20140799 Ver 1_Application_20140729

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PAT L. MCCRORY ANTHONY J. TATA
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
July 28, 2014
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
ATTN: Mr. David Bailey
NCDOT Coordinator
Subject: Application for Section 404 Nationwide Permit 14 and 401 Water Qualtiy
Certification for the replacement of Bridge No. 97 on SR 1925 (Worsham Mill
Road) over Wolf Island Creek in Rockingham County, North Carolina. Federal
Aid Project No. BRZ-1925(2).
TIP No. B-4803.
Debit $240.00 from WBS Element 38573.1.1.
Please find enclosed the Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) form, USFWS concurrence letter,
Preliminary Jurisdictional Form, stormwater management plan, permit drawings, and design
plans for the above referenced project. For impact totals, please see the PCN.
The proposed let date for the project is January 20, 2015 with a review date of December 2, 2014.
However, the let date may advance as additional funds become available.
A copy of this permit application will be posted on the NCDOT Website at
https://connect.ncdot.gov/resources/Environmental/Pages/default.aspx, under Quick Links>
Permit Applications. A copy of the CE is also available at the above website address under Quick
Links > Environmental Documents.
Thank you for your assistance with this project. If you have any questions or need additional
information, please contact Jason Dilday at [e-mail] or [phone].
Sincerely,
Richard W. Hancock, P.E., Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Unit
cc: NCDOT Permit Application Standard Distribution List
MAILING ADDRESS: LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TELEPHONE: [phone] CENTURY CENTER, BUILDING B
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS UNIT FAX: [phone] BIRCH RIDGE DRIVE
1598 MAIL SERVICE CENTER RALEIGH NC 27610
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548 WEBSITE:NCDOT.GOV

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
10 Permit
�I Section 404 Permit ❑ Section
lb. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
I Yes ❑ No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from
the DWQ (check all that apply):
— Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
— Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
401 Water Quality Certification
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ►1 No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter
fee program.
program proposed for mitigation
from mitigation bank or in -lieu
❑ Yes 0 No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes 0 No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes 6, No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Replacement of Bridge 97 over Wolf Island Creek on SR 1925 (Worsham Mill Road)
2b. County:
Rockingham
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Ruffin
2d. Subdivision name:
not applicable
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
B-4803
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
North Carolina Department of Transportation
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
not applicable
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
not applicable
3d. Street address:
1598 Mail Service Center
3e. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27699-1598
3f. Telephone no.:
[phone]
3g. Fax no.:
[phone]
3h. Email address:
[e-mail]
1

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent
❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
not applicable
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
not applicable
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
2

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
not applicable
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 36.456619 Longitude: - 79.569765
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size:
4.6 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project:
Wolf Island Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C
2c. River basin:
Roanoke
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Forest communities, agriculture, historic mill site, minor residential development
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.01 acre
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
1262 linear feet
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
To replace a structurally deficient bridge.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project involves replacing a four span, 171-foot bridge with a two span, 195-foot bridge on a new alignment. Traffic
will be maintained on the existing roadway structure and serve as an on -site detour. The new bridge will be built north
(downstream) of the existing bridge. Improvements to the approach roadways will be required for a distance of
approximately 480 feet to the northwest and 950 feet to the southeast of the structure. Standard road building
equipment, such as trucks, dozers, and cranes will be used.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
❑Yes
I No ❑Unknown
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
Preliminary ❑Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑Yes
I No ❑Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. .
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes I No
6b. If yes, explain.
3

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections
❑ Wetlands
❑ Open Waters
were completed below
for your project (check all that apply):
Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
Pond Construction
/1
❑
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
(if known)
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
(Corps - 404, 10
DWQ — non-404, other)
2f.
Area of impact
(acres)
Site 1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
Site 2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
Site 3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
Site 4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
Site 1 ❑ P ❑ T
Utility Impacts
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number -
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial
(PER) or
intermittent
(INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
(Corps - 404, 10
DWQ — non-404,
other)
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact length
(linear feet)
Bank
Stabilization
Wolf Island Creek
�1 PER
►1 Corps
27
111
Site 1 0 P ❑ T
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
Causeway
Wolf Island Creek
PER
�1 Corps
27
36
Site 1 ❑ P 0T
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
Causeway
UT to Wolf Island
Creek
❑ PER
/1 Corps
1
43
Site 2 ❑ P /1 T
❑DWQ
II INT
Site 3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ INT
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
Site 4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ INT
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
Site 5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ INT
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
111 Perm
79 Temp
3i. Comments: Impact of pier placement = 24 sq. ft. Causeway to UT to Wolf Island Creek will consist of 24" pipe overtopped
with riprap. Causeways will be constructed by first applying a sheet of geotextile fabric before riprap is applied. After
construction, the fabric will be unpinned at the toe and removed, removing the riprap at the same time. All banks, with
exception of areas of bank stabilization, will be returned to their previous state.
4

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
4b.
Name of
waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
0 Permanent
0 Temporary
4g. Comments:
5. Pond
If pond or
or Lake Construction
lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID
number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavat
ed
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
5

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer
impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Other: Jordan
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
Buffer impact
number—
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1 impact
(square feet)
6g.
Zone 2 impact
(square feet)
B1 ❑P❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P❑T
Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
0
6i. Comments:
6

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
See Stormwater Management Plan. The existing 4 span bridge will be replaced with a 2 span structure. The new bridge
will be constructed parallel to the existing bridge which will allow traffic to be maintained on the existing bridge. Riprap
pads will be used at pipe outlets. Riprap bank stabilization will be used where ditches tie into Wolf Island Creek.
Wetlands in the project vicinity have been avoided.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Best Management Practices for Surface Waters will be used during all phases of construction.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes I No
❑ DWQ • Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: not applicable
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
0 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
0 square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
7

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes I1 No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
Zone 2
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
8

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
❑ Yes I1 No
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: Project not within a buffered basin.
❑ Yes I1 No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
N/A
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
►/ Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
See attached.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Certified Local Government
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
not applicable
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Phase II
❑NSW
❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
/1 Yes ■ No
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply):
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
❑ ORW
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No NA
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
t:1 Yes ❑ No
9

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
use of public (federal/state) land?
. Yes ❑ No
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
/1 Yes ❑ No
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
Comments:
Yes ❑ No
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
❑ Yes /1 No
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes /1 No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
❑ Yes
II/ No
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Due to the minimal transportation impact resulting from this bridge replacement, this project will neither influence nearby
land uses nor stimulate growth. Therefore, a detailed indirect or cumulative effects study will not be necessary.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
not applicable
10

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
habitat?
❑ No
4 Yes
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
impacts?
❑ No
4 Yes
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
4 Raleigh
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
N.C. Natural Heritage Program database; USFWS-Raleigh Field Office website; biological surveys for protected species
listed for Rockingham County, which include the Roanoke logperch, James spinymussel and smooth coneflower.
Biological Conclusions of "No Effect" were rendered for the James spinymussel and smooth coneflower. Though habitat
is present for the James spinymussel, no freshwater mussels of any species were found in Wolf Island Creek No further
surveys were required for the James spinymussel. Habitat for smooth coneflower exists, but a survey conducted of the
study area on 6/6/2012 resulted in no specimens being found. A Biological Conclusion of "May Affect, Not Likely to
Adversely Affect" was rendered for the Roanoke logperch. Informal Section 7 consultation was conducted with USFWS
and concurrence was received on July 14, 2014.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes
0 No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NMFS County Index
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
No
4 Yes ❑
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NEPA Documentation
Project designed to avoid impacts to historic property.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
No
4 Yes ❑
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: NCDOT Hydraulics Unit coordination with FEMA
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Maps
Richard W. Hancock, P.E.
"7- 2 Ni-
Date
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
11

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box33726
Ralei gh, North Carolina 27 63 6 -37 26
Julv 14.2014
Richard W. Hancock, P.E.
North Carolina Department of Transportration
Proj ect Development and Environmental Analysis
1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27 699 -1598
Dear Mr. Hancock:
This letter is in response to your letter of July 9,2014 which provided the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) with the biological conclusion of the North Carolina Department of Transportation
that the replacement of Bridge No. 97 on SR 1925 over Wolf Island Creek in Rockingham County
(TIP No. 8-4803) may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect the federally endangered Roanoke
logperch (Percina rex). These comments are provided in accordance with Section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act @SA) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543).
According to information provided, fish surveys were conducted at the project site on May 13,2014
and April 21,2009. The surveys extended 100 meters upstream and 400 meters downstream of SR
1925. No Roanoke logperches were observed and habitatquality for the species was marginal.
However, the Roanoke logperch has been identified 6.2 miles downstream.
Based on the fish survey results and other available information, the Service concurs with your
conclusion that the proposed bridge replacement may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect the
Roanoke logperch. We believe that the requirements of Section 7(a)(2) of the ESA have been
satisfied. We remind you that obligations under Section 7 consultation must be reconsidered if: (1)
new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect listed species or critical
habitat in a manner not previously considered in this review; (2) this action is subsequently modified
in a manner that was not considered in this review; or (3) a new species is listed or critical habitat
determined that may be affected by this identified action.
The Service appreciates the opportunity to review this project. If you have any questions regarding
our response, please contact Mr. Gary Jordan at [phone] (Ext.32).
Sincerely,
,A
n H-ry Y")*-
W' Pete Benjar{inu Field Supervisor
David Bailey, USACE, Wake Forest, NC
Travis Wilson, NCWRC, Creedmoor, NC
Felix Davila, FHWA, Raleigh, NC
Electronic copy:
ATTACHMENT A
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD):
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT
SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: City:
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat. °N; Long. OW.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody:
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non -wetland waters:
linear feet: width (ft) and/or acres.
Cowardin Class:
Stream Flow:
Wetlands:
Cowardin Class:
acres.
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters:
Tidal:
Non -Tidal:
1

E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD
(check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and,
where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
❑ M• aps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant:
❑ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the
appljnt/consultant.
Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ D• ata sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U• .S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ U• SGS NHD data
El
El
El
El
El
El
El
El
El
USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey.
Citation:
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
FEMA/FIRM maps:
100-year Floodplain Elevation is:
(National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date): or
n Other (Name & Date):
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
Other information (please specify):
2

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre -construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.
3

This preliminary JD finds that there "may be" waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not
necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for
later jurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of Siature and •ate of
Regulatory Project Manager person requesting preli ry JD
(REQUIRED) (REQUIRED, taining
the signature is impracticable)
4

Site
Number Latitude Longitude Cowardin
Class
Estimated Amount
of Aquatic Resource
in the Review Area
(lin. ft or ac.)
Class of Aquatic
Resource

NC OneMap, NC Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, N C 911 Board
0 0.05 0.10.025 Miles
¯
Project Area/Deline ation Limits
Historic Worsh am Mill
Wetland O utsid e o f Proje ct Area
Wolf Island Creek
SA
SB
Worsham Mill Road (SR1925)
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: V vt_e_ Jooq Project: r-6_ L/ 0
Latitude:
Evaluator: Nel/Hied//Ic, /1/��Site: /Jd/-C -�1t cI t`c=€tPL_ Longitude:
Total Points: Stream is at least intermittentI' b , 5
if >_ 19 or perennial if z 30
County: %%U c &LK, I lar,L
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = I k )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuous bed and bank
0
1
2 '
3
2. Sinuosity
0
2
.3.
3. In -channel structure: riffle -pool sequence
0
t 1
2
3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
0
2
3
5. Active/relic floodplain
0
1)
2
3
6. Depositiorral bars or benches
0
(1)
2
3
7. Braided channel
01
1
2
3
8. Recent alluvial deposits
(70
1
2
3
9a Natural levees
(p)
1
2
3
10. Headcuts
"In
1 .
2
3
11. Grade controls
`0
0.5_ j
1
1.5_,
12. Natural valley or drainageway
0
0.5
1
1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
No 0
-
Yes = 3
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
a..
an -made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal =
14. Groundwater flow/discharge
0
1
2
3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- dry or growing season
0
1
2
3
16. Leaflitter
1.5
1
0.5
%
0
17. Sediment on plants or debris
0 )
0.5
1
1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines)
0
0.5
1 _,
_ 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present?
No = 0
Yes = 1.5 )'
C. Biology (Subtotal =
206. Fibrous roots in channel
2
1
0
21b. Rooted plants in channel
2
1
0
22. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.51
23. Bivalves
2
3
24. Fish
(0)
0.5
1
1.5
25. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
0.5
1 `
1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton
,, 0-2;}
1
2
3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus.
I 0
0.5
1
1.5
29 b. Wetland plants in streambed
FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
nd 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
e(' i`1 t'`t (7.)
c M:C1 A\trot~t?nAA'OtS
Sketch:
l? 'h(k tit.'II ie
culkolk-
(,j

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: k) C,-D ' T
3. Date of evaluation: " v VN.9 2 U 4. Time of evaluation: I il0 el°
5. Name of stream: 6. River basin: MA4 4-12-
7. Approximate drainage area: 8. Stream order:
S-1-
9. Length of reach evaluated: A- ( 10. County: L2 9c .'Acy
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): Longitude (ex. -77.556611):
2. Evaluator's name: i Ae�, «�
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
v, • r e&n pos4 4-vr
16. Site conditions at time of visit: V\-t Co, (• v a1 h 1
15. Recent weather conditions: ".0'"
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known:
Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? (0 NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential
% -Forested
22. Bankfull width: t
Section 10 _Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Nutrient Sensitive Waters
_Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
point? ES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? NO
% Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
/i % Cleared / Logged _% Other ( )
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 'S
24. Channel slope down center of stream: _Flat (0 to 2%) iC Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight _Occasional bends X Frequent meander _Very sinuous
Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): Comments:fQ�i�4
•
Evaluator's Signature %' \J2! ->e, Date (0 149.(6q
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
1

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
# ,
CHAItACTERTSTICS
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
-Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
SCORE
PHYSICAL
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
(no flow or saturation ='0; strong' flow =max points)
0 - 5
0 — 4
0 5
2
Evidence of past human alteration
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
0- 6
0- 5
0 5
3
Riparian zone
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
0 — 6
0 - 4
0 5
4
Evidence of nutrient' or chemical discharges
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
0 — 5
0 - 4
0 — 4
5
Groundwater discharge
0 — 3
0 — 4
0 4
_,
`
6
' Presence of adjacent floodplain
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain ='max points)
0 — 4
0 — 4
0 —2
/
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
0 5
0 4
0
t
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
p_ 6
0- 4
0 2
9
Channel sinuosity
0 5
0 4
0 3
10
Sediment input
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
0 5
- 4
0 4
I 1
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
(fine, homogenous- 0; large, diverse sizes max points)
NA*
0 4
0 — 5
STABILITY
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
0 5
0 4
0 5
, J
13
Presence of major bank failures
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
0-5
0-5
0-5
14
Root depth and density on banks
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout =max points)
0 3
0 4
0 5
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
0 - 5
0 4
0 — 5
,
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well -developed = max points)
0 3
0 5
0 6
0—(
17
Habitat complexity
(little or no habitat — 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
0 6
0 —b
0 6
/
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
5
0 5
0 5
19
Substrate embeddedness
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
NA
0 -,4
0 4
f
c.1
BIOLOG'V
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
0 — 4
0 — 5
0 - 5
�'
1
Presence of amphibians
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
0 — 4
0 — 4
0 — 4
2?
Presence of fish
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
0 4
0 — 4
0 - 4
n
�3
Evidence of wildlife use
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
0 6
0— 5
0— 5
T uial Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
ictenstics arc not assessed in coastal streams.

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: ca__Oq
Project: is_ y ?,0 3 Latitude:
Evaluator:
L' L�rcarr�u
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
if >_ 19 or perennial if z 30
Site: as.
County: i`-,0c . Li'
Longitude:
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = -1 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
la. Continuous bed and bank
0
1
CO
3
2. Sinuosity
0
1
3
3. In -channel structure: riffle -pool sequence
0
C1)
2
3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
0
0
2
3
5. Active/relic floodplain
0
1
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
&
2
3
7. Braided channel
i�
1
2
3
8. Recent alluvial deposits
CO
1
2
3
9 a Natural levees
re-
1
2
3
10. Headcuts
6\
1
2
3
11. Grade controls
0.5
1
1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway ('A. k \, `
(Vl
0.5
1
1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
No = 0
Yes = 3
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
a Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal =
14. Groundwater flow/discharge
0
1
Q)
3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- dry or growing season
0
1
3
16. Leaflitter
��
1
0.5
0
17. Sediment on plants or debris
(1_0
0.5
1
1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines)
0
.-0 5=,
1
__ 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present?
No = 0
(Yes = 1.5 -�
C. Biology (Subtotal =
20b. Fibrous roots in channel
"3 j
2
1
0
21 b. Rooted plants in channel
3
21
1
0
22. Crayfish
0
•0
1
1.5
23. Bivalves
A
1
2
3
24. Fish
0)
0.5
1
1.5
25. Amphibians
0
- 0.5)
1
1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
" 0 '�
0.5
1
1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton
0
A0,6
2
3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus.
0
1
1.5
29 b. Wetland plants in streambed r^ 4,1-' 's71).6
FAC = 0.5; FACW .7 OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or yvetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
0 t f\ j-k` c r74, r, v\ re
Sketch:
p r '\ r/t 1V1 r l

USACE AID#
DWQ #
SB
Site # (indicate on attached map)
bri`c A. C iU! ;
U
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions: Yld 4-Gk5. ✓1 7 Ct- 4' 1 c _'-
16. Site conditions at time of visit: S'(, ft ✓u-t Ch c-s" k 11.4-
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: NCI.o7- 2. Evaluator's name:
3. Date of evaluation: t /2- / d 9 4. Time of evaluation:
5. Name of stream: Sa
ChmI II (77'!'o,oE'�e
LLSPAA
6. River basin: 0 g.,✓tol
7. Approximate drainage area: 8. Stream order: ® -
9. Length of reach evaluated: 100'
10. County: 'Rock,-
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): Longitude (ex. -77.556611):
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
v36, Q
Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: _
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey'? YES NO
% Commercial % Industrial
l 1 _% Cleared / Logged _% Other ( )
22. Bankfull width: /2 - 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): f -
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential
IGO% Forested
_% Agricultural
24. Channel slope down center of stream: / Flat (0 to 2%) ✓ entee (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight ✓Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): S 7
r -C . "I>M1 r\s . l gin() WA
Comments: M.o.-1‘ - n ��7. ).c C.-210:nruD -Par-
Evaluator's Signature Date 0
This channel evaluation form is intended to used only as a guide to assist landowners and' environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
1
2

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
I PHYSICAL
#
CHARACTERISTICS
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
SCORE
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
0--5
0-4
0-5
—
2
Evidence of past human alteration
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
0 6
0 - 5
0 5
�(
3
Riparian zone
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
0 6
0 4
0 5
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
0 5
0 - 4
0 - 4
5
Groundwater discharge
(no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)
0 3
0 4
0 4
6
' Presence of adjacent floodplain
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
0 4
0 - 4
0 2
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
0 5
0 - 4
0 - 2
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
(no wetlands = 0; Iarge adjacent wetlands = max points)
0 6
0 - 4
0 2
LI-
9
Channel sinuosity
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
0- 5
0 4
0 3
3
10
Sediment input
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
0. 5
0 4
0 4
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
NA*
0 4
0 5
STABILITY
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
0-5
0-4
0-5
�-
13
Presence of major bank failures
tsevere erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
0 5
0 5
0- 5
J
14
Root depth and density on banks
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
0 -3
0 - 4
0 - S
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
0-5
0 4
0 5
HABITAT
16
Presence of riffle-pooUripple-pool complexes
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well -developed = max points)
0 - 3
0- 5
0 - 6 `
2
17
Habitat complexity
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats - max points)
0- 6
0- 6
0- 6
3
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
0 - 5
0 - 5
0 5
L{
19
Substrate embeddedness
deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
NA*
0 4
0 4
_,2.
BIOLOGY
0
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
0 4
0 5
0 S
21
Presence of amphibians
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
0 4
0 4
0 4
�2
Presence of fish
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
0-4
0-4
0-4
��
ri,
�3
Evidence of wildlife use,
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
0 _ 6
0 - 5
0 - 5
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
5 I
These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

(Version 1.2; Released September 2011)
B-4803 County(ies):Rockingham Page 1 of 3
Project Type:Date:
Phone:Phone:
Email:Email:
County(ies):
CAMA County?
Design/Future:Existing:
Supplemental:None
Primary:
Wolf Island Creek
Roanoke
22-48
[e-mail]
2-11' lanes w/ 4' paved shoulders 2-9' lanes w/ 6' grass shoulders
N/A
NCDWQ Stream Index No.:
Project/TIP No.:
NCDOT Contact:
Project No.:B-4803
Contractor / Designer:
[e-mail]
General Project Information
Address:
3/18/2014
121 West Trade Street, Suite 1950
Raleigh, NC 27699-1590 Charlotte, NC 28202
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Highway Stormwater Program
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
FOR LINEAR ROADWAY PROJECTS
Jay Twisdale, Jr. P.E.
Bridge Replacement
B-4803 Natural Resources Technical Report, July 2009
ac.
General Project Narrative:The project B-4803 consists of constructing a new bridge, 195 long, to replace the existing bridge #97 in Rockingham County on SR-1925 over Wolf Island Creek. The
project creates a surface water impact by adding bank stabilization to Wolf Island Creek. The project drainage systems consist of grated inlets with associated pipe
systems, and riprap pads and ditches at pipe outlets.
Impacts have been minimized by using riprap pads at pipe outlets and riprap bank stabilization where the ditches tie in with Wolf Island Creek. There are wetlands in the
project vicinity but they are not impacted by the design.
Typical Cross Section Description:
References
1000 (2009)
1.12
Average Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day):
ac.
Other Stream Classification:
Parsons Brinckerhoff
City/Town:
704-342-5403
1590 Mail Service Center Address:
Ruffin
919-707-6700
Rockingham
No
None
NCDWQ Surface Water Classification for Primary Receiving Water
303(d) Impairments:
River Basin(s):
Primary Receiving Water:
Class C
Buffer Rules in Effect
Project Description
None
Surrounding Land Use:Agricultural and rural residential, with forested areas along stream corridors0.303 miles
1300 (2030)
0.79Project Built-Upon Area (ac.)
Proposed Project Existing Site
Project Length (lin. Miles or feet):
(Version 1.2; Released September 2011)
B-4803 County(ies):Rockingham Page 2 of 3
Sheet
No.
Station
(From / To)
Feature
Impacted
Water / Wetland /
Buffer Type
Receiving Surface
Water Name
NRTR Map
ID
NCDWQ Stream
Index
NCDWQ Surface
Water Classification
303(d)
Impairments
Type of
Impact
Existing
SCM
15+07
17+02
10+25 RT
15+70 RT
16+49
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
FOR LINEAR ROADWAY PROJECTS
Equalizer Pipes to be noted as a minimization of impacts.
References
B-4803 Natural Resources Technical Report, July 2009
Project/TIP No.:
* List all stream and surface water impact locations regardless of jurisdiction or size.
Project Environmental Summary
Stream
Stream4 Culvert
22-48 Stabilization
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Highway Stormwater Program
Stabilization22-48
22-48
Proposed
SCM
Energy
Dissipator
N/A
N/A
N/A
Wetland, WA right of station 16+60 has been avoided and will not be impacted.
Description of Minimization of Impacts or Mitigation
All proposed SCMs listed must also be listed under Swales, Preformed Sour Holes and other Energy Dissipators, or Other Stormwater Control Measures.
Stream4 None
None
4 Perennial None
Surface Water Impacts
Wolf Island Creek
UT Wolf Island Creek
UT Wolf Island Creek
Perennial
Intermittent
C
C
C
Wolf Island
Creek
SA
SB
(Version 1.2; Released September 2011)
B-4803 County(ies):Rockingham Page 3 of 3
Sheet
No.Station
Energy Dissipator
Type Riprap Type
Drainage Area
(ac)
Q10
(cfs)
V10
(fps)
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
FOR LINEAR ROADWAY PROJECTS
Have minimum design criteria, as presented in the NCDOT Best Management Practices Toolbox (2008), NCDOT Standard Details, or FHWA
HEC-14 (July 2006), been met and verified, as applicable? If No, provide further explanantion of why design criteria was not met.
Additional Comments
16+28 Riprap Apron / Pad
Project/TIP No.:
Riprap Apron / Pad
Class 'B'
15+64 2.315"
Ditch4 8.5 2.84.40
Pipe/Structure
Dimensions
(in)
Ditch
Conveyance Structure
15"
4
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Highway Stormwater Program
2.50Class 'B'4.1
Preformed Scour Holes and Energy Dissipators
* Refer to the NCDOT Best Management Practices Toolbox, Version 1 (March 2008), NCDOT Standard Details, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Hydraulic Engineering Circular No. 14 (HEC-14),
Third Edition, Hydraulic Design of Energy Dissipators for Culverts and Channels (July 2006), as applicable, for design guidance and criteria.
YES NO
•
c/
co
cr
TIP PROJECT: B 4803
See Sheet 1-A For Index of Sheets
See Sheet 1-H For Conventional Symbols
See Sheet 1-C For Survey Control Sheet
1752
1914
1913
s)
ddwells 1912
Store) Steens
Cross .•�
1916
J1911
023
OegaI ill
10-0
1944
—L
1929
_ 1943 �/11914 1930
2060/
_,\1942 941 1914
2030
910
J
2023
1922
1921
920 K ;
GJ�
a, PROJECT B-
1925
2061
1926
1927 a 2024
1925 aa: �— 7
.2o o
1919
7_4
BUS-
2023
192`
\ 1767
1 1767
8036,./ 1767
1931
Stacey
5925
1929
557
953
uffin
5
2565
2565
ST
VICINITY MAP
s -
°ATE OF NOW
l �l lC `U A RO.i.. /INA 11
DIVISION OF HIGH WAYS
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY
LOCATION: BRIDGE NO. 97 ON SR 1925 (WORSHAM MILL RD.)
OVER WOLF ISLAND CREEK
TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING, AND STRUCTURE
-,\
STAIR
N.C.
STATE
STATE
B-4803
PRO, NO.
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
E. A. PRO!. NO.
HERT
1
DESCRIPTION
TOTAL
SHEETS
38573.1.1
38573.2.FD1
BRZ-1925(2)
BRZ-1925(2)
PE
RAY & UTILITIES
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 1 OF 6
SURFACE WATER AND WETLANDS IMPACTS PERMIT
STA. 10+25.00 -L- BEGIN TIP PROJECT B-4803
WOLF ISLAND CREEK
BEGIN BRIDGE
—L— STA. 15+06.31
—L— SR 1925
(WORSHAM MILL ROAD)
WOLF ISLAND
S
4 ,)
END CONSTRUCTION
CREEK
END BRIDGE
—L— STA. 17+03.69
-DRV2—
2
END CONSTRUCTION\
—DRV2— STA. 10+60.00
—DRV1— STA. 10+65.00
/
O
Ari
STA.26+25.00 -L- END TIP PROJECT B-4803
INCOMPLETE PLANS
00 NOT USE FOR R7 W ACQUISITION
PRELIMINARY PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
F
GRAPHIC SCALES
50 25 0 50 100
PLANS
50 25 0 50 100
`1�11111111...-
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
10 5 0 10 20
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
DESIGN DATA
ADT 2015 =
ADT 2035 =
DHV =
D =
T =
V=
1069
1300
10 %
60 %
4 % *
40 MPH
I IST 1% DUAL 3%
FUNC CLASS=MINOR
COLLECTOR
"SUB —REGIONAL TIER" 2
PROJECT LENGTH
LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-4803 = 0.266 MILES
LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT B-4803 = 0.037 MILES
TOTAL LENGTH OF TIP PROJECT B-4803 = 0.303 MILES
Prepored In the orrice or:
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
1000 Birch Ridge Dr., Raleigh NC, 27610
2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
A
RIGHT OF WAY DATE:
JANUARY 17, 2014
LETTING DATE:
JANUARY 20, 2015
JAMES A. SPEER, PE
PROJECT ENGINEER
DANIEL W. GARDNER, JR., PE
PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER
HYDRAULICS ENGINEER
P.F.
SIGNATURE:
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
P.E.
SIGNATURE:

PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
SHEET NO.
B-4803
3
KATHERINE ALCORN WILSON
DB 1301 PG 1808
I IP
i
PEA
x
is--
TOEPROTECTION
W/CLASS B RIP RAP
EST. 3 TONS
EST. 6 SYGF
SEE DETAIL
PV
BM.1
SEE SHEET I-C
ELEV - 574.18'
BEGIN STATE PROJECT B-4803
-L- STA. 10+25.00
E
_— —
20r
0
e'-�'�"
•
DENOTES TEMPORARY
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
DENOTES IMPACTS IN
SURFACE WATER
®76 .�F'I►�O
#r 'XjE�G�a• • a!isi
STA 65,pr EFA1N
14+95.00 36° RCP
EXCAVATE
TO ELEV. 534.0
LIN. FT = 22
BETTY K. SUTTON
DB 1080 PG 2412
DETAIL E
RIP RAP BANK STABILIZATION
(Not to Scale)
EXISTING BANK 2'
CLASS II RIP RAP vd STREAM BED
NATURATIL`. TO
NATURAL GROUND
Length- 65 Et.
Tot 116 Tons, Class II Rip -Roy
Est.= 129 Sr Geotextile
-L- STA. 16+05
BETTY K. SUTTON
DB 1080 PG 2412
LATERAL 'V' DITCH
WITH CLASS B RIP RAP
EST. 17 TONS
EST. 40 SYGF
SEE DETAIL B
BEGIN SBG
STA. 14+65.00
END SBG
STA. 14
OJ •r
.00
0
LIN. FT = 10
CL B RIP RAP
EST 2 TONS
EST 7 SYGF
DUI 47 •UEIMF
r iUr/ S
TANDARD
/CL 9 RIP
T. TOI
T. -0 SY
S E • ETAII
3
IP //
DITCH
RIP RAP
AT EM K
58 D AIL
'�, JP
vey
040
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 2 OF 6
WILLIAM & MERNALLA M. SHEFFIELD
DB 1307 PG 1080
PB 17 PG IO
STANDARD 'V' DITCH
SEE DETAIL E
LIN. FT = 11
TEMPORARY CAUSEWAY w/24" :PIPE
LIN. FT = 43 f'
- Cl Ba RIP RAP i —E- E_E
/ me aanscrnrTN r C C _ — C
EST 7 sON �[e-mail] - �_'-r'' - 1` -� F--- �
�E-ST. S�TONS '"4 -L _PLC-C-
.10 SYGF c1 _ f
2 ELBOW VI
E
CLA55 II r t �`P R• • r
RIP RAP �_ �1\s IL •
•
r-n
wow wimp r imavP: i=161"
- x•L������� � ! rir er •� inan
•••4 J .e44• - t..
1rry� �4►:?• l 1� CI ' 5 II RIP y Y
T•
MVO
V
LP
RAW
\= 36 j
-BANKS-
SEE DETAIL E
,y\
17.400
LIN.
f. LIN. FT
IRIP RAP
T EMBANKMENT
EE DETAIL D
1�6R
- EST
SEE DETAIL A
00
STONE \
WARMING
HOUSE
- =
2GI
%: ���,
i31•-100 TON9_4 4°—
'Se
uc5 SYGF
��nlL��i
E
3
NC
C-
RAN SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER
INC[•MPLETE
PLANS
00 NOT USE FOR
t/ W ACQUISITION
PRELIMINR
RY PLANS
DO NOT USE FO.
CONSTRUCTION
EC—
E
e5 ▪ 'T
T Ods \
p$ G 4 EIP
1NV 5F8.T�t:r,h1 "j
rh� f
-1,t'-'
15' Pi IT>
wY
I ISLTA IW - .,
,-.Y inii+J Y
BM "2 -
SEE SHEET I-C
ELEV - 563.29'
DETAIL E
STANDARD 'V' DITCH
I Not to Scale)
Natural
Ground
Natural
Ground
FROM -L- STA. 16+28 TO STA. 17+14 LT
DETAIL A
TOE PROTECTION
I N.M. Scale)
NATURAL
GROUND
GEOTEXTILF
d= 1 Ft.
Type of Liner= CLASS B Rip-Rop
FILL
SLOPE
FROM -L- STA. 13+75.00 TO STA. 14+25.00 LT
FROM -L- STA. 17+20.00 TO STA. 17+55.00 LT
NANCY K. PITTS
DB 1300 PG 1875
PB 17 PG 10
Ground
rrod
DETAIL F
STANDARD 'V' DITCH
Not 10 Scale)
Nuturol
Ground
Geottoono
Min. 0 2 F.
Type of Liner= CLASS B Rip -Rap Max. d= 2 Ft.
FROM -L- STA. 15+00 TO STA. 15+64 LT
DETAIL B
LATERAL 'V' DITCH
I Not to Scale)
Slope
Min. 0= 2 Ft.
Max. d= 2 F.
Type of Liner= CLASS B Rip -Rap 6= 5 Ft.
FROM -L- STA. 14+25.00 TO STA. 15+00.00 LT
DETAIL C
CUT DITCH
(No1 fo Scale)
Natural
Ground
Type of Liner= CL B Rip -Rap
Uio _5= 1 F.
Max. d= 1 Ft.
Fro
Ditch
Slope
FROM -L- STA. 18 +25.00 TO STA. 20+00.00 RT
DETAIL D
RIP RAP AT EMBANKMENT
I Not to Scale)
Type of Liner= 7 TONS,CL B Rip-Rop
Geotextile- 15 SY
-L- STA. 15+55.00 -RT
-L- STA. 15+64.00 -LT
-L- STA. 16+28.00 -LT
50 25 0 50 100
`1111 1.,
SCA! F: 1" = SQR

PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
SHEET NO.
8-1803
3
KATHERINE ALCORN WILSON
DB 1301 PG 1808
BEGIN STATE PROJECT B-4803
-L- STA. 10+25.00
TOE P TECTION \
W/C S B RIP RA
EST. TONS
EST. STOP
SEE DETAIL V.
-E
10,
DENOTES TEMPORARY
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
DENOTES IMPACTS IN
SURFACE WATER
BETTY K. SUTTON
DB 1080 PG 2412
DB-1080 1YB 2412
LATERAL 'V' DITCH
WITH CLASS B RIP RAP
EST.17 TONS
EST. 40 SYGF
SEE DETAIL B
LIN. FT = 101 I
CL B RIP RAP
EST 2 TONS
EST 7 SYGF
, F . Rl RIP RAPT / Il��� \���a. 0e --�� ,_�.s .. ,���27E� � -
t���'0�! ■J�ii�lii�l�IllP 1•�.`�1��!% 1�1�! I� 1��'13I�11�"
WILLIAM & MERNALLA M. SHEFFIELD
DB 1307 PG 1080
PB 17 PG 10
STANDARD 'V' DITCH
SEE DETAIL E
LIN. FT = 11
TEMPORARY CAU
LIiV. FT = i43
YG -� CL-T BSil
_ C ST:5TOBi
ST.10 SYGF
EE'-DETAIL A
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 3 OF 6
w24 PIPE \,
- C
- E
DETAIL E
RIP RAP BANK STABILIZATION
Net to Scale)
EXISTING BANK 2'
CLASS II RIP RAP w' STREAM RED
GEOTEXTILE
NATURAL GROUND
Length- 65 Ft.
Est = 116 Tons, Class II Rip-Rop
Este 129 SY Ge0lextlle
-L- STA. 16+05
LI
LIN. F
-'RIP RAP
(.AT EMBANKMENT
SEE DETAIL D
fUr-lO0 eEf;9- -
EST. 225SYGF
fE '1N.TATL C
PUE 2>`J
DETAIL E
STANDARD 'V' DITCH
I Nat to Scale)
FROM -L- STA. 16+28 TO STA. 17+14 LT
DETAIL A
TOE PROTECTION
I NOW Scale)
NATURAL
GROUND
GEOTEXTILF
d= 1 H.
Type of Liner= CLASS B Rip-Rop
FILL
SLOPE
FROM -L- STA. 13+75.00 TO STA. 14+25.00 LT
FROM -L- STA. 17+20.00 TO STA. 17+55.00 LT
iU' G'H/Vr L 0;
NANCY K. PITTS
DB 1300 PG 1875
PB 17 PG 10
DETAIL F
STANDARD 'V' DITCH
( Net to Scale)
Notorol
Ground
Noiurol
Ground
Geotexele
Min. O 2 F.
Type of Liner= CLASS B Rip -Rap Mox. d= 2 Ft.
FROM -L- STA. 15+00 TO STA. 15+64 LT
DETAIL B
LATERAL 'V' DITCH
Not to Stole)
Slope
D= 2 Ft.
Ma.d= 2 F.
Type of Liner= CLASS B Rip -Rap b= 5 Ft.
FROM -L- STA. 14+25.00 TO STA. 15+00.00 LT
Natural
Ground
RAW SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER
INCOMPLETE
PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR
t/ W ACQUISITION
PRELIIMINA
RY PLANS
DO NOT USE FO.
CONSTRUCTION
Type of Liner= CL B Rip -Rap
Min _0= 1 Ft.
Max. d= 1 Ft.
FROM -L- STA. 18 +25.00 TO STA. 20+00.00 RT
DETAIL D
RIP RAP AT EMBANKMENT
(Not to Sole)
Type of Liner= 7 TONS,CL B Rip -Rap
Geotextile- 15 SY
-L- STA. 15+55.00 -RT
-L- STA. 15+64.00 -LT
-L- STA. 16+28.00 -LT
50 25 0 50 100
`1111 1.,
SCALE: 1Rr=Sf'
i

PROJECT REFERENCE NO
SHEET NO.
___-600
590
580
_570
_560
550
540
530
520
BEG N GRADE -L
STA. 10+25.00
ELEV. = 565.82'
PI = 10+80.00
EL = 562.97'
VC = 110'
K = 7/ (DS > 40 MPH)
BRIDGE HYDRAULIC DATA
DESIGN DISCHARGE
DESIGN FREQUENCY
DESIGN HW ELEVATION
BASE DISCHARGE
BASE FREQUENCY
BASE HW ELEVATION
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE _
OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY=
OVERTOPPING ELEVATION =
DATE OF SURVEY
W.S. ELEVATION
AT DATE OF SURVEY
45QQ_-_ CFS
25_ YRS
54Q.$Q__ FT
ELL____ CFS
1Q) YRS
542.72 FT
187QQ CFS
5QQ± YRS
55Q.4Q__ FT
FT
= 02/27/203
= 529.5Q_- FT
JS/B/8i
-J3.63,
th-
I_L
III
PI = 11175.00
EL = 559.52'
VC = 80'
K = 52 (DS > 40 MPH)
BM1 ELEVATION = 574.18'
N 985800 E 1832061
BL STATION 30+39.00 122' RIGHT
RR SPIKE IN BASE OF 18" RED OAK
PI - 13+70.00
EL = 549.43'
VC = 300'
K = 49 (DS = 35 MPH)
11111
■■■■■
1::::
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 4 OF 6
B-4803
■ i
s ■�T ■ .m
1041-11
■
CLASS II RIP RAP
ON DISTURBED BANKS
(STR. PAY ITEM)
TOP OF TEMPORARY
ROCK CAUSEWAY
EL. 730.5
-L- STA. 16+05.00
EL 551.79'
2 SPANS, I D 100', 10 95'. 39' BOX BEAM
90° SKEW, 4' DEEP CAP
LC EL. 0 CL = 547.79'
/?449 •
(+A.0000%
-
. _
BEGIN LAT.'V' DITCH -L- STA.14+25.00 LT. --98
EL. = 541.65'
PI =15+00.00 LT.1
EL. = 534.9/'
END 'V' DITCH -L- STA.I +64.00 LT.
EL. = 533.00'
.9844%
DESIGN EXCEPTION REQUIRED FOR SAG VERTICAL CURVE AND
ASSOCIATED NIGHTTIME STOPPING SIGHT
DISTANCES.
,
1
)4.9302
END 'V'/JITCH
-L- STA.17+14.00 LT.
EL. = '35.30'
7
11 / ......_
` 7
CLASS II RIP RAP
KEYED IN 3.5' (TYP.)
(STR. PAY ITEM)
24' (YE PORARY)
WSE 529.5
(02-27-2013)
BEGIN 'V' DITC -L- STA.16+28.00 LT.
EL. = 534.50'
i
1
■11
Pl = 19+10.00
EL = 554.83'
VC = 320'
K = 50 (DS > 35 MPH)
MUSE
H
i
TOP OF TEMPORARY i
ROCK CAUSEWAY
/
L
/ • +��-4S?�L
3.5600% •
o N
r,
O II
O_
:. :: : ■■:::. :.
llp
iiik
BEGIN SPECIAL CUT DITCH -L- STA.I8+25.00 RTLLI iEE ■..... : ■ ■� 1 1 ■.��
(IT 14.1
EL. = 549.25' n i i 11
BM2 ELEVATION = 563.29' _-EG N 985360 E 1832512 G
BL STATION 36+83.00 93' RIGHT
RR SPIKE IN ROOT OF 30" DOUBLE RIVER BIRCH
1 1 IIIIIIIIIEIII .,
....
11111
11
11111
ii i iiii1i i i
EiIEAEEEEE!EI�EE!IIIIIIIIIIEEEEEEi
............ ..11111:111111
IIIlIIIIIIIIIIII
111. ■■:11■■■■■■1
..■ mop..
■■ ■■■ ■■
Pl - 21+70.00
EL = 574.21'
VC = 200'
K = 2/0 (DS > 65 MPH)
ME■EM
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
1PRELlIMIN
DO NOT USE FO
HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER
RY PLANS
CONSTRUCTION
0
ro
......1 :111
.2o I M ■■■■■■■■:■■•U••• 1111111111�Ililll�i�li�l�i111� on■:n:::::: on:o■:n :::H!H ooa■ ■ o ■ ■ o
\�E bEEEEEEEi EEEE EE1EEEE EEa=6EEEEEe1EEEEE
END SPECIAL CUT DITCH -L STA.20+0000 RT. iEEEEi�EEEi 1
EL. = 560.00 -
.11 leET .11
SEE
SHEET
4 AND 5 FOR PLAN
VIEW
540_
530
520
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
620
610
600
580
570
560
550.
PI = 24+15.00
EL = 590.14'
VC = /65'
K = 75 (DS > 45 MPH)
(+0.300(%
PI = 25+65.00
EL = 596.59'
VC = 120'
K = 50 (DS > 35 MPH)
(+)4.300°.
t
\END GRADE -L- STA. 26+25.00
ELEV. = 600.62'
I
580
570
560
o�,
0
DRV1
PI = 10+25.00
EL = 552.73'
V = 20'
550
540
530
520
510
PI = 10+50.00
EL = 548.47'
V = 30'
i
END GRADE -DRV1- STA. 10+65 00
ELEV. - 547.10'
BEGIN GRADE -DRV1- STA. 10+11.00
ELEV. = 553.57'
600
590
580
570
(+)3.142`
560
550
540
530
r
H
triri
DRV2
Pl = 10+25.00
EL = 566.09'
V = 20'
PI = 10+48.00
EL = 566.18'
V = 20'
1
401
)/. \ am lkl)` i n I
V9/3i\
\END GRADE -DRV2- S
ELEV. = 567.56
111111111I1 HI II I 111111
BEGIN GRADE -DRV2- STA. 10+11.00
ELEV. = 565.65'
T
iE _iiiiEE
:■ - -E :I:1�
IF !9!E-E
:: EEl E:■
TA 10+60.00■
III.:
T
■
■
I
MEM
MEM
MI
MEM M
MN
....1. -UU ==
MEMIN
•
11 UU
.• U.
1 U.
1:r U.
11 MN
MN
T
FOR PLAN VIEW
CAA
SEE
SHEET 4 FOR PLAN VIEW
SEE SHEET 4 FOR PLAN VIEW -
24 25 26 27 28 10 11 12
10
11
12

(NOT TO SCALE)
FLOW
QUANTITIES OF ESTIMATES
3
PROPOSED BRIDGE DECK
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
N.W.S. ELEV=729.5
1’
Estimate 96 Tons Class ’II’ Rip Rap
NATURAL GROUND
(CLASS ’II’ RIP RAP)
ROCK CAUSEWAY
2
:1
2:1
2.5’2.5’
TEMPORARY ROCK CAUSEWAY
ON SR 1925
OVER WOLF ISLAND CREEK
BRIDGE NO. 97
PROJECT: 38573.1.1 (B-4803)
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY
3/18/14SHEET 5 OF 6
WORKPAD
CLASS ’B’ RIP RAP
GEOTEXTILE
VOLUME OF CLASS II RIP RAP= 68 yds
Estimate 43 Tons Class ’B’ Rip Rap
AREA OF CLASS II RIP RAP= 0.02 ac
Hand Existing Existing
Permanent Temp. ExcavationMechanized ClearingPermanent Temp. ChannelChannelNatural
Site Station Structure Fill In Fill In in Clearing in SW SW Impacts ImpactsStream
No.(From/To)Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlandsin Wetlands Wetlands impacts impactsPermanentTemp.Design
(ac)(ac)(ac)(ac)(ac)(ac)(ac)(ft)(ft)(ft)
-L- STA. 15+70 LT Bank Stabilization <0.01 10
-L- STA. 16+05 Bank Stabilization <0.01 68
-L- STA. 16+10 LT Bank Stabilization <0.01 11
-L- STA. 15+55 RT Bank Stabilization <0.01 22
-L- STA. 16+05 Causeway 0.02 36
-L- STA. 16+49 Causeway <0.01 43
TOTALS:0.01 0.03 111 79
24sf of Bent 1 is within the ordinary high water mark of the stream
ATN Revised 3/31/05 SHEET 6 of 6 3/18/2014
WBS - 38573.1.1 (B-4803)
WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY
SURFACE WATER IMPACTSWETLAND IMPACTS
ROCKINGHAMCOUNTY
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
100 100 DHVDTV ======%%ADTADT% *
D
O

N
O
T

U
S
E

F
O
R

C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y

P
L
A
N
S
000PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)

3
8
5
7
3
.
1
.
1

P
E

B
R
Z
-
1
9
2
5
(
2
)

P
R
O
J
E
C
T

L
E
N
G
T
H
R
I
G
H
T

O
F

W
A
Y

D
A
T
E
:

L
E
T
T
I
N
G

D
A
T
E
:
S
T
A
T
E
S
T
A
T
E

P
R
O
J
E
C
T

R
E
F
E
R
E
N
C
E

N
O
.
S
T
A
T
E

P
R
O
J
.

N
O
.
F
.

A
.

P
R
O
J
.

N
O
.
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
N
O
.
T
O
T
A
L
S
H
E
E
T
S
N
.
C
.
SH
E
E
T
1
DESIGN DATA
P
r
e
p
a
r
e
d

i
n

t
h
e

O
f
f
i
c
e

o
f
:
S
I
G
N
A
T
U
R
E
:
S
I
G
N
A
T
U
R
E
:
P
.
E
.
P
.
E
.
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N

O
F

H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
S
P
R
O
J
E
C
T

E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
P
R
O
J
E
C
T

D
E
S
I
G
N

E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
GRAPHIC SCALESPLANSPROFILE (VERTICAL)

H
Y
D
R
A
U
L
I
C
S

E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y

D
E
S
I
G
N
L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
:

T
Y
P
E

O
F

W
O
R
K
:
09/08/99

B
-
4
8
0
3

D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N

O
F

H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
S
S
T
A
T
E

O
F

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
00028-JAN-2014 09:21R:\Roadw ay\Proj\b4803_rdy_tsh.dgn$$$$USERNAM E$$$$
1
0
0
0

B
i
r
c
h

R
i
d
g
e

D
r
.
,

R
a
l
e
i
g
h

N
C
,

2
7
6
1
0
CONTRACT:TIP PROJECT:
DEPARTMENT
O
F
T
R
A
N
S
P
OR
T
A
T
IO N
S
T
ATE
O
F
N
O
R
T
H
C
AROLINA
See Sheet 1-C For Survey Control Sheet See Sheet 1-B For Conventional Symbols See Sheet 1-A For Index of SheetsB-4803 50 25 50 50 25 50 10 5 10 20 2035 10 1300 604* TTST 1%

J
A
M
E
S

A
.

S
P
E
E
R
,

P
E

D
A
N
I
E
L

W
.

G
A
R
D
N
E
R
,

J
R
.
,

P
E

O
V
E
R

W
O
L
F

I
S
L
A
N
D

C
R
E
E
K

R
O
C
K
I
N
G
H
A
M

C
O
U
N
T
Y

B
R
I
D
G
E

N
O
.

9
7

O
N

S
R

1
9
2
5

(
W
O
R
S
H
A
M

M
I
L
L

R
D
.
)
DUAL 3% 191419311930 1929 2740 19251928 19271929 2023 1914 1947 2026 1948 191319121918202319151917191620301926192019192023192119221910191120231767204020691925192519252084208317671767208527082561178825622563256025602560256525652557255725572556266719291929193120241945%29 %29BUS 29BUS 29%%19232061 1752(700PowellsStoreStephensCrossroadsOregan HillRuffinStaceyCreek IslandBirchForkSForkQuaquaSdRdRdRHGjFFGHFF1942206019411944198019431914SOUTHERN RAILWAY Creek 2023WolfIslandCreekWolfIslandCreekLovelaceCreek%29 29BUS%2559 PROJECT B-4803VICINITY MAP
B
E
G
I
N

B
R
I
D
G
E
STA. 10+25.00

-
L
-

B
E
G
I
N

T
I
P

P
R
O
J
E
C
T

B
-
4
8
0
3
E
N
D

B
R
I
D
G
E
S
T
A
.

2
6
+
2
5
.
0
0

-
L
-

E
N
D

T
I
P

P
R
O
J
E
C
T

B
-
4
8
0
3
THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES.FUNC CLASS=MINORCOLLECTOR
J
A
N
U
A
R
Y

2
0
,

2
0
1
5
J
A
N
U
A
R
Y

2
8
,

2
0
1
4
"SUB-REGIONAL TIER"
T
O
T
A
L

L
E
N
G
T
H

O
F

T
I
P

P
R
O
J
E
C
T

B
-
4
8
0
3

=

0
.
3
0
3

M
I
L
E
S
20151069
2
0
1
2

S
T
A
N
D
A
R
D

S
P
E
C
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
CO
N
V
E
N
T
I
O
N
A
L

P
L
A
N

S
H
E
E
T

S
Y
M
B
O
L
S
G
R
A
D
I
N
G
,

D
R
A
I
N
A
G
E
,

P
A
V
I
N
G
,

A
N
D

S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E

-
L
-

S
R

1
9
2
5

(
W
O
R
S
H
A
M

M
I
L
L

R
O
A
D
)
W
O
L
F

I
S
L
A
N
D

C
R
E
E
K
W
O
L
F

I
S
L
A
N
D

C
R
E
E
K
5
4
OREGON
HILL RO
AD
TO
T
O
U
S
29
B
U
SI
N
E
SS
-
D
R
V
1
-
-
D
R
V
2
-
E
N
D

C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
-
D
R
V
1
-

S
T
A
.

1
0
+
6
5
.
0
0
E
N
D

C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
-
D
R
V
2
-

S
T
A
.

1
0
+
6
0
.
0
0
40MPH DESIGN EXCEPTION REQUIRED FOR DESIGN SPEED, SAG VERTI
C
A
L

C
U
R
V
E
S
,

A
N
D

A
S
S
O
C
I
A
T
E
D

N
I
G
H
T
T
I
M
E

S
T
O
P
P
I
N
G

S
I
G
H
T

D
I
S
T
A
N
C
E
S
.
-
L
-

S
T
A
.

1
5
+
0
6
.
3
1
-
L
-

S
T
A
.

1
7
+
0
3
.
6
9
L
E
N
G
T
H

S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E

T
I
P

P
R
O
J
E
C
T

B
-
4
8
0
3

=

0
.
0
3
7

M
I
L
E
S
L
E
N
G
T
H

R
O
A
D
W
A
Y

T
I
P

P
R
O
J
E
C
T

B
-
4
8
0
3

=

0
.
2
6
6

M
I
L
E
S
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PREPARED TO THE LIM
I
T
S

E
S
T
A
B
L
I
S
H
E
D

B
Y

M
E
T
H
O
D

I
I
.

B
R
Z
-
1
9
2
5
(
2
)

R
/
W

&

U
T
I
L
I
T
I
E
S

3
8
5
7
3
.
2
.
F
D
1

WOLF ISLAND CREEK
9.56’
+62.35
N AD 8 3 / 2 0 0 1
Existin
g

E
d
g
e

o
f

P
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
Existin
g

C
u
r
b
Propos
e
d

S
l
o
p
e

S
t
a
k
e
s

C
u
t
Propos
e
d

S
l
o
p
e

S
t
a
k
e
s

F
i
l
l
Existin
g

M
e
t
a
l

G
u
a
r
d
r
a
i
l
Existin
g

C
a
b
l
e

G
u
i
d
e
r
a
i
l
Propos
e
d

G
u
a
r
d
r
a
i
l
Equali
t
y

S
y
m
b
o
l
Pavem
e
n
t

R
e
m
o
v
a
l
Baselin
e

C
o
n
t
r
o
l

P
o
i
n
t
RIGH
T

O
F

W
A
Y
:
Existin
g

R
i
g
h
t

o
f

W
a
y

M
a
r
k
e
r
Existin
g

R
i
g
h
t

o
f

W
a
y

L
i
n
e
h
Existin
g

C
o
n
t
r
o
l

o
f

A
c
c
e
s
s
Propos
e
d

C
o
n
t
r
o
l

o
f

A
c
c
e
s
s
Propos
e
d

R
i
g
h
t

o
f

W
a
y

L
i
n
e
CF
Existin
g

E
a
s
e
m
e
n
t

L
i
n
e
Propos
e
d

T
e
m
p
o
r
a
r
y

C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n

E
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
Propos
e
d

T
e
m
p
o
r
a
r
y

D
r
a
i
n
a
g
e

E
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
Propos
e
d

P
e
r
m
a
n
e
n
t

D
r
a
i
n
a
g
e

E
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
Propos
e
d

P
e
r
m
a
n
e
n
t

U
t
i
l
i
t
y

E
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
HYDROLOGY:Stream or Body of WaterHydro, Pool or ReservoirFlow ArrowDisappearing StreamSpring
;
zvWKProposed Lateral, Tail, Head DitchFalse Sump Propos
e
d

C
a
b
l
e

G
u
i
d
e
r
a
i
l
M
A
J
O
R
:
B
r
i
d
g
e
,

T
u
n
n
e
l

o
r

B
o
x

C
u
l
v
e
r
t
B
r
i
d
g
e

W
i
n
g

W
a
l
l
,

H
e
a
d

W
a
l
l

a
n
d

E
n
d

W
a
l
l
M
I
N
O
R
:
H
e
a
d

a
n
d

E
n
d

W
a
l
l
P
i
p
e

C
u
l
v
e
r
t
F
o
o
t
b
r
i
d
g
e
P
a
v
e
d

D
i
t
c
h

G
u
t
t
e
r
U
T
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
:
ROA
D
S

A
N
D

R
E
L
A
T
E
D

F
E
A
T
U
R
E
S
:
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g

P
o
w
e
r

P
o
l
e
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d

P
o
w
e
r

P
o
l
e
P
U
/
G

P
o
w
e
r

C
a
b
l
e

H
a
n
d

H
o
l
e
P
o
w
e
r

M
a
n
h
o
l
e
P
o
w
e
r

L
i
n
e

T
o
w
e
r
P
o
w
e
r

T
r
a
n
s
f
o
r
m
e
r
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g

J
o
i
n
t

U
s
e

P
o
l
e
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d

J
o
i
n
t

U
s
e

P
o
l
e
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g

T
e
l
e
p
h
o
n
e

P
o
l
e
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d

T
e
l
e
p
h
o
n
e

P
o
l
e
T
e
l
e
p
h
o
n
e

M
a
n
h
o
l
e
T
e
l
e
p
h
o
n
e

B
o
o
t
h
T
e
l
e
p
h
o
n
e

P
e
d
e
s
t
a
l
U
/
G

T
e
l
e
p
h
o
n
e

C
a
b
l
e

H
a
n
d

H
o
l
e
R}T pQle]/b
H
-
F
r
a
m
e

P
o
l
e
O
O
P
O
W
E
R
:
T
E
L
E
P
H
O
N
E
:
T
e
l
e
p
h
o
n
e

C
e
l
l

T
o
w
e
r
R
e
c
o
r
d
e
d

U
/
G

P
o
w
e
r

L
i
n
e
R
e
c
o
r
d
e
d

U
/
G

T
e
l
e
p
h
o
n
e

C
a
b
l
e
D
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
e
d

U
/
G

T
e
l
e
p
h
o
n
e

C
a
b
l
e

(
S
.
U
.
E
.
*
)
R
e
c
o
r
d
e
d

U
/
G

T
e
l
e
p
h
o
n
e

C
o
n
d
u
i
t
D
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
e
d

U
/
G

T
e
l
e
p
h
o
n
e

C
o
n
d
u
i
t

(
S
.
U
.
E
.
*
)
R
e
c
o
r
d
e
d

U
/
G

F
i
b
e
r

O
p
t
i
c
s

C
a
b
l
e
W
A
T
E
R
:
W
a
t
e
r

M
a
n
h
o
l
e
W
a
t
e
r

M
e
t
e
r
W
a
t
e
r

V
a
l
v
e
W
a
t
e
r

H
y
d
r
a
n
t
R
e
c
o
r
d
e
d

U
/
G

W
a
t
e
r

L
i
n
e
4IHa
T
V
:
T
V

S
a
t
e
l
l
i
t
e

D
i
s
h
T
V

P
e
d
e
s
t
a
l
T
V

T
o
w
e
r
U
/
G

T
V

C
a
b
l
e

H
a
n
d

H
o
l
e
R
e
c
o
r
d
e
d

U
/
G

T
V

C
a
b
l
e
R
e
c
o
r
d
e
d

U
/
G

F
i
b
e
r

O
p
t
i
c

C
a
b
l
e
D
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
e
d

U
/
G

F
i
b
e
r

O
p
t
i
c

C
a
b
l
e

(
S
.
U
.
E
.
*
)
r|I]
G
A
S
:
G
a
s

V
a
l
v
e
G
a
s

M
e
t
e
r
R
e
c
o
r
d
e
d

U
/
G

G
a
s

L
i
n
e
nc
S
A
N
I
T
A
R
Y

S
E
W
E
R
:
S
a
n
i
t
a
r
y

S
e
w
e
r

M
a
n
h
o
l
e
S
a
n
i
t
a
r
y

S
e
w
e
r

C
l
e
a
n
o
u
t
U
/
G

S
a
n
i
t
a
r
y

S
e
w
e
r

L
i
n
e
R
e
c
o
r
d
e
d

S
S

F
o
r
c
e
d

M
a
i
n

L
i
n
e
D
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
e
d

S
S

F
o
r
c
e
d

M
a
i
n

L
i
n
e

(
S
.
U
.
E
.
*
)
do
A
/
G

W
a
t
e
r
A
b
o
v
e

G
r
o
u
n
d

G
a
s

L
i
n
e
A
/
G

G
a
s
A
b
o
v
e

G
r
o
u
n
d

W
a
t
e
r

L
i
n
e
A
b
o
v
e

G
r
o
u
n
d

S
a
n
i
t
a
r
y

S
e
w
e
r
A
/
G

S
a
n
i
t
a
r
y

S
e
w
e
r
M
I
S
C
E
L
L
A
N
E
O
U
S
:
U
t
i
l
i
t
y

P
o
l
e
OFS3
U
t
i
l
i
t
y

P
o
l
e

w
i
t
h

B
a
s
e
U
t
i
l
i
t
y

L
o
c
a
t
e
d

O
b
j
e
c
t
U
t
i
l
i
t
y

T
r
a
f
f
i
c

S
i
g
n
a
l

B
o
x
U
t
i
l
i
t
y

U
n
k
n
o
w
n

U
/
G

L
i
n
e
?
C
O
N
C
C
O
N
C

W
W
v
v
D
r
a
i
n
a
g
e

B
o
x
:

C
a
t
c
h

B
a
s
i
n
,

D
I

o
r

J
B
S
t
o
r
m

S
e
w
e
r
S
t
o
r
m

S
e
w
e
r

M
a
n
h
o
l
e
m
U
/
G

T
a
n
k
;

W
a
t
e
r
,

G
a
s
,

O
i
l
A
/
G

T
a
n
k
;

W
a
t
e
r
,

G
a
s
,

O
i
l
BOUNDARIES AND PROPERTY:State LineCounty LineTownship LineCity LineReservation LineProperty LineExisting Iron PinProperty CornerProperty MonumentExisting Fence LineProposed Woven Wire FenceProposed Chain Link FenceProposed Barbed Wire Fence gF123Existing Wetland BoundaryProposed Wetland BoundaryExisting Endangered Animal BoundaryExisting Endangered Plant BoundaryBUILDINGS AND OTHER CULTURE:Area Outline Gas Pump Vent or U/G Tank CapChurchSchoolDamSignSmall Mine Well VMWWSxFoundationSBuildingyyVEGE
T
A
T
I
O
N
:
Single
T
r
e
e
XY
V
i
n
e
y
a
r
d
Single
S
h
r
u
b
HedgeWoods

L
i
n
e
O
r
c
h
a
r
d
V
i
n
e
y
a
r
d
RAIL
R
O
A
D
S
:
Standa
r
d

G
a
u
g
e
RR Sig
n
a
l

M
i
l
e
p
o
s
t
SwitchRR Ab
a
n
d
o
n
e
d
RR Dis
m
a
n
t
l
e
d
S
FLOW
D
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
e
d

U
/
G

P
o
w
e
r

L
i
n
e

(
S
.
U
.
E
.
*
)
D
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
e
d

U
/
G

F
i
b
e
r

O
p
t
i
c
s

C
a
b
l
e

(
S
.
U
.
E
.
*
)
D
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
e
d

U
/
G

W
a
t
e
r

L
i
n
e

(
S
.
U
.
E
.
*
)
D
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
e
d

U
/
G

T
V

C
a
b
l
e

(
S
.
U
.
E
.
*
)
D
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
e
d

U
/
G

G
a
s

L
i
n
e

(
S
.
U
.
E
.
*
)
U
/
G

T
e
s
t

H
o
l
e

(
S
.
U
.
E
.
*
)
*S.U.E. = Subsurface Utility EngineeringWLBEIPBECM
C
O
N
C

H
W
C
B
C
S
X

T
R
A
N
S
P
O
R
T
A
T
I
O
N
M
I
L
E
P
O
S
T

3
5
S
W
I
T
C
H
Cemetery
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G

S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
S
:
Parcel / Sequence Number
E
A
A
T
U
R
E
n
d

o
f

I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
E
.
O
.
I
.
Note: Not to Scale
S
H
E
E
T

N
O
.
P
R
O
J
E
C
T

R
E
F
E
R
E
N
C
E

N
O
.
1
-
B

B
-
4
8
0
3

A
b
a
n
d
o
n
e
d

A
c
c
o
r
d
i
n
g

t
o

U
t
i
l
i
t
y

R
e
c
o
r
d
s
WLBEABEPB
RW
RW
RW
CAE
T
D
E
P
D
E
P
U
E
SPPTTT
C
T
C
T

F
O
T

F
O
WWT
V
T
V
T
V

F
O
T
V

F
O
GG
S
S
F
S
S
F
S
S
?
U
T
L
Jurisdictional StreamJS 04/16/11Buffer Zone 1Buffer Zone 2 BZ 1BZ 2Wetland Propos
e
d

P
e
r
m
a
n
e
n
t

E
a
s
e
m
e
n
t

w
i
t
h
Iron

P
i
n

a
n
d

C
a
p

M
a
r
k
e
r
Propos
e
d

T
e
m
p
o
r
a
r
y

U
t
i
l
i
t
y

E
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
T
U
E
Iron
P
i
n

a
n
d

C
a
p

M
a
r
k
e
r
Propos
e
d

R
i
g
h
t

o
f

W
a
y

L
i
n
e

w
i
t
h
D
U
E
Propos
e
d

P
e
r
m
a
n
e
n
t

D
r
a
i
n
a
g
e

/

U
t
i
l
i
t
y

E
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
A
U
E
Propos
e
d

A
e
r
i
a
l

U
t
i
l
i
t
y

E
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
C
R
Propos
e
d

C
u
r
b

R
a
m
p
S
T
A
T
E

O
F

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N

O
F

H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
S
CO
N
V
E
N
T
I
O
N
A
L

P
L
A
N

S
H
E
E
T

S
Y
M
B
O
L
S
U
n
d
e
r
g
r
o
u
n
d

S
t
o
r
a
g
e

T
a
n
k
,

A
p
p
r
o
x
.

L
o
c
.
G
e
o
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l

B
o
r
i
n
g
U
S
T
Known Soil Contamination: Area or SitePotential Soil Contamination: Area or Site Conc
r
e
t
e

o
r

G
r
a
n
i
t
e

R
/
W

M
a
r
k
e
r
Propos
e
d

R
i
g
h
t

o
f

W
a
y

L
i
n
e

w
i
t
h
CA
Conc
r
e
t
e

C
/
A

M
a
r
k
e
r
Propos
e
d

C
o
n
t
r
o
l

o
f

A
c
c
e
s
s

L
i
n
e

w
i
t
h
D
A
T
U
M

D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
T
H
E

L
O
C
A
L
I
Z
E
D

C
O
O
R
D
I
N
A
T
E

S
Y
S
T
E
M

D
E
V
E
L
O
P
E
D

F
O
R

T
H
I
S

P
R
O
J
E
C
T
I
S

B
A
S
E
D

O
N

T
H
E

S
T
A
T
E

P
L
A
N
E

C
O
O
R
D
I
N
A
T
E
S

E
S
T
A
B
L
I
S
H
E
D

B
Y
N
C
D
O
T

F
O
R

M
O
N
U
M
E
N
T

"
B
4
8
0
3
-
2
"
W
I
T
H

N
A
D

8
3
/
2
0
0
1

S
T
A
T
E

P
L
A
N
E

G
R
I
D

C
O
O
R
D
I
N
A
T
E
S

O
F
N
O
R
T
H
I
N
G
:

9
8
6
,
2
0
4
.
7
9
9
(
f
t
)

E
A
S
T
I
N
G
:

1
,
8
3
0
,
2
4
2
.
4
8
1
(
f
t
)
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
:

6
4
8
.
6
9
’
(
f
t
)
T
H
E

A
V
E
R
A
G
E

C
O
M
B
I
N
E
D

G
R
I
D

F
A
C
T
O
R

U
S
E
D

O
N

T
H
I
S

P
R
O
J
E
C
T
(
G
R
O
U
N
D

T
O

G
R
I
D
)

I
S
:

1
.
0
0
0
0
6
8
4
8
0
1
T
H
E

N
.
C
.

L
A
M
B
E
R
T

G
R
I
D

B
E
A
R
I
N
G

A
N
D
L
O
C
A
L
I
Z
E
D

H
O
R
I
Z
O
N
T
A
L

G
R
O
U
N
D

D
I
S
T
A
N
C
E

F
R
O
M
"
B
4
8
0
3
-
2
"

T
O

-
L
-

S
T
A
T
I
O
N

1
0
+
2
5
.
0
0

I
S
S
8
1
3
6
’
5
4
"
E

1
,
7
7
5
.
6
4
’
A
L
L

L
I
N
E
A
R

D
I
M
E
N
S
I
O
N
S

A
R
E

L
O
C
A
L
I
Z
E
D

H
O
R
I
Z
O
N
T
A
L

D
I
S
T
A
N
C
E
S
V
E
R
T
I
C
A
L

D
A
T
U
M

U
S
E
D

I
S

N
A
V
D

8
8
-
D
R
V
1
-
-
D
R
V
2
-
>
>
>
ALCORN LOOP SR 2069
S
H
E
E
T

N
O
.
P
R
O
J
E
C
T

R
E
F
E
R
E
N
C
E

N
O
.
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n

a
n
d

S
u
r
v
e
y
s
28-JAN-2014 09:21R:\Roadway\Proj\b4803_ls_1c.dgn$$$$USERNAM E$$$$
N
O
T
E
:

D
R
A
W
I
N
G

N
O
T

T
O

S
C
A
L
E
12/01/2005
B
A
S
E
L
I
N
E

D
A
T
A
B
E
N
C
H
M
A
R
K

D
A
T
A
NOTES>PROJECT CONTROL ESTABLISHED USING GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM.1. THE CONTROL DATA FOR THIS PROJECT CAN BE FOUND ELECTRONICALLY BY SELECTINGPROJECT CONTROL DATA AT:HTTP://WWW.DOH.DOT.STATE.NC.US/PRECONSTRUCT/HIGHWAY/LOCATION/PROJECT/THE FILES TO BE FOUND ARE AS FOLLOWS:SITE CALIBRATION INFORMATION HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED FOR THIS PROJECT. IF FURTHERINFORMATION IS NEEDED, PLEASE CONTACT THE LOCATION AND SURVEYS UNIT.NETWORK ESTABLISHED FROM NGS ONLINE POSITIONING SERVICE (OPUS)CONTROL BY THE NCDOT LOCATION AND SURVEYS UNIT.INDICATES GEODETIC CONTROL MONUMENTS USED OR SET FOR HORIZONTAL PROJECT
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
R
R

S
P
I
K
E

I
N

B
A
S
E

O
F

1
8
"

R
E
D

O
A
K
B
L

S
T
A
T
I
O
N

3
0
+
3
9
.
0
0

1
2
2

R
I
G
H
T
N

9
8
5
8
0
0

E

1
8
3
2
0
6
1
B
M
1

E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N

=

5
7
4
.
1
8
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
B
I
R
C
H
R
R

S
P
I
K
E

I
N

R
O
O
T

O
F

3
0
"

D
O
U
B
L
E

R
I
V
E
R
B
L

S
T
A
T
I
O
N

3
6
+
8
3
.
0
0

9
3

R
I
G
H
T
N

9
8
5
3
6
0

E

1
8
3
2
5
1
2
B
M
2

E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N

=

5
6
3
.
2
9
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
7

B
L
-
7

9
8
5
1
4
6
.
4
1
0
7

1
8
3
2
7
9
0
.
5
1
7
8

5
7
5
.
0
2

2
1
+
7
8
.
2
5

3
8
.
8
9

R
T
6

B
L
-
6

9
8
5
5
3
5
.
5
4
1
5

1
8
3
2
4
9
6
.
5
7
3
3

5
4
6
.
8
3

1
6
+
9
8
.
1
8

2
5
.
6
6

R
T
5

B
L
-
5

9
8
5
9
2
2
.
8
6
6
9

1
8
3
2
1
1
0
.
5
2
1
4

5
6
0
.
3
8

1
1
+
3
8
.
3
2

7
.
8
4

L
T
4

B
L
-
4

9
8
6
2
0
1
.
8
2
5
9

1
8
3
1
1
1
4
.
5
8
1
4

6
3
9
.
1
7

O
U
T
S
I
D
E

P
R
O
J
E
C
T

L
I
M
I
T
S

3

B
L
-
3

9
8
6
1
8
6
.
5
2
9
3

1
8
3
0
6
4
3
.
5
0
4
0

6
5
4
.
5
2

O
U
T
S
I
D
E

P
R
O
J
E
C
T

L
I
M
I
T
S

2

B
4
8
0
3
-
2

9
8
6
2
0
4
.
7
9
9
0

1
8
3
0
2
4
2
.
4
8
1
0

6
4
8
.
6
9

O
U
T
S
I
D
E

P
R
O
J
E
C
T

L
I
M
I
T
S

1

B
4
8
0
3
-
1

9
8
6
4
8
3
.
9
7
6
0

1
8
2
9
7
3
4
.
0
4
7
0

6
4
7
.
8
6

O
U
T
S
I
D
E

P
R
O
J
E
C
T

L
I
M
I
T
S

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

P
O
I
N
T

D
E
S
C
.

N
O
R
T
H

E
A
S
T

E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N

L

S
T
A
T
I
O
N

O
F
F
S
E
T
B
L
T
O
U
S
2
9
B
U
S.
TO OREGON HILL ROAD
WOLF
ISLAND
CREEK

E = 1832110.5214 N = 985922.8669 STATION "BL-5"NCDOT BASELINE
E

=

1
8
3
2
4
9
6
.
5
7
3
3
N

=

9
8
5
5
3
5
.
5
4
1
5
S
T
A
T
I
O
N

"
B
L
-
6
"
N
C
D
O
T

B
A
S
E
L
I
N
E
E

=

1
8
3
2
7
9
0
.
5
1
7
8
N

=

9
8
5
1
4
6
.
4
1
0
7
S
T
A
T
I
O
N

"
B
L
-
7
"
N
C
D
O
T

B
A
S
E
L
I
N
E
E
L
E
V

=

5
6
3
.
2
9
B
M
2
ELEV = 574.18 BM1 STA. 10+25.00 -L- BEGIN TIP PROJECT B-48
0
3
S
T
A
.

2
6
+
2
5
.
0
0
-
L
-

E
N
D

T
I
P

P
R
O
J
E
C
T

B
-
4
8
0
3
N
C
G
RI
D
N
A
D 83/2001
S
R

19
2
5

WO
R
S
H
A
M

MILL
R
OAD

2
0
’
P
A
V
E
D

R
O
AD
B
-
4
8
0
3
b4803_ls_control.txt
1
-
C
S
H
E
E
T

N
O
.
P
R
O
J
E
C
T

R
E
F
E
R
E
N
C
E

N
O
.
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y

D
E
S
I
G
N
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
2
B
-
4
8
0
3
P
A
V
E
M
E
N
T

D
E
S
I
G
N
6/2/9928-JAN-2014 09:21R:\Roadway\Proj\b4803_rdy_typ.dgn$$$$USERNAM E$$$$
D
O

N
O
T

U
S
E

F
O
R

C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y

P
L
A
N
S
G
R
A
D
E

T
O

T
H
I
S

L
I
N
E
4
:1
1
1
’
1
1
’
6’9’ W/GR
6
’
4
’
4’
F
D
P
S
FDPS
LC

-
L
-
8
’
2:
1
9
’

W
/

G
R
-
L
-

S
T
A

1
2
+
0
0
.
0
0

T
O

S
T
A

1
5
+
0
6
.
3
1

(
B
E
G
I
N

B
R
I
D
G
E
)
M
I
N
.
M
I
N
.
C

S
U
R
V
E
Y

L
U
U
8
"
.
0
2
4
:1
.02
G
R
A
D
E

T
O

T
H
I
S

L
I
N
E
GRADE TO THIS LINE
.
0
2
G
R
A
D
E
4
’
4’
8
’
.
0
2
.0
8
.08
P
O
I
N
T
6’9’ W/GR
6
’
9
’

W
/
G
R
LC

-
L
-
T
Y
P
I
C
A
L

S
E
C
T
I
O
N

N
O
.

1
T
Y
P
I
C
A
L

S
E
C
T
I
O
N

N
O
.

2
U
S
E

T
Y
P
I
C
A
L

S
E
C
T
I
O
N

N
O
.

2

A
S

F
O
L
L
O
W
S
U
S
E

T
Y
P
I
C
A
L

S
E
C
T
I
O
N

N
O
.

1

A
S

F
O
L
L
O
W
S
8
"
8
"
-
L
-

S
T
A

2
1
+
9
1
.
0
0

T
O

S
T
A

2
5
+
7
5
.
0
0
-
L
-

S
T
A

1
0
+
2
5
.
0
0

T
O

S
T
A

1
2
+
0
0
.
0
0
E
2
C
1
C
2
C
2
C
1
D
e
t
a
i
l

S
h
o
w
i
n
g

M
e
t
h
o
d

o
f

W
e
d
g
i
n
g
E
2
V
A
R
.

2
2
’

T
O

0
’
3
"
3
"
.
0
2
.
0
2
.
0
2
.0
8
.02.08 FDPS
F
D
P
S
G
R
A
D
E
P
O
I
N
T
1
1
’
1
1
’
N
O
T
E
:

M
I
L
L
I
N
G

R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
D

F
O
R

P
A
V
E
M
E
N
T

T
I
E
-
I
N

-
L
-

S
T
A
.

1
0
+
2
5
.
0
0

T
O

S
T
A
.

1
1
+
5
0
.
0
0

-
L
-

S
T
A
.

2
5
+
0
0
.
0
0

T
O

S
T
A
.

2
6
+
2
5
.
0
0
N
O
T
E
:

T
R
A
N
S
I
T
I
O
N

F
R
O
M

T
Y
P
I
C
A
L

S
E
C
T
I
O
N

N
O
.

1

T
O

E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G

-
L
-

S
T
A
.

2
5
+
7
5
.
0
0

T
O

S
T
A
.

2
6
+
2
5
.
0
0
-
L
-

S
T
A

1
7
+
0
3
.
6
9

(
E
N
D

B
R
I
D
G
E
)

T
O

S
T
A

2
1
+
9
1
.
0
0
VAR. SEE X-SECTIONSVAR. SEE X-SECTIONS
2:
1
PAVEMENT SCHEDULEAT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 137.5 LBS. PER SQ. YD. IN EACH OF TWO LAYERS.PROP. APPROX. 2" ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE SF9.5A,EARTH MATERIAL.T C1PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE SF9.5A,AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 110 LBS. PER SQ. YD. PER 1" DEPTH. TOBE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT TO EXCEED 1" IN DEPTH.C2PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TYPE B25.0B,AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 114 LBS. PER SQ. YD. PER 1" DEPTH. TOTHAN 5" IN DEPTH.BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT LESS THAN 3" IN DEPTH OR GREATERE2 PROP. APPROX. 5" ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TYPE B25.0B,AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 627 LBS. PER SQ. YD.E1PROP. 6" AGGREGRATE BASE COURSE.J
T
T
U
W
W
E1
E
1
C
1
C
1
C
1
C
1
U
C
1
C
1
E
1
E
1
T
T NOTE: PAVEMENT EDGE SLOPES ARE 1:1 UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE.VARIABLE DEPTH ASPHALT PAVEMENT (SEE STANDARD WEDGING DETAIL).W EXISTING PAVEMENT.
D
O

N
O
T

U
S
E

F
O
R

C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y

P
L
A
N
S
2
’
G
R
A
D
E

T
O

T
H
I
S

L
I
N
E
2
’
CL
4
’
2:1
3:1
3:1
U
S
E

T
Y
P
I
C
A
L

S
E
C
T
I
O
N

N
O
.

4

A
S

F
O
L
L
O
W
S
1
1
’
1
1
’
CL
-
L
-
NOTE
:

S
R

1
9
2
5

(
W
O
R
S
H
A
M

M
I
L
L

R
D
.
)

I
S

A

D
E
S
I
G
N
A
T
E
D

B
I
C
Y
C
L
E

R
O
U
T
E
,

N
C

4
.
-
D
R
V
1
-

S
T
A

1
0
+
2
1
.
7
8

T
O

S
T
A

1
0
+
6
5
.
0
0
-
D
R
V
2
-

S
T
A

1
0
+
2
0
.
3
9

T
O

S
T
A

1
0
+
6
0
.
0
0
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G

G
R
O
U
N
D
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G

G
R
O
U
N
D
6
"
M
E
T
A
L

R
A
I
L
2
-
B
A
R
MET
A
L

R
A
I
L
2
-
B
A
R
U
S
E

T
Y
P
I
C
A
L

S
E
C
T
I
O
N

N
O
.

3

A
S

F
O
L
L
O
W
S
1
2
’
-
D
R
I
V
E
S
-
T
Y
P
I
C
A
L

S
E
C
T
I
O
N

N
O
.

3
T
Y
P
I
C
A
L

S
E
C
T
I
O
N

N
O
.

4
G
R
A
D
E
P
O
I
N
T
.
0
8
.
0
2
.0
8
.
0
2
S
H
E
E
T

N
O
.
P
R
O
J
E
C
T

R
E
F
E
R
E
N
C
E

N
O
.
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y

D
E
S
I
G
N
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
2
-
A
B
-
4
8
0
3
P
A
V
E
M
E
N
T

D
E
S
I
G
N
6/2/9928-JAN-2014 09:21R:\Roadway\Proj\b4803_rdy_typ.dgn$$$$USERNAM E$$$$
G
R
A
D
E
P
O
I
N
T
W
W
4
’
-
3
"
1
’
-
3
"
1
"
4
’
-
3
"
1
’
-
3
"
1
"
3
3
’

3
0
’
-
6
"
.
0
2
.
0
2
-
L
-

S
T
A
.

1
5
+
0
6
.
3
1

(
B
E
G
I
N

B
R
I
D
G
E
)

T
O

S
T
A
.

1
7
+
0
3
.
6
9

(
E
N
D

B
R
I
D
G
E
)
B
E
A
R
I
N
G
8
.
5
"
@
C
L
B
E
A
R
I
N
G
4
.
7
5
"
@
C
L
B
E
A
R
I
N
G
4
.
7
5
"
@
C
L
C
1
C
1
P
A
V
E
M
E
N
T

S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
T
T
J
C
1
C
2
E
1
E
2
JTU
E
A
R
T
H

M
A
T
E
R
I
A
L
.
2
"

T
Y
P
E

S
F
9
.
5
A
V
A
R
.

T
Y
P
E

S
F
9
.
5
A
5
"

T
Y
P
E

B
2
5
.
0
B
V
A
R
.

T
Y
P
E

B
2
5
.
0
B
6
"

A
G
G
R
E
G
R
A
T
E

B
A
S
E

C
O
U
R
S
E
.
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G

P
A
V
E
M
E
N
T
W
V
A
R
.

D
E
P
T
H

W
E
D
G
I
N
G
G
R
O
U
N
D
N
A
T
U
R
A
L
S
L
O
P
E
FI
L
L
GE
O
T
E
X
T
I
L
E
S
E
E

D
E
T
A
I
L

A
E
S
T
.

1
0

S
Y
G
F
E
S
T
.

5

T
O
N
S
W
/

C
L
A
S
S

B

R
I
P

R
A
P
T
O
E

P
R
O
T
E
C
T
I
O
N
SEE D
E
T
A
I
L

A
EST.

6

S
Y
G
F
EST.

3

T
O
N
S
W/ C
L
A
S
S

B

R
I
P

R
A
P
TOE
P
R
O
T
E
C
T
I
O
N
S
E
E

D
E
T
A
I
L

B
E
S
T
.

4
0

S
Y
G
F
E
S
T
.

1
7

T
O
N
S
W
I
T
H

C
L
A
S
S

B

R
I
P

R
A
P
L
A
T
E
R
A
L

’
V
’

D
I
T
C
H
O
N

B
A
N
K
S

O
N
L
Y
C
L
A
S
S

I
I

R
I
P

R
A
P
E
L
B
O
W
S
1
5
"

W
/

R
I
P

R
A
P
C
L
A
S
S

I
I
E
S
T

7

S
Y
G
F
E
S
T

2

T
O
N
S
C
L

B

R
I
P

R
A
P
PS
R
M
2
0
’

X

1
0
’
PSRM 20’ X 10’
E
S
T

7

S
Y
G
F
E
S
T

2

T
O
N
S
C
L

B

R
I
P

R
A
P
T
O

E
L
E
V
.

5
3
4
.
0
E
X
C
A
V
A
T
E
2

E
L
B
O
W
S
1
5
"

w
/

R
I
P

R
A
P
C
L
A
S
S

I
I

S
E
E

D
E
T
A
I
L

C
E
S
T
.

2
2
5

S
Y
G
F
E
S
T
.

1
0
0

T
O
N
S
W
/

C
L

B

R
I
P

R
A
P
S
P
E
C
I
A
L

C
U
T

D
I
T
C
H
S
E
E

D
E
T
A
I
L

D
A
T

E
M
B
A
N
K
M
E
N
T
R
I
P

R
A
P

S
E
E

D
E
T
A
I
L

E
S
T
A
N
D
A
R
D

’
V
’

D
I
T
C
H
G
r
a
d
e
D
i
t
c
h
1
’
G
E
O
T
E
X
T
I
L
E
S
E
E

D
E
T
A
I
L

F
E
S
T
.

4
0

S
Y
G
F
E
S
T
.

2
3

T
O
N
S
W
/

C
L

B

R
I
P

R
A
P
S
T
A
N
D
A
R
D

’
V
’

D
I
T
C
H
S
l
o
p
e
D
i
t
c
h
F
r
o
n
t
G
e
o
t
e
x
t
i
l
e
A
P
P
R
.

S
L
A
B
E
N
D

S
B
G

-
L
-

S
T
A
.

1
4
+
6
5
.
0
0
B
E
G
I
N

S
B
G
A
P
P
R
.

S
L
A
B
E
N
D

S
B
G

-
L
-

S
T
A
.

1
4
+
6
5
.
0
0
B
E
G
I
N

S
B
G
G
e
o
t
e
x
t
i
l
e
S
l
o
p
e
F
i
l
l
G
e
o
t
e
x
t
i
l
e
REVISIO NS
H
Y
D
R
A
U
L
I
C
S
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y

D
E
S
I
G
N
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
R
/
W

S
H
E
E
T

N
O
.
S
H
E
E
T

N
O
.
P
R
O
J
E
C
T

R
E
F
E
R
E
N
C
E

N
O
.
28-JAN-2014 09:22R:\Roadway\Proj\b4803_rdy_psh4.dgn$$$$USERNAME$$$$8/17/99
D
O

N
O
T

U
S
E

F
O
R

C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y

P
L
A
N
S
22’4’ PS
4
’

P
S
4
’

P
S
BEGIN BRIDGEEND BRIDGEBEGIN APPR. SLABEND APPR. SLAB TYPE IIITYPE IIITYPE IIITYPE III 22’
S
E
E

S
H
E
E
T
S

S
-
1

T
H
R
U

S
-
?

F
O
R

S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E

P
L
A
N
S
S
E
E

S
H
E
E
T

6

F
O
R

-
L
-

P
R
O
F
I
L
E
METAL RAIL 2-BARMETAL RAIL 2-BARSKETCH SHOWING BRIDGE / ROADWAY RELATIONSHIP
M ATCH LIN E -L- STA. 22+50.00 SEE SH EET 5
0203 15 8:1
8
:
1
8:18:1 02 0101020002NC -L- PT Sta. 14+86.014’ PS22’NCPS - "PAVED SHOULDER"
B
-
4
8
0
3
4
4’-3"4’-3"30’-6"(NTS)SBG - "SHOULDER BERM GUTTER"SBGSBG-L- STA. 14+95.31 -L- STA. 15+06.31-L- STA. 17+03.69-L- STA. 17+14.69
M
I
L
L
3
S
F
W
O
O
D
S
2
4
"

R
C
P
15
"

R
C
P
18" RCP
3
6
"

R
C
P
WOLF

IS
LAND
CRE
EK

D
B

10
8
0

P
G

2
4
12
481.89
’
W
IL
L
IA
M

&

M
E
R
N
A
L
L
A

M
.

S
H
E
F
F
IE
L
D
D
B

13
0
7

P
G

10
8
0
B
E
T
T
Y

K
.

S
U
T
T
O
N
D
B

10
8
0

P
G

2
4
12
B
E
T
T
Y

K
.

S
U
T
T
O
N
D
B

13
0
0

P
G

18
7
5
N
A
N
C
Y

K
.

P
IT
T
S
P
B

1
7

P
G

1
0
E
I
P
EIP
1
0
’

G
R
A
V
E
L

D
R
T
O
U
S
2
9
B
U
S.
ALCORN LOOP SR 2069
W
O
O
D
S
768.76’
3
3
5
.
0
2
’
B
R
I
D
G
E
W
O
O
D

&

S
T
E
E
L

B
R
I
D
G
E

#
9
7
H
O
U
S
E
W
A
R
M
I
N
G
S
T
O
N
E

W
O
O
D
S
TO OREGON HILL ROAD
S
R

19
2
5

WOR
S
H
A
M
MILL
R
OAD

2
0
’ B
S
T
S
R

19
2
5

W
O
R
S
H
A
M
M
I
L
L
R
O
A
D

2
0
’
B
S
T
WOODS
W
O
O
D
S
W
O
O
D
S
W
O
O
D
S
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G

R
/
W
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G

R
/
W
EXISTING R/WEXISTING R/W
60.00’
40.00’
S 53 48’58" W
677.14’S 53 53’20" W
96.11’
P
B

1
7

P
G

1
0
EXISTING R/W DB 1301 PG 1808 KATHERINE ALCORN WILSON
1
0
.
0
0
’
+
6
6
.
2
0
9
.5
6
’
+
6
2
.3
5
ELEV = 574.18’SEE SHEET 1-C BM #1
E
L
E
V

=

5
6
3
.
2
9
’
S
E
E

S
H
E
E
T

1
-
C
B
M

#
2
-BL-5
-BL- 6
-BL-7
02
03
04
05
06
NC
0201
0200
0201
02
03
04
06
+20.00
2
0
’
T
Y
P.
I
N
C.
2
0
’
T
Y
P
.
I
N
C
.
PI Sta 13+13.43DL = 358.41’T = 185.83’R = 550.00’PI Sta 23+75.29DL = 550.64’T = 306.99’R = 500.00’-L-SE = SEE PLANSSE = SEE PLANS
12’
1
2
’
-
D
R
V
2
-

P
O
T

S
t
a
.

1
1
+
0
0
.
0
0
-
L
-

P
O
T

S
t
a
.

1
7
+
9
0
.
0
0
-
D
R
V
1
-

P
O
T

S
t
a
.

1
0
+
0
0
.
0
0
-
L
-

P
O
T

S
t
a
.

2
0
+
5
0
.
0
0
-
D
R
V
2
-

P
O
T

S
t
a
.

1
0
+
0
0
.
0
0
G
R
A
U

3
5
0
G
R
A
U

3
5
0
G
R
A
U

3
5
0
05
1
5
2
0
-L- PC Sta. 11+27.60
-L- PT Sta. 14+86.01
-L- PC Sta. 20+68.30
BEGIN STATE PROJECT B-4803
G
R
A
U

3
5
0
8
:1
8
:
1
02 01
0102
0002
-
D
R
V
1
-

P
T

S
t
a
.

1
0
+
2
0
.
3
1
-
D
R
V
1
-

P
C

S
t
a
.

1
0
+
6
3
.
6
8
NC
0306 06+45.0020’TYP.INC.
-
D
R
V
1
-

P
O
T

S
t
a
.

1
1
+
0
3
.
6
8
E
N
D

C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
E
N
D

C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
40’
-L- POT Sta. 10+00.0022’
22’
4’ PS4’ PS
-
D
R
V
1
-

P
R
C

S
t
a
.

1
0
+
4
2
.
0
0
-
D
R
V
1
-

S
T
A
.

1
0
+
6
5
.
0
0
+86.54
-
D
R
V
2
-

S
T
A
.

1
0
+
6
0
.
0
0
4
’
P
S
4
’
P
S
10’
10’
10’
10’
-L- STA. 10+25.00 0702 04 050606NOTE 1: PAVED SHOULDER TRANSITION -L- STA. 10+25.00 TO

S
T
A
.

1
0
+
7
5
.
0
0

L
T
.
/
R
T
.
NOTE 2: PAVE ALL DRIVES TO BACK OF TURNOUT RADIUSNOTE 3: DESIGN EXCEPTION REQUIRED FOR DESIGN SPEED.
8:
1
F
C
C
C
C
C
F
C
F
C
F
CF CF CF CFCF CF CC CC C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
F
F
F
F
F
F
FF
FF
FF
FF
C
C
CC
CC
CC
CC
CC
CC
CC
CC
C
C
CC
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C C
C
C
C
C
C
C
20.17’ (RT.)+25.00 -L-43.00’ (RT.)+50.00 -L-20.39’ (RT.)+57.00 -L-55.00’ (RT.)+83.00 -L-37.92’ (RT.)+14.00 -L-50.00’ (
R
T
.
)
+00.00

-
L
-
4
2
.
3
8
’

(
R
T
.
)
+
5
0
.
0
0

-
L
-
7
5
.
0
0
’

(
R
T
.
)
5
9
.
9
9
’

(
R
T
.
)
+
0
0
.
0
0

-
L
-
9
0
.
0
0
’

(
R
T
.
)
6
9
.
9
8
’

(
R
T
.
)
+
1
0
.
0
0

-
L
-
9
0
.
0
0
’

(
R
T
.
)
6
9
.
4
4
’

(
R
T
.
)
+
3
0
.
0
0

-
L
-
80.00’ (LT.)+50.00 -L-75.00’ (LT.)+00.00 -L-
5
5
.
0
0
’

(
L
T
.
)
+
8
0
.
0
0

-
L
-
3
0
.
0
0
’

(
L
T
.
)
+
8
0
.
0
0

-
L
-
7
5
.
0
0
’

(
L
T
.
)
+
5
0
.
0
0

-
L
-
3
8
.
8
7
’

(
L
T
.
)
+
9
6
.
0
0

-
L
-
5
0
.
0
0
’

(
L
T
.
)
3
0
.
0
0
’

(
L
T
.
)
+
8
6
.
0
1

-
L
-
30.00’ (LT.)+27.60 -L-
5
0
.
0
0
’

(
L
T
.
)
3
0
.
0
0
’

(
L
T
.
)
+
2
5
.
0
0

-
L
-
7
5
.
0
0
’

(
L
T
.
)
+
5
0
.
0
0

-
L
-
3
0
.
0
0
’

(
L
T
.
)
+
4
5
.
0
0

-
L
-
3
0
.
0
0
’

(
L
T
.
)
+
6
8
.
3
0

-
L
-
6
5
.
5
3
’

(
L
T
.
)
+
7
0
.
0
0

-
L
-
9
5
.
0
0
’

(
L
T
.
)
+
0
0
.
0
0

-
L
-
9
2
.
0
0
’

(
L
T
.
)
+
0
0
.
0
0

-
L
-
7
5
.
0
0
’

(
L
T
.
)
+
0
0
.
0
0

-
L
-
7
7
.
0
0
’

(
L
T
.
)
+
0
0
.
0
0

-
L
-
6
5
.
0
0
’

(
L
T
.
)
+
5
0
.
0
0

-
L
-
1
1
2
3
9
0
.
0
0
’

(
R
T
.
)
7
0
.
0
0
’

(
R
T
.
)
+
0
0
.
0
0

-
L
-
9
0
.
0
0
’

(
R
T
.
)
7
0
.
0
0
’

(
R
T
.
)
+
3
0
.
0
0

-
L
-
30.00’ (LT.)+25.00 -L-TIE TO EIP 87.34’ (LT.) PL +27.60 -L-66.01’ (LT.) PL +45.00 -L-
7
0
.
0
0
’

(
R
T
.
)
+
6
7
.
1
9

-
L
-
7
5
.
0
0
’

(
R
T
.
)
+
6
7
.
1
1

-
L
-
8
0
.
0
0
’

(
L
T
.
)
7
5
.
0
0
’

(
L
T
.
)
+
1
0
.
0
0

-
L
-
7
5
.
0
0
’

(
L
T
.
)
+
8
6
.
0
1

-
L
-
8
0
.
0
0
’

(
L
T
.
)
7
5
.
0
0
’

(
L
T
.
)
+
2
5
.
0
0

-
L
-
1
5
"
R
E
T
A
I
N
R
E
TA
I
N
R
E
T
A
I
N
G
T
D
REM O VE
(

N
o
t

t
o

S
c
a
l
e
)
T
O
E

P
R
O
T
E
C
T
I
O
N
d
FL
A
T
TE
R
2:1
O
R
F
R
O
M

-
L
-

S
T
A
.

1
7
+
2
0
.
0
0

T
O

S
T
A
.

1
7
+
5
5
.
0
0

L
T
F
R
O
M

-
L
-

S
T
A
.

1
3
+
7
5
.
0
0

T
O

S
T
A
.

1
4
+
2
5
.
0
0

L
T
D
E
T
A
I
L

A
T
y
p
e

o
f

L
i
n
e
r
=

C
L
A
S
S

B

R
i
p
-
R
a
p
d
=

1

F
t
.
0
4
0
3
0
4
0
2
0
4
0
1
0
4
0
6
0
4
0
5
15"
2
G
I
F
S
GTD
GTD
G
T
D
0
4
0
715"2
G
I
0
4
0
8
(

N
o
t

t
o

S
c
a
l
e
)
R
I
P

R
A
P

A
T

E
M
B
A
N
K
M
E
N
T
-
L
-

S
T
A
.

1
6
+
2
8
.
0
0

-
L
T
-
L
-

S
T
A
.

1
5
+
6
4
.
0
0

-
L
T
D
E
T
A
I
L

D

G
e
o
t
e
x
t
i
l
e
=

1
5

S
Y

T
y
p
e

o
f

L
i
n
e
r
=

7

T
O
N
S
,
C
L

B

R
i
p
-
R
a
p
1
0
’
m
i
n
.
1
.
0
’
m
i
n
.
2:1
D
Flatter
4:1 or
d
(

N
o
t

t
o

S
c
a
l
e
)
C
U
T

D
I
T
C
H
F
R
O
M

-
L
-

S
T
A
.

1
8
+
2
5
.
0
0

T
O

S
T
A
.

2
0
+
0
0
.
0
0

R
T
D
E
T
A
I
L

C
M
a
x
.

d
=

1

F
t
.
M
i
n
.

D
=

1

F
t
.
T
y
p
e

o
f

L
i
n
e
r
=

C
L

B

R
i
p
-
R
a
p
G
r
o
u
n
d
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
2
G
I
T
B
2
G
I
T
B
2:1
2:1
D
(

N
o
t

t
o

S
c
a
l
e
)
S
T
A
N
D
A
R
D

’
V
’

D
I
T
C
H
D
D
E

=

6
2

C
Y
F
R
O
M

-
L
-

S
T
A
.

1
6
+
2
8

T
O

S
T
A
.

1
7
+
1
4

L
T
M
i
n
.

D
=

2

F
t
.
D
E
T
A
I
L

E
G
r
o
u
n
d
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
G
r
o
u
n
d
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
2:1
2:1
D
(

N
o
t

t
o

S
c
a
l
e
)
d S
T
A
N
D
A
R
D

’
V
’

D
I
T
C
H
D
D
E

=

5

C
Y
F
R
O
M

-
L
-

S
T
A
.

1
5
+
0
0

T
O

S
T
A
.

1
5
+
6
4

L
T
T
y
p
e

o
f

L
i
n
e
r
=

C
L
A
S
S

B

R
i
p
-
R
a
p
M
a
x
.

d
=

2

F
t
.
M
i
n
.

D
=

2

F
t
.
D
E
T
A
I
L

F
G
r
o
u
n
d
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
G
r
o
u
n
d
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
L
A
T
E
R
A
L

’
V
’

D
I
T
C
H
(

N
o
t

t
o

S
c
a
l
e
)
2:1
2:1
D
b
d
1
"
/
F
t
.
D
D
E

=

2
8

C
Y
F
R
O
M

-
L
-

S
T
A
.

1
4
+
2
5
.
0
0

T
O

S
T
A
.

1
5
+
0
0
.
0
0

L
T
T
y
p
e

o
f

L
i
n
e
r
=

C
L
A
S
S

B

R
i
p
-
R
a
p
b
=

5

F
t
.
M
a
x
.

d
=

2

F
t
.
M
i
n
.

D
=

2

F
t
.
D
E
T
A
I
L

B
G
r
o
u
n
d
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
N A D 8 3 / 2 0 0 1
REVISIO NS
H
Y
D
R
A
U
L
I
C
S
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y

D
E
S
I
G
N
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
R
/
W

S
H
E
E
T

N
O
.
S
H
E
E
T

N
O
.
P
R
O
J
E
C
T

R
E
F
E
R
E
N
C
E

N
O
.
28-JAN-2014 09:22R:\Roadway\Proj\b4803_rdy_psh5.dgn$$$$USERNAME$$$$8/17/99
D
O

N
O
T

U
S
E

F
O
R

C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y

P
L
A
N
S
MATCHLINE -L- STA. 22+50.00 SEE SHEET 4
S
E
E

S
H
E
E
T

6

F
O
R

-
L
-

P
R
O
F
I
L
E
B
-
4
8
0
3
5
S 3200’06" E
547.08’
S 00 00’08" W
1230.92’
EIP0.59’ EIP TO R/W
2.10’ R/W TO EIP
EIP
EIP
CONC DRIVE
S
OIL&GR
AVE
L
DARREL & CHERYL CHRISMONDB 829 PG 1469PB 17 PG 10
W
I
L
L
I
A
M

&

M
E
R
N
A
L
L
A

M
.

S
H
E
F
F
I
E
L
D
D
B

1
3
0
7

P
G

1
0
8
0
P
B

1
7

P
G

1
0
W
I
L
L
I
A
M

&

M
E
R
N
A
L
L
A

M
.

S
H
E
F
F
I
E
L
D
D
B

1
3
0
7

P
G

1
0
8
0
P
B

1
7

P
G

1
0
47.87’+55.97BL-18
2
5
-L- PT Sta. 26+18.94
-L- S
T
A
.

2
6
+
2
5
.
0
0
END

S
T
A
T
E

P
R
O
J
E
C
T

B
-
4
8
0
3
+45.00
2
0
’
TYP
.
IN
C
.
-L- POT Sta. 28+16.31
22’
4
’ PS
4
’ PS
0602
03
04
05
06
22’
06
5
0
’ TA
P
ER
06
06
21.1’
LT. &

RT.
N
O
T
E

1
:

P
A
V
E
D

S
H
O
U
L
D
E
R

T
R
A
N
S
I
T
I
O
N

-
L
-

S
T
A
.

2
5
+
7
5
.
0
0

T
O

S
T
A
.

2
6
+
2
5
.
0
0

L
T
.
/
R
T
.
N
O
T
E

2
:

D
E
S
I
G
N

E
X
C
E
P
T
I
O
N

R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
D

F
O
R

D
E
S
I
G
N

S
P
E
E
D
.
-
L
-
P
I

S
t
a

2
3
+
7
5
.
2
9
DL

=

5
5
0
.
6
4
’
T

=

3
0
6
.
9
9
’
R

=

5
0
0
.
0
0
’
S
E

=

S
E
E

P
L
A
N
S
CCCCCFCFCFCFCFCFCFCF
C
F
C
F
F
F
F
F
FF
5
5
.
0
0
’

(
L
T
.
)
+
0
5
.
0
0

-
L
-
60.00’ (LT.)+50.00 -L-55.0
0
’

(
L
T
.
)
+50
.
0
0

-
L
-
55.00’ (LT.)+50.00 -L-65.00’ (LT.)+50.00 -L-31.76’ (R
T
.
)
+25.00

-
L
-
45.00’

(
R
T
.
)
+50.0
0

-
L
-
4
5
.
0
0
’

(
R
T
.
)
+
0
0
.
0
0

-
L
-
3
0
.
6
9
’

(
R
T
.
)
+
1
8
.
9
4

-
L
-
2
4
3
0
.
0
0
’

(
L
T
.
)
+
1
8
.
9
4

-
L
-
2
9
.
3
4
’

(
L
T
.
)
+
2
5
.
0
0

-
L
-
RETAINGTD GTD GTD
NAD 83/ 2001
(
S
T
R
.

P
A
Y

I
T
E
M
)
K
E
Y
E
D

I
N

3
.
5
’

(
T
Y
P
.
)
C
L
A
S
S

I
I

R
I
P

R
A
P
(
S
T
R
.

P
A
Y

I
T
E
M
)
O
N

D
I
S
T
U
R
B
E
D

B
A
N
K
S
C
L
A
S
S

I
I

R
I
P

R
A
P
-
L
-
520 530 540 550 560 570 580 590550560570580590
5
2
0
5
3
0
5
4
0
5
5
0
5
6
0
5
7
0
5
8
0
10111213
1
4
1
5
1
6
1
7
1
8
1
9
2
0
2
1
2
2
2
3
2
4
600RR SPIKE IN BASE OF 18" RED OAK BL STATION 30+39.00 122’ RIGHT N 985800 E 1832061 BM1 ELEVATION = 574.18’
R
R

S
P
I
K
E

I
N

R
O
O
T

O
F

3
0
"

D
O
U
B
L
E

R
I
V
E
R

B
I
R
C
H
B
L

S
T
A
T
I
O
N

3
6
+
8
3
.
0
0

9
3
’

R
I
G
H
T
N

9
8
5
3
6
0

E

1
8
3
2
5
1
2
B
M
2

E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N

=

5
6
3
.
2
9
’
BEGIN GRADE -L- STA. 10+25.00ELEV. = 565.82’25262724 600 610 620
2
8
S
E
E

S
H
E
E
T

4

F
O
R

P
L
A
N

V
I
E
W
D
O

N
O
T

U
S
E

F
O
R

C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y

P
L
A
N
S
5/28/99
S
H
E
E
T

N
O
.
P
R
O
J
E
C
T

R
E
F
E
R
E
N
C
E

N
O
.
H
Y
D
R
A
U
L
I
C
S
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y

D
E
S
I
G
N
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R

6

B
-
4
8
0
3

28-JAN-2014 09:22R:\Roadway\Proj\b4803_rdy_pfl.dgn$$$$USERNAM E$$$$
5
6
0
5
7
0
5
8
0
-
D
R
V
2
-
-
D
R
V
1
-
5
6
0
5
7
0
5
8
0
5
9
0
6
0
0
5
5
0
1
0
1
1
1
2
S
E
E

S
H
E
E
T

4

F
O
R

P
L
A
N

V
I
E
W
540
5
4
0
5
1
0
5
2
0
5
3
0
5
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
2
5
2
0
5
3
0
E
L
E
V
.

=

5
5
3
.
5
7
’
B
E
G
I
N

G
R
A
D
E

-
D
R
V
1
-

S
T
A
.

1
0
+
1
1
.
0
0
E
L
E
V
.

=

5
4
7
.
1
0
’
E
N
D

G
R
A
D
E

-
D
R
V
1
-

S
T
A
.

1
0
+
6
5
.
0
0
E
L
E
V
.

=

5
6
7
.
5
6
’
E
N
D

G
R
A
D
E

-
D
R
V
2
-

S
T
A
.

1
0
+
6
0
.
0
0
E
L
E
V
.

=

5
6
5
.
6
5
’
B
E
G
I
N

G
R
A
D
E

-
D
R
V
2
-

S
T
A
.

1
0
+
1
1
.
0
0
-L
-
S
E
E

S
H
E
E
T

4

A
N
D

5

F
O
R

P
L
A
N

V
I
E
W
SEE SHEET 5 FOR

P
L
A
N

V
I
E
W
5
9
0
END GRADE -L- STA. 26
+
2
5
.
0
0
ELEV. = 600.62’
5
4
0
5
5
0
PI = 10+80.00EL = 562.97’(-)5.1818%(-)3.6316%VC = 110’PI = 11+75.00EL = 559.52’(-)5.1744%VC = 80’PI = 13+7
0
.
0
0
EL = 549
.
4
3
’
(-)5.1744%
(
+
)
1.
0
0
0
0
%
VC = 30
0
’
P
I

=

1
9
+
1
0
.
0
0
E
L

=

5
5
4
.
8
3
’
(
+
)
1.
0
0
0
0
%
(
+
)
7.
4
5
3
8
%
V
C

=

3
2
0
’
P
I

=

2
1
+
7
0
.
0
0
E
L

=

5
7
4
.
2
1
’
(
+
)
7.
4
5
3
8
%
(
+
)
6.
5
0
2
0
%
V
C

=

2
0
0
’
VC = 165’
588.86
PI = 24+15.00EL = 590.14’(+)6.5020%(+)4.3000%588.86 PI = 25+65.00EL = 596.59’(+)4.3000%(+)6.7167%VC = 120’K = 71 (DS > 40 MPH)K = 52 (DS > 40 MPH)K = 49 (D
S

=

3
5

M
P
H
)
K

=

5
0

(
D
S

>

3
5

M
P
H
)
K

=

2
1
0

(
D
S

>

6
5

M
P
H
)
K = 75 (DS > 45 MPH)K = 50 (DS > 35 MPH)
P
I

=

1
0
+
2
5
.
0
0
E
L

=

5
5
2
.
7
3
’
(-
)6
.0
0
0
0
%
(-)17.0400%
P
I

=

1
0
+
5
0
.
0
0
E
L

=

5
4
8
.
4
7
’
(-)9.13
3
3
%
V

=

2
0
’
V

=

3
0
’
P
I

=

1
0
+
2
5
.
0
0
E
L

=

5
6
6
.
0
9
’
(
+
)
3
.
1
4
2
9
%
(
+
)
0
.
3
9
13
%
P
I

=

1
0
+
4
8
.
0
0
E
L

=

5
6
6
.
1
8
’
(+)11.5000
%
V

=

2
0
’
V

=

2
0
’
DESIGN EXCEPTION REQUIRED FOR SAG VERTICAL CURVE AND ASSOCIATED NIG
H
T
T
I
M
E

S
T
O
P
P
I
N
G

S
I
G
H
T

D
I
S
T
A
N
C
E
S
.
(-) 8.9867%
(-
) 2
.9
8
4
4
%
(
+
)

0
.
9
3
0
2
%
(
+
)
3
.
5
6
0
0
%
(
+
)
7.
1
3
3
3
%
(+) 10.9200
%
BEGIN LAT. ’V’ DITCH -L- STA. 14+
2
5
.
0
0

L
T
.
EL. = 541.65’
P
I

=
1
5
+
0
0
.
0
0

L
T
.
E
L
.

=

5
3
4
.
9
1
’
E
L
.

=

5
3
3
.
0
0
’
E
L
.

=

5
3
4
.
5
0
’
B
E
G
I
N

’
V
’

D
I
T
C
H

-
L
-

S
T
A
.

1
6
+
2
8
.
0
0

L
T
.
E
L
.

=

5
3
5
.
3
0
’
PI =19+00.00 RT.
EL. = 551.92’
PI =19+75.00 RT.
EL. = 557.27’
E
L
.

=

5
6
0
.
0
0
’
E
N
D

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

C
U
T

D
I
T
C
H

-
L
-

S
T
A
.

2
0
+
0
0
.
0
0

R
T
.
E
L
.

=

5
4
9
.
2
5
’
B
E
G
I
N

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

C
U
T

D
I
T
C
H

-
L
-

S
T
A
.

1
8
+
2
5
.
0
0

R
T
.
E
N
D

’
V
’

D
I
T
C
H

-
L
-

S
T
A
.

1
5
+
6
4
.
0
0

L
T
.
DESIGN DISCHARGEDESIGN FREQUENCYBASE DISCHARGE
C
F
S
Y
R
S
Y
R
S
BASE FREQUENCYOVERTOPPING ELEVA
T
I
O
N
OVERTOPPING FREQ
U
E
N
C
Y
OVERTOPPING DISCH
A
R
G
E
C
F
S
C
F
S
Y
R
S
F
T
F
T
F
T
DESIGN HW ELEVAT
I
O
N
BASE HW ELEVATIO
N
BRIDGE HY
D
R
A
U
L
I
C

D
A
T
A
F
T
DATE OF SURVEYW.S. ELEVATIONAT DATE OF SURVE
Y
F
T
=

4
5
0
0

=

2
5

=

5
4
0
.
8
0

=

6
7
1
5

=

1
0
0
=

5
4
2
.
7
2

=

1
8
7
0
0

=

5
0
0
+
=

5
5
0
.
4
0

=

=

0
2
/
2
7
/
2
0
1
3
=

5
2
9
.
5
0

E
L

5
5
1
.
7
9
’
L
C

E
L
.

@

C
L

=

5
4
7
.
7
9
’
1.5
:1
1.5:1
2

S
P
A
N
S
,

1

@

1
0
0
’
,

1

@

9
5
’
.

3
9
"

B
O
X

B
E
A
M
(
0
2
-
2
7
-
2
0
1
3
)
W
S
E

5
2
9
.
5
LC
-
L
-

S
T
A
.

1
6
+
0
5
.
0
0
-
L
-

S
T
A
.

1
7
+
1
4
.
0
0

L
T
.
E
N
D

’
V
’

D
I
T
C
H