Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20051672 Ver 1_EPA Comments_20051121,, A i~ ~S ° rte"~`~ UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ,~~~ ~'„F,~ REGION 4 . ~ . ~~~ ~ Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center '~r,,L ~~cc~ 61 Forsyth Street, S.W. Atlanta, Georgia 30303 - 8960 November 17, 2005 Colonel John E. Pulliam, Jr. District Engineer ATTN: Ms. Lillette Grande ~ , -~ `~ ~~~ ; ~ ~1 0~ :,~"~` ~ ~' ° ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ~ ~ s~ ~ ~r,~~j P.O. Box 1890 _ ~ ~ ~ , Wilmington, NC 28402-1890 r, S ` „ ~;. ,,y,~ ~~rf~--T SUBJ: Terry and Katherine McKnight Public Notice Buckhead Subdivision Action ID: 200500470 Dear Colonel Pulliam: This letter is in reference to the application by Terry and Katherine McKnight described in the above referenced Public Notice (PN) dated September 23~, 2005. The applicants are applying for an after-the-fact permit to retain unauthorized fill that was placed on their residential building lot for the development of a backyard. The McKnight's lot is located in Buckhead Subdivision in Fayetteville, Cumberland County, North Carolina. The subdivision developer (Dohn Broadwell) received a Nationwide Permit 26 on December 31, 1997, to discharge authorized fill into 0.9 acres of wetlands for the construction of single family residences. The 401 Water Quality Certification required the developer to place a deed notification on certain lots in the subdivision to prevent future impacts to the remaining wetlands in the development. Of the 0.9 acres of fill originally permitted, 0.13 acres was designated for the lot in question to provide upland area for the construction of a single dwelling. This lot was subsequently divided into two lots by the builder (Tim Jackson). T-trese lots are designated as lots 205 and 206 with Lot 205 being purchased by the applicant. Lot 205 received an additional 0.036 acres of unauthorized fill which was used to provide a backyard for the residence. The lot owner would like to keep the unauthorized fill and has offered to mitigate for this impact, although no mitigation plan was provided with the PN. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 4, has reviewed the project information contained in the PN and have the following concerns with the proposed project. Although the EPA is sympathetic with the applicant's position since they were evidently not responsible for the unauthorized fill, we have strong concerns about the granting of an after- the-fact permit to allow the fill for the backyard to remain in place for several reasons. The initial nationwide permit for the development was issued with the Division of Water Quality 401 Water Quality Certification condition that the remaining wetlands in the development be placed under a deed restriction to protect future impacts to these wetland areas. The Water Quality Certification was issued with the understanding that the remaining wetlands would be protected. 2 The EPA has reviewed a copy of the property deed and it clearly states the 401 condition that the 'remaining wetlands on the lot are protected. We are strongly opposed to overturning the conditions of the original certification by granting a permit to allow the protected wetlands to be removed from jurisdiction by allowing the unauthorized fill to remain in place. Furthermore, we do not believe that the removal of the fill would satisfy the avoidance and minimization requirement of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. We are also concerned about the potential for increased flooding that will likely occur due to fill placed in the riparian wetlands in the floodway along Buckhead Creek. Wetlands function to attenuate flooding and removal of any remaining wetlands in the floodway will only exacerbate the flooding problem which already exists along Buckhead Creek In summary, we recommend the after-the-fact permit not be issued and the unauthorized fill be removed. We hope the applicant will be able to pursue and receive legal compensation for the loss of property value from whoever placed the unauthorized fill on their building lot. EPA appreciates the opportunity to comment on this project. If you have any questions regarding these comments, please contact Becky Fox at (828) 497-3531 or fox.rebecca@ epa.gov. Sincerely, Y~ ~ `~'`~ _ U Ronald J. Mikulak, Chief Wetlands Regulatory Section cc: USFWS, Raleigh NCDWQ, Raleigh NCDWQ, Wilmington