820054_Routine Inspection_20220719

Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
1 1912
Arrival Time:j$ :' (
Farm Name: hb�ej Ra;rm1ng C�/
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
heft fatmtng CO,
Departure Time:
100
Owner Email:
Phone:
County: Gjainf o
ENTERED TO
LASERFICHE
JUL. 2
Region:
\IV I Vo4\W
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
cam e
Title:
DEO/DWR WOROS
FAYETTF\N I I= PF—410NAI (IFFICF
Latitude:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
1d8+64tM1
}4 %d35ifi4Y§bJ>Y
}4 Ki$8YW$NA.i
4fr.}{§tr3k'iNdid&u#�4t�%#d%5
S4#Y£nS�AYd
d Y.j: `.Btdt
x+x^
d.H Rtk4P9
Rbd94'+i >b# kkdt kd'S{
stClleQp���%,.0}=nrre4�
+bY 4Nk§kdYA Oij/4�N$4�3'tt§
Apq;::tr t:4rY,.}hc
bS MSbrrF iF#t IX4
& fr�bh A4t .k d4A$Y
yY }
+x�'$t.�,5itit5Y
au 4y54id°
YX *o-aa h&555 A$S
Si5}?i
kd99.dk
biR
fiA§rid
}
"
F4
Y`#$R�%xy]9
NxOt m
t% rt§ t}s.C4tlG a 4X YIFd 4++o-" 9}ffit.%x}+�'d. {. q, .�4'f
t4 kdk tk PYt'+i+k!d 8kT =4YW R4fidYO fi..#G$#±
8YA 5£Vbx3 5x ��y5jjyy+��P.,93yy��Y x4.ti Po dY M. 3i£ E43`b Y ak kx+4::k xnLLd 4'ri dt .{p O'krn$+�
$k405 Mi4k5fr R4 ��d�4}r5l4A5Vnrreynt"dM1
NyY A4x dxj+{dtQBY=R L�da .�k j+d '(jhMrt tY}Sb a✓.5
dJ l °tit � 1`, kXb b..W #Pt(55frY ,k Yt Pk +,i'i2$tli5 #&�yyeqq�ia d�kY� j${ �A$.
5nd#�,dd kk a 6Ai%'{uG#c tx ii44 �%9 k d...;a�t1e R%g X3Fkk*a§e#�NYP4tt9xY14T$�'
{
Wean to Finish
Layer
•
Dairy Cow --}a
Dairy Calf
Heifer == $
$"
Wean to Feeder
K;t
Non Layer
Feeder to Finishq;+
3adk A a rr*`re «a= r*`
.,v as s
raga r aiht V" °f?'e grt*G' $*t
t£d * 4*t dKk dfi`U iYr§ **
xl) �D tAF4attr r 2k 1pa�._.* idl5tk
a%x�•�+�--xie,..■
d
k
�Dai
A■DryCow
Farrow toWean
--'„
&$_
-Dairy
$t§
t13
FarrowtoFeeder
$ •Non
qh
rf;
xa
##
Farrow to Finish
BStocker
tockderer
Gilts
$s
# Non -Layers
--HYR
--fA
ad#
WS�T,i#+1
#fr 9fY
bii tta
Ad
%#it �dC
of Feeder
aa°n
p 3
Boars
.PL•Pullets
pi.
Beef Brood Cow —*
bR Y4'k+}£+}t iFi 4*xR+ ++' rsdkdr
k 4Nfl$41:M 5R4J} YRHW 5Y AY %
tlt VY45 #Xb fY ktk&4A 4Y{<
§it F£$4/�+y dk kaxv+Y Yq 'it kd #
A#6 PYY4Y1l1eiT h P£a 5nASYi{5k
k P541#ni%4x?Ndt
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
*M'Ys4P. "`YS kM1£>rt�kw5 L!n Y6 4k4 56b 9$�¢+
�1*iv * Y y. G $ S&9t 5..
% rt •F +.n Y'UXY#Ekbkk § 4 x�4x# 'k4t
t+* a u 2N s"i 33x e.p :%{ik#45t 9vA#R yb'.
4414 *44 a4t fi } frq*b#k*4*FFO$4Ai' k
i�C '[rtd dkH frr#k i4 k*rvr q(+"+`
mk9+16&Q%rtitt6ikRk{Y4�:/%$tt:#§#Y'4{'$$6d � µ
i
§
3itl I.
�ryid4 I I#*k�Other
A $ ru+1:633q :: dG S!Ad#+I Yixa���.
a +avxF
--
S
't=n
daiM1 �P�' ix6fd.S+N %xa
9,.Ff .gt+rt A.4ptx-iX�...k
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑Yes n INo ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No DNA ❑NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
!Di Yes tiNo ❑NA ❑NE
Page 1 of 3
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number:
Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below,
D Excessive Ponding D Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy
❑ Yes pt I No
❑ Yes F No
❑ Yes V No
❑ Yes R No
❑ Yes No
Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)"
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
D PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop TYpe(s): CO,ICIi Bei-mu t, R>Je. ' Si N 1p �IVjj
13.SoilType(s): iJ)QQt-a -hmahawK, QvtNvidle
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
it Yes
!!!!'"❑���Yes
Structure 5
❑No ❑NA El NE
No ❑NA ❑NE
Structure 6
❑ Yes 1�jNo ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes T0'No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes
N Yes
❑E Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No ❑NA ❑NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑NA ❑NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
ANo ❑NA ❑NE
7 No ❑NA ❑NE
El Other:
❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Tr nsfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
Page 2 of 3
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
�No ❑NA ❑NE
( No ❑ NA ❑ NE
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number:
Date of Inspection:
J
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes L,NVo ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes It_No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ISR,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes IR No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes j No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes VINo ❑NA ❑NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes J No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes 11No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes "❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Rbw c r, looK food , howeve1C Mov r coasia -ITh 44 l"S not IN
Styge, t€ under control VI wir rear ma'/
Mick a ronotmst b?PcnijN.
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Intart
Phone:
Date: 1 la 22
5/12/2020