670084_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20220629

iJ
Facility Number
L7
Division of Water Resources
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Q Other Agency
Type of Visit: d Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ® Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: lf' G "- /?? Arrival Time:
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
Departure Time:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Owner Email:
Phone:
County:
Region:
Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
�,--�- ,14--d►a
Latitude:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Swine
Design°- Ciir'rent
CapacityLL Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
ezwY
Design Current.
Poultry' .._ Capacity, Fop.
Layer
Non -Layer
Design . Current
Capacity Pos:
Cattle
Design ' Current`;.
Capacity . Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ETA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No 0 NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes [ ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No [/]NA El NE
❑Yes ❑No 1‹ ❑NE
Page 1 of 3
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: G "7 -
Waste Collection & Treatment
Date of Inspection: C,
J .III
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
Page 2 of 3
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ No lA ❑ NE
Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
❑ Yes LJ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
❑Yes ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
5/12/2020 Continued
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ �Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
No ❑NA ❑NE

Facility Number: -
Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No A 0 NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes El No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes 0'I�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) /
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA Q NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Ef No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Conirnents (refer,torecieznmendations mrany other coninents e,
Use drawings ref facility to better- expiaiu situations (use. additionalgages as necessary}: .
o - s ' - f,'-Q ' cP
L(122_ LEv-
s
f
v`J-Q *.e c9 CO'
coo-
t03
LiU%
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone: el( 1/4)51-5)3S�J
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 3 of 3 5/12/2020