820388_Routine Inspection_20220719

bb,K
Ftdrdypii'4x Wd'
6 w9 Nawu
&#Y'3##id4 f
#�4I03 M flx sam
ieiug;of?, r.
4 $t 4i
gk Aisfrge xr.
uree,i>f n+
ater onservak,91!
a• is #x• #}rt bai. a#
Type of Visit: }'s0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: No Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
'7 it2
Arrival Time:
FarmName:mL(l`GVl gal \ hog fin
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
rnf Ufapj gRAI
Departure Time:
:OD
Owner Email:
Phone:
County: S Region:
ENTERED TO
LASERFICHE
Title:
Onsite Representative: V V 1 i (c 6.
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
same
Latitude:
Integrator:
DEQ/DWR WQROS
PgETTFVII t F RFGIONAI OFFICE
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
X#P*6
#6##t5#9
bq{2h+tY
A#Ptpp
}#trw5#'C[t
p$##ffbt'.YYedt9b
$ $
t'b #t dk'k'rt4 y,. Vh.#dk N##3A N4{a%kN*•.xr Yx. �: age e 4 Rx..
$F12Y 4V%?eNY ryy yd94}fiC#F %Ytrrt xx S..%kQ6}(}35(atkd*#
FP#N#W dd4Yb SM5 #v p M °Y tY.µ d+pit tii dw rvro{Y Rubt iffim8-6kYib }
#9kdNR i+dk Yx:Qd<r RaX }R hSA44en l?P9baiYi-0#§d 4%3Yid 4SbX{'i'� b6'k#1Td j gn Xp{j.ny C4
ht@9X n.R li Cg4Nk0."n #4kY3�.Y�8bl?9S4
q#Sllwine5 aett#1k yi5dY d58i" 4 tyii #bPYL43 4 % Ji tl}:d #a +44P»%##:`r6S{e n(rK"��$®91pp;Y#}�KKg,{Pi B@4$ygRb
t ^dMrykN ranxda5 Ppot sh{.x4AF#ayYytry tjf *,33# $Y• t/Y. age�${1 F. lr nt iH. yS qp Yr94k$V+'b� 9N
aah#k4tl4M@5ti4:a+::�vas#YNR3 a}{idkk YYeldUtry"pph.Ua;#lAeitFykY3Pb�tiYx� #4fa ]katNle TF#0a#Yi@YIDdFo- k4#'#A
# 5te avgtl{4a rt yiimixti.,#M.Y 4'fl kii'..•d SSd UxbulMtC n}^. $dY*)'F##'F€„r #§x''931 rFtl
Wean to Finish
#
,f,;.'
*>
}}
Layer
.i;.
# *
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -Laver
5s
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
E *a
SS f
=p}�#
b #% i . a#Y
L#p+4�axe4gxx x.,b
a }%a+flF#b and+sbv+�$a+sai
cdfrflaag 3b*Rt
<'F!ou(f"r +R,('4apti'"#
#+ a >rrc..,_
ak9%$arkil SF b#�59#
i� �Rk�ii
o 4C'��e #i°:�
}''lt
o#tr+
$; ~�
Dairy Heifer
�,.
Farrow to Wean
Y
(aiY.,R}ii
Dry Cow
#�
Farrow to Feeder
gat%aa
i'
b#.
Non -Dairy
�n
Farrow to Finish
ais�-i�r+"-�
i�I
Beef Stocker
Gilts
# F
Non -Layers
-- *a
Beef Feeder'
�d
a #
Boars
a$:
Pullets
4#
k*
Beef Brood Cow
Xtld
&i
x Ak)!ip&Y%R%<4
<b'R$fik
ki #fl'p
ii'A»M #1 k9akY,
Yt kd 64 kt44w sS
Pi1fl.T.$P#h <#4-'.titi4H L b :'4 tP
Yd%Y kfYd& i 49P t+54 h2tY%d %*, y,}#SYbF
R4thl i R4%N#Yd4$i ith ¥4 C'#Aktkt,.■
Fb# Fb ar wAi9$6Fi'F 1k 5k iA5#§
■
Turkeys
--
M
f t42 YPt TN. d d Rn.ry.t nM1uli+9q#A,.F42#F{'y..
{Si # P 'Xb%.dVLT #kYbA S'.YSG44k'A drF?p GY3
x,Y A k F b#..N 4}}%k#v#4b}k#*#$iC49flp
Turke Ponits
--S.t
ka■Other
t-0d¢fraR'+ FF ^,2.:.'n. Frs vtfY.EEka Ykdery
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ' No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes1\1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ' No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes I,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page l of 3
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number:
Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
9
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Structure 5
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs.
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window
12. Crop Type(s): �, tie
IP Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
r::E Yes V No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 113 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes t'No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
13. Soil Type(s): `.bM t W 191 an]DN
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
fl Yes Ki No ❑ NA ❑ NE
XI Yes 00 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes %No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 10 No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
Page 2 of 3
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
,J No
iNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number:
Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑Yes c\No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes \htNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes \No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
afions onanSt. v4041vd
spray - or doq fpntl.
mom taq,00n 3 around pump
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Phone:
�ff-yp�]/�/
V± V tot —cm Date: 1 t9 /� L
Page 3 of 3 5/12/2020