780077_Routine Inspection_20220718

411/1i Oli Wtatilit4gg;
to "!St aon. anu "'Ik
mg ney3n}x}1.
Type of Visit: Compliance�Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
y
Reason for Visit: �1 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Farm Name:
7•
Arrival Time:
Op POFK
cf. D0
Departure Time:
Owner Name: /0 rOII` II(
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: /�
Facility Contact: Cu r 1 c pp100 1 C f .
Onsite Representative: SU I'ot
=1 . g t2
Owner Email:
Phone:
County: robecoN 1Jemm:. Fro
F_aRr t
L SFRfIFIC:
nr.
Certified Operator: gock W j N ;ON
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title: T Lh C3F
Latitude:
DEOIDWR VVU L
rfvv;TTEVILLE REGI .. ;`'
Phone:
Integrator: Snit' fled
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
#%09Pfit Ya YbG3-M1fiYAk
an{n{*ta rvxaam*#'a'tx rre +#5 N8H attbkd*
t!V&YkNA#d±:G{}8#X+ xk.'w•a%4 y.?:Y+G'+#s}YY M2bd¢p
A#$k#4d #.%3't 4Y k+3t Y!Yxx%1x Y#LF.�IL(R dUunnunl�li9
,�@bYA$Bk}v4d.i Mk 'AY SAY .a#tt 4^ta #§444{ Yr#yrM±!L
yl'#5,`'G�5 C.
iukArotk+b..t.&xtrJ.Si.r
Sv3Yk § # '3drtrF {k5 YtM#&i..#ix 4P@: 45t XMai{.
Aen,Yx¢Fdyj it#4 ppttp.'k.
1',4£nxLes#f!n#hk3Qnnb?Qr'ad #.'
Yd4*Y s3+i+ni.aid*afrs{.}{d 64 k6mtY A+Y$#'6X8{k$LYx
V11m 4 $bi��Y 3d='C A S abP #x, .a#
ki "..N u%#Y3MA#i$Y..'Md Nax f: 4SkvkY 4dx}i0 #.Rx••%i $.
tbaiF4.#"Sk.a§A4Ga. SSYc4UM#>3k&aF. b§#'6 Y44C
k ,§"#i t4a d4 k#tb
4Y rt.4 x3+n x%i$5+n n`ax k9kibpu'�q}� ,'(y (f
d}+N'A S9 MLL#W%2A ftt'fi8d "1RSfb} Xd A
ku .[i#n+bi .uAk4 A # Yd#3
G'a Uem'yw a.#a,. x�dBB1t"aa ac optB
bR't'tYy tlM 39t MG$a Y6_#Ak# b9Q# 83'4265%' k#Sf
64i
%$Y
)m
Wean to Finish
{Si J �/�kfi}XKtx#ki
ill
--(+
Layer
Dairy Cow
$
Wean to Feeder
Non -Layer
DairyCalf
ni
%4
FeedertoFinish
--
rok3
#>:..+�
8-0sb�ny,s#*
#i'ta3"k8t aT 4= +#a$&atk##
ffistY# iyssa s+,Is'kt#atsa.t#>);a}q''
K#xipa#R aCs rvxap ca&§a#tB
Y2£k9G3;tNkbRk3 4
# �rg�,+.
tlt}T.@ry�yl Kd# ys
tr �.a t t
�xFY4 � S'..
#9.
x #B
r b !
t,.fitt�t' �ke■D
�DairyFIeifer
(
Farrowto Wean
--
ktd§0
s'&#*sat#-vaxaaxexis
Cow
Farrow toFeeder
--
}}
st,ro'.}
}lt j!� y M"ij
e a
d Y 4 4 d■
Non-Dai
M4
FI�Farrow
�.ro$
kk:
toFinish
Gilts
--#
Beef Stocker
--
'
{£n
c{ma
Non-La ers--§��Beef
Pullets kt ,
Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
--�a
Boars
. §
1 BiBtat
fi}k5k4t
StkKpFfk<tr
xe kaaaka# a# 4 at, ena xxmn rox nac st"a■TurkeyskP>e.ex't4n t xab da.ex § t.S e4i P# 9xi >. adx Y±
(3YJ£RC�
WthGrqry Y MY Frvq {A! 43x tiaEd4=ad4.Ss xxitta
'y""*". r
-.
--XbxC 'AkC
TurkeyPonits tYt
,
2aix h•i. tS§ ?iAfiz .htT {'rikb xtR<pY# rix?t4L4nkd{+bk}i}4!k•$#Sdbi8fi4#
adat., xx}ra 5xn Y r nn em
}s;s-3C £a ttH 3F4
st.ro« a# #: �.,'sb
fl 'YSfi k A'{.. * *gIS'?'db
5(Y'#i i Mk^Y#tk S§
4$4aa*
A: gd'a4r6$N4:'
rti hx ai4at tR#a'#�
daFkdkSku#kK"4 #J A${.
mro#sw{ayssget rots¢ga%�x gad
dnBk$5b fle as im
AgbSA b a"ro##£ +6
f
rlY
t#x to}v
nta■Other --st at
xtb{ 9Aa fl4
nAkia9#, . rtpd».5nx%rvk'#>u.,+A6}+xA 36'£.}k#36 F8t ii'Li.1.dV£a eianq.. sa xrim4 �.{Lr.K`+Fm.a Skk't4 $t.4
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is.there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑Yes CNo ❑NA El NE
❑ Yes J No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes C No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes IN No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Pagel of 3
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: $- -17
Waste Collection & Treatment
Date of Inspection:
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
Structure 1
�I
IV
I
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA El NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Ev'dence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
nPT�re(s): BerMACti otte e(
12. Cr
13. Soil Type(s): N D t -O I <
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? g Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ['Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
ElWaste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ElWaste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Tran fers ['Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
Page 2 of 3
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No ❑NA ❑NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number:
Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ Yes NI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 61 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No
No
j No
j�No
N.
I�INo
No
No
® No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
SpltI for w-ec i in betinuda, fly 4 -e;piull1' ! ? - 9B
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
-' <Oji 2, f nrenot
aint
Phone: gigi)(1/✓ 1115
Date: 1
Page 3 of 3
5/12/2020