540037_Inspection_20220517

Facility 'Number
Division of Water Resources
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: • Compliance inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure I•'vatriation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emcrgencs 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
5-17
Arrival Time:
Farm Name: A qCi►^ tLp f
Owner Name: c)n l Q C u_. Va t k L_ LC
303 1 1w 115 , ,Ins - �
Mailing Address: t
Departure Time:
MUM
County: 0.o Region:c_�
Physical Address:
Asti ner Email:
Phone:
,z•
Facility Contact: •,] , A\VM. Q \0 • d Title: Phone:'
Integrator: 50.1IF+ -1—{ el
Certification Number: / >�) 4
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
I.atitudc:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feder to Finish
Farr io to ‘1•'e:ln
Fa: -rot to Feeder
I -"arrow to Finish
Capacity Pup.
)4iilts
Roars
Other
Design Current Design Current
11.et Poultry Capacity Pop.
lay el'
Non -Layer
Dr Poultry
Design Current
Ca aci • Po
•MM
•
• Turkev Poults
• Other NMI
Pullets
Cattle
Design Current
Capacity Pap.
•
•
t
Dairt Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heiler
Dry Cow
Non -}airy
Reef Stocker
Beet' Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
I . Is any discharge observed from any part of'the operation'?
Discharge originated at: Q Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (lf yes. notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system'? Of yes, notify DWR}
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. lL'cre there arty observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of'the State ocher than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
El Yes f,:l "4 ❑ NA \ L-
1 Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 0 NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes d.? ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Do ❑ NA ❑ NE
51I2/2020 Continued

Facility Number: 5,4 - 3
Date of Inspection; -011.1..., 1
N4'aste Collection & Treatment
4, Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. ]f yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Structure 4 Structure 5
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i,e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which arc not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes
waste management or closure plan?
if any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or ens ironmenta] threat, notify DWR
IND
1;144°
Structure 6
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits. dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Aaalicatian
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
l 1. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
PAN ❑ FAN > 10% or I0 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate ManurelSiudge into Bare Soil
0 Outside of Acceptable Crop Window © Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
❑ Yes
[l,No ❑NA
ElfNo ❑NA
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
C] , 56
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ YesEr/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Ycs
j No 0
❑ NE
❑ NE
NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑NE
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement'?
l6. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18• Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Renuired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fad to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
21, Does record keeping need improvement? if yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
n Yes L13 No
Yes o
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Other:
❑ Yes
❑ N.A ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑NE
DN•A Q NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA El NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 12a Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23, if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
Page 2 43
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
0 Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
5f12/2020 Continued

r
Faeilit) Number: - � 4
Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? [f yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structures) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
26_ Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
". Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
24. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30_ Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field 0 LagooniStorage Pond ❑ Other,
DI/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
DINo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 'No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes d No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes diblo NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 0 No NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes I'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with an on -site representative?
34_ Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
El Yes
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or am. additional recommendations or arty other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
6 r - o \ 0 - 0 Lk
.s Lil -
*0?" '6"-
Ii) cL5A-t Pi A _, 5
ores. L3<«S tfi`1x �1y
(_5-22
IC)•-1-56-Zl
-7- , -.2_1
1
LTA ,
.+. - .4
-50 1 e5 - i0-1 —Z� L,j 1
Ca �- G -z n v cis 4. 5 t o �`-
(Ls ' 4 1
1 l Ct tt C3That C
ivek—
* C•Aci1i1~. (IDif` } 0-e
'-, cjc. ,S 1,0. ►q �
lCpss -
P\ .n law '� 1
ter. ,11 „n�rt wti.s}e y CiCisd ti
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3of3
1
.0.1- 0 r[a a of r^t pp,v 5� 'r pert{ y to
5e _9q7-d 3c
Phane:
2/4/2011
[}ate: