830008_Routine Inspection_20220716

Owner Name:
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Arrival Time:
Farm Name: Big C RJI fli%
c, farms
fo'LFO
Departure Time:
Oct
Owner Email:
Phone:
County:
ENTERED TO
Region:
LAS ERI-1 U-I L
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: CU 1 I �y 1 C 190 tlijI C1 Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Integrator:
JUL 21 ZCIZZ
DEQ/DWR WQROS
FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OrF!GE
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ? No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes kl No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number:
Date of Inspection:
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window
12. Crop Type(s): SFI) J \ ryf r(� M. /� / � y / j J
13.SoilType(s): YIW �14gra11/� 1(M�..ICKI l , ((Mtt�Ilej
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
G90
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Structure 5
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
❑ Yes 1K1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
or environmental threat, notify DWR
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ Yes EA No ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Yes No ❑NA El NE
❑ Yes ] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Evidence of Wind Drift 0 Application Outside of Approved Area
❑ Yes
Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑Other:
❑ Yes No
❑ Waste T sfers
0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
�J No ❑ NA ❑ NE
7`No El NA ❑NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
El NA ❑NE
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes AO No
21 If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? El Yes r No
Page 2 of 3 5/12/2020 Continued
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA El NE
❑ NA ❑ NE

Facility Number:
Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
,4,'ptoi dog feortd i rl flIQ0.
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
KO4Q Pon -Mot
Dater ' I B`
5/12/2020