NC0028169_Wasteload Allocation_19940803

NIMES DOCUHENT SCANNIN. COVER :SHEET
Permit:
NC0028169
Aquadale Quarry
NPDES
Document Type:
Permit Issuance
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File
- Historical
Correspondence
Speculative Limits
Instream Assessment (67b)
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Permit
History
Document Date:
August 3, 1994
This document is printed on reuse paper - ignore any
content on the re w eriae side

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NC0028169
PERMIT FEE NAME:
FACILITY NAME:
Carolina Solite Corporation
Carolina Solite Corporation
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
Major Minor A/
Pipe No.: 001
Design Capacity: 0.864 MGD
Domestic (% of Flow): 0
Industrial (% of Flow): 100 %
Comments: APmZ `'y tid SL�Nr"F ccA;I7 6/AN
7A! Pc.4E 'rA/c- ?& w '3 PE,2jw-%, A l n
C3FJJ� A(S tT 43Lr, ?E w -mrE
cl,scr1xay ;:.. Crow, 0tY S(v tabhP' 1,46 rce -}"1uv o�
rleS
RECEIVING STREAM: Rocky River
Class: C
Sub -Basin: 03-07-13
Modeler
Date Rec.
#
Mivt vs
40(z4k k'c
7g. fL,
Drainage Area (mil ) 96 y Avg. Streamflow (cfs): 9ZQ
7Q10 (cfs) D29 Winter 7Q10 (cfs) 30Q2 (cfs) 16,
Toxicity Limits: IWC 4, 4 % ! Chronic P/ r-fly,
Instream Monitoring: /llonilar Whtvi d scha t occi" S
Parameters mow, 6n 001/ Ill 4um/ sR 19 7 B'ii)G
Upstream 2 I4C6 /)�rtf Location z) c�. .ar,'/rr if, fedy Aver --
Downstream / /a a /,dh Location O.5fa l.v with fr DS a
on Rail Ave,-
Daily Max. Monthly Average Yearly Aver
0.864
30
6-9
Flow (MGD):
TSS pH (SU(m)g/1)::
MBAS (mg/1):
t G� u Ay,
; Cadmium (gg/1):
J Fluoride (mg/1):
Lead (µg/1):
Cyanide (}tg/1):
Reference USGS Quad: G 17NE, Oakboro (please attach)
County: Stanly
Regional Office: Mooresville Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 11/30/94 Treatment Plant Class:
Classification changes within three miles:
None
Gross Beta Emitters (piC/1):
Turbidity (NTU):*
Temperature
1 1 1 1
E#►ui,f
Requested by: Sean Goris Date: 6/24/94
Prepared by: 140p Id s Date:
Reviewed by:(Vj1j . 0 /r1(L111 ate:
-36>LL Al
LA) Ck_ El —
45
6-9
11.3
29
27
368
74
50**
50
MONITOR: Iron, Chromium, Copper, Zinc, Silver, Arsenic, Berylium, Nickel, Boron,
Aluminum. pissob ec{ Ox59en.
*Gross Beta Emitters shall not exceed an annual average of 50 picoCuries per liter
** The discharge shall not cause the turbidity of the receiving waters to exceed 50 NTU. If turbidity exceeds these
levels due to natural background conditions, the discharge level cannot cause any increase in the turbidity in the
receiving waters.
***The temperature of the effluent shall be such as not to ause an increas in the temperature of the freceiving stream
of more than 2.8 egrees C and in no case cause the ambient water temperature to exceed 32 degrees C.

FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Request # 781b. DEPT. OF
Facility Name: Carolina Solite Corporation �; 00 I ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH,
NPDES No.: NC0028169 & NATURAL RESOURCES
Type of Waste: Industrial - 100%
Facility Status: Existing JUL 14 1994
Permit Status: Renewal
Receiving Stream: Rocky River
Stream Classification: C DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Subbasin: 030713 MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
County: Stanly Stream Characteristic:
Regional Office: Mooresville? USGS #
Requestor: Sean Goris Date:
Date of Request: 6/24/94 Drainage Area (mi2): 965
Topo Quad: G 17 NE, Oakboro Summer 7Q10 (cfs): 29
Winter 7Q10 (cfs): 51
Average Flow (cfs): 920
30Q2 (cfs): 76
IWC (%): 4.4
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
Pipe 001 water discharge comes from air pollution control devices (dust collectors) used , 0 .
for particulate removal from exhaust gases (hazardous waste being used as fuel) of rotary kilns -�' r,-•
used in light weight aggregate production by pyro-processing of slate and shale. Discharge flows =r
into 2 settling basins where suspended particulate fines settle out. A mechanical method of pH f" -=+
V v, �.=
treatment using quick lime (CaOH) to adjust the pH, occurs in the second settling pond. Q., ;;v:(5 _;
This area of the Rocky River Watershed has been rated as Good -Fair with support threatened.. rC-I r``
1- Therefore, I recommend at least monthly instream monitoring with 2 upstream locations when ' n
_w t-'r-
fir,.
facility is discharging. No current data exists; Facility has not discharged since 6/91. I recommend:) ;z-F^
existing limits with instream monitoring when discharging, and a Qrtly Acute WET test. Cam;
oa
Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers:
c �4-t ' 7c-c-54 c 4irc;,, Cc t �P_ i1�fif"
('7-Z/-`11 J ✓
.4 ,_7(%d_L,
Recommended by: 7/7
Reviewed by
�Instja/YkriteilA
ream Assessment: ( CchX,�- Date: IiIq4_/
Regional Supervisor: /r)7? /7,71J Date: 7(2 sl%sue
Permits & Engineering: its Date: r7.?T
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SUPPORT BY: AUG 0 9 1994

2
E{{luenf
Type of Toxicity Test:
Existing Limit:
Recommended Limit:**
Monitoring Schedule:
Existing Limits
Flow (MGD):
TSS (mg/1):
U):
(mg/1):
Fluoride (mg/1):
Lead (4/1):
ross Beta Emitters (piC
Tarim NTU):
Temperature
APAM
MONITOR:
Aluminum.
TOXICS/METALS/CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Chronic P/F @ 4.4%
MAR, JUN, SEP, DEC Quarterly
Acute P/F Limit **see attachment
When facility discharges not to exceed 4/year. Recommended by Matt
Matthews from the Aquatic Toxicolgy Unit.
Daily Max.
45
-l.l•s �
29
27
368
74
*
50**
***
Monthly Average Yearly Average
0.864
30
6-9
50
4/year
Iron, Chromium, Copper, Zinc, Silver, Arsenic, Berylium, Nickel, Boron,
Dissolved Ox yjen.
*Gross Beta Emitters shall not exceed an annual average of 50 picoCuries per liter
** The discharge shall not cause the turbidity of the receiving waters to exceed 50 NTU. If turbidity exceeds these
levels due to natural background conditions, the discharge level cannot cause any increase in the turbidity in the
receiving waters.
***The temperature of the effluent shall be such as not to ause an increas in the temperature of the freceiving stream
of more than 2.8 egrees C and in no case cause the ambient water temperature to exceed 32 degrees C.
Recommend Adoption of existing limits and monitoring requirements, except
change Chronic Toxicity Test to Acute toxicity Test and Drop APAM requirement.
6 : Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of the immediate
receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based effluent limitations for additional
dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
OR
No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.

3
..
INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Upstream Location: 1) Upstream on Long Creek @ SR 1917 Bridge.
2) 0.2 miles upstream on Rocky River
Downstream Location: 0.5 to 1.0 miles downstream from effluent on Rocky River.
Parameters: DO, Temp, Cond, pH, Turbidity
Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies: **
**Monitor when discharge occurs
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Adequacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility demonstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities? Yes No
If no, which parameters cannot be met?
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
If no, why not?
Special Instructions or Conditions
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) N (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.

Li nck 1-e. Cov NC, aU P, 40o
ACUTE TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY)
The permittee shall conduct acute toxicity tests on a quarterly basis using protocols defined in the North Carolina
Procedure Document entitled "Pass/Fail Methodology For Determining Acute Toxicity In A Single Effluent
Concentration." The monitoring shall be performed as a Fathead Minnow (Pimephales promelas) 24 hour static
test. The effluent concentration at which there may be at no time significant acute mortality is 90% (defined as
treatment two in the North Carolina procedure document). Effluent samples for self -monitoring purposes must be
obtained during representative effluent discharge below all waste treatment. The first test will be performed after
thirty days from the effective date of this permit upon the first discharge from the facility during each quarter, the
quarters defined as January -March, April -June, July -September, and October -December.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge
Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter code TGE6C.
Additionally, DEM Form AT-2 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements performed in
association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity
sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, subsequent monthly monitoring
will take place in any month in which a discharge occurs until such time that a single test is passed. Upon
passing, this monthly test requirement will revert to quarterly as specified above.
Should no discharge occur during any periodin which monitoring is required, the Division must be informed of
such in writing to the above address.
Should any test data from either these monitoring requirements or tests performed by the North Carolina Division
of Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and
modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism
survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate
retesting (within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to submit suitable test results will constitute
noncompliance with monitoring requirements.
7Q10 cfs
Permitted Flow O. 8'6 4 MGD
IWC 4, 4 %
Basin & Sub -basin Y 1) , 3 - 0 7 - / 3
Receiving Stream Ax kq %'i :/e ;--
County S'kh
Date O7//er/,4
QAL PIF Fathead 24 Version 9/91

av\1L9
earoli yporo_
D3 - 07 -- /3
NCOO�1(q 1oo70 In0/„-17 /
koCk PoJer / ton granc��
y
tgpt 06 z ,�,�tt2i.
())-erz, 00 I Pev yri t mo 44-
�xis�iG1
Row
TSS
Ttp9S
G ems. d
Ca ohm, k/.r,
e, an/ Ve
Dram, )
£d'CQGlit
0.g64 h6D
30 hta. /L
00/ Rinu,
lox ru
O )Z
501 /c.
-.- Cress e bm; fierf S/iu /! /l no! -eirCPP
5'0 p;co Curies IL
/ ` 6/.o% 4 - -CX(e-Pct SW /VW (17o f A) ,. r[ 6QC,C�y�viinp/
/eve11 ate 94is Ai h kC//, row 110/
/n(i 7 PaSt, hrb, 1
-eir--/J ---) Pe 0 6 4-40r 4, re IL. 110 CLVOlk.3 Gat
u k gArci grik, myry Svn 1 p i -e,y
PP € 44%
D%')712 (evJ eu>
6/ 9/9/ rdC!/i- -egah 1�
J
if( y c i-e vuae
�'Io oh,S a fkr 71 S c/J vo m
-eI i= v _ p 001 Or 00i.
1 -4i is d0. k T Q. h 1GI Q>l Pow = 6.(010 i/r1 G4)
Skki- 6/;,//47,61
JJ

PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
i
ht
-The wastewater discharge from Carolina Solite comes from he use
of wet scrubbers to remove particulates from the kilns used in light
weight aggregate production. The wastewater generated at Carolina
Solite passes through two (2) earthen settling basins (the second
basin contains a mechanical means of pH adjustment using CaOH) prior
to discharge. The settling basins may also receive some runoff from
an adjacent sludge stockpile area.
Approximately six (6) years ago, and unbeknown to the Water
Quality Staff of this Office, Carolina Solite (CS) began using
hazardous waste as their primary fuel source. As a result of this
change in fuels, elevated levels of waste constituents have begun to
show up in the wastewater and sludge removed from the wastewater
treatment facilities (see attached sampling results). Recently,
Carolina Solite discontinued use of hazardous waste as a fuel; and
has applied for and received authorization (dated 2/20/90) to
construct a new wastewater treatment facility. Carolina Solite
intends on abandoning the existing earthen settling basins and will
resume the use of hazardous waste as a fuel upon construction of the
proposed facilities. As noted in the A to C, the proposed wastewater
facilities will have capability for total recycle of the wastewater.
Carolina Solite, however, has indicated in a conversation with Mr.
Colburn on 3./15/90 that under normal operation, some, if not all,
wastewater generated will end up being discharged to the Rocky River.
Mr. Colburn also indicated that the proposed facilities should be
constructed and available for operation on or about mid -April 1990.
These facilities should be incorporated into the renewal of this
Permit, as final action on renewal will not occur until well after
the proposed completion date.
As previously noted, elevated levels of a variety of waste
constituents have been found in sampling results taken at the wet
scrubber discharge (Outfall 001). It is requested that Tech Services
evaluate the sample results and prescribe effluent limitations
(and/or monitoring) which would effectively address the assorted
constituents which currently are or may be expected in this waste
stream. The Permit should, however, contain a condition which allows
for additional monitoring should future situations warrant.
Outfall 002 consists of pit dewatering wastewater accumulated
through groundwater se'epage and rainfalls. Presently, this Office
has no indication that this wastewater contains elevated levels of
contaminants. Tech Services, however, may want to verify this fact
prior to promulgation of the wasteload allocation.
Pending receipt and final approval of the wasteload allocation,
it is recommended that the NPDES Permit be reissued with any
additional monitoring and/or limitations as deemed necessary by Tech
Services.
JAIZea);
S-igralie of Report Preparer

E 00_4 > _chschav
+! 1 ru 4-‘AL, !.fi (,- c.--, )!: ! i : CO- / C.;
Pi p.12._ Do z -=> de,G-ierf. v3 _ (Jo vvy — irow3 d 1,,,e1 i
S. eepac7Q__, 4Ver land r u no ff-
Coo-7(01E4 Y
k'2 e-e r ill/ -I-1
Yjn. scru Day-
C
coJc._ ri .J.(1)Pi (4_ ;_c
0
V..)0
IA1 e tiq CIkk1_6 / d ki 0-7 eioel piken
JPad .c ; L1.1_ 171 T-__e_Etyjr_r/OtJ
(1111-;1 ‘.1V1 7
Tppy p#7
11-7-41,.c'kf km 1v7 /1)-1 ,
Pf Pe- 001-,
DMQ Altad E114/-e// b7(1)-1-/Vir
t,Z
u r
1
1)r) ) 101c-Oh eia_Lo11±_wryi, Fl_, P Pe__)
C
D y- rch, eloc, 11
it
too 0
!_..
Up si CION,$))/ S Iye6 Gi,T)
- Lib herfn i/eti
vorfJ udixeri
dist ix
t/4 -N/L_ci .6 24
pc- I to.
rE
_ _ _

Long Term Changes in Bioclassification
Long term changes in bioclassification have been noted at five BMAN locations in
the Yadkin River Basin. A negative trend was noted at Jones Creek, while positive trends
were noted at the Yadkin River, Rocky River, Long Creek, and the Little River. Trends at
several locations were complicated by between -year changes in flow, with short-term
changes due to effluent dilution, scour, or low flow during droughts.
Site Region 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 Changes
Yadkin R Patterson Mtn - G-F - G - - G 0 (see text)
Elk River @ Elk R Mtn - - E - E 0
Yadkin R Wilkesboro Mtn - G-F F G-F G-F - G +?
Roaring R @ Roaring R Mtn G - G - - E - 0 (flow related)
Yadkin R @ Elkin Pied - - G-F - G-F 0
Little Yadkin Dalton Pied - - G - G-F 0
Ararat River @ Ararat Pied - G-F - F - F - F 0 (see text)
Muddy Creek Pied F - F - - - 0
Yakdin R Yadkin College Pied G-F G G - - - G 0? (see text)
Hunting Creek Harmony Pied G E - G - - 0
S Fk Yadkin Mocksville Pied E - G - - E - 0
Third Creek Woodleaf Pied - - G - G-F 0 (see text)
Abbotts Creek @ I-85 Pied F - F - - - 0
Barnes Creek Pied - G - G - G - 0
Uwharrie River Pied G - G G - G 0
Dutch Buffalo Creek Pied - - F - G-F 0? (flow related)
Long Cr. Rocky R Spr. Pied F - - F - - G-F - +
Rocky River Norwood Pied G-F G G G-F - G - G + (see text)
Big Bear Cr Richfield Pied - - - - G - - G 0
Richardson Cr Fairfield Pied - - - F - F 0
Little River nr Star Pied G-F - E - - E - - +
Pee Dee R Rockingham Pied G-F G-F G-F - - G-F - G-F 0
Jones Creek nr Pee Dee Pied - - - G - G-F -?

at SF
pallii
the flow. Dominant taxa included intolerant species: Stenacron
phylax moestus and Psephenus hen-icki.
EPT S EPT N BI(BI EPT) Bioclass Flow
20 July 87 97 28 139 2.95(2.40) Good Low
24 July 90 88 31 134 2.82(2.32) Good Low
Fairly high NO2/NO3 concentrations have been recorded from this location. For
example, the only nutrient sample collected from this location in 1990 (February) recorded
a NO2/NO3 value of 1.40 mg/1. Average concentration for the period of record was 1.07
mg/1, with maximum values exceeding 1.30 mg/1 each year. A small school discharge
(0.05 MGD) is located just above our site on Big Bear Creek, but these nitrogen
concentrations also may be related to nonpoint source runoff.
PQ. Rocky River nr Norwood
Bioclassifications from the Rocky River at Norwood have been fairly consistent for the
period of record: High Good -Fair (borderline Good) or Good. EPT S values have ranged
from a low of 22 in 1986 to a high value of 28 in 1990. The minimum observed in 1986
was associated with extremely low flows during drought conditions. Several large point
sources are located above this site (primarily on tributaries of the Rocky River), including
the Mooresville WWTP (5.2 MGD to Dye Branch), the Concord WWTP (24 MGD to the
Rocky River) and the Monroe WWTP (7.0 MGD to Richardson Creek). These facilities
(along with many smaller dischargers) apparently have a combined instream waste
concentration large enough to impact the benthos during drought conditions. Conductivity
values during June and September in 1986 were near 600 umhos/cm, indicating the
potential impact of these dischargers during very low flows. Rex Gleason at the
Mooresville Regional Field Office noted that Carolina Solite (perniited flow of 0.864
MGD), which is located approximately 6-8 river miles above the BMAN location, has
improved its treatment by adding additional settling basins.
Date Total S EPT S EPT N BI(BI EPT) Bioclass Flow
02Aug 83 73 23 134 Good -Fair Low
24Sept 84 79 24 143 2.98(2.24) Good High
01Aug 85 76 25 154 2.67(2.23) Good Normal
24July 86 93 22 103 3.09(2.43) Good -Fair Very Low
14July 88 80 25 156 2.65(2.00) Good Low
24July 90 80 28 154 2.72(2.07) Good Low
If we compare only those years with low flow, there is evidence of improved water
quality. Good -Fair ratings were assigned in 1983 and 1986, while Good ratings were
asigned in 1988 and 1990. Very few changes were noted in the composition of the benthic
fauna between the 1988 and 1990 collections, but Plecoptera (Acroneuria) became
abundant for the first time in 1990.
PZ. Richardson Creek nr Fairfield
Benthic macroinvertebrates have been collected from this location during surveys in
1987 and 1990. Data from both years have indicated Fair bioclassifications with very
similar Total S and EPT S, indicating that there has been no change in water quality
between years. This site is located below the Monroe WWTP, with a permitted flow of
seven MGD and an instream waste concentration of 97 percent under 7Q10 flow
conditions.
95

WHOLE EFFLUENT TOXICITY TESTING 0[SELF-MONITORING SUMMARY] Tuc, Jun 14, 1994
FACILITY
REOL1IREMENT
YEAR JAN
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL,
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
CAROLINA MIRROR PERM CHR LIM:82%
NC0006696/001 Begin:7/1/89 Frequency: Q P/F A FEB MAY AUG NOV NonComp:
County:WILKES Region:WSRO Subbnsin:YADO1
PF:0.50 Special
7Q10:0.17 IWC(%):81.98 ' der.
y 90 FAIL
91 —
92 —
93 —
94 —
FAIL
PASS
PASS
PASS
NR,PASS
PASS
—
—
--
--
PASS
—
--
---
--
bR
PASS
PASS
NR/PASS
PASS
PASS
—
—
—
—
—
—
--
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
—
--
—
—
—
—
—
--
PASS
PASS
PASS
FAIL.PASS
—
---
---
CAROLINA MOUNTAIN WA1TJ2 PERM CIIR LIM:11%
NC0067954/001 Bcgin:9/1/92 Frequency: Q P/F A MAR JUN SEP DEC NonComp:SINGLE
County: JACKSON Region: ARO Subbnsin: SAVO?
- - __ -
PI':0.006 Special
7QI0:0.075 1WC(%):11.03 Omer.
Y 90 --
91 PASS
92 --
93 •--
94 FAIL
—
--
---
---
PASS
bl
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
—
•••
---
---
--
--
--
---
PASS
PASS
PASS
FAIL
—
—
---
PASS
—
—
---
--.
PASS
PASS
PASS
I•Alt.
---
—
--
NI
---
-•
---
PASS
LATE
PASS
PASS
FAIL
CAROLINA SOLITE CORP/001 PERM CIIR LIM:4.4%
NC0028169/001 Begin:6/I/91 Fn:guency: Q P/F A MAR JUN SEP DEC NonComp:
Counly:STANLY Region: MRO Subbasin: YAD13
PF:0.864 Special
7Q10:29 IWC(%):4.4 Order
y 00 PASS
91 PASS
92 ---
93 --
94 —
FAIL
PASS
--
—
—
PASS
PASS
H
H
H
PASS
--
--
--
•-
PASS
---
--
-•
PASS
PASS
H
H
Na
--
—
•-
PASS
--
---
•-•
PASS
H
H
H
PASS
--
--
---
PASS
---
--
--
bl
t1
11
H
CAROLINA SOl.fl'li CORI'/002 I'ERM CIIR LIM:99%
NC0028169/002 Begin:6/1/91 Frequency: Q P/F 6 MAR JUN SEP DEC NonComp:
County: STANI.Y Region: MRO Subbnsin: YAD13
Pr: 0.36 Special
7Q10:0.0 I`./C(%):100.0 Order.
90 --
91 ---
92 •-
93 ...
94 —
---
—
--
__
--•
'--
---
11
II
11
'-.
---
...
---
""
'--
'--
...
—
H
H
H
"-
—
'-'
--_
"'
---
_.
—
F1
11
I-1
—
--
---
_._
""
---
---
_..
I{
1 i
11
CAROI.INA WATER SERVICE-BENTCR1MK PERM CIIR 1.IM:28%
NCI036684/MMI Begin:1/1/92 Eminency: V WI' A JAN APR 1111.00[' NonComp:
County:BUN(1)MBII Region: ARO Subl,a;n:1k002
Pr: 0.1 Special 1
7Q10: 0.4 IWC(%):28 Ober:
D0 ---
91 ••-
02 FAILSIG
93 PASS
94 PASS
-'-
---
N1
--
--
---
-
•••
--
-.-
—
---
FAIL
PASS
FAIL
—
---
FAIL.PASS
—
—
--
FAIL
—
—
---
FAIL
PASS
•'"
---
PASS
•--
---
PASS
---
--
FAIL
PASS
PASS
---
-•-
•-•
CAROLINA WATER SERVICE -KINGS GRANT PERM CHR LIM:90%(GRAB)
NC0062219/001 Begin:9/1/93 Frequency: Q P/F 6 MAR JUN SEP DEC NonComp:SINGLE
County: WAKE Region: RRO Subbasin: NEU02
PE:0.210 Special
7QI0:0.0 IWC(%): 100.0 Order:94
90 —
91 —
92 PASS
93 --
—
—
PASS
—
—
—
-•
F1
FAIL
NI1/FAIL
FAIL
—
—
PASS
PASS
PASS
"- •
—
—
--
—
PASS
Na
NI
—
—
—
—
—
—
PASS
—
--
PASS
N7
PASS
—
—
—
--
—
—
—
-•
—
FAIL
PASS
PASS
90 --
91 -•-
92 KR
93 NR
94 Bi
—
--
—
—
PASS
--
--
—
---
—
--
---
141
—
PASS
..
--
—
--
—
-•
—
—
--
^•
WI
--
"-
•-
—
—
---
—
—
—
—
all
Nq
1•11
--
---
-..
•-•
-•
CAROLINA WA1L•R SERVICIE•WR.I.OWBROOK PERM CUR LIM:90%, (GRAB) NO TOX REQ 0 0.06 MOD
NC0064378/001 Bcgin:9/1/93 Eminency: Q WE 6 JAN APR JUL OCT NonComp:SINGLE
County: WAKE Region: RRO Subbasin: NIiUO2
PF:0.03 Special
7Q10: 0.0 IWC(%): 100.0 Order.
CAROLINA WATER SERVICE/WIIITE OAK PERM Ci-[R LIM:90%; UPON RELOC. TO WHITE OAK CHR
NC0060330/001 Begin:12/1/93 Frequency: Q P/F 6 JUN SEP DEC MAR NonComp:SINGLE
County: JOIINSTON Region: RRO Subbasin: NEU02
PF:0.05 Special
7Q10: 0.0 1WC(%). 100 Omer:
90 —
91 —
92 —
B3 --
94 --
—
—
—
—
--
—
--
--
-.
MR
—
—
—
...
--
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-•
—
—
—
—
—
•••
—
—
—
-.
—
—
—
—
--
---
•-
.._
•-
—
—
-.
CARTER PHARMACY PERM CHR LIM:2.9%
NC0074179/001 Begin:12/1/93 Frequency: Q P/F 6 JAN APR JUL OCT NonComp:SINGLE
County:NEW HANOVER Region: WIRO Subbasin: CPF17
PE:0.0014 Special
7QI0:0.075 IWC(%):2.89 Order
90 —
9) PASS
92 —
93 —
94 H
H
—
—
—
PASS
—
Nq
PASS
H
—
—
PASS
—
—
PASS
—
—
—
—
PASS
PR
PASS
H
—
PASS
—
—
—
—
—
—
FAIL
hR
PASS
H
—
PASS
—
H
—
—
--
H
LATE
PASS
PASS
H
y 90 FAIL-
91 —
92 —
93 —
94 —
—
PASS
PASS
PASS
LATE,LATE
PASS
—
—
—
PASS
PASS
--
•-
—
—
bA
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
--
—
---
—
CARY NORTII WWII' PERM CIIR LIM:95%
NC0048879/001 Begin:12/1/89 Frequency: Q P/F 6 FEB MAY AUG NOV NonComp:
County:WAKE Region: RRO Subbasin: NEU02
PF:4.0 Special
7QI0:0.30 IWC(%):95.37 Order.
0 2 consecutive failures = significant noncompliance Y Pre 1990 Data Available
LEGEND:
PERM = Permit Requirement I.ITT = Administrative Letter - Target Frequency = Monitoring frequency: Q. Quarterly: M- Monthly; BM- Bimonthly; SA- Semiannually; A• Annually; OWD- Only when discharging: D- Discontinued monitoring requirement; IS- Conducting independent study
Benin = First month required 7Q10 = Receiving stream low Bow criterion (cfs) 6 = quarterly monitoring increases to monthly upon single failure Months that testing must occur - ex. JAN,APR,IUI.,OCT NonComp = Current Compliance Requirement
PE = Pormined flow (MGM IWC% = lnstrcam waste concentration P/E 0 1 nss/Fail chronic test AC = Acute CIIR = Chronic
Data Notation: r- Fathead Minnow: • • Ceriodanhnia sn.: my - Mvsid shrimp: CIiV - Chronic value; P • Mortality of stated nerecnlnec al Iti¢hcsi concentration: al - I'crtuuued by DIN Tox [ivol Gmun: IA • Bad teal
Reporting Notation: --- = Data not required: NR - Not reported; ( ) - Beginning of Quarter Facility Activity Status: 1 • Inactive, N - Newly Issucd(1'o construct); 1l - Active but not discharging; t-More data available for month in question SIG = ORC signature neared
A

a.V. Yalr+- Vi. f:.11V.1..LV l=111.u1 1`1Gi1G r«E+r1C
Water Quality Ambient Monitoring Network
Sorted by Basin/Subbasin
1/23/90
02125128 LONG CREEK
Region:MOORESVILLE
County:STANLY
Field: M
Tot Res: Q
AT SR 1954 NEAR ROCKY RIVER SPRINGS, NC
USGS Map:G17NE Gage: Remarks:M1 Wp
Class:C S7Q10: W7Q10:
BOD: Q Metals: Q Mercury: Q
Res Sus: Q Arsenic: 0 Col ADMI:M
THQ2:
Hardness:M
Copper: M
Frequency:Monthly
Subbasin:030713
DA:196 QA:200
Nut Ser: Q Turbid: Q
02126000 ROCKY RIVER AT SR 1935 NEAR NORWOOD, NC
Region:MOORESVILLE USGS Map:G18NW Gage:GAGE
County:STANLY Class:C S7Q10:41
Field: M
Res Sus: M
BOD: Q
Arsenic: 0
Metals: 0
Remarks:MI
W7010:73.1
Mercury: Q
THQ2:108
Frequency:Monthly
Subbasin:030713
DA:1372 QA:1330
Hardness:Q Turbid: M
Tot Res: M
02125482 RICHARDSON CREEK AT SR 1649 NEAR FAIRFIELD, NC
Region:MOORESVILLE USGS Map:G17SW
County:UNION
Field: M
Res Sus: Q
Class:C
BOD: 0 Metals: Q
Arsenic: Q
Gage: Remarks:wp
S7Q10:0.44 W7Q10:0.52
Mercury: Q
Frequency:Monthly
Subbasin:030714
TH02:1.17 DA:153 QA:103
Hardness:Q Turbid: Q Tot Res: Q
02128000 LITTLE RIVER AT SR 1340 NEAR STAR, NC
Region:FAYETTEVILLE USGS Map:CM123 Gage:GAGE Remarks:a
County:MONTGCMERY Class:WS-III S7Q10:1.06 W7Q10:7.97
Field: M BCD: Q Metals: 0 Mercury: Q
Res Sus: 0 Arsenic: Q
Frequency:Menthly
Subbasin:030715
THQ2:10.7 DA:106 QA:110
Hardness:Q
Turbid: Q Tot Res: Q
02129000 PEE DEE RIVER AT US HWY 74 NEAR ROCKINGHAM, NC Frequency:Monthly
Region:FAYETTEVILLE USGS Map:H19NE Gage:GAGE Remarks:ma Subbasin:030716
County:RiCHMOND Class:WS-III S7010:1112 W7Q10:1673 THQ2:2878 DA:6863 QA:7997
51 Field: M BOD: 0 Metals: Q Mercury: Q Hardness:Q Turbid: Q Tot Res: Q
Res Sus: Q Arsenic: Q
02129341 HITCHCOCK CREEK AT SR 1109 AT CORDOVA, NC
Region:FAYETTEVILLE USGS Map:F19NE Gage: Remarks:
County:RICHMOND Class:C S7010:25.0 W7Q10:68.0
Field: Q
Tot Res: Q
BOD: Q
Res Sus: Q
Metals: S
Arsenic: S
Mercury: s
THQ2:68.0
Hardness:S
Frequency:Quaterly
Subbasin:030716
DA:134 OA:174
Nut Ser: Q Turbid: Q
0212955844 MARKS CREEK AT SR 1812 NEAR HAMLET, NC
Region:FAYETTEVILLE USGS Map:H2OSW Gage:
County:RICHMOND Class:C S7010:
Field: Q BOD: Q Metals: 0
Res Sus: Q Arsenic: Q Gr/Oil: Q
Remarks:
W7Q10:
Mercury: 0
THQ2:
Hardness:Q
Frequency:Quaterly
Subbasin:030716
DA:12.9 QA: 15.1
Turbid: Q Tot Res: Q
02129527 JONES CREEK AT NC HWY 145 NEAR PEE DEE, NC
Region:FAYETTEVILLE USGS Map: Gage:
County:ANSON Class:C S7Q10:
Field: Q BOD: Q Metals: Q
Tot Res: Q Res Sus: 0 Arsenic: Q
Remarks:
W7Q10:
Mercury: Q
THQ2:
Hardness:Q
Frequency:cuaterly
Subbasin:030717
DA:92.8 OA:94.6
Nut Ser: Q Turbid: 0
02133500 DROWNING CREEK AT US HWY #1 NEAR HOFFMAN, NC
Region:FAYETTEVILLE USGS Map:G21SW Gage:GAGE Remarks:MI,COLOR
County: RICHMOND Class:CSW S7010:43.2 W7010:98.2
Field: M HOD: 0
Res Sus: Q Arsenic: 0
Metals: Q Mercury: Q
THQ2:98.0
Hardness:0
Frequency:2Monthly
Subbasin:030750
DA:183 QA:261
Turbid: Q Tot Res: 0
1
X
1

17 'LTV xrpuaddy
APPENDIX TABLE A17. YAWN PEE-DEE RIVER BASIN FRESt1WATER SEGMENTS (19613.1901)
Stilton
Number
Station Location Classification
Index Number
Mlles
1989-91
Chemical
Hating
<
1987
Biological Baling
1986 1989 1990
>
1991
< Overall Rating
Ubs
Problom P.ramotxrs Support
>
Source
Rocky River, mouth of Long Cr. 10 Carolina Solits Discharge C
13.17-(30)a
0.8
Good•Falr
ST
02128000
Rocky River neu Norwood C
13-17-(30)b
19.3
Good
Good
S
Long Creek above/ below Abernade WWTP, Slanly Co. C
13.17.31 a
21.9
Fak
Fak
Sad, Fecal, Nutr, BOD 16
FP
02125128
Long Creek near Rocky River Springs al 3R 1954 C
13.17-31b
11.5
Good Fak
Sad, Fecal, Nutr, BOOST
Pj4P
02125000
Blg Bsar Creak near RIchlle►i, SR-1134 C
13.17.31.5
21.8
ST
Good
Good
9
Lower Long Branch above Carolna Sollle old dscharge C
13.17-31-7a
0.6
Fair
F6
hP
Lower Long Branch below Carolina Solite old dlscharga C
13.17.31.76
1.0
Poor
MS
FP
(Richardson Creak source to Lake Lis WS-I11
13.17.38111a
9.3
Fak
Fair
RS
IP
02125482
Richardson Creak at SR 1761, Union Co. C
13.17-38-(5)■
1.6
Fak
Poor
Sod, Fecal. Nutr, BOD i-S
NP,P
Richardson Creak a1 SR 1849, Unbn Co. C
13.17.38-(5)c
5.8
Fak
Poor
Sad, Fecal, Nutt, 13001E
FP
lanes Creak, Gum l og Branch to Mlarshvlle Water Supp. WS Ill
13-17.40-(11a
22.2
Fak
i6
FP
Wicker Branch, source to Linea Creek WSW
13- 17-40.4
5.3
Fair
Fair
LS
FP
Waxhaw Branch, source to Linea Croak WS-III
13.17.40-e
6.7
Fair
Fak
F6
FP
0212740615
Brown Crssk near rinksnon, SR•1827 C
13.20
43.0
• R9
Sod.DO 3
FP
Little River near Star at SR•1340, Montgamsty Co. WS-Ill
13.25410)b
8.2
Excellent
S
02128000
Lhlls River near Stu al SR-1340 WS-III
13.25-(I0)6
9.2
Excullam
Excellent
9
West Fork Little Rivet, From Randolph County l lne WS III
13-25.1512)
13.8
Goal
9
Denson* Creak source to Trays Water Supply WSIII
13-25-20-ill
5.3
Excellent
3
Bridgers Creak mime to Unit. River C
13-25.24
7.3
Excellent
S
02129000
Poe Dee River near RocklnQham, US )Iwy 74 WS III
13-(34)
15.2
Good Fair
Good•Fak
ST
NP
Hitchcock Creek al SR 1475, Richmond Co. WS-III
13-39•(1111T1
0.0
Good•Fak
37
UT Bones Creek at SR 1475, Richmond Co. WS III
I3-39• 511T 1
0.0
crawl
9
02120527
Jones Creek neu Poe Des, NC Hwy 145 C
13-42
12.3
flood
Good•Falr
ST
0212055844
Marks Creek near Hamial at SR-1812, Richmond Co. C
13-45-(2)■
4.1
Goat
Fa4
Sod i6
NP P
Marks Creek al NC 68, Richmond Co. C
13-45-(2)b
2.3
Fair
Sod 03
IP
Marks Creak al NC 86, Richmond C
13.45-(2)c
18.3
Fak
Sod Flo
FP

4
• AA
A8
•
OTHER EVALUATIONS
AC
AD
AF
AO
AH
Al
AK I AL LAM AP
AO
AR
5
Other biological
Workshops/Age
OVERALL RATING
AS
5
7
5
1 0
1 1
N2nq of Stream
Probhm Parameters
Ra6np
Rorer once 8
Prob par
notes
Maio,
Comp or Tox
UT Mulberry Crook
Little Beaver Crook
Radr
Basl�Relororrp
Pmblom Parsmetors
atln!
Bash (PN�Subeat
.
.very
Reference
Fodl6y
Cop_or Tox
Name
ProbbmParama �`
NS
M
1
1 2
1 3
Ararat River
Ararat ANer
Sad
J Midray,88
Sod
NS
F6
M
M
hP
F,P
84
1 0
Topo 88
1 3
Ararat RNer
Sod
Sad
J Mldrey,88
J Mickey 88
Sod
Sad
NS
F6
M
M
hP
1040
NCFS 1988
PP
10,40
1 4
Ararat RNer
SedJ
Mlcxey,BB
Sad
FS
1 6
1 7
Fauknar Croak
lov8b Croak (Lovell
Sad
NS
M
WSR WKS 88
Sod
NS
M
M
N'
M
06,10 40
40, 10
Topo 88,Comp92
Suny Co. Sch.-Streak m Eh.
B0O 14143
18
Toms Creole
NS
M
MAP
40,08,06
Topo 88Comp92,Tox92
Col Care
1 9
20
Hoalherly Gook
16
M
is
1 0
Frank. Elam Proc Sllex, Un Tech Auto
BOD,TSS,NH3 Fecal Tdz
Heather lj Gook
F6
M
hP
1 0
2 1
South UT
h6
M
Topo 88
2 2
Danbury Crook
6
M
23
Caner Creek
1
FS
M
rP
11,43
WSR WKS 88
24
Barkers Creek
16
M
hP42
DWR,88
25
Cedar Creel, trcluding
GF
Dr Assess,84
M
H'
1040
SWCD 1988
2 6
Cedar Creak
GF
Dr Assess
16
F6
M
2 7
28
UT Grants Croeft
LMIe Creek
F6
NS
M
M
SF
E
WRC,DIST.6
PS
M
DFR
Golden Ape, Inc.
Tox
2 9
3 0
31
UT Nonh Potts Crook
Town
F6
M
N.
56
Creek
Town Creek
Sad, Focal
Sod, Focal
Poor
Poor
Assess, 1085
Assess,
Sod, Fecal
RS
M
N'
32,42,43,56,11,62
88, Tox 93
SWCD DFR 1988,T0x92
3 2
3 3
7 4
3 5
UT Second Crook
GF
1985
Dr Assess,84
Sod Fecal
NS
M
hP
32,42,43,56,11,62
SWCD OFR 1968 Tox 93
Salisbury
T
Tot
Abbons Crook
Abbotts Croak
COF6
N
NSMTot
M
hP
56,31
DFR 1988
Abbots Croak
Tura
F6
M
FP
4 0
Topo 88
36
37
3 8
Rich Folk
RSM
hP
40
Topo 88
Rich Fork
Rich Fork
Rich
FeW
NS
F6
M
M
W
PP •
31,32
08 1 1 31 32
DFR 88
SCS DFR 1968
Auman's MHP,
39
Fork
F6
M
MPp
08,11,40,31,32,63
SCDFR 1968
LamNun b's NuHome Poch Fk Wy
Duke PowCo.
Pow. Co.
BOOTS ,S F. cal
40
41
Hunts Fork
F6
M
hP
11,40,31,32
SCS 1988
TSS,NH3,Fecal
Hamby Crook
GF
Dr Assess,84
F6
M
4 2
41
4 4
Nonh Hamby Crack
NS
M
hP
40 10
SCS 68,Tox 93
Thomasville
Jlmmys Creek
NS
M
hP
4 0
Topo 88
Tox
UT Lick Creek
FS
M
4 6
UT Lick Croak
NS
M
4 0
Topo 88
4 6
Dye (Branch)
e Creek Branch
Sed
Pox/Assess,
F6
M
6P
N'
40
Topo 88
47
48
4 9
Dye Creek (Branch)
Clarke Creek
Sod
Sed
Poor
Fat
1985
Assess, 1985
NS
M
Sod
fS
M
FP
40,10
Topo 88
MRO 88
Sed
NS
M
hop
40,10,03
AR0,88,Comp92
Mooresvl6o WWTP
Back Creek
Assess, 1985
F6
M
Mock Cry,88
F6
M
N.
1 8
Tope 88
CN
5 0
UT Reedy Crook
rSedFacal
F6
NS
M
M
Melt Cn,88
Sod,Focd -
FS
F6
M
M
N.
N.
10,32 40
Mock C41,88
AR0,88
Mack Cn 88
ARO 88
s 1
5 2
5 3
54
McKee Greek
Sod Fecal
F6
M
Sod Ford
F6
M
hP P
1 0
10 40,32,06
Char Crook
Long Creek
Sect
Sed,Fecal
NS
M
Mock Cn 88
Mock Cn,88, Comp 90
CWS Systems, Inc
Sod Focal
NS
M
11 40,32
Mods 8,88
Little long Croak
Fair
Assess, 1985
F6
M
WFICDIST.6
Sod Focal
fS
M
FP
I'P
t t
SCS 1988
66
56
Long Br(Lower Long Bh
Long Br(Lowor Long Br)
PS
M
hP
42,43
WRC DIST.6,90
FS
M
hP
1 1
SCS 88
57
Richardson Crook
Sod Foal Nut,BOD,Tox
Poor
Assess
NS
M
hP
1 1
SCS 88
5 8
Richardson Creek
Sed,Fecal,Nu,800,Tox
Poor
1985
Assess 1985
Sed
Sad
Sed
FS
F6
RS
E
E
E
WSR WKS 88
WSR WKS 88
WSR WKS,88
SedFecal,Nu,800,Tox
NS
M
hP
14, 16, 18
WSR WKS,88
5 9
6 0
6 t
Richardson Creek
Marks Ck Everotb Lk)
Marks Ck Everette Lk)
Sed,Facal,Nu,000,Tox
Poor
Assess, 1985
Sod Fecal Nu,B00 Tox
Sed,Fecal Nu,BOD,Too
PS
NS
M
hP 14,
16, 18
WSR WKS 88
Sed Fat
Sed
Assess,
1985
Sed
M
N' 14,
16, 18
WSR WKS 88
F6
M
Npp 41,43,03
SCS 1988,Comp92 Hamlett
WWTP
62
checks Ck (Ev.etts Lk)
Fat
Sad
Assosa,
19851
Sad
RS
M
N' 41,43
SCS
1988
63
Fat
Assess,
1985
Sod
PS
M
hP 41,43
SCS
1968
54
6 5
Sod,BO0,Nt4,Foul,Tox
Poor
Assess,
198
Sad
J
Mldcoy 88
Sad Turb
F6
M
N' 10,40
SWCD
1988 BMAN 90

D
Doac --- Station
Q ei�-DNun ter Location
�w .. TI I I RT
MMe Link) Beaver Creek From NC 268 to Fisher River
0
EN
11/
NEI
m
m
m t
131
Ell
EEI
Erl
ED
Nam. of Stream
Ararat River
Ararat River
Ararat RN.r
Faukn.rCreek
Lovi"s Creek Lovell
Toms Creek
Heather Creek
South UT
Danbu Creek
Cedar Cr Inckid
Cedar Creek
UT Grants Creek
EEI
m
ID
m
Norm Ha Creek
45
46
Lurie Croak
UT Nonh Pons Creek
Town Creek
Town Creek
UT Second Crook
Abbons Crook
Abbons Crook
Abbons Creek
Filch Fork
Rich Fork
RIch Fork
Filch Fork
Hunts Fork
Creek (Branch
e Creek Branch
Clarke Crean
Back Creek
McKee Creek
Clear Creek
Lonq Crack
L role Lon. Crook
Long 8 Lower L- Br
Lon. Br lower • . Br
Richardson Creek
Richardson Creek
Richardson Greek
Marks Ck Ev.rens Lk
Marks Cie Ev.rens Lk
NA
Mil
v©o©© ooa,,©©o
INIINININII
caes®rr�®� ��am�mm�am
__-_
MEMO__ ��
®MO®®__
ramommillow
re®.e��___�
ilmosimminini
111111011111111111111111111111
____INNINNIN�N
1111111111111111111101
___MEMO
____MEMO
____ -..
cam 1111111INNINNIIIIMINIENIN
®MEMO__
311
IAN
®®MO__
���®MO__
31 ®MO__
ENE
!EMI 11313111111111MINIII
31 MEMO__
311
®MEMO__
YACIGU.PEE DEE RIVER BASIN
r311
'�
From SR-2019 to SR 208o
Fr Mt AI WS Dam
From source to WWTP
WWTP to Toms Creek
Sourc. to Yadkin R/SR1624 Source to 5R 1620
Source to SR 1410
SR 1410 to above Oua
From source to Grants Creek
Source to N Potts Cie
SR1915 to Crane CWat Duke
Ab WWTP Io Second Ck
SR2001 nr Loxln. on
SR2o01 at Lakin • on
At 1-85 Davidson Coun
AI SR-1800 nr Thomasvbie
SR1784 nr NC 109
SR-1792 Davidson Coun
SR-2005 Davidson Coun
SR-1702 Davktson Coun
1-85 Davidson Coun
Source to Ha Cg5R2085
NC-17 Davidson Creek
SR•2505 Davidson Creek
SR-1142 trade" Coun
WZMEMIEZMII
erg.-..
From source to McKee Creek
Source to Albemarle WWTP
From source to Lon. Creek
Car. Solke ditch to L • Ck
Monroe WS dam to SR1751
From SR 1751 10 SR 1006
From SR 1006 to SR 1649
Hamlet WS Dam 10 SR1812
From SR 1812 to NC 177
From NC 177 to NC/SC Una
Station
0212149619
02121500
0212147355
02125482
0212955544
Lithe Beaver Creek
L at mouth
12.42-10b
12.63-13b
12.72- 4.5 b
antizzammeremzukainnomus
Ararat RNar at NC 52 Bus.
Ararat RN.r at SR 2080
Lovil1s Creek at SR 1371 Su Co.
Toms Creek at SR 1815 Su Co.
S UT E Pron. L Yarkin R al NC 66
Caner Creek at SR 1624 Davie Co.
NC 801 Davie Co
Cedar Creek above Oua Davie Co.
UT Grants Creek at SR 1500
Little Creek at SR 1535 Rowan Co.
UT North Pons Ck ab. 8 be .11
Town Creek at 185 Rowan Co.
UT Second Ck bi Rockwell nr SR1337
Abbotts Ck sr SR2001 nr Lax Duracell
Abbons Creek at Laski ton
Abbott' Creek at 185 Davidson Co.
Rich Fk nr TNIie SR1800
Rich Fork at SR 1784 and NC 109
Rich Fork at SR 1792
Hunts Fork at SR 1702
Ckaband aOu
Lon. Ck ab d bi Abemarle WWTP
Lower L. • Br ab Carotna Solna old d
Lower Long Br bi Carolina Sorita old d,
Richardson Crook at SR 1751 Union
Richardson Creek at SR 1649 Union
Marks at nr Hamlet at SR1812
Marks Creek at NC 68 Richmond
m
The following stream was elknlnated frothe 303 d 1st sinceIemR- sto-
Mud. Croak SR 2995 nr Mud. Ck
gram
12-72-6
ramnsmamm
3111
1311
131
3111
liMI
311
31
311
12-72-14.5a-
12-72.14-5b
12.77-2UT1
12-77.3
12.93
12.94-1a
12.102-13- 1
12-102-13. 2 ■
12-11OUT 1
12-110.3
12.112UT1
12-115-3a
12.115-3b
12-117UT2
12-119. 6 b .
12-119- 6 1
12.119-7a
12.119 7b
12-119.7c
12-119.7f
12-119-7.4b
12-1 19-7.4.1
12-119.7-4-2
12-126-0.5a
12-1 26-0.5b
13-17.2b
13-17-2e
13.17-4
13-1 7.7b
13.17-8.0.5
30702
30703
30703
30703
30703
30703
30703
30702
30704
30705
30704
30704
30704
30707
30707
30707
30708
30708
30711
6.0
0.8
0.0
®MEMO__
raw BEIM MEMO___
ram
1311
ram
13.17.8.4
13-17-8-4.1
13-17.31a
13-17-31.4
13.17-31-7a
30711
30713
30713
30713
30713
30714
1.0
1.5
DO 4 NH3 4
D0 22
H. 10 DO 4 Fecal 56
BIOLOGICAL
Poor
Poor
NM MI
EIMIEMMIMMININNINI
naltj� 30714 ME__ ®MEMO___
---"_�� 30716 ®_IM= 11121__111111 Poor _
13-45. 2 b 30716MEMO Fe MO Gaol __MO®
MINIIIIIIIIINI IIIMINIEMOMOr® tarrate N -___ ______
EFZI®_MO� cc, 10 Turb 20 Pb 10 NH3 4 ®====..
Poor
Poor
13-17.36- 5 b
12.94a
0

P.O. 130X 987 ® Al.13EN1ARNORTH CAROLINA 28002 • PHONE: [phone]
CERTIFIED NAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
July 20, 1994
Mr. Sean D. Goris
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
Subject: NPDES Application NC0028169
Permit Renewal
Carolina Solite Corporation
Stanly County
Dear Mr. Goris:
Carolina Solite is in receipt (as of June 27, 1994) of your letter
dated June 24, 1994.
Since the promulgation of standards under subpart H of 40 CFR Part
266 and 270 which regulate the combustion of hazardous waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces (BIFs), Carolina Solite no longer
utilizes hazardous waste as a fuel source for kilns no. 5, 6, and
7 when emissions are being controlled by the wet scrubber air
pollution control devices (APCDs). Hazardous waste fuel is used
only on kilns when emissions are controlled utilizing a bagfilter
APCD.
The bagfilter APCD is a "dry" system which does not contribute any
wastewater discharge to the existing scrubber water treatment
facilities (outfall p01) into the Rocky River. Therefore, this
change in the process significantly reduces the amount of expected
pollutants in the effluent discharge.
Only conventional fuel sources are currently permitted for use on
kilns no. 5, 6, and 7 when emissions are controlled using the wet
scrubber system APCD.
In summary, no significant changes have been made to our operation
which we believe would adversely affect our discharge. Therefore,
the current permit is believed to be more than adequate to address
all expected pollutants.
cD

Page Two
July 20, 1994
Mr. Sean D. Goris
If you have any questions or require additional information, please
do not hesitate to contact me or Adrianne McLain at [phone].
Sincerely,
))3
John M. Kuiken
Plant Manager
amm:/npdesapp
cc: Adrianne M. McLain
Stephen P. Holt

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NC0028169
PER ITTEE NAME:
FACILITY NAME:
Carolina Solite Corporation
Carolina Solite Corporation
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
Major Minor
Pipe No.: 002
Design Capacity: 0.36 MGD
Domestic (% of Flow):
Industrial (% of Flow):
0 %
100
Comments:
Wc,k-et 41,11tj _ 31. ©uIA41►d er Seer
60'r Ikvid yr
RECEIVING STREAM: L b A $P„4-NCii
Class: C
Sub -Basin: 03-07-13
Reference USGS Quad: G17NE, Oakboro
County: Stanly
Regional Office:
Mooresville Regional Office
(please attach)
Previous Exp. Date: 11/30/94 Treatment Plant Class:
Classification changes within three miles:
None
Requested by:
Prepared bv:
Sean Goris
Reviewed by: h,(4-
Date: 6/24/94
Date: ; ) ''
Date:
Modeler
Date Rec.
lN1 M ui
Drainage Area (mi2 )
I94-
911
Avg. Streamflow (cfs):
7Q10 (cfs) a Winter 7Q10 (cfs) 30Q2 (cfs)
Chronic pL 2, ;/ aar//y
Toxicity Limits: IWC /00 %
Instream Monitoring:
Imp ,C r (11,f/, lvr�li,1/.
Y
Location OFF- ufikeao, con e7Seite
YLocation la/ f/ da,, j,,i Q., fiPeo, ,eb7b, kt
n Long /, fram
t
Monthly Average
0.36
30
6-9
30
Parameters
Upstream
Downstream
Flow (MGD):
TSS (mg/1): 45
PH (SU): 6-9
Oil and Grease (mg/1): 60
Chromium (14/1): 50
Lead (1): 25
Manganese(µg/1):
Daily Max.
monitor
* The discharge shall not cause the turbidity of the receiving waters to exceed 50 NTU. If turbidity exceeds these
levels due to natural background conditions, the discharge level cannot cause any increase in the turbidity in the
receiving waters.
**The temperature of the effluent shall be such as not totause an increaspn the temperature of thelreceiving stream
of more than 2.81egrees C and in no case cause the ambient water temperature to exceed 32 degrees C.
***BMP Conditions:
1. The permittee shall operate the facilities in a manner which will minimize the impact on the receiving waters.
2. The permittee shall utilize sound management practices to ensure that contaminants do not enter the surface waters
as a rtesult of blasting at this site.
Comments: /4(.,tj teS / c.l,+r14 -P.0l fre,y, ohie; lit) 19rJ7

Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Permit Status:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Topo Quad:
FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Carolina Solite Corporation
NC0028 169
Industrial - 100%
Existing
Renewal
Long Branch
C
030713
Stanly ��,,��
MooresvilleY
Sean Goris
6/24/94
G 18 NW Aquadale
Request #
pipe 002
7897
N.C. DEPT. OF
ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH,
& NATURAL RESOURCES
J U L 14 1994
DIVISION MMOF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Stream CharactensncSVILIE REGIONAL OFFICE
USGS #
Date:
Drainage Area (mi2):
Summer 7Q10 (cfs): 0
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
Average Flow (cfs):
30Q2 (cfs):
IWC (%): 100
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.) -Q r,
Pipe 002 water discharge comes from mine quarry pit as part of dewatering quarry. Water -1/
accumulates in quarry from ground water and rainfall. Upstream from discharge has been rated -'
(89-91) as Fair and partially supporting and downstream from effluent has been rated Poor and
non -supporting. Therefore, I recommend instream monitoring when discharge occurs. No current
data exists; Facility has not been discharging. I recommend existing limits and an episodic Acute
P/F toxicity limit at 90%.
Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers:
Recommended by: ifel7,7/(z_4-c--Date: 7 ,�
Reviewed by
Instream Assessment:
Regional Supervisor: 0/? LecAzAo,
Permits & Engineering:
Ant
"7
Date: !f / // Y
Date: 3/40,e-
Date:
AUG 0 9 1994
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SUPPORT BY:

2
Set above
Type of Toxicity Test:
Existing Limit:
Recommended Limit:**
Monitoring Schedule:
Existing Limits
TOXICS/METALS/CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Chronic P/F @ 99%
MAR, JUN, SEP, DEC Quarterly
litkertlic Acute P/F Limit **see attachment
When facility discharges not to exceed 4/year. Recommended by Matt.
Matthews from Aquatic Toxicolgy Unit.
Flow (MGD):
TSS (mg/1):
pH (SU):
Oil and Grease (mg/1):
Chromium (µg/1):
Lead (µg/1):
Manganese (µg/1):
—Dissolved-Oxygen..(mg/l):: -_-- -
Turbidity (NTU):*
Temperature
BMP Conditions
Chronic Toxicity
Daily Max.
45
6-9
60
50
25
50* ---
**
***
Monthly Average
0.36
30
6-9
30
monitor
monitor— --
Yearly Average
* The discharge shall not cause the turbidity of the receiving waters to exceed 50 NTU. If turbidity exceeds these
levels due to natural background conditions, the discharge level cannot cause any increase in the turbidity in the
receiving waters.
**The temperature of the effluent shall be such as not to ause an increas in the temperature of the freceiving stream
of more than 2.8 egrees C and in no case cause the ambient water temperature to exceed 32 degrees C.
***BMP Conditions:
1. The permittee shall operate the facilities in a manner which will minimize the impact on the receiving waters.
2. The permittee shall utilize sound management practices to ensure that contaminants do not enter the surface waters
as a rtesult of blasting at this site.
RECOMMENDED LIMITS: ADOPTION OF EXISTING LIMITS. except change WET test to Acute.
Flow (MGD):
TSS (mg/1):
pH (SU):
Oil and Grease (mg/I):
Chromium (1.1g/1):
Lead (µg/1):
Manganese (14/1):
--Dissolved-Oxygen-(mg/0:
Turbidity (NTU):*
Temperature
BMP Conditions
Acute Toxicity
Daily Max.
45
6-9
60
50
25
50*
**
***
Monthly Average
0.36
30
6-9
30
monitor
_ __monitor
Yearly Average WQ or EL
4/year
EL
EL
F.I..
WQ
WQ
EL
EL
_X_ Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of the immediate
receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based effluent limitations for additional
dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
OR
No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.

3
INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Upstream Location: 100 ft upstream from effluent
Downstream Location: 100 ft downstream from effluent on long Branch.
Parameters: ID321, Temp, Cond, pH, Turbidity.
Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies:
Monitoring should occur whenever facility is discharging.
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Adequacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility demonstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities? Yes No
If no, which parameters cannot be met?
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
If no, why not?
Special Instructions or Conditions
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) N_ (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.

-C ra/, 16 ' �� /� /--e .Coves /7&7 NC/00 cgllp 9 f iik #ooZ
ACUTE TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY)
The permittee shall conduct acute toxicity tests on a quarterly basis using protocols defined in the North Carolina
Procedure Document entitled "Pass/Fail Methodology For Determining Acute Toxicity In A Single Effluent
Concentration." The monitoring shall be performed as a Fathead Minnow (Pimephales promelas) 24 hour static
test. The effluent concentration at which there may be at no time significant acute mortality is 90% (defined as
treatment two in the North Carolina procedure document). Effluent samples for self -monitoring purposes must be
obtained during representative effluent discharge below all waste treatment. The first test will be performed after
thirty days from the effective date of this permit upon the first discharge from the facility during each quarter, the
quarters defined as January -March, April -June, July -September, and October -December.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge
Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter code TGE6C.
Additionally, DEM Form AT-2 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements performed in
association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity
sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, subsequent monthly monitoring
will take place in any month in which a discharge occurs until such time that a single test is passed. Upon
passing, this monthly test requirement will revert to quarterly as specified above.
Should no discharge occur during any period'in which monitoring is required, the Division must be informed of
such in writing to the above address.
Should any test data from either these monitoring requirements or tests performed by the North Carolina Division
of Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and
modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism
survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate
retesting (within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to submit suitable test results will constitute
noncompliance with monitoring requirements.
7Q10 0 cfs
Permitted Flow 0..3 ((, MGD
IWC /00 %
Basin & Sub -basin YfiD OS-C7-/3
Receiving Stream ton IS rdn c 1-7
County S fnh
Recommended by: //
Date
QAL PIF Fathead 24 Version 9191