The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutWQ0002638_Inspection_20070614JATF 212Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross Jr., Secretary :. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources rAlan W. Klimek, P.E. Director -1 Division of Water Quality , June 14, 2007 Jimmy Cook Town of Angier POBox278 Angier NC 27501 SUBJECT: June 7, 2007 Compliance Evaluation Inspection Town of Angier Angier Town -Land App Sys/Epa Permit No: WQ0002638 Harnett. County Dear Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection form from the inspection conducted on June 7, 2007. The Compliance Evaluation Inspection was conducted by Joel Shields of the Fayetteville Regional Office. The facility was found to be in Compliance with permit WQ0002638. Please refer to the enclosed inspection report for additional observations and comments. If you or your staff have any questions, pleasecall me at . Sincerely, j Joel Shields cc: Emory Austin Brooks, ORC Central Files Fayetteville Files AtiTriti NCDgNit NCDENR Division of Water Quality 225 Green Street -Suite 714 Fayetteville, NC 28301-50431 (910)486-1541 Telephone J (910)486-0707 Fax Customer Service; 1 877 623-7748 Compliance Inspection Report 2 Permit: WQ0002638 Effective: 08/22/03 Expiration: 07/31/08 Owner: Town of Angier SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Angier Town -Land App Sys/Epa , County: Harnett PO Box 278 Region: Fayetteville Contact Person: Jimmy Cook Title: Director of Public Utilities Directions to Facility: System Classifications: Primary ORC: Emory Austin Brooks Secondary ORC(s): On -Site Representative(s): RelatedPermits: Angier NC 27501 Phone: 919-639-2071 Certification: 23356 Phone: 919-639-2071 Inspection Date: 06/07/2007 Entry Time: 09:00 AM EXit TiMe: 11:00AM Primary Inspector: Joel Shields _ Phone: Secondary Inspector(s): Reason for Inspection: Routine Permit Inspection Type: Surface Irrigation Facility Status: • Compliant 0 Not Compliant Question Areas: Miscellaneous Questions II Record Keeping (See attachment summary) Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation • Treatment'Lagoons •End Use -Irrigation Permit: WQ0002638 Owner - Facility: Town of Angier Inspection Date: 06/07/2007 ' Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine Inspection Summary: Lagoon and spray fields are in good shape., The monitoring reports, GW-59's, and analytical reports are on site and support reported data. The facility 'awaiting to be taken over by Hamett County in the" near future. Page: 2 Permit: WO0002638 Owner - Facility: Town of Angier Inspection Date: 06/07/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine Type Infiltration System Reuse (Quality) Single Family Spray, LR Single Family Drip Recycle/Reuse . Activated Sludge Drip, LR Activated Sludge:Spray, HR Activated Sludge Spray, LR Lagoon Spray, LR . 'Record Keeping Is a copy of current permit available? Are monitoring reports present: NDMR? NDAR? Are flow rates Tess than of permitted flow? Are flow rates less than of permitted flow? Are application rates adhered to? Is GW monitoring being conducted, if required (GW-59s submitted)? Are all samples analyzed for all required parameters? Are there any 2L GW quality violations? Is GW-59A certification form completed for facility? Is effluent sampled for same parameters as GW? Do effluent concentrations exceed GW standards? Are annual soil reports available? # Are PAN records required? # Did last soil report indicate a need for lime? If so, has it been applied? Are operational logs present? Are lab sheets available for review? Do lab sheets support data reported on NDMR? Yes No NA NE n n n n n n ' n Yes No NA NE ■ nnn ■ nnn ■ :nnn ■ nnn ■ n.n,n. ■ nnn ■ nnn ■ nnn ■ nnn: 1nnn •nnn. n ■nn ■ nnn ■ nnn n nn n n■n ■ nnn; ■ nnn ■ nnn Page: 3 Permit: WQ0002638 Owner - Facility: Town of Angier Inspection Date: 06/07/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine Do lab sheets support data reported on GW-59s? Are Operational and Maintenance records present?_ Were Operational and Maintenance records complete? Has permittee been free of public complaints in last 12 months? Is a copy of the SOC readily available? No treatment units bypassed since last inspection? Comment: Effluent concentrations do not exceed GW standards. The last soil report did not indicate the need for lime and no treatment units have been bypassed since last inspection. End Use -Irrigation Are buffers adequate? Is the cover crop type specified in permit? Is the crop cover acceptable? Is the site condition adequate? Is the site free of runoff / ponding? Is the acreage specified in the permit being utilized? Is the application equipment present? Is the application equipment operational? Is the'disposal field free of limiting slopes? Is access restricted and/or signs posted during active site use? Are any supply wells within the CB? Are any supply wells within 250' of the CB? How close is the closest water supply well? Is municipal water available in the area? # Info only: Does the permit call for monitoring wells? Are GW monitoring wells located properly w/ respect to RB and CB? Are GW monitoring wells properly constructed, including screened interval? Are monitoring wells damaged? Comment: ■ nnn ■ nnn ■ nnn ■ nnn ■ nnn n ■nn Yes No NA NE ■ nnn ■ nnn ■ nnn ■ nnn innn ■ nnn • nnn ■ nnn ■ nnn ■ nnn n nn■ nin•n n n■n firm■ ■ nnn ■ nnn mnnn • nnn Page: 4