20071491 Ver 1_Application_20070904

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPAR'I~NT OF'I~ZANSPORTATION

t
CJ

N1ic~AEL F. E,~sLEY
GOVERNOR
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801-5006
ATTENTION: Mr. David Baker
NCDOT Coordinator
~~~
~o~
,S~ p
4
~Y~T~~OSR SST ~~R QUq 2Q~ J
Re~cH
LYNDO TIPPETT
$EQtETARY
071491
SUBJECT: Nationwide Permit 33 Application for the proposed replacement
of Bridge No. 270 on SR 1155 (Grays Road) over Broad River, in
Rutherford County. Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-1155(2), State
Project No. 8.2890801 WBS Element 33237.1.1, TIP No. B-3697,
in Division 13.
Dear Mr. Baker:
Enclosed, please find a copy of the Pre-Construction Notification, permit drawings, 1/2
size plans and Categorical Exclusion for the above referenced project. Due to the age and
condition of the current structure, the North Carolina Department of Transportation
(NCDOT) proposes to replace Bridge No. 270 downstream 100 feet from the existing
location with a new 280 foot single span bridge. Despite avoidance and minimization
efforts, temporary impacts to 0.08 acres (110 linear feet) of the Broad River are required.
No permanent impacts are proposed for this project. Traffic will be maintained on the
existing bridge during construction.
Impacts to Waters of the United States
The Broad River, which is assigned as a "Class C" water by the North Carolina Division
of Water Quality (DWQ), is located in the Broad River Basin, Subbasin 03-08-02 within
Hydrological Cataloguing Unit 03050105. There are no Outstanding Resource Waters
(ORW), High Quality Waters (HQW), WS-I, WS-II, or watershed Critical Areas (CA),
within 1 mile of the project study area. Broad River is not identified as a 303(d) stream
by DWQ nor does the project drain to a 303(d) stream within one mile. No moratoriums .
are present within the study area.
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548
August 27, 2007
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WEBSITE: yyyyyV.NCDOT.ORG
LOCATION:
TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
1 SOUTH W ILMINGTON STREET
RALEIGH NC

Permanent Impacts: There will be no permanent impacts to surface waters or wetlands
resulting from the construction of this project.
Temporary Impacts: The implementation of two temporary causeways will result in 0.08
acre of temporary surface water impacts to the Broad River. These causeways are
necessary for the removal of the existing structure and to construct the interior bent of the
new structure. In addition, at no time will the temporary causeways cover greater than
50% of the Broad River.
There aze no impacts to jurisdictional resources due to utilities for this project.
Bridge Demolition
Bridge No. 270 is constructed of timber and steel and can be removed without any
temporary fill resulting from bridge demolition.
Historical Properties
As stated in the MOA NCDOT has agreed to replace Bridge No. 270 in a new location.
Within ninety days of the Council's filing this MOA, NCDOT will advertise the bridge
on its World Wide Web home page for two yeazs. Bridge No. 270 will be recorded in
accordance with the attached Historic Structures and Landscape Recordation Plan (See
CE, Appendix A).
Federally Protected Species
As of May 10, 2007, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service lists five federally
protected species for Rutherford County (Table 1).
Table 1. Federally Protected Species for Rutherford Coun
~~~ ~~ (,
bJn N .r. e

t ~ y ~'g-y~^~q.~/w ~ ~r/~~'~yyryry ~~
4:J c2.entA.RA.,f N~}ir.Sie'~- Static ~ ~ abita to~Qical ` ~~
.,. - '.. ~fi
onc~us~on
diana bat yotis sodalis ndangered o o Effect
wazf-flowered heartleaf exastylis naniflora eatened o o Effect
Small-whorled pogonia sotria medeoloides eatened o o Effect
'te irisette isyrinchium dichotomum ndangered o o Effect
ock gnome lichen Gymnoderma lineare ndangered o o Effect
Avoidance and Minimization
NCDOT has minimized impacts to the fullest extent possible. The proposed bridge
replacement will span the Broad River; therefore, totally avoiding permanent surface
water impacts. Traffic will be maintained on the existing bridge during construction.
2

Mitigation
Construction for this project will impose only temporary impacts to jurisdictional waters,
therefore, no mitigation is proposed for this project.
Regulatory Approvals
Section 404 Permit: It is anticipated that the temporary construction impacts to Broad
River can be authorized under Section 404 Nationwide Permit 33 (Temporary
Construction Access and Dewatering). We are, therefore, requesting the issuance of a
Nationwide Permit 33 authorizing the temporary surface water impacts of Broad River.
Section 401 Permit: We anticipate 401 General Certification number 3634 will apply to
this project. All general conditions of WQC 3634 will be met. Therefore, we are not
requesting written concurrence from DWQ. In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0501(a)
we are providing two copies of this application to DWQ for their records.
Comments from WRC will be requested prior to authorization by the Army Corps of
Engineers. By copy of this letter and attachment, NCDOT hereby requests WRC's
review and that WRC forward their comments to the Corps of Engineers and NCDOT
within 30 calendar days of receipt of this application.
Thank you for your assistance with this project. A copy of this permit application will be
posted on the NCDOT Website at www.ncdot.or~preconstruct/pe/neu/permit.html.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kris Dramby at
[phone].
Sincerely,
~.
(,,~,~/ Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Environmental Management Director
~"_ Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
Cc
W/attachment W/o attachment
Mr. John Hennessy, NCDWQ Mr. Jay Bennett, P.E., Roadway Design
Ms. Mazella Buncick, USFWS Mr. Majed Alghandour, P. E., Prgm. And TIP
Ms. Mazla Chambers, NCWRC Mr. Art McMillan, P.E., Highway Design
Dr. David Chang, P.E., Hydraulics Mr. Scott McLendon, USACE, Wilmington
Mr. Victor Barbour, P.E., P.S. Unit Ms. Natalie Lockhart, Project Planning Engineer
Mr. Greg Perfetti, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. Mark Staley, Roadside Environmental
Mr. J.J. Swain, P.E. (Div. 13), Division Engineer
Mr. Roger Bryan (Div. 13), DEO

Office Use Only: Form Version March OS
20071 491
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ^ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
^ 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 33
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here:
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^
II. Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Gregory J Thorpe PhD Environmental Management Director
Mailing Address: 1598 Mail Service Center
Ralei~ NC 27699-1598
Telephone Number: [phone]
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
Fax Number: [phone]
Page 1 of 9

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing. the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps maybe included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the -
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final versiori is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Replacement of Bridge No. 270 on SR 1155 (Grays Road) over the Broad
River
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): B-3697
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A
4. Location
County: Rutherford Nearest Town: Rutherfordton to the east and
Pea Ridge to the west.
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): From the town of
Rutherfordton travel west on US 108 (Tryon Road) cross-over Mountain Creek and travel
approximately 435 feet and turn left on SR 1155 (Gray's Road). Head southwest on SR 1155
for approximately 1 3 miles until reaching Bridge No. 270 over the Broad River.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum}: 35"19'44.15" N 82"01'34.40" W
6. Property size (acres): N/A
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Broad River
8. River Basin: Broad River Basin
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site is located in a rural section of Rutherford County
Page 2 of 9

primarily surrounded by a.Qriculture and forested land. 'The topog_raphy in the project area is
comprised of a downward slope leading_into the nearly level floodplain of the Broad River.
Elevation within the project area measures approximately 770 feet above mean sea level.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The project
will consist of replacing the existing 256 foot eight-span structure that consists of timber _
floor on a pin connected steel truss and I-beams supported by reinforced concrete post and
beams and reinforce concrete post and beams in steel cylinders. The new bridge structure
will be located 100 feet downstream (to the east) of the exiting structure and measures 280
feet. The roadway grade of the new structure will be approximately three feet higher than the
exitingrQrade. The existing roadway will be widened to a 22-foot pavement width to provide
two 11-foot lanes. Six-foot grass shoulders will be provided on each side. The roadway will
be designed as a rural local route. Traffic will be maintained on the exiting bridge during
construction. Construction equipment will consist of heavy trucks, earth moving equipment,
cranes, etc.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The existing bridge is structurally deficient and
according to federal guidelines is considered functionally obsolete. The replacement of this
bridge will result in safer traffic operations.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or- permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USAGE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. N!A
V. Future Project Plans
Are any firture permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
N/A
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
Page 3 of 9

permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs maybe included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: No permanent impacts to surface
waters will result from the replacement of the structurally deficient Bridge No. 270 on SR
1155 over the Broad River Temporary surface water impacts totaling 0.08 acre will occur to
construct the necessary temporary causeways.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
s arately list im acts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Site Number

(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
e. forested, marsh,
( g''
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
(es/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
linear feet Area of
Impact
(acres)
N/A

Total Wetland Impact (acres)
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.00 acre
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
mi~ct he included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
indicate on ma
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Im act Impact
Length
linear feet Area of
Impact
(acres
Site 1 Broad River Temporary Perennial 60 feet 110 0.08

Page 4 of 9

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 110 0.08
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill_ excavation. dredging. flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of
Impact
acres)
N/A

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative im act to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the roject:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.08
Wetland Impact (acres): 0
O en Water Im act (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.08
Total Stream Im act (linear feet): 110
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
Page 5 of 9

site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. See Permit Application Cover
Letter
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USAGE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that maybe appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USAGE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strm~ide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
N/A
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
Page 6 of 9

that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ^
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ® No ^
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ® No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ^ No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact Multiplier Required
s uare feet) Miti ation
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Page 7 of 9

2 l.s
Total
K Zone 1 extends out 30 feet veroendicular from the ton of the near bank of channel; Zone ~
additional ZO feet from the edge of Zone 1.
extends an
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. N/A
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. N/A
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this anafter-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
Page 8 of 9

It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
N/A
C • ~ , ~~~. ~o/ C~,~~, .7. Tliivnt Pin 0 cg • ?~ -4
plica~t/Agent's Signature ~ `~ ~ ~ ~ Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 9 of 9

RED ~~~~D
FED 2,07
P~EA-OFr%i: ~~' t~
11
1194

DETOUR ROUTE
~~~®~
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RUTHERFORD COUNTY
PROJECT: 3323711 (B-3697)
REPLACE BRIDGE X270 OVER
BROAD RIVER~BO~N ~~ ..,~
~heet~.,,,~,,
SHEET OF
r~oRTH
CAROLINA

D V ~ y 1.841 '°`
4 .7
7 V' _~ 1.41!
y `.
i d 1]33
W 1841
1]60 61 ~. G44' , d 1131 0
1.6 ? a t
59~ ,~ , . 2 ~ .~
rs h
4 i. ~ 1
Ie ~ IZ f~P _ '4~ ~
~~ 07 ~ 2f2 ',
t5 9
11 t1 r
'~%' I711 .d
k " Ileo 1
---' 1174
~., .J ~~' 271
1179
i
:r
~~,~ 303 117. ~
heosanl Grove ' 2* °`r~A4 ?o
Ql,
I ~ F
~ ~ :1i
Pleasmt ~~ _ 38
a,
:~- ti
P ,

m
" ~
II
269 •/- .
,
35°20' FAS
uaM~ loe
16~ zs
To 0
a
115]

~ IE
2
., 1l+lA
\ ' R
~.. C
~ ~ ~~
~`~
G ;
ww -- F9'Fi;
~Y

r
s.l.T~ Y
I
I]60
37~ b •r.
Isla

115]
'-`=~ ~ ~~145
~ y .6ry .1
? Y b • .! IIN 11 ~ ]ti
1~ •'~ 17 ~
~' 111 .P lu ~~ ~ 92-~ ~~a
e: ~ ~.
~~
A 114 ~ 11.i
~ ~ o
'* O,. .9
1106
,G,,,,,,358, 18~ ,
-, a,epe~ .` Ilv
:y , ]:
*O'~ 1~ , ~ ~ .,.
~ '~z
I1]o ~1 ~ .,
`s ac 1143 '!~
35°IS'
\\
IL~~A~~~~I~T
~.~~s
POP: 7,68
1
a~ - ~ ~ 14 ;
~`L~ ~® JL
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RUTHERFORD COUNTY
PROJECT: 33237.1.1 8-369n
REPLACE BRIDGE X270 OVER
BROAD RIVER ON SR 1155
PAtf>n~ • i
SHEET OF

~°
i
1
~
~
\
O

+ ~

~
\
0
o~
o~,
0
~ ~ N
r-
d W ~
~~
w y ~
~ F ~ ~ ~ ~
~ az"~~
~~ ~ N
® x U ~ c~ O
A
~ ~ ~ a ~. ~
~za~,m~ o
° ~' w ~' x
a'F C ~~
A x a ~ ~
a '~ ~
m
0
~ +
\\ w
~\
~~
;'~ ~
~ Z,
3 `~`
0
0
~_ ~
~ ~ r
~ N
~ ~
1 0 v
~

o~
~' ~

U
1 ~~ I ~ ~+
_ ~ f j
~ ~~ ~ ~
l ~ ~
~

'
,
/
`.5.1

0
/ +

a°
o
'~
~
/ -
0
~~s,
0 0

tJI) ~,
I ~ ~
N~
~N~
~~
z >~
J~
W'
O~
~~ ~
® ~
w
O
~ z
i
W ~ a'~
~ ~ C '.+.
~ ~~ ~.
U ~ ~ p
O b a ~ O
a m¢
F p ~' !
A °~ a ~ m H
a ~
N
~ U
V Q
t/1 ~ ~O
~ N O
O
U
W
0
W
0
m

o ~.
a~
oa
~~
g
u
i
Q
W
~~
~~
Q
V~
~g
QV

W
u.
W
H
Z
C~
II
IQI
d
~..
oG O.
LL ~
tJ..
W
J
Q

a
Q~
Q

~
~ O
3g
U

C~

~ ~ o
N
V
W
0
W
~_
m
N~
V! N'
~~
Z 1, ~
WI
J
W'
~o ,
~`1
15~
s~
O
W
m
W
GC
H
N
~ ~ q~
~+ >. ~ C
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~'~~~~ z
® ~ G ~ W D !
~o ~~~~
~jo~~w~ ~
F~ ~ E O C ~
4
o ~ a a a
a `° ~
m
i
Q ~
~~
W
~~
a-
v~
OV
OC ~...
VJ
~ W
~ QV
V
N ~ N
~ `~ O
C
_ II
~ a' II
W p[ ~ .
W _~
O oG ~_
t/~ LL GG
_W O
F,- L.L.
~ W O
Z
~ J ~
Q

~~~~~ °~°~ 6uo3Pao~aav~~u~ uo~~ao~aa~~~e~ ~®
~~o~ s6~as~ ~L~ °auibsuaa~~ Pua~ aaet~ y
~~~~~ °~°~ buo3Pao~aa~3m~
~D~v~v ~o~ s~ °3~ °a~b~~a~ °~ ~Q~suo~
S~SS~2IQ4~'
S~I~i~'N
'~N 'I~~~iVd
S~SS~2~~QV QN~' S~Z1I~rI

V

Rutherford County
Bridge No. 270 on SR 1155 (Grays Road)
over Broad River
Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-1155(2)
W.B.S. No. 33237.1.1
State Project No. 8.2890801
T.I.P. No. B-3697
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION & PROGRAMMATIC 4(fl
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMIlJISTRATION
AND
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
n ' /
_ / J ,.
r
DAT ~; ~ Gregory J. Thorpe, PhD,
Environmental Management Director, PDEA
3/~ D~
DATE J F. Sullivan, III, Di ' ' ator
Federal Highway Administration

Rutherford County
Bridge No. 270 on SR 1155 (Grays Road)
over Broad River
Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-1155(2)
W.B.S. No. 33237.1.1
State Project No. 8.2890801
T.I.P. No. B-3697
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION & PROGRAMMATIC 4(F~
Documentation Prepazed in
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch By:
~ L~I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; "
DATE Natalie ckhazt
Project Development Engineer
/ ~ ~`
L1z~~~~ ~~'~L~N--~
DATE Jo L. Williams, PE, Project Engineer
Bridge Project Development Unit
i-

PROJECT COMMITMENTS•
Rutherford County
Bridge No. 270 on SR 1155
Over the Broad River
Federal Aid Project No. BR~1155 (2)
State Project No. 82890801
WBS No. 33237.1.1
TIP No. B-3697
Division 13 Construction -Coordination with Local officials
In order to allow Emergency Management Services (EMS) and school transportation time to
prepare for road closure, the NCDOT Resident Engineer will notify Rutherford County EMS and
the Rutherford County School Transportation Office, prior to road closure.
Bridge Demolition
Bridge No. 270 is constructed of timber and steel. Therefore, it is unlikely that there will be any
temporary fill resulting from bridge demolition.
Memorandum of Agreement
As stated in the MOA NCDOT has agreed to replace Bridge No: 270 in a new location. Within
ninety days of the Council's filing this MOA, NCDOT shall advertise the bridge on the World
Wide Web through its home page and will remain on the home page for two years. Prior to the
removal of Rutherford County Bridge No. 270, NCDOT shall record the bridge in accordance
with the attached Historic Structures and Landscape Recordation Plan (Appendix A).
Programmatic Categorical Exclusion Page 1 of 1
Green Sheet
February 2006

Rutherford County
Bridge No. 270 on SR 1155 (Grays Rd)
over Broad River
Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-1155(2)
W.B.S. No. 33237.1.1
State Project No. 8.2890801
T.I.P. No. B-3697
INTRODUCTION: Bridge No. 270 is included in the latest approved North Carolina
Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Transportation Improvement Program and is eligible
for the Federal-Aid Bridge Replacement and Rehabnlitation Program. The location is shown in
Figure 1. No substantial environmental impacts are anticipated. The project is classified as a
Federal "Categorical Exclusion".
L PURPOSE AND NEED STATEMENT
NCDOT Bridge Maintenance Unit records indicate Bridge No. 270 has a sufficiency rating of
25.6 out of a possible 100 for a new structure. The bridge is considered functionally obsolete
due to deck geometry appraisal of 2 out of 9 according to Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA) standards and therefore eligible for FHWA's Highway Bridge Replacement and
Rehabilitation Program
Bridge No. 270 is an eight span bridge over the Broad River, constructed in 1917, and has an
overall length of 256 feet. The bridge consists of a timber floor on a pin connected steel trust
and I-beams supported by reinforced concrete post and beams, reinforced concrete post and
beams in steel cylinders and masonry abutments. Bridge No. 270 is approaching the end of its
useful life.
Bridge No. 270 carries 400 vehicles per day with 1000 vehicles per day projected for the year
2020. The substandard deck width is becoming increasingly unacceptable and replacement of
the bridge will result in safer traffic operations.
Components of both the concrete superstructure and substructure have experienced an
increasing degree of deterioration that can no longer be addressed by maintenance activities.
The posted weight limit on the bridge is down to 17 tons for single vehicles and 17 tons for
truck-tractor semi-traflers. The bridge is approaching the end of its useful life. Replacement of
the bridge will result in safer traffic operations.
II. EXISTING CONDITIONS .
The project is located in southwestern Rutherford County, 1.7 codes east of the Polk County
line (see Figure 1). Development in the area is agriculture, scattered residential and
undeveloped.

SR 1155 is classified as a rural local route in the Statewide Functional Classification System
and it is not a National Highway System Route. This route is not a designated bicycle route
and there is no indication that an unusual number of bicyclists use this. roadway.
In the vicinity of the bridge, SR 1155 has a 22-foot pavement width with 6-foot grass
shoulders (see Figures 3 and 4). The roadway is situated approximately 32.0 feet above the
creek bed.
Bridge No. 270 is an eight-span structure that consists of timber floor on a pin connected steel
truss and I-beams supported by reinforced concrete post and beams, reinforced concrete post
and beams in steel cylinders. The existing bridge (see Figure 3) was constructed in 1917. The
overall length of the structure is 256 feet. The clear roadway width is 11.0 feet. The posted
weight limit on this bridge is 17 tons for single vehicles and 17 tons for TTST's.
There are no utilities attached to the existing structure, but the project could affect an
underground telephone line along the southside of SR 1155. The line goes aerial crossing the
river. Utility impacts are anticipated to be low.
The current traffic volume of 400 vehicles per day (VPD) is expected to increase to 1000 VPD
by the year 2025. The projected volume includes two percent truck-tractor semi-trailer (TTST)
and one percent dual-tired vehicles (DT). The speed lirrrit is not posted but is statutory 55 miles
per hour in the project area. Six school buses cross the bridge daily on their morning and
afternoon routes.
There were no accidents reported in the vicinity of Bridge No. 270 during a recent three-year
period.
III. ALTERNATIVES
A. Project Description
The replacement structure will consist of a bridge approximately 280-foot long. The bridge
length is based on prelimiiiary design information and is set by hydraulic requirements. The
bridge will be of sufficient width to provide for two 11-foot lanes with 3-foot offsets on each
side. The roadway grade of the new structure will be approximately three feet higher than the
existing grade.
The existing roadway will be widened to a 22-foot pavement width to provide two 11-foot
lanes. Six-foot grass shoulders will be provided on each side. This roadway will be designed as
a rural local route.
2

B. Reasonable and Feasible Alternatives
One alternative for replacing Bridge No. 270 was studied in detail and is described below.
Alternate 1(Preferredl
Alternate 1 involves replacing Bridge,No. 270 with a 280-foot bridge located approximately
100 feet downstream (east) of the existing bridge on new alignment. When practical, traffic
may be maintained on the existing structure during construction. Construction during certain
portions of the project w~71 require traffic to be detoured offsite.
NCDOT Guidelines for Evaluation of Oflsite Detours for Bridge Replacement Proiects
considers multiple project variables beginning with the additional time traveled by the average
road user resulting from the o$site detour. There is a feasible offsite detour for this project.
C. Alternatives Eliminated From Further Consideration
The "do-nothing" alternative will eventually necessitate closure of the bridge. This is not
acceptable due to the traffic service provided by SR 1155.
"Rehabilitation" of the old bridge is not practical due to its inadequate geometry and its
inability to safely cazry heavy loads.
Staged Construction is not feasible for this bridge because the 11-foot deck width and beam
configuration will not support removal of a portion and maintenance of traffic on the remaining
portion.
Replace in place is not a practical option due to the very poor alignment of the existing
structure and approaches.
D. Preferred Alternative
Bridge No. 270 will be replaced with a new bridge to the east. Traffic wi71 be maintained along
the existing bridge during construction. Total project length w~71 be approximately 1500 feet.
Based on the preliminary design, the design speed will be approximately 25 mph. A design
exception will be required for the design speed of 25 mph.
NCDOT Division 13 concurs with the selection of Ahernative 1 as the preferred alternative.

IV. ESTIlVIATED COSTS
The estimated costs for the one alternatives are as follows:
Alternative 1
Preferred
Structure $ 640,000
Roadwa A oaches $ 400,000
Detour Structure and A oaches - 0 -
Structure Removal $ 37,000
Misc. & Mob. $ 207,000
En . & Contin envies $ 190,000
Total Construction Cost $ 1,500,000
Ri t-of-wa Costs $ 29,000
Total Pro'ect Cost $ 1,529,000
V. NATURAL ENVIRONMENT
Physical Characteristics
Water Resources
This section contains information concerning those water resources hYcely to be
impacted by the project. Water resource information encompasses physical aspects of
the resource, its relationship to major water systems, Best Usage Standards, and water
quality of the resources. Probable impacts to surface water resources and mininrization
methods are also discussed.
Water Impacted and Characteristics
The Broad River wr~l be the only surface water resource directly impacted by
the proposed project. The section of the River to be impacted is located in sub-
basin 03-08=02 of the Broad River Basin. The average baseflow width is
approximately 82 ft. Average depth is approximately 2.50 ft. The Broad
River's substrate is composed of sand and silt.
Best Usage Classification
Streams have been assigned a best usage classification by the NC Division of
Water Quality. The classification of the Broad River in the project azea is WS-
IV (NCDWQ Broad River Basinwide Water Quality Management Plan, 1998).
The classification is placed upon water that can be used as a source of water
4

supply for drinking, and culinary or food processing purposes. Generally these
waters are located within moderately to highly developed watersheds.
Neither High Quality Waters (HWQ), Water Supplies (WS-I: undeveloped
or WS II: predominately undeveloped watersheds) nor Outstanding
Resource Waters (ORW) occur within 1.00 mile of the project study area.
Water Quality
Benthic Macroinvertebrate Ambient Network, BMAN station is not located on
the Broad River within 1.00 mde of the project study area. There is no point
source discharge located on the Broad River within 1.00 mile upstream of the
project study area. .
Jurisdictional Topics
This section provides descriptions, inventories, and impact analysis pertinent to two important
issues: "Waters of the United States" and rare and protected species.
Waters of the United States
Surface waters and jurisdictional wetlands fall under the broad category of "Waters of
the United States," as defined in Section 33 of the Code of Federal Register (CFR) Part
328.3. Wetlands, defined in 33 CFR 328.3, are those areas that are inundated or
saturated by surface or ground waxer at a frequency and duration sufficient to support,
and under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically
adapted to life in saturated conditions. Any action that proposed to place fill into these
areas falls under the jurisdiction of the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) under
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344).
Surface Waters and Wetlands
Potential wetland communities were investigated pursuant to the 1987 Corps of
Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. The three-parameter approach is used where
hydric so~7s, hydrophytic vegetation, and presented hydrologic characteristics must all
be present for an area to be considered a wetland. Wetlands are present within the
project area.
The Broad River is a jurisdictional surface water under Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act (33 USC 1344). Discussion of the biological, physical, and water quality aspects of
all surface waters in the project area are presented in previous sections of this report.

Summary of Anticipated Impacts
Anticipated impacts to surface waters are determined by using the entire project ROW
width of 80.00 ft. The area of impact to the Broad River wr71 consist of a 80.00 ft
wide, 80.00 ft long crossing for an area of O.1S ac. Usually, project construction does
not require the entire right of way; therefore, actual surface water impacts maybe
considerably less.
Federally Protected Species
Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered (E), Threatened (T), Proposed
Endangered (PE), and Proposed Threatened (PT) are protected under the provisions of Section
7 and Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. Currently, the FWS lists
four federally protected species for Rutherford County (Table 2). A brief description of the
characteristics and habitat requirements for these species along with a conclusion regarding
potential project n~rrpacts follows.
Myotis sodalis (Indiana. bat) Endangered
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT
Summer habitat is present due to the project corridor's location over the Broad River, but no
winter habitat in the form of cavernous area was observed during field inspection. The NC
Natural Heritage Program database of rare species and unique habitats reviewed on 1 S May
2001 revealed no records of the Indiana bat within the project vicinity. A definitive biological
conclusion cannot be reached because a certified Indiana. bat surveyor has not performed a
survey.
Hexastylis naniflora (Dwarf-flowered heartleafl Threatened
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION:
NO EFFECT
No species of Hexastylis were identified during the field inspection, although, some marginal
habitat was present within the Mesic Forest communities. The NC Natural Heritage Program
database of rare species and unique habitats reviewed on 1 S May 2001 revealed no records of
the dwarf-flowered heartleaf within the project vicinity. Construction of the proposed project
wr71 not effect this species.
Sisyrinchium dichotomum (White irisette) Endangered
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT

Habitat in the form of open and disturbed roadside is present within the proposed project
corridor, but White Oak Mountain, Sugar Load Mountain, Chinmey Rock, and Mekose
Mountain do not bound the site. Additionally, no species were observed during field
inspection. The NC Natural Heritage Program database of rare species and unique habitats
reviewed on 15 May 2001 revealed no records of the white irisette within the project vicitity.
Construction of the proposed project will have no effect on this species.
Gyninoderina lineare (Rock gnome lichen) Endangered
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION:
NO EFFECT
Elevation of the proposed project corridor does not meet required habitat elevation of 4,000 ft
on mountaintops with frequent fog, or elevation at 2,500 ft in deep gorges. The NC Natural
Heritage Program database of rare species and unique habitats reviewed on 15 May 2001
revealed no records of the rock gnome lichen within the project vicinity. Construction of the
proposed project will have no effect on this species.
VI. HUMAN ENVIRONMENT
Section 106 Compliance Guidelines
This project is subject to compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation
Act of 1966, as amended, and, implemented by the Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106, codified at Title 36 CFR Part
800. Section 106 requires Federal agencies to take into account the effect of their undertakings
(federally funded, licensed, or permitted) on properties included in or eligible for inclusion in
the National Register of Historic Places and afford the Advisory Council a reasonable
opportunity to comment on such undertakings.
Historic Arclutecture
The Historic Preservation Office (HPO) reviewed the subject project. One historic
architecture structure is located within the area of potential effects. The structure is the
bridge itself. Bridge No. 270 is eligible for the National Register. Concurrence was
received from HPO and documentation sent to the Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation for compliance. It was determined that the project would have an adverse
effect on Bridge No. 270 (see form dated June 28, 2001). A Memorandum of
Agreement was developed and filed on May 7, 2002. The Advisory Council on
Historic Preservation acknowledges completion of the requirements of Section 106 of
the National Historic Preservation Act (see letter dated June 17, 2002).

Archaeology
Waiting on Concurrence.
Community Impacts
No adverse impact on farrnlies or communities is arnicipated. Right-of--way acquisition wdl be
limited. No relocatees are expected with implementation of the proposed alternative.
No adverse effect on public facilities or services is expected. The project is not expected to
adversely affect social, economic, or religious opportunities in the area.
The project is not in conflict with any plan, existing land use, or zoning regulation. No change
in land use is expected to result from the construction of the project.
The Farmland Protection Policy Act requires all federal agencies or their representatives to
consider the potential impact to prime farmand of all land acquisition and construction
projects. There are no sor7s classified as prime, unique, or having state or local importance in
the vicinity of the project. Therefore, the project will not involve the direct conversion of
farmland acreage within these classifications.
The project wr71 not have a disproportionately high and adverse human heahh and
environmental effect on any minority or low-income population.
Noise & Air Quality
This project is an air quality "neutral" project, so it is not required to be included in the
regional emissions analysis and a project level CO analysis is not required If vegetation is
disposed of by burning, all burning shall be done in accordance with applicable local laws and
regulations of the North Carolina State Implementation Plan (SIP) for air quality in compliance
with 15 NCAC 2D.0520. Noise levels could increase during construction but wi71 be
temporary. This evaluation completes the assessment requirements for highway traffic noise of
Title 23, Code of Federal Regulation (CFR), Part 772 and for air quality (1990 Clean Air Act
Amendments and the National Environmental Policy Act) and no additional reports are
required.
VII. GENERAL ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
The project is expected to have an overall positive impact. Replacement of an inadequate
bridge wdl result in safer traffic operations.
The bridge replacement w171 not have an adverse effect on the quality of the human or natural
environment with the use of the current North Carolina Department of Transportation
standards and specifications.
s

The proposed project will not require right-of--way acquisition or easement from any land
protected under Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966.
An examination of records at the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources, Division of Environmental Management, Groundwater Section and the North
Carolina Department of Human Resources, Solid Waste Management Section revealed no
underground storage tanks or hazardous waste sites in the project area
Rutherford County is a participant in the National Flood Insurance Program There are no
practical alternatives to crossing the floodplain area Any shift in alignment will result in an
impact area of about the same magnitude. The proposed project is not anticipated to increase
the level or extent of upstream flood potential.
VIIL COORDINATION & AGENCY COM1ViENTS
NCDOT has sought input from the following agencies as a part of the project development:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, NC Department of Natural Resources, U.S. Fish & Wddlife
Service, N.C Wildlife Resource Commission, N.C. Iivision of Parks & Recreation, North
Carolina Historic Preservation Office.
The N.C. Wildlife Resource Commission and U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service in standardized
letters provided a request that they prefer any replacement structure to be a spanning structure.
The N.C. Division of Water Quality, the Army Corps of Engineers, and had no special
concerns for this project.
lx. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
A letter was setrt by the Location & Surveys Unit to all property owners affected directly by
this project. Property owners were invited to comment. No comments have been received to
date.
X. PROGRAMMATIC 4(F~
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION
FINAL NATIONWIDE SECTION 4(fl EVALUATION AND APPROVAL
FOR FEDERALLY-AIDED HIGHWAY PROJECTS
THAT NECESSITATE THE USE OF HISTORIC BRIDGES
F. A. Project BR2r-1155(2)
State Project 8.2890801
T. I. P. No. B-3697
Description: The replacement structure will consist of a bridge approximately 280-foot long.
The bridge length is based on preliminary design information and is set by hydraulic
requirements. The bridge will be of sufficient width to provide for two 11-foot lanes with 3-
9

foot offsets on each side. The roadway grade of the new structure will be approximately three
feet higher than the existing grade.
Yes No
1. Is the bridge to be replaced or

rehabilitated with Federal funds? ^
x
2. Does the project require the use of
a historic bridge structure which is

on or eligible for listing on the ^
x
National Register of Historic Places?
3. Is the bridge a National Historic
rk?
L
d ^
x
ma
an
4. Has agreement been reached among the
FHWA, the State Historic Preservation

officer (SHPO), and the Advisory Council ^
x
on Historic Preservation (ACHP) through
procedures pursuant to Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA)?
The following alternatives were evaluated and found
not to be feasible and prudent: -
Yes No
1. Do_nothine x
Does the "do nothing" ahernative:
(a) correct the problem situation that
caused the bridge to be considered ~ x
deficient?
(b) pose serious and unacceptable safety ^
hazards? x
Yes No
2. Budd a new structure at a different ^
location without a ecting~the historic x
10

integritx of the structure.
(a) The following reasons were reviewed:
(circle, as appropriate)
(i) The present bridge has already
been located at the only feasible
at~d prudent site
and/or (n~ Adverse social, envirorunental,
or economic impacts were noted
and/or (ink Cost and engineering difficulties
reach extraordinary magnitude
and/o (iv The existing bridge cannot be
preserved due to the extent of
rehabilitation, because no
responsible party will maintain
and preserve the historic bridge,
or the permitting authority
requires removal or demolition.
3. Rehabilitate the historic bridge without
affecting the historic integrity of the
structure.
(a) The following reasons were reviewed:
(circle, as appropriate)
(i) a bridge is so structurally
deficient that rt cannot be
rehabilitated to meet the
acceptable load requirements
and meet National Register
criteria
and/o (ii The bridge is seriously
deficient geometrically and
cannot be widened to meet the
required capacity and meet
National Register criteria
1~~IINIlVIIZATION OF HARM
The project includes all possible planning
to mmmiizze harm
2. Measures to irunimize harm include the
following: (circle, as appropriate)
a For bridges that are to be
,^
Yes No
.^
11

rehabilitated, the historic
irrtegrity of the bridge is preserved
to the greatest extent possible,
consistent with unavoidable transpor-
tation needs, safety, and load
requirements.
b. For bridges that are to be
rehabilitated to the point that the
historic integrity is affected or that
are to be removed or demolished, the
FHWA ensures that, in accordance with
the Historic American Engineering
Record (HAER) standards, or other
suitable means developed through
consultation, fully adequate records
are made of the bridge.
c. For bridges that are to be replaced,
the existing bridge is made available
for an alternative use, provided a
responsible party agrees to maintain
and preserve the bridge.
Oil. For bridges that are adversely affected,
agreement among the SHPO, ACHP, and
FHWA is reached through the Section
106 process of the NHPA on measures
to rrrinirrrize harm and those measures
are incorporated into the project.
3. Specific measures to rYrinuYrize harm are
discussed below:
Bridge No. 270 is constructed of timber and steel. Therefore, it is unlikely that there will be
any temporary fill resulting from bridge demolition
Note: Any response in a box requires additional information prior to approval. Consult
Nationwide 4(fl evaluation.
COORDINATION
The proposed project has been coordinated with the following (attach correspondence):
a. State Historic Preservation Off cer
b. Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
c. LocaUState/Federal Agencies ~ N/A
d. US Coast Gruard N/A
(for bridges requiring bridge permits)
SUMMARY AND APPROVAL
The project meets all criteria included in the programmatic 4(f) evaluation approved on July
5, 1983.
12

All required alternatives have been evaluated and the findings made are clearly applicable to
this project.
There are no feasible and prudent alternatives to the use of the historic bridge. The project
includes all possible planning to mininrize hazm, and there aze assurances that the measures to
minirrrize harm will be incorporated in the project.
All appropriate coordination has been successfully completed.
Approved:
,~~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~~
~~ er Plannin & Enviro ental Branch
Date g
NCDOT
D to ~~'Division Adrrrinistrator,
XI. CONCLUSION
On the basis of the above discussion, it is concluded that no substantial adverse environmental
impacts wdl result from implementation of the project. The project is therefore considered to
be a federal "Categorical Exclusion" due to its limited scope and lack of substantial
environmental consequences.
13

i0 ~ ~ ~ t4' s
• 1 11~T2 1,~y4
+~ 1175 ~ ~ ••••, .
~~`7 ~ 31.72 ~ 1173
v ~r a A
1135 l.~ ~
a $ ~ , a ,
_~
y ,
~'' 11Fi1
i i~S7 1 ~ 59 `-~ ~ rJ ~ r
--,.
~~~ ~ 1160 # 194 ~ \~ ~ ~
J QQ
Pleasant Kf4 ~ ~ V '. ~ 154,
1
,~~ L ~~ 1158 Gh.+~"'~
+~,~ 1194T
t
~f ~ '~ rI
` ~ J' 1 t57 1 Z93~
•
. ••
-r
7 ~~ i 1156 , J ~~~
r r T ~
1~ ~ ~
.7 ~.. ~ 11A9
/i `
1i56 ,
1331
~~ ~ ~~~~ ~
~ ~ ~ 15iB
< Jw 1 ~ ~
~ `~ ~ f ~ ] 145 ,
' ~ ti•
.-
1327 ,t ~ ~ f~id6 1 .6 _ J '~
~ r ~'~:l'E~' • ~. ~L 3 ~ ~ T 147 ~~ _ /
1
• ~~ ~
-Q •4 1331 . m t .5 .8
G. O •' 'Z
~,±.,.._ - ~, a Studied Detour Route _
X. 1 ~ . g a. 1
- ~~4 '°°6 ~ ~ '
,~ ,
`~~~'~ NORTH CAROLINA
DEPART1v1ENT OF TRANSPORTATION
,~ PROJECT DEVELOPMENT &
~ ENVIRONIvIENTAL ANALYSES BRANCH
~oRm~.
RIrrI~RFORD COUNTY
REPLACE BRIDGE 270 oN SR 1155
OVER BROAD RIVER
B-3697
Scale: lin = lmi Figure 1
_ti/
L

t~
i ~~ ~
;Rt1T1iE16F
1~`'
~' ~~
3
t ~
~ ~~
i
~ ~

~~
l'
~
1
i
,
f .

~~ Appraa~h ~€~
~~ 1~Fom Z'~~3
Est Approach to
$ricig~ €-. X70

_-
Federal Aid # BRZ-1155(2) "7'IP # B-3697 County: Rutherford
CONCURRENCE FORM FOR ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTS
Project Description: Replace Bridge No. 270 on SR 11>j over Broad River
On 6/28!2001, representatives of the
[~ Nort6 Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
[~ North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (HPO)
Other
Reviewed the subject project.and agreed -~
There are no effects on the National Register-listed property/properties located within
the project's area of potential effect and listed on the reverse.
There are no effects on the National Register-eligible propertylproperties located within
the project's area of potential effect and listed on the reverse. .
There is an effect on the National Register-listed property/properties located within the
project's area of potential effect. The property~preperties and the effect(s) are listed on
the reverse.
d There is an effect on the National Register-eligible property/properties located within the
project's area of potential effect. The property/properties and effect(s) are listed on the
reverse.
Signed:
...~ ~ .
FHWA, for the Division

istrator, or other Federal Agency
~.-~tt,Q~. 1,~'l~tL.~ ~L_x " LS..Lc.SdCa~1
Representative, HPO
~~'V~I~ -
'Lt?'.~UU 1
Date
'~ ~~ i
Date
o`~ -
Da
State Historic Preservation Officer (~--~~
~- -

{:

Federal Aid # BRZ-1155(2) . TIP i~ B-3697 County: Rutherford
Properties within thearea of potential effect for which there is no ,effect. Indicate if property is
National Register-listed (NR) or determined eligible (DE}.
Properties within the area of potential effect for which there is an effect. Indicate property status
(NR or DE) and describe the effect.
Bridge No. 270 (DE) -Adverse Effect
Reason(s) why the effect is not adverse (if applicable).
Initialed: NCDOT Q~- FHWA~~~f~ HPO ~•~~3'C~

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
AMONG
THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
AND
NORTH CAROLINA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER
FOR
THE REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE N0.270 ON SR 1155
OVER THE BROAD RIVER,
RUTHERFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
WHEREAS, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has determined that the
replacement of Bridge No. 270 on SR 1155 over the Broad River in Rutherford County,
North Carolina _(the undertaking) will have an effect upon the bridge, a property
determined eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places, and has
consulted with the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) pursuant to
36 CFR Part 800, regulations implementing Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. 470f); and
WHEREAS, the North Cazolina Depaztment of Transportation (NCDOT) participated in
the consultation and has been invited to concur in this Memorandum of Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, the FHWA, NCDOT, and the North Carolina SHPO agree that
the undertaking shall be implemented in accordance with the following stipulations ~in
order to take into account the effect of the undertaking on the historic property.
STIPULATIONS
FHWA will ensure that the following measures aze carried out:
I. Reuse in New Location: NCDOT will offer the bridge for reuse at a new
location in accordance with NCDOT's Historic Bridge Relocation & Reuse
Program. If no responsible party accepts the bridge prior to removal, Rutherford
County Bridge No. 270 will be disassembled and stored at a NCDOT bridge
maintenance yazd until a new owner accepts the bridge. If no owner is found for
the bridge within two years then NCDOT may dispose of the bridge.
II. Advertisement: Within ninety (90) days of the Council's filing this MOA,
NCDOT shall advertise the bridge on the World Wide Web through its home
page. The advertisement will remain on NCDOT's home page for a period of at
least two (2) yeazs or until a new owner is identified and accepts the bridge in
accordance with NCDOT's Historic Bridge Relocation & Reuse Program.
III. Photodocumentation: Prior to the removal of Rutherford County Bridge No.
270, NCDOT shall record the bridge in accordance with the attached Historic
Structures and Landscape Recordation Plan (Appendix A).

orth Carolina SHPO object within elm' (30)
rovided for review Pursuant to this
IV . Dis ute Resolute dociune tation p olina SHPO to resolve the
days to any plans or ect~on
a Bement, FHwA shall consult with the NOrth ~ elevant to the
North Carolina SHPO determine r that the obj
gr
objection. If FHWA or the da s after receipt of all pertinent
be resolved, FHWA shall forty 3U all Y°CUmentatio
cannot
dispute to the Council. ~ ~luv~l~i her:
documentation, the Co will take into
' e FHWA nth recommendations which FHwA
a fir-al decision regarding the dispute, or
A. Proved
account in reaching
ent ursuant to 36 CFR Section
Council comment provided in
g, Notify FHwA that it will Comm P Ain
roceed to comn1ent. Any
800.7(c)) and Ph a request will be taken into account by FHw
response to suc Section 800.7(c)(4) "11~ reference to the subject
accordance ~~ 36 CFR
of the dispute.
the Council will be understoo to
ent rovided by to carry out all
Any recommendation or cornet P FHwA° s responsibility
ect of the dispute; ect of the dispute will rema~
-pertain only to the subj
tions under this agreement that are not the subj
the ac
unchanged.
~r

919-856-4353
rHWN NC LIV
~~ uG UI:G4a
r,e~
's MOA by FHWA, NCDOT, and the Nc P er Servationsand0~ its
Execution of thl Council on Heston ortumty
subsequent filing with the Advisory
tion of its terms evidence that FHWA ho SR 1155 over the Broad River and
unplementa lacement of Bridge No. 270
to comment on the ~P taken into account the effects of the
its effects on the bridge, and that FHWA has
undertaking on the historic property.
AGREE ,
~~~.. o..~ ~ C
CONCUR:
FILED BY:
a ~/v Z

APPENDIX A
Historic Structures and Landscape Recordation Plan
For the Replacement of Bridge No. 270 on SR 1155
Over the Broad River
Rutherford County, North Carolina
TIP No. B-3697, State Project No. 8.2890801
Federal Aid No. BRZ-1155(2)
Landscape
Site plan sketch of the existing. conditions of Bridge No. 270.
Photographic Requirements
Selected photographic views of Bridge No. 270, as a whole, and views of the
structure and its setting, including:
• Overall views of the structure (elevations and oblique views
• Details of the structural elements of the bridge
• Overall views of the project area, showing the relationship of the structure to
its setting
Photographic Format
• Color slides (all views)
• 35 mm or larger black and white negatives (all views)
• Two (2) Black and white contact sheets (all views)
• All processing to be done to archival standards
• All photographs and negatives to be labeled according to Division of Archives
and History standards
Copies and Curation
One (1) set of all photographic documentation will be deposited with the North
Carolina Division of Archives and History/State Historic Preservation Office to
be made a permanent part of the statewide survey and iconographic collection.
One (1) co~~ of the black and white contact sheet shall be placed in the project
file located in the Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch of
NCDOT.

Advisory
Council On
Historic
Preservation
The Old Post Office Building
1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, IWV, X809
Washington, DC 20004
~J~JIY
Mr. Nicholas L. Graff P.E.
Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration
310 New Bern. Avenue, Suite 410
Raleigh, NC 27601
REF: Proposed Replacement of Bridge No. 270 on SR1155 at Broad River
Rutherford County, North Carolina
Federal Project No. BRZ-11SS(2)
Dear Mr. Graf:
The Council recently received your executed Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) for the
referenced project. In accordance with Section 800.6(b)(1) of the Council's regulations,
"Protection of Historic Properties" (36 CFR Part 800), the Council acknowledges receipt of the
MOA executed by the Federal Highway Administration, the North Carolina State Historic
Preservation Officer, and the North Carolina Department of Transportation and the supporting
project documentation.
The filing of the MOA completes the requirements of Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act and the Council's regulations. Please provide copies of the signed MOA to all
consulting parties for their records if necessary.
If we can be of any additional assistance, please contact Martha Catlin at 202-606-8505.
Sincerely,
Raymond V. Wallace
Historic Preservation Technician
Office of Federal Agency Programs
i ] + ~~. !
;..
_~ ~ - ~ "
x
::l .-
~ ;
t `~

NorEh Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Peter B. sanrmeek Administrator
Michael F. Easley, Governor
Lisbeth C. Evans, Secretary
Jeffroy J. Crow, Deputy Secretary
February 17, 2006
Office of Arehives and History
Division of Historical Resources
David Brook, Director
MEMORANDUM •~' .
. z
Q06
TO: Matt Wilkerson, Archaeology Supervisor =~ ~~~ ~ ~ R ~
Division of Highways .
Department of Transportation AEeI=_N~~
FROM: Petet Sandbeck ~.2~ =~
~~ .
SUBJECT: Bridge No. 270 on SR 1155 over Broad Rivex, B-3697, Rutherford County, ER 00-8458
Thank you for your letter transmitting the archaeological survey report by Brian Overton for the above .
project The report meets our office's guidelines and those of the. Secretary of the Interior.
During the course of the survey, one archaeological site was located within the project area. Mr. Overton has
recommended that no further archaeological investigation be conducted in coaaection with. this project. We
concur with this recommendation since the project will not involve significant archaeological resources.
The above commtmts are made pursuant to Set:rion 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council oa Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800. -
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919/733-4763. In all future
communication concerning this ~projet:t, please tdte the above referenced tracking number.
cc: Brian Overton, NCDOT
Location Maillsg Addrac TdephonelFaa
ADMINISTRATION 507 N. Blount Street. Raleigh NG 4617 Mail Service Centet, Raleigh NC 276994617 (9l9)733~763/733-6653
RESTORATION 515 N. Bkunt Street, Raleigh NC 4617 Mail Servix Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 [phone]r/i5-4801
SURVEY & PLANNING 515 N. Bbunt Street. Raleigh, NC 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 276994617 [phone]rJ15.4801

i
t r
.tsh
'~"'O CO
3mm Zm
~..
=On
v~
~ ~~
°
0 ~~
`
0
Z m
yyn
50 -1

RIB
= V!N
~ r
v ~~ ~

>~ _~
Z
C ~.N
.oc
v

z
~
z
C011 tTRA CT:
0 0 0
oN w~~
?~ m o
m = ~
s n
~ _ ~-° H ~
N
o O o o T~L~`,
a
N "'
~ O O
Z g g ~_
~ -~ -~ c O
n ~ : ~ o o ~ mN
N< -i p L v V ~ ~ ~
a /~.
~ II U II 11 II II x CF
C
O p ~ p 0 0 .Ap a m -~-1
O
c N w
aE f1617O
O ^' ^' ~ x
~ ~ ~~
m ~ ~ ~H
D
=gig
~ '°
~ ~ mo
~'.'
~ ~
~ ~ ~ p--'
m ~ ~ Tm
A ~ o a~
O
m
~~~~ ~3
~~~ ~ D
°' ,o ^~c3
~ V G~ ~ ~'o
'~yi (~ _
~O
~~
'I ° a 0
is o ~ -On Dv
W to G r
_o A
C
3 ~ m ~m
m m
v ~
s ~ ~ ~
•~ ~ ~ b
s ~ ~ H
" N ,~ S
ao b -a ~ o y
-~ a °o o ti
o~ °' ~ ~ ~.0~2,'8
p~
0. O
O p"~~
~° ~ ~~"
N
C OVi
(7 o
m
O
~~
ti
'b ~ a
~~
TIP PROJECT.• 8-3697
~ pO'"'D~
v ~
o _ ~ o~ O
~ g ~
~ _n ~~ ~ ,~~' ~ ~ r
tt~IO _
Z n
1
~ __
~_
W ~ ~_' ~_
A ~p
C
v $~
~O
~° ~ ~
~~
~ ~~;~ ~~,
~ `~ 'ss
z ~~ ~~
fA
~ \~ \ ~f
m
v ~~~ '~o.
3
,,
a
0 0 `~~
o \~`.~~~
S O ~ ~
O ~ ~~
O ~n ~~
~ ti ~ \~~
~ ~ y
\ \\\
~~~. 1
\\
~ ~\
'ti ~ ~o ~ v,
'~ a
~° ~~ -~
[j ~' ~ t
y d
a o
i
a ~ //
v ~,
G ~ /
O /
~ ;
-;~
~~y``
.~//
~~ O
A
/ / /
oy y
~h
~b~' a
~O
V
~~ y
~" ~~ ~~`
l
Oy
~~
x
'~
:,
~ ~ ~ ~.
a
~~
vi y ~ ~
~ ~ y
~ Ox
i
r .

~ a C
~ y
o ~
x
0
~ ~.
b~ ~,~
~~ o
~ _~ o
N
~~ ~ o
V
y O
r~ ~ ~ O
y ... ~
y ~
C~ ~ ~
~; n
V~
Z
v
w
w
~ c~
~~~
~c~s;
Wn
1~ T
-~ ;
~~
4
~'
~D k
~o
3

~~
r®
b
~~
G1~ ~
a~a
~•
a
q
~'
V
3
as
h"' ~a
~~

i i
25-JAN-2007 09:53
r:\roa wa \pro,J\63697.typ
~
5/l4/9.
-o ~ m m w w
~ 1 N i
~ ~ -ImD'9 D'o mD-o rD~ D~
I w m~ ~ m-l ~~O ~O
o O
D p O
I 3 v zvD'v D~ •nD•o mD~
~
z• D'v
z•
rn m mrDz• z• ~z• o
""'~ I n a~ oD< DD n"D< ~DD
<-o DD
<~
I
r• o
D a m<D
=vm7o <~
m~ m<D
m7o m~ my
~ • v
~
70 N
_ ~wI ~
D p
O ~r~-ID
zzov DO
oX w D
zov DO
G~X DO
G)X
o z' ~ ~o mm m• mm m• m•
0 N ~ -I cmi m~~o~ ~~ Ds
~ mro x-~
m ~ m ~ _
~m
D _
D _
m ~ -Did -Did
~ -
I -1
• =
6
66 m xsmD mD ~omD m m
~ n D m NOV O~ yOV oD
w OD
m
_ ~ ~ r~ m ai OmD mD OmD T m

D _
O c

f

' i

~

~ i

~ i =

r i

r
r ~
~ ~ ~ ~I C
7
° rA
w
o W
o ~O
°
o V
~ ~I
~
N ° ~
a Q w c
~o r
mmz r
mz r
mmz u~
n tn
n
m 3 ~
~• ~ cn cn
m mc~
-~ • ~o tno
~o Xmc~
• x ro
m z ro
m z
~ ~
~ D ~
A^ ~ p
m
m ~~ ~~
0 ~ ?
°~ r o
z~m ~
~m l
~-
°~m -m-I 1
Z ~ ~ ~ w m m i N v
mm ~
mm
Z
~
~
pm
Om
~o~
e
e
~
~ H m m
' Z n O fJ u
H
w D -~ C)
vvo -~ n
vo r~ -<
zom ~
D ~
D
' ~• ~ ~ • vm vm
,= -C
G =gym m v
n
~ O O
-19~
- H

s a
~ m ~ N
-
G ~ 1 m
o ~ v Dm m
svm m v -a c~-
m m
ro
D
~ m -G s
~
~
-
i
i - ro ~ m o
m x cn cn x m ~ ~
s• m m m
-i om °m -i m ~ w to
o- o• om m
D m ~ m
D D
m
N z
.~
~ ~ --~

o z
tlN a
o
~
~
~
n
~'
Z M
8 V •'~' D tie ~
i Z m m •a m
1 O ~ m < ~
~~ r
O ~ Z
-1 v
m 3
m - C
~° N m
z
A
+~
N
~ r
~
rn
;• r w
v ~ to
Z
O Z

O
~ o
o
m m
q) to
x

~ °'
~ ° ~ m
v
~ ~` S m
s
~ P .. •
r
A o n
0 ,~ ~
~i i
~
V I ~ ~ Z

A~
V ~
D
~
~ °
N
~ N
Q

r p,
~ ~
I
n H 6
~ =
°i [~ O - ~fl ' ~ ~
z
~o ~ ~ I rn ~ ~ ~
#~ Z Z i ~~ ~ 5 ~5 '1 ~ ~ ~ x

~ m u _

~ 1
m
tt
r
O
N
I
C v t
~ ~ ~
~
~- Z ~ '~ ~ Z ~ w ~ Z 4 M
ivy
O N mim ~NpoO m ° ? O fA
s O+ °o oDm ++++ Z I ,~ m
1' 7p
r~~~ N
D O
N N w9N 4NN
O DW ~ S S O
0
C
O
t
}} ~m ~ r~ ~
OO 0
o° ° o-'o
o c
O ~ ~ n
N
~y~ N
m O m ~~
N
~ -• < .~ N
0
m 2• 1 m
41~~V ~

Il• p+, P u n
S tNo
--1 ~
O ~N C~ P
o
m Se Z 1~~~
~pD? ~
0
a
;
~
o~-' ~~ ~ ~ o ~ ~
SO'tH 0 ~ + H ~ A +
++ m
}
--1Q O 1 V m ~ Qm
.
.
2zm VNV w
to N O

~

~
~
~
~
Z A~ mzN GpCC O
0
Z ~. >
~ j
y
~
~~
~ V 900
0 ~ y ~
~' ~ ~~'.
-1
t
n Z p x
x 44

o + + • 6>A O O ~
a
p~ th G
p O u

~ ~ ~
70
O ,~ ~ O ~
~ ~ ~
T
7
i x~ N
': ,.:
:~ A
N

I ~ 1-f I r i r--, 8
I
O I I I I I , ~ I ~~+ ~ a
Z pp 11 i 1 I I I ~ ~ rr ~ o
.--1 I I I ~ a a
~ ~ ~ j ~ ~ I I I~ o~ 03 x ~ 3 ~ I I I ~ I ~ ~ 13
~ Q~ ~ I ~ o ~ I I I f ~ ~
I_ V ~ ~ I I I 1 i ~ I''II a
L I I ~ I I i i 1 ~ l~
I I I I I A 1
~ , -, I 1 ~ '
I ' I
V ; I I I I ; I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I
1 ; 1 I 1 1 ; ' I I 1 I ' ' I 1 1 1 1 1 ~
' ' 1 ' ' ' I I I ' ; I I I I I I i ~ I 1 i i I ' I I
I 1 I ' ; f I ; 1 I I ' ' 1 I 1 I 1 I i I
1 I I ' 1 I I I I ' 1 I I Z ' I I 1 U I
I I ; i ; i ; I I ; I I I I i ; ; I 1 ; 1 I I ' I I I _I I
1 1 ~ I i i ' 1 1 i ~ i i I
' I 1 ' 1 I 1 1 ' ' ' I ' ~ ' I O I 1 I t I '
' ~ ' I ° I ' I 1 I I 1 I ~ ; 1 I ' ' ' ~ ~ ' ' 1
' ' U ' ' 1 I I 1 ~ ; ' I I ; ; 1 ; ; ' ; I ; ; ' I
' ' ; ' ~ I I I 1 ' ' 1 ~ ' ' I I 1 ' ' i 1 I ' ' I
I ' I ``C I i ; ' ' I I i I I i ; I 1 I ; ' I I ~ I I ~ ' ; I I ' I 1
' I 1 1 1 ' I I ~ ' 1 ' ' 1 ' I
' 1 ' I r ' ' I 1 I ' , I ~ ' ' ~ ' I i ' ' I I ' ; 1 I ~ I I ' ; ' ~ '
; ; ; i i I I I i ; i ; O ~ V I I I ~ I 1 , I 1 I I I ' ' '
I
r__J 1 ' 1 ' 1 I ' ; I I ' I AMA I I ' I I I I I ' ' ' ' 1 1 I I I I
I I i ~ I I 1 ; I 1 ` I I ~ i I I o I ; ^ I i 1 1 I
; i I i O ' ' ~ i i ' ; i i ~ I i N r .O ; i ; C i i I i i i 1 ' ~ i ~
I Q y;• Q. ; ; ; I 1 ; ; C ~ `~ Y°~. C ~ ° O 0 I ~ a N 0 2 C i I ~/
• ~ I ' , ~ I I
r~ ~ E ' ~ I ' ` ° I ~ 1 ~ ~ L S ; ~ O ~
~ c •° O ~ ~ ° ~ 1 ~ - •E o w c ~ ~ •° o u o .n ". = o 0 o y °` ~°. ~° °_' t
p ~ _i+ y L v O m° ~ m E ~ 0 G .C ~ 01 7 p C O ~ 7 p •C p- C C m~ ~ C O p y~ 3
m IL ~ C7 ~ U N d u ~ N ~ N N _1 = C7 V OZ C7 ~ m m u. C7 IL F- ~ N t/~ _ ~ O ~ V1 OC V!
I ,~ ~ I I ~ ~ I ~~ ~ I J~ I' ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ + x~ ~ ~ ~ I I I
N N I I U V F > > O LL I; I m m m
~ I I I I~ }I I I I~ e~ ~ ~ 1 ~ I I I CiJ O~ I C~ \-NM~o x., ; a o 3 a; I ~'
N ~' 4 ~ N t ~ ~ i IV- f ~ F F IOL 4 1 I i I 1 V I# ( S J
I ~~ I~ i ~ l I ~ I ~ i ~ ~ i ~ i ~ I I ~ ~ I I I I ~ ~ ~ I I I
I I ; W ~ I ; ~ ~ ~ i ~ ' ~ ~ 1 I ; I ~ ' i ' I ' 1 I
' , I I I i 1 ^I I i ~ ~ ; ' ~ ~ i
I ~ ; I y ; i ~ ~ ~ ~ I 1 ~ ; ' 1 ' I i ' O I I ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ I ' i ; 1 ~
I I ~ 1 ' ,
~ ~ ~ C ' I ; ' i ' ~ ; ~ I * ~ 1 I ~ i I ~ ~ ~ I ; 1 1 i ' ~ I I ~ ; y
I I I C ° 1 ' I I I 1 ~ I ; 4 ' W ; I ~ I ~ I ; I I 1 I I I I ~ 1 I y 1 I [~~ y
O I I • I ' 1 i 1 1 W ~ I i ; ' ` ' (~ i ' ' 1 ' ' i ; ; ; i ; i i i o ' ; •`
I ; ~ V i ' I ; ! H ~ C I , ~ , ~ ! ~ ; I I i i I ' ' i 1 ; I i I ~ ~ I '
~ i I O ~ I , s i O ~ ~ N 1 (~ i I ' ' i I Z` C C C
I o I I I
I ~ i (i t.. ; W ,~ O~ U o o O ° y ~ I ~ 1 ' ' i p C m C •C p m
1~ ' ~ ~ I 1 -0 o O ~ O ° W I ; 1 ~ i O~ ~ E
t~ ~ I o i N I ~ ° ~ C t ~ ° ~ u ; ~ ; ' ; I i i ; ; i , ~ m C m ~ °
~+ C ~ ; H C u o S m W U C •+~- ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ' ~ ; 1 I ' I C~ ° ~~ d
C :J i to ~ C ; C J o ~ ~ 0' C ° ~ d W C ' i i i ' O ; ' ,F ; O C~ C m -p -p
~ /~ o a c s F- vs o a o. 0 ~ ~ ~ 1 c 11~ m° 3° m
V• $~ .'°t ~~ '^ `e o s m F- a b ~ o o ~ t O 1 ~ l o~ l,~ o h o o~ o,
o y ° ~ c m m ~ •b o m ~ ~ o ~ ~ o c ' " I $ ~ ~ ~ c ~ ' 3
3 3 c '~ ° t7 m o d o~ ~ "= m~ •o ii ~ c~ c ~~ m o ~ E c E~ ~°~~ ~ c° o
3~ o~~ U d f- ~ 7 t- ii. ~ Q o ;~ c c~ o o~ o ._ ~_ v •a
o N O o~ m m m O ~ O= O O C i p~ J C u ~. Z E o~°~ •° ~ W W
J ~ a ° ~ ~ ~ ~ € -E ~ ~ w •E cc- ~ ~ of -o ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ y ~ Z o 0 0 0 o m o c ~ ° c c
o ~ 0 0 0~ o~ c~~ o vii V~ V~ d d X~ E o ~ 0 3°
~) ~ O N ~ og ~ N oC O oC O OC 0~ oC p Q~~~ ` W d d d d li ~_~ .J d
,_ v
®® ~ II ~ ~ I
~~ ® ~ II ~ ~ I ••-0 ~ ¢ ~-~Op~~[~4515~0+00~~01~~®ao®OL~]®O~~©Or~
o it ~ I T
®~ ~ ` JL ~
1 p 7 ~ , 1 ; ' I I 1 , I I ; ' 1 ~ ' 1 I ~ ' ' ' I I 1 I ; 1 I ; ; ; ,
FF~~ I ; 1 1 1 i , ; i i i , 1 , 1 i , , , i I
I I i I , I ; I 1 I 1 I 1 I i ' ' ' ~ 1 I ' ' I
~ W I I ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ I I I I i I I I 1
I rw
! ' ~ 1 ~ -J ~ I ; I I ~ 1 I •° I I ' ; ' ~ I I I ' I ' I ' 1 ' ; '' II ° C
' i ~ 1 ; ~ 1 ~ ' ~ ; ~ ~ ' O I I ' I ' I I ~ ' I ; I I I ' ~ 1 ~ ~ ' 1 1 I ~ ' f`
Z i ; 1 i ~ ; i , i I I ;~ ; ' ; ~ ' I ; ; i ; 1 ~ 1 I ' ; i ' ' E
' ' 1 ~ ~ ; ; ; I ~ C I I 0 i 1 I , ; i i ~ i ; 1 1 ; 1 1 I I i i~ O I
I ~ 1 I i 1 i i I ; , I q
I ; ; 1 I 1 , I I 1 ' ; ° ~, ' ' ' I I I I ~ I I I ; I ` M~ d
O I ' ' I ' 1 ' 1 ' I ~ I I= ° ' I ' ~ ' I o ~ ~ ~ I 1 ' i ' ~ i 0 1 o V
V - ; L l a ° o M I ° `~ I ~ ~ 1 I ; I I ; I I i ~ I C t ~ ° m u a
o
' o~ l O o o c •v c o o°~ 0 0 0 "E s o o~ h I I o€ .. ~~
~ c d o. ~ o ~ ~ ~ o o .c u ' r > o o a o ; 1`- a ° ` ~ us ~ ~ u
c t I m r ~~ r~ r n. a L ,n ` c r m o s ~ m ~ '~ ~ o ~~ o ° o
w o o ~ o o a o. ,~ •- o a u o l p o° c o o c o o~ o c ~n ~~ c c° 3~
~ of o o; 3 D o c c c o ~ o° c r-- o 0 o c~ ~ c ° °° °- ~ c c
oc ai'j ° a m o 0 0 ° m m '0 0 0 m ~ o •- ° V ~ o ~ ~ o ~ 'Z o o ~ "' ~- H °' ° °
O -° u ~ ~ ,° d d a. ~ ~ , -+ a 1- o ~ n. Q ~ 3 0 0 a ~ ~ E ` •~ > ~ s ~ 0 3 ~ ~ O •,~ n. ,3
~= d u. ~ d d~ d d F- V = N d t` U 3 ~~ n.. d (~ ~ H d N Vf F- 3 t` u. F- ~ h
I 1 I 1 I I i I I I u
I I ~ _ I T i~
I VI 4I ~ ~ ,,II ~ ® . a IVQI V i W O `mod' ~ I :: ~ 1 ~ I OI Z
W I I 1 I 1 /~ O I ~, ~ ~ °
~ I I I I I 1 i I
„ Z 1 ' I I ~ ' ' I ' ' 1 ' I I ' I
I 1 1 I I I I I ; ; 1 I I i ; 1 I 1 I 1
W 1 ' I 1 1 I 1 I ; ' ; I I I I I 1 I I I I i I i I 1 ~ I
~I I t ' ' 1 1 I ; I I I , ; 1 I
I ' 1 1 1 1 I ; i ' ; ; I I ; ~ 1 I i ' ' ; ; i ; ; I I ' I
; ~ ; ' I ; ' ' I , ; I I ; 1 ; ' ~ i I I ; v I ' 1 I '
F I I I 1 °. 1 1 I I ~ I I I
I I ~ ~ ~ 1 ; I pp I 1 1 ~ ' ~ ~ O pp V ~ ~ C ~' C ~ ' ~ ' ' ~
W E+1 . ; ' ~ ' OC ; ; ~ ' ~ ' ~ d O. o ~ ;j ~ ; ; ; ' ;
~ ' ; ~ ~ ; ; Y I I ; L.7 t O o ; W O ~ 1 I I r _ .r~ 11 ``
I ' ' 1 ~ ; ' ' ; 1 1~ •~ ~ ~ C C 1 y y O 1 I I ; ~ 1 /
m ~ I 1 i t o ~ o ; ; i , ' ° ~ ~, J ' C ° O ~ O ; i i i I D ~ O
~ ~ i +~• ~ oC o C O. ~ ; i i ~ ,~ ~ O O O ~ ~ O W W O C ' ' ' ; i Q U •°
H ~ V ii LL. 0 IOL C o i C ~ J d j ~_ m o ~ a°1 ~ /~~i ~ ~ ~ QQII U o=
II ' ~ O Y. ~ OC ~ I i i ~ ; V d~ b` C b` C ~ ~ C ~ C C A C` O ; i i= ~ m- I
~ E ; .n w :~ ~ ~ .E ~ E c ~ •.. •«- ~ - - o u ~ p ~ o m ; s Vj m 3
y ~ ~ ~ ~. ~. °> .o ~ m ~ o o` H ..,. ° c oZ s r ~ ~ o c c $ E E ~ o` ~ o c ~ ~ ~° m ~ W w
0 0 o s° >> > c~ o a °o ° aet ~ o o° o 0 0 ~, o o a .,., ~~
's y Vi 3 U m ~ u ~ V ~` • c ~ oZ o~ ~ oa ~ U V u.~ ~ 1- o.. ° ~ o c ° o
E r c v E m a o, a •- oc ~ oc o o •°
o{ n a d n n a{ o, •a o w m~ a a c d a. a s °~ °- c E L ~ a~ °~ c
~ a o Q o 0 0 0 , .~ o '~ b m v y Qy ° ~ v •~ Q Qy ° ~ ° ,~! > o ° .a 3 .c° o o ;o :o °
W u d d d d d d V W ~ W d m m~ W d ~ d W ~ {17 ~ O. d H p~ !L ~ fA fA t/~ IL d ~ m m
66/82/6 dfi1'L69E9\fo.ld~ en ooa~l 5 __
t
t