20220267 Ver 2_ePCN Application_20220708

Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 13, 2022 Ver 4.3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
OO Yes
O No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
OYes 0No
Change only if needed.
Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
7/8/2022
BIMS # Assigned* Version#*
20220267 2
Is a payment required for this project?*
O No payment required
O Fee received
O Fee needed - send electronic notification
Select Project Reviewer*
Chad Turlington:eads\ccturlington
Information for Initial Review
Reviewing Office*
Fayetteville Regional Office - [phone]
la. Name of project:
Dry Creek Village Subdivision
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Krissina Newcomb
lb. Primary Contact Email:*
lc. Primary Contact Phone:*
[e-mail] [phone]
Date Submitted
7/8/2022
Nearest Body of Water
Dry Creek
Basin
Cape Fear
Water Classification
C
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.45155818
A. Processing Information
Longitude:
-78.78920109
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Harnett
Is this a NCDMS Project
0Yes ONo
Is this project a public transportation project?*
0Yes ONo

la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
EI Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
O Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
0 Yes
O No
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
E Nationwide Permit (NWP)
0 Regional General Permit (RGP)
0 Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
0Yes ®No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
EO 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
0 Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
0 Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
58 - Utility Line Activities for Water and Other Substances (frequently used)
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
If. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
O Yes O No
O 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
0 Riparian Buffer Authorization
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
O Yes O No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
O Yes O No
lh. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
O Yes O No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
OYes 0No
B. Applicant Information
OYes 0No
OYes 0No
Id. Who is applying for the permit?
0 Owner O Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
OYes 0No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
INLINE PROPERTIES LLC, and Travis Scott Wester
2b. Deed book and page no.:
4068 : 0468 and 92E : 0105
2c. Contact Person:
Sam Ahmed
2d. Address
Street Address
2900 N Main St
Address Line 2
City
Fuquay-Varina
Postal / Zip Code
27526
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA

2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2f. Fax Number:
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Krissina Newcomb
4b. Business Name:
Hal Owen & Associates Inc
4c. Address
Street Address
PO Box 400
Address Line 2
City
Lillington
Postal / Zip Code
27546
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
Krissi [e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
[phone]
1. Project Information
1 b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
Dry Creek Village
lc. Nearest municipality / town:
Lillington
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
0661298122 & 0661184529
2c. Project Address
Street Address
103 Dry Creek Rd
Address Line 2
City
Lillington
Postal / Zip Code
27546
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project: *
Dry Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water: *
C
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Cape Fear
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
0303000405
4. Project Description and History
2b. Property size:
26
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA

4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: *
The 26-acre site is located on the northern side of Dry Creek Road and has one existing home. It is dominated by an agricultural field, with a forested wetland in the north eastern comer.
Land use to the west, south, and southeast is residential; to the north and south is agricultural; and to northeast is forested.
A sewer line will be constructed along Dry Creek Road from NC 210 located west of the site. The sewer line easement will encroach about 10 feet onto an undeveloped, forested parcel
dominated by wetlands. Dry Creek has been channelized and runs southeast through this parcel and into a culvert under Dry Creek Rd.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
0 Yes O No 0 Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
7
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
45
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The purpose of the project is to construct a single-family residential subdivision connected by a road and utilities (61 Lots). The proposed wetland and stream impacts are due to extension
of the sanitary sewer line from NC 210 Hwy to the subdivision.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used: *
The sewer line construction corridor will be excavated, the sewer line installed, and the area backfilled and graded to pre -construction contours. The disturbed wetlands areas will be re -
vegetated using a hydrophytic herbaceous seed mix. Permanent wetland impacts will be due to vegetation maintenance in the access corridor.
The water line on the southern side of the road may be improved (larger pipe), resulting in a temporary stream impact.
Typical subdivision construction activities includes grading and paving roads, installing utilities, grading lots, and building homes. Typical construction equipment such as excavators,
loaders, dump trucks, and graders will be utilized.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas? *
O Yes O No
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? *
0 Preliminary 0 Approved ® Not Verified 0 Unknown 0 N/A
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
6. Future Project Plans
Hal Owen & Associates, Inc.
6a. Is this a phased project?*
O Yes O No
0 Unknown
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
No future wetland or stream impacts are anticipated.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
RI Wetlands OO Streams -tributaries
Oi Open Waters 0 Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
0 Buffers
2a. Site #* (?)
2a1 Reason (?)
2b. Impact type* (?)
2c. Type of W.*
2d. W. name
2e. Forested*
2f. Type of Jurisdicition*
(?)
2g. Impact
area*
W1
sewer line
P
Headwater Forest
B
Yes
Both
0.005
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.005

2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.005
2i. Comments:
The wetland impact is due to excavation for the sewer line installation. The area will then be graded to pre -construction contours and re -vegetated using
a hydrophytic herbaceous seed mix. Permanent wetland impact due to vegetation maintenance in the access corridor.
3. Stream Impacts
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.Impact type*
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type*
(?)
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction*
3g. S. width
3h. Impact
length*
si
sewer line
Temporary
Excavation
Dry Creek
Perennial
Both
5
Average (feet)
33
(linear feet)
S2
water line
Temporary
Excavation
Dry Creek
Perennial
Both
5
Average (feet)
10
(linear feet)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
0
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
43
3j. Comments:
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
43
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Wetlands and streams were excluded from all subdivision lots. The stormwater basin in the northeast corner was configured to avoid wetland impacts.
All excavated materials from sewer and water line installation will be stored on high ground and not in wetlands. The maintenance corridor will be limited
to 10 feet wide through wetlands to minimize permanent impacts.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Sediment and erosion control measures will be used, such as silt fencing, to protect water quality. Construction limits will be clearly marked through
wetlands. No clearing will occur in wetlands outside of the proposed impact area. Construction and fill materials will be stored in upland areas.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
O Yes
J No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Permanent and temporary wetland impacts less than 1/10 acre.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
O Yes p No
If no, explain why:
Cape Fear River Basin (HUC 03030004) is not subject
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250? *
0Yes ONo
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
OYes 0No
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information

1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
Yes • No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
Yes • No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
Yes • No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This residential development is relatively small and will not likely affect regional growth patterns.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
0 Yes 0 No 0 N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a
treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
Harnett Regional Water (public sewer and water)
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
• Yes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
• Yes No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
0 Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
0 Yes ® No
O No Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S
OYes 0No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
0Yes ®No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
0 Yes • No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
0 Yes 0 No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
US FWS iPaC (https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/ ). NC Natural Heritage Program (https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/)
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
Yes • No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
NOAA Habitat Conservation National Marine Fisheries Service
https://www.habitat.noaa.gov/apps/efhmapper/
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
0 Yes • No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
NC State Historic Preservation Office (http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/)

8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
O Yes ® No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
NC Flood Risk Information System (https://fris.nc.gov/fris/ )
Miscellaneous
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Dry Creek Village-PCN attachments.pdf 17.47MB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments
Signature
[1 By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Krissina Newcomb
Signature
4tadUlg+ltAE4d
Date
7/8/2022

HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS
P.O. Box 400, Lillington NC 27546-0400
Phone [phone] / Fax [phone]
www.halowensoil.com
8 July 2022
Mrs. Liz Hair
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
Reference: Pre -Construction Notification for
Dry Creek Village Subdivision (Proposed)
Harnett County, North Carolina
Dear Mrs. Hair,
A Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) is being submitted for the above referenced
property. The subject site contains 26 acres and is located on the northern side of Dry Creek
Road, Lillington, NC. The subject site is located in the Dry Creek -Cape Fear River
Subwatershed (HUC 03030004-0505) in the Cape Fear River Basin. A wetland delineation was
conducted for the 26-acre tract by Hal Owen & Associates Inc. staff in April 2021 and for the
sewer line corridor along Dry Creek Road in April 2022.
The proposed development is for a 61 lot single family residential subdivision. The plan
proposes extending the sewer line along Dry Creek Road to the new subdivision, resulting in 33
linear feet of temporary stream impact and 0.005 acre of permanent wetland impact for the
vegetation maintenance corridor. The water line will be improved on the southern side of Dry
Creek Road resulting in 10 LF of temporary stream impact. This pre -construction notification is
being submitted pursuant to USACE Nationwide Permit 58 and NCDWR Water Quality General
Certification 4276. PCN attachments include:
• Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Package
• Site Plans and Impact Maps
• Threatened\Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat Assessment
• NC Historic Properties map
The owner of the property would like to receive permit verification and a preliminary
jurisdictional determination to satisfy local planning requirements.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact me at
your convenience.
Sincerely,
1'
Krissina B. Newcomb
Environmental Scientist
CC: Alan R. Keith, P.E.@ Diehl & Phillips
Soil Science Investigations • Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting

HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION PACKAGE
Soil Science Investigations • Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting

Jurisdictional Determination Request
US Army Corps
of Engineers.
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www. saw.usace. army.mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator. aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Depaitiuent of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 103 Dry Creek Road
City, State: Lillington, NC 27546
County: Harnett
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 0661-29-8122
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Krissina Newcomb, Hal Owen & Assoc
Mailing Address: PO Box 400
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
Select one:
o
❑
EI
o
Lillington, NC 27546
910-893-8743
[e-mail]
I am the current property owner.
I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION2
Name: Inline Properties
Mailing Address: 2900 N. Main Street
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
Fuquay-Varina, NC 27526
919-523-0036
[e-mail]
1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION3,4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Krissina Newcomb
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner fl Authorized Agent'
28 June 2022
Date /
2c4° ci. . l ,lgcd_
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
nI intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
n I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
n I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
nI intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
nI intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
n A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
❑ I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
nI believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
n Other:
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
4 If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
n
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
Size of Property or Review Area 26 acres.
❑ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017
Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
z
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: 35.45155818
Longitude: -78.78920109
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
• North Arrow
• Graphical Scale
• Boundary of Review Area
• Date
• Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
• Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
• Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
• Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
• Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
n
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017
Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
0
Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Forma
Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/regdocs/JD/RGL 08-02 App A Prelim JD Form fillable.pdf
s Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federaljurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY INFORMATION
Project Name:
Address:
PIN:
County:
Dry Creek Village Subdivision
103 Dry Creek Road Lillington, NC 27546
0661-29-8122
Harnett
APPLICANT INFORMATION
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
Inline Properties
2900 N. Main Street Fuquay-Varina, NC 27526
919 523 0036
[e-mail]
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting
on -site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.
I, the undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified
herein, or acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
I hereby authorize Mrs. Krissina Newcomb of Hal Owen & Associates, Inc. to act on
my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
jurisdictional determinations, CWA Section 401 and 404 permits and certifications, and
any and all standard and special conditions attached.
This authorization will remain in effect for (5) five years unless revoked by the undersigned
in writing.
Authorize ignature Title Date
(Please 1ekibly print name here: Sam Ahmed

Print this page
Harnett
r--, COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
PID: 110661 0061
PIN: 0661-29-8122.000
Account Number: 1500045522
Owner: INLINE PROPERTIES LLC
Mailing Address: 1209 GRAEDON DR RALEIGH, NC 27603-3986
Physical Address: 103 DRY CREEK RD LILLINGTON, NC 27546 ac
Description: 26 ACRES MATTHEWS MAP#2001-85
Surveyed/Deeded Acreage: 26
Calculated Acreage: 25.14
Deed Date: 1635465600000
Deed Book/Page: 4068 - 0468
Plat(Survey) Book/Page: 2001 - 85
Last Sale: 2021 - 10
Sale Price: $575000
Qualified Code: Q
Vacant or Improved: I
Transfer of Split: T
Actual Year Built: 1978
Heated Area : 1431 SqFt
Building Count : 1
Harnett County GIS
Building Value: $114770
Parcel Outbuilding Value: $1070
Parcel Land Value: 426520
Market Value: $542360
Deferred Value: $0
Total Assessed Value: $542360
Zoning:
Zoning Jurisdiction: Lillington
Wetlands: Yes
FEMA Flood: Minimal Flood Risk
Within 1mi of Agriculture District: Yes
Elementary School: Lillington-Shawtown Elementary
Middle School: Harnett Central Middle
High School: Harnett Central High
Fire Department: Lillington
EMS Department: Medic 8, D8 EMS, D7 FR
Law Enforcement: Lillington Police
Voter Precinct: Central Harnett Neills Creek
County Commissioner : W Brooks Matthews
School Board Member: Jason Lemons

27G269k247
I29a7 s !76 48�302 289
-109 '2:57 17 29
55 83 43 29 1 323

Harnett
r--, COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
Harnett County GIS
PID: 110661 0028 06 Building Value: $0
PIN: 0661-18-4529.000 Parcel Outbuilding Value: $0
Account Number: 1102930000 Parcel Land Value: 326330
Owner: WESTER TRAVIS SCOTT Market Value: $326330
Mailing Address: 3631 NC 210 N LILLINGTON, NC 27546-9366 Deferred Value: $305080
Physical Address: 3630 DRY CREEK RD LILLINGTON, NC 27546 ac Total Assessed Value: $21250
Description: LT#2 TRAVIS C WESTER RMG ACRES Zoning: RA-30 - 35.58 acres (100.0%)
Surveyed/Deeded Acreage: 33.56 Zoning Jurisdiction: Harnett County
Calculated Acreage: 35.58 Wetlands: No
Deed Date: 700963200000 FEMA Flood: Minimal Flood Risk
Deed Book/Page: 92E - 0105 Within 1mi of Agriculture District: Yes
Plat(Survey) Book/Page: - Elementary School: Lillington-Shawtown Elementary
Last Sale: 1992 - 3 Middle School: Harnett Central Middle
Sale Price: $0 High School: Harnett Central High
Qualified Code: E Fire Department: Summerville Bunnlevel
Vacant or Improved: V EMS Department: Medic 8, D8 EMS
Transfer of Split: T Law Enforcement: Harnett County Sheriff
Actual Year Built: Voter Precinct: Central Harnett Neills Creek
Heated Area : SgFt County Commissioner : W Brooks Matthews
Building Count : 0 School Board Member: Jason Lemons

Vicinity Map
The subject property is located north of Dry Creek Rd, Lillington NC.
Site coordinates are 35.45155818, -78.78920109
Arch Network Services
True Homes A
Arlie Meadows
nson's Auto
3ody Repair
9
Greater Llght
Baptist1Church
Walker Or Ln
i
4Solid Rock United
Pentecostal Church
a$
1
My Storage Unit 9
t
11W1
Greater Visio
Fellowship C arch
9
to
Bell fitness 9
155131
H & H Monuments9
115131
� 7riangle Concrete
Ping
Hal Owen & Associates, Inc. 12/7/2018

..
--" •v;
M
V \
tµ
a
-.r
x
r 4 U w a
, r "
Ni' ,S `,
V } ��a_
1 J^ Wr�,�,� y,
!tea, A "r i -4 ..4., ` it J� p „ i �y,a }':+ y �r 'fay v! .t •- �',, �. `�.
141014;
x^ - - % ser h d 4 T
:' .. y�" -yam,, ./.9" �NE' �,, '�[v �F 'l..a
y,- .t - lj pit p
, ; "" -"'
' .a
0 500 1,000 ft Map for reference only.
Not a survey.
Hal Owen &Associates Inc. Dry Creek Subdivision Figure 2.
PO Box 400, Lillington, NC 27546
www.halowensoil.com Dry Creek Road, Lillington, NC Aerial photograph
919-893-8743
24 June 2022 Google Earth 2022

0
1,000 2,000 ft
Map for reference only.
Not a survey.
Hal Owen & Associates Inc.
Dry Creek Subdivision
Figure 3.
PO Box 400, Lillington, NC 27546
www.halowensoil.com
Dry Creek Road, Lillington, NC
USGS Topographic Map
919-893-8743
24 June 2022
Quad: Lillington, NC

JOB NO.
Wetland Data form
3 & Photo C
Wetland Data form
2 & Photo A
25541
��"C\ 5F.
• `+ `s 7013 SF.
CULIOter_____
` • ST t`.0 909ARDON MAYOR
• ST. +81.019ANPf``RO CREEK WAY,.
s. 7617 SF \\
�`.
EN S CE
65
• 55
`j� IunBIGI@ ROMP`
JAMES W. JOHNSON, III
DB.2310, PC.988
PC/ 2, SUOE 373
PIN 0662-20-5185.000
8834SF..��
O 752995F. -/
• 18
✓ C 7540 SF. �
.S'SXREG'TREEs
`5. j �SE�N1T71105.1
< 7551
C 7562SF. j
`v\ r 8135 SF, j�
/
♦
,,
APPROX▪ IMATE
LOCATION
WETLANDS
ACME OPEN
SPACE
70477SF. \•
v��Ali
12409 SF.
MPTC6\ L1N T NUP-(10
SF15_ 0 CO�t
' r ' r_IITIFTI e_iel
' trA. 18+99.77 COM240M.• DRN 1
I' I STA. 10+00.00 VIIIEVARD CREEk0
i I 'i 9066 SF. 11 111 7522 SF. I '1 7741 SF.
,�
zb 1 j]
15' LANOSCAP BUFFER
It PUBLIC C.A. NENr
12
10441 SF.
/ I
/ WHAM T. SNNH
D.B.3889, PG.58
PCj F, SIDE 67A
PIN 0661-29-1229.000
YASNINE J. SCHNIOT
D.8.3814, PG.339
PCj' F, SUDE 67A
RN 0661-29-1111D00
20' RIBLIC DRAINAGE
AND ACCESS EASQAENT
13071 SF.
30
10717 SF.
r 1 CIS' uBuC RA. BUFFER
31 PLANC ORENBuF FASENENi
8786 SF.
GREATER N ON FELLOWSHIP, INC. C/0
L q>� 1HONA5 1. KILLER
r
i PUBLIC__ - I'S1�
DRUMENT� 1
8769 SF. - _ _1TI I
1
1
8752 5F.
5P---
1
34
8779 SF.
21
LI
5�SIBBARK__
11P.) L
35
813E SF. 1 I
L 94i I
104 6 SF.
HANDICAP RAMP--------
8041 SF.
09
HEVIN OCCRPDAY
0.13.1878, PG.346
POI F. SLIDE 67A
PIN 0661-28-1906000
SUBDIVISION PLAN
SCALE. 1" = 60'
38
7752 5F.
J L
40
40
7990 SF.
00—
Ift00 13t40
5' STREET IRE(
EA M E N MP)
8480 SF.
37
8230 SF.
89450
SF. 5' PUBLIC
DRAIN./8520
LI �DRAINF.
fASEMfNf --
JJJJJJLLLLLL 00 L J
D.8.1470. PG.404
N.B.2001, PC.85
PIN 0661-28-7762.000
�15' LANDSCAPE
FASENEN=BJFFER
T r
l
0
8480 SF.
1 1
.° �' POO
I
Are
171 30*
8480 SF.
ELZ4BEM F. SMITH
DB.1414, PG20
N.B.2000, PG.240
PIN 0661-28-9564.000
0 42 I
8109 5F. 1 8228 SF. I
_6 C}LRRDONI\t d Y
(TYR_)00 DRIVE
l 'rlye- PAl
�m.1 I 1
DRAINAGE 20' PNBWC OMJNAOE
]sxFNT AND MCfS$ FA50JENT
O* Q*
8480 5F. 1 8480 SF. OPEN SPACE &
I 5 PUBLIC
DRAINAGE EASEMENT
I 1 0.42 AC.
I EASOPrnEl
CMEM
bl+
I J 1 1 CaI I 1 C0 ! B AND W COM
OB.1322, PC
15' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 1 1 2y II / N.B.2D06, PG
k R1BIC ORNNPGE EASEMENT
PA ED 1 r 4 1 PIN 0860-09-1,
• 1 W!''''
/ 1II II 1 1 2
A II Q $
Iv �B�R sb• I' Wetland Data form
/ SFNER EASENE �� II
1RAW5 S - T- 1
ESTATE ,
PIN 0881�i - / • 1 1 & Photo B
/ Limit.: /
1
I iI11 I
Wetland Delineation
4/26/2021 and 4/08/222
Hal Owen & Associates Inc.
5' SIDEWAY
(TP.)
10' PUBNC PBOBS4AN k , 1
sm. sal EA9EmENT
ntIMHG1E
o4010
43
8312 SF.
12300 ,n m 11f00
15' LANDSCAPE BUFFER
It PUBLIC DRAINAGE EASEMENT
MELANIE WADDELL JERRY WADDELL
D.B.2171, PG.526
PCj' F, SDDE 67A
PIN 0661-28-0780.000
1E1POMM' 12' LOPE
GE Intersection
STA. 10+00.00 CHARDONI
STA. 15+3,50 Dry Creek F
r0_
40
S10P S
/
/ of
Study: ,/ B I i
3N17
10' PUBLIC PEDESTRIAN It
SAN. SEWER EASE2ENT
PROPOSED 12' 0.1
SAN. SEWER
BY OTHERS
60
HC = HDA HANDICAP RAMP
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 30 60
120
DESCN
ARK
DR1WN
MAT
ARK
1"= 60'
f1LE
By oe CPAs,

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Dry Creek Subdivision
Applicant/Owner: Inline Properties
Investigator(s): Dye
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P
City/County: Harnett County
Sampling Date: 07/31/2022
State: NC Sampling Point: 1
Section, Township, Range:
Local relief (concave, convex, none): none
Lat: 35-4488887 Long: -78.7917335
Soil Map Unit Name: Rains sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology
for this time of year? Yes X
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
NWI classification: none
Slope (%): <2%
Datum: NAD83
No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑
❑
✓
❑
❑
❑
0
0
✓❑
✓
Surface Water (A1) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
High Water Table (A2) ❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Saturation (A3) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Water Marks (B1) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Drift Deposits (B3) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ,❑✓
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ,❑✓
Iron Deposits (B5) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) .D.
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) .
. Water -Stained Leaves (B9) ,❑,
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Crayfish Burrows (C8)
, Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
, Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 6
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 1
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius
1 Liriodendron tulipifera
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
3 Acer rubrum
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
50% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius
1. Acer rubrum
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
5 N FACU
60
5
Y
FAC
FAC
70 = Total Cover
35 20% of total cover: 14
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
100 = Total Cover
40
40
FAC
FAC
Quercus phellos
Magnolia virginiana
10
10
FACW
FACW
50% of total cover: 50 20% of total cover: 20
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius
1 Arundinaria gigantea
2. Woodwardia areolata
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Carex lurida
Juncus coriaceus
45 Y FACW
20 Y OBL
10 N OBL
10 N FACW
85 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 42.5 20% of total cover: 17
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius
1 Smilax rotundifolia 80 Y FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
6 (B)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (NB)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hyd rophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: 1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-15 2.5YR 3/1 100 CL
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
❑
❑
❑,
❑,
❑,
❑,
❑
.11
111
❑,
❑,
.111
.11
❑,
111
❑,
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
Histosol (A1) .❑
Histic Epipedon (A2) .❑
Black Histic (A3) .❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) .❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) .❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) .❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) .❑
Below Dark Surface (A11) .❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) .
Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) .❑
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Matrix (S6) .❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) 0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Marl (F10) (LRR U) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
✓ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Dry Creek Subdivision City/County: Lillington/Harnett County Sampling Date: 07/31/2022
Applicant/Owner: Inline Properties
Investigator(s): Dye
State: NC Sampling Point: 2
Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): <2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 35.4510280 Long: -78.7883157 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Norfolk loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Yes Soil no or Hydrology no significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation no Soil no or Hydrology no naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
Upland. Area had been cleared. No trees present only a mixture of fast growing grasses/herbs.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
0
0
❑
❑.
Surface Water (Al) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
High Water Table (A2) ❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Saturation (A3) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Water Marks (B1) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Drift Deposits (B3) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ,❑,
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ,❑,
Iron Deposits (B5) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) .D.
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) .
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) ,❑,
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 2
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius
1 Erigeron canadensis 80 Y FACU
2. Eupatorium capillifolium
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
80 Y FACU
160 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 80 20% of total cover: 32
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (NB)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species 2 x 4 = 8
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 4
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hyd rophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes No X
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: 2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 5/4 100 SL
5-16+ 10YR 5/8 100 SCL
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
❑
❑
❑,
❑,
❑,
❑,
❑
.11
111
❑,
❑,
.111
.11
❑,
111
❑,
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
Histosol (A1) .❑
Histic Epipedon (A2) .❑
Black Histic (A3) .❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) .❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) .❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) .❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) .❑
Below Dark Surface (A11) .❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) .❑
Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) .❑
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Matrix (S6) .❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) 0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Marl (F10) (LRR U) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Dry Creek Subdivision
Applicant/Owner: Inline Properties
Investigator(s): Dye
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P
City/County: Lillington/Harnett County
Sampling Date: 07/01/2022
State: NC Sampling Point: 3
Section, Township, Range:
Local relief (concave, convex, none): none
Lat: 35.4512867 Long: -78.7881631
Soil Map Unit Name: Rains sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology
for this time of year? Yes X
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
NWI classification:
Slope (%): <2%
Datum: NAD83
PFO1A
No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes X
No
Remarks:
Wetland.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
1
II
✓
✓
❑
❑
E.
0
✓❑
✓
Surface Water (A1) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
High Water Table (A2) ❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Saturation (A3) ❑❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Water Marks (B1) IJ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Drift Deposits (B3) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ,❑✓
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ,❑✓,
Iron Deposits (B5) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) .D.
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) .
. Water -Stained Leaves (B9) ,❑✓
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
✓ Drainage Patterns (B10)
1 Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Crayfish Burrows (C8)
, Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
, Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 4
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 2
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 3
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius
1 Pinus taeda
2. Quercus phellos
3 Liquidambar styraciflua
4. Liriodendron tulipifera
5.
6.
7.
8.
Quercus nigra
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
40 Y FAC
30
30
Y
10
15
FACW
FAC
FACU
FAC
125 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 62.5 20% of total cover: 25
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Acer rubrum
Quercus nigra
20
10
FAC
FAC
30 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover: 6
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius
1 Arundinaria gigantea 80 Y
FACW
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius
1 Smilax rotundifolia 80 Y FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
7 (B)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (NB)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hyd rophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes Y No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: 3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-15 10YR 3/1 95 10YR 3/8 5 SCL
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
❑
❑
❑,
❑,
❑,
❑,
❑
.11
111
❑,
❑,
.111
.11
❑,
111
❑,
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
Histosol (A1) .❑
Histic Epipedon (A2) .❑
Black Histic (A3) .❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) .❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) .❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) .❑
Below Dark Surface (A11) .❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) .
Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) .❑
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Matrix (S6) .❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) 0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
✓ Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Marl (F10) (LRR U) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
✓ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Krissina Newcomb, Hal Owen & Assoc; PO Box 400, Lillington, NC 27546
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Harnett City: Lillington
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 35.45155818
Long.: -78.78920109
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Dry Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
A
35.45263240
-78.78805643
7ac
Wetland
404
B
35.44894864
-78.79167131
.006ac
Wetland
404
S
35.44898512
-78.79149526
45ft
Stream
404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
• Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:
O Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
n Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
n Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
• U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Lillington quad
■❑ Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Websoil survey
• National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
• FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
• Photographs: n Aerial (Name & Date): Google Earth 2021
or n Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determi nations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
1' ?.rqo ; 2 A/463co'-&-•
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
6-24-2022
Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

USDA United States A product of the National Custom Soil Resource
Department of Cooperative Soil Survey,
Agriculture a joint effort of the United Report for
States Department of
RCS Agriculture and other Harnett County,
Federal agencies, State
Natural agencies including the North Carolina
Resources Agricultural Experiment
Conservation Stations, and local
Service participants Dry Creek SD
l .-r
A'�� �.
k r
' .. ,£ .
� •
; -
it ..i.,
i I1. ��. -
{ ' i it r ; ..ry -
T i1
. : :.:.,j ... f:. ,: .1 :•. 110.741 .....
•
' ti '4AL. 1. i
•
� '• I ry
. {-._i.r i _ jai , �'y��'}y��'}y • �--d• y . i''. _ _,t
June 24, 2022

Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nrcs/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
(https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nres) or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/contactus/?
cid=nres142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require
2

alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at [phone] (voice
and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or
call [phone] (voice) or [phone] (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.
3

Contents
Preface 2
Soil Map 5
Soil Map 6
Legend 7
Map Unit Legend 8
Map Unit Descriptions 8
Harnett County, North Carolina 10
GoA—Goldsboro loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes, Southern Coastal
Plain 10
Ly—Lynchburg sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 11
NoA—Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes 12
NoB—Norfolk loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes 13
Ra—Rains sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 15
To—Toisnot loam 17
W—Water 18
References 20
4

Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.
5

35° 27' 16" N
35° 26'49"N
Custom Soil Resource Report
Soil Map
700400
700100 700200 700300 700400 700500 700600 700700 700800 700900 701000 701100
Map Scale: 1:6,020 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.
Meters
0 50 100 200 330
Feet
0 250 530 1000 15530
Mapprojedion: Web Mercator Comerwordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84
6
0
0
0
35° 27' 16" N
35° 26' 49" N

Custom Soil Resource Report
MAP LEGEND
Area of Interest (AOI)
n Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
El Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
Special Point Features
• Blowout
Borrow Pit
• Clay Spot
• Closed Depression
• Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
▪ Landfill
A. Lava Flow
jda Marsh or swamp
• Mine or Quarry
CO Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
• Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
• Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
oa Sodic Spot
r=
6
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
▪ Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
am Aerial Photography
MAP INFORMATION
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:24,000.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Harnett County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 19, Jan 21, 2022
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Oct 22, 2018—Oct
25, 2018
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
7

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
GoA
Goldsboro loamy sand, 0 to 2
percent slopes, Southern
Coastal Plain
1.6
1.1 %
Ly
Lynchburg sandy loam, 0 to 2
percent slopes
1.9
1.3%
NoA
Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2
percent slopes
48.0
32.9%
NoB
Norfolk loamy sand, 2 to 6
percent slopes
41.3
28.3%
Ra
Rains sandy loam, 0 to 2
percent slopes
45.7
31.3%
To
Toisnot loam
5.2
3.6%
W
Water
2.3
1.6%
Totals for Area of Interest
146.1
100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
8

Custom Soil Resource Report
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha -Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
9

Custom Soil Resource Report
Harnett County, North Carolina
GoA—Goldsboro loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes, Southern Coastal
Plain
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2v750
Elevation: 110 to 300 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Goldsboro and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Goldsboro
Setting
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 9 inches: loamy sand
E - 9 to 12 inches: loamy sand
Bt - 12 to 62 inches: sandy clay loam
Btg - 62 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Moderately well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 24 to 36 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 8.1 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Norfolk
Percent of map unit: 8 percent
Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
10

Custom Soil Resource Report
Down -slope shape: Convex, linear
Across -slope shape: Convex, linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Lynchburg
Percent of map unit: 7 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Ly—Lynchburg sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2vx8p
Elevation: 10 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained
Map Unit Composition
Lynchburg and similar soils: 84 percent
Minor components: 16 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Lynchburg
Setting
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 8 inches: sandy loam
E - 8 to 11 inches: sandy loam
Bt - 11 to 21 inches: sandy clay loam
Btg - 21 to 65 inches: sandy clay loam
BCg - 65 to 85 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 6 to 18 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
11

Custom Soil Resource Report
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 6.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Goldsboro
Percent of map unit: 8 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Rains
Percent of map unit: 8 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Dip, talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
NoA—Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2v75w
Elevation: 10 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Norfolk and similar soils: 83 percent
Minor components: 17 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Norfolk
Setting
Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down -slope shape: Convex, linear
Across -slope shape: Convex, linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits

Custom Soil Resource Report
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 8 inches: loamy sand
E - 8 to 14 inches: loamy sand
Bt - 14 to 65 inches: sandy clay loam
BC - 65 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 40 to 72 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 6.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 1
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Goldsboro
Percent of map unit: 9 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Wagram
Percent of map unit: 8 percent
Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, ridges on marine
terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest, talf
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
NoB—Norfolk loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2v75y
Elevation: 30 to 450 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F

Custom Soil Resource Report
Frost -free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Norfolk and similar soils: 83 percent
Minor components: 17 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Norfolk
Setting
Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down -slope shape: Convex, linear
Across -slope shape: Convex, linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 8 inches: loamy sand
E - 8 to 14 inches: loamy sand
Bt - 14 to 65 inches: sandy clay loam
BC - 65 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 40 to 72 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 6.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Wagram
Percent of map unit: 10 percent
Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, ridges on marine
terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Riser, rise
Down -slope shape: Convex, linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
Goldsboro
Percent of map unit: 7 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
14

Custom Soil Resource Report
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Ra—Rains sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2v760
Elevation: 30 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained
Map Unit Composition
Rains, undrained, and similar soils: 58 percent
Rains, drained, and similar soils: 24 percent
Minor components: 18 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Rains, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Carolina bays on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine
terraces, flats on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Dip, talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
A - 0 to 6 inches: sandy loam
Eg - 6 to 12 inches: sandy loam
Btg - 12 to 65 inches: sandy clay loam
BCg - 65 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.20 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
15

Custom Soil Resource Report
Description of Rains, Drained
Setting
Landform: Carolina bays on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine
terraces, flats on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Dip, talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 6 inches: sandy loam
Eg - 6 to 12 inches: sandy loam
Btg - 12 to 65 inches: sandy clay loam
BCg - 65 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.20 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 12 to 36 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Minor Components
Lynchburg
Percent of map unit: 10 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Pantego, undrained
Percent of map unit: 8 percent
Landform: Stream terraces, flats, broad interstream divides
Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread, talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Concave
Hydric soil rating: Yes

Custom Soil Resource Report
To—Toisnot loam
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3sgh
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Toisnot, undrained, and similar soils: 80 percent
Toisnot, drained, and similar soils: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Toisnot, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces,
carolina bays on marine terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy fluviomarine deposits
Typical profile
A - 0 to 6 inches: loam
Eg - 6 to 13 inches: sandy loam
E/Btg - 13 to 28 inches: sandy loam
Ex - 28 to 45 inches: sandy loam
Btg - 45 to 61 inches: sandy clay loam
2Cg - 61 to 90 inches: sandy clay
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 20 to 40 inches to fragipan
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to
moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: Frequent
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 3.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 5w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D
17

Custom Soil Resource Report
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Description of Toisnot, Drained
Setting
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces,
carolina bays on marine terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy fluviomarine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 6 inches: loam
Eg - 6 to 13 inches: sandy loam
E/Btg - 13 to 28 inches: sandy loam
Ex - 28 to 45 inches: sandy loam
Btg - 45 to 61 inches: sandy clay loam
2Cg - 61 to 90 inches: sandy clay
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 20 to 40 inches to fragipan
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to
moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 3.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
W—Water
Map Unit Composition
Water: 100 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Water
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 8w
Hydric soil rating: No

Custom Soil Resource Report
19

References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep -water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nres/detail/national/soils/?cid =nres 142 p2_0 54262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://
www. nres. usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://
www. nres. usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/
home/?cid=nres142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/
detail/national/landuse/rangepastu re/?cid=stelprdb1043084
20

Custom Soil Resource Report
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/
n res/deta i l/so i is/scie ntists/?cid=nres 142 p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,
the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook
296. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?
cid=nres142p2_053624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http://
www. n res. usda.gov/I nternet/FSE_DOCU M ENTS/n res142p2_052290. pdf
21

nw axrua�r�
I:N
`'erim U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Iv. ,
National Wetlands Inventor Dry Creek SD
. ____......
...,• . .1 , ',...,....eir. „.. ,,.
..iir ,.. .. ..0,, .-- -.T.. 1 , !,.,„4.., . , .
, •
.. •
, ...
, . 4- Di' - /A
.ir . AV ... , , t. i plit 't A " . :11 tii...,-
to.'4:. .-, \ . ' 4 . .. ,61.2 i.,
. .' ,I 'a. . iiit7' #
11.r1�
1 ♦ 1
qt, _,��e. County Park r
%\
' V ' ' ' 7.". , t= - . :
4_. '_
PFO1A ill,
.04 r „,,,..`�1. ,+
• , , ,. •.. . .,1-.
, ... .
. ..„. .. 4 ,. ,..•
. �ii
, -r+vcS ,1
Sh.iii,..b. . s'- )' ' .-.
i . , , . .
1:":-?....Pi,,,....-- --,,41. ticj. 4 -.-1. .4 1 - -- ..;: 'i-• *AV,. 4 - ..: ,
� �', aa' PFO1A
7'
r- . .
..,
.4.i
. - C • .
ik
Ilk
1:11,557 _ • �� 1
o 0.1 0.2 0.4 mi '4' t,' l i EM1 , f *
' ' 1 ' 1 ' 1 ' 1 _ ,, ft.
li .. , .�t i . . , �:..•rn.`' 1,. .1. _a Team,_
I I 4, .'e { ds team fws ov '
0 0.15 0.3 0.6 km d ' �;
June 24, 2022 This map is for general reference only.The US Fish and VUldlife
Service is not responsible for the accuracy or currentness of the
Wetlands base data shown on this map.All wetlands related data should
Freshwater Emergent Wetland Lake be used in accordance with the layer metadata found on the
�I Wetlands Mapper web site.
U Estuarine and Marine Deepwater • Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland ❑ Other
El Estuarine and Marine Wetland ❑ Freshwater Pond ❑ Riverine
National Wetlands Inventory(NW)
This page was produced by the NW mapper

Northing:=620,555,Easting=2,060,574 Northing:=620,555,Easting=2,064,042
lilaWithout Base Flood Elevation(BFE)
•
{ With BFE or Depth
e. . 67.1 .771.''in 1 ill
, Regulatory Floodway
r
I •
K..
r.T / 0.2%Annual Chance Flood Hazard
- Future Conditions 1%Annual Chance
•
r •_ I L � Flood Hazard
r4� �, , ,• �,• • di ti;' Areas Determined to be Outside the
'I 0.2%Annual Chance Flood Hazard
r M
r
t
'�+, r �4 ,?" 5 Jurisdiction Boundary
1 •F ' . " it t' I t FIRM Panel Boundary
'- North Carolina State Plane Projection Feet(Zone 3200)
yit -.• ! - Datum:NAD 1983(Horizontal),NAVD 1988(Vertical)
.66
_+�' ,..ti _ 1 inch=500feet 1:6000
I
n4', ~ J. a , li4 ' 0 125 250 500
i" i Feet
• •• ` I 0 25 50 100
, •, '�. 'WI •t,k y
• , F _ MetersO
. I i i
' + E NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM
C�CS FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
QA
' i
0 Panel(s):0662,0660• a CONTAINS:
•
• • COMMUNITY CID
V HARNETT COUNTY 370328
. I C6
. ■ r i Notice to User:The Map Number(s)shown
• , y'
• = below should be used when placing map
orders;the Community Number(s)shown
• _ above should be used on insurance
.•yt•- applications for the subject community.
. ti
R I. �' ti 5 ,' ale OG SELECTED PANELS:
. .� ,� , u_ MAP NUMBER EFFECTIVE DATE
�� • ! {�W. :rlir Imo; } '' 1 i y '' _ j an ia 3720066200J 10/3/2006
4 f•+ 1'I■ { }, ; i. IPeili 3720066000J 10/3/2006
•
F O
•'•*'Y y y P;•
L • Z
f'
L.
... ..,.. ... ,. ,-.Ff,5., ,tor,v,,)
41 '• 3 + rw, S
Northing: 617,087,Easting 2,060,574 v Northing: 617,087,Easting2,064,042 ^ '
= s= Page1of2 s = = rr``
W ,q No s,o,
This is an official copy of a portion of the above referenced flood map.This map incorporates changes or amendments which may have been made subsequent to the date on the title block.For the latest 11��
product information about National Flood Insurance Program flood maps check the FEMA Flood Map Store at www.msc.fema.gov.

FEMA: National Flood Insurance Program
Page 2 of 2"1gNo
yb"'F
sE�g
Panel(s):0662,0660
CONTAINS:
COMMUNITY CID
HARNETT COUNTY 370328
Notice whentplacingUser: The Map Number(s)ds; he shownni below should be
used map orders; the Community Number(s)
shown above should be used on insurance applications for
the subject community.
SELECTED PANELS:
MAP NUMBER EFFECTIVE DATE
3720066200J 10/3/2006
3720066000J 10/3/2006
NOTES TO USERS
LEGEND
Base map information and geospatial data used to develop this FIRMette were obtained
from various organizations, including the participating local community(ies), state and
federal agencies, and/or other sources. The primary base for this FIRM is aerial imagery
acquired by the State in 2010. Information and geospatial data supplied by the local
community(ies) that met FEMA base map specifications were considered the preferred
source for development of the base map.
See geospatial metadata for the associated digital FIRMette for additional information
about base map preparation. Base map features shown on this FIRMette, such as
corporate limits, are based on the most up-to-date data available at the time of publication.
Changes in the corporate limits may have occurred since this map was published. Map
users should consult the appropriate community official or website to verify current
conditions of jurisdictional boundaries and base map features. This map may contain
roads that were not considered in the hydraulic analysis of streams where no new
hydraulic model was created during the production of this statewide format FIRM.
Flood elevations on this map are referenced to either or both the North American Vertical
Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88) or National Geodetic Datum of 1929 (NGVD 29), and are
labeled accordingly. These flood elevations must be compared to structure and ground
elevations referenced to the same vertical datum. To obtain current elevation, description,
and/or location information for bench marks shown on this map, or for information
regarding conversion between NGVD 29 and NAVD 88, please contact the Information
Services Branch of the National Geodetic Survey at (301) 7133242, or visit its website at
http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/.
LEGEN D
MAP REVISIONS
There are no map revisions for the
selected area.
NOTES TO USERS
This is an official FIRMette of a portion of the effective panels
listed in the Title Block shown on Page 1. The information
represented on this FIRMette was extracted from the effective
digital flood hazard data available at http://fris.nc.gov/fris.
Base flood elevation data, floodway, nonencroachment widths,
information on certain areas no in the Special Flood Hazard
Areas protected by flood control structures, and other pertinent
data are available in the Flood Insurance Study (FIS) available at
http://fris.nc.gov/fris. Users should be aware that flood elevations
shown on this FIRMette represent elevations rounded to one
tenth of a foot (0.1') and should be utilized in conjunction with
data available in the FIS.
MORE INFORMATION
Letters of Map Amendment (LOMA)
1-877-336-2627
http://msc.fema.qov/
Letters of Map Revision (LOMR)
919-715-5711
www.ncfloodmaps.com
Flood Insurance Availability
North Carolina Division of Emergency
919-715-5711
Management (NCDEM)
http://www.nccrimecontrol.orq/nfip
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)
1-877-638-6620
http://www.fema.qov/business/nfip
Questions about this FIRMette
1-877-336-2627
h
http://fema.qov

Landscape Photographs
Landscape photo A: Upland photo taken near Wetland A. Flat topography,previously cleared,dominated by fast
growing herbs.
WitP
•
,. ; _
lb I
- - T- - !I L •. I 'I ti 1
M- 1 rr ..
1%.6
�y• t '
I l
1 !Ir
_
Hal Owen &Associates, Inc. 30 June 2022 Dry Creek SD, Harnett Co, NC

Landscape Photographs
Landscape photo B: Photo taken at Wetland B.
1' •
la.. =max, 4 t^ r .'4..-4/
•
A,•!•rye ii��} ,/p, 'y' O ' ' R• r"
t,�-F• v sir:� rw ' i ,
ii
4140... . .- . - .. • -• V A., -a- ...I
ipglippe.
' }'ter _4°06. '4 -, . ' t - r: �*' �'�*i� �� r_r ,�_
^-04,„ w ry. ; _ 3: „sA v i r .w•y
942 'l�S~+�F
- JI \ Fly
t f � f _ t
n.
►a ...Si _'
' f i •
� 111/4.
)„,,Ptir \;tal Fs:,, .-. . - 1, ,
, -1., ...... ..! ,-N.-_
N.. .,- • iii .
.r _. Ir3/41?-„A _,Ap Ad...
liollIVII"-11 ir ' 11111 I - R,14' 411'
- •-1. i 140
- .41
--e'--7-Lllr?;:' III ....,
lilleill -'-
dt ,.
a-
Hal Owen &Associates, Inc. 30 June 2022 Dry Creek SD, Harnett Co, NC

Landscape Photographs
Landscape Photo C: Photo taken at Wetland A. Surface water is present. Primarily dominated by Arundinaria g.and
Smilax r.Several buttressed trees are located in the surface water.
IL... . . J. ',..., 4,4 -..t.. s -.4--- - -,..„ , . , , 4...._ ,t,..it,.4, . .0„/... ,,, , .4.; , .....,.,.., ,.. ., ,
. 4 . . y .4 :i.. ,, - /4" :......._ ..: ::
Its "'IV
+�4 + ` •+ X.f . i ''• + -
..
t is I.-. ,t , . , 4
.♦ !_, - ' 'f �' .r .may . i
NI lelf
- f r _ r• may- •
- , ,.., .,,,,,.. -- =7; - i 0, 4 i .4,.•,
, , ..„ .
. b, ,,
' .... ,,,t.,:i:. . . ) ri ,,, ,.. 4.. —4, :•••:et -tP . 7o :
i .1 . -C-forrry' �� vs �
.4 — .. 4,7 -„, tr t,,i . %., -
lilliti* to • --,•-•-•-
,1, + ' "R .r
' :C f _.•, _�: • .k ! ..
i -4, -. Vr.
.w 'i. ....• -`. �---, .`ter
4% re AVir .; •-• .'• 494 ':.•
: 16., ,ir.••. /(._.,- ,....)46...,'".• t -1r-' '!._ 1..,r41...,- _.7' • . - - ..••
y
Hal Owen &Associates, Inc. 30 June 2022 Dry Creek SD, Harnett Co, NC

HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
SITE PLANS
Soil Science Investigations • Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting

MATCH CONTIN PT10.
SHT. 1 FOR
DESIGN
ARK
GRmvx
MAT
11`P-(GAG �-C
�I/5541
S��
STA+
7617 SF
*
`, 7013 SF.
GL Intersetuo
O1 81 9CHARDONNAV
81.09 V1� OARD CR.E0 WA'
•
•
JAMES W. JOHNSON, 111
D.6.2310, PG988
PC)✓ 2. SLIDE 373
PIN 0662-20-5185.000
•
i
OPEN SPACE
♦ °m •
•
•
TOT
•
15' LANDS
& PUBUC ORM.
APPROXIMATE
LOCATION
WETLANDS
L�
// 1249 SF.
BUFFER
EMENT
OPEN
\ SPACE
A 28 "
11521 SF.
15'_-_ -C T NMAV erseclio-
T P 4TA. 26+99.T2 C�iA!R¢ONNAV DRIVJ=
II STA. 10+0091.
.00VIN�E1'ARDCREEKVA
10441 SF. 1 i 11 11 9 0 I O
I 9066 SF. III, 7522 SF II 7741 SF.
�r
L/L LJ
31, ./ T
r
WILLIAM T. SMITH
D. B.3889, PG.58
PC11 F SLIDE 67A
PIN 0661-29-1229.000
VASMINE J. SCHMIDI
D.B3814, PG339
PC, F. SLIDE 67A
PIN 0661-29-1111 000
r 1
\ 1
\
I30]195F.
;T 1
11 I
30
10717 SF.
l 1
31
8786 SF.
bkL
iPV&IC
DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
8769 SF.
33
875 SF,
(73
qJ /I
10436 SF. �I _I 1_1
HANDICAP
QWj__ —1 R4--
20' PUBUC DRMNACE
OND ACCESS EASEMENT
15' LANDSCAPE BUFFER
8 PUBUC DRAINAGE 671204ENT
ELIZABETH F. SMITH
D.B.1414, PG.20
M.B.2000, PC.240
PIN 0661-28-9564.000
GREATER VISION FELLOWSHIP, INC C/0
THOMAS T. MILLER
D.B.1470, PC 404
M.B.2001, PG,65
PIN 0661-28-7762.000
15' LANDSCAPE
EASEMENT BUFFER
38
7752 SF.
16 S
81
t O
8945 SF.
09
KEVIN HOCKADAY
D,B,1878, PG,346
PC/ F. SLIDE 67A
PIN 0661-28-1906.000
SUBDIVISION PLAN
SCALE. 1" = 60'
37
8230 SF
T TIT
5' STREET 1Pa
EASEMENT (TT)
39
7871 5F.
A0 —
© O
8522 SF. 8480 SF. 8480 SF,
PUBLIC
FArNu f} I
EA MEN I I I
7990 SF.
41
8109 SF.
SIDEWALK"
(TWIT/
ag_
T
T
42
8228 SF.
1 I 1
I I
1 I
I I 1
1 I
1 1
I I
1 I 1
1 I
11 �U
1I
�ILLInil
1 6' I
I1
1 H
5' MEMNK 1 I 1
CIO' PUBDC PHOEISM! rN& ---
SON. SE601 EASEMENT
10 'I(
MRMNCIE (1W.
43
8312 SF.
FZRDONI\f4Y
DRIVE
�C�oEwnc- I I
14m.)
_.---20' PUBIC DRAINAGE
O MUM EASEMENT
0*
O*
8480 SF. 8480 SF.
�09
15' LANDSCAPE BUFFER
& PUB. ORMUME EASENENr
MELANIE WADDELL JERRV WADDELL
D.B.2171, PG.526
PC4 F. SLIDE 67A
PIN 0661-28-0780.000
STO
STOP S
20' PUBIik oRNNACE
" 640 ACC EASEMENT
P 8480 F. OPEN SPACE &
DRAINAGE EASEMENT
BLIC 0.42 AC.
DRAMA E
III
I I Eu EMENT
/
/
15' LANDSCAPE BUFFER
8 PUBUC DRAINAGE EASEMENT
C� j _
P21UBLIC
7
.l�
4
1
CIL Intersection
STA. 10+00.00 CHARDONI
STA, 15+3,50 Dry Creel: F
10' PUBUC PEDESIRVN &
SON. SEVER EASEMENT
B AND W CON
D.B.1322, PC
M.B.2006, PG
PIN 0660-09-1-
HC = HDA HANDICAP RAMP
GRAPHIC SCALE
60 0 30 60
120
ARK
SGLE
I" = 60'
FILE
M oeNr OP**
DRY CREEK VILLAGE
LILLINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA
SUBDIVISION PLAN
2
OF
18

/
BLON-OFF
ASSEMBLY
• • • CIL Intel-settm�
:91.052CHAROONNAV DR
81.Oy1A�EyARD CRDER WAY
JAMES W. JOHNSON, HI
D.62316, PG.988
PC# 2, SLIDE 373
PIN 0662-20-5185.000
i
I I OPEN SPACE
/
7
♦
e see
MP OR O� TNU "110= •
jF_
_ • _
•
WEDELINEATION
s
DRE
"P 8040c DRAINAGE EASEVEN1J
M'IDTH VARIES (1YP.)
TJ2
T
ACTIVE OPEN
SPACE
STR418j62362\
♦
♦
15' VNDSDAP BUFFER
k PUBLIC DRAINAGE ELEMENT
/
STRIRNo (1VP:j-
_644U644- EL)_
• U — I
sTa:10+65.e6
1
ST 17414.26 STOP 51. I
aue
1_
WILLIAM T. SMITH
D.B3889, PG58
PC# F, SLIDE 67A
PIN 0661-29-1229.000
OPEN
SPACE
J
3/4WARA SBi1� _ - _ T 1
30
0
EASEMENT 1
32 —
It]
FlCd-H-1.0 nr
(IT
ASSEMBLY (TV.) 1
33 1
STSBEWNK
HMIDMM Rome ]14•
LIC aRNN,GE `a : 41'l ui mlBu n` 03040 -- (,YP
N DD ,
041
$Ti �''a''�'s'CvuaE —_-- --- _ 4512.17.
---
AF ( ) _ - SAAS F s , r TI �5�IDFDtIr�
lnlarDfl�s —� a 1 T ACE (I1P.) EASENE TRmf DT Ai +sAa 1 FT'r.)
clu I a f' STA. is ezeD
R"T D a
' ,� h' MI Eva IDRMnME
I II MID � � useuenr �pf
µ' PUBLIC DRAINAGE
0 ACCESS EA4MENT
15' VNDSCAPE BUFFER
k PUBLIC DRAINAGE GSENFNT
GREATER VISION FELLOWSHIP, INC. C/0
1H0MAS T. MILLER
D.B.1476, PG,404
M.B.2001, P0.85
PIN 0661-26-7762.000
15• LONOSCN£
EIfiEMBIT BUFFER
ELIZABETH F. SMITH
D.B.1414, P0..20
M.B2000, P6.240
PIN 0661-28-9564.000
10• PUBIC PEOB5BOJ k
SMI. KOMI kkEryryASEMENT
TRPONf1£ (�P)I I
41 42 43
I I
4 Cf-�FtRDONt'iAY
(m.) DRIVE
STREET AD
ISTY 10+00.00 VIMErRD CREEK OOTINPV 401 TER
(i o I 0e 1
10
11 I
I
YASMINE J. SCHMIDT
D.B.3314, PG.339
PO/' F, SLIDE 67A
PIN 6661-29-1111.666
UTILITY PLAN
SCALE: 1 " = 60'
= 0-
KEVIN HOCKADAY
D.B.18I8, PG.346
PC# F, SLIDE 6IA
PIN 0661-28-1906.000
0
I
I
I
I
I° PUBLIC
EASEMENT
0
ES (T•P
0. 0.
L�12 1mli
15..11SCAPE BUFFER]
k PUBLIC DRAINAGE EIfiEMENT
a
MELANIE WADDELL JERRY WADDELL
D.B2171, PG526
Pc0 F, SLIDE 67A
PIN 6661-28-6780.000
/
/
FES GYP.
f.
OPEN SPICE k
DRAINAGE EASEMENT
0.42 AC.
15. .0 BUFFER
k PUBLIC DRAI EASEMENT
/ 10' PUBLIC SANITARY
SLIER EASEMENT
TRAMS S. WESTER
ESTATE 92E, PG.165
PIN 0661-18-4529.000
WO.
C I
II
/ DEDNEATION�I
II
— J II
1RT.iloTi(T (BY OTHERS) I
01. 2I0;Se
N1
8•R16' TAPPING
k TOPPING, YE
CIL Intersection
STA. 10+30.00 CHARDONN AY DRIVE-
STA,15+35.50 Dry Creek Rd
M.H. No.1
STA 10+3E79 STREET
L DITCH UNE
5-J5
0' PUBLIC PEOESTRUN
SON. SEWER EASEMENT
ROD C2 22
O BD BN0322CPG853
`/ M.B.2006, PG.1I0
01( 1 W 1 PIN 6666-09-1769.666
Q
PROPOSED IS 0,1
SAN. SEVER
BY OTHERS
HC = HDA HANDICAP RAMP
9 i'L37x}
0
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 30 so
Teo
ARK
nenwly
MAT
ARK
SCALE
" = 60'
ar Reek D•...1
9,1
DRY CREEK VILLAGE
LILLINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA
UTILITY PLAN
3
OF
msrp,i (PEN CDT
SEVER
AT 11_ERS
18

JOB NO.
0
LOTS WITH ` SEE
MINIMUM FINISHED
FLOOR ELEVATIONS
•
/
♦NACE
♦
� � J
\" 25
�'C• I / 5' STREET-1RE
51<
EASM>Ellf (Tr.)
•� ---
--ALL CILlntersecto
ST 1.OPfl EVARD AV E1198 A-
/ sT +si.oy-�nNevARD oR€erCwnv
y / HANDICAP RAN
♦\`/ ,'/ 19
/ 8
JAMES W. JOHNSON. III
D.B.2310, PC.988
PO/ 2, SLIDE 373
PIN 0652-2D-5185.000
--*
WEILAND LINE /
ELINEALON
See
SH-M;F0-1111�
- / jam,,,
rjt s s iJD
STPoPPiNCSTYF:j-
P
U' S EASEMENT
�� BkfC DRAINAGE EA EM \ / / / /
/KEITH VARIES (TVP)S �^/ / / ' /
az/ /
\1�si �, SEIMCE�✓/
STOP SIGN V A I
0I
Vv /
�- /
\ I
5' b(REET TREE
„EASEMENT (TvP.)
/ 0
_z
IV LANDS BUMRER
k PMBLIC DRAINAGE ENT
58 �
S OIRE5' THEE 1 ^
��— EFSE88 LP/P.)
P10N01 TOPSOIL _ _
/ BERM
?55—
/ CHANNEL 'A" '
SEE --DETAILS
5' SIDEW>5A-1
—(nP,y
BEAN
WILLIAM T. SMITH
D B.3889. RG.58
PCI F, SLIDE 67A
PIN 0661-29-1229.000
aL mleree
STA 16+99.72 GHFJJJ,,RDONNAY DRNE�
I STA, 10+00.00 VITRO CREEK WA
11 /
5 1
SPACE —
EASEMENT
SEE SHEET 13
-- FOR DETAILS
20' PUBLIC DRAINAGE
ONO ACCESS EASEMENT
1 I 1
1 1
1
I 1
1 I
I I 1
1 I
1 � 1
ELIZABETH F. SMITH I I 1
TPIN DB1414, PG20 I
M0661-2 PC.24D
1
1
BERM
iI
III
1
I
IhWAl
II
11.
II
', /_./ �� ,I jJ� III 1
/ 1D 761::71Esi,
)II III I I1'LI III1
40 42����I�I I�/Tt
5.5,0ARDONJ'Y I / III;
w. DRIVE +AOOr4
l�I 1'
15' LANDSCAPE DIFFER
k PMttIC DNJNACE EASEMENT
GREATER VISION FELLOWSHIP, INC. 0/0
THOMAS T. MILLER
D.B.14I0. PG 404
M.B.2001, PG.85
PIN 0661-28-7762.000
1 15 LANDSCAPE
EASEMENT BARER
TREE
EASEMENT (,YP) !
Zo
LIS
ASEM(LA ALL I
sLI
E
FES±7)
v
a ., . z:®. -® pe
VASMINE J. SCHMIDT
D.B3814, PG339
PC# F, SLIDE 6IA
PIN 0661-29-1111.00D
_L
NEVIN HOCKADAY
D.B.18I8, PG346
PCI' F, SLIDE 67A
PIN D661-28-1905.0.
GRADING & STORM DRAINAGE PLAN
SCALE 1" = 60'
15' LANDSCAPE BUFFER-
& PUBLIC DRAINAGE EASEMENT
MELANIE WADDELL JERRY WADDELL
D.B.21I1, PG526
PCI F. SLIDE 67A
PIN 0661-28-0780.000
emu
BARER
EASEMENT
15' LAN
k PLINK DNJ
\ IIIII
it
111I 1
I
JI j11
I III
10' PUBLIC SANITARY
SEVER EASEMENT
;I
yA1 eD I 1(
. N ) Or PLIEUC PEDESTRIAN k
NNNN 11 SAN. SEM. EASDIENT
rr
II II EI
( III
I
E Q
j I /II I* I D AND W COM
) 1I� O D.B.1322. PG
2 E111111 ' � M.B.2006, PG
L1D Illdl y,1 I PIN 0es0-D9-1-
Y e
I I Ali II I III` j s
IIII I I I, U
III\Ili L=G V--1 r\� i
I I)I IIII 6 •/�'Y 1N/ Q
II
TRAMS S. WESTER //�
ESTATE 92E, PC.105 VI IIII I
PIN 0661-18-4529.000 I illlllllI
I I1 loll
ll \ A,
°1'I I,
II 111° 11 \p II
1
I t
I
�iC210N
Dc
J
1
CLT Intersection
STA. 15+35.50 Dry Creek F
75
PROPOSED 12.
Sy OTHERS
GRAPHIC SCALE
60 0 30 60 120
•
OESICH
ARK
DRAWN
MAT
CHECKED
ARK
SCALE
DRY CREEK VILLAGE
GRADING & STORM DRAINAGE PLAN
4
OF
18

Impact Maps
Wetland Impact
W1 0.005 acre permanent impact
Stream Impact
S1 33 LF temporary impact
S2 10 LF temporary impact
Plan View of sewer and water line installation
PROPOSED 8" D.I. GRAVITY SEWER
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE & CLEARING
LIMITS OF DELINEATED WETLANDS
TREE PROTECTION FENCE
TREE PROTECTION/SILT FENCE
++-�---- SILT FENCE
WETLAND LINE
WETLANDS PERMANENT
IMPACT - 251 SQ. FT.
DELINEATED WETLANDS
PERENNIAL STREAM - TEMPORARY
STREAM IMPACT - 43 LF.
W 1 WETLAND PERMANENT IMPACT - 251 SQ. FT. 15' LANDSCAPE BUFFER
& PUBLIC DRAINAGE EASEMENT
M.H. No. -IA -29'LT (BY OTHERS)
STA:10+31.82
PERENNIAL STREAM - TEMPORARY _
STREAMIMPACT 33 LF. 1 . -CHECK - DAM, (TYP. )
B-R-SE-3kT9f l T R- --
1 m ''PUBLIC. SANITARY
SEWER- EASEMENT
EXISTVNG RIGHT OF WAY
CONCRETE_
0
I! _ao,—oo;�G m,+hwa.7-� ,moo �' — �� i �_,s�«—`arr�`so---
11 i /°°�°P"�—� „ m= r am _.
jz
;�r��' �`° _ EXISTING 36rRCP
�q. % /� - -� PERENNIAL STREAM -
JP
i
'r a/ IV �� s2 TEMPORARY STREAM
IMPACT 10 LF.
,
/' fir,
r
;!�lull f
Ir
1
SIGN
8"X16" TAPPING SLEEVE
& TAPPING VALVE
PROPOSED 12" D.I.
SAN. SEWER
BY OTHERS
INV. OUT = 240.42
SCALE: 1 = 50'
Hal Owen & Associates, Inc. 30 June 2022
Dry Creek SD, Harnett Co, NC

Impact Maps
Profile View of sewer and water line installation
250 250
IXIST.
16"
WATERMAIN
a
_ t'�
EXISTING
C/L
GRADE
1
_
_ —
—
—
— —
—
CENTER
f
PIPE
—
J
'
INT
z
ON
BRANCH
C/L
,'...
`
o'oEXISTING
INV.
I
=
240.91
36" RCI
rn
�_
PROPOSED
12"
D
I.
LF
' DI-SANI_SE:NER("
0.40%
L_
240
- .
_
366.84
-
-
1�
L
'4
O
CONCR
COL
,'
MA
M
HOLE{BY
No.1A
29.3'
OTHERS)
LT
24"
MI
.
_
ST'•
10+31.82
CLEARANCE
INV
L.� .
IN=239.58
246�79-
8"
WATERLINE
INV
OUT
-239,38
r`
v
F
7.r
cv
rn
GP.
n
t0
•.-
L-C]
V�
47
�'
II
�'
II
�=
II
�=
II
�'
II
II
II
xw
ww
x�
ww
k�
ww
x�
ww
x�
ww
xw
ww
23L
w
10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00
Scale horizontal 1" = 50' vertical 1"=5'
Hal Owen & Associates, Inc.
30 June 2022 Dry Creek SD, Harnett Co, NC

HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
ENDANGERED SPECIES AND DESIGNATED CRITICAL HABITAT
Soil Science Investigations • Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting

KYE.p T {Ds ry
-
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Project Code: 2022-0057546
Project Name: Dry Creek SD
June 24, 2022
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the
requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the
Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). If your project area
contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species on this species list, the proposed
action has the potential to adversely affect those species. If suitable habitat is present, surveys
should be conducted to determine the species' presence or absence within the project area. The
use of this species list and/or North Carolina Natural Heritage program data should not be
substituted for actual field surveys.
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered

06/24/2022 2
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having
similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological
evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may
affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended
contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.
If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that
listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the
agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service
recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed
within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7
consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered
Species Consultation Handbook" at:
http://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF
Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species
under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to
protect native birds from project -related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional,
resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more
information regarding these Acts see https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations.php.
The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally
killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to
comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within
applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan
(when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid
or minimize the production of project -related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and
their resources to the project -related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and
recommended conservation measures see hops://www.fws.gov/birds/bird-enthusiasts/threats-to-
birds.php.
In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies
to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities
that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures
that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both
migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of
Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations/
executive-orders/e0-13186. php.

06/24/2022 3
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of
this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit
to our office.
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List
• Migratory Birds

06/24/2022 1
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

06/24/2022 2
Project Summary
Project Code: 2022-0057546
Event Code: None
Project Name: Dry Creek SD
Project Type: Residential Construction
Project Description: Single family residential
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www.google.com/maps/@35.45132045,-78.78937292728523,14z
Counties: Harnett County, North Carolina

06/24/2022 3
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 6 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesl, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Birds
NAME
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Reptiles
NAME
STATUS
American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/776
Fishes
NAME
Endangered
STATUS
Similarity of
Appearance
(Threatened)
STATUS
Cape Fear Shiner Notropis mekistocholas
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6063
Clams
NAME
Endangered
STATUS
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164
Threatened

06/24/2022 4
Insects
NAME
STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Flowering Plants
NAME
Rough -leaved Loosestrife Lysimachia asperulaefolia
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2747
Candidate
STATUS
Endangered
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

06/24/2022
Migratory Birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act1 and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Actz.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the
USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your
project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this
list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location,
nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact
locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project
area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species
on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing
the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to
additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your
migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be
found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
NAME
American Kestrel Falco sparverius paulus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9587
Bachman's Sparrow Aimophila aestivalis
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6177
BREEDING
SEASON
Breeds Apr 1 to
Aug 31
Breeds May 1 to
Sep 30

06/24/2022 2
NAME
BREEDING
SEASON
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types
of development or activities.
hops://ecos.fws. gov/ecp/species/1626
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Breeds Sep 1 to
Jul 31
Breeds Apr 1 to
Jul 31
Breeds May 10
to Sep 10
Breeds
elsewhere
Breeds May 10
to Aug 31
Probability Of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the
FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting
to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence ( 1)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week
months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see
below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher
confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for
that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee
was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is
0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence

06/24/2022 3
in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12
(0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on
week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
Breeding Season ( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across
its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project
area.
Survey Effort (I)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on
all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
▪ probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
American
BCRestrel ---- +-- --_, iill 1111 1111 1111 IIII ---I --—
w�;;::�:.�----1+■III■III■I-
Bald Vu„�-,[1111I■�IIII�■III■I-r■IIIII■IIII
ary
WarbleProthonr ---- +— *-1III 1111 1111 1111---- ---� --—
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Red-headed
Woodpecker
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
---• it 1111 1111 1111 11-- I---
- -..-- -++-1-
- -..-- -++I

06/24/2022 4
Rusty Blackbird --- —+-- --_,_ — +-------------------------
BCC-BCR
Wood Thrush
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
--- --I 11III11■I1111--------
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds/species
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library/
collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-migratory-birds
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds hops://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf
++-.-
Migratory Birds FAQ
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts
to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize
impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly
important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in
the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very
helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding
in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits
may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of
infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified
location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCC) and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding,
and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as
warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act
requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your
project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list
of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds
potentially occurring in my specified location?

06/24/2022 5
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data
provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing
collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information
becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and
how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my
project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding,
wintering, migrating or year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab
of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of
interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your
migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your
project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds
elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern
throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands,
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on
your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles)
potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities
(e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made,
in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC
species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles,
please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species
and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the
Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides
birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird
model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical
Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.

06/24/2022 6
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use
throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this
information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study
and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid
violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of
birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for
identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC
use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be
aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that
overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no
data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey
effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of
certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might
be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you
know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement
conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell
me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.

06/24/2022 7
IPaC User Contact Information
Agency: Hal Owen & Associates
Name: Krissina Newcomb
Address: PO Box 400
City: Lillington
State: NC
Zip: 27546
Email [e-mail]
Phone: [phone]

r ■■■
■■ tx NC DEPARTMENT CF
■ ■ti■i NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
• ■■■
June 24, 2022
Krissina Newcomb
Hal Owen & Associates Inc
PO Box 400
Lillington, NC 27546
RE: Dry Creek SD
Dear Krissina Newcomb:
Roy Cooper, Governor
0. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Buchanan
Deputy Director, Natural Heritage Program
NCNHDE-18422
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Di rectory/Li stOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally -
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rodney.butler(ancdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely.
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
ap 121 W. JONES STREET. RALEIGH, !VC 27603 * 16S1 HAIL SERVICE CENTER, PALEIGI-1, rfC 27699
OFC 91g,J07&120 • FAX [phone]

V
cD
0
0_
0
L
4J
0
rD
0
c
O
C
L
a)
Q
N
0
C - N
O
N
ui
rD
ui
N
a�
w
a�
N
N
co
W
0
I
Z
U
Z
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
0 -
C
EL
4 C
0 r0
EL
)
6 Ul
a) M
LL
V
3)
U
V
Q
a)
C 4- C
E coc
EL
W
0
2004-Pre
Somatochlora
0)
M
M
(7
L
0_
O
0
.(13
C -
aa�
L -o
o 75
a) 33
a1:C
C)
M
Lo
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
0
n5
a)
0
N
O
N
0
0
a
z
0
z
3)
0
N
N
O
N
N
0
C
o
C C
D =
�o
Dz
c
3)4-
0
0-) o
w -0
�-a
7 -0
r
0 O
0
0
E
3)
O ro u
"0 0
0 Q
o a
rD
N 2
U 0 0
C w
ro Q
v
0 0
c -a Q
O °co
C ro 0
c o
Cc
-0 0") vo
CD
3) +-
C -o 2)
a) 40
E
m
U `�
O o w
0
C a
N o
m
C 0
U) OD
c6 n OD
Q o r
ro C
a)
C 0
0-) ro o
rD T
C C_,
: o •—
Z 0 2

NCNHDE-18422: Dry Creek SD
Buffered Project Boundary
Project Boundary
M
0
M
N
0)
M
a

HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE MAP
Soil Science Investigations • Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting

0
Road
500 1,000 ft
State Historic Preservation Office
• NCHPOpoints
NCHPO NR SL DOE Boundaries
n Local_District_Boundaries
Q boundary
Map for reference only.
Not a survey.
Hal Owen & Associates Inc.
Dry Creek Subdivision
State Historic Preservation Office
PO Box 400, Lillington, NC 27546
www.halowensoil.com
Dry Creek Road, Lillington, NC
919-893-8743
24 June 2022