20051290 Ver 1_Monitoring Report_20140619

McCAIN STREAM RESTORTION SITE
EEP ID (IMS #443)
USACE ACTION ID # 200521090
DWQ 401# Issued by default
CLOSEOUT REPORT
Stream Restoration Project
s
g
,UN 1 9 2014
Project Setting & Classifications
County
Randolph
General Location
Sophia, NC
Basin:
Yadkin
Ph sio ra hic Region:
Piedmont
Ecore ion:
Carolina Slate Belt
USGS Hydro Unit:
03040103
NCDWQ Sub - basin:
03 -07 -09
Wetland Classification
NA
Thermal Regime:
Warm
Trout Water:
No
Monitoring Year 5
October 2013
Supplemental Planting
November 2013
Project Performers
February 2013
Source Agency:
DOT /EEP
Provider:
NA
Designer:
KCI
Monitoring Firm
Ward
Consulting/Axiom
Channel Remediation
NA
Plant remediation
Carolina Silvics
Property Interest Holder
DOT
Project Activities and Timeline
Milestone
Month -Year
Project Instituted
Aril 2003
Permitted
August 2005
Construction Completed
March 2009
As -built survey
July 2009
Monitoring Year -1
December 2009
Monitoring Year -2
November 2010
Monitoring Year 3
November 2011
Monitoring Year 4
November 2012
Monitoring Year 5
October 2013
Supplemental Planting
November 2013
Invasive Species Treatment
February 2013
Closeout Submission
May 2014

Project Setting and Background Summary
The McCain Stream Restoration Site (Site) consisted of restoration of 2,470 linear,feet of stream; however, 52
linear feet of channel is located within a power, line utility right -of -way and has therefore been excluded from
credit assets, resulting in 2417 Stream Mitigation Units (SMUs): The Site is located one mile southeast of the
intersection of Lake Lucas Road (SR 1518) and Spero Road (SR 1504) in Sophia, Randolph County, North
Carolina. The Site will be protected by a permanent conservation easement held by NCDOT and is contained
within a parcel owned by Ms. Sigrid N. McCain., The project -reach is located in. the Yadkin River Basin, within
W, t4tedtStates- Giological' Society (USES) Hydrologic Unit 030401,03050050. The drainage area at the Site
outfall_'is 0 88 square miles. The contributing drainage area consists of: forest (67 0/6), agriculture (16 %),
,►
rangeland (12 %); and`urban (4 %) land use /land cover.
Prior Ito: construction; the Site was characterized as an active farm with a portion of the ,property dedicated to
pasture .and:llvestock! grazing. Primary land uses on the property include rangeland, agriculture (small grain),
and hardwood forest. Portions of the stream had been relocated in the past�and livestock had access to the entire
project reach. The stream was characterized as entrenched and narrow, with low to moderate sinuosity. The
project restored 2,470 linear- feet of stream using Priority 2 restoration by constructing a new meandering
channel and excavating a floodplain bench. The channel has not needed repair post construction, 90
containerized hardwood species were installed in November 2013 to address area of low vigor or density. Site
actiurties provide 2,417 SMUs:
Goal's and Obiectives
Project Goals
• Restore stable stream channel morphology that is capable of moving flows and•sediment provided by its
watershed.
• Restore,riparian buffer habitat and functions.
• Improve water quality, to the receiving watershed by reducing bank erosion�and bed degradation.
• Improve aquatic habitat: ,
Project Objectives
• Build an appropriate C4,chanriel with,stable channel dimensions.
• Plant a functional Bottomlad Hardwood Forest community to create an effective - riparian buffer.
• Exclude livestock from the riparian areas.
Success, Criteria
Performance Standard
Result
Vegetation: Vegetation, success criteria dictate that an
Based on the number of planted stems counted,
average density of 320 stems per acre must be
average densities were measured at 358 planted` stems
surviving in the first three monitoring years.
per acre (excluding,livestakes) surviving in year 5
Subsequently, 290 stems per acre must-be surviving in
(2013). Vegetation was successful over the 5 -year
ear 4 and 260 -stems per acre in year 5. -
monitorin period.
Streams: Success criteria for stream restoration will
Stream morphology emulates the:restoration design
be assessed using measurements of stream dimension,
plans and as -built channel, no significant changes have .
pattern, and profile; site photographs; visual
occurred in channel morphology. ,
assessments; and vegetation sampling. Stream success
criteria are based on significant changes in channel,
morphology between baseline- measurements and the
present monitoring ear.
Streams: Success criteria for stream restoration will
A total of five bankfiill events were documented to
include documentation of two bankfull channel events
have occurred during'the five year•monitoring period.
during the monitoring period. In the event that, less
Bankfull events occurred in separate,monitoring years
than two bankfull events occur during the first five
(2009, 2010, and 2013). Stream restoration should
years, monitoring will continue until the second-event
be considered successful over the 5 -year
is documented. In addition, bankfull events must
monitoring period
occur during separate monitoring ,ears.
Page 2 of 17

McCain
# 44.3 Asset Tabfe
Non
Pre —
Mitigation Units
Wetland
Mitigation
Restoration
Construction
Mitigation
Watershed
As -Built Linear
Mitigation
Units
Segment/Reach
(acreage/linear
Approach
Acreage
Footage /Acreage
Ratio
(SMUnits
feet
0
0
0
0
0
STREAM
Reach l
1 490
P2
563
286
1 1:1
286
Reach 2
1 1955
P2
563
2183
1 1:1
2131*
Mll ■ .F�' 4 dt n k' .n. S n'.�"'i
52 If Utihty ROW excised 11 credits
MITIGATION UNIT TOTALS
Stream
Riparian
Non
'Total
Mitigation Units
Wetland
riparian
Wetland
Riparian
Nutrient
(SMU)
Units
Wetland
(WMU)
Buffer
Offset
Units
2,417
0
0
0
0
0
Page 3 of 17

Page 4 of 17
Prepared bY'
Prepared for
ASSET MAP
D� by FIGURE
Ka,uc�F
McCAIN STREAM RESTORATION
Date
EEP PROJECT NUMBER 443
Doc 2013
bra aMawruo.
inn
}'d11:11 Y'!. ..
Randolph County, North Carolina
°r0j0C
12-004 11
Page 4 of 17

RA'
Ft gu re 3. Soils
!�Sc=
Wry Clunmy Siltla w.. N Suutss
kSiltyCkvLo�rn r cAts
.1 ll l i i� 1t C.B,,. l k Silt l.otm 0 D anae
.... DopeSuttlyLoar.
I tAv.TswtnCano&
Page 5of17
Nkcain Site
I
Y.f6 0 9:tj kc

Axi m Ehvironm 121 CURRENT CONDITIONS PLAN VIEW KRJ/ LF FIGURE
216 Snow Avenue MCCAIN STREAM RESTORATION
R*MQh. NC 27.603 EEP PROJECT NUMBER 443 SOM 2013 ��
(9191 215.1603 Randolph County. North Carolina Pf "102
77-0M 14
Page 6 of 17

a
kn
�
kn
00
00
all
�
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
b
F
R
aw
Qt
r-
0
a�
on
a

A
u1
h
rA
ice, 1
U
a
U
V
s1
i
i
wr.1.
i
b
7
11
17
w.w
�w
i
i
i
rl �
r
I
R
s
s 1
I
i
1
■ i
;
s
E e e e e e t e a e
8
P
4
w.w
s1
i
i
wr.1.
i
b
7
11
17
w.w
�w
ire
i
;
rl �
r
I
r
s 1
e
;
E e e e e e t e a e
ire
1
a
i
;
r
I
r
s 1
e
R
6
3
5
o
S
c S
5
S
w11r�e
1
a

s1
.7
o°
a�
�s
A
h
0
N
P
8r
w
SSS {•
a
f
A
N
g�
i
a�
(04) U09"913
4.
a
a
o
R�
M7A
4A
1
NONE
NEI1i
A
h
0
N
P
8r
w
SSS {•
a
f
A
N
g�
i
a�
(04) U09"913
4.
a
a

IV
�
■
@-
■
�
■
k
�
�
�
■
�
�
0
0
/
a
a
�
4L .§
2
2
4
a
8
�
2
2
2
�
#
R
k
-
k
2
§
�
fn
o
�
`
R
�
0
0
/
a

O
bA
c�
>-
LO
i
i
N
r
�
M
O
r
CD
M
M
N
r
N
M
M
O
N
CO
N
qT
N
LO
O
O
Cn
�
`LO
i
M
v
r
�'
CD
Ln
N
d
m
Im
LO
N
N
ccn
i
i
i
M
Ln
N
N
N
LO,
N
r
N'
N
N
L
L
V
M
CO
CO
LO
M
M
O
M
CO
.-
CO
CO
i
N
i
l4
}
N
CD
M
N
O
co
I-
N
CO
v
LO
N
M
In
e-
N
M
v
°Cp
C
N
}
(D
to
N
qT
M�
CO
M,
OD
1
1
1
C
C
N
}
M
Cn'
O
Cn
'CO
qT
N
�
M
O
O
_O
+'
M
LO
N
�'
N
O
M
M
M
LO
N
�M
�=
N
N
r
N
O
0
H
}
LO
LD
M
i
LO
N
r
CA
14,
�
N
Iq
r_
CO
O
`
LO
N
M
C
2
LO
r-
U
r
N
N
N
�
U
4)
O
ID
LO
N
(D
i,
r
4)
M
(0
r
u
O
00
r
NO
c�
N
�,
N
M
O
N
CO
M
Lf)
N
LO
N
M
cn
N
N
M
CO
V
M
N
00
U')
M
Cn
(O
i
v
M
N
O
r
N
(n
y
LO
�
L
�
C
M
M
M
M
~
In
r
~
O
M
v
i
M
co
O
i
N
N
CO
r
N
M
N
M
a
2
m
V
I,
N
M
M
N
L
v
L
'
}
M
M
co
�
COQ
CO
Q
O
M'
0
M
d
,
.
M
'N
O
i�
I
i
CD
0
N
�'
N
V
N
O
LO
r
r
N
:Q
v
C
N
O
V
_
�
�+
�-
co
000
0
L
LO
_
CO
c0
�"
0
"
CO
w
CO
CO
`-
M
r--
(D
CN
t
N
O
N
+
M
(0
N
n
C
O
V
N
,
N
O
10
LD
r
r
O
d
E
a
y
O
N
to
�
,-
Cn
O
�
Cn
N
�-
M
N
L
co
M
2
V
i(V
`-'
N
v
n
4
LO
N
�
U
U
m
0
N
1
M
�
M
M
CO
�'
r
CA
N
,
N
00
i
CD
f+
CO
LO
N
O
r
M
N
m
cn
CO
r
N
N
N
O
E
`
LO
LO
N
W
M
M
N
M
r
O
}
A
M
I`
N
O
�
CD
N
p
LO
V0
%
-W
c-
cN-
r
CM7
Ln
N
v
r
r
N
m
C
O
'�
�
�.
O
LO
I-
M,
d
LO
O,
N
O
cD
00
N
LO
0
t
dA
cP
r
i=
N
r
v
N
LO
N
�-
N
N
LO
L
u,
O
Vi
V
V
M
v
N
CD
I-
Cn
00
00
CY)
M
0
N
CD
N
n
M
N
�
N
to
n
O
I-
I-
I-
o
00
}
V
N
O
N
to
M
O
00
O
N
CO
r
I
N
M
M
V)
N
r
N
O
M
O
r
r
r
m
v
v
'
q1t
O
V
C
N
�
r
LO
M
M
CO
I-
N
c!')
M
M
LO
C
C
N
}
LO
Cn
O
M
0)
'CA
(0
V
O
LO
Cn
(n
.�
A
00
M
O
r
�oO
�
0)
M
A
M
N
`-
O
O
O
O
N
C
V
LO
N
r
E
N
M
N
M
N
CD
co
N
N
M
M
N
N
Q
tr
r
r
N
cam-
N
0
N
i-
N
y
O
LO
�,
LO
CO
'0
�-
N
M
n
Ch
CO
N
m
(D
M
�-
.-
00
N
N
m
N
ti
r
M
O
O
O,
L
a0
7
w
w
w
N
W
W
W
�
O
=
L
t
«
w
N
cc
-
O
.r
>
£
a
v_
a
o
s
Q
r
a
Q
rn
o
�
'>
E
v
a
a
aD
a
L
..
.,
O
m
r—
N
��
—
O
N
c
x
ip
ZE
N
c
m
x
W
(0
Y
N
O
C
y
€3
Y
c
g—
p,
o
C'
y
c
a
mC
a
ca
to
$p
O
w
Y
Ui
c
w
p
Y
Cn
c'
cu
Y
t�
m
m
O
Y
3
Y.
m
Gt
N
,m
p
Y
74
C
Im
U
N
m
m
U
ca
Y
N
'E
—
m
cco
m
im
'a
—
in
M
CO
V
Y
m
V
Y
m
L
Cif
c
L
tU
c
w
w
�O
O
�m
m
Fs
O
bA
c�

6
W
W
Y
a
C
u �
m � 7
� A
S m L c
N
n a F F
c
c�L
N N G
>a�
0 0
4.
O
N
Qu
to
C�
a
N
N
n N
N
M
W
M
W
n
N
d
fn
O
y
W
70
F
M
N
M
r
W
r
J
N
O
A
T
6
O
n
d
W
ffl
a
��
F
wt
T
r
n
T
r
T N
M
r
W
N
<
M
fe
d
N
O
O
n
N
N
M
W
�
W
J
J
�
f�l
N
N
yR
7
YY
O
F
a
�
o
S
W
g
3
e
�p
r
r
T
♦
N
co
<
r
N P
O
f"
6
O
n
�
go
N
r
M
r
W r
y
"+
s
8
N
X71
M
N
N
M
aMf
0
r
0
�
n
Jg
yy
yy (y�
�yi y�I
yy
(y1 yy
y{�
�y! {{l�
}y� �yI
y{� }��1
q
y
y
� • Yjy fit+
N
u
A
V
w
l
}Y
8
Q
�•CC
N
7
�
V
N
A
�
x
7
V
u
�
Y
«�
G
�
L
V
'
N
N
y N N
I
x x
V
6�:
Y
a
C
u �
m � 7
� A
S m L c
N
n a F F
c
c�L
N N G
>a�
0 0
4.
O
N
Qu
to
C�
a

r
N C
a� 4
' A
«z
A�
z�
o 's
C
A
Y
V 4
Aa
HUJI
W
v
m
t
m
C_
'O
u
N �
d
Y '
A yiy
x
y
nan
N II
C 5 Q It
a a r r
abb
� « L
L y
N N
d4E
.ti M a
N
y
7
0'
0
" 0 0
LL
_Q
O
cn
N
C�
a
n.Ni
N
ID
Mn
a
N
0OO
-0
N
00
W
N
a
01
n
V1
O
U1
a
0+
n
a
N
"
N
0
I'D
I
N
00
'�
n
Qt
r
a
0+
a
0
00
do
n
O
N
N
101
n
�
d
o
a
N
y�
^
V1
a
tD
Ol
Jg
F-"
r
"
..
..
IM
%D
0
IN
V
o
r
°
non
coo
co
a
v+
M.+�
naD
n
A
n
s
d
c
a
m
M
a
U1
01
M
.�
lD
'I
c
.1
ao
(11
d
n
�
d
A
In
CIO
co
Inir.
N
N
�
C
.�
I
I
•+
I
N
lufal
10
I
I
N
~
N
N
I
r
I
N
n
'+
A
�j
=
00
00
a
u1
0)
N
N
n
00
00
00
n
o
4
>d
00
M
a
0
01
N
N
n
O
CO
rl
g"
i71
n
^'
r
N
ITT
'+
N
r
n
R
coo
.I
CIO
a
N
1A
oo
Nao
nOo
N
nN01
—
n
�
d
O
LA
y�
00
.+
M
IT
N
0
00
N
m
O
Jg
IL
•+
2
N
N
a
•o
�
'~
N
n
0�0
a
✓1
m
.+
N
m
n
ao
Qt
o
,Mn
IN
N
M
a
M
Jt
00
.+
N
oo
N
N
O
H
H
r
R
d
8
�
c
o
V
E 6
y
r y
N
V
•
QyI
L
Qy1
0J
0y1
01
yy
6i
�y1
07
yy
0J
yy
01
QyI
L
yy
0!
Qy�
OI
0y!
01
Qy�
C�
yy
0!
yy
L
QyI
0!
Qy!
01
0
yy
0J
7
7
L
7
N
N E
1
-0
6
6
P..
1
C
L
.
V
V
L
rrrrrrH
V
L
L
L
L
x
w
L
L
IAOILA
L
y
Y
A
9
Q
0
�
C
►
y
d
E
c
21,
C
Lc I
d
M
u
6,3
v
N
2
C
Q
0
J
u
3
•,n
d
A
d
R
Z
c
q
C
A
A=
TO
t"
C
M
0J
17
C
$
Q
C
E
v
A
E
O
m
c
c`
m"
5
1f-q
c
7:
C
E
N
L►
LQ�
0
.�.
�_
rJ
N
CS
��JJJ
c�
A�
N�
a
�
c�
a,
N
C
e
e
e
X.0
E
c
Y
bLL
=
�L
dr?,c'0,15,9
==
v
m
t
m
C_
'O
u
N �
d
Y '
A yiy
x
y
nan
N II
C 5 Q It
a a r r
abb
� « L
L y
N N
d4E
.ti M a
N
y
7
0'
0
" 0 0
LL
_Q
O
cn
N
C�
a

E'EP Recommendation and Conclusion
Stream points considered areas of concern during previous monitoring years have recovered and
vegetation has established. The project stream reaches are stable and functioning as intended.
Based -on the number of stems,counted, average densities were measured at 358 planted stems
per -acre (excluding livestakes) surviving in year 5 (2013). The dominant planted species
identified at the Site included river birch (Betula mgra), silky dogwood (Cornus amomum),
green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), American sycamore (Platanus occzdentalis), and willow
oak (Quercus phellos). Six of the seven individual °plots met success criteria based on planted
stems alone. Plot? was below success criteria based on planted stems alone; however,,when
including'naturally'recruited stems of box elder (Acer negundo), green ash, tulip poplar
(Liriodendron tulipifera), and American sycamore °plot 7 was well -above 260 stems per acre.. In
summary, the Site has met vegetation and stream performance standards. EEP,recommends the
site be closed,generating 2,417 SMUs.
Contingencies
- No contingencies are proposed for this site
Page 14 of 17

�� r. * .
,�,
A f .
J�. ��
�.. .
-i�,
f., �.
r
� — �. —
��: '.'r
r
' � 6
'.Y.".
`.�s
i'
1
' i
.�
.. .,� _
a
. ;��
.',
� J,-
`� . � . }'
-...L_...,Y.._... ..n .
�!+ � S.
A t :- � �
�—= +• :'�
�. :`�� it � � �.

poor-

Appendix A: Watershed Summary
443- McCain Property
Watershed Characteristic Overview
The McCain Property stream restoration project is, located in Randolph County,, approximately 3
miles west of the City of Asheboro in the Yadkin Pee -Dee River Basin. It is located within HUC
03040103050050, the Back Creek watershed, which is listed as a Targeted Local Watershed
(TLW) in the 2009 Lower Yadkin Pee -Dee River Basin Restoration Priorities (RBRP) plan, as
well as in the previous 2003 RBRP.
The McCain Property is located on a UT to Back Creek which flows into the Uwharrie River
roughly 9`miles downstream of the project site. Back Creek is classified as a Water Supply
Watershed as well as a High Quality Water. Back Creek Lake, which is just downstream of the
project site, is identified as Impaired on the NCDWR 2012 303(d) List for impacts to aquatic
life. The 2009 RBRP indicates that there is a small percent of Significant Natural Heritage Areas
(SNHAs) and 15 Natural Heritage Element Occurrences (NHEOs) within the TLW. The TLW is
16% agricultural with 9 permitted animal operations, approximately 4% impervious and has 25%
non - forested buffers.
Links to Watershed Goals and Objectives
As noted in the Project Settings and Background section, the project involves 2,470 linear feet of
stream restoration along an unnamed tributary to Back Creek. The project is located in a rural
landscape with substantial forested buffer located along both sides of the stream and agricultural
uses' adjacent to the forested buffer. Prior to the restoration, the site was active "farmland with a
portion of the property dedicated to pasture and livestock grazing. Site streams were
characterized by entrenched, narrow, deep, step -pool channels with low to moderate sinuosity.
Primary land uses on the property include rangeland, agriculture (small grain), and hardwood
forest.
The project provides benefits to habitat, water quality and hydrology through the stabilization of
streambanks, establishment of a riparian buffer, exclusion of cattle, and excavation,of a
floodplain bench. These watershed improvements serve to increase stream stability and nutrient
removal capacity and reduce sediment loss, thereby reducing the volume of pollutants flowing
downstream into the designated 303(d) impaired waters of Back Creek and further protecting the
water quality of a water supply watershed.

Watershed Summary
There is one additional EEP mitigation project in this watershed, Heath Dairy. The Heath Dairy
project consists of stream restoration, enhancement and preservation and is located
approximately 2 miles upstream of the McCain Property site. There are two agricultural BMPs
that have been implemented in this watershed as well, including an impervious surface
conversion site and a critical area planting.
PH
L099nd
• EEP Prq*M Rlsr 1) 2014 CbuaAs
• EEP PrCIOM Mor 0
AVICOUril BMPS
CWMTF Prgsds
♦ 319ProNas
0 EEP Loaf WOorshed P%ns
Q EEPTU9044 LOCI Wssfn Oft
oCrWOg VnIs
o Oeultr Bo~gS
IL
c
Q
N EEP 2014 Project Closeout
0 o.s i z
W e McCain Property (Yakdin 03040103)
I�" Willi,

APPENDIX B — Land Ownership and Protection
The site protection instrument for this mitigation project includes the following document(s),
available at the specified County Registerof Deeds office:
Project
Name
Grantor
Name
County
Property Rights
Deed /Page
Plat /Page
Total
Acres
McCain
Sigrid N.
Randolph
@onservatiom
MOMONMcEasement
This property will be transferred to the NC Department of Transportation for long term
management.

i
I'
1
APPENDIX C - Jurisdictional Determination & Permits REcEl
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS VeD
WILMINGTON DISTRICT AUG g 2005
Action ID: 200521090 County: R &)E0MG
RAWf
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property - Owner: NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program
'Salam Murtada
Mailing Address: 1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699
Authorized Agent:
Mailing Address:
Telephone No.: (919) 715 -1157
Telephone No.:
Location of property,(road name /number, town,,etc.). McCain Stream Restoration project site located southwest of
the intersection of SR 1518 (Lake Lucas Road) and SR 1504) Spero Road, south,of Sphla, In Randolph County,
North Carolina. The project -is located'adjacent to unnamed tributaries of Back Creek.
Site Coordinates: 3546'4.96 ON 795118.82 °W _ USGS Quad: Randleman
Waterway: Back Creek River Basin: Yadkin
HUG 03040101
Description of projects area and activity (see page 2 for a summary of authorized impacts): Proposed McCain Stream
Restoration Project as described in your construction plan included with yourtapplication of July 08, 2005, to
restore 2,475 linear feet of stream channel of the jurisdictional waters of unnamed tributaries of,Back Creek. The
entire, restoration reach Is contained on,property owned by the Terry W. and Sigrid Nissen McCain and includes a
100 foot conservation buffer administered by EEP.
Applicable Law: ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
❑ Section 10 (Rivers and ,Harbors.Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Nationwide or Regional General Permit Number(s): 27
Your work'is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in striet,accordance with the attached
conditions and your submitted plans. Any violation of the attached conditions,or,deviation from yoursubmitted plans may subject the
perrnittee'to a.stop work order, a restoration order and/or appropriate legal action
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authonzation is modified,
suspended or revoked If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and/or
modified, this verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all requirements of
the modified nationwide permit. Ifthe,nation%ide permit authorization expires =or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the
activity would no longer comply with the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i e., are
under construction) or are under contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain, authorized provided the
activity is completed within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation, unless
discretionary authority has been exercised,on a case -by -case basis, to, modify, suspend or revoke the authorization.
Activities ^ subject to Section 404�(as indtcatedlabovc) may also,require an individual, Section 401 Water'Quality Certification. You
should contact the NC'Division of Water Quality (telephone [phone]) to determine Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (LAMA),
prior to beginning work you must•contact the N.0 Division of Coastal Management.
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the,responsibility to obtain any other required Federal,
State or local Vprovals/permits.
If there are any questions regarding #is verificapqn and of the conditionscof the Permit, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory
program, please contact John Thona it telepho a (9 9) 876 -9441, ext 25:
Corps,Regulatory Official ALYA. Date: 0712612005 Verification )expiration Date: 0311812007,
Page 1 of 2

Copy Furnished
Page 2 of 2

WILMINGTON DISTRICT
POST— CONSTRUCTION COMPLIANCE FORM
Action ID Number: 200521090 County: Randolph
Permittee: NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program Salam Murtada
A
Date Permit Issued: 07/26/2005
Project Manager:, John Thomas
Upon completion of the activity authorized by th6 permit and any mitigation required by the permit,
sign this certification and return it to the following address:
US Army Corps Of Engineers
Wilmington District
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls Of The Neus_e Road
Suite 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
Please note that your permitted activity is subject to a compliance inspection by a U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers representative. If you fail to comply with this permit you are subject to permit suspension,
modification, or revocation.
I hereby certify that the work authorized by the above referenced. permit has been completed in
accordance with the terms and condition of the said permit, and required mitigation was, completed in
accordance with the permit conditions.
Signature of Permittee Date
s

N M. N5w;W
IT10 A W UU PROCESS
S E.
XIA:
Applicant: NC Ecosystem Enhancement
File Number: 200521090
I
Date: 67/26/2005'
Program Salam Murtada
Attached
is:
See Section below
F
-INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of
A
permission) I
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Pen-nit or Letter of permission)
B
PERMIT DENIAL
C
I
r7
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
and op I ihiin al oftheabove
tiph'sregaraii4an W istrative ap
-T*
�g (;Z "'C',
;decision dditi&flal,!ihfdfiffation;i��bef(5und.-it'htti�: iuske.annw ffiivifid c on to
ha tibn­s',a_U3%1C-FR--,A
A. INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received,a Standard Permit,,you may,sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization, If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may,accept,the LOP-and your work is authon7ed Your signature
on the Standard,Peniut or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the pen-nit-
• OBJECT: if you object to the permit (Standard•or LOP) because of certain terms-and conditions therein, you may request that the
permit be modified accordingly. You must complete,Section 11 of this form and return the form to (he. district engineer Your
objections must be received by the district engineur'within 60 days of the date of this notice, of yquox ill forfeit your right to appeal,
the,pennit in the future. Upon receipt of your,letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may (a) modify the
permit to,address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address,some of your objections, of (c) not modify the permit
having determined that the permit should be issued,as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the district engineer
will send,you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Secuon B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT- If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and retum.it to,the district engineer for-final
authorization, If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), yowma y accept the LOP and your work is authorized Your signature
on the Standard Permit,or acceptance of the LOP means that you acceputhe permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to,appeal the
perinit,including its terms,and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the Permit.
* APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you
may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Proem by completing Section H of this form
and sending the form to the division engineer This, form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of
this notice.
,C: PERMIT,DENIAL: You may appeal,the denial of a permit under the Corps,of Engineers Adminis•ative Appeal Proces s'by
completing Section .11 of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be-received by the division engineer
-within,60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or -
provide new information.
• ACCEPT- You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of
this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, an&waiye,,all rights, to appeal the approved JD.,
• APPEAL: if you disagree widi the•approved'JI), you,may appeal the approved JD under the Corps Of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section 11 of this-form and sending the fbriwto the division engineer This form must be received by
the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice

E. PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps
regarding the preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved
JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide=new
information forTurther consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
.�.- ,y��,+� `_- '.,-T -.,1+ 'C]" '� ^— c'.ii;�`'.._ ,..,..+.5-s� fti -t. - "'sip "'r�ry- r�..+. - '4 + "__w,.•�- -CF' '1r�
w {' � 1 (^ + � .. +�: ? 4T i-{x',: •^�Ye• -'• 1 A ��i h' r3+. �fY. .) y (• T� Y � iv- ! ") g. M 1 •� y
• 4 1 K3:4 Y. •lv. `r Y iJ FY T.. t` ' . t -`t'A: •� _ _ - .hr'Y,. �.•`•1 +' �::2 yY..+.,4 .Yi �%+ '.C'•
Y� v_ 7 r M1 5�. ' 7'�_
t •.Z 't • \..^ 'J`. _�, ek {'J�` iH`,. lt.Si•i• .i L +.,.�t�
•1.. � L
�]/'+ T 7�� 7` -i J f �,•. "i 4i c:� a t
��S ECTI 1V �114• �
4 'RE - iJEST�F.OR APPE•AL�'or; OBJECTIONS' TOAN�INITIALaPROFF
� ,ERED'�PERMIT; ��:• ���x:,>,
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your
objections to an initial'proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to
this form to clarify where,your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to�a review of the administrative record, the Corps
memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the
review officer has determined is,needed to clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps
may add new information or analyses to the record. However, you may provide additional information to clarify
the location of information that is already in the administrative record
,POINT•OFtCONTACT`F`ORR r UESTI NS "OR
If you have questions regarding this decision
and'or the appeal process you may contact:
If you only have questi ns regarding,the appeal process you
may also contact: �i 61211
John Thomas
Mr. A:rl itfid ton, Administrative Appeal Review
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Officer
US Army Corps of Engineers
CESAD- ET -CO -R
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
Raleigh, North Carolina 276,15
60.Forsyth Street, Room,9Ml'5
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -8801
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any
government consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You
will be provided a 15 day notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site
investi ations.
Date:
Telephone number:
St Mature of a ellant or agent.
IDIVISION ENGINEER:
Commander
U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic
60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -3490

file / /M/ EEP% 2OPROJECT% 2OLIBRARY %2OFILES /PROJECT%o2ODELIVEK OPiedmont/McCam( 443) /Pemuts/Mccain %2Onotice %20of %20401 txt
From: Salam Murtada [salmn [e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 3:33 PM
To:MelonieAllen
Cc: 'Tim Morris'
Subject: Re: McCain Addendum #1 and Agenda
Tim/Melonie
The 401 was issued`by default w/o paper permit. I thmk we can just proceed-based on the assumption that DWQ is fine the project. Thanks!
Salam
Melonie Allen wrote:
>Tim/Salam,
>I've,attached the 404 and,S &EC permits toAhis.message. I think the 401
>was statutory; Salam, Daryl'Lamb of DWQ, and I visited the site back on
>8/24/05 and he had no issues with the site. Salam let me know that we
>could proceed butl don't know if we ever received a hard copy of the
>401. Salam, do you have a copy of the 401 ?
> Thanks,
> Melonie °
> Melonie Allen
>NG EEP
>From: Tim Morris [mailto:tmorris @kci.com]
>Sent; Wednesday, April 23; 2008 2:49 PM
>To: ' Melonie Allen'; ' Salam Murtada'
>Cc: 'Adam Spiller'
> Subject: RE: McCain Addendum #1 and Agenda
> Melonie,
>When you�get a chance could you send meka PDF or fax of the.,LQ, 4,01 and
>404 permits for the project file.
> Thanks,
>Tim
file / /M/ EEPo/ 20PROJECT %20LIBRARY %2OFILES/PROJE Cam( 443) /Pertmts /McCain%2Onotice %2Oof%20401'txt (1 of 3) [5/19/2014 9 00 15'AM]

file / //R]/ EEP %20PROJECT%20LIBRARY%20FILES / PROJECT %o20DELIVER- OPiedmont/McCatn( 443)/ Permrts/McCaui %20nohce %20ot%20401 tzt
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Melonie Allen [ mailto :Melonie.Allen @ncmail.net]
>Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 2:17 PM
>To: 'Tim,Morns; 'Salam Murtada'
>Cc: 'Adam Spiller'
>Subject:,RE: McCain Addendum* I and Agenda
>
>Tim,
>I was on the phone when you called, sorry I missed you. I have reviewed
>the agenda,and,addendum 1 and both-look fine to me. Randolph Electric
>Cooperative are aware of the pending project,and have approved the
>stabilizaiion,measures :anticipated on the steep slope, they also
>requested that we keep these in,place post construction. I can state
>this at the meeting tomorrow. I do have one question, are all the
>additional spoil areas- identified in addendum 1 within the limits of
>the easement? Ms. McCain,had,agreed to allow us to use-additional area
>if necessary, I will just need to get the agreement and specific areas
>outside the easement in writing prior to breaking ground.
>Thanks,
> Melonie
> Melonie Allen
>NC EEP
>From: Tim Morris [inailto:tmorris @kci.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 200811:40 AM
>To:'Salam Murtada;'Melonie Allen'
>Cc: 'Adam Spiller'
>Subject: McCain Addendum #1 and Agenda
>Salam/Melonie,
>Attached is a PDF of Addendum•# 1 along with the Agenda for tomorrow.
>Letme know ifyou,have'any changes /additions to make ASAP.
> '
>Thanks,
>
>Tim
file / //F4/ EEP% 20PROJECT /`20LIBRARY%20FILES /PROJE Cain( 443)/ Pertmts/McCam %20notue %20ot%20401 txt (2 of 3) [5/19/2014 9 00 15 AM]

file //M/ EEP %2OPROJECT %2OLIBRARY %20FILES/ PROJECT /`20DELIVER.'OPiedmont/McCam( 443)/ Pennits/McCam %20nohce%2Oot%20401 txt
>Timothy J. Morris
>Senior Environmental Scientist
>KCI Associates of North Carolina
>4601 Six Forks Road, Suite 220
>Raleigh, NC.27609
>Office - 919- 783 -9214
>Mobile - 919 - 793 -6886
>Fax - 919 - 783 -9266
>email - tmorris @kci.com
Salam Murtada, PE, CFM
Design and Construction Unit
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Work Phone: [phone]
Fax: (9,19) 715 -2219
Me /// R4/ EEP% 20PROJECT %2OLIBRARY %2OFILES/PROJE Cain( 443) /Pernuts/ McCain %2Onohce %2Oof%20401 txt (3 of 3) [5/19/2014 9 00 15 AMj

FBI
W
F
IMM
h+�
W
1
A
z
A
a
Q
5
m
O
S M
Z O
Y �
O
U eh O
N
E
z
d
o
D
c H
00m•�
rn(L
fWd'U
r
n
r
u:
N
M
in
iv
ih
u�
N
N
O
lY
N
U
N
Q
sruo4dso4d ON
u860illN ON
(eeJ�!) AJRIg
uwsgg Rpl
(is) AIuo lasll0
luauinN JalAH
uoAsae wd
4.JLIW lelseoO
luauwaoue4u3
4sieW IalseoO
uolleajo
4siew lelseoo
uollejolsaa
4sieW IelsooO
uollemasaJd
ueueduuoN
luawaoue4u3
ueueduuoN
uolleajo
ueueduuoN
uopeaolsaa
ueueduuoN
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
N
N
Q
W
E
_
O (U
V
M O
cc
z
m
O
�=
Q
vU
o)
N
U
v al
U Y N
N
Z
a
co
V
4. J Q)
d d y
a o
2]
m
�1-
o E�
E�
-
rn�rn
n
F a�F
aIH04
ciq
c
Q
`
0 2
N
M
Ol
Vi
N f/l
EZco
Z
�ZO
al
I
V)
O
r
r
cD
co
r
O
c
0
O
O
O
C)
O
O
0
O
O
O
0
O
t
m
c_]
C'14
C
V
Q
O
O
O
O
O
O
W
N
N
N
N
N
_
H
U
J
J
m
C
C
m
F
C.
O
l9
C
A
c
N
N
w•+
E
�N'
R
�dd
u
u
aao
O
A
vE
U
J
m
m
w
c
A
c
m
m
m
I
o
m
o
m
a
c
c
c
c
d
•E
•E
.E
.E
F
d
c
c
OO
m
m
O
a
m
a�i
m
U
W
0
Imiml
lzlwl
ix
d
v
0
N
a
c+�
a
N
co
a
N
rn
N
N
O
CL
W
W
E
0
c
0
m
0
c