NC0082821_Report_20220713

L�
synTerra
Science & Engineering Consultants
synterracorp.com
REPORT OF ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING
William M. Flinchum, P.G.
Senior Review
SOUTHERN STATES COOPERATIVE, INC.
STATESVILLE FERTILIZER PLANT
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
JULY 11, 2022
PREPARED FOR
SOUTHERN STATES COOPERATIVE, INC.
6606 WEST BROAD STREET
RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23230
Thomas S. Dunham, P.G.
Senior Geologist
Evan Jevnikar
Field Scientist

Report of Annual Groundwater Monitoring
Southern States Cooperative, Inc.
Statesville, North Carolina
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Site Location, Description, and History 1
1.2 Summary of Remedial Actions 2
2.0 TREATMENT -SYSTEM MAINTENANCE AND MONITORING 2
3.0 MONITORING WELL -SAMPLING ACTIVITIES AND RESULTS 3
3.1 Monitoring Well -Sampling Methodology 3
3.2 Results from Sampling Event 4
3.2.1 Nitrate Results and Trends 4
3.2.2 Ammonia Results and Trends 5
4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 6
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Site Topographic Map
Site Map with Cross -Section Traces
Map of Treatment System Discharge Line
Potentiometric Surface Map — November 2021
Shallow Aquifer Nitrate Isoconcentration Map — November 2021
Deep Aquifer Nitrate Isoconcentration Map — November 2021
Cross Section A -A' — November 2021
Cross Section B-B' — November 2021
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Historical Recovery Well Results
Summary of Water -table Elevation Data
Summary of Groundwater Analytical and Field Parameter Results
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A Laboratory Analytical Reports
Appendix B Trend Graphs of Nitrate and Ammonia in Groundwater
July 2022 Page i
P:\Cary\Southern States\Statesville Fertilizer - 50200\Reports\2021\2021 GWM Report.docx Project: 00.2398.00

Report of Annual Groundwater Monitoring
Southern States Cooperative, Inc.
Statesville, North Carolina
LIST OF ACRONYMS
2L standard 15A NCAC 02L .0202
70 Bypass U.S. Highway 70 Bypass
AST aboveground storage tanks
btoc below top of casing
Canonie Canonie Environmental Services, Inc.
CAP Corrective Action Plan
DO dissolved oxygen
DMR Discharge Monitoring Reports
IMAC Interim Maximum Allowable Concentration
mg/L milligrams per liter
NCDEHNR North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural
Resources
NCDEQ North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, formerly
Division of Environmental Management
Southern States, Site Southern States Cooperative, Inc. fertilizer plant
SynTerra Synterra Corporation
USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency
July 2022 Page ii
P:\Cary\Southern States\Statesville Fertilizer - 50200\Reports\2021\2021 GWM Report.docx Project: 00.2398.00

Report of Annual Groundwater Monitoring
Southern States Cooperative, Inc.
Statesville, North Carolina
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Site Location, Description, and History
The Southern States Cooperative, Inc. (Southern States) fertilizer plant (Site) is at 2582 Salisbury
Highway, approximately 6 miles east of Statesville, North Carolina (Figure 1). The Site is
developed with several buildings that include a fertilizer -manufacturing building, an office
building, a warehouse, several support buildings, and multiple aboveground storage tanks
(ASTs; Figure 2). The Site is used for the manufacture, storage, and distribution of fertilizer. The
Site is bordered to the north by Salisbury Highway; to the east by McNess Road, across which
are Ferti Technologies and Cardinal Logistics Management; to the south by U.S. Highway 70
Bypass (70 Bypass), across which are single-family residences; and to the west by agricultural
land. The 70 Bypass crosses east to west through the southern portion of the Site and separates
approximately 13 acres from the main property that consists of approximately 61 acres to the
north.
Groundwater at the Site exhibits ammonia and nitrate from releases of liquid ammonium
nitrate that apparently flowed into four surface -water ponds formerly on the Site. Two ponds
were formerly located approximately 1,000 feet southwest of the main plant, and two ponds
were formerly located east and southeast of the main plant. Those ponds are referenced in the
Corrective Action Plan (CAP) dated January 28, 1994, submitted by Canonie Environmental
Services, Inc. (Canonie) to the North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural
Resources (NCDEHNR), Division of Environmental Management (now called the Department of
Environmental Quality, or NCDEQ). The NCDEHNR approved the CAP in 1994. The CAP showed
the extent of affected groundwater was defined with reasonable certainty. The objectives of
the CAP were to remediate groundwater and to prevent off -Site migration of the constituent
plume. Canonie developed a groundwater -sampling plan that established a semiannual
groundwater -sampling schedule to monitor the effectiveness of the CAP.
In an email dated April 30, 2014, to Duncklee & Dunham (now SynTerra) from Andrew Pitner,
NCDEQ agreed with our recommendation in the 2013 Annual Groundwater Monitoring and
Treatment System Effectiveness Report to reduce the frequency of groundwater monitoring
from semiannual to annual.
On behalf of Southern States, Duncklee & Dunham researched nitrate -treatment technologies,
evaluated remedial alternatives for the subject Site, and reported findings to NCDEQ in the
2015 Annual Groundwater Monitoring and Treatment System Effectiveness Report, dated
November 9, 2015. We recommended in the report that the continued operation of the existing
treatment system appeared to be the most cost-effective approach to remove constituent mass
from groundwater and control off -Site migration of the plume. We met with NCDEQ personnel
at the subject Site on December 9, 2015, to discuss the findings and remedial alternatives
presented in our 2015 report.
July 2022 Page 1
P:\Cary\Southern States\Statesville Fertilizer - 50200\Reports\2021\2021 GWM Report.docx Project: 00.2398.00

Report of Annual Groundwater Monitoring
Southern States Cooperative, Inc.
Statesville, North Carolina
During this meeting, NCDEQ requested and Southern States agreed to:
• Begin semiannual sampling of the extraction wells
• Collect vertical -gradient data from the monitoring wells that surround RW-2
• Extend the operational period of the treatment system to throughout the year.
1.2 Summary of Remedial Actions
Groundwater -recovery wells RW-2, RW-5r and RW-6 were constructed as part of the CAP.
These wells pump groundwater to a treatment system, in which the pH is adjusted by adding a
caustic solution to the water prior to discharge from Outfall 001 into Fourth Creek (Figure 3).
The groundwater -treatment system is permitted under the National Pollution Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) program. SynTerra conducts bi-monthly Site visits to maintain and
monitor the treatment system. We collect effluent water samples bi-monthly and report the
data to NCDEQ on monthly Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMR).
TREATMENT -SYSTEM MAINTENANCE AND MONITORING
The groundwater -treatment system was operational during the reporting period from January
1, 2021, to December 31, 2021. The treatment system did not experience shutdowns or
malfunctions during this time period.
The table below summarizes the volumes of water removed by each extraction well during this
reporting period.
Monitoring Period: January 1, 2020 — December 31, 2021
Well ID
Volume of Water (Gallons)
RW-5r
1,252,964.7
RW-6
862,179
RW-2
14,252,032
SynTerra did not collect water samples from the three recovery wells during this reporting
period. Sampling of the three recovery wells will resume on a semi-annual basis during the
2022 reporting period. This sampling will include the collection of samples from the spigots
near the wellheads, which will be submitted for laboratory analysis of nitrate according to the
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 300 and ammonia -nitrogen
according to SM 4500. A summary of these test results and copies of analytical laboratory
reports will be included in the next monitoring report.
July 2022
Page 2
P:\Cary\Southern States\Statesville Fertilizer - 50200\Reports\2021\2021 GWM Report.docx Project: 00.2398.00

Report of Annual Groundwater Monitoring
Southern States Cooperative, Inc.
Statesville, North Carolina
In accordance with the NPDES permit, the operator collects treatment system effluent samples
bi-monthly for analysis of total suspended solids (TSS) according to Method SM 2540D and
ammonia -nitrogen according to SM 4500. The operator also collects monthly effluent samples
for analysis of copper according to EPA Method 200.7, total phosphorus according to SM4500,
total Kjeldahl nitrogen according to EPA Method 351.2, and total nitrate and chloride according
to EPA Method 300. In accordance with the current permit issued on August 1, 2019, the
operator also collects monthly effluent samples to be tested for total hardness according to EPA
Method 200.7. We submit the effluent samples to Waypoint for laboratory analysis. The
operator also collects effluent samples for analysis of Ceriodaphnia chronic toxicity (chronic
toxicity) according to the December 2010 North Carolina Phase 11 Chronic Whole Effluent
Toxicity test procedure.
SynTerra collected monthly samples to be tested for chronic toxicity. We submitted these
samples to Waypoint Analytical and submitted quarterly DMRs that include chronic toxicity
results to DEQ, as required by the NPDES permit.
3.0 MONITORING WELL -SAMPLING ACTIVITIES AND RESULTS
SynTerra conducted annual groundwater -monitoring activities on November 2, 3, and 5, 2021.
Prior to purging and sampling each well, we measured depths to the water table with an
electric water -level probe and recorded those data on field -sampling data sheets. Table 2
summarizes those depths and respective water -table elevations. Figure 4 illustrates the
potentiometric surface for the November 2021 sampling event. The direction of groundwater
flow during the event was to the southwest and the average hydraulic gradient was 0.033
feet/feet, which is consistent with historical trends. The vertical -gradient from the monitoring
wells that surround RW-2 could not be calculated because K65W7F and K65W7G were both dry
at the time of sampling.
3.1 Monitoring Well -Sampling Methodology
SynTerra collected groundwater samples from 10 of the 14 monitoring wells during the
November 2021 sampling event. We did not sample K65W6D because this well is damaged and
has historically been dry during sampling events since February 1993. K65W7C is damaged and
has remained dry since April 2011. Monitoring wells K65W7F and K65W7G were dry during this
event.
SynTerra purged the wells and collected samples using a peristaltic pump fitted with new
tubing to sample those wells in which the depth to water was less than 26 feet below top of
casing (btoc). We collected the groundwater samples using low-flow/minimum draw -down
sampling techniques. During the sampling process, we recorded field measurements for
dissolved oxygen (DO), oxidation-reduction potential (ORP), pH, temperature, turbidity, and
electrical conductivity, as summarized in Table 3.
July 2022 Page 3
P:\Cary\Southern States\Statesville Fertilizer - 50200\Reports\2021\2021 GWM Report.docx Project: 00.2398.00

Report of Annual Groundwater Monitoring
Southern States Cooperative, Inc.
Statesville, North Carolina
SynTerra discharged the groundwater samples directly into labeled laboratory -provided
containers, recorded the samples on a chain -of -custody form, placed the containers in coolers
with ice, and delivered the coolers to Pace. Pace tested the samples for nitrate according to
USEPA Method 300.0 and ammonia nitrogen according to USEPA Method 350.1.
3.2 Results from Sampling Event
The laboratory reports are in Appendix A. Table 3 summarizes the test results and graphs of the
nitrate and ammonia trends over time are in Appendix B. Nitrate isoconcentration maps are
presented as Figures 5 and 6. Nitrate and ammonia concentrations are displayed on cross
sections A -A' (Figure 7) and B-B' (Figure 8).
3.2.1 Nitrate Results and Trends
We observed the following with respect to the nitrate results.
• Samples from saprolite wells K65W6A, -6B, -6N, and -7J, and samples from
bedrock wells K65W6E, -7K and -7L exhibited nitrate at concentrations greater
than the North Carolina groundwater quality standard (2L standard) of 10
milligrams per liter (mg/L).
• The nitrate concentration in the sample from saprolite well K65W6A, located in
the core of the plume, decreased from 140 mg/L to 99.6 mg/L in November
2021. The nitrate concentration in the sample from the bedrock well K65W7K
decreased from 94 mg/L to 31.3 mg/L, which is the lowest detection in a sample
since 2007. The nitrate concentration in the sample from saprolite well K65W7J
decreased from 110 mg/L during the previous sampling event to 65.1 mg/L. The
nitrate concentration in the sample from bedrock well K65W7L decreased from
120 mg/L to 99.8 mg/L.
• Samples from bedrock monitoring well K65W6E, located near the former
location of Pond B, exhibited nitrate at a concentration of 384 mg/L, the highest
concentration detected in samples from this well. Samples from this well have
exhibited an increasing trend in nitrate concentrations since May 1997. The
nitrate concentration in the sample from saprolite well K65W6N increased from
19 mg/L during the previous sampling event to 130 mg/L in November 2021,
which is the highest concentration detected in samples from this well.
• The sample from bedrock well K65W6B, located in the northern zone of the
plume, increased from 41 mg/L to 45.9 mg/L and remain consistent with
historical concentrations.
• Samples from saprolite wells K65W6M and K65W67D and bedrock well K65W7H,
at the southern extent of the plume, did not exhibit nitrate at concentrations
greater than the 2L standard.
July 2022 Page 4
P:\Cary\Southern States\Statesville Fertilizer - 50200\Reports\2021\2021 GWM Report.docx Project: 00.2398.00

Report of Annual Groundwater Monitoring
Southern States Cooperative, Inc.
Statesville, North Carolina
• In general, concentrations of nitrate in samples from monitoring wells have
exhibited stable to decreasing trends over time, with the exception of K65W6E
and K65W7G. However, K65W7G has been dry since 2016.
3.2.2 Ammonia Results and Trends
We observed the following with respect to the ammonia results.
• The sample collected from saprolite well K65W7J exhibited ammonia at a
concentration greater than the current Interim Maximum Allowable
Concentration (IMAC) of 1.5 mg/L. Ammonia concentrations in samples from
K65W7J have been greater than the IMAC since October 2010. The ammonia
concentration in the sample decreased from 5.1 mg/L during the previous
sampling event to 4.34 mg/L in November 2021.
• Samples from the saprolite well K65W6A exhibited ammonia at 0.173 mg/L, a
decrease from the previous concentration of 0.18 mg/L in October 2020.
• The ammonia concentration from saprolite well K65W6N decreased from 2.2
mg/L to 0.354 mg/L. The ammonia concentration from bedrock well K65W6N,
located in the center of the plume, decreased from 1.9 mg/L to 1.44 mg/L. The
ammonia concentration from saprolite well K65W7L decreased from 6.9 mg/L to
1.34 mg/L. All concentrations detected from these wells in November 2021
decreased to less than IMACs.
• Samples from bedrock monitoring well K65W6E, located near the former
location of Pond B, have exhibited a decreasing trend in ammonia
concentrations since November 2011.
• Samples from saprolite wells K65W6B, -6M, -7H, and -7D and bedrock well
K65W7H did not exhibit ammonia at detectable concentrations.
• In general, concentrations of ammonia nitrogen in samples from monitoring
wells have exhibited stable to decreasing trends over time, with the exception of
K65W7G and K65W7J.
July 2022 Page 5
P:\Cary\Southern States\Statesville Fertilizer - 50200\Reports\2021\2021 GWM Report.docx Project: 00.2398.00

Report of Annual Groundwater Monitoring
Southern States Cooperative, Inc.
Statesville, North Carolina
4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the information presented above, SynTerra recommends the following:
• Continue to operate the groundwater -treatment system in accordance with the CAP.
• Test groundwater samples from the three recovery wells for nitrate and ammonia on a
semi-annual basis and conduct the next event in June and December of 2022.
• Continue the groundwater -monitoring program on an annual basis and conduct the next
sampling event in October 2022.
July 2022 Page 6
P:\Cary\Southern States\Statesville Fertilizer - 50200\Reports\2021\2021 GWM Report.docx Project: 00.2398.00

Report of Annual Groundwater Monitoring
Southern States Cooperative, Inc.
Statesville, North Carolina
FIGURES
•
•
• •
0
synTerra
Science & Engineering Consultants

USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OBTAINED FROM THE USGS STORE AT http://store.usgs.gov/
L7
synTerra
IREDELL COUNTY
FIGURE 1
SITE TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
SOUTHERN STATES COOPERATIVE -
STATESVILLE FERTILIZER PLANT
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
STATESVILLE EAST QUADRANGLE
511 KEISLER DRIVE, SUITE 102
CARY, NORTH CAROLINA
PHONE [phone]
www.synterracorp.com
DRAWN BY: C. NEWELL
PROJECT MANAGER: WMF
LAYOUT: FIGURE 1
DATE: 3/23/2022
CONTOUR INTERVAL: 10 FT
MAP DATE: 1995
P:`Cary\Southern States\Statesville Fertilizer - 50200\CAD\2021\00239803Site Topo.dwg
GRAPHIC SCALE
1000 0 1000 2000
IN FEET

/ \
/ \
/ \ /N /
N. i \ /
\ / \
7
/
1
/
7
V — —850-
1/—\\ \�.�� \I
\ 7�, I
1 _
\\ \\
\ 7---
/ \\ \
/
/
/
/
7
7
/ 1
7
/
/
— \ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
I 1
/ 1
\ \ \/ I \ /
\ \
— _ —
\ \
\ \
\ \
\\ \ \\ / // /
\ \
�7---/ // / /
\ \
\
\ K65W7D \
\ \ \ I \ \
\ \\ \ \ \ \ \
\ \ \ \ \ \. \� \ 1
\ \
\\ \I 11 \\ ��K65W7H RW-2 \\\i `--r—\ i \/
1 y
\ I `— K65W7G — I\ \ / / '
\1 / \� K65W7F \ \ ' 1 \\ \\
s00—
�� — — \,� / - — \ \ \ i_ \ \ \ ' \ / IBIG FOREST DRIVE \�` \\ / \
/1 ,
.,
....„
\ .........„
/ \ / / / \\ \ ,� 1 \ I \ // \
/l , --\ I 7 �� ' \\\\ \` ---, \ 1 --
BENT BROOK ROAD \ \ 7 \ — 1
— _ � \ _ 1
1 \ \ _\' \ �\ \ \
1 \ \ \ \
\�- •-- \- \ \ \ \ \
\ \
/ / ---�\ \ I /
/ / --\ I I
I / / I I
1 I / \ / /
I' — �\ I //
I I / / / / /
I // / / // /
/ 1 / / 7-
I /
I I I 7 I
I I \ — — — — — — 7 // K65W7J K65W7K
I 1 /
I \\ // /
I
\ \
\ /
1 /
\
SALISBURY H\GHWp,Y
1
WAREHOUSE II
1
1
1
1/
/
/
V.S. HIGHWAY 70
/ I
\
/� \"---/�\\\\ \\�
l\ /1
I \\ \\\
1 \ I
1 \ I
// \
/I 1
1 I
1 I
\r- - ) J 1 I \ \
/1 / / / 1 \---.. \
77 \ / / / K65W6N 1
7 \ 7- / / \ I
// // \ \\ I
OFFICE
STATESVILLE
FERTILIZER
PLANT
/
/
/ RW-6
/
K65W7L —
7
7
7
K65W6D
K65W6M
/
7
7
/
111111111111
—850
e/
9
LEGEND
BOUNDARY OF SUBJECT SITE
BOUNDARY OF TAX PARCEL
RAILROAD TRACKS
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP CONTOURS
WATER -SUPPLY WELL
SAPROLITE-SCREENED MONITORING WELL
BEDROCK -SCREENED MONITORING WELL
DAMAGED MONITORING WELL
RECOVERY WELL
CROSS-SECTION TRANSECTS
ASTS
RW-5r
I IIH Hi111111111111IIIIHH11111111111111111111111111 II 1111111111111111111
0
0
w
0
0
w
z
0
2
K65W6B
K65W6E
K65W6A
1 I
REMEDIATION
SYSTEM
1/
b5�/ \ \ CARDINAL
i \ I'\i LOGISTICS
\ I, \MANAGEMENT
\/\\
\ \
\\ \
\\
\I\
\I
I —1
I
/
---
FERTI / /
TECHNOLOGIES /
I
11
1
I
/
7
/
t 1
1 /
I /4
/ 1
/' ----.1 7-
/ ' — \.
/ /
1 I 1 /
I 1 %J 1
71— \
\
/
K65W7C
L7
synTerra
\ — —
GRAPHIC SCALE
125 0 125 250
IN FEET
511 KEISLER DRIVE, SUITE 102
CARY, NORTH CAROLINA
PHONE [phone]
www.synterracorp.com
DRAWN BY: C. NEWELL
PROJECT MANAGER: WMF
LAYOUT: FIGURE 2
DATE: 3/23/2022
1 I� 7\ I
\ \ 1 I
\ \ / I
\\
\ I
\
' II
1 \1
I
I` �_ \ \\
I1 1 L
I -'I
II
/ I
FIGURE 2
SITE MAP WITH CROSS-SECTION TRACES
SOUTHERN STATES COOPERATIVE -
STATESVILLE FERTILIZER PLANT
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
03/24/2022 1:39 PM P:`Cary\Southern States\Statesville Fertilizer - 50200\CAD\2021\00239803-Site Map.dwg

1
Fourth Creek
FOURTH CREEK SEWAGE
TREATMENT PLANT
JOHN LONG ROAD
SALISBURY HIGHWAY
1:14.111
L- GHWAY 7
I
Terra
GRAPHIC SCALE
500 0 500 1000
IN FEET
511 KEISLER DRIVE, SUITE 102
CARY, NORTH CAROLINA
PHONE [phone]
www.synterracorp.com
DRAWN BY: C. NEWELL
PROJECT MANAGER: M. FLINCHUM
LAYOUT: FIGURE 3
DATE: 3/23/2022
H
LEGEND
BOUNDARY OF SUBJECT SITE
[___ BOUNDARY OF TAX PARCEL
BOUNDARY OF WATER BODY
TREATMENT SYSTEM DISCHARGE LINE
DISCHARGE
POINT TO CREEK
OUTFALL 001
BUCKBEE ROAD -I 1/
FIGURE 3
MAP OF TREATMENT SYSTEM DISCHARGE LINE
SOUTHERN STATES COOPERATIVE —
STATESVILLE FERTILIZER PLANT
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
3/23/2022 9:28 PM P:_Cary \Southern States\Statesville Fertilizer - 50200\CAD\2021\00239803-Discharge Line Map.dwg

\ \ --
\ \
\ \
\ \ \� // / / /
\\ \\ \----/ // // /
\ \ / / /
\ \ \ / / / /
\,''\\ \\ / � / /
.�
\\\ \\\ \ i/ // / / of
1 \ // I \
1 \ \/ 1
\ \
\ \ I \\
\ /I
\ v
\ \
\ \
\
\
N S K65W7C
\/
\ 1 N
\ \ \ N
\ \ , K65W7H RW-2
I 1 \ 780.86 Gy ',N
\\ I `— \ \ K65W7F K65W7G
\ i,� -hi \DRY soo-
_ _ \I / I 1 1
/ 1 I
/ I
\ 1 II \
\ \ \I \
\ 1 \
I \ I \
I / I \
/
I /
/ /
/1 //
/
/
/
I I
1 /
1 1 I
/ / I
/ / I
/ / l 7
/ I
/
I \
I-----_� / 8/0
1 // /
\\ _-
// // K65W7L _—
(807.78)
RW-6
SAkISBURY H'GN`N `
--
OFFICE
STATESVILLE
FERTILIZER
PLANT
I I
/ I
/ I
/ / 1
/ / /
/ 1
/ 1 —\
I // \
I
1 I 1/ 820
/ // /
/ / / /i
\ /
K65W7D
(786.71)
/ / // , ___ \ \\ \_.,,
\ /
/,
/ C
,______ __t___I
/ /,� /7
/ / II A V I A V I
, ,
\__,_____
BENT BROOK ROAD �I \ \ \ \ \ \ 1�
\\ \\` \ \ _ +--� \
- \
i
K65W7J
71 (810.66)
K65W6D
K65W6M
(808.20)
7
/7
7
/
//
r
\
FERTI
TECHNOLOGIES
7
/
—850--
LEGEND
BOUNDARY OF SUBJECT SITE
BOUNDARY OF TAX PARCEL
RAILROAD TRACKS
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP CONTOURS
Cw WATER -SUPPLY WELL
SAPROLITE-SCREENED MONITORING WELL
BEDROCK -SCREENED MONITORING WELL
DAMAGED MONITORING WELL
RECOVERY WELL
C!
K65W6B MONITORING WELL ID
(855.38) WATER -TABLE ELEVATION (msl)
DRY WELL DRY; WATER LEVEL NOT MEASURED
POTENTIOMETRIC-SURFACE CONTOUR
—820 (DASHED WHERE INFERRED)
DIRECTION OF GROUNDWATER FLOW
0
0
�1
�I
w
z
0
2I
8s/ K65W6B
`50.47)
JH
K65W6E
(835.44)
K65W6A
(837.02)
REMEDIATION
YSTEM
I\
\ I \ CARDINAL
\ �I ' LOGISTICS
\ \MANAGEMENT
7
1 I
7
N I
\
\II^
N
\ I
\
/
/
I
/ I
/1
/
T
I
I /
IK65W7K I
(808.07) \
\ , / 11\
/ ' I
\ / \
BIG FOREST DRIVE \
\
//
I
tea_
L7
synTerra
GRAPHIC SCALE
125 0 125 250
IN FEET
511 KEISLER DRIVE, SUITE 102
CARY, NORTH CAROLINA
PHONE [phone]
www.synterracorp.com
DATE: 3/23/2022
PROJECT MANAGER: M. FLINCHUM
LAYOUT: FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE MAP -
NOVEMBER 2021
SOUTHERN STATES COOPERATIVE -
STATESVILLE FERTILIZER PLANT
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA

\
\ I \
\ \ /\
\
\ ./
1
I;
SAkiSBURY H'GNWY
OFFICE
_850—
/\ \
1
I I \ \\ \ \ WAREHOUSE
II \ I
I \\\\ -- \ \\\ \\\ II
....---
/-\ I\ 7 I
lJI \ NY'�
I
\ \ I
1 �o \ I y
\\ XI \I �/ \7�
—/ I I \\
\�— —� II ioo vv �7\
/ \ / / // K65W6N \
�/� (130) \ I
// // \N� \\ \
/// / ---- \ I
/ I/ 7--\ I I I
I I / \ / I
I / / / I
/ I I
\ I.' — i
I / / / // I
I // / / / / I
I / / / 1 / / / / I
/ l I / / 1�i / // I
/ / I ( / I \.:-_ K65W7J / I
1 1 1 / // ' K65W7K
/ I \ I \ // / / K65W7L
/ ..../
\ \ \
\\ \ \� / / // / /
\ \\ \----/ / // / U.S. HIG /
\ \ / / / / HWAY 70
— T\ _ _� — — _\ ' / / co / /%
/A �� vv // / / / I
\ 77 /
\ \ \\ \ /
1 \ \ /
1 \ \ -/
\ \
\ \
\ \
\\ \\ /K65W7D
\ (< 0.048)
\ \ I \ \ S ' K65W7C
\ \ \
\ \ \ \
\ \ \ \ \
\ \ \ N N RW-2
I \ — \\ \\ K65W7H NS
N.
\ \1 K65W7F UR W7G N.
/ 1 I
I 1 \
1 \ /�
I \\ \\ //
I \ \\ /
\ \
\ N\ -/
\ \
�7 \
STATESVILLE
FERTILIZER
PLANT
s K65W6D
K65W6M
(0.223)
E__�
LEGEND
BOUNDARY OF SUBJECT SITE
BOUNDARY OF TAX PARCEL
RAILROAD TRACKS
—850-- TOPOGRAPHIC MAP CONTOURS
\w WATER -SUPPLY WELL
SAPROLITE-SCREENED MONITORING WELL
• BEDROCK -SCREENED MONITORING WELL
DAMAGED MONITORING WELL
• RECOVERY WELL
K65W6B WELL ID
(45.9) NITRATE CONCENTRATION IN mg/L
DRY WELL DRY; NOT SAMPLED
50
NITRATE ISOCONCENTRATION CONTOUR IN mg/L
(DASHED WHERE INFERRED)
NS NOT SAMPLED
FERTI
TECHNOLOGIES
K65W6B
(45.9)
(99.6)
R EDIATION
SYSTEM
\
I
\ CARDINAL
\ LOGISTICS
\ \MANAGEMENT
1\
\1 \\1 \
\ \: \\
1 , \ ; \ \
` :\ \ \
/ \\
I _ `\ \I \\ 1 /1 \\�
1 �— \ I I \
v �I A 1 I /'7
I,_ \
/ v
// --------\_ _
--___P_ _/ / \
/
7 �_ -1 \
\ --/--_
1 \
\ / \
�� I DRY Boo i \ :_______:117,
—/—�\,,
BIG FOREST DRIVE \�` \\
▪ ___-,
\ _____
///////��\\\� \._,,
----1, \\\
/ /' / / \1\ I\ / \
/BEN BT ROOK ROAD \ 1 \ \ \� 1 \ \_ + _ \ 1� \� \ 1
/ /' �� \ ` k \ I \
/ \ \ \ \ \ ---I— 1
\ / 7 —%v A V v V A
\\ \ \
\ /
\7
1 / -T--
I /
I I
—
L7
synTerra
7
GRAPHIC SCALE
125 0 125 250
IN FEET
511 KEISLER DRIVE, SUITE 102
CARY, NORTH CAROLINA
PHONE [phone]
www.synterracorp.com
DRAWN BY: C. NEWELL
PROJECT MANAGER: M. FLINCHUM
LAYOUT: FIGURE 5
DATE: 3/24/2022
II (-- —\
\ \ I
\\ \\ �/
FIGURE 5
SHALLOW AQUIFER NITRATE
ISOCONCENTRATION MAP - NOVEMBER 2021
SOUTHERN STATES COOPERATIVE —
STATESVILLE FERTILIZER PLANT
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
04/26/2022 5:51 PM P:_Cary \Southern States\Statesville Fertilizer - 50200\CAD\2021\00239803-Site Map.dwg

\
/
\
\ \\ \
\\ \\ \7,
\ \
\ \ \
\,�\ N
i\
/
/ \\ / / /)1 /
/ \ /
\ / /
\ // \\ / /' /
\` Ji \\ / / 1 /
/ I - -i
_______,
/ /r
I 1,
\ 1 II
\ /__�\ I
\/ \ 1 I
\7-' \1 I I j /--
1 / I 1 /
/ I I l
1 1 I 1 \ \
-�\ \\ I \l \ \\\
\ \ \ \
\ \\
\\ \\� / I \ \
\ / \ \_
N. / \
7 i \
/
/
\
\ \ \
\ \\ \
\ \ \
\ \ I
\
\
\ /
\ —� 7�\ \\1 \
/ / _
�"\\
\\\\\
\\ 7N.�
\ \ 7 - +--
7
SALISBov H\GH\NAY
LEGEND
BOUNDARY OF SUBJECT SITE
BOUNDARY OF TAX PARCEL
RAILROAD TRACKS
—850 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP CONTOURS
© WATER -SUPPLY WELL
4 SAPROLITE-SCREENED MONITORING WELL
eat
BEDROCK -SCREENED MONITORING WELL
S DAMAGED MONITORING WELL
LiA
RECOVERY WELL
K65W6E WELL ID
(384) NITRATE CONCENTRATION IN mg/L
50 NITRATE ISOCONCENTRATION CONTOUR IN mg/L
(DASHED WHERE INFERRED)
NS NOT SAMPLED
OFFICE
\ -850—
/ I/ \\ __ \\ \
\ �77 1
I I \ \\ \ `X I WAREHOUSE 1 STATESVILLE
I I \ `� I I FERTILIZER
I I �\ �_-- \ I PLANT
I \ \` _ / \\\ - \\\ II
/ I I 1 \ 7\ I
lJ iI \ \
\ \ 11 I\
I // \ I \
\\ I I 11 I \ \ \
\ I I I \\ /
\ x.
\/
\r- — ) ) I I /\
A / / / \/
' \ __ / / / K65W6N /
/
/ // \ \ / h°. I •
/
I /� \\ / // �/1 I
/ /
\ \ I / / / / / / // / / / /
/ l it /// l \��'/// // //// /// 1 /© //
/ / I / I / / / / I / / /
/ / I I I /7 7 / / // /
/ / I I \-----� I / K65W7K, /// /
I / I 1 / // K65W7J (31.3) - -- -- / o� -` \
II \\ / �/ / K65W7L, /�2$�/ \
I
I 4 \ \ / / // RW-6 / / \
/ I \ 1 / / S K65W6D / /
/ -- % \
/ / // / / K65W6M / \
/ // / U // / �/ 1
- / / / / / S• HIG AY 7p / I
/ / / // / /
/ /
/ / / / I k �� l
/ / / I / /'
\/ \\ \\ /� y
7
1 \ 7
\ r /
\ 7
/ 1 � K65W7D \ `7 -- -- \
\ \
/ I \� \ \
\ x x \
I \ S K65W7C -----�
-\ `---
1 \ \
\ \ ' \ K65W7H RW-2 1 x \1
1` \\ \ (0.966) NS \\ 1 - tK65W7G
K65W7F \ 1 \ 1
800—
i
/
/
/
/
/
/
BENT BROOK ROAD
i
7
7
X
_ - I
L�
synTerra
BIG FOREST DRIVE
\-__ \
\ \ ' " 7 —T---
_
i
125
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 125
250
IN FEET
K65W6B
FERTI
TECHNOLOGIES
i
» 1
K65W6E I I
(384) K65W6A / /
/
REMEDIATIO 1/
SYSTEM / /
// //1 /
/ �/
/ASe
RW-5r
511 KEISLER DRIVE, SUITE 102
CARY, NORTH CAROLINA
PHONE [phone]
www.synterracorp.com
DRAWN BY: C. NEWELL
PROJECT MANAGER: M. FLINCHUM
LAYOUT: FIGURE 6
DATE: 3/24/2022
G:
/ 1 /
II
I
\� CARDINAL
\ LOGISTICS
\MANAGEMENT
/\
\
7
//
I
I
I
I
I I/
I /
1\
I, \\
1� \
\\ \\ \
• - - - 7\ I \\
/ \\
I \\\ \ /1 \\
1 I A
\\ I `-�_\7\ \\,
/ I //
'�a� / /
_ + -
I
I� \ I
\ 1 I
\
\ N
\ I
\ /
\ /
FIGURE 6
DEEP AQUIFER NITRATE
ISOCONCENTRATION MAP - NOVEMBER 2021
SOUTHERN STATES COOPERATIVE -
STATESVILLE FERTILIZER PLANT
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
04/26/2022 5:52 PM P:`Cary\Southern States\Statesville Fertilizer - 50200\CAD\2021\00239803-Site Map.dwg

880 Co
840
800
760
720
680
640
600
PARTIALLY
WEATHERED
ROCK
A'-
( Cps (0 (
65.]).173
65.1
4.34
384 ,��=
1.111
0.348 = 31.3
+ + + + + + +_ + + + + + + + +1.44=
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - +
+ + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + BEDROCK + + + + + + + + + + + + + - +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + =998 +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + -1.34
+ + + + + + + + + + + I- + + + + H + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + +
LEGEND
SCREEN INTERVAL OF WATER -TABLE ELEVATION
MONITORING OR RECOVERY WELL -
IlMONITORING WELL WITH OUTER
CASING
31.3 NITRATE CONCENTRATION IN mg/L
NOTE: ALL WELLS ARE CONSTRUCTED WITH ABOVE -GRADE CASINGS.
NS - NOT SAMPLED.
AMMONIA CONCENTRATION IN mg/L
_ = 0.223
- - <0.117 -
+ + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + +
+ + + + + + +
+ + + + + +
+ + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + r + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + +
OPEN BOREHOLE
880
840
800
760
720
680
640
600
ELEVATION (FEET ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVEL)
L7
synTerra
125 0 125
250
HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" = 250'
6.25x VERTICAL EXAGGERATION
148 RIVER STREET, SUITE 220
GREENVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA 29601
PHONE [phone]
www.synterracorp.com
DRAWN BY: C. NEWELL
PROJECT MANAGER: M. FLINCHUM
LAYOUT: FIGURE 7 A -A'
DATE: 3/24/2022
FIGURE 7
CROSS-SECTION A -A' - NOVEMBER 2021
SOUTHERN STATES COOPERATIVE -
STATESVILLE FERTILIZER PLANT
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
5/10/2022 11:38 AM P:_Cary \Southern States\Statesville Fertilizer - 50200\CAD\2021\00239803-CSECTS.dwg

880
840
800
760
720
680
640
600
_
�co Loco
CO
_I<r)-.
�(0
-
-
-
-
-
SAPROLITE-
\ZZ\ \ZZ\ \ZZ\
130
-
0.334
= \ \X
-
-
—
-
_
, X X 65.1
t 0.223
\ZZ\ 4.34
Z < 0.117-
\\\ \\\ \Z\ \Z\ \Z\
— — —
\ \ \ PARTIALLY \'k
X
- \\\ % %
\�\ W EAH ERED \�\ \�\
\ZZ\
\\\ .\
\\\ \\\ \
ROCK
\\ \\ %
\ \\\ \\\ \\
_
-
-
-
-
-
T T T T T T T T 1-31.3
+ + + + + + + + 144g
+ + + + + + + + + +
T T T T T I
+ + + + +
+ + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + +
+
+ + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + BEbROtK + + +
+ + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + +=1.34+
+ + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + +
+ + + + +
+ + + + + +
+ + + + +
i 99-8 + + + +
+ + +
+ + + + + +
_
-
-
_
-
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ L + + + + +
-
-
—
-
_
—
LEGEND
SCREEN INTERVAL OF WATER -TABLE ELEVATION
MONITORING OR RECOVERY WELL
cl MONITORING WELL WITH OUTER
CASING
31.3 NITRATE CONCENTRATION IN mg/L
1.44 AMMONIA CONCENTRATION IN mg/L
NOTE: ALL WELLS ARE CONSTRUCTED WITH ABOVE -GRADE CASINGS.
880
840
800
760
720
680
640
600
ELEVATION (FEET ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVEL)
0
synTerra
125 0 125
250
HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" = 250'
6.25x VERTICAL EXAGGERATION
148 RIVER STREET, SUITE 220
GREENVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA 29601
PHONE [phone]
www.synterracorp.com
DRAWN BY: C. NEWELL
PROJECT MANAGER: M. FLINCHUM
LAYOUT: FIGURE 8 B-B'
DATE: 3/24/2022
FIGURE 8
CROSS-SECTION B-B' — NOVEMBER 2021
SOUTHERN STATES COOPERATIVE —
STATESVILLE FERTILIZER PLANT
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
4/26/2022 5:52 PM P:_Cary \Southern States\Statesville Fertilizer- 50200\CAD\2021\00239803- SECTS.dwg

Report of Annual Groundwater Monitoring
Southern States Cooperative, Inc.
Statesville, North Carolina
TABLES
•
•
• •
0
synTerra
Science & Engineering Consultants

Table 1
Historical Recovery Well Results
Statesville Fertilizer Plant
Statesville, North Carolina
Well ID
RW-2
RW-5r
RW-6
Analyte
Nitrate
Ammonia
pH
Nitrate
Ammonia
pH
Nitrate
Ammonia
pH
2L Standard
10
1.5*
6.5-8.5
10
1.5*
6.5-8.5
10
1.5*
6.5-8.5
Sample Date
Sample Results
3/13/2012
42
3.1
NT
176
26.8
NT
93.9
6.3
NT
12/22/2015
NT
1.5
NT
NT
20
NT
NT
13
NT
1/7/2016
24
NT
NT
160 A
NT
NT
89
NT
NT
5/26/2016
29
0.46
NT
120
54
NT
92
15
NT
1/31/2017
28
1.6
5.75
130
88
5.11
100
8.9
5.46
6/13/2017
33
1.1
5.57
NT
NT
NT
110
9.9
4.98
8/28/2017
NT
NT
NT
150
68
4.31
NT
NT
NT
12/21/2017
26
1.3
5.39
NT
NT
NT
95
4.6
5.52
3/19/2018
NT
NT
NT
110
84
4.80
NT
NT
NT
6/8/2018
25 A
1.2
5.96
180 A
31
4.75
95 A
8.7
5.58
12/11/2018
24
1.0
5.91
160
25
5.15
99
10
5.49
6/24/2019
26
1.1
5.81
150
27
5.02
110
14
5.36
12/30/2019
37
0.18
6.33
160
29
5.36
15
4.9
5.94
6/22/2020
23
1.0
6.01
150
19
5.22
96
12
5.59
12/11/2020
28 E
1.0
5.80
160 E
24
5.01
100 E
15
5.28
Average
29
1.2
-
145
41.3
-
90.0
10.2
-
Notes:
Units in mg/L - milligrams per liter
2L standard - 15A NCAC 02L groundwater quality standard
pH was measured in the field and recorded in standard units
Bold text indicates concentration exceeds the laboratory reporting limit
* - Indicates value is an Interim Maximum Allowable Concentration (IMAC)
Shaded cell indicates concentration exceeds the 2L or IMAC Standard
NT - Not tested
Qualifiers:
A - Sample initially ran in hold, exceeded calibration range. Sample was re -ran with dilution out of hold. Prepared by: EMJ
E - Sample initially ran in hold, exceeded calibration range. Sample was re -ran with dilution out of hold. Checked by: ZCG
P: \ _Cary \ Southern States \ Statesville Fertilizer - 50200 \ Tables_Excel \ Current Annual Report tables \ Historical Recovery Well Results

Table 2
Summary of Water -Table Elevation Data
Statesville Fertilizer Plant
Statesville, North Carolina
Water
Aquifer
Date
TOC
Total Well
Depth to
Table
Well ID
Elevation
Water Table
Code
Measured
Depth (ft)
Elevation
(ft amsl)
(ft BTOC)
(ft amsl)
K65W6A
Saprolite
11/05/21
864.52
58
27.50
837.02
K65W6B
Saprolite
11/03/21
871.55
30
21.18
850.37
K65W6D
Saprolite
NM
846.37
38
NM
NM
K65W6E
Bedrock
11/05/21
864.89
133
29.45
835.44
K65W6M
Saprolite
11/03/21
838.12
50
29.92
808.20
K65W6N
Saprolite
11/03/21
845.30
50
12.47
832.83
K65W7C
Saprolite
NM
809.72
22
NM
NM
K65W7D
Saprolite
11/02/21
800.64
23
13.93
786.71
K65W7F
Saprolite
11/02/21
796.15
28
DRY
DRY
K65W7G
Saprolite
11/02/21
795.98
15
DRY
DRY
K65W7H
Bedrock
11/03/21
796.07
112
15.21
780.86
K65W7J
Saprolite
11/03/21
848.19
60
37.53
810.66
K65W7K
Bedrock
11/03/21
849.34
121
41.27
808.07
K65W7L
Bedrock
11/03/21
848.15
200
40.37
807.78
Notes:
TOC - Top of casing
amsl - Above mean sea level
NM - Not measured due to well casing being damaged and inaccessible
DRY - Well was dry during this sampling event
ft BTOC - Feet below top of casing Prepared by: EMJ
Aquifer Code - Represents aquifer being monitored at this well location Checked by: ZCG
P:\ Cary\Southern States\Statesville Fertilizer - 50200\Tables Excel\Current Annual Report tables\Annual Report Tables

Table 3
Summary of Groundwater Analytical and Field Parameter Results
Statesville Fertilizer Plant
Statesville, North Carolina
Laboratory Data
Field Parameters
Well ID
Date
Nitrate
Ammonia
pH
Temp.
Conductivity
Turbidity
ORP
DO
mg/L
mg/L
Standard Units
Degrees
µS/cm
NTUs
mV
mg/L
2L Standard
10
1.5*
Celsius
K65W6A
11/05/21
99.6
0.173
5.64
16.9
2,610
1.00
12.7
0.84
K65W6B
11/03/21
45.9
<0.117
3.88
18.1
1,352
4.52
144.8
4.49
K65W6D
NS
NS
NS
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
K65W6E
11/05/21
384
0.348
6.55
16.9
6,240
2.61
18.5
0.15
K65W6M
11/03/21
0.223
<0.117
5.48
15.2
57.9
21.0
113.8
6.72
K65W6N
11/03/21
130
0.354
4.71
17.0
1,794
1.48
131.5
2.22
K65W7C
NS
NS
NS
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
K65W7D
11/02/21
<0.048
<0.117
4.99
16.9
138.0
15.5
86.1
0.63
K65W7F
11/02/21
DRY
DRY
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
K65W7G
11/02/21
DRY
DRY
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
K65W7H
11/03/21
0.966
<0.117
6.75
14.4
119.7
0.42
95.9
5.03
K65W7J
11/03/21
65.1
4.34
5.44
15.1
867
48.3
120.1
0.33
K65W7K
11/03/21
31.3
1.44
6.56
15.3
1,532
5.53
120.7
0.33
K65W7L
11/03/21
99.8
1.34
3.86
15.2
1,670
0.81
183.3
1.30
Notes:
2L standard - 15A NCAC 02L groundwater quality standard
Bold text indicates concentration above the laboratory reporting limit
* - Indicates value is an Interim Maximum Allowable Concentration (IMAC)
Shaded cell indicates concentration exceeds 2L Standard or IMAC
NS - Not sampled
DRY - Dry well; not sampled
NM - Not measured
mS/cm - Millisiemens per centimeter
NTUs - Nephelometric turbidity units
mV - Millivolts Prepared by: EMJ
mg/L - Milligrams per liter Checked by: ZCG
P: \ _Cary \ Southern States \ Statesville Fertilizer - 50200 \ Tables_Excel \ Current Annual Report tables \ Annual Report Tables

Report of Annual Groundwater Monitoring
Southern States Cooperative, Inc.
Statesville, North Carolina
APPENDIX A
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORTS
L7
synTerra
Science & Engineering Consultants

eAnaIicaI® A\ALYTI CAL REPO
November 09, 2021
RT
SynTerra Corporation
Sample Delivery Group: L1426137
Samples Received: 11/03/2021
Project Number: 00.2398.00
Description: SSC-Statesville Fertilizer Plant
Report To:
Zachary Garlick
PO Box 639
Cary, NC 27512
Entire Report Reviewed By:
Heather J Wagner
Project Manager
Results relate only to the items tested or calibrated and are reported as rounded values. This test report shall not be
reproduced, except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. Where applicable, sampling conducted by Pace
Analytical National is performed per guidance provided in laboratory standard operating procedures ENV-SOP-MTJL-0067 and
ENV-SOP-MTJL-0068. Where sampling conducted by the customer, results relate to the accuracy of the information provided,
and as the samples are received.
Mr -
Pace Analytical National
12065 Lebanon Rd Mount Juliet, TN 37122 615-758-5858 800-767-5859 www.pacenational.com
Cp
2
Tc
3
Ss
4
Cn
6
Qc
7
GI
8
Al
9
SC
ACCOUNT:
SynTerra Corporation
PROJECT:
00.2398.00
SDG:
L1426137
DATE/TIME:
11/09/21 09:54
PAGE:
1 of 10

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cp: Cover Page
Tc: Table of Contents
Ss: Sample Summary
Cn: Case Narrative 4
Sr: Sample Results 5
K65W7D L1426137-01 5
Qc: Quality Control Summary 6
Wet Chemistry by Method 300.0 6
Wet Chemistry by Method 350.1 7
GI: Glossary of Terms 8
Al: Accreditations & Locations 9
Sc: Sample Chain of Custody 10
ACCOUNT: PROJECT: SDG: DATE/TIME: PAGE:
SynTerra Corporation 00.2398.00 L1426137 11/09/21 09:54 2 of 10

SAMPLE SUMMARY
K65W7D L1426137-01 GW
Collected by Collected date/time Received date/time
Zachary Garlick 11/02/2113:55 11/03/2113:45
Method
Batch
Dilution Preparation Analysis Analyst Location
date/time date/time
Wet Chemistry by Method 300.0
Wet Chemistry by Method 350.1
WG1768498 1 11/04/21 05:56 11/04/21 05:56 ELN Mt. Juliet, TN
WG1769691 1 11/08/2116:24 11/08/2116:24 SL Mt. Juliet, TN
ACCOUNT: PROJECT: SDG: DATE/TIME: PAGE:
SynTerra Corporation 00.2398.00 L1426137 11/09/21 09:54 3 of 10

CASE NARRATIVE
All sample aliquots were received at the correct temperature, in the proper containers, with the
appropriate preservatives, and within method specified holding times, unless qualified or notated within
the report. Where applicable, all MDL (LOD) and RDL (LOQ) values reported for environmental samples
have been corrected for the dilution factor used in the analysis. All Method and Batch Quality Control
are within established criteria except where addressed in this case narrative, a non-conformance form
or properly qualified within the sample results. By my digital signature below, I affirm to the best of my
knowledge, all problems/anomalies observed by the laboratory as having the potential to affect the
quality of the data have been identified by the laboratory, and no information or data have been
knowingly withheld that would affect the quality of the data.
Heather J Wagner
Project Manager
Cp
2
Tc
3
Ss
Cn
5
Sr
6
Qc
7
GI
8
Al
9
SC
ACCOUNT: PROJECT: SDG: DATE/TIME: PAGE:
SynTerra Corporation 00.2398.00 L1426137 11/09/21 09:54 4 of 10

K65W7D SAMPLE RESULTS - 01
Collected date/time: 11/02/21 13:55
L1426137
Wet Chemistry by Method 300.0
Result Qualifier MDL RDL Dilution Analysis Batch
Analyte ug/I ug/I ug/I date / time
Nitrate U 48.0 100 1 11/04/2021 05:56 WG1768498
Wet Chemistry by Method 350.1
Analyte
Result Qualifier MDL RDL Dilution Analysis
ug/I ug/I ug/I date / time
Batch
Ammonia Nitrogen U 117 250 1 11/08/202116:24 WG1769691
ACCOUNT: PROJECT: SDG: DATE/TIME: PAGE:
SynTerra Corporation 00.2398.00 L1426137 11/09/21 09:54 5 of 10

WG1768498 QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY
Wet Chemistry by Method 300.0
L1426137-01
Method Blank (MB)
(MB) R3725632-1 11/04/21 03:12
MB Result
Analyte ug/I
Nitrate U
MB Qualifier
MB MDL MB RDL
ug/I ug/I
48.0 100
L1425215-01 Original Sample (OS) • Duplicate (DUP)
(OS) L1425215-01 11/04/21 03:36 • (DUP) R3725632-3 11/04/21 03:47
Original Result DUP Result Dilution DUP RPD DUP Qualifier DUP RPD
Limits
Analyte ug/I ug/I % %
Nitrate U U 1 0.000 20
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
(LCS) R3725632-2 11/04/21 03:24
Spike Amount LCS Result LCS Rec. Rec. Limits LCS Qualifier
Analyte ug/I ug/I % %
Nitrate 8000 8080 101 90.0-110
L1425215-01 Original Sample (OS) • Matrix Spike (MS) • Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD)
(OS) L1425215-01 11/04/21 03:36 • (MS) R3725632-4 11/04/21 03:59 • (MSD) R3725632-5 11/04/21 04:11
Spike Amount Original Result MS Result MSD Result MS Rec. MSD Rec. Dilution Rec. Limits MS Qualifier MSD Qualifier RPD RPD Limits
Analyte ug/I ug/I ug/I ug/I % % % % %
Nitrate 5000 U 4880 4870 97.6 97.4 1 80.0-120 0.222 20
ACCOUNT: PROJECT:
SynTerra Corporation 00.2398.00
SDG: DATE/TIME: PAGE:
L1426137 11/09/21 09:54 6 of 10

WG1769691 QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY
Wet Chemistry by Method 350.1
L1426137-01
Analyte
Ammonia Nitrogen
Method Blank (MB)
(MB) R3727012-1 11/08/2116:02
MB Result
ug/I
U
MB Qualifier
MB MDL MB RDL
ug/I ug/I
117 250
L1425179-03 Original Sample (OS) • Duplicate (DUP)
(OS) L1425179-03 11/08/2116:12 • (DUP) R3727012-5 11/08/2116:14
Analyte
Original Result DUP Result Dilution DUP RPD DUP Qualifier DUP RPD
Limits
ug/I ug/I % %
Ammonia Nitrogen
U U 1 0.000 10
L1426639-06 Original Sample (OS) • Duplicate (DUP)
(OS) L1426639-06 11/08/2116:45 • (DUP) R3727012-7 11/08/2116:47
Analyte
Ammonia Nitrogen
Original Result DUP Result
ug/I
1340
Dilution DUP RPD DUP Qualifier
ug/I %
1310
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
1 1.89
DUP RPD
Limits
%
10
(LCS) R3727012-2 11/08/2116:03
Spike Amount LCS Result LCS Rec. Rec. Limits LCS Qualifier
Analyte ug/I ug/I % %
Ammonia Nitrogen 7500 7220 96.2 90.0-110
L1426639-05 Original Sample (OS) • Matrix Spike (MS)
(OS) L1426639-05 11/08/2116:42 • (MS) R3727012-6 11/08/2116:44
Spike Amount Original Result MS Result MS Rec. Dilution Rec. Limits MS Qualifier
Analyte ug/I ug/I ug/I % %
Ammonia Nitrogen 5000 1440 6070 92.5 1 90.0-110
L1425179-01 Original Sample (OS) • Matrix Spike (MS) • Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD)
(OS) L1425179-01 11/08/2117:00 • (MS) R3727012-8 11/08/2117:01 • (MSD) R3727012-9 11/08/2117:03
Spike Amount Original Result MS Result MSD Result MS Rec. MSD Rec. Dilution Rec. Limits MS Qualifier MSD Qualifier RPD
Analyte ug/I ug/I ug/I ug/I % % % %
Ammonia Nitrogen 5000 U 4450 4830 88.4 95.9 1 90.0-110 J6 8.14
RPD Limits
%
10
ACCOUNT:
SynTerra Corporation
PROJECT:
00.2398.00
SDG: DATE/TIME: PAGE:
L1426137 11/09/21 09:54 7 of 10

GLOSSARY OF TERMS
Guide to Reading and Understanding Your Laboratory Report
The information below is designed to better explain the various terms used in your report of analytical results from the Laboratory. This is not
intended as a comprehensive explanation, and if you have additional questions please contact your project representative.
Results Disclaimer - Information that may be provided by the customer, and contained within this report, include Permit Limits, Project Name,
Sample ID, Sample Matrix, Sample Preservation, Field Blanks, Field Spikes, Field Duplicates, On -Site Data, Sampling Collection Dates/Times, and
Sampling Location. Results relate to the accuracy of this information provided, and as the samples are received.
Abbreviations and Definitions
MDL
RDL
Rec.
RPD
SDG
U
Analyte
Method Detection Limit.
Reported Detection Limit.
Recovery.
Relative Percent Difference.
Sample Delivery Group.
Not detected at the Reporting Limit (or MDL where applicable).
The name of the particular compound or analysis performed. Some Analyses and Methods will have multiple analytes
reported.
Dilution
If the sample matrix contains an interfering material, the sample preparation volume or weight values differ from the
standard, or if concentrations of analytes in the sample are higher than the highest limit of concentration that the
laboratory can accurately report, the sample may be diluted for analysis. If a value different than 1 is used in this field, the
result reported has already been corrected for this factor.
Limits
These are the target % recovery ranges or % difference value that the laboratory has historically determined as normal
for the method and analyte being reported. Successful QC Sample analysis will target all analytes recovered or
duplicated within these ranges.
Original Sample
The non -spiked sample in the prep batch used to determine the Relative Percent Difference (RPD) from a quality control
sample. The Original Sample may not be included within the reported SDG.
Qualifier
This column provides a letter and/or number designation that corresponds to additional information concerning the result
reported. If a Qualifier is present, a definition per Qualifier is provided within the Glossary and Definitions page and
potentially a discussion of possible implications of the Qualifier in the Case Narrative if applicable.
Result
The actual analytical final result (corrected for any sample specific characteristics) reported for your sample. If there was
no measurable result returned for a specific analyte, the result in this column may state "ND" (Not Detected) or "BDL"
(Below Detectable Levels). The information in the results column should always be accompanied by either an MDL
(Method Detection Limit) or RDL (Reporting Detection Limit) that defines the lowest value that the laboratory could detect
or report for this analyte.
Uncertainty
(Radiochemistry)
Confidence level of 2 sigma.
Case Narrative (Cn)
A brief discussion about the included sample results, including a discussion of any non -conformances to protocol
observed either at sample receipt by the laboratory from the field or during the analytical process. If present, there will
be a section in the Case Narrative to discuss the meaning of any data qualifiers used in the report.
Quality Control
Summary (Qc)
This section of the report includes the results of the laboratory quality control analyses required by procedure or
analytical methods to assist in evaluating the validity of the results reported for your samples. These analyses are not
being performed on your samples typically, but on laboratory generated material.
Sample Chain of
Custody (Sc)
This is the document created in the field when your samples were initially collected. This is used to verify the time and
date of collection, the person collecting the samples, and the analyses that the laboratory is requested to perform. This
chain of custody also documents all persons (excluding commercial shippers) that have had control or possession of the
samples from the time of collection until delivery to the laboratory for analysis.
Sample Results (Sr)
This section of your report will provide the results of all testing performed on your samples. These results are provided
by sample ID and are separated by the analyses performed on each sample. The header line of each analysis section for
each sample will provide the name and method number for the analysis reported.
Sample Summary (Ss) This section of the Analytical Report defines the specific analyses performed for each sample ID, including the dates and
times of preparation and/or analysis.
Qualifier
Description
J6 The sample matrix interfered with the ability to make any accurate determination; spike value is low.
ACCOUNT:
SynTerra Corporation
PROJECT: SDG:
00.2398.00 L1426137
DATE/TIME: PAGE:
11/09/21 09:54 8 of 10

ACCREDITATIONS & LOCATIONS
Pace Analytical National 12065 Lebanon Rd Mount Juliet, TN 37122
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
40660 Nebraska NE-OS-15-05
17-026 Nevada TN000032021-1
AZ0612 New Hampshire 2975
Arkansas 88-0469 New Jersey—NELAP TN002
California 2932 New Mexico' TN00003
Colorado TN00003 New York 11742
Connecticut PH-0197 North Carolina Env375
Florida E87487 North Carolina' DW21704
Georgia NELAP North Carolina 3 41
Georgia 1 923 North Dakota R-140
Idaho TN00003 Ohio—VAP CL0069
Illinois 200008 Oklahoma 9915
Indiana C-TN-01 Oregon TN200002
Iowa 364 Pennsylvania 68-02979
Kansas E-10277 Rhode Island LA000356
Kentucky16 KY90010 South Carolina 84004002
Kentucky 2 16 South Dakota n/a
Louisiana A130792 Tennessee' 4 2006
Louisiana LA018 Texas T104704245-20-18
Maine TN00003 Texas 5 LAB0152
Maryland 324 Utah TN000032021-11
Massachusetts M-TN003 Vermont VT2006
Michigan 9958 Virginia 110033
Minnesota 047-999-395 Washington C847
Mississippi TN00003 West Virginia 233
Missouri 340 Wisconsin 998093910
Montana CERT0086 Wyoming A2LA
A2LA — ISO 17025 1461.01 AIHA-LAP,LLC EMLAP
A2LA — ISO 17025 5 _ 1461.02 DOD
Canada _ 1461.01 USDA
EPA—Crypto TN00003
Drinking Water 2 Underground Storage Tanks 3 Aquatic Toxicity ° Chemical/Microbiological 5 Mold 6 Wastewater n/a Accreditation not applicable
* Not all certifications held by the laboratory are applicable to the results reported in the attached report.
*Accreditation is only applicable to the test methods specified on each scope of accreditation held by Pace Analytical.
100789
1461.01
P330-15-00234
ACCOUNT: PROJECT: SDG: DATE/TIME: PAGE:
SynTerra Corporation 00.2398.00 L1426137 11/09/21 09:54 9 of 10

Company Name/Address:
IL Analysis / Container / Preservative ,Chain of Custody Page 1of_4_
_fBillinglnformation•
Sy nTerra
511 Keisler Dr.
Cary, North Carolina 27518
, t
t- A.B S•C-I•E•N•C•E•S
f
ESC
Report to:
Email To:
Z r\,ems [e-mail]
Mount he to1N 37172
Phone:[phone]•i
Phone: [phone],.::,.4.
_
Project
SSC-Statesville Fertilizer Plant
City/State
Fan-615-758-5859
Description:
Collected:
v
O
L#
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Client Project #
00.2398.00
Lab Project # W
a
N
I
W
C
C 6V
Tat `
Collected by (print):
?,a<VN4.1"C� A,e�
Site/Facility ID #
P.O. # -
CV
I
E
-I
Acctnum: DUNDUNNC
Template: U?�L3�
Collected by (sig atur
•Ar
Rush? (Lab MUST Be Notified) I
Same Day 200%
Date Results Needed i
CD
p
I/I
Prelogin:
mmediately
zt Day 100%
Two Day 50%
Three Day 25%
Email? No LYes I o to
No. C p
FAX?
1
TSR: Wagner
Cooler:
Packed on Ice N Y
_
_No _Yes
of
E
2
Shipped Via: Raleigh Sery
Sample ID
Comp/Grab
Matrix *
Depth
Date
Time
ntrs
_
Z
EJI
<
Rem./Contaminant
Sample/ (lab orgy)
KCCoSA-7D
GA
Cso
1$_5'
it a
1355
!a
's
)c
- o fi
1
' Matrix: 55 - Soil GW- Groundwater WW - WasteWater DW - Drinking Water OT-Other pH Temp
0 ` 4:7 143� Flow Other
Remarks: 5,3
Hold #
0 -C
Relinquished by : (Si a ure)
Date:
+( ��/� I
Time: /"�
Received by: (Signature)
Samples returned via: ❑UPS
0 FedEx ❑Courier 0
Condition: (lab use only) ��(�
linquishe y : (Signature)
Date:
Time:
Received by: (Signature} ---
PTem�QC Bottles eceived:
e
"t�v-3r
/
COC Seal Intact: Y N J NA
by : (Signature)
Date:
Time:
Re iv for b :(Si nature)
lRelinquished Time:
pH Checked:
NCF:

ace Analytical® A\ A L Y T C A L REPO
November 11, 2021
RT
SynTerra Corporation
Sample Delivery Group: L1426639
Samples Received: 11/04/2021
Project Number: 00.2398.00
Description: SSC-Statesville Fertilizer Plant
Report To:
Zachary Garlick
PO Box 639
Cary, NC 27512
Entire Report Reviewed By:
Heather J Wagner
Project Manager
Results relate only to the items tested or calibrated and are reported as rounded values. This test report shall not be
reproduced, except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. Where applicable, sampling conducted by Pace
Analytical National is performed per guidance provided in laboratory standard operating procedures ENV-SOP-MTJL-0067 and
ENV-SOP-MTJL-0068. Where sampling conducted by the customer, results relate to the accuracy of the information provided,
and as the samples are received.
Mr -
Pace Analytical National
12065 Lebanon Rd Mount Juliet, TN 37122 615-758-5858 800-767-5859 www.pacenational.com
Cp
2
Tc
3
Ss
4
Cn
6
Qc
7
GI
8
Al
9
SC
ACCOUNT:
SynTerra Corporation
PROJECT:
00.2398.00
SDG:
L1426639
DATE/TIME:
11/11/2111:33
PAGE:
1 of 16

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cp: Cover Page
Tc: Table of Contents
Ss: Sample Summary
Cn: Case Narrative
Sr: Sample Results
K65W7H L1426639-01
K65W6M L1426639-02
K65W6B L1426639-03
K65W6N L1426639-04
K65W7K L1426639-05
K65W7L L1426639-06
K65W7J L1426639-07
3
4
5
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Qc: Quality Control Summary 12
Wet Chemistry by Method 300.0 12
Wet Chemistry by Method 350.1 13
GI: Glossary of Terms 14
Al: Accreditations & Locations 15
Sc: Sample Chain of Custody 16
ACCOUNT: PROJECT: SDG: DATE/TIME: PAGE:
SynTerra Corporation 00.2398.00 L1426639 11/11/21 11:33 2 of 16

SAMPLE SUMMARY
Collected by
Collected date/time Received date/time
K65W7H L1426639-01 GW
Zachary Garlick 11/03/21 07:55 11/04/21 09:00
Method
Batch
Dilution Preparation
date/time
Analysis
date/time
Analyst Location
Wet Chemistry by Method 300.0
Wet Chemistry by Method 350.1
K65W6M L1426639-02 GW
WG1769223 1 11/05/21 02:33 11/05/21 02:33
WG1769691 1 11/08/2116:32 11/08/2116:32
ELN
SL
Mt. Juliet, TN
Mt. Juliet, TN
Collected by Collected date/time Received date/time
Zachary Garlick 11/03/2110:10 11/04/21 09:00
Method
Batch
Wet Chemistry by Method 300.0
Wet Chemistry by Method 350.1
K65W6B L1426639-03 GW
Dilution Preparation
date/time
Analysis
date/time
Analyst Location
WG1769223 1 11/05/21 02:44 11/05/21 02:44
WG1769691 1 11/08/2116:33 11/08/2116:33
Collected by
Zachary Garlick
ELN
SL
Mt. Juliet, TN
Mt. Juliet, TN
Collected date/time Received date/time
11/03/2114:35 11/04/21 09:00
Method
Wet Chemistry by Method 300.0
Wet Chemistry by Method 350.1
K65W6N L1426639-04 GW
Batch
Dilution Preparation
date/time
Analysis
date/time
Analyst Location
WG1769223 10 11/05/21 02:56 11/05/21 02:56
WG1769691 1 11/08/2116:35 11/08/2116:35
ELN
SL
Mt. Juliet, TN
Mt. Juliet, TN
Collected by Collected date/time Received date/time
Zachary Garlick 11/03/2115:45 11/04/21 09:00
Method
Wet Chemistry by Method 300.0
Wet Chemistry by Method 350.1
Batch
Dilution Preparation
date/time
Analysis
date/time
Analyst Location
K65W7K L1426639-05 GW
WG1769223 20 11/05/21 03:08 11/05/21 03:08
WG1769691 1 11/08/2116:41 11/08/2116:41
ELN
SL
Mt. Juliet, TN
Mt. Juliet, TN
Collected by Collected date/time Received date/time
Zachary Garlick 11/03/2111:25 11/04/21 09:00
Method
Wet Chemistry by Method 300.0
Wet Chemistry by Method 350.1
K65W7L L1426639-06 GW
Batch Dilution
WG1769223 10
WG1769691 1
Preparation
date/time
Analysis
date/time
Analyst Location
11/05/21 03:20
11/08/2116:42
11/05/21 03:20
11/08/2116:42
Collected by Collected date/time
Zachary Garlick 11/03/2112:25
ELN
SL
Mt. Juliet, TN
Mt. Juliet, TN
Received date/time
11/04/21 09:00
Method
Batch
Dilution Preparation
date/time
Analysis
date/time
Analyst Location
Wet Chemistry by Method 300.0
Wet Chemistry by Method 350.1
K65W7J L1426639-07 GW
WG1769223 20 11/05/21 03:31 11/05/21 03:31
WG1769691 1 11/08/2116:45 11/08/2116:45
Collected by
ELN
SL
Mt. Juliet, TN
Mt. Juliet, TN
Collected date/time Received date/time
Zachary Garlick 11/03/2113:25 11/04/21 09:00
Method
Wet Chemistry by Method 300.0
Wet Chemistry by Method 350.1
Batch
Dilution Preparation
date/time
Analysis
date/time
Analyst Location
WG1769223 10 11/05/21 03:43 11/05/21 03:43
WG1769691 1 11/08/2116:48 11/08/2116:48
ELN
SL
Mt. Juliet, TN
Mt. Juliet, TN
ACCOUNT:
SynTerra Corporation
PROJECT: SDG:
00.2398.00 L1426639
DATE/TIME:
11/11/2111:33
PAGE:
3 of16

CASE NARRATIVE
All sample aliquots were received at the correct temperature, in the proper containers, with the
appropriate preservatives, and within method specified holding times, unless qualified or notated within
the report. Where applicable, all MDL (LOD) and RDL (LOQ) values reported for environmental samples
have been corrected for the dilution factor used in the analysis. All Method and Batch Quality Control
are within established criteria except where addressed in this case narrative, a non-conformance form
or properly qualified within the sample results. By my digital signature below, I affirm to the best of my
knowledge, all problems/anomalies observed by the laboratory as having the potential to affect the
quality of the data have been identified by the laboratory, and no information or data have been
knowingly withheld that would affect the quality of the data.
Heather J Wagner
Project Manager
Cp
2
Tc
3
Ss
Cn
5
Sr
6
Qc
7
GI
8
Al
9
SC
ACCOUNT: PROJECT: SDG: DATE/TIME: PAGE:
SynTerra Corporation 00.2398.00 L1426639 11/11/2111:33 4 of 16

K65W7H
Collected date/time: 11/03/21 07:55
SAMPLE RESULTS - 01
L1426639
Wet Chemistry by Method 300.0
Result Qualifier MDL RDL Dilution Analysis Batch
Analyte ug/I ug/I ug/I date / time
Nitrate 966 48.0 100 1 11/05/2021 02:33 WG1769223
Wet Chemistry by Method 350.1
Analyte
Result Qualifier MDL RDL Dilution Analysis
ug/I ug/I ug/I date / time
Batch
Ammonia Nitrogen U 117 250 1 11/08/202116:32 WG1769691
ACCOUNT: PROJECT: SDG: DATE/TIME: PAGE:
SynTerra Corporation 00.2398.00 L1426639 11/11/21 11:33 5 of 16

K65W6M
Collected date/time: 11/03/21 10:10
SAMPLE RESULTS - 02
L1426639
Wet Chemistry by Method 300.0
Result Qualifier MDL RDL Dilution Analysis Batch
Analyte ug/I ug/I ug/I date / time
Nitrate 223 48.0 100 1 11/05/2021 02:44 WG1769223
Wet Chemistry by Method 350.1
Analyte
Result Qualifier MDL RDL Dilution Analysis
ug/I ug/I ug/I date / time
Batch
Ammonia Nitrogen U 117 250 1 11/08/202116:33 WG1769691
ACCOUNT: PROJECT: SDG: DATE/TIME: PAGE:
SynTerra Corporation 00.2398.00 L1426639 11/11/21 11:33 6 of 16

K65W6B SAMPLE RESULTS - 03
Collected date/time: 11/03/21 14:35
L1426639
Wet Chemistry by Method 300.0
Result Qualifier MDL RDL Dilution Analysis Batch
Analyte ug/I ug/I ug/I date / time
Nitrate 45900 480 1000 10 11/05/2021 02:56 WG1769223
Wet Chemistry by Method 350.1
Analyte
Result Qualifier MDL RDL Dilution Analysis
ug/I ug/I ug/I date / time
Batch
Ammonia Nitrogen U 117 250 1 11/08/202116:35 WG1769691
ACCOUNT: PROJECT: SDG: DATE/TIME: PAGE:
SynTerra Corporation 00.2398.00 L1426639 11/11/2111:33 7 of 16

K65W6N SAMPLE RESULTS - 04
Collected date/time: 11/03/21 15:45
L1426639
Wet Chemistry by Method 300.0
Result Qualifier MDL RDL Dilution Analysis Batch
Analyte ug/I ug/I ug/I date / time
Nitrate 130000 960 2000 20 11/05/2021 03:08 WG1769223
Wet Chemistry by Method 350.1
Analyte
Result Qualifier MDL RDL Dilution Analysis
ug/I ug/I ug/I date / time
Batch
Ammonia Nitrogen 354 117 250 1 11/08/202116:41 WG1769691
ACCOUNT: PROJECT: SDG: DATE/TIME: PAGE:
SynTerra Corporation 00.2398.00 L1426639 11/11/21 11:33 8 of 16

K65W7K
Collected date/time: 11/03/21 11:25
SAMPLE RESULTS - 05
L1426639
Wet Chemistry by Method 300.0
Result Qualifier MDL RDL Dilution Analysis Batch
Analyte ug/I ug/I ug/I date / time
Nitrate 31300 480 1000 10 11/05/2021 03:20 WG1769223
Wet Chemistry by Method 350.1
Analyte
Result Qualifier MDL RDL Dilution Analysis
ug/I ug/I ug/I date / time
Batch
Ammonia Nitrogen 1440 117 250 1 11/08/202116:42 WG1769691
ACCOUNT: PROJECT: SDG: DATE/TIME: PAGE:
SynTerra Corporation 00.2398.00 L1426639 11/11/21 11:33 9 of 16

K65W7L SAMPLE RESULTS - 06
Collected date/time: 11/03/21 12:25
L1426639
Wet Chemistry by Method 300.0
Result Qualifier MDL RDL Dilution Analysis Batch
Analyte ug/I ug/I ug/I date / time
Nitrate 99800 960 2000 20 11/05/202103:31 WG1769223
Wet Chemistry by Method 350.1
Analyte
Result Qualifier MDL RDL Dilution Analysis
ug/I ug/I ug/I date / time
Batch
Ammonia Nitrogen 1340 117 250 1 11/08/202116:45 WG1769691
ACCOUNT: PROJECT: SDG: DATE/TIME: PAGE:
SynTerra Corporation 00.2398.00 L1426639 11/11/2111:33 10 of 16

K65W7J
Collected date/time: 11/03/21 13:25
SAMPLE RESULTS - 07
L1426639
Wet Chemistry by Method 300.0
Result Qualifier MDL RDL Dilution Analysis Batch
Analyte ug/I ug/I ug/I date / time
Nitrate 65100 480 1000 10 11/05/2021 03:43 WG1769223
Wet Chemistry by Method 350.1
Result Qualifier MDL RDL Dilution Analysis Batch
Analyte ug/I ug/I ug/I date / time
Ammonia Nitrogen 4340 117 250 1 11/08/202116:48 WG1769691
ACCOUNT: PROJECT: SDG: DATE/TIME: PAGE:
SynTerra Corporation 00.2398.00 L1426639 11/11/2111:33 11 of 16

WG1769223
QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY
Wet Chemistry by Method 300.0 L1426639-01,02,03,04,05,06,07
Method Blank (MB)
(MB) R3727000-1 11/04/21 23:37
MB Result MB Qualifier MB MDL MB RDL
Analyte ug/I ug/I ug/I
Nitrate U 48.0 100
L1425866-09 Original Sample (OS) • Duplicate (DUP)
(OS) L1425866-09 11/05/21 01:11 • (DUP) R3727000-3 11/05/21 01:23
Original Result DUP Result Dilution DUP RPD DUP Qualifier DUP RPD
Limits
Analyte ug/I ug/I % %
Nitrate U U 1 0.000 20
L1426683-05 Original Sample (OS) • Duplicate (DUP)
(OS) L1426683-05 11/05/21 05:05 • (DUP) R3727000-6 11/05/21 05:17
Original Result DUP Result
Dilution DUP RPD DUP Qualifier
Analyte
Nitrate
ug/I
ug/I
U U 1 0.000
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
DUP RPD
Limits
20
(LCS) R3727000-2 11/04/21 23:49
Spike Amount LCS Result LCS Rec. Rec. Limits LCS Qualifier
Analyte ug/I ug/I
Nitrate 8000 8060 101 90.0-110
L1425866-09 Original Sample (OS) • Matrix Spike (MS) • Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD)
(OS) L1425866-09 11/05/21 01:11 • (MS) R3727000-4 11/05/21 01:58 • (MSD) R3727000-5 11/05/21 02:09
Spike Amount Original Result MS Result MSD Result MS Rec. MSD Rec. Dilution Rec. Limits MS Qualifier MSD Qualifier RPD RPD Limits
Analyte ug/I ug/I ug/I ug/I
Nitrate 5000 U 4570 4560 91.4 91.1 1 80.0-120 0.359 20
L1426683-06 Original Sample (OS) • Matrix Spike (MS)
(OS) L1426683-06 11/05/21 05:28 • (MS) R3727000-7 11/05/21 05:40
Spike Amount Original Result MS Result MS Rec. Dilution Rec. Limits MS Qualifier
Analyte ug/I ug/I ug/I % %
Nitrate 5000 4400 9120 94.4 1 80.0-120
ACCOUNT: PROJECT:
SynTerra Corporation 00.2398.00
SDG: DATE/TIME: PAGE:
L1426639 11/11/2111.33 12 of 16

1
WG1769691 QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY
Wet Chemistry by Method 350.1 L1426639-01,02,03,04,05,06,07
Analyte
Ammonia Nitrogen
Method Blank (MB)
(MB) R3727012-1 11/08/2116:02
MB Result MB Qualifier
ug/I
MB MDL MB RDL
ug/I ug/I
U 117 250
L1425179-03 Original Sample (OS) • Duplicate (DUP)
(OS) L1425179-03 11/08/2116:12 • (DUP) R3727012-5 11/08/2116:14
Analyte
Original Result DUP Result Dilution DUP RPD DUP Qualifier DUP RPD
Limits
ug/I ug/I % %
Ammonia Nitrogen
U U 1 0.000 10
L1426639-06 Original Sample (OS) • Duplicate (DUP)
(OS) L1426639-06 11/08/2116:45 • (DUP) R3727012-7 11/08/2116:47
Analyte
Ammonia Nitrogen
Original Result DUP Result
ug/I
1340
Dilution DUP RPD DUP Qualifier
ug/I %
1310
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
1 1.89
DUP RPD
Limits
%
10
(LCS) R3727012-2 11/08/2116:03
Spike Amount LCS Result LCS Rec. Rec. Limits LCS Qualifier
Analyte ug/I ug/I % %
Ammonia Nitrogen 7500 7220 96.2 90.0-110
L1426639-05 Original Sample (OS) • Matrix Spike (MS)
(OS) L1426639-05 11/08/2116:42 • (MS) R3727012-6 11/08/2116:44
Spike Amount Original Result MS Result MS Rec. Dilution Rec. Limits MS Qualifier
Analyte ug/I ug/I ug/I % %
Ammonia Nitrogen 5000 1440 6070 92.5 1 90.0-110
L1425179-01 Original Sample (OS) • Matrix Spike (MS) • Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD)
(OS) L1425179-01 11/08/2117:00 • (MS) R3727012-8 11/08/2117:01 • (MSD) R3727012-9 11/08/2117:03
Spike Amount Original Result MS Result MSD Result MS Rec. MSD Rec. Dilution Rec. Limits MS Qualifier MSD Qualifier RPD
Analyte ug/I ug/I ug/I ug/I % % % %
Ammonia Nitrogen 5000 U 4450 4830 88.4 95.9 1 90.0-110 J6 8.14
RPD Limits
%
10
ACCOUNT:
SynTerra Corporation
PROJECT:
00.2398.00
SDG: DATE/TIME: PAGE:
L1426639 11/11/2111.33 13 of 16

GLOSSARY OF TERMS
Guide to Reading and Understanding Your Laboratory Report
The information below is designed to better explain the various terms used in your report of analytical results from the Laboratory. This is not
intended as a comprehensive explanation, and if you have additional questions please contact your project representative.
Results Disclaimer - Information that may be provided by the customer, and contained within this report, include Permit Limits, Project Name,
Sample ID, Sample Matrix, Sample Preservation, Field Blanks, Field Spikes, Field Duplicates, On -Site Data, Sampling Collection Dates/Times, and
Sampling Location. Results relate to the accuracy of this information provided, and as the samples are received.
Abbreviations and Definitions
MDL
RDL
Rec.
RPD
SDG
U
Analyte
Method Detection Limit.
Reported Detection Limit.
Recovery.
Relative Percent Difference.
Sample Delivery Group.
Not detected at the Reporting Limit (or MDL where applicable).
The name of the particular compound or analysis performed. Some Analyses and Methods will have multiple analytes
reported.
Dilution
If the sample matrix contains an interfering material, the sample preparation volume or weight values differ from the
standard, or if concentrations of analytes in the sample are higher than the highest limit of concentration that the
laboratory can accurately report, the sample may be diluted for analysis. If a value different than 1 is used in this field, the
result reported has already been corrected for this factor.
Limits
These are the target % recovery ranges or % difference value that the laboratory has historically determined as normal
for the method and analyte being reported. Successful QC Sample analysis will target all analytes recovered or
duplicated within these ranges.
Original Sample
The non -spiked sample in the prep batch used to determine the Relative Percent Difference (RPD) from a quality control
sample. The Original Sample may not be included within the reported SDG.
Qualifier
This column provides a letter and/or number designation that corresponds to additional information concerning the result
reported. If a Qualifier is present, a definition per Qualifier is provided within the Glossary and Definitions page and
potentially a discussion of possible implications of the Qualifier in the Case Narrative if applicable.
Result
The actual analytical final result (corrected for any sample specific characteristics) reported for your sample. If there was
no measurable result returned for a specific analyte, the result in this column may state "ND" (Not Detected) or "BDL"
(Below Detectable Levels). The information in the results column should always be accompanied by either an MDL
(Method Detection Limit) or RDL (Reporting Detection Limit) that defines the lowest value that the laboratory could detect
or report for this analyte.
Uncertainty
(Radiochemistry)
Confidence level of 2 sigma.
Case Narrative (Cn)
A brief discussion about the included sample results, including a discussion of any non -conformances to protocol
observed either at sample receipt by the laboratory from the field or during the analytical process. If present, there will
be a section in the Case Narrative to discuss the meaning of any data qualifiers used in the report.
Quality Control
Summary (Qc)
This section of the report includes the results of the laboratory quality control analyses required by procedure or
analytical methods to assist in evaluating the validity of the results reported for your samples. These analyses are not
being performed on your samples typically, but on laboratory generated material.
Sample Chain of
Custody (Sc)
This is the document created in the field when your samples were initially collected. This is used to verify the time and
date of collection, the person collecting the samples, and the analyses that the laboratory is requested to perform. This
chain of custody also documents all persons (excluding commercial shippers) that have had control or possession of the
samples from the time of collection until delivery to the laboratory for analysis.
Sample Results (Sr)
This section of your report will provide the results of all testing performed on your samples. These results are provided
by sample ID and are separated by the analyses performed on each sample. The header line of each analysis section for
each sample will provide the name and method number for the analysis reported.
Sample Summary (Ss) This section of the Analytical Report defines the specific analyses performed for each sample ID, including the dates and
times of preparation and/or analysis.
Qualifier
Description
J6 The sample matrix interfered with the ability to make any accurate determination; spike value is low.
ACCOUNT:
SynTerra Corporation
PROJECT: SDG:
00.2398.00 L1426639
DATE/TIME: PAGE:
11/11/2111:33 14 of 16

ACCREDITATIONS & LOCATIONS
Pace Analytical National 12065 Lebanon Rd Mount Juliet, TN 37122
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
40660 Nebraska NE-OS-15-05
17-026 Nevada TN000032021-1
AZ0612 New Hampshire 2975
Arkansas 88-0469 New Jersey—NELAP TN002
California 2932 New Mexico' TN00003
Colorado TN00003 New York 11742
Connecticut PH-0197 North Carolina Env375
Florida E87487 North Carolina' DW21704
Georgia NELAP North Carolina 3 41
Georgia 1 923 North Dakota R-140
Idaho TN00003 Ohio—VAP CL0069
Illinois 200008 Oklahoma 9915
Indiana C-TN-01 Oregon TN200002
Iowa 364 Pennsylvania 68-02979
Kansas E-10277 Rhode Island LA000356
Kentucky16 KY90010 South Carolina 84004002
Kentucky 2 16 South Dakota n/a
Louisiana A130792 Tennessee' 4 2006
Louisiana LA018 Texas T104704245-20-18
Maine TN00003 Texas 5 LAB0152
Maryland 324 Utah TN000032021-11
Massachusetts M-TN003 Vermont VT2006
Michigan 9958 Virginia 110033
Minnesota 047-999-395 Washington C847
Mississippi TN00003 West Virginia 233
Missouri 340 Wisconsin 998093910
Montana CERT0086 Wyoming A2LA
A2LA — ISO 17025 1461.01 AIHA-LAP,LLC EMLAP
A2LA— ISO 17025 5 _ 1461.02 DOD
Canada _ 1461.01 USDA
EPA—Crypto TN00003
Drinking Water 2 Underground Storage Tanks 3 Aquatic Toxicity ° Chemical/Microbiological 5 Mold 6 Wastewater n/a Accreditation not applicable
* Not all certifications held by the laboratory are applicable to the results reported in the attached report.
*Accreditation is only applicable to the test methods specified on each scope of accreditation held by Pace Analytical.
100789
1461.01
P330-15-00234
ACCOUNT: PROJECT: SDG: DATE/TIME: PAGE:
SynTerra Corporation 00.2398.00 L1426639 11/11/2111:33 15 of 16

l...01Tipculy [-Name/Hooress:
Billing Information:
Analysis / Container / Preservative
Chain of Custody Page of
SynTerra
51 1 Keisler Dr.
Cary, North Carolina 27518
et,
1
L•A•B 5
C•I•E-N•C•E-S
R!Report to:
P
Eck f\o & -Vi
�'
Email To:
r1iC
Z� a @syntemaeorp.com
12065 Lebanon Rd Q
Mount eban, TN 37122
#}'
O
s
[-Project
SSC-Statesville Fertilizer Plant
Description:
City/State w\
Collected: ,V
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
. +L
Q•C
v
' Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Client Project #
00.2398.00
Lab Project #
O
0 w
_
tit -QV/
(; 2 2
Collected by (print):
Zo etlAry car -Vies•
Site/Facility ID #
P.O. #
Q
—
E 0
to
cN
_ -
Acctnum: DUNDUNNC
Collected by (signature):
Rush? (Lab MUST Be Notified)
- Same Day 200%
Date Results Needed
O
o
N
Template:
Prelogin:
mediately
Packed on Ice N Y3.7
ext Day 100%
TDay 50%
_Three Day 25%
Email? No leyes
_
FAX? No _Yes
O
Owo
9.
OC
TSR: Wagner
Cooler:
l
Sample ID
1,
Comp/Grab
Matrix'
Depth
Date
of
Time ntrs
�
Z
E
E
a
Shipped Via: R8(elafl
--_,
Rem./Contaminant
$ery
r_-__-___—t
Sample 8 (lab only) i
Kb5 trJ`1M
&rob
&W
!i/3411
015S is
X
t ,
K.6SW(0N1
(.0(0
K. ko5 W1
I V.ko5 W 1oNi
i i 5Li 5
I
-al 1
14to5k1
11 Q
'
'a
Ko4W1 L
I IDDS
____
1
- a
K1C5w7S
�
• 3 a 5
v
i 'd`-
L
1
* Matrix: SS - Soil GW - Groundwater WW - WasteWater DW - Drinking Water OT - Other
_
pH
Temp
'' (/
$Remarks: OD -/ ZiiQ 5 V 34' Flow Other
Hold #
Relinquished y : (Signs Date: 7
1 11 /3 / P 1
Tim-e::l
) 1 00
!Received by: (Signature)
Samples returned via: 0 LIPS
p
❑ FedEx ❑ Courier 0
Condition: {lab use only)
linquished by Signature) pate:
l
Time.
Received by: (Signature)
Temp:Al* Bottles Received:
G% r (({j ((1- ly
COC Seal Intact: / Y N NA
Relinquished by : (Signature) Date:
— - - --1 - -- _,
Time: ;Received for y: (Sign )
-- - / - —
Date: Time:
It /1hl b f'4"'
pH Checked: [[[
NCF: -i
i

eAnaIicaI® A\ALYTI CAL REPO
November 12, 2021
RT
SynTerra Corporation
Sample Delivery Group: L1427785
Samples Received: 11/06/2021
Project Number: 00.2398.00
Description: SSC-Statesville Fertilizer Plant
Report To:
Zachary Garlick
PO Box 639
Cary, NC 27512
Entire Report Reviewed By:
Heather J Wagner
Project Manager
Results relate only to the items tested or calibrated and are reported as rounded values. This test report shall not be
reproduced, except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. Where applicable, sampling conducted by Pace
Analytical National is performed per guidance provided in laboratory standard operating procedures ENV-SOP-MTJL-0067 and
ENV-SOP-MTJL-0068. Where sampling conducted by the customer, results relate to the accuracy of the information provided,
and as the samples are received.
Mr -
Pace Analytical National
12065 Lebanon Rd Mount Juliet, TN 37122 615-758-5858 800-767-5859 www.pacenational.com
Cp
2
Tc
3
Ss
4
Cn
6
Qc
7
GI
8
Al
9
SC
ACCOUNT:
SynTerra Corporation
PROJECT:
00.2398.00
SDG:
L1427785
DATE/TIME:
11/12/2112:39
PAGE:
1 of 11

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cp: Cover Page
Tc: Table of Contents
Ss: Sample Summary
Cn: Case Narrative 4
Sr: Sample Results 5
K65W6A L1427785-01 5
K65W6E L1427785-02 6
Qc: Quality Control Summary 7
Wet Chemistry by Method 350.1 7
Wet Chemistry by Method 9056A 8
GI: Glossary of Terms 9
Al: Accreditations & Locations 10
Sc: Sample Chain of Custody 11
ACCOUNT: PROJECT: SDG: DATE/TIME: PAGE:
SynTerra Corporation 00.2398.00 L1427785 11/12/2112:39 2 of 11

SAMPLE SUMMARY
Collected by
Collected date/time Received date/time
K65W6A L1427785-01 GW
Zachary Garlick 11/05/2113:05 11/06/21 09:30
Method
Wet Chemistry by Method 350.1
Wet Chemistry by Method 9056A
K65W6E L1427785-02 GW
Batch
Dilution Preparation
date/time
Analysis
date/time
Analyst Location
WG1772319 1 11/11/2116:53
WG1770084 20 11/06/21 22:22
11/11/2116:53
11/06/21 22:22
Collected by Collected date/time
Zachary Garlick 11/05/2114:20
SL
ELN
Mt. Juliet, TN
Mt. Juliet, TN
Received date/time
11/06/21 09:30
Method
Batch
Dilution Preparation
date/time
Analysis
date/time
Wet Chemistry by Method 350.1
Wet Chemistry by Method 9056A
WG1772319 1 11/11/2116:14
WG1770084 50 11/06/2119:00
11/11/2116:14
11/06/2119:00
Analyst Location
SL
ELN
Mt. Juliet, TN
Mt. Juliet, TN
i
Cp
2
Tc
4
Cn
5
Sr
6
Qc
GI
8
AI
9
Sc
ACCOUNT:
SynTerra Corporation
PROJECT: SDG:
00.2398.00 L1427785
DATE/TIME:
11/12/2112:39
PAGE:
3 of 11

CASE NARRATIVE
All sample aliquots were received at the correct temperature, in the proper containers, with the
appropriate preservatives, and within method specified holding times, unless qualified or notated within
the report. Where applicable, all MDL (LOD) and RDL (LOQ) values reported for environmental samples
have been corrected for the dilution factor used in the analysis. All Method and Batch Quality Control
are within established criteria except where addressed in this case narrative, a non-conformance form
or properly qualified within the sample results. By my digital signature below, I affirm to the best of my
knowledge, all problems/anomalies observed by the laboratory as having the potential to affect the
quality of the data have been identified by the laboratory, and no information or data have been
knowingly withheld that would affect the quality of the data.
Heather J Wagner
Project Manager
Cp
2
Tc
3
Ss
Cn
5
Sr
6
Qc
7
GI
8
Al
9
SC
ACCOUNT: PROJECT: SDG: DATE/TIME: PAGE:
SynTerra Corporation 00.2398.00 L1427785 11/12/2112:39 4 of 11

K65W6A SAMPLE RESULTS - 01
Collected date/time: 11/05/21 13:05
L1427785
Wet Chemistry by Method 350.1
Analyte
Ammonia Nitrogen
Result Qualifier MDL RDL Dilution Analysis Batch
ug/I ug/I ug/I date / time
173 J 117 250 1 11/11/202116:53 WG1772319
Wet Chemistry by Method 9056A
Result Qualifier MDL RDL Dilution Analysis Batch
Analyte ug/I ug/I ug/I date / time
Nitrate 99600 960 2000 20 11/06/2021 22:22 WG1770084
ACCOUNT: PROJECT: SDG: DATE/TIME: PAGE:
SynTerra Corporation 00.2398.00 L1427785 11/12/2112:39 5 of 11

K65W6E SAMPLE RESULTS - 02
Collected date/time: 11/05/21 14:20
L1427785
Wet Chemistry by Method 350.1
Analyte
Ammonia Nitrogen
Result Qualifier MDL RDL Dilution Analysis Batch
ug/I ug/I ug/I date / time
348 117 250 1 11/11/202116:14 WG1772319
Wet Chemistry by Method 9056A
Result Qualifier MDL RDL Dilution Analysis Batch
Analyte ug/I ug/I ug/I date / time
Nitrate 384000 2400 5000 50 11/06/202119:00 WG1770084
ACCOUNT: PROJECT: SDG: DATE/TIME: PAGE:
SynTerra Corporation 00.2398.00 L1427785 11/12/2112:39 6 of 11

WG1772319 QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY
Wet Chemistry by Method 350.1
L1427785-01,02
Method Blank (MB)
(MB) R3728484-1 11/11/2115:47
MB Result
Analyte ug/I
Ammonia Nitrogen U
MB Qualifier
MB MDL MB RDL
ug/I ug/I
117 250
L1425900-03 Original Sample (OS) • Duplicate (DUP)
(OS) L1425900-03 11/11/2115:56 • (DUP) R3728484-5 11/11/2115:57
Analyte
Original Result DUP Result Dilution DUP RPD DUP Qualifier DUP RPD
Limits
ug/I ug/I % %
Ammonia Nitrogen
U U 1 0.000 10
L1428326-02 Original Sample (OS) • Duplicate (DUP)
(OS) L1428326-02 11/11/2116:18 • (DUP) R3728484-7 11/11/2116:20
Analyte
Original Result DUP Result Dilution DUP RPD DUP Qualifier DUP RPD
Limits
ug/I ug/I % %
Ammonia Nitrogen
U U 1 0.000 10
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
(LCS) R3728484-2 11/11/2115:48
Spike Amount LCS Result LCS Rec. Rec. Limits LCS Qualifier
Analyte ug/I ug/I % %
Ammonia Nitrogen 7500 7140 95.2 90.0-110
L1425900-01 Original Sample (OS) • Matrix Spike (MS) • Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD)
(OS) L1425900-01 11/11/2115:51 • (MS) R3728484-3 11/11/2115:53 • (MSD) R3728484-4 11/11/2115:54
Spike Amount Original Result MS Result MSD Result MS Rec. MSD Rec. Dilution Rec. Limits MS Qualifier MSD Qualifier RPD RPD Limits
Analyte ug/I ug/I ug/I ug/I % % % % %
Ammonia Nitrogen 5000 U 4940 4960 98.7 99.1 1 90.0-110 0.425 10
L1428326-01 Original Sample (OS) • Matrix Spike (MS)
(OS) L1428326-01 11/11/2116:15 • (MS) R3728484-6 11/11/2116:17
Spike Amount Original Result MS Result MS Rec. Dilution Rec. Limits MS Qualifier
Analyte ug/I ug/I ug/I % %
Ammonia Nitrogen 5000 U 4750 95.0 1 90.0-110
ACCOUNT: PROJECT:
SynTerra Corporation 00.2398.00
SDG: DATE/TIME: PAGE:
L1427785 11/12/2112:39 7 of 11

WG1770084 QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY
Wet Chemistry by Method 9056A
L1427785-01,02
Method Blank (MB)
(MB) R3728238-1 11/06/21 12:24
MB Result
Analyte ug/I
Nitrate U
MB Qualifier
MB MDL MB RDL
ug/I ug/I
48.0 100
L1427812-05 Original Sample (OS) • Duplicate (DUP)
(OS) L1427812-05 11/06/21 20:08 • (DUP) R3728238-6 11/06/21 20:23
Original Result DUP Result
Analyte ug/I ug/I
Dilution DUP RPD DUP Qualifier
Nitrate 76.1 62.1 1 20.3 J P1
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
DUP RPD
Limits
15
(LCS) R3728238-2 11/06/21 12:39
Spike Amount LCS Result LCS Rec. Rec. Limits LCS Qualifier
Analyte ug/I ug/I % %
Nitrate 8000 8170 102 80.0-120
L1427470-10 Original Sample (OS) • Matrix Spike (MS) • Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD)
(OS) L1427470-10 11/06/21 15:46 • (MS) R3728238-4 11/06/2116:01 • (MSD) R3728238-5 11/06/2116:16
Spike Amount Original Result MS Result MSD Result MS Rec. MSD Rec. Dilution Rec. Limits MS Qualifier MSD Qualifier RPD
Analyte ug/I ug/I ug/I ug/I % % % %
Nitrate 5000 1280 6320 6430 101 103 1 80.0-120 1.71
L1427812-05 Original Sample (OS) • Matrix Spike (MS)
RPD Limits
15
(OS) L1427812-05 11/06/21 20:08 • (MS) R3728238-7 11/06/21 21:07
Spike Amount Original Result MS Result MS Rec. Dilution Rec. Limits MS Qualifier
Analyte ug/I ug/I ug/I % %
Nitrate 5000 76.1 4970 97.9 1 80.0-120
ACCOUNT: PROJECT:
SynTerra Corporation 00.2398.00
SDG: DATE/TIME: PAGE:
L1427785 11/12/2112:39 8 of 11

GLOSSARY OF TERMS
Guide to Reading and Understanding Your Laboratory Report
The information below is designed to better explain the various terms used in your report of analytical results from the Laboratory. This is not
intended as a comprehensive explanation, and if you have additional questions please contact your project representative.
Results Disclaimer - Information that may be provided by the customer, and contained within this report, include Permit Limits, Project Name,
Sample ID, Sample Matrix, Sample Preservation, Field Blanks, Field Spikes, Field Duplicates, On -Site Data, Sampling Collection Dates/Times, and
Sampling Location. Results relate to the accuracy of this information provided, and as the samples are received.
Abbreviations and Definitions
MDL
RDL
Rec.
RPD
SDG
U
Analyte
Method Detection Limit.
Reported Detection Limit.
Recovery.
Relative Percent Difference.
Sample Delivery Group.
Not detected at the Reporting Limit (or MDL where applicable).
The name of the particular compound or analysis performed. Some Analyses and Methods will have multiple analytes
reported.
Dilution
If the sample matrix contains an interfering material, the sample preparation volume or weight values differ from the
standard, or if concentrations of analytes in the sample are higher than the highest limit of concentration that the
laboratory can accurately report, the sample may be diluted for analysis. If a value different than 1 is used in this field, the
result reported has already been corrected for this factor.
Limits
These are the target % recovery ranges or % difference value that the laboratory has historically determined as normal
for the method and analyte being reported. Successful QC Sample analysis will target all analytes recovered or
duplicated within these ranges.
Original Sample
The non -spiked sample in the prep batch used to determine the Relative Percent Difference (RPD) from a quality control
sample. The Original Sample may not be included within the reported SDG.
Qualifier
This column provides a letter and/or number designation that corresponds to additional information concerning the result
reported. If a Qualifier is present, a definition per Qualifier is provided within the Glossary and Definitions page and
potentially a discussion of possible implications of the Qualifier in the Case Narrative if applicable.
Result
The actual analytical final result (corrected for any sample specific characteristics) reported for your sample. If there was
no measurable result returned for a specific analyte, the result in this column may state "ND" (Not Detected) or "BDL"
(Below Detectable Levels). The information in the results column should always be accompanied by either an MDL
(Method Detection Limit) or RDL (Reporting Detection Limit) that defines the lowest value that the laboratory could detect
or report for this analyte.
Uncertainty
(Radiochemistry)
Confidence level of 2 sigma.
Case Narrative (Cn)
A brief discussion about the included sample results, including a discussion of any non -conformances to protocol
observed either at sample receipt by the laboratory from the field or during the analytical process. If present, there will
be a section in the Case Narrative to discuss the meaning of any data qualifiers used in the report.
Quality Control
Summary (Qc)
This section of the report includes the results of the laboratory quality control analyses required by procedure or
analytical methods to assist in evaluating the validity of the results reported for your samples. These analyses are not
being performed on your samples typically, but on laboratory generated material.
Sample Chain of
Custody (Sc)
This is the document created in the field when your samples were initially collected. This is used to verify the time and
date of collection, the person collecting the samples, and the analyses that the laboratory is requested to perform. This
chain of custody also documents all persons (excluding commercial shippers) that have had control or possession of the
samples from the time of collection until delivery to the laboratory for analysis.
Sample Results (Sr)
This section of your report will provide the results of all testing performed on your samples. These results are provided
by sample ID and are separated by the analyses performed on each sample. The header line of each analysis section for
each sample will provide the name and method number for the analysis reported.
Sample Summary (Ss) This section of the Analytical Report defines the specific analyses performed for each sample ID, including the dates and
times of preparation and/or analysis.
Qualifier
Description
J
P1
The identification of the analyte is acceptable; the reported value is an estimate.
RPD value not applicable for sample concentrations less than 5 times the reporting limit.
ACCOUNT:
SynTerra Corporation
PROJECT: SDG:
00.2398.00 L1427785
DATE/TIME: PAGE:
11/12/2112:39 9 of 11

ACCREDITATIONS & LOCATIONS
Pace Analytical National 12065 Lebanon Rd Mount Juliet, TN 37122
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
40660 Nebraska NE-OS-15-05
17-026 Nevada TN000032021-1
AZ0612 New Hampshire 2975
Arkansas 88-0469 New Jersey—NELAP TN002
California 2932 New Mexico' TN00003
Colorado TN00003 New York 11742
Connecticut PH-0197 North Carolina Env375
Florida E87487 North Carolina' DW21704
Georgia NELAP North Carolina 3 41
Georgia 1 923 North Dakota R-140
Idaho TN00003 Ohio—VAP CL0069
Illinois 200008 Oklahoma 9915
Indiana C-TN-01 Oregon TN200002
Iowa 364 Pennsylvania 68-02979
Kansas E-10277 Rhode Island LA000356
Kentucky16 KY90010 South Carolina 84004002
Kentucky 2 16 South Dakota n/a
Louisiana A130792 Tennessee' 4 2006
Louisiana LA018 Texas T104704245-20-18
Maine TN00003 Texas 5 LAB0152
Maryland 324 Utah TN000032021-11
Massachusetts M-TN003 Vermont VT2006
Michigan 9958 Virginia 110033
Minnesota 047-999-395 Washington C847
Mississippi TN00003 West Virginia 233
Missouri 340 Wisconsin 998093910
Montana CERT0086 Wyoming A2LA
A2LA — ISO 17025 1461.01 AIHA-LAP,LLC EMLAP
A2LA— ISO 17025 5 _ 1461.02 DOD
Canada _ 1461.01 USDA
EPA—Crypto TN00003
Drinking Water 2 Underground Storage Tanks 3 Aquatic Toxicity ° Chemical/Microbiological 5 Mold 6 Wastewater n/a Accreditation not applicable
* Not all certifications held by the laboratory are applicable to the results reported in the attached report.
*Accreditation is only applicable to the test methods specified on each scope of accreditation held by Pace Analytical.
100789
1461.01
P330-15-00234
ACCOUNT: PROJECT: SDG: DATE/TIME: PAGE:
SynTerra Corporation 00.2398.00 L1427785 11/12/2112:39 10 of 11

C3Ylparr9 Name/Address:
Billing Information: 1 Analysis / Container / Preservative
Chain of Custody Page Lof 1
SynTerra
511 Keisler Dr.
Cary, North Carolina 27518
-42-
(
*ESC
L-A-B S•C-I•E•N
C•E-S
INKMIKEZZIEMEIEEI
Report to:
� ` �p�r c
�+e,, Ytitia+ley
Email To: ' C >�
2
ynterracorp.com
12065 Lebanon Rd +
Mount Juliet, TN 37122 0 : a
Phone.[phone] X _
Phone:80
Project SSC — S\'oCe6 41M,
-vier-
City/State `�
1`\V1
O+++T 1
Fax: [phone]
Description: Per- ',\ P evir
Collected:
f �7 �7 Q ( '
L # / / O J
Client Project #
Lab Project #
In
(y�
Phone:[phone]
Fax: [phone]
n 3� D C
v
w
O
Table # B 140
Collected by (print):
}}�� (^��f C(
+
Site/Facility ID #
P.O. #
In
O_
Z
D-
Acctnum: DUNDUNNC
Template:
Collected by (signature): A
Rush? (Lab MUST Be Notified)
Same Day 200%
Date Results Needed 0
0
0
O
lt\/�Ir
�y"
I medlately
��Next Day 100%
.yr Two Day 5096
Three Day 25%
Email? No /_Yes
FAX?
CA
No.
N
N
w
TSR: Wagner
Cooler:
Packed on Ice N Y
_ .
_No _Yes
of
o'i
~
Cntrs i
Shipped Via: Raleigh Sery
Sample ID
Comp/Grab
Matrix *
Depth
Date
Time
Z
Z
Rem./Contaminant
Sample # (lab only)
1(to50Gq
Gro
60
it/s/ \
3305
D
x
,c
.-.11
K_LD5wce. E.-
C31W
1'
H O
L1
1
le
—>✓t
Sample Rece pt Checklist
CO'''''Seal Present!Intact: YN If Applicable
1 COC S gned/Accurate: 1J VOA Zeru Headspace: _Y_N
Bottles arrive intact: N Pres.Correct/Check: YN
Correct bottles used: N
Sufficient
volume sent: N
RAD Screen <0.5 mR. `.:—':
1
-
__ -- -- ----
• Matrix: SS - Soil GW - Groundwater WW - WasteWater DW - Drinking Water OT - Other pH Temp
Remarks: Flow Other
3 7I I,2
Hold #
57 9 Y / �c
Relinquishe by : (Signature)
Date:
t
I ti /5/a 1
Time:
1 54-i 0
Received by: (Signature))
Samples returned via: ❑ UPS
yi FedEx ❑ Courier 0
Condition: (lab use only)
Temp: f%C Bottles Received:
15Tt2( 5 /
COC Seal Intact: Y N / NA
elinquished : (Signature)
Date:
Time:
Received by: (Signature)
Relinquished by : (Signature)
Date:
Time:
Received for lab by: (Signature)
.
Date: Time:
11-6-s) M3-
pH Checked:
NCF:

Report of Annual Groundwater Monitoring
Southern States Cooperative, Inc.
Statesville, North Carolina
APPENDIX B
TREND GRAPHS OF NITRATE AND AMMONIA IN GROUNDWATER
L7
synTerra
Science & Engineering Consultants

K65W6A (Saprolite)
400 90
Treatment System Became Operational (1994)
Nitrate Results
350 -4\:\
300
•
- - - Nitrate 2L Standard
—A.—Ammonia
- - - Ammonia IMAC
Standard
- 80
70
-
Nitrate Concentration in mg/L
N
O to O to
O O O 0 0
♦,♦♦,♦ ♦.1 ♦,♦ A. .-i♦ ♦.1 ♦ ♦, ♦,
co A 01 6)
O O O O O 0
Ammonia -Nitrogen Concentration it
,♦ ,♦ , ♦,
V o
O N 7 . , 00 tT O N 7 ,.G -i , . 0, O ,-N 7 ,G , . G\ O
Q' CI'Q' enQi Qi O.' Qi O.' Qi O O O O O O O O O O N N
a d N d N d N d N d N d d d d N d N d N d N d N d d d d
w a: a: w w w w w w w a: 'a a: w a: a: a: a: w w w w w w w a: 'a w w w w w
Date
Date
2/13/90
1/22/92
4/16/92
7/27/92
10/21/92
2/10/93
4/8/93
8/3/93
10/7/93
3/8/94
9/27/94
8/2/95
11/8/95
Nitrate (mg/1)
370
252
360
360
311
30
210
340
330
250
260
250
180
Ammonia -Nitrogen (mg/1)
No Data
Date
2/8/96
5/9/96
11/15/96
5/20/97
11/18/97
5/19/98
11/19/98
3/30/99
11/3/99
3/28/00
11/16/00
4/5/01
10/24/01
Nitrate (mg/1)
240
260
210
106
243
121
199
236
240
220
200
180
190
Ammonia -Nitrogen (mg/1)
No Data
Date
3/29/02 10/18/02
5/2/03
10/17/03
4/16/04
10/28/04
7/18/05
10/27/05
4/26/06
10/23/06
5/1/07
10/15/07
4/25/08
Nitrate (mg/1)
235 170
140
84
200
150
170
190
160
150
140
30.9
92.8
Ammonia -Nitrogen (mg/ 1
No Data
77
0.24
NS
NS
NS
0.23
NS
0.14
0.13
0.25
0.36
Date
4/9/09
10/30/09
4/6/10
10/21/10
4/22/11
11/2/11
5/10/12
11/7/12
5/23/13
11/20/13
5/30/14
5/21/15
5/25/16
Nitrate (mg/1)
152
186
135
122
118
120
162
105
124
157
141
129
170
Ammonia -Nitrogen (mg/1)
NS
0.10
0.16
0.19
0.30
0.33
0.24
0.88
<0.10
0.12
<0.10
0.12
0.16
Date
7/28/17
10/16/18
10/30/19
10/27/20
11/5/21
Nitrate (mg/1)
Ammonia -Nitrogen (mg/1)
150
0.11
93
0.11
160
<0.10
140
0.18
99.6
0.17
P:\_Cary\Southern States\Statesville Fertilizer - 50200\Tables_Excel\Current Annual Report tables\Historical Nitrate Trend Graphs with Tables

Nitrate Concentration in mg/L
160
140
120
100 -
80
60 -
40
20
0
- - - Nitrate 21, Standard
- Nitrate Results
-� Ammonia Results
- - - Ammonia IMAC
Standard
Treatment System Became Operational
(1994)
fn000 0,'
O 0 0 L 0 L
V N a N N V N a N N N N
44 V. w w 44 V. V. w w V.
K65W6B (Saprolite)
rn 0 'Cr 0 0
Date
O O O �--i CV(+1 V a vO r- an C N N
p A L L A L 4 p 0 p
a
44 v.. 44 w w w w w w w w w w w
1.8
1.4
1
0
0.8 O
z
0.6
0.4 g
0.2
0
Date
2/13/90
1/22/92
4/16/92
7/27/92
10/21/92
2/10/93
4/8/93
8/3/93
10/7/93
3/8/94
9/27/94
3/30/99
11/3/99
Nitrate (mg/1)
22
22
15
26
16
7.6
6.8
28
29
19
18
89.4
140
Ammonia -Nitrogen (mg/1)
No Data
Date
10/24/01
5/2/03
10/17/03
4/16/04
10/28/04
7/18/05
10/27/05
4/26/06
10/23/06
5/1/07
10/15/07
4/25/08
4/9/09
Nitrate (mg/1)
78
92
40
41
44
33
35
28
23
31
31
32
40
Ammonia -Nitrogen (mg/1)
No Data
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
NS
NS
0.12
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
NS
<0.1
<0.1
Date
10/29/09
4/6/10
10/22/10
4/21/11
11/1/11
5/9/12
11/7/12
5/23/13
11/20/13
5/29/14
5/21/15
5/25/16
7/28/17
Nitrate (mg/1)
55.9
34.5
30.2
26.9
38.4
34.2
39.8
59.6
28.5
31.8
35.8
51
80
Ammonia -Nitrogen (mg/1)
<0.1
<0.10
1.4
0.61
<0.10
<0.10
NS
0.33
0.13
0.19
0.11
0.19
<0.10
Date
10/15/18
10/29/19
10/26/20
11/03/21
Nitrate (mg/1)
51
46
41
45.9
Ammonia -Nitrogen (mg/1)
0.17
<0.10
<0.10
<0.117
P:\_Cary\Southern States \ Statesville Fertilizer - 50200\Tables_Excel\Current Annual Report tables\Historical Nitrate Trend Graphs with Tables

K65W6D (Saprolite)
Concentration in mg/L
t Nitrate Results
v
rn
on
d
a
p
w
o,
to
¢
Date
9`
w
rn a`,
to a
d w
Date
8/1/90
1/22/92
2/10/93
4/8/93 to 10/26/20
Nitrate (mg/1)
0.63
0.17
0.25
Dry
Ammonia (mg/1)
No Data
Dry
P:\_Cary\Southern States\Statesville Fertilizer - 50200\Tables_Excel\Current Annual Report tables\Historical Nitrate Trend Graphs with Tables

Nitrate Concentrations in mg/L
K65W6E (Bedrock)
- Nitrate Results
- - - Nitrate 2L Standard
-� Ammonia Results
- - - Ammonia IMAC
Standard
Treatment System Became Operational (1994)
en
b t 00 a
ti ti ti - g ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti g ti ti ti ti - ti ti ti ti - g ti ti ti ti g ti
Date
1.8
- 1.6
- 0.2
0
Ammonia -Nitrogen Concentration mg/L
Date
8/1/90
1/22/92
2/10/93
8/2/95
11/8/95
2/8/96
5/9/96
11/15/96
5/20/97
11/18/97
5/19/98
11/19/98
3/30/99
Nitrate (mg/1)
7.3
37
27
4.4
5
56
7.9
8.5
11.7
24.1
30.9
49.9
50.4
Ammonia -Nitrogen (mg/1)
No Data
Date
11/3/99
3/28/00
11/16/00
4/5/01
10/24/01
3/29/02
10/18/02
5/2/03
10/17/03
4/16/04
10/28/04
7/18/05
10/27/05
Nitrate (mg/1)
56
67
68
62
78
81
76
62
60
90
100
120
150
Ammonia -Nitrogen (mg/1)
No Data
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
NS
NS
<0.10
Date
4/26/06
10/23/06
5/1/07
10/15/07
4/25/08
12/18/08
4/9/09
10/30/09
4/6/10
10/22/10
4/22/11
11/2/11
5/10/12
Nitrate (mg/1)
140
150
150
14.2
169
202
253
44.4
243
203
311
278
181
Ammonia -Nitrogen (mg/1)
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
0.5
<0.10
1.7
0.62
1.6
1.8
0.33
Date
11/7/12
5/23/13
11/20/13
5/30/14
5/21/15
5/25/16
7/28/2017
8/30/17
10/16/18
11/11/19
10/27/20
11/5/21
Nitrate (mg/1)
223
196
297
275
263
320
74
330
350
340
340
384
Ammonia -Nitrogen (mg/1)
1.2
0.56
1.6
1.0
1.5
0.92
0.7
0.44
0.36
0.16
0.24
0.348
P:\_Cary\Southern States\Statesville Fertilizer - 50200\Tables_Excel\Current Annual Report tables\Historical Nitrate Trend Graphs with Tables

Nitrate Concentration in mg/L
1.5
1.4
1.3
1.2
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
K65W6M (Saprolite)
- Nitrate Results
- - - Nitrate 2L Standard
- Ammonia Results
- - - Ammonia IMAC
Standard
00
0 0
U U
4) 4)
ca ca
o U U U U U U V U
r ca ca ca r ca ca A
Date
1.6
1.4
0.2
0
Date
12/19/08
4/9/09
10/29/09
4/6/10
10/22/10
4/21/11
11/1/11
5/9/12
11/6/12
5/23/13
11/20/13
5/29/14
5/21/15
5/25/16
7/27/17
Nitrate (mg/1)
0.44
<.10
0.15
0.16
0.28
0.14
0.37
<0.20
1.0
0.44
0.49
0.33
0.26
0.54
0.28
Ammonia -Nitrogen (mg/1)
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
Date
10/15/18
10/29/19
10/26/20
11/3/21
Nitrate (mg/1)
0.22
0.29
0.24
0.223
Ammonia -Nitrogen (mg/1)
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.117
P:\_Cary\Southem States\Statesville Fertilizer - 50200\Tables_Excel\Current Annual Report tables\Historical Nitrate Trend Graphs with Tables

- Nitrate Results
- - - Nitrate 2L Standard
->~ Ammonia Results
- - - Ammonia IMAC
Standard
Nitrate Concentration in mg/L
K65W6N (Saprolite)
Date
7.0
6.0
en
5.0 E
4.0 tt
3.0,, e
z
2.0 E
e
1.0
0.0
Date
12/19/08
4/9/09
10/29/09
4/7/10
10/22/10
4/21/11
11/1/11
5/10/12
11/6/12
5/23/13
11/20/13
5/29/14
5/21/15
5/25/16
7/27/17
Nitrate (mg/1)
16.7
61.9
82.3
67.2
66.6
61.4
50.2
48.5
50.4
32.1
57.3
44.7
56.1
58
63
Ammonia -Nitrogen (mg/1)
6.6
3.5
1.7
1.4
1.2
1.3
0.99
0.35
0.93
0.18
1.1
0.32
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
Date
10/15/18
10/29/19
10/26/20
11/3/21
Nitrate (mg/1)
110
90
19
130
Ammonia -Nitrogen (mg/1)
0.65
<0.10
2.2
0.354
P:\_Cary\Southem States\Statesville Fertilizer - 50200\Tables_Excel\Current Annual Report tables\Historical Nitrate Trend Graphs with Tables

140
K65W7C (Saprolite)
35
Nitrate Results
Nitrate 2L Standard
—.,— Ammonia Results
120
- 30
• •• • Ammonia IMAC
centration in mg/L
00 0
O O
Standard
N N
O 0,
gen Concentration mg/L
Treatment System Became Operational
E
60
- 15
N A
J O O
J cn O
Ammonia -Nita
u
O
0,
N
01
en 7 v-, ,0 N 00 0, O
O, 01 0,
N
M
O
7
O
V-,
O
,0
O
t�
O
00 01 O
O O
?
P
? L ) p L p p p ?
L
Pw
?
L
P
p
L .0 A
w w
w
w w w w w w 4-1 w w
w
w
w
w
w
w w w
Date
Date
2/13/90
1/22/92
2/10/93
10/17/03
7/18/05
10/28/05
4/25/08
12/19/08 to 10/21/10
4/21/11
11/1/11 to 10/26/20
Nitrate (mg/1)
93
130
13
82
33
53
<0.10
Dry
9.4
Dry
Ammonia -Nitrogen (mg/1)
No Data
9
NS
2.3
29.4
Dry
<0.10
Dry
P:\_Cary\Southern States\Statesville Fertilizer - 50200\Tables_Excel\Current Annual Report tables \Historical Nitrate Trend Graphs with Tables

Nitrate Concentration in mg/L
40
K65W7D (Saprolite)
35 -
30 -
25 -
20 -
15 -
10
0
N rn 7 v/ 10 r� 00 01 O N rn 7 a 10 0- 00 01 O
01 a1 a1 T T T T D, D, D\ O O O O 1111
O O O O O
- Nitrate Results
- - - - Nitrate 2L Standard
-A- Ammonia Results
- - Ammonia IMAC
Standard
Treatment System Became Operational
(1994)
♦ A Air A 'A
N M 7 0 10 r- 00 01 O
N
ti ti , ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti
Date
2.5
2
- 1.5
1
- 0.5
Ammonia -Nitrogen Concentration mg/L
Date
8/1/90
1/22/92
2/10/93
3/30/99
11/3/99
3/28/00
11/16/00
4/5/01
10/24/01
3/29/02
10/18/02
5/2/03
10/17/03
Nitrate (mg/1)
11
2
0.57
0.775
2
1
2
1.1
<0.10
1.1
2.4
1.4
0.05
Ammonia -Nitrogen (mg/1)
No Data
0.41
<0.10
Date
4/16/04
10/28/04
7/18/05
10/27/05
4/25/06
10/23/06
5/1/07
4/25/08
4/16/09
10/29/09
4/6/10
10/21/10
4/21/11
Nitrate (mg/1)
1.3
2.4
0.48
2
1.1
15
39
0.48
0.21
<0.10
0.22
<0.10
0.16
Ammonia -Nitrogen (mg/1)
<0.10
NS
NS
0.12
<0.10
1.1
2.1
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
Date
11/2/11
5/9/12
11/6/12
5/23/13
11/19/13
5/28/14
5/20/15
5/25/16
7/27/17
10/15/18
10/29/19
10/26/20
11/2/21
Nitrate (mg/1)
<0.20
<0.20
<0.020
<0.020
0.15
0.30
0.07
0.24
<0.10
2
<0.20
0.24
<0.048
Ammonia -Nitrogen (mg/1)
0.18
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.117
P:\_Cary\Southern States\Statesville Fertilizer - 50200\Tables_Excel\Current Annual Report tables\Historical Nitrate Trend Graphs with Tables

K65W7F (Saprolite)
180 3
160 -
Nitrate Results
- - - Nitrate 2L Standard
Ammonia
140 -
-a- Results
- - - Ammonia MACII
Standard
♦
- 2.5
ntration in mg/L
O N
O O
N
n Concentration n
a7
a 80
cj
Treatment System Became Operational
(1994)
y
on
`
a)
os L 60-
z
40 -
20
♦
�
• ./ ---- - ---r/
4 --
Ammonia-P
O N n 7 Vl ,O N oo O, O N rn 7 V1 ,D N CO O, O ^. N M 7 VI 'O N
O1 O' O\ O1 9' O1 O1 O' O' O\ 9 9 9 9 O 9 9 9 9 9
ti ti ti ti ti g g ti ti ti ti ti g ti ti ti ti ti ti g g ti ti ti kg g g ti
Date
Date
8/1/90
1/22/92
4/16/92
7/27/92
10/21/92
2/10/93
4/8/93
8/3/93
10/7/93
3/8/94
9/27/94
2/8/96
5/9/96
Nitrate (mg/1)
99
100
109
79
79
110
100
100
96
1.6
94
150
6.1
Ammonia -Nitrogen (mg/1)
No Data
Date
3/28/00
11/16/00
10/24/01
3/29/02
10/18/02
5/2/03
10/17/03
4/16/04
10/28/04
7/18/05
10/27/05
4/26/06
10/23/06
Nitrate (mg/1)
5.1
0.52
20
33
17
3
21
8.5
<0.1
20
NS
31
15
Ammonia -Nitrogen (mg/1)
No Data
<0.10
NS
<0.10
NS
NS
NS
0.12
1.1
Date
4/25/08
4/9/09
10/29/09
4/6/10
10/21/10
4/21/11
11/1/11
5/9/12
11/6/12
5/23/13
11/19/13
5/29/14
5/20/15
Nitrate (mg/1)
61.9
33.6
Dry
9.2
30.7
6.7
Dry
Dry
10.7
4.1
NS
18.4
16.5
Ammonia -Nitrogen (mg/1)
<0.10
<0.10
Dry
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
Dry
Dry
<0.10
<0.10
NS
2.5
<0.10
Date
1/7/16
5/26/16
7/27/17
10/15/18
10/29/19
10/26/20
11/2/21
Nitrate (mg/1)
34
98
50
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Ammonia -Nitrogen (mg/1)
0.77
<0.10
<0.10
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
P:\_Cary\Southern States\Statesville Fertilizer - 50200\Tables_Excel\Current Annual Report tables\Historical Nitrate Trend Graphs with Tables

Nitrate Concentration in mg/L
280
K65W7G (Saprolite)
260 -
240 -
220 -
200 -
180 -
160 -
140 -
120 -
100 -
80 -
60 -
40 -
20 -
0
Nitrate Results
Nitrate 2L Standard
—� Ammonia Results
- - - Ammonia IMAC
Standard
Treatment System Became Operational (1994)
O N M
O
♦
O O O O O O O O O N - - - -
ti n ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti n ti ti ti ti ti ti n ti ti
Date
90
80
70
E
60
50
40 0
z
30 R
20 5
10
Date
8/1/90
1/22/92
2/10/93
2/8/96
11/3/99
11/16/00
10/24/01
3/29/02
10/18/02
5/2/03
10/17/03
10/28/04
7/18/05
Nitrate (mg/1)
1.7
1.9
2.6
3.5
2.9
3.6
2.8
31
32
1.3
0.4
4.4
1.7
Ammonia -Nitrogen (mg/1)
No Data
<0.10
<0.10
NS
NS
Date
4/25/06
10/23/06
5/1/07 to 4/6/10
10/21/10
4/21/11
11/1/11
5/9/12
11/6/12
5/23/13
11/19/13
5/28/14
5/20/15
Nitrate (mg/1)
16
29
Dry
3.3
Dry
Dry
Dry
6.2
1.7
NS
118
248
Ammonia -Nitrogen (mg/1)
<0.10
4
Dry
<0.10
Dry
Dry
Dry
<0.10
<0.10
NS
9.0
81.2
Date
1/7/16
5/25/16
7/27/17
10/15/18
10/29/19
10/26/20
11/2/21
Nitrate (mg/1)
56
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Ammonia -Nitrogen (mg/1)
6.7
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
P:\_Cary\Southern States\Statesville Fertilizer - 50200\Tables_Excel\Current Annual Report tables\Historical Nitrate Trend Graphs with Tables

12
10
Nitrate Concentration in mg/L
K65W7H (Bedrock)
- Nitrate Results
- - - Nitrate 2L Standard
- - - Ammonia IMAC
Standard
-.I.- Ammonia Results
0o rn
O O
o o
A A
1
r 0.9
O N to 7 kn 'O l� oo O, O
NUo U U UN U U N U N U
A A A A A A A A A A A
Date
0.8 a
E
a
0.7 0
a
L
0.6 e:
U
a
0.5 U
a
d
on
0.4 y
z
0.3 a
0
E
0.2 5
0.1
0
Date
12/19/08
4/9/09
10/29/09
4/6/10
10/21/10
4/21/11
11/1/11
5/9/12
11/6/12
5/23/13
11/19/13
5/29/14
5/20/15
5/25/16
Nitrate (mg/1)
0.30
0.26
0.36
0.47
0.36
0.40
0.36
0.72
0.54
0.74
0.52
0.67
0.79
0.76
Ammonia -Nitrogen (mg/1)
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
Date
7/27/17
10/15/18
10/29/19
10/26/20
11/3/21
Nitrate (mg/1)
1.1
0.8
1
0.97
0.966
Ammonia -Nitrogen (mg/1)
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.117
P:\_Cary\Southern States\Statesville Fertilizer - 50200\Tables_Excel\Current Annual Report tables\Historical Nitrate Trend Graphs with Tables

300
K65W7J (Saprolite)
250 -
200
a
.a
0
0
L
a 150 -
u
G
0
U
i 100
z
50
0
- Nitrate Results
- - - - Nitrate 2L Standard
—A— Ammonia Results
- - - Ammonia IMAC
Standard
•
44ff
O 0
O 0
♦
oo a o ^� ▪ ti ,M-i 7i t- 00 0, o
O O O N N
U U U U U U U J U U U U U U U
O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O
Date
5
1
0
Date
10/28/04
7/18/05
10/27/05
4/26/06
10/23/06
5/1/07
10/15/07
4/25/08
12/18/08
4/9/09
10/30/09
4/7/10
10/22/10
Nitrate (mg/1)
100
140
74
150
180
140
14.4
178
204
191
199
157
172
Ammonia -Nitrogen (mg/1)
NS
NS
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
0.10
0.6
0.86
0.79
1.7
1.7
1.4
2.2
Date
4/21/11
11/2/11
5/10/12
11/7/12
5/23/13
11/19/13
5/29/14
5/22/15
5/26/16
7/27/17
10/16/18
10/30/19
10/27/20
Nitrate (mg/1)
162
184
134
185
187
191
193
146
150
140
120
89
110
Ammonia -Nitrogen (mg/1)
3.3
2.8
4.2
2.2
2.5
3.8
2.8
3.4
4.0
3.5
5.3
5.5
5.1
Date
11/3/21
Nitrate (mg/1)
65
Ammonia -Nitrogen (mg/1)
4.3
P:\_Cary\Southern States\Statesville Fertilizer - 50200\Tables_Excel\Current Annual Report tables\Historical Nitrate Trend Graphs with Tables

Nitrate Concentration in mg/L
200
K65W7K (Bedrock)
180 -
160
140
120
100 -
80
60 -
40
20
0
•
- Nitrate Results
• • - Nitrate 2L Standard
-� Ammonia Results
- - - Ammonia IMAC
Standard
12
10
8
6
4
0
V1 iD 00 01 00 al O
O O O O O O N N
U U U U U U U CJ CJ U U U V V V U U U
Date
Ammonia -Nitrogen Concentration mg/L
Date
10/28/04
7/18/05
10/27/05
4/25/06
10/23/06
5/1/07
10/15/07
4/25/08
12/19/08
4/9/09
10/30/09
4/7/10
10/22/10
Nitrate (mg/1)
81
89
190
100
120
89
25.9
99.5
108
95.4
99.4
77.4
84.6
Ammonia -Nitrogen (mg/1)
NS
NS
4.1
3.7
11
4.5
4.2
4.8
4.1
4.2
3.6
3.6
3.8
Date
4/21/11
11/2/11
5/10/12
11/7/12
5/23/13
11/19/13
5/29/14
5/22/15
5/26/16
7/27/17
10/16/18
10/30/19
10/27/20
Nitrate (mg/1)
92.3
85.3
87.1
85.6
86.7
90.2
85.6
87.2
86
82
87
96
94
Ammonia -Nitrogen (mg/1)
2.8
2.7
2.6
2.3
2.8
3.0
2.7
2.8
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.3
1.9
Date
11/3/21
Nitrate (mg/1)
31.3
Ammonia -Nitrogen (mg/1)
99.8
P:\_Cary\Southern States\Statesville Fertilizer - 50200\Tables_Excel\Current Annual Report tables\Historical Nitrate Trend Graphs with Tables

Nitrate Concentration in mg/L
0
U
O
0
U
0
0
U
0
0
U
0
0
U
0
0
U
0
K65W7L (Bedrock)
U
0
U
0
ts-
V
0
00
U
0
- Nitrate Results
Nitrate 2L Standard
-� Ammonia Results
- - - Ammonia IMAC
Standard
a
U
0
U
0
-2
A
Date
10/28/04
7/18/05
10/27/05
4/25/06
10/23/06
5/1/07
10/15/07
4/25/08
12/19/08
4/9/09
10/30/09
4/7/10
10/22/10
Nitrate (mg/1)
22
98
110
130
120
99
30.5
104
103
93.8
103
85.7
95.2
Ammonia -Nitrogen (mg/1)
NS
NS
7.7
7.4
11
11
12.9
12.4
10.4
10.1
9.4
9.0
12.8
Date
4/21/11
11/2/11
5/10/12
11/7/12
5/23/13
11/19/13
5/29/14
5/22/15
5/26/16
7/27/17
10/16/18
10/30/19
10/27/20
Nitrate (mg/1)
96.4
116
94.9
97.8
94.5
94.7
94.2
101.0
100
89
110
96
120
Ammonia -Nitrogen (mg/1)
7
12
10.7
4.9
9.5
9.5
9.4
9.3
7.2
4.5
5.5
1.2
6.9
P:\_Cary\Southern States\Statesville Fertilizer - 50200\Tables_Excel\Current Annual Report tables\Historical Nitrate Trend Graphs with Tables