20140689 Ver 1_Application_20140707

Corps Submittal Cover Sheet
Please provide the following info:
1. Project Name: Brid�e 990037, SR 1317
2. Name of Property Owner/Applicant: NC DOT
3. Name of Consultant/Agent:
*Agent au[horization needs to be attached.
4. Related/Previous Action ID number(s):
5. Site Address:
6. Subdivision Name:
7. City: Burnsville
8. County: Yancey
9. Lat: 35.99106 Long: _ 82.23224 (Decimal Degrees Please )
10. Quadrangle Name: Micaville
11. Waterway: Brush Creek
12. Watershed: French Broad
13. Requested Action:
X Nationwide Permit # 3
General Permit #
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Pre-Application Request
The f'ollowing information will be completed by Corps office:
AID:
Prepare File Folder Assign number in ORM Begin Date
Authorization: Section 10 Section 404
Project Description/ Nature of Activity/ Project Purpose:
Site/Waters Name:
Keywords:

�e���
�a�.,..�•
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PAT MCCRORY
GOVF.RNOR
July 7, 2014
Ms. Lori Beckwith
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801-5006
AN'I'HONY J. TA'PA
SECRETARY
Subject: Nationwide Permit #3
Bridge 990037, SR 1317 Big Brush Creek Road
State Project No. 17BP.13.R.109 (DWQ Minor Permit Fee $240)
Yancey County, NC
Dear Ms. Beckwith:
I have enclosed a set of plans, a PCN application for NWP #3, and a vicinity map relative
to the proposed bridge replacement project on SR 1317 Big Brush Creek Road, Yancey
County, NC.
We propose to replace the existing 16' two-span bridge with a 35'single-span bridge. A
permanent impact to 571inear feet of Brush Creek will be necessary for rip rap scour
protection. In addition, temporary impacts to 10 linear feet of Brush Creek will occur to
install the rip rap. Brush Creek is an approximately 10 foot wide stream with a
predominately cobble and gravel substrate. Brush Creek is classified as Class C, trout.
Existing channel morphology will be maintained upstream and downstream of the bridge.
Riparian vegetation will be reestablished along disturbed areas associated with the
project. Stormwater will be diverted through grass-lined ditches or vegetated buffers
prior to entering streams.
No effect on federally listed species (threatened or endangered) or their habitats will
occur.
As a part of the 401 Certification process, the project was processed through the DOT
Programmatic Agreement for Minor Project as required by Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and GS 121-12(a). No Historic Resources will be
affected.
Division Thirteen Office Post Office Box 3279 Asheville, NC 28502
Phone:[phone] Office ofthe Division Engineer Fax:[phone]
w ww.ncd ot. gov/d oh/operations/d ivisi on 13

Ms. Lori Beckwith
Page —2 Bridge 990037, Yancey County
July 7, 2014
By copy of this letter, we request Marla Chambers, Narth Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission Western Region Coordinator, to comment directly to the Corps concerning
the permit request.
By copy of this letter, we are asking the Area Roadside Field Operations Engineer, to
comment on the above project. Brush Creek is classified as C, trout. The project will not
require a trout buffer variance.
By copy of this letter, I am forwarding one electronic copy of the application package to
Sonia Carillo, NC Division of Water Quality, Transpor[ation Permitting Unit with cc to
Kevin Barnett, NC DWQ Transportation Permitting Unit for review and comment.
Please charge the application fee of $240.00 to WBS element #17BP.13.R.109. Please
forward comments directly to the Corps with copy to Division 13 Environmental Officer.
Your earliest consideration for this request would be greatly appreciated. If you have any
questions or information needs, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
�� a a,��—
Roger D. Bryan
Division 13 Environmental Officer
Enclosures
cc: J.J. Swain, Jr., P.E.
Ben DeWit, CPESC
Kevin Barnett
Sonia Carillo
Marla Chambers
Eileen Fuchs
Eleni Ri�gs

tax.-.�
sp w� �
� � t ���� i��
{� � -�
�� �
�.s�� :,� �;��,�
`i �'_"!,TF�,
p� �J
�'y�y� �
n L.JlA1�.X- -`
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Versian 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps: X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 3 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? X Yes ❑ No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? Certification:
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes X No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � yes X No
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program.
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h ❑ Yes X No
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes X No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Bridge 37, SR 1317
2b. County: Yancey
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Burnsville
2d. Subdivision name: N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state 17BP.13.R.109
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: NoAh Carolina Department of Transportation
3b. Deed Book and Page No. N/A
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if N/A
applicable):
3d. Streetaddress: N/A
3e. City, state, zip: N/A
3f. Telephone no.: N/A
3g. Fax no.: N/A
3h. Email address: N/A
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: North Carolina Department of Transportation
4b. Name: J.J. Swain, Jr., P.E., Division Engineer
4c. Business name N.C. Department of Transportation
(if applicable):
4d. Street address: 55 Orange Street, P.O. Box 3279
4e. City, state, zip: Asheville, NC 28802
4f. Telephone no.: 828-251-6171
4g. Fax no.: 828-251-6394
4h. Email address: rdbryan ncdot.gov
5. AgenUConsultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: N/A
5b. Business name N/A
(if applicable):
5c. Streetaddress: N/A
5d. City, state, zip: N/A
5e. Telephone no.: N/A
5f. Fax no.: N/A
5g. Email address: N/A
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): N/A
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.99106° N Longitude: - 82.23224° W
1c. Propertysize: 0.1acres
2. Surtace Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to grush Creek
proposed project
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C, Trout
2c. River basin: French Broad
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Existing bridge on SR 1317 surrounded by low density residential area and forested land.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
100
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Replace existing 16' bridge with a single span 35' bridge at the existing location.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
A permanent impact to 57 linear feet of Brush Creek will be necessary for rip rap bank stabilization of bridge
abutments. An additional temporary impact of 10 linear feet will be necessary for installation of the rip rap. The
new bridge abutments are above ordinary high water. Equipment used will include excavator, crane, and trucks.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / � Yes X No ❑ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type � preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): N/A Other: N/A
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
Sa. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes X No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Sb. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes X No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands X Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type ofjurisdiction
number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non-404, other) (acres)
Tem orar T
W1 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
WZ � P� T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P � T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
WS ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3 b. 3c. 3d. 3 e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ — non-404, Width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
S1 ❑ P X T Work Area Brush Creek X PER X Corps �0 10
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
S1 X P❑ T Rip Rap Brush Creek X PER X Corps 10 57
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
S2 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
S2 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 67
3i. Comments:57 feet of permanent impacts for rip rap, 10 feet of temporary impacts
Page 4 of 10

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individuall list all o en water im acts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number — (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Tem orar T
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If ond or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an im acts re uire miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number— Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Tem orar T im act re uired?
B1 ❑P�T ❑Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes
❑ No
63 ❑P❑T ❑Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Replacement of bridge with longer span with floodplain area.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
N/A
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑ Yes X No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? ❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Sa. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes X No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified � Yes X No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? X Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The project will use BMP's to the Maximum Extent Practicable (MEP) in compliance with NCDOT's NPDES Permit No.
000250 Post Construction Stormwater Program
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? X DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local governmenYs jurisdiction is this project? N/A
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW
apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
X Other: N/A
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been N/A
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply � ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
X Other: N/A
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? N/A
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? N/A
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? N/A
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes � No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in � Yes � No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Yes � No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � Yes ❑ No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
� Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Field survey of the project area and evaluation of current distribution data.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Current Maps/Database
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes � No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Current Maps/Database
8. Flood 2one Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? � Yes ❑ No
Sb. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: Project will not impact water passage or flood zone beyond existing
conditions
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Current FEMA Maps
Roger D. Bryan 7/7/2014
ApplicanUAgenYs Printed Name ApplicanUAge s Signature Date
(AgenCs signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is rovided.
Page 10 of 10

Figure 1. Bridge 990037, SR 1317, Brush Creek, Yancey County, NC.

155 1/2
#3
155 3/4
#3
INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
PRELIMINARY PLANS
VICINITY MAP
4BRIDGE NO. 990037
SR 1317
-L- STA. 10+55.00
BEGIN PROJECT
-L- POT STA. 12+23.12
END BRIDGE
-L- POT STA. 11+85.52
BEGIN BRIDGE
-L-CREEK RD.
BIG BRUSH
SR
1
3
1
7
B
ig
B
ru
sh
C
re
e
k
R
d
.
SR 1308Brush Creek Rd.
OFFSITE DETOUR
M
I
T
C
H
E
L
L

C
O
.
Y
A
N
C
E
Y

C
O
.
Brush Creek
B
rush C
reek
-L- STA. 13+25.00
END PROJECT
CREEK RD.
TO LITTLE BRUSH
CREEK RD.TO BRUSH
C
h
a
r
l
i
e

D
e
y
t
o
n

R
d
.
Bridge No. 990037
S
R
13
1
8
D
e
yton
R
d
.
C
h
a
rlie
Ridge Rd.SR 1313
S
R

13
18
STATE STATE PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
STATE PROJ. NO.F. A. PROJ. NO.DESCRIPTION
NO.
TOTAL
SHEETS
N.C.
SHEET
1
V
=ADT
DESIGN DATA
6
/
10
/
2
0
1
4
R
:
\
H
y
d
r
a
u
li
c
s
\
P
E
R
M
IT
S
_
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l\
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
9
9
0
0
3
7
_
H
y
d
_
t
s
h
0
1
.
d
g
n
e
r
i
g
g
s
C
O
N
T
R
A
C
T
:
A
R
T
MEN
N
A
S
O
H
D
E
P
T
O
F TRA SPORT
T
IO
N
T
A TEOFN RT
CAR
O
LI
N
A
PROJECT LENGTH
LETTING DATE:
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PROJECT ENGINEER
PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER
FOR
CONTRACTOR :
SIGNATURE:
SIGNATURE:
P.E.
P.E.
RIGHT OF WAY DATE:
1-888-521-4455 OR 919-878-9560
NC LICENSE NO. F-0112
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609
900 RIDGEFIELD DRIVE, SUITE 350
RUMMEL, KLEPPER & KAHL, LLP
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
RESURFACING
GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING, STRUCTURES AND
LOCATION:
TYPE OF WORK:
VICINITY MAP
ENGINEER
DESIGN
ROADWAY
ENGINEER
HYDRAULICS
& CONST.
P.E. ROW, UTIL.,
* TTST =3%DUAL 3%
C
2
0
3
3
1
4
APRIL 16, 2013
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
GRAPHIC SCALES
PLANS
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
100
100
50 0 50
50 0 50
2010010
APRIL 16, 2013
2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
=
=
B. Keith Skinner, P.E.
17BP.13.R.109
17 BP 13.R.109
YANCEY COUNTY
FUNC CLASS =
LOCAL
RURAL
Brandon McInnis, P.E.
WETLAND AND STREAM IMPACTS
SUBREGIONAL TIER NCDOT CONTACT: Virginia Mabry
PRIORITY PROJECTS OFFICE MANAGER
320
6%*
2. THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES.
THE TOE OF SLOPE WITH NO GRUBBING.
LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II, WITH CLEARING EXTENDING 5’ BEYOND
1.CLEARING AND GRUBBING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE
NOTES:
SHEET 1 OF 4
PERMIT DRAWING
NSRS 2007
NAD 83/
DESIGN EXCEPTION NEEDED FOR BRIDGE WIDTH.
NOTE:
30 MPH
ON SR 1317 (BIG BRUSH CREEK ROAD)
BRIDGE NO. 990037 OVER BRUSH CREEK
B
R
I
D
G
E

9
9
0
0
3
7
TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT 990037...............
LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT 990037.......
LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT 990037........
0.051 mi
0.007 mi
0.044 mi
T
T
C
H
A
R
LIE

D
E
YT
O
N

R
D
.

(GR
A
V
E
L
)
3S
BW
3SBW
3
S
BW
3SBW
EXISTING R/W
6
0
.
0
0
’
W
D
6
0
.
0
0
’EXISTING R/W
EXISTING R/W
EXISTING R/W
FIELD
CULTIVATED
FIELD
CULTIVATED
WOODS
NO DEED LISTING
ETAL
LYDIA MARGARET DEYTON
NO DEED LISTING
ETAL
LYDIA MARGARET DEYTON
NO DEED LISTING
O.W. DEYTON ESTATE
NO DEED LISTING
O.W. DEYTON ESTATE
NO DEED LISTING
YVONNE S. DEYTON
ROBERT G. &
NO DEED LISTING
YVONNE S. DEYTON
ROBERT G. &
WOODS
WOODS
WOODS
S
R

13
1
8
S S SURFACE WATER
DENOTES IMPACTS IN
SURFACE WATER
IMPACTS IN
E
XI
S
T
E
X
I
S
T
0
3
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
2
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
3
0
1
0
2
0
2
0
3
TO EXISTING25’ TRANSITION
TO EXISTING25’ TRANSITION
+
6
7
.
5
15’ INC.
+
4
2
.4
4
+
2
0
.
0
0
0
5
0
4
INC.
12.5’
FENCE
DO NOT DISTURB
18
’
18
’
8:1
8:18:1
8:1
-L- POT Sta. 12+33.97
END APPROACH SLAB
-L- POT Sta. 12+23.12
END BRIDGE
9
’
9
’
1’-
9
"
1’-
9
"
F
-
F.
0
2
.
0
2
-L- POT Sta. 11+85.52
BEGIN BRIDGE
-L- POT Sta. 11+74.67
BEGIN APPROACH SLAB
2
1’-
6
"
Sta. 12+46.00
END SBG RT
Sta. 12+59.00
END SBG LT
11’-
4
"
11’-
4
"
+
4
8
.9
0
+
2
9
.3
3 FLARE GR
FLARE GR +
3
5
.8
2
+
16
.9
1
2
4
’
O
T
O
PLANS PREPARED BY :
900 RIDGEFIELD DRIVE SUITE 350
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609-3960
RUMMEL, KLEPPER & KAHL, LLP
NC LICENSE NO. F-0112 [phone]
8
/
1
7
/
9
9
6
/
10
/
2
0
1
4
R
:
\
H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c
s
\
P
E
R
M
I
T
S
_
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
\
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
9
9
0
0
3
7
_
p
r
m
_
w
e
t
_
p
s
h
0
2
.
d
g
n
e
r
i
g
g
s
ENGINEER
ROADWAY DESIGN
R/W SHEET NO.
ENGINEER
HYDRAULICS
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
NAD 83 (NSRS 2007)
14+0013+0012+0011+00
4990037
10+00
2,310
DIV13B - BRIDGE 990037 - YANCEY COUNTY
NOTES:
WITH NO GRUBBING.
WITH CLEARING EXTENDING 5’ BEYOND THE TOE OF SLOPE
PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II
3. CLEARING AND GRUBBING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE
2. PROPOSED BRIDGE SHALL HAVE NO DECK DRAINS.
BASIN, WHICH HAS NO BUFFER ZONES AT THIS LOCATION.
1. BRUSH CREEK IS IN THE FRENCH BROAD RIVER
DRAINAGE AREA
Q10
V10
0.05 ac
0.2 cfs
0.8 ft/s
SHEET 2 OF 4
PERMIT DRAWING
1"=50’
SCALE
15" PIPE OUTLET DATA
C BRIDGE STA. 12+04.32 -L-
L
1@ 35.0’
21" CORED SLAB
SKEW = 120
o
ELEV. = 2268.36’
L
21" CORED SLAB UNITS
PROPOSED BRIDGE DIMENSIONS - 1@35’-0", 120 DEG. SKEW;
TIMBER FLOOR ON TIMBER JOISTS
EXISTING BRIDGE DIMENSIONS - TWO SPANS, 1@8’-10", 1@7’-2", 120 DEG. SKEW;
Length
STREAM IMPACTS
Permanent
Temporary
Type DescriptionArea
377 sf
78 sf
57 ft.
10 ft.
of the existing abutmet along the stream.
along the proposed end bent and removal
For installation of rip rap sloped abutment
abutment along the stream.
sloped abutment and remove the existing
For construction access to install rip rap
and Remove Existing Abutment
Install Rip Rap Sloped Abutment
and Remove Existing Abutment
Work Area to Install Rip Rap
FROM END APPROACH SLAB TO APPROX. -L- STA. 12+59 LT
FROM END APPROACH SLAB TO APPROX. -L- STA. 12+46 RT
SHOULDER BERM GUTTER:
F
F
C
F
F
F F
F
F
FRETAIN
SEE DETAIL A
TOE PROTECTION
TB 2GI
TB 2GI 7 SY GEO FAB
RIP RAP W/
2 TON CL B
DETAIL A
GROUND
NATURAL
GEOTEXTILE
2:1 ROADWAY
PROPOSED
Type of Liner= Cl B Rip-Rap up to Shoulder Point
( Not to Scale)
TOE PROTECTION
FROM -L- STA. 12+75 TO STA. 13+10 RT
15
"
RCP-IV
15"
N
A
D

8
3
/
N
S
R
S

2
0
0
7
THE LOCALIZED COORDINATE SYSTEM DEVELOPED FOR THIS PROJECT
IS BASED ON THE STATE PLANE COORDINATES ESTABLISHED BY
WITH NAD 83/NSRS 2007 STATE PLANE GRID COORDINATES OF
NORTHING: 831015.2343(ft) EASTING: 1044009.8346(ft)
ELEVATION: 2273.33(ft)
HISTORIC BOUNDARY
H
IS
T
O
R
IC
B
OU
N
D
A
R
Y
HI
S
T
O
RI
C
B
O
U
N
D
A
R
Y
H
I
S
T
O
R
I
C
B
O
U
N
D
A
R
Y
HISTORIC BOUNDARY
F
F
F
F
TB 2GI
TB 2GI
1
5
"
RCP-IV
15"
R
:
\
H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c
s
\
P
E
R
M
I
T
S
_
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
\
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
9
9
0
0
3
7
_
p
r
m
_
w
e
t
_
p
s
h
0
2
.
d
g
n
-L-
2,290
2,280
2,270
2,260
2,250
2,290
2,280
2,270
2,260
2,250
TYPE-III TYPE-III
TYPE-IIITYPE-III
GRAU 350 (TL-2)GRAU 350 (TL-2)
GRAU 350 (TL-2)GRAU 350 (TL-2)
SKETCH SHOWING ROADWAY IN RELATION TO PROPOSED STRUCTURE
-L- STA. 12+66.00 TO STA. 13+25.00
-L- STA. 10+55.00 TO STA. 11+26.00
MILLING LIMITS:
RR SPIKE IN BASE OF 42" SYCAMORE TREE
-L- STA. 12+13.25 (50.71’ LT)
N 831244 E 1043951
BM#1 EL. = 2264.65’
DESIGN EXCEPTION APPROVED FOR BRIDGE WIDTH.
NOTE:
2262.7’
NWS
DS = 42 mphDS = 31 mph
ELEV. = 2,270.79’
-L- STA. 10+55.00
BEGIN GRADE
ELEV. = 2,267.76’
-L- STA. 13+25.00
END GRADE
PI = 11+00.00
EL = 2,269.37’
(-)3
.1500
%
(-)0.9708%
VC = 90’
K = 41
PI = 12+80.00
EL = 2,267.63’
(-)0.9708%(+)0.3000%
VC = 90’
K = 71
-L- STA. 12+23.12
END BRIDGE
-L- STA. 11+85.52
BEGIN BRIDGE
BRIDGE HYDRAULIC DATA
100 YEAR FREQUENCY
= 10
= 100 YRS
= 2267.3
= 2268.5
STR #990037 Sta. 12+04.32 -L-
DESIGN FREQUENCY
DESIGN DISCHARGE
DESIGN HW ELEVATION
100 YEAR DISCHARGE
100 YEAR HW ELEVATION
OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY
OVERTOPPING ELEVATION
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE
YRS
CFS
FT
CFS
FT
YRS
CFS
FT
= 550
= 1000
= 2269.58
= 700
NORMAL WATER SURFACE ELEV = 2262.7 FT
NWS SURVEY 9/4/2013
= 25+/-
-L-
TS TS
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
DENOTES TEMPORARY
IN SURFACE WATER
TEMPORARY IMPACTS
IN SURFACE WATER
TEMPORARY IMPACTS
22
6
0
2
2
6
0
2260 2260
2265
2
2
6
5
2
2
6
5
22
65
2265
2
2
6
5
2265
2270
2
2
7
0
2270
2270
2270
2
2
7
0
2
2
7
5
2275
2275
2
2
8
0
2280
2280
2285
2285
2290
2290
2295
2300 2305 2310
2
3
1
5
2
3
2
0
2
3
2
5
T
T
C
H
A
R
LIE

D
E
YT
O
N

R
D
.

(GR
A
V
E
L
)
3S
BW
3SBW
3
S
BW
3SBW
EXISTING R/W
6
0
.
0
0
’
W
D
6
0
.
0
0
’EXISTING R/W
EXISTING R/W
EXISTING R/W
FIELD
CULTIVATED
FIELD
CULTIVATED
WOODS
NO DEED LISTING
ETAL
LYDIA MARGARET DEYTON
NO DEED LISTING
ETAL
LYDIA MARGARET DEYTON
NO DEED LISTING
O.W. DEYTON ESTATE
NO DEED LISTING
O.W. DEYTON ESTATE
NO DEED LISTING
YVONNE S. DEYTON
ROBERT G. &
NO DEED LISTING
YVONNE S. DEYTON
ROBERT G. &
WOODS
WOODS
WOODS
S
R

13
1
8
S S SURFACE WATER
DENOTES IMPACTS IN
SURFACE WATER
IMPACTS IN
2
2
6
5
226
5
2
2
6
5
2270227522802285
E
XI
S
T
E
X
I
S
T
0
3
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
2
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
3
0
1
0
2
0
2
0
3
TO EXISTING25’ TRANSITION
TO EXISTING25’ TRANSITION
+
6
7
.
5
15’ INC.
+
4
2
.4
4
+
2
0
.
0
0
0
5
0
4
INC.
12.5’
FENCE
DO NOT DISTURB
18
’
18
’
8:1
8:18:1
8:1
-L- POT Sta. 12+33.97
END APPROACH SLAB
-L- POT Sta. 12+23.12
END BRIDGE
9
’
9
’
1’-
9
"
1’-
9
"
F
-
F.
0
2
.
0
2
-L- POT Sta. 11+85.52
BEGIN BRIDGE
-L- POT Sta. 11+74.67
BEGIN APPROACH SLAB
2
1’-
6
"
Sta. 12+46.00
END SBG RT
Sta. 12+59.00
END SBG LT
11’-
4
"
11’-
4
"
+
4
8
.9
0
+
2
9
.3
3 FLARE GR
FLARE GR +
3
5
.8
2
+
16
.9
1
2
4
’
O
T
O
PLANS PREPARED BY :
900 RIDGEFIELD DRIVE SUITE 350
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609-3960
RUMMEL, KLEPPER & KAHL, LLP
NC LICENSE NO. F-0112 [phone]
8
/
1
7
/
9
9
6
/
10
/
2
0
1
4
R
:
\
H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c
s
\
P
E
R
M
I
T
S
_
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
\
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
9
9
0
0
3
7
_
p
r
m
_
c
o
n
_
p
s
h
0
3
.
d
g
n
e
r
i
g
g
s
ENGINEER
ROADWAY DESIGN
R/W SHEET NO.
ENGINEER
HYDRAULICS
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
NAD 83 (NSRS 2007)
14+0013+0012+0011+00
4990037
10+00
2,310
DIV13B - BRIDGE 990037 - YANCEY COUNTY
NOTES:
WITH NO GRUBBING.
WITH CLEARING EXTENDING 5’ BEYOND THE TOE OF SLOPE
PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II
3. CLEARING AND GRUBBING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE
2. PROPOSED BRIDGE SHALL HAVE NO DECK DRAINS.
BASIN, WHICH HAS NO BUFFER ZONES AT THIS LOCATION.
1. BRUSH CREEK IS IN THE FRENCH BROAD RIVER
DRAINAGE AREA
Q10
V10
0.05 ac
0.2 cfs
0.8 ft/s
SHEET 3 OF 4
PERMIT DRAWING
1"=50’
SCALE
15" PIPE OUTLET DATA
C BRIDGE STA. 12+04.32 -L-
L
1@ 35.0’
21" CORED SLAB
SKEW = 120
o
ELEV. = 2268.36’
L
21" CORED SLAB UNITS
PROPOSED BRIDGE DIMENSIONS - 1@35’-0", 120 DEG. SKEW;
TIMBER FLOOR ON TIMBER JOISTS
EXISTING BRIDGE DIMENSIONS - TWO SPANS, 1@8’-10", 1@7’-2", 120 DEG. SKEW;
Length
STREAM IMPACTS
Permanent
Temporary
Type DescriptionArea
377 sf
78 sf
57 ft.
10 ft.
of the existing abutmet along the stream.
along the proposed end bent and removal
For installation of rip rap sloped abutment
abutment along the stream.
sloped abutment and remove the existing
For construction access to install rip rap
and Remove Existing Abutment
Install Rip Rap Sloped Abutment
and Remove Existing Abutment
Work Area to Install Rip Rap
FROM END APPROACH SLAB TO APPROX. -L- STA. 12+59 LT
FROM END APPROACH SLAB TO APPROX. -L- STA. 12+46 RT
SHOULDER BERM GUTTER:
F
F
C
F
F
F F
F
F
FRETAIN
SEE DETAIL A
TOE PROTECTION
TB 2GI
TB 2GI 7 SY GEO FAB
RIP RAP W/
2 TON CL B
DETAIL A
GROUND
NATURAL
GEOTEXTILE
2:1 ROADWAY
PROPOSED
Type of Liner= Cl B Rip-Rap up to Shoulder Point
( Not to Scale)
TOE PROTECTION
FROM -L- STA. 12+75 TO STA. 13+10 RT
15
"
RCP-IV
15"
N
A
D

8
3
/
N
S
R
S

2
0
0
7
THE LOCALIZED COORDINATE SYSTEM DEVELOPED FOR THIS PROJECT
IS BASED ON THE STATE PLANE COORDINATES ESTABLISHED BY
WITH NAD 83/NSRS 2007 STATE PLANE GRID COORDINATES OF
NORTHING: 831015.2343(ft) EASTING: 1044009.8346(ft)
ELEVATION: 2273.33(ft)
HISTORIC BOUNDARY
H
IS
T
O
R
IC
B
OU
N
D
A
R
Y
HI
S
T
O
RI
C
B
O
U
N
D
A
R
Y
H
I
S
T
O
R
I
C
B
O
U
N
D
A
R
Y
HISTORIC BOUNDARY
F
F
F
F
TB 2GI
TB 2GI
1
5
"
RCP-IV
15"
R
:
\
H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c
s
\
P
E
R
M
I
T
S
_
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
\
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
9
9
0
0
3
7
_
p
r
m
_
c
o
n
_
p
s
h
0
3
.
d
g
n
-L-
2,290
2,280
2,270
2,260
2,250
2,290
2,280
2,270
2,260
2,250
TYPE-III TYPE-III
TYPE-IIITYPE-III
GRAU 350 (TL-2)GRAU 350 (TL-2)
GRAU 350 (TL-2)GRAU 350 (TL-2)
SKETCH SHOWING ROADWAY IN RELATION TO PROPOSED STRUCTURE
-L- STA. 12+66.00 TO STA. 13+25.00
-L- STA. 10+55.00 TO STA. 11+26.00
MILLING LIMITS:
RR SPIKE IN BASE OF 42" SYCAMORE TREE
-L- STA. 12+13.25 (50.71’ LT)
N 831244 E 1043951
BM#1 EL. = 2264.65’
DESIGN EXCEPTION APPROVED FOR BRIDGE WIDTH.
NOTE:
2262.7’
NWS
DS = 42 mphDS = 31 mph
ELEV. = 2,270.79’
-L- STA. 10+55.00
BEGIN GRADE
ELEV. = 2,267.76’
-L- STA. 13+25.00
END GRADE
PI = 11+00.00
EL = 2,269.37’
(-)3
.1500
%
(-)0.9708%
VC = 90’
K = 41
PI = 12+80.00
EL = 2,267.63’
(-)0.9708%(+)0.3000%
VC = 90’
K = 71
-L- STA. 12+23.12
END BRIDGE
-L- STA. 11+85.52
BEGIN BRIDGE
BRIDGE HYDRAULIC DATA
100 YEAR FREQUENCY
= 10
= 100 YRS
= 2267.3
= 2268.5
STR #990037 Sta. 12+04.32 -L-
DESIGN FREQUENCY
DESIGN DISCHARGE
DESIGN HW ELEVATION
100 YEAR DISCHARGE
100 YEAR HW ELEVATION
OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY
OVERTOPPING ELEVATION
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE
YRS
CFS
FT
CFS
FT
YRS
CFS
FT
= 550
= 1000
= 2269.58
= 700
NORMAL WATER SURFACE ELEV = 2262.7 FT
NWS SURVEY 9/4/2013
= 25+/-
-L-
TS TS
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
DENOTES TEMPORARY
IN SURFACE WATER
TEMPORARY IMPACTS
IN SURFACE WATER
TEMPORARY IMPACTS
Ha
n
d
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g

E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g

Pe
r
m
a
n
e
n
t
T
e
m
p
.

E
x
c
a
v
a
t
i
o
n
M
e
c
h
a
n
i
z
e
d

C
l
e
a
r
i
n
g
P
e
r
m
a
n
e
n
t

T
e
m
p
.

C
h
a
n
n
e
l
C
h
a
n
n
e
l
N
a
t
u
r
a
l

Si
t
e
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
F
i
l
l

I
n
F
i
l
l

I
n
i
n

C
l
e
a
r
i
n
g
i
n

S
W

S
W
I
m
p
a
c
t
s
I
m
p
a
c
t
s
S
t
r
e
a
m
No
.
(
F
r
o
m
/
T
o
)
S
i
z
e

/

T
y
p
e
W
e
t
l
a
n
d
s
W
e
t
l
a
n
d
s

W
e
t
l
a
n
d
s
i
n

W
e
t
l
a
n
d
s

W
e
t
l
a
n
d
s
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
P
e
r
m
a
n
e
n
t
T
e
m
p
.
D
e
s
i
g
n
(a
c
)
(
a
c
)
(
a
c
)
(
a
c
)
(
a
c
)
(
a
c
)
(
a
c
)
(
f
t
)
(
f
t
)
(
f
t
)
11
+
8
2

t
o

1
2
+
1
5
*
B
r
i
d
g
e
<0
.
0
1
5
7
11
+
7
9

t
o

1
2
+
1
5
*
*
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
<0
.
0
1
1
0
TO
T
A
L
S
:
<0
.
0
1
<
0
.
0
1
5
7
1
0
*P
e
r
m
a
n
e
n
t

s
u
r
f
a
c
e

w
a
t
e
r

i
m
p
a
c
t
s

d
u
e

t
o

t
h
e

i
n
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n

o
f

r
i
p

r
a
p

s
l
o
p
e
d

a
b
u
t
m
e
n
t

a
l
o
n
g

t
h
e

p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d

e
n
d

b
e
n
t
s

a
n
d

t
h
e

r
e
m
o
v
a
l

o
f

t
h
e

e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g

a
b
u
t
m
e
n
t

a
l
o
n
g

t
h
e

s
t
r
e
a
m
.
**
T
e
m
p
o
r
a
r
y

s
u
r
f
a
c
e

w
a
t
e
r

i
m
p
a
c
t
s

i
n
c
l
u
d
e

c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n

a
c
c
e
s
s

t
o

i
n
s
t
a
l
l

r
i
p

r
a
p

s
l
o
p
e
d

a
b
u
t
m
e
n
t

a
n
d

r
e
m
o
v
e

t
h
e

e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g

a
b
u
t
m
e
n
t

a
l
o
n
g

t
h
e

s
t
r
e
a
m
.
AT
N

R
e
v
i
s
e
d

3
/
3
1
/
0
5
6/10/2014
YA
N
C
E
Y

C
O
U
N
T
Y
NC

D
E
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T

O
F

T
R
A
N
S
P
O
R
T
A
T
I
O
N
DI
V
I
S
I
O
N

O
F

H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
S
WB
S

-

1
7
B
P
.
1
3
.
R
.
1
0
9

(
9
9
0
0
3
7
)

W
E
T
L
A
N
D

P
E
R
M
I
T

I
M
P
A
C
T

S
U
M
M
A
R
Y
SU
R
F
A
C
E

W
A
T
E
R

I
M
P
A
C
T
S
WE
T
L
A
N
D

I
M
P
A
C
T
S
SH
E
E
T

4

o
f

4