WQ0002638_Inspection_20080926

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G? Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen Sullins; Director
Division of -Water Quality
September 26, 2008
Jimmy Cook
Town of Angier
PO Box 278
Angier NC 275010278
SUBJECT: September 17, 2008 Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Town of Angier
Angier Town -Land App :Sys/Epa
Permit No: WQ0002638
Harnett County
Dear :.Mr. Cook
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Evaluation. Inspection form from the inspection_ conducted on
September 17, 2008. The Compliance Evaluation Inspection was.conducted by Tony,W Honeycutt of the
Fayetteville Regional Office. The facility was found to be in Compliance with permit WQ0002638.
Please refer to the enclosed inspection report for additional observations and comments. If you or your'staff have
any questions, please call me at 910-433-3339:
cc: Henry James Cook, ORC 1
Central Files
anWtreVillsecEilowa
North Carolina DWQ/Aquifer Protection Section 225 Green St./ Suite 714 Fayetteville, NC 28301 ._ Phone [phone]
FAX [phone] Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer-50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
None
rthCarolina
Naturally.

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: WQ0002638 Effective: 04/04/08 Expiration: 12/31/12 Owner: Town of Angier
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Angier Town -Land App Sys/Epa
County: Harnett PO Box 278
Region: Fayetteville
Contact Person: Jimmy Cook
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC: Henry James Cook
Secondary ORC(s):
Angier NC 275010278
Title: Director of Public Utilities Phone: [phone]
Certification: 18548 Phone: [phone]
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 09/17/2008 Entry Time: 01:45 PM Exit Time: 03:15 PM
Primary Inspector: Tony W Honeycutt Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Surface Irrigation
Facility Status: ■ Compliant 0 Not Compliant
Question Areas:
II Miscellaneous Questions II Record Keeping
(See attachment summary)
"'Treatment Lagoons End Use -Irrigation
Page: 1

Permit: W00002638 Owner - Facility: Town of Angier
Inspection Date: 09/17/2008
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation ' Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Page: 2

Permit: WQ0002638 Owner - Facility: Town of Angier
Inspection Date: 09/17/2008
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Type Yes No NA NE
Reuse (Quality) 0
Infiltration System ❑
Activated Sludge Spray, HR 0
Activated Sludge Drip, LR 0
Activated Sludge Spray, LR ❑
Single Family Spray, LR 0
Single Family Drip 0
Recycle/Reuse ❑
Lagoon Spray, LR ■
Record Keeping Yes No NA NE
Is a copy of current permit available? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are monitoring reports present: NDMR? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
NDAR? ■ ❑ ❑ 0
Are flow rates less than of permitted flow? ■ ❑ ❑ 0
Are flow rates less than of permitted flow? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are application rates adhered to? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is GW monitoring being conducted, if required (GW-59s submitted)? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Are all samples analyzed for all required parameters? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are there any 2L GW quality violations? 0 0 0 ■
Is GW-59A certification form completed for facility? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Is effluent sampled for same parameters as GW? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Do effluent concentrations exceed GW standards? ❑ ❑ ❑ ®'
Are annual soil reports available? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Are PAN records required? • 0 0 ❑
# Did last soil report indicate a need for lime? 0 • 0 0
If so, has it been applied? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are operational logs present? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are lab sheets available for review? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Do lab sheets support data reported on NDMR? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Page: 3

Permit: WQ0002638
Inspection Date: 09/17/2008
.Owner - Facility: Town of Angier
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation . Reason for Visit: Routine
Do lab sheets support data reported on GW-59s?
Are; Operational and Maintenance records present?
.
Were Operational and Maintenancerecords complete?
: Has.permittee been free of public complaints in last 12 months?
Is a.copy of the SOC readily available?
No.treatment units bypassed since last inspection? -
Comment: The'facility paperwork was well, maintained. A crop management plan is to
be formalized and availabir for inspection.
Soils lab analysis did not -indicate the need to add lime.
End Use -Irrigation -
Are buffers adequate?
Is the cover crop type specified in permit?
• Is the crop cover acceptable? _
Is the site condition adequate? .
Is the site free of runoff / ponding?
Is the acreage specified in the permit being utilized?
Is the application equipment present? -
Is the application equipment operational?
Is the disposal field free of limiting slopes? - .
Is access restricted and/or signs posted during active site use?
Are any supply wells within the CB?
Are any supply wells within 250' of the CB?
How close is the closest water supply well?
Is municipal water available in the area? '
# Info only: Does the permit call for-monitoringwells?
Are GW monitoring wells located properly w/ respect to RB and CB?
Are GW monitoring wells properly constructed, including screened interval?
Are monitoring wells damaged?
Comment: Grass fields are in good shape and well maintained. The tree spray site
hasrexcessive undergrowth which is to be removed.
❑ ❑.❑■
• 000
• 000
• 000
o ❑■❑
• 000
Yes No NA NE
• 000
■ 0❑❑
• 000
■ ❑-Q ❑
■ ❑.❑ ❑
■ n❑.❑
■ ..nOn
■ 0nn
■ ❑n'❑
..❑ ❑ ■ ❑
'❑❑Ilia
n nln
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑n❑
❑❑■❑
❑❑"n■
❑❑0■
Page: 4