20220924 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20220708

Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 13, 2022 Ver 4.3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
OO Yes
O No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
OYes 0No
Change only if needed.
Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
7/8/2022
BIMS # Assigned* Version#*
20220924 1
Is a payment required for this project?*
® No payment required
0 Fee received
O Fee needed - send electronic notification
Select Project Reviewer*
Colleen Cohn:eads\cmcohn
Information for Initial Review
Reviewing Office*
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone]
la. Name of project:
Applenook
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Jessica Tisdale
lb. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
7/8/2022
Nearest Body of Water
Richland Creek
Basin
Neuse
Water Classification
WS-IV;NSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.967662
A. Processing Information
Longitude:
-78.54596
lc. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Wake
Is this a NCDMS Project
0Yes ONo
Is this project a public transportation project?*
0 Yes ® No

la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
EI Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
O Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
0 Yes
O No
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
O Nationwide Permit (NWP)
0 Regional General Permit (RGP)
0 Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
0Yes CNo
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
EO 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
0 Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
0 Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
58 - Utility Line Activities for Water and Other Substances (frequently used)
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
If. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
O Yes O No
O 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Op Riparian Buffer Authorization
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
O Yes O No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
O Yes O No
lh. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
O Yes O No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
OYes 0No
B. Applicant Information
OYes 0No
OYes 0No
Id. Who is applying for the permit?
O Owner O Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
OYes 0No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
City of Raleigh
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2c. Contact Person:
Whit Wheeler, PE
2d. Address
Street Address
222 W. Hargett St.
Address Line 2
City
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27601
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA

2e. Telephone Number: 2f. Fax Number:
[phone] [phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Jessica Tisdale
4b. Business Name:
HDR Engineering, Inc. of the Carolinas
4c. Address
Street Address
555 Fayetteville St., Suite 900
Address Line 2
City
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27601
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
1. Project Information
1 b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
lc. Nearest municipality / town:
Wake Forest, NC
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number: 2b. Property size:
2c. Project Address
Street Address
911 Applenook Court
Address Line 2
City
Wake Forest
Postal / Zip Code
27587
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project: *
Richland Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water: *
WS-IV;NSW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Neuse
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030202010701
4. Project Description and History
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: *
The site is located within a City of Raleigh sewer easement which has a sewer line under a streambed that feeds to Richland Creek. The eastern stream bank has eroded behind the
existing sanitary sewer manhole and has compromised the structural integrity of the manhole. (Photos 1 & 2 in Attachment A.) There is also a spot where plastic sewer pipe is exposed
and it must be replaced with ductile iron pipe (Photos 3 & 4 in Attachment A.)

4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
0 Yes ® No 0 Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
none (study area in easement)
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
100
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: *
The purpose of this project is to protect an exposed gravity sewer manhole, replace an exposed PVC in a stream bed, and stabilize nearby streambank. The project will temporarily impact
a total of approximately 1,000 square feet of streambank on an unnamed tributary to Richland Creek near 911 Applenook Court at 35.967662°,-78.54596° decimal degrees.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used: *
Work at the first area (Photos 1 & 2 in Attachment A photos) will entail creating a dry work area, filling in the area next to exposed manhole, establishing a stable toe, constructing a stable
bank using rock/geotextile, coir matting or a combination and establishing a stable segment of stream bed at the base of the bank. Work at the second area (Photos 3 & 4 in Attachment A
photos) will entail creating a dry work area, replacing plastic pipe with ductile iron pipe, establishing a stable toe, constructing a stable bank using rock/geotextile, coir matting or a
combination and establishing a stable segment of stream bed at the base of the bank. Both areas will be accessed from the existing sanitary sewer easement along the pipe. The
temporary disturbance will occur inside the maintained easement. Tree debris shown in Photo 2 of Attachment A will be removed from stream. Seven trees will be removed to perform pipe
replacement and bank stabilization. Erosion control measures will be installed prior to work.
A "pump around" will be established to create a dry work area. Disturbed areas will be reseeded and mulched when work is complete. It is expected that a tire or track -mounted excavator
and a dump truck will be used to place the boulders, reconstruct the streambank, and stabilize the streambank. Please see the five attached details; "pump around", temporary silt fence,
temporary construction entrance, bank stabilization, and seeding details.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas? *
®Yes ONo
Comments:
See Attachment A for wetland and stream delineations.
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? *
0 Preliminary 0 Approved ® Not Verified 0 Unknown 0 N/A
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
6. Future Project Plans
Jessica Tisdale
HDR Engineering, Inc. of the Carolinas
6a. Is this a phased project?*
O Yes ® No
Unknown
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
Wetlands L: Streams -tributaries
Open Waters O Pond Construction
3. Stream Impacts
OO Buffers
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.lmpact type*
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type*
(?)
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction*
3g. S. width
3h. Impact
length*
S1
Stream bank stabilization
Temporary
Stabilization
Ut to Richland Creek
Perennial
DWR
10
Average (feet)
50
(linear feet)
S2
Stream bank stabilization
Temporary
Stabilization
Ut to Richland Creek
Perennial
DWR
10
Average (feet)
50
(linear feet)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0

3i. Total permanent stream impacts: 3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
0
100
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
100
3j. Comments:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)?
Check MI that apply.
O Neuse
O Catawba
O Goose Creek
O Other
O Tar -Pamlico
0 Randleman
O Jordan Lake
6b. Impact Type
6c. Per or Temp
6d. Stream name
6e. Buffer mitigation required?
6f. Zone 1 impact
6g. Zone 2 impact
Tree cutting
T
Ut to Richland Creek
Yes
35
0
6h. Total buffer impacts:
Total Temporary impacts:
Total Permanent impacts:
Total combined buffer impacts:
6i. Comments:
See attached mitigation letter in Attachment A.
Zone 1
35.00
Zone 1
0.00
Zone 1
35.00
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
Zone 2
0.00
Zone 2
0.00
Zone 2
0.00
`.J
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
See project description in Section C.4.i.
lb. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
See attached details referenced in Section C.4.i.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
O Yes • No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
U Yes O No
What type of SCM are you providing?
O Level Spreader
O Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
0 Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
O Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen
eO Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
2. Stormwater Management Plan

2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
0 Yes • No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
OYes 0No
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
• Yes No
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina)
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?*
Yes • No
Comments:*
N/A
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
Yes • No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
Yes • No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
0Yes ®No0N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
Yes 0• No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS conceming Endangered Species Act impacts?*
Yes O No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
0 Yes ® No
• No Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S
OYes 0No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
0 Yes ® No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
0Yes ®No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
0 Yes ( No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
An NHP and PAC report were ran for the project. We anticipate a "No Effect" on all species due to the small scale, short duration and current degraded
aquatic habitat condition of the steam from adjacent development. No habitat exists for Dwarfwedge mussel, Atlantic pigtoe, Carolina madtom, Neuse
River waterdog, Michaux's sumac or Red -cockaded woodpecker in the stream and the project area. No federally listed species were noted within one
mile of the project.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)

6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
O Yes O No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
NOAA Fish Map
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
O Yes U No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/. We anticipate only stream stabilization for a small area and archaeological resources were not reviewed.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
O Yes r) No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FEMA Floodplain GIS Map
Miscellaneous
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Applenook Attatchment A_Red.pdf 5.94MB
IPaC_ Explore Location resources_ApplenookCourt.pdf 14.15MB
project_report_cor_sewer_repair_36924_36924.pdf 917.84KB
COR_AgentAuthorization .pdf 207.43KB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments
Supporting information is provided in Attachment A.
Agent authorization is attached.
NHP is attached.
IPAC report is attached.
Wetland/Upstream and stream forms are provided in Attachment A.
Mitigation letter is provided in Attachment A.
Signature
RI By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Jessica Tisdale
Signature
Date
7/8/2022

DocuSign Envelope ID: CD1 E3F04-A347-437F-8ADE-D6FFA5EDF5A1
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
I, Acting Director of Public Utilities, Whit Wheeler, representing the City of Raleigh hereby certify that I have authorized Jessica
Tisdale, representing HDR (HDR) of the Carolinas, to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary to the processing and
issuance of the Section 404/401 permits and associated regulatory forms for Sanitary Sewer Repair projects located in Wake
County, North Carolina.
We hereby certify that the information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the best of our knowledge.
Whit Wheeler. PE
Applicant's Name
E
DocuSignedby:v�� VvIA�C.C�I.C�Y
63607D23CE4C474...
Jessica Tisdale
Agent's Name
Applicant's Signature Agent's Signature
1 /10/2022 1 /6/2022
Date Date
hdrinc.com
555 Fayetteville Street, Suite 900, Raleigh NC 27601
T 919.232.6654 F 919.785.1187

Attachment A
Proposed Bank Stabilization
Applenook, Raleigh
The purpose of this project is to protect an exposed gravity sewer manhole, replace an exposed PVC in a
stream bed, and stabilize nearby streambank. The project will temporarily impact a total of
approximately 1,000 square feet of streambank on an unnamed tributary to Richland Creek near 911
Applenook Court at 35.967662°,-78.54596' decimal degrees.
Work at the first area (Photos 1 & 2 in Attachment A photos) will entail creating a dry work area, filling
in the area next to exposed manhole, establishing a stable toe, constructing a stable bank using
rock/geotextile, coir matting or a combination and establishing a stable segment of stream bed at the
base of the bank. Work at the second area (Photos 3 & 4 in Attachment A photos) will entail creating a
dry work area, replacing plastic pipe with ductile iron pipe, establishing a stable toe, constructing a
stable bank using rock/geotextile, coir matting or a combination and establishing a stable segment of
stream bed at the base of the bank. Both areas will be accessed from the existing sanitary sewer
easement along the pipe. The temporary disturbance will occur inside the maintained easement. Tree
debris shown in Photo 2 of Attachment A will be removed from stream. Seven trees will be removed to
perform pipe replacement and bank stabilization. Erosion control measures will be installed prior to
work.
A "pump around" will be established to create a dry work area. Disturbed areas will be reseeded and
mulched when work is complete. It is expected that a tire or track -mounted excavator and a dump truck
will be used to place the boulders, reconstruct the streambank, and stabilize the streambank. Please
see the five attached details; "pump around", temporary silt fence, temporary construction entrance,
bank stabilization, and seeding details.

Ut to Richland Creek
911 Applenook Court
I ` 35.967662-78.54596
IN , M a.
A 'a F-EM
r

o e 1i
r• ,., �4�F��NE AE 9
TOZF,OF
R SEE FOREST
2J TO _ OF II SITE d / 3
FOREST ETT IIaE
SITE —
a" LOCATION TorT>OF
T� SrE FOREsr
Fo
NE 11
O
g CI Tti OF / r
y� Ra LEIGH a
x �
/
Fatu� 4
'hiG b ag teii All ,:
U"I i E A
f.
t4
FLOOD HAZARD INFORMATION
SEER REPORTFORZONE DESCRIPTIONS AND INDEX MAP
ME INFORMATION DEPICTED ON MIS MAP AND SUPPORTING
DOCUMENTATION ARE ALSO AVAILABLE IN DIGITAL FORMAT AT
HTTP://FRIS.NC.GOV/FRIS
Wi[hod Bases laud Devation (BEE)
W[h BFEvo,D.pt,. ,,aq aH, vE,act
SPECIAL RDARFIS ROOD—Regul..ry Flood-y
HAiA
— 0.2%Annual Chance Flood Harad, Areas
,1%Annual Chance Flood With Average
Depth Less Than One Foot ,With Dre nag,
Areas of Less Than One Square M Ie zone x
— FUW re Conditions 1%Annual
ance ChFlood Am"' zore x
OTHERAREASOF — Areawith Reduced Flood Risk due to levee
ROOD HAZARD See Notes zorex
OTHER — Areas Determined to be outside tin,
AREAS 02%Annual Chance Roodplainzorex
------------- Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer
— Accredited orPn:mio..III
GENERAL �, Dike, or Floodwall
STRUCTURES ............. Nona¢redit,d Levee, Dike, or Floodwall
North Carolina Geodetic Surveybench mark
National Geod,ti, Surveybench mark
R® Con[rector Es[. NCFMPS-n benchmark
rass SeRio. ithl%Aanc
Cnnual Che
Water Surface Elevation (BFE)
O- - - - - Coastal Tmns,ct
------ Coastal Transco Baseline
--- Profile Baseline
Nydrogmphic Feature
OTHER ..it d Study
FEATURES Jurisdiction Boundary
TES TO USERS
iz
1- nU.it cf Moderate Wave Anion (UMWA)
EMICBRS)xOTE
® CBRSArea Otlmr i. Prated dArea
SCALE
uewm. rvao isaa m°n:°�mn, rvnw i,aa Mni®n
I Inch - 500 fcet
0 250 500 � Feet
Meters
0 15 150 300
PANEL LOCATOR
OFFI S = ��/
FOR FT ®�
Bonn ,
/ZONE E
o�$
,c
T0F OF
-: aI�E FOREST
NORM CAROLINA ROODPW NMAPPING PROGRAM
NATIONAL FLOOD NSURANCE PROGRAM
co FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
vA NORTH CAROLINA
, 1830
w
Q) FENIA
rW
U
1�
Panel Contains:
cc
I. PA -EL SUI-
wnxe roaesr,Towx or axmaa iaao
C)
O
i
0
a -r
cc
z
} 3Z2ML13000p1
05/O2 05

F)R City of Raleigh, Applenook, Stream Stabilization
• • • • .: • •-- • , 4-k'.'1 t, "94g5IWg' ' 44 YritAT
. .-'.- `,'-7- 21- •:.c ''-x-,, ,.;::'•#% '. - ' -'&V:: ''k . —---" '''1 -• - .
-,.n.-,V,340: ' ,v.,-; -._z 721' , ' .-- 1;',:-''.':,. .- -,' .14- .4,..i.,!"----.•-• -
• ;'-',.-r•,.••• C-- _,,- -,&,t, *,'""wt "'F'1'.'," 1 ' ts.,,Mkx6}fr--'-•.1- ..4 ----- ,
1-41,,,, ••---• "-- c. .. •-irreio'.`",•`. :. ` 1 -2skz..,tr.; 4.,.......,:ittot.x. , Anim,,,,R,•.i.. „lisp,- ::.•_.,
..,....,;;,v• _ -,.**,.: •- 4 ,••••_.- :'4,.• ,.•- ...,. ,_ - , '-:',t --' ''-w-f' 4 '71.`"-- IM'
, - '-.•.,.. --1Z.Z•v:- •"•:P.-'4....,`" ;',`-'-', `t• :", ).',. _ -.--' -.- •. --- 4---'• -' ' Ai-‘. .,
it-•.,..40,,-,,-- -..:-. - -`‘'.--- -.A.'•P': -.. " -- • ' - ' - ,ix•ov . 4 ".'
rrn'"---•-c'''' ter -'7Z- .-, S4. ' '• 4 r-
:Y • , ,,,,...',..dir ••, :Y6. ---.
17115,tr.,..
.)••• •
ro. •Z":".'" 4%,-:' 17.....,n ••• .1
0, .01
6" - • ,,..,.-Or ."‘ffigt.t,,,,,'igisin . '•-• ,;..• r 4 .i , -:•,,, 4," ,...._= -.
-1,. .,= ...-,', % ' - •r*E-__ ----0 - ' ' -,t'5. . '' .-•
..V •;',-46 1,... / _ ,L,.-,4
• - 7,
•• •.,=-, ..,.-. ;...la .. 11•-•--,-',-L ----
- • •k 7. ..l: '
..
,,.
.. ,
tk,
,._ •
A;k_•'_ ' .: ! .
.40' -'- -•'
- ....),. 4'''.1i,.''tt '' ' -'1' 'w --:1, •-' ' .1c-: .4='- ''''.1.S.'---"' 'IL : ''
4fr.
. --,
.- '-k. t:',130 VV.'•••,,t. •74-.7.4111i4t,0".. ;le", ^ : ----e''''',.1-.^ .-Mittlk-: .,_ --,.
--%
,, -.ft':-I l'-.• zricigif ei:r - .•., • iii• 4 " , ' ..!• , ; ,t,,,-` 4 _`,., _ Al,
4A" - , 4iFe., .8,,.....6. ie,L . . • , •
# ,... - ..7 •.' *,,, ',.. ..'4''' •fr4;-.
-, •A_ .4.-,--, - -, -----0-, - • ' -...---„arww•.i. ••• •-
•...- . • •••• . ,,,•-••. - •. - •,.... , „...,1 '.7.!•,.4 l'' -
Tar- cci,-,4 : ••,'"
.• ' .4, ..4 -.'' --t•
.• • .. . ,
...:'..,-- l' c-X• -
. , —- ••,,'_
----7----,—. ._ . ...
-1.•3.„...„._,,,.,e. _
,... ,.. , .
. •4-34 ..., . •
_ \
. ,.,
4„, ,,...... . ..
we ri '
..:$•.a, -_- _.0 .4! -•,,,. ..;, 1— Vs-"4„.1,:-.:7
- •-x•-,46,0:- „,se
• ;• • , 1 v 4.
Photograph 1, First repair location, Facing Southeast (Dated April, 2022).
• w 1 .e. -,A-e•I`="'• ' -410 it...IL '4
___ •,,,,;g, ., ,_ ,- ', ,• f 4r1 , :. ,• 1,-,'.10_‘• Ai ,.,F. ... ' e ',..--,,1_,*„.•• --,A r--V
.-,- ' /..,•`• t, ' •, ..-,P '.-'-..,-".- ,,* 7,- '',, - .-' v.: ,,:r-- ...i.r. - .' , ',.'4, 11,' '
'' ' ' i ' '•4-14 !.-••' ''A - Vim :,,- - ' _. ' ., . pi -,:i -, 4.
-•••r•4•4 4,14r_.1-„, •' =• - ' :- ••• ,_ r ' ' r '''........0101X:.,4„-- • - .43,,LA.-.0 , ,, ..c.-1,4,4v4- J• .. •-•` •''T4 -'
k A44145; .- .-.• 1- .'L,- ..,T ' ,'''APRA' L'r e..:. .-.. i j.:, 9 4 .11'
ittiA .'."r ,Ik•'' '' -4 no., ;, ' tr. z- --A' •-
- ,- - •'-..- - ;",4.- -fir,`,,51414 - 1` ' '
tt
. .0,
... ' `410_. 0..t..k, •It4.0trkikIrr° ....--.,- - - ' .,
- .•
. .-. .#..r.
1.;-.116 • '. ' .'
..,., '-Wt. ' -'- —•• , •
...3
.-
' ''''Allilt '' t-''''X'f:' .'4 ''-40 ..--
,7-• -,
1." -r..
. --'- - ' ... . .
-'1:--'3,..'-':..4'-'-ir
-. ,- : ' -• •, ' l•iq.. I.Atir-.• *'
? 25.''''' • - ,,,v .'5_--•••=4:ropv---0AiwkAr-*' .- --: -. _
;•!`.4-1
; 'N.A.....-,`L.- 1 ..-.• - k•k- .---..- -- _'
...-- -- .-•••-.4~ .,,,,,,, ir .4..,%4:4,„.•; -•
Pk,''.11. 131111611*34"W' •
-Adj'' -4.',,..,. _ • • vi,..L''' ., ., 4 - -
-,„' -+,1'!"s!' j..4,:- Ai ,,--- --:-.`,43015t.-:-.,-X '• '
-'.' -
Ski "... .''
•
•- z.-NIIIS.4.:=-_ ior ''
..,...ale-
,....
..,
• •,:,,--o. ...•
-•:4 '
' ''' I
Photograph 2,First repair location'FaCing Southeast (Dated April, 2022).

......,
F)R City of Raleigh, Applenook, Stream Stabilization
-
"
,- Q -"4.76.- •_. 'NV --ifir fid:1''
..-'- . ,.% ..-'
.
7" .744 4: - ,..'..-- ''.. e , ,'1.. . ;1 -'..`,r•
Ilir ftr "r t sc 'r,
1 ik -'"V '1 41F-relt,4 ' ' , •''t'.. '- erf, ..0.,-.4.,,k-kL..._,e. T,,,Z;..•,- tia----
'! a,kaz ,,wim. . ,— -,.,-, j --. • . - • .g_adrff,c, Ngt4v;.::::-._•4:
' - mitliFt e_ :: , ' :-A. -. ,, - — r= •,-_,, 411i . ..,",". !Om,
•41AFtvt: '? .3* - )-1,' -,..e. ec ,. - ..,., ', - r- •-14 . • , ._... ,,,
'''..4''',, '4, -I-. '-',. • - . '..-L 7._ i.,,r,-“..,-...*, Iv ..".. „'-.11:-.,: A'- --,:' 444ar ,'-$ t• • -
,... ' : ' ,44...k- -,?..,:',\ j •.-i.--- '...., •,.7., .),Let?'::1:4,' --:. ' .,„.,,, ..10'•.-.,1.-1*
Ito
, _. , .- .3.ry• , i, •-k,,.•-•:,, •,5„....',: ,---,4, c7, • •-- , . ---; --...4mr•temt
p:;:"
. .., __ ._.. „or , .,_,_ -7._ ,1 ,...•,.-_. .:L.,•••10",-...;,....f.. ..7.•-= '. n't.,,,,',,,..03..r:'- „iv- 44,4'•"••; .
.-, '., ,. __- e A '..,, ' tg.. „ ...,.., -, •.'.. i..14-.4 - /;..-r-,',.. -: -'-..e' '1*:V.' ,'* '
..S. .. • ' , ''. i ' Sf '.' '1. '''''' .... :‘:'',Irg.''. • . '..•'
• J r."..e.c.." ..".. Ir.,,p-:'. "r4o•,- •..,.... ik-r...i,:, It tic-, .y ..:k •, ,,,, •
.•. , •-, '''"- -„*Ag'4 • ,._-, . h.,,.,?low'. x....-_, • , - .140v -'''' '",•'''
.....4,1'.., ''''• 1 atT, ' '' ily `.4•f.--
*- .41"-' ,:',4- ---=,,e -•',, - ''.•.r zus
,p• 4,, -• '-1- .h ,- ,e
L.." •'-.--% r ,•.-1,, , '..•'"" - ' ."•-• IA._ t- '-''''' ,'_-,e-_ • ' _ , .
ei, ' -4.,;.-:A.', 1" 470
• 4.
4', 1
.....
'. •,..,40,k.,tiriri; ..„. ,, ,, t ,,
Attt ,
....0,; - • -- 'w, :7, -4' . - ;4f, d ,,\
oro,:-• A. .
i .• '' '' '' Letfj - ',.". . "•.• '''',...,,__ '
' '''• • •-• ''...'0`. ` ' 'Alt"4,c4 •
• _,i'd111' ' !,. -1,04) . -- -.'• -).- •
Photograph 3, Second repair location, Facing Northeast (Dated April, 2022).
'''' '';-_ '-x e.i-:'•,...':-;,' XIII -' ir '•;;,-,, 10'; it 4 - r.r;.. ..., -.-,-,, - -:•1-,i, `,.4,v
•-•-.5'• ,, ,, .4' '' '.4, ra, , !it:''4;..c.-' 'tr l'_"
' r,,- • '-- SA '
• „1 • . • ,,,-.•••,. --,...•_. , 1 . v. $._.r..*'IL1/4"%7 2e, %-i',i5'per .. .. .4.. 4-..t- .
; r:,' -,,,-',,,-_•,.1 AN''''.'-,'-'7,. .;• _:-'-'4'e.;•-_47,''`--'";; ':*' '''':',... ,:,:'''LAX- . ' ' --7, :-.4- -
7
„.,_ „ _.. . .. . ,,, . - ,, , .. - .,-_. ,,,,...-_,-.1 ..orsid, ---' '-•—• r
NI— 4eVor--•.sk -•,v;r ''-'•' -'1'' ';.'',.1''.;1•''''. • '' '•:•-"r-''? i 1414'3''1.--- 'it, i Ogii-l'r4g-loc...vie .f,,L.p,A..1. ',..;...:,%, fk L - t, , ,- , • r -. ,
A . . . .
... ,
... • ,...„.r J i IV- ...4.',„,-, .' 4 ,, II ,..i,:'._,.-:,,-. ., .4,:f k,„;41'', .,,..„.....V. , .:: __- ••_.,„,,, _ ''''- '1,-... ',4,'.0
.. ,. .
, - •• --..._ 1''''',D. :.' ,,,-- „, . 1: '..air • L.,.., •' -.
„-•i
--- 1.4 :.. reph-:,,;.,e.., ,.4- -1 Vitifetl•.,- il%'. -•, - - L ' --OW" -
•>"- -• ,r.- _ ,-'','P-7 ' . ;P.' -,. ,, ., , L,
.1 ' ...;* •... - -)-. *S.. IN. . ' -' - .-. ,-....
--- **'"'V. -='4*- '.' .- ..4:154 ti' - '5-- . • •
.' -; _, • ,,,` ',4%-' •,' ...j ti.,",-•"2' ''',:• • rt_
•
, .,_,,,. .. „,,,,...,...„_•...-..1_ ,.-,..-.7_, -:„, _._.,1,.
--•••-• „
. .•, „.,.-, •;,. ',c__, „,„.. _ - .,
. •
. ,-:'•r;vd.•4°' - :- ••• -- --• • - -
• -.4 •;',1-„a';',....i. :- . .0., n. • _ 1
_,- ,=.,...,,LV*444rt'w•*,.. ,,,,. •L•:'• -,,... -. ,
..., ...,._ ..,„,.... ...- • . ...:. _,„„,ek. . _ r.z.,,....wor.e, ..;sa., 4_,, , , ,./ ,
. . -1 . ,_ ._, ,..c.--1"`v- -..,..---.: .•"•7••.,..-V ' - ..,..C- '• :.-:.,,
_. ., irc,:,, ...... . ;„., , , , .....-0` 1 •.,it.Lor,:,/, ,..4,... . . . -, _-„
',.„--'7--,.•ik.:*""..d. - '''"''' -'' ' •.-.-,
. ' 14t** ''....'• •'''t''-...._ ' h1414'.41:-- '. v`••A,,-,•A
-.0.F.,!,..-:7,:i ., . - : .-4,, ,,, ...4_, ir_ - - - _ _-,.. _... ..--d*-..‘ .7. , •.-
. - .• - .r-- .._ r-f.--- _ ,,iaik..-,_.- -„,,.. ...
;,.., ' ,.:•-,0.:,- --_ r_, , ,: ,,.. ,. :. :—..-, .. d .
Photograph 4, Second repair location, Facing Southeast
(Dated April, 2022).

0 Sewer Manhole
Gravity Sewer Main
Delineated Stream
Delineated Wetland
North Carolina Parcels
Feet 100
FY2
CONSTRUCTION
ACCESS
SILT FENCE
PUMP AROUND
DETAIL
911 APPLENOOK COURT SANITARY SEWER REPAIR
PROJECT MAP
FIGURE 2
PATH:IIRALMAINIGIS_DATAIGISIPROJECTS14059_CITYOFRALEIGH110326049_RALEIGH_SEWER_MAINT_ENVIR017.2_WORK_IN_PROGRESSIMAP_DOCSIMXDIWORKINGIFIG2_APPLENOOK_CT_PERMIT.MXD - USER. JTISDALE - DATE. 61912022
EPCN NOTIFICATION ONLY

c�
z z
0
> Lu = L)
Q Z
Z
IL
ww
J J~
~ z
::)aU
w
z U= W 0
_
LL
LL, Lu
c)
w W LL z U
III—
z H W
❑c�U❑
O > w w
~ ❑ w °� w =
cn
z
—III
LL
❑
LU
_ o
U w p
O
U
III —III —I
z
c�u)�«s
o w d Z
J w °
"—' O w m
w
_III —III_
�pp0000-11I-
w z
o a
'�
o'm w Q
z_ w z
z
�o0pDo00=III—III
��
�Z�w
z ❑ Z = w
m� >=Qw�
p° °oo III —III...
po0°o0—III
JN
0z��
o Z ❑
z
0°0p0 III
way
o�
wzzz
wa°o
0 Z z °° o
°opo o°IIIIII
z
z ❑z
❑Jz0
U) ° ~ ° U) ❑ x
0 00 0° 0° =1
w ❑
U p z
H O U Q w
U Z w� 0 C)
o0p o
°°0°0 °
~ Q U)
Q❑
Z U
-1
W J U z
°00000
ir
<0
w 00
tnUwo_
w Cl) Ucr
00p0
J
OU O> a z
0 0
OZ
cn LL
()Do
N
p000
000
w
op0
z
_
O
00°III
°pllllll
o
w
11
o c
z
°0 0 111
v
z
O
�wU-
°p00
o
m
J cn Z Of
00
Q
w
a�ww
LL
0° 0
W
0wUo°0
a
ow
(A
_
In [if
N O O �: CD
000
00p
nw
(n
00
0
0°0
pop —
U000
000000000
o po00oo 00 000
00o—i
0 0000000 pp0 �p0000°00
p0°
o p pop
0 0°0 00oOp0
°OOO
a
J
—T—i�
o_
000 ❑
° 00
a=
w
Y w
U °
O0po ❑ O op 0O
O cn
00o w w Q 0°p
0° m Z J po
}
Z
z U
°600 °o o pp
w
Q
cm
w H
L U w
00 LL) U)❑ p
00p z w Q 00
F-
0z
L �_
p00 O CD O 00
0 0 0 � -J 0 °
Of
❑ ❑
U) w
U)
pp0 0 U) Q o O
w
cf)
CD
z
❑ U)
000 ° p
Q
Op0 0 °p 0
z
w
OpOp ppoOO
LL
° 0°0 OOO
o00 0000 0000°p00
0 0 0 0 p00O00 0 00p0 p
U)
J°000
00000000
0°000Oopo°
300
o pp°p°o°0 00 0000pp
CITY OF RALEIGH
00° o o°o° 0°°0 00 0 0 000)
STANDARD DETAIL
0000000°0000000 000ODO
REVISIONS
DATE:812020
NOT TO SCALE
,kVMOVMJ EMISIX3
CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCE
SW-20.09

z
m
F-
Ln
pL
Z L3
� Q
W O
C, O
C9 F-
Z W
VI ~
X
W
O
F-
F-
0�
O
z
W
0�
a
m
0
w
Ln
w
z
In
Z
0
�
�
a
i?
=
Z
O
Q
Q
O
(n
U
U
w
j
OU
O
O
H
N
Z
O
N
M
Ld
N
Q
N
J
J
H
=
r
W
F-
W
J
W
q4t
<
<
m
Ld
H
x
X
C-9
a
Q
C
J
U)
W
CL
v
Z
Q
U')
Ln
LLI m
X
Z
Z
Z
W
m
U-)
U
p
p
Q
Q
H
X
Q
N
O
_
~
U-)
_
W
a
O
a
J
W
O
Z
O
Q
p
>
Z
M
La
w
m
p
_
U)
U'?
a
a
o
W
inO
Q
O
Q
U)m
N
Q
>
Z
F-
X
N
a
<
=
U)
wD
HZ
Ld ~o
Z
w
W
C
Ld
3
a
o
F-
az
c.Dw
p
W Z
L�
O
=
0
a —
LLJ
N
ul
F-Op
a
d Q
-
W
Q
a J
Q
J
N Q
Z
Y
=
F-
Q
W F-
a
N
V
a
aZ
W a
O?
H
p
WL)
H
O
Z -
N
f 7
Ln
LW
U)

¢LU
c�
LL
O U)
N p
W
w
p
a
H ~
W w
z�
U'
U]L]
m
a
LL
W
z
X
�z
M
U
W
a-O
UZ
�Za
w
a
m
O
�_
p U
Co IL
U J zLU p
Ova
CD
LL
Ir w
w a
O
z
- (D
J
LL Q_
W O W
W
m
z
W
U
O
= w aLL
z W
z
n-
IIIIIIIII /
-III _ z
>
w a�
- �-
0
WW
-III-III IIiL�-111
MEN
-j o Q LLJ
D z
111
-i
W.o_
11- L=III=11IIi
W
Q W a
bZ
z
MEN
w w �LU
Oz
j zLJ z 2
z 2
U 2w
�
� z o ui z
�
O w
MENz
LL
�
J
0 p:
C�H<
W
WLL
2 �UW
ZCD
04MCn
O zUU) V)
NUMBER
BONNLLD-
W O p W W z
J Q
OLL W fnU]OU
0(n
MR
Z N M
v
U
Q
a
_ IB
U
_
LU
Q Z:
zz
z
J
00
Z 2
W Co
J
U C7
.. Z
U U
Z Z
Q W
Z LL
W LL
H O
a w
CITY OF RALEIGH
LL
J
STANDARD DETAIL
REVISIONS
DATE:812020 NOT TO SCALE
STANDARD TEMPORARY
(SEDIMENT/SILT) FENCE
SW-20.01
�1
i •
►��
1

El-
w
0
W
0
0
a_
a0
>mw
wr
mm
zoo
0-,
0
m0
00
mw
W Y
� W
Q
U
wwm ww-z ww
_ O m= w w = Z
z z z w z
ww< Q QLn � Cn0
m
Uwm ww=w mQ
_ U U m 0
w > m w
U W W Z U
w Q m Z w= O 0 Q z
W ~ (n w
m 0 w w O 0
QQ w m Q0CD
LLJw w Q Z
L W w z m m
m w w
(n O U U Y w m w 0
Z w Z U U z
m w Q �Q�
O w 0 m z Q 0 0
_ (n m O
O Z w(n c( W
O LLJ
w U 0 Q Z Q U
Q Z O m� w Q
m Q O z Z w m
O w Z
QIQQ 0Om UU aJZ
a_ LLJ Q w
w cn O Q ~ U = >
w w w LLI
m O 0 0 m
> w = O m w
w_ w w z O O
W wU ww
Q
m0 m�Q� �m0
x z w w Q w Q = O 0 U=
Q w< w z N = Q U
�0 0 (� NUm (nz�m rwQ
Q r z z z< Q O w w Q z w
LLJQ O w
mo ow 000 mmOm0
wQ Q wm
LLJ CD Q
m<0 wzU<z�OQ
z r m m 0 w Q > w
Q� Z w J m U U
(n zw Qwm o-
(n U w m z w Q Q
wm =wJ�z Um
(n z Q N w, O Q w z N
wQz QwUo (n
oQ� o<�wm�0�
U 0 w 0 0 U w N w 0 o w
< < Qm �wm
m Jmm �� = w—
wwwww=(n0 0Zw>
zm0z�UQ w w�=-
U� Q O= Q Q w w w= 0= z U
w(n(n(n3: nmNQwQ
O
z CAI
_ Z 03 Q
(n 00 _
w � �
w
� = w =
U
x Uz
w mm
O O cn Q Q O
w w w w
O J 0 U
z mQ z zw
w z w m w m
O m > > —
>O w = O w
~ z �w
Qz m =mw
z = o w
w 0 Z J U
o zww0 Qz
ww mO N=Q
0 wzO— ocnz CD
Uw OU
00(=z —QN m
o QQ 0 Q Qmo CD
z
G 0= 0 w U cn
o w 0 Z m——
m�nJ—� 0r w
Y N z Q Q o Q
0 Q Uw - z�N �
>z =w = Q Cnw0 W
w0(nz= wm
—> U m u o
U Q Q Q m w>-
ww�= m==
G QmU N N
wm Q
Q U w
~o U - z o
Z z w Q O w w 0=
m U m w 0 m Q
U z w m
Q w z Cn o x m
mQZUw�=ww=
w U
UQw0m(n
w m wow<
—
Z w z 0 0 O 0 U= w
—
ww>- ww(nwUw
_ = w = m
QNQQQNNNww
w
w — N r� 4 Lri
J_
Q
W
0
0
Z
D
Q
a_
D
a_

SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES:
UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AND
MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE EROSION CONTROL LAWS OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, SPECIFICALLY
THE SEDIMENT POLLUTION CONTROL ACT OF 1973, AS AMENDED, AND THE LOCAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT
CONTROL ORDINANCES.
THE FOLLOWING SEQUENCE OF EVENTS AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INCORPORATED INTO THE
CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE FOR THIS PROJECT AND SHALL APPLY TO ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES WITHIN
PROJECT LIMITS:
1. INSTALL SILT FENCE, CHECK DAMS, AND INLET PROTECTION DEVICES AS DEPICTED ON DRAWINGS AND IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS.
2. THE EROSION CONTROL REVIEW AND INSPECTION WILL BE ADDRESSED BY NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL RESOURCES (NCDENR) LAND QUALITY SECTION, NOT THE CITY OF RALEIGH.
3. AREAS WHICH ARE NOT TO BE DISTURBED SHALL BE CLEARLY MARKED BY FENCING, FLAGS, SIGNS, ETC.
4. UPON ACCEPTANCE OF ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES, COMMENCE EXCAVATION AND/OR
GRADING ACTIVITIES. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESTRICTED TO A 25 FOOT WIDE AREA FOR EXCAVATION,
EQUIPMENT STAGING ACTIVITIES AND TEMPORARY STOCKPILING OF EXCAVATED SOIL ALONG THE LENGTH OF
PIPELINES 4-INCH THROUGH 8-INCH AND 30-FOOT WIDE ALONG THE LENGTH OF PIPELINES 12-INCH
THROUGH 20-INCH. TEMPORARILY STOCKPILED MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED UPSLOPE OF THE EXCAVATION.
FOR ANY DEMOLITION OR OTHER ACTIVITIES DESIRED PRIOR TO COMPLETION OF ALL EROSION AND
SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES, INTERIM MEASURES ACCEPTABLE TO AND PRE -APPROVED BY ENGINEER,
AND NCDENR DIVISION OF ENERGY, MINERAL LAND RESOURCES, LAND QUALITY SECTION MUST BE PROVIDED.
5. LIMIT CLEARING AND GRUBBING OF THE TRENCH TO THE AMOUNT OF PIPE THAT CAN BE CONSTRUCTED IN
ONE DAY. LIMIT TRENCH EXCAVATION TO THE AMOUNT OF PIPE THAT CAN BE CONSTRUCTED AND
BACKFILLED IN ONE DAY, OR 50 LINEAL FEET, WHICHEVER IS LESS. EXCAVATED TRENCH MATERIAL MUST BE
STOCKPILED UPSLOPE OF THE TRENCH. OPEN TRENCHES SHALL BE BACKFILLED AND STABILIZED AT THE
CESSATION OF EACH WORK DAY. ALL DISTURBED SURFACES MUST RECEIVE TEMPORARY STABILIZATION AT
THE END OF EACH WORK DAY. PROVIDE PUMP FILTER BAGS OR OTHER APPROVED DEWATERING DEVICES
FOR DEWATERING OF TRENCH EXCAVATION AS NEEDED. SOIL SUPPLEMENTS, SEED AND MULCH, IF
APPLICABLE, SHOULD BE APPLIED WITHIN SEVEN DAYS AFTER THE PIPELINE/UTILITY LINE IS CONSTRUCTED.
ANY TEMPORARY ACCESS CONSTRUCTED FOR PIPELINE WORK MUST BE STABILIZED WITH A NON -GRADE
AGGREGATE.
6. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE TEMPORARY PROTECTION AND PERMANENT STABILIZATION OF
ALL SOIL STOCKPILES ON SITE AS WELL AS SOIL INTENTIONALLY TRANSPORTED FROM THE PROJECT SITE.
INSPECT ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES ONCE PER SEVEN DAYS, AND IMMEDIATELY
FOLLOWING ANY RAINFALL OF 0.5" OR MORE IN A 24-HOUR PERIOD. SEDIMENT ACCUMULATIONS ALONG
SILT FENCE AND OTHER EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE PROMPTLY REMOVED. THE PROJECT
SUPERINTENDENT SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL EROSION AND
SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES.
7. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL WILL BE CHECKED REGULARLY FOR UNDERMINING OR DETERIORATION AND
BUILDUP OR CLOGGING WITH SEDIMENT. CORRECTIVE ACTION WILL BE TAKEN IMMEDIATELY.
8. ANY AREAS WHICH ARE NOT TO BE FURTHER GRADED WITHIN A 14-DAY PERIOD, OR WHICH HAVE NOT
BEEN GRADED WITHIN 14 DAYS SHALL BE SEEDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING:
SITE DESCRIPTON
STABILIZATION TIME
TIMEFRAME EXCEPTIONS
PERIMETER DIKES, SWALES,
7 DAYS
NONE
DITCHES, AND SLOPES
HIGH QUALITY WATER (HQW)
7 DAYS
NONE
ZONES
IF SLOPES ARE 10' OR LESS IN
SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1
7 DAYS
LENGTH AND ARE NOT STEEPER
THAN 2:1, 14 DAYS ARE ALLOWED
SLOPES 3:1 OR FLATTER
14 DAYS
7 DAYS FOR SLOPES GREATER THAN
50' IN LENGTH
ALL OTHER AREAS WITH SLOPES
14 DAYS
NONE, EXCEPT FOR PERIMETERS AND
FLATTER THAN 4:1
ZONES
Fn E&SC Notes

SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES CONTINUED:
9. PERMANENTLY STABILIZE ALL DISTURBED AREAS BY SEEDING AND MULCHING PER THE
STANDARD DETAILS.
10. ALL SEEDED AREAS WILL BE CHECKED REGULARLY TO ENSURE THAT A GOOD STAND OF GRASS IS
MAINTAINED. AREAS SHOULD BE FERTILIZED AND RESEEDED AS NEEDED. UPON FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF
COMPLETE STABILIZATION OF THE SITE BY THE ENGINEER AND NCDENR, REMAINING TEMPORARY EROSION
AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES MAY BE REMOVED. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
MEASURES TO BE REMOVED WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER FINAL SITE STABILIZATION OR AFTER MEASURES ARE NO
LONGER NEEDED, UNLESS OTHERWISE AUTHORIZED BY THE LOCAL PROGRAM ADMINISTRATOR.
11. UPON COMPLETION OF PROJECT, THE SELF-INSPECTION/SELF-MONITORING FORMS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO
THE ENGINEER FOR CONVEYANCE TO THE OWNER FOR REGULATORY RECORD MAINTENANCE TIME PERIOD.
12. WHERE CONSTRUCTION VEHICLE ACCESS ROUTES INTERSECT WITH PAVED PUBLIC ROADS, PROVISIONS SHALL
BE MADE TO MINIMIZE THE TRANSPORT OF SEDIMENT ONTO THE PAVED SURFACE. WHERE SEDIMENT IS
TRANSPORTED ONTO A PUBLIC ROAD SURFACE, THE ROAD SHALL BE CLEANED THOROUGHLY AT THE END
OF EACH DAY. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE ROADS BY SHOVELING OR SWEEPING, AND
TRANSPORTED TO A SEDIMENT CONTROL DISPOSAL AREA (STREET WASHING SHALL BE ALLOWED ONLY AFTER
SEDIMENT IS REMOVED IN THIS MANNER).
13. SITES UTILIZED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR THE PURPOSE OF STORING EQUIPMENT, EXCESS EXCAVATED
MATERIALS, STRIPPED TOPSOIL, ETC, SHALL BE ENVIRONMENTALLY SUITABLE FOR SUCH PURPOSES AND
SHALL BE APPROVED IN ADVANCE BY THE OWNER. ENVIRONMENTALLY SUITABLE SITES SHALL BE LEVEL,
DEVOID OF MATURE STANDS OF TREES, AND ISOLATED FROM DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND FEATURES, WETLANDS
STREAMS, AND STREAM CORRIDORS. SITES SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
REQUIREMENTS OF THE TOWN OF CARY.
14. THE CLEANUP AND DISPOSAL OF EXCESS EXCAVATED MATERIALS SHALL BE DONE AS SOON AS PRACTICAL
AND AS THE OWNER MAY DIRECT.
15. CHECK DAMS, SILT FENCE, OR OTHER FILTERING DEVICES SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT AREAS OF STOCKPILED
MATERIALS, EXCAVATED AREAS, CATCH BASINS, AND OTHER STORM WATER INLET STRUCTURES IN
CONSTRUCTION AREAS TO CONTROL SILT RUNOFF.
16. ALL DEWATERING FLOWS SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF SILT, SEDIMENT, DEBRIS, AND OTHER POLLUTANTS
THROUGH APPROPRIATE MEANS (SETTLING BASINS, FILTER, ETC.). FOLLOWING THIS, THE FLOWS SHALL ONLY
BE RELEASED DIRECTLY INTO STORM SEWERS, STREAM CHANNELS, TO OTHER STABILIZED DRAINAGE
COURSES AND NOT INTO EXPOSED SOILS, STEEP SLOPES, OR ANY OTHER SITE WHERE FLOWS COULD
CAUSE FURTHER DAMAGE.
17. CUT AND FILL SLOPES ARE TO BE VERTICALLY TRACKED, HORIZONTALLY SCARIFIED, MATTED, OR OTHERWISE
CONSTRUCTED TO ENHANCE VEGETATIVE GROWTH AND EXPEDITE STABILIZATION. SEEDING SHALL BE
INSTALLED AS PORTIONS OF THESE SLOPES ARE COMPLETED.
18. THE EXISTING EROSION CONTROL FEATURES SUCH AS ROCK CHECK DAMS AND RIP RAP ALONG THE NEW
RECLAIMED WATERLINE ROUTE MUST BE REMOVED AND REPLACED TO FACILITATE INSTALLATION OF THE NEW
RECLAIMED WATERLINE AS SHOWN.
19. IF AT ANY TIME BEFORE THE EXPIRATION OF THE CONTRACT BOND ANY PART OF THE SEEDED AREA IS NOT
IN GOOD CONDITION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FERTILIZE AND RESEED AS OFTEN AS NECESSARY TO GET A
GOOD STAND OF GRASS.
20. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT CROSS ANY DITCH WHEN FLOWING WATER IS PRESENT OR DURING WET WEATHER
UNLESS A PUMP AROUND SYSTEM IS PROVIDED DURING INSTALLATION OF PIPELINE (SEE DETAIL).
PRIOR TO CROSSING A DITCH, CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THAT A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP OR CHECK
DAM EXISTS DOWNSTREAM OF CROSSING PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF PIPELINE. IMMEDIATELY AFTER
BACKFILLING OF PIPELINE, DITCH SHALL BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL GRADE AND STABILIZED. USE EXCELSIOR
MATTING OR RIP RAP AS NECESSARY TO STABILIZE THE DITCH. INSPECT DITCHES IMMEDIATELY AFTER WET
WEATHER EVENT FOR STABILIZATION.
21. WHENEVER CONSTRUCTION CAUSES LAND DISTURBANCE OF ANY KIND WITHIN THE LIMITS OF A DITCH, THE
CONTRACTOR MUST INSTALL EXCELSIOR MATTING OR RIP RAP AS NECESSARY TO STABILIZE THE DITCH.
22. ALL OPEN CUT CROSSINGS OF DITCHES SHALL BE COMPLETED IN ONE WORK DAY.
23. ALL CHECK DAMS SHOULD APPROPRIATELY FILL THE DITCH THEY ARE PLACED IN, SO THAT DRAINAGE IS
FORCED THROUGH THE STRUCTURE. THE ENGINEER WILL NOTIFY THE CONTRACTOR IN WRITING IF ANY
CHECK DAM IS INSUFFICIENTLY SIZED BASED ON THE ENGINEER'S JUDGEMENT. CONTRACTOR WILL REMEDY
THE PROBLEM WITHIN 3 DAYS.
FN E&SC Notes

SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES CONTINUED:
24. GROUND STABILIZATION SHALL BE ACHIEVED CONSISTENT WITH NC DENR GENERAL PERMIT NCGO10000 EFFECTIVE AS OF APRIL
1, 2019. WHERE LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES HAVE TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED, ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE
PROVIDED WITH TEMPORARY OR PERMANENTLY STABILIZATION WITH GROUND COVER WITHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS FROM THE
LAST LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY EXCEPT FOR ALL PERIMETER DIKES, SWALES, DITCHES, PERIMETER SLOPES, AND ALLSLOPES
STEEPER THAN 3:1(H:V), WHICH SHALL BE PROVIDED TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT STABILIZATION WITH GROUND COVER
WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS FROM THE LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY.
25. IF EXCAVATED SOIL IS PLACED ON ANY ROADWAY PAVEMENT DURING CONSTRUCTION, CONTRACTOR SHALL
PROVIDE SAND OR SCREENING FINES ALONG PAVEMENT SURFACE FOR SUFFICIENT REMOVAL OF SEDIMENT.
26.IN THE EVENT THAT SEEDING IS PERFORMED AFTER EXCELSIOR MATTING IS PLACED AS A STABILIZING
FEATURE, IT WILL BE NECESSARY TO REMOVE THE MATTING WHEN APPLYING GRASS SEED AND FERTILIZER.
CONTRACTOR MUST REPLACE THE MATTING AT THE END OF EACH DAY TO STABILIZE THE SOILS.
27. SPOIL OR DEBRIS SHALL NOT BE PLACED WITHIN 50' OF STORM DRAINS OR STREAMS.
28. PROVIDE PORTABLE SELF-CONTAINED CONCRETE TRUCK WASHOUT SYSTEM. ALL CONCRETE TRUCKS WILL
UTILIZE PORTABLE WASHOUT SYSTEM FOR CLEAN OUT. NO CONCRETE TRUCK WASHOUT WILL BE ALLOWED
TO REACH GROUND, AND NO CONCRETE WASHOUT DEBRIS SHALL BE ALLOWED ON GROUND.
29. REMOVE DEMOLITION DEBRIS FROM SITE ON A DAILY BASIS AND DISPOSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE
REGULATIONS.
30. HYDROSEEDING SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED ON THIS PROJECT. CRIMPING STRAW MULCH SHALL NOT BE
ALLOWED ON THIS PROJECT.
31. SEED SHALL BE UNIFORMLY BROADCAST AND LIGHTLY CULTIVATED PRIOR TO MULCH AND TACKIFER
OPERATIONS.
32. MULCH AND TACKIFIER OPERATIONS SHALL BE COMPLETED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF SEEDING.
33. CONTRACTOR STAGING, TEMPORARY STORAGE, LAY DOWN AREAS, AND DIRT PILES SHALL BE WITHIN LIMITS
OF DISTURBANCE.
34.OBTAIN AND PAY FOR EROSION CONTROL PERMITS FOR OFF -SITE STORAGE YARD, BORROW AREA, AND
DISPOSAL AREAS AS REQUIRED. INSTALL AND MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL DEVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH
APPROVED PLAN.
35. A LAYER OF SAND, FINES, OR SCREENINGS SHALL BE PLACED ON PAVED SURFACES BEFORE DEPOSITION
OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL. AFTER REMOVAL OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL FROM PAVED SURFACES, A MECHANICAL
SWEEPER SHALL BE USED TO REMOVE ALL MATERIAL FROM PAVED SURFACES. PAVED SURFACES SHALL BE
SWEPT ON A DAILY BASIS WITH MATERIAL PLACED ON NON -PAVED SURFACES WITHIN LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE.
36. ON SLOPES GREATER THAN 5:1, DITCHES, PLACE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET IMMEDIATELY AFTER BACKFILL
AND GRADING.
37. NOTIFICATION OF LAND RESOURCES SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL SELF -INSPECTION PROGRAM:
THE SEDIMENTATION POLLUTION CONTROL ACT WAS AMENDED IN 2006 TO REQUIRE THAT PERSONS
RESPONSIBLE FOR LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITIES INSPECT A PROJECT AFTER EACH PHASE OF THE PROJECT
TO MAKE SURE THAT THE APPROVED EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN IS BEING FOLLOWED.
RULES DETAILING THE DOCUMENTATION OF THESE INSPECTIONS TOOK EFFECT OCTOBER 1, 2010. THE
INSPECTIONS MUST BE CONDUCTED AFTER EACH PHASE OF THE PROJECT, AND CONTINUED UNTIL
PERMANENT GROUND COVER IS ESTABLISHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NCGS 113A-54.1 AND 15A NCAC
48.0131. TO SIMPLIFY DOCUMENTATION OF SELF -INSPECTION REPORTS AND NPDES SELF -MONITORING
REPORTS, A COMBINED FORM IS NOW AVAILABLE. THE NEW FORM WAS DEVELOPED TO SATISFY
REQUIREMENTS OF THE SEDIMENTATION POLLUTION CONTROL ACT AND THE NPDES STORMWATER PERMIT FOR
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, NCGO10000. BEGINNING AUGUST 1, 2013, THE DIVISION OF ENERGY, MINERAL,
AND LAND RESOURCES IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ADMINISTERING BOTH THE SPCA AND THE NPDES STORMWATER
PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, NCG 010000. THE COMBINED FORM SHOULD MAKE IT EASIER TO
COMPLY WITH SELF -INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS. THE COMBINED SELF -MONITORING FORM IS AVAILABLE AS A
PDF AND WORD DOCUMENT FROM THE LAND QUALITY WEB SITE,
HTTP://PORTAL.NCDENR.ORG/WEB/LR/EROSION. IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS OR CANNOT ACCESS THE FORM,
PLEASE CONTACT THE LAND QUALITY SECTION OF THE RALEIGH DENR OFFICE AT [phone].
Fn E&SC Notes

Practice Standards and Specifications
r
0
V
C
R
CI
O
Q
w
U
C
R
W
R
E
rn
c
0
rn
c
0
c
R
W
C
0
R
C
0
E
E
0
0
L
d
A
H
Z
O
�
0 2
O
4
n
O
N
�
N
(6
UNl
UNl
UNl
UNl
UNl
O
O
O
O
O
�°
6
ac
O
w
c
oo��������
N
Ul
X�
Ul
X�
Ul
X�
Ul
X�
Ul
X�
Ul
X�
Ul
X�
Ul
OU
N
>
-
UI
>
-
UI
>
-
UI
>
-
UI
>
-
UI
>
-
UI
>
-
UI
t
.°_
L .�
E N
.°_
(6
E N
.°
(6 .�
E N
.°_
(6
E N
.°_
(6
E N
.°_
(6
E N
.°_
(6
E N
.O
(6
O
O
N
fl-
N
N
N
�_ a
N
4 N
Q
�_ a
N.
4 N
�_ a
N
4 N
m
�_ a
N
4 N
m
�_ a
N
4 N
�_ a
N
4 N
Q
a
U
UI X
y N
N
N
N N
N
N
N N
N
N
N N
N
N
N N
N
LOO>N
> N NN
Nfl-0N
NN
Q
fl
fl
2 N
fl
ON
6
N
°
NL
O
LN> 6
NON
°U
°U
°U
°U
°U
°U
°U
d' 4>
a
4'
M
Y a
o
0
m z°
z
z
z°
z°
z°
z°
z°
z°
' >I
nmm
O
.c om
mm
mm
CO
a
a
a°
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
m
Ir
z
z
>
z
z
z
z
z
l)
N
3 o
in
in
L
in
in
in
in
in
75
ar
ar
N
ar
ar
is
0
1O -
U
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
a
c
E
V
N
V
V
V
z
V
(6
E
a
s
N
N
N
N
N
N
O
N
0 N N
o
m
•-
m
•-
m
•-
m
•-
m
•-
m
•-
m
•-
m
�
m
Z5
—o
C � a
LL
m
w
m
w
m
w
m
w
m
w
m
w
m
w
m
r a-
CO
CO
U
0
0
0
W
W
� U
(6
ZI O+•
o
h
s o
h
s
m
c
w
c
y
o
oQ)
o
�`•
o
m
`m
m
`m
COs
o
o
M
o
CO U
CO
C
h
E
m
z
E
E
E
w
w
o
E
°
m
°
m
&
o
0
0
E
o
o10
CO
CO
°
U
a
a
CO
CO
CO
o
0
mICOI
CO
:r
J
I
:r
J
Rev. 5/08 6.11.17

C
f6
0
0
r
N
M
O
i f0
E 0
Q 0)
cn
W
U
W
a
cn
\w
Q
z
0
O
l0
�
O O
N
(6
(6
N
N
N
p
U
N
N
N
0
0
0
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
U
U
U
U
(6
UI
L
Ul
N
N
o
N
N
o
O
N
N
o
O
N
N
o
O
N
N
o
O
N
N
0
O
N
N
0
O
N
N
0
O
N E
.O
N C
N C
N C
N C
N C
N C
N C
N
NO
N NN
N
UI
.(g
N N
NNN
i6N
i6N
i6
O
> UI
-p
.0
t>
M
(6
t>t>
(6
(6
(6
(6
(6
(6
t N
(6
GO
(6
>
O
>
O
LN
>
O
O
LN
NLx2
>
O
NLxO
LN
>
O
NLx2
O>
>
O
NLxO
LN
>
O
LN
>
O
O
L.mN-
NN(6
LxO
Lx
=-
O 0
aONS(6
aONS(6
aONS(6
aON(6
aON(6
aO6
x
xO
Oy
iEp0
O
m
O
m
O
6
66>
>
O
Ul
m
>
O
Ul
>
Ul
N
'U1 O O
> Z
O
Z
O
Z
O
Z
O
Z
O
Z
O
Z
O
Z
O
Z
O
Z
a
T
O
N G
O
O
O
Q o
N
O -6
°
O
O m(6
a
(6
(6
O
O (6
a
O
O (6
a
O.
O (6
a
m
a
3
s
a
a
a
s
s
s
N
a
Z
}
}
Z
Z
Z
}
}
}
N N
p
1 l
o
U)
U)
U)
r
E
o
E
o
E
o
E
(6
l 10
O
O
N
N
N
Z
N
V
V
V
V O
V O
N
N
N
V O
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
(6
E
d
N
N
N
W
W
W
0
N
N
N N
N N
N N
Nog
N N
N N
N N
�
Z
O
d
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
C � a
N -
LL
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
r a-
w
W
I
-
Y
J
J
a
\ U
N �
Zi 0
G
0
N
U
N
j
Z
U U
'�
'�
w
o,
?
a
'Q
CO
.N
co
E
E
Z
E
U
o
E
d
a
O
O
0I
a
O
O
a
m
U)
0I
E
O
m
U
m
=
N
o
cn
E2
O
t
o
>
W U`
(n
(n
LL
T N
N _
L G N
N �
N (6 N N 0
> N U F
0 N a
a O �
N
N d Y N
O
U E
> a
Q O m
U �
T N N N
3 N
O O >
U .N
N N 4
O
N 0 �
o E o a
N _ s 4o
a y
m -
-
4 N 4 S 3 U(6
E � � o
w E N ._
Ul
m
T O U > E
> E
m E O o
U E p
O N E
N L
Q o O 6 O
N N p O- t
E `m fl n
N a U
w T (6 (n '0
O N
m
N O
N U
T
O O N
OU N
LL 3 T 6
.Q p d = U -6
U .- O
m E m E
a Z >m
a E U wmE m-E E
N Q Z t o 3 N
O >
E Via'` ma
O
E N
E o >o
6 6 O N U Q
Y U o rw m
o
Ul U
N O O N a 0 m�i
o N 0 ', p '� 4 t N �
I www-O ox- .ryvN� U
N N
2 4 O E N O W T O
6 w oE U ww E `Y
� � Z � E .°' w-o
- _ n o
o
w .w `o x Y o 0 0 .in
2 s E T m� m
N
� O,� d O s G N
p E a N T O Q
Ul N E N
6 N EO N a Q
N N N N W MI
N Q
Ul E N U a >
N w .O N� E
E Q w&° E m o 0
d J U) E N .N N Y o
m .5 w° E
6 m N C r E
S N
=o E > w
N N LL' N> Q o o !E S
U) LL Z Z� U) U) J ,�.. O
6.11.18 Rev. 5/08

Practice Standards and Specifications
Table 6.11.d
Seed Mixes for Native Species (Ibs/ac)
When Mixed with 3, 4, or 5 Other Native Species
(See Table 6.11.a for nurse crop species to be added to these mixes)
3 Other
(total 4 species)
4 Other
(total 5 species)
5 Other
(total 6 species)
Switch Grasses A
3.5 lbs.
3.0 lbs.
2.5 lbs.
Indian Grasses (B)
7.0 lbs.
6.0 lbs.
5.0 lbs.
Deerton ue C
6.0 lbs.
5.0 lbs.
4.0 lbs.
Big Bluestem (D)
7.0 lbs.
6.0 lbs.
5.0 lbs.
Little Bluestem (E)
7.0 lbs.
6.0 lbs.
5.0 lbs.
Sweet Woodreed (F)
2.5 lbs.
2.0 lbs.
1.5 lbs.
Rice Cutgrass G
6.0 lbs.
5.0 lbs.
4.0 lbs.
Indian Woodoats (H)
2.5 lbs.
2.0 lbs.
1.5 lbs.
Virginia Wild Rye (1)
6.0 lbs.
5.0 lbs.
4.0 lbs.
Eastern Bottlebrush Grass (J)
2.5 lbs.
2.0 lbs.
1.5 lbs.
Soft Rush (K)
2.5 lbs.
2.0 lbs.
1.5 lbs.
Sedges (L)
2.5 lbs.
2.0 lbs.
1.5 lbs.
NOTE:
With the native varieties, the seed mix should be in the range of 15 pounds per acre.
Depending on availability of native seeds adaptable to North Carolina, the percentage
of a particular variety used may be reduced or increased accordingly. Although
diversity is desirable, it is imperative that the primary crop develop and become an
effective protective cover. In addition to the native species mix, additional nurse crop
species must be included to provide immediate stabilization and an adequate ground cover.
Rev. 5/08 6.11.19

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-0024, Exp:1113012024
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-12-9; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: 911 Applenook Court Sanitary Sewer Repair City/County: Wake County Sampling Date: 5/9/2022
Applicant/Owner: City of Raleigh State: NC Sampling Point: WA UDP
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, PWS Section, Township, Range: Raleigh
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): flat Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.967468 Long:-78.545911 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: PaE - Pacolet sandy loam, 15 to 25 % slopes NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Climatic/hydrologic conditions are normal as determined by the USACE Antecedent tool. Data point is representative of upland conditions
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches): 0
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No hydrology indicators are present.
ENG FORM 6116-4, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WA UDP
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liriodendron tulipifera
10 Yes
FACU
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Acerrubrum
10 Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
3.
Carya tomentosa
10 Yes
UPL
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 37.5% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
30 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
15 20% of total cover:
6
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
- Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
=Total Cover
-3
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Festuca heterophylla
30 Yes
UPL
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Lolium perenne
10 Yes
FACU
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Verbesina alternifolia 10 Yes FACW
4.
Microstegium vimineum
10 Yes
FAC
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
Phytolacca americana
10 Yes
FACU
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
70 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
35 20% of total cover:
14
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
No hydrophytic vegetation is present.
ENG FORM 6116-4, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WA UDP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Locz Texture Remarks
0-8 10YR 4/4 100 Loamy/Clayey sandy clay loam
8-16 10YR 4/3 100 Loamy/Clayey sandy clay loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
No hydric soils are present.
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-0024, Exp:1113012024
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-12-9; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: 911 Applenook Court Sanitary Sewer Repair City/County: Wake County Sampling Date: 5/9/2022
Applicant/Owner: City of Raleigh State: NC Sampling Point: WA WDP
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, PWS Section, Township, Range: Raleigh
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): flat Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.967511 Long:-78.545891 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: PaE - Pacolet sandy loam, 15 to 25 % slopes NWI classification: PEM
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Climatic/hydrologic conditions are normal as determined by the USACE Antecedent tool. Data point is representative of jurisdictional wetland WA
DBP.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 10
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 5
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Primary hydrology indicators are present.
ENG FORM 6116-4, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WA WDP
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Carpinus caroliniana
10 Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Ulmus rubra
10 Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 85.7% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
20 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
10 20% of total cover:
4
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Onoclea sensibilis
30 Yes
FACW
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Arisaema triphyllum
10 Yes
FACW
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Impatients capensis 10 Yes FACW
4.
Microstegium vimineum
10 Yes
FAC
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
Galium aparine
10 Yes
FACU
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
70 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
35 20% of total cover:
14
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
ENG FORM 6116-4, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WA WDP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Locz Texture Remarks
0-8 10YR 4/3 100 Loamy/Clayey sandy clay loam
8-16 10YR 4/1 95 10YR 5/6 5 C PL/M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric soil indicators are present.
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Stream 1 (UT to Richland Creek)
Date: 5/9/2022
Project/Site: Applenook Court City of
Raleigh Sanitary Sewer
Latitude: 35.967621
Evaluator: Jessica Tisdale
county:Wake County, NC
Longitude:-78.545904
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 36.25
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other Wake Forest
if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30`
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 21 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
O2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 7.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2O
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 7.75 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW f(O.79 OBL =
1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: Bank height: 1-3'; BFW: 1-2'. Water depth: 2-36".
Substrate:
Sand, gravel, cobble. Velocity: slow to moderate.
larity:-Clear. Midges noted in stream cobble.
Channel is located in neighborhood fed from a road pipe. Channel has degraded around manhole and scour is
Sketch: present.

HWILDoiivGs �
Statement of Credit Availability
July 6, 2022
City of Raleigh
222 W. Hargett St.
Raleigh, NC 27601
Attn: Mr. Whit Wheeler, PE
[e-mail]
RE: Availability of Riparian Buffer Credits for the "Applenook Court Sanitary Sewer Repair" project
Bank Name: Grantham Branch Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Bank
Bank Sponsor: Wildlands Holdings III, LLC
DWR Project #: 2017-0687v2
Riparian Buffer Credits Requested: 105.00 sq. ft.
Riparian Buffer Credits Available: 10,563.04 sq. ft
Neuse 03020201 River Basin (outside of the Falls Basin)
Dear Mr. Wheeler,
Wildlands Holdings III, LLC has the above -mentioned Riparian Buffer credits from the Grantham Branch
Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Bank to satisfy the mitigation requirements related to the above -
mentioned project. The project is located within the service area (HUC 03020201) of the Bank.
Credits may be reserved for a period of 6 months upon the receipt of a non-refundable deposit of 10%
of the purchase price. Should credits not be reserved, they will be sold on a first come, first serve basis.
Credit prices will be guaranteed for a period of 6 months from the date of this letter and are then
subject to change.
An invoice for this transaction will be sent upon your request and we will reserve the credits and price
for a period of 30 days from invoice. This letter is a Statement of Availability as of the date provided — it
is not a reservation of credits nor a guarantee of price. Credits will be sold on a first come, first serve
basis.
Final transfer of the credits will be made upon receipt of a copy of the 401 Water Quality Certification
Authorization Certificate from the NC Department of Environmental Quality approving the Riparian
Buffer mitigation purchase from the Bank and upon receipt of your payment to Wildlands Holdings III,
LLC. We will then issue a credit transfer certificate verifying your credit purchase to the North Carolina
Division of Water Resources and to you for your records
We appreciate the opportunity to assist you with your mitigation requirements. Please contact me at
[phone] x124 [e-mail] if you have any questions or need any additional
information.
Wildlands Holdings III, LLC • Wildlands Engineering, Inc • 1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104, Charlotte, NC 28203

HWILDoiivGs O
Sincerely,
Ashley N. Yarsinske
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Marketing & Credit Sales
[e-mail]
0: [phone] ext. 124
M: [phone]
Cc: Ms. Katie Merritt, Nutrient Offset & Buffer Banking Coordinator I NC Division of Water Resources
Ms. Colleen Cohn, Environmental Specialist II I NC Division of Water Resources
Ms. Jessica Tisdale, Sr. Environmental Scientist, CE, PWS I HDR
Wildlands Holdings III, LLC • Wildlands Engineering, Inc • 1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104, Charlotte, NC 28203

5/5/22, 2:51 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
IPaC U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical
habitat (collectively referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's
(USFWS) jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced
below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but
that could potentially be directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area.
However, determining the likelihood and extent of effects a project may have on trust
resources typically requires gathering additional site -specific (e.g., vegetation/species
surveys) and project -specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the
USFWS office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to
each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI
Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that
section.
Location
Wake County, North Carolina
�V. 0V%A%,
Local office
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
[phone]
[phone]
MAILING ADDRESS
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/BPLEG2NC7FDAZDWNPMQZJEKC3Q/resources 1 /14

5/5/22, 2:51 PM
Post Office Box 33726
IPaC: Explore Location resources
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
PHYSICAL ADDRESS
551 Pylon Drive, Suite F
Raleigh, NC 27606-1487
�o�
Foy
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/BPLEG2NC7FDAZDWNPMQZJEKC3Q/resources 2/14

5/5/22, 2:51 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis
of project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each
species. Additional areas of influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes
areas outside of the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in
that area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a fish population even if that fish does not occur at
the dam site, may indirectly impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow
downstream). Because species can move, and site conditions can change, the species on this
list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project area. To fully determine any
potential effects to species, additional site -specific and project -specific information is often
required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the
Secretary information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be
present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted,
funded, or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list
which fulfills this requirement can only be obtained by requesting an official species list from
either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC (see directions below) or from the local field
office directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC
website and request an official species list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed speciesi and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown
on this list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction.
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also
shows species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for
more information. IPaC only shows species that are regulated by USFWS (see FAQ).
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/BPLEG2NC7FDAZDWNPMQZJEKC3Q/resources 3/14

5/5/22, 2:51 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office
of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
Birds
1,I_1AII
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Amphibians
NAME
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of theme
critical habitat is not available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecptspecies/6772
STATUS
Endangered
STATUS
Threatened
Fishes
NAME STATUS
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the
critical habitat is not available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528
Clams
NAME
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the
critical habitat is not available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164
Endangered
STATUS
Threatened
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/BPLEG2NC7FDAZDWNPMQZJEKC3Q/resources 4/14

5/5/22, 2:51 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Dwarf Wedgemussel Alasmidonta heterodon Endangered
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/784
Insects
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Flowering Plants
NAME
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
Critical habitats
STATUS
Candidate
STATUS
Endangered
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the
endangered species themselves.
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS AT THIS LOCATION.
\",*A.
Migratory birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Acts and the Bald and Golden
Eagle Protection Acts.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and
consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/BPLEG2NC7FDAZDWNPMQZJEKC3Q/resources 5/14

5/5/22, 2:51 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gQv//program/migratory-birds/species
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds
https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-
migratory-birds
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds
https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-
measures.pdf
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the
USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your
project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how
this list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this
location, nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see
exact locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around
your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date
range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional
maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your
list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other
important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and
use your migratory bird report, can be found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization
measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF
PRESENCE SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be
present and breeding in your project area.
NAME
10�
BREEDING SEASON (IF A
..............................................................................
BREEDING SEASON IS
INDICATED FOR A BIRD ON
YOUR LIST, THE BIRD MAY
....................................................................................
BREED IN YOUR PROJECT AREA
....................................................................................................
SOMETIME WITHIN THE
TIMEFRAME SPECIFIED, WHICH
...................................................................................................
IS A VERY LIBERAL ESTIMATE
............................................................................................
OF THE DATES INSIDE WHICH
................................................................................................
THE BIRD BREEDS ACROSS ITS
.................................................................................................
ENTIRE RANGE. "BREEDS
................................................................................
ELSEWHERE" INDICATES THAT
.................................................................................................
THE BIRD DOES NOT LIKELY
.........................................................................................
BREED IN YOUR PROJECT
................................................................................
AREA.)
.....................
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/BPLEG2NC7FDAZDWNPMQZJEKC3Q/resources 6/14

5/5/22, 2:51 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area,
but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential
susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of
development or activities.
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Probability of Presence Summary
Breeds Sep 1 to Jul 31
Breeds May 1 to Jul 31
Breeds May 10 to Sep 10
-1 % nl�4
Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
X 1% ,
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely
to be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your
project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and
understand the FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before
using or attempting to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence( )
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s)
your project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-
week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey
effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One
can have higher confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also
high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events
for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted
Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in
week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/BPLEG2NC7FDAZDWNPMQZJEKC3Q/resources 7/14

5/5/22, 2:51 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of
presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence
at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of
presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds
across its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your
project area.
Survey Effort ()
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of
surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The
number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data( )
W4..X J
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are
based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
probability of presence breeding season i survey effort no data
SPEC I ]AN FEB MAP APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/BPLEG2NC7FDAZDWNPMQZJEKC3Q/resources 8/14

5/5/22, 2:51 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
Bald Eagle
Non -BCC
.........................
Vulnerable
..............................
(This is not a
...................................
Bird of
...................
Conservation
.....................................
Concern (BCC)
........................................
in this area, but
............................................
warrants
.........................
attention
..........................
because of the
.........................................
Eagle Act or for
...........................................
potential
.........................
susceptibilities
.........................................
in offshore
...............................
areas from
...............................
certain types of
...........................................
development
.....................................
or activities.)
Prairie Warbler
BCC Rangewide
............................................
(CON) (This is a
..........................................
Bird of
...................
Conservation
.....................................
Concern (BCC)
........................................
throughout its
........................................
range in the
..................................
continental
................................
USA and
........................
Alaska.)
IIII IIII IIII 111111111111 k-111— __MJ IIII IIII IIII
+--- — — — — — — — — ---� IIII IIII IIII--- --
11000
Red-headed _ — + —III IIII IIII 1111 IF+ --�— ---� --��
Woodpecker
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a�
......................
Bird of
...................
Conservation
.....................................
.
ncern (BCC)
..................................
throughout its
........................................
range in the
..................................
continental
................................
USA and
........................
Alaska.)
Wood Thrush +��—
BCC Rangewide
............................................
(CON) (This is a
..........................................
Bird of
...................
Conservation
.....................................
Concern (BCC)
........................................
throughout its
........................................
range in the
..................................
continental
................................
USA and
........................
Alaska.)
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/BPLEG2NC7FDAZDWNPMQZJEKC3Q/resources 9/14

5/5/22, 2:51 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all
birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds
are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the
locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure.
To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of
Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity
you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC), and other
species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge
Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey., banding, and citizen science
datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid
cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because
they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a
particular vulnerability to offshore activities or development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area.
It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially
present in your project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially
occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by
the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and
citizen science datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes
available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret
them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering,
migrating or year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All
About Birds Bird Guide, or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest there), the Cornell Lab of
Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season
associated with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point
within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in
your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/BPLEG2NC7FDAZDWNPMQZJEKC3Q/resources 10/14

5/5/22, 2:51 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
"BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their
range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin
Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in
the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either
because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in
offshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or
longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in
particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of
rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and
minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects 1�4
ot n
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and
groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data
Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to
you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal
maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird
Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the
year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional
information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving BirdBird Studv and the nanotag studies or contact
Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating
the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of
priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what
other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the migratory
birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability
of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project
footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black
vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is
the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as
more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a
lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there,
and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look
for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to
avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/BPLEG2NC7FDAZDWNPMQZJEKC3Q/resources 11 /14

5/5/22, 2:51 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can implement
to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources
page.
Coastal Barrier Resources System
Projects within the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System (CBRS) may be subject
to the restrictions on federal expenditures and financial assistance and the consultation
requirements of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (CBRA) (16 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). For more
information, please contact the local Ecological Services Field Office or visit the CBRA
Consultations website. The CBRA website provides tools such as a flow chart to help
determine whether consultation is required and a template to facilitate the consultation , -
A
process.
THERE ARE NO KNOWN COASTAL BARRIERS AT THIS LOCATION. 4�
Data limitations
The CBRS boundaries used in IPaC are representations of the controlling boundaries, which are depicted
on the official CBRS maps. The boundaries depicted in this layer are not to be considered authoritative for
in/out determinations close to a CBRS boundary (i.e., within the "CBRS Buffer Zone" that appears as a
hatched area on either side of the boundary). For projects that are very close to a CBRS boundary but do
not clearly intersect a unit, you may contact the Service for an official determination by following the
instructions here: https://www.fws.gov/service/coastal-barrier-resources-system-property-documentation
Data exclusions
CBRS units extend seaward out to either the 20- or 30-foot bathymetric contour (depending on the location
of the unit). The true seaward extent of the units is not shown in the CBRS data, therefore projects in the
offshore areas of units (e.g., dredging, breakwaters, offshore wind energy or oil and gas projects) may be
subject to CBRA even if they do not intersect the CBRS data. For additional information, please contact
[e-mail].
Facilities
National Wildlife Refuge lands
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must
undergo a 'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the
individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/BPLEG2NC7FDAZDWNPMQZJEKC3Q/resources 12/14

5/5/22, 2:51 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS AT THIS LOCATION.
Fish hatcheries
THERE ARE NO FISH HATCHERIES AT THIS LOCATION.
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes. i
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District. eo
WETLAND INFORMATION IS NOTAVAILABLE ATTHIS TIME
This can happen when the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI)ap service is unavailable, or
for very large projects that intersect many wetland areas. Try again, or visit the NWI map to
view wetlands at this location.
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level
information on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of
high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A
margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular
site may result in revision of the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image
analysts, the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work
conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any
mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There
may be occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted
on the map and the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of
aerial imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or
submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and
nearshore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/BPLEG2NC7FDAZDWNPMQZJEKC3Q/resources 13/14

5/5/22, 2:51 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
been excluded from the inventory. These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial
imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe
wetlands in a different manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or
products of this inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local
government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies.
Persons intending to engage in activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should
seek the advice of appropriate federal, state, or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory
programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such activities.
o�
C)O�
� FOB
�O
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/BPLEG2NC7FDAZDWNPMQZJEKC3Q/resources 14/14

Roy Cooper, Governor
■ ■■■
r ■■ ■ INC DEPARTMENT OF
■■,■i NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
■ ■■
May 5, 2022
Jessica Tisdale
HDR
555 Fayetteville Street
Raleigh, NC 27601
RE: COR sewer repair
Dear Jessica Tisdale:
❑. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Buchanan
Deputy Director, Natural Heritage Program
IR \��r.TDTM1111i0YA
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project
boundary. These results are presented in the attached `Documented Occurrences' tables and map.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is documented within the project area or indicated within a one -mile
radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
httr)s://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional
correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund
easement, or an occurrence of a Federally -listed species is documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod ney.butler�ncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPAR7HEN7 OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
121 W. JONES STREET. RALEIGH. NC 27603 • 1691 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEIGH. NC 27609
OFC 919.707.9120 • FAX [phone]

U
ƒ
\ \
e = 2
CO ~
~
D /
/ E / e
co
/ /
co
aa»s
%
3
.[ D
=
3z2>
t
§ CO
\ \
/ /
} / \ °
n
3: D-4
\ _
\
COo
±
»%\\
4
0 D- m z
}
\
/ \ / /
-
a
CO = z «
&
y \ \/
\:
> z
m
yz
\\��
3
m cnE
»
` 3 /
%«w
t
E3 G}
\
�a�
(u
®
%
//2 \
z:
z o u-
/
& o
> °
y e
^ �
e E /
G o
.= z = 2
CO
}
3> 0±
3
>' s
±
z s 2
} CO
2° 3
<
» CO e e
y u
./
a\\\
s
\ \ /
»
\ G ^ ±
)�3E
CO\\\\
6®=m
2\}E
/
>
\ / / 2
- 2
\
.s
e
3 % / (
\ �«
e
± / \
3 0 /
:5 ƒ.0
Ln
2
c
o:©
M?~
±�©©
°
\
cc,cy
\
\ n Z
Z
coU
w?>\±
2/
e�
e
®
/\E\
\
> e 2 o
®
®
: _ > :
/
0
» _ / ±
/
ƒ / % 2
4
// z m
3= s?
\
\
\
\ \
\ \ /
e
E
0)
\
\
) ( \
/
\
e
e
E
t
/
y
D-
u,
o
®
LE
\\
\�Z3
»
` 5}
m
m
4
\\s\
\
\ 0 ?
\
\\ \ \
\
3
§ Ln Cl
LE
2 t .0 ±
2
=
u?/z
3
±
-%/
co°
/
/ /
_
y au)/ 2
\
\ / 9 \
\
\
co
e
e
±
\cn
`
s\ 2 3
/
cn /
% /
/
y
e %
/
° \
`
©
)
(
u
° _
/
Z /
/
2 \ \ ®
±
\
/ v
\ 3 % \
y
/ \ c'
/
<
< e
E
®
(
\
/ / � 0
o%
0)2
«
/ \ \
Z
\ / \ \
}
/
/ \
o
e eee %
o
e
e 2
0=_:
Z
5 Z 3% s
Z
x
x e,J
9 j/
§
\
c

CO
\
\
0
c
\
0
/
CO
2
�
/
O
CO
?
\
ƒ
■
CO
Z
\
O
\
E
/
CO
/
�
3 d CO e
CO \ .g CO / \ 2
s
7
Al
\
0 E
/ co\ (
m E
E
}
O
CO
/ e
/ E
s `
\ u
E
0
\
/
e
/
\
0
/
■
> >
\\
\ E
e
■ .
■tt
t
ttt
t
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
_
_
_
_
_
m
z e
e
%
%
%
%
%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
33
3
333
3/
co
co
a
a e
CO
/ \
\
\
\
\
\
\ \
0
CO
\
/
\
«
/
e
\ CO
2 w w w
w g
e
e % % %
\ /
ƒ \
0 0 0 0
o a
c u
z z z
z=
3 ƒ^»
^
j
0 \
/»
/ E e e e
CO
% E
y
e e
22
e O%%%
2D-0
\<
/ _
co
m
0
y y
y\\\
\
\
d
OO
O////
/Z
E \
a
~
} »
\ }
CO
c
` §
a
— 0 s
E
/
-
D
/
/
/ �
_
\ CO
\
\
� \
/
\ /
\
CO
\
/ E
y /
e
a .2 \ \ \
CO $
CO
E \
\
\ \ / / /
®
t
/
> \
\ \ a) a) a)
D-\
o e
o E
CO COe=
4 4
4 3 3 3
O e
/
e w w w
\
±
E
% % %
` /
/
\ ± ±
z 3 3
± 0 0 0 0
o c c c
0 \
c=
r
± m
4 ±±
e s s
s s
w
e= s e e
s m m m
e e
CO
mo
E
= -0
-0 ®®
mc,m / / /
m / E
e
e
y/ z o 0 0
4 0<
CO 0)
Z
0) \ \
= o o _ _ _
_ = e
==
co
x x
e»»
e
±: e 0 0 0
e
± 0 0
o
Z x
x e e
3 e Z e e e
3 5 Z
\
/
\\
ra
s
\
/

L
M
CL
(
W
L
^L,
W
U)
O
U
ti
00
00
ti
w
z
U
Z
3
i
m
Z
pia
O
3
v
LO
py a
Spa
4',
w0 -
°nzsm°p
i,
M
W O
Q O
� CO
u
ro N
O
Q 7
a�i m
O, v u
o m a
N
N73
:1
G
QI