62-0098-WS-0164_Well Construction_19940701

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Fayetteville. Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes; Secretary
AA rew McCall, Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
July 1, 1994
Mr. Steven Biggs
Town of Aberdeen
115 North Poplar Street
P.O. Box 785
Aberdeen, NC 28315
SUBJECT: Well Construction Permit
No. 62-0098-WS-0164
Municipal Supply Well
Aberdeen, Moore County
Dear Mr. Biggs:
In accordance with your application received June 24, 1994, we are forwarding
herewith Well Construction Permit No. 62-0098-WS-0164 dated July 1, 1994, issued to
the Town of Aberdeen for the construction of a supply well located off Devonshire
Trail, Aberdeen, North Carolina. -
This Permit will be effective from the date of its issuance and shall be subject to
the conditions and limitations as specified therein.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this Permit are
unacceptable to you, you have the right toan adjudicatory hearing before a hearing
officer upon written demand to the Director within 30 days following receipt of this
Permit, identifying the specific issues to be contended. Unless such demand is made,
this Permit shall be final and binding.
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens
Regional Supervisor
KTS/SAB/tf
Enclosure
cc: W. Pickard
Wachovia Building, Suite 714, Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5043 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Acfion Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A WELL OR WELL SYSTEM
In accordance with the provisions of Article 7, Chapter 87, North Carolina
General Statutes, and other applicable Laws, Rules and Regulations.
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
The Town of Aberdeen
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF a supply well to be completed in the Upper Cape Fear
Aquifer and located off Devonshire Trail in the Town of Aberdeen, Moore County, in
accordance with the application dated June 9, 1994, and in conformity with
specifications and supporting data, all of which are filed with the Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources and are considered a part of this permit.
This permit is for well construction only, and does not waive any provisions or
requirements of the Water Use Act of 1967 or any other applicable laws or regulations.
Construction of a well under this permit shall be in compliance with the North
Carolina Well Construction Regulations and Standards and any other laws and
regulations pertaining to well construction.
This permit will be effective from the date of its issuance through the duration of
this project or as this shall be amended, and shall be subject to other specified
conditions, limitations, or exceptions.
Permit issued this the 1st day of July, 1994.
FOR THE NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
•
Kerr T. Stevens, Regional Supervisor
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Permit No. 62-0098-WS-0164

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, ��
Health and Natural Resources 4/1)(Jdrl_ior,
'7119!
Fayetteville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, B. Jr., Governor E E H N Fl
Jonathan Howes, Secretary
Andrew McCall, Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
June 15, 1994
Mr. Steven Biggs, Town Manager
Town of Aberdeen
115 North Poplar Street
P.O. Box 785
Aberdeen, NC 28315
SUBJECT: Analytical Results
New Well Site
Aberdeen, Moore County
Dear Mr. Biggs:
Enclosed are the results of the analyzes conducted for water collected from the .test well
.near the water tower off Devonshire Trail.
If you have any questions you may contact me or Mr. Jim Bales, L.G., by telephone
[phone].
Sincerely,
Stephen A. Barnhardt, L.G.
Hydrogeologist II
SAB/zlt
Enclosure
Wachovia Building, Suite 714, Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5043 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
May 3, 1994
•
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mr. Jack Butler, P.E.
Remedial Branch Head
NC Superfund Section
FROM: Art Barnhardt, L.G
Hydrogeologist
Fayetteville Regional Office
SUBJECT: Stained Soil
Adjacent to NPL Site
Aberdeen, Moore County
NCD 981 927 502
The Fayetteville Regional Office has reviewed the information you forwarded to the
DEM. Also, we checked with Moore County Emergency Management to determine if they
had any records of fuel spills in that area and they reported that they did not.
We recommend that the parties responsible for the Geigy Chemical Corporation Site
analyze the soil for pesticides, petroleum, and any other contaminates that are of concern at
this site. If only petroleum fuel constituents are found, we will assume that the
contamination resulted from an unreported spill and handle the release as the regulations and
statutes require.
If you have any questions you may contact me or Mr. Jim Bales, L.G., at (910) 486-
1541.
SAB/zit

ENV. MANAGEMENT
FAYEITEVILLE REG. OFFICE
. State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604.
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
MEMOR
TO:
FROM:
RE:
ANDUM
March 18, 1993 Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Randy McElveen.
Environmental Engineer
Division of Solid Waste Management.
NC Superfund Section
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
Director
Division of Environmental Management
Draft Feasibility Study
Aberdeen Pesticide Dump Site
Operable'Unit Three
Project, No. 93-04
As requested the Division of Environmental Management has,.
reviewed the .subject document. The comments .from our
Groundwater, Water Quality and Air.QualitySections are provided
below:
Groundwater. Section Comments:
The alternatives for acting on the contamination at the
Farm Chemicals/Twin sites were narrowed down to the
following:
Alternative 1: No Action /
Alternative.2: In -situ Permeable treatment beds./
Alternative 3A: 'Extraction, coagulation, flocculation,::
precipitation, steam stripping and
-
discharge.
Extraction, coagulation,
flocculation, precipitation,'
uv/hydrogen peroxide/ozonetreatment.
and discharge.
Extraction, reverse osmosis/
ultrafiltration and discharge:./
for acting on the contamination at the
narrowed down to the following:
No Action /
Limited action of deed restrictions
and monitoring.
Alternative 3B:
Alternative 4:
The alternatives
Fairway Six Site were
Alternative 1:
Alternative 2:
•
P.O.
Box 27687, Raleigh,Notth Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] Fax # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Alternative 3:
Alternative 4:
Alternative 5:
In -situ permeable beds.
Extraction, granular activated carbon
adsorption and discharge.
Extraction, reverse osmosis/
ultrafiltration and discharge.
These alternatives appear to cover all viable options,
and further refinement will occur during the preparation of
the. record of .decision following the public comment period.
The Groundwater Section recommends that infiltration
galleries be considered for the method of discharge of
fluids except where the effluent might be toxic. Monitoring
downgradient from the infiltration galleries will most
probably be required. Once the final alternative has, been
selected, further determination of permitting requirement
can be finalized.
Water Oualitv Section,Comments:
If surface discharge or discharge to POTW is considered
for the effluent, permitting through the Water Quality
Section must be evaluated to determine permit types,and
conditions. The Water Quality Section would prefer on -site
reinfiltration.
Air Oualitv Section Comments:
Any steam stripping or other aeration of contaminated
soils or groundwater would require review and approval by
the Air Quality Section to determine compliance with the
toxic 'air pollutants requirements.
Thank you for the opportunity to review the subject
document. Should you have any comments or wish additional
discussion on this matter, please contact Mick ,Noland at
919-486-1541.
APH/nt/McElven2.nt
cc: Arthur Mouberry
Steve Tedder
Alan Klimek
�M��k�olan_d
Nargis Toma

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
February 18, 1993
MEMORANDUM
TO: Arthur Mouberry, Chief
Groundwater Section
FROM: M. J. Noland, Regional Supervisor'};
Fayetteville Regional Office //
SUBJECT: Draft Feasibility Study
Aberdeen Pesticide Dump Site, Operable Unit 3
NCD 980843346
Aberdeen, Moore County, North Carolina
Project No. 93-04
As requested, the subject document has been. reviewed by -.the Air Quality,
Groundwater, and Water Quality sections,. It appears that adequate site
characterization has been accomplished. The alternatives for acting on the
contamination at the Farm" Chemicals/Twin Sites were narrowed down' to the
following:
Alternative 1: No action.
Alternative 2: In -situ permeable treatment beds.
Alternative 3A: Extraction, coagulation, flocculation, precipitation,
steam stripping and discharge.
Alternative 3B: Extraction, coagulation, flocculation, precipitation,
UV/Hydrogen Peroxide/Ozone treatment and discharge.
Alternative 4: Extraction, reverse osmosis/ultrafiltration and
discharge.
The alternatives for acting on the contamination at the Fairway Six
Site were narrowed down to the following:
Alternative 1: No action.
Alternative 2: Limited action of deed restrictions and monitoring.
Alternative 3: In -situ permeable beds.

Mr. Arthur Mouberry
Page 2
February 18, 1993,
Alternative 4:
discharge.
Alternative
discharge.
ExtraCtion, granular activated carbon adsorption and
5: Extraction,
reverse osmosis/ultrafiltration and
These alternatives appearto cover all viable options, and further
refinement will occur during the preparation of the Record of Decision
following the public comment period.
The Groundwater section recommends that infiltration galleries be
considered for the method of discharge of fluids except where the effluent
might be toxic. Monitoring downgradient from the infiltration galleries will
most probably be roTuired.. ,Once the final alternative has been selected,
further determination of permitting requirements can be finalized.
If surface discharge or discharge to a POTW is considered for the
effluent, permitting through the Water Quality section must be evaluated to
determine permit types and conditions. The Water Quality section would
prefer on -site• reinfiltration.
Any steam stripping or other aeration of contaminated soils or ground-
water would require review and approval by the Air Quality section to deter-
mine compliance with toxic air pollutants requirements.
MJN/jb
cc: Steve Tedder
Alan Klimek
FRO W/Q
FRO A/Q

DIVISION OF •ENVIRONMENTAL.L 6`4. '"°fr
GROUNDWATER SECTION_
January 20, 1993
M EMORANDUM
TO: Mick Noland, Regional Supervisor
Fayetteville Regional Office
FROM: Arthur Mouberry
SUBJECT: Aberdeen Pestic7rde Dumpsite
NCD0980843346
Draft Feasibility
Moore County
Project #93-04
ENV. MANAGEMENT
FAYETTEVILLE REG. OFFICE
Attached is'the documentation on the referenced project
submitted to this; Division, forreviewand comment, by the
Division of Solid Waste Management.
You are requested to have someone from each of the Ai'r
Quality, Groundwater and Water Quality staffs in your office
review the project and provide comments. The Central Office.
Section staff will also have an opportunity to review the
addendum.
The Groundwater Section has been assigned
responsibility for coordination of Division comments, so
your regional comments and the application package should be
sent to my attention. no later than February 4; 1`99'3R If
additional time isneeded to .complete the regional office
review, please contact Brian Wagner.
Attachments'
AM/sbp/ABERDEEN.RO
cc: Brian Wagner

COMMISSIONERS
WILLIAM A. (BILL) MARTS
JOHN McCRUMMEN, JR.
ELIZABETH B. MOFIELD
ARTHUR PARKER
WALTER H. WRIGHT
June 17, 1993
-6own of .Aberdeen
43tv't4NivN
Mr. Jim Bales
Suite 714, Wachovia Bldg.
Fayetteville, NC 28301
Dear Mr. Bales:
ROBERT N. PAGE, III, MAYOR
STEVEN BIGGS, TOWN MANAGER
TELEPHONE
[phone]
glEWZDI
i.L\I JUN I81993-
ENV. MANAGEMENT
FAYETTEVILLE REG. OFFICE
Per our conversation, please find enclosed a copy of the letter that
was sent to EPA.
Steve Biggs
Town Manager
SB/jd
Enclosure
115 NORTH POPLAR STREET
• POST OFFICE BOX 785 • ABERDEEN, NORTH CAROLINA 28315

COMMISSIONERS
WILLIAM A. (BILL) MARTS
JOHN McCRUMMEN, JR.
ELIZABETH 8. MOFIELD
ARTHUR PARKER
WALTER H. WRIGHT
June 2, 1993
"Oown of "Aberdeen
Ms. Kay Crane
Remedial Project Manager
US Environmental Protection Agency
345 Courtland Street, N.E.
Atlanta, Georgia 30365
Dear Ms. Crane:
ROBERTN. PAGE, III, MAYOR
STEVEN BIGGS, TOWN MANAGER
TELEPHONE
[phone]
Your recent visit to Aberdeen and the public meeting held was,
very informative for me and the other Town officials in
attendance. However, we were disturbed by the knowledge that no
formal effort is underway to identify the source of the
contamination of three of our water supply wells. (In addition
to the two wells of which you are aware have been shut down, we
recently received official notification from the State Department
of Environment, Health and Natural Resources that well number
thirteen has lindane contamination and must be taken off-line.)
Loss of any additional wells will jeopardize the ability to the
Town to provide an adequate supply of water for its citizens and
businesses. In addition, it is our opinion that the parties
responsible for the well contamination should be held accountable
for replacement of this vital resource. The Environmental
Protection Agency has invested heavily in the Aberdeen water
system through the installation of mains to serve properties in
the Crestline area and this investment will have been for nothing
if we are unable to meet system demand as a result of
contaminated well sites.
We formally request that any decisions made on settlement of the
Aberdeen Pesticide Dumps Sites account for loss of these well
sites and provide for their replacement and that no settlements
be finalized until the source of contamination is identified. We
also request assistance with identifying the source or sources of
contamination. Finally, the Town seeks assistance with both the
technical and financial aspects of mitigating the contaminated
well sites to the extent necessary to utilize the sites as a safe
water supply source.
115 NORTH POPLAR STREET
• POST OFFICE BOX 785 • ABERDEEN`, NORTH CAROLINA 28315

Ms. Kay Crane
June 2, 1993
Page Two
The importance of this matter to the Town and its citizens cannot
be overstated. Your assistance with this matter will be most
appreciated.
Sincerely,
Steven Biggs
Town Manager
cc: Aberdeen Mayor and Board of Commissioners

• e
North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, & Natural Rocources
• Division of Epidemiology
Environmental Epidemiology Section
Drinking Water -Health Risk Evaluation
. General
DATE •?„9( 2"z/7/
LABORATORY DER
COUNTY
Based on these analytical results,•this water should be considered safe
for normal usage.
( ) Chemical analysis did not show any contamination. Hater should be
resampled if odor or taste persists.
( ) The water should not be used for drinking or cooking purposes, avoid
prolonged bathing/showering.
( ) .Based on these analytical results, this water is highly contaminated and
should not be used for drinking, cooking or bathing/showering.
( ) T44 leboratory results are not conclusive, please resample•:
r7i
EDPLEASE INDICATE ON- LAB SHEET THAT IT IS A RESAMPLE AND PROVIDE PREVIOUS
$A?i.P E NUHBER (S) .crz
csi
( ) D NTS :
For further informat:,
Environmental Epidemi___„
DEHNR 3B91 (5/92)
Environmental Epidemiology Section (Review 5/95)

N.C. Dept. of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Laboratory Services
State Laboratory of Public Health
P.O. Box 28047, Raleigh, N.C. 27611
Environmental Sciences Analysis Report
Name of Owner, Patient
or Supply: 7)12.46s rb c1 .S'f��-�
Addr e s s17.R1 / t,0 (S l /-2J Q
to
County: IN\ 0`U /
Report To: M4 Ov 2�= lip -c_'ir. ab
Jti
yyl,Cmj e /1 I
Address:
1fr;
!!i
D
f 1 10AR 20 1996
ENVIRONIvIENIAL
D:>,OLOG i SECf!ON
Pltse Read instruction sheet.
,ak n3 VOA vials contain 1:1 HC
quo cf &A-1 s/ h-,
Pv 27
3 Z7
Date Collected: 37
i, rhG4
Collected By:
Analysis Desired:
nee-. (/ /c-64 „u` -
71,124-,J)
Laboratory
Number
Sample
Number
Sample Description or Remarks
Results In
961301
kATTACHEL SHED -CS)
961 0.Z
-
Date Received
Date Extracted
�-- g/.6) WA
Date Reported
DEHNR Form 2364 Revised (9-89)
Laboratory
1658E
Date Analy ed
Reported By:,
3
6

Laboratory No.
N. C. DEPARTMENT OF'ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH; .& NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION•OF LABORATORY SERVICES, .ENVIRONMENTALSCIENCES SECTION-
P.O. BOX _28047'- 306N. WILMINGTON ST, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611
PURGEABLE COMPOUNDS Date of Analysis //S/7'�
'- COMPOUND
ug/1
Dichlorodifl'uoranethane
/.1
Chloramethane
✓Vinyl. Chloride -
Bromomethane
Chloroethane
Trichl.orofluoromethane •'
11,1-Dichloroethylene
-
-Methylene Chloride
tert-Butyl Methyl Ether
✓trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
Isopropyl ether
1,1-Dichloroethane -
2,2-Dichloropropane
,
✓ci.s-1,2-Dichloroethylene '-
Chloroform
( / T
(BCM) Bromochloranethane
LA
11,1,1-Trichloroethane .
1,1-Dichloropropene
✓Carbon Tetrachloride
✓Benzene
1/1,2-Dichloroethane
✓Trichloroethy-lene
11,2-Dichloropropane
Bromodichloromethane
Dibromanethane
✓Toluene
1,1;2-Trichloroethane -.
✓Tetrachloroethylene,
•-1,3-Dichloropropane
Dibromochloromethane
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB).
1-Chlorohexane
-
Mq. ei e,
+rare_.,
.5.5,- U
Te_• ra. yarn lN.
COMMENTS:
' . COMPOUND
ug/ 1
✓Chlorobenzene
(A
✓Ethylbenzene
1,1,1.,2-Tetrachloroethane,-'
✓p-Xylene,.
Vim-Xylene
✓o-Xylene
✓Styrene '.
Bramoform
Isopropylbenzene
1,1,22-Tetrachloroethane .
Brc nobenzene
n-Propylbenzene
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
'2-Chlorotoluene
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
4-Chlorotoluene "
tert-Butyl:Benzene -
'Pentachloroethane - .
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
Set -Butyl Benzene
p-Isopropyltoluene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
11,4=D:ichlorobenzene
n=6utylbenzene •
11,2=Dichlorobenzene
Bis (24h1oroisopropyl) Ether
1,2=Dibrano-3-Chloropropane
1,2,4=Trichlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Naphthalene
1,2;3-Trichlorobenzene
\/
MOL -:Minimum Detection. Limit for water .(EPA Method 502.,2), is 1.0 pg/1..
J = Estimated value_
K = Actual value is known to be less than value given.
L - Actual value is known to be greater than value given.
U - Material-. was analyzed for but not detected.
NA = Not analyzed.
1/ - Tentative identification..
- Regulated VOC
T Trihalomethane
N.C. Dept. of Environment, Health, & Natural Resources
DEHNR 3068-0 (Rev. 10/92 Laboratory Services)
#1532E D=18.

N. C. DEPARTMENT OF' ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, & NATURAL RESOURCES :
DIVISION OF LABORATORY SERVICES, ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES SECTION-
P.O. BOX 28047 - 306 N. WILMINGTON ST, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611
Laboratory No.9 /36':T PURGEABLE COMPOUNDS Date of Analysis /y-/ y4%
/ ' /
COMPOUND
pg/1
Dichlorodifluoromethane
L)
Chloromethane
✓Vinyl Chloride
Bromomethane
Chloroethane
Tri chlorofluoromethane
11,1-Dichloroethylene
Methylene Chloride
tert-Butyl Methyl Ether
✓trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
Isopropyl ether
1,1-Dichloroethane
2,2-Dichloropropane
✓cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
Chloroform
(BCM) Bromochloromethane
11,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloropropene
✓Carbon Tetrachloride
✓Benzene
11,2-Dichloroethane
✓Trichloroethylene
✓1,2-Dichloropropane
Bromodichloromethane
Dibromomethane
✓Toluene
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
✓Tetrachloroethylene
1,3-Dichloropropane
Dibromochloromethane
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
1-Chlorohexane
`P.AfaRk rOA
4.1-cum
4ra-c _
idrn
PtCR -,-t
M a-1, y 1 e Vkid Kr i-Ake
41-cue.-
COMMENTS:
COMPOUND
119/1
VChlorobenzene
U
✓Ethyl benzene
-14'0.0 c_
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
l,(
✓p-Xylene
*- cLcc_
✓m-Xylene
1
✓o-Xylene
-
-14=iL-
✓Styrene
Ifs
Bramfarm
I J
Isopropyl benzene
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Bromobenzene
n-Propylbenzene
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
2-Chlorotoluene
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
4-Chlorotoluene
tert-Butyl Benzene
Pentachloroethane .
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
sec -Butyl Benzene
p-Isopropyltoluene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
V1,4-Dichlorobenzene
n-Butylbenzene
✓1,2-Dichlorobenzene
Bis (2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Naphthalene
1;
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
V
MDL - Minimum Detection Limit for water (EPA Method 502.2), is 1.0 Iig/1.
J - Estimated vaTue.
K - Actual value is known to be less than value given.
L - Actual value is known to be greater than value given.
U - Material was analyzed for but not detected.
NA.- Not analyzed.
1/ _ Tentative identification.
✓ - Regulated VOC
T - Trthalomethane
N.C. Dept. of Environment, Health, & Natural Resources
DEHNR 3068-0 (Rev. 10/92 Laboratory Services)
#1532E 0-18

N.C. Dept. of Environment, Health and Natural Resource's
Division of Laboratory Services
State Laboratory of Public Health
P.O. Box 28047, Raleigh, N.C. 27611
Environmental Sciences Analysis Report
Name of Owner, yatient, �.
f ., k
or Supply: /)-GS fbn) ,J� ►��� (
Address: j/lyyt 21/ �L)L.S l L-ti ./)
County: / 67) ,QL'- CO
Report To:
Address:
r 1 4_C��f}� //lrf'
row z-may
Date Collected:
Collected By:
Analysis Desired:
3/ /3 /
T 44,
F.TROLitJM PRODUCTS
?.' -.mac; iiTi•r , , A:: BC!
vials •
446
''4 , ( 46-
Laboratory
Number
Sample
Number
Sample Description or Remarks
•
`"Results In
a.
-7
G7)
—
1
C°1
L-
m
•
Date Received 2- ) 7-' Date Reported
/—
Date Extracted -1 k-9 -,,L6 cA Date Analyzed vt µQ (� 4- A , 3 I —%,4-
j I <
Reported By: � l/�y,
DEHNR Form 2364 Revised (9-89)
Laboratory
1658E

Laboratory No.
N. C. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, & NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF LABORATORY SERVICES, `ENVIRONMENTAL "SCIENCES SECTION>
P.O.'BOX '28047-"306..N. WILMINGTON ST, RALEIGH, N.C.27611
PURGEABLE COMPOUNDS Date of Analysis.
COMPOUND -
pg/1,
Dichlorodifluoromethane
'.
(A
Chloromethane
✓Viny.l Chloride
Bromomethane
Chloroethane
Trichlorofluoromethane
✓1.,1-Dichloroethylene
Methylene Chloride
tert-Butyl Methyl ° Ether :.
✓trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
Isopropyl ether
1,1-Dichloroethane
2,2-Dichloropropane
✓cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
'J
Chloroform
f,4F -
(BCM) Bromochloromethane
U
✓1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloropropene
✓Carbon Tetrachloride
✓Benzene
✓1,2-Dichloroethane
✓Trichloroethylene
✓1,2-Dichloropropane -
Bromodichloromethane
Dibromomethane
✓Toluene . -
1,1,2-Trichloroethane.
✓Tetrachloroethylene.
1,3-Dichloropropane
Dibromochloromethane
�.
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
1,-Chlorohexane
V -
MQ- 1 e \ A.,yj K- o
lakq do r
.
0
COMMENTS:
AL/76
COMPOUND
P9/1
✓Chlorobenzene-
I,(
lEthylbenzene
I
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
✓p-Xylene
-f"Or1e.-
Tm-Xylene
✓o `Xylene- --
Id
✓Styrene
=Bromoform
i
IsopropyTbenzene
''�
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Bromobehzene
!
n-Propylbenzene
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
2-Chlorotoluene
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
4=Chlorotoluene
tert-Butyl Benzene '
Pentachloroethane`
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
1.•
sec -Butyl Benzene
i
p-Isopropyl.toluene,
I
1,3-Dichlorobenzene _
!'
11,4-Dichlorobenzene
n-Butylbenzene
✓1,2-Dichlorobenzene
Bis:,(2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether'
i'
1;2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane
!`
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Naphthalene
1,2;3-Trichlorobenzene
�J
MDL -Minimum Detection Limit for water .(EPA Method 502.2),•is 1.0 pg/1.
J - Estimated value..
K - Actual, value is known to be less thanvaluegiven.
L - Actual value is known to -•be greater than value given.
U _ Material was analyzed .for but not detected.
NA - Not analyzed.
1/ - Tentat-ive identification. -
✓ - Regulated VOC
T = Trihalomethane. '
N.C. Dept: of Environment,' Health, & Natural Resources
DEHNR 3068-0 (Rev. 10/92'Laboratory Services)
#1532E D-18

acc (13s 54-ise tiyi,
A) cup Vo-ed)
uuLeA G luLe_
t.t9eJ(
to-03 oi-l/g?
V(Lsk
TA3-ei_5 cc ro e ccck