20140685 Ver 1_401 Application_20140714

a P I L O T • E N V I R O N MENTAL • I N U•
June 26, 2014
Ms. Karen Higgins
NC DWR, 40f/Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail, Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1650
Subject- Pre - Construction Nofification'Application
Request for 401 Water Quality Certification
Proposed Pepsi Expansion
350 Enterprise Boulevard
Winston- Salem, Forsyth County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Higgins
Please find attached four copies of the Pre - Construction Notification Application for the above
referenced site. The site contains wooded land Pepsi bottling /distribution facility is located on
adjacent property. They have out -grown their current location and need to expand To
accommodate growth, it is necessary to construct,a truck parking area and associated access roads
on the site.
The access roads associated with the proposed project will temporarily impact 22 linear feet of
stream channel and permanently impact 293 linear feet of perennial stream channel and 0 00'5.,acres
of wetland. Mitigation is proposed ,through the NCEEPF ",k,
I am requesting that a 401 Water Quality Certification be issued to authorize, the proposed
impacts. There are no additional wetland.or stream impacts proposed at,this time. Release feel free
to contact me at, 336 -708 -4620 if you have any questions concerning this request or if'additional
information is required. Thank you in advance for your timely conside"_ration of this matter,
Sincerely,
11�4J -7 4,00w,
Michael' T Brame, PWS
Environmental Principal
Attachment Pre - Construction Notification Application
www pilotenviro com

Qafl� 11 AT �pG
h
$ PAID
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
2 0 1 4 0 6
8 5 DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form – Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NWP 39 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
X❑ 401 Water Quality Certification – Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification – Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes x❑ No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑X Yes ❑ No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 In
below.
❑ Yes X❑ No
1h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes X❑ No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Pepsi Bottling - 350 Enterprise Park Boulevard
2b.
County:
Forsyth
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Winston -Salem
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
� I
tv-6041112d.
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Forsyth County Development Corporation
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
Block 6353, Lot 010 Brand,
Bob Leak
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
1080 West 4TH Street
3e.
City, state, zip:
Winston - Salem, NC 27101
3f.
Telephone no.:
336- 723 -8955
3g.
Fax no.:
336- 761 -1069
3h.
Email address:
rleak @wsbusinessinc.com
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form – Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner,)
4a
Applicant is
❑ Ageht ❑X Other, specify Buyers
4b
Name
Scott Jamison
4c
Business name
(if applicable)
Pepsi Bottling Ventures, L' LC'
4d
Street address
441 Park Lake Boulevard, Suite 600
4e
City,, state, zip
Raleigh, North Carolina 27612
4f
Telephone no
919- 865'2337
4g
Fax no
919 - 783 -6925
4h
Email,-address
scott iamison @pbvllc corn
5.
Agent/Consultant Information [(if'applicable)
5a
_Name
Michael Brame
5b
Business name
(if applicable)
Pilot Environmental, Inc
5c
Street address
120 1/2 North Main Street,
5d
City, state, zip
Kernersville, North Carolina 27285
5e
Telephone no
336- 708 -4620
5f
Fax no -
5g
Email�address
mbrame @pilotenviro corn
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information andl Prior,Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a
Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID)
6863 -24 -3146 00
1b
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees)
Latitude 36 036872 Longitude - 80142189
1c
Property size
1039 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project
Sawmill Branch
2b
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water
Class C
2c
River basin
Yadkin /Pee -Dee
3.
Project Description
3a' Describe the existing conditions on the site,and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of,this
application
The,site contains�wooded land Surrounding properties,contain`wooded land and light industrial businesses A Pepsi bottling and distribution facility is
located on adjacent property west of the site Additional light industrial businesses and residences are located,farther from the site
3b
List the total estimated acreage of all existing,wetlands,on the property 05
3c
List the'total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property 500
3d Explain the purpose.of the proposed project
T,he,purpose of the proposed protect is to, expand the,, Pepsi Ibottling /distribution facility located= adjacent property west,of thwsite
3e Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used
See Attachment 3e
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or;obtained for this property /
project (including all riot phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
Comments The wetlands were delineated by others
4b
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known) David Brame
Agency /Consultant Company ECS
Other
4d If yes, list the dates ofthe, Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
The delineation report completed by others is included as an attachment We do not have knowledge that the site has been,venfied
&
Project History
5a Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including allprior, phases),imthe� past?
❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
5b
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions
6.
Future Project Plans
6a
Is this a phased project?
❑X Yes ❑ No
6b If,yes, explain
There is an immediate need for additional tractor - trailer parking The initial phase of proposed construction will be to construct the access roads and
parking lot A 2 94 acre portion of the site has been platted,for development with a building Thereoare no jurisdictional areas on the 2 94 acres
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
❑X Wetlands ❑X Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland' impacts proposed on the site, then complete,this questlon,for each wetland area =Impacted
2a
26
2c
2d
2e
2f
Wetland Impact
Type of Impact
Type of wetland
Forested
Type of jurisdiction
Area of
number
Corps (404,10) or
Impact
Permanent (P) or
DWQ (401, other)
(acres)
Temporary
W1 SS -1 - P
Culvert
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps - DWR
0 005
W2
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W3
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W4
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
WS
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W6
Choose one
Chooseione
Yes /No
2g.'Total Wetland Impacts:
0 005
2h Comments
In order,to access the proposed tractor - trailer parking area from the existing bottling /distribution facility, it is necessary to construct a stream crossing
that will impact a 0 005 acre (200 square feet) wetland
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or Intermittent stream Impacts,(including temporary Impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3f
3g
Stream Impact
Type of Impact
Stream name
Perennial (PER) or
Type of
Average
Impact
number
intermittent (INT)?
jurisdiction
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(feet)
feet)
S1 SS -1 -P
Culvert/Rip Rap
Unnamed
PER-
Corps - DWR
3
155
S2 SS -2 -P
Culveit/Rip Rap
Unnamed
PER-
Corps - DWR
6
138
S3 SS- 1 -T
Dam construction
Unnamed
PER-
Corps - DWR
3
10
S4 SS -2 -T
Dam construction
Unnamed
PER-
Corps - DWR
6
12
S5
Choose one
S6
Choose one
3h Total stream and tributary impacts
315
31 Comments
In order to access the proposed tractor - trader parking area from the existing bottling /distribution,facility, it is necessary to construct'a stream crossing
that,will permanently impact 155 linear feet of perennial stream channel In order'to provide access, to the sde,from Enterprise Park Boulevard', it' is
necessary to�construct a streamlcrossing thatiwdl permanently impact 138 linear feet,of,perennial stream channel Temporary impacts from aacoffer
dam (associated with a pump around) will temporarily impact;22 linear feet of stream channel
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If-there are pro posed'impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U S then indivi ually list all open water impacts below
4a
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
4b
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c
Type of impact
4d
Waterbody
type
4e
Area of Impact (acres)
01 -
Choose one
Choose
02 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
O4 -
Choose one
Choose
4f Total open water impacts
4g Comments Pen water impacts are not propose
'S. 'Pond ortake,Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then -coin lete the chart below
5a
Pond ID number
5b
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c
Wetland,Impacts (acres)
5d
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Stormwater
033
P2
Choose,one
5f Total:
033
,5g Comments A wet retention pond is being constructed that has been designed to remove 90% Total Suspended Solids The,pond wili be
constructed in,high ground
5h Is a dam high hazard permit'required?
❑ Yes ❑X No If yes,'permit ID no-
51 Expected pond surface area (acres)
033
5j Size of pond'watershed (acres)
751
5k Method of construction
Excavation In high ground
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will Impact a protected riparian, buffer, then complete the chart,below 'If °yes, then Individually list all buffer impacts
below If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other
6b
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P.) or
Temporary T
6c
Reason for impact
6d'
Stream name
6e
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet )
6g
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
BI
Yes /No
B2
Yes /No
B3
Yes /No
B4
Yes /No
B5
Yes /No
B6
Yes /No
6h Total Buffer Impacts:
61 Comments The site, is located,in the Yadkin/Pee -Dee watershed in an area that has been, designated as Class C waters It will be necessary to
clear buffers at eachiof the stream crossings Buffers will remain on non - impacted portions of the streams
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project
See Attachment D -1a
1 b� Specifically describe `measures,taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques
See Attachment D -1b
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation °for
Impacts to Waters of`the U S or Waters of the State?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2b If yes, mitigation is required by (check.all that apply)
❑X DWQ ®,Corps
2c If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑X Payment,to In -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a Name of Mitigation Bank Not Available
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type Choose one
Type Choose one
Type Choose one
Quantity
Quantity,
Quantity
3c Comments
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In- Iieu.Fee Program
4a Approval letter from In -lieu fee program Is attached
❑X Yes
4b Stream mitigation requested
299 linear feet
4c If using stream mitigation, stream temperature
cool
4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)
0 square feet
4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested
0 acres
4f `Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested
0 acres_
4g Coastal (tidal) wetland`mitigation requested
0 acres
4h Comments The NCEEP has approved the stream credits•as both cool and warm due to internal requirements /credit availability
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a_ If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
The proposed project will impact 315 linear feet of stream channel- and 0 005 acres of wetland Permanent impact is proposed to 293 linear feet of
stream channel The streams are perennial and will,reguire mitigation at a 2 1 ratio based on our observations 299 linear feet of stream credits were
requested and accepted by the NCEEP (a copy of the acceptance letter is attached)
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version ,1 4 January 2009

6. Buffer'Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian, Buffer Rules) — ;required by DWQ
6a Will the project,result In an Impact,withln a protected riparian buffer that requires
Yes Q ,No El
buffer mitigation?
6b, If yes, them identify the squaceifeet of
­y each zone Of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
amount of mitigation required
6c
6d
6e
Zone
'Reason for impact
Total,impacf
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(squareJeet)
Zone 11
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
15
6f Total,buffer mitigation required:
6g If buffermitigation is required, discuss what type +of mitigafiomis proposed (e g ,, payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible, riparian buffer, resto ration, ;payment into an approved in- liewfee +fund)
The'site is located in the,Yadkm /Pee -Dee watershed'in anlarea'that has been designated by the NCDENR DWRpas Class C waters
6h Comments - 'Therefore, state regulated buffers are not required,and buffer, mitigation is notproposed
Page 7 of 10

E
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a
Does,the protect include,or is it adtacentto protected npananybuffers, identified,
❑ Yes ® No
within one of'the NC'RI arian Buffer'Protection Rules?
1 b
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan Included? If no, explain why
The site is, located in the Yadkin /Pee- Dee�watershed in an area that has been designated as Class C
Based
❑ Yes ❑ NO
The
stormwater pond has been designed to_ remove 90% total suspended solids on our
understanding, a diffuse flow plan is not required
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a
What Is the overall percent Imperviousness of,this protect?
2829,%
2b
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
0 Yes ❑ No
2c
If this protect DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why -
2d
If this protect DOES require$a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief„ narrativeadescription
of the plan
The,City,of ,Winston -Salem is responsible for reviewing °the stormwater management plan The stormwater management plan has been prepared by
Triad, Design Group, PC A stormwater pond (wet�detention) ^has been designed,to remove °90% +total suspended solids(TSS) the plan has been
designed to treat,an additional 2 -94 acres on the property that is,platted fora future budding that may be constructed during a later phase The plan will
be submittedAo the City of Winston -Salem for approval
2e
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
City of Winston -Salem
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater, Review
3a
In which local government's jurisdiction Is this project?
Clty,of VVnston- 'Salem
❑X Phase II
❑NSW
3b
Which of the following locally-'Implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply)
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other
3c
Has the.approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of'approval been
❑ Yes. ❑X No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a
Which of the following state - Implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that'apply)
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑X Other Phase 11
4b
Has`the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof, of,approval been
❑Yes ❑X No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑X Yes ❑ No
5b
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑X Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
El Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal /state),land?
lb If you,answered "`yes" to.the above, does the protect;require, preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of'the,National or State
❑Yes ❑X No
(Worth Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA /SEPA)?
1c If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑X No
letter ) The project is being privately funded Based on our knowledge, the protect does not
Comments require that a NEPA or SEPA be submitted or approved
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a Is the site in vlol`afion of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500); Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
E] Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer, Rules,(15A NCAC 213 0200)?
2b Is this an afterthe,fact permlt;appllcatlon?
❑Yes ❑X No
2c If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s)
PEI is not aware of violations associated with the site
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a Will this project,(based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result In
❑Yes ❑X No
additional development, which could Impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative Impact analysis in accordance�wlth the
most recent,DWQ policy, If you answered "no," provide a short narrative,description
In addition to'the proposed constructiornof a parkingparea, 2 94 acres, located immediately adtacent to the proposed parking area on the site, are
being, reserved for future d'evelopment„with a,buhding The budding has not been designed /will not be,constructed at this time The stormwater pond
has been designed /sized to treat this,area as an impervious surface The,2 94 acres does not contain jurisdictional features The construction of the
additional I building on the site has=been designed in an area that,doesrnotcontain jurisdictional areas, Additional impacts to ^wetlands or surface
waters are,not anticipated dunng,the future budding construction phase of the�project
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility
Wastewater will not be,gendrated as a result of the construction of the parking lot If a budding is constructed'm the future, wastewater generated will
be discharged into the City of Winston -Salem sewage system The connection has not been designed at this time
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a, Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑'Yes ❑X ,No
habitat
5b Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ❑X No
impacts?
5c If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted
-
5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated, Critical
Habitat?
NC Natural Heritage Program Website,'See Attachment'5d
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps,Requirement)
6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑, Yes ❑X No
6b What,data sources did you use,to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
See Attachment 6b
7. Historic or Prehistoric, Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e g , National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NCSHPO- HPOWEB GI&Service, See,Attachment'7b
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ❑X No
8b If yes, explain how project�meets FEMA requirements
8c What source(s) did you use to make'the floodplain determination?
FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map Panel 6863 (included as an attachment)
Michael T Brame
JW
June 26, 2014
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided
Page 10 of 10

SupplementalJnformation - Pepsi, PCN
3e.
Pepsi has occupied the adjoining property west of the site for two years The location is used as a
distribution facility Vending machines are also repaired, commissioned and shipped from the facility
Since occupying the location, areas surrounding the building have been paved to the extent that the
property will allow for parking of tractor trailers and other support vehicles used in the regional delivery
of Pepsi products
Pepsi is in the process of,consolidating several of their satellite distribution operations in the state and
distributing from Winston Salem Additionally Pepsi Bottling`Ventures acquired the Charlotte franchise
territory'and this location is now supporting distribution routes in Charlotte As,a result, Pepsi Bottling
Ventures needs additional parking to accommodate these additional business activities When PBV
moved into the current location PBV was offered the lot by Winston Salem Business, Inc for the
anticipated growth and has opted to exercise our option to purchase the land and develop it for parking
When PBV moved distribution to 390 Business Park the traditional side bay trucks were eliminated. The
growing number of product demanded ;larger delivery vehicles and the entire fleet,was converted to 40'
box'trailers. Additionally ,this site became a regional hub, for storage of inventory that is produced -in
Winston 'Salem and distributed to other Pepsi Bottlers nationwide. It is necessary to construct an
additional parking area on the adjacent property (the subject site) to support the new business
activities PBV delivery vehicles are loaded' at night for the next day delivery of products. A road is being
constructed between the two properties to allow shuttling of trailers to and from the warehouse The
second entrance allows a secondary means of egress to the site
In addition to the immediate need of parking, a 2 94 acre portion of the site is platted for development
with a building or additional parking as dictated by future business needs The building pad will be
graded in conjunction with the grading /,construction of the parking area. However, the building has
not been designed and will not be constructed at this time. Jurisdictional areas are not located on the
2 94 acre portion of the site. When constructed, the access road will be necessary to safely separate
employee traffic and transport vessel traffic
A stormwater device will be constructed on the site to treat surface -water runoff from the impervious
areas. The pond has been designed to remove 90% total suspended solids and has been sized to
include runoff from the parking lot and a future building or parking lot The construction, of the,
stormwater °pond will not impactjurisdictional areas.
In order,to accommodate the current and future needs of Pepsi, it is necessary to impact two streams
(293 linear feet) and an associated wetland pocket (0 005 acres) Coffer dams will be used and water
will be pumped around during the installations of the culverts /rip rap Graders, loaders, excavators,
haulersand cranes will be used during construction activities on the site
D -1a
The access roads between the existing, Pepsi bottling facility and the proposed parking area have been
designed to, cross the streams'in areas where the streams are, relatively straight The ,road crossings
have been designed to be as perpendicular to the streams as possible Headwalls and end walls have

been designed to reduce the impacts. Rip rap has been sized to reduce the linear footage of impact
2:1 slopes have been designed on each end of the stream crossings
The current parking lot, future construction and stormwater pond have been designed in
non - jurisdictional areas of the site. The stormwater pond has been designed, to treat 90% total
suspended solids, preventing sediment discharge from impervious surfaces that will be constructed on
the,site A pump- around system has been designed that will use a coffer dam Although a temporary
impact, the system will prevent sediment from entering down - gradient portions of the streams during
culvert installation The project has been designed in a manner that buffers will remain on
non - impacted portions of streams on the remainder of the project area
In order for Pepsi Bottling Ventures °to operate /occupy the distribution facility, it is necessary to expand
'The only adjoining'property that is available that'will accommodate the expansion is this site. Without
being able, to use the site, Pepsi will be forced to relocate: Relocation of the distribution faalrty to a
green -field site is not a practical alternative and will have greater environmental impacts and likely
impact more streams and wetlands The expansion has been designed in a manner to avoid
unnecessary impacts to green -field sites,
D -1b
The clearing limits of the proposed project will be staked prior to clearing (including the impact limits of
the streams) Prior to .grading, silt fence will' be, installed to prevent runoff from entering nearby
streams. During culvert installation (including headwall and endwall construction), coffer,d'amsswill be
placed on the up- gradient ends of the culverts and water will be pumped around Following
installation, the coffer dams will be removed and water will be redirected into the culvert The graded
areas on the site will be seeded and matted immediately following site grading activities. Additional
best management practices will be implemented.
E -2a
The stormwater pond has been designed to treat 90% total suspended solids The pond has been sized
to also treat stormwater from the `2.94 acre portion of the site that is, platted for future building
development.
5d
,PEI reviewed the Natural Heritage Database to determine if federally protected threatened and
endangered species have been documented on the Winston-,Salem East, NC Quadrangle (the quadrangle
that contains the site) and the Kernersville, NC Quadrangle (the quadrangle that borders the site
quadrangle to the east). Glyptemys muhlenbergn (bog turtle) has been identified on the site
quadrangle The bog turtle is a federally listed threatened species due to similarity in appearance.
Bog turtles inhabit bogs, wet pastures and wet thickets. We `did not observe, this species or suitable
habitat,for this species on the site.
6b
The streams on the site have not, been designated as trout waters Federally protected endangered
and'threatened fish species have not been documented for the site quadrangle or the quadrangle that
borders the site to the east

7b
The site contains wooded land. PEI consulted the NCSHPO web site to determine if there are mapped
historic cultural resources on the site or adjacent properties Mapped properties were not identified
on the site or adjacent properties (Screen -shot included below).

AGENT AUTHORIZATION
This form authorises PEI to, act as our agent in.'strearn /wetland matters ,including U.S. Army
Corps of 'Engineers-,and' North Carolina Division of Water Resources field verification and
permitting:
'Property Address: 350 fjS tie TAI2K: Z -V D
LOT' #_1`0
k0u I r45 MP3 !SA u ik4 ,"'C_ -Z" 00-7
Owner Information:
Name: PC i tom i►,?Cr UM7-j7-DI?6S L-L-r.
Address: 4K L t�'i�,►2K, t..A+:�Irl_ 50 1 i-E Coo
Telephone Number: g `a -g "GS — 23-61
Fax Number:, 41 c_..a-' 1$3 - G21SE
E- mail,Address: r CL, %NA\,:J0VyA yl� V _[, VC Co M
T
Signature: Date:

KIN
t 1 '
eullOJe'J41ON'WWS-tlswM Z g I I
PAIS 4ed es!dJOW3 09C g
a �
sajn ;uan Bul.1008 is ed
JOj ial Jolm j y $
w D U m Q
I $ a
i
�Doli!8llffi N I I I Iiii1' mv•ati i�� 3 2
=3
Flit 4.91
��lJ fib¢ T•�*>a • #E31i�e® m R ; `� '`�/ , .. .�.. s
Ike
i
I
Ul
W Q i 11 °— -- I
3B 1 — -- -- ••— fly
1
I l i I i •t �v / / !I . _
• i 1 '� ' 4 i/ - - - - - -- c
oe
j / t
`• �/•`--------
- - - --I
------------------ 1
1
l iI ; 4
e
i
i i I Slla I dda
M'0' w0 . i� •t ar\
4\ \ \\ ruxro
/ �f�d� +� �� `� ✓�� �� S� � `,�; "ham \ �.°F
l
Jlp
41 Jlp
jj gg77�� j p � � � ®� q, , '►� i oy � ` �`.
�' �
�����;<R��y�e�f����i ! ai8� ar8; a.6.; ,y�� �0 �s� ,r� •., w
•wl.oeZ���P p'q_
w o U m a

ewjaeO 4UoN 'weleg- U01RUIM'
N p tioJa4 —PNB >ued esud/e1u3 OSE Z < _
sain ;uan uil��o8 is ad
a-
m j
''+!+!SSA- ��,{{�
^ � �� 22 uu77 bliil i �y�� \� � �J U' ❑ 3
LLI L)
co
Y 5 I I (r : my • v
_�I
p� � B_ � y3 r5 {� I�+ "gam '� k $g hill,
I �i 'v^'''w'v' � �g 13 � i5 ex c „E•'°`. s,-� aGy �.a 0�8Q� �� �Q'�n3 ] y�Ijyp��� = g
I I ' 7 i l l ! i �� a a it qq� o It
z
fil-
X S
to
^ d tt
/ ' ad
gg 8 ;e , i te+a - - - - - -- - - --
Imo:%
J
- -- -- - ----- - ---- ------ ---- ---'
Q@ d) ;
!I
QE
vu Ft
it
pI /
�x`r4-��`,_ //�
`
1
�— -- - -- t t 1. p a
'I °I I°� 9I�/ _ y �' e f�f ' �% dpf • r I�9�' j I
Q/\— —Y' I / I`— - - - - - -- _ -- -- III
Jill ✓
� §fig a '�I I \ � I i i ,,� ;•�., '^ 'ti+' � � /.:° ' I I• �„''
NN .�' ,r I\ }
ow
—\
1 o
get
tee+
� Pfd u'"`,'`' `�✓ ^r�"' dp "''�' q` `�` a d�� ^�,
�p
'''Y�b �4an
aL�9�RSPPW °CP�WW apF `7ER a °�'
4`A
yy^Rt�$�93yvn�9F a aefi, apfi ar6 ° N Y �'
,yam �
_JJJJ J na�oo�nirsc ;& - e A / e �t
ui ❑ U m Q

„ g eulaeO VON 'uwleSuOlsulM �
z y tio�e ,P c r” rJ PNB Od esudiew3 OSE a g R
M
sa,n ;uan BUIMOG Is ed Z v
o0 8 I I I I> imv• a�
� � y, � � � I °�t S � �' � � � � � i � IE 3 �1 � 81�, if � � � � �'g '� '� � �?G; I° � `� �-•0i� w{'` � `� � ������ � �
h,
@ A / n I I F I I n31
Lu 114,
QL ix
1( Ul
ui
Q s
'w
r
�
lair
F ` .�A I' I f I , I �— �,��,��'!x" • ,q 1 [19� /y�° / �
x, — - - - - -- �' �' > '� $ e ire I�•°
/ ! t I �/ € `�' �' l I < I ';, /'/ i I I ' $6�4 9Q@ a eaeqeq
°��"•o` � r / ��� , •` ` 9a a %� I EI I A 1 / I, I " `�� ° j / /� /°,> � _ .ca k � � �a. a=» � ' ,I' c �t , 6 j A� d p / '.�/°> ' / r o aa.> y I , d' 1 i I I I I II . � at e� � �ggtl� }�• �B H$I 01' �$ 610
1
� ` `\ '�y \ i I/ I � . /��i •d / I� +1 / % � � rw -- y � '' I � I � $�����6�'8����$E3�
/ - — — — --
\\ - ---------- - - - ---
� ' I I I •�.rd': --' . =' _ °'` '� � @ as _ I ...wD
` 3 \I � ice' p°•' j ', \ R � �, / �
➢�, ads % 3g�9�$, ��, ;e�•� � I�I i li ��� ,:' --- •ae��,.;;�v'�/ i�w� °��i ^ �'!1 J I ,^,°,
Nil
im
lit
4¢ !9 3 i� � H•� �jzlg' �� M5
4F �HIM,
�
C
� a
¢QEry}ry +
g \ \ \ S
��� a -`i�K ��E5� �y \ -- �- � ^m --___ �'�``��'� • � aka \�\ \- \ sna3vnw
s \
a�■
lip
moll $h fill; 5. a :5. a :b.
tt � cb
W p U U m ¢
,1
r6yq¢ pk
SC��
R
/�g
[flRt
m
�
r
ii
�
EzE�
¢QEry}ry +
g \ \ \ S
��� a -`i�K ��E5� �y \ -- �- � ^m --___ �'�``��'� • � aka \�\ \- \ sna3vnw
s \
a�■
lip
moll $h fill; 5. a :5. a :b.
tt � cb
W p U U m ¢
,1

g a 2^ 9''9 S§ C eullaeo,LWON'w8IeS-uotsu'M
��` _ ry w PM8 Ved esud 81u3 09C g a
z k ,� > aZ: Za -
$ $ __ s< _ j, so_ m ;uop Builpog Is od
I'� a� �oovia i "� ,.,..,, v .101 1101 Jefle11 4 w
w p U m
300
LU
IE 4 � •� Y $ ate, E � gy $e 4
�aQIE ��� _ -� � a IV,
i aam. P $ � � Q a $ 9�i1
✓d i
m
�. w @yy yyg�Ia gy °m qg g 1y
L�,`a.R d) � d i • .+ d • A .I a
>
I I h
'/�// //'
lie
p y a
j 'RP
Y
A
A OLi R
W
111 n Ye
�8� w � '�. I � ''dG.aa. �� • A � I
dd
�o6`°;,
KK$ I
I 3
i I -1 li li & --
�z
t� S°>,'n
II I
- e►
1�9k� ,'•>_ \.4 : +i/,' `'
OR Ea% ,533 Y 1c4'�9 3tta.E °,I 13 I� ! � i \ t 1.T. ___'°�l:�r,'►!,•%y �.et
M 11
Jill /
Rp2 �vr
Tp^•
a °
° 9 @E8@ d C hiY 'pl 3�x�wewaN�ayywwwgqIwwww 3 g? _�� 3Rg w ;� As�
HIM p$ 5'x,1 E �ERy�2�99y?gyj9rR = � ^dafi� dafi� drc5� O � ? �aAS
w p U
le
I,
I
� # 9
d- � ° • N d
L
.,:3 �d� IFS ^ Y
Rp2 �vr
Tp^•
a °
° 9 @E8@ d C hiY 'pl 3�x�wewaN�ayywwwgqIwwww 3 g? _�� 3Rg w ;� As�
HIM p$ 5'x,1 E �ERy�2�99y?gyj9rR = � ^dafi� dafi� drc5� O � ? �aAS
w p U
le
I,
I
� # 9
Z
6
g
5
✓tY
_
Zap �
�b
dO v
Rp2 �vr
Tp^•
a °
° 9 @E8@ d C hiY 'pl 3�x�wewaN�ayywwwgqIwwww 3 g? _�� 3Rg w ;� As�
HIM p$ 5'x,1 E �ERy�2�99y?gyj9rR = � ^dafi� dafi� drc5� O � ? �aAS
w p U
le
I,
I
� # 9
m
I
� a
pr �11 �g
✓tY
_
Zap �
�b
dO v
m
I
� a
pr �11 �g
Q
4�a
Zap �
Q

^
®111011010101101010101111111111
�..... � � f l l l l l l ,__ -_ -•
II11.1. 1 � 1 p
1111.1:11 ��.I.I.I.I.I.I.
I1,1'l�i i-.I:I:I. I�I I I C :�
E�11111�1 11.1:111:1; Wli I -
fie[— - �
n
—_ -- �IYIYYY
' II� '�,'
11101 E9a999a9
�0c8a99998a0a8s9 a
10C 0
M® all
Ilia
>.. � 097309J9
mo�oo E aaeade�a
�:0�00 09999999
�i000 110�0003�
•
M101011010101101010101101101101
UNION:
i'I14E�
��nI�EEE
tEE�13EEE
�1d10110101011010101011011011B1
QUIY'lll
]
I:t..Su.YYY
111111111111111111111111111111
101011010191191010101191101101
m010110101111910101911911111011
919119191111919191911911111911,
101011010111110101011011111011
710101111111101010101101101101
'
®�1�110101111010101011011111�11
M10101101010110101010110
1191101
Milli
1111101101110111111111
81010
10101011010101011
0
101010101010910191010010010011
8111111111011111111
�
11111111111
811�1�11�101011�1�1011111011111
�01010�1�101�010101�IIAIA011A10
�010�10101810010101010010110010
X111191111011011111110111011010
it i I iii1� !' 'i1111 i� ii
A Y V
d a
III' � 9E9E9E r—�� i�j'y O' u
• � J i
Q f
i
��., _� o
N
ddd °°e" � � � •� p
1 9R[ ®¢ppp4ap
Y
MOROLlVON'uraleS- uoisulM
p1481�ed asudialu3 p5E
w
cm
_ +Ps sajn ;uaA uil ; ;og as ed N`W
� aa
•••.. o 1 �e Lei
Mhh p
: m
Im
s
m
m.
O !
r
i _.. I H,
p
I 'I �!
IN m �
9 till I$ Q r 1e! t m
L�J
J
a
t�W
a°
M
TM
7
�� #1�� @!�
��� E 6P+ .i � A A � Yl��i♦ 9
J
° B S
Ip
d
1 §„P Blsrtl: e s
J
"o
rm
JI—
INU
J1
yi
°ia
lip,
�q
e
�S
�Q
9'8 =
f
0
e
e
e°
$8
boa 8$
a
' It
�I
all t t
�1 I gdid
d
z
° II °$ ° II °, E s I I I a s
I � m
s 1 I #8>V #: #8>; #8n,?.; g •i$ '� ,Q @}I 'li; I, � i `� 9' $i I ,� � s 3'a � � ; � �� 1� s @
air! a 9 g e a @@ #� �8 �'� �:# s;•� }I ¢a� i § �a'§
����•' -' � �I'�g °�8� �;�$� � � �' 9 1� ��' �`E��� �� a3 �I ��g� �itl. a� �p �9€ a3�+ �q�� $'s3 '� 1 _ , J - I i ! �_� � W � - �
�..... � � f l l l l l l ,__ -_ -•
II11.1. 1 � 1 p
1111.1:11 ��.I.I.I.I.I.I.
I1,1'l�i i-.I:I:I. I�I I I C :�
E�11111�1 11.1:111:1; Wli I -
fie[— - �
n
—_ -- �IYIYYY
' II� '�,'
11101 E9a999a9
�0c8a99998a0a8s9 a
10C 0
M® all
Ilia
>.. � 097309J9
mo�oo E aaeade�a
�:0�00 09999999
�i000 110�0003�
•
UNION:
i'I14E�
��nI�EEE
tEE�13EEE
QUIY'lll
]
I:t..Su.YYY
Mhh p
: m
Im
s
m
m.
O !
r
i _.. I H,
p
I 'I �!
IN m �
9 till I$ Q r 1e! t m
L�J
J
a
t�W
a°
M
TM
7
�� #1�� @!�
��� E 6P+ .i � A A � Yl��i♦ 9
J
° B S
Ip
d
1 §„P Blsrtl: e s
J
"o
rm
JI—
INU
J1
yi
°ia
lip,
�q
e
�S
�Q
9'8 =
f
0
e
e
e°
$8
boa 8$
a
' It
�I
all t t
�1 I gdid
d
z
° II °$ ° II °, E s I I I a s
I � m
s 1 I #8>V #: #8>; #8n,?.; g •i$ '� ,Q @}I 'li; I, � i `� 9' $i I ,� � s 3'a � � ; � �� 1� s @
air! a 9 g e a @@ #� �8 �'� �:# s;•� }I ¢a� i § �a'§
����•' -' � �I'�g °�8� �;�$� � � �' 9 1� ��' �`E��� �� a3 �I ��g� �itl. a� �p �9€ a3�+ �q�� $'s3 '� 1 _ , J - I i ! �_� � W � - �

BUIP80 yuoN'WOMS- u03suM
PAI8 )Ped 8sudi81u3 05£ u�
°
san ;uan uIMOD is ad i ~ s
Lu
°
U
m
Q,
L/
i
Ij �
'atl a
929 656 y
p
l�q�
� 4
DCSes
p
Q
qq
6
.J
In C[8 ��
In w
9i3
lE4
\
■3pG C Q y5
Y6bq Fb�C d §O
'&p
\a
_
F
LU
•��
5y ��JY��
�
Y5�2
a�i
8 6 °
Z dj ��
d�
� ry
w
lu
y
J
9
T0
RO 4;�e
66 w
4
w
Wa
Ul
Ilk,
'Nb # I Oil i6 Is
of ih •�
� [ � � �p�� ��. ��
a
\
(j�{qpp
pp$is
3 o�iff
56 EE p2
Yq V i
'
it
\
\
i
[ F } B 4M
u
T ytgtl
U W
$ J � pppp
\
�W j 9
WF
p•`j$
W
b
YY 71�� dUl o e H n
g h
S bb
mid
nW
a
1 a
�I L—LI
6
hh
,11 a� ^ j a
di�>
$
11'' le 1 1%
9 3 4 4
'y�
'0p
i
?
' 6 6 92
lilt,
i
h 1"n oil [•
pq
R m
Kpn
p
gg j b 7
u$g�
mu
m
V
^1 a
O
o. N W 4
c1 0 9
0 0�
Q bm6
}
>ll))))) cccc�c�((r(rrrrrrrrrrrr R
a
9�
0 e
00
9p
e
n
l��lllll�ll�l
�lll>llll
((r(((((
y�
W
O
U
m
Q

Cl)
ate;
ME C.)
ME
CO)
LAJ
CO)
d)
CY) 0-
0
a)
tu 6 LLJ CI C1
LL
LL,
W _30
0 oc W 4
0 C/)
LI) z
LLI
W 47
�; E,,� A�A�� Ir LULU
W 19, H
gm 02, d)W
mill
.0
< c'),
Cq:
CN
lu oil
----- -----------
---- --- ------
J-! Eg
FOUND
-4 w
fj -STONE
_2� c%
d- Jn
................
f LLAf
.01
1z
40+ 07, VV SQ//
r
jo.
X,
2
. ......... ..
V
till -------------
•i�
Ole
e�e
04
P0
4! -
CL
? gk,
wz
qk
--- Cos
4C ,
teams - Lno
wos N,
IL
oars r
----------
'05
jl IN
uj
JU

I
✓LI
CA
I'lu
�j
%f.�� �� ` �,,��� iii � ,I 1
9-7
At
(L
z
I
ini
li
Z
SC
-i lu
In ui .
TZ 5 T,
4
41t
jai
.,� � J
(owl
136e.
Ul
Y1
0 0
AY,
1 -44 4 If
--------------
co U.,
Ow)
I C
C-4
'10
CN
fait
AM . 11
Vic
fro
cl)
A
;,
A)
Cl)
<
z
CL
0 '=�
OD
>
in-
Ix
6
o
CO)
.O
o
a.
l.-
a):
V
z
0
6 t
0 f
Lu,
M.0
w
LO
wo ,
z V)
W
ce)
W
1
u
.,� � J
(owl
136e.
Ul
Y1
0 0
AY,
1 -44 4 If
--------------
co U.,
Ow)
I C
C-4
'10
CN
fait
AM . 11
Vic
fro
i
JU
z � _
A
;,
A)
i
JU
z � _

e4
NCDEHR
North Carolina Department of Environment,and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
Scott Jamison
Pepsi Bottling Ventures, Inc.
4141 Park Lake Blvd Suite 600
Raleigh,,NC 27612
Project: 350 Entei,phse Park Boulevard
Michael Ellison, Director
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
May'27, 2014
John E Skvarla, III
Secretary
Expiration of Acceptance: November 27. 2014
County: roisyth
This is a conditional acceptance letter. The purpose,of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP) is willing'to accept payment for compensatory mitigation,for impacts associated with the above referenced project
asmidicated m,the table below Please note that this decision does not assure that participation,in the NCEEP will be,approved,bythe
permrt'issumg agencies,asiimitigation foi, project, impacts It is the responsibility,ot'f lie •apphcant to contact these agencies totdeterrnine
if payment to the NCEEP iv111 be approved° You must also comply with all other state, fed`eral'or'local government' perm its.,
iegulatjons,or`authorizations associated ,,,v ith_the„propose&activity mcludingy SL 2009 -337 An, Act to Promote,the Userof
Coiripensafor'y Mitigation Banks.as emended by
S L 2011-34'
Tlu§acceptancers valid for sip, months from, the !date of;this,letter and.-is not`nansferable If°we have, not, received a,copyof the,
issued 404 Permit/401 Certification /LAMA permit within this.time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's
responsibility to send copies of the permits to'NCEEP Once NCEEP receives axopy of the peinut(s) an invoice v ill be issued based
on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must be,made prior to conducting the author i'zed work The amounrofthe in-
Lieu Fee to be paid to NCEEP by an applicant is calculated base&upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed at www nceep net
Based,onrthe informationsupplied by y6u7m youi request,to -,use theNCEEP. theampacts that,may iequu,e compensatory mitigation
are summarized in the following'table_ The amount ofanitigation required and assigned,to NCEEP for this impact is determined by
permitting agencies and may exceed the impact amounts shown,below
River
Basic
I
CU
Location
Stieam (feet)
Wetlands (acres)
Buffer I BuHei I
(Sq- F't) (Sq Ft )
Cold
Cool
Warm
Ri arias
=-
NoneAt arias Coastal di—gh
Yadkin
03040101
0
0
299 **
0
0 0
U 0
Impact
EEP will provide either Warm or "Coal sti;eam credit for this impact.
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will takeiresponsibiliry for providing the compensatory mitigation The mitigation will be performed
in accordance with the N C Department of Environment,and Natural Resources' Ecosystem Enhancement Program In -Lieu Fee
Instrument,dated July 28, 20,10, Thank you for yourlinteiest;in the NCEEP If you have any questions or need,additronal
information, please contact Kelly Wdliarns,ati(9'19) 707 =89'1.5'
Si-- erely.
_ 3
Jar e . B Stanfill
Asset Management Supervisor
CC' 'Sue Homewood, NCDWR Winston -Salem
,John Thomas, USAGE- Raleigh
Bradley Luckey, agent
File
16521Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North:Carolina 27699 71652
Rhone, 91192707'89_76 \Jnternet-www,ncdenr gov.
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer- Made in part by recycled paper

APPROVED,JURISDiCTiONAL DETERMINATION FORM_'
U.S' Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided.in Section iV of the JD Form instructional Guidebook
SECTION i• BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED.JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD).
B_ DISTRICT OFFICE, FiLE NAME, AND NUMBER: Raleigh, 350 Enterprise Park Boulevard, PEI Project 1034
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: _
State NC County/parish/borough Forsyth City Winston -Salem
Center coordinates ofsite,(lat/long m,degree4ecimal format) Lat 36 036872° N „Long , -80 142189°
Universal Transverse. Mercator
Name of nearest waterbody Sawmill Branch
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) Into which the aquatic resource flows Muddy Creek
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 03040101
Check if map /diagram of review area and/or potential Jurisdictional areas is /are availableiupon request
Check it other sites (e g , offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc ),are associated with this4ction and are recorded on a
different JD form
D REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SiTE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination Date
Field Determination Date(s) ,P,Ei visited the, site on June 25, 2014 to, confirm the delineation performed'by others
SECTION 11: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There fir, ._ e"IMM "navigable waters of the U S ” within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) Jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area, [Required]
Waters subject to theSebb and flow of the tide
Waters are presently used, or have been „used in the past, „or may be,susceptible`for use to transport interstate'oi foreign commerce
Explain
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There e "waters,of the US, "'within Clean Water Act (CWA),jurisdiction (as,d'efined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area [Required]
1. Waters ofthe U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U S. in- review area (check all that apply): '
F1 TNWs, including territorial seas
Wetlands adjacent to TN,Ws
Relatively permanent waters' (RPWs),that,flow directly,or indirectly" into TNW's
Non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
I Wetlands adjacent to but,not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
impoundments of jurisdictional waters
Isolated (mterstate'or intrastate) waters, including. isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non - wetland waters 500 linear feet 3 -6 width (ft) and/or acres
Wetlands 0 25 acres
e: LimiW(boundaries) of jurisdiction based on
Elevation of established OHWM (if known) Unknown -
2 Non - regulated waters /wetlands (check if applicable):3
ffl, Potentially jurisdictional waters and/,or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to,be not jurisdictional
Ezplairr
'Boxes checked,below shall be'supported by completing the; appropriate ,sections,injSectiomlll ,below
2'For purposes of this form, an RPW'is defined as a tributary that is, not a TNW and thattypically flows,year- "round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e g , typically 3 months)
"Supporting documentation is presented in Section iii F

SECTION III. CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNR's and wetlands adjacent to,TNR's. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Sectioglll.A.l and Section fH.D.I. only; if the aquatic resource,is °a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section HLD.1.; otherwise, se0ection,I11.B below
1 TNW
Identify TNW-
Summarize rationale supporting determination
Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "`adjacent"
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (,THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (iF ANY):
This section,summanzes information regarding characteristics of the,tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any „and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met
The-agencies will assert jurisdiction over,non- navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters” (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typicallyflow,year -round or, have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly =abuts an RPW is atsoqurisdictional. i "the aquatic resource is not a TNW, bufhas year -round
(perennial) flow; skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abutran,RPW requires aisigmficant nexus evaluation—Corps districts and
EPA regions wdlanclude in the-record any available information that documents the existence ofa significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though;a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody"'is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting,an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with,a TNW if the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This sign ificanUnexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes,;the tributary,and all of its,adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. if the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands; completeiSection 11I.13 1' for
the tributary, Section IIi.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section iII B 3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section HI.0 below.
1. Characteristics,of non -TNWs that flow directly or4ndirectly'mt6` TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size des'
Drainage area a` ties
Average-annual rainfall inches
Average annual snowfall inches
(u) Physical Characteristics
(a) Relationship with TNW
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW
❑ Tributary flows through Niek =L 9t tributaries before,entermg'TNW
Project waters,are M"ick's nver miles from TNV
Project waters are river miles from RPW
Project waters are aerial (str aight) miles from TNW
Project waters are Pig A aerial (straight) miles front RPW
Project waters °cross or serve =as,state boundaries Explain
identify flow route to TNW'
Tributary stream order, if known
' Note that the instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West
' Flow route-can be described by identifymg, e g , tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow mto,tributary b, which,then flows into TNW

(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply)
Tributary is ❑ Natural
❑ Artificial (man -made) Explain
❑ Manipulated (man - altered) Explain Debris fields located upgradient of streams
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate)
Average width feet
Average depth feet.
Average side �slopes'E�ist.
Primary tributary substrate composition,(eheck all that apply)
'❑ Silts ❑ Sands ❑ Concrete
❑ Cobbles ❑ Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation Type /% +cover
❑ Other Explain
Tributary condition /stability [e g , highly erodmg, sloughing banks] Explain
Presence of run /riffle /pool complexes Explain
Tributary geometry Ftc is
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope) %
(c) Flow
Tributary provides for Eck =:ist
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year- (� " °;st
Describe flow regime
Other information on duration and volume
Surface flow is fit ' "" t. Characteristics`
Subsurface flow Lie Lkt Explain findings
❑ Dye (or other) test performed
Tributary has (check all that apply)
❑ Bed and banks
❑ OHWM' (check all indicators that apply)
❑ clear natural line impressed on the bank
❑ changes,m the character of soil
❑ shelving
1:1 vegetation matted down, bent; or absent
❑ leaf litterdisturbed or washed away
❑ sediment,deposrtion
❑ water staining
❑ other (list)
❑ Discontinuous OHWM ' Explain
If factors,other than,the OHWM were used to determ
High Tide Line indicated by 91
❑ oil onscum line along shore objects
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
❑ physical markings /characteristics
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list)
❑ the presence of htter and debris
❑ destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑ the presence of wrack line
❑ sediment sorting
❑ scour
❑ multiple observed or predicted flow,events
❑ abrupt change in plant community
ine lateral extent of CWAjurisdiction (check all that,apply)
Mean High Water Mark indicated by
❑ survey to available datum,
❑ physical markings,
❑ vegetation lines /changes in vegetation types
(m) Chemical Characteristics:
Clid'racterize tributary (e g , water color is clear, discolored, oily film, water,quality, general watershed characteristics, etc )
Explain
Identify specific pollutants, if known
6A natural or man -made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e g , where the stream temporarily flows,underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices) Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e g , flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break
'Ibid

(v) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian corridor Characteristics (type, average width)
❑ Wetland fringe Characteristics
❑ Habitat,for
0 Federally Listed species Explain findings
❑ Fish/spawn areas Explam'tindmgs
❑ Other environmentally- sensrtrvepspecies Explain findings
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity Explain findings
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non -TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics
Properties'
Wetland size acres
Wetland type Explain s,
Wetland quality Explain
Project wetlands cross{or -serve as state boundaries Explain
(b) General Flow Relationship,with Non -TNW
Flow is c1c��List Explain- ,Saturated to surface
Surface flow is:
KIM
Characteristics
Subsurface flow ,pi' Explain findings
❑ Dye,(or other) test performed
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non -TNW
❑ Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection Explain
❑ Ecological connection Explain
❑ Separated by berm/barrier Explain
(d), Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are tek [:Ist river miles from TNW
Project waters are. 1 J aerial (straight) miles,from TNW
Flow °is from c
Estimate approximate location of'wetland as within theyy "rlcl floodplam
(n) Chemical Characteristics*
Characterize wetland system (e g , water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface, water quality, general watershed
characteristics, etc ) Explain
Identify specific pollutants, if known Unknown
(w) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer Characteristics (type,daverage width)
❑ Vegetation type /percent,cover Explain
❑ Habitat for
❑ Federally Listed species Explain findings
❑ Fish /spawn areas Explain findings
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species Explain findings
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity Explain findings
3. Characteristics,of,all wetlands,adlacent to the tributary (if,any�
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis ickI—As-,
Approximately +( ) acres in total;are being considered in the cumulative analysis

For each wetland „specify the following
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts %(Y /N ) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological chemical and physical functions being performed
C. SIGNIFICANT'NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by-any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affecuthe chemical, physical, and biological integrity
,of a TNW,. For each ofthe followingrsituations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with,all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a,speculatrve or`lnsubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and /or biological integrity of aTNW.
Considerations when evaluating sigmficantmexus include, but are,not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine,sigmficant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between,a tributary and the TNW.). Similarly, the fact,an,adjacent wetland,lies within or
outside of a tloodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as� identified in the Rapanos,Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the,trnbutary, in combination, with its adjacen6wetlands (if any,), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or'to reduce�the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a'TNW?
• Does thvtnbutary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and hfecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young.for species that are present'm the TNW9
• Does the tributary, m combination With its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon,that
supportidownstream ,foodwebs9
• Does the tnbutary,'m combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any); have other relationships,to the,physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW
Note: the above list of considerations;is not inclusive andother functions observed or known to,occur should be documented
below:
1. Significant nexus findings'for non -RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs Explain
'Findings of .,presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go'to Section III'D
2 Significant nexus findings for non -RPW and its adjacent wetlands,,where the non -RPW "flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs Explain findings of presence,or�absence of,sigmficant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III'D They are�connected directly to RPWs on this site
3 Significant nexus findings, for wetlands adjacent'to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence,or�absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of rts+adjacent,wetlands, then you
Section III D The wetlands are located in the tloodplams�adjacent to the streams and in other areas are connected by non=
jurisdictional drainage features
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. TH&SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY)-
TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and pride size estimates in review area
ER TNWs linear feet width (ft), Or, acres
MWetlandsiad)acent to TNWs acres
2. RPWs`that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year -round are jurisdictional Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial Perenmal,on NC DWQ Stream Form
Tributaries,of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally” (e g , typically'three,montlls each year) are
jurisdictional Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III'B Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally

Provide,estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply)
0 Tributary waters 500 linear feet 3 -6 width (ft)
0 Other non - wetland waters acres
ldent6 type(s) of waters
Non -RPWss that flow threctly'or indirectly into TNWs
C5 Waterbody thatlis not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus wrth,a
TNW is juusdicttonal Data supportmg,this conclusion'is`provided at Section iii C
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply)
IM Tributary waters linear feet width (ft)
iM Other =non - wetland waters acres
identify type(s) of waters
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands directly abut RPW,and thus are jurisdictional as,adjacent wetlands
Wetlandssdtrectly abutting an RPW'where,tributanes typically flow year -round Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is,perenmal in Section Iii D 2,,above Provide, rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW Wetland Determination Data Forms in ECS report (attached).
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW`where tributaries typically flow "seasonally " Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section iii Band rationale in'Section 111 1) 2, above Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area acres
Wetlands adjacent to but-,not directly'abuttmg an RPW thatifloW directly or indirectly into TNWs.
' Wetlands that do,not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with -the tributary wwhich they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section iii C
Provide,acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the fevieW'area acres
Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands,adjacent to such,Watefs, and have whemconsidered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similar ly,situated,adjacentwetlands have a significant hex-us with a TNW are jurisdictional Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section iii C
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands m,the review area acres
impoundments of jurisdictional waters v
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary femams jurisdictional
Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U S or
Demonstrate'that water meets the criteria for one,of the categories presented above (1 -6), or
Demon strate.that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below)
E. ISOLATED ]INTERSTATE OR iNTRA- STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD,AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY').10
0 which are orcould be used,by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes
from which fish or,shellfsh are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce
® which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries -m interstate commerce
interstate isolated wafers Explain
nh Other factors Explain
"See Footnote # 3
v To complete the analysis refer to the`key m'Section iii D 6 of the instructional Guidebook
10 Pnor,to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category,,Corps Districts will elevate'the action to Corps�and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos

Identify-water body and summarize rationale supporting,determmatdon
Provide estimates for Jurisdictional waters.m the review area (check all that apply)
'Tributary waters- linear feet width (tt)
Other non- wetland'waters acres
Identify type(s) of waters
Wetlands acres
F. NON - JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
If potential wetlands were,assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/orappropnate Regional Supplements
Review area•mcluded isolated,waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC" the review area would'have been regulated based sole) on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR)
4 Waters,do not meet the "'Significant Nexus" standard, where such a findmg�is`required for Jurisdiction Explain
4 Other (explain, if not coveted above)
Provide acreage estimates for non - jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of Jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i e , presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
Judgment (check all that apply)
Non = wetland waters (i a „rivers, streams) linear feet width (ft)
Q Lakes /ponds acres
Q Other non - wetland waters acres List type of aquatic resource
Wetlands acres
Provide acreage estimates for non - jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the, "Significant Nexus" standard, where�such
a finding is required for Jurisdiction (check.all that apply)
Non - wetland waters,(i a -, rivers, streams) linear feet, width (ft)
❑ Lakes /ponds acres
❑ Other non - wetland waters acres List type of aquatic resource ,
'[„ Wetlands acres
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES
A SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD,(cheek all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where, checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below)
Maps, plans, plots or plat,submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/cohsultant
❑ Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report
❑ Office doesmot concur with data sheet`s /delineation report
n Data sheets prepared by the Corps
Corps navigable waters' study
U S Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas
❑ USGS NHD data
❑'USGS 81and.12 digit HUC maps
U S Geological Survey map(s) Cite scale & quad name Lake 'Brandt , 1 "= 2,000'
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Sod Survey Citation NRCS Web,Soil Survey
® National wetlands inventory map(s) Cite name
State-/Local wetland inventory map(s)
FEMA/FIRM maps
100 -year Floodplam Elevation is (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs ® Aerial (Name & Date) GIS Map /Aerial Photo Dated 2010
or ❑ Other (Name & Date)
Previous determination(s) File no and date of response letter
Applicable /supporting case law
Q Applicable /supporting scientific literature
® Other information (please specify,)
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD- Unnamted tributaries to Sawmill Branch are located on the site Wetlands abut the
tributaries

S CAROLINAS, LLP "Setting the Standard for Service„
Geotechnicai •Construction Matenalsi° Environmental--- Facilities NGRegmteredEngmeenngFtrmF -9016
July 9, 2013
Mr, Allan, Hill
Triad Design Group
4807 -C Koger Boulevard
Greensboro, North Carolina 27407
Reference Report of Wetland Delineation
Union Cross Business Park — Lot 1'0
Approximate 10 39 Acre Tract
350 Enterprise Park Boulevard
Forsyth County,, North Carolina
ECS, Project',No 09- 22830A
Dear Mr Hill
ECS Carolinas, LLP (ECS) is pleased to submit this report of the jurisdictional waters /wetland
delineation for the site located at 350 Enterprise Park Boulevard in Forsyth County, North
Carolina This report summarizes our findings for the site
Background
The site is an approximate 10 39' acre tract (Figure 1) The site is identified, by the Forsyth
County GIS as PIN' 6863 -24 -3146 00 The site contains undeveloped wooded land The site is
being evaluated for future development ECS was contracted to delineate jurisdictional waters
including ponds, streams and wetlands on the site The property boundaries were not marked
in the field at the time of our site visit
Wetlands are, defined by the U S Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the United States
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as "those areas that are inundated or saturated by
surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and under normal
circumstances, do support a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil
conditions "' In order for an area to be classified as wetland, hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils,
and wetland hydrology indicators must be present
Literature Review
We,reviewed the USGS Topographic Map, the Soil Survey of Forsyth County and the Geologic
Map of North Carolina'to obtain information regarding the site
The USGS Topographic Map (Figure 1) shows an unnamed tributary to Sawmill Branch
crossing the northern portion of the site The map shows additional drainage swales that
could contain surface waters or wetlands on the central portion of the site and near the
western site boundary
4811 Koger Blvd, Greensboro, NC 27407 • T- 336 - 856 -7150 • F 336- 856 -7160 - wwmecsiimited.com
ECS Captcat Si races, FILL - ECS Cdrorhas, LLP • ECS C mtd, RIC • ECS t7orda, LLC • ECS MA -At ank, LLC - ECS MdAesl, LLC,- IECS Swtheast, LLC • ECS Trues, LLP

350 Enterpnse Park Boulevard
Forsyth County, North Carohna
ECS Project 09- 22830,
July 9, 2013
The Soil Survey of Forsyth County (Figure 2) indicates that soils on the site have been
mapped, as Pacolet sandy loam (PaF and PaD) and Wedowee sandy loam (WdC, WdB and
WeD) The Pacolet and Wedowee soil series consists of well drained, moderately
permeable soils that occur on piedmont uplands The mapped soils on the site are not
identified on the Forsyth County Hydric Soils List
The Geologic Map of North Carolina indicates that the site is located in the Piedmont
Physiographic Province In general, shallow, unconfined groundwater movement within the
overlying soils is controlled largely by topographic gradients Recharge occurs primarily by
infiltration along higher elevations and typically discharges into streams or other surface
water ,bodies The elevation of the shallow water table is transient and can vary with
seasonal fluctuations'm precipitation Movement in this water table `is generally from higher
to lower elevations As such, shallow groundwater would be expected to flow beneath the
site towards, the, U named tributary to Sawmill Branch
Site Reconnaissance
Mr David Brame of ECS conducted the site reconnaissance on July 5, 2013 During the
reconnaissance, the site was observed for evidence of ,streams, ponds and wetlands Ponds
are not located on the site Streams are located on the northern and central portions of the site
A third stream is located near the western site boundary The streams located on the northern
portion of the site and near the western site boundary have defined, beds and banks, meanders,
iron- oxidizing bacteria and contained flowing water at 'the time of our site visit Based on our
observations, these streams are perennial The stream located on the central portion of the site
originates as .an ,apparent groundwater discharge point, with an approximate two foot head -cut
This stream has a defined bed and bank, moderate substrate sorting and did not contain water
at the time of our site visit Based on our observations, this stream is intermittent The
centerlines of the streams were marked in the field with blue and,white striped surveyot tape
Wetland hydrology indicators, hydrophytic vegetation and hydric soils were observed in pockets
adjacent to the streams The wetland pockets appear to be located off site but near the site
boundaries ECS delineated the wetland boundaries since the site boundaries were not marked
in the field to insure that they do not encroach onto the site The wetlands are separated from
surrounding uplands by distinct topographic, vegetation breaks and /or soil breaks A Wetland
Determination Data Form that documents the conditions encountered on the site was completed
in the field by ECS The wetland boundaries were marked in the field with red and white striped
surveyor tape A survey of the wetland boundaries may be required if it is determined that they
extend onto the site
Figures 3 and 4 show the approximate locations of the streams, wetlands, data point and our
flag numbers Figures 3 and. 4 are based on our field notes and should only be used for
preliminary planning purposes We recommend that the delineation be verified by the USACE
and NCDENR -DWQ The delineation, including our stream designations, is subject to change
based on the agencies verification Following the verification, the flags should be surveyed to
determine the exact location and extent of the jurisdictional areas

350 Enterpn §e Park Boulevard
Forsyth County, ,North Carolina
ECS Pro�ecf 09 -22830
July 9, 2013
Watershed Classification
Unnamed tributaries to Sawmill Branch are located on the site According to the NCDENR-
DWQ, the site is located in the Yadkin- Pee Dee River Basin in an area that has been classified
as Class C Waters Based on the NCDENR -DWQ watershed classification, mandatory state
vegetative buffers are not required adjacent to the streams located on the site However„ local
buffer requirements may apply
General Discussion
Section 404 of ,fhe `Clean Water Act regulates the discharge of dredge and fill materials `into
waters of'the United States (lakes, rivers, ponds, streams, etc ), including wetlands Waters of
the United States include the territorial seas, navigable coastal and inland lakes, rivers and
streams, intermittent streams, and wetlands Activities that could be regulated under Section
404 'include the placement of fill for construction of roadways, residential, commercial or
industrial structures, and the construction of, water retention ponds along tributaries The EPA
and the USACE jointly administer the Section 404 program Section 401 of the Clean Water Act
grants each state the authority to approve, condition, or deny any Federal permits that could
result in a discharge-to State waters
Streams, ponds and wetlands are regulated by the USACE and NCDENR -DWQ Permits are
required prior to impacting wetlands or open waters, including ponds, lakes and perennial or
intermittent streams Mitigation and stormwater management plans will be a condition of any
permits, issued for the, site Additionally, buffers may be required adjacent to streams, and water
bodies
For impacts to one -half acre or more of wetlands or to more than 300 linear feet of stream
channel, an individual permit' (IP) may be, required An I requires a habitat analysis, alternative
site analysis., project justification, plans to, avoid and minimize impacts; ;and a proposed
mitigation plan Depending on the habitat analysis and the extent of impacts, an Environmental
Impact Statement may be required by the rU S' Army Corps of Engineers An IP allows for a
public comment period and may require 4 to 18 months to obtain depending on conditions
arising during the USACE review and pubhc`eomment period
3

350 Enterpnse,Park Boulevard.
Forsyth County, North ,Carohna
ECS Project 09 -22830
July 9, 2013
Closure
ECS appreciates the opportunity to provide wetland services for your project Please contact us
at (336) 856 -7150 if you have any questions concerning this report
Sincerely,,
ECS Carolinas, LLP
David S Brame Michael T Brame, PWS
Project Manager Environmental Principal
Attachments Figure 1 — Site Location Map
Figure 2 — Soil Map
Figure 3 — Approximate Stream/Wetland Flag Location Map
Figure 4 — Stream/Wetland Flag Map
Wetland Determination Data Form
4

I . A .'. _"� `.� / { 1 ��° • 1663 mow!
ti.
r
SITE
i
L 4� � �� ��� � is " ;• `y"'
`. ��{ �„_v" ((j ;,l i` � i }! `.� � .'a.- •.• vt ,.r• � ,.,t L .�l �' _ _� ; VIi)nit
_
t
4111--;1---
,'7 �K
�: �.l,� ! ter- � / � ✓��'� \,.i` • \- ( iJ - ��,1 �R.
� / a
1
N
SOURCE: FIGURE 1
USGS Topographic Map:
SITE LOCATION MAP
Winston Salem East, NC Quadrangle Approximate 10.39 Acre Tract
Dated 1950, Revised 1994 and 350 Enterprise Park Boulevard
Kernersville, NC Quadrangle Forsyth County, North Carolina
Dated 1969, Revised 1994
Scale: 1" = 2,000' ( .k ECS Project 09- 22830A

r pG
v PCC a „PaB �. ts , CCD
PcC2 �;cC2 "f F- 4 ?+ I �'weC op, �O Ccii
$ n ecc
PCC2+
eC r WeB a, is C�pz, c Ps � °" �• � v,� YVBB VaB WeC CCB
PdB .,' V
PC
{ APB
APB P ds
tu
.= Cc(� { ' APB CCB
J`
Wh
WtD Ch Hm92 Cep
C2 C C2 APC WeC WdC g.
wic' '4eSITE Pcb2, .. -
Pa
S' a.
\;eC
.✓ :Va fi � � CCB;
.> e
A Pr62 We
a[
WeC e� `'.'
l
I .
Lw'��N v t) � . le0 I a 1 "CCC
WdC �\
We(J WeC WdC dB
's�
Cu WeC\ !,a es'94r APB iPaC
e8 �y • �� 4 C I CCB
Vlr.B o }
.mot
S CCB
A APC
B / Y � � ACS WE t`
V Y r / y P APB j
W' WeB !� WdC 7
Ali
Pau, 3
v - '•� wee aU � WdC � >
WeC f - WeG APB
eB
B
A P e0 -t Y PaCeJ r QcC VA
1 WdB
we WdC
PcD2 '
"'Mc PaB �g C
* �. �� "AV IDS(3( _Pae
z � �
LEGEND
Approximate Site Boundary
Of I
FIGURE 2
SOURCE: - SOIL MAP
USDA Soil Survey of Forsyth County, NC Approximate 10.39 Acre Tract
Issued May 1976 350 Enterprise Park Boulevard
Sheet No. 47 Forsyth County, North Carolina
Scale: 1" - 1.320'.w ECS Project 09- 22830A

THE STREAM /WETLAND LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THIS MAP ARE APPROXIMATE. THEY HAVE BEEN DELINEATED BY ECS. THEY
HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY THE U.S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED.`
LEGEND �,"
Approximate Location of Site Boundary
pP �. �
A
t""%o Approximate Location of Perennial Stream.
Approximate Location of Intermittent Stream ,
Approximate Location of Wetland - T
■ Location of Data Point
I
N
SOURCE:
9
Forsyth County GIS
2010 Aerial Photograph and
ECS Field Notes
Approximate Scale: 1" = 200'
FIGURE 3
APPROXIMATE STREAM/WETLAND
LOCATION MAP
Approximate 10.39 Acre Tract
350 Enterprise Park Boulevard
Forsyth County, North Carolina
A ECS Project 09- 22830A

THE STREAM /WETLAND LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THIS MAP ARE APPROXIMATE. THEY HAVE BEEN DELINEATED BY ECS. THEY
VERIFIED BY THE U.S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS OR SURVEYED.
LEGEND
Approximate Location of Site Boundary
Approximate Location of Perennial Stream
Approximate Location of Intermittent Stream
Approximate Location of Wetland
■ Location of Data Point
SC 1 -58 I
WC 5 -17
SB 1 -37
WB 1-4
N
,r SOURCE:
Forsyth County GIS
2010 Aerial Photograph and
ECS Field Notes
Approximate Scale: 1" = 200'
FLAG NUMBERS /INFO
WETLAND FLAGS =
STREAM /POND FLAGS =
Stream Flags = 105
Wetland Flags = 41
Total Flags = 146
WC 31-41
SA 1 -7
SD 1 -3
WC 18 -30
FIGURE 4
STREAM/WETLAND FLAG MAP
Approximate 10.39 Acre Tract
350 Enterprise Park Boulevard
Forsyth County, North Carolina
ECS Project 09- 22830A

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM— Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site `350 Enterprise Park Boulevard City /County Winston -Salem /Forsyth Sampling Date 7/5/13
Applicant/Owner Forsyth County Development Corporation State NC Sampling Point DP -1
Investigator(s) Brame, ECS Carolinas Section, Township, Range
Landform (hdlslope, terrace, etc,) Floodplain Locahrelief (concave, convex, none) Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA)
Lat
Long
Datum
Sod Map'Unit Name WdC NWI classification
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation [:1 , Sod ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes M No ❑
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers,in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map�showing sampling point locations, transects,, important features„ etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes _ M No El
ICI Is the Sampled Area
Hydnc Soil Present? Wetland Yes � No JM within a Wetland? Yes F] No _M
Hydrology Present? Yes El No _M
Remarks Hydnc sod and wetland hydrology indicators are not present The,sampling point,is not located within a wetland
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ Water- Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave, Su rface;(g8)
❑ High Water Table;(A2)
❑ Aquatic Fauna,(B13)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑ Saturation,(A3)�
❑ True Aquatic Plants (614)
I�I Lines (616)
El Moss
❑ Water Marks (131)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
as
❑ Sediment Deposits (62)
❑ Oxidized Rh¢ospheres on Living Roots (C3)
El Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (63)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
❑, Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Thin Muck 'Surface,(C7)
❑ Stunted,or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Indundation Visiblefon,Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Geomorphic Position,(D2)
El Shallow Agwtard (D3)
El Microtopographic Rehef'(D4))
❑ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes r1
No, M Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes El
No JI��IL Depth (inches)
Saturation Present? Yes, _7
No _Jpt Depth (inches)
ICI
Wetland;Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No Z
includes capillary frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks Wetland hydrology indicators are not present
US Army Corps of'Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants Sampling Point DP -1
Remarks (Include photo numbers here,or on a separate sheet )
The dominant vegetation is hydrophytic
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot,size 30 feet )
% Cover
Species?
Status
1 Pmus taeda
20
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2 Liquidambar styraciflua
10
FAC+
That Are OBL - -, FACW, or. FAC 5 (A)
3 Llrodendron tulipifera
5
❑
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4
Species Across All Strata 5 (B)
5
5
L3
of'Dommant Species 100
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A/B)
That
❑
0
Prevalence Index worksheet
8
El
Total % Cover'of Multiply by
35
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
FACW�species x2=
Saplino /Shrub Stratum (Plot size 30 feet
)
FAC species x 3 =
1 Pmus,taeda
20
FAC
FACU species x 4 =
2 Liguidambar styraciflua
10
FAC+
UPL species x 5'=
g Prunus serotlna
5
❑
FACU
Column Totals (A) (B)
41
T❑
5
II
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
6 I—I
F-] F-] 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation,
7
8
-E:1
F]
M 2- Dominance Test is >50%
35
= Total Covey
❑ 3- Prevalence Index,is 53 '0'
4- Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
Herb Stratum (Plot size 30 feet )
_ data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
] Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
1
❑
2
❑
3
❑
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
4
❑
present, unless,disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
5
❑
6
❑
Tree – Woody,plants; excluding vines, 3 in (7 6' cm) or
7
❑
more In diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
8
❑
height
9 _
10
11
❑
❑
Sapling /Shrub – Woody plahts, excluding vines, less
*28
than 3 In DBWand greater than 3 ft (1 m),tall
12
❑
-
= Total Cover
Herb –All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants, less than 3 28 ft tall
Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3 28`ft in
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 30 feet
)
height
1_Toxicodendronradicans 30 FAC
2
3 _
❑
4
❑
5
❑
30
= Total Cover
Hydrophyfic
Vegetation M
F
Present? Yes No
Remarks (Include photo numbers here,or on a separate sheet )
The dominant vegetation is hydrophytic
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

JVIL
Profile Description (Describe to -the depth needed to document the mdicator,or confirm the absence of indicators )
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color�(moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc? Texture
0 -12 5YR,4 /6 100 L
aampung -omr
Remarks
'Type C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix
Hydnc Sod Indicators
for Problematic Hydnc Soils'
Histosol (Al)
F1 Stripped Matrix (S6)
IInndicators
1 2 cm Muck (At 0) (MLRA 147)
Histic'Epipedon (A2)
II Dark•Surface (S7)
I--I1
II Coast Prairie Redox (At 6) (MLRA 147,
II Black Histic (A3)
I�I
II Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA
148)
II Piedmont Floodplam Soils (F19) (MLRA
147, 148))
136, 147)
II' Hydrogen Sulfider(A4)
Eli Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Red-ParentWatenal (TF2)
Stratified Layers,(A5)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
II 2 dm, Muck (At 0) (LRR N))
II Depleted Matrix (F3)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
,Depleted'Below Dark Surface (At 1)
II Redox.Dafk'Surface;(F6)
Thick DarkSurface (Al2)
II Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Sandy'Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
I�I
1__l Redox Depressions (F8)
3Indicators of hydroph* vegetation and
wetland,hydrology must,be present, unless
MLRA 147,148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
II Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
disturbed or problematic
MLRA 136)
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Umbnc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19),(MRLA,148)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type
Depth (inches) Hydnc Sod Present? ❑ Yes No
Remarks Hydric soil indicators are not present
US Army'Corps of Engineers
,Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version