Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout820049_Routine_20220623FacilityNumber ivision of Water Resources 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency Type of Visit: &C`Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: &R-outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: Farm Name: Owner Name: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: Arrival Time: ! r ' 1 Departure Time: Owner Email: Phone: County;.5 — Region: Onsite Representative: Certified Operator: Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Title: Phone: Latitude: Integrator: Certification Number:,,. Certification Number: Longitude: Design Current Capacity Pop. Wean to Finish Wean to Feeder Feeder to Finish ? �'' Farrow to Wean i,'' Farrow to Feeder Farrow to Finish Gilts Boars Other Other Design Curren Capacity Pop. Layer Non -Layer Design Current Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Layers Non -Layers Pullets Turkeys Turkey Poults Other Cattle Design Current Capacity Pop. Dairy Cow Dairy Calf Dairy Heifer Dry Cow Non -Dairy Beef Stocker Beef Feeder Beef Brood Cow Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: n Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Ycs ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? n Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters n Yes 0-No ❑ NA ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge'? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued Facility Number: `6J,1 _ - 1 '1 Date of Inspection: (:) Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑"No ❑ NA ❑ NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑Yes No ❑NA El NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? n Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need n Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. n Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): 13. Soil Type(s): . • 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑`No ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes D.N o ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑" No ❑ NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? n Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes 0--No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑-No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code ❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? n Yes ❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? n Yes ❑'"No ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 5/12/2020 Continued Date of Inspection: 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No pi NA ❑ NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box(es) below. ri Failure to complete annual sludge survey ri Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge'? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond E Other: - Yes ❑ No No ❑ Yes ❑ Yes ❑ No ri NA ❑ NE n Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ Yes ❑ Yes No ❑` No 0-No ❑ NA 0 NA ❑ NA ❑ NA ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NE ❑ NE ❑ NE ❑ NE Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary). / 1 Reviewer/Inspector Name: Phone: Reviewer/inspector Signature: Page 3 of 3 Date: ) 5/12/2020 • ;1