820112_Routine Inspection_20220719 (2)

ivi`sion
astung)
°sod ces84t OS aSS =`
Ater;fit inservat?o
xi+. R44 4 1,4 A.
Type of Visit: SL Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ZFk Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Farm Name:
'1 19 22
Arrival Time:
j: 00
John hope Mtn') -W3
OwnerName: John R hope
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
{� 1 /fit �i �j� /� C+'�J: i REC�LUPIA.l?YIrLL
Facility Contact: writs I S C/IAt INI VK Title: 1'G1 G`%V 4 Phone:
Onsite Representative:
Some fi "
Departure Time:
�JD
Owner Email:
Phone:
County: SQmp Region:
ENTERED TO
f_ASENI-IUNb
Fro
JUL 2 1 22022
D OOD`APRW ROS
Certified Operator: io h n 11opo
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Integrator:
Certification Number: ass
Certification Number:
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Longitude:
El Yes INo ❑NA El NE
Page 1 of 3
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number:
Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Structure 4 Structure 5
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes I I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) '�
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes C No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes 1 No ❑ NA
❑ Yes Ilk No ❑ NA
❑ Yes fclNo ❑NA
❑ Yes kl No ❑ NA
❑ Yes No ❑ NA
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop `Window j� ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): COOCCtQt W 91 I1Q
13. Soil Type(s): APB ll, i Malt/Mc IAvitiVi vG
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
Page 2 of 3
❑ Yes
q, Yes
❑ Yes
TA No
0 No
No
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Other:
❑ Yes ' No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
No ❑NA ONE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
5/12/2020 Continued
❑ Yes
❑ Yes

Facility Number:
Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
4-1 t1V-1. -1
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus Loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes
Yes
No
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ' No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 'I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
e
o%anytiatk
IttanglttFoi
6. Q\tfl for weeds in -hqd wdh Pfviot
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature
Page 3 of 3
'he ftnwnof
❑ Yes 1:\]No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ER No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
©mien omine
Phone: l lq ER(, 4i f r
Date:1 f 9 d-
5/12/2020