20140719 Ver 1_401 Application_20140714

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
DATE July 10, 2014
To NCDENR -DWR- Raleigh
Attn Jennifer Burdette
1617 Mail Service ^Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1617
FROM Ronnie Thomas (for Hy N u en
PROJECT Van Hanh Temple
DPR'PROJECT # 10003
RE Updating PCN form
I ndscape � architecture
planning
=;Ieqf
civil engineering
WE ARE SENDING YOU THE FOLLOWING ITEMS
AA UPS
,,COPIES
DATE
NO`
DESCRIPTION
1
2 -4 -2011
10 -shts
Van Hanh Temple Construction Documents (C -1 thru C -9)
5
7 -10 -2014
1,0 -pgs,
Revised Signed PCN Form
1
6 -6 -2014
3 -pgs
Email Letter from Ralaigh Engineer, Keith Tew
1
- - --
3 -pgs
Copy of Deeds (as organization documentation)
1
7 -8 -2014
3 -pgs
USGS Map and Soils Map
- - --
7 -10 -2014
1 check
Check No 14437 in the amount of $240 00 payable to NCDENR
THESE,ARE TRANSMITTED
FOR APPROVAL
FOR REVIEW/ COMMENT
REMARKS
Ronnie (for'Hy Nguyen)
rthomas @dprassociates net
COPY TO
FOR'YOUR USE
OTHER
SIGNED
RECIEVED BY
DPR Associates, InC1 1 420 Hawthorne Lane I Charlotte, NC 28204 1 ph 704 332 1204 kx 704 332 12101 www dprassociates net

1 � �
oaoF w a rFRO�
20 1 4 0 ( . 9
O Y
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
1.
Applicant Information
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 12 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑X Yes ❑ No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Van Hanh Temple
2b.
County:
Wake ;K'ra
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Raleigh
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
s
3.
Owner Information �p,LIN
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Van Hanh Temple
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
DB 7975 PG 514 & MB 1974, PG 100
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Van Hanh Temple / North Carolina Buddhist Association
3d.
Street address:
4229 Forestville Road
3e.
City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 272616
3f.
Telephone no.:
919 - 426 -4757
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
dulenc @gmail.com
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

}
4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a
Applicant is
❑X Agent ZX ' Other, specify
4b
Name
Same as Above
4c
Business name
(if applicable)
4d
Street address
4e
City, state, zip
4f
Telephone no
4g
Fax no
Ah
Email address
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a 'Name
Hy Nguyen, PE
5b
Business name
(if applicable)
DPR Associates, Inc
5c
Street address
420 Hawthorne Lane
5d
City, state, zip
Charlotte, NC 28204
5e
Telephone no
704 -332 -1204
5f
Fax no
704- 332 -1210
5g
Email address
hguyen@dprassocaites net
t
Page 2,of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a
Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID)
(ID 009544) PIN 1746 -49 -3709
lb
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees)
Latitude 35 864168 Longitude -78 513184
1c
Property size
4 895 acres
2
Surface Waters
2a
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project
Harris Creek (Peep(es Creek) (Wake Crossroad Lake)
2b
Water Quality Classification ofnearest receiving water
C, NSW
2c
River basin
NEUSE RIVER
3.
Project Description
3a, Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application
The site has an existing building and existing outdoor religious displays and gazeboos
3b
List the total estimated acreage of all existing, wetlands on the property 1 03
3c, ,List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property- 390
3d Explain the purpose of °the proposed project
(3c' Centerline of'creek is property line per Map book 1974, pg 100, but surveyed boundary is not the same) Proposed new, building
and parking lot Pro ose&8" gravity sewer,to °serve new building needs,to,cross the stream to tie into existing sewers stem
3e Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used -
The proposed,gravity sewer crossing will,be bored under the stream, with bored pit approx 10' from top of bank
4.
Jurisdictional'Determinations
4a
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or "State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including " all nor hases in the past?
0 Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments-- USAGE= wetlands (Enc Alsmeyer),on 11-12-10&
4b :If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ❑X Final
4c
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known) Eric Alsmeyer, Martin{Richmond
Agency /Consultant Company_
Other
4d If yes„ list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
USACE-Wetlands, (Eric Alsmeyer) on 11 -12 -10 & DWQ- Streama (Martin Richmond) on 10 -18 -10
5.
Project History
5a
Have permits or certifications been requested or,obtained for
this project (including all priorrphases) in the past?
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ Unknown
5b
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions
6.
Future Project Plans
6a
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b
If yes, explain
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
❑X Wetlands ❑X Streams — tributaries ❑X Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ `Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetlan_d,impacts proposed on the site,-then complete this question for each wetland area impacted
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
Wetland impact
Type ofimpact
Type of wetland
Forested
Type of jurisdiction
Area of
number
Corps (404,10) or
impact
Permanent (P) or
DWQ (401, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 T
Type In (Other)
Unknown
No
Corps
'&02847
W2 T
Type In (Other)
Unknown
No
Corps
001653
W3
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W4
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W5
Choose,one
Choose�one
Yes /No
W6
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
2g Total'Wetland Impacts.
0 045
2h Comments
W1 Type of�Impactis open'cut for Construction (on -site)
W2 Type of Impact is`open cut for Construction (off -site)
This'is temporary wetland impact for sewer construction only Sewer is,bored
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream'impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this'
question for`all stream sites impacted
3a
3b
3c
3d
`3e
3f
3g
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial (PER) or
Type of
Average
Impact
number
intermittent (INT)?
jurisdiction
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(feet)
feet)_
S1 P
Bore under creek,bed
Harris Creek =(Peeples)
PER
DWQ
1
S2 -
Choose one
S3 -
Choose one
S4 -
Choose one
,S5 -
Choose�one
-
S6 -
Choose one
-
3h, Total_ stream and tributary impacts
1
31 Comments
Proposed sewer crossing is bored The borepit is 10 min away from top of bank The 8" gravity sewer crossing will be bored to minimize the impact
to stream and wetlands The 16" steel'casmg specified on the approved plan is already the minimally acceptable size to,accommodate,an 8" maim It
leaves only a 4" space between the casing & DI'carner pipe, which is necessary to install the supporting, hardware (spiders) See email letter for
Raleigh Engineer, Keith Tew
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

4 Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean; or any other open water of
the U•S then indivi ually, list.all o en water impacts below
4a
Open water
impact number
Permanent,(P) or
Temporary T
4b
Name of waterbody
(if,applicable)
4c
Type of impact
4d
Waterbody
type
4e
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
02,
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04
Choose one
Choose
4f Total open water impacts
4g Comments NIA
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below
5a
Pond ID number
5b
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c
Wetland Impacts (acres)
'5d
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e
Upland
(acres]
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose,one
5f Total:
5g Comments N/A
5h Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no
51 Expected pond surface area (acres)
5j Size of ^pond watershed (acres)
5k Method of construction
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below- If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below If any impacts require mitigation. then v6u MUST fill out Section D of this form
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑X Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other
6b
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c
Reason for impact
6d
Stream name
6e
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f
Zone 1
`impact
(square
feet )
6g
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1 T
8" gravity sewer crossing
ONSITE Harns,Creek
No
400
400
B2 T
8 ",grairity sewer crossing
OFFSITE Harris Creek
No
400
400
B3
Yes /No
B4
Yes /No
B5
Yes /No
66
Yes /No
6h Total Buffer Impacts:
800
800
61 Comments Zone 1 impact is approx 20'x20' since,bonng- starts about 10' from top of bank
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or,minimize the proposed impacts in designing project
The 8" gravity sewer crossing will be bored to minimize the impact to stream and wetlands The 16" steel casing specified on the approved plan is
already the minimally acceptable size to accommodate °an 8" main It leaves only a 4" space,between the casing & DI carrier pipe, which'is, necessary
to install the supportmg'hardware (spiders) See email letter for Raleigh Engineer, Keith Tew
1b Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the,proposed impacts through,construction techniques
The 8" gravity sewer crossing will be bored to minimize the impactJo stream and wetlands Construction to be carried out with extra caution and
diligence'to stay'within the 20' corridor or less This is temporary impact except for the 4" above creek bed- Contractor to restore wetland grade
2 Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U S , or Waters, of the State?
❑ Yes ❑ No
2b If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that'apply)
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
�project�
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment.to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a Name of Mitigation Bank
3b Credits Purchased'(attach receipt and letter)
Type Choose one
Type Choose one
Type Choose one
Quantity
Quantity
Quantity
3c Comments
4. Com lete,if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached
❑ Yes
4b Stream mitigation, requested
Linear feet
4c If using stream mitigation, stream temperature
Choose one
4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)
square feet
4e Riparian' Wetland mitigation requested
acres
4f Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested
acres
4h , Comments
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a If'using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
1
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1, 4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a Will'the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
Yes No
6b If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffet that requires mitigation Calculate'the
amount of mitigation required
Zone
6c
Reason for impact
_6d,
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone, 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1._5
6f Total buffer mitigation required-
6g If,buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g , payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration,, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund)
6h Comments
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
la
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b
If-yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why
Stormwater and erosion control are proposed,as part of overall plans submitted and approved by City of
Yes No
Raleigh
Stormwater Department Total TN buydown was approved by City of Raleigh, purchased with a
❑ ❑X
private mitigation,bank Copy attached
2.
Stormwater Mana ement,Plan
2a
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
2b
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
0 Yes ❑ No
2c
If this project DOES NOT'require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why
2d
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide'a brief, narrative description of the plan
Stormwater
and erosion control are proposed as part of overall plans submitted and approved by City of Raleigh Stormwater Department Total TN
buydown was approved by City of Raleigh, purchased with a private mitigation bank Copy attached
2e
Who will be, responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
Certified Local Government
3.
Certified Local,Government Stormwater Review
3a
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Raleigh
0 Phase II
❑NSW
3b
Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check,all that apply)
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other
3c
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑X Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply)
❑Session Law 2006 -246
❑X Other N /A
4b
Has the,approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached ?'
5
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑,Yes ❑ No
5b
Have all of the,401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la
Does the project Involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
❑ Yes
❑X No
use of public (federal /state) land?
lb
If you answered `'yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been`finalized by the
'State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy,of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes
❑ No
letter )
Comments
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (1`5A.NCAC 2H 0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300), DWQ Surface'Water or Wetland Standards,
❑Yes
❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)?
2b
Is this an,after- the -fact permit applications
❑,Yes
❑X No
2c
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s)
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑,Yes
❑X No
additional development, Which could impact nearby,downstream water quality?
3b
If you °answered "yes' to.the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance With the
most recent DWQ policy If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description
The proposed development for this site includes a new building, and parking,lot All applicable permits,a re, being obtained with local authority, City of
Raleigh
Total TN buydowmwas approved'by City of Raleigh, purchasedwith a private mitigation bank Copy attached
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods`and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of'the subject facility
°discharges to the 8" future discharge +/- 1,359 GPD
Wastewater
proposing gravitysewer,
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ❑X No
habitat
5b Have you checked`with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ❑X No
impacts?
5c If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted
-
5d What data sources did you use to determine whether yoursite would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Contacted Corps Office (Eric Alsmeyer)
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b What, data sources did you use to determine�whether'your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat
I /A -not in, coastal region
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or,cultural - preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e g , National Historic Trust designation or properties, significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b What data sources did you use to determine whether your�site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Contacted Corps Office (Eric Alsmeyer)
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a Will this project occur in a FEMA7 designated 100- year,floodplain?
❑X Yes ❑ No
8b If -yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements
The proposed development is outside of,the FEMXfloodline The proposed sewer crossing is bored under the stream No fill No impact
8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
I Have contacted the FEMA Region IV office (Mohammad Waliullah, 770 - 220 -5493)
07
-1,0 -2014
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's, signature is valid only'if an authorization
letter from,the applicant is provided
Page 10 of 10

809 160514 6392
FOF
n REGIST,'',I
03/25/911 0 0 0 1 '7 7 tf� r
913 117 1
y11,KE COUNTY NC $B�•fl�
ST Olt'P %� Real'Estate REGIS i�:� l itc-r_i_;
PT ° T Excise Tax VIA
GPa l
Excise Tax ,Recording T,me,'BOOk and Page
Tax Lot No Parcel ,Identifier No 0095244
Verified by _ County on the day of M, "'19
by
Mall after recording to Andrew. S,, Martm
This instrument was prepared by Andrew S. Martin—
Brief
description for the Index
NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL WARRANTY DEED
TH =IS DEED,made, this 24th day of March „ 19 98 , by and between
GRANTOR
DAN M. BENbTON
and wife,
ALV'A POOLE B'ENTON
GRANTEE
NORTH CAROLINA BUDDHI -ST
ASSOCIATION
4229 Forestville Road
Ral'eig'h, NC 27616
Enter in appropriate block for each party name, address, and, if appropriate, character of entity, a q- corporation or partnership
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors, and assigns; and
shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine or neuter as required by, context
WITNESSETH, that the Grantor, for a valuable consideration paid by I,the Grantee; the receipt of which is hereby
acLnoy.ledged, has and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the Grantee to fee simple, al'l that
,,ertain lot or parcel of land situated in the City of , I Township,
WAKE _ County, ,North, Carolina and more particularl;,y described as follows
SEE EXHIBIT A ATTACHED HERETO AND I1NCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE.

1 "map showing the above described property is recorded in Plat Book - - . page _
CO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and appurtenances thereto belonging to
he Grantee In fee isimple.
knd the Grantor covenants with the Grantee, that Grantor is seized of the premises in fee simple, has the right to convey
he same in fee simple, that title is marketable and- free and clear of all encumbrances, and that Grantor will warrant and
efend the title against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever except for the exceptions hereinafter stated
'itle to the property hereinabove described is subject to the following exceptions
Res�trftti,ons and easements of record, and 1998 ad valorem taxes.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal, -veyf- corporate, has caused this instrument to be signed in its
krporate name by 'its duly authorized officers and Its seal to he hereunto affixed by authority of its Board of Di t°lors, the day and year hist
love written ` / I /
/ �..
----- --- ------- - � - -- �-= �. ✓,rc•/••/!�--- -1 ----t--- - -/----_-- -- --- - -- --(SEAL)
---- -- -- -- --
(Corporate Name) ;0: DAN 'M. BENTON
Y------ --- - --- --- ---- --------------- - -- ------ --------
____ _________ ____ _________President ALVA POOLE BENTON 1 /
TTEST
---------------- ------------------------ -----------
-
? "
G'
.7
s
m
:D
----- --- - - - -- --- -= --- - ----- --- -- ----------- --- ---- ---- (SEAL)
- -- - ---------- ------ ----- -- -- -- --- ------ --- -- (SEAL)
NORTH CAROLINA, ------------ WAKE ----------------- County
x I; a Notary Public of the County and State aforesaid, certify that _Dan_ M___y_enLQn__a_nd__Alva
.r7
Y P4gle _Benton
---------------------- -- - - - - -- Grantor,
u---------=------------------------- - - - - -- - - - -- --
N
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the execution of the foregoing instrument Witness my
aV AA 1l,, n
hand -and official stamp or seal_, this _2-Y -.U_ day of ____M_ a_r_ch_________ __ __ __ __ ________ 1,g 98-
1 t.
My commission expires _ __ f_�_J' - --- _'- -_____ _ j��14 =-< ----- Notary Public
SEAL -STAMP NORTH CAROLINA, ____________ _______________ _______County,
I, a Notary Public of the County and State aforesaid, certify that
m personally came before me this day and acknowledged that ____ he is Secretary of
k
X _______________________ ______ ___ ______ _______ __ _______ a North Carolina corporation, and that by authority duly
d given and as the act of the corporation, the foregoing instrument was signed in its name by Its ...............
fA
y President, sealed with its corporate seal and attested by ___________ as its ___ Secretary
7 -
Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, this ------- day of ________________________ _ _, 19________
Illy commission expires - ------ --- ----- --- ---- ---- - -- ----------------------------------------- Notary Public
e foregoing Certificate(s) of _____________ _____ #
----- - - - - -----------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------- - - - - -- -
- - - ------------------------------------ - - - - -- --------------- - - - - -- _------------------------------_-------------------------
ire certified to be correct This instrument and this certificate are duly' registered at the date and time and in the Book and Page shown on the
t page; hereof,
________________ ______ __REGISTER OF DEEDS FOR___! --------------------------- COUNTY
__l.�_ __�5.. -__- Sic`_'____ ' ____Deputy /AA'Fff :RiT-Register of Deeds
Bar Assoc Form No 3 © 1976 Revised © ier % a co 1- eb, 177 Yadki N C 27055
d by Agte t`w 1h the N C Sat A— - 1981 -

EASTERN PORTION'OF TRACT .- 4,'DIVISION OF HORACE M. POOLE.ESTATE
SUBDIVISION,
AS RECORDED N MAPOBOOKK19745 PAGES 1004
I
OF THE WAKE _ COUNTY REG I SUR OF DEEDS.
This map is drawn from on actual survey made under my superviiion based on Information found
m the 'above referenced ,record document(s) and is correct to, the 'best of my, knowledge. The
unadjusted_rano of precision is IAO.000• This map does not meet 1he.itandards for record `law
os per GS47 -30 and u not to be recorded or used' m conveyance without written permission from,
the /�yw�'y�"yor aanydqappro to town officials,
1' // ri 1 71 V l /Iii
and "extent is
Excavation m
Other under
at 1 -800_V
w
U N Ln O O to
ZZ — N Ln M aD
-v), r) co oD Ln' 'C'
W
3 3 B,: W w
00000
M 0 0 0 0
Z co Ln O Ln aD
Ln O N s1• Ln
Q LD N to Ln V'
to
N Z Z V) (n
LU
Z — N' M T Ln
J J .J J J J
O
G
� f
0
� r
� [T1
Professional Land Surveyor
utile evidence located.
own are approximate
1 1 Areas are by coordinate computation.
2.) Distances are horizontal ground dutdacos
3) North arroi a 'referenced to recorded
document shorn above unless otherwise noted
4 ) BuildLny / house he(s) are perpendicular to
property lines unless otherwise noted
5) rearm & and distances of title lines shown
are from 'record plot(!) and /or deed(:)
6.) Field ®easurements are shown Im parentheses
rh"ere,slyndicant differences exist from retort
lot. or where record ,lot does not close
mathematically
may be incomplete N/F J. H. POOLE_
d to vardy locations D -S 4852 , PG'. 168,
may exist Call -ONE CALL CENTER'
6 199' "9; NOTE: CENTER L'I'NE OF CREEK-13 PROPERTY L1 NE SEE
MAP BOOK 1,974 P
PAGE 100 E
EXISTING POND OBSCURES
CENTER, L I'NE OF C
CREEK -
89'31 00'E
123.08'' S 79. °
\ ,
°o
\
,
�� c
CL
101 v
v
LS r
rn
w
0 m
m
W
N
0 0
0
O
W
LL
1,83 eo )
mLN D B 7357 PG 410
Qr O
mL
OLD WATKINS ROAD
SURVEY FOR:
Alf%DTU" /'`,A enl I wit s wit Lr.w...
N /F'PERRY
D.B 2236 PG 400
LEGEND
a EXISTING IRON PIPE
m COMPUTED POINT
e NEW IRON PIPE
N ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER
LBS LOCATION BY SCALE
PK MASONRY NAIL
—X —X- FENCE
-- CREEK(APPROX LOCATION)
£ —E—OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE
n DFrx
P PORCH
S STOOP
SH SHED
W WINDOW
LP L 1 GHT POLE
PP POWER POLE
CP CARPORT
G GARAGE
MH MANHOLE

'W
V
x
az
V1 O
U
xx
wz°
N
W
R
W
V1
W
Z
Z.
C)
M
00
n
0
M
N
M
N O
Lc) O
N p L O
M °' n I LL m
M
Ln
N
Ict
N
H
w
W
LL
Co
O
O
CN
M
N
n
-0b 3IN?I!?9,71W 0 0
�j
tic
o
�`4) " _
p �'_"
_
6RESTVILLE'RD1 l ��
ol
Lai
CK
�
/f
�- bO m 250
_-
u
e
Z
_ SpUTHALL RD --� �
- i
� j
p,_ 05 i
/� 2�
of

35° 51'5f N
35" 51'45"N
724430 724460 724490 724520 724550
3
Map Sole: 1:1,350 if printed on A portrait (8.S' x 11 ") sheet.
Meters
NN 0 20 40 80 120
/V r
D 50 100 200 300
Map pml�: Web Mercator Comer coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey
Hydrologic Soil Group —Wake County, North Carolina 3
(10003 Van Hanh Temple)
724580 724610
3
a
R
m
n
Q
m
n
�i
K
n
n
n
�i
K
n
m
b
n
n
�i
0
i.
rn
m
7/8/2014
Page 1 of 4
35° 51' 54" N
35" 51'45N

m
O
m
U
L
0
0
Z
T p,
c E
y
o
UL
Y m
I�I _
h>
� M
O O
O
o
U)
U'
Ol
O
O
T
Z
_O
H
O
LL
z
a
0
z
W
0
W
J
CL
W
C 0
— C
a) o m
N N m
U O CN�pp
C U U U
N
U
0-0
10 U _�
m a m d m
a a)
U m C m .O
N 'E 'm'm
r O 'm ;N E
d o
m a= m
N' E 3 76
,> Y O C
L 3
N O
C O N
o 0>, v c c
C O
0 0
T N 'D ()
m
E m 0 o >
a
m E -) E z
o-5L-O
C j
O C m ~
ii a) y C U
0) E a) N
m
C m C EEy w
E fa 7 U N
wEau))
0 0
N N
�0- a)
n rn
m
a
T
m
Z
>
CD 0
Z co
0 m
U) .�-
m
O N
U) CL
U
m
0
m
Z
U
7 N
O C
U) O
m
d
7 c
m O
Z U
0l
m
2
r-:
0)
C
O N
w L)
]
o
N
U U
N m m
L
O)
p L a)
N 7 O
E
fnN
mvNE
T
L CL
C
_ w
O
t7
,0
a)
a)
`
m C co
N
w a) co N
N
N
M
Z T
a y 7
C O O
f0
U)i Z �
D° `I n a�i
m
0 0a
rn W
m-0
m
E
U
0
.0 aL
L
U
m
f0/1
(LD
).D
a)
�j
C
2 O
m U Y 0 lO
CD
C
O
7 2
N <� a)
> C V m
'O N
E
N a;�
L N
N
0 m
m
0
76
(n
— Z o a o
`e
J
N a c
m
a
(D
Z�,E
U
te d Q o mr-
a)
N
a ) CL @in
U
•L"
c w
(gym/)
a T
u) = m m o
0 c
m 0 U)
Z;
m
O O C
w 8 0
fU) f0/)
m m
�
j.0 O
N U C ` 5
a m m U
O
a) E
0 E
p N 0
to U
m N�-
a v ;Fr N
0 0
N N
�0- a)
n rn
m
a
T
m
Z
>
CD 0
Z co
0 m
U) .�-
m
O N
U) CL
U
m
0
m
Z
U
7 N
O C
U) O
m
d
7 c
m O
Z U
0l
m
a
C)
r-:
0)
C
1
'
L
1
N
a
C
U
Lo
en
T
L CL
`o
1
2 N
O
N
N
O
N O C
y O
f0
0
c 6 E
o)
m o
U
(n
N
— Y a)
'cu
a
m
O
N
O m E
N •O N
I
6 M
E
�
El M
U N
w
`e
L N
o
C
7
N
L
I
r N
L
m
m
o
Z CD
U
m
N
O Q-0
s
m
C
N
a
m
co
;
O
o
m a a)
E?1ca a)
D
a)
o c
U 0
N
L
o-
m Q Ea
N� a) T
-0
a) v)
m
M 0 N m
m
a)
O
3
`mom
N
I—
O)
m
N
a)
t m C N
0 N O
in
m
N
o)
c0
v v
°?
m
T
;�
Tm
E
�_°
r c L�
m-
O
I N
a)
Z a
O
�a �
m m
�
O C
L -0
C m
z
7 T
to a)
E °)
w
I a
0 a a) m
CD
= Z
— m
°3`-
m E mE
• :5
(n 'fn
VJ 'O
❑ N
H• U S O
0 0
N N
�0- a)
n rn
m
a
T
m
Z
>
CD 0
Z co
0 m
U) .�-
m
O N
U) CL
U
m
0
m
Z
U
7 N
O C
U) O
m
d
7 c
m O
Z U
0l
m
'
>
C9
0
c
N
a
C
U
J
m
r
°
T
L CL
`o
m
2 N
O
a
O
v
m
o
p
a)
co
o)
m o
,�°
L
a
L) ❑U
m
❑ 2
m N
N
,3 M O Ix
a
y a
❑
0
Q
El M
El E3
A
Q) t
w
`e
C
7
3 �
m
m
m
a
s
m
C
a
m
co
;
0
0
N
N
C
O
O
C
O ,r
O)
N
y
N
y
Q O
T
T
d
is
C
H a))
o
0
❑
in U v ❑
z
a O ❑
a CO m
Q
Q
in
U
Z
m Q ao
mm ¢
0
®
®®®
El®®❑
1
I ®t ®�
y C
to
C ■ i
fn
to
Q
N
0 0
N N
�0- a)
n rn
m
a
T
m
Z
>
CD 0
Z co
0 m
U) .�-
m
O N
U) CL
U
m
0
m
Z
U
7 N
O C
U) O
m
d
7 c
m O
Z U
0l

Hydrologic Sod Group —Wake County, North Carolina
Hydrologic Soil Group
1,0003 Van Hanh Temple
Hydirologic,Soil Group= Summary by-Mip Unit = Wake•County, ck h Carohna!(NC183) ",
".Map,unitsymbol°
Map uriit'namei I
a_ a Rating
AcresaimAO1.
y Percent;9f7AO1' v.
CnA
Colfax -sandy Ioam,,0 to 3
C/D
2 4
41190/6
percent slopes
LoD
Louisburg loamy sand,
A
11
1 6%
10 to, 15 percent
slopes
MeA
Mantachie sandy,loam, 0
B/D
00
01%
to 2 percent,siopes,
rarely flooded
WmC2
Wedowee sandy loam, 6
B
04
14%
to 10 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
WoA
Wehadkee and Bibb
B/D
05
11 0%
sods, O'to 2 percent
slopes, frequently
flooded
WyA
Worsham sandy loam, 0
D
1 5
30 0 %,'
to 3 percent slopes
Totals for Arewof Interest
( 4.9
100.0%
USDA Natural Resources Web Sod Survey 7/8/2014
2� Conservation Service National Cooperative Sod Survey Page 3 of 4

Hydrologic Soil Group —Wake County, North Carolina
Description
Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential Soils are
assigned to one of fourgroups according to,the rate of water Infiltration when the
soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet', and receive precipitation
from long - duration storms
The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and
three dual classes (A/D, B /D, and C /D) The groups are defined as follows
Group A Soils having a high Infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly
wet These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or
gravelly sands These soils have a high rate of water transmission
Group B Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet These
consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained orwell drained
soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture These soils
have a moderate rate of °water transmission
Group C Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet These consist
chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or
soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture These soils have a slow rate °of water
transmission
Group D Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when
thoroughly wet These consist chiefly of clays that have,a high shrink -swell
potential,'soils that,have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer
at or near the surface, and soils that,are,shallow over nearly impervious material
These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission
If'a soil Is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A/D, B /D, or C /D), the first letter is
for drained areas,and the second is for undrained areas Only the soils that in their
natural condition' are in group D are assigned to dual classes
Rating Options
Aggregation Method Dominant Condition
Component Percent Cutoff None Specified
Tie -break Rule Higher
10003 Van'Hanh Temple
usDA Natural Resources Web,Sod;Survey 7/8/201,4
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey PageA of 4

Ronnie Thomas
Subject: FW Van Hanh Temple, Stream crossing (UNCLASSIFIED)
From: Tew, Keith [mailto Keith Tew @raleighnc.gov]
Sent:, Fr,iday,,June 06, 2014 3.37 PM
To: BurdetteJennifer a
Cc: Sanchez, Cesar, Larry @Carolinal3ld_gContractors com;'Eric C Alsmeyer @us.army mil', Du Le; Hall, Randy; Higgins,
Thomas; Hy Nguyen
Subject: RE- Van Hanh Temple, Stream crossing
The 16" steel casing specified on the approved plan is already the minimally acceptable size to accommodate, an 8" main.
It leaves only a 4" space between the - casing & DI carrier pipe, which'is necessary to install the supporting hafdware
(spiders).
• p�T /7
Keith' A,few, P
Project Engineer I
Administration Division
Public Utilities Department
One Exchange Plaza, Suite 620
Phone: [phone]
Email: keith tew @raleighnc -go v
Website: www raleighnc gov
From: Burdette, Jennifer a [mailto:Jennifer.Burdette @ ncdenr.gov]
Sent: Friday, June, 06, 2014 2:57 PM
To: Hy Nguyen; Tew, Keith
Cc: Sanchez, Cesar; Larry @CarolinaBldgContractors.com; 'Eric: C.Alsmeyer@ us.a rmy, mi I'; Du Le; Hall, Randy; Higgins,
Thomas
Subject: RE: Van Hanh Temple, Stream crossing
Hy,
Our water quality certification for NWP 12 (GC 3884) requires written,approval when there are, permanent impacts to
surface waters or,wetlands This gives the Division the opportunity to review the project to ensure that impacts have
been avoided and minimized to the maximum extent practical. In this case, we would ask if the casing diameter could
be reduced to the avoid the permanent,im pact to the stream channel- As far as the method of installation, directionally
boring would impact less stream channel than an open cut trench If an open cut trench is proposed as a more
economical method of installation, you'will need to explain how installation via open cut would be accomplished
without releasing sediment into the stream channel
Thanks,
Jennifer
Jennifer A Burdette
401 /Buffer Coordinator
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit

Wetlands Branch
NCDENR - ,Division of Water Resources - Water QualityPrograms
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1650
(919) 807 -6364 phon&
(919) 807 -6494 fax
*Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to
third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulation.*
From: Hy Nguyen [ mailto :HNguyen @dprassociates.net]
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 9:57 AM
To: Tew, Keith; Burdette, Jennifer a
Cc: 'Sherri, James F SAW'; Mcmillan, Ian; Sanchez, Cesar; [e-mail];
'Eric. C.Alsmeyer @us.army.mil'; 'Richmond, Martin'; Du Le; Hall, Randy; Higgins, Thomas
Subject: RE: Van Hanh Temple, Stream crossing
Thank you Keith for the clarification
Jennifer: Please see my email below. Sorry [got your email address incorrectly the first time.
Hy V. Nguyen, F.E.
DPR ASSOCIATES, INC
landscape architecture, civi engineenng, & planning
420 Hawthorne Lane, Charlotte, NC 28204
O 704 332 1204 Ext 115 M 704 340 0641 F 704 332 1210
www dorassociates net
hnnuyen(a)dprass6ciat6s net
40Years "Making b the Land Work for You"
Any attached'digital file(s) are supplied by DPR Associates, 1'nc to the above recipient(s) as a design / construction aid Be advised that the attached file(s) may or
may not be the final record drawings Any information obtained from. this digital file(s) shall be used for reference only
From: Tew, Keith [mailto Keith Tew @raleighnc gov]
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 9:59 AM
To: Hy'Nguyen
Cc:'Sheen, James F SAW ;'Mcmillan, lan';,Sanchez, Cesar; Larry @Carolina BldgContractors.com,
' Eric. C. Alsmeyer @us.army.mil';'Richmond, Martin'; Du Le; lennifer.burdette @ncdenr, org; Hall, Randy; Higgins, Thorrias,
Subject: RE Van Hanh Temple, Stream crossing
Hy:
To clarify CORPUD's position, the method of construction (open cut`ve(sus B&J) does not matter so much - but either
method still requires the restrain joint DIP carrier pipe (installed to waterline specifications) with crown of steel casing
exposed in the creek. If your environmental permitting is modified to reflect another method of installation, please
resubmit the revised'Utility sheet (only) showing the change in both plan & profile. I will review & forward to our
inspectors, once approved. Thanks.
Keith

Keith A. Tew, PE
, R
Project Engineer I
/) Administration Division
G� Public Utilities Department
One Exchange Plaza, Suite 620
Phone: [phone]
Email: keith tew @raleiQhnc oov
Webslte-: www raleighnc gov
From: Hy Nguyen [mailto:HNguyen @ dprassociates.net]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 10:43 PM
To: Tew, Keith; 'Eric.C.Alsmeyer @us.army.mil'; lennifer.burdette @ncdenr.org
Cc: 'Sherri, James F SAW'; 'Mcmillan, Ian'; Sanchez, Cesar; Larry (a)CarolinaBldgContractors.com; 'Richmond, Martin'; Du
Le
Subject: RE: Van Hanh Temple, Stream crossing
To* Jennifer Burdette (NCDENR)
Eric Alsmeyer (Corps of Engineer)
Keith'Tew (Raleigh Engineering)
Ec. James Sherri (Corps of Engineer)
Ian Mcmillan (NCDENR)
Martin Richmond (NCDENR)
Cesar Sanchez (Raleigh Engineering)
Du Le (Van Hanh Temple Representative)
Larry Rhinehart (Carolina Bldg Contractor)
Hello All
It's been a while since we last communicated on Van Hanh Temple stream crossing for sanitary sewer extension Please
see my last email dated 10 -25 -10 below. We have obtained the Nationwide permit 12 and submjtted appropriate PCN
Form previously (See attachments Eric Alsmeyer is in the process of issuing the updated Nationwide, Permit 12 ) We
chose to bore, under creek to minimize the impact as much as,possible in this environmental sensitive area, and that we
wouldn't have to,obtain a 401 permit We believe we`have gone through all the appropriate channels and obtained all
necessary permits The project has been long approved since,and is currently under construction. The contractor (Larry
Rhinehart of Carolina Bldg Contractor) is getting ready to bore the sewer main connection per approved plans. See
attached sheet C -0 for the overall plan and sheet C -7 for the sewer /water plans
It,came to my attention in early May from the Larry contractor that NCDENR (Ms Jennifer Burdette office) may require
additional permit:(401) for this sewer crossing. My understanding from speaking toJennifer is that because the sewer
encasing, is +/ -,4" above the existing creek bed, therefore it's considered an impact. I personally do not believe it is an
impact. We did the best we could with the existing sewer on the other side of the creek is too shallow. The encasing
size is what City of Raleigh requires. Raleigh requires us to make the (very expensive) sewer main extension We could
have lived with septic fields for the development.
If this 4" sewer encasing above the creek bed is considered an impact, and a separate 401 permit is required, then we
would like to go for the open cut, since it is the same permit. It,would save us substantial construction cost for not
having to bore I spoke with Keith Tew who approved the sewer /water plans previously, and he confirmed that open cut
is allowed per City of Raleigh

Eric and Jennifer, thank you both fortspeaking with me in the last few weeks regarding this matter We would like to
move forward with the construction method revision for the open cut, and will submit-the 401 permit application to
Jennifer office as soon as I hear back from you
Please advise Thank you
Hy V. Nguyen, P.E.
DPR ASSOCIATES, INC
landscape,architecture, civil engineering, & planning
420, Hawthorne, Lane, Charlotte, NC 28204
O 704 332 1204 Ext 115 M 704 340 0641 F 704 332 1210
www dprassociates net
hnguvenp_d`pfassociates net
AM AM
&AM+ U Years "Making the Land Work for You"
b
Any attached digital hle(s) are supplied by DPR Associates, Inc to the above recipient(s) as a design /construction aid Be advised that the attached file(s) may or
may not be the final record drawings Any information obtained from this digital hle(s) shall be, used for reference only
From: Hy Nguyen [mailto:HNguyen @dprassociates.net]
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 10:31 AM
To: Tew, Keith; Richmond, Martin
Cc: Sherri, James F SAW; Eric. C.Alsmeyer @us.army.mil; Mcmillan, Ian; Sanchez, Cesar
Subject: RE: Van'Hanh Temple, stream crossing
Keith - Thanks for the clarification
All again, per COR ordinance, the Temple is required to build a public 8" gravity sewer system to serve the proposed
building and for future tie -in from upstream parcel (or pay a 'pre- payment assessment' fee) The proposed sewer line will
have to tie into an existing 15" sewer line, which is on the other side of the creek (Powell creek, a tributary Harris
creek) We propose to bore under the creek because it appears to be the most efficient method, as aerial crossing is not`
feasible, and open -cut would probably involve further permitting
Everyone I talked to at DWQ and USACE seem to agree that no permits are necessary for the proposed sewer
crossing- I simply dust need someasort of letter or email in writing so that I can forward to CORPUD
Thank you
Hy Nguyen
Hy V. Nguyen, P.E.
: ASSOCIATES, INC
landscape architects, planners, & engineers
420 Hawthorne Lane, Charlotte, NO 28204
O 704 332 1204 Ext 309 M 704 340'0641 F 704 332 1210
www dprassociates net
hnguvenODdprassociates net
The attached digital file(s) are supplied by DPR Associates, Inc to the,above recipient(s) as a designl construction aid Be advised that the
attached file(s) mayor may not be the final record drawings Any Information obtained from this digital file(s) shall be used for reference only

From: Tew, Keith [ maiIto:Keith.Tew @raleighnc.gov]
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 9:45 AM
To: Hy Nguyen; 'Richmond, Martin'
Cc: 'Sherri, James,F SAW'; 'Eric.0 '.Alsmeyer @us.army.mil'; 'Mcmillan, Ian'; Sanchez, Cesar
Subject: Van Hanh Temple, stream crossing
All:
Just as a brief matter of clarification, CORPUD never actually required that the sewerline be bored
under Harris Creek - versus open cut. Plans submitted to our office for first review had already
specified this as the method of choice. Either way, we simply requested that the Project Engineer,
provide us a copy of all environmental permits associated with the stream crossing - should any apply.
However, if NCDWQ &/or USACE has determined that no permits are necessary for the proposed
impact - then no further action is needed for CORPUD on this'issue.
Martin:
I will call you later this morning to discuss.
Thank you all,
Keith A. dew, M
Public Utilities Department
Administration Division
One Exchange'Plaza
Suite 620
Phone: [phone]
Email: keith.tew0raleighnc.gov
Website: www.raleighne.gov
WATER
USE IT
WISELY
From: Hy Nguyen [ mailto :HNguyenO)dprassociates.net]
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 1:59 PM
To: Richmond, Martin
Cc: Sherri, James F SAW; Eric. [e-mail].m11; Mcmillan, Ian; Tew, Keith; Sanchez, Cesar
Subject: RE: 4229 Forestville Rd, Raleigh Site (10003, Van Hanh Temple)
Martin
COR Public Utilities is the one who requests DWQ and /or,USACE permits for `stream crossing', as
applicable My contacts are Keith Tew and Cesar Sanchez, (919 -857 -4540) I've copied both Keith and Cesar
here also
Please verify /confirm
Thank you

From: Richmond, Martin [ mailto :martin.richmond @ncdenr.gov]
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 1:45 PM
To: Hy Nguyen
Cc: Sherri, James F SAW; Ehc.C.Alsmeyer @us.army.mil; Mcmillan, Ian
Subject: RE: 4229 Forestville Rd, Raleigh Site (10003, Van Hanh Temple)
Hy ­I don't believe you need a 404/401 for boring under the stream, but I'm not positive
For Jamie /Eric /Ian — they,are proposing to horizontally bore a sewer line under a Jurisdictional, subject stream
(Harris,Creek; I believe) I'm thinking if they stay out of the buffer on either side of the stream, and they're not
impacting the stream, they don't need a permit or buffer authorization However,,they may have concerns with
the City of Raleigh. I contacted them (CoR) about boring under`the stream I believe the City may want us —
eventually —to either approve this or issue something like a no permit needed
Comments.. ?
Hy — do you have a contact with' City of Raleigh?
From: Hy Nguyen [ma i Ito: HNguven @dprassoaates. net]
Sent: Thursday, October,21; 2010 12:02 PM
To: Richmond, Martin
Subject: RE: 4229 Forestville Rd, Raleigh Site (10003, Van Hanh Temple)
Martin
Thanks for the stream determination letter I will forward it to the City and see what they say I was hoping for the
letter that states the proposed activity is acceptable without any (404/401) permit, but your letter actually states
that'this project may require a Section 404/401 Permit' Is this within your DWQ Wetlands /Stormwater'Junsdiction
to render a such statement or I have to contact the USACE (Raleigh Regulatory Field Office) also? Is this permit
issued through your DWQ branch or USACE? I've contacted Eric Alsmeyer and James Sherri of USACE and am
waiting for their response
Any further clarification is greatly appreciated
Thanks,
Hy
From: Richmond, Martin [ mailto :martm.richmond @ncdenr.gov]
Sent: Monday; October 18, 2010 3:15 PM
To: Hy Nguyen
Subject: RE: 4229 Forestville Rd, Raleigh Site (10003, Van Ranh Temple)
Hy — stream determination letter,attached I'm hoping this is what the city wants. Hard cop_ y goes out in
tomorrow's mail
Let me know if you have questions
Thanks, Martin
From: Hy Nguyen [mai Ito: HNguven @dprassociates.net)
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 9:27 AM
To: Richmond, Martin
Subject: RE: 4229 Forestville Rd, Raleigh Site (10003, Van Hanh Temple)
Martin

Attached PDF is our latest sewer crossing creek plan, addressing Raleigh's comments @ bore /jack with 16"
encasing For your records
Thank you
From: Hy Nguyen
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 11:51 AM
To: 'Richmond, Martin'
Subject: RE: 4229,Forestville Rd, Raleigh Site (10003, Van Hanh Temple)
Thank you Martin
I knew you were busy,'but I was worried as I couldn't get °a hold of you after several email /voicemail attempts,
especially-you were quick to call me back the first time Yes, Raleigh wanted to get something in writing from
DWQ and /or USACE%FEMA
The design for the 8" gravity sewer crossing the creek changed a little bit since I received the comments back
from Raleigh engineering department They require 18" steel encasing pipe to be bored with the 8" DIP carrier
pipe inside The 8" pipe is still +/- 0 3' below creek bottom, but,the 18" encasing will be +/- 0 T above the creek
bottom for a short section Since it is still a direct bore perpendicular to the stream, less than 40' corridor, I hope
that it is still good, and does not trigger any 401/404 permit
I will send you the revised sewer plan /profile hopefully today or Monday the latest so that you can have it for your
field visit
Thanks for °your help Let me know if you have any questions,
Hy
From: Richmond, Martin [ mailto :martin.richmond @ncdenr.gov]
Sent: Thursday, September'16, 2010 8:17 AM
To: Hy Nguyen
Subject: RE: 4229 Forestville Rd, Raleigh Site (10003, Van Hanh Temple)
Hey Hy —I talked to CORPUD and finally figured, some of this out We don't require permits or authorizations for
boring under a, stream We "really,don't have any issue unless the stream or stream buffer °is impacted, and I was
thinking you can simply proceed without anything from us But the, City sees it different I will run out there
ASAP and get you some kind of a determination letter for the City My schedule is packed to the gills „but I think
I can work this in sometime on Tuesday I will getback with you as;soon as'l can
Sorry for the delay — totally a misunderstanding on my end. Let me know if you have questions
Thanks, Martni
From: Hy Nguyen [ma i Ito: H Nguyen @dprassociates.net]
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 4:20 PM
} To: Richmond, Martin
Subject: FW: 4229 Forestville Rd, Raleigh Site (10003, Van, Hanh Temple)
Martin
Have you had a chance to review,this yet? Let me know
Thanks
From: Hy Nguyen
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 5:12 PM
To: 'martin.nchmond @ncdenr.gov'
Subject: RE: 4229 Forestville Rd, Raleigh Site (10003, Van Hanh Temple)

Martin
Again, the site is at 4229 Forestville, Raleigh, NC 27616 Wake County ID # 1746 =01-49 -3709
Im attaching here our latest sewer design plan as submitted to Raleigh for permitting, which shows the 8" DIP
bore under the creek Attached also is the FEMA map, the sewer crossing is approximately at section station
1'99 1 don't have the county soil map at the moment, but geotech reports states it is Sandy Clay and Silty Sands
within the property
Let me know what would be the appropriate�steps we need to go thru with NCDENR -DWQ in addition to the
permitting process with City of Raleigh I appreciate your help
Hy
From Hy Nguyen
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 4:22 PM
To: 'martin.richmond @ncdenr.gov'
Subject: 4229 Forestville Rd, Raleigh Site (10003, Van Hanh Temple)
Martin
Got your voicemail on Wednesday.
It's a proposed 8" public gravity sewer, tying into Raleigh existing 15" sewer trunk, to serve the 8000 sf
new building of Van Hanh Temple project. We have to cross the creek once; top of bank to top of bank
is approximately 20' -35'. It's the Powell Creek, a tributary of Harris Creek., I am looking to bore under
it, with perhaps 1' below the bottom of creek.
FYI. I will send you the GIS map and soil information tomorrow
Thanks,
Hy.
Hy V. Nguyen, P.E.
9D!. rASSOCIATES, INC
landscape architects, planners, & engineers
420 Hawthorne Lane, Charlotte, NC,28204
O 704 332 1204 Ext 309 M 704 340 0641 F 704 3.32 1210
www dprassoaates net
hnquyen(@dprassociates net
The attached digital file(s) are supplied by DPR Associates, Inc to the above recipient(s) as a design/ construction aid Be advised that the
attached fde(s) mayor may not be the,frnal °record drawings Any information obtained from this, digital files) shall be, used, for reference only
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE