20210877 Ver 1_More Info Received_20220705

Strickland, Bev
From: Michael Brame <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2022 7:55 AM
To: [e-mail]; Scott Wallace
Cc: Homewood, Sue
Subject: [External] RE: Request for Additional Information: SAW-2022-01175; Northborough /
High Point / Guilford County
Attachments: ESA Photo Page Template.pdf; DP-1A.pdf; DP-2A.pdf; DP-3A.pdf;
GRIDMODELSPACEBLOCKdwg_1_1_6334_REV_12-16-21 24x36 - 60 SCALE_SS Crossing
Exhibit_07-01-22.pdf; GRIDMODELSPACEBLOCKdwg_1_1_6334_REV_06-23-21_1_2_
6827 Overall NorthBorough Development Plan_06-27-22.pdf;
GRIDMODELSPACEBLOCKdwg_1_1_6334_REV_12-16-21 24x36 - 60 SCALE_PP-1 &
PP-2_06-27-22.pdf
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Report Spam.
Thank -you David. Please see responses in red below and referenced attachments.
Sincerely,
Michael T. Brame
336.708-4620 (c)
336.310.4527 (o)
PO Box 128
Kernersville, NC 27285
www.pilotenviro.com
[e-mail]
PILOT E N V I R O N M E N T A L, I N C
From: Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2022 10:11 AM
To: Michael Brame <[e-mail]>; Scott Wallace <[e-mail]>
Cc: Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>
Subject: Request for Additional Information: SAW-2022-01175; Northborough / High Point / Guilford County
All,
Thank you for your PCN, dated 5/20/2022, for the above referenced project. I have reviewed the information and need
clarification before proceeding with verifying the use of Nationwide Permit (NWP) 29 (https://saw-
reg.usace.army.mil/NWP2021/NWP29.pdf). Please submit the requested information below (via e-mail is fine) within 30
days of receipt of this Notification, otherwise we may deny verification of the use of the Nationwide Permit or consider
your application withdrawn and close the file:
1) NWP 29 Regional Condition C.b states that discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the U.S., including
wetlands, within the floodway or mapped FEMA 100-year floodplain resulting in permanent above -grade fills are

not authorized by this NWP. As such, NWP 29 cannot be used to authorize the proposed discharge of fill material
in Stream SA. NWP 14 (https://saw-reg.usace.army.mil/NWP2021/NWP-14.pdf) has no such restriction; please
notify us if you would like the proposed project to be evaluated for use of NWP 14; Please evaluate the
proposed project under a NWP 14.
2) Thank you for your delineation map and supporting information. To further support your delineation, please
provide data forms and pictures from the following locations:
a. Just west of the proposed crossing, at lat/lon: 36.076503, -80.022251;
b. An area on the west side of Stream SA, near the edge of the FEMA floodplain, at lat/lon: 36.078148, -
80.022540;
c. An area in the southwestern corner of the property, just east of West Fork Deep River, at lat/lon:
36.074511, -80.024109.
If any changes to your delineation are warranted, please prove the updated delineation map; Pilot returned to
the site on June 29, 2022. The additional Data Forms and Photos from the specified lat/lon are attached. There
are no changes to the delineation.
3) Plan Sheets C-3A, C-3B, and "Preliminary Sketch Plan" (no Sheet number included) contain inconsistencies and
do not show the entirety of the overall Northborough development. Please provide a cohesive plan sheet
showing the entirety of the overall Northborough development to enable our review of this development for
indirect and secondary impacts, including the following:
a. All portions of the proposed development, including the southwestern quadrant of the development;
Attached
b. Grading limits, roads, lots, utilities, and the wetland/stream delineation (including any changes made
per item 2 above); Attached
c. Correct inconsistencies shown on the current plan sheets, such as stormwater facilities shown on the
"Preliminary Sketch Plan" but not on plan sheet C-3A, etc. Attached
4) The PCN proposes a sewer line crossing involving the temporary discharge of fill material into 0.012 acre (30
linear feet) of stream channel. However, this crossing does not appear on the plan sheets provided. Please
provide a plan sheet clearly shown the location, plan and profile views, and dewatering strategy for this
crossing. Provide also the revegetation plan (live stakes and/or appropriate riparian seed mix specifications) to
stabilize the stream banks upon completion of sewer installation. Attached
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Dave Bailey
David E. Bailey, PWS
Regulatory Project Manager
US Army Corps of Engineers
CE-SAW-RG-R
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Mobile: [phone]
Office: [phone], Ext. 30.
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated Customer Service Survey is
located at: https://regulatory.ops.usace.army.mil/customer-service-survey/
Thank you for taking the time to visit this site and complete the survey.
2

From: RaleighNCREG <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2022 1:51 PM
To: Michael Brame <[e-mail]>
Cc: Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Subject: SAW-2022-01175 (205 Model Farm Road / High Point NC / Guilford County)
Good Afternoon,
Your Pre -construction Notification (PCN) NWP with JD request has been received, assigned action ID SAW-2022-01175.
Please refer to the action ID in all correspondence.
Dave- docs forwarded in your folder
Thank you,
Josephine Schaffer
From: Michael Brame <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2022 3:14 PM
To: RaleighNCREG <[e-mail]>
Cc: Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>; Homewood, Sue
<[e-mail]>; Heather LaGamba <[e-mail]>
Subject: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Pilot Project 6139.2 - Northborough Subdivision - PCN Application with
JD request
The application is also being uploaded to the NCDEQ-DWR portal. Please let me know if you need additional
information.
Sincerely,
Michael T. Brame
336.708-4620 (c)
336.310.4527 (o)
PO Box 128
Kernersville, NC 27285
www.pilotenviro.com
[e-mail]
PILE1TPILQT M ENTAL I NC
3

71 4
k MI,
1- 644
Or

yxi4,
jr
tie t. a r •i
Al7
a \' ,
op-
_ � e
r - ',
P)i
4 �i

ham'" J `
f. mod'
■
r _ ■
►;-
r•

.• a=�-=.' C�'
�i.�
� �•' - r
��x. — � •-
•'
-
Syr _
�,i
,y+j
' �' xr
`ems �y�: �`•.r � •y `� � -- - _ _

SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
Photograph 9 - View of soil at DP-3A.

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET— Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: 6139.2/Northborough Road City/County: Colfax/Guilford Sampling Date: 6.29.22
Applicant/Owner: Keystone State: NC Sampling Point: DP-1A
Investigator(s): Pilot Section, Township, Range: NA
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Flat Slope (%): 0-1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 36.076503 Long:-80.022251 Datum: wgs 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Dan River Loam (DaA) NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP-1A
Absolute
Uominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liquidambar styraciflua
20
Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 57.1 % (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
20
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
10
20% of total cover:
4
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1.
Liquidambar styraciflua
20
Yes
FAC
FAC species 75 x 3 = 225
2.
Prunus serotina
10
Yes
FACU
FACU species 35 x 4 = 140
3.
Juglans nigra
10
Yes
FACU
UPL species 5 x 5 = 25
4.
Column Totals: 115 (A) 390 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.39
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is !-3.0'
40
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20
20% of total cover:
8
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Rubus betulifolius
10
Yes
FACU
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
Eulalia viminea
20
Yes
FAC
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Artemisia vulgaris 5 No UPL
4.
Solidago canadensis
5
No
FACU
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
Viola sororia
5
No
FAC
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6.
Dichanthelium pedicellatum
5
No
FAC
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
50
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
25
20% of total cover:
10
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
Vitis rotundifolia
5
Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
5
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
3
20% of total cover:
1
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP-1A
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type LoC2 Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 4/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
4-18 7.5YR 4/6 100 Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soi
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET— Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: 6139.2/Northborough Road City/County: Colfax/Guilford Sampling Date: 6.29.22
Applicant/Owner: Keystone State: NC Sampling Point: DP-2A
Investigator(s): Pilot Section, Township, Range: NA
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Flood Plain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Flat Slope (%): 0-1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 36.078148 Long:-80.022540 Datum: wgs 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Dan River loam (DaA) NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP-2A
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1. Cornus amomum
2. Prunus serotina
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover: 30
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1. Boehmeria cylindrica
2. Toxicodendron radicans
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 5
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Smilax rotundifolia
2.
3.
4.
5.
Absolute Uominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
50 Yes FACW
10 No FACU
60 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 12
5 Yes FACW
5 Yes FAC
10 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 2
5 Yes FAC
5 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 3 20% of total cover: 1
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 55 x 2 = 110
FAC species 10 x 3 = 30
FACU species 10 x 4 = 40
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 75 (A) 180 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.40
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
-3 - Prevalence Index is !-3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP-2A
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type LoC2 Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 4/3 100 Loamy/Clayey
3-18 10YR 4/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soi
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET— Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: 6139.2/Northborough Road City/County: Colfax/Guilford Sampling Date: 6.29.22
Applicant/Owner: Keystone State: NC Sampling Point: DP-3A
Investigator(s): Pilot Section, Township, Range: NA
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Flood Plain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Flat Slope (%): 0-1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 36.074511 Long:-80.024109 Datum: wgs 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Dan River loam (DaA) NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP-3A
Absolute
Uominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liriodendron tulipifera
30
Yes
FACU
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 33.3% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
30
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
15
20%
of total cover:
6
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1.
Elaeagnus umbellata
10
Yes
UPL
FAC species 40 x 3 = 120
2.
Platanus occientalis
10
Yes
FACU species 50 x 4 = 200
3.
Liquidambar styraciflua
10
Yes
FAC
UPL species 10 x 5 = 50
4.
Column Totals: 100 (A) 370 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.70
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
_
3 - Prevalence Index is !2.0'
30
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
15
20%
of total cover:
6
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Eulalia viminea
30
Yes
FAC
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
Parthenocissus quinquefolia
5
No
FACU
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Rosa multiflora 5 No FACU
4.
Verbesina occidentalis
5
No
FACU
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
45
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
23
20%
of total cover:
9
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
Lonicera japonica
5
Yes
FACU
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
5
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
3
20%
of total cover:
1
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP-3A
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type LoC2 Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 4/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
3-18 7.5YR 4/6 100 Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soi
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

�� �I
MF PROVIDE6L GATL
/ / / 1 -P!1 ON 51TE. PVN�1P �PJINND I l i l I ( uPE'rREAM P �1r It j
AND MAINTAINEEJPol A� ALL IM) 5 DURtNG Ilj OR BA9 FFEE W F1 I
NO PERIOIk ` ti (I ( I
�
30"
�IcoNs I j P�-IIII I �(`�� GR E �A`(�
71 - - T `L ION �1T. Il
Mo 52 ly
r J �� —�� 1 \\V/ I
�3J1 55 PR9P. 8 DI 5E Z (P LIG) �� I r
HE -I ATERING 19,11
kAl
HARC 5E
WEST FORK DEEPrl co/icy OJT: 8 3. 1 )/Ij i(I/
1 RIVER TRIBUTARY NO. 1 f DON TE)�jfP RYVA �G
1 (STREAM NO. 3) /J /� /� 3 � C.OF A � I RI
In
' ' I �
(2)I2wxIOhI
♦ `1Wo-GUL I I11 ILI(601
40P GONGqoj
e0 ,�Ir
\� l-6 �ic3tK TG 1(1 w
i qt J
TEMPORARY STREAM BUFFER IMPACTS ? / /� 1 ((/ Pf�6P
ZONE 1 ..... 2,508 SF / P(N. M(ii
ZONE 2 ..... 1,672 SF
VEG. STRIP..... 2,814 SF
STREAM INPACT AREA..... 1,568 SF TOTAL STREAM
BUFFER IMPACTS
8,562 SF SEE PAGE 2 OF 3 FOR PROFILE
... LF OF STREAM IMPACT: 52 LF
MEMO ... STREAM BUFFER IMPACT AREA TRACT E-1 & E-2
NORTHBOROU16H
5515 BOYLSTON IWAV
DEEP RIVER TON4N5HIP - GUILEORD COUNTY -NORTH CAROLINA
17 E:NG I NEE:R I NG SAND 5UR\/EY I NG, I NG
LAND DEVELOPMENT GON51)LTING
4400 TYNINCG STREET
HIGH POINT, NORTH GAROLINA 27265
PHONE: (536) 5I2-8500 - FAX: (536) 5I2-8780
PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER LINE
STREAM IMPACT EXH I BI T
5GALE: I " = 40'
DATE: 05-II-22, JOE3 NO.: 13G0-15 P6 1 of 5

X
X
W
on
+1 - m
N
+ks)q)
? O
�-»
Oz
—
�XOzz
Qn W—
--v
4-4
'I
EX. 6R
UNDO,
II
i
II
��
II
II
II
II
II
EX. IS"
5AN.
218
LP - 8"
D.I. 5AN1
ARY 5EOER
@ 0
%
2+00 1 +50
SCALE: I" = 40' HORIZ.
I " = 4' VERT.
1 +00
E NG I NEE:R I NG AND 5UR\/EY I NG, INC.
LAND DEVELOPMENT GONSULTING
4400 TYNING STREET
HIGH POINT, NORTH GAROLINA 27265
PHONE: (33(b) 8I2-8800 — FAX: (336) SI2-8780
:-•
b55
825
0+50 0+00
TRACT E-1 & E-2
NORTHBOROUGH
5515 BOYLSTON ROAD
DEEP RIVER TOAN5HIP - GUILFORD COUNTY -NORTH CAROLINA
PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER LINE
PROFILE EXHIBIT
DATE: 06-27-22, JOB NO.: 13Q0 15 P6 2 of 3

Shoreline Installation ***USE FOR STREAM BANK ONLY***
Below are recemmendBtlOns for installing Roi]Max System temporary and/or permanent RECPs along shoreline and stream bank
applications. Consult the staple pattern guide (Figure 1) for fastener spacing recommendations based on the bank severity-
SHORELINE/STHEAMBANK INSTALLATION STEPS
I. For easier Installation, lowerwater level from Level A to
Level B before Installation to allow bottom trenching
2. Prepare soil before Installing RECPS, including any necessary
application of ll fertilizer and seed.
3. Begin at the top of the shoreline by anchoring the I In
a 6 In (15 cm) deep x 5 in. (15 cm) wide trench with approxi-
mately 12 In. (3o DEE) of FIELDS extended beyond the upslope
portion of the trench. Anchor the FIELDS with a row of
Staples/stakes approximately 12In. (30 cm) apart in the
bottom of the trench. Backf6l and compact file trench
after stapling- Apply seed to the compacted soil and fold
the remaining 12 in. (3D I portion of FZECPs back over
the seed and compacted Sall. Secure RECPs over compacted
561 with a row of staples/stakes spaced approximately
12 In. (3A cm} apart across the width of the REEDS,
4. Roll RECI either (A) down the shoreline for long banks
(top to buttorn) or (B) horizontally across the shoreline
slope. FIELDS will unroll with appropYiate side against the
211-5'
(5-12.5 c }
4'
soil surface, All FIELDS must be securely fastened to soil
surface by placing staples stakes In appropriate locations
as shown in the staple pattern guide.
S. The edges of all horizontal and vertical seams must he
stapled with an approximately 21n: in. (5-12,5Din) overlap
.
In streambank applications, seam overlaps should he
shingled In the predominant flow direction.
S. The edges of the REl at or below normal water level must
be anchored by placing the FIELDS in a 12 in. (30 cm} deep x
6 In. (15 cm) wide anchor trench. Anchor the Rl with a
row of staples/stakes spaced approximately 12 in. (30 cm)
apart in the trench. Backfill and compact the trench after
stapling (stone or soil may be used as backfilq. For installa-
tion at or below normal wate r level, use of a ShoreMax Mat
on tap of the RECP or geotextlle may be recommended.
Bottom anchor trench cart be eliminated when using a
ShoreMax Mat over RECP along the bottom edge.
NOTE: In adverse soil mndrtfonslooger smples/stnYes or Borth onrhors moy
be neeessory U. pmptdy secure thtRECPS.
PLANTS & MIXTURES
RATES ACRE
PLANTING DATES
TALL FESGLI:
120 LRs.
I. AUG. 15 - OCT.
2 FEB. 15 -APR. 35
TML FESCUE
30 IES.
t, AUG. 15 - OCT.
AND RED FESCUE
20 Li3S,
2. net. T5 - APR. 15
TALL FESCUE AND BLHICEA LESPEPEZA
BG La$
I. AUG. 15-00T.
(UNSCAFIFIED)
3D LM
TALL ,EscVE AND
100 LBS.
JULY 15 - Ali
BROYM TOP MILLET
3o Less.
TALL'ESCUE AND WINTER RYE GRAIN
90 LBS
Nov. -- J.W.
(NOT RYEGRA55)
2B M
WEEPING LOVEGRASS Wo sesic'EA
5 LRS.
MAR. 13 - ARE 15
LESP@EZA (SCARIFII
40 Las.
COMMON BERMUDA GRASS
10 Las. {NULLED)
1. APR. 15 - W E J9
1C LHS. (UNHULLED)
2L Fea' - MAR.
SEEDBED PREPARAnON,
I. INSTALL SURFACE WATER CONTROL MEASURES ACCORDING TO R1AJC
2. AREAS TO HE SEERED SHALL RE RIPPED AND SPREAD w1T1 AVAILABLE TOP SUL S CUP,
TOTAL SEEDBED FNEPAAAIION DEPTH VALC BE 4" TO e" DEEP.
3. L005E ROCKS, MOOTS AND UTHER URSTRUCnONS LARGER PLAN 14' SHALL aE REMObEO
FROM THE EVBFACE 50 THEY Wa NOT INTERFERE WITH ESTABLISHMENT AND MAINPCNANCE
OF VECETATON. LEAVE SURFACE IN 'MOWABLE GONDIT1aN'.
a- F NO SOIL 1E 7 IS PERFORMED, APPLY 2 TONS CF FINELY
sRI DOLG LIMESTONE
PER A',RE, 800 POUNDS OF SOFER PN04''HATE OR EO IYALENT PER ACRE, AN0 1,000
POUNDS CF 10-10-:0 FERTILIZER PER ACRE- LIME, SUPER PHOSPHATE, AND FERTILIZER
SHALL BE APPLIED DH60RMLY AND Mr WTI THE SOIL DUR:NC STEP TWU ABOVE.
5, APPLY MULCH (GRAIN STRAY) AT A RATE of 5,ow POUNDS (2.5 TONS) PER ACRE
ENGINEERING POND 5URVEY I Ni INC
LAW DI=VELOPMENT CONSULTING
4400 TYNING 5TREET
HIGH POINT, NORTH GAROLINA 21265
PHONE: (536) 8I2-5500 — FAX; (336) 8I2-8780
E-atll¢ 21-51
(5-12.5 cm)
1 1-1 2Y'(0.5 m)
3.3'(1m
3.75 staples Per sq yd
U5E NORTH AMERICAN GREEN 5G150BN
ER05ION CONTROL BLANKET AND U5E
5TAPLE PATTERN "E" FOR HIGH FLOW
GHANNEL5 AND SHORELINE5
TRACT E-1 & E-2
NORTHBOROUCSH
6615 BOYLSTON ROAD
DEEP RIVER TON &IF - WILFORD COUNTY -NORTH CAROLINA
PROPOSEI17 SANITARY SEAM LINE
PROFILE EXHIBIT
DATE: 06-2Z-22, JOB NO.: 13G0-15 F& 3 of 3

0 z
og
oo
a'S=z
LL
°Nw O O
==
qJw
t~L
�
W
I'l
Al

a§WHOM$ F� 6�
" aORION mu ww ?LL9§`§ 9§®§§S NZ
haw& wpm€��o
oa
o �qZq 1� i Y wQy
n,��Yo ❑ W UZ 9
z w
a w;w a HP
wa wNaz ❑ z s
cs m
, fi
�r
,- M,_ �
"�a l�,"A�y . " i_.€ S, fi /�.8"$$� (i 8
`�� - •'fix»,:- � � ��.' 'a - .,P 4pg� 1 �i� �� r-" �'_ __ _ €
&a�'
'J-
�rz_{����
C.,�- rrz G m
` r r�`Fe�.'

- •gworq qt, , za-ei 966,1-1 ,
co-aaix .1"1291-21,3,51,1-1,..0011330.1513031131.19.1NOCI.514[16S....A