Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout820626_Routine_20220616Facility Number eig tv�(P Division of Water Resources Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency Type of Visit: Reason for Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: (� g-`} Arrival Time: Departure Time: Farm Name: nor -ton ent new farm Owner Name: Robett torton Mailing Address: Physical Address: Owner Email: Phone: Cogj Ar.„ Region: fro LASERFICHE JUN 2 1 2022 FAYETTEVILL REGIONALBOFFICE Facility Contact: Cuttl' Q(iJ1C Title: Tch Phone: Onsite Representative: f ( Integrator: t21€ 7tdg Certified Operator: L. Cri I ltiotloN Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Latitude: Certification Number: Certification Number: Longitude: Swine Design Current Capacity Pop. Wean to Finish Wean to Feeder Feeder to Finish Farrow to Wean Farrow to Feeder Farrow to Finish Gilts Boars Other Design Current Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Layer Non -Layer Dry Poultr Design Current Capacity Pop. Layers Non -Layers Pullets Turkeys Turkey Poults Other Cattle Design Current Capacity Pop. Dairy Cow Dairy Calf Dairy Heifer Dry Cow Non -Dairy Beef Stocker Beef Feeder Beef Brood Cow Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? 1# 4 t, ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes tyij No ❑ NA ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? TTT d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes lyLl No ❑ NA ❑ NE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes VI No ❑ NA ❑ NE 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge? Page 1 of 3 5/12/2020 Continued Facility Number: Date of Inspection: Co.,jiff t_ Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): NO 35 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thr ❑ Yes No ❑ Yes1\INo 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ElYes 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ElYes (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ElYes maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes kl No ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ElHeavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ElPAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ElTotal Phosphorus 1]Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area b 12. Crop Type(s): C 31j CjLt , 13. Soil Type(s): Nt) uJQ 161(intpn 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ElYes No ❑ NA ElNE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check 1-1Yes t No ❑ NA ElNE the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ['Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes NI No ❑ NA ElNE ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ElWaste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers E Weather Code ElRainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ElYes Ell No ElNA ❑ NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes E\ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 5/12/2020 Continued ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑NE eat, notify DWR No ❑ NA ❑ NE No ❑NA ❑NE ❑ NA ❑ NE No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes n No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Facility Number: Pj -(06? Date of Inspection: W " (0,ga 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 14.S No ❑ NA ❑ NE If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes NNo ❑ NA ❑ NE permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes NNo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary). fIP.IQ b7 vgoon hay, Some weedS may CDfYidQ± sGraHi rg. keo)rcl; (NfD: wAc1e QwiiyciS g.a-)g., 10-(pai cot, (i 30-al givdgeG.001 �.2�-P0 Min-fqo Reviewer/Inspector Name: Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date4P. 1(10.90 PhMeqlqt9flc0 9115 Page 3 of 3 5/12/2020