540093_Inspection_20180416

y'acifity Number
&Division of Water Resources
O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of y irflr (umplianee inspection Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
pate of Visit: ri
Arrival Tirne:
Farm Name: bci 1 C\o r ,
Owner Name: e -'� c;. C I I
Departure Time:
Owner Email:
Phone:
County:
Region:
tufkao
!failing Address: �� S rl i.J et I ` (1 L j rcvti ► L 5 1
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator;
Rack -up Operator:
Luc:lti❑n of Farm:
J_QI I Title: Phone:
lAttt
Latitude:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultr} Capacity Pop,
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder 330
Farrow to Finish
0
Gilts
Boars
Other
t }Iher
I
Layer
Non -Layer
Design Current
Dry Poultry Capacity Pop.
.ayers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey F'c:UEts
_
Other
Cattle
Design Current
Capacity Fop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Bee IBrood Cow.
Discharses and Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any pan of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (lf yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? Of yes, notify DWR)
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
❑ IL o ❑NA ❑\E:
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No In NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Er/ ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2/4/2015 Continued

FaciliM \t�mfrer: Li ' Ai= (Date of Inspection: l/- t,
►I ette Collcrt� Treatment
4. Is storapacit}' (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes o [] NA D NE
a. if yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Q Yes No 0 NA El NE
Identifier:
Spillway`?;
Designed Freeboard (in):
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
observed Freeboard (in): 31
5, Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 ► ere answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health nr environmental threat, notify DWR
Structure 6
❑ Yes io El NA ❑NE
O Yes [ o ❑ NA [] NE
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? es ❑ No
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit'?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
❑ Excessive Pending ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12, Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
❑ Yes• °
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
▪ Yes o ❑NA El NE
❑ Yes [No 0 NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes • a ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes o. ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
I7. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 3No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CA W ]v1P readily available? if yes, check ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ['Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ['Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? 11' yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 0/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and l" Rainfall inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ N ❑ NE
23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? © Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
Pine 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Date of Inspection: 4 if. 1 `.Z
24.3id the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
0 Yes
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey El Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Q Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA El NE
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 0 Yes EI '(u ❑ NA ❑ NE
27, Didthe facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? 0 Yes ❑ No NA ] NE
Other Issues
2$. Did the facility fail to properly dispose ofdead animals with 24 hours and/or document © Yes 12No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29• At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA I rJ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes 1: No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes io ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes alk Kr NA El NE
❑ Yes �'N+ij ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #). Explain any YES unsw,ers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use dra►sin�s of facilit► to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
t e oDu ti t
l nett Co
-7) Ic.%.„) beAAJt V`e iv\ 1
► kV 4 s
2e/0
ctc LON\-.
nt.t QrY�
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: q V-39 47
Date: ' ) 6 -18
2/4121115