20210448 Ver 2_ePCN Application_20220617

DW R
mrlsloa of ware.Besourcrs
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 13,2022 Ver 4.3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
Yes
No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
Change only if needed.
Pre-Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
4/21/2022
BIMS#Assigned" Version#*
20210448 2
Is a payment required for this project?*
No payment required What amout is owed?*
Fee received $240.00
Fee needed-send electronic notification $570.00
Reviewing Office*
Winston-Salem Regional Office-(336)776- Select Project Reviewer*
9800 Sue Homewood:eads\slhomewood
Information for Initial Review
1a.Name of project:
Gateway 85-Aberdeen Blvd.Extension and Lineberger Rd.Realignment
1a.Who is the Primary Contact?*
The City of Gastonia(Rusty Bost)
1 b.Primary Contact Email:* 1c.Primary Contact Phone:
[e-mail] [phone]
Date Submitted
6/17/2022
Nearest Body of Water
Duharts Creek
Basin
Catawba
Water Classification
C
Site Coordinates
Latitude: Longitude:
35.269218 -81.119589
A. Processing Information
County(or Counties)where the project is located:
Gaston
Is this a NCDMS Project
Yes No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No

1a.Type(s)of approval sought from the Corps:
Section 404 Permit(wetlands,streams and waters,Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit(navigable waters,tidal waters,Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?"
Yes
No
Please provide the date of the previous submission."`
3/20/2021
1 b.What type(s)of permit(s)do you wish to seek authorization?
Nationwide Permit(NWP)
Regional General Permit(RGP)
Standard(IP)
1c.Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
Yes No
Nationwide Permit(NWP)Number: 13-Bank Stabilization
Nationwide Permit(NWP)Number: 14-Linear transportation
NWP Numbers(for multiple NWPS):
1d.Type(s)of approval sought from the DWR:
401 Water Quality Certification-Regular 401 Water Quality Certification-Express
Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit Riparian Buffer Authorization
Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
le.Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification: Yes No
For the record only for Corps Permit: Yes No
1f.Is this an after-the-fact permit application?"
Yes No
1g.Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
1g.Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
1 h.Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
Yes No
1j.Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
Yes No
B. Applicant Information
1d.Who is applying for the permit?
Owner Applicant(other than owner)
le.Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?"
Yes No
2.Owner Information
2a.Name(s)on recorded deed:
NP Gastonia Industrial,LLC
2b.Deed book and page no.:
2c.Contact Person:
Michael Johnston

2d.Address
Street Address
4825 NW 41 Street,Suite 500
Address Line 2
City State/Province/Region
Riverside MO
Postal/Zip Code Country
64150 United States
2e.Telephone Number: 2f.Fax Number:
[phone]
2g.Email Address:*
[e-mail]
3.Applicant Information(if different from owner)
3a.Name:
Rusty Bost
3b.Business Name:
The City of Gastonia
3c.Address
Street Address
150 South York Street
Address Line 2
City State/Province/Region
Gastonia NC
Postal/Zip Code Country
28052 United States
3d.Telephone Number: 3e.Fax Number:
[phone]
3f.Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4.Agent/Consultant(if applicable)
4a.Name:
Chris Tinklenberg
4b.Business Name:
Kimley-Horn and Associates
4c.Address
Street Address
200 South Tryon Street,Suite 200
Address Line 2
City State/Province/Region
Charlotte NC
Postal/Zip Code Country
28202 United States
4d.Telephone Number: 4e.Fax Number:
[phone]
411'.Email Address:
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1.Project Information
1 b.Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
1c.Nearest municipality/town:
Gastonia and Lowell
2.Project Identification

2a.Property Identification Number: 2b.Property size:
2c.Project Address
Street Address
Address Line 2
City State/Province/Region
Postal/Zip Code Country
3. Surface Waters
3a.Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:"
Duharts Creek
3b.Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:"
C
3c. What river basin(s)is your project located in?*
Catawba
3d.Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030501020605
4. Project Description and History
4a.Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The project area is currently undeveloped and is immediately adjacent to a 68-foot wide Duke Power Easement.Existing
land use in the vicinity of the project includes residential neighborhoods,commercial development,and undeveloped
forested/maintained properties.
4b.Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project(including all prior phases)in the past?*
Yes No Unknown
If yes,please give the DWR Certification number or the Corps Action ID(exp.SAW-0000-00000).
SAW-2020-00836
4f.List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.296
4g.List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
1,172
4h.Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The Gateway 85 Project,formerly named The Lineberger Connector Project,is a well-known,previously planned public
connector located within the Gastonia Logistics Center(GLC)property.The connector will provide independent utility to
the residents of Gastonia and Lowell that live and work locally.The connector will decrease travel time for
eastbound/westbound users and eliminate cut-through traffic in adjacent residential communities,providing safer
neighborhoods for these residents.In addition to time savings for residents who may no longer need to commute along I-
85,other travelers and the freight industry will benefit from the reduced congestion along the interstate.The"Lineberger
Connector'project is currently included in the Gaston-Cleveland-Lincoln Metropolitan Planning Organization's(GCLMPO)
Comprehensive Transportation Plan(CTP)and has been included in the MPO's long-range transportation plans for many
years.The project is currently listed in the GCLMPO's 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan(MTP)for completion in the
2035 horizon year.The owner of the GLC property has donated a 70-foot public right-of-way(ROW)to the City of
Gastonia who is the applicant responsible for the design and construction of this project.

4i.Describe the overall project in detail,including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
Authorization is requested to extend Aberdeen Boulevard and realign Lineberger Road.The approximately 13-acre
project area consists of the limits of disturbance and a 70-foot roadway right-of-way and is located in Gastonia,Gaston
County,NC.The proposed project seeks to construct the roadway infrastructure in two phases.Phase I seeks to extend
Aberdeen Boulevard from the terminus of existing Aberdeen Boulevard east to existing Lineberger Road.Phase II seeks to realign Lineberger Road by shifting the entrance point along
Lowell Road west,approximately one-third of a mile,and
connecting south with Aberdeen Boulevard Extension.
Impacts to aquatic resources are proposed to be conducted in two phases at five separate and distant impact sites along
both roadway corridors.The following summarizes the proposed impacts:
Phase I—Aberdeen Blvd.Extension
•Impact Site 1(1A,1B,&1C)
o 1A(NWP14)—168 linear foot(If),72-inch reinforced concrete pipe(RCP)placed within Stream 3(Culvert A
in plans).The pipe will be buried 12-inches and will include the installation of 12-inch sills at the inlet and
outlet of the pipe to indicate burial necessary for aquatic passage,to accelerate the reestablishment of the
channel bed,and to maintain the width of the stream channel.10 If riprap dissipator pads will be installed at
the inlet and outlet of the pipe to meet non-erosive discharge velocities.30 If of temporary impacts are
necessary to install an impervious dike and pumped diversion to perform the construction activity in dry
conditions.
o 1 B(NWP14)—127 If,84-inch RCP placed within Stream 1(Culvert B in plans).The pipe will be buried 12-
inches and will include the installation of 12-inch sills at the inlet and outlet of the pipe to indicate burial
necessary for aquatic passage,to accelerate the reestablishment of the channel bed,and to maintain the
width of the stream channel.10 If riprap dissipator pads will be installed at the inlet and outlet of the pipe to
meet non-erosive discharge velocities.30 If of temporary impacts are necessary to install an impervious
dike and pumped diversion to perform the construction activity in dry conditions.
o 1C(NWP13)—290 If of bank stabilization is proposed on the left and right banks of S1 and S3 immediately
adjacent and downstream of the proposed roadway crossing Culverts A and B.The existing banks in this
area are erosive—lacking stable slopes and adequate vegetated cover.The banks will be graded back to a
3:1 slope providing a stable transition between the culverts and the existing channel banks.In addition to
stability,the sloped channel banks also offset the impact to the 100-year water surface elevation caused by
the encroachment of the roadway fill.
•Impact Site 2(NWP14)-137 If,72-inch RCP placed within Stream 5(Culvert C in plans).The pipe will be buried 12-
inches and will include the installation of 12-inch sills at the inlet and outlet of the pipe to indicate burial necessary for
aquatic passage,to accelerate the reestablishment of the channel bed,and to maintain the width of the stream
channel.10 If riprap dissipator pads will be installed at the inlet and outlet of the pipe to meet non-erosive discharge
velocities.30 If of temporary impacts are necessary to install an impervious dike and pumped diversion to perform the
construction activity in dry conditions.
•Impact Site 3(NWP14)—0.052-ac to Wetland 11 results from grading necessary to construct the Aberdeen
Extension.0.01-ac of temporary impacts are necessary to perform the construction activities.
Phase II—Lineberger Rd.Realignment
•Impact Site 4(NWP14)—0.224-ac to Wetland 8 results from grading necessary to realign Lineberger Road.This
portion of the roadway is constained by site development by others which confines the roadway alignment through
this location.0.01-ac of temporary impacts are necessary to perform the construction activities.
•Impact Site 5(NWP14)—253 If,72-inch RCP placed within Stream 5(Culvert D in plans).The pipe will be buried 12-
inches and will include the installation of 12-inch sills at the inlet and outlet of the pipe to indicate burial necessary for
aquatic passage,to accelerate the reestablishment of the channel bed,and to maintain the width of the stream
channel.10 If riprap dissipator pads will be installed at the inlet and outlet of the pipe to meet non-erosive discharge
velocities.30 If of temporary impacts are necessary to install an impervious dike and pumped diversion to perform the
construction activity in dry conditions.
•Impact Site 6(NWP14)—77 If of permanent stream impact to Stream 6 is requested for grading/fill necessary to
realign Lineberger Road.As mentioned above,this portion of the roadway is constrained by site development by
others which confines the roadway alignment through this location.
General construction equipment,including but not limited to bulldozers,excavators,front-end loaders,etc.will be used for
construction purposes.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a.Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
Yes No Unknown
Comments:
5b.If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination,what type of determination was made?*
Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2020-00836
5c.If 5a is yes,who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name(if known): Chris Tinklenberg,PWS
Agency/Consultant Company: Kimley-Horn and Associates
Other:
5d.List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
7/15/2020
6.Future Project Plans
6a.Is this a phased project?*
Yes No

6b.If yes,explain.
The roadway construction proposes to be conducted in two phases—Phase I—Extension of Aberdeen
Blvd.and Phase 11—Realign Lineberger Road.
Are any other NWP(s),regional general permit(s),or individual permits(s)used,or intended to be used,to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a.Where are the impacts associated with your project?(check all that apply):
Wetlands Streams-tributaries Buffers
Open Waters Pond Construction
2.Wetland Impacts
2a1 Reason(?) 2b.Impact type*(?) 2c.Type of W. 2d.W.name 2e.Forested* II 2f.Type of Jurisdicition*2g.impact IP) area'
Impact 3 Fill P Headwater Forest W11 Yes Both 0.052
(acres)
Impact 3 Construction Access T Headwater Forest W11 Yes Both 0.010
(acres)
Impact 4 Fill P Headwater Forest W8 Yes Both 0.224
(acres)
Impact 4 Construction Access JL
Headwater Forest W8 Yes Both 0.010
(acres)
2g.Total Temporary Wetland Impact 2g.Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.020 0.276
2g.Total Wetland Impact
0.296
21.Comments:
Impact Site 3(NWP14)—0.052-ac to Wetland 11 results from grading necessary to construct the Aberdeen Extension.0.01-ac of temporary impacts are
necessary to perform the construction activities.
Impact Site 4(NWP14)—0.224-ac to Wetland 8 results from grading necessary to construct the Lineberger Road realignment.0.01-ac of temporary
impacts are necessary to perform the construction activities.
3.Stream Impacts
11
3a.Reason for impact(?) 3b.lmpact type* 3c.Type of impact* 3d.S.name* 3e.Stream Type* [3f.Type of 3g.S.width 3h.Impact
(?) urisdiction* length*
S1 Culvert Permanent Culvert S3 Perennial Both 168
Average(feet) pinear feet)
S2 Impervious Dike and Pumped Temporary Other S3 Perennial Both 30
Diversion Average(feet) pinear feet)
S3 Culvert Permanent Culvert S1 Perennial Both 127
Average(feet) Qinear feet)
S1
S4 Impervious Dike and Pumped Temporary Other Perennial Both 30
Diversion Average(feet) Qinear feet)
S5
Bank Stabilization Permanent Bank Stabilization S3 Perennial Both 5 105 Average(feet) (linear feet)
S6
Bank Stabilization Permanent Bank Stabilization S1 Perennial Both 6 185
Average(feet) Qinear feet)
S7 Culvert Permanent Culvert S5 Perennial Both 137
Average(feet) Qinear feet)
gg Impervious Dike and Pumped Temporary Other S5 Perennial Both 30
Diversion Average(feet) Qinear feet)
S9 Culvert Permanent Culvert S5 Perennial Both 4 253
Average(feet) (linear feet)
�01
Impervious Dike and Pumped Temporary Other S5 Perennial Both 30
Diversion Average(feet) Qinear feet)
H
Fill Permanent Fill S6 Intermittent Both 77
Average(feet) (linear feet)

31.Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
31.Total permanent stream impacts: 31.Total temporary stream impacts:
1,052 120
31.Total stream and ditch impacts:
1172
3j.Comments:
The proposed project seeks authorization to permanently impact 762 If of stream/potential non-wetland WoUS under NWP14 for construction of the
roadway.Authorization is requested under NWP13 to perform 290 If of streambank stabilization to reduce bank erosion by grading banks to a more
stable slope and planting with native riparian vegetation species.120 If of temporary stream/potential non-wetland WoUS impacts are necessary to
install pump diversion operations at the four proposed culvert locations to allow for work in dry conditions.
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.Avoidance and Minimization
1a.Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
The Aberdeen Blvd.Extension alignment is intended and designed to border the existing 68-foot Duke Power Easement which bisects the Gastonia
Logistic Center property.Impacts to aquatic resources within this corridor could not be avoided by the proposed roadway;however,the proposed impact
locations minimize impacts to higher quality resources since the general quality of each aquatic resource feature adjacent to the Duke Power Easement
has been altered or degraded due to
construction and regular maintenance of the easement.The dimension,pattern,and profile of the streams above and below the proposed culverts will
not be modified by altering the width or depth of the stream profile in connection with the construction activities.The width,height,and gradient of the
proposed culverts have been modeled and sized sufficiently to pass the average historical low flow and spring flow without adversely altering flow
velocity,as well as flood flows during major storm events.
Culverts have been designed and will be constructed in a manner that minimizes destabilization and head cutting to the streams.Destabilizing the
channel and head-cutting upstream have been considered and appropriate actions incorporated
into the design and placement of the culverts.Culvert lengths have been reduced to the maximum extent practicable by implementing taller headwalls
and maximizing side slopes to minimize stream impacts and will be installed in such a manner that the original stream profiles will not be altered.
All culverts will be buried 12-inches and will include the installation of 12-inch sills at the inlet and outlet of the pipe to indicate burial necessary for
aquatic passage,to accelerate the reestablishment of the channel beds,and to maintain the width of the stream channels.Rip-rap outlet dissipation will
be placed in a manner that the boulders will be pushed or"keyed"into the channel beds so that the finished top elevation of the riprap will not exceed
that of the original stream beds to prevent destabilization of the stream beds or banks downstream of the impact areas and to allow for aquatic life
passage.
1 b.Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Temporary impacts have been minimized to the greatest extent practicable to meet the needs of the project and do not pose adverse alterations to the
existing channels.Erosion control measures implemented during the construction of the roadway will be removed immediately following the activities
and any disturbance will be returned to pre-construction conditions.
2.Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S.or Waters of the State
2a.Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S.or Waters of the State?
Yes No
2c.If yes,mitigation is required by(check all that apply):
DWR Corps
2d.If yes,which mitigation option(s)will be used for this project?
Mitigation bank Payment to in-lieu fee program Permittee Responsible Mitigation
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a.Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached.
- Yes No
4b.Stream mitigation requested:
(linear feet) 4c.If using stream mitigation,what is the stream temperature:
762 warm
4e.Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
4d.Buffer mitigation requested(DWR only): (acres)
(square feet) 0.276
4f.Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: 4g.Coastal(tidal)wetland mitigation requested:
(acres) (acres)
4h.Comments
6. Buffer mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules)- required by DWR
6a.Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation?If yes,you must fill out this entire form-please contact DWR for more information.
Yes No

F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a.Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes No
If no,explain why:
The project does not include nor is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a.Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?
Yes No
2b.Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H.1003(2)?
Yes No
2c.Does this project have a stormwater management plan(SMP)reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state-approved local government stormwater program?
Yes No
N/A-project disturbs<1 acre
2d.Which of the following stormwater management program(s)apply:
Local Government State
Local Government Stormwater Programs
Phase II NSW USMP Water Supply
Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.
City of Gastonia
Comments:
Stormwater is mitigated by over detaining within the overall project limits so that the overall development meets the
oridinance requirements.Additionally the site has been design to attenuate post development peak flows to predevelopment
rates for the 25YR-24HR storm event,which is excess of the code requirements.
G. Supplementary Information U
1. Environmental Documentation
1a.Does the project involve an expenditure of public(federallstate/local)funds or the use of public(federal/state)land?
Yes No
2.Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a.Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules(15A NCAC 2H.0500),Isolated Wetland Rules(15A NCAC 2H.1300),or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules(15A NCAC 2B.0200)?*
Yes No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a.Will this project result in additional development,which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
Yes No
3b.If you answered"no,"provide a short narrative description.
The roadway project seeks to provide independent utility for local residents of Gastonia and Lowell as well as provide access into and out of the GLC for
employees and truck traffic.No additional development is proposed.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a.Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
Yes No N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat(Corps Requirement)
5a.Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
Yes No
5b.Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
Yes No
5c.If yes,indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville

5d.Is another Federal agency involved?*
Yes No Unknown
5e.Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
Yes No
5f.Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
Yes No
5g.Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
Yes No
5h.Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
Yes No
5i.Does this project involve(1)blasting,and/or(2)other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines,such as jackhammers,mechanized pile drivers,etc.?
Yes No
5j.What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
Kimley-Horn(KH)completed a threatened and endangered species assessment within the project site.Before conducting the field survey,KH reviewed
state and federal records to determine if any listed species were known to occur within and/or in the general vicinity of the project area.A review of the
U.S.Fish&Wildlife Service Information for Planning and Consultation(IPaC)System and the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program(NCNHP)was
conducted to identify species that are known to occur within Gaston County.Following the review of available information,KH conducted a pedestrian
survey of the project site to determine the available habitats on-site and the potential occurrence for listed species.Pedestrian surveys were conducted
in April and September 2020.No individuals of listed species or critical habitat associated with a listed species were observed
during the pedestrian surveys.Results of the pedestrian survey were provided to the USFWS to request their concurrence.Per the USFWS response:
According to the information provided,suitable habitats also occur onsite for the federally threatened dwarf-flowered heartleaf(Hexastylis naniflora),and
the federally endangered Schweinitz's sunflower(Helianthus schweinitzii).However,targeted surveys for these species conducted during their
respective optimal survey windows detected no evidence for these species.(See attached USFWS Concurrence Letter).
6. Essential Fish Habitat(Corps Requirement)
6a.Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?
Yes No
6b.What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?
NCNHP element occurrence database did not indicate the presence of EFH within the project boundary.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a.Will this project occur in or near an area that the state,federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
Yes No
7b.What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
A request for a review of potential cultural resources was submitted to the North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources State Historic
Preservation Office(NCSHPO)on April 3,2020 for the Gastonia Logistics Center(GLC)property.NCSHPO responded on June 5,2020 and stated the
proposed project will adversely affect the National Register-eligible Caleb John Lineberger House(GS0327).Additionally,the letter notes that one
previously recorded archaeological site(31GS376)consisting of the remains of an early twentieth-century domestic structure is present within the project
area.(ER 20-0882)A Phase I Archaeological Survey and Phase II Testing were conducted per SHPO's recommendation and formal Section 106
consultation with SHPO is underway for the GLC.The above listed cultural resource occurrences are not located within or within the immediate vicinity
of The Gateway 85 project area(LOD)and therefore,poses no adverse effects to the cultural resources.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a.Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
Yes No
8b.If yes,explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
USACE HEC-RAS version 4.1.0 was used to create the Corrected Effective plan.A model was created based on a surveyed surface and calibrated to
the data obtained from North Carolina Flood Risk Information System(FRIS).The criteria for a no-rise certification state that there shall be no more than
a 0.00'foot rise within the 100-year BFE in the existing conditions watershed.When compared to the corrective effective model the proposed model
does not increase the 100-year BFE.A Conditional Letter of Map Revision and Letter of Map Revision are not required since there is no increase in the
100-year BFE.A floodplain development permit and No-Rise/No-Impact certification will be submitted to satisfy the City of Gastonia permitting
requirements for a floodplain development/zoning permit.
8c.What source(s)did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FIRM 3710356500J
Miscellaneous
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review.Documents should be combined into one file when
possible,with a Cover Letter,Table of Contents,and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
_20220617_Gateway_85_PCN_FINAL.pdf 86.47MB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments

Signature
By checking the box and signing below,I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true,accurate,and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief;and
The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true,accurate,and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a"transaction"subject to Chapter 66,Article 40 of the NC General Statutes(the"Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66,Article 40 of the NC General Statutes(the"Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature;AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Chris Tinklenberg
Signature
624f �
Date
6/17/2022