20190159 Ver 1_Year 0 Monitoring Report_2022 (Buffer)_20220718

Mitigation Project Information Upload
ID#* 20190159
Version* 1
Select Reviewer: *
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 07/18/2022
Mitigation Project Submittal - 7/18/2022
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site? * 0 Yes O No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name: *
Email Address: *
Jeremiah Dow [e-mail]
Project Information
ID#:*
20190159
Existing ID#
Project Type:
Project Name:
County:
• DMS Mitigation Bank
Strawberry Hill Mitigation Site
Johnston
Document Information
Mitigation Document Type: *
Mitigation As -Built Plans
File Upload:
Signature
............................................
Print Name: *
Signature:*
Version:* 1
Existing Version
StrawberryHill_100094_Buffer_MY0_2022.pdf 31.71MB
Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Jeremiah Dow

As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report—Riparian Buffer Mitigation
FINAL
STRAWBERRY HILL MITIGATION PROJECT
NCDMS Project#100094(Contract#7745)
USACE Action ID: SAW-2019-00124
DWR Project#2019-0159
Johnston County,North Carolina
Neuse River Basin
HUC 03020201
Y
I ,b 1 I
�
• ct ' z' r d ^ a F
I �
,1?
''
i 8 I I
Provided by:
Ores
Resource Environmental Solutions,LLC
for Environmental Banc&Exchange—Neuse I,LLC(EBX-Neuse I)
Provided for:
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
July 2022

MEMORANDUM
fires
3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100 Raleigh, North Carolina 27612 919.770.5573 tel. [phone] fax
TO: Division of Mitigation Services
FROM: Jamey McEachran — RES
DATE: July 8, 2022
RE: DMS Comments on the Draft As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Strawberry Hill, Project ID #100094, DMS Contract #0007745
Comments:
1. DMS recommends using the most current templates and tables for monitoring reports. It is
understood that this project was contracted in December 2018 and therefore templates from that
time period are applicable. However, the most current templates provide the IRT and DMS with the
needed information in a more streamlined and less verbose format.
Majority of the Report has been updated using the most current template and tables.
2. Recommend adding dates to photos that do not have them either at the top of the page or with
each photo.
Dates have been added to all photos.
3. Please add Limits of Disturbance to the Record Drawings.
Limits of Disturbance (LOD) have been added to the Record Drawings.
4. Please consider updating the Sheet List Table on the Record Drawing Title Page in the buffer report
only by removing the reference to sheets that are not included, or otherwise indicating that only
sheets M1 & M2 are included. Also consider a reference to sheet EC2.
The Sheet List Table has been updated to only include references to sheets M1 and M2. A Cover
Page has also been added for the ESC map with a reference to sheet EC2.
5. During the site visit conducted on June 8, 2022 some small, isolated areas of struggling herbaceous
growth were observed, specifically a small bare area on JH5 near the tree line and relatively sparse
herbaceous cover along some portions of the old farm roads that paralleled JH5 and JH3. Areas did
not appear to currently be causing any major issues, but we recommend over seeding this fall if
herbaceous vegetation does not more fully establish this summer.
This area will be monitored this fall and seeded if needed.
6. At the upstream end of JH1-B near Yelverton Grove Road there is a small area that appears to be less
than 30' in width, but greater than 20', which would apply a 25% reduction to buffer credits in this
area. Please update the buffer credits and report as necessary.
The revision has been made. The area has been separated out as a unique polygon in the buffer
shapefile and a row has been added in the buffer credit table that accounts for the 75% credit
stipulation. The resulting credit yield was reduced by 227.498 credits. The report, credit table, and GIS

shapefile have all been updated accordingly.
Digital File Comments:
1. It is not possible to ensure the easement is accurate when compared to the CCPV in the stream asset
baseline report, the CCPV does include the entire easement. The digital easement submitted does
represent the DMS recorded easement. A requirement of the CCPV is to include the easement
boundary, please revise the CCPV in the Stream Baseline Report to include the entire easement
boundary. It is complete in the Buffer Baseline Report.
Figure 2 has been divided into Figure 2a and 2b so that monitoring devices are legible on 2a and the
entire conservation easement is visible on 2b.
2. The tables used are not the most updated templates (2020); this project may not have been
contracted with these as requirements. The tables are missing the following information:
a. Project Background is missing regulatory information and pre-existing stream lengths The
Project Background tables were updated and display the new requirements.
b. The goals table is missing from the digital submission and report. The goals
table has been added to the report and digital submission.
3. In future submissions, please choose unique names for 'feature name' in buffer excel asset table and
use those unique feature names in the digital submission attribute date for buffer feature class.
There are numbers on the buffer asset map that are not defined in the legend. This is noted for
future submissions, the unique feature names will be consistent.
4. Data missing from the digital submission: Please submit the missing data.
a. Longitudinal profile is missing, data and graph
Long pro data and graphs are shown in the as -built record drawings and redlines.
b. Particle size distribution is missing, data and graph
This is not a requirement in the approved mitigation plan nor required as part of the
monitoring guidance and therefore was not conducted and will not provided in this report.
c. Photo point spatial data file is missing Photo
points have been added.
d. Station id not included in the raw cross sectional survey data
A spreadsheet has been added that includes the raw survey data with station id.
e. Planted zone
Planted zone has been added.
5. Please refer to DMS As-bult Survey Requirements, item 15; the .dwg file submitted is not adequately
attributed.
All layers were started with "AB-" to symbolize they are part of the As -Built condition. Layer details
can be found behind the AB convention.

Table of Contents
1 Project Summary 1
1.1 Project Location and Description 1
1.2 Monitoring Protocol and Project Success Criteria 1
1.3 Project Components 2
1.4 Riparian Mitigation Approach 3
1.5 Construction and As -Built Conditions 3
1.6 Baseline Monitoring Performance 4
2 Reference 4
Appendix A: Background Tables and Site Maps
Table 1: Buffer Project Areas and Assets
Table 2: Summary: Goals, Performance and Results
Table 3: Project Attributes
Table 4: Project Timeline and Contacts
Figure 1: Site Location Map
Figure 2: Current Conditions Plan View Map
Figure 3: As -Built Planting Map
Figure 4: As -Built Riparian Buffer Map
Figure 5: Site Preparation and Other Activities Map
Figure 6: ESC Plan Map
Appendix B: Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 5: Plant Species Summary
Table 6: Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table
Table 7: Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Appendix C: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
i

1 Project Summary
1.1 Project Location and Description
The Strawberry Hill Project is within the Neuse River Basin within the 8-digit HUC 03020201, 14-digit
HUC 03020201140010 and DWR Sub -basin Number 03-04-02.
The Strawberry Hill Project is located in Johnston County in Smithfield, NC at the crossroads of Yelverton
Grove Road and Brogden Road (Figure 1). To access the Project from Raleigh, take I-40 East to US-70
East. Then take US-70 BUS West until taking a right onto South 3' Street in downtown Smithfield. Then
take a left onto Brogden Road. Follow Brogden Road for 2.9 miles and the downstream extent of reach
JH1-B will be on your left. The coordinates are 35.469579 °N and -78.323896 °W.
Environmental Banc & Exchange — Neuse I, LLC (EBX-Neuse I), a wholly -owned subsidiary of Resource
Environmental Solutions (RES), is pleased to provide this Baseline Monitoring Report as a component of
the Strawberry Hill Mitigation Project (Project), a full -delivery stream and buffer mitigation project for the
Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) (DMS #100094). This buffer component of the Project is designed
to provide riparian buffer mitigation credits for unavoidable impacts due to development within the Neuse
River Basin, United States Geological Survey (USGS) 8-digit Cataloguing Unit 03020201 (Neuse 01)
(Figure 1). This Buffer Project provides mitigation in accordance with the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation
Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 and Nutrient Offset Credit Trading Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0703. The
Strawberry Hill Project also entails a stream mitigation component, generating stream mitigation credits
through stream restoration. As -built and baseline conditions pertaining to the stream mitigation component
of this Project will be provided in a separate baseline monitoring report.
The conservation easement of the Strawberry Hill Project totals 22.12 acres and includes two unnamed
tributaries and three ditches that drain into Polecat Branch and eventually the Neuse River. Previous land
use within the Project was primarily crop production and disturbed riparian forest. The Project area was
used extensively for agricultural and forestry purposes for over 80 years. Land use adjacent to and
surrounding the Project is either crop production or forest regeneration. Water quality stressors affecting
the Project include pollution from crop production and lack of forested riparian buffer. Previous buffer
conditions demonstrated significant degradation with the loss of stabilizing vegetation because of continued
crop production and recent clear cut of adjacent riparian forest.
The goal of the buffer component of the Project is to restore and preserve ecological function to the existing
streams and their associated riparian buffer areas by establishing appropriate plant communities while
minimizing temporal and land disturbing impacts. Buffer and surrounding riparian area improvements will
filter runoff from agricultural fields, thereby reducing nutrient and sediment loads to Project channels and
provide water quality benefit to the overall watershed. Project attributes are summarized in Table 1.
1.2 Monitoring Protocol and Project Success Criteria
Annual vegetation monitoring and visual assessments will be conducted. Riparian vegetation monitoring is
based on the "Carolina Vegetation Survey -Ecosystem Enhancement Program Protocol for Recording
Vegetation: Level 2 Plot Sampling Only Version 4.2". Monitoring plots were installed a minimum of 100
meters squared in size and cover at least two percent of the planted mitigation area. These plots were
randomly placed throughout the planted riparian buffer mitigation area (15.13 acres) and are representative
of the riparian restoration conditions. The following data is recorded for all trees in the plots: species, height,
planting date (or volunteer), and grid location. All stems in plots are flagged with flagging tape. Data is
processed using the CVS data entry tool. In the field, the four corners of each plot were permanently marked
with PVC at the origin and metal conduit at the other corners. Photos of each plot are to be taken from the
origin each monitoring year. There are 13 fixed vegetation monitoring plots (Figure 2).
Strawberry Hill Mitigation Project 1 Baseline Monitoring Report — Riparian Buffer
Project #100094 July 2022

Photos are to be taken at all vegetation plot origins each monitoring year and be provided in the annual
reports. Visual inspections and photos will be taken to ensure that areas are being maintained and compliant.
The measures of vegetative success for the Project are the survival of at least four native hardwood tree
species, where no one species is greater than 50 percent of stems, at a density of at least 260 stems per acre
at the end of Year 5. Native volunteer species may be included to meet the performance standards as
determined by NC Division of Water Resources (DWR).
A visual assessment of the conservation easement is also performed each year to confirm:
• Easement boundary markers/signage are in good condition throughout the site;
• No encroachment has occurred;
• No invasive species in areas were invasive species were treated,
• Diffuse flow is being maintained in the conservation easement areas; and
• There has not been any cutting, clearing, filling, grading, or similar activities that would
negatively affect the functioning of the buffer.
Component/
Feature
Monitoring
Maintenance through project close-out
Vegetation
Annual Vegetation shall be maintained to ensure the health and vigor of the targeted plant
vegetation community. Routine vegetation maintenance and repair activities may include
monitoring supplemental planting, pruning, mulching, and fertilizing Exotic invasive plant species
shall be treated by mechanical and/or chemical methods. Any vegetation requiring
herbicide application will be performed in accordance with NC Department of
Agriculture (NCDA) rules and regulations. Vegetation maintenance activities will be
documented and reported in annual monitoring reports. Vegetation maintenance will
continue through the monitoring period.
Invasive and Nuisance Visual Invasive and noxious species will be monitored and treated so that none become
Vegetation Assessment dominant or alter the desired community structure of the Project. Locations of invasive
and nuisance vegetation will be mapped.
Project Boundary
Road Crossing
Visual Project boundaries shall be identified in the field to ensure clear distinction between the
Assessment mitigation project and adjacent properties. Boundaries are marked with signs identifying
the property as a mitigation project and will include the name of the long-term steward
and a contact number. Boundaries may be identified by fence, marker, bollard, post, tree -
blazing, or other means as allowed by Project conditions and/or conservation easement.
Boundary markers disturbed, damaged, or destroyed will be repaired and/or replaced on
an as -needed basis. Easement monitoring and staking/ signage maintenance will
continue in perpetuity as a stewardship activity.
Visual Road crossings within the Project may be maintained only as allowed by conservation
Assessment easement or existing easement, deed restrictions, rights of way, or corridor agreements.
Crossings in easement breaks are the responsibility of the landowner to maintain.
1.3 Project Components
This Project generates 642,298.475 riparian buffer restoration credits on pre-existing non -forested land, and
8,091.309 buffer preservation credits. The total area of riparian preservation is less than 25 percent of the
total area of riparian buffer mitigation in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5). The total riparian
buffer mitigation credits that the Strawberry Hill Mitigation Project generate are summarized below, but
the detailed Project credit breakdown, including buffer credits that are convertible to nutrient offset credit,
utilizing the DWR "Project Credit Table Template (Updated February 2022)," is provided in Table 1;
Appendix A.
Mitigation Totals
Area Square Feet Credits
Restoration
652,991 642,070.977
Preservation
81,431 8,091.309
Total Riparian Buffer
734,422 650,162.286
Strawberry Hill Mitigation Project 2 Baseline Monitoring Report — Riparian Buffer
Project #100094 July 2022

1.4 Riparian Mitigation Approach
The buffer mitigation is in accordance with the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295
and Nutrient Offset Credit Trading Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0703. In addition to traditional riparian
restoration, the Project also incorporates the alternative buffer mitigation options: Preservation of Buffers
on Subject Streams, as outlined in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o) (5), and Restoration and Enhancement of
Ditches, as outlined in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o) (8).
Riparian restoration along the Project streams and ditches is accomplished through the planting,
establishment, and protection of a hardwood forest community. Restoration activities included planting a
composition of native bare -root tree species along streams and ditches based on reference data. The result
will be a riparian area that functions to mitigate nutrient and sediment inputs from the surrounding uplands.
Preservation occurs in some areas along Reach JH1-A and JH1-B. Some of these preservation areas were
associated with stream restoration under the stream mitigation component of the Project; therefore, some
of the areas were cleared during construction of the new stream corridor. However, these impacted areas
were planted under the same criteria as restoration areas.
1.5 Construction and As Built Conditions
Restoration activities included planting a composition of native bare -root tree species in riparian areas along
streams and ditches. The target community type is Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp (Schafale 2012).
There were two planting zones: Zone 1 encompassed the northern easement section where more wet -
tolerant tree species were prioritized due to a wetter riparian area, and Zone 2 encompassed the southern
easement section where it is drier and wet -tolerant species were not prioritized. Furthermore, bald cypress
(Taxodium distichum) was only planted in Zone 1 and not in Zone 2. There were no deviations from the
originally proposed planting plan. A list of the planted species can be found in Table 5. Wherever possible,
mature trees were preserved and incorporated into the riparian area. Specifically, some high -quality tree
species were found within the cutover areas that were timbered over 8 years ago, so these species were left
in place where feasible.
Preparation at the Project involved treating exotic invasive species, clearing undesirable scrub -shrub
vegetation, contoured ripping in select areas, seeding, and planting. Other activities included stream
restoration, culvert removal, debris removal, irrigation piping removal, demolition of building structures,
and local livestaking. Four culverts were removed in the southern easement section: three along reach JH2
and one at the transition of JH3 to JH5. One of the culverts removed along JH2 was not originally planned
in the approved mitigation plan, but upon construction preparation, a non-functioning, buried culvert was
discovered along the left bank of JH2. There is a lateral drainageway along an adjacent field edge that
terminated abruptly before JH2, but then the buried culvert was identified in the field which had likely
conveyed water into JH2 historically. Therefore, it was decided to remove the buried culvert from the
Project easement and stabilize the resulting drainage feature. Consequently, this feature could convey
concentrated flow into the Project riparian buffer area; therefore, a credit deduction was preemptively
incurred. Upon removal of all culverts, the banks were graded to match the existing channel dimensions
and stabilized. Debris was removed throughout the Project, including brick and concrete piles. Along
reaches JH2, JH3, and JH4, exposed, abandoned irrigation piping was removed from buffer restoration
areas and disposed of off -site. Along reach JH3, old chicken house structures were demolished, and the
debris materials were stockpiled away from the conservation easement for future disposal to be conducted
by the landowner. Livestakes were planted on stream and ditch banks where stability was compromised,
such as identified areas of erosion and banks where culverts and irrigation pipe were removed.
Strawberry Hill Mitigation Project 3 Baseline Monitoring Report — Riparian Buffer
Project #100094 July 2022

1.6 Baseline Monitoring Performance
Establishment and monitoring of 13 fixed vegetation plots was completed on March 15t1i, 2022. Vegetation
tables are in Appendix B and associated photos are in Appendix C. MYO monitoring data indicates that
all plots are exceeding the interim success criteria of 320 planted stems per acre. Planted stem densities
ranged from 526 to 971 planted stems per acre with a mean of 753 planted stems per acre across all plots.
A total of 12 species were documented within the plots. Volunteer species were not noted at baseline
monitoring but are expected to establish in upcoming years. The average tree height observed was 1.5 feet.
Visual assessment of vegetation outside of the monitoring plots indicates that the herbaceous vegetation is
becoming well established throughout the project and no invasive species were observed. Easement
boundary markers and signs are clearly visible and in good condition. Additionally, there were no signs of
encroachment or undocumented concentrated flow in the easement area.
2 Reference
Lee Michael T., Peet Robert K., Roberts Steven D., and Wentworth Thomas R., 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol
for Recording Vegetation Level. Version 4.2
NC Environmental Management Commission. 2014. Rule 15A NCAC 02B.0295 - Mitigation Program
Requirements for the Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Buffers.
NC Environmental Management Commission. 2020. Rule 15A NCAC 02B.0714 — Neuse River Basin:
Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy: Protection and Maintenance of Existing
Riparian Buffers.
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC (2020). Strawberry Hill Mitigation Project — Final Mitigation
Plan — Appendix A — Final Buffer Mitigation Plan.
Schafale, M.P. 2012. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Fourth
Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation,
NCDENR, Raleigh, NC.
Strawberry Hill Mitigation Project 4 Baseline Monitoring Report — Riparian Buffer
Project #100094 July 2022

Appendix A
Project Background Tables and Site Maps

Table 1. Strawberry Hill, DMS# 100094, Project Credits
Neuse 03020201-Outside Falls Lake
Project Area
N Credit Conversion Ratio (ft2/pound)
P Credit Conversion Ratio (ft2/pound)
19.16394
N/A
Credit Type
Location
Subject? (enter
NO if
ephemeral or
ditch')
Feature Type
Mitigation Activity
Min -Max Buffer
Width (ft)
Feature Name
Total Area (ftz)
Total (Creditable)
Area of Buffer
i
Mitigation (ft)
Initial Credit
Ratio (x:1)
% Full Credit
Final Credit
Ratio (x:1)
Convertible to
Riparian
Buffer?
Riparian Buffer
p
Credits
Convertible to
Nutrient Offset?
Delivered
Nutrient Offset:
N (Ibs)
Delivered
Nutrient
Offset: P (Ibs)
Buffer
Rural
Yes
I / P
Restoration
0-100
Cropland (JH1, JHS)
370,703
370,703
1
100%
1.00000
Yes
370,703.000
Yes
19,343.778
—
Buffer
Rural
Yes
I / P
Restoration
0-100
Tmberland (JH1)
122,409
122,409
1
100%
1.00000
Yes
122,409.000
No
—
—
Buffer
Rural
Yes
I / P
Restoration
101-200
Cropland (JH1, JHS)
9,149
9,149
1
33%
3.03030
Yes
3,019.173
Yes
477.407
—
Buffer
Rural
Yes
I / P
Restoration
101-200
Timberland (JH1)
6,810
6,810
1
33%
3.03030
Yes
2,247.302
No
—
—
Buffer
Rural
No
Ditch
Restoration
0-50
JH2,JH3,JH4
136,211
136,211
1
100%
1.00000
Yes
136,211.000
Yes
7,107.672
—
Buffer
Rural
No
Ditch
Restoration
0-50
Segment Less than SO'
fIH2)
6,799
6,799
1
100%
1.00000
Yes
6,799.000
No
—
—
Buffer
Rural
No
Ditch
Restoration
0-100
Non -diffused Flow
Deductions (JH1, JH2,
JH4)
16,303
0
1
100%
No
—
No
—
—
Buffer
Rural
Yes
I / P
Restoration
20-29
Segment Less than 30'
fIH1)
910
910
1
75%
1.33333
Yes
682.502
No
—
—
Totals (ft2):
Total Buffer(ft2):
Total Nutrient Offset (ft2):
669,294
652,991
642,070.977
26,928.857
0.000
669,294
652,991
0
N/A
Enter Preservation Credits Below
Total Ephemeral Area (ft) for Credit:
Total Eligible Ephemeral Area (ft):
Total Eligible for Preservation (ft):
0
187,681
0.0%
223,098
9.1%
Ephemeral Reaches as % TABM
Preservation as % TABM
Credit Type
Location
Subject?
Feature Type
Mitigation Activity
Min -Max Buffer
Width (ft)
Feature Name
Total Area (sf)
Total (Creditable)
Area for Buffer
Mitigation (ft5)
Initial Credit
Ratio (x:1)
% Full Credit
Final Credit
Ratio (x:1)
Riparian
Buffer Credits
Rural
Yes
I / P
0-100
JH1, JH5
80,658
80,658
10
100%
10.00000
8,065.800
Rural
Yes
I/P
101-200
JH1, JHS
773
773
10
33%
30.30303
25.509
TOTAL AREA OF BUFFER MITIGATION (TABM)
Mitigation Totals
Square Feet
Credits
Restoration:
652,991
642,070.977
Enhancement:
0
0.000
Preservation:
81,431
8,091.309
Total Riparian Buffer:
734,422
650,162.286
TOTAL NUTRIENT OFFSET MITIGATION
Mitigation Totals
Square Feet
C
Nutrient Offset.
Nitrogen:
0
0.000
Phosphorus:
0.000
Preservation Area Subtotals (ftz): 81,431 81,431
Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) will have the flexibility to convert Riparian Buffer Mitigation Credits to Nutrient Offset Credits, where viable, in accordance with this table.
Credit conversions must be calculated using the guidance provided in the Clarified Procedures for Calculating Buffer Mitigation Credits and Nutrient Offset Credits letter issued by the DWR in
November 2019.
1. The Randleman Lake buffer rules allow some ditches to be classified as subject according to 15A NCAC 02B .0250 (5)(a).
last updated 08/03/2020

Table 2: Summary: Goals, Performance and Results
Goal
Objective/Treatment
Likely Functional
Uplift
Performance Criteria
Measurement
Cumulative Monitoring
Results
Restore and preserve native floodplain and
streambank vegetation.
Established and increased forested riparian
buffers to 50 feet and greater along both sides of
the channel along the project reaches with a
hardwood riparianplant community;and
p
Reduction in floodplain
sediment inputs from
runoff, increased bank
stability, increased LWD
organic material in
streams,
increased
Survival of at least four
native hardwood tree
species, where no one
species is greater than
50 percent of stems, at
a density of at least
260 stems per acre at
the end of Year S.
13 fixed vegetation plots
N/A

Table 3. Project Attributes
Project Name
Strawberry Hill Mitigation Project
County
Johnston
Project Area (acres)
22.12
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)
35.469579, -78.323896
Planted Acreage (Acres of Woody Stems Planted)
19.73
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
65m - Rolling Coastal Plain
River Basin
Neuse
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit I 03020201
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-digit I 03020201140010
DWR Sub -basin
03-04-02
Project Drainage Area (Acres and Square Miles)
383 ac (0.60 mil)
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area
2%
CGIA Land Use Classification
Bottomland Forest, Cultivated, Evergreen Shrubland, Southern Yellow
Pine, Unconsolidated Sediment

Table 4. Project Timeline and Contacts
Activity or uebverable
Data Collection
Complete
Task Completion or
uellverable submission
Project Instituted
NA
Dec-20
Mitigation Plan Approved
NA
Nov-20
Construction (Grading) Completed
NA
20-Jan-22
Planting Completed
NA
07-Mar-22
As -built Survey Completed
NA
May-22
MY-0 Baseline Report
Mar-22
May-22
MY1+ Monitoring Reports
Remediation Items (e.g. beaver removal, supplements, repairs etc.)
Encroachment
Strawberry Hill #100094
Provider
Mitigation Provider POC
RES / 3600 Glenwood Ave., Suite 100, Raleigh, NC 27612
Jamey Mceachran [phone]
Designer
Primary project design POC
RES / 3600 Glenwood Ave., Suite 100, Raleigh, NC 27612
Ben Carroll, PE [phone]
Construction Contractor
Construction contractor POC
RES / 3600 Glenwood Ave., Suite 100, Raleigh, NC 27612
Jacy Kirkpatrick

QGreen Chapel Missionary
Baptist Church
ass
Stevens Sausage Co. Inc0
Legend
Proposed Easement
Neuse River Basin - 03020201 (Excluding Falls Lake Watershed)
0 500 1.000
Feet
Figure 1 - Site Location
Strawberry Hill
Mitigation Project
is
°9den Rd a
KD's Carts9
Cnrnmu
Project Coordintates:
35.469579, -78.323896
Durham
0
0
apel Hill
Raleigh
0
Strawberry Hill
Mitigation Project
Fayetteville E-
Rock
4'I
ti^1llsol
Gold
or
Date: 3/24/2022
Drawn by: MDD
Checked by: JRM
1 inch = 1,000 feet
fires
Johnston County, North Carolina

k# .i i l �i v e 9,4s �i 't" �w$'« rQ �k'rvf �._,. - :
0-1
g,,Zite4'
1.
' , .„ . '''..---;1 res,, ,.,„,,,.„,..,..S,
..."
►• ¢Jf�' "M. ? 8 ' ^` .,"'�' r .ri.'� •b�,, -, .,�.i:.:i„ ` R.•^f' ,y,7 _ e.1 • - -
dd R
.. � 'x l:- ' � :d Mel.°.G-r $ ,1 -
> L. - w "xE9�;4' ,p y,^ t ' N
.x�
qt±'' 't� V �:'w ta-x `??..:;y„b+ ''.:;,,A';',.;: t. .d ' "�°--
w ----.) ,...— E
a4..� ,� �.,y,, r. b'"T, I'+ _' laa _ - -sue. I
L�J
3 F ft ..
Area 20-29 '
,� ', - .'� Feet
�i Figure 2
— �- . a JH1 A
�� e a__?
� Current Conditions Plan View
�� _ •
• Riparian Buffer Mitigation
7 _mil_ �.,A ti
• Ita.l. / MYO 2022
�y� .
., y �� �� Strawberry Hill
x �� �R f ,l`L / �� Ijii$ //1
�.'.; Mitigation Project
. r '�, .` ,� f� G. Johnston County,
_
� o� _�.-y .`i. North Carolina
" 7 `Y »" �� - _ Date 7/8/2022 Draw DD
+ C
4.:
„� ".,,,,�r ,u'+rirr,..7.: Checked by:JRPdI 1 in=300 feet
't a. c ^ ..�: 1 E r r
<.: I Leaend
i4� > 4' + y j! ' � '� fi ,' O Recorded Easement(22.12 ac)
i t ` EqE� Vegetation Plot
_ '
. ',;," ..,.„ ;yt; ❑>320 stems/acre
4'� r r ,� Riparian Buffer Mitigation
ys t 3. , , .,. ». I
Approach
9r Riparian Restoration,0-100'
' , E Riparian Restoration, 101-200'
P } ,. ,. i.a i ,tt ,
d : /' Riparian Restoration(Ditch),0-50
r � t i "' FYL Riparian Preservation,0-100'a
��' • 0 � !~ / Riparian Preservation, 101-200'
�'. 4' • t ;' `� t ,12' � _ ®Non diffuse Flow Deduction
= Wfti, 1T�.. - " tl c Area Not Viable for Credit
`* 0• s' � —� r —Surveyed Top of Bank
ia
-^l.' ' � 1} , ' +K"^ ra '''' wr" --- • itr �,w .,k.4:-
[fmt 'aF. -•r :,k ,its .,.•.�.` ;:VEq„ Y 0� .Jx „,, ,» f. `,, t �� • :ar ,'t"';'+�' a ,y., p,,
a� S"
r i' • ",- ^ `� ^y`. �. ;�rsu - S i+ ` _ It: ^ail` V.
1 • :•� • ,n- ., r .
•
t,. 4 • 'V 7 ", ,k_'�. '1"4-W !4, S y!,/ ter y • - ..r.f A,
R! z, x t
ni
E
w �,, 4
- SY
a py
•
y---
r ; ,.',E' k 'El.!''�'d�l a` -..o-'� i''' - yi ,�k1-' �i`'' ;a i�yf •'';3 fin 3'.�y w.:� `�- '--^.�¢y hr �� k .)l A%1 , l y . ld; I,
2 11/ p5. g { r _ <
x ,. * , ;1. 'u ;w+!; -. `4 1 Vegetation Condition Assessment
,: 's .; _ - '��.` F\ \•,: - t _ t �1, ,t - -. ."Y ys 'J• ..4s, � - Y. .�: ' ; Vy.; r _ ,•; Target
,. x n y 5 a� '� �D rw 9 Community
txi:tz • dw�a L. _ Present Marginal Absent
s +! i� r d "Z:k"' � �` _ •�1.+-.,a . .�,'� J kr _ + tl n_-;_ Gl
< U
;.- a«. S�. ,•►n 7.,t,_.
;,,\ r' `� , Via.. s` r1 _ Q Absent No Fill
22
441
y" ti +,yy16 �, .�,;Y...' r °3 - ifIT J , ,. ' :".,. ">
,, .� , - Ilk' + ,✓- . 4'7`'.�'.r r ,� �. i" .N Present
-. t!'^ .- :+$+ '.:: ,,•s .,..x ' ` l'r c .. •` -�. iU:sT <. :� , a k d x to Y

•
'Sd t. ''F i az r ♦ �` .y'x a a,,. '� -L 4 i a° t 7>� y* Jt i.� aV r.
.ac n '- - `g yS�- 'i e 4,4, ra fi <, E 4 „ , .� g s: �. yP, gu. w 1.:ir F x�'+ E+.
A gy ➢l• a1Re tY`' y l '' , h� i ". "'� ��
Some Mature, Desirable k . .,, , ? � � ".� y R
Trees Left Undisturbed x <� 'A'''',,�. 10,,,q4 _.. , ;w' ' ' ` . ,, d
444 4
'♦.:::♦::♦�♦�♦�♦���♦�.:♦:♦:♦: - -- ,•a .fin,
, ,,_ .4 V - Asiiiiiiiiiii46,,
, - --- - ., , w _--...)
•
,-.'.'*:::- '*-4:-1-':."--...'''''''' -;.- — .w,:, ii
4 , ,�♦����1 , _. - �♦�♦..� '��.�♦�♦�♦ ��'��� �� - Feet
�������� �������� � ������1 ®�������'�•������� �� t� ��� " ' :� r" Figure 3
. �.�.� ��������I �a As,. _���������.�♦'.♦'4:�40441`:71".' • , As-Built Planting Map
� .��,���.... ♦ . • , �; Mvo zozz
y Strawberry Hill
Mitigation Project
Johnston County,
"---max North Carolina
-. t>t ��` Date: 5/18/2022 Drawn by: MDD
�,_ � ,, : -�..,. � ,. Checked by:JRM tin=300feet
�. Legend
„ ' `~`` El Recorded Easement(22.12 ac)
'� �" i `,' I Planted Area
�,� i— ®Zone 1
h ®Zone 2
'•' ., �, Livestake Zone
. .., Vegetation Plot
•+ a
El>320 stems/acre. , } ,
y-"r
- S �'P' t{:• 'f 4R.n c'4$ eta
t a 1 afRR * A"; ,a4-
e , .t r`
."` , + TIC ` " m �•. +� 9,{
Vegetation Condition Assessment
. • + 7 x" , t ° Target Community
�1
No Fill
v y y k � b r � ,� „ v Present Marginal Absent
g ' :� } h °w? a Absent
N k
p aka.. ass ,: +.1'if •� Present
Y. •
_b >
«S s yk
,
w:

g SAVED BY: Bhockett
awberry Hill WBRL\101038_AB_BPDP Buffer Zones Map_5_17
FILE NAME:R:\Res
Total Area of Buffer Mitigation
Mitigation Totals
Zones
Square Feet
Restoration (Ditch)
0-50
143,010
Restoration
0-100
494,022
Restoration
101-200
15,959
Preservation
0-100
80,658
Preservation
101-200
773
BUFFER AREA LEGEND
4444,
i+•••�AAi
RESTORATION (DITCH ZONE 0-50)
RESTORATION (ZONE 0- 1 00)
RESTORATION (ZONE I 0 I -200)
PRESERVATION (ZONE 0- 1 00)
PRESERVATION (ZONE I 0 I -200)
THE PURPOSE OF THIS SURVEY IS TO
SHOW THE BUFFER ZONES ON THE
STRAWBERRY HILL MITIGATION SITE.
NO PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINES OR
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
BOUNDARY LINES WERE SURVEYED
AT THIS TIME.
PROJECT DIRECTORY
OWNER:
JEREMIAH DOW
NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
2 17 WEST JONES ST., SUITE 3000A
RALEIGH, NC 27603
DESIGNED CONSTRUCTED BY:
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, LLC
3600 GLENWOOD AVE, SUITE 100
RALEIGH, NC 2761 2
AS -BUILT SURVEY BY:
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, LLC
3600 GLENWOOD AVE, SUITE 100
RALEIGH, NC 2761 2
DMS PROJECT #: 100094
CONTRACT #: 7745
USACE ACTION ID #: SAW-201 9-00I 24
RFP #: 16-007576
DWR #: 20190159
AS -BUILT TOPOGRAPHY AND PLANIMETRICS SURVEY WAS
PROVIDED BY RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS,
LLC (BRIAN S. HOCKETT, NC PLS L-5 165), DATED
OCTOBER 27, 202 1 - MARCH 29, 2022
STRAWBERRY HILL MITIGATION PROJECT
PROJECT LOCATION: 35.469170°,-78.312918°
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
NEUSE RIVER BASIN: HUC 030202201
MAY 2022
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, LLC
3600 GLENWOOD AVE, SUITE 100
RALEIGH, NC 27612
SITE MAP
NTS
LCE
res
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
\ \SN mC���RO
A.....ESS/0.� �'
SEAL
L-5165
soy
REVISIONS: PLOT DATE:
RELEASED FOR:
BUFFER AREAS AS -BUILT DRAWING
PROJECT NUMBER:
101038
PROJECT MANAGER:
JRM
DESIGNED:
BRC
DRAWN:
BSH
CHECKED:
BRC
SHEET NUMBER:

s\101038 RD Cover.dwg SAVED BY: Ts
FILE NAME:R:\Res
tches MAI
1
PROJECT LOCATION
VICINITY MAP
NTS
PROJECT DIRECTORY
OWNER:
JEREMIAH DOW
NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
2 17 WEST JONES ST., SUITE 3000A
RALEIGH, NC 27603
DESIGNED 4 CONSTRUCTED BY:
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, LLC
3600 GLENWOOD AVE, SUITE 100
RALEIGH, NC 27612
AS -BUILT SURVEY BY:
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, LLC
3600 GLENWOOD AVE, SUITE 100
RALEIGH, NC 27612
DMS PROJECT #: 100094
CONTRACT #: 7745
USACE ACTION ID #: SAW-201 9-00I 24
KFP #: 1 6-007576
DWK #: 20190159
STRAWBERRY HILL MITIGATION SITE AS -BUILT SURVEY
SEALED BY BRIAN S. HOCKETT, PLS (L-5 165) ON MAY 13,
2022.
STRAWBERRY HILL MITIGATION PROJECT
PROJECT LOCATION: 35.469170°,-78.312918°
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
NEUSE RIVER BASIN: HUC 030202201
MAY 2022
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, LLC
3600 GLENWOOD AVE, SUITE 100
RALEIGH, NC 27612
SITE MAP
NTS
Sheet List Table
Sheet Number
Sheet Title
Cover
M1
MAINTENANCE COMPLETED
M2
MAINTENANCE COMPLETED
res
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
,,,,,H C AROe,,,i'''%
4 4,:,
2SQ 0E.SS/0,
SEAL
.�/?�Z5J8/QSZ
'mac^ - GrINFO- t
�., To —PeQ-
1
REVISIONS: PLOT DATE:
RELEASED FOR:
RECORD DRAWINGS
PROJECT NUMBER:
101038
PROJECT MANAGER:
JRM
DESIGNED:
BRC
DRAWN:
BSH
CHECKED:
BRC
SHEET NUMBER:

enace Sheets.dwg SAVED BY: Bcarrall
z
6
FILE NAME:R:\Res
REMOVED EXISTING
TRASH AND DISPOSED
OF OFF -SITE
REMOVED EXISTING PIPE
AND DISPOSED OF
OFF -SITE/
7
WETLAND WB
WETLAND WD
WETLAND WA
i
7
i
7
REMOVED EXISTING PIPE
AND DISPOSED OF
OFF -SITE
REMOVED EXISTING\
CONCRETE AND
DISPOSED OF OFF -SITE\
REACH J11 I -B
REMOVED EXISTING
CONCRETE AND
DISPOSED OF OFF -SITE
REACH JHI-A
REMOVED EXISTING
CONCRETE AND
DISPOSED OF OFF -SITE
res
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
.lj tCAgp4„
`2 at§ESS/cy
..,,-
' SEAL =
0 Ushv
SS//�� z
,./.. ..,
,4
.,/,
FULL SCALE: 1"=100
0 100 200
2" = FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE 1'
REVISIONS: PLOT DATE:
5/23/2022
RELEASED FOR:
RECORD DRAWINGS
PROJECT NAME:
STRAWBERRY HILL MITIGATION PROJECT
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DRAWING TITLE:
MAINTENANCE COMPLETED
PROJECT NUMBER:
101038
PROJECT MANAGER:
JRM
DESIGNED:
BRC
DRAWN:
BSH
CHECKED:
TRS
SHEET NUMBER:
M1

enace Sheets.dwg SAVED BY: Bcarrall
FILE NAME:R:\Res
5
_wW
EXISTING PIPE WAS
REMOVED AND
DISPOSED OF OFF -SITE
L-
1C1
w
RN✓
U
Rhv
S
REMOVED EXISTING
PIPE AND DISPOSED
OF OFF -SITE
LCE-
0
REMOVED EXISTING
ASPHALT PILE AND -
SPOSED OF OFF -SITE - -
EXISTING CONCRETE
WAS REMOVED AND
DISPOSED OF OFF -SITE
REPLACED WITH CLASS I I
RIP -RAP TO I .5' DEPTH
—
EXISTING POSTS WERE
REMOVED AND
DISPOSED OF OFF -SITE
EXISTING RIP -RAP WAS
REMOVED AND
DISPOSED OF OFF -SITE
L
�C1
CE
—JL
3
DITCH J112
Riw
TR"
REMOVED EXISTING PIPE
AND DISPOSED OF
OFF -SITE
�C1
LCE
DEMOLISHED EXISTING
BUILDINGS AND
REMOVED DEBRIS
FROM WITHIN REMOVED EXISTING PIPE
EASEMENT AND REPLACED WITH SWALE,
PER DETAIL FROM ENGINEER
RAN
Rw
REMOVED EXISTING PIPE
AND DISPOSED OF
OFF -SITE
REMOVED EXISTING PIPE
PILE AND DISPOSED OF
OFF -SITE
REMOVED EXISTING
IRRIGATION SYSTEM AND
DISPOSED OF OFF -SITE
NOTE:
REMOVED ALL PIPES NOT SHOWN
ON PLAN BUT FOUND IN FIELD
AND DISPOSED OF OFF -SITE
res
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
.ojtCAgp „
- SEAL
p
04t
nr mi
FULL SCALE: 1"=100
0 100 200
2" = FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE 1'
REVISIONS: PLOT DATE:
5/23/2022
RELEASED FOR:
RECORD DRAWINGS
PROJECT NAME:
STRAWBERRY HILL MITIGATION PROJECT
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DRAWING TITLE:
MAINTENANCE COMPLETED
PROJECT NUMBER:
101038
PROJECT MANAGER:
JRM
DESIGNED:
BRC
DRAWN:
BSH
CHECKED:
TRS
SHEET NUMBER:
M2

A
0
x
T.
CreechesMill
PROJECT LOCATION
VICINITY MAP
NTS
Know what's below.
CaII before you dig
NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, DIGGING, OR EXCAVATION THE
CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING ALL UNDERGROUND
UTILITIES (PUBLIC OR PRIVATE) THAT MAY EXIST AND CROSS THROUGH
THE AREA(S) OF CONSTRUCTION, WHETHER INDICATED ON THE PLANS
OR NOT. CALL "81 I " A MINIMUM OF 72 HOURS PRIOR TO DIGGING OR
EXCAVATING. REPAIRS TO ANY UTILITY DAMAGED RESULTING FROM
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE
CONTRACTOR.
PROJECT DIRECTORY
DESIGNED BY:
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, LLC
3600 GLENWOOD AVE., SUITE 100
RALEIGH, NC 27612
DESIGNED FOR:
JEREMIAH DOW
NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
2 1 7 WEST JONES ST., SUITE 3000A
RALEIGH, NC 27603
SURVEYED BY:
WSP USA, INC.
1 28 TALBERT ROAD
SUITE A
MOORESVILLE, NC 281 1 7
DMS PROJECT #: 100094
CONTRACT #: 7745
USACE ACTION ID #: SAW-201 9-001 24
RFP #: 16-007576
DWR #: 201901 59
PROJECT TOPOGRAPHY AND EXISTING CONDITIONS
PLANIMETRICS SURVEY WAS PROVIDED BY WSP USA,
INC. (NC FIRM LICENSE NUMBER F-089 I ,
CHRISTOPHER A. MELKE, NC PLS L-502 1), DATED
MARCH 18, 2020
STRAWBERRY HILL MITIGATION PROJECT
PROJECT LOCATION: 35.469170°,-78.312918°
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
NEUSE RIVER BASIN: HUC 03020201
AUGUST 2021
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, LLC
3600 GLENWOOD AVE, SUITE 100
RALEIGH, NC 27612
91
FOR NCDEQ DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
DITCH JH4
0 if
REACHJH5-`
1
SITE MAP
NTS
Sy
CE
53
PROJECT COORDINATE
POINT
REACH JHI -A
331
LCE
DITCH JH2
LCE 1'
59 _ - 58
S/
Sheet List Table
Sheet Number
Sheet Title
COVER
EC2
EROSION CONTROL
res
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
RE•VIIONS
RELEASED FOR:
z
0
FINAL RELEASED FOR CONSTRUC
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT MANAGER:
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
0674
JRM
BRC
SCF
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
a

Rescad\Projects \101038-Strawberry Hi
•
a J )
�:.. (
x .L,
AR
DEED
PIA
•
,11
•
1' WETLAND WB
:1.14 ---,=., � � 4 el 1.
e
r1 t sj cst // /' l r"
./fr,
) h! < t \� v",r�rs
r" 9
fir'° ., j 1 . R�Bb,� C_'tt 'I
r " - I' I C• , I `
r'P �r-7 I I.
tics } (� 1
el ! ` r x
i f ,1'.1s
028,9
I
} < it .)•
� F
•14
/ f S .„1.1
AA
LEGEND
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
PROPOSED CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
PROPOSED LIMITS OF GRADING
EXISTING CONTOUR MAJOR
EXISTING CONTOUR MINOR
LOD
LCE
50
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
SILT FENCE ■ ■ ■ ■
SILT FENCE W/ OUTLET --/\/—■
PROPOSED PUMP AROUND LOCATION •
STAGING/STOCKPILE AREA
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
IIAUL ROAD
PROPOSED CULVERT
■
■
1
TOTAL AREA OF DISTURBANCE: 20.97 ACRES
TOTAL AREA OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT: 22. 12 ACRES
(AREAS CALCULATED IN AUTODESK AUTOCAD CIVIL 3D)
\a
�A2
_f
r� p/
WETLAND WC
WETLAND WD
PROPOSED 20 LE
OF I8" HDPE
0`..
L ti• .
b.,,, a \^• wy,' 1j
1
a').; '~ \ c
1.;,--...:),/----
GO 4L ` -•-_—'`_ `` �
.'ems G „ •,J-' U _ ' qD w .1,• • ° A
J t.* r ti
rp E �& ey�� 'l WSJ
a-9a J .GAF• '. r....
Aa ,
WETLAND WA- •
—1 1 %• /
g
1,`— I a "C �L` 2
SR 100—`qx,
35
r''''
1„'> a 007
37
I 4 a�-� �Op1
DEED BOOK 5199 PACE 70
01.Ar BOP( 87 PACE
/ ti'
x
JAN PENNY
rt' ,4 L.
-*'-. DITCH J114
4-
NO
•
REACH JH5
Q
f I
0
0
O
L
'4
:ti
(• NM OR FORMER,
\'5
. • •
Com BOOKsrirPACE B PLAT BOOK 76 PAGE SS 4,19,
• 9•.•
--`77) .ram
PARCEL 22
PA
dM
E
a
r:
AO :^. .
/ e:v
93 •
.3 -
F\oc`coo ar'OrPA
NOW CR RAWER,
.2 PARCEL 0, mtrasaa
1
.r
1J.
''sai
..tee.
(�
.'
/
so'
a P
J Y.
✓ „•
erg ✓
_^pn
PROPOSED 30 LP
OF 18" HDPE
a:
J\
PROPOSED 30 LE
OF 18" 11DPE
PERMIT BOX {-.
RAIN GAUGE s,7
DITCH JH3
4
•
II.
DITCH JH2
0
(1,t
BRIDGETTE DAMS
DEED BOOK 3980 PAGE 792
•
> a.
��5�)
1.00,
a'`-:2 v
C't•"
7J
L03
„9
�2V
PARCEL IC IIXOSPr
DEED BOOK SSW PAGE 529
52,
res
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
0001111111114
SEAL
a"
FULL SCALE: 1"=150
0 150 300
REVISIONS: PLOT DATE:
8/20/2021
RELEASED FOR:
FINAL RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT NAME:
STRAWBERRY HILL MITIGATION PROJECT
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DRAWING TITLE:
EROSION CONTROL
PROJECT NUMBER:
0674
PROJECT MANAGER
JRM
DESIGNED:
BRC
DRAWN:
SCF
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
EC2

Appendix B
Vegetation Assessment Data

Appendix B. Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 5. Strawberry Hill Riparian Buffer Planted Species Summary
Common Name
Species
Zone 1
Zone 2
Total
Planted Amount
River birch
Betula nigra
10
10
1,600
Buttonbush
Cephalanthus occidentalis
5
5
800
Yellow poplar
Liriodendron tulipifera
10
10
1,600
Wax Myrtle
Morella cerifera
5
10
1,000
Swamp tupelo
Nyssa bora
5
5
800
American sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
10
10
1,600
Laurel oak
Quercus laurifolia
5
10
1,000
Overcup oak
Quercus lyrata
10
10
1,600
Swamp chestnut oak
Quercus michauxii
10
10
1,600
Water oak
Quercus nigra
10
10
1,600
Willow oak
Quercus phellos
10
10
1,600
Bald cypress
Taxodium distichum
10
0
1,000
TOTAL
15,800
Table 6. Strawberry Hill Riparian Buffer Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Plot #
Planted
Stems/Acre
Volunteer
Stems/Acre
Total
Stems/Acre
Success
Criteria
Met?
Average
Planted Stem
Height (ft)
1
850
0
850
Yes
1.6
2
809
0
809
Yes
1.6
3
647
0
647
Yes
1.6
4
769
0
769
Yes
1.7
5
971
0
971
Yes
1.6
6
850
0
850
Yes
1.5
7
809
0
809
Yes
1.3
8
809
0
809
Yes
1.5
9
809
0
809
Yes
1.4
10
809
0
809
Yes
1.4
11
567
0
567
Yes
1.3
12
567
0
567
Yes
1.3
13
526
0
526
Yes
1.9
Project Avg.
753
0
753
Yes
1.5

Appendix B. Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 7. Strawberry Hill Riparian Buffer Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Strawberry Hill Riparian Buffer
Current Plot Data (MYO 2022)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species
Type
101038-01-0001
101038-01-0002
101038-01-0003
101038-01-0004
101038-01-0005
101038-01-0006
101038-01-0007
101038-01-0008
101038-01-0009
101038-01-0010
PnoL!
P-all
T
PnoL;
P-all
T
PnoL!
P-all
T
PnoL',
P-all
T
PnoL!
P-all
T
PnoL',
P-all
T
PnoL;
P-all
T
PnoL!
P-all
T
PnoL',
P-all
T
PnoL!
P-all
T
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
2
2
2
3
3
3
2
2
2
3
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
1
1
1
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
1
1
1
3
3
3
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
4
4
4
2
2
2
5
5
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
Morella cerifera
wax myrtle
shrub
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
4
4
4
6
6
6
1
1
1
1
1
1
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
2
2
2
4
4
4
2
2
2
4
4
4
5
5
5
Quercus laurifolia
laurel oak
Tree
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
4
4
4
3
3
3
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
5
5
5
1
1
1
4
4
4
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
1
1
1
3
3
3
2
2
2
5
5
5
7
7
7
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
4
4
4
3
3
3
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
Tree
3
3
3
8
8
8
4
4
4
1
1
1
4
4
4
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
21
21
21
20
20
20
16
16
16
19
19
19
24
24
24
21
21
21
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
9
9
9
8
8
8
9
9
9
8
8
8
7
7
7
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
8
8
8
850
850
850
809
809
809
647
647
647
769
769
769
971
971
971
850
850
850
809
809
809
809
809
809
809
809
809
809
809
809
Strawberry Hill Riparian Buffer
Current Plot Data (MYO 2022)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species
Type
101038-01-0011
101038-01-0012
101038-01-0013
MY0 (2022)
PnoL!
P-all
T
PnoL;
P-all
T
PnoL!
P-all
T
PnoL',
P-all
T
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
3
3
3
18
18
18
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
2
2
2
9
9
9
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
33
33
33
Morella cerifera
wax myrtle
shrub
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
23
23
23
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo
Tree
1
1
1
5
5
5
15
15
15
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
1
1
1
18
18
18
Quercus laurifolia
laurel oak
Tree
4
4
4
2
2
2
24
24
24
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
16
16
16
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
1
12
12
12
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
20
20
20
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
34
34
34
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
Tree
20
20
20
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
14
14
14
14
14
14
13
13
13
242
242
242
1
1
1
13
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.32
7
7
7
9
9
9
5
5
5
12
12
12
567
567
567
567
567
567
526
526
526
753
753
753

Appendix C
Riparian Buffer
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos

Strawberry Hill Riparian Buffer Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos (MYO)
is € ii
,
r _ , k [ r r
•:7:1q, l' ,4-•,', ._., A-2;-$.,'Iry..'tgie,';",,z- $1
, '$ r $ - y A- s '4 Sr �' r ^` '�T =o a'.3Nf ga.
� � � 4ft"
is�LR e�,T€iv'� .,� Dz�' ,.1�.r �'�vZ �q n tl "ai Yc iri - - ,�, 7 ' m +�;'" t _ ..�n_. a _ .' .. ' ' .ass"a' k - & S o,
Vegetation Plot 1 (3/15/2022) Vegetation Plot 2(3/15/2022)
a Y
Y +
i'-,..,,,,'.',' , '. ,, ill -p . ),,f,/
'
a cmas��
,x ir.� P r 4 <
s., ,, '° Y ��- $ a` '-2 '.�i %. a
.' n�' xu "� j Yak.,, � � £ti'
/ z .e fit,y � -
S T =�nFc- 4-�h
r
•
'": � ... 'w�E' {: 3h i5"'= sa e,s,xt 3 ..... W ' m� �'b�_� .. _ _
Vegetation Plot 3 (3/15/2022) Vegetation Plot 4 (3/15/2022)

p
vas
�� M - 3
y
<,�a3.}1if • %.. -,�5 sg; t, wi. - s• #y t,'
,�� �_ � 1 �r.._ Vie_ v x
e y � "�
e _, - •
1 __ .1.-_..,..- rrl . .d x - a w> M .. .r' Mh A a�`�so:3:�..
Vegetation Plot 5 (3/15/2022) Vegetation Plot 6(3/15/2022)
S ill
., 3
a b & ¢ Lit . J '---.. —
111 �t+ _ -` '" .M•.n i ; s"ems xA F'a
P i i.0 ��i F- y
.-: ` 73 r r. ra p 1.ON a .9 -3.' �, ,L • 4�i p, `Y -.eb� ac:c r °' 1 3t°
ilpflitor
' - J 'r ' .. ,sue �, `°? l - �' M1'� TA.,a 4b�' , "' �:
?- -;, ` .1� :1 2 -� .ryr - , r a ids=+c + y:i
° :-"" a. .�, "' 1�.m., =,f: v_ r F1=: " . Vegetation
.u ^x a � �+`'�,n.'s _ ,a< .c,,-
Vegetation Plot 7(3/15/2022) Vegetation Plot 8(3/15/2022)

r
x ---su• I� w t A akl ....',...:„1,--:',1--
i a t�a5 -f:W tr - - . fi
r
\\ 1 1
1
'
p4 • _ i....,„..„.
u$- T s .n_, ��e
.: iz < :gS < %AO
Vegetation Plot 9(3/15/2022) Vegetation Plot 10(3/15/2022)
c,„ .,_ ....,,,,.,
woo
r :.;_..,,.., _,,, -:-- ,.. ----
...
... 1... .....,...44 ,_
,.„
1 P q. "NIMEtb.- ,......re I ,.. _ , _
t,.., .
7` — i r, it
► , l
iik,_,.. li,
d'6 '1 "Zb L :.. L. .ram#- .
.`.4 d- SS'-t_ M 'R. b aYx f,;= YD x* Y .�K .g
P.
-- ',;4 N1 e ; - $k�wy,-�{6 , k, i -- Y y,ff x- - i7.!:;...,..'„,,1416.1'
::-,_,;:-..1-::;i:it::,-,1„::,-,t-,..,,,,w-',.
# ' ,y7 t 'vl�Sac .S, n , �,� -.x Y67
� �fip1r: `.
.'�t - "cam ^ - r �- .-
,� , ,-SI, Y: � L: .. s :ems .av� r ,ki.r4c+. .. . ` � .. .'4! k tg
Vegetation Plot 11 (3/15/2022) Vegetation Plot 12 (3/15/2022)

a
8v ion a rd'� �� x k:4 � '' ,,,t1' ° -" c
1
r ya'- .v�� '°*`,. r G e 1` E a, .-:k .: h .o
s. l *` a _, w{ fit...; t"+ s
Vegetation Plot 13 (3/15/2022)