NC0090051_Fact Sheet_20220711

Fact Sheet
NPDES Permit No. NC009005 1
Permit Writer/Email Contact: Derek Denard/[e-mail]
Date: 11Ju12022
Division/Branch: NC Division of Water Resources/Water Quality Permitting Section
Compliance & Expediated Permitting Branch
Fact Sheet Template: Version 28Mar2019
Permitting Action:
❑ Renewal
❑ Renewal with Expansion
New Discharge
❑ Modification (Fact Sheet should be tailored to mod request)
See Permit Application Attachment A_NC0090051_Application_20211021_103p and
B More Information Received _202202163p
Complete applicable sections below. If not applicable, enter NA.
1. Basic Facility Information
Facility Information
Applicant/Facility Name:
Georgia-Pacific Wood Products LLC / Georgia Pacific Dudley Plywood
Facility
Applicant Address:
139 Brewington Dr, Dudley, NC 28333
Facility Address:
139 Brewington Dr, Dudley, NC 28333
Permitted Flow:
Not limited
Facility Type/Waste:
Industrial Process & Commercial Wastewater Discharge/Wet Deck
Facility Class:
Physical Chemical Not Classified WPCS
Treatment Units:
Bark screen, Settling Pond (284,000 cubic feet, with a 88.3 hour
residence time), optional spill pond for further treatment (35,00 cubic
feet)
Pretreatment Program (Y/N)
N
County:
Wayne
Region
Washington
Briefly describe the proposed permitting action and facility background: Georgia-Pacific Wood Products
LLC [139 Brewington Dr, Dudley, NC 28333] has requested a new permit NC0090051 for its Dudley
Plywood Facility in Wayne County. This permitted facility discharges treated wet deck wastewater to
Brooks Swamp in the Neuse River Basin.
Page 1 of 8

2. Receiving Waterbodv Information:
Receiving Waterbody Information
Outfalls/Receiving Stream(s):
Outfall 001 / UT to Brooks Swamp (Buck Swamp)
Stream Segment:
27-54-5-2
Stream Classification:
WS-IV; NSW
Drainage Area (mi2):
0
Summer 7Q10 (cfs)
0
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
0
30Q2 (cfs):
0
Average Flow (cfs):
0
IWC (% effluent):
100
303(d) listed/parameter:
Not Listed in 303(d) or 305(b) 2020 Integrated Report
Subject to TMDL/parameter:
Neuse River Estuary TMDL, Nitrogen, 7/25/1999,
https ://file s.nc. gov/ncdeq/W ater%20Quality/Planning/TMDL/FINAL
%20TMDLS/Neuse/Neuse%2OTN%20TMDL%201Lpdf
Mercury Statewide TMDL
Basin/Sub-basin/HUC:
Neuse / 03-04-12 / HUC 030202011401
USGS Topo Quad:
SW Goldsboro, NC
3. Effluent Data Summary
Not applicable. New discharge application.
4. Instream Data Summary
Instream monitoring may be required in certain situations, for example: 1) to verify model predictions
when model results for instream DO are within 1 mg/1 of instream standard at full permitted flow; 2) to
verify model predictions for outfall diffuser; 3) to provide data for future TMDL; 4) based on other
instream concerns. Instream monitoring may be conducted by the Permittee, and there are also
Monitoring Coalitions established in several basins that conduct instream sampling for the Permittee (in
which case instream monitoring is waived in the permit as long as coalition membership is maintained).
If applicable, summarize any instream data and what instream monitoring will be proposed for this
permit action: NA.
Is this facility a member of a Monitoring Coalition with waived instream monitoring (Y/N): NA.
Name of Monitoring Coalition: NA.
Page 2 of 8

5. Compliance Summary
Summarize the compliance record with permit effluent limits (past 5 years): NA.
Summarize the compliance record with aquatic toxicity test limits and any second species test results
(past 5 years): NA.
Summarize the results from the most recent compliance inspection: NA.
6. Water Quality -Based Effluent Limitations (WQBELs)
Dilution and Mixing Zones
In accordance with 15A NCAC 2B.0206, the following streamflows are used for dilution considerations
for development of WQBELs: 1Q10 streamflow (acute Aquatic Life); 7Q10 streamflow (chronic Aquatic
Life; non -carcinogen HH); 30Q2 streamflow (aesthetics); annual average flow (carcinogen, HH).
If applicable, describe any other dilution factors considered (e.g., based on CORMIX model results): NA.
If applicable, describe any mixing zones established in accordance with 15A NCAC 2B. 0204(b): NA.
Oxygen -Consuming Waste Limitations
Limitations for oxygen -consuming waste (e.g., BOD) are generally based on water quality modeling to
ensure protection of the instream dissolved oxygen (DO) water quality standard. Secondary TBEL limits
(e.g., BOD= 30 mg/1 for Municipals) may be appropriate if deemed more stringent based on dilution and
model results.
If permit limits are more stringent than TBELs, describe how limits were developed: NA.
Ammonia and Total Residual Chlorine Limitations
Limitations for ammonia are based on protection of aquatic life utilizing an ammonia chronic criterion of
1.0 mg/1 (summer) and 1.8 mg/1 (winter). Acute ammonia limits are derived from chronic criteria,
utilizing a multiplication factor of 3 for Municipals and a multiplication factor of 5 for Non -Municipals.
Limitations for Total Residual Chlorine (TRC) are based on the NC water quality standard for protection
of aquatic life (17 ug/1) and capped at 28 ug/1 (acute impacts). Due to analytical issues, all TRC values
reported below 50 ug/1 are considered compliant with their permit limit.
Describe any proposed changes to ammonia and/or TRC limits for this permit renewal: NA.
Reasonable Potential Analysis (RPA) for Toxicants
Not applicable.
Toxicity Testing Limitations
Permit limits and monitoring requirements for Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) have been established in
accordance with Division guidance (per WET Memo, 8/2/1999). Per WET guidance, all NPDES permits
Page 3 of 8

issued to Major facilities or any facility discharging "complex" wastewater (contains anything other than
domestic waste) will contain appropriate WET limits and monitoring requirements, with several
exceptions. The State has received prior EPA approval to use an Alternative WET Test Procedure in
NPDES permits, using single concentration screening tests, with multiple dilution follow-up upon a test
failure.
Describe proposed toxicity test requirement: Toxicity testing is will not be required. Although this
industry is not listed in the August 2, 1999 Memo, wet deck facilities are minor discharges that fall into a
category that is not routinely assigned WET testing.
Mercury Statewide TMDL Evaluation
There is a statewide TMDL for mercury approved by EPA in 2012. The TMDL target was to comply with
EPA's mercury fish tissue criteria (0.3 mg/kg) for human health protection. The TMDL established a
wasteload allocation for point sources of 37 kg/year (81 lb/year), and is applicable to municipals and
industrial facilities with known mercury discharges. Given the small contribution of mercury from point
sources (-2% of total load), the TMDL emphasizes mercury minimization plans (MMPs) for point source
control. Municipal facilities > 2 MGD and discharging quantifiable levels of mercury (>1 ng/1) will
receive an MMP requirement. Industrials are evaluated on a case -by -case basis, depending if mercury is a
pollutant of concern. Effluent limits may also be added if annual average effluent concentrations exceed
the WQBEL value (based on the NC WQS of 12 ng/1) and/or if any individual value exceeds a TBEL
value of 47 ng/1
Describe proposed permit actions based on mercury evaluation: NA.
Other TMDL/Nutrient Management Strategy Considerations
If applicable, describe any other TMDLs/Nutrient Management Strategies and their implementation
within this permit: WQBEL. Required per Neuse nutrient strategy NCAC 02B .0713, and to comply with
NC chl-a WQS. 15A NCAC 2B.0200
Other WQBEL Considerations
If applicable, describe any other parameters of concern evaluated for WQBELs: NA.
If applicable, describe any special actions (HQW or ORW) this receiving stream and classification shall
comply with in order to protect the designated waterbody: NA.
If applicable, describe any compliance schedules proposed for this permit renewal in accordance with
15A NCAC 2H.0107(c) (2) (B), 40CFR 122.47, and EPA May 2007 Memo: NA.
If applicable, describe any water quality standards variances proposed in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.3(e) and 15A NCAC 2B. 0226 for this permit renewal: NA.
Page 4 of 8

7. Technology -Based Effluent Limitations (TBELs)
Industrials (if not applicable, delete and skip to next Section)
Describe what this facility produces: SIC Code 243 — Millwork, plywood, and structural members.
NAICS Code 321212 — Softwood veneer and plywood manufacturing. The nature of the business was
reported on the application as plywood manufacturing.
List the federal effluent limitations guideline (ELG) for this facility: 40 CFR 429.104, Subpart I, Wet
Storage. New source performance standards (NSPS).
If the ELG is based on production or flow, document how the average production/flow value was
calculated: NA.
For ELG limits, document the calculations used to develop TBEL limits: NA.
Table. TBEL Development per 40 CFR 429.104, Subpart I, Wet Storage. (NSPS)
Pollutant
TBEL Limitation
pH
The pH shall be within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.
Debris
There shall be no debris discharged
Document any TBELs that are more stringent than WQBELs: TBEL and WQBEL limits for pH are the
same for freshwater.
Document any TBELs that are less stringent than previous permit: NA.
8. Antidegradation Review (New/Expanding Discharge):
The objective of an antidegradation review is to ensure that a new or increased pollutant loading will not
degrade water quality. Permitting actions for new or expanding discharges require an antidegradation
review in accordance with 15A NCAC 2B.0201. Each applicant for a new/expanding NPDES permit
must document an effort to consider non -discharge alternatives per 15A NCAC 2H.0105( c)(2). In all
cases, existing instream water uses and the level of water quality necessary to protect the existing use is
maintained and protected.
If applicable, describe the results of the antidegradation review, including the Engineering Alternatives
Analysis (EAA) and any water quality modeling results: The EAA was reviewed on 03/11/2022. The
following alternatives were considered to be cost prohibitive:
Connection to POTW $8,178,000
Land Application $2,966,514
Wastewater Reuse $2,301,148
The cost for surface water discharge (NPDES) was estimated to be $186,942.
Page 5 of 8

9. Antibacksliding Review:
Sections 402(o)(2) and 303(d)(4) of the CWA and federal regulations at 40 CFR 122.44(1) prohibit
backsliding of effluent limitations in NPDES permits. These provisions require effluent limitations in a
reissued permit to be as stringent as those in the previous permit, with some exceptions where limitations
may be relaxed (e.g., based on new information, increases in production may warrant less stringent TBEL
limits, or WQBELs may be less stringent based on updated RPA or dilution).
Are any effluent limitations less stringent than previous permit (YES/NO): NA.
If YES, confirm that antibacksliding provisions are not violated: NA.
10. Monitoring Requirements
Monitoring frequencies for NPDES permitting are established in accordance with the following
regulations and guidance: 1) State Regulation for Surface Water Monitoring, 15A NCAC 2B.0500; 2)
NPDES Guidance, Monitoring Frequency for Toxic Substances (7/15/2010 Memo); 3) NPDES Guidance,
Reduced Monitoring Frequencies for Facilities with Superior Compliance (10/22/2012 Memo); 4) Best
Professional Judgement (BPJ). Per US EPA (Interim Guidance, 1996), monitoring requirements are not
considered effluent limitations under Section 402(o) of the Clean Water Act, and therefore anti -
backsliding prohibitions would not be triggered by reductions in monitoring frequencies.
For instream monitoring, refer to Section 4.
11. Electronic Reporting Requirements
The US EPA NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule was finalized on December 21, 2015. Effective
December 21, 2016, NPDES regulated facilities are required to submit Discharge Monitoring Reports
(DMRs) electronically. Effective December 21, 2020, NPDES regulated facilities will be required to
submit additional NPDES reports electronically. This permit contains the requirements for electronic
reporting, consistent with Federal requirements.
Page 6 of 8

12. Summary of Proposed Permitting Actions:
A. Table. Current Permit Conditions and Proposed Changes — Outfall 001
Parameter
Proposed
Condition
Basis for Condition/Change
Flow
Monitor & Report
15A NCAC 2B .0505
Chemical Oxygen
Demand (COD)
Monitor & Report
BPJ for a parameter of concern. 40 CFR 125.3(c)(2) on a case -
by -case basis under section 402(a)(1)(B) CWA. COD measures
organic pollutants in stormwater. COD is found at concentrations
3 to 6 times the BOD5 concentrations found in domestic
wastewaters. For BOD5, the secondary treatment standard of 30
mg/1 is found in 40 CFR 133. COD will be monitoring only.
Total Suspended
Solids (TSS)
MA 30.0 mg/1
DM 45.0 mg/1
TBEL. Secondary treatment standards/40 CFR 133 / 15A NCAC
2B .0406
Settleable Solids
Not required
Monitoring for Settleable Solids was removed from 40 CFR 429
Subpart I — Wet Storage Subcategory.
pH
Not less than 6.0
S.U. nor greater than
9.0 S.U.
TBEL. 40 CFR 429 Subpart I — Wet Storage Subcategory
Oil & Grease
(EPA Method 1664
[SGT-HEM])
Monitor & Report
WQBEL. Narrative Standard 15A NCAC 02B .0220
Total Nitrogen
Monitor & Report
WQBEL. Required per Neuse nutrient strategy NCAC 02B
.0713, and to comply with NC chl-a WQS. 15A NCAC 2B.0200
Total Phosphorus
Monitor & Report
WQBEL. Required per Neuse nutrient strategy NCAC 02B
.0713, and to comply with NC chl-a WQS. 15A NCAC 2B.0200
Electronic
Reporting
Add Electronic
Reporting Special
Condition
In accordance with EPA Electronic Reporting Rule 2015.
Biocide condition
Add Condition
G.S. 143-215, 143-215.1
MGD — Million gallons per day, MA — Monthly Average, WA — Weekly Average, DM — Daily Max
Page 7 of 8

13. Public Notice Schedule:
Permit to Public Notice: April 12, 2022 [See Attachment E]
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0109 & .0111, The Division will receive comments for a period of 30 days following
the publication date of the public notice. Any request for a public hearing shall be submitted to the
Director within the 30 days comment period indicating the interest of the party filing such request and the
reasons why a hearing is warranted.
14. Fact Sheet Addendum (if applicable):
Were there any changes made since the Draft Permit was public noticed (Yes/No): Yes.
If Yes, list changes and their basis below:
This final permit includes the following significant change from the draft dated April 5, 2022:
• The final was given an expiration date of May 32, 2023, to be consistent with the renewal
schedule for NPDES permits in the Neuse River Basin. In accordance with NPDES Permit
Standard Conditions Part II Section B. 10., a renewal application should be submitted by
November 30, 2022 (180 days prior to expiration).
15. Fact Sheet Attachments (list in order of reference):
A. NC0090051_Application_20211021_103p
B. More Information Received 202202163p
C. Peer Review _20220324_lp
D. Regional Staff Report Requested _20220216_lp
E. NCPA_NCNotices.com_Goldsboro News-Argus_20220412_4p
F. PWSReview 202206151p
G. Draft Email20220418
H. Permittee Receipt _20220711_3p
I. QA_QC_20220711_2p
Page 8 of 8

ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
S. DANIEL SMITH
Director
Georgia-Pacific Wood Products, LLC
Attn: Mike Golden, Plant Manager
139 Brewington Rd
Dudley, NC 28333
Subject: Permit Application
Application No. NC0090051
Georgia Pacific Dudley Plywood Facility
Wayne County
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
October 21, 2021
Dear Applicant:
The Water Quality Permitting Section acknowledges receipt of your application for a new NPDES WW permit, including
supporting documentation and your check number 0909990514 in the amount of $860.00 as payment of the application
fee. These items were received in our offices on October 21, 2021. Your application will be assigned to a permit writer
within the Section's NPDES WW permitting branch. The permit writer will contact you if additional information is required
to complete evaluation of your application. Your timely and direct response to any such request will help to expedite the
review process. Please note that acceptance of the application does not guarantee a NPDES permit will be issued for the
proposed activity. A permit will only be issued following a complete review of the application, concluding the proposed
discharge is allowable per applicable statutes and rules.
Information regarding the status of your renewal application can be found online using the Department of Environmental
Quality's Environmental Application Tracker at:
https://deq.nc.gov/permits-regulations/permit-guidance/environmental-application-tracker
If you have any additional questions about the permit, please contact the primary reviewer of the application using the
links available within the Application Tracker.
cc: Brandy Turley -Facility Manager
ec: WQPS Laserfiche File w/application
Wren Thedford
Administrative Assistant
Water Quality Permitting Section
�DEQ;
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality 1 Division of Water Resources
Washington Regional Office 1943 Washington Square Mall I Washington. North Carolina 27889
252.946.6481

Georgia-Pacific
Georgia-Pacific Wood Products LLC
Dudley Plywood Facility
139 Brewington Road
Dudley, NC 28333
October 7, 2021
NC DENR / DWR / NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
RE: NPDES Permit Application and Engineering Alternative Analysis
Georgia Pacific Wood Products — Dudley Plywood Facility
Wayne County
Attached are the original and two copies of the completed NPDES Application forms and
Engineering Alternative Analysis for Georgia Pacific Wood Products Dudley Plywood Facility.
The application is for a proposed wet decking operation for the Georgia Pacific facility located
in Wayne County, NC.
If you should have any questions concerning this application or need additional information,
please contact Sean Coury at 910-685-3662 or email, [e-mail] or Brandy
Turley at 919-750-5095 or email, [e-mail].
Certification:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my
direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel
properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or
person who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the
information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true,
accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false
information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Sincerely,
Mike Golden
Plant Manager
Attachments: Check #: 0909990514

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
Individual Permit Application
Georgia Pacific Wood Products LLC
Dudley, Wayne County, North Carolina Plywood Facility
Prepared by:
COURY
Sf fFNC': d ENGINS.E4IN
P1 C
Coury Science & Engineering, PLLC
PO Box 125
Hampstead, North Carolina 28443
September 2021

Georgia Pacific Dudley NPDES Permit Application
September 2021
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section 1: Introduction 4
Permit Request and Permit Fees 4
Facility Information 4
Document Organization 4
Section 2: Site Information 5
Site Location 5
Description of Manufacturing Process 5
Site Map 6
Section 3: Effluent Description and Treatment 6
Description of Discharged Wastewater and Treatment 6
Estimated Effluent Data 6
Engineering Design of Settling Pond 7
Section 4: Engineering Alternatives Analysis 7
Allowable Proposed Discharge 7
Stream flow Restrictions 7
Receiving Stream Classification Restrictions 7
Endangered Species 8
Zoning 8
Flow Projections 8
Technologically Feasible Alternatives 8
Connection to Existing Wastewater Treatment Plant 9
Land Application 9
Wastewater Reuse 10
Surface Water Discharge Through NPDES Program 10
Combination of Alternatives 10
Economic Feasibility of Alternatives 10
Land Application 11
Wastewater Reuse 11
Surface Water Discharge Through NPDES Program 11
Combination of Surface Water Discharge and Land application Error! Bookmark not defined.
Results of Economic Feasibility Alternatives 11
Report Certification 12
Section 5: Application Form 13
Page 2 of 24

Georgia Pacific Dudley NPDES Permit Application September 2021
Appendix 1 Site Map 14
Appendix 2 Topographic Map 15
Appendix 3 Wastewater Flow Line Diagram 16
Appendix 4 Settling Pond Diagram and supporting calculations 17
Appendix 5 Correspondance with USGS 19
Appendix 6 Correspondance with US Fish and Wildlife 20
Appendix 7 Local Government Review Form 21
Appendix 8 USDA Soils Map — Spray Irrigation 22
Appendix 9 NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 2, Version 3 Dudley, NC 23
Appendix 10 Economic alternative analysis cost details 24
Page 3 of 24

Georgia Pacific Dudley NPDES Permit Application
September 2021
SECTION 1:
Georgia-Pacific Wood Products LLC (GP) owns and operates a Plywood manufacturing plant in Dudley, Wayne
County, North Carolina. GP operations are categorized under North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) code 321212 for softwood veneer and standard industrial classification (SIC) code of 2436 for softwood
veneer and plywood.
The facility is proposing to permit wastewater discharges from a wet deck operation.
PERMIT REQUEST AND PERMIT FEES
The purpose of this application is for a new individual National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
Permit. The facility's stormwater discharges are currently covered under the North Carolina general NPDES
stormwater permit No. NCG210000 (Certificate of Coverage # NCG210185). The plant does not have a sludge
management plan because wastewater is not treated onsite.
This application is intended to satisfy all requirements of 15A NCAC 2H .0105. In accordance with the North Carolina
(NC) Division of Water Resource (DWR) fee schedule, the fees associated with new permit applications for Minor
Individual NPDES permits is $860, which is being submitted with this application. Included in this package is one
original and two copies of the application as required.
GP is not required to obtain an Authorization to Construct (ATC) following issuance of the NPDES permit by the NC
DWR. Session Law 2011-394, which became effective July 1, 2011, no longer requires ATC permits for wastewater
generated from manufacturing facilities.
FACILITY INFORMATION
The physical and mailing address for GP facility is as follows:
139 Brewington Road
Dudley, North Carolina 28333
To facilitate review of this application, please contact the following individuals identified below.
Preparer's Contact Information:
Sean Coury, PE (NC)
Partner
Coury Science & Engineering, PLLC
[phone]
[e-mail]
DOCUMENT ORGANIZATION
Facility's Contact Information:
Brandy Turley
Environmental Manager
Georgia-Pacific Wood Products LLC
Dudley Plywood and Chip-N-Saw
[phone]
[e-mail]
This permit application is divided into five sections and various appendices. Tables are included throughout the
document and are referenced in the table of contents. The seven sections and four appendices are as follows:
Section 1
Section 2
Section 3
Section 4
Section 5
Introduction
Site Information
Effluent Description and Treatment
Engineering Alternatives Analysis
Application Form
Refer to the table of contents for a detailed listing of tables and figures.
Page 4 of 24

Georgia Pacific Dudley NPDES Permit Application
September 2021
SECTION 2: SITE INFORMATION
This section provides information on the site location, surrounding terrain, and description of industrial activities.
SITE LOCATION
The GP Dudley Complex is located in Dudley, North Carolina in Wayne County. The approximate Universal Transverse
Mercator (UTM) coordinates of the facility are Zone 17, 769.8 km east and 3,906.1 km north, at an elevation of
approximately 180 feet above mean sea level. Refer to the Area Map in Appendix A for additional details.
The GP Dudley Complex has 2 stormwater outfalls authorized under North Carolina Department of Environmental
Quality (NCDEQ) General Permit NCG210000 (COC NCG210168). A majority of the stormwater from the plywood
plant is discharged to Outfall 001 and a small portion of the facility stormwater is discharged through Outfall 002.
Stormwater outfall 002 will not be impacted by the proposed wet deck operation.
DESCRIPTION OF MANUFACTURING PROCESS
The GP Dudley Facility consists of a Chip-N-Saw (CNS) lumber mill and a Plywood manufacturing facility. The co -
located CNS Mill is separated from the Plywood Plant by a CSX rail spur that runs east to west with the manufacturing
areas of the Plywood Plant situated south of the spur. The Plywood Plant operates under North American Industry
Classification System (NACS) Code 321212, Softwood Veneer and Plywood Manufacturing, and employs
approximately 400 employees. The CNS Mill operates under NAICS Code 321213, Softwood Sawmill, and employs
approximately 170 employees. Production process areas at the plywood facility consist primarily of the logyard,
green end (lathes), dryers, presses, finishing/shipping, and the boiler. Major production processes for the CNS
include sawing (sawmill), drying (kilns), and finishing (planer mill). The facility operates 24 hours per day, 7 days per
week.
The Plywood Plant receives pine and softwood logs and stores them on the log yard prior to processing. The logs are
debarked, cut to length, conditioned in steam -heated vats, peeled on the lathes, dried in the veneer dryers, graded
and formed into plywood panels by gluing and pressing. After pressing, the plywood sheets are trimmed, sanded,
and sorted for shipping. Finished product and manufacturing process residuals are shipped offsite via truck and rail.
The topography of the GP Dudley Plywood Plant and surrounding area is relatively flat. Most of the stormwater from
the Plywood Plant is discharged to Outfall 001 under North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ)
General Permit NCG210000 (COC NCG210168). The outfall is located at the southwest corner of the property.
Stormwater runoff from the majority of the manufacturing areas of the Plywood site generally flows south or
southwest via sheet flow, soil ditches, or underground piping into the spill retention pond located along Brewington
Road on the south side of the Plant. The spill pond discharges into the Plant's stormwater treatment pond and then
to Outfall 001. Runoff from the northern part of the Plant flows west and then south via an open soil ditch directly
to Outfall 001.
Stormwater runoff from a grassed area on the northwest corner of the Plywood facility discharges to Outfall 002.
Outfall 002 is classified as substantially identical to Outfall 001. Outfall 002 discharges into an open ditch on the west
side of the railroad (located on the west side of the facility). This ditch converges with the discharge from Outfall
001, which discharges to an unnamed tributary of Brooks Swamp.
Page 5 of 24

Georgia Pacific Dudley NPDES Permit Application September 2021
The Plywood Plant's nondischarge wastewater permit (WQ0003380) requires that all categorical non -discharge
process wastewater and the effluent from the facility's oil water separator be recycled or discharged to the county
wastewater treatment facility (POTW). All sanitary wastewater is discharged to the POTW.
SITE MAP
A site map depicting the facility and surrounding areas is located in Appendix 1. The log storage area where the wet
deck operation will take place has been outlined in red and the proposed location of the settling basin is outlined in
blue. The facility outfall location has been denoted with a red star on the site map.
A topographic map that shows the terrain of the site and surrounding areas is included in Appendix 2.
SECTION 3: EFFLUENT DESCRIPTION AND TREATMENT
This section describes the effluent that will be generated from the wet decking operation. The section also details
the proposed method of wastewater treatment and disposal and engineering design analysis.
DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGED WASTEWATER AND TREATMENT
Georgia-Pacific is proposing to permit discharge from a wet decking operation, which will be used to spray water
onto the log storage piles especially during warmer, dryer months. Water will be pumped from the stormwater
collection pond or from a groundwater well and then sprayed onto logs stockpiled on the wet deck via spray
nozzles. The wet decking pad will be paved with concrete and will be sloped in a manner that will ensure water
will flow into a detention/settling pond prior to discharge via Outfall 001, indicated on the site map in Appendix 1.
The wet decking operation will consist of four sprinkler heads, each with an approximate flow rate of 100 gallons
per minute (gpm). The calculated maximum flow rate is 0.576 million gallons per day (MGD), assuming 100 gpm
from each of four sprinkler heads for 1,440 minutes per day. No chemicals will be added for the wet decking
operation. A water flow line diagram is included in Appendix 3.
ESTIMATED EFFLUENT DATA
US EPA effluent limitations guidelines for Timber Products Processing (40 CFR 429), Subpart I, Wet Storage
Subcategory, states that there shall be no debris discharged from the wet decking operation and provides ranges
for effluent pH. As required by these federal effluent limitations guidelines, there will be no debris present in the
effluent and the pH will remain within the range of 6.0 to 9.0. To ensure that no debris will be present in the
discharge, all runoff associated with the wet decking operation will be routed to a settling pond prior to discharge.
In accordance with the Nuese River Basinwide Water Quality Plan, Brooks Swamp is classified as a NSW (Nutrient
Sensitive Water) which requires wastewater dischargers to set permitted nitrogen and phosphorus limits of 3 mg/I
and 1 mg/I, respectively. Based on the characteristics of the proposed wastewater stream and the design of the
proposed wet settling basin, effluent nitrogen and phosphorus quantities are expected to be well within these
specified limits.
The water withdrawal/discharge system is designed to have the option of operating as a single pass system to
prevent concentrations of BOD from increasing. The wet deck operation will have the option of pulling water out
of the collection pond during wet weather periods where the pond is turning over frequently or from a
groundwater well during drier periods. Additionally, incoming water will pass through a filter to minimize the
Page 6 of 24

Georgia Pacific Dudley NPDES Permit Application September 2021
amount of bark that is introduced to the settling basin. The facility will also have the option of diverting
wastewater to the spill pond to provide an additional pretreatment step and reduce solids in the permanent pool.
ENGINEERING DESIGN OF SETTLING POND
The runoff from the proposed wet decking operation will be diverted to a wet detention pond prior to discharge to
surface waters. The pond has been designed in accordance with USDA Soil Conservation Services Practice
Standard Code No. 378 and the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR)
Practice Standards and Specifications for Sediment Basins. Appendix 4 includes a drawing of the proposed settling
pond and supporting calculations. The proposed pond is designed with a 3.3:1 length to width ratio, which is
greater than the recommended minimum of 2:1. The volume of the pond is 284,000 cubic feet and results in a
hydraulic residence time of 88.3 hours at maximum dry weather flows. Additionally, the facility will be designed
with the option of diverting wastewater to a 35,000 cubic foot spill pond to enhance solids removal and reduce the
cost of pond cleanouts.
SECTION 4: ENGINEERING ALTERNATIVES ANA
YSIS
In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0105, an Engineering Alternatives Analysis (EAA) is required for any new
wastewater discharge. This section contains the components of the engineering alternatives analysis including
determination if the proposed discharge will be allowed, flow projections, evaluation of technically feasible
alternatives, and evaluation of economically feasible alternatives.
ALLOWABLE PROPOSED DISCHARGE
Prior to evaluating alternatives, GP made the determination that the proposed wastewater discharge would be
allowed. The following sections detail the evaluation that was conducted in order to confirm that the proposed
wastewater would be an allowable discharge. The restrictions that could be imposed on a proposed wastewater
discharge to surface waters include zero flow stream restrictions, receiving stream classifications, NPDES permitting
strategies listed in the Basinwide Water Quality Plans, impaired water and Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL)
classifications, and the presence of endangered species.
STREAM FLOW RESTRICTIONS
Specific stream restrictions are listed in 15A NCAC 2B .0206(d)(2) for oxygen -consuming wastewater in zero -flow
streams. In efforts to determine the 7Q10 flow at the proposed discharge location into Bennetts Creek, Mr. Curtis
Weaver, with United States Geological Services (USGS), was contacted. Mr. Weaver indicated that the low -flow
files at the USGS South Atlantic Water Science Center in Raleigh, NC did not indicate any determinations for the
specified point of interest. Low flow estimates were determined based on six index sites in the area of interest and
was estimated to have an average 7Q10 flow of 0.1 cubic feet per second. A copy of the correspondence with the
USGS is included in Appendix 5.
RECEIVING STREAM CLASSIFICATION RESTRICTIONS
The stream classification for Brooks Swamp is Water Supply IV (WS-IV) and NSW (Nutrient Sensitive Waters), which
requires wastewater dischargers to set permitted nitrogen and phosphorus limits of 3 mg/I and 1 mg/I,
respectively. Based on the characteristics of the proposed wastewater stream, effluent nitrogen and phosphorus
quantities should be well within these specified limits.
Page 7 of 24

Georgia Pacific Dudley NPDES Permit Application September 2021
Brooks Swamp is not listed as impaired on the 303(d) list and is not subject to any impending TMDLs according to
the NC DWR's website. However, Brooks Swamp is located in the Neuse River Basin which has a TMDL for nitrogen
and Fecal Coliform. Discharges associated with the proposed wet decking operation are not anticipated to include
nitrogen or bacteria.
ENDANGERED SPECIES
If endangered species are suspected to be present in the proposed discharge location, then additional restrictions
may be implemented for wastewater discharges in that area. To determine if any endangered species might be
present in the area of discharge to Brooks Swamp, an evaluation request was submitted the US Fish and Wildlife
Services — Raleigh Field Office.
According to US Fish and Wildlife Service's response, the proposed discharge would not likely adversely affect any
federally -listed endangered or threatened species, their formally designated critical habitat, or species currently
proposed for listing under the Act at the proposed wet decking location. Therefore, the requirements for section
7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 were satisfied for this project.
The US Fish and Wildlife Services was, however, concerned about potential impacts on aquatic species, since they
are highly susceptible to sedimentation. Since GP proposes to utilize a pond to provide for settling of solids prior
to discharge, the proposed discharge is not expected to adversely impact aquatic species. The correspondence
with US Fish and Wildlife Services is included in Appendix 6.
ZONING
GP is currently operating a plywood manufacturing facility on Brewington Drive (Book 2495 Page 137) which is
zoned as 'H-2' for heavy manufacturing. Since the facility is an existing located in an area zoned for heavy
manufacturing, the site and proposed discharge is consistent with local zoning ordinances.
Wayne County Planning Department has completed its review of the application and a completed Local
Government Review Form is included in Appendix 7.
FLOW PROJECTIONS
The population projections are not applicable to industrial facilities, but instead apply to domestic wastewater
production for evaluation of an increase or decrease in population. The projected wastewater flows for GP are only
dependent on the manufacturing operation and would not be affected by changes in population.
As previously discussed in this application, the projected wastewater flow is expected to be approximately 578,000
gallons per day.
TECHNOLOGICALLY FEASIBLE ALTERNATIVES
The section includes the evaluation of other technologically feasible alternatives for wastewater discharge. As listed
in the NC Division of Water Resource's Engineering Alternatives Analysis (EAA) Guidance Document, the
determination includes the evaluation of the technological feasibility of the following:
1. Connecting to an existing wastewater treatment plant
Page 8 of 24

Georgia Pacific Dudley NPDES Permit Application September 2021
2. Land application through spray irrigation
3. Reuse of wastewater
4. Surface water discharge through NPDES permitting
5. Combination of any of the alternatives
CONNECTION TO EXISTING WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
The GP facility currently discharges sanitary wastewater to the City of Goldsboro Water Reclamation Facility. If the
existing settling pond were diverted to the POTW, it is estimated that approximately 282,000,000 gallons of water
per year would be sent to the POTW. The estimate is based on 576,000 gallons per day plus the stormwater runoff.
A majority of the stormwater associated with the facility is conveyed to the stormwater pond prior to discharge.
Approximately 63 acres of the site area drains to the stormwater pond with approximately 56 (88%) of the acres
designated as impervious. The average annual rainfall for Dudley, NC is 48.8" per year, which results in a total of
approximately 78,000,000 gallons per year. See Appendix 4 for supporting calculations.
LAND APPLICATION
Soil types in the vicinity of the proposed wet decking operation were reviewed to evaluate the potential for disposing
of the wastewater via land application (or spray irrigation). GP owns farmland on a neighboring parcel of land. The
neighboring farmland consists of primarily the following soil types: NoA (Norfolk loamy sand 0-2% slope), NoB
(Norfolk loamy sand 2-6% slope), WaB (Wagram loamy sand), We (Weston loamy sand), and Bb (Bibb sandy loam).
According to the soils report obtained from USDA, a majority of the soil types are classified as well drained according
to the drainage class. Appendix 8 includes a map from the USDA Custom Soil Resource Report which depicts the
various soil types and classification for wastewater disposal by irrigation.
Due to the speculative nature of this exercise, specific property tracts have not been identified yet for this
alternative; therefore, the necessary testing has not been performed. However, the most likely tract of land that
would be utilized is the GP owned farmland south of the facility. Based on the USDA soils report, the soil types are
conducive for spray irrigation. For cost estimation purposes, it is assumed that the highest application rate for low -
rate application can be met in the soils located in the property south of the facility. If the infiltration rate is lower,
then the costs to accomplish infiltration would be much higher.
The settling pond that is proposed to be used as the wet deck wastewater pond is currently utilized as the
stormwater collection and treatment pond for the facility. The pond would be required to be enlarged to ensure
that water is not discharged during heavy rain events. According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Association (NOAA) Atlas 14, Volume 2, Version 3 for the Dudley, NC station, 24-hr 25-yr precipitation estimates for
the GP facility are approximately 7.2 inches (Appendix 9). As discussed in the previous section, a majority of the
stormwater associated with the facility is conveyed to the stormwater pond prior to discharge. A storage basin
capable of holding 1.4 million cubic feet of water in addition to 77,184 ft3 of wastewater generated in 24 hours and
the regulatory required 2 foot freeboard to prevent a discharge during high intensity rain events will be required. In
order to utilize the existing pond, the dike walls would need to be extended ^20' higher than the current height.
An application rate of 0.156 gallons per day per square foot (gpd/ft2) will be assumed to estimate the amount of
land required. Therefore, the application of 0.578 MGD would require at least 3,703,205 ft2 of property (85 acres).
Approximately 1.8 miles of piping would be required to transfer and apply the water over 85 acres.
Page 9 of 24

Georgia Pacific Dudley NPDES Permit Application September 2021
WASTEWATER REUSE
Reuse of water from wet decking operations is commonly utilized; however it does pose several disadvantages.
When wastewater from wet decking operations is continuously recirculated the level of BOD in the wastewater
continues to increase and debris from the operation begins clogging pumping and sprinkler heads. Additionally, the
pond will need to be enlarged as described in the Land Application Section. In addition to a large storage basin, some
form of land application will be required so that discharge does not occur during extended wet periods. For this
exercise, it is assumed that the water equivalent of approximately 1' of freeboard will be required to be land applied.
Based on the dimensions of the existing pond, approximately 530,000 gallons of water will be required to decrease
the storage basin by 1'.
SURFACE WATER DISCHARGE THROUGH NPDES PROGRAM
The GP facility is in close proximity to Brooks Swamp, which drains into the Neuse River. Wastewater associated
with the GP Wet Decking operation will include a combination of reused stormwater or groundwater that is
sprinkled on logs. Wastewater will pass through a filtration step and a settling pond prior to discharge. Feasibility
studies for discharge into Brooks Swamp have been discussed in prior sections.
The surface water discharge option will utilize an existing settling pond and minimal piping to transfer the water
from the settling pond to an unnamed tributary that drains into Brooks Swamp.
COMBINATION OF ALTERNATIVES
A combination of wastewater reuse with land application is being proposed for this operation. During wet periods,
stormwater collected in the settling pond will be utilized for the wet decking operation and during dryer periods
groundwater will be used to prevent concentration increases in the wastewater.
Discharge to surface waters is the least complicated option and will require the least amount of construction to
implement. Combination of land application with surface water discharge will be much more costly than utilizing
the surface water discharge option alone. The combination of land application with surface water discharge will be
comparable to the wastewater reuse option; therefore, the cost will be assumed to be equal to the wastewater
reuse option.
ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY OF ALTERNATIVES
This section addresses the economic feasibility of each of the technologically feasible engineering alternatives.
Those alternatives that were considered technologically feasible and evaluated in this section are land application,
wastewater reuse, and surface water discharge through the NPDES program. Each cost analysis includes the capital
cost, recurring cost, and lost opportunity costs. The cost estimates are determined assuming 20 years of operation.
The cost analyses are explained in detail below for each technologically feasible alternative.
CONNECTION TO EXISTING WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
Appendix 10-1 includes cost estimate details for connecting to an existing wastewater treatment plant. The current
fee that GP pays for discharge to the POTW is $0.029/gal. The annual discharge volume is estimated to be
282,000,000 gallons which results in an annual cost of $8,178,000.
Page 10 of 24

Georgia Pacific Dudley NPDES Permit Application September 2021
LAND APPLICATION
Appendix 10-2 includes cost estimate details for land application. It is estimated that the purchase of 105 acres
would be necessary for disposal of wastewater via land application based on infiltration rates and setback
requirements. GP owns farmland adjacent to the manufacturing facility that appears to be appropriate for spray
irrigation.
Land Application costs include the cost of modifying the settling pond, a pump station, 1.8 miles of piping, and an
irrigation system capable of supplying water to 87 acres of land. The cost could be substantially more if soils in the
adjacent land need significant work to make them suitable for land application. The total present value cost analysis
for land application was found to be $2,966,514.
WASTEWATER REUSE
Appendix 10-3 includes cost estimation details for wastewater reuse. A combination of wastewater reuse and land
application was considered to provide options during extended periods of increased precipitation. An application
rate of 100 gpm is assumed and that the application will be split over three eight hour days, resulting in an application
rate of 38,300 gallons per day. Using the same assumptions as the land application alternative, the wastewater
reuse alternative will require approximately six acres of property and an additional three acres of property for
setbacks. In addition to the land purchase, costs for the wastewater reuse option include 1.0 miles of piping,
modification of the settling basin, a pump station, irrigation systems, and ancillary equipment. The total present
value cost analysis for wastewater resuse was found to be $2,301,148.
SURFACE WATER DISCHARGE THROUGH NPDES PROGRAM
Appendix 10-4 includes cost estimation details for surface water discharge through the NPDES program. Discharge
through the NPDES program will require a settling basin to remove the potential for discharge of solids. The existing
stormwater pond is adequately designed to provide the necessary retention time to meet the categorical standards
associated with wet decking operations. The total present value cost analysis for discharge through the NPDES
program was found to be $186,942.
RESULTS OF ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY ALTERNATIVES
A summary the costs of each alternative considered are displayed in the table below.
Alternative
Total Cost
(assumes 20 years of operation)
Connection to POTW
$8,178,000
Land Application
$2,966,514
Wastewater Reuse
$2,301,148
Surface Water Discharge (NPDES)
$186,942
The alternative with the least economic impact is surface water discharge into Brooks Swamp. The discharge
alternative is about 10% of the cost of the next closest alternative (wastewater reuse). The most expensive option
is connection to a POTW.
Page 11 of 24

Georgia Pacific Dudley NPDES Permit Application September 2021
REPORT CERTIFICATION
This report was prepared by Coury Science and Engineering, PLLC. Coury Science and Engineering is licensed to
practice engineering in the state of North Carolina (P-1120). I, Sean Coury, a North Carolina Professional Engineer
for Coury Science and Engine ri rtify that the information contained in this report is correct and accurate to
the best of my knowledg 'i CARA 1,,�
\o4.. S31 `� 'ems
= . a SE S5 T.
03 !
; k
Sean T Coury, PE (North Car T fiber 037855)

Georgia Pacific Dudley NPDES Permit Application
September 2021
SECTION 5: APPLICATION FORM

EPA Identification Number
NPDES Permit Number
W CD ICIO I
Facility Name
, \ 1e Wit, 1 wCOA
Form Approved 03/05/19
OMB No.2040-0004
Form
1
NPDES
\•-/EPA
U.S. Environme al Protection Agency
Application for NPDES Permit to Discharge Wastewater
GENERAL INFORMATION
Activities Requiring an NPDES Permit
1. ACTIVITIES
REQUIRING AN NPDES PERMIT (40 CFR 122.21(f) and (f)(1))
1.1
Applicants Not Required to Submit Form 1
1.1.1
Is the facility a new or existing publicly
treatment works?
If yes, STOP. Do NOT complete
Form 1. Complete Form 2A.
owned
1 1 2
Is the facility a new
treating domestic
If yes, STOP. Do NOT
complete Form 1.
Form 2S.
or existing treatment works
sewage?
v No
p No
Complete
1.2
Applicants Required to Submit Form 1
1.2.1
Is the facility a concentrated animal
operation or a concentrated aquatic
production facility?
Yes 4 Complete Form 1
and Form 2B.
feeding
animal
1.2.2
Is the facility an existing
commercial, mining,
currently discharging
Yes 4 Complete
1 and
manufacturing,
or silvicultural facility that is
process wastewater?
r No
Form ✓ No
Form 2C.
1.2.3
Is the facility a
mining, or silvicultural
commenced to
new manufacturing, commercial,
facility that has not yet
discharge?
Complete Form 1 No
and Form 2D.
1.2.4
Is the facility a new
commercial, mining,
discharges only nonprocess
❑ Yes 4 Complete
1 and
or existing manufacturing,
or silvicultural facility that
wastewater?
' Yes 4
Form p No
Form 2E.
1.2.5
Is the facility a new or existing facility
discharge is composed entirely of stormwater
associated with industrial activity
discharge is composed of both stormwater
non-stormwater?
Yes 4 Complete Form 1
and Form 2F
unless exempted by
40 CFR
122.26(b)(14)(x) or
b 15 .
whose
or whose
and
✓ No
2. NAME,
MAILING ADDRESS, AND LOCATION (40 CFR
122.21(f)(2))
Name, Mailing Address, and Location
2.1
Facility Name
Georgia Pacific Dudley Plywood Facility
2.2
EPA Identification Number
2.3
Facility Contact
Name (first and last)
Brandy Turley
Title
Facility Environmental Manager
Phone number
[phone]
Email address
[e-mail]
2.4
Facility Mailing Address
Street or P.O. box
139 Brewington Dr
City or town
Dudley
State
NC
ZIP code
28333
EPA Form 3510-1 (revised 3-19)
Page 1

EPA Identification Number
M
C
1
c
Q 0
rn
c c
— o
M
W J
E
z
NPDES Permit Number
Facility Name
Form Approved 03/05/19
OMB No. 2040-0004
2.5
Facility Locat'on
Street, route number, or other specific identifier
139 Brewington Dr
County name
Wayne
County code (if known)
City or town
Dudley
State
NC
ZIP code
28333
SECTION 3. SIC AND NAICS CODES (40 CFR 122.21(f)(3))
3.1
SIC Code(s)
Description (optional)
243
Millwork, plywood, and structural members
3.2
NAICS Code(s)
Description (optional)
321212
Softwood veneer and plywood manufacturing
SECTION 4. OPERATOR INFORMATION (40 CFR 122.21(f)(4))
c
0
c�
o c
c c
0
5
d
n
0
4.1 Name of Operator
Georgia Pacific
4.2
4.3
Is the name you listed in Item 4.1 also the owner?
❑✓ Yes ❑ No
Operator Status
❑ Public —federal ❑ Public —state ❑ Other public (specify)
0 Private 0 Other (specify)
4.4
Phone Number of Operator
[phone]
4.5
Operator Address
Street or P.O. Box
139 Brewington Rd
City or town
Dudley
State
NC
ZIP code
28333
Email address of operator
[e-mail]
SECTION 5. INDIAN LAND (40 CFR 122.21(f)(5))
a�
i° c
C ry
C J
5.1
Is the facility located on Indian Land?
❑ Yes ❑✓ No
Page 2
EPA Form 3510-1 (revised 3-19)

EPA Identification Number NPDES Permit Number Facility Name
Form Approved 03/05/19
OMB No. 2040-0004
SECTION 6. EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS (40 CFR 122.21(f)(6))
6.1
Existing Environmental Permits (check all that apply and print or type the corresponding permit number for each)
❑✓ NPDES (discharges to surface
water)
NCG210168
© RCRA (hazardous wastes)
NCD000813659
❑ UIC (underground injection of
fluids)
❑r PSD (air emissions)
NC0000003709600058
❑ Nonattainment program (CAA)
0 NESHAPs (CAA)
NC0000003709600058
❑ Ocean dumping (MPRSA)
❑ Dredge or fill (CWA Section 404)
❑r Other (specify)
WQ0003380
SECTION 7. MAP (40 CFR 122.21(f)(7))
7.1
Z
Have you attached a topographic map containing all required information to this application? (See instructions for
specific requirements.)
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ CAFO—Not Applicable (See requirements in Form 2B.)
SECTION 8. NATURE OF BUSINESS (40 CFR 122.21(f)(8))
8.1
Nature of Business
Describe the nature of your business.
Plywood manufacturing
SECTION 9. COOLING WATER INTAKE STRUCTURES (40 CFR 122.21(f)(9))
9.1
Does your facility use cooling water?
❑ Yes 0 No 4 SKIP to Item 10.1.
9.2
Identify the source of cooling water. (Note that facilities that use a cooling water intake structure as described at
40 CFR 125, Subparts I and J may have additional application requirements at 40 CFR 122.21(r). Consult with your
NPDES permitting authority to determine what specific information needs to be submitted and when.)
SECTION 10. VARIANCE REQUESTS (40 CFR 122.21(f)(10))
10.1
Do you intend to request or renew one or more of the variances authorized at 40 CFR 122.21(m)? (Check all that
apply. Consult with your NPDES permitting authority to determine what information needs to be submitted and
when.)
❑ Fundamentally different factors (CWA
Section 301(n))
❑ Non -conventional pollutants (CWA
Section 301(c) and (g))
❑r Not applicable
❑ Water quality related effluent limitations (CWA Section
302(b)(2))
❑ Thermal discharges (CWA Section 316(a))
EPA Form 3510-1 (revised 3-19)
Page 3

EPA Identification Number
NPDES Permit Number
Facility Name
Form Approved 03/05/19
OMB No. 2040-0004
SECTION 11. CHECKLIST AND
CERTIFICATION STATEMENT (40
CFR 122.22(a) and (d))
Checklist and Certification Statement
11.1
In Column 1 below, mark the sections of Form 1 that you have completed and are submitting with your application.
For each section, specify in Column 2 any attachments that you are enclosing to alert the permitting authority. Note
that not all applicants are required to provide attachments.
Column 1
Column 2
1: Activities Requiring an NPDES Permit
Section
✓ w/ attachments
2: Name, Mailing Address, and Location
v Section
i' w/ attachments
3: SIC Codes
Section
v wl attachments
4: Operator Information
Section
v w/ attachments
5: Indian Land
v Section
v w/ attachments
6: Existing Environmental Permits
Section
✓ wl attachments
7: Map
wl additional attachments
Section
,, ap topographic
8: Nature of Business
v Section
v w/ attachments
9: Cooling Water Intake Structures
Section
✓ w/ attachments
10: Variance Requests
.' Section
v w/ attachments
11: Checklist and Certification Statement
v Section
✓ w/ attachments
11.2
Certification Statement
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision
in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the
information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons
directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations.
Name (print or type first and last name)
Official title
-14/� J
Signat r
Date signed n /
/OA
EPA Form 3510-1 (revised 3-19)
Page 4

EPA Identification Number
Form
2D
NPDES
kkEPA
NPDES Permit Number
Nc.000loot
Facility Name Form Approved 03/05/19
^u l e I Ir OMB No. 2040-0004
O.
U.S. Environmedtal Pr tection Agency
Application for NPDES Permit to Discharge Wastewater
NEW MANUFACTURING, COMMERCIAL, MINING, AND SILVICULTURAL OPERATIONS
THAT HAVE NOT YET COMMENCED DISCHARGE OF PROCESS WASTEWATER
SECTION 1. EXPECTED OUTFALL LOCATION (40 CFR 122.21(k)(1))
1.1
Provide information on each of the facili 's outfalls in the table below.
Outfall
Number
Receiving Water
Name
Brooks Swamp
Latitude
35° 15' 36"
IP
SECTION 2. EXPECTED DISCHARGE DATE (40 CFR 122.21(k)(2))
Month
December
15
SECTION 3. AVERAGE FLOWS AND TREATMENT (40 CFR 122.21(k)(3)(i))
3.1
Longitude
78° 02' 117"
Year
2021
For each outfall identified under Item 1.1, provide average flow and treatment information. Add additional sheets as
necessary.
**Outfall Number'* 001
Operations Contributing to Flow
0. eration
Wet Deck
Stormwater
Treatment Units
Description
(include size, flow rate through each treatment unit,
retention time, etc.)
284,000 cubic foot retention pond (88.3 hr retention)
Screens
EPA Form 3510-2D (Revised 3-19)
Code from
Exhibit 2D-1
1-U
1-T
Avera. a Flow
0.576 mgd
0.203 mgd
mgd
mgd
mgd
Final Disposal of Solid or Liquid
Wastes Other Than by Discharge
Land Apply
Boiler Fuel
Page 1

EPA Identification Number
3.1
Cont.
NPDES Pemlit Number
I-aclllty Name
"Outfall Number"*
-orm Approvea usiuo/1 u
OMB No. 2040-0004
Operations Contributing to Flow
Operation
Average Flow
mgd
mgd
mgd
mgd
mgd
Treatment Units
Description
(include size, flow rate through each treatment unit,
retention time, etc.)
Code from
Exhibit 2D-1
Final Disposal of Solid or Liquid
Wastes Other Than by Discharge
**Outfall Number**
Operations Contributing to Flow
Operation
Description
(include size, flow rate through each treatment unit,
retention time, etc.)
Code from
Exhibit 2D-1
Average Flow
mgd
mgd
mgd
mgd
mgd
Final Disposal of Solid or Liquid
Wastes Other Than by Discharge
EPA Form 3510-2D (Revised 3-19)
Page 2

EPA Identification Number
NPDES Permit Number
Facility Name
Form Approved 03/05/19
OMB No. 2040-0004
SECTION 4. LINE DRAWING (40 CFR 122.21(k)(3)(ii))
y 0
a
0
4.1
Have you attached a line drawing to this application that shows the water flow through your facility with a water
balance? (See instructions for drawing requirements. See Exhibit 2D-2 at end of instructions for example.)
O Yes ❑ No
SECTION 5. INTERMITTENT OR SEASONAL FLOWS (40 CFR 122.21(k)(3)(iii))
5.1
Except for stormwater runoff, leaks, or spills, are any expected discharges described in Sections 1 and 3 intermittent
or seasonal?
❑ Yes
❑r
No 9 SKIP to Section 6.
5.2 Provide information on intermittent or seasonal flows for each applicable outfall. Attach additional pages, if
necessary
Ouffall
Number
Outfall
Number
Outfall
Number
Operations
(list)
Freeuenc
Average
Days/Week
days/week
Average
Months/Year
months/year
Rate and Volume
Maximum Daily
Discharge
mgd
Maximum Total
Volume
gallons
Duration
days
days/week
months/year
mgd
gallons
days
Operations
(list)
days/week
months/year
mgd
gallons
Fre . uenc
Average
Days/Week
days/week
Average
Months/Year
months/year
Rate and Volume
Maximum Daily
Discharge
mgd
Maximum Total
Volume
gallons
days
Duration
days
days/week
months/year
mgd
gallons
days
Operations
(list)
days/week
months/year
mgd
gallons
Frequency
Average
Days/Week
days/week
Average
MonthslYear
months/year
Rate and Volume
Maximum Daily
Discharge
mgd
Maximum Total
Volume
gallons
days
Duration
days
days/week
months/year
mgd
gallons
days
days/week
months/year
mgd
gallons
days
SECTION 6. PRODUCTION (40 CFR 122.21(k)(4))
0
0
a
6.1
Do any effluent limitation guidelines (ELGs) promulgated by EPA under CWA Section 304 apply to your facility?
0 Yes
❑ No 9 SKIP to Section 7.
6.2
Provide the following information on applicable ELGs.
ELG Category
ELG Subcategory
Regulatory Citation
Timber Products Processing
Subpart I, Wet Storage
40 CFR 29
EPA Form 3510-2D (Revised 3-19)
Page 3

EPA Identification Number
NPDES Permit Number
Facility Name
Form Approved 03/05/19
OMB No. 2040-0004
6.3
Are the limitations in the applicable ELGs expressed in terms of production (or other measure of operation)?
❑ Yes
❑ No 4 SKIP to Section 7.
6.4
Provide an expected measure of average daily production expressed In terms and units of applicable ELGs.
Outfall
Number
Expected Actual Average Daily Production for First Three Years
Year
Operation, Product, or Material
Year 1
Year 2
Quantity per Day
(note basis if applicable)
Unit of Measure
c
c
0
U
c
0
'�
c
0
o_
Year 3
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
SECTION
7. EFFLUENT
CHARACTERISTICS
instructions
Note that
to determine
not all applicants
(40 CFR 122.21(k)(5))
the parameters and pollutants you are
need to complete each table.
required to monitor and, in turn,
the tables you must
in
y
•c u
co
es
o
c
3
(Li
See the
complete.
Table A. Conventional and Non -Conventional Parameters
7.1
Are you requesting
of your outfalls?
a
waiver from your NPDES permitting authority
for one or more of the Table A parameters for any
No 4 SKIP to Item 7.3.
• Yes
17
7.2
If yes, indicate the applicable outfalls below. Attach waiver request and other required information to the application.
Outfall number Outfall number Outfall number
73
Have you
waiver has
have provided
not been
estimates or actual data for all Table A
requested and attached the results to this
parameters for each of your outfalls for which a
application package?
No; a waiver has been requested from my
NPDES permitting authority for all parameters at
all outfalls.
51 Yes
■
Table B. Certain Conventional and Non -Conventional Pollutants
7.4
Have you
applicable
checked "Believed Present" for all pollutants listed in Table B that are limited directly or indirectly by an
ELG?
Yes ❑ No
✓
7.5
Have you
checked "Believed Present" or "Believed Absent" for all remaining pollutants listed in Table B?
Yes ❑ No
✓
7.6
Have you
in your discharge?
provided estimated data for those Table B pollutants for which you have indicated are "Believed Present"
Yes ❑ No
✓
EPA Form 3510-2D (Revised 3-19)
Page 4

EPA Identification Number
NPDES Permit Number
Facility Name
Form Approved 03/05/19
OMB No. 2040-0004
Engineering Report Effluent Characteristics Continued
Table C. Toxic Metals, Total Cyanide, and Total Phenols
7.7
Have you indicated
for all outfalls?
whether pollutants are "Believed
Present" or "Believed Absent"
for all pollutants listed on Table C
✓ Yes
• No
7.8
Have you completed
including the source
Table C by providing estimated data for pollutants you indicated are "Believed Present,"
of the information, for each applicable outfall?
❑ No
✓ Yes
Table D. Organic Toxic Pollutants (GC/MS Fractions)
7.9
Do you qualify for
Yes -4
a small business exemption under
Note that you qualify at the top
Table D, then SKIP to Item 7.12.
the criteria specified in the Instructions?
of p No
7.10
Have you indicated
for all outfalls?
whether pollutants are "Believed Present" or "Believed Absent" for all pollutants listed on Table D
❑ No
✓ Yes
7.11
Have you completed
including the source
Table D by providing estimated data for pollutants you indicated are "Believed Present,"
of the information, for each applicable outfall?
❑ No
✓ Yes
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-Dioxin (TCDD)
7.12
Does the facility use or manufacture one or more
know or have reason to believe that TCDD is or
❑ Yes
of the 2,3,7,8-TCDD congeners listed
may be present in effluent from any
in the Instructions, or do you
of your outfalls?
✓ No
Table E. Certain Hazardous Substances and Asbestos
7.13
Have you indicated
for all outfalls?
whether pollutants are "Believed Present" or "Believed Absent" for all pollutants listed in Table E
❑ No
INI Yes
7.14
Have you completed
quantitative data for
Table E by reporting the reason the pollutants are expected to be present and available
pollutants you indicated are "Believed Present" for each applicable outfall?
❑ No
✓ Yes
Intake Credits, Tables A through E
7.15
Are you applying for net credits for the presence
outfalls?
❑ Yes 4 Consult with your NPDES permitting
authorit .
of any of the pollutants on Tables
A through E for any of your
✓ No
8. ENGINEERING
REPORT (40 CFR 122.21(k)(6))
8.1
Do you have any
studies?
technical evaluations of your wastewater treatment, including engineering reports or pilot plant
❑ No 4 SKIP to Item 8.3.
✓ Yes
8.2
Have you provided
the technical evaluation and all related documents to this application package?
❑ No
✓ Yes
8.3
Are you aware of
treatment at your
any existing plant(s) that resemble production processes, wastewater constituents, or wastewater
facility?
❑ No .4 SKIP to Section 9.
✓ Yes
EPA Form 3510-2D (Revised 3-19)
Page 5

EPA Identification Number
NPDES Permit Number
Facility Name
Form Approved 03/05/19
OMB No. 2040-0004
Engineering Report
Continued
8.4
Provide the name and location of the similar plants.
Name of Similar Plants
Location of Similar Plants
Ashton Lewis
Gatesville, NC
9. OTHER
INFORMATION (40 CFR 122.21(k)(7))
that you would
already noted
like considered as part
in the application as being
of the application review process
attached)?
Section 10.
Other Information
9.1
Have you attached any optional information
(i.e., material beyond that which you have
❑ Yes
✓ No + SKIP to
9.2
List the additional items and briefly note why you have included them.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
SECTION
10. CHECKLIST
AND CERTIFICATION
STATEMENT (40 CFR 122.22(a) and (d))
mark the sections of Form 2D that you have completed and are submitting with your application.
specify in Column 2 any attachments that you are enclosing to alert the permitting authority. Note
are required to complete all sections or tables, or provide attachments.
Checklist and Certification Statement
10.1
In Column 1 below,
For each section,
that not all applicants
Column 1 Column 2
Section
1: Expected Outfall
w/ attachments (e.g., responses for additional outfalls)
•
Location
Section
2: Expected
Date
w/ attachments
•
Discharge
Section
3: Average Flows
w/ attachments
•
and Treatment
4: Line Drawing
wl line
w/ additional attachments
Section
■
drawing ■
Section
5: Intermittent or
Flows
wl attachments
•
Seasonal
6: Production
w/ attachments
Section
•
Section
7: Effluent
w/ Table
request
approval
Table
Table
w/ other
attachments
A waiver
Table A
Table C
Table E
•
or ■
•
B •
Characteristics
■
D •
■
Section
8: Engineering
w/ technical evaluations and related attachments
■
Report
9: Other Information
w/ optional information
v Section
■
Section
10: Checklist and
Statement
■
w/ attachments
Certification
EPA Form 3510-2D (Revised 3-19)
Page 6

EPA Identification Number
NPDES Permit Number
Facility Name
Form Approved 03/05/19
OMB No. 2040-0004
10.2
Certification Statement
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision
in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the
information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons
directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, true, accurate, and complete. 1 am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations.
Name (print ty e first and last name)
Signature
Official title
(h ftA /
Date signed
J6/e/2
EPA Form 3510-2D (Revised 3-19) Page 7

EPA Identification Number
NPDES Permit Number
Facility Name
Form Approved 03/05/19
OMB No. 2040-0004
Form
2F
NPDES
��EPA
U.S Environmental Protection Agency
Application for NPDES Permit to Discharge Wastewater
STORMWATER DISCHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITY
SECTION 1. OUTFALL LOCATION (40 CFR 122.21(g)(1))
1.1 Provide information on each of the facili 's outfalls in the table below
Outfall
Number
001
Receiving Water Name
Brooks Swamp
Latitude
35 15 36"
Longitude
78° 02' 117"
002
Brooks Swamp
35' 15' 47"
78° 02' 16"
SECTION 2. IMPROVEMENTS (40 CFR 122.21(g)(6))
2.1 Are you presently required by any federal, state, or local authority to meet an implementation schedule for constructing,
upgrading, or operating wastewater treatment equipment or practices or any other environmental programs that could
affect the discharges described in this application?
❑ Yes
ElNo 4 SKIP to Section 3.
2.2
N
d
E:
d
O
0
E
Briefly identify each applicable project in the table below.
Brief Identification and
Description of Project
Affected Outfalls
(list outfall numbers)
Source(s) of Discharge
Final Compliance Dates
Required
Projected
2.3
Have you attached sheets describing any additional water pollution control programs (or other environmental projects
that may affect your discharges) that you now have underway or planned? (Optional Item)
❑ Yes ❑ No
EPA Form 3510-2F (Revised 3-19) Page 1

EPA Identification Number
NPDES Permit Number
Facility Name
Form Approved 03/05/19
OMB No. 2040-0004
SECTION
3. SITE
DRAINAGE MAP (40 CFR 122.26(c)(1)(i)(A))
a�
A 2
cn 76 N
o
3.1
Have
specific
A
you attached a site drainage map containing all required information to this application? (See instructions for
guidance.)
Yes • No
SECTION
4. POLLUTANT
SOURCES (40 CFR 122.26(c)(1)(i)(B))
4.1
Provide information on the facility's pollutant sources in the table below.
Outfall
Number
Impervious Surface Area
(within a mile radius of the facility)
Total Surface Area Drained
(within a mile radius of the facility)
001
56
specify units
acres
7
specify units
acres
002
1.1
specify units
acres
10.7
specify units
acres
specify units
specify units
specify units
specify units
specify units
specify units
specify units
specify units
e,
a)
o
0
co
c
R
0
rs
4.2
Provide a narrative description of the facility's significant material in the space below. (See instructions for content
requirements.)
Facility is wood products manufacturing facility that produces plywood.
4.3
Provide the location and a description of existing structural and non-structural control measures to reduce pollutants in
stormwater runoff. (See instructions for specific guidance.)
Stormwater Treatment
Outfall
Number
Control Measures and Treatment
Codes
from
Exhibit
2F-1
(list)
001
Settling Pond
1-U
EPA Form 3510-2F (Revised 3-19)
Page 2

tNA Itlentiticauon Number
NNUtS I ermlt Number
Faculty Name
Form Approvea U 7/U5119
OMB No. 2040-0004
SECTION 5. NON STORMWATER DISCHARGES (40 CFR 122.26(c)(1)(i)(C))
5.1
I certify under penalty of law that the outfall(s) covered by this application have been tested or evaluated for the
presence of non-stormwater discharges. Moreover, 1 certify that the outfalls identified as having non-stormwater
discharges are described in either an accompanying NPDES Form 2C, 2D, or 2E application.
Name (print or type first and last name)
Official title
Signature
Date signed
5.2
Provide the testing information requested in the table below.
Outfall
Number
001
Description of Testing Method Used
Visual
Date(s) of Testing
Onsite Drainage Points
Directly Observed
During Test
Yes
SECTION 6. SIGNIFICANT LEAKS OR SPILLS (40 CFR 122.26(c)(1)(i)(D))
6.1
Describe any significant leaks or spills of toxic or hazardous pollutants in the last three years.
None
SECTION 7. DISCHARGE INFORMATION (40 CFR 122.26(c)(1)(i)(E))
See the instructions to determine the pollutants and parameters you are required to monitor and, in turn, the tables you must
complete. Not all applicants need to complete each table.
7.1
Is this a new source or new discharge?
❑ Yes 4 See instructions regarding submission of
estimated data.
❑ No 4 See instructions regarding submission of
actual data.
Tables A, B, C, and D
7.2
Have you completed Table A for each outfall?
❑r Yes ❑ No
EPA Form 3510-2F (Revised 3-19)
Page 3

EPA Identification Number
NPDES Permit Number
Facility Name
Form Approved 03/05/19
OMB No. 2040-0004
Discharge Information Continued
7.3
Is the facility
wastewater?
subject to an effluent limitation guideline
(ELG) or effluent limitations in an
NPDES permit for its process
7.5.
• Yes
0 No 4 SKIP to Item
7.4
Have you completed Table B by providing quantitative
indirectly in an ELG and/or (2) subject to effluent limitations
❑ Yes
data for those pollutants that are
in an NPDES permit for the
(1) limited either directly or
facility's process wastewater?
■ No
7.5
Do you know or have reason to believe any pollutants
❑ Yes
in Exhibit 2F-2 are present in the
discharge?
7.7.
IN No 4 SKIP to Item
7.6
Have you listed all pollutants in Exhibit 2F-2 that
provided quantitative data or an explanation for those
❑ Yes
you know or have reason to believe
pollutants in Table C?
are present in the discharge and
t7 No
7.7
Do you qualify for a small business exemption under
❑ Yes 4SKIP to Item 7.18.
the criteria specified in the Instructions?
0 No
7.8
Do you know or have reason to believe any pollutants
❑ Yes
in Exhibit 2F-3 are present in the
discharge?
7.10.
MI No 4 SKIP to Item
7.9
Have you listed all pollutants in Exhibit 2F-3 that
Table C?
❑ Yes
you know or have reason to believe
are present in the discharge in
• No
7.10
Do you expect any of the pollutants in Exhibit 2F-3
❑ Yes
to be discharged in concentrations
of 10 ppb or greater?
7.12.
■ No 4 SKIP to Item
7.11
Have you provided quantitative data in Table C for
concentrations of 10 ppb or greater?
❑ Yes
those pollutants in Exhibit 2F-3 that
you expect to be discharged in
17 No
7.12
Do you expect acrolein, acrylonitrile, 2,4-dinitrophenol,
of 100 ppb or greater?
❑ Yes
or 2-methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol to
be discharged in concentrations
7.14.
12 No 4 SKIP to Item
7.13
Have you provided
discharged
quantitative data in Table C for
in concentrations of 100 ppb or greater?
the pollutants identified in Item 7.12
that you expect to be
Yes
• No
7.14
Have you provided
discharge at
quantitative data or an explanation
concentrations less than 10 ppb (or less
in Table C for pollutants you expect
than 100 ppb for the pollutants identified
to be present in the
in Item 7.12)?
Yes
■ No
7.15
Do you know or have reason to believe any pollutants
❑ Yes
in Exhibit 2F-4 are present in the
discharge?
7.17.
DI No 4 SKIP to Item
7.16
Have you listed
explanation
pollutants in Exhibit 2F-4 that you
in Table C?
know or believe to be present in the
discharge and provided an
Yes
• No
7.17
Have you provided
information for the storm event(s)
sampled in Table D?
v Yes
■ No
EPA Form 3510-2F (Revised 3-19)
Page 4

EPA Identification Number
NPDES Permit Number
Facility Name
Form Approved 03/05/19
OMB No. 2040-0004
Discharge Information Continued
Used or Manufactured Toxics
7.18
Is any
manufactured
•
pollutant listed on Exhibits 2F-2 through 2F-4 a substance
as an intermediate or final product or byproduct?
Yes
IS
or a component of a substance used or
No 4 SKIP to Section 8.
7.19
List the pollutants below, including TCDD if applicable.
1. 4. 7.
2. 5. 8.
3. 6. 9.
m
Biological Toxicity Testing Data El
R o
8. BIOLOGICAL
TOXICITY TESTING DATA (40 CFR 122.21(g)(11))
8.1
Do
any
■
you have any knowledge or reason to believe that any biological
of your discharges or on a receiving water in relation to your
Yes
discharge
test for acute or chronic toxicity has been made on
within the last three years?
No 4 SKIP to Section 9.
8.2
Identify the tests and their purposes below.
Test(s)
Purpose of Test(s)
Submitted to NPDESDate
Permitting Authority?
Submitted
❑ Yes ❑ No
■
Yes
■
No
❑ Yes
•
No
9. CONTRACT
ANALYSIS INFORMATION (40 CFR 122.21(g)(12))
9.1
Were
consulting
In
any of the analyses reported in Section 7 (on Tables A through
firm?
Yes
•
C) performed by a contract laboratory or
No 4 SKIP to Section 10.
Contract Analysis Information
9.2
Provide information for each contract laboratory or consulting firm below.
Laboratory Number 1
Laboratory Number 2
Laboratory Number 3
Name of laboratory/firm
Pace
Laboratory address
9800 Kincey Ave, Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
Phone number
[phone]
Pollutant(s) analyzed
TSS, COD, Oil and Grease
EPA Form 3510-2F (Revised 3-19)
Page 5

EPA Identification Number
NPDES Permit Number
Facility Name
Form Approved 03/05/19
OMB No. 2040-0004
SECTION
10. CHECKLIST
AND CERTIFICATION STATEMENT (40 CFR 122.22(a) and (d))
with your application. For
permitting authority. Note that not
Checklist and Certification Statement
10.1
In Column 1 below, mark the sections of Form 2F that you have completed and are submitting
each section, specify in Column 2 any attachments that you are enclosing to alert the
all applicants are required to complete all sections or provide attachments.
Column 1
Column 2
1
❑ w/ attachments (e.g., responses for additional outfalls)
Section
2
Section
■ wl attachments
3
map
Section
• wl site drainage
4
v Section
■ wl attachments
5
Section
• wl attachments
6
v Section
■ wl attachments
7
exemption request
as an attachment
Section
0 Table A
• w/ small business
■ Table B
• w/ analytical results
• Table C
• Table D
8
Section
• w/attachments
9
(e.g., responses for additional contact laboratories or firms)
v Section
■ w/attachments
10
v Section
•
10.2
Certification Statement
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in
accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information
submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system or those persons directly responsible
for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and
complete. 1 am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine
and imprisonment for knowing violations.
Name (print ope first and last name)
//fJv&44i' i
Official title
I / 1/IA i V*1,-
Signature
Alt— e _
Date signed
/fl e I
EPA Form 3510-2F (Revised 3-19)
Page 6

EPA Identification Number
NPDES Permit Number
Facility Name
Outrall Number
Form Approved 03/05/19
OMB No. 2040-0004
TABLE A. CONVENTIONAL AND NON CONVENTIONAL
PARAMETERS
(40 CFR 122.26(c)(1)(i)(E)(3))h
You must provide the results of at least one analysis
for every pollutant in this table. Complete one table for each outfall. See instructions for additional details and requirements.
Pollutant or Parameter
Maximum Daily Discharge
(specify units)
Average Daily Discharge
(specify units)
Number of Storm
Events Sampled
Source of
Information
("e" soumeMew
dischargers only, use
codes in instructions)
Grab Sample Taken
During First
30 Minutes
Flow -Weighted
Comp°Ske
Grab Sample Taken
During First
30 Minutes
Flow -Weighted
Composite
1.
Oil and grease
5
4.9
7
2.
Biochemical oxygen demand (BODs)
3.
Chemical oxygen demand (COD)
121
79
7
4.
Total suspended solids (TSS)
19.6
118
7
5.
Total phosphorus
6.
Total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN)
7.
Total nitrogen (as N)
8.
pH (minimum)
pH (maximum)
1 Sampling shall be conducted according to suffic'ently sensitive test procedures (i.e., methods) approved under 40 CFR 136 for the analysis of pollutants or pollutant parameters or
required under 40 CFR chapter I, subchapter N or 0. See instructions and 40 CFR 122.21(e)(3).
EPA Form 3510-2F (Revised 3-19)
Page 7

This page intentionally left blank.

EPA Identification Number
NPDES Permit Number
Facility Name
Outfall Number
Form Approved 03/05/19
0M8 No. 2040-0004
TABLE B. CERTAIN CONVENTIONAL AND NON CONVENTIONAL POLLUTANTS (40 CFR 122.26(c)(1) i)(E)(4) and 40 CFR 122.21(g)(7)(vi (A))l
List each pollutant that is limited in an effluent limitation guideline (ELG) that the facility is subject to or any pollutant listed in the facility's NPDES permit for its process wastewater (if the
facility is operating under an existing NPDES permit). Complete one table for each outfall. See the instructions for additional details and requirements.
Pollutant and CAS Number (If available)
Maximum Daily Discharge
(specify units)
Average Daily Discharge
(specify units)
Number of Storm
Events Sampled
Source of
Information
(new sourceinew
dischargers only; use
codes in instructions)
Grab Sample Taken
During First
30 Minute
Flow -Weighted
Composite
Grab Sample Taken
During First
30 Minutes
Flow -Weighted
Composite
1 Sampling shall be conducted according to sufficiently sensitive test procedures (i.e., methods) approved under 40 CFR 136 for the analysis of pollutants or pollutant parameters or
required under 40 CFR chapter I, subchapter N or 0. See instructions and 40 CFR 122.21(e)(3).
EPA Form 3510-2F (Revised 3-19)
Page 9

This page intentionally left blank.

EPA Identification Number
NPDES Permit Number
Facility Name
Outfall Number
Form Approved 03/05/19
OMB No. 2040-0004
TABLE C. TOXIC POLLUTANTS, CERTAIN HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES, AND ASBESTOS (40 CFR 122.26(c)(1)(i)(E)(4) and 40 CFR 122.21(g)(7)(vi)(B) and (vii))t
for additional
List each pollutant shown in Exhibits 2F-2, 2F-3, and 2F-4 that you know or have reason to believe is present. Complete one table for each outfall. See the instructions
details and requirements.
Pollutant and CAS Number (if availabe'
Maximum Daily Discharge
(specify units)
Average Daily Discharge
(specify.units)
I
Number of Storm
Events Sampled
Source of
information
(new source/new
dischargers only; use
codes in instructions)
Grab Sample Taken
During First
30 Minutes
Flow -Weighted
Composite
Grab Sample Taken
During First
30 Minutes
Flow -Weighted
Composite
1 Sampling shall be conducted according to sufficiently sensitive test procedures (i.e., methods) approved under 40 CFR 136 for the analysis of pollutants or pollutant parameters or
required under 40 CFR chapter I, subchapter N o 0. See instructions and 40 CFR 122.21(e)(3).
EPA Form 3510-2F (Revised 3-19)
Page 11

This page intentionally left blank.

EPA identification Number
NPDES Permit Number
TABLE D. STORM EVENT INFORMATION (40 CFR 122.26(c)(1)(i)(E)(6))
Facility name
Outfall Number
Provide data for the storm event(s) that resulted in the maximum day discharges for the flow -weighted composite sample.
Date of Storm Event
Duration of Storm Event
(in hours)
Total Rainfall During
Storm Event
(in inches)
Number of Hours Between
Beginning of Storm Measured and
End of Previous Measurable Rain
Event
Maximum Flow Rate
During Rain Event
(in gpm or specify units)
Provide a description of the method of flow measurement or estimate.
Form Approved 03/05/19
OMB No. 2040-0004
Total Flow from Rain Event
(in gallons or specify units)
LPL-, FOP) 3510-2F 1Rensea 3-19) Page 13

APPENDIX 1 SITE MAP

Legend
Brooks Swamp
Stream Class NSW
• 0utfall 001 — Coordinates 35.259962, —78.038021
II Proposed Wet Deck
Stormwater Direction
Storm water
Collection
Pond,,
Proposed
Wet
Deck
Operation
Georgia-Pacific
Outfall
GP Dudley Plywood
Site Map
Appendix 1

APPENDIX 2 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP

Project Manager:
ST
Drawn by: STC
Checked by: CC
Approved by:
CC
I� a
v 4 5t Matthews
eh: D
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP IMAGE COURTESY OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
QUADRANGLES INCLUDE: SOUTHWEST GOLDSBORO, NC (1/1/1998) and MOUNT OLIVE, NC (1/1/1977).
Project Name.
Dudley NPDES
Scale:
1 "=2,000'
File Name:
Date:
Sept 2021
COURY
t.G.•t£t 1. t C. P:
PO Box 125
Hampstead, NC 28443
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
Dudley Plywood Facility
NPDES Permit Application
139 Brewington Road
Dudley, Wayne County, North Carolina
Appendix
2

APPENDIX 3 WASTEWATER FLOW LINE DIAGRAM

WATER
WITHDRAWAL
From Pond or
Groundwater
Well
WET DECK
4 HEADS
100 SPM/HEAD
two -
SETTLING
POND
StormWater
Me
POND AND WATER FLOW
MP

APPEND' 4 s�
Volume Calculations
Method: NRCS Methodology Weighted Average Volume Technique
1. CN Impervious = 98, CN Pervious 35
2. A = (Runoff) Area = 63 Acres (88% impervious)
3. I = Intensity, Rainfall (NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 2, Version 3 for the Dudley, NC station)
25-yr, 24hr. storm: 7.2 inches
Annual Average Precipitation: 48 inches/year
4. Impervious Area
S = 1000/CN - 10
S = 0.2 inches
Impervious Area Abstraction = 0.2(S) = 0.04 inches; 0.8(S) = 0.16 inches
Pervious Area Runoff Volume = Q = (P - 0.2S)2 /( P + 0.8S)
QImperv25yr = (7.2 - 0.04)2 / (7.2 + 0.16) = 6.97 inches
QlmpervAnn = (48 - 0.04)2 / (48 + 0.16) = 47.76 inches
5. Pervious Area - S = 18.6 inches
Impervious Area Abstraction = 0.2(S) = 3.71 inches; 0.8(S) = 14.9 inches
QImperv25yr = (7.2 - 3.71)2 / (7.2 + 14.9) = 0.55 inches
QlmpervAnn = (48 - 3.71)2 / (48 + 14.9) = 31.2 inches
6. Runoff Volume
55 Acres Impervious, 8 acres pervious
Runoff Volume = (rain ft x acre x 43560 sf per acre)
Runoff Volume 25 yr = (6.97/12 x 55 x 43560) + (0.55/12 x 8 x 43560) =
1,407,533 cubic feet = 10.5 million gal
Runoff Volume Annual = (47.76/12 x 55 x 43560) + (31.2/12 x 8 x 43560) =
10,441,332 cubic feet = 78 million gal

Pond Calculations
1. Pond dimensions and compare to minimum design requirements
a. Minimum Length to Width ratio is 2:1
b. The depth is 4' for the permanent pool
c. The dimensions of the pond are 350' by 170' and 130' by 100'
Surface area = 72,500 ft2
Volume = 290,000 ft3
2. Determine Hydraulic Residence Time (HRT)
a. HRT = Volume / Qavg
Qavg = 400 gpm* 60 minutes/hour * 24 hours/day * 0.134 ft3/gallon = 77,000 ft3/day
HRT = 290,000 ft3 / 77,000 ft3/day * 24 hours/day = 90 hours
APPENDIX 5 CORRESPONDANCE WITH USGS

[e-mail]
From: Weaver, John C <[e-mail]>
Sent: Sunday, August 1, 2021 8:32 PM
To: [e-mail]
Cc: Hill, David A; [e-mail]; Montebello, Michael J; Albertin, Klaus P; Weaver, John C
Subject: USGS response to DWR USGS Low Flows request # 2021-141 (dated 2021/07/29) for Brooks Swamp
Wayne County...RE: [EXTERNAL] Low -flow request approval
Mr. Coury,
In response to your inquiry about the low -flow characteristics for a location on Brooks Swamp between NC Secondary
Road 1938 and U.S. Highway 117 Alternate near Dudley in southern Wayne County, the following information is
provided:
A check of the low -flow files here at the USGS South Atlantic Water Science Center (Raleigh office) indicates a previous
low -flow determination for the point of interest, identified by the lat/long coordinates (35.243648, -78.045896)
provided via email dated 07/29/2021 from the DWR USGS Low Flow portal following your request
submission. Completed in January 1988, low -flow characteristics were determined for an identical location on Buck
Swamp above US 117 near Mt. Olive (station id 0208830700, drainage area at 4.6 sqmi). The low -flow discharges were
estimated based on transfer of flow characteristics from a downstream USGS partial -record site on Buck Swamp near
Dudley (station id 02088310, drainage area at 15.5 sqmi).
For the record: Internal site information at the USGS Raleigh office indicates a change in the stream name at some point
in the past (date unknown). Whereas this stream was previously known as Buck Swamp, the site information indicates
the name was changed to Brooks Swamp. This current stream name is consistent with that shown for the basin on the
USGS topographical quadrangle map (Mount Olive) for the area around this stream.
No USGS discharge records are known to exist for the point of interest.
In the absence of site -specific discharge records sufficient for a low -flow analysis, estimates of low -flow characteristics at
ungaged locations are determined by assessing a range in the low -flow yields (expressed as flow per square
mile drainage area, or cfsm) at nearby sites where estimates have previously been determined.
A basin delineation completed using the online USGS StreamStats application for North Carolina
(https://streamstats.usgs.gov/ss/) indicates the drainage area for the point of interest (StreamStats adjusted
coordinates 35.24359, -78.04589 NAD83) is 4.18 sqmi.
For streams in southern Wayne County, low -flow characteristics published by the USGS are provided in the following
reports:
(1) The first is a statewide report completed in the early 1990's. It is USGS Water -Supply Paper 2403, "Low -flow
characteristics of streams in North Carolina" (Giese and Mason, 1993). An online version of the report is available at
http://pubs.usgs.gov/wsp/2403/report.pdf. The report provides the low -flow characteristics (based on data through
1988) via regional relations and at -site values for sites with drainage basins between 1 and 400 sqmi and not considered
or known to be affected by regulation and/or diversions.
(2) The second is a basin -wide report for the Neuse River basin published in 1998. It is USGS Water -Resources
Investigations Report 98-4135, "Low -flow characteristics and discharge profiles for selected streams in the Neuse River
1

basin, North Carolina" (Weaver, 1998). The report is available online at
http://pubs.usgs.gov/wri/1998/4135/report.pdf. This report provides low -flow characteristics (based on data through
1996) for USGS continuous- and partial -record sites in the Neuse River basin where sufficient data was available for
analyses. However, the report does not provide statistical relations for estimating low -flow characteristics at ungaged
locations.
(3) The third is a basin -wide report for the Cape Fear River basin published in 2001. It is USGS Water -Resources
Investigations Report 01-4094, "Low -flow characteristics and discharge profiles for selected streams in the Cape Fear
River Basin, North Carolina, through 1998 " (Weaver and Pope, 2001). An online version of the report is available
through http://nc.water.usgs.gov/reports/wri014094/. The report provides the low -flow characteristics (based on data
through 1998) for continuous -record gaging stations and partial -record sites within the Cape Fear River basin. The
report also provides low -flow discharge profiles (7Q10, 30Q2, winter 7010, and 7Q2) for the Cape Fear River and
selected tributaries within the basin.
(4) The fourth is a statewide report published in March 2015. It is USGS Scientific Investigations Report 2015-5001,
"Low -flow characteristics and flow -duration statistics for selected USGS continuous -record streamgaging stations in
North Carolina through 2012" (Weaver, 2015). The report is available online at
http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2015/5001/. The report provides updated low -flow characteristics and flow -duration statistics
for 266 active (as of 2012 water year) and discontinued streamgages across the state where a minimum of 10 climatic
years discharge records were available for flow analyses.
Low -flow characteristics estimated for point of interest:
Inspection of the reports indicates the presence of six (6) nearby selected USGS partial -record sites (4) and continuous -
record streamgages (2) in the general vicinity of the point of interest where low -flow characteristics were
published. Among these 6 index sites, the low -flow discharge yields for the indicated flow statistics are as follows:
Annual 7Q10 low -flow yields ==> from 0 to 0.11 cfsm (average about 0.025 cfsm, median about 0.004 cfsm) (zero flow at
2 of 6 index sites)
Annual 30Q2 low -flow yields ==> from 0 to 0.26 cfsm (average about 0.093 cfsm, median about 0.078 cfsm) (zero flow at
2 of 6 index sites)
Winter 7Q10 low -flow yields ==> from 0 to 0.2 cfsm (average about 0.069 cfsm, median about 0.059 cfsm) (zero flow at
2 of 6 index sites)
Annual 7Q2 low -flow yields ==> from 0 to 0.19 cfsm (average about 0.055 cfsm, median about 0.029 cfsm) (zero flow at
2 of 6 index sites)
Average annual discharge yields ==> from 1.2 to 1.3 cfsm (both average and median about 1.2 cfsm)
Application of the above range in yields to the drainage area (4.18 sqmi) for the point of interest results in the following
estimated low -flow discharges:
Annual 7Q10 low -flow discharges ==> from 0 to 0.46 cfs (average about 0.1 cfs, median about 0.017 cfs) 4 rounded
down to zero flow
Annual 30Q2 low -flow discharges ==> from 0 to 1.1 cfs (average about 0.39 cfs, median about 0.33 cfs)
Winter 7Q10 low -flow discharges ==> from 0 to 0.84 cfs (average about 0.29 cfs, median about 0.25 cfs)
Annual 7Q2 low -flow discharges ==> from 0 to 0.79 cfs (average about 0.23 cfs, median about 0.12 cfs)
Average annual discharge discharges ==> from 5 to 5.4 cfs (both average and median about 5 cfs)
Please note there are large differences between the average and median statistics (particularly for the annual minimum
7-day series), which is due to wide ranges in the low -flow yields for each of the statistics. Much of these large ranges are
2

primarily driven by high yields at one of the index sites, which is a nearby discontinued continuous -record streamgage
(station id 02107600, drainage area 47.5 sqmi).
Please note:
(1) The estimated flows are provided in units of cubic feet per second (cfs).
(2) The low -flow yields provided above are rounded to 2 significant figures. Estimated low -flow discharges less than 1
cfs are rounded to 2 significant figures. If between 1 and 100 cfs, then rounded to 1 decimal place; if greater than 100,
then rounded to the nearest whole number (zero decimal places).
(3) The information provided in this message is based on a preliminary assessment and considered provisional, subject
to revision pending collection of future data and further analyses.
These provisional streamflow statistics are provided via the DWR USGS Low Flows cooperative agreement between
the USGS and the N.C. Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Water Resources.
Hope this information is helpful.
Thank you.
Curtis Weaver
1 Curtis Weaver, Hydrologist, PE Email: icweaverusas,aov
USGS South Atlantic Water Science Center Online: httns://www.usas.aov/centers/sa-water
North Carolina - South Carolina - Georgia
3916 Sunset Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
Phone: [phone] // Fax: [phone]
From: Albertin, Klaus P <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2021 3:41 PM
To: [e-mail]
Cc: Albertin, Klaus P <[e-mail]>; Hill, David A <[e-mail]>; [e-mail];
Weaver, John C <[e-mail]>; Montebello, Michael J <[e-mail]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Low -flow request approval
This email has been received from outside of DOI - Use caution before clicking on links, opening attachments, or responding.
Your request has been approved and will be forwarded to USGS. A response from USGS usually takes 7 - 10 business
days.
Request Flow Statistic Approval
Request ID: 141
3

Requestor: Sean Coury
Requestor e-mail: [e-mail]
Requestor Phone: [phone]
Local Government:
Public Water Supply:
Consultant:
Contact:
Reason: Permit
River/Stream: Brooks Swamp
Drainage Area (sq. mi.): not available
Latitude: 35.243648
Longitude: -78.045896
Other Information:
Statististics: ["7Q10"]
Approved by: Albertin, Klaus P
4

APPENDIX 6 CORRESPONDANCE WITH US FISH AND WILDLIFE

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh ES Field Office
551-F Pylon Drive
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
August 25, 2021
Sean Coury
Coury Science & Engineering, PLLC
PO Box 125
Hampstead, NC 28443
Re: Plywood Manufacturing Facility — Wayne County
Dear Mr. Coury:
This letter is to inform you that the Service has established an on-line project planning and
consultation process which assists developers and consultants in determining whether a
federally -listed species or designated critical habitat may be affected by a proposed project. For
future projects, please visit the Raleigh Field Office's project planning website at
https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/pp.html. If you are only searching for a list of species that may be
present in the project's Action Area, then you may use the Service's Information, Planning, and
Consultation System (IPaC) website to determine if any listed, proposed, or candidate species
may be present in the Action Area and generate a species list. The IPaC website may be viewed
at https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/. The IPaC web site contains a complete and frequently updated list
of all endangered threatened species protected by the provisions of the Endangered Species Act
of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)(Act), a list of federal species of concern' that are
known to occur in each county in North Carolina, and other resources.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally -listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally -protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or
1 The term "federal species of concern" refers to those species which the Service believes might be in need of
concentrated conservation actions. Federal species of concern receive no legal protection and their designation
does not necessarily imply that the species will eventually be proposed for listing as a federally endangered or
threatened species. However, we recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid or minimize adverse
impacts to federal species of concern.

evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes.
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally -protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
With regard to the above -referenced project, we offer the following remarks. Our comments are
submitted pursuant to, and in accordance with, provisions of the Endangered Species Act.
Based on the information provided and other information available, it appears that the proposed
action is not likely to adversely affect any federally -listed endangered or threatened species, their
formally designated critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Act at
these sites. We believe that the requirements of section 7(a)(2) of the Act have been satisfied for
your project. Please remember that obligations under section 7 consultation must be
reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect
listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered; (2) this action is
subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review; or, (3) a new species
is listed or critical habitat determined that may be affected by the identified action.
However, the Service is concerned about the potential impacts the proposed action might have
on aquatic species. Aquatic resources are highly susceptible to sedimentation. Therefore, we
recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid adverse impacts to aquatic species,
including implementing directional boring methods and stringent sediment and erosion control
measures. An erosion and sedimentation control plan should be submitted to and approved by
the North Carolina Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section prior to construction.
Erosion and sedimentation controls should be installed and maintained between the construction
site and any nearby down -gradient surface waters. In addition, we recommend maintaining
natural, vegetated buffers on all streams and creeks adjacent to the project site.
The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission has developed a Guidance Memorandum (a
copy can be found on our website at (http://www.fws.gov/raleigh) to address and mitigate
secondary and cumulative impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources and water quality.

We recommend that you consider this document in the development of your projects and in
completing an initiation package for consultation (if necessary).
We hope you find our web page useful and informative and that following the process described
above will reduce the time required, and eliminate the need, for general correspondence for
species' lists. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis of this office at
[phone] ext. 26.
Sincerely
!/(,,.. EVE 4
Pete Beifjamin
Field Supervisor

APPENDIX 7 LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVIEW FORM

-CS
0
0
a
Cl
I LO
▪ •
m •
@
i-'
N CD
O 0 t0 •
LOO >,C I. O C'0
>,r.-r-. 1-0 O
(r3C'l • @N® ..C7 • -
N L ^ O co i0)CO OO
@\i C+--F @ CO
a - p0 CDa-,--Lf)
L�'- m o CD
0
(60 •@ M-
-
Q-C 0 —1-
X L
.00@CD3Lt1 U
L
t1
0
CO
•G
Q)
O
k0
a
O
L-1--
@
CC
0
F-
0
ffl•
O
,--4
3-1
fir
@
U
m
.n
Cn
LO
t 0.
N46.
6'th0 i1500 DODO OETLT 'KEIL
Grand Total:
c •
O
CNS
K3-
C01
• m ,4 0-N(
3c 4-044 0 Cn.
3c 0 0 C 3c (NI @
3c > m @ 34 .
3c @ N 3c
3c -o >, 4-, 5,
(--0)'
34 N000D 'a< I -Li
3< =Q0 3c Off.
• @Ee 3c c40)6'
it 0 CDO 3C
N 0 -6 @ >, 3C + � .
3< @ @ .=34 3c
3C Q.^f-' 3-,4c 0Ni
3c C i= o C6 3<
0 N
3c Of 0 0 3< C
3c C '.0 C•L 3<
3( 0 (0 0) 3 0 '•"'
3c C C6 3(
5‘ m 03 —' 3c
3<
K ..,_.c. @ @ 3c
L N 33c —
34 O. O L— L • 3 'f@:
3c XLC603c N•
3< O U ^ •r: 3c L 0 •
3c N 1
T ((r3 - is
+-' zn
4%0- Ui3l XO
SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION
• Complete items 1, 2, and 3.
• Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
• Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addresse to:
(Jayne 4r►1y (91001(v�
13 I/ �. l�c�11✓1J-�"
go bk?OCo, kJ(' 9 3O
IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIilllllllll11111 IIIIIIII
9590 9403 0706 5196 2133 44
COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY
A. Signature
X C'7,0
2
B. Received by (Printed Name)
\3J a 1, C
❑ Agent
❑ Addressee
C. Date of Delivery
b
?
D. Is delivery addre different from ite Yes
If YES, enter delivery address belo ' ❑ No
2. Article Number (transfer from service label)
7018 1130 0000 0054 0419
3. Service Type
❑ Adult Signature
❑ Adult Signature Restricted Delivery
❑ Certified Mail®
0 Certified Mall Restricted Delivery
0 Collect on Delivery
0 Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery
^ insured Mail
isured Mall Restricted Delivery
ever $500)
PS Form 3811, April 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053
0 Priority Mall Express®
0 Registered MaIl"M
❑ Registered Mall Restricted
Delivery
❑ Return Receipt for
Merchandise
0 Signature Confirmation,"
0 Signature Confirmation
Restricted Delivery
Domestic Return Receipt

COu4-71.J
Attachment A. Local Government Review Form
General Statute Overview: North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 (c)(6) allows input from local governments in the issuance
of NPDES Permits for non -municipal domestic wastewater treatment facilities. Specifically, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) may not act on an application for a new non -municipal domestic wastewater discharge facility until it has
received a written statement from each city and county government having jurisdiction over any part of the lands on which the
proposed facility and its appurtenances are to be located. The written statement shall document whether the city or county has a
zoning or subdivision ordinance in effect and (if such an ordinance is in effect) whether the proposed facility is consistent with
the ordinance. The EMC shall not approve a permit application for any facility which a city or county has determined to be
inconsistent with zoning or subdivision ordinances unless the approval of such application is determined to have statewide
significance and is in the best interest of the State.
Instructions to the Applicant: Prior to submitting an application for a NPDES Permit for a proposed facility, the applicant
shall request that both the nearby city and county government complete this form. The applicant must:
• Submit a copy of the permit application (with a written request for this form to be completed) to the clerk of the city and
the county by certified mail, return receipt requested.
■ If either (or both) local government(s) fail(s) to mail the completed form, as evidenced by the postmark on the certified
mail card(s), within 15 days after receiving and signing for the certified mail, the applicant may submit the application to
the NPDES Unit.
• As evidence to the Commission that the local government(s) failed to respond within 15 days, the applicant shall submit a
copy of the certified mail card along with a notarized letter stating that the local governments) failed to respond within
the 15-day period.
Instructions to the Local Government: The nearby city and/or county government which may have or has jurisdiction over
any part of the land on which the proposed facility or its appurtenances are to be located is required to complete and return this
form to the applicant within 15 days of receipt. The form must be signed and notarized.
Name of local government (/isq t'j n-e
(City/County)
Does the city/co my have jurisdiction over any part of the land on which the proposed facility and its appurtenances are to be
located? Yes [✓JNo [ ] If no, please sign this form, have it notarized, and return it to the applicant.
Does the city/county have in effect a zoning or subdivision ordinance? Yes [V] No [ ]
If there is a zoning or subdivision ordinance in effect, is the plan for the proposed facility consistent with the ordinance? Yes [1-"(
No [ ] /
Date ) O/J ? J Signature
(City Mager/County Manager)
State of NO,.4-h C4 ea I j K. ♦ , County of L✓4y n t
On this / $ ° day of OC 1-0 b ev , _____1_, personally appeared before me, the said
name Bee e y 6 re, y to me known and known to me to be the person described in
and who executed the foregoing document and he (or she) acknowledged that he (or she) executed the same and being duly sworn
by me, made oath that the statements in the foregoing document are true.
My Commission expires li/0V 1514 O?OAR..(Signature of Notary Public)
EAA Guidance Document Revision: April 2014
Page 8of8
Notary Public (Official Seal)

APPENDIX 8 USDA SOILS MAP - SPRAY IRRIGATION

USDA United States
Department of
Agriculture
\ RCS
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
Wayne County,
North Carolina
September 3, 2021

Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nrcs/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
(https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nres) or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/contactus/?
cid=nrcs142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require
2

alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at [phone] (voice
and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or
call [phone] (voice) or [phone] (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.
3

Contents
�
��N� ��U� s
Preface 2
How Soil Surveys Are Made 5
Soil Map 8
Soil Map U
Legend 10
Map Unit Legend 11
Map Unit Descriptions 11
Wayne County, North Carolina 14
8b--Bibbsandy loam 14
Op—Dnagotonloamy sand 15
GoA--8o|dnboroloamy sand, Oto2percent slopes, Southern Coastal
Plain 17
Ka--KonannviUeloamy sand 18
La —Lakeland sand 19
Ly--Lynohburgsandy loam, Uto2percent slopes 20
NoA--Norfo|kloamy sand, 0hu2percent slopes 21
NoB--Norfo|kloamy sand, 2to6percent slopes 23
Ro--Roinosandy loam, Uhn2percent slopes 24
Tr—Troupsand28
VV--VVa\or 27
VVa8--VVagramloamy sand, Oto0percent slopes 27
We —Weston loamy sand (VVoodington) 28
References 31
4

How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous
areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous
areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and
limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length,
and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and
native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil
profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The
profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the
soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is
devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other
biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource
areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that
share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water
resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey
areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that
is related to the geology, Iandforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the
area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind
of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and
miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific
segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they
were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict
with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a
specific location on the landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their
characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented
by an understanding of the soil -vegetation -landscape relationship, are sufficient to
verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They
noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them
to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for
comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic
classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character
of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil
5

Custom Soil Resource Report
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the
individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that
they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and
research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the
objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a
unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components
of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way
diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such
landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite
investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape,
and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the
soil -landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at
specific locations. Once the soil -landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller
number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.
These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color,
depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for
content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil
typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of
characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit
component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other
properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally
are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists
interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field -observed
characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the
soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through
observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.
Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new
interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other
sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of
specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management
are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same
kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on
such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over
long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example,
soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will
have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict
that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the
survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and
6

Custom Soil Resource Report
identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings,
fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.
7

Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.
8

35° 16'9"N
35° 15 3" N
Custom Soil Resource Report
Soil Map
7,
NI Map Sole: 1:9,860 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet
N Meters
0 100 200 400 600
Feet
0 450 BM1800 2100
Map proje�on: Web Mer ator Caner 000niinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zane 17N WGS84
9
AIX)
35° 16' 9" N
35° 15'3"5

Custom Soil Resource Report
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
Special Point Features
tj Blowout
Borrow Pit
}y Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
kiti Spoil Area
o Stony Spot
03 Very Stony Spot
H Wet Spot
Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
.—. Rails
,.v Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aenal Photography
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:20,000.
Waming: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Wayne County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 18, Jun 3, 2020
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Oct 22, 2018—Oct
25, 2018
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
10

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
Bb
Bibb sandy loam
20.7
4.5%
Dr
Dragston loamy sand
1.5
0.3%
GoA
Goldsboro loamy sand, 0 to 2
percent slopes, Southern
Coastal Plain
1.4
0.3%
Ke
Kenansville loamy sand
12.8
2.8%
La
Lakeland sand
19.2
4.2%
Ly
Lynchburg sandy loam, 0 to 2
percent slopes
15.2
3.3%
NoA
Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2
percent slopes
150.5
32.7%
NoB
Norfolk loamy sand, 2 to 6
percent slopes
16.9
3.7%
Ra
Rains sandy loam, 0 to 2
percent slopes
111.0
24.2%
Tr
Troup sand
64.6
14.1%
W
Water
2.8
0.6%
WaB
Wagram loamy sand, 0 to 6
percent slopes
36.0
7.8%
We
Weston loamy sand
(Woodington)
6.8
1.5%
Totals for Area of Interest
459.4
100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
11

Custom Soil Resource Report
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha -Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
12

Custom Soil Resource Report
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
13

Custom Soil Resource Report
Wayne County, North Carolina
Bb—Bibb sandy loam
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wyb
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Bibb, undrained, and similar soils: 80 percent
Johnston, undrained, and similar soils: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Bibb, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Sandy and loamy alluvium
Typical profile
A - 0 to 6 inches: sandy loam
Cg1 - 6 to 60 inches: sandy loam
Cg2 - 60 to 80 inches: loamy sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95
in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: FrequentNone
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 5w
Hydrologic Soil Group: AID
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Description of Johnston, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Flood plains
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Sandy and loamy alluvium
14

Custom Soil Resource Report
Typical profile
A - 0 to 30 inches: mucky loam
Cg1 - 30 to 34 inches: loamy fine sand
Cg2 - 34 to 80 inches: fine sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Very poorly drained
Runoff class: Ponded
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95
in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 inches
Frequency of flooding: FrequentNone
Frequency of ponding: Frequent
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 9.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Dr—Dragston loamy sand
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wyh
Elevation: 0 to 20 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 42 to 58 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 64 degrees F
Frost -free period: 190 to 270 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Dragston, drained, and similar soils: 45 percent
Dragston, undrained, and similar soils: 40 percent
Minor components: 5 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Dragston, Drained
Setting
Landform: Marine terraces
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Sandy and loamy fluviomarine deposits and/or marine deposits
Typical profile
A - 0 to 6 inches: loamy fine sand
E - 6 to 10 inches: loamy fine sand
15

Custom Soil Resource Report
Bt - 10 to 42 inches: sandy loam
2Cg - 42 to 80 inches: loamy sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95
in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 12 to 30 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 6.3 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
Hydric soil rating: No
Description of Dragston, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Marine terraces
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Sandy and loamy fluviomarine deposits and/or marine deposits
Typical profile
A - 0 to 6 inches: loamy fine sand
E - 6 to 10 inches: loamy fine sand
Bt - 10 to 42 inches: sandy loam
2Cg - 42 to 80 inches: loamy sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95
in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 12 to 30 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 6.3 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w
Hydrologic Soil Group: ND
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Portsmouth, undrained
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, depressions on marine terraces
16

Custom Soil Resource Report
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Nimmo, undrained
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Landform: Depressions on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
GoA—Goldsboro loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes, Southern Coastal
Plain
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2v750
Elevation: 110 to 300 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Goldsboro and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Goldsboro
Setting
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 9 inches: loamy sand
E - 9 to 12 inches: loamy sand
Bt - 12 to 62 inches: sandy clay loam
Btg - 62 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Moderately well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 24 to 36 inches
17

Custom Soil Resource Report
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 8.1 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Norfolk
Percent of map unit: 8 percent
Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down -slope shape: Convex, linear
Across -slope shape: Convex, linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Lynchburg
Percent of map unit: 7 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Ke—Kenansville loamy sand
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wys
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Kenansville and similar soils: 90 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Kenansville
Setting
Landform: Stream terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Loamy alluvium over sandy alluvium
18

Custom Soil Resource Report
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 8 inches: loamy sand
E - 8 to 24 inches: loamy sand
Bt - 24 to 36 inches: sandy loam
BC - 36 to 42 inches: loamy sand
C - 42 to 84 inches: sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 3 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 5.95 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: Rare
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 4.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
La —Lakeland sand
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wyv
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Lakeland and similar soils: 80 percent
Minor components: 5 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Lakeland
Setting
Landform: Ridges on marine terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder, summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Sandy marine deposits and/or eolian sands
Typical profile
A - 0 to 6 inches: sand
19

Custom Soil Resource Report
C1 - 6 to 48 inches: sand
C2 - 48 to 80 inches: sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Excessively drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High to very high (5.95
to 19.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 4.0 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Leon
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Concave
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Ly—Lynchburg sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2vx8p
Elevation: 10 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained
Map Unit Composition
Lynchburg and similar soils: 84 percent
Minor components: 16 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Lynchburg
Setting
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
20

Custom Soil Resource Report
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 8 inches: sandy loam
E - 8 to 11 inches: sandy loam
Bt - 11 to 21 inches: sandy clay loam
Btg - 21 to 65 inches: sandy clay loam
BCg - 65 to 85 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 6 to 18 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 6.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Goldsboro
Percent of map unit: 8 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Rains
Percent of map unit: 8 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Dip, talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
NoA—Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2v75w
Elevation: 10 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
21

Custom Soil Resource Report
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Norfolk and similar soils: 83 percent
Minor components: 17 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Norfolk
Setting
Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down -slope shape: Convex, linear
Across -slope shape: Convex, linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 8 inches: loamy sand
E - 8 to 14 inches: loamy sand
Bt - 14 to 65 inches: sandy clay loam
BC - 65 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 40 to 72 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 6.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 1
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Goldsboro
Percent of map unit: 9 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Wagram
Percent of map unit: 8 percent
Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, ridges on marine
terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest, talf
22

Custom Soil Resource Report
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
NoB—Norfolk loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2v75y
Elevation: 30 to 450 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Norfolk and similar soils: 83 percent
Minor components: 17 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Norfolk
Setting
Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down -slope shape: Convex, linear
Across -slope shape: Convex, linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 8 inches: loamy sand
E - 8 to 14 inches: loamy sand
Bt - 14 to 65 inches: sandy clay loam
BC - 65 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 40 to 72 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 6.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
23

Custom Soil Resource Report
Minor Components
Wagram
Percent of map unit: 10 percent
Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, ridges on marine
terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Riser, rise
Down -slope shape: Convex, linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
Goldsboro
Percent of map unit: 7 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Ra—Rains sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2v760
Elevation: 30 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained
Map Unit Composition
Rains, undrained, and similar soils: 58 percent
Rains, drained, and similar soils: 24 percent
Minor components: 18 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Rains, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Carolina bays on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine
terraces, flats on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Dip, talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
A - 0 to 6 inches: sandy loam
Eg - 6 to 12 inches: sandy loam
Btg - 12 to 65 inches: sandy clay loam
24

Custom Soil Resource Report
BCg - 65 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.20 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Description of Rains, Drained
Setting
Landform: Carolina bays on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine
terraces, flats on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Dip, talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 6 inches: sandy loam
Eg - 6 to 12 inches: sandy loam
Btg - 12 to 65 inches: sandy clay loam
BCg - 65 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.20 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 12 to 36 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Minor Components
Lynchburg
Percent of map unit: 10 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
25

Custom Soil Resource Report
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Pantego, undrained
Percent of map unit: 8 percent
Landform: Stream terraces, flats, broad interstream divides
Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread, talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Concave
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Tr —Troup sand
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wzk
Elevation: 300 to 450 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 45 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 64 degrees F
Frost -free period: 190 to 270 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Troup and similar soils: 90 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Troup
Setting
Landform: Ridges on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine
terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder, summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Sandy and loamy fluviomarine deposits and/or eolian sands
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 53 inches: sand
H2 - 53 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Somewhat excessively drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
26

Custom Soil Resource Report
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 5.1 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
W—Water
Map Unit Composition
Water: 100 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Water
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 8w
Hydric soil rating: No
WaB—Wagram loamy sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wzl
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Wagram and similar soils: 90 percent
Minor components: 5 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Wagram
Setting
Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, ridges on marine
terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder, summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
27

Custom Soil Resource Report
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 8 inches: loamy sand
E - 8 to 24 inches: loamy sand
Bt - 24 to 75 inches: sandy clay loam
BC - 75 to 83 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 60 to 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 6.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Bibb, undrained
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Johnston, undrained
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
We —Weston loamy sand (Woodington)
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wzp
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
28

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Composition
Woodington, drained, and similar soils: 80 percent
Woodington, undrained, and similar soils: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Woodington, Drained
Setting
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, depressions on marine terraces, broad
interstream divides on marine terraces
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Concave
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 4 inches: loamy sand
E - 4 to 12 inches: loamy sand
Btg - 12 to 47 inches: sandy loam
Cg - 47 to 85 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95
in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.0 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w
Hydrologic Soil Group: ND
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Description of Woodington, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, depressions on marine terraces, broad
interstream divides on marine terraces
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Concave
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
A - 0 to 4 inches: loamy sand
E - 4 to 12 inches: loamy sand
Btg - 12 to 47 inches: sandy loam
Cg - 47 to 85 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
29

Custom Soil Resource Report
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95
in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.0 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes

References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep -water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_054262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://
www. nres. usda.gov/wps/portal/n res/detai I/national/soils/?cid=nres 142p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://
www. nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/
home/?cid= n res 142 p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/
detail/national/Ianduse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084
31

Custom Soil Resource Report
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nres/detai I/soils/scientists/?cid=n res 142p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,
the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook
296. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?
cid=nrcs142p2_053624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_052290.pdf
32

APPENDIX 9 NOAA ATLAS 14, VOLUME 2, VERSION 3 EDENTON, NC

9/3/21, 4:32 PM
Precipitation Frequency Data Server
NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 2, Version 3
Location name: Dudley, North Carolina, USA*
Latitude: 35.2673*, Longitude:-78.0423*
Elevation: 181 ft**
source: ESRI Maps
** source: USGS
POINT PRECIPITATION FREQUENCY ESTIMATES
G.M. Bonnin, D. Martin, B. Lin, T. Parzybok, M.Yekta, and D. Riley
NOAA, National Weather Service, Silver Spring, Maryland
PF tabular 1 PF graphical' Maps & aerials
PF tabular
PDS-based point precipitation frequency estimates with 90% confidence intervals (in inches)1
Duration
Average recurrence interval (years)
1
2
5
10
25
50
100
200
500
1000 j
5-m1n
0.449
(0.413 0 489)
0.526
(0.484-0.572)
0.605
(0.556-0.6571
0.678
(0 6220.736)
0.761
(0.695-0 n825
0.826
10.751-0.89611j0.804-0.963)1
0.889
0.950
(0.853-1.03)
1.02
(0,912-1.11)
1.09
10n962-1.19)
10-min
0.717
(0.659-0.781)
0.841
(0.774-0.915)
0.969
(0.891-1.05)
1.09
(0.995-1.18
1.21
11.11-1.32)
1.32
(1.20-1.43)
1.41
(1.28-1.53)
1.51
(1.35-1.63) 1
1.62
(1.44-1.76)
1.72
(1.52-1.87)
0.896
(0m824 0 976)
1.06
(0 973 1.15)
1.23 1.37
(1.13-1.33) M(1.26-1.49)
1.54
(1.40-1.67)
1.67
(1 52 1 81)
1.79
(1.61 1 94)
1.90
071-2.061
2.04
(1.82-2.221
2.16
11.90-2.35)
15-min
30-min
1.23
(1.13-1.34)
1.46
1.35-1 _59
1.74
(1.60-1.89_1 ,
1.99
(1.82_2.16)
2.28
_(2_08-2.47)
2.51
(2.28-2.72)
2.74
(2.47-2.96)
f 2.96
( (2.66-3.21)
3.25
(2.89-3.531
3.49
(3.08-3.80)
60-min
1.53
(1.41-1.67)
1.83
(1.69-1.99)
2.23
(2.05-2.42)J
2.59
(2.38-2.81)
3.03
(2.77-3.29)
3.40
(3.09-3.691,
3.77
(3.41-4.08)
4.15
(3.73-4.50)
4.66
(4.14-5.06)
5.10
(4.50-5.ba
2-hr
1.80
(1.65-1.99)
2.17
(1.99-2.39)
2.70
(2.46-2.97)
3.19
(2.90-3.50)
3.83
(3.46-4.19)
4.39
(3.95-4.81)
4.96
(4.44-5.43)
5.59
(4.96-6.12)
6.46
(5.68-7.08)
7.24
(6.31-7.95)
3-hr
1.92
2.32
2.12-2.56)
2.89
(2.63-3.20),
3.44
13.13-3.80J
4.18
(3.77-4.61)
4.85
4.35-5.34
5.55
14.93-6.10)
1 6.32
(5.57-6.95)
7.43
(6.48-8.17)
8.44
(7.27-9.31)
6-hr
2.30
(2.10-2.56)
2.77
(2.53-3.07)
3.47
(3.15-3.83)
4.13
(3.75-4.56)
5.04
(4.54-5.55)
5.86
(5.25-6.44)
6.73
(5.97-7.39)
7.69
(6.75-8.43)
9.08
(7.87-9.97)
10.4
(8.86-11.4)
12-hr
2.70
(2.44-3.021_
3.25
J2.95-3.63)
4.09
0-44.56L
4.90
(4.41-5.461
6.01
(5.36-6.68)
7.04
(6.23-7.80J
8.13
(7.13-9.01) ((8.11-10.4)
1 9.35
11.2
12.8
10.8-14.2)
_(3
4.83
(4.40-5.33)
5.78
(5.24-6.37)
7.21
(6.49-7.94)
8.45
(7.55-9.33)
9.86
(8.72-10.9)
3 11.4
(9.98-12.6j
.(9.50-12.4)
13.8
(11.9-15.4)
15.9
(13.4-17.8)
24-hr
3.08
(2.81-3.41)
3.73
(3.41-4.13)
3.56
(3.27-3.91)
4.31
3.96-4.73
5.52
(5.06-6.06)
6.57
(6.00-7.19)
L 8.13
( 7.37-8.89)
9.48
(8.53-10.4)
11.0
(9.79-12.1)
12.7
(11.1-14.m0,-(13.1-16.9)
15.2
17.4
(14.8-19.4)
2-day
3-day
3.79
(3.50-4.15)
4.58
(4.22-5.01)
5.83
(5.37-6.37)
6.90
(6.32-7.52)
8.48
(7.71-9.24)
9.83
_8.88-10.7)
11.3
(10.1-12.4)
13.0
(11.5-14.3)
15.5
(13.4-17.1)
17.6
15.0-19.6
4-day
4.02
(3.72-4.38)
4.85
(4.48-5.29)
6.14
(5.67_6.681 _
7.23
(6.65-7.851_
8.82
18.05-9.59)
10.2
, (9.22-11.1)
11.7
(105-12.7)
13.3
(11.8-14.61_
15.7
_(13.7-17.3)
17.8
(15.3-19.7)
7-day {
4.72
(4.37-5.141f
5.69
(5.26-6.19)
7.13
(6.59-7.771
8.33
J7.67-9.06)
10.1
�(9.20-11.0)
11.5
(10 4-12,5)
13.1
(11 .8 14 3)
14.7
113.2-16.11
17.1
(15.1-18.9)
19.2
(16.6-21.3)
7.99
(7.43-8.6 j)
9.24
m(8.58,-9.961_1
11.0
(10.2-11.9)
12.5
_ j 1 5 13.5j
14.1
. (12.9 15 3)
15.8
(14.3 17 2)
18.3
(16 2 20.01
20.3
(17.8-22.3)
10-day I
5.40
(5.03-5.82_
6.46
(6.03-6.98)
(9.91-11.4)
111 3-13.1)
(13.3- 5.4L,
(14.8-17.3)
_16.4- 9.4)
(18 1-21.61
120.4-24.7
(22.1-27.3)
20-day
7.3
6.8439
7?88
8. 6 9?
30-day
9.14
(8.58-9.78) _
10.8
_(10 2 11 6)
13.0
(12.2-13.91_
14.7
_03.8-15.7)
17.1
F (15.9 18.31_
18.9
(17.6-20.3)
20.8
_119_2-22A)
22.8
(20.9-24.6)
25.5
(23.2-27.71
27.6
(24_9-30.111
45-day
11.5
(10.9-12.3)
13.6
(12.9-14.5)
16.1
(15.2-17.2)
18.1
(17.0-19.3)
20.8
(19.5-22.2)
22.9
(21.4-24.5)
25.1
(23.3-26.9)
27.3
(25.2-29.3)
30.3
(27.7-32.7)
32.7
(29.6-35.4)
19.1
(18.1-20.21,
.,
21.2
(20.1-22.5)
24.1
(22.7-25.5)
26.3
(24.7-27.9)
28.5
(26.7-30.3)
30.7
(28.6-32.8)
33.6
(31.0-36,0�
35.8
(32.9-38.6)
60-day
13.9
23.1-14.7)
16.4
(15.5_17.3)
1 Precipitation frequency (PF) estimates in this table are based on frequency analysis of partial duration series (PDS
Numbers in parenthesis are PF estimates at lower and upper bounds of the 90% confidence interval. The probability hat precipitation frequency estimates
(for a given duration and average recurrence interval) will be greater than the upper bound (or less than the lower bound) is 5%. Estimates at upper bounds
are not checked against probable maximum precipitation (PMP) estimates and may be higher than currently valid PMP values.
Please refer to NOAA Atlas 14 document for more information.
Back to Tog
PF graphical
https://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds_printpage.html?lat=35.2673&Ion=-78.0423$data=depth&units=english&series=pds 1/4

9/3/21, 4:32 PM
Precipitation Frequency Data Server
Precipitation depth (in)
Precipitation depth (in)
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
PDS-based depth -duration -frequency (DDF) curves
Latitude: 35.2673°, Longitude: -78.0423°
0
c c c
E E .E
tr1 O �!1
e-d rl
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
t L
rA 1b ry
Duration
T >, T T >, T T
N A v l0
2 5 10 25 50 100 200 500 1000
Average recurrence interval (years)
NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 2, Version 3
Created (GMT): Fri Sep 3 20:32:39 2021
Back to Top
Maps & aerials
Small scale terrain
Average recurrence
interval
(years)
— 1
2
— 5
— 10
— 25
— 50
— 100
— 200
--- 500
— 1000
Duration
— 5-mtn — 2-day
— 10-min — 3-day
15-min — 4-day
— 30-min — 7-day
— 60-min — 10-day
— 2-hr — 20-day
— 3fir — 30-day
— 6-hr — 45-day
— 12-hr — 60-clay
— 24-hr
https://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds_printpage.html?lat=35.2673&Ion=-78.0423&data=depth&units=english&series=pds 2/4

9/3/21, 4:32 PM Precipitation Frequency Data Server
Large scale terrain
Large scale map
Rocky Mount
North h tGreenville
Carolina
100km
Arai
oJacksanvilb
Wilmington
Large scale aerial
https://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds_printpage.html?lot=35.26738,1on=-78.04238,data=depth units=english8<series=pds 3/4

9/3/21, 4:32 PM Precipitation Frequency Data Server
em
•
reensboro
Durham
North
Carolina
Raleigh
Fayetteville
100km
•
Rocky Mount
•
GI een it le
aark onvllL
Back to Top
US Department of Commerce
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
National Weather Service
National Water Center
1325 East West Highway
Silver Spring, MD 20910
Questions?: [e-mail]
Disclaimer
https://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds_printpage.html?lat=35.2673&Ion=-78.0423&data=depth&units=english&series=pds 4/4

APPENDIX 10 ECONOMIC ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS COST DETAILS

Apendix 10-1 POTW
Cost
Total Annual Gallons
Cost per gal
Total Discharge Fee
282,000,000 gal
0.029 $/ga;
$8,178,000 per year

Apendix 10-2 Land Application Alternative
Land Cost
Land already owned by GP
Total Land Purchase Cost
so
Piping/Pumping Cost
U Units Cost/unit Total Cost
12" Pipe 1000 ft $40.00 $40,000
10" Pipe 500 ft $30.00 $15,000
8" Pipe 500 ft $20.00 $10,000
6" Pipe 500 ft $15.00 $7,500
4" Pipe 4500 ft $12.00 $54,000
Irrigation System 2 ea $55,000 $110,000
Pumps 1 ea $300,000 $300,000
Electrical controls 1 ea $90,000.00 $90,000
Engineering 10% of cost ea $0.10 $62,650
Total Piping/Pumping Cost
$689,150
Pond Modification
Construction cost
Engineering
$1,837,500 52,000 cubic yards of clay at $35/cubic yard
$25,000.00
Total Pond Cost $1,862,500
Total Land and Capital Cost of Land Application
$2,551,650

Land Application Alternative - Operation and Maintenance Costs
Pump Station
Friction Loss
Delivery Pressure
Elevation Head
Total
Pump Efficiency
HP Required
KW Required
585,000 gpd
1ftper 100ft
60 psi
8ft
450 gpm
70 feet
139 feet
8 feet
217 feet Total Dynamic Head
70%
33 Horsepower (HP)
25 Kilowat (KW)
Power Cost
Pumping Rate
Pumping Cost
Pump Cost/day
Pump Cost/yr
$0.06 $/kw-hr Duke Energy
0.908428732 kw-hr/1000 gal
$0.05 $/1000 gal
$31.89 $/day
$11,638.33 $/yr
O&M Pond
Operator
600 $/yr from Table 2 - NC State Structural Stormwater Best Management Practices
10400 $/yr
$40/hr - 5 hrs/week
Analytical Costs
Permit Fees
Sytem Maintenance
2500 $/yr
1260 $/yr
$6,891.50 $/yr
Assume 1% of piping capital Cost
Total O&M Cost
Present Value Cost Analysis
$33,289.83 $/yr
PV
Co
C
n
r
PV
Present Value Costs
Costs incurred in presentyr $2,551,650
Costs incurred yearly $33,289.83
ending life of facilty = 20 20
current EPA discount rate 0.05
$2,966,514.92

Appendix 10-3 Wastewater Reuse Alternative
Land Cost
Land alread owned by GP
Total Land Purchase Cost
so
Piping/Pumping Cost
# Units Cost/unit Total Cost
12" Pipe 1000 ft $40.00 $40,000
10" Pipe 500 ft $30.00 $15,000
8" Pipe 500 ft $20.00 $10,000
6" Pipe 500 ft $15.00 $7,500
4" Pipe 500 ft $12.00 $6,000
Irrigation System 1 ea $6,000 $6,000
Pumps 1 ea $100,000 $100,000
Electrical controls 1 ea $20,000.00 $20,000
Engineering 10% of cost ea $0.10 $20,450
Total Piping/Pumping Cost
$224,950
Pond
Construction cost
Engineering
$1,837,500 52,000 cubic yards of clay at $35/cubic yard
$25,000.00
Total Pond Cost $1,862,500

Total Land and Capital Cost of Land Application $2,087,450
Wastewater Reuste Operation and Maintenance Costs
Pump Station
Friction Loss
Delivery Pressure
Elevation Head
Total
Pump Efficiency
HP Required
KW Required
38,333 gpd
1ftper 100ft
60 psi
8 ft
100 gpm
30 feet
139 feet
8 feet
177 feet TDH
70%
6 HP
4 KW
Power Cost
Pumping Rate
Pumping Cost
Pump Cost/day
Pump Cost/yr
O&M Pond
Operator
Analytical Costs
Permit Fees
Sytem Maintenance
Cost of Property Taxes
$0.06 $/kw-hr Duke Energy
0.164661429 kw-hr/1000 gal
$0.01 $/1000 gal
$0.38 $/day
$138.23 $/yr
600 $/yr
10400 $/yr
2500 $/yr
1260 $/yr
$2,249.50 $/yr
$0.00 S/yr
from Table 2 - NC State Structural Stormwater Best Management Practices
$40/hr - 5 hrs/week
Assume 1% of piping capital Cost
Gates County Tax rate $0.64/$100 valuation
Total O&M Cost
Present Value Cost Analysis
$17,147.73 $/yr
PV
Co
C
n
r
PV
Present Value Costs
Costs incurred in present yr
Costs incurred yearly
ending life of facilty = 20
current EPA discount rate
$2,301,148.66
$2,087,450
$17,147.73
20
0.05

Appendix 10-4 NPDES Discharge Alternative
Sprinkler System
Piping (50', 1" pipe) $3,000.00
Total Sprinkler System Cost $3,000
Total Capital Cost of NPDES Discharge
Operation and Maintenance Costs
$3,000
O&M Pond
Operator
Analytical Costs
Permit Fees
600 $/yr
10400 $/yr
2500 $/yr
1260 $/yr
from Table 2 - NC State Structural Stormwater Best Management Practices
$40/hr - 5 hrs/week
Total O&M Cost
$14,760.00 $/yr
Present Value Cost Analysis
PV Present Value Costs
Co Costs incurred in present yr $3,000
C Costs incurred yearly $14,760.00
n ending life of facilty = 20 20
r current EPA discount rate 0.05
PV $186,942.22

2/16/22, 12:32 PM Mail - Denard, Derek - Outlook
Re: [External] RE: NPDES Application No. NC0090051 for Georgia Pacific Dudley
Plywood Facility
Denard, Derek <[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail] <[e-mail]>; [e-mail] <[e-mail]>
Cc: Tankard, Robert <[e-mail]>
Thanks!
Derek Denard
Environmental Specialist
N.C. Division of Water Resources
N.C. Department of Environmental Quality
919 707 3618 office
919 707 9000 main DWR
[e-mail]
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: [e-mail] <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2022 11:47 AM
To: Denard, Derek <[e-mail]>; [e-mail] <[e-mail]>
Cc: Tankard, Robert <[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] RE: NPDES Application No. NC0090051 for Georgia Pacific Dudley Plywood Facility
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment
to Report Spam.
Hi Derek,
The units are mg/I for the parameters reported in the form. The COD is reported correctly, but the
TSS values need to be swapped. The average TSS is 19.6 mg/I and the max is 118 mg/I.
Sean Coury, PE
Partner
[phone] - office
[phone] - cell
[e-mail]
www.couryse.com
An Economically Disadvantaged
https://outlook.office365.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkADdhYTVmZDBILTESZDctNGI5MC04ZjliLWU4MjVhZTBhMmJkMgAQANKk2N1 EB%2B1 JnvpcztJvy... 1/3

2/16/22, 12:32 PM
Woman -Owned Small Business
Mail - Denard, Derek - Outlook
Original Message
Subject: NPDES Application No. NC0090051 for Georgia Pacific Dudley
Plywood Facility
From: "Denard, Derek" <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, February 11, 2022 12:22 pm
To: "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>,
"[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
Cc: "Tankard, Robert" <[e-mail]>
Sean & Brady,
I was reviewing the permit application. I had a question about the COD data (see below). The
maximum daily value was reported as 19.6. However, the average daily value was reported as
118. Was this a type-o? Also the units of measure such as mg/I were not reported for Oil and
Grease, COD, and TSS. I am assuming it was mg/L for all of these parameters. Please confirm
the units and the average for TSS.
Thanks,
Derek
EPA Idenfinuahon Number
NP6E5 Ferret Nwr 9F
FauhyName
Cures Number
FOnn ApaloAO 03J05119
OMB No. 2640-0604
TABLE A, CONVENTIONAL AND NON CONVENTIONAL
You must provide the results or at least one analysis
PARAMETERS 40 CFR 122.21(e}(1)(q(EO)),
for every pollutant in this table. Complete one table tar each eutfall. See instructions for additional details and requ rernents.
PolkRart or Parameter
Maximum Daily Discharge
Is°°°t,' units)
Average Daily Discharge
(rpedfy ads)
Number of Storm
Events Sampled
Source of
Information
(rrewsouroYnew
&chargers only, as
eudesinkoseimo)
Grab 5 ngp a Taken 1
During First i Flow-Waighf d
30Minutes : CCmYpotiM
Grab Sample Taken
During Firer
36Minutes
! Flom-WaigMed
Composite
1.
Oil and grease
5
4 s
2.
Biochemical oxygen demand (BODO(
,
3.
Chemical oxygen demand (COD)
121
79
7
4.
Total suspended solids (TSS)
19 6
118 1
7
5,
Total phosphorus
8.
Total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN)
7.
Total nitrogen les N)
B.
pH (minimum)
pH (maximum)
Sampling shall be conducted according to sufficiently sensitive test procedures (i.e,, methods( approved under 40 CFR 136 for the analysis of pollutants or pollutant parameters or
required under40 CFR chapter I, subchapter N o 0. See instructions and 40 CFR I22.21(e((3)
Derek Denard
Environmental Specialist
N.C. Division of Water Resources
N.C. Department of Environmental Quality
919 707 3618 office
919 707 9000 main DWR
[e-mail]
https://outlook.office365.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkADdhYTVmZDBILTESZDctNGI5MC04ZjliLWU4MjVhZTBhMmJkMgAQANKk2N1 EB%2B1 JnvpcztJvy... 2/3

2/16/22, 12:32 PM Mail - Denard, Derek - Outlook
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
https://outlook.office365.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkADdhYTVmZDBILTESZDctNGI5MC04ZjliLWU4MjVhZTBhMmJkMgAQANKk2N1 EB%2B1 JnvpcztJvy... 3/3

6/29/22, 1:18 AM Mail - Denard, Derek - Outlook
RE: Peer Review for NC0090051
Phillips, Emily <[e-mail]>
Thu 3/24/2022 3:56 PM
To:
• Denard, Derek <[e-mail]>
Looks fine to me....
From: Denard, Derek <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2022 2:48 PM
To: Phillips, Emily <[e-mail]>
Subject: Peer Review for NC0090051
Emily,
Please find the attached peer review. This is for a new permit application. It is a wet deck facility. Let me know if
you have questions.
Thanks,
Derek Denard
Environmental Specialist
N.C. Division of Water Resources
N.C. Department of Environmental Quality
919 707 3618 office
919 707 9000 main DWR
[e-mail]
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
https://outlook.office365.com/mail/id/AAQkADdhYTVmZDBILTESZDctNGI5MC04ZjliLWU4MjVhZTBhMmJkMgAQAGX5gFYh3T1AjJF7W9rOG6w%3D 1/1

6/29/22, 1:24 AM Mail - Denard, Derek - Outlook
DRAFT permit NC0090051 Georgia-Pacific
Denard, Derek <[e-mail]>
Thu 3/24/2022 2:59 PM
To:
• Tankard, Robert <[e-mail]>
002 attachments
NC0090051 DRAFT 20220405.pdf; NC0090051 Fact Sheet Binder 2022(1).pdf;
Robert,
Please find the attached draft permit NC0090051 for the region's review. This is a wet deck at the Georgia-
Pacific Wood Products, LLC - Dudley Plywood Facility in Wayne County. I have attached a link to the factsheet
that includes the application. I plan to submit the draft for public notice on April 5th.
Thanks,
Derek
Derek Denard
Environmental Specialist
N.C. Division of Water Resources
N.C. Department of Environmental Quality
919 707 3618 office
919 707 9000 main DWR
[e-mail]
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
https://outlook.office365.com/mail/id/AAQkADdhYTVmZDBILTESZDctNGI5MC04ZjliLWU4MjVhZTBhMmJkMgAQABmWdj%2B%2BOJxAITYseo%2B8... 1/1

6/29/22, 1:53 AM https://www.ncnotices.com/DetailsPrint.aspx?SID=hi5mto21xutzijergogxulbp&ID=214236
Goldsboro News-Argus
PuUIIL'atiOli Logo
U navailahlc
Publication Name:
Goldsboro News-Argus
Publication URL:
Publication City and State:
Goldsboro, NC
Publication County:
Wayne
Notice Popular Keyword Category:
Notice Keywords:
NC0090051
Notice Authentication Number:
202206290053061282491
2510867466
Notice URL:
Back
Notice Publish Date:
Tuesday, April 12, 2022
Notice Content
1090010000137514/5/2215/3/22IDees, Smith, Powell, Jarrett, Dees &JonesI70334203INOTICE OF ADMINISTRATION NORTH CAROLINA
WAYNE COUNTY The undersigned, having qualified as Executor of the Estate of Joseph Jay LaRue, late deceased of Wayne County, hereby
notifies all persons having claims against the estate of said deceased to file them with the undersigned on or before the 30th day of June
2022, or this notice will be pleaded in bar of their right to recover against said estate. All persons indebted to said estate will please make
immediate payment. This 5th day of April, 2022. Richard Edward Carter, Executor c/o John W. Dees Attorney for the Estate 100 N.
William Street Post Office Drawer 8 Goldsboro, N. C. 27533-0008 PUBLICATION DATES: April 12, April 19, April 26, 2022, and May 3 2022
1090017006001313/29/2214/12/22IThe Suggs Law Firm, PCI70320317ISTATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF DARLINGTON IN THE
FAMILY COURT FOR THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT Angela W. Keathly, Plaintiff, -vs- Brian Scott Keathly, Defendant. SUMMONS
Docket No.: 2015-DR-16-134 TO: THE DEFENDANT ABOVE NAMED: YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED and required to answer the Motion to
Amend Final Decree herein, a copy of which is herewith served upon you, and to serve a copy of your Answer to said Motion upon the
subscriber, at his office at 506 West Evans Street, Florence, S.C., 29501, within thirty (30) days after the service hereof, exclusive of the day
of such service, and if you fail to answer the Motion within the time aforesaid, the Plaintiff will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in
the Motion to Amend Final Decree and judgment by default will be rendered against you for the relief demanded in the Motion. TAKE
NOTICE, that on the 30th day of December, 2020, Brian Scott Keathly, the Defendant herein, forwarded their Motion to Amend Final Decree
in this action to the Office of the Clerk of Court for Darlington County, South Carolina against the above -named Plaintiff, Angela W. Keathly. A
Hearing in this matter is scheduled in the Darlington County Family Court on June 30, 2022, at 9:30 o'clock, a.m., at One Public Square,
Darlington, S.C. 29532 THE SUGGS LAW FIRM, P.C. BY: B. Scott Suggs B. Scott Suggs S.C. Bar No.: 012896 Federal I.D. No.: 5846 506 W.
Evans St. P.O. Drawer 591 Florence, S.C. 29503 [phone] (Telephone) [phone] (Facsimile) [phone] (Toll Free)
TheSuggsLawFirm© sc.twcbc.com ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT Florence, South Carolina March 15, 2022
1090010000107614/12/2215/3/22IBaddour, Parker, Hine & HaleI70338456INOTICE TO CREDITORS OF RONALD FRANKLIN STEELE All
persons, firms, and corporations having claims against Ronald Franklin Steele, deceased, of Wayne County, are notified to exhibit them to the
undersigned on or before the 12th day of July, 2022, or this notice will be pleaded in bar of their recovery. All persons indebted to the estate
will please make immediate payment to the undersigned. This 12th day of April, 2022. Mark J. Hale, Jr., Administrator of the Estate of
https://www.ncnotices.com/DetailsPrint.aspx?SID=hi5mto21 xutzijerqogxulbp&ID=214236 1/4

6/29/22, 1:53 AM https://www.ncnotices.com/DetailsPrint.aspx?SID=hi5mto21xutzijergogxulbp&ID=214236
Ronald Franklin Steele Baddour, Parker, Hine & Hale, P.C. Attorneys for Estate P.O. Box 916 Goldsboro, NC 27533-0916 [phone]
April 12, 19, 26, and May 3, 2022.
1090017006156714/12/2215/3/22IDimitri DimtroffI70338288INOTICE OF ADMINISTRATION STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF WAYNE
The undersigned EXECUTOR of the Estate of JACQUELINE BLUM gives notice that all claims against said decedent are to be presented to the
undersigned on or before July 12th, 2022 or this notice will be pleaded in bar of their recovery. All persons indebted to said estate, please
make immediate payment. This notice is given pursuant to the provisions of G.S. 28A-14-1. This the 12th day of April, 2022 DIMITRI G.
DIMTROFF 1709 PINE STREET ELIZABETH CITY, NC 27909 April 12, 19, 26; May 3
1090010000131714/12/2214/12/22ICounty of Wayne Katherine PierceI70338444IPUBLIC NOTICE SALE OF COUNTY PROPERTY An offer of
$6,000.00 has been submitted for the purchase of certain property owned by the County of Wayne located at 209 and 213 N. Georgia Ave.,
Goldsboro, NC (Wayne County PINs 2599677450, 2599677562, and 2599678507) more particularly described as follows: 209 N. Georgia
Ave., Goldsboro, NC (PIN: 2599677450) COMMENCING at an iron stake at the Northwest intersectional corner of Mulberry Street and Georgia
Avenue and runs thence with Georgia Avenue N. 22 degrees 41 minutes E. 220.00 feet to an iron stake, the point of beginning; thence from
said point of beginning N. 67 degrees 19 minutes W. 133.00 feet to an iron stake; thence N. 22 degrees 413 minutes E. 10.00 feet to an iron
stake; thence North 67 degrees 19 minutes W. 55.00 feet to an iront stake; thence North 22 degrees 41 minutes E. 55.00 minutes to an iron
stake in the line of Lot No. 3; thence with the line of Lot No. 3, S. 67 degrees 19 minutes E. 188.00 feet to an iron stake found in the western
right of way of Georgia Avenue; thence with Georgia Avenue S. 22 degrees 41 minutes W. 65 feet to the beginning. 213 N. Georgia Ave.
Goldsboro, NC (PINs: 2599677562 & 2599678507) BEING the house and lot together with the vacant lot known and identified as 213 North
Georgia Avenue and being Lots 1 and 2 of Block 21 of the F.K. Borden Subdivision as shown on a plat recorded in Plat Cabinet B, Slide 197 in
the Wayne County Registry. And being those same lots or parcels of land conveyed to Ronyar, LLC by deed recorded in Book 1652 at Page
403 of the Wayne County Registry. Persons wishing to upset the offer that has been received shall submit a sealed bid with their offer and
the required deposit to the Clerk to the Board of Commissioners, PO Box 227, Goldsboro, NC 27533 by 5:00 P.M. on April 22, 2022. At that
time the Clerk to the Board shall open the bids, if any, and the highest qualifying bid will become the new offer. If there is more than one bid
in the highest amount, the first such bid received will become the new offer. A qualifying higher bid is one that raises the existing offer at
least 10% of the first $1,000 and 5% of the remainder. A qualifying bid must raise the existing offer to an amount not less than
$6,350.00. A qualifying higher bid must be accompanied by a deposit in the amount of five percent (5%) of the bid; the deposit may be
made in cash, cashier's check, or certified check. The County will return the deposit on any bid not accepted and will return the deposit on an
offer subject to upset if a qualifying higher bid is received. If no other bids are made the original offer to purchase of $6,000.00 will be
accepted. Further information may be obtained at the Wayne County Staff Attorney's Office, 100 S. Ormond Ave., Goldsboro, NC or by
telephone at [phone] during normal business hours. Andrew J. Neal, Wayne County Staff Attorney PO Box 227 Goldsboro, NC 27533
[phone] Run date: April 12, 2022
1090010000107614/12/2214/19/22IBaddour, Parker, Hine & HaleI70317814INOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Village of Walnut Creek is
considering the adoption of a system development fee. A written analysis of a system development fee has been prepared by Scott Edwards,
a professional engineer and is posted on the website of the Village of Walnut Creek. The Village Council of the Village of Walnut Creek will
conduct a public hearing on April 27, 2022 at 103 Village Drive, Goldsboro, NC 27534 beginning at 7:30 pm for the purpose of considering
the adoption of the analysis with any modifications or revisions and to consider the adoption of a system development fee. This the 14th
day of March, 2022. /s/Jacqui Whitmire Jacqui Whitmire, Village Clerk Village of Walnut Creek Published April
12 and April 19, 2022
1090017006045013/29/2214/19/22ILaura GurleyI70325602INOTICE OF ADMINISTRATION STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF WAYNE
The undersigned CO-ADMINISTRATORs of the Estate of MILES EUGENE POPE give notice that all claims against said decedent are to be
presented to the undersigned on or before June 29th, 2022 or this notice will be pleaded in bar of their recovery. All persons indebted to said
estate, please make immediate payment. This notice is given pursuant to the provisions of G.S. 28A-14-1. This the 25th day of March, 2022
LAURA P. GURLEY 202 WALDEN WOODS DR LA GRANGE, NC 28551 JACKIE B. POPE 248D LAZY LANE HOBUCKEN, NC 28537 March 29; April
5, 12, 19
1090010000107614/12/2215/3/22IBaddour, Parker, Hine & HaleI70338464INOTICE TO CREDITORS OF LINDA LYNN BENNETT All persons,
firms, and corporations having claims against Linda Lynn Bennett, deceased, of Wayne County, are notified to exhibit them to the
undersigned on or before the 12th day of July, 2022, or this notice will be pleaded in bar of their recovery. All persons indebted to the estate
will please make immediate payment to the undersigned. This 12th day of April, 2022. Mark J. Hale, Jr., Administrator of the Estate of
Linda Lynn Bennett Baddour, Parker, Hine & Hale, P.C. Attorneys for Estate P.O. Box 916 Goldsboro, NC 27533-0916 [phone] April
12, 19, 26, and May 3, 2022.
1090017006055413/29/2214/19/22IDonnie CarterI70327138INOTICE OF ADMINISTRATION STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF WAYNE
The undersigned ADMINISTRATOR of the Estate of LORRAINE MITCHELL CARTER gives notice that all claims against said decedent are to be
presented to the undersigned on or before June 29th, 2022 or this notice will be pleaded in bar of their recovery. All persons indebted to said
estate, please make immediate payment. This notice is given pursuant to the provisions of G.S. 28A-14-1. This the 29th day of March, 2022
DONNIE CARTER 2681 INDIAN SPRINGS RD SEVEN SPRINGS, NC 28578 March 29; April 5, 12, 19
1090017004950714/12/2214/19/22I"Nodell, Glass & Haskell "I70324504INORTH CAROLINA WAYNE COUNTY Special Proceedings No. 22 SP
33 Substitute Trustee: Philip A. Glass NOTICE OF FORECLOSURE SALE Date of Sale: April 26, 2022 Time of Sale: 10:00 a.m. Place of Sale:
https://www.ncnotices.com/DetailsPrint.aspx?SID=hi5mto21 xutzijerqogxulbp&ID=214236 2/4

6/29/22, 1:53 AM https://www.ncnotices.com/DetailsPrint.aspx?SID=hi5mto21xutzijergogxulbp&ID=214236
Wayne County Courthouse Description of Property: See Attached Description Record Owners: Edna Christine Burden Address of Property:
810 Franklin Street Goldsboro, NC 27530 Deed of Trust: Book : 2855 Page: 288 and that second Deed of Trust recorded in Book 3247, Page
743 Dated: May 13, 2011 and that second Deed of Trust dated August 11, 2016 Grantors: Edna Christine Burden Original Beneficiary: State
Employees' Credit Union CONDITIONS OF SALE: Should the property be purchased by a third party, that person must pay the tax of
Forty-five Cents (45) per One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) required by N.C.G.S. 7A-308(a)(1). This sale is made subject to all unpaid taxes
and superior liens or encumbrances of record and assessments, if any, against the said property, and any recorded leases. This sale is also
subject to any applicable county land transfer tax, and the successful third party bidder shall be required to make payment for any such
county land transfer tax. A cash deposit of 5% of the purchase price will be required at the time of the sale. Any successful bidder shall be
required to tender the full balance of the purchase price so bid in cash or certified check at the time the Substitute Trustee tenders to him a
deed for the property or attempts to tender such deed, and should said successful bidder fail to pay the full balance purchase price so bid at
that time, he shall remain liable on his bid as provided for in North Carolina General Statutes Section 45-21.30 (d) and (e). This sale will be
held open ten (10) days for upset bids as required by law. Residential real property with less than 15 rental units, including single-family
residential real property: an order for possession of the property may be issued pursuant to G.S. 45-21.29 in favor of the purchaser and
against the party or parties in possession by the clerk of superior court of the county in which the property is sold. Any person who occupies
the property pursuant to a rental agreement entered into or renewed on or after October 1, 2007, may, after receiving notice of sale,
terminate the rental agreement by providing written notice of termination to the landlord, to be effective on a date stated in the notice that is
at least 10 days, but not more than 90 days, after the sale date contained in the notice of sale, provided that the mortgagor has not cured
the default at the time the tenant provides the notice of termination. Upon termination of a rental agreement, the tenant is liable for rent due
under the rental agreement prorated to the effective date of the termination. Dated: 3/22/22 Philip A.
Glass, Substitute Trustee Nodell, Glass & Haskell, L.L.P. Posted on 3/22/22 EXHIBIT A THAT CERTAIN LOT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE
CITY OF GOLDSBORO, WAYNE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT AN IRON STAKE ON THE EASTERN
EDGE OF FRANKLIN STREET SAID POINT OF BEGINNING BEING NORTH 8 DEG. 39 MINUTES EAST 386.21 FEET FROM A CONCRETE
MONUMENT AT THE NORTHEASTERN INTERSECTION OF FRANKLIN STREET AND BERRY STREET; THENCE FROM SAID POINT OF BEGINNING
SOUTH 81 DEG. 27 MINUTES EAST 208.37 FEET TO AN IRON STAKE; THENCE NORTH 0 DEG. 56 MINUTES EAST 75.67 FEET TO AN IRON
STAKE; THENCE NORTH 81 DEG. 27 MINUTES WEST 198.34 FEET TO AN IRON STAKE ON THE EASTERN BOUNDARY OF FRANKLIN STREET;
THENCE SOUTH 8 DEG. 33 MINUTES WEST AND WITH THE EASTERN BOUNDARY OF FRANKLIN STREET 75 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING. AND BEING ALL OF LOT NO. 48 OF THE SUBDIVISION KNOWN AS WOODFORD TERRACE, SECTION II, A PLAT OF WHICH IS
RECORDED IN BOOK 8, PAGE 38 OF THE WAYNE COUNTY REGISTRY. Subject to easements, restrictions and rights of way of record, and
utility lines and rights of way in existence over, under or upon the above described property. Parcel ID: 3508398918 Property Address: 810
Franklin St. Goldsboro, NC 27530
1090017004950714/12/2214/19/22I"Nodell, Glass & Haskell "I70324478INORTH CAROLINA WAYNE COUNTY Special Proceedings No. 22 SP
18 Substitute Trustee: Philip A. Glass NOTICE OF FORECLOSURE SALE Date of Sale: April 26, 2022 Time of Sale: 10:00 a.m. Place of Sale:
Wayne County Courthouse Description of Property: See Attached Description Record Owners: Jeffrey Brandon Sullivan Address of Property:
4172 Stevens Mill Road (PIN 2547387767); Vacant Lot, Stevens Mill Road (PIN 2547395174) and Vacant Lot, Stevens Mills Road (PIN
2547491014) Goldsboro, NC 27530 Deed of Trust: Book : 3542 Page: 757 Dated: August 07, 2020 Grantors: Jeffrey B. Sullivan an
unmarried person Original Beneficiary: State Employees' Credit Union CONDITIONS OF SALE: Should the property be purchased by a third
party, that person must pay the tax of Forty-five Cents (45) per One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) required by N.C.G.S. §7A-308(a)(1).
This sale is made subject to all unpaid taxes and superior liens or encumbrances of record and assessments, if any, against the said property,
and any recorded leases. This sale is also subject to any applicable county land transfer tax, and the successful third party bidder shall be
required to make payment for any such county land transfer tax. A cash deposit of 5% of the purchase price will be required at the time
of the sale. Any successful bidder shall be required to tender the full balance of the purchase price so bid in cash or certified check at the
time the Substitute Trustee tenders to him a deed for the property or attempts to tender such deed, and should said successful bidder fail to
pay the full balance purchase price so bid at that time, he shall remain liable on his bid as provided for in North Carolina General Statutes
Section 45-21.30 (d) and (e). This sale will be held open ten (10) days for upset bids as required by law. Residential real property with
less than 15 rental units, including single-family residential real property: an order for possession of the property may be issued pursuant to
G.S. 45-21.29 in favor of the purchaser and against the party or parties in possession by the clerk of superior court of the county in which
the property is sold. Any person who occupies the property pursuant to a rental agreement entered into or renewed on or after October 1,
2007, may, after receiving notice of sale, terminate the rental agreement by providing written notice of termination to the landlord, to be
effective on a date stated in the notice that is at least 10 days, but not more than 90 days, after the sale date contained in the notice of sale,
provided that the mortgagor has not cured the default at the time the tenant provides the notice of termination. Upon termination of a rental
agreement, the tenant is liable for rent due under the rental agreement prorated to the effective date of the termination. Dated:
3/22/22 Philip A. Glass, Substitute Trustee Nodell, Glass & Haskell, L.L.P. Posted on 3/22/22 Exhibit A Tract
1: Beginning at an iron stake found on the Northern right-of-way line of N.C.S.R. 1008 (Stevens Mill Road), said iron stake being the
Southeastern corner of the C. L. Williford and wife Lola H. Williford property, Deed Book 1377, Page 353, said beginning point also being
located, S 78-52-39 W, 862.84 feet, S 79-02-47 W. 188.70 feet, N 14-28-26 W. 30.05 feet from the centerline Intersection of N.C.S.R. 1008
and N.C.S.R. 1211; Thence from the beginning, and with the Eastern line of said Williford property, N 14-28-26 W. 534.15 feet to an iron
stake found; Thence with said Willifords Northern line, S 78-49-47 W. 138.00 feet to an iron stake found, the Southeastern corner of Lot #18
of Mill Creek Landing Subdivision, section Five recorded in Plat Cabinet "L", Slide "21D"; Thence with the Eastern line of said Lot #18, N 15-
38-39 W. 136.12 feet to an iron stake found, the Southeastern corner of Lot #17 of said subdivision; Thence with the eastern line of said Lot
#17, N. 15-38-39 W. 34.50 feet to an iron stake found; Thence continuing with the Eastern line of said Lot #17, N. 32-14-54 W. 100.40 feet
to an iron stake set, a new corner; Thence a new line, N. 85-05-20 E. 200.19 feet to an iron stake set, a new corner; Thence continuing N
85-05-20 E. 174.72 feet to an iron stake set in the centerline of an existing fifty foot ingress, egress and regress easement; Thence with the
https://www.ncnotices.com/DetailsPrint.aspx?SID=hi5mto21 xutzijerqogxulbp&ID=214236 3/4

6/29/22, 1:53 AM https://www.ncnotices.com/DetailsPrint.aspx?SID=hi5mto21xutzijergogxulbp&ID=214236
centerline of said easement, a curve to the left, having a radius of 526.83 feet, an arc of 93.46 feet, and a chord of S. 02-58-31 E. 93.34 feet
to an iron stake set, a new corner; Thence continuing with the centerline of said fifty foot easement, S 15-15-58 E 656.27 feet to an iron
stake found on the Northern right-of-way line of N.C.S.R. 1008; Thence with the Northern right-of-way line of N.C.S.R. 1008, S 79-03-56 W.
188.83 feet to an iron stake found, the point of Beginning, containing 4.02 acres, and being the same property recorded by deed recorded in
Deed Book 2380, Page 215 of the Wayne County Registry. Tract 2 & 3: Being Lot #1 and Lot #1A as shown on the map dated December 12,
2005, prepared by A Darrell Ham, Professional Land Surveyor, entitled "Survey for Blaney W. Jeanette, Grantham Township, Wayne County,
NC" and recorded In Plat Cabinet M, Slide 59-I, of the Wayne County Registry. This conveyance is made subject to restrictions and
easements of record, if any. Subject to easements, restrictions and rights of way of record, and utility lines and rights of way in existence
over, under or upon the above described property. PINs: 2547387767, 2547395174, and 2547491014 Property Address: 4172 Stevens Mill
Rd. Goldsboro, NC 27530 Vacant Lot, Stevens Mill Rd. Goldsboro, NC 27540 Vacant Lot, Stevens Mill Rd. Goldsboro, NC 27540
1090017002156214/12/2214/12/22INorth Carolina Environmental Management CommissionI70338423IPublic Notice North Carolina
Environmental Management Commission / NPDES Unit 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Notice of Intent to Issue a NPDES
Wastewater Permit NC0090051 Georgia Pacific Dudley Plywood Facility The North Carolina Environmental Management Commission proposes
to issue a NPDES wastewater discharge permit to the person(s) listed below. Written comments regarding the proposed permit will be
accepted until 30 days after the publish date of this notice. The Director of the NC Division of Water Resources (DWR) may hold a public
hearing should there be a significant degree of public interest. Please mail comments and/or information requests to DWR at the above
address. Interested persons may visit the DWR at 512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, NC 27604 to review information on file. Additional
information on NPDES permits and this notice may be found on our website: http://deq.nc.gov/about/ divisions/water-resources/ water -
resources -permits/ wastewater -branch/ npdes-wastewater/ public -notices, or by calling [phone]. Georgia-Pacific Wood Products LLC
[139 Brewington Dr, Dudley, NC 28333] has requested a new permit NC0090051 for its Dudley Plywood Facility in Wayne County. This
permitted facility discharges treated wet -decking wastewater and stormwater to Brooks Swamp in the Neuse River Basin. No parameters are
water quality limited. This discharge may affect future allocations in this segment of Brooks Swamp.
1090017006159614/12/2215/3/22ILarry TaylorI70338527INOTICE OF ADMINISTRATION STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF WAYNE
The undersigned ADMINISTRATOR of the Estate of ROBERT EARL TAYLOR gives notice that all claims against said decedent are to be
presented to the undersigned on or before July 12th, 2022 or this notice will be pleaded in bar of their recovery. All persons indebted to said
estate, please make immediate payment. This notice is given pursuant to the provisions of G.S. 28A-14-1. This the 12th day of April, 2022
LARRY L TAYLOR 1507 SCOTTY DRIVE GOLDSBORO, NC 27534 April 12, 19, 26; May 3
Back
https://www.ncnotices.com/DetailsPrint.aspx?SID=hi5mto21 xutzijergogxulbp&ID=214236 4/4

ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretarya,AM
RICHARD E. ROGERS, JR. NORTH CAROLINA
Director Environmental Quality
May 5, 2022
MEMORANDUM
To: Jamie Midgette [[e-mail]]
NC DEQ / DWR / PWS / WaRO
From:
Subject:
for:
Derek C. Denard, Environmental Specialist
DWR / WQPS / Compliance & Expediated Permitting Branch
919-707-3618
Review of Discharge to Surface Waters Designated Water Supply (WS)
• UT to Brooks Swamp (Buck Swamp) [27-54-5-2], WS-IV; NSW
• Neuse / 03-04-12 / HUC 030202011401
Application for new NPDES Permit NC0090051
Georgia-Pacific Wood Products LLC / Georgia Pacific Dudley Plywood Facility
Wayne County
Please provide your comments by 05/20/2022 [email OK]
RESPONSE:
Signed:
I concur with the issuance of this permit provided the Permittee properly operates and
maintains the facility; the Permittee meets the stated effluent limits prior to discharge; and the
discharge does not contravene the designated water quality standards.
1 concur with issuance of the above permit provided the following conditions are met:
I oppose the issuance of the above permit based on reasons stated below, or attached:
E
4epartrnenl a! Enrirenmenral Oua[IIY
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 11617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
919.707.9000

7/8/22, 6:06 PM Mail - Denard, Derek - Outlook
Draft NPDES Permit NC0090051 - Georgia Pacific Dudley Plywood Facility
Denard, Derek <[e-mail]>
Mon 4/18/2022 2:25 PM
To: [e-mail]<[e-mail]>;[e-mail]
<[e-mail]>
Cc: Kinney, Maureen <[e-mail]>;Tankard, Robert <[e-mail]>
1 attachments (3 MB)
NC0090051 DRAFT 20220405.pdf;
Please find the attachment for Draft NPDES Permit NC0090051 - Georgia Pacific Dudley Plywood Facility.
The draft was mailed to the permittee the week of April 4th.
In order to provide more convenience, control, and security to our permittees and assist them in processing their
transactions, the Division of Water Resources is currently transitioning towards electronic correspondence. This
will hopefully provide more efficient service to our permittees and other partners and will allow us to more
effectively process and track documents. We are writing to ask you for your approval of the transmittal of
documents related to your permitting and related activities with the Division in an electronic format. Documents
will be emailed to the appropriate contact person(s) in your organization in a PDF format.
Please respond to me through email with verification that transmittal of your documents in an electronic
manner is acceptable to you.
Please respond to this email confirming that you received the attached document(s), were able to open and
view the document(s) and have saved/printed a copy for your records.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Derek Denard
Environmental Specialist
N.C. Division of Water Resources
N.C. Department of Environmental Quality
919 707 3618 office
919 707 9000 main DWR
[e-mail]
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
https://outlook.office365.com/mail/id/AAQkADdhYTVmZDBILTESZDctNGI5MC04ZjliLWU4MjVhZTBhMmJkMgAQAMcRUF7fp5pAkmIQ8ToC8%2FQ%3D 1/1

7/11/22, 10:26 AM
Mail - Denard, Derek - Outlook
RE: [External] RE: Issuance of NPDES Permit NC0090051 - Georgia Pacific Dudley
Plywood Facility
Turley, Brandy J <[e-mail]>
Mon 7/11/
To: Denard, Derek <[e-mail]>
Cc: Weaver, Charles <[e-mail]>;Tankard, Robert <[e-mail]>
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment
to Report Spam.
Thank you for the clarification.
Environmental Manager
Georgia-Pacific Wood Products LLC
Dudley Plywood & Chip-N-Saw
139 Brewington Rd
Dudley, NC 28333
(0) 919-705-0526
(C) 919-750-9738
From: Denard, Derek <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2022 10:21 AM
To: Turley, Brandy J <[e-mail]>
Cc: Weaver, Charles <[e-mail]>; Tankard, Robert <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [External] RE: Issuance of NPDES Permit NC0090051 - Georgia Pacific Dudley Plywood Facility
Sent by an external sender
Brandy,
The permit will not be effective until 9/1/2022. No discharge can occur before that date. This allows
time for us to update the database for the new permit. This also gives the the permittee time to register
for eDMR, designate operators, etc.
Session Law 2011-394, which became effective July 1, 2011, no longer requires an (Authorization to
Construct) ATC permit for construction work at industrial NPDES facilities. So construction can be done
at any time for this treatment system.
If you have questions, please let me know.
Derek
https://outlook.office365.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkADdhYTVmZDBILTESZDctNGI5MC04ZjliLWU4MjVhZTBhMmJkMgAQANu18QOZYbtChD1 zzObvYdQ... 1/3

7/11/22, 10:26 AM Mail - Denard, Derek - Outlook
Derek C. Denard
Environmental Program Consultant
N.C. Division of Water Resources
N.C. Department of Environmental Quality
919 707 3618 office
919 707 9000 main DWR
derek.denard©ncdenr.gov
Water Quality Permitting Section - NPDES
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Turley, Brandy J <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2022 8:41 AM
To: Denard, Derek <[e-mail]>
Cc: Weaver, Charles <[e-mail]>; Tankard, Robert <[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] RE: Issuance of NPDES Permit NC0090051 - Georgia Pacific Dudley Plywood Facility
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to Report Spam.
Mr. Denard;
I have a quick question about the final permit. It says the permit becomes effective September 1, 2022 on Page 1.
Does that mean that we can not begin the wet decking process until that date? What about the construction of
the system itself?
Thank you
Environmental Manager
Georgia-Pacific Wood Products LLC
Dudley Plywood & Chip-N-Saw
139 Brewington Rd
Dudley, NC 28333
(0) 919-705-0526
(C) 919-750-9738
From: Denard, Derek <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, July 8, 2022 6:11 PM
To: Turley, Brandy J <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
https://outlook.office365.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkADdhYTVmZDBILTESZDctNGI5MC04Zjli LWU4MjVhZTBhMmJkMgAQANu18QOZYbtChD1 zzObvYdQ... 2/3

7/11/22, 10:26 AM Mail - Denard, Derek - Outlook
Cc: Weaver, Charles <[e-mail]>; Tankard, Robert <[e-mail]>
Subject: Issuance of NPDES Permit NC0090051 - Georgia Pacific Dudley Plywood Facility
Sent by an external sender
Brandy,
Please find the attached Issuance of NPDES Permit NC0090051 for Georgia Pacific Dudley Plywood
Facility.
In order to provide more convenience, control, and security to our permittees and assist them in
processing their transactions, the Division of Water Resources is currently transitioning towards
electronic correspondence. This will hopefully provide more efficient service to our permittees and other
partners and will allow us to more effectively process and track documents. We are writing to ask you for
your approval of the transmittal of documents related to your permitting and related activities with the
Division in an electronic format. Documents will be emailed to the appropriate contact person(s) in your
organization in a PDF format.
Please respond to me through email with verification that transmittal of your documents in an
electronic manner is acceptable to you.
Please respond to this email confirming that you received the attached document(s), were able to
open and view the document(s) and have saved/printed a copy for your records.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Derek C. Denard
Environmental Program Consultant
N.C. Division of VVater Resources
N.C. Department of Environmental Quality
919 707 3618 office
919 707 9000 main DWR
[e-mail]
VVater Quality Permitting Section - NPDES
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
https://outlook.office365.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkADdhYTVmZDBILTE5ZDctNGI5MC04Zjli LWU4MjVhZTBhMmJkMgAQANu18QOZYbtChD1 zzObvYdQ... 3/3

7/11/22, 10:38 AM Mail - Denard, Derek - Outlook
Re: Issuance of NPDES Permit NC0090051 - Georgia Pacific Dudley Plywood Facility
Denard, Derek <[e-mail]>
Mon 7/11/2022 10:38 AM
To: Weaver, Charles <[e-mail]>
Charles,
QA/QC looks good.
Derek
Derek C. Denard
Environmental Program Consultant
N.C. Division of Water Resources
N.C. Department of Environmental Quality
919 707 3618 office
919 707 9000 main DWR
[e-mail]
Water Quality Permitting Section - NPDES
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Weaver, Charles <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2022 10:02 AM
To: Denard, Derek <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Issuance of NPDES Permit NC0090051 - Georgia Pacific Dudley Plywood Facility
The permit has been issued in BIMS. You can QA/QC at your discretion.
CHW
From: Denard, Derek <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, July 8, 2022 6:11 PM
To: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Cc: Weaver, Charles <[e-mail]>; Tankard, Robert <[e-mail]>
Subject: Issuance of NPDES Permit NC0090051 - Georgia Pacific Dudley Plywood Facility
Brandy,
https://outlook.office365.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkADdhYTVmZDBILTESZDctNGI5MC04ZjliLWU4MjVhZTBhMmJkMgAQANu18QOZYbtChD1 zzObvYdQ... 1/2

7/11/22, 10:38 AM Mail - Denard, Derek - Outlook
Please find the attached Issuance of NPDES Permit NC0090051 for Georgia Pacific Dudley Plywood
Facility.
In order to provide more convenience, control, and security to our permittees and assist them in
processing their transactions, the Division of Water Resources is currently transitioning towards
electronic correspondence. This will hopefully provide more efficient service to our permittees and other
partners and will allow us to more effectively process and track documents. We are writing to ask you for
your approval of the transmittal of documents related to your permitting and related activities with the
Division in an electronic format. Documents will be emailed to the appropriate contact person(s) in your
organization in a PDF format.
Please respond to me through email with verification that transmittal of your documents in an
electronic manner is acceptable to you.
Please respond to this email confirming that you received the attached document(s), were able to
open and view the document(s) and have saved/printed a copy for your records.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Derek C. Denard
Environmental Program Consultant
N.C. Division of VVater Resources
N.C. Department of Environmental Quality
919 707 3618 office
919 707 9000 main DWR
[e-mail]
VVater Quality Permitting Section - NPDES
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
https://outlook.office365.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkADdhYTVmZDBILTE5ZDctNGI5MC04Zjli LWU4MjVhZTBhMmJkMgAQANu18QOZYbtChD1 zzObvYdQ... 2/2