HomeMy WebLinkAboutWQ0002638_Inspection_20130419April 19, 2013
Jimmy Cook
Town of Angier
PO Box 278
Angier NC 275010278
SUBJECT: April 17, 2013 Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Town of Angier
Town of Angier Wastewater Irrigation System
Permit No: WQ0002638
Harnett County
Dear Mr. Cook:
Pat McCrory, Governor
John Skvarla, Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Charles Wakild P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection form from the inspection
17, 2013. The Compliance Evaluation Inspection was conducted by Tony W. Honeycutt of the
Regional Office. The facility was found to be in Compliance with permit WQ0002638.
Please refer to the enclosed inspection report for additional observations and comments. If you
any questions, please call me at (910) 433-3339.
Sincerely,
Tony W. Honeyc>Rfftt
Environmental Specialist
FRO/AP
cc: Emory Austin Brooks, ORC
Central Files
Faye tee 11`_e_File
conducted on April
Fayetteville
or your staff have
NorthCarolina
Naturally
North Carolina DWQ/Aquifer Protection Section • 225 Green St./ Suite 714 Fayetteville, NC 28301-5095 Phone (910).433-3300
FAX (910) 486-0707 Internet h2o.enr.state.nc.us Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: WQ0002638 Effective: 04/04/08 Expiration: 12/31/16 Owner: Town of Angier
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Town of Angier Wastewater Irrigation System
County: Harnett PO Box 278
Region: Fayetteville
Contact Person: Jimmy Cook
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications: SI,
Primary ORC: Emory Austin Brooks
Secondary ORC(s):
Title: Director of Public Utilities
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 04/17/2013 Entry Time: 01:30 PM
Primary Inspector: Tony W. Honeycutt
Secondary Inspector(s):
Angier NC 275010278
Phone: 919-639-2071
Certification: 23356 Phone: 919-639-2071
Exit Time: 04:00 PM
Phone: 910-433-3339
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Wastewater Irrigation
Facility Status: IN Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
In Miscellaneous Questions • ■ Record Keeping
(See attachment summary)
El Treatment Lagoons ■ End Use -Irrigation
Page: 1
Permit: WQ0002638 Owner - Facility: Town of Angier
Inspection Date: 04/17/2013
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Records were in good shape.
Spray sites were well maintained. Excess growth in field (1&2, trees) has been removed and maintained.
No problems noted.
Page: 2
Permit: WQ0002638•,
Inspection Date: 04/17/2013
Owner Facility: Town of Angier
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Type Yes No NA NE
Reuse (Quality) n
Lagoon Spray, LR 0
Infiltration System n
Activated Sludge Spray, LR n
Single Family Spray, LR •n
Activated Sludge Drip, LR - - -n
' Activated Sludge Spray, HR n
•
Single Family Drip
Recycle/Reuse n
Record Keeping Yes „No NA NE
Is a copy of current permit available? ■ n n n
Are monitoring reports present: NDMR? ■ n n n
NDAR? ■nnn
Are flow rates less than of permitted flow? ■ ❑ n n
Are flow rates less than of permitted flow? ■ ❑ n " n
Are application rates adhered to? .. ■: n n n
Is GW monitoring being conducted, if required (GW-59s submitted)? . ■. 'n 0 0
Are all samples` analyzed for all required parameters? ■ n n- n
Are there any 2L GW quality violations ? Finn.
Is GW-59A certification'form completed for facility? n n ❑ ■
Is effluent sampled for same parameters as GW? / n n n ■
Do effluent concentrations exceed GW standards? n n ■
Are annual soil reports available? ■..Q ❑ ❑
# Are PAN records required? ■ n n n
# Did last soil report indicate a need for lime? n .■ ❑ n
If so, has it been applied? n n ,■
Are operational logs present? ■ n n n
Are lab sheets available for review? ■ n n ❑
Do lab sheets support data reported on NDMR? ■ n n n
Page: 3
Permit: WQ0002638 Owner - Facility: Town of Angier
Inspection Date: 04/17/2013
• Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Do lab sheets support data reported on GW-59s?
Are Operational and Maintenance records present?
Were Operational and Maintenance records complete?
Has permittee been free of public complaints in last 12 months?
Is a copy of the SOC readily available?
No treatment units bypassed since last inspection?
Comment: Limke addition was not indicated at this time.
End Use -Irrigation
Are buffers adequate?
Is the cover crop type specified in permit?
Is the crop cover acceptable?
Is the site condition adequate?
Is the site free of runoff / ponding?
Is the acreage specified in the permit being utilized?
Is the application equipment present?
Is the application equipment operational?
Is the disposal field free of limiting slopes?
Is access restricted and/or signs posted during active site use?
Are any supply wells within the CB?
Are any supply wells within 250' of the CB?
How close is the closest water supply well?
Is municipal water available in the area?
# Info only: Does the permit call for monitoring wells?
Are GW monitoring wells located properly w/ respect to RB and CB?
Are GW monitoring wells properly constructed, including screened interval?
Are monitoring wells damaged?
Comment: .
n nn■
■ nnn
■ n n.n
■ nnn
■ nnn
■ nnn
Yes No NA NE
■ nnn
■ nnn
■ nnn
■ nnn
■ nnn
■ nnn
■ nnn
■ nnn
■ nnn
■ nnn
n nn■
n nn■
n nn■
■ nnn
■ nnn
■ nnn
n nn■
n nn■
Page: 4