740014_Inspection_20220510

Facility Number
1
0 Division of Water Resources
D Division of Soil and Water Consenatiou
O Other Agency
ype of Visit: • Compliance Inspection # Operation Rev iew 0 Structure l:ruluation 0 Technical AssistanCv
Reason for }-isit: • Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other Q Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Farm Name:
Arrival Time:
1 Your ] m 15 I 4'r7 )--
Owner Name: of l . , 1 � 1t5 •-M
Departure Time:14 5'ra,_ County: Vt Region;
Owner Email:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: l
Facility Contact: l]fY,1k,Tyy (l} L.AIL Title:
Phone:
Onsite Representative: I :i L-Drt 5'."
(ertitied Operator! 1 i ct'vL,< Gi t at i t \t 5
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm.
Latitude:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certification Number: `"19 5-2 9
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current
Capacity Pop-
1. L:an to I']i]]til]
4t�antol«da
(1 ceder to Finish
'SL} .0
_
11Cq•,,
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
(lifts
Boars
Other
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
I .o'er
lion -Laver
Design Current
D Poultry Ca i aci Po
Cattle
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Dail'', Cow
Doily. Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow_
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Rccf Brood Cull
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any pan of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure El Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance titan -made?
D Yes ❑iNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (N yes, notify DWR)❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify EWR) ❑ Yeso D NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation'? ❑ Yes Di
t
❑ NA ElNE
3- Were there any observable adverse impacts Dr potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑Yes ❑ D NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page)ref3
S/12if020 Continued

Facilit► Number: 1
t.J
Date of inspection: -4— 10-22_
Waste C.: ollection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacit} (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 12N ElNA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑+�n ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e__ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? if yes, check the appropriate box below.
ea'as No ❑NA ID NE
❑ Yes aiiiNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Flo DNA ❑NE
El NA ❑NE
❑ Yes EilNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu„ in, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
O Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Typets):
13, Soil Type(s);
l4. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15_ Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16_ Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Rec aired Records & Documents
9. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ]f yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑WLIP
❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
El Yes o ❑NA NE
❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
El No ❑ NA ❑ NE
© Yes 17( o ❑ NA ❑ NE
▪ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
D Yes
❑ other
[]NA ONE
❑NA ONE
2l. Does record keeping need improvement? if yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers L] Weather Code
Rainfall ['Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ['Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections D Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to instal! and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 121/Nio ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment"? ❑ Yes ❑ Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 5/12,2020 Continued

1
Facility Number: -1 Li -
Date of Inspection: c- fO 2 1
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No D NA ❑ NE
25. Ts the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑4No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the Facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? © Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ElYes "No ❑ NA ElNE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE
lfyes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes 2/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge. freeboard problems, over -application)
3l. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ]f yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 0 NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon'Storage Fond ❑ Other
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Q NA ❑ NE
❑Yes No DNA ❑NE
Comments (refer to question #]: Explain any YES answers and/or an% additional recommendations or any other Comments.
1'we dra.tings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
3 30-
i i-r4 -
fry - / G',.)f
c-,Loct Sok-- ), g —is
c .t-- 202 2
0-0w�C41i c Y
1-ILL tt,EL-
TT) cl bi E . e_ rocted
aek
53
v
�..., s n� 1,14
.‘"-...--
greqo
R
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: 9
Date: C a 2
,21412011