20140345 Ver 1_401 Application_20140614

Pat McCrory
Governor
��TA 2014034Q
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Michael Ellison, Director
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
MEMORANDUM:
TO: Cindy Perry
FROM: Lin Xu �-x
SUBJECT: Payment of Permit Fee
401 Permit Application
DATE: June 23, 2014
John E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
-- D
JJlV ? 1614
am>tiy., k/ry
The Ecosystem Enhancement Program is implementing a stream restoration and
enhancement project for Brown Creek Tributaries Site in Anson County (EEP IMS #
95351). The activities associated with this restoration project involve stream restoration
related temporary stream impact. To conduct these activities the EEP must submit a Pre -
construction Notification (PCN) Form to the Division of Water Resources (DWR) for review
and approval. The DWR assesses a fee of $570.00 for this review.
Please transfer $570.00 from Fund # 2984, Account # 535120 to DWR as payment
for this review. If you have any questions concerning this matter I can be reached at 919-
707 -8319. Thanks for your assistance.
cc: Eric Kulz, DWR
1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1652
Phone: [phone] Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer - Made in part by re::ycled paper

�._ 4 201403 5
�i
RUM
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
Eric Kulz
Division of Water Resources
401 Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 - 1650
Michael Ellison, Director
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
June 23, 2014
VE
JUN 2 0 2014
John E Skvaiia, III
Secretary
Re: Permit Application- Brown Creek Tributaries Stream Restoration Project, Anson County
(EEP Full Delivery Project)
Dear Mr. Kulz-
Attached for your review are two sets of copies of 401/404 permit application package and
mitigation plans for Brown Creek tributaries stream restoration project in Anson County. A memo
for,the permit application fee is also included in the package. Please feel free to contact me with
any questions regarding this plan (9,1`9- 707- 8319).
Thank you very much for your assistance.
Sincerely
Lin Xu
Attachment: 404/401 Permit Application Package (2 originals)
Final Mitigation Plan (2 originals)
Permit Application Fee Memo
CD containing all electronic files
1652 Mall Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1652
Phone 919= 707 -89761 Internet www.ncdenr gov
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative ACbon Employer — Made in part by recycled paper

O�Of W A TEgO
y
o -r
20140345
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 27 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑X No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
X❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
❑ Yes ❑ No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Brown Creek Tributaries Restoration Project
2b.
County:
Anson
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Ansonville
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
N/A
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Tom & Janice McRae, Alan McRae, William & Linda Hatem, Terry & Martha Dennis
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
Bk 160 /Pg 205, Bk 246 /Pg 139 & Bk 951 /Pg 182, Bk 404 /Pg 008, Bk 211 /Pg 482
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
N/A
3d.
Street address:
1718 Pinkston River Rd /151 Bailey Rd / 1500 Turtlewood Dr / 1930 River Rd
3e.
City, state, zip:
Wadesboro, NC, 28170 / Waxhaw, NC, 28173 / Troy, INC, 27371
3f.
Telephone no.:
704 -695 -4780 (T. McRae), 704 - 694 -8711 (A. McRae), 704 - 847 -6036 ( Hatem)
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑X Other, specify: In -Lieu Fee (ILF)
4b.
Name:
Tim Baumgartner' •.
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP)
4d.
Street address:
217 West Jones St., Suite 3000A
4e.
City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC, 27603
4f.
Telephone no.:
919- 707 -8976
4g.
Fax no.:
919 - 715 -0710
4h.
Email address:
tim.baumgartner @ncdenr.gov
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Kayne Van Stell
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
5c.
Street address:
8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 600
5d.
City, state, zip:
Cary, NC 27518
5e.
Telephone no.:
919 -463 -5488
5f.
Fax no.:
919 -463 -5490
5g.
Email address:
kvanstell @mbakerintl.com
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a
Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID) 1648700230123,,649700452685,669700138104
lb
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees)
Latitude 35 0498 Longitude -80 0665
1c
Property size
61898 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project
Brown Creek
2b
Water Quality Classification of'nearest receiving,water
Class C
2c
River basin
Yadkin
3.
Project, Description
3a Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application
The,existing, streams and'surrounding rural watershed have been negatively'impacted,and are,actively degrading�due,to agricultural conversion
activities i including, silviculture, crop/hay and pasture lands, cattle grazing, and channelization/ditching
3b
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on'the property 1 16
3c
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing_ streams (intermittent and perennial) on'the property 11,070
3d Explain ttie purpose,of the proposed project
See attached sheet,at end, of application
3e Describe the overall project'in,detail, including the type of equipment to'be used
See attached,sheet at,end of application
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by'the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all riot ha §es in the ast�_
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
Comments See attached sheet at end of application
4b
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
El Preliminary ❑ Final
4c
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known) ,
Agency /Consultant Company
Other
4d
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
5.
Project History
5a ,Have;permits or certifications,been requested'or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
5b
If,yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions
6.
Future Project Plans
6a
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b
If yes, explain
Page 3 of 10
,PCN Form —Version 14 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la Which sections were completed below for your;project (check all that apply)
❑X Wetlands © Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted
2a
2b
2c,
2d
2e
2f
- Wetland impact
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
Type of jurisdiction
Area of
number
Corps (404,10) or
impact
Permanent,(P) or
DWQ (401, other)
(acres) '
Temporary
W1 P
Excavation
Unknown
No
Corps
006
W2 T
Land Cleanng
Unknown
Yes
Corps
012
W3 T
Land Clearing
Unknown
No
Corps
006
W4 T
Land Clearing
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0,03
W5
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W6
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
2g, Total Wetland Impacts:
0`27
2h Comments
The proposed stream restoration practices will provide a more natural hydrology and flooding regime, and the riparian buffer area will be planted,with
native woody vegetation that'is tolerant of wetter conditions The design approach will also improve existing areas'of adjacent fringe. of marginal
wetlands thfougMhigher water table conditions (elevated stream profile), and a more frequent over -bank flooding regime Stream profiles will be raised
along various reaches, which will lead to higher water table conditions adjacent to the channels and more frequent out-of -bank flooding
3. Stream Impacts
If there areYperenrnal or intermittent,stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed,on the site; then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
'3f
3g
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial (PER) or
- Type of
Average
Impact
number
intermittent (INT)?
jurisdiction
stream
length
Permanent (P),or
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(feet)
feet)
S1 P
Stream Restoration
HC -R1
INT
DWQ
14
1,896
S2 P
Stream Restoration
HC -R2
PER
DWQ
16
1,288
S3 P
Stream Enhancement I
HC -R3
INT
DWQ
6
579
S4 P
Stream Restoration
UT4 -R1
INT
DWQ
12
1,417
S5 P
Stream`Restoration
UT4 -R2, R3
PER
DWQ
13
1,917
S6 P
Stream Restoration, Enhan
UT4 -R4, R5
INT
DWQ
9
3,973
3h Total stream and tributary impacts
11,010
31 Comments
Average stream widths�are represented at the existing channel -top of banks and not OHWM or bankfull elevations,since those features were difficult to
consistently identify in the field
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 14 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the, Atlantic ^Ocean, or any other open water of
the U S then indivi ually list all.o en water impacts below
4a
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
4b
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c
Type of impact
4d
Waterbody
type
4e
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
O2
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04
Choose one
Choose
4f Total open water, impacts
4g Comments
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction pr000sed, the complete the chart below
,5a
Pond ID number
5b
Proposed use or
purpose'of pond
5c
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f Total:
5g Comments
5h Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no
51 Expected pond surface area (acres)
5j Size of, pond watershed (acres)
5k Method of construction
6. Buffer Impacts (fONDWO)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below- If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below If any im acts're uwre mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form
6a. Project is in,which protected basin?
❑'Neuse ❑ °Tar- Pamlico []Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other -
6b
Buffer,lmpact
number –
Permanent (P) or
T
6c
Reason for impact
6d
Stream name
6e
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet )
6g
Zone 2
'impact
(square
feet
—Temporary
B1
Yes /No
B2
Yes /No
B3,
Yes /No
B4
Yes /No
B5
Yes /No
B6
Yes /No
6h Total Buffer Impacts:
61 Comments
Page 5of10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project
Proposed impacts and mitigation approaches are necessary to restore 8,201 LF of perennial stream, enhance 2,500 LF of stream, and preserve 511
LF of�stream along Hurricane Creek and'four unnamed tributaries to Brown Creek
lb Specifically describe measures,taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques
Sedimentation and ErosiomControl measures,will be implemented throughout =the construction process °per the NCDENR - Land Quality Divisions
S &EC Planning and Design Manual and permit approval The stream restoration work will involde "filling the old degraded channel and constructing the
new design channels ofttine The contractor will work outside -the degraded stream banks and only enter the channel from specific locations
designated on the plans to minimize buffer disturbances Pump - around /dewatenng operation will be utilized to minimize sediment entering downstream
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
❑ Yes ❑X No
impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State?
2b If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply)
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c If -yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Com late if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a Name of Mitigation Bank
Type Choose one
Quantity
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type Choose one
Quantity
Type Choose one,
Quantity
3c Comments
4. Complete if Making a Pa ment,to In -lieu Fee Program _
4a Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached
❑ Yes
4b Stream mitigation requested
linear feet
4c If using stream mitigation, stream,temperature
Choose one
4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)
square feet
4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4f Non- npanan'wetland mitigation requested
acres
4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested
acres
4h Comments
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
The proposed full delivery project will potentially provide 9,766 stream mitigation units (SMUs) in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin for the NCEEP ILF
program A recorded conservation easement consisting of 43 0 AC will protect the site in perpetuity See attached'Mitigation Plan that provides
detailed descriptions, site mapping, and design plan sheets of the existing,conditions,and proposed design approach,to generate,theseiassets, as,weil
as the.proposed credit release schedule, vegetationi planting plan,land performance monitonng'plan to be implemented aft& construction is completed
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January'2009

6. BufferVitigation (State,Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a Will the project result in an impact,withm a protected riparian buffer,that requires
buffer mitigation?
Yes QX No
6b If'yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each, zone of the, riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate4he
amount of mitigation required
Zone
6c
Reason for'impact
6d
Total impact
(square feet)
'Multiplier
6e
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2,for,Catawba)
Zone 2
15
6f Total buffer mitigation required:
6g If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g , payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an-approved in -lieu fee fund)
6h Comments
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
la
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian, BufferiProtection Rules?
1 b
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Mana enient Plan
2a
What is the,overall percent imperviousness of,this project?
2
2b
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes 0 No
2c
If'this project DOES NOT`requir&a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why
2d
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then,provide a brief, narrative description of the plan -
Project site meets the criteria for Low Density development and will not increase overall percent imperviousness Site plan is well below 24 %,
impervious surface area Stormwater /diffuse flows will be transported via vegetated channels and across restored valley streams and natural
floodplain topography
2e
Who will be responsible for, the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3.
Certified Local Government,Stormwater Review
3a
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Anson County
❑ Phase II
3b
Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply)
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other
3c
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with i proof of approval been
El Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply)
[:]Session Law 2006 -246
[:]Other
4b
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a
Does the Stormwater Management,Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met,
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1 4 January 2009

A;VA A
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
Eric Kulz
Division of Water Resources
401 Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 - 1650
Michael Ellison, Director
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
June 23, 2014
John E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
Re: Permit Application- Brown Creek Tributaries Stream Restoration Project, Anson County
(EEP Full Delivery Project)
Dear Mr. Kulz:
Attached for your review are two sets of copies of 401/404 permit application package and
mitigation plans for Brown Creek tributaries stream restoration project in Anson County. A memo
for the permit application fee is also included in the package. Please feel free to contact me with
any questions regarding this plan (919- 707 - 8319).
Thank you very much for your assistance.
Sincerely
Lin Xu
Attachment: 404/401 Permit Application Package (2 originals)
Final Mitigation Plan (2 originals)
Permit Application Fee Memo
CD containing all electronic files
1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1652
Phone: 919 - 707 -89761 Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer — Made in part by recycled paper

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ,Requirement)
la
Does the project' involve an expenditure of pubhc#ederal /state %local') funds or the
® Yes
❑ No
use of'public (federal /state)1and?
lb
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
® Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c
If you answered "yes" to the above, has,the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (if ,so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes
❑'NO
letter) Refer to the Categoncal Exclusion in Appendix B of the approved Mitigation Plan
Comments
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCA02H 0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland 'Standards,
El Yes
® No
or Riparlan'Buffe "r4Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)?
2b
Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
El Yes
®No
2c
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the, above questions„ provide,an explanation of the violation(s)
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated'future impacts) result in
El Yes
X❑ No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b
If you answered "yes "'to the above, submit,a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy If you answered "no,"-provide a short narrative description
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a Clearly,detad the ultimate °tr'eatrrtent,rriethodsiand disposition (non = discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility
Page 9 of 1'0
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑Yes ❑X No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
X❑ Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NCWRC Natural Heritage website (http: / /www.ncnhp.org /Pages /heritagedata.htmi), Natural Heritage workroom, USFWS website (http: / /nc- es.tws.gov/
es /countyfr.html). Letters were sent to USFWS and NCWRC - refer to the Categorical Exclusion in Appendix B of the approved Mitigation Plan.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NCWRC, NCDWQ, and USFWS website (http:/ Inc- es.fws.gov /es /countyfr.html). Letters were sent to USFWS and NCWRC requesting information
regarding potential species impacts, verified that proposed action is not likely to significantly /negatively impact aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑ No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NC Office of Archives and History website and NRIS database was searched. A letter was also sent to the NC Office of State and Archaeology and
the NC Historic Preservation Office. The approval letter can be found in Appendix B of the approved Mitigation Plan,
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑X Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
Hurricane Creek is a FEMA - regulated stream and the project area is located within a mapped AE Zone. See Mitigation Plan Section 16.5, Appendix B
for FEMA and local floodplain administrator correspondence. Agent has submitted a CLOMR application and local floodplain development permit.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
North Carolina Floodmaps / Floodplain Mapping Information System and FIRM Panel 3710648600J.
Baumgartner
��"�'`� � " h-B"/ltAAW
TTim
06 -19 -2014
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10

NOTE: The following project descriptions were attached separately from the PCN document
because the interactive Adobe form would not allow more than one line of text to be displayed
for these three questions.
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The primary purpose of the proposed project is to improve ecologic functions to impaired
stream systems that discharge directly into Brown Creek within the Pee -Dee National Wildlife
Refuge. See attached Mitigation Plan for specific goals and objectives.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The Proposed stream restoration, enhancement, and,preservation activities, along Hurricane
Creek (HC) and unnamed tributaries (UT4) to Brown Creek. Activities will cor►sisvof filling the
impaired /channelized portions of existing stream and restoring a natural floodplain connection.
Work will be conducted using track hoes (excavators), dump trucks /track dumps, tractors w/
disk harrow or rippers; and other equipment typically used in restoration projects for minor
grading and in- stream structure installation. See approved Mitigation Plan for proposed
restoration practices and approach descriptions.
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested
or obtained for this property /project (including all prior phases) in the past? No.
Comments: DWR has requested preliminary JD determination information for wetlands
identified during biologic investigations. Wetland data forms, mapping locations, and other
pertinent information is included in conjunction with this NWP 27 permit application.

ker
Wetland i Impacts:
ac permanent
ti

NC Division of Water°Quality — Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 > ,E,4c N _
Date:
Project/Site: wn C Nc K
r�
Latitude:
Evaluator:' i.
County:
5
Longitude:
0
h
2
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle,one)
Other 1isat j-1&__
Stream is at least'rntermtt nh �6
Ephemeral nterm Perennial
e g Quad Name:
If 2 -19 or. renmal ff t 30`
0
05
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 5 _
Absent
Weak
Moderate_
'Strong
18 Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3 _
14 Leaf litter
1 'S
1
ro . _P
0
3 In- channel structure. ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
n le- ool sequence
0
05
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
4
2
3
5. Active /relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositlonal;bars or benches
0
05
2
3
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
8. Headcuts
1.5
1 -
0
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5^
10 Natural valley
0
0.
1
1 5
11 Second or greater order channel
N6=0!
es'=
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B.,Hvdrologv (Subtotal = S.S )
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13 Ironloxidizing.bacteria
19. Rooted, upland) plants,in streambed
1
2
3 _
14 Leaf litter
1 'S
1
ro . _P
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
05
1
1 5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
015
1
1.5
17 Soil -based evidenceW high-water table?
No =,0
Yes = 3
C. Biology Subtotal
V
1
�dY
f
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted, upland) plants,in streambed
3
2
1
0
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
_
2
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
0
2
3
22 Fish
05
1
1.5
23 Crayfish
0
05
1
1.5
24 Amphibians
05
1
1
1.5
25 Algae
0
0.5
1
15
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75, OBL = 1.5
ther = 0
'perennial streams,may also beddentified,using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes
�� F Rrptl, t
Sketch
51AR Z
4>;A01
41

NC Division of Water Quality — Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 ?CA, 0 2
Date: i
rl�
Project/Site. , a`o m �r � � l�
"o nGl,
Latitude:
Evaluator. 4� .,Id i,-a
County:
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream Is at least lff Z 30' Intermittent
if z 19 or perennial N
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = ;5 Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed, and bank
0
1.
2
3
0
1
1
3
14. Leaf litter _
3 In=channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool;
ripple-pool sequence
0
co
2
3
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active /relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
0
2
3
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
LYA
2
_ _3
8 Headcuts
0
1,
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0
1
15
10. Natural valley
0
0 5
1'
1.5
11, Second or greater order ctiannel
No = 0
Yes.=
a artificial ditches are not rated „see discussions In manual
R_ Hvrirnlnnv tSuhtntal = q ., 1
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13 _Iron oxidizing bacteria_
0
1
1
3
14. Leaf litter _
15
1 -
k 0.5 '
0
15. °Sediment on plants or debris
0
0 5
1
1.5
16 Organic debits lines,or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17 Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No- 0
Yes =
L;_ K1011 1M rS1111M 11— 'C' A A
18 Fibrous roots imstreambed
3
2
1
0
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20 Macrobenthos'(note diversity and abundance)
0
(1?
2 _
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22 Fish
05
1
11.5
23 Crayfish _
0
1
1.5
24 Amphibians
0
1
1.5
25 Algae
05
1 __ __
1 5
26 Wetland plants imstreambed
FACW = 0 75; OBL = 1 5 Other =t
'perennial streams may also be IdenUfied using other methods See p. 35 of manual
Notes:
Sketch: o
I
ci S%
r,
A
41
J i
i
,
i
i
i
i
i
M1.4 I

.J
NC Division of Water Quality - Methodology for Identification of°Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and'Their Origins v. 4.11
1Vf ilWl1 C4rnom idan*iRnatinn Farm VPrainn :d_11.
�3
Date: Z i3
Project/Site: groom r(e
Latitude:
Evaluator: 1 1'
County: 4.7St7Y-\
Longitude:
„c
1
.-Z _
Total Points:
Stfeam'Dete inatlon circle one)
Other �nsoq_ v1
Stream is at least Intermdtent z3,
Ephemeral n erm tten Perennial
_ -
e g Quad Name:
if 2 19 or perennial if ;t 30'
0
1
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal- )
Absent'
Weak
Moderate
Stro
1' Continuity of channel, bed and bank
0--
1
.-Z _
-3
? 4���F�eZ' rtl'= C�" Gf13Flfisi�fl�f '3iiFjzir�3��1�:• r__
s_.- )
�-t
y
1G1.*31��i�Y�_LC.
y y'
SS'i i�E
3 In- channel structure- ex riffle -pool, step -pool,
ri le- ool sequence,
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5 Active /relict flood lain
0
Yes =
1 _
3
6. Depositional "bars or benches
CD
Y
2
3
T. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1-
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade, control
0
0:5
1
-1.5
10. Natural valley _
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
es =
artificlal ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iromoxidizing bacteria_
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1 5
1
.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debns
0
0.5
2_
1,5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.
1 _
1.5
17. Soil -based evidenc&of high water table?
No,= 0
Yes =
P` Rininnv !Q, Gh+n+n1 = G . 11 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed T
3
1
0 •
19. Rooted upland'plants In streambed
2
1
_0
20.1Macrobenthos,(note diversity and abundance)
'CO 2
1
2
'3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2_
3
22.'Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
05
1 _
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25 Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants In streambed
FACW = '0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other =
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p. 35 of manual
Notes:
-
Sketch-
41

NC Division of Water Quality - Methodology for identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: r 13
Project/Site: 3 %v c f r.r � `11
Latitude:
Evaluator. +� lei
County:
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream Dete n circle one)
Other i4Sc�' ✓)
Stream Is at least IntemMent ^
If a 19 or erennial ff Z 30 d�
Ephemeral ntermIHen Perennial
e.g Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= IL• S Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a Continuit _of channel bed _and bank _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
__ _ ___0_
2
3'
13 'Iron oxidiztng�bacteria
r" :#65 -S W318`8it i81
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
3 In- channel structure• ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple4pool sequence
0
Q
2
3
4. Particie,size of stream substrate
0
1
1'.5
3
5. Active /relict- fi'oodplain -
0
1
6V
3
6-Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
1
1
2
3
9. Grade`centroi
0
,0.5
1
1.5-
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second,or greater order channel
o =
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are riot fated, see discussions In manual
R_ Hvdrnlnnv (Suhtntal = & . C� 1
12. Presence of Baseflow,
1
2
3'
13 'Iron oxidiztng�bacteria
1
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
15
1
0.
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris,
0
0.5
1
1'.5
16. Organic debris Imes or piles
0
0.5
21. Aquatic,Mollusks
1.5
17. Soli -based evidence of high,water table?
No = &
s = 3
C Rininnv (Rnhtntal = ,SC 1 '
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
(2)-
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3 )
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21. Aquatic,Mollusks
0
Q
2
13
22. Fish
0 `
05
1
1.5
23- Crayfish
0
0
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
015
1
15
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 7,5, OBL =1.5
ther =
'perennlaPstreams may also be Identified using other methods See p. 35 of manual
Notes.
Sketch:
SS�
lver�
41
I ,
f

i
i
NC Division of Water Quality - Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and'
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11 I!
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date:
Project/Site: 6 -k-7 e "I ` c
Z_
L
Latitude:
Evaluator:
County:
Longitude:
Y-� �_- nu sit;; "afi, ftartrvri'ai.�rgwisw3 ;5.URR=�
2
2
Total Points:
Stream, Determination (circle o
Other
Stream is at least inteffrditent 3
Ephemeral Intermittent a ennial
e,g Quad !Name:
4f;,_
if 2 19 or erennlal ifif 2 30'
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = Absetit 'Weak Moderate Stroi
18 Qontlnqit y of channel'bed and bank
0
1_
2
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
Y-� �_- nu sit;; "afi, ftartrvri'ai.�rgwisw3 ;5.URR=�
2
2
3
14 Leaf litter,
3. In- channel structure: ex.,riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool sequence
0
0:5
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1 _
2
3
5. Active /relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial'deposits
0
1-
2
3
8. Headcuts _
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0 -
05
1 _
1.5
10. Naiural-valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11 Second or greater order channel
No = 0• _
Yes = 3
artificial ditches ere not rated, see discussions in manual
R. Hvdroloov !Subtotal
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
©
2
3
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
2
3
14 Leaf litter,
15
11
0:5
0 _
15 Sediment on`planis or debris
0
1
1
1-.5-
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1'.5,
17. Soil -based evidence of'high water table?
No = 0
es
C. Rinlnnv (Ruhtntal = (_ . S )
18 LFibrous roots imstreambed
'3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants In streambed
2
1
0 _
20. Macrotienthos (note diversity and abundance)
11
2
3`
21. Aquatic'Mollusks
1
2
-3
22, Fish
0.5
1
1 5
23. Crayfish
0
U
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
05
1
-1.6
25. Algae
0
05
1
1.5
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0,75, OBL = 1.5 Other =
'perennial streams may also be Identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes.
Sketch: Uo55��
dS
Z14 7
1

- - - -- - ------ - - - - -- - - -- --
f
NC Division of'Water Quality - Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4 -11
Date: 2 IN
t
Project/Site: 3f0 �� t�
Latitude:
Evaluator: i I�LI� / ° I a
County:
Longitude:
Total Points: I
Stream Determination (ci le one
Other
Scream Isar least Intermittent
' 1f,219 or ergnnial tit 30' �� S
Ephemeral Intermittent erennlal
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology ( Subtotal =_M Absent Weak' Moderate Stror
1 a' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
oSir`.
1
1
s,ft
-- - -r
3 In- channel structure* ex riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool sequence
0
0.5
2'
3
4.'Particle size bf stream.substrate
0
1
15,
3'
5. Active/relict floodplain
0.5
1
2
3
6. Depositionaibars,or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
1.5
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
-1
3
9. Grade control
FACW = 0 75, OBL = 1.5 Other =
05
1
15
10..Natural valley
0
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes =
a artificial ditches;are not'rated; see discussions in manual `
B. Hvdmlonv ( Suhtotal = X 0. S 1
,12.'Presence of Baseflow
'0
1
2
6?
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
1
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
10'
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
5
1
15,
16. Organic debris lines, or_plies
0 1
0.5
1 _41
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es =J3
G. t310100V (Subtotal'= 4 `) 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3,
2
1{
0
19. Rooted upland plants,in streambed
3
2
1
0
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3_
21 Aquatl&Mollusks
0
1,
2
3
22. Fish
0
1
15
23. Crayfish
0
1
15
24. Amphibians
0
w
1
1.5
15. Algae
0:5
1
1.5.
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75, OBL = 1.5 Other =
'perennial streams may also beidentifled using other methods. See p 35'otrnanual
Notes:
Sketch•
N
s
41
i

i J /'I�
r
NC Division of Water Quality — Methodology for, Identification of Intermittent, and
Perennial Streams -and Their °Origins v. 4.11
Nt' ViWn CtrPam lfdpntifien inn Fnrm Vercinn 4-11 ..�
Date: Z
,Pro)ect/Site.T 1 < <
Latitude:
Evaluator. I
I F: `� C
County: A
Longitude:
N, �t
1
2
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at,least intermittent //�� �p .�
Ephemeral Intermittent erennia
e g Quad 'Name:
rf x 1 9i or Ltjehnial if z 30'
0
��
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = a
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1' Continuity, of channel bed and bank
'0
1
2
3 __
?1Sinuosity -ef-cbannel`along•thalweg
1.5
1
(0 5)
3 lit-channel structure: ez rift-pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool sequence
0
��
2
3
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
-05
2
3
5 Active /relict floodpla)n
0
1
23 Crayfish
3
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7 Recent alluvial deposit's
0
to -
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
(,1
2 _ _
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10, Natural valley
0
06
1.5
11 Second or greater order channel
o = 0
Yes = 3
- artificial ditches are,not rated, see discussions in manual
Q U in.vu /C. If-4 1 - /'_ ,
12 Presence of Basefiow
0
3
2
3
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
19 Rooted, upla ndj plants] n streambed-
1
2
3
14 Leaf litter
1.5
1
(0 5)
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0
1
15
16 Organic debris,lines or piles
0
-05
1
15
17 Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No— 0
CYes = 3
1 : Rinlnnv /Ruhtntol,= I.if) wr 1
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19 Rooted, upla ndj plants] n streambed-
2
1
0
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
f
2
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
0
2
-3
22 Fish
0
0
1
15
23 Crayfish
0
.6
1
1.5
24 Amphibians
0
to -
1 '
1.5
25 Algae,
0,
0.5
1
1 5
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0,75. OBL = 1 5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified_using other methods See p.35 of manual
Notes.
X
X ..^.1 _i, - .. JI ... - Y 1
h. S G.p1PNl
�poe�iVG
[k,,
f
r i�

NC Division of Water Quality - Methodology for Identification of Intermittent,and
Perennial Streams,and Their,Origins v_. 4.11
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version,411
Date: i
Project/site: /3rq`�n If -ak _
Latitude:
Evaluator. tk n
County:
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream Is at least Intermittent
li 2 1 g or erenniallf z 30'
Ephemera rater itten Perennial
e.g Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology Subtotdl = ,;
1" Continuity of channel bed and bank
3 In- channel structure: ex riffle -pool, step -pool,
ri le- ool, *se uence
4. Particle'size of stream substrate
5. Active/relict floodplain
6. Depositional bars or benches
7. Recent alluvial deposits
8. Headcuts
9., Grade control
10. Natural valley
11. Secondor greater order channel
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B_ Hvdrolnnv ISuhtntal = 'r . S 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
sent
;Weak
Moderate
Stronc
0
1
2
2
3,
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0
1
2
3
0
1
2
3
0
In
2
3,
0
No = 0
2
3
0
24. Amphlbians
2
3
0
1.5
2
3
0 ;
0.5
1
1.5� ,
0
05
1
1.5
0_7 07
Y,es = 3
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
2
3
1.3: Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3,
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
(9_
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.
1 _
1 5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
05
1;
1 5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3,
C. Bioloav (Suhtotal = (.a 1
18. Fibrous,roots'in streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1 i
2'
.3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
05,
1
1.5
23. Grayfish
611
1
1.5
24. Amphlbians
0:5
1 _
1.5
25. Algae
0
03
1
1.5
26 Wetland,plants In streambed
FACW,= 0 75, OBL = 15 , (Other =
`perennial streams may also be Identified using other methods. Seep 35 of manual
Notes:
� t
Sketch• �r
F �x
t
41

§
ƒ E
r 6
$
§
f
2 £ 2 2
k k %
©
2
) 0 2 )
® ( `
}
LL w LL; } § } \
I
-
!■�
,2
| |!
|$
|
| |!
� |!
'!§
!
�((7
_
.
�
�
.
�
�
.
�
.
ROO
.0
f
2
%
�
. \�
�
�
•
�
2
�
-
�
■

k
2
f ƒ
¥
]
\ t
! I § I 0
c
V
$ k
10 C
2ƒ)
LU j ui
W k} k
|�!
qa|
!!k
! |§
-z�
■!|
f|�
a!
�
� ||■
_
�
�
.
�
�
.
�
�
.
cc
,
c
.0
lea
cc
z
2
|
#|
�
M
E
k,
■
�
�
■
�
■
�

t
WETLAND DETERMNKTION DATA FORK! " Easttm Mountains and Oledmont-11691on
Project/Site: C co'lk+t­,)A
A c6jcouhty A,,.s,, S6mplifig Date
plldantlomm&: Al 4- f- L P
State, IV-4- Sampling Point, wr it A
Investi
Section, foWnship. Range:
Landforrii ( Ifislo'p-ei,tdreaee, etc.):
Local rellef,(concave, convex. none):-...6di-,e- 4 u e— Slope
Subrejlon(LkRorM`LRft 4-912-4 —'Let:
If 6N101211 Long:, C) -7 Datum: A& 8
Soil Mip,UnitName.
NW[classificatloh:,
Are d1matic I hydrologic conditions �on the site typical for this time ofyear? Yes X No,— (If no, explain ln�Rilmaft.)
Are,Vegetation _,,S�pll or. Hyd�idlogy'—
significantly dliturbedl AiVNormal CIrduinstances'Twesent? Yes K No
Are Vegetation _,,Soil or Hydrology _
naturally,problematic? (if needed, explain any answers IhLRemarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -Attach siftli rhap showing sampling point locations, tra sects, important features, etc.
- -- I 1 0. "n
Hy1rophytit Vegetation Present? Yes' A 'No_ Is the!Samolid Area
H i6i -
ydWci Yes No wittilh a Witlirid? Yes, X No
� - j-, , . .
Welland Hydrology Present? Yes, X No
r. t5 d c p1rf 3 io. I .5,wcq hr C, r. 4.S /z, "C',
4D 14k" "4, 4 t1c., 4 ell" idt",
HYDROLOGY
Weiland Hydrology.l.ndicators:
-Secandary Indicators ftWnImunVofAw6reauIre(fi
F4'ary Indicators ( niffiuin,orbnilirigulred:chbtk,bl6thiti§pjyI
_ Surfa66 Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
'
­,True Aquatic Plants (ai�j
— Sparsely` Vegetated dbncave,Surface'(Bi)
H i '"at"er fibli
gh- W'-'- (A * 2)
Hydfi5jen-Sulfikle,Odor (dl)
Drainage Paiiiems (B10)
,7
Saturation (Q)
tied R'h1zosphirei,qkLlvI6g Roots (C3)
— Moss TrIffi Lfqes,(til
Wal6eMarksa(Bll)
Presence of Reduced'Iron I(C4)
— Dry - Season Whter'Table (C2)
Sedlment,Depqsfts (82)
Ricent Ir6n Redkil6n In Till6d Solls (C6)
— Crayflitf Eiurrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
Thin Mucl(Surface (C71
— S6t6rallonVisible'on Abrialfinagetr(C9)
Alial'Mai &Cftist'(84)
other (Explain In Remarks)
Stunted or'Stressed Plants (131)
Iron bep6s'Its.-(B6)
Geomorphic Position.
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
2-ShalloA(Aquiter'd (Di)
Water-St`alned Leaves
Mcr? topograp�c Relief (D4)
A4uatIc'Fauna,(B13)
Field ObservatlonM
Surface Water Present? Yes
x No Depth,(Inches). 0
Watefiatile lireiefit?' Yes
_'No c X Deoth,(Inch6s):
Saturation Present? Yes
No X Depth Onches): .70
Wetiand Hydrology Present? Yes NO
(Ihc;Iuaes,capiII9iy ,Mn qe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge,, monitoring well, serial photos, Previous Inspections), If available:
Remarks
.5o,ret,,
5 4,C t-
6. jP e ds.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern, Mountains and Piedmont – VersIon•10

rJIto w» Crf,rc - /+vr.�'ruHr dr ✓ft's
w,�Iia d A
VEGETATION (Five Strataf —'Use scientific nammof plants.
Sampling Point, L,.,, ,e A
Tie Stratum (Plot size' )
cover Soacle ? Slatus
- Number of Dominant'Species
1.
That Are OBL, FACK or FAC. ! (A)
2'
Total Numberof bominant
3.
-
Spedes,Across All State: (Bj
4.
'Percent of Dominant Species
That AM't)BL, FACW, or FAC: -d (AJB)
6
_ .
6.
= Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50% of total cover.
20% of total cover.
Total % Cover of: - Multight bv:
OBL epeCles x 1
Saolina Stratum (Plot slze:
FACW,spedes x 2=
FAC epecles x 3 =
2•
FACU s pa, des
3.
UPL species X5=
4•
ColumnrTOtels' (A) ,(B)
5•
Prevalence Index = B1A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indlestorar
= Total Cover
50% of•total cover.
20% of total cover.
j� 1, - Rapid Test for Hydrophy , Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size-, 1
Y
2. Dominance Testis >6b%
1
_ 3 - Prevalence Index Is S3.0'
_ 4 -- Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
aate In Remadfs'or on' sbpareite` sAest)
2,
3
_ Probiemsic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (EiViatn)
'Indicators of hyddb soli and wetland hydrology must
-
4.
6.
6•
be present, unless disturbed'or ro'blematic.
D
-
Total Cover
D_eflnitlon_a of Five Vegeta_tlon Struts:
60 %,of total cover
Herb Stratum Plot S� 14v K4O.
,20% of total cover: -
T! xir - plants, exduding ;woody vnes,
size: - s
( )
appro ximately 20 R (6 m),or more M height and'3,In.
1 F�� d ro t_,i• � I t ar4,n i J rn Gad t'• d i d f t
! S is y G LPL
(7.6 cm) or laiger in diameter et bieast height (DBFI).
Sa iri Wood plants, e�idudin w_ ood vines
approximately,20 ft (6 m) or more in helght end less
than 3 in. (7:6 cm)"DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding,woody vines,
approxihistely 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6in) In height-
Herb -All herbaceous (non - woody) plants,, Including
Herbaceous Wines, regardless of slze; end woody,
plants „except woody'vines„less,then approxlrriatety 3
2 Al AE t/
3.
4.
_
5.-
6
7•
g
-
g
tt (1 m) in height.
_
10.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height:
11
Gr> = Total Cover
5095 of total cover:, t/57 20% of total cover. / 7
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1
2.
3.
4
S, Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover. 200 %,of total cover. Present? Yes No
Remarks: (inciud&photo numbers here.or on a separate sheet.)
14 Yd ,,,�*l, 11” ") , C4,C,a1,v , I rsrsrg4,7! A+vw be-
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Version 2 0

SOIL
8 F4,`✓11 CYt( r — /•i(JY /1e-" -. 'rYLt L'
W t c+., J A
Point: w t c
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth'needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence or Indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(Inchisl •Color (moistl, je_ Color lmoist) 4'° Tya Texture Remarks
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for, ProblemaUc Hydrlc Bolls ":
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA'147)
_ HlAd Eplpedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
Sulfide
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, .148)
Matrix
(AALRA 147,148)
X Piedmont Fio Soils (FIS)
Hydrogen (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed (F2)
pialn
_ Stratillid Layers (A5)
_ Depleted,MatdX (F9
(MLRA 136„147)
_ 2 em AAuolr {A10) (LRR N)
_ Redok Derk Surface (F8)
_ Very Shallow Dark'Surfsoe (TF12)
Depleted Beloiiv o'arli Surface (A71)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7,)
_ Other (Explain In,Remarics)
_
Thick Dark Surface (A62)
7 R ®dtix Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Minerat,(61) (LRR N,
_ Iron= Mangenese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
ML'RA`147,148)
IALRA 138)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F,13) (MLRA 136,122)
Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox ( 65)
_ Piedmont,Floodplain'Soils (F19) (ALRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Mainxl(S8)
_ Red Parent Mieit rlil (F21) (ARI.R/4127,147)
unless-disturbed or problematic.
R"triadve Layer (if observed):
Type: G "la `t
Depth {inches): S i fig, 4�
Hydric Soil Present? Yes �_ No
Remarks:
(•(yCj tJ., 4a /t dvx rCa 4✓r Gnd frsLos
(010 /.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and,P(edrnont— Version 10

�J c •� I u h � (�
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM = Eastem Mountains and Piedmont,Reglon
Pn5jecdSlte - !�� �� 4s K < < ✓c e G ►�'� f City /County A -hs& Sampung Date. )� fig% 13
Applicarit/Owner` : A,.'f-`L 44 P State: %y 4- Sampling,Poini:•Wc*-
Investlgator(s): f s) � rn 6 t' Section, Township, Range:
Landfonn (htilslope,.terrace, etc):- L2,1 y Local reAef (concave,, convex, none): to r _ r Slope
Subreglon (LRR or MLRA). L e Q - 11 Lat: ©SI 4 y Q Long. o!o , 3 tJ Datum. 171i4rJ 7 3
Sotl'Map Unit Name:. lz C1, t w c, c.1 n . l ye, w, NWI classification, - if F
Are cilmatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical foi this time of year? Yes X_ No (If no; explain in Remarks,)
Are-Vegetation Soil ,or Hydrology ,significantly disturbed ?. Are 'Normal Circumstances, present? Yes _ No
Are Vegetetlon . Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any,'answers,ln Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, i'1'mp6hafit features, etc.
Hydrophytic V6getatWvPresent? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Sol] Present? Yes _ No within a Wetland? Yes —Y No
Wetiand Hydrology Present? Yes _ No
Remarks: j j � - - -- -
%rle 1`5 tJ ;r%o(SS''v / rj�Ct1%11f.sr Su1�%r' ,`h 4i-e— r'VC
'{`O 110 //r' Lt. n� C ✓CtG --``
HYDROLOGY
'Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minlmum`of two redu]red)
Qj]ma(ylndlcatam fminlmum of one is reouired,
check all that aooly)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
�C SuAace,Water, (A1)
_ True Aquallc,Plants (814)
_ Sparsely Vegetated,Concave Surfaced(BS)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns (810)
_ Saturatlon (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres,on Llving Roots (0)
_,Moss Trlm Unes (B16)
_ Water Marks (81)
_ Presence of Reduced'Iron Mill
_Dry- Season Water Tebl_e (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
` Recent Iron Reduction In Tliled Solis (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Ddit; posits (83)
— Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or�Crust,(B4)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (01)
_ Iron Deposits (35j
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Shallow Aquitard (03)
_ Water - Stained Leaves (89)
_ Mlcrotopographlc R6ef'(D4)
-_ Aquatic Fauna (613)
FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations'
Surface Water Present? Yes )t No
Depth pnches)4i-� "
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth pnches) :>,A0 "
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes k No
ncludes ca' Illa tinge)
Describe Recorded'Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous Inspections), If available.
Remarks_:
C,ri - C( WL1r� i'lrst'�
,Jr • ` i r
Ci �p rt S r, ^rt ✓i �'�rr
r C%, !�
�G�t/ c �C,d. lU- tom +
�p {_ r,� /i /7oc.f rr•� t1t�
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2:0

t.v � •! J z„ cil �
/z
NEGETA►TION (Five,Strats) — use scientific names of plants. aarnpnng rol"u. w�
2.
3.
4
5 Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation �
50°% of total cover 20°% of total cover. Present? Yes T - No
Remarks, (Include photo numbers here or on a separate' sheet.)
ii Jic, l) frZ J(e, titr,I,uA, 4 f(: ;(- t A, C4 Cr- / +t
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern, Mountains and'Piedmont- Version 2 0
Absolute Dominant indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum
{Plot size: ) °% Cover Suedes? Status
Number of'Dominani Spedes
1
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: _ [__ (A)
,2:
Total Number of Dominant
3.
-
Species Across All Strata• (B)
4.
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or. FAC: m U (AM)
= Total Cover
Prevalence index worhaheat:
Tota(GgAr Mufy_ohr by
50% of totai cover. 20°% of total cover.
of,
OBL species x 1 =
(Plot sae* t
FACW spades x 2 =
1
FAC Species x3=
2•
FACU species -x4 = —
3:
UPL "species x5=
4•
Column Totals• (A) (B)
6.
6:
Prevalence Index = BIA =
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover. 20% of total cover,.,
1- Rapid Teat for Hydrophytic Vegetation
12
- Dominance Test Is >50%
Shrub`Stratum
(Plot size:
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
1
_
4 -Morphological Adaptations! (P`o4tde supporting
hats In'Remarks or- oma'separatbrstreet)
3
_ Problematic 'Hytlr`ophydcVegetaGon'•(E*Ialn)
4:
5
-
'Indicators of hydric soil and wederid, hydrology must
6.
be present, unleae disturbed o� protilematic:
=Total Cover
Deflnitien® of Five'VegatatioKStrata:
50% of total cover 20 %'ot total cover.
Tree - Woody, plants,,exdudind,woody vines,
Herb Stratum
(Plot siie. S= l�aa f rw� +vs)
approxlmately�20 it (6 m) or more in, height and 3 In.
(7.8 cm) or larger In,diameter atbreasi height(DBH).
2. are
_� x
- S'7, N F.1C�✓
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 It' (6 m) or inors'in:lietght slid less
3. .ry , -,_.r f_ F as1 �® FM w
4. A H rl
_ -^—�T
_ +i ,`r c �,'a_.. c �' !v N r-4 G
then 3 Iri (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
5.
approximately 3 to 20 It (1 to 6 m) In height.
6'
Herb - All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, Including
7,
herbaceous vines, regardless,of size, and woody
6
plants, except woody vtnes, less than approximately 9�
9,
ft (1 m) in height.
10.
�
Woody vine -All woody vines, regardless of height.
1.1.
6, =Total Cover
50% of total cover q7, 5= 20% of total cover 4
Woodv Vine
Stratum (Plot site: )
1
2.
3.
4
5 Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation �
50°% of total cover 20°% of total cover. Present? Yes T - No
Remarks, (Include photo numbers here or on a separate' sheet.)
ii Jic, l) frZ J(e, titr,I,uA, 4 f(: ;(- t A, C4 Cr- / +t
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern, Mountains and'Piedmont- Version 2 0

l� /Gw • Cvrr6r - 1�v' •r "tc , L ✓rc �-
SOIL Sampling Point: we 6 1�1'
Profile Descriptlon: (Descrlbeto the depth needed to document theJndlcator er confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inoFiis1_ Color (moist) ° Color (molstl �Tyne _ � Texture Remsr
oao„ ." lo 43/Y so 10 514 _j;v i�-
Histosol (A1)
= Histic Eplpedon (A2)
_ Black Hietic (AS)"
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stiatrfied Leyers'(A5)
Zdm MUl k (A I O) (LRR H)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Thlck�Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky,Nllneral (S1);(LRRIAI,
P;LRA147,146)
_ Sandy Glay`edVatriz (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (35)"
_ Stripped_Mlatrbi(S8)
_ Dark`Surfece,(S7)
_ PoJyJelue Below Surface (S8),(MLRA,5147 „146)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148)
_ Loamy Gleyed,Mstrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
flied& Derk,Surfece (F6)
Depleted Dsrksu -Aice (F7)
I•Redox "Depressions {F6)
_ lm"anganese Masses (F12),(LRR,N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric,Surface (F13) (MLRA 136,122)
_ Piedmont Floodplein Soils (F19) (MLRA 146)
_ ,Red Parent_ katerials(F21)(MLRA 127,147)
Indlcatore for Problematic Hydrlc $olle i
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ _C_ oastrPra16. jRedoz�(AI6)
(IdLRA 147,148)
_ Piedmont Floodpialn,Soile (F19)
(MLRA 188;147)
_ Very Shallow Daik Surface (TF12)
Otlier'{Expiain'in Remarks)
cators of hydrophyUpyegetation and
Jand hj droloBY must be present,
- Typei
D`epth (Inches)• t C Hydric Soll'Present? Yes–k— No
Remarks:
- (4 tip+ Sc" l ��rs� ✓�
Y C ice) a
US Armq,Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -- Version 2 0

f5iar i. t ✓c c c.s r Y
'A /1?
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM „Eastern Mountalns,and Pledmont,Reglon
Project/Site: &o,.,j h Cry. k • iJT _'�` wt4 A%6 Clry /County, A” sa, r+ Sampling Date-
Appllcant/Owne_r: /V_4- f- r-; P Slate:, /V C Sampling Point: Lc-� A
Investigaior(s); rh+� '5;--yA r ` ( Secilon, Township, Range*
Landrorm',(hlllslope, terrace, etc.). ? l dd P la ,' �, Local relief (concave, convex, none). ea r, i e ✓ i Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA)-_ 1.4/1 ^ P Lat: �' Ste. O 5/ 7 9 t �r Long; Datum, AlWoO, 91.15
Soil Map tinN Name: _QA, It Gin cc w4< le. hea +� NWLclassifrcatlori: tiP fie+►
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site * typical for this Nme' of•year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetatlon Solt or Hydrology; significantly disturbed? Are "Normal,Circumstancesi present? Yes K_ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturatiy problematic? (If needed, explain any:answers'ln Remarks)
SUMMARY'OF FINDINGS - Attach site map'showing
transacts, irbportant features, etc.
Hydrophytic'Vegetatlon'Present7 Yes rX Nei Is the Sampled Area
Hydilc Soll Present? Yes X- No Within a' WePf1iLT Yes _X No
Watland,Hydratogy Present? Yes No
Aloe., t'o 1, twolfwlcd C)CtojtC$ rC.) Sta.'gNw/J
HYDROLOGY,
Wetland Hydrology'Indicators:'
Secondary indicators (minimum of two reoulred)
ply Indicators fr�h r(�umfof,'one is reoulred.
check all that nooiv)
_ Surface Soil,Cracks (B6)
+� Surface Water_(A1)
_ True`Aquatic Plants ?(814)
= Sparsely Vegelated,Condave Surface (B8)
a, .r
_... Hlgli Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Drainage Patlems (810)
Saturation,(A3)
_ b41zed'Rhizosp6res onlLlving,Roots,(0)
_ Moss Trim:Lines (1516)
_ Watei Marks (151)
i,1 _
_ Pi esence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Seesori Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposlts'(B2)
_ Recent Iron Reduction'In'Tllled Solis (C6)
_ Creyflsh1Bur'rows (C8)
_ DrIR'Deposlis (83)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
r Algal Mat brCrust (B "4)
_ Other (Explaliijri Remarks)
_ Stunted 6r Stressed Plant's_ (D1)
_ Iron,Deposits (85)
— Geomorphic Posltlon`(D2j
_ Inundation Visible on Aerlal`Imagery (157),
4 Shallow`Aqultard�(D3)
_ Water- Stalned Leaves (89)
--,- Mlcrotopographlc Reief (0-4)
_, Aquatic'F,auna,(813)
FAC- Neutral Test,(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface,Water,Present? yes _ No
Depth (Inches)•,0-6"
WaterTable,0'4sent7 Yes No
K_ Depth,pnches). 7 6"
Saturation Present? Yes No
a Depth pnches) 2 aL'
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
ncludes is Ills f e
Describe, Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well,,aerlal photos,-,previous inspections) -if available -
Remarks:
S ✓� c<,�.r �!�!s ,T JC1c
(o ,rr9 {/ i r,ii[ C`��� j%ycY,
�� %r,, JU �cr.'t) r•ry 1
So,:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

B !vc✓ n L✓ C! 4 CJ 7- y
VEGETATION (Pive,3trata) = Use sclentitic names orplants. 5amp ling Point -wc T
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Version 210
Absolute' Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tres Stratum (Plot size: )
'% Cover, SRS§? - Status
Number of Dorn'nent Species
1.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC. y (A)
Total Number od Dominant
2.
3•
Species Across'All Strata {B)
i
4.
P.efeent of, Dominant Species
_
5
'Kist AreOBL, FACW, of FAC: Is as (AM)
Total Covey
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Coygs qf MA RN bv:
50% of total - cover•
2096 of total cover. -
061; species x 1 =
(Plot size. - J
FACW species x2-
1.
FAC species i'3 =
2'
FACU species x4=
,UPL species x 6 =
4.
Column Totals:. (A) (B)
6
Prevalence Index = BIA =
e.
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover.
20%,of total cover.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydroptioc Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size. 16 • &t ruA LA) )
2 - Dominance Test Is >50%
1. ;4 Ll i d4
10 Y r a
3- Prevalence Index is s3v
_ 4 -'Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data In Remarks or cn a separate sheet)`
2
3
Problematlri Hyrlrophytic Vegetation' (E) plain)
4
_
'indicaiom of hydric soil and wetland hydrology, must
6:
6.
be present„ unless disturbed'or problematla,
f D = Total C vei
Defintdons of Five degetetlon Strata: '
60a% of total cover;
S 20% of tote' cover.
Tree - Woodyplants, exduding400dy vines,
Herb Stratum,;(Pbt sire: S-4&4- ys)
approximately; ,20 ft (6 m) of iinore In heigFit;and 3,In
1. J uv , . t n r fu «, ,
_ _� fAj
CI.B'cm) of larger In diameter at breast heigtit,(PBH).
Sapling Woody 'ants, exdudin wood vines
approximately 20 f1 (6 m) or more, in height end less
than 3 In. (7.8cm)DBH.
2. V vJ w %e e c, (Ja•lr/54., 5 • �_ 05
.3. Ga "t x 5 /y_ _� + t t ✓
4. 11 Po l.t, 0
5.
Shrub -Woody plants, exduding,woody, vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to -O m) hi helght.
- Ail herbaceous (non - woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, ,arid woody
plants, akcepf woody vines, less4han approximately 3
6
7--
g
9
ft o m) iii Freight.
10.
Woody vine —All woody vines, regardless of,height.
11.
0_ = Total Cover
50% oflotal cover,
C/O 20% of total cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1
Hydrophydc
2
3.
4,
5.
=Total Cover
Vegetation
k
50°% of,total cover,
20°% of total cover.
Present? yes No
Remarks (includeiphoto numbers here or on a separate sheet )
4-1dln ✓?L-44'4- .iv r_lr.11,o— . _
rftsr+ -f
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Version 210

SOIL
�5�a�✓n LV, ct W l- t/,
Point: w� •.
Depth — Metrtx Redox_ Features
(Inches) Color (moistl Color (moist) �_ Twe L`oc� Texture Aemarka
ncnntration.,D= Danietinn. RM =Reduced Matrix. MS =Masked Send Grains. kocatlon: PL =Pore U_ nli
'Hydric Boll Indicators:
_ Histosolh(A1)
_ HisUcEpipedon,(A2)
_ Black -kstic (A9)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (AS)
_ 2 cm Muck,(A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below }bark Surface (Al 1)
_ Thlck Dark,Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy;MuckyMineral}(S1),(LRR'N,
1191.RA147, -148)
_
Sandy GleyedMstrix,($4)
_ Ssndy Red(w(SS)
Type. Ch
depth (inches): 5 v f
_ Dark Surface.($?)
_ P„ IoaW)BelovrSurface (S8) (MLRA 147,148)
_
Thin Dark Surface (Sg)- (t1ALRA 147,148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
)� Depleted'Matrix�(F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F8)
_ Deptetetl Dark Surtece °(F7)
_ +Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron- Menganese,Mwses,(F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 1k)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 138,122)
_ Pled_irwrd,Floodplai ,"a (F18),(MLRA 148)
Red PereM Materiel (F21.),(6ALRA.127,147)
Indicators for Problernatic,Hydric'Sa
_ 2'crn Muck (A1l))r(ML" 147)
= Coast Prairie Redoi(A'IB)
(MLRA_147,148)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Solis (F19)
(MW 188,147)
_ Very Shallow DarkSurface (TF12)
Oli eF iEicplein InAemarks)
'Ind)cetore of hydrophytlovegetation and
Wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydrlc Soil Present! Yes �_ No
So. tJL 40 V'Ecka Fe"t-, Ivn t' d 9 /etb rrvA- j
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Version 2.0

1'U�'iIc --~J C.
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Eastern Mountains and Pledmont�Region
Project/Site: 13, f NW H C , «% U f'-/ - w e1.1,1 d G City /County: r SeJ Sampling Date_
ApplicanUOwner: �VGf A-P State; _ N G Sampling
Investigator(s): S—r- l Section, Township, Range:
Landiorm (hilislope, terrace; etc.): Locatrellef (concave, convexrnone):, Cc— C Slope
SWeglon (LRR or MLRA):, 441L-)f Lai: 3 5 Q Y lo-5.1 Long. 6. n ;L-o Oatum: ;VA /D C 3
Soll Ma UnftiName: C-4i A -
p NWI classification. P f 0
Are- cfirrlatic / hydroloolc contlltions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _ X No 'of no, explaln` in Remarks')
Are`V ,getallon, . Soli or; Hydrology- significantly disturbed? Are Normal,Clrcumstances' present? Yes No
Are Vegetatton Soll or Hydrology naturally pr9blerrratk7 (If needed, explaln any answers In Remarks:)
SUMMARY OF FIND-146S -- Attach site map showing'sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
HydroPhytic Vgetatlon Presenf? Yes K_ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Wittiln a Wetland? Yes _ Y No
Wetidnd,H)drology.Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Attu Its (�t �✓essi •-, ,'e, 1paelt �wc._�v .rr /de�� /a,'r. .
HYDROLOGY
Wetland,Hydrology indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reoulredl
Primary Indicators (minimum ofoneds reaulred_
: check all that aooty)
_ Surface Soil ,Cracks (86)
_ Surface Water,(A1)
i 7rue Aquatic Plants (s 14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Conc®vkSurface�(BB)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Dralnage,Patterns (810)
_ Saturatiow(A3),
_ Oxldlied Rhliospheres on LW Hg Rooti'((Z3)
_ Moss ,,Tdm,Unes (816)
_ Water Msrks:(B1)
_ Presence of Reduced iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water TeWe'(G2)
_ Sediment Deposits (82)
_ Recent Iron Reductlon In Tllied Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
— Drift Deposits (83)
_ Thin Muck - Surface (0)
_ 'Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
— AIg01 Mayor- Crt6t,(84)
= Other (Eiplaln In Remarks)
_ Stunted or,Stressed Plants (D1)
_ IromDeposits`(85)
_ Geomorphic Posttlon (02)
_ inundation Vlsible�on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water- Stained Leaves (89)'
_ Microtopographlc,Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (813)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field'Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No 'C Depth Qnches)
Water Table Present? Yes
No X Depth,(Inches) ? d s �r
Saturation Present? Yes
No Y Depth (Inches) '7,Pp" f
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes >( No
ncludes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data' (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous Inspections), if available,
Remarks
�),r_.'�; r
_ tr,'r5�
�trv� tLCn %5 0-�.
�cr �' e
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2,0

61411' C c �_ L_)% 41
L,✓ i y ! A--d G
VEGETATION (Five Sti!ata) Use sclentific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size. 1 u vat •ys ) % Cover SQBdegT Status Number of Dominant Species
*at,A OBL, FACW; or FAC: 3 (A)
2. PW-+C, n,. QeLM'e h �a l,'g y ail c `'� Total-Number of Dominant ,J
3. Spe "ties Across Ailttrata: 7 (B)
4. ----------- -
Percerit of Oomineiit Spades
5. Thii Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 S� (A@)
2f - Total Cover
50 Wof total cover �a. 5— 2096 of total cover: •s
Senlina Stratum (Plot slie )
2.
�3 - -
4.
-
6.
Total Cover
Total % Cover of:
Multiply b)q
OSL spades
x 1
FACW species
x2=
FAC species
x,3 =
FACU spades
z 4`=
UPL species
x5=
Column Total`s:
- +(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = BIA =,
50% of total cover. 20 %'of total coJer. .� 1,- Rapid Test for Hydrophyde Vegetation
Shrub Stratum, (Plot size: )
= 2 - ,Doininan6d Test is >50%
6
3,- Prevalence Index is b3.01
2
_ 4 - Morphologleal'A laptetlons_' (Provide supporting
9 _ _
data in Remarks�,oron a separate sliest)
10.
-
dti
Problematic Hydrophyilc Vegetation' (Explain)
11
5
(� = Total Cover
'Indicators of hydrio soil and wetland hydrology must
6.
11
be present; unless disturbed or problematic. -
= Total Cover
50% of total cover. 26% of,total cover.
Herb'Stratum (Plot size: S rr4JI4is )
4,
6.-
Tree.- Woody plants; exduding woodylyines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or mare in height and 3 in.,
(7,6 cm) of larger„ Ir diameter st bieast heighf(DBH).
Sapling -Woody plants „excluding woody vines,
approximately 20'ft (6;iri),or more in Height and less
than 3 In. (7,:6 orrm) DBH.
Shrub ,m- Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (fto 6 m) in height.
7.
Herb -'All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, Including
6
,herbaceous vines, redardless of,size, and woody
plants, except -woody vines, less than approximately 3
9 _ _
it (lm) in height -
10.
-
Woody vine - All woody vines,, regardless offieight.
11
(� = Total Cover
50% of total cover. 20% of total cover
Woody Vine +Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
4
5• Hydrephytic
Total Cover Vegetation
50% of totatcover. 20 %,of total cover. Present? Yes _ No
Remarks (include photo numbers here or on a separate sheeL)
{ '
> - 9'' L ”, Le .f&,k.- f ter.; i,
US,Army Corps ot,Engineem Eastern Mountains and Piedinont - Verslon,2.0

SVIL
j c#wn t .4tt4'-
t'vl L4 tz- -d L
Point: - w- -u "
rronre ueacnpuon: luascnbe tome deptn needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix RedoxFoatures
(Ind188i Color (molstl _ f Color (moist) _ ,1j21 Texture Remarks
7 :: C=Concentration D =De lotion RM =RedUoad Matrix MS=Maaked"Sand Grains. 2Looetiom PL =Pore Uni JM =Metnx.
Hydrie 66111ndicators;
-
Indicators for Problemettc Hydric Solis':`
_ Histosol (A1)
_ Dark Surfade'(S7)
_ 2'cm Mudt,(A10)'(MLRA 147)
Fiistic Epipedcn (A2)
_ ,PolyJelue Below Surface (S8) (MI.RA 147,146)
v
_Coast Fralrie Redox (A18)
_ Black Hietic (A3)
_ Thin Deck Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,146)
(MLRA 147,146)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matiix`(F2)
K P, mont Floodplain'Solls (F19)
_ Strathled Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3j
(ML 4 156,147)
_ 2,cm Muds (A10) (LRWN)
_ Ridox Dark'Surfece (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
n
Depieted'Dertc "Surface,(F7)
_ Other (EWain in Remirks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Dapresslons'(F8)
r
_ Sandoucky Mineral (Si) (LRR H;
_Iron Marigeriese Messes (F12) (LRR N;
MLRA 147,448)
MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric'Surface (F13) (MLRA 136,122)
Nridicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox,(SS)
_ Piedmont Floodplaln Solis (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetlantl hydrology must be present,
_ SWpped Matrix`(56)
_ .Red Parent'MatbHal,(F21),(ML"127,=147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Type: .
Depth (Inches): Hydrlc Soil Prbsent? Yeas No
amarks:
(4ydr,2 5v' i r c ��%'c�'c.�� cJv< �o C.l-�a /�rtJt�v J�ttrtr.r S icfv,rrd �p
V14ccE F 19.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Version 2.0

Crrc �- - vT `l
J n
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Pledmont•,Region
Pro)ecUSite: ti /own_ Cyce k-, U 14 ' e✓c °'t< (4r) P City /County. Sampling Date. r aZLO.
Applicant/Owner: .A/���aP _ State: Sampling Paint: -Vt + 4
Investlgpttir(s), f'V .S� .�1 -( Section: Township, Range
Landform (hlllslope, terrace, etc). F� u�rJc f�., Local relief, (concave, convex, none): taw c.&., c Slope 00 7
Subregldn (LRR dr MLRA): JJ k -•f Lat:, 35- Oy 70�') Long. - =D a `1 9.1 % Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name. Qi A- c Lo,a +«, NWI classification, Pf;*-t
Are lunatic I hydfologic condl(lons on the slte typical foethis time of year? Yes �, No , _ (If no, explaln In,Rernarks.)
Are VegetaHorr Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstance§' present? Yes No
1..
Are Vegetation - Soil ; or Hydrology, naturally prolilemallc? (If needed', explain any,ensv a In Remarks:)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach slte -map showing sampling point locations, transects. Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled °Area
Hydrie Soil Present? Yes ^ No- within a Wetland_? Yes X No
Wetiend,Hydrology'Present? Yes K No
`Remarks.
�'�(`+ ry5 GirrSrr% C%c�s'cs�,'ca• -. �^, GtG�LC� �'G;,f�c.ri'.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Iridieators:
Secondary Indlcators (minimum of two reautred)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reaulred:'check
all that aooly)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A7) _
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ 5paisely Vegetated:Concave Surface (88)
High Water Table (A2)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
4
_ S ®turallon'(A3)
Oxidized RhiiaspFieres•, +on lJving R6ots, (0)
_Moss ^TrIm Lines (816),
_ Wetet Marlin (e1) _
-
Presence of Reduced Iron (Cs_ ,4)
_ Dry. Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (82) _
Recent Ir6mReducBon,ln TIIIed;Soils (C6)
= Crayfish Burrovus (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (8;) _
Thin Muck Surface (C?)•
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (Bdj _
Other,,(Explaln in Remarks)
i Stunted or. Stressed 1311ants�(D1)
_ IronjDeposlts (B5)+
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
is Shallow,Aqultard (D3)
_ Water- Stalned`Leaves (89)
_ Mlcrotopographlc Relief (D4)
— Aquatic Fauna`(813)
_ FAC-Neutral'Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes >; - •No
Depth (inches).,•0
Water Table•Present? Yes -No -X Depth (Inches): 7 are ' e
',' `
Saturation Present? Yes No,
Depth (Inches): ?
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
- IncQe—sta Illa' frin e
Describe Recorded.Data (stream gauge, monitoring Well, aerial,photos, previous'lnspectlons), If available
Remarks:
1
t IF/ d i.� fop fc5,fI,'t4+.,/('
C' e, %ci�r�
,[
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - V,erslon 2 0

%j taw. -r 6 Fe C ( k - &W ' N
VECsETATiom (Five Strata) — use scientific names.of _plants.. Sampling Point:
50% of totatoover:,
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Shrub_ Stratum , (Plot MO. 1
Tree Stratum (Plot size• - )
§? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
2
That Are OBL, FACW,'or,FAC:
.
Total Number of Dominant
(A)
2
_ t?roblematic Hyd_rophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wettand,hydroiogy must
3
b
Specie's Across All,strate• D_
r .yr
(8)
4.
Percent cf,Dorrdnah Speclea
=Total Cover
Definitions of,Fivs VegetallonStrata:
5.
20% of total cover,
That Are,OBL, FACW, c r FAC: 1 y y
(A!B)
6.
1. Jv+scvs rlc'PWAa, ,s
tr
_ 7 fe.
Q.6,i rij or Isrger In diameter at brsa9fheight.(DBH).
So-piing - Woody,plants, excluding woody vines,
approxlmately 20 ft (6'm) oe6dre In- height and,law
2. 66
=Total Cover
Prevalence lndoit worksheet:
Total %Cover Multioly by
50% of,total cover
2.0% of total cover,OBL
of:
"apedes z`1 =
7•
Saolmg Stratum (Plot size: 1
-
FACW species x2=
1'
FAC'species x3=
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height
2.
'
FACU species x4=
50% of total •cover
3'.
UPL species X5=
)
4
Column Totals: (A)
(B)
3.
5
b.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Vegetation
Ai'
= Total Cover
1 llydrophytic Veastedon1ndicators:
I Present? Yes No•
50% of totatoover:,
20% of total cover.
_ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophyfic Vegetation
Shrub_ Stratum , (Plot MO. 1
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1
_ 3 - PrevalenceAndex Is 53.0'
_ 4 - Morphological)Adaptational (Provide supporting
data�in Remarks 0,,i'seperate'sfieet)•
2
3. -
_ t?roblematic Hyd_rophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wettand,hydroiogy must
4 ry
b
6
be present, uniess disturbed or protiierriaifc.
=Total Cover
Definitions of,Fivs VegetallonStrata:
50% of total coder
r,
20% of total cover,
Tract — Woody plants, eicdudirig woody ulnas, ,
Herb Stratum (Plot,size:
approximately 20 R'(6 m)`or more in helghhand 31n.
1. Jv+scvs rlc'PWAa, ,s
tr
_ 7 fe.
Q.6,i rij or Isrger In diameter at brsa9fheight.(DBH).
So-piing - Woody,plants, excluding woody vines,
approxlmately 20 ft (6'm) oe6dre In- height and,law
2. 66
3,
„j
than 3 In. (7.6 am) DSH.
Shrub — Woody plants, excludind woody vines,
approximetely 3 to 20ft (1 to 6 m) in height
Herb — All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, Including
�Iierbaceous.mnss, regardless of size, and,wogdy
plants, except woody vines, less then approximately 3
5.
6
7•
g
g
ft (1 m) V height;
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height
11
f = Total Cover
50% of total •cover
_ 20% of total cover._ ,
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
)
1.
Hydrophytic
2.
3.
4•
b.
= Total Cover
Vegetation
Ai'
50% of total'cover.
20% of total,cover.
I Present? Yes No•
Remarks- (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheep.)
1t iAt 4 ill> .:14'&c,4-
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

11►�'�v' +� ✓tr�c -vr y
wcf1�,J 00
SOIL Sampling, Point: i vs E 0
Profile Description: (Describe to" depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm,the absence of indicators:)
Depth WMrlk Redoz Featares
(lnchdsl - Coton(moist) � QQr(p�ft °[�_ 1j�_ _6gfi_ Tear Rern6 tcs
Hydrlc Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solis ":
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm MUCK (A'10) (MLRA147)
Hisdc Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA'147,146)
_ coast Prelne Redox (A18)
_ Black Hletic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4j
_ Thin Dark Surface (S8) (AAL.RA 147,148)
_Loamy (ileyed Matrix (F2)
(ML.RA 147,148)
%C PledmoM Floodplaln So is (F18)
_ Str8t1})ed Layers- (AS)
_ Depleted'Matrix (F3j
(MLRA 136,147)
_ 2 cm Muck'(A10)'(LRR b)
_ Redoz'Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Darn Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark §urface (F7)
_ Othei (Enplein 1n Remarks)
_ Thick Darn Surface (Al2)
� ' Redox Depkwlons (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mlneral�(S,1) (LRR M,
_ Iron - Manganese - Messes (F12),(LRR k,
MLRA'147,148)
MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbdc Surface (F13) (MLRA 138,12?)
'Indicators,of;hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox 050,
= Piedmont FI`odplain Sollaff" o) (MLRA,14e)
weflandihydrology must tie;present,
_
_ Stripped Mainx (S6)
_ Red Parent Materlal (F21) (MLRA 127,147)
unless dmWrbed,br problematic.
Type: t- I tea=
Depth (inches): Sv 1611 r Hydric Soil Present? Yes rk No
Remarks: 7
l e %CSnn l c1 v� %u °w �I,.at�,cl l °n 1,V a,s,!/ j'✓i :ivvcr G% r< ti8 1
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

,WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastem Mountains and Piedmont Region
Protect /Site- h e a w - er c r � r jT 4 '� r. f le., d Cpy/County: i4 ,Sampling Date.
Applicant/Owner- N f_C if State Al L Sampling Point: w �
Investigator(s):, f So ie, r Section, Township, Range•
Landfo"`rm'(hlilslope; terrace, eic.)• F/, odd •lrr r ,,, Coca6relief (concave, convex, none):, ea—
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) Lat: - 3 O Y?• / S Long. ono: D DL O a Datum: A•!'A y-2 3
Soil Map UnR Name: Lin A - G'v1104,J Q I !a La .., NW(W'islHcailon:. PA- O
Are climatic) hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _ �C No (If no; explain In Remarks.)
Are'Vegetatioh . Soil or Hydrobgy slgnlficantty, disturbed? Are Nor Circumstances," present? Yes' No -�_
Are Vegetation . Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic Of needed, explain any�answers In Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS- Attach slte map showing sampling point locations, transacts; knooiiant`features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation'Present? Yes No­,_ Is the,Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes __)�_ No
Remarks:
e A
i
s 4
�C' 5C.✓� rJ
.„�,► nF �"rU�O)�iG ;' t.,. + ,61te 4 r
Leh N r ,o 7 V$
HYDROLOGY
5- �rcr, », C4 -4h.ye
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum g1two reaulredl
Primgpv Indlsbt2m (minimum of one Is
required, check all that jpptyL
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (All
_ True Aquatic Plants (814)
_ Sparsely Vegetated � Concave 'Surface (BS)
_ High'WeterTalSie (AZ)
_Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C7)
Dralnage Patterns (B10)
_ Saturation,(A3)
_ Oxidized,Rhlzospheres on Living Roots'(C3)
_ Moss Trim Unes,(B16)
Water M6rk 061)
_ Presence'of Reduced Iron (C4)
•_ Dry-'Season Water Table.(C2)
_ ,Sediment Deposlts (82)
_ Recent Iron Reduttion In Tilled Solis (C6)
= Cr_ayflsh Burrows-(C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
_ _ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
--Algal Mat or Crust (84)
= Other (Explain In Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_ Iron Deposits (Bb)
_ Geomorphlegl;Posltion (62)
_ Inundation Visible,on Aerial Imagery (Bn
_ Shallow Aqultard,(D3)
- Water - `Stained Leaves (89)
_ MichAopo®rephic Rellef(04)
_ Aquatic Fauna (813)
FAC•Neutral Test (DS)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (Inches)
Water Table Present? Yes,
No - CY Depth Qnches)
Saturation Present? Yes
No X Depth (Inches) d
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes �_ No
nciudes ca Ills fringe)
DescribwRecorded Data (streem,gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous Inspections),, If available
Remarks,
'
tJJt ?lb�r) �FYr%rG % ✓�
r
v(zr % ✓r�- a c �S c• 5 Ov +�
�lrc:: c'.�r•'•-r, ` /r�ua�
J
3/ ord
i.rl. ir.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and'Pledmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) ­Use scientific names of
Tree
I.
Stratum (Plot size /0 -�tl .�a s )
L, vi,f (0(d.-' ta.r ; /a L/ !da -
�, Cover 62edas7,'
? t? V
2.
PJNUg *k Cdr
fi �r�7
nO
3.
z 3 c
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
z 5 =
4:
-
5.
6.
-
y0 = Total Cover
50% of totat cover. 2 -0 20 % -of total cover
(Plot size: 1
1.
2.
-
3'
4.
5
6:
= Total Cover
50 %,of total cover.
,20% of totef cover.
Shrub,Stratum (Plot size- log'- /er9I1:'S 1
1, t^ia k.,lyG t iJG
2.
3.
4.
!,o = Total Cover
50% of total cover. `'r 20% of total cover:_
Herb
Simii= (Plot size. �E
2.
3.
-
4:
5.
7
e.
10.
11.
-
= Total Cover
50% of total cover
o� 20% of totsl'cover. I
Wacdv
2.
Vine Stratum (Plot size 16 r- r4 u y=
'
)
r
t• frl
3.
4
Point: wt T "L
Number.of Dominant Species
Ttiet Are OBL; FACW; or FAC: �° (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Speoies'Across All Strafe: (B)
Percent of, Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW „or FAC: rites (A/B)
Total % Cover at
Multloty bv:
OBL species
x1 =
FACW spades
k,2 =
FAC species
z 3 c
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
z 5 =
Column Totals;
(A) (B)
Index = B/A
— t - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic,Vegetatiori
7'� 2,- Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ 4 - Morphol-ogical Adaptation " (Provide supporting
data In Remarks -or on 6 sepanke`sheik)
Problemstic'Hydrdpl ytic Vegethtlort'- (Explain)
must
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 4,ft (6 °m) cr more;in Freight andjUn.,
(7.6 cm) or.larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling -Woody plants; excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) of more in heightand less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately Ito 20 ft (toto 6 m) in height
Herb -All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, Including
herbaceous - vines, regardlem6f size, and,woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 �m) in- height.
Woody vine - All woody vines,, regardless of height.
5 Hydrophytic
Total Cover Vegetation
50% of tote[cover., _7 20 %,of total cover: �� Present? Yes No
Remarks• (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
1 r,
US Army Corps of Engineers Esstem Mountalns,and,Piedmont - Version 2'0

SOIL
Sampiing`Point: c £
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of In leators.)-
Depth Matrix
Redox'Features -
fincK6sl Color`lmotat) °
`Color frrtoistl Twe Loci' Texture
Remarks
'T '. C =Concentration D =De etion RM =Reduoed Matrix MS=Masked'Sand Grains. Location: PL =Pore Limn M =Matrix.
Hydrlo Boll Indicators:
lbdicatorifor Probletnauc Hydric Salle:
_ HlAosol (Al)
_ .Dark Surface (S7)
— '2 c, 'muck�(A10) (M,LRAt147)
— Histic Epipedon,(A2)
— Polyvalue Below Surfaoe (S8) (MLRA 147,146)
— Coast Pralile kR doX,(A18)'
_ Black Hlstic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148)
(MLRA 147,148)
— Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Metrlx,(F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Solls`(F19)
— Stratified Layers (A5)
— Depleted Matrix (F3)
(NILRA 138, 147)
_ 2'cm Mu6 h(A10),(LRKN)
` Redox'-Derk Surfaa (F6).
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
— Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
— Depleted bark Surface (F7)
_ Othe► (Expl'ain' in Remarks)
— Thick 6ark'Surface4Al2),
— Redox Depressions (6e)
— Sandy Mucky Minerel'(S1) (LRR,fd,
_ Iron= Manganese Messes (F12) (LRR N,
RALRA 147,148)
MLRA138)
— Sandy Gleyed Ma6-(S4)
— Umbdr, Surface (F13) (AALRA 136,122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
— Sandy Redox4(55)
— Piedmont Floodplaln Solis (F19) (AALRA 748)
wetland hydrology must be present,
— Shipped Mafrlx'(S6) ,
— Red' parent'Niateilal (F21)"(IVILRA`127,147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layen(if observed):
Type.
Depth pnches);
Hydric Soil Present? Yes rC No
Remarks:
14 .y0r�Z S� %� fS fJira�
-,7t G:1u. �D C,%t,rc.a.,� ✓cr�or
t/'r �i.�? i�,
►^'itch F1 .9 .
US Army Corps of Engineers Eestem Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

Brown Creek Tributaries Photo Log, Wetland Areas (unverified), 12/23/13
Hurricane Creek — Wetland Area `A'
Hurricane Creek — Wetland Area 'B'
UT4 — Wetland Area `A'

Brown Creek Tributaries Photo Log, Wetland Areas (unverified), 12 /23/13
ITT4 — Wetland-Area `E'

Appendix A
Categorical Exclusion Form for Ecosystem Enhancement
Program Projects
Version 1.4
Note: Only Appendix A should to be submitted (along with any supporting documentation) as the
environmental document.
Version 1.4, 8/18/05
Part 1: General Project Information
Pro ect ame: Brown Creek Tributaries Resloration Project (Oplion J)
CounU Name• • Maori
P umber: 00+84+
Project Sponsor: Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
ro
ect ontact Name: chit -LYow
ra
ect Contact AZN—ess: 7800 nkpon Center Dr., Ste. 100, Greensboro, NC 27409
Project
Contact E-mail: nb- P m
FFP ro ect and er: Harry Tsomides
Description Proiect
The Brown Creek Tributaries Project is located In Anson County, approximately 5.5 miles north of Wadesboro in the
Yadkin River Basin (Figure 1). The Project site Includes Hurricane Creek and its tributaries (West Site) and
unnamed tributaries to Flat Fork (Fast Site), all of which flow Into Brown Creek, a 303(d) listed stream that flows
through the Pee Dee National Wtldrife Refuge. A combination of restoration, enhancement, and/or preservation will
I e Implemented on the site to improve and protect approximately 9,750 linear feet of stream channel. This project
will be used to obtain 9,693 stream mitigation credits for the NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program.
For Official Use Only
Reviewed By:
Date EEP Project Manager
Conditional Approved By:
Date For Division Administrator
FHWA
❑ Check this box if there are outstanding issues
Final Approval By:
Date For Division Adminis—trVtor-
FHWA
Version 1.4, 8/18/05