHP and USFWS webpages for records of federally
protected species that are known to have current or historic populations within Mecklenburg County, N.C. and conducted a field evaluation.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes FK-1 No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
http: / /www. habitat.noaa.gov
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑x No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
http: / /gis.ncdcr.gov/
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain? --T-El
Yes No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
http: / /fris.nc.gov/
-N;zD ;�om 04,
Applicant/Age Signature
-7/2
Date
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
I^ is
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10

M
r
CL
(D
s d '-' f• 3 R, 1 ' - -
CL C
m Q O
0
m cz
CD
i c
W
e� H N
in
v
in E N
y►'- m
_ m
L L m V
C
N
O o U O
C C w d
N C
> EN a E
O O c
m
L L E
IL a a)
La
ON
u co
0
l (n
Y+ys'lii� , a N
p 7
2
w cL C
i C o
L
o
co
m
cL
!•it�1 o Q �p O
7
co
E � Y
m N
O 0 N U
O O
CL a o

f,..
''Z d y -� •
IF
LU
tt'
f I mt-
w OVA

M
vi p O
cm
C � M
ca
a°i r a
E 72 O
C� N 0
C c
cu a
Y -
N
m = U
W.� d c
m —
_a Z
L
IL
X c O aS
0
H �
s Z w v o co
0
t �
a
0 W `
O O = N
a .
N � O
- Z
O � U
C � �
N
N ; O
N N N
3 d o a
M
N �
r r �
S O C
Q X
L t N
IL aQ
LLI
(U
_r_
H
E
m
u>
o
� c
o m
,8
c
3 x
E x o
m
VO N l 'N Q7
E c r
m
n
L
Y O
c O n
2 N 07
C 76 c
y C
U CO p
CL v
m a�
0 o Q o
L N N T-
0-0
N
c a
m 3 0 �
c+i
3 > (U Y
Y U
O ~ U D
O U
O O
t � L
a m a

ATTACHMENT A
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD):
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Sgwre,Elliott, w /Motiva Enterprises LLC 1910 Louisiana Street, Houston TX 77002
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
Wilmington District
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Portion of Parcel No 05724302 at 7501 Old Mount Holly Rd & Parcel No 05721208 Old Mount Holly Rd, Charlotte
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES,AT DIFFERENT
SITES)
State NC County /parish /borough Mecklenburg City charlotte
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format)
Lat 3527677 °N, Long -8093007 OW
Universal Transverse Mercator 17
Name of nearest waterbody Paw Creek
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area
Non - wetland waters
830 linear feet 5 width (ft) and /or 0 09 acres_
Cowardin Class Rivenne
Stream Flow Weak Base Flow
Wetlands 0 63 acres
Cowardin Class Palustine
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters
Tidal
Non -Tidal

E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION ,(CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination Date
❑✓ Field Determination Date(S) 3/19/2014
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD
(check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and,
Where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
❑✓ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant
❑✓ Data sheets prepared /submitted, by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant
Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report
Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps
❑ Corps navigable waters' study
❑ U S Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas
❑ USGS NHD data
❑ USGS `8 and 12 digit HUC maps
❑✓ U S Geological Survey map(s) Cite scale & quad name Mountain Island Lake, NC
❑✓ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey
Citation
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s) Cite name
❑ State /Local wetland inventory map(s)
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is
(National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
✓❑ Photographs ✓0 Aerial (Name & Date) Figure 4 3/27/2014
✓❑ Other (Name & Date) Site Photographs - S &ME 3 -19 -2014
❑ Previous determination(s) File no and date of response letter
❑✓ Other information (please specify) NC Dwa,Stream ID Form V 4 11
K
or

1 The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be Jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved Jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time
2 In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre- construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non - reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
Jurisdictional waters, (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions, of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions, (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization, (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary, (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable, (6) accepting a permit authorization (e g , signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on.anylorm of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and, other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are Jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such Jurisdiction in any administrative or Judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court, and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C F R Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, Jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C F R 331 5(a)(2)) if, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA Jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of Jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable

This preliminary JD finds that there "maybe" waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information
informati
later jurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
0
not
rel
Signature and date of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)

SAMPLE
Estimated
amount of
Class of
Site
Latitude
Longitude
Cowardin
aquatic
aquatic
number
Class
resource in
resource
review area
1
0 1 acre
Non - section 10
— non- wetland
2
100 linear feet
Non- section10
— wetland
3
15 square feet
Non - section 10
— wetland
4
0 01 acre
Non - section 10
— non-wetland

NC Division of Water Quality — Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Oriqins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date 3/19/14
Project/Site Freedom Drive /S1
Latitude-35276
Evaluator H Caldwell
County Mecklenburg
Longitude -8093
Total Points
Stream IS at,least Intermittent 28
Stream Determination (circle,one)
Intermittent
Other
Mountain Island Lake
e g Quad Name
if 2! 19 or perennial if> 30'
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
A Geomorphology (Subtotal= 13'5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2 0
30
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1•
2
3
3 In- channel structure ex riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool se uence
0 0
1 0
2 0
30
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
1 O
2 0
3
5 Active /relict floodplain
00
1 0
2•
30
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2.
3
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2.
3
8 Headcuts
0
1•
2
3
9 Grade control
00
05E)
1
1 50
10 Natural valley
0 0
0
1 •
1 50
11 Second or greater order channel
No = 0 •
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual
B H drolo Subtotal = 7
12 Presence of Baseflow
0 0
1
20
3 0
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1•
20
30
14 Leaf litter
1
1Q
0 •
0
15 Sediment on plants or debris
0
0 5
1•
1 5
16 Organic debris, lines or piles
00
0 5•
10
1 1 5
17 Sod -based evidence of high water tables
No = 0
Yes = 3 •
C Biolo Subtotal = =_-)
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
3(-)
2
1
0
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
3 •
2
10
0
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1 s
20
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
0 •
1'
2
3
22 Fish
06
0 5
10
1 5
23 Crayfish
0
05 •
1 _
1 5
24 Amphibians
0•
0 5
10
1 5
25 Algae
0•
050
10
1 5
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75COBL = 1 500ther = 0 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes Limited Stream diversity noted ,Stream structurelmorphoiogy /hydrology does not support habitat for abundant Macrobentos
Sketch
41

NC Division of Water Quality — Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date 3/19/14
Project/Site Freedom Drive /S2
Latitude 35 276
Evaluator H Caldwell
County Mecklenburg
Longitude. _80 93
Total Points-
Stream is at least intermittent 22
Stream Determination (circle one)
Intermittent
Other
Mountain Island Lake
e g Quad Name
lf? 19 or erenmallf? 30'
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
A Geomorphology (Subtotal = 105 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1 •
2 0
3 0
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1•
2
3
3 In- channel, structure ex riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool sequence
0 0
1 •0
2 0
30
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
1 0
2 0
30
5 Active /relict floodplam
00
1 0
2•
30
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
1•
2
3
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0 0
1•
2
3
8 Headcuts
00
1•
2
3
9 Grade control
0
0 5•
1
1 50
10 Natural valley
00
0
1 •
150
11 Second or greater order channel
No = 0 •
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not,rated, see discussions in manual
B H drolo Subtotal = 55
12 Presence of Baseflow
00
1 (F)
20
30
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
0•
1
20
3 0
14 Leaf litter
1,690
1Q
0 •
0
15 Sediment on plants or debris
0
0 5 •
10
1'5
16 Organic debris lines or piles
00
0 5•
1
1 5
11 Sod -based evidence of'high water table?
No=00
I Yes = 3 •
C Biolo Subtotal =
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2 •
1
0
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
3 .
20
1
0
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1 •
20
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
0 •
1
20
3
22 Fish
00,
05C)
1
1 5
23 Crayfish
06
05
1
1 5
24 Amphibians
0•
050
10
1 5
25 Algae
1 0•
0 5
10
1 5
26 Wetland plants in streambed
I
FACW ° = 0 75O0BL = 1 5O0ther = 0 (F)
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods Seep 35;of manual
Notes Limited Stream diversity noted Stream structure /morphology /hydrology does not support habitat for abundant Macrobentos
Sketch
41

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountalns,and Piedmont Region
Pro)ect /Site City /County ��tk f�[I�iU (�'J''4 Sampling Date
Applicant /Owner �� /M� 4\/Gt State Alm - Sampling Point �t
investigatoi(s) (� (/I] ((• (U'�- � Section Township, Range
Landform (hdlslope, terrace, etc) Local reliet (concave, convex, none) ��ac�� C13 r /f Slope ( %)
Subregion (LRR of MLRA) Lati �(n Long Datum
Sod Map Unit Name _d/ / �, C� J < �� ttft ti NWI classification
Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this tune of year? Yes_ No (if no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are 'Normal Citcumstances" present? Yes_ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ___X— No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes _ No
Welland Hydrology Present? Yes _ )(— No
HYDROLOGY
Weiland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators (mnimum of two requited)
Primary Indicators (minumim of
one is required check all that apply)
_ Surface Sod Cracks (136)
Surface Water (A1)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_
_ High Water Table (A2)
— Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)/
Drainage Patterns (B 10)
Saturation,(A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (B1)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7.)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (BS)
C Geomorphic Position (D2)
_
Inundation Visible on Aerial
Imagery (67)
_ Shallow Aqudard (03)
_
Water-Stained � Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_
Aquatic Fauna (613)
_X FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present?
Yes No Depth (inches)
Water Table Present?
Yes No Depth (inches) `
Saturation Present?
Yes_ Nn Depth (inches)
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
(Includes ca filar fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream
gauge, monitoring well aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Ve Sion 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants Sampling Point- 'W I
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastein Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0
? , Absolute Dominant Indicator
®
Dominance Test worksheet
Tree
Stratum (Plot size J ) % Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1
m /' ox I �0 _y _ �
That Are OBl , FACW, or FAC 7 (A)
2
v —✓ «
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
3 Ut Vv,(1 ,,
4
5
That Are OBL, FACW or FAC_ (A /B)
6
7
Prevalence Index worksheet
Total % Cover of Multiply by
�= Total Cover
OBL species C/ x 1 =
/
50% of total cover Y7, 3 20 %of total cover 15
Saphng
/Shrub Stratum (Plot size IS )
FACW species '-ice x 2 = _[!
1 L
/
Li rnn so
FAC species _ x 3 =
FACU species x 4 = - C1
2 (iGU� fautaa Piyls'i�' �_ jQr _
3
_
UPL species x 5 = U
Column Totals (A)— (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A
4
5
6
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
7
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophyhc Vegetation
8
% 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
V0
3 Prevalence Index is s3 0'
= Total Cover
Q
50% of total cover 20% of total cover
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
Herb Stratum (Plot size 5/ )
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
1 Dec_
eke-I ild d9 ri -ce4 AL' -M —� _ 6
Pioblemahc Hydrophyhc Vegetation' (Explain)
—
2 ftking-"tu aA,t.1r� UI,_4
zr
Indicatois of hydnc sod,and wetland hydrology must
3
be present unless disturbed or problematic
4
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
5
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more In diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
7
height
8
Sapling /Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9
than 3 in DBH and greater than or equal to 3 28 It (L
10
m) tall
11
Total Cover
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants regardless
of size, and woody less than 3 28 ft tall
_ =
50% of total cover, 5 20% of total cover j_
plants
Woody
Vine Stratum (Plot size ��' )
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
1 Lim
ii �r Aj(6 ar_� -\
-height
--
2 `'
3
4
Hydrophyhc
5
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Total Cover
50% of total cover d 20% of total cover
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastein Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

SOIL
Samphng Point Vii I
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type, Loc' Texture Remarks
ct ��
'Type C= Concentratlon D= Depletion, f
Hydnc Soil Indicators
_ Histosoi (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrx (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type
Depth (inches)
uced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL =Dore Lining, M =MatnK
Indicators for Problematic Hydnc Se
Dark Surface (S7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted'Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron Manganese ?Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbrnc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Fioodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Coas� PraineQedox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (T` 12)
_ Other (Explain In Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland nydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or pioblematic
Hydnc Soil Present? Yes �e- No
US Army Corps of Engineers Fastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 10

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region //��
(2e {� �'O, City /County /yl�G/ VV�t'1 Sampling Date yi� ///4
Protect /Site F (A'�`- #—�
Applicant /Owner fnn�� n State &g_ Sampling Pouri_
Invesugator(s) l Section, Township, Range
Landform (hillsiope terrace, etc) F/' tt - Local relief (concave, convex, none) Slope ( %)
Subregion (LRR or,MLRA) j 3 f�� Lat S f7 & % Long - Datum
Sod Map Unit Name d e_o G �' f �� )a t4 -A _ NWI classification
Arc climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes `Y No (If no explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are 'Normal Circumstances present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Sod , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed explain any answers In Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes _ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No _ within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland`Hydrology Indicators
Primary ndicators (minimum of one is required check all that apply)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C 1)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
AigaLMat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Water - Stained Leaves (139)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches)
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches)
(Includes capillary fringe)
Deschbe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring
well, aerial photos previous n,
Remarks
Surface Sod Cracks (136)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Dry - Season Water Table (C2)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aqutard (D3)
Microlopographic Relief (D4)
FAC- Neutral Test (05)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X_
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot s ?�ii��r/ ) %Cover Species? Status
i C� i S �FA!(
3 J (y ✓SET) C,
4
5
6
7
= Total Cover
50% of total cover 20% of total cover
Sapling /Shrrib Stratum (Plot size )s )
I Jvv,, r uc _ 5
2
3 i t ifi yu C�nti1 �C° fs� t_ G%�Q
4
5
b
7
8
9
= Total Cover
50% of total coverr 20% of total cover
Herb:Stratum (Plot size S r )
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
= Total Cover
50% of total cover 20% of total cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size c) n )
2
3
4
5 -
�J = Total Cover
50% of total covei i S 20% of total cover
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
Sampling Point
Dominance Test worksheet
Number or Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW or FAC tp (A)
Total Number of Dominant �1
Species Across All Strata ! (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL FACW or FAC _ (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet
Total % Cover of
Mlllhoiy by
OBL species f�_
x 1 =
FACW species _�
x 2 =
FAC species -.7
x 3 = a a�
FACU species 1S
x 4 =
UPL species —Q—
x 5 = 7
Column Totals
(A) �2 " S (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A
= 3, to
Hydrophytrc Vegetation Indicators
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytrc Vegetation
_ 2 Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53 0'
4 Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in,Remarks or on a separate,sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytrc Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problernatic
our Vegetation Strata
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
Sapling /Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in DBH and greater thamor equal to 3 28 ft (1
m) tall
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woodyiplants less than 3 28,ft tall
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
Hydrophytrc
Vegetation
Present? Yes �_l No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2'0

SOIL
Sampling Point T
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) %fie _ o Texture Remarks
Type C= Concentration D= Depletion, I
Hydnc Sod Indicators
Histosol (A1)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Hislic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S 1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type
Depth (inches)
Remarks
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix "(F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Suface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Sods (F19) (MLRA 148)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
on PL =Pore Linincl, M= Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydnc Sods
_ 2 cm Muck (A 10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present
unless disturbed or problematic
Hydnc Sod Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and piedmont Region
Protecl/Srte V-r,,, ' N& Dn"e City /County P_ IP t�Ei Sampling Date
Applicant /Owner / v�C� f SAC State OC— Sampling Point f A 16,1,
IIi p d [ t
Investigator(s) t l .fix t / C (L 14� Section, Township, Range
Landform (hdlslope terrace, etc) iw d r Sr . Local relief (concave, convex, none) C ��✓ C-L / r Q Slope ( ^ /o)
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) �� (? Lai ;`f . / �� %Cf `� Long - 'Fa j Datum
Soil Map Unit Name tLI ✓1� L<'} /✓a I �/l /�+vi NWI classification
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this,time of year? Yes -4 No (If no, explain,in ^Remarks)
Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes —y— No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes = No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes k No
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reouired check all that apply)
_ Surface Sod Cracks (66)
Surface Water (Al)
— True�AquatictPlants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
i� High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydiogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
X Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Rools (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (61)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
' "Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mal or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_C Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aqudard (D3)
Watei Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_
-X FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B 13)
Field Observations y
Surface Water Present? Yes No
1` Depth (Inches)
Water Table Present? Yes _ No
Depth (inches)_
Saturation Present? Yes _� No
Depth (inches) s
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes ^> No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring
well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Easter n Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
10
11
= Total Cover
50% of total cover > 20% of total cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 3 Ci / )
2
3
4
5
�= Total Cover ??
50% of total cover 20% of total cover J
Remarks (include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
Sampling Point
Dominance Test woi ksheet
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size ��� )
%Cover Species? Status
I L i �(rtf�Q.IMltiJ� �, 4 fJ�
_nl -CAI-
2 c to -P/'b f g(n r,
�Co Y TA6(�/
3 ue-rniC
a
Total'Number of Dominant
4
5
6
Percent of Dominant Species
7
That Are OBL, FACW or FAC
(QD = Total Cover
50% of total cover
20% of total over
i
Saplino /Shrub Stratum (Plot size I )
1 otal % Cover of
Multiply by
2
OBL species _ 0
3
4
x 2 =
5
FAC species_
6
7
x 4 =
8
UPL species O
9
Column Totals (t S
36 = Total Cover
50% of total cover LS
20% of total rover
Herb Stratum (P/lot size 5-( )
J WlClz\ -e l V�✓�
f 1� ,
2
3
_
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
= Total Cover
50% of total cover > 20% of total cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 3 Ci / )
2
3
4
5
�= Total Cover ??
50% of total cover 20% of total cover J
Remarks (include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
Sampling Point
Dominance Test woi ksheet
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
_
(A)
Total'Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata
(B)
Percent of Dominant Species
—7f,,
That Are OBL, FACW or FAC
?
(A /B)
Prevalence Index worksheet
1 otal % Cover of
Multiply by
OBL species _ 0
x 1 = _
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species_
x 3 = / 3
FACU species _n_
x 4 =
UPL species O
x 5 = D
Column Totals (t S
(A) 3
(B)
Prevalence Index = B/A
= —�
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53 0'
4 - Mot phological Adaptations' (Provide supportinq
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Proolemahc Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydnc sod and wetland hydrology must
be present unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
Tree - Woody plants excluding vines, 3 In (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
Sapling /Shrub - Woody plants excluding vines less
than 3 in DBH and greater than or equal to 3 28 ft (1
m) tall
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 It tall
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3 28 it in
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

SOIL
Sampling Point lt/-2
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators)
Depth Matrix __ Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (mold) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
'Tye C= Concentration D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix MS= Masked Sand Grains `Location PL =Pore Lining, M =Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators
indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils'
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A 10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (SR) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coas[ Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Hlstic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Sods (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (176)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF 12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A 11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Mateilal (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type
Depth (inches)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 'y— No
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern, ,9 Mountains/ and Piedmont Region
Protect /Site rreeb, - r t "� City /County (r'IP_G4/ %�� 6_)1' h _ Sampling Date (�L
Applicant /Owner PA64 ,_% State Sampling Point uo a
^ F
Investigatoi(s) cx, Section Township, Range
Landform (hillsiope terrace, etc) tp�7/& Local relief (concave convex, none) %I -- Slope ( °b)
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) ) ��p _ Lat �� �yrJ 1 �a Long — 6 f / Datum
Soil Map Unit Name C G r S t= �CSf �f P C� (� fit- NWI classification
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical tor this tune of year? Yes l No (If no, explain In Remarks )
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology _ significantly disturbed? Are 'Normal Circumstances' present? Yes_ No
Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrology naturally,problematic? (if needed, explain any answers In Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes K No Is the Sampled Area
Hydnc Sod Present? Yes No withima Wetland? Yes No
'Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No x
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Prumry, indicators (minimum of one is required check all that apply)
_ Surface Sod ('lacks (136)
_ Surface Water (A t)
_ True Aquatic Plantss(1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BB)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhrzospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (B1)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Suits (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (Ca)
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Snailow Aquilard (D3)
_ Watei -Stained �Leaves (B9)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches)
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastein Mountains,and Piedmont - Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point
,�1
Tree Stratum (Plot size 3d I
1 1_;�utP�Ciwt,k�- � .a,r.
Absolute
) n % Cover
-P /0 0
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
Dominance Test worksheet
Number of Dominant Species /
That Are OBL FACW, or FAC i (A)
l "
2 Ulwfvs Gu��r '—
FACW species
_y
Y
Total Number of Dominant
3
FACU species _
x 4 = Le
Species Across All Strata_ (B)
a
Percent of Dominant Species OO,,�� e
5 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC O V %Y (A /B)
6
7
{� = Total`Cover
50% of total coves 20% of total cover
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size LS ( )
2 �-
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
,fib =Total Cover
50% of total cover 20% of total cover_
Herb Stratum (Plot size S/ )
FAL
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
/0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover S 20% of total cover
3d'
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size )
2
3
4
5
t^a = Total Cover
50% of total cover I b 20% of total cover
e photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
Prevalence Index worksheet
Total % Covei of
Multiply by
OBL species �_
x 1 = (')-
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species ��
x 3 =_
FACU species _
x 4 = Le
UPL species 6
x 5 = Q_
Column Totals
(A)
Prevalence Index = B/A
= 3
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 Prevalence Index is 53 0'
4 -Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remaiks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Four Veqetation Strata
Tree - Woody plants excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
Sapling /Shrub - Woody plants excluding vines less
I
han 3 in DBH and greater than or equal to 3 28 it (1
M) tall
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 it tali
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

SOIL
Sampling Point On.
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator of confirm the absence of indicators )
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
( inchos) _ Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc`
_Texture Remarks
0 -ko YR.Wr IC2 C)
SlS )nom
'Type C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains
21-ocation PL =Pore Lining M =Matnx
Hydric Soil Indicators
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils'
_ Histosoi (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ HIshc Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) = Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydiogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplaln Sods (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cin Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (176)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted,Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ 1 hick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F 13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21),(1VILRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic
Restrictive Layer (If observed)
Type
Depth (inches)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Vei sion 2 0

%m
f
s.
- ,
!
2
0
2
a
{7
.
by
! �
�
)■ ■ �
�
�
);
�
Q
|
/•
g
,y=
\
FD
CL
,
a-
_
0
§
\ <
E
! -
co
±
�
.
k
k

RESTORATION PLAIN
Ethanol Pipeline Project
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
The proposed project has been designed to avoid and minimize jurisdictional impacts
where practicable. As part of mitigation for unavoidable impacts, the following plan
shall be implemented to restore temporarily- affected wetlands and streams This plan
entails restoration of temporarily - disturbed areas to their original contours and conditions
to the degree practicable upon project completion. Further, disturbed wetland areas and
streambanks will be permanently stabilized with a native vegetative cover The measures
outlined below will be specified in the contract documents prepared for construction of
the proposed project.
Proposed restoration activities will include the removal of placed fill material and
restoration of original pre - disturbance contours Excavated material shall be returned to
the trench to the extent possible, and remaining material relocated and,retained on an
upland site Excavated topsoil will be stockpiled separately and then replaced uniformly
over the area of excavation from which it was removed The native seed mix identified in
Table 1 below will be utilized within temporarily- disturbed portions of the ROW
comprised of wetlands
Table 1! Wetland Seed Mix
�y •r.cr ".' "`a, u,. osr`_. °t `,d
S cies r ` - _,� ��
'" ���t ^:�resl' r' -33i. .s�
��CommonsName ��� a� = 'vtlP.ercenta
C ✓iMr�S .� +.—_r � n..
e'of�Mix;
El mus n anus
Riverbank wild rye
20
A rostis stolonifera
Creeping bent grass
15
Carex vul moldea
Fox sedge
12
Panicum vir atum
Switch grass
15
Poa palustns
Fowl bluegrass
15
Dichanthelium clandestmum
Deer,ton ue
08
Bidens anstosa
Bidens
04
Juncus effusus, NC Ecotype
Soft rush
04
Aster latenflorus
Calico aster
03
Sa ittana latifolia
Duck potato
02
Saururus cernuus
Lizards tail
02
100
Wetland Seed Mix to be applied to all wetland areas extending five feet landward following construction
Recommended application rate 20 -25 Ibs per acre
At temporarily- affected streambanks, the native riparian seed mix specified in Table 2 shall
be utilized

Restoration Plan SWE project No 4226 -14 -030
Ethanol Pipeline Protect July 2014
Table 2: Riparian Seed Mix *'
11C ffi'ndn.Nime °
S eciesV„ s
1Percen6ge of Mix��
Virginia wild rye
EI mus vir inicus
15
Switch grass
Panicum vir atum
15
Creeping bent grass
A rostis stolmifera
10
Black-eyed Susan
Rudbeckia hirta, NC ecotype
10
Lance leaf tickseed
Coreo sislanceolata
10
Deer tongue
Panicum clandestinum _
10
Big bluestem
Andro o on gerardil
05
Soft rush
Juncus effusus
05
Awned barnyard grass
Echmochloa muncata
05
Little bluestem
Schizach num sco anum
05
Indian grass
Sor hastrum nutans,
05
Gamma
Tn sacum dact loides
05
100
• Riparian Seed Mix to be applied to all,disturbed streambanks, extending five4eet landward folloWng construction
• Recommended application rate 20 -25 Ibs per acre
Additional information related to streambank restoration activities is included on Figures
6 and 7 in the Figures Section of this PCN.
Restoration Plan Prepared By:
S &ME, Inc
9711 Southern Pine Blvd
Charlotte, N.0 28273
704 523 4726
Contact Crystal Fox, C E
cfoxna,smeinc com
Local Suppliers of native seed and plant material
Mellow Marsh Farm
1312 Woody Store Road
Siler City, N C 27344
919 742 1200
919 742 1280 fax
www mellowmarshfarm com
Natives
550 East Westinghouse Boulevard
Charlotte, N C 28273
688 527.1177
688 527 1133
plantsgplantnative net