NC0051918_Wasteload Allocation_19821027

NPDES DOCUHENT SCANNINL COVER SHEET
NPDES Permit:
NC0051918
Cleveland County WTP
Document Type:
Permit Issuance
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File
- Historical
Engineering Alternatives (EAA)
Staff Report
Instream Assessment (67b)
Environmental
Assessment (EA)
Permit
History
Document Date:
October 27, 1982
This document is printed on reuise paper - iggnore nay
content on the re'w rise side

Facility Name:
Existing
Proposed
NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
tIpp.01 P U QML4 & rt ,r Di S . C.i�kdr �TA.fDate:
�.
1i _ A 7 -
Permit No : C i•X) � 1' 18' Pipe No.: 60/ County: 6evsle 4244 rg
Design Capacity (MGD): ©• o i 1 Industrial (% of Flow): Domestic (% of Flow):
Receiving Stream: V-� i'S� L�f vf� r� RI VN VV" Class: Sub -Basin: _ i') 3 - & - C3 4
Reference USGS Quad: J4-444tt v (F-1 i)(Please attach) Requestor • 11Y 4 13L1 Regional Office - E
(Guideline limitations, if applicable, are to be listed on the back of this form.)
Drainage Area: I O frk, Avg. Streamflow:
Winter 7Q10• 30Q2-
a) . 3
Location of D.O.minimum (miles below outfall): Slope:.
Velocity (fps): K1 (base e, per day, 20°C): K2 (base e, per day, 20°C)•
0
JALI,
Design Temp
7Q10:
0
Effluent
Characteristics
Original Allocation
Revised Allocation
`o
, � epared By:
Monthly
Average
5
Date(s) of Revision(s)
(Please attach previous allocation)PIOT' E D
Reviewed By:
VIZ., Date: I D/U? (b

•
• r%
L.
REQUEST NO. 455
********************* WASTILOAD ALLOCATION APPROVAL FORM *********************
FACILITY NAME
TYPE OF WASTE
COUNTY
REGIONAL OFFICE
RECEIVING STREAM
7Q10 : 93 CFS
DRAINAGE AREA
•
•
UPPER CLEVELAND CO WTP
WATER TREATMENT PLANT
CLEVELAND
ASHEVILLE REQUESTOR ; REGGIE BAIRD
FIRST BROAD RIVER SUBBASIN 030804
W7010 : CFS 3002 : CFS
190.00 SQ. MI . STREAM CLASS t C
************************ RECOMMENDED EFFLUENT LIMITS ************************
WASTEFLOW(S)
BOD-5
NH3-N
D.O.
PH
FECAL COLIFORM
TSS
(MGD) 0.019
(MG/L)
(MG/L)
(MG/L)
(SU)
(/100ML):
(MG/L)
466 ilac� 1e,7t
***************************
FACILITY IS : PROPOSED (
LIMITS ARE : REVISION (
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED BY:
S
TURBIDITY=THE DISCHARGE SHALL
NOT CAUSE THE TURBIDITY OF THE
RECEIVING WATERS TO EXCEED
SONTU
&.-PY 7-5 S "(14
64x! e , .. '/ "
*************************************.K ************
EXISTING ( ) .NEW ( )
CONFIRMATION ( ) OF THOSE PREVIOUSLY ISSUED
•
MODELER
SUPERVISOR,MODELING GROUP
REGIONAL SUPERVISOR
PERMITS MANAGER
APPROVED BY
DIVISION DIRECTOR
TE : _%1D1

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
WATER QUALITY SECTION
ASHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
October 12, 1982
MEMORANDUM
TO: Randy Williams, Supervisor
Modeling Group
FROM: James R. Reid
Environmental Chemistry Consultant
SUBJECT: Recommended Effluent Limits
Upper Cleveland County Water Treatment Plant
Cleveland County, North Carolina
The proposed discharge is not for filter backwash and primary sludge;
these are to be treated in a non -discharge system. The discharge for which
a permit is requested will be the daily drainage from an intake detention
tank the overflow from which will fill the primary settling basin.
When the primary settling basin needs to be filled, the intake pumps
will be activated and the hydraulic drain valve on the 19,000 gallon intake
detention tank will close. After the intake tank fills, the overflow will
then run to the primary settling basin. Pumping of water through the intake
detention tank will continue at the rate of 1200 gpm until the desired level
is reached in the primary settling basin. After the desired level has been
reached, the intake pumps will then stop and the hydraulic drain valve on
the detention tank will open allowing the tank to drain. The materials to
be discharged when the tank drains are approximately 19,000 gallons of river
water plus the rapidly settling sand which was suspended in the volume of
water pumped through the detention tank.
Due to the nature and volume of the proposed discharge, the TSS and
settleable solids limitations recommended in the attached form are thought
to be unnecessary. Hydraulic sand dredges and other water treatment plants
do not have limitations as restrictive as those proposed for this facility.
JRR/mkd
Attachment