Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20220388 Ver 1_Variance Information_20220622Strickland, Bev From: Mark Mayhew <mmayhew@eseconsultants.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2022 11:00 AM To: Cohn, Colleen M; George.L.Phillips@usace.army.mil Subject: [External] Signed Variance for 0 Parlier Drive, Toll Brothers Attachments: 22VAR03 FOF_COL Signed 06 2022.pdf CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to Report Spam. Sorry Colleen, typed incorrect email address. Mark Mayhew, PE President ESE Consultants, Inc. 1140 Virginia Drive, Fort Washington, PA 19034 P: 215-293-5435 C: 215-353-8711 mmayhew@eseconsultants.com www.eseconsultants.com From: Mark Mayhew Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2022 10:47 AM To: Dan Rossi <drossi@tollbrothers.com>; Jeff Westmoreland <jwestmoreland@tollbrothers.com>; Ted Pease <tpease@tollbrothers.com>; David Kelly <DAKELLY@tollbrothers.com>; George.L.Phillips@usace.army.mil; colleen.cohn@dedenr.gov; Michelle Savage-Measday, PWS <MMeasday@ecslimited.com> Cc: Brianne Massey <bmassey@eseconsultants.com> Subject: Signed Variance for 0 Parlier Drive, Toll Brothers Team, Approved Apex stream buffer disturbance variance attached. Lyle, Please let us know the status of our wetland permit application. Colleen, Please update us on the status of our buffer permit application. Thank you. Mark Mayhew, PE President ESE Consultants, Inc. 1140 Virginia Drive, Fort Washington, PA 19034 P: 215-293-5435 C: 215-353-8711 mmayhew@eseconsultants.com www.eseconsultants.com From: Brianne Massey <bmassey@eseconsultants.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2022 9:42 AM 1 To: Mark Mayhew <mmayhew@eseconsultants.com> Subject: Fwd: Signed Variance for 0 Parlier Drive Signed variance received. Brianne Massey, PE Project Engineer II ESE of North Carolina, PC 900 Perimeter Park Drive, Suite 83, Morrisville, NC 27560 P: 919-355-0721 C: 919-889-1475 bmassey@eseconsultants.com www.eseconsultants.com From: Sarah Van Every <Sarah.VanEvery@apexnc.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2022 9:08:52 AM To: Michelle Savage-Measday, PWS <MMeasday@ecslimited.com>; Brianne Massey <bmassey@eseconsultants.com> Cc: Ted Pease <tpease@tollbrothers.com> Subject: Signed Variance for 0 Parlier Drive EXTERNAL EMAIL : Use caution with links and attachments Good morning all Hope everyone is doing well! Please find attached the signed FOF/COL document granting the variance form the Town. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you! Sarah Van Every, AICP Senior Planner Planning & Community Development PO Box 250 1 73 Hunter Street 1 Apex, NC 27502 919-249-3339 1 www.apexnc.org Email sent to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. Please note that I am teleworking as part of the Town's efforts to reduce the risk of exposure to the community. Therefore, email is the best way to reach me. Thank you. 2 BEFORE THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWN OF APEX TED PEASE, TOLL NC II LP, GREEN LEVEL CROSSING COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC. 0 PARLIER DRIVE (0733133605 & 0733049008) FINDINGS OF FACT Based on the competent, material, and substantial evidence in the record, the Board of Adjustment makes the following findings of fact: 1. Ted Pease, Toll NC II LP, (the "Applicant"), submitted a completed application for a variance on the 11th day of April, 2022. 2. Pursuant to G.S. §160A-384 and Sec. 2.2.11.E of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), the Planning & Community Development Director caused proper notice to be given (by publication and posting), of a public hearing before the Board of Adjustment on the variance for 0 Parlier Drive, Apex, North Carolina, on the 26th day of April, 2022. 3. The Board of Adjustment held a public hearing, including an evidentiary hearing, on the 17th day of May 2022. 4. All persons who desired to present evidence relevant to the variance for 0 Parlier Drive were allowed the opportunity to present evidence at the public hearing before the Apex Board of Adjustment. 5. Applicant sought a variance from the following UDO Section: UDO Section 6.1.11.G Uses Permitted Within the Riparian Buffer, reads: This Section shall apply to activities conducted within, or outside of with hydrologic impacts in violation of the diffuse flow requirements set out in Sec. 6.1.11.E upon, a riparian buffer regulated by this Section. The Town shall issue an approval for new development only if the proposed development will avoid impacts to riparian buffers regulated by this Section or, if an impact to any such buffer is proposed, in accordance with the requirements in Sec. 6.1.11.6.1 or 2 below, as applicable, the applicant has demonstrated that: (i) the proposed activity is exempt, (11) the proposed activity is allowable or allowable with mitigation, and the requirements of this Section for proceeding such designated use have been met, or (iii) a variance authorizing the proposed activity has been obtained. 6. The Town approved The Hunt at Green Level Crossing, in which the subject property sits, was approved on July 16, 2007. 7. The Town adopted Unified Development Ordinance on August 1, 2000. 8. The Town Sanitary Sewer Easement the Floodplain, the Riparian Buffer, and the Watershed Protection Overlay District are existing on the subject property. 9. The culvert has existed on the subject property prior to August 23, 2017. 10. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Region IV issued remedial options for Violation Case #17-04-7608P including removing culvert on December 20, 2021 11. The applicant purchased the property on July 23, 2007. 12. The Town amended the Unified Development Ordinance to permit variance applications for properties within the Watershed Protection Overlay District on March 23, 2021. 13. The applicant held a pre -application meeting for the subject property with Town staff on February 11, 2022. 14. The applicant submitted a variance application on April 11, 2022. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. Unnecessary Hardship. Unnecessary hardship would result from the strict application of the Ordinance. It shall not be necessary to demonstrate that in the absence of the variance, no reasonable use can be made of the property. Strict interpretation of the regulation would restrict any activity on the subject site. The existing conditions of the culvert are in violation of FEMA Region IV. If the violation remains, it would risk the status of the National Flood Insurance Program (NDIP) for the entirety of Apex and therefore deemed an unnecessary hardship. 2. Hardship Results from Peculiar Conditions. The hardship results from conditions that are peculiar to the property, such as location, size, or topography. Hardships resulting from personal circumstances, as well as hardships resulting from conditions that are common to the neighborhood or the general public, may not be the basis for granting a variance. The existing conditions of the culvert and related infrastructure within the Watershed Protection Overlay District limit any activity. The Watershed Protection Overlay District was applied after initial development and encompasses the subject property. The FEMA violation is unique to the subject properties. These existing conditions are peculiar to the site and deemed the cause of the hardship. 3. Not Result of Action by Applicant. The hardship did not result from actions taken by the applicant or the property owner. The act of purchasing property with knowledge that circumstances exist that may justify the granting of a variance shall not be regarded as a self-created hardship. The FEMA violation was not created by the initial design and therefore not a result of actions by the applicant, but rather resulted from a series of regulations. 4. Consistency with the UDO. The requested variance is consistent with the spirit, purpose, and intent of the ordinance, such that public safety is secured, and substantial justice is achieved The applicant has demonstrated that the remedy is environmentally sensitive and with the least harm, to provide corrective measure and maintain the insurance status. 5. The Applicant did meet the burden of proof and establish facts that show all of the standards for granting a variance were met. DECISION The Apex Board of Adjustment hereby approves the variance by a vote of 5 to 0 for 0 Parlier Drive (PIN 0733 13 3605 & 0733 04 9008) as requested by the applicant, to permit activity shown or similar and as permitted by the Town of Apex. This Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Decision shall constitute written documentation of the Board of Adjustment's approval of the variance for 0 Parlier Drive Apex, NC. THE TOWN OF APEX By: MYJZ Mike Wilson Chair Effective Date (Corporate Seal) ATTEST• Sarah Van Every Senior PI