NC0028169_Wasteload Allocation_19910129

NPDES DOCUMENT SCANNING COVER SHEET
NC0028169
Aquadale Quarry
NPDES Permit:
Document Type:
Permit Issuance
'„'
Wasteload Allocation-)
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File
- Historical
Correspondence
Speculative Limits
Instream Assessment (67b)
Environmental
Assessment (EA)
Permit
History
Document Date:
January 29, 1991
This document is printed on reuse paper - lig:more any
content on the re -sr -erne side

6), GP
PERMIT NO.: NC00281� • G=- M ��
PERMITTEE NAME: Carolina Solite Corporation
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal % , .. -
Major Minor '\1
Pipe No.: 001
Design Capacity: 0.864 MGD
Domestic (% of Flow):
Industrial (% of Flow):
0%
100* %
Comments:
*Scrubber Water thru two lagoons in series.
** See attached Staff Report and PPA.
STREAM INDEX: 13-17-(30)
{�a mwNc , ___,
, ise f
ice('
RECEIVING STREAM: Rocky River
Class: C
Sub -Basin: 03-07-13
Reference USGS Quad: G17NE, Oakboro
(please attach)
County: Sternly
Regional Office: Mooresville Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 8/31/90 Treatment Plant Class:
Classification changes within three miles:
None: Rocky River changes from WS-III to C at the mouth of Long
Creek. Approximately 15 - 20 miles do st am, at the Pee Dee,
classification becomes WS-III again.
Requested by:
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
Et_
Jule Shanklin
Pe 509
ate: 7/19/90
Date: llh y� i
Date: !l ZY 1 ct l
9
NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
Modeler
Date Rec.
#
akt,S
i`Iq(cio
511
Drainage Area (mil) 1 (p S Avg. Streamflow (cfs): a O
7Q10 (cfs) 021 Winter 7Q10 (cfs) 30Q2 (cfs) 7,
Toxicity Limits: IWC '{ % Acute:ors
Instream Monitoring:
Parameters- b 1 rem p / (� vte� r A Tt e (o ► et
Upstream ✓ Location ,Aosftece.»,
`./ Location t(O lAt HcL, u ea.w
Downstream
Effluent
Characteristics
-
PioNtIbit
--(SS (-1'S 1 !)
3 b
trout / elnror► t.t kw
P15ks (vA.9/ '
I t.3
Stver1 AlSeniCi
evytiu. kie C.E
t.l.0r'iAO ( n)
a?.0
i_zG
0.v I
3 (p 0
/
'b ra r1 J klum:nuen
Ca cou.i1.w- (/L)
act
,_.y.avu e_te, C 1/ i.)
7 `{
f P,D1crrcnv,rY 7, rr
,.^ Beht.. ;der
stic,_f( na+- eXceEc
/7i QVl✓LLcJ 6.'/eral--
SO pei / L n
Ff PEIa, ruf 4 _ .TV-
(LA,: ... -_ --,.,.<:.
,-!o�- Cause .}.1' .
'11-.,,, railt.re cif;
YFritP ii nc u/I2jPcS ID
exree(i a• 7 cC- ,2_
Comments: bQc_1(41tiu..6 a,Ad 1,to ra5.42 ea(r-eoGt. 3.z. °C.
o.$11N rii The � s� ar5 e She a.11 ho* C7�� wS'e.
'1. 'I �, e. rexi:0.4 .1 vic e3 "fa e xcee4 573 ) -» - o r

P (1 lit. , . ,,
May 23, 1990
Mr. Julius A. Shanklin, Environmental Engineer
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Subject: Additional Information as requested
for Amendment to NPDES Permit Number 0028169
Dear Jule,
As requested in a letter from your office, dated March 28, 1990.
Requiring additional information for the above referenced NPDES permit. I am
enclosing analyses which satisfies that information requested.
The EPA methodology utilized involved a library search (attached) which
would have identified any additional pollutants present in our process
effluent water (discharge number 001). The compounds listed in Table V were
not specifically analyzed since the library searches conducted in the Volatile
and Semi -volatile fractions would have identified these specific compounds if
they were present. Also, the inorganic parameters listed in Table V were not
analyzed since they are not present in the raw materials nor the fuels utilized
within our process operation. Carolina Solite has satisfied the above
referenced request for additional information. If I can be of further
assistance please don't hesitate to phone [phone]).
Sincerely,
Stephen Holt
Carolina Solite
Environmental Affairs Coordinator
Enclosures
cc: Mr. J.F. Colburn
Mr. G.S. Kosko
lir. J. Patterson, Hatcher -Sayre
Mooresville Regional Office
.1
RECE
IE
JUL 10 1990
PERMITS R F gIMEFRI hrt;

•
ANALYSIS REPORT
£ancasterfTabomtor:es
NC ORP ORATED
"f.`:`f? t':7i"' :rwr... ' (!';la'r .,'...�., .. ...n... .yT 7S• t . .... ....�
ytda. t ..V , .. �_. •t ..3 .. .__,�..1.. _-- - LLI - Sam
e No.' VW 1341966
0ldover Corporation
P. 0. Box 228
Ashland, VA 23005
Bexill CS-VLS-1 Slater Sample
Collected on 12/21/88 by JC
ANALYSIS
Purgables Method # 624
VOA GC/MS Library Search
1 COPY TO 0ldover Corporation
1 COPY TO Data Package Group
Tna Amar.can %.f304.1a11on for
Laboratory Accraaiuuon
Cr..n.cal. a.o.oq.cai 8 En.nonnynur
lyta{ 01 to+ling
!en7.60.: Ames an Ct Mrn.
eoMGMt Laboralrr.o3 arc
Date Reported 1/26/89
Date Submitted 12/27/88
Discard Date 2/26/89
Collected by JC
P.O.
Rel.
RESULT
AS RECEIVED
attached
attached
ATTN: Mr. George Kosko
- SAmPt_FS L0 LEciE D
�,An u+s11. Ex t S
m rYt e-DifxTELv
059 04815 25.00 026500
See Reverse Sloe For Explanation
et Symbols And Abbreviations And
Our Standard Terms And Conditions
LIMIT OF
QUANTITATION LAB CODE
052023000P
089001000P
Respectfully Submitted
Lancaster Laboratories, Inc.
Reviewed and Approved by:
Lee A. Seats, B.S. Mgr.
Inorganic Analysis

`P
ANALYSIS REPORT
�..£ancasterJJiboratorz'sNCORPORATED
2425 New Holland Pike; Lancaster, PA 17601-5994 [phone]'
Oldover Corporation
P. 0. Box 228
Ashland, VA 23005
Bexill CS-VLS-1 Water Sample
Collected on 12/21/88 by JC
Purgables Method it 624
Chloromethane
Bromomethane
Vinyl Chloride
Chloroethane
Acrolein
Acrylonitrile
Methylene Chloride
Trichlorofluoromethane
1,1•Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Bromodichloromethane
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
Dibromochloromethane
1,1,2•Trichloroethane
Benzene
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
2•Chloroethylvinyl ether
Bromoform
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
1 COPY TO Oldover Corporation
1 COPY TO Data Package Group
TM Amar.can Assocaf,y• for
la�orafory A({rpnal.on
Cnsrrf.caf. Babp.cal S Enr•ronr.ymu
fyys of fesf•nq
d" ar r.,y,rr
.'eG& ie. ! lrOrra�.i •�s rc
RESULT
AS RECEIVED
< 10. ug/1
< 10. ug/1
< 10. ug/1
< 10. ug/1
< 100. ug/1
< 100. ug/1
< 5. ug/1
< 5. ug/1
< 5. ug/1
< 5. ug/1
< 5. ug/1
< 5. ug/1
< 5. ug/1
< 5. ug/1
< 5. ug/1
< 5. ug/1
< 5. ug/1
< 5. ug/1
< 5. ug/1
< 5. ug/1
< 5. ug/1
< 5. ug/1
< 5. ug/1
< 5. ug/1
< 10. ug/1
< 5. ug/1
< 5. ug/1
< 5. ug/1
< 5. ug/1
< 5. ug/1
LLI-Sample No. WV 1341966
ATTN: Mr. George
See Reverse Side For Explanation
Of Symbols And Abbreviations And
Our Standard Terms And Conditions
Date Reported 1/26/89
Date Submitted 12/27/88
Discard Date 2/26/89
Collected by JC
P.O.
Rel.
LIMIT OF
QUANTITATION LAB CODE
10. 08270000OP
10. 08280000OP
10.
10.
100.
100.
5.
5.
5.
5.
5.
5.
5.
5.
5.
5.
5.
5.
5.
5.
5.
5.
5.
5.
10.
5.
5.
5.
5.
5.
Kosko
08290000OP
08300000OP
08240000OP
08250000OP
08310000OP
07900000OP
08320000OP
08330000OP
08340000OP
08350000OP
08360000OP
08370000OP
08380000OP
08390000OP
08490000OP
08400000OP
08410000OP
08420000OP
08460000OP
08450000OP
08430000OP
08440000OP
08260000OP
08470000OP
08480000OP
08500000OP
08510000OP
08520000OP
Respectfully Submitted
Lancaster Laboratories, Inc.
Reviewed and Approved by:
Timothy S. Oostdyk, B.A.
Group Leader, GC/MS Volatiles

. •
ANALYSIS REPORT
£ancastrLabomtorzesINCORPORATED
2425 New Holland Pike, Lancaster, PA 1760t 5994. (7t7) 65&
LLI.Sample No. WV 1341966
0ldover Corporation
P. 0. Box 228
Ashland, VA 23005
Bexill CS-VLS-1 Water Sample
Collected on 12/21/88 by JC
Date Reported 1/26/89
Date Submitted 12/27/88
Discard Date 2/26/89
Collected by JC
P.O.
Rel.
RESULT LIMIT OF
VOA GC/MS Library Search AS RECEIVED QUANTITATION LAB CODE
Volatile compounds 0. 15 peaks 0. 08980000OP
VOLATILE ORGANICS TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
CAS NUMBER
COMPOUND NAME
RT
EST. CONC. 0
1. The data indicated that
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
B=detected in method blank
1 COPY TO 0ldover Corporation
1 COPY TO Data Package Group
t rn. Amerr_,srt AY-OC.D1.On tpr
t. _oo.,tory ACc..Cd4Iron
tiem.cal. Ma:oq.ca a En..ron.nenut
.e.dI of te.hng
OgOlk
no significant
extraneous
J=estimated concentration
peaks were observed.
D=diluted sample
ATTN: Mr. George Kosko
See Reverse Side For Explanation
Ot Symbol_ And Abbravlations And
vaViR �, .. - Our Standard Terms And Conditions
!moor At*arran Gour<a
3e0enoent LAOctafone5
it
JUL 10)990
PERMITS & F.;rr;iNErtinNr,
Respectfullj Submitted
Lancaster Laboratories, Inc.
Reviewed and Approved by:
Timothy S. Oostdyk, B.A.
Group Leader, GC/MS Volatiles

£ancasterEaboratorzV INt:f1RPlSRAT
2425 New Holland Pike. Lancaster. PA 17601-5994 [phone]
'LLLI-Sam ple'No.•VW 134196
Oldover Corporation
P. 0. Box 228
Ashland, VA 23005
Bexill CS-BNLS-1 Water Sample
Collected on 12/21/88 by JC
Base Neutrals (cont)
anthracene
di-n-butyl phthalate
fluoranthene
pyrene
benzidine
butyl benzyl phthalate
benzo (a) anthracene
chrysene
3,3'-dichlorobenzidine
bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
di-n-octyl phthalate
benzo (b) fluoranthene
benzo (K) fluoranthene
benzo (a) pyrene
indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene
dibenzo (a,h) anthracene
benzo (ghi) perylene
1 COPY TO Oldover Corporation
1 COPY TO Data Package Group
rho Amsr+Gan Assoc+spon for
L taata ➢+Gry Accr.dn.+.on
Cnwmcal, L'.ologKs1 a Enforonnsnisl
'.olds of INUng
igirt
jfittf
sQTDQf :Amer- CCtrN I
"*"Q^rJMr LaCCfatorms IrC
w
Date Reported
Date Submitted
Discard Date
Collected by
P.O.
Rel.
RESULT
AS RECEIVED
< 10. ug/1
< 10. ug/1
< 10. ug/1
< 10. ug/1
< 25. ug/1
< 10. ug/1
< 10. ug/1
< 10. ug/1
< 25. ug/1
< 10. ug/1
< 10. ug/1
< 10. ug/1
< 10. ug/1
< 10. ug/1
< 10. ug/1
< 10. ug/1
< 10. ug/1
ATTN: Mr. George Kosko
See Reverse Side For Explanation
Of Symbols And Abbreviations And
Our Standard Terms And Conditions
1/26/89
12/27/88
2/26/89
JC
LIMIT OF
QUANTITATION LAB CODE
10. 06590000OP
10.
10.
10.
25.
10.
10.
10.
25.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
06820000OP
06870000OP
07010000OP
06600000OP
06710000OP
06610000OP
06740000OP
06790000OP
06690000OP
06850000OP
06630000OP
06650000OP
06620000OP
06930000OP
06750000OP
06640000OP
Respectfully Submitted
Lancaster Laboratories, Inc.
Reviewed and Approved by:
Richard S. Rodgers, B.S.
Group Leader. GC/MS

•
ANALYSIS REPORT
L'ancasterEaboratorz's INf ntiPORATF[l
2425 New Holland Pike, Lancaster, PA 17601-5994 (717) 6502301 •
•LLI Sample No.- WW 1341967 -
0ldover Corporation
P. 0. Box 228
Ashland, VA 23005
Bexill CS-BNLS-1 Water Sample
Collected on 12/21/88 by JC
ANALYSIS
Acid Extractables
Base Neutrals
Base Neutrals (cont)
Semivolatile Library Search
See Attached
1 COPY TO 0ldover Corporation
1 COPY TO Data Package Group
(Ns Ame..can Ai,oc.at.on IOr
.a Mrator`r Ac4rtYJ.I_I.On
�nem.cat. a oloq.cal d Enwronmentat
.eW a of Ie1I.nq
059 n4815
25.00 051500
Date Reported 1/26/89
Date Submitted 12/27/88
Discard Date 2/26/89
Collected by JC
P.O.
Rel.
RESULT
AS RECEIVED
attached
attached
attached
25 peaks
ATTN: Hr. George Kosko
See Reverse Side For Explanation
Ot SymboisAnd Abbreviations And
Our Standard Terms And Conditions
LIMIT OF
QUANTITATION LAB CODE
055217000P
055329000P
05540000OP
0. 089303000P
Respectfully Submitted
Lancaster Laboratories, Inc.
Reviewed and Approved by:
Lee A. Seats, B.S. Mgr.
Inorganic Analysis

•
ANALYSIS REPORT
fancasterEaboratories......
• ,r
2425 New Holland Pike. Lancaster. PA 17601-5994 (717) 656-230t •
Oldover Corporation
P. 0. Box 228
Ashland, VA 23005
Bexill CS-BNLS-1 Water Sample
Collected on 12/21/88 by JC
Base Neutrals
N-nitrosodimethylamine
bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
1,3•dichlorobenzene
1,4-dichlorobenzene
1,2-dichlorobenzene
bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether
hexachloroethane
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
nitrobenzene
isophorone
bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene
naphthalene
hexachlorobutadiene
hexachlorocyclopentadiene
2-chloronaphthalene
acenaphthylene
dimethyl phthalate
2,6-dinitrotoluene
acenaphthene
2,4•dinitrotoluene
fluorene
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
diethyl phthalate
1,2-diphenylhydrazine
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
hexachlorobenzene
phenanthrene
1 COPY TO Oldover Corporation
1 COPY TO Data Package Group
rho An,.r.erw, Assoc.ar.oe ror
.aooraro.r Aecrwwa..o..
.-na.n.car. B.obycar 6 En...on,+•ewr
owa or Issrwq
oe� Arre.�yr G� r•.,� ,. . `�
s�ie:.t�•ren� larria:cw.:s :rc•
RESULT
AS RECEIVED
< 10. ug/1
< 10.
< 10.
< 10.
< 10.
< 10.
< 10.
< 10.
< 10.
< 10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
< 10.
< 10.
< 10.
< 10.
< 10.
< 10.
< 10.
< 10.
< 10.
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
•LLI-Sam
y,.
1341967
Date Reported 1/26/89
Date Submitted 12/27/88
Discard Date 2/26/89
Collected by JC
P.O.
Rel.
ATTN: Mr. George Kosko
See Revere Side For Exp!aaat!on
Of Symbois And AL.Ibreviattuns And
Our Standard Terms And Conditions
e No. WW
LIMIT OF
QUANTITATION LAB CODE
10. 06970000OP
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
06670000OP
06770000OP
06780000OP
06760000OP
06680000OP
06920000OP
06980000OP
06960000OP
06940000OP
06660000OP
07020000OP
06950000OP
06900000OP
06910000OP
06720000OP
06580000OP
068100000P
06840000OP
06570000OP
06830000OP
06880000OP
06730000OP
06800000OP
06860000OP
06990000OP
06700000OP
06890000OP
07000000OP
Respectfully Submitted
Lancaster Laboratories, Inc.
Reviewed and Approved by:
Richard S. Rodgers, B.S.
Group Leader, GC/MS

1
ANALYSIS REPORT
£ancasterL�iborator,'sINCORPORATED
2425 New Holland Pike. Lancaster; PA .17601-5994% (717) 658►2301
0ldover Corporation
P. 0. Box 228
Ashland, VA 23005
Bexill CS-BNLS-1 Water Sample
Collected on 12/21/88 by JC
Acid Extractables
2-chlorophenol
phenol
2-nitrophenol
2,4-dimethylphenol
2,4-dichlorophenol
4-chloro-3-methylphenol
2,4,6-trichlorophenol
2,4-dinitrophenol
4-nitrophenol
2-methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol
pentachlorophenol
1 COPY TO 0ldover Corporation
1 COPY TO Data Package Group
The An1M,can AysoGalion ICr
UOo•alor, ACCiWnation
C^�* a.�ron.cu A En.•rnnnsonlzl
hews of Ivil,n.
_r ..
ATrrc.ar CLUM1CY Of
CCo+:run Lam .1to,Y5 Ir[
RESULT
AS RECEIVED
< 10. ug/1
< 10. ug/1
< 10. ug/1
< 10. ug/1
< 10. ug/1
< 10. ug/1
< 10. ug/1
< 25. ug/1
< 25. ug/1
< 25. ug/1
< 25. ug/1
ATTN: Mr. George
See Reverse Side For Explanation
Of Symbols And Abbreviations And
Our Standard Terms And Condltlo,34
�>AD1�No:US7_ 13419f7
Date Reported 1/26/89
Date Submitted 12/27/88
Discard6Date 2/26/89
Collected by JC
P.O.
Rel.
LIMIT OF
QUANTITATION LAB CODE
10. 06460000OP
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
25.
25.
25.
25.
Kosko
065500000P
06510000OP
06480000OP
06470000OP
06530000OP
06560000OP
06500000OP
06520000OP
06490000OP
06540000OP
JUL .i I
PERMITS & Fair;.
Respectfully Submitted
Lancaster Laboratories, Inc.
Reviewed and Approved by:
Richard S. Rodgers, B.S.
Group Leader, GC/MS

INCORPORATEDace
THE ASSURANCE OF OUALITT
May 18, 1990
Mr. Steve Holt
Carolina Solite Corporation
P.O. Box 987
Albemarle, NC 28002
RE: PACE Project No. 600413.508
Dear Mr. Holt:
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
Enclosed is the report of laboratory analyses for samples received
April 13, 1990.
If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free
to contact us.
Sincerely,
Paul R. Jenkins, Jr.
Project Manager
Enclosures
.i00 veisity ..rsinmetcia! Place
Charfotte,NL28214
TE 7Cr69-84s ---
—*-
8.15
- Offices: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Tampa, Florida
Iowa City, lowa
San Francisco, California
Kansas City, Missouri
Los Angeles, California
Charlotte, North Carolina
Asheville, North Carolina
An Equal Opportunity Employer

cice
INCORPORATED
THE ASSURANCE OF QUALITY
Carolina Solite Corporation
P.O. Box 987
Albemarle, NC 28002
Attn: Mr. Steve Holt
PACE Sample Number:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Parameter
SUBCONTRACT ANALYSIS
RADIOLOGICAL ANAYSIS
Gross Alpha
Gross Beta
INORGANIC ANALYSIS
INDIVIDUAL PARAMETERS
Aluminum
Bacteria, Fecal Coliform
Barium
Boron
Bromide
Cobalt
Color
Fluoride, Total
Iron
Magnesium
Manganese
Molybdenum
Nitrogen, Ammonia
Nitrogen, Kjeldahl
Nitrogen, Nitrate
Nitrogen, Nitrite
Oil and Grease
Phosphorus, Total
Sulfate
Sulfide
Sulfite
MDL Method Detection Limit
ND
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
May 18, 1990
PACE Project
Number: 600413508
Units
Zc1 N c, P Cam Nos rrre CaLLEcTE n [VT
[.ATy,oLENA ,oL17 ES IDISCI►A2GE p1 pE OGl
476000
04/13/90
04/13/90
MDL Effluent
pCi/L 1.0 ND
pCi/L 1.0 7.4 +- 3.2
mg/L
col/100m1
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
Pt -Co
ppm
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
ppm
ppm
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
Not detected at or above the MDL.
1700 University Commercial Place
Charlotte, NC 28213
TEL: 784.537•5454
FAX: [phone]
0.10 1.74
5 ND
0.010 0.246
0.10 0.431
5.0 ND
0.025 ND
Unit 1 30
0.10 12.7--
0.010 0.070
0.10 0.202
0.010 0.010
0.10 ND
0.050 0.33
0.050 1.91
0.1 0.522
0.020 ND
1.0 ND
0.02 0.03
1 380
0.50 ND
3.0 3.0
Offices: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Tarried. Fluriva
Iowa City, iuwa
San Francisco, California
Kansas City, Missouri
Los Anodes. California
CkliOlie, North Carolina
Asheville, North Carolina
An Equal Opportunity Employer

c1ce
NCORPUNAILD
THE ASSURANCE OF OUAIIIY
Mr. Steve Holt
Page 2
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
May 18, 1990
PACE Project
Number: 600413508
PACE Sample Number: 476000
Date Collected: 04/13/90
Date Received: 04/13/90
Parameter Units MDL Effluent
INORGANIC ANALYSIS
INDIVIDUAL PARAMETERS
Surfactants ug/L 0.05 1.29
Tin mg/L 0.10 0.122
Titanium mg/L 0.10 ND
MDL Method Detection Limit
ND Not detected at or above the MDL.
The data contained in this report were obtained using EPA or other
approved methodologies. All analyses were performed by me or under
my supervision.
Charles M. Cabaniss
Manager Inorganic Chemistry
1700 l,'ni•rerity Commeicial Place
Charlotte, NC 282'.3
TEL: [phone]
FAY: 704-E97 8455
Offices: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Tampa, Florida
Iowa City, Iowa
San Francisco, California
Kansas City, Missouri
los Angeles, California
Charlotte, North Carcfine
Asheville, North CaroNna
An Equal Opportunity Employer

pWI$WN OP ENVIn ,NMEWYA. :I,PIVPiSt PFir
DEC 13"0
► OORES.4LE
UMNINEW
Request No.: 5794
WASTELOAD ALLOCATION APPROVAL FORM
Facility Name: Carolina Solite Corporation: Pipe 001
NPDES No.: NC0028169
Type of Waste: Industrial
Status: Existing/Renewal w/Modification
Receiving Stream:
Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Quad: G17NE
RECOMMENDED EFFLUENT
EXISTING
0.864
30
6-9
Wasteflow (mgd) :
TSS (mg/1) :
pH (su) :
MBAs (mg/1) :
Fluoride (mg/1) :
Lead (ug/1) :
Cadmium (ug/ 1) :
Cyanide (ug/1) :
RADIOACTIVITY:
Gross Beta Emitters shall not exceed an annual average of 50
TEMPERATURE:
The discharge shall not cause the temperature of the receiving waters to
exceed 2.8 C above the background, and in no case exceed 32 C.
TURBIDITY:
The discharge shall not cause the turbidity
of the receiving waters to exceed 50 NTU.
Rocky River
C
30713
Stanly
Mooresville
Jule Shanklin
7/19/90
Drainage areal`
Summer 7Q10`
Winter 7Q10:
Average flow:
30Q2:
LIMITS
PROPOSED
0.864
30
6-9
11.3
27.0
368
11 29
9(,/ 74 J
A)
965 sq mi
29 cfs
51 cfs
920 cfs
76 cfs
Monitor:
Aluminum
Iron
Chromium
Copper
Zinc
Silver
Arsenic
Berylium
Nickel
Boron
pCi/L.
TOXICITY TESTING REQ: Chronic quarterly at 4.4%
MONITORING
PARAMETERS: DO, TEMPERATURE, CONDUCTIVITY, pH, 7'ii5U'1TY
Upstream (Y/N): Y Location:100 feet upstream
Downstream (Y/N): Y Location:100 feet downstream
COMMENT S
Facility relocating to original permitted site; constructing new facilities;
hazardous wastes are used as fuel source in lightweight aggregate production
Recommend quarterly priority pollutant analyses to coincide with toxicity te3C.
Oakboro WWTP considering move to same site on Rocky River.
Recommended by:
Reviewed by
Instream Assessment:
Regional Supervisor: 9&
Permits & Engineering:
z
15, Sa,',A
41,144:-IR
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SUPPORT BY:
J A N -:1. 5 1991
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Z-//d/90
( "zit 2-1i v
(oi (vv.4t.Y5 I;N. s - acca `E- 4,- i40evaLA-4,,, w/ Uc""D D & 84"2-rcc.s

10/89
Facility Name d kOil Permit # IV -Co 0gg 7
CHRONIC TOXICITY TESTING REQUIREMENT (QRTRLY)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit chronic toxicity in any two consecutive toxicity tests,
• using test procedures outlined in:
1.) The North Carolina Ceriodaphnia chronic effluent bioassay procedure (North Carolina Chronic
Bioassay Procedure - Revised *September 1989) or subsequent versions.
The effluent concentration at which there may be no observable inhibition of reproduction or
significant mortality is y. 11 % (defined as treatment two in the North Carolina procedure
document). The permit holder shall perform quarterly monitoring using this procedure to establish
complianceewith the permit condition. The. first test will be performed after thirty days from
issuance of this permit during the months of RA:R Ott .S - . Effluent
samplingfor this testing shall be erfomed at the NPD S permitted final effluent discharge below w
all treatment processes. •
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent
Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter
code TGP3B. Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N.C. 27611
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements
performed in.association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual
chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for
disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly
monitoring will begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this
monthly test requirement will revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina
Division of Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this
permit may be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
•
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the•cittcdck*ument, such as minimum
control organism survival and appropriate environmental controls:shall constitute an invalid test
and will require immediate retesting(within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to submit
suitable test results will constitute noncompliance with monitoring requirements.
7Q10 oZ cfs
Permited Flow . g4 y MGD Recommended by:
IWC% y. y _•
Basin & Sub -basin 03-0 7 - 13
Receiving Stream ,r oekhr ,�.etr-
County Sinn y Date ' V /z.//p/f O
**Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) P/F at yy%,fficd_ W,S bF.�.See Part 3, Condition .

-/-
i
S /t /e c
(.e.r6 lr it Ge cr�.
e cc fs
17,3 .
-7 -'O h-- / e �H
re/ Bounce (A.;
A
/h ✓e7;v7[icr /?70
osvE P111-10_,2„----- antit (
D% 20C.(C , MvPr
Ct /e SCvCJ
I4Z.c_ r�0)S
.-SPc_f/
7 �e ! i,1�
i
as /e . %ei (d hs
�l J 8/(/9 0
b3-C7-/3
N264)
Smrne joos5-",67Y 4//) �:
tee_
1 �1 ma's` 7
'7ta Le 7� Uvo h GL - cc
f 7e
i?0.5.c. 7 (-a 1%S// 2!;.^- 67' Q / ;; G %HO(_• /'/ ^;t/P
j _s rP �Sfit `�` a ki/oc_ i'. c..,—. V`. — re IC vf.r1
),'Ulet, •-h_e r/ `-4 ,_5
,usGs # o�, / 7 .
QA ' 9aO cfs
/vs _} cC5
51 ccs
330 ' ei
Noy==
15 47257'eee
D K GT vet N. , G0i %' l ti D e/s7,z •
0 L g�in
i vB/
/P/ c = y. 10/
;Cck- e aa. ;

=-Taci 647 - Pa-Z z c(c) fe rvt cs
5; c-e, (Jse GiQz,:zeSvus uvds i Prod s S — �v� a. 1 �cdvc-tL
1/0 C s `Avv1c( 7 r} .S/uc je P r 6 t'y - l2&z a.,- /a U s
/eveLs coet4aorine.t.--5
air - (sc r b r-g )
4n� Si'uQ'g�
/0 k i c i �y m r .71 rj J
/9?7.
�5oi (s j s'clnr eDT's
�ff7 - /wc y, y / 7ca/os = z (A k _
i4--t-u'-C tea,,, �� = < C 525 7.. /
/? g•F- - YnO-rt-A (Ci Gil e ni c niesri 1,71-u-)o. r. q @ 2 a'`' ? GP/0 - ! t - c7(5.
G6 4 G�v/� c 6rseg_k Gf-s-
/fro sat, a. y c L„. 4e 4e �u �o c ky , 74)(05 = 2 9 c h /<iC :1
Aa
7
/bre any ec( /Vo 7 - �.'s�ar-e
ri vs"- aGlClie.5S c7F e r- f,Z) 6 L ,i S,
5; e-c .e 5 G / c. h i ca.. / 1.14",
i) 4i- ? /7G 5 Q�,p/c c..--i 'v set.
s� l%-�� � re 10,-,.._(
<t a 71- IPN�
s� 44.71.n7L
pt o (2 ;74(cs' 7 f e a ..c- (
b")0577A1/6 L //1/ /-77s
ASS 30 YkLyn
QL/YI:ri7
4az4 .ct os ` is (cc. $ /
- -e-L.. - c( e s 7 0'71- co n-) nx. c/ .
i s a 11.44.'40`e

,23 . 1
V : apSo UQkbaro,se Ace
acute
3rav
dD
Cu.ro`li40,. tide. - o0Ro
1rrYl
/'Ia vIr5i um
niCUISAAJSC
i1r
—rP
(u, (1
Eglue.+
IICP
10.
5?
7
(316
1 ego
at-14
L131
3o
Ia1700
Iy
5D
a
5-0
1 frL
s
Po-
•0fo
3s? A�
1 SOD
nowa.ble
1I3a
7
ALI
011
73c,
1o3
73.6
3'g
N%1-02
MDN tT d R
1.IrnIT ►�
moarrDti ✓
M D N I"rc»- ✓
LIM►T 1/
LIICIir
MONIMR.
AAacat-a
Mow +Tam ✓
Ito N Croft_ /
Mo.kJ 1..,
Ma, Crb
LIM IT
M0IJI'fa2
AI Z Au / Pa

•
y
U-L +1,1---__ .v o t
t -- — — 6Tt LQwT
1
J
CAN to r '1E9
J(00
ij Ace-f-an� �r
#( 1
i .e Artie
T L I ass; � 7. t W---------3 �C'------
l}. 3
3a 3,glei
EA-4. I.z- jlo / qo
e.�li..o.�'►-` .5--'-' �?- �VI.C.. �...�'CG� 4?c,t ky- (MLR. O .3_/- 0 6
I-- ! _" Ro `1cA Zt.ree- ( M 450_0 e3 - Fri' .
�v D - .5o►�u- v►-.ti5 - , Vw

37
1
eta2-12_ CIA C./
6- \\ c-AI\.sr_..._
I pue 0 —1-t, 1 ‘ ->p a-
wk 14- S ,
I
I
i
I fr51/0
1 '
1 1; 4, SoUcte t,"; t( id C -Gio
connouvic_41 -it, ?ul9L. iLitc.c.t--- cool
i
Mbl-
1 7/2'0 0
1 ns. )oi.,) ec7,4-,f, bien,.2i --Z;/-es ez_s cr_.„2(. if
1/teed klp) SCt of- iivp,147-forizi C141:ct_ . 147-iliA pt-c5P-td— LOLA
ibv0 vcd c-a,r-v--- --he, WC.\<1_ ?ct.(Y-_,_, — 1A-Q. LAAL oUskss ,A;tit
S ot4.44,-c—rz.
IL
I, re itck.G-
1 i
iii/d7/90 044 % S . ke,c, 5 bees u vrel 11, (., nit.. 4 0, k a zete-cl 0 CLS_ WC,- 3 fr5 ". feCte-(CC(
‘...)
s f kOf b5-eZI
1
I ,
IedY-Cigh C .. • Ire-per*.e Sisns_kt.tie....) — re c-,..,s-e... i--0 etA7SciAP5.-c,
t,
I
1
i
I
,
1
I I
1 .
i
i
i
i _

O. BOX 987 e ALBEMARLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28001 o NFIONE: [phone]
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
August 24, 1990
t1 G ti
Mr. Julius A. Shanklin, Environmental Engineer
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Subject: Additional Information as
requested to complete the
project NPDES permit #NCO
028169, renewal requests.
Dear Mr. Shanklin,
As requested in a letter from your office, dated March 28,
1990. Requiring additional information for NPDES permit renewal
number NCOO28169, requesting a priority pollutant analysis (PPA)
for the chemicals listed in tables II, III, IV and V of appendix
D. I am enclosing analysis for table III, appendix D (Other Toxic
Pollutants, Metals and Cyanide and Total Phenols).
In a. letter dated May 23, 1990, I submitted information
concerning tables II, IV and V of appendix D. Upon receipt of this
correspondence with enclosures, Carolina Solite will have submitted
all requests for additional information concerning the renewal of
permit number NCOO28169. If I can be of further assistance please
don't hesitate to telephone [phone].
Lncerel
StephLn Hilt, Carolina Solite
Environmental Affairs Coordinator
Enclosures
cc: Mr. J.F. Colburn
Mr. G. S. Kosko
Mooresville Regional Office

mac¢.
INCORPORATED
THE ASSURANCE OF QUALITY
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
August 22, 1990
Mr. Steve Holt
Carolina Solite Corporation
P.O. Box 987
Albemarle, NC 28002
RE: PACE Project No. 600803.602
Dear Mr. Holt:
Enclosed is the report of laboratory analyses for samples received
August 03, 1990.
If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free
to contact us.
Sincerely,
it
Rodney H. Lang
Project Manager
Enclosures
1700 University Commercial Place
Charlotte, NC 2B213
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
Offices Serving: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Tampa. Florida
Iowa City, Iowa
San Francisco, California
Kansas City, Missouri
Los Angeles, California An Equal Opportunity Employer
Charlotte, North Carolina
Asheville, North Carolina
New York, New York
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
rg:_mr,n- • .....

r .
INCORPORATED
THE ASSURANCE OF QUALITY
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
Carolina Solite Corporation
P.O. Box 987
Albemarle, NC 28002
Attn: Mr. Steve Holt
PACE Sample Number:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Parameter
INORGANIC ANALYSIS
INDIVIDUAL PARAMETERS
Antimony
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Cyanide, Total
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Phenol
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Zinc
August 22, 1990
PACE Project
Number: 600803602
92 0513894
08/03/90
08/03/90
Units MDL Effluent
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
0.10 0.510
0.0050 0.009
0.020 ND
0.010 0.017
0.010 ND
0.010 0.116
0.005 ND
0.10 ND
0.0002 ND
0.020 0.057
0.005 ND
0.005 0.021
0.010 ND
0.10 ND
0.050 0.151
MDL Method Detection Limit
ND Not detected at or above the MDL.
The data contained in this report were obtained using EPA or other
approved methodologies. All analyses were performed by me or under
my supervision.
Charles M. Cabaniss
Manager, Inorganic Chemistry
1700 University Commercial Place
Charlotte, NC 28213
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
Offices Serving: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Tampa. Florida
lowa City. Iowa
San Francisco, California
Kansas City, Missouri
Los Angeles, California
Charlotte, North Carolina
Asheville, North Carolina
New York, New York
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
An Equal Opportunity Employer

pcice.
C O R P O R A T E D
THE ASSURANCE OF QUALITY
Client Caro i(r!ri• SU%172.-
Address A (J , d o / / ( 7
:•
�d�- S�711-_3/4__ gooZ
Phone
•
Report To: _51/' P' V
Bill To:
1,706`
P.O. # / Billing Reference.
12687
CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECORD
Analytical Request
Pace Client No.
z�/
Pace Project Manager
Pace Project No. (('(\ C• -0?
Project Name / No. 'Requested Due Date:, h B �; - Z I'i
L 1
Sampled By (PRINT):
�A Ira. ,i
Sampler Sigp ure Date Sampled
,,vy"Ytiv1,1 1l
2
3
4
5
6
7
COOLER NOS.
BAILERS
SHIPMENT METHOD
OUT / DATE RETURNED / DATE
NO. OF CONTAINERS
PRESERVATIVES
UNPRESERVE
O
CIO
O
Z
0
ANALYSES
REQUEST
REMARKS
,
3%` i
Additional Comments
/1 A,�E
J
CIS, S�
5
ITEM
NUMBER
RELINQUISHED BY/ AFFILIATION
ACCEPTED BY / AFFILIATION •
DATE
SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR INSTRUCTIONS

PERMIT NO.:
PERMMEE NAME: eacro I:na
Facility Status:
Permit Status:
CxZ'sti��
wat
NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
06T AGP \
Ac, �rnr:vws� �,.d:,c. e� )
Sol:
Coee0la,fian
Major Minor ✓
Pipe No.: 001
Design Capacity: . O. 36
Domestic (% of Flow):
Industrial (% of Flow):
on
Comments:
dewaSe...1.1
�✓au��.va�t,. stye
rK V
RECEIVING STREAM: Loin
Class: -
4v /tcc✓tG
ram► cdL £-
I
Sub-Basin:03 - o 1 — V3
tS%Vie
Reference USGS Quad: (please attach)
County: S44
Regional Office: I R08 rea u►0,e,
Previous Exp. Date: $ f 3 t 1 ct 0 Treatment Plant Class:
Classification changes within three miles:
Requested by: J vie. Sinnnkl:•s
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
b. ScoLdA
Daze:
Date: y.)-8/9
Date: ll28lgl
Modeler
Date Rec.
#
-0A-J
71/g
o_
.57?
-/
Drainage Area (mil )
Avg. Streamflow (cfs):
7Q10 (cfs) Q Winter 7Q10 (cfs) 30Q2 (cfs)
Toxicity Limits: IWC / 7 % Acute/ ronici
Instream Monitoring:
ParametersTo Te e , ('o K cl e vit
Upstream 1/ Location 100 -4- upsch-ecc•-
Downstream Location la) do(Aps � ►-�-L
Effluent
Characteristics
7. 6.41'/L )
- p i- (zt)
6 -- /
,1-7-tir-,4-‘4" Km)
3-0
` ekrvA v u.,( li)
.6o
i- 4.eezei fi.e...910
.v? 5-
)
:Oil ar,c1 41/3
6
41Oni / Tb2°
444.: ael e -
riP q- n ie :
%ire• -scLIrzoi ,
lu.Ll .-1071- cQ,-cs e.
/he 7`eni/a P -& rr°
71 L e rece - --!,
Li.... `f-..S- A
exceect .2.. E-t
6L bOlAe 714e_ Ckc,i'az.c.irl . /iv7,1 ; n
Comments: h,, r-y , e4-coa-( 3c °C
Vim' J}t

3 o l v ct ; L
avd r4ei Li -Hz < 5-1 C.)
Oc>2,
sad
So
SD

Request No.: 5794 8�
WASTELOAD ALLOCATION APPROVAL FORM
Facility Name: Carolina Solite Corporation: Pipe 002
NPDES No.: NC0028169
Type of Waste: Industrial
Status: Existing/Unpermitted
Receiving Stream: Long Branch
Classification: C
Subbasin: 30713 Drainage area: sq mi
County: Stanly Summer 7Q10: 0 cfs
Regional Office: Mooresville Winter 7010: cfs
Requestor: Jule Shanklin Average flow: cfs
Date of Request: 7/19/90 30Q2: cfs
Quad: G17NE
RECOMMENDED EFFLUENT LIMITS
PROPOSED
Monitor:
Wasteflow (mgd): 0.360 Manganese
TSS (mg/1) : 30
pH (su) : 6-9
Turbidity (NTU): 50
Chromium (ug/1): 50.0
Lead (ug/1): 25
0;( afti Greme 640) : 3o 6,o
TEMPERATURE:
The discharge shall not cause the temperature of the receiving waters to
exceed 2.8 C above the background, and in no case exceed 32 C.
TOXICITY TESTING REQ: Chronic quarterly at 99%
MONITORING
RECEIVED
�y{;ION 9F ENVIRONMENTAL MAN114EMOB
DEC 19 1990
IIEGIONM. ONO
PARAMETERS: DO, TEMPERATURE, CONDUCTIVITY, pH
Upstream (Y/N): Y Location:100 feet upstream
Downstream (Y/N): Y Location:100 feet downstream
COMMENTS
Existing illegal discharge. Pit dewatering wastewater accumulated through
groundwater seepage and runoff.
Recommended by:
Reviewed by
Instream Assessment:
Regional Supervisor: iy�,G
Permits & Engineering:
Xftat ScoA
A Th4.,isIA
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SUPPORT BY:
J A N 1 5 1991
Date: 12./.0 6
Date:
Date:
Date:
(21111Rv

10/89
Facility Name eztraltout. (..;4e- bb 4-1-1 Permit # Ncoo a 8147
CHRONIC TOXICITY TESTING REQUIREMENT (QR'I'RLY)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit chronic toxicity in any two consecutive toxicity tests,
• using test procedures outlined in:
1.) The North Carolina Ceriodaphnia chronic effluent bioassay procedure (North Carolina Chronic
Bioassay Procedure - Revised *September 1989) or subsequent versions.
The effluent concentration at which there may be no observable inhibition of reproduction or
significant mortality is i 9 % (defined as treatment two in the North Carolina procedure
document). The permit holder shall perform quarterly monitoring using this procedure to establish
compliance with the permit condition. The. first test will be performed after thirty days from
issuance of this permit during the months of glad u.IJ 1 sue, 'DES • . Effluent
sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below
all treatment processes.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent
Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter
code TGP3B. Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N.C. 27611
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements
performed in -association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual
chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for
disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly
monitoring will begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this
monthly test requirement will revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina
Division of Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this
permit may be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum
control organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test
and will require immediate retesting(within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to submit
suitable test results will constitute noncompliance with monitoring requirements.
7Q10 0 cfs
Permited Flow - 3 (o MGD Recommended by:
IWC% 100
Basin & Sub -basin 01 -c ? - 13
Receivin Stream Lb .
ng Bran .
County M Date ! z io 70
**Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) P/F atg9 %,MQ►2�1 Z , See Part 3 , Condition

§ 435.51
§ 435.51 Specialized definitions.
For the purpose of this subpart:
(a) Except as provided below, the
general definitions, abbreviations, and
methods of analysis set forth in 40
CFR Part 401 shall apply to this sub-
part.
(b) The term "onshore" shall mean
all land areas landward of the territo-
rial seas as defined in 40 CFR
125.1(gg).
(c) The term "use in agricultural or
wildlife propagation" means that the
produced water is of good enough
quality to be used for wildlife or live-
stock watering or other agricultural
uses and that the produced water is
actually put to such use during periods
of discharge.
§ 435.52 Effluent limitations guidelines
representing the degree of effluent re-
duction attainable by the application of
the best practicable control technology
currently available.
In establishing the limitations set
forth in this section, EPA took into ac-
count all information it was able to
collect, develop and solicit with re-
spect to factors (such as age and size
of facility, raw materials, production
processes, product produced, treat-
ment technology available, energy re-
quirements and costs) which can
affect the industry subcategorization
and effluent levels established. It is
however, possible that data which
would affect these limitations have
not been available and, as a result,
these limitations should be adjusted
for certain plants in this industry. An
individual discharger or other interest-
ed person may submit evidence to the
Regional Administrator (or to the
State, if the State has the authority to
issue NPDES permits) that factors re-
lating to the equipment or facilities in-
volved, the process applied, or other
such factors related to such discharger
are fundamentally different from the
factors considered in the establish-
ment of the guidelines. On the basis of
such evidence or other available infor-
mation, the Regional Administrator
(or the State) will make a written find -
EDITORIAL NOTE: Part 125 was revised at
44 FR 32948, June 7, 1979.
40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-87 Edition)
ing that such factors are or are not
fundamentally different for that facil-
ity compared to those specified in the
Development Document. If such fun-
damentally different factors are found
to exist, the Regional Administrator
or the State shall establish for the dis-
charger effluent limitations in the
NPDES permit either more or less
stringent than the limitations estab-
lished herein, to the extent dictated
by such fundamentally different fac-
tors. Such limitations must be ap-
proved by the Administrator of the
Environmental Protection Agency.
The Administrator may approve or
disapprove such limitations, specify
other limitations, or initiate proceed-
ings to revise these regulations.
(a) The following limitations estab-
lish the quantity or quality of pollut-
ants or pollutant properties, con-
trolled by this section, which may be
discharged by a point source subject to
the provisions of this subpart after ap-
plication of the best practicable con-
trol technology currently available:
(1) There shall be no discharge of
waste pollutants into navigable waters
from any source (other than produced
water) associated with production,
field exploration, drilling, well comple-
tion, or well treatment (i.e., drilling
muds, drill cuttings, and produced
sands).
(2) Produced water discharges shall
not exceed the following daily maxi-
mum limitation:
Effluent characteristics: Effluent limita-
tion (mg/1).
Oil and Grease: 35.
Subpart F—Stripper Subcategory
§ 435.60 Applicability; description of the
stripper subcategory.
The provisions of this subpart are
applicable to those onshore facilities
which produce 10 barrels per well per
calendar day or less of crude oil and
which are operating at the maximum
feasible rate of production and in ac-
cordance with recognized conservation
practices. These facilities are engaged
in production, and well treatment in
the oil and gas extraction industry.
Environmental Protection Agency
§ 435.61 Specialized definitions.
For the purpose of this subpart:
(a) Except as provided below, the
general definitions, abbreviations, and
methods of analysis set forth in 40
CFR Part 401 shall apply to this sub-
part.
(b) The term "onshore" shall mean
all land areas landward of the inner
boundary of the territorial seas as de-
fined in 40 CFR 125.1(gg).'
(c) The term "well" shall means
crude oil producing wells and shall not
include gas wells or wells injecting
water for disposal or for enhanced re-
covery of oil or gas.
(d) The term "gas well" shall mean
any well which produces natural gas in
a ratio to the petroleum liquids pro-
duced greater than 15,000 cubic feet of
gas per 1 barrel (42 gallons) of petrole-
um liquids.
PART 436—MINERAL MINING AND
PROCESSING POINT SOURCE CAT-
EGORY
Subpart A —Dimension Stone Subcategory
[Reserved]
Subpart B—Crushed Stone Subcategory
Sec.
436.20 Applicability; description of the
crushed stone subcategory.
436.21 Specialized definitions.
436.22 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
resenting the degree of effluent reduc-
tion attainable by the application of the
best practicable control technology cur-
rently available.
Subpart C—Construction Sand and Gravel
Subcategory
436.30 Applicability; description of the con-
struction sand and gravel subcategory.
436.31 Specialized definitions.
436.32 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
resenting the degree of effluent reduc-
tion attainable by the application of the
best practicable control technology cur-
rently available.
r EDITORIAL NOTE: Part 125 was revised at
44 FR 32948, June 7, 1979.
Fart 4�
Sec.
Subpart D—Industrial Sand Subcategory
436.40 Applicability; description of the i
dustrial sand subcategory.
436.41 Specialized definitions.
436.42 Effluent limitations guidelines re
resenting the degree of effluent redi
tion attainable by the application of t
best practicable control technology ct
rently available.
Subpart E—Gypsum Subcategory
436.50 Applicability; description of t
gypsum subcategory.
436.51 Specialized definitions.
436.52 Effluent limitations guidelines r(
resenting the degree of effluent reds
tion attainable by the application of t
best practicable control technology c•
rently available.
Subpart F—Asphaltic Mineral Subcategory
436.60 Applicability; description of the
phaltic mineral subcategory.
436.61 Specialized definitions.
436.62 Effluent limitations guidelines r
resenting the degree of effluent red
tion attainable by the application of i
best practicable control technology c
rently available.
Subpart G—Asbestos and Wollastonite
Subcategory
436.70 Applicability; description of the
bestos and wollastonite subcategory.
436.71 Specialized definitions.
436.72 Effluent limitations guidelines I
resenting the degree of effluent red
tion attainable by the application of
best practicable control technology
rently available.
Subpart H—Lightweight Aggregates
Subcategory [Reserved]
Subpart I —Mica and Sericite Subcategor
[Reserved]
Subpart J—Barite Subcategory
436.100 Applicability; description of
barite subcategory.
436.101 Specialized definitions.
436.102 Effluent limitations guidelines
resenting the degree of effluent re(
tion attainable by the application of
best practicable control technology
rently available.
Subpart K—Fluorspar Subcategory
436.110 Applicability; description of
fluorspar subcategory.
262
263

Part 436
40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-87 Edition)
Environmental Protection Agency
§c
Sec.
436.111 Specialized definitions.
436.112 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
resenting the degree of effluent reduc-
tion attainable by the application of the
best practicable control technology cur-
rently available.
Subpart L-Salinas From Brine Lakes
Subcategory
436.120 Applicability; description of the sa-
lines from brine lakes subcategory.
436.121 Specialized definitions.
436.122 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
resenting the degree of effluent reduc-
tion attainable by the application of the
best practicable control technology cur-
rently available.
Subpart M-Borax Subcategory
436.130 Applicability; description of the
borax subcategory.
436.131 Specialized definitions.
436.132 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
resenting the degree of effluent reduc-
tion attainable by the application of the
best practicable control technology cur-
rently available.
Subpart N-Potash Subcategory
436.140 Applicability: description of the
potash subcategory.
436.141 Specialized definitions.
436.142 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
resenting the degree of effluent reduc-
tion attainable by the application of the
best praticable control technology cur-
rently available.
Subpart 0-Sodium Sulfate Subcategory
436.150 Applicability; description of the
sodium sulfate subcategory.
436.151 Specialized definitions.
436.152 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
resenting the degree of effluent reduc-
tion attainable by the application of the
best practicable control technology cur-
rently available.
Subpart P-Trona Subcategory [Reserved]
Subpart 0-Rock Salt Subcategory
[Reserved]
Subpart R-Phosphate Rock Subcategory
436.180 Applicability; description of the
phosphate rock subcategory.
436.181 Specialized definitions.
Sec.
436.182 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
resenting the degree of effluent reduc-
tion attainable by the application of the
best practicable control technology cur-
rently available.
436.183-436.184 (Reserved]
436.185 Standards of performance for new
sources.
Subpart S-Frasch Sulfur Subcategory
436.190 Applicability; description of the
Frasch sulfur subcategory.
436.191 Specialized definitions.
436.192 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
resenting the degree of effluent reduc-
tion attainable by the application of the
best practicable control technology cur-
rently available.
Subpart T-Mineral Pigments Subcategory
[Reserved]
Subpart U-Lithium Subcategory [Reserved]
Subpart V-Bentonite Subcategory
436.220 Applicability; description of the
bentonite subcategory.
436.221 Specialized definitions.
436.222 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
resenting the degree of effluent reduc-
tion attainable by the application of the
best practicable control technology cur-
rently available.
Subpart W-Magnesite Subcategory
436.230 Applicability; description of the
magnesite subcategory.
436.231 Specialized definitions.
436.232 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
resenting the degree of effluent reduc-
tion attainable by the application of the
best practicable control technology cur-
rently available.
Subpart X-Diatomite Subcategory
436.240 Applicability; description of the di-
atomite subcategory.
436.241 Specialized definitions.
436.242 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
resenting the degree of effluent reduc-
tion attainable by the application of the
best practicable control technology cur-
rently available.
Subpart Y-Jade Subcategory
436.250 Applicability; description of the
jade subcategory.
436.251 Specialized definitions.
Sec.
436.252 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
resenting the degree of effluent reduc-
tion attainable by the application of the
best practicable control technology cur-
rently available.
Subpart Z-Novaculite Subcategory
436.260 Applicability; description of the
novaculite subcategory.
436.261 Specialized definitions.
436.262 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
resenting the degree of effluent reduc-
tion attainable by the application of the
best practicable control technology cur-
rently available.
Subpart AA -Fire Clay Subcategory
[Reserved]
Subpart AB-Attapulgite and Montmorillonite
Subcategory [Reserved]
Subpart AC-Kyanite Subcategory
[Reserved]
Subpart AD -Shale and Common Clay
Subcategory [Reserved]
Subpart AE-Aplite Subcategory [Reserved]
Subpart AF-Tripoli Subcategory
436.320 Applicability; description of the
tripoli subcategory.
436.321 Specialized definitions.
436.322 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
resenting the degree of effluent reduc-
tion attainable by the application of the
best practicable control technology cur-
rently available.
Subpart AG -Kaolin Subcategory [Reserved]
Subpart AH-Ball Clay Subcategory
[Reserved]
Subpart Al -Feldspar Subcategory
[Reserved]
Subpart AJ-Talc, Steatite, Soapstone and
Pyrophyllite Subcategory [Reserved]
Subpart AK -Garnet Subcategory [Reserved]
Subpart AL -Graphite Subcategory
436.380 Applicability; description of the
graphite subcategory.
436.381 Specialized definitions.
436.382 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
resenting the degree of effluent reduc-
tion attainable by the application of the
best practicable control technology cur-
rently available.
AUTHORITY: Secs. 301, 304 (b) and (c)
eral Water Pollution Control Act, awai
ed (33 U.S.C. 1251, 1311, 1314 (b) and (
Stat. 816 et seq., Pub. L. 92-500) (the Ai
Souses: 40 FR 48657, Oct. 16, 1975, i
otherwise noted.
Subpart A -Dimension Stone
Subcategory -[Reserved]
Subpart B-Crushed Stone
Subcategory
SOURCE: 42 FR 35849, July 12, 1977,
otherwise noted.
§ 436.20 Applicability; description a
crushed stone subcategory.
The provisions of this subpar
applicable to the mining or quar
and the processing of crushed
broken stone and riprap. This sul
includes all types of rock and' s
Rock and stone that is crush(
broken prior to the extraction
mineral are elsewhere covered.
processing of calcite, however, in
junction with the processini
crushed and broken limestone or
mite is included in this subpart.
§ 436.21 Specialized definitions.
For the purpose of this subpart:
(a) Except as provided below
general definitions, abbreviation:
methods of analysis set forth in
401 of this chapter shall apply t(
subpart.
(b) The term "mine dewate
shall mean any water that is imp(
ed or that collects in the mine a
pumped, drained or otherwise ren
from the mine through the effoi
the mine operator. However, if a
is also used for treatment of pl
generated waste water, discharg
commingled water from the fac
shall be deemed discharges of pi
generated waste water.
(c) The term "10-year 24-houl
cipitation event" shall mean the :
mum 24-hour precipitation event
a probable reoccurrence intery
once in 10 years. This informati
available in "Weather Bureau Te
cal Paper No. 40," May 1961
"NOAA Atlas 2," 1973 for the 11 '
ern States, and may be obtained
264
265

§ 436.22
the National Climatic Center of the
Environmental Data Service, National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administra-
tion, U.S. Department of Commerce.
(d) The term "mine" shall mean an
area of land, surface or underground,
actively mined for the production of
crushed and broken stone from natu-
ral deposits.
(e) The term "process generated
waste water" shall mean any waste
water used in the slurry transport of
mined material, air emissions control,
or processing exclusive of mining. The
term shall also include any other
water which becomes commingled
with such waste water in a pit, pond,
lagoon, mine, or other facility used for
treatment of such waste water.
§ 436.22 Effluent limitations guidelines
representing the degree of effluent re-
duction attainable by the application of
the best practicable control technology
currently available.
In establishing the limitations set
forth in this section, EPA took into ac-
count all information it was able to
collect, develop and solicit with re-
spect to factors (such as age and size
of plant, raw materials, manufacturing
processes, products produced, treat-
ment technology available, energy re-
quirements and costs) which can
affect the industry subcategorization
and effluent levels established.:It is,
however, possible that data which
would affect these limitations have
not been available and, as 'a result,
these limitations should be adjusted
for certain plants in this industry. An
individual discharger or other interest-
ed person may submit evidence to the
Regional Administrator (or to the
State, if the State has the authority to
issue NPDES permits) that factors re-
lating to the equipment or facilities in-
volved, the process applied, or other
such factors related to such discharger
are fundamentally different from the
factors considered in the establish-
ment of the guidelines. On the basis of
such evidence or other available infor-
mation, the Regional Administrator
(or the State) will make a written find-
ing that such factors are or are not
fundamentally different for that facil-
ity compared to those specified in the
Development Document. If such fun-
40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-87 Edition)
damentally different factors are found
to exist, the Regional Administrator
or the State shall establish for the dis-
charger effluent limitations in the
NPDES permit either more or less
stringent than the limitations estab-
lished herein, to the extent dictated
by such fundamentally different fac-
tors. Such limitations must be ap-
proved by the Administrator of the
Environmental Protection Agency.
The Administrator . may approve or
disapprove such limitations, specify
other limitations, or initiate proceed-
ings to revise these regulations.
(a) Subject to the provisions of para-
graphs (b) and (c) of this section, the
following limitations establish the
quantity or quality of pollutants or
pollutant properties, controlled by this
section, which may be discharged by a
point source subject to the provisions
of this subpart after application of the
best practicable control technology
currently available:
(1) Discharges of process generated
waste water pollutants from facilities
that recycle waste water for use in
processing shall not exceed the follow-
ing limitations:
Effluent characteristic
Effluent limitations
Maximum
for any 1
• day
Average of daily
values for 30
consecutive days
shall not
exceed —
pH
(1)
(')
Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.
(2) Mine dewatering discharges shall
not exceed the following limitations:
Effluent characteristic
Efflue
t limitations
Maximum
for any 1
day
Average of daily
values for 30
consecutive days
shall not
exceed —
PH
(1)
(')
'Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.
(b) Any overflow from facilities gov-
erned by this subpart shall not be sub-
ject to the limitations of paragraph (a)
of this section if the facilities are de-
signed, constructed and maintained to
contain or treat the volume of waste
Environmental Protection Agency
water which would result from a 10-
year 24-hour precipitation event.
(c) In the case of a discharge into re-
ceiving waters for which the pH, if un-
altered by man's activities, is or would
be less than 6.0 and water quality cri-
teria in water quality standards ap-
proved under the Act authorize such
lower pH, the pH limitations for such
discharge may be adjusted downward
to the pH water quality criterion for
the receiving waters. In no case shall a
pH limitation outside the range 5.0 to
9.0 be permitted.
(42 FR 35849. July 12. 1977, as amended at
44 FR 76793, Dec. 28. 1979)
Subpart C—Construction Sand and
Gravel Subcategory
SOURCE: 42 FR 35850, July 12, 1977, unless
otherwise noted.
§ 436.30 Applicability; description of the
construction sand and gravel subcate-
gory.
The provisions of this subpart are
applicable to the mining and the proc-
essing of sand and gravel for construc-
tion or fill uses, except that on -board
processing of dredged sand and gravel
which is subject to the provisions of 33
CFR Part 230 of this chapter will not
be governed by the provisions of this
subpart.
§ 436.31 Specialized definitions.
For the purpose of this subpart:
(a) Except as provided below, the
general definitions, abbreviations and
methods of analysis set forth in Part
401 of this chapter shall apply to this
subpart.
(b) The term "mine dewatering"
shall mean any water that is impound-
ed or that collects in the mine and is
pumped, drained or otherwise removed
from the mine through the efforts of
the mine operator. This term shall
also include wet pit overflows caused
solely by direct rainfall and ground
water seepage. However, if a mine is
also used for treatment of process gen-
erated waste water, discharges of com-
mingled water from the mine shall be
deemed discharges of process generat-
ed waste water.
§ 436.32
(c) The term "10-year 24-hour pre-
cipitation event" shall mean the maxi-
mum 24 hour precipitation event with
a probable reoccurrence interval of
once in 10 years. This information is
available in "Weather Bureau Techni-
cal Paper No. 40," May 1961 and
"NOAA Atlas 2," 1973 for the 11 West-
ern States, and may be obtained from
the National Climatic Center of the
Environmental Data Service, National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administra-
tion, U.S. Department of Commerce.
(d) The term "mine" shall mean an
area of land, surface or underground,
actively mined for the production of
sand and gravel from natural deposits.
(e) The term "process generates
waste water" shall mean any west(
water used in the slurry transport of
mined material, air emissions control
or processing exclusive of mining. Th(
term shall also include any other
water which becomes comminglec
with such waste water in a pit, pond
lagoon, mine or other facility used fol
treatment of such waste water. Thf
term does not include waste water
used for the suction dredging of depos
its in a body of water and returned • di
rectly to the body of waste withou
being used for other purposes or com
bined with other waste water. ;.f -E
§ 436.32 Effluent limitations guideline
representing the degree of effluent Ire
duction attainable by the application o
the best practicable control technolog
currently available. 7.
In establishing the limitations _se
forth in this section, EPA took into ac
count all information it was able.. t.
collect, develop and solicit with r(
spect to factors (such as age and siz
of plant, raw materials, manufacturin
processes, products produced, treat
ment technology available, energy r(
quirements and costs) which ca
affect the industry subcategorizatio
and effluent levels established. It it
however, possible that data whic
would affect these limitations hav
not been available and, as a resul
these limitations should be adjuste
for certain plants in this industry. A
individual discharger or other interes
ed person may submit evidence to tY
Regional Administrator (or to tY
267
266

§ 436.70
by such fundamentally different fac-
tors. Such limitations must be ap-
proved by the Administrator of the
Environmental Protection Agency.
The Administrator may approve or
disapprove such limitations, specify
other limitations, or initiate proceed-
ings to revise these regulations. The
following limitations establish the
quantity or quality of pollutants or
pollutant properties, controlled by this
section, which may be discharged by a
point source subject to the provisions
of this subpart after application of the
best practicable control technology
currently available:
(a) Subject to the provisions of the
following paragraphs of this section,
there shall be no discharge of process
generated waste water pollutants into
navigable waters.
(b) Only that volume of water re-
sulting from precipitation that ex-
ceeds the maximum safe surge capac-
ity of a process waste water impound-
ment may be discharged from that im-
poundment. The height difference be-
tween the maximum safe surge capac-
ity level and the normal operating
level must be greater than the inches
of rain representing the 10-year, 24-
hour rainfall event as established by
the National Climatic Center, National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administra-
tion for the locality in which such im-
poundment is located.
Subpart G—Asbestos and
Wollastonite Subcategory
§ 436.70 Applicability; description of the
asbestos and wollastonite subcategory.
The provisions of this supbart are
applicable to the processing of asbes-
tos and wollastonite.
§ 436.71 Specialized definitions.
For the purpose of this subpart:
(a) Except as provided below, the
general definitions, abbreviations and
methods of analysis set forth in Part
401 of this chapter shall apply to this
subpart.
40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-87 Edition)
§ 436.72 Effluent limitations guidelines
representing the degree of effluent re-
duction attainable by the application of
the best practicable control technology
currently available.
In establishing the limitations set
forth in this section, EPA took into ac-
count all information it was able to
collect, develop and solicit with re-
spect to factors (such as age and size
of plant, raw materials, manufacturing
processes, products produced, treat-
ment technology available, energy re-
quirements and costs) which can
affect the industry subcategorization
and effluent levels established. It is,
however, possible that data which
would affect these limitations have
not been available and, as a result,
these limitations should be adjusted
for certain plants in this industry. An
individual discharger or other interest-
ed person may submit evidence to the
Regional Administrator (or to the
State, if the State has the authority to
issue NPDES permits) that factors re-
lating to the equipment or facilities in-
volved, the process applied, or other
such factors related to such discharger
are fundamentally different from the
factors considered in the establish-
ment of the guidelines. On the basis of
such evidence or other available infor-
mation, the Regional Administrator
(or the State) will make a written find-
ing that such factors are or are not
fundamentally different for that facil-
ity compared to those specified in the
Development Document. If such fun-
damentally different factors are found
to exist, the Regional Administrator
or the State shall establish for the dis-
charger effluent limitations in the
NPDES permit either more or less
stringent than the limitations estab-
lished herein, to the extent dictated
by such fundamentally different fac-
tors. Such limitations must be ap-
proved by the Administrator of the
Environmental Protection Agency.
The Administrator may approve or
disapprove such limitations, specify
other limitations, or initiate proceed-
ings to revise these regulations. The
following limitations establish the
quantity of or quality of pollutants or
pollutant properties, controlled by this
section, which may be discharged by a
Environmental Protection Agency
point source subject to the provisions
of this subpart after application of the
best practicable control technology
currently available:
(a) Subject to the provisions of the
following paragraphs of this section,
there shall be no discharge of process
generated waste water pollutants into
navigable waters.
(b) Only that volume of water re-
sulting from precipitation that ex-
ceeds the maximum safe surge capac-
ity of a process waste water impound-
ment may be discharged from that im-
poundment. The height difference be-
tween the maximum safe surge capac-
ity level and the normal operating
level must be greater than the inches
of rain representing the 10-year, 24-
hour rainfall event as established by
the National Climatic Center, National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administra-
tion for the locality in which such im-
poundment is located.
Subpart H—Lightweight Aggregates
Subcategory [Reserved]
Subpart 1—Mica and Sericite
Subcategory [Reserved]
Subpart J—Barite Subcategory
§ 436.100 Applicability; description of the
barite subcategory.
The provisions of this subpart are
applicable to the processing of barite.
§ 436.101 Specialized definitions.
For the purpose of this subpart:
(a) Except as provided below, the
general definitions, abbreviations and
methods of analysis set forth in Part
401 of this chapter shall apply to this
subpart.
§ 436.102 Effluent limitations guidelines
representing the degree of effluent re-
duction attainable by the application of
the best practicable control technology
currently available.
(a) In establishing the limitations
set forth in this section, EPA took into
account all information it was able to
collect, develop and solicit with re-
spect to factors (such as age and size
of plant, raw materials, manufacturing
[processes, products produced, treat-
§'436.102.
ment technology available, energy re-
quirements and costs) which can
affect the industry subcategorization
and effluent levels established. It is,
however, possible that data which
would affect these limitations have
not been available and, as a result,
these limitations should be adjusted
for certain plants in this industry. An
individual discharger or other interest-
ed person may submit evidence to the
Regional Administrator (or to the
State, if the State has the authority to
issue NPDES permits) that factors re-
lating to the equipment or facilities in-
volved, the process applied, or other
such factors related to such discharger
are fundamentally different from the
factors considered in the establish-
ment of the guidelines. On the basis of
such evidence or other available infor-
mation, the Regional Administrator
(or the State) will make a written find-
ing that such factors are or are not
fundamentally different for that facil-
ity compared to those specified in the
Development Document. If such fun-
damentally different factors are found
to exist, the Regional Administrator
or the State shall establish for the dis-
charger effluent limitations in the
NPDES permit either more or less
stringent than the limitations estab-
lished herein, to the extent dictated
by such fundamentally different fac-
tors. Such limitations must be ap-
proved by the Administrator of the
Environmental Protection Agency.
The Administrator may approve or
disapprove such limitations, specify
other limitations, or initiate proceed-
ings to revise these regulations.
(b) The following limitations estab-
lish the quantity or quality of pollut-
ants or pollutant properties, con-
trolled by this section, which may be
discharged by a point source subject to
the provisions of this subpart after ap-
plication of the best practicable con-
trol technology currently available:
For operations not employing wet
processes or flotation processes there
shall be no discharge of process gener-
ated waste water pollutants into navi-
gable waters.
272
273

MEMO
DATE -
TO: 8e� :)-0-/4/t)567U SUBJECT: (24'041;+%t-
001---oda Gd se,,i .d.acc, ` -70iu-gce4,1,L
5Th.t 7 .a--v/-e, ria, '-et3&, , 6,
1,,,,,,„ ,,„ 74, , 5,?4,., .1/ v7-(te_ ow:, , cia.,,e,;(7
,n_c.. w„),_
vi„, ,..4„e
st, °Itli,,,5L-
Oe-'6'
io,p,n;Al k
:4 „,"„e,„__
Ai7 a.t.e
Ca0 71A-C, t ce Ca4,t
From
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health, and Natural Resources

• 'j VELOP.VE\ T
LAB NO.
REPORTED BY
CHECKED BY
REVIEWED BY
SUPERVISOR
OW3523
DATE
SAMPLE TYPE: WAT.ER
STORET NO.
COMPOUND
VOLATILE ANALYTICAL REPORT S AP 2 0 1990
AIiVI-N OF v:
I4t,%CNEc,�I!LE[IEEl;3 •! :::.,'.6E�It1rI
KAL OFFICE
ENTERED BY t JQ
CHECKED BY
ANALYSIS RESULTS
NO VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS DETECTED BY GC/ELCD.
81552 ACETONE
81595 METHYL ETHYL KETONE
DETECTED BYGC/PID..
.c(442,
CONCENTRATION
45 UG/L
12 UM

LAB NO.
REPORTED BY
CHECKED BY
REVIEWED BY
SUPERVISOR
0W3523
Lop
DATE
SAMPLE TYPE: WATER
STORET NO.
COMPOUND
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC REPORT
ANALYSIS RESULTS
ENTERED BY -ha,
CHECKED BY
NO BASE/NEUTRAL OR ACID EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DETECTED
BY GC/MS.
CONCENTRATION

c •
LAB NO.
REPORTED BY
CHECKED BY
REVIEWED BY
SUPERVISOR
0W3889
fro
I�ln"
'43eK
SAMPLE TYPE: WATER
STORET NO.
32106
81552
81595
34010
81551
VOLATILE ANALYTICAL REPORT
DATE ����g1/2e--_
ENTERED BY ha -
CHECKED BY
ANALYSIS RESULTS
COMPOUND CONCENTRATION
CHLOROFORM
ONE UNIDENTIFIED PEAK DETECTED BY GC/ELCD
ACETONE
METHYL ETHYL. KETONE
TOLUENE
M,P—XYLENES
TWO UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED BY GC/PI D
E — ESTIMATED CONCENTRATION; ANALYZED BEYOND EXPIRATION DATE
0.26 UG/L
160.UG L..::.
180 .UG/L. E:
2.3 UG/L
0.96 LIG/L
SCI..VNeRk(2 &LCL\X )0C)0‘' ' V!k
r". ' ;
• . ? N •7
• t
I^ �`7•

LAB NO.
REPORTED BY
CHECKED BY
REVIEWED BY
SUPERVISOR
OW3889
222_2_
SAMPLE TYPE: WATER
STORET NO.
COMPOUND
DATE
SEMIYOLATILE ORGANIC REPORT
ANALYSIS RESULTS
ENTERED BY
CHECKED BY _. '
t
THE FOLLOWING COMPOUNDS WERE IDENTIFIED BY GC/MS
TARGET COMPOUND ANALYSIS.
PHENOL
ISOPHORONE
A TENTATIVE IDENTIFICATION WAS ATTEMPTED ON TWO(2)
SIGNIFICANT PEAKS DETECTED 8Y GC/MS. CONCENTRATIONS
WERE ESTIMATED AS RATIOS TO KNOWN INTERNAL STANDARDS.
BENZALDEHYDE
3 ME)7 YL PHENOL
CONCENTRATION.
UG/L

C
LAB NO.
REPORTED BY
CHECKED BY
REVIEWED BY
SUPERYISOR
OW4875
DATE
SAMPLE TYPE: WATER
STORET NO.
COMPOUND
0015,`'
VOLATILE ANALYTICAL REPORT
,� riNc� OI�MQQo�(Si1�
ANALYSIS RESULTS
ENTERED BY I)a
CHECKED BY
NO VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS DETECTED BY GC/ELCD.
81552 ACETONE
81595 METHYL ETHYL KETONE
34030 BENZENE
DETECTED BY GC/PI D.
CONCENTRATION
61 UG/L
17 UG/L
0.86 UG/L
. a. cka

v. bl:i . •cir NA i'cthy'L
AND
LAB NO. OW4875
REPORTED BY 4212_
CHECKED BY
REVIEWED BY ! PP
SUPERVISOR 12f
SAMPLE TYPE: WATER
SEMIYOLATILE ORGANIC REPORT
ANALYSIS RESULTS
1990
DI7 ISI::N E :,:._: ': ;` t .i. r.ANAGEMENT
MOO ES:I_LE REGIONAL OFFICE
ENTERED BY
CHECKED BY
STORET NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION
UG/L
THE FOLLOWING COMPOUNDS WERE IDENTIFIED BY GC/MS
TARGET COMPOUND ANALYSIS FOR EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS.
PHENOL 33
J
2—METHYLPHENOL 10*
4—METHYLPHENOL 24
*ESTIMATED
A TENTATIVE IDENTIFICATION WAS ATTEMPTED FOR ONE (1)
SIGNIFICANT PEAK DETECTED BY GC/MS. CONCENTRATION WAS
ESTIMATED AS A RATIO TO A KNOWN INTERNAL STANDARD.
UNIDENTIFIED 7

•
OcN. Gea�
Name C.,o�-c`..cNo.. S oOce...
Permit Number NCOO 'ci`1oG�.
County SNco_�
Sample Location , ; 4‘, Q. 0.0 C>isob
BOD5 mg/1
Phenols ug/1
COO;Hioh mq/1
Sulfate mg/1
CollJ Dr mg/1
Sulfide . ... ....
Coliform:Fecal /100m1
__M/1
Biomass:Dry Wt. g/m2
C ]j, folm ;Total / 100m1
Biomass : Peri Ash Free g/ml
Co1;Tube Fecal 100m1
NH3 mg/1
Col:Tube Total 110ml
TKN mg/1
Residue:Total mg/1
NO2 +NO3 mg/1
Volatile mg/1
P°4 mg/1-
Fixed mg/1
P:Total mg/1
Residue:Suspended mq/1
P:Dissolved mg/1
Volatile m./1
A. -Silver 4 i ug/1
Fixed mg/1
Al -Aluminum ` 9 Q O ug/1
off —7. �'�j units
Be -Beryllium 4, D ug/1
Acidity to pH 4.5 mg/1
Ca -Calcium S6.... mg/1
Acidity -to. pH 8.3 mg/1
Cd-Cadmium -. - 'Lag). Ug/1
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 img/l. •
.Co -Cobalt. .4 50...ug/1 "
Alkalinit 'to • 4.5 ms/1
Chromium:Total 0 A ug/1
TOC •mg/1
Cu-Copper exi ug/1
Turbidity NTU
Fe -Iron a0 0 ugll
lolide mg/1
Hq-Mercury, ug/1
Ars,enic;Total 7,2A uq/1
Li -Lithium Mu ug/1
Chl a; T]ri uq/1
Mg -Magnesium 5.\ mg/1
Ch1 a:Corr uq/1
Mn--Manqanese k 0,0 ug/1
pheoohvtln uq/1 '
Na-Sodium \Lk mg/1
Color:True Pt -Co
Ni-Nickel \) ug/1
Chromium;Hex uq/1
Pb-Lead ug/1
Cyanide mg/1
Sb-Antimony ug/1
Fluoride mg/1
Se -Selenium 44 ug/1
Formaldehyde mg/1
Zn-Zinc ' `(O ug/1
Oil & Grease mq/1
MBAS mg/1
Hardness:Total mq/1

N me s Permit Number NCO() ''1
t\\•k
fSamp1en0ece, `1• Vk- °O Co
B005• mq/1
q
w
Phenols ug/1
COD:High mq/1
Sulfate mg/1
_CDD: Lnw mu/1
Sulfide /1
CQliform:Fecal /lOOml
_
Biomass:Dr Wt. g/mom
CnliformlTota1 /100m1
Biomass:Peri Ash Free g/m
Col:Tube Fecal /100ml
NH3 mg/1
Col :Tube Total / l poml
TKN mg/1
Residue:Total mg/1
NO2+NO3 mg/1
Volatile mq/1
PO4 mg/1
Fixed mg/1
P:Total mg/1
Residue:Suspended l k mq/1
P:Oissolved mg/1
Volatile mg/1
Ag-Silver .&5 O ug/1
Fixed mq/1
Al-Aluminum%IOC)u /1,
g
.HRH
-1 CW, units
Be -Beryllium .4 k(). ug/1
Acidity to pH 4.5 mg/1
Ca --Calcium s5. mg/1
Acidity to pH 8.3 •mq/1
Cd-Cadmium _ (,.S : - Ug/1
Alkalinity to. pH 8.3 mg/1
_
Co -Cobalt ,: Q ug/1'
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 mq/1
Chromium:Total 415 ug/1
TOC mq/1
Cu-Copper '5\ ug/1
Turb f silty NTU
Fe -Iron $ ' . I (): ug/1
Ch�lor, d - mg/1
Hg-Mercury ug/1
Arsenic:Total I\ uq/1
Li -Lithium kQ O ug/1
61 a:Trl uq/1
Mg -Magnesium 5A?) mg/1
Cbi a Corr uq/1
Mn--Manganese c ug/1
a Phegphvtin uq/1
Na-Sodium ,O� mg/1
Pt -Co
Ni-Nickel ug/1
Chromium:HexPb
:• ug/1
cyanide mq/1
Sb-Antimony ug/1
Fl«nride mq/1
Se -Selenium ` \ ug/1
.. ormaldehvde mq/1
Zn-Zinc '30 ug/1
.....Oil & Grease mq/1
HBAS mg/1
Hardness:Total mq/1
•

i .
DIVIgION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COUNTY
RIVER BASIN \'+ � . •
REPORT TO: ARO FRO MRO O RRO WaRO W1RO'W 9. S
AT BM
tipf_ �l
Other
•
Shipped by: But; Courier, Staff, Other
COLLECTOR(S): -•
jrY
Estimated BOD Range: 0-5/5-25/25-65/40-130 or 100 plus
Yes ❑ No Chlorinated: Yes ❑ •Lip ❑
r
Seed:
WATP' UALITY FIELD -LAB FORM }(DM1)
SAMPLE TYPE
❑ STREAM
❑ LAKE
❑ ESTUARY
yNMEN
COMPLIANC4I, HAIN
zz ft46 ISTODY
R621sICW,90
41doir
STATIOI 1 gATION:
REMARKS:
1
❑X • EFFLUENT
❑ INFLUENT
!.•-•
•
.1- For Lab Use ONLY
Lab Number:
Date Received: T
e') -!
0 Time:/c j '
Rec'd by:WA kii From: Bus
: and
DATA ENTRY BY: 1 �A ' '' CK:
IDel.
j , }
DATE REPORTED:
q • )' .
<,
U
Station #
Date Begin (yy/mm/dd)
Time Begin
Dpte End
Time End
Depth DM DB DBM
Value Type
Composite
Sample T pe .:; :: _; j;L^
V-....:.. L .
`.
C- \
'.:
:
•- • �' �• }� r
I ? `_.1
t
t
A H
L
T S
B
C. GNXX' !�'
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
GODS 310
COD High 340
COD Low 335
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616
Coliform: MF Total 31504
mg/I
mg/I
mg/I
/I00m1
/100m1
Coliform: Tube Fecal 31615
Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673
Residue: Total 500
Volatile 505
Fixed 510
Residue: Suspended 530
Volatile 535
Fixed 540
pH 403
Acidity to pH 4.5 436
Acidity to pH 8.3 435
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410
/100m1
/100m1.
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/l
mg/I
mg/1
units
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
TOC 680
Turbidity 76
mg/I
NTU
Chloride 940
mg/1
Chl a: Tri 32217
ug/1
Chl a: Corr 32209
ug/1
Pheophytin a 32213
ug/1
Color: True 80
Pt -Co
Color:(pH ) 83
ADMI
Color: pH 7.6 82
ADMI
:`
Cyanide 720 G %1
lag/1
Fluoride 951
.--.Ing/1
Formaldehyde 71880
mg/1
Grease and Oils 556
mg/1
Hardness Total 900
mg/I
Specific Cond. 95
uMhos/cm2
MBAS 38260
mg/I
Phenols 32730 7
ug/I
Sulfate 94S
mg/I
Sulfide 745
mg/1
NH3 as N 610
mg/I
TKN as N 625
mg/I
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630
mg/1
P: Total as P 665
mg/1
PO4 as P 70507
mg/1
P: Dissolved as P 666
mg/I
Cd-Cadmium 1027
ug/l
Cr-Chrondum:Total 1034
ug/I
Cu-Copper 1042
ug/I
Ni-Nickel 1067
ug/1
Pb-Lead 1051
ug/1
Zn-Zinc 1092
ug/1
Ag-Silver 1077
ug/1
Al Aluminum 1105
ug/1
Be -Beryllium 1012
ug/I
Ca -Calcium 916
mg/1
Co -Cobalt 1037
ug/1
Fe -Iron 1045
ug/I
Li -Lithium 1132 . "•, ... . • ug/I
Mg -Magnesium 927 : r' *" '- mg/1
Mn-Manganese 105.5 i;.;y.' ug/1
Na-Sodium 929 . ..'y ^'� '� ;rE =; mg/L
Arsenic:Total 1002 , , i...:1 .1110/1
Se -Selenium 1147 r' _; ' '+ ug/1
Hg-Mercury'71900" . % ' `,` ug/I
Organochlorine Pesticides' '
Organophosphonzs Pesticides .
Acid Herbicides • 0 ,
•
Base/ Neutral Extractable.Organics .' :;
Acid Extractable Organics •:'
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)..
Phytoplankton , • •
Sampling Point %
Conductance at 25 C
Water Temperature (C)
D.O. mg/1
pH
Alkalinity
pH 8.3 pH. 4.5
Acidity
pH 4.5 pH 8.3
Air Temperature (C)
2
94
10
300 1•
400 I•
82244
431
82243 182242
20
Salinity %
Precipition an/day)
Cloud Cover %
Wind Direction (Deg)
Stream Flow Severity
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity M/H
can Stream Depth ft.
Stream Width ft.
480
45
32
36
1351
1350
35
64
4 ' • ; •,......• ' ':1'
DM1/Revised 10/86
.••• ••Y.'�....i ». ...n. �t.aY:A ir-[ ,.,�:s::, r...•c`ji:�'�i�.i.�l�...��i.'.iw.J. �. �_.- 'i�.r..'IfkhlS.i�

Post -It'"" brand fax transmittal memo
7671 # of pages ► /
To 4 \e A/ke����//-
Fro pLe-IslO � i Lj!?SO.']
Co.
[fit / - 5W'o/t
Co.
LdGc.TC2 QUalc
Dept. ff
7
Phone #SQ 3
733-
Fax#
l resvfAL R.o.
Fax#
.The News and Observer. Raleigh, N.C., Friday, Nov. 23, 1990
Stanly plant burns hazardous wastes
again after receiving state report
The Associated Press
AQUADALE — Carolina Solite
Corp. has resumed burning haz-
ardous waste at a Stanly County
industrial plant, three months
after switching to coal to quiet
residents' health concerns.
Company President John W.
Roberts said a new state environ-
mental report showed that the
burning does not threaten the
environment.
"When the report was so posi-
tive, there's no reason whatsoever
for us not to be burning fuel," Mr.
Roberts said Wednesday.
Officials questioned the timing,
on Thanksgiving eve. when no
air -quality or hazardous -waste
regulators were available to su-
pervise the startup.
"I can't believe it," said George
T. Everett, director of the state
Division of Environmental Man-
agement. "I'm not so much sur-
prised that they resumed as that
we didn't have any advance warn-
ing or inkling that it was coming."
Carolina Solite had been North
Carolina's largest burner of haz-
ardous waste until the Richmond,
Va.-based company announced
Aug. 15 that it would end the
seven-year practice.
Carolina Solite burned more
than 67 million pounds of hazard-
ous waste last year and has
applied for a state air -quality
permit that would double that
amount.
One critic in Aquadale said she
thinks the report. indicates danger
from the burning.
"It seems like they're able to do
what they want to do," added
Joann Almond, who is leading a
local campaign against the burn-
ing of hazardous wastes.
Waste burning linked
to saving EPA permit
AQUADALE — A state official
has offered another explanation
for why Carolina Solite Corp.
resumed burning hazardous
waste at its Stanly County indus-
trial plant.
Steve Reid, spokesman for the
state Department of Environ-
ment, Health and Natural Re-
sources, said the plant's EPA
permit was at stake. The Environ-
mental Protection Agency had
already extended Solite's permit
' for burning hazardous waste until
..the first Saturday in December,
lie said.
Failure to resume by that date
.would have enabled the agency to
rtvoke the permit to ensure that
stay inspectors would be on hand
for a;tart-up beyond the deadline,
Mr. Reid said.
/1/27/gv
ivestigator inspecting
arolina Solite Corp.
AQUADALE — A federal inves-
;ator has begun a weeklong
;pection of Carolina Solite
rp., North Carolina's largest
rner of hazardous waste, while
rte officials consider stepping
reviews of the Stanly County
mt.
- The action comes just five days
:.after the company announced its
-~return to burning hazardous
;.waste as the primary fuel for four
'kilns that it uses to produce
lightweight aggregate, a con-
: -crete-like construction material
derived from shale.

ME
*./
r ,
TO: SUBJECT:
z v`lEc,
sol 5/z
7,0
SLCI
Ice`;f
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health, and Natural Resources

SOLID AND
LIQUID wASTEs
6/1/90
0023-90.ANC
UQUIDS/SOLIDS
WASTE ANALYSIS
AND STORAGE
SOLVENTS
RECYCLABLE
METAL
CONTAINERS
ThermalKEM North Carolina
CLEAN
FLUE
GAS
INCINERATOR
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROLS
STEAM
CLEAN
EFFLUENT
LEACHATE
COLLECTION
WASTE WATER]
TREATMENT
SOLIDS
SOLVENT
RECYCLING
RECYCLABLE
SOLVENTS
STEAM
COGENERATION
FACILITY
SOLID WASTE
STABIUZATI ON
Figure B-1. Simple overview of the North Carolina waste
recycling and management operations.
LANDFILL
1
B - 5 Rev.0

/
r;riff,; _
EXPLA'VAT /OI J � 2000
EXISTING A/PDES APPROX. SCALE, FT.
DI5C MARGE POINT
D/SC REGE PD/AJTNA L IVPDES
RET L25.6.5. FLDOD P,PONE N1MP, AOUADALE,
N.C. AAJD DA,LE.DEO, N.C., DATED
1R7/.
LAW ENGINEERING
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
GEA/ EeML LOCAT/DN
CAROL /A/A SOLJTE CO, ePDEA77DN
A&UMDAL, A/02.TN C/ OL/NA

✓•a�.olj
• 566 1 6T0000 FEET 567
438
CAeor rivA Soc T Coep
•NCooZOI
C717"/E/6/BA1w
•I v1—'vut-A1-1-11C)
568 80.15'
•
< / -0ii , Jam' f /'-
/,-»L. \ ."\ 1
j \
/ ./ ,, i Sec, /ehefn P
.J/' O � 3 �(� rr 1 _ rl 1 f/ .
U • _
l
A <46 -V500
gl
0•{�r Li/ �y •1 • 5� flJ1/�. h, I I 'rijI,/
�t � � - �'i fJI7::::,:. 1,"7,:i:i. ,
UEOLOGICAL SURVEY
.rr1 E. 570
—T21
•
11
1.` /� shy
rr
•1
!/
i o
- : f •
11/155U.i , T #s
•