20140650 Ver 1_Shoreline Stabilization_20140625

LI gxr
S &ME, Inc.
9751 Southern Pine Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28273
(704) 523 -4726
(704) 525 -3953 fax
NC,DENR 401 Wetlands Unit
Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Attn Karen Higgins
WE ARE SENDING YOU: ® Attached
❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints
❑ Copy of letter ❑ Report
1 1
rit'i [PAID S 2 &ME
1 - -- - - - ;
DATE 2014 06 24
JOB NO 7235 14 013, Ph 7
ATTENTION Ms Karen Higgins
RE T021 B Proposed Pipeline Project
2014 06 24
❑ Under separate cover via
❑ Plans ❑ Draft
the following items
❑ Specifications
COPIES
DATE
NO
DESCRIPTION
2014 06 24
1
Pre - Construction Notification NWP 12/WQC3884, Riparian Buffer Authorization
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW:
® For approval
® As requested
❑ FORBIDS DUE
® For your record
❑ For review and comment ❑
❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS: Karen - Please find attached a hard copy and cd of the PCN for Line T -021 B Please feel free to call me
with questions or comments Thank you — Crystal
SIGN:
Copy File, USACE, Sue Homewood DWR
S &ME, INC / 9751 Southern Pine Boulevard / Charlotte, NC 28273 -5560 / p 704 523 4726 f 704 525 3953 / www smeinc corn

June 2014
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Avenue, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Attention: Mr. Craig Brown
N.C. Division of Water Resources
401 Wetlands Unit
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Attention: Ms. Karen Higgins
14
_- ro
--
Z1
Reference: Pre - Construction Notification: NWP No. 12/WQC No. 3884 and
Riparian Buffer Authorization Request
Line T -021B Pipeline Project
Alamance and Orange Counties, North Carolina
S &ME Project No. 7235 -14 -013 Phase 7
Dear Mr. Brown and Ms. Higgins:
On behalf of our client, Energy Management Services (EMS), S &ME, Inc. (S &ME) is
pleased to submit this application for impacts to Waters of the U.S. in accordance with
Nationwide Permit (NWP) No. 12 and the corresponding North Carolina Water Quality
Certification (WQC) No. 3884. EMS is comprehensively managing a PSNC Energy
pipeline project proposed for construction in Alamance and Orange Counties, North
Carolina. PSNC, the project sponsor, will be considered the applicant. The project will
involve construction of approximately 16 miles of natural gas pipeline. In support of this
application please find enclosed the following:
• Figures: Site Vicinity Map (Figure 1),USGS Topographic Maps (Figures 2 -7), Soil
Survey and Known Element Occurrence Location Maps (Figures 8 -13), 2010 Aerial
Photographs (Figures 15 -25), Dwarf Wedgemussel Vicinity Map (Figure 26),
Typical Stream and Wetland Crossing Drawings (Figures 28 -33), and Back Creek
HDD Crossing - Plan and Profile Drawings;
• Appendix I: Completed Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) and Authorization to
Act as Agent;
• Appendix lI: Wetland, Stream, and Riparian Buffer Impact Tables;
• Appendix III: Representative Site Photographs;
• Appendix IV: Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. and Riparian Buffer Impact Plan
Drawings (58703301 through 58703351) and Typical Crossing Details (28 -33);
S &ME, INC / 9751 Southern Pine Boulevard / Charlotte, NC 28273 -5560 / p 704 523 4726 f 704 525 3953 / www smeinc corn

Pre - Construction Notification: NWP No. 12/WCQ No. 3884 SWE Project No. 7235 -14 -013, Phase 07
Line T -021 B Pi eiine Project - Alamance and Orange Counties N.C. June 2014
Appendix V: Agency Correspondence; and
Appendix VI: Restoration Plan, Mitigation Summary Tables and Mitigation
Acceptance Letters.
This PCN is being provided to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) for approval,
and complies with all applicable conditions of NWP No. 12. Written concurrence from
the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) is also required in part
because the proposed project does not meet condition numbers 10, 16, and 17 of WQC
No. 3884, as specified below:
Condition No. 10: The proposed gas line will not cross all streams within the project
corridor at a near - perpendicular angle because much of the project will parallel or be
installed within existing utility corridors. Because the existing utility corridors do not
cross all streams within the tolerance identified in the aforementioned WQC, the
proposed project will also not meet this requirement.
Condition No. 16: The proposed project will require a combined temporary and
permanent construction right -of -way (ROW) greater than 40 -foot wide at stream and
wetland crossings where the pipe will be installed. In these areas, a 50 -foot wide
ROW is required to safely accommodate the equipment and work space necessary to
install the 16 -inch pipe. Two other existing pipelines (a 24 -inch Cardinal line and a
10 -inch PSNC line) are present within the existing maintained easement that
proposed pipeline is to be installed in or adjacent to. The 50 -foot wide proposed
working corridor is necessary to maintain safe distances between the existing
pipelines and the proposed pipeline as well as provide additional space for equipment
to work safely over the existing pipelines. While there is no formal guidance
regarding the distance that must be maintained between installed pipelines, the
industry standard is a minimum of 10 feet. Where the new ROW will parallel an
existing ROW, a portion of the proposed 50 feet will lie within the existing corridor,
based on the proximity of the existing pipeline to the edge of the existing ROW.
Condition No. 17: The proposed project will require a permanently- maintained ROW
that exceeds 15 feet in width. The WQC includes an exemption for natural gas
pipelines, so long as mitigation is provided for wetland fills. To meet their
operational requirements, PSNC is requesting an additional 35 feet for a total
maintained width of 50 feet at stream and wetland crossings where an existing ROW
cannot be paralleled. This is the width required to support: 1) leakage surveys from
ground mobile units or aerial technology; 2) aerial patrolling for possible
encroachment activity near the pipeline; 3) accurate identification of possible repairs
and maintenance; 4) promotion of damage prevention in that the ROW can be more
easily identified by the public; 5) minimization of potential canopy encroachment,
which creates visibility concerns; 6) minimum turn- around requirements for
mechanized mowing and side - trimming equipment; 7) a consistent width of ROW to
be maintained into perpetuity.
PSNC has endeavored to limit the clearing of "virgin" 50 -foot ROW. Of the
proposed 16 -miles to be constructed, only approximately 1.07 miles will be

Pre - Construction Notification: NWP No. 12/WCQ No. 3884 SWE Project No. 7235 -14 -013, Phase 07
Line T -021B Pipeline Pro ecl - Afamance and Oran a Counties N.C. June 2014
established as virgin ROW. In non - parallel portions where new ROW must be
established, routes selected are in response to physical constraints, e.g. houses, other
existing utilities, property owner requests, and/or property owner encroachment on
the existing ROW. In these areas, the route selected following field and engineering
review is the route with the least environmental impact considering existing and
adjacent property owner's needs, natural resources, and while attempting to stay as
close to the existing easement as possible. In other areas where existing ROW can
be paralleled, the width of the new maintenance corridor will be based on the location
of the existing pipelines, and in some instances will be limited to 15 feet in width or
installed completely within existing maintained easement.
The project will also affect streams subject to the Jordan Lake Watershed Riparian Buffer
rules. All buffer impacts resulting from the proposed project are considered "Exempt,"
"Allowable" or "Allowable with Mitigation" per the buffer rules.
GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION
PSNC proposes to install the pipeline to increase service capabilities and service
reliability for customers in Durham and Chapel Hill, North Carolina. The new gas line
will originate at PSNC's existing take -off station located west of N.C. Hwy 54 near
Graham, N.C. (36.0453 °N, - 79.3656 °W), then run generally east/southeast, parallel to or
within an existing combination of PSNC and Cardinal gas line easements, crossing N.C.
Hwy 119, Mebane Oaks Road, Bradshaw Quarry Road and terminating at Old Chapel
Hill Hillsborough Road near Chapel Hill, North Carolina (35.9573 °N, - 79.1099 °W).
The location of the project corridor is depicted on the Site Vicinity Map (Figure 1),
USGS Topographic Maps (Figures 2 -7), Soil Survey and Known Element Occurrence
Location Maps (Figures 8 -13), and 2010 Aerial Photographs (Figures 15 -26). A Plan and
Profile Drawing of the Back Creek crossing are also included.
As previously stated, the proposed pipeline will parallel or be installed within existing,
maintained ROWs where feasible. Where engineering, constructability or property
owner- imposed constraints prohibit paralleling or installing within an existing ROW, the
gas line will be installed within a new ROW. In such areas, work at wetland and stream
crossings will be conducted in a "virgin" ROW that will not exceed 50 feet in width.
PSNC proposes to maintain a 50 -feet ROW in these areas for visibility concerns, as
previously noted, and for consistency with maintenance of existing pipeline ROW. It
should be noted that direct impacts resulting from the new virgin ROW will be limited to
2 stream crossings and 5 wetland areas that are either crossed or converted to herbaceous.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED WORK
Construction of the new pipeline will first involve demarcation of clearing limits,
jurisdictional boundaries, and other associated workspaces etc., followed by
aboveground removal of woody vegetation from the proposed ROW by mechanical
means or hand - clearing, as appropriate. In wetland areas, efforts will be made to remove
surface vegetation in a manner that minimizes disturbance of the substrate and prevents
exposure of soil. If necessary, temporary equipment crossings will be installed along one

Pre - Construction Notification: NWP No. 12/WCQ No. 3884 SWE Project No. 7235 -14 -013, Phase 07
Line T -021 B_ Pipeline Project - Alamance and Orange Counties. N.C. June 2014
side of the ROW to facilitate equipment passage, cross over streams, and prevent
excessive rutting and ground disturbance in the wetlands. Appropriate sediment and
erosion control measures (S &EC) will be installed to prevent sedimentation of
jurisdictional features as a result of construction. Stream bank vegetation within the
corridor will be hand cleared, and introduction of logging debris into the streams will be
avoided to the extent possible.
No grubbing or below - ground vegetation removal will occur within wetlands or along
stream banks outside of the construction corridor. Where the pipe will be installed
conventionally (e.g. "open- cut "), grubbing will be limited, to the extent practicable, to the
trench line. For HDD locations (Back Creek), grubbing and grading will occur only in
those areas where new ROW will be established, however, it will not occur on stream
banks or within wetlands. Select upland portions of the ROW may require rough grading
to facilitate safe passage of equipment, and to prepare a suitably -level work surface.
Appropriate S &EC measures will be installed following initial soil disturbance as the
project progresses. Within wetland areas where extensive rutting or soil disturbance may
occur, timber mats are planned for use to provide work and travel space for equipment.
Following preparation of the ROW and installation of necessary sediment and erosion
control measures, the trench will be excavated along the "non- working" side of the
ROW. Subsurface disturbance or stump removal will only be conducted within the
trench line at wetlands and stream crossings. Stump removal or light grading may occur
on the working side of the ROW if required for safety reasons. The work will be
performed from the timber mats placed along the working side of the ROW. In certain
areas, including wetlands and fields supporting crops, efforts will be made to segregate
topsoil from the subsoil. If necessary, trench breakers (temporary barriers generally
constructed of sand bags or similarly suitable material) will be installed within the trench
to slow the flow of subsurface water.
In general, approximately 55 -foot lengths of the 16 -inch pipe will be trucked to the site
from a temporary storage yard, strung along the ROW and placed on skids (wooden
pedestals). Specialized machines will be used to bend individual segments of pipe to fit
the contours of the trench where necessary. The pipe segments will be welded together,
x -rayed and inspected for structural integrity, and then lowered into the trench. Segments
of the trench may require dewatering or "padding" to prevent large rocks or other debris
from coming in contact with the pipe. Permanent trench breakers will then be installed
where necessary and the trench backfilled. In areas where segregation of the subsoil and
topsoil is required (including wetlands), the topsoil will be replaced last. Affected areas
will then be "cleaned up" by rough - grading and temporary seeding (if necessary),
followed by final grading, permanent seeding and mulching to restore the ROW as
closely as possible to pre - disturbance contours and conditions.
All work within wetlands and Waters of the U.S. will be conducted in accordance with
the applicable permits. Best Management Practices (BMP's) will be employed at all
stream and wetland crossings to prevent an inadvertent discharge to a Waters of the U.S.

Pre - Construction Notification: NWP No. 12MCQ No. 3884 SWE Project No. 7235 -14 -013, Phase 07
Line T -021 P Pipeline Pro ject - Alamance and Oranae Counties, N.C. June 2014
Crossing Methodology Selection
There are many factors that affect selection of an appropriate and constructible
installation method for a natural gas pipeline. Typical methods of installation include
HDD (horizontal directional drills), conventional bore, and /or open trench. Regulatory
implications, environmental impacts, cost, and pipeline integrity are considered during
the design and maintenance of pipelines and thus the selection of crossing methodology.
Less environmentally invasive installation methods, such as horizontal directional drills,
are considered during the design process. However, estimates from leading industry
contractors indicate that the use of HDD construction in areas where traditional trench
construction is feasible would increase the anticipated cost of each crossing by 500% to
800% depending on the specific crossing.
The use of traditional trench construction to the greatest extent practical controls project
costs, and just as importantly, allows the pipeline to be installed at a consistent 4 -5 feet
below land surface depth for a far greater length when compare to a drilled installation.
Maintaining a normal depth is critical to the safety and integrity of the pipeline. As the
depth of cover increases so does the difficulty when locating, exposing, and performing
routine maintenance required for transmission pipelines. Location specific conditions,
such as topography, physical barriers, subsurface conditions, etc. dictate how much cost
savings will be achieved at any stream or wetland crossing and those factors can
significantly increase the cost and risk of HDD as a crossing methodology.
Horizontal Directional Drill (HDD)
Geology
The Geologic Map of North Carolina (1985) indicates that the project corridor is in the
Carolina Slate Belt of the Piedmont Physiographic Province. The soils in the vicinity of
the project corridor have formed as a mantle of soil that has weathered in -place from the
parent bedrock. These soils have variable thicknesses and are referred to as residuum or
residual soils. The residuum in the vicinity of the project corridor is typically fine
grained and has a higher clay content near the surface because of advanced weathering.
The soils generally become less clayey and sandier with depth because of less advanced
weathering.
As previously stated, HDD technology is considered during the crossing selection
process. Several intermediate -sized stream crossings, primarily named channels, were
evaluated for the suitability of using the HDD crossing method. These channels have
been summarized on Table 1: HDD Suitability Evaluation Areas, below. Intermediate -
sized streams are those streams with a width of 10 -feet but less than 100 -feet wide as
defined by Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). These stream crossings
were selected based on impact avoidance and minimization requirements in accordance
with the requirements of Sections 404 and 401, size of the channel, flow regime, and
feasibility of HDD success. To address subsurface conditions, S &ME was subcontracted
to conduct geotechnical borings that would aid in construction planning and selection of

Pre - Construction Notification: NWP No. 12MCQ No. 3884 S &ME Project No. 7235 -14 -013, Phase 07
Line T -021 B Pipeline Project - Alamance and Orange Counties, N.C. June 2014
crossing methods. Nineteen boring locations were determined by EMS based on
engineering requirements and were located outside of Waters of the U.S.
Table 1: HDD Suitability Evaluation Areas
In general, the geotechnical results indicated the boundary between soil and rock is not
sharply defined along the project corridor. This transitional zone termed "partially
weathered rock" is normally found overlying the parent bedrock. Weathering is facilitated
by fractures, joints, and by the presence of less resistant rock types. Consequently, the
profile of the partially weathered rock and hard rock is quite irregular and erratic, even
over short horizontal distances.
Given the substantial cost of HDD technology, the presence of mitigating conditions in
the substrate could do the following:
• prohibit drilling in a given location,
A roxit� ate
pP
-.:. Comments
Feature ID
Connection
Chanel Width
at Crossing
Location
Presence of subsurface rock with fractures
noted in report. Continuous strata of hard
S1
Back Creek
65 -feet
material will require the use of specialized
drilling equipment. Gradual loss of drilling
fluid noted.
Presence of subsurface rock with fractures
UT to Haw
noted in report. Continuous strata of hard
S14
River
16.5 -feet
material will require the use of specialized
drilling equipment. Complete loss of drilling
fluid noted.
Presence of subsurface rock with fractures
noted in report. Gradual to complete loss of
S17
Haw River
40 -feet
drilling fluid noted. Continuous strata of hard
material will require the use of specialized
drilling a ui ment.
Presence of subsurface rock with fractures
S18
32 -feet
noted in report. Gradual to complete loss of
S18A
Haw River
25 -feet
drilling fluid noted. Continuous strata of hard
material will require the use of specialized
drilling equipment.
S23
Tom's Creek
22 -feet
Geotechnical evaluations suspended prior
to evaluation.
Turkey Hill
Presence of subsurface rock with fractures
S29, and
Creek/Wetland
25 -feet
noted in report. Gradual to complete loss of
S30
W34 /Cane
28 -feet
drilling fluid noted. Continuous strata of hard
Creek
material will require the use of specialized
drilling a ui ment.
S38
Morgan Creek
14 -feet
Geotechnical evaluations suspended prior
to evaluation.
S47
Bolin Creek
23 -feet
Geotechnical evaluations suspended prior
to evaluation.
In general, the geotechnical results indicated the boundary between soil and rock is not
sharply defined along the project corridor. This transitional zone termed "partially
weathered rock" is normally found overlying the parent bedrock. Weathering is facilitated
by fractures, joints, and by the presence of less resistant rock types. Consequently, the
profile of the partially weathered rock and hard rock is quite irregular and erratic, even
over short horizontal distances.
Given the substantial cost of HDD technology, the presence of mitigating conditions in
the substrate could do the following:
• prohibit drilling in a given location,

Pre - Construction Notification: NWP No. 12/WCQ No. 3884 S &ME Project No. 7235 -14 -013, Phase 07
Line T-02.18 Pipeline Project - Alamance and Orange Counties N.C. June 2014
• increase the probability of inadvertent return of drilling fluid to the surface
(frequently referred to as a "frack out "),
• require additional drill advances in the substrate, which leads to lost time,
• prolong drilling time, which increases risks to the environment, and/or
• require the use of specialized equipment.
All of the aforementioned consequences of unpredictable subsurface conditions and
physical limitations with respect to pipe flexibility and additional engineering result in
more cost, more impact to the public, longer pipeline construction times, and potentially
more impact to the environment.
Inadvertent returns are difficult to anticipate, can be difficult to locate, and can be
difficult to remediate. They typically occur as a result of fractures in subsurface rock or
unconsolidated materials located in the subsurface environment. While geotechnical
investigations can, and do, provide a window to the specified bore location and provide
general information with respect to the surrounding subsurface conditions, they cannot
necessarily detect all conditions. Once drilling fluid has found fractures, water columns,
or unconsolidated materials within which to move, there is no feasible way to predict
where surface releases might occur. Inadvertent returns are often detected visually for
smaller returns near the ROW; however, larger returns are typically detected as a loss of
pressure of fluid being pumped through the annulus of the drill. Fluid pressure and ROW
conditions are constantly monitored by trained pipeline professionals; however,
dependent on site geological conditions adjacent to the annulus of the drill, high
volume/high pressure fluid can be lost quickly, and oftentimes occur in areas within
which it is difficult to assess and/or access for clean -up (e.g. densely forested areas,
outside of the ROW, beneath structures).
Once a large inadvertent return is detected, the drilling must be shut down, the drilling bit
retracted, and time must be provided for the annulus breach to seal. The contractor must
then locate, contain, and remediate the inadvertent return. Inadvertent returns can exit in
Waters of the U.S. or uplands located outside of the permitted limits of disturbance. In
these areas, additional considerations with respect to access to the site and feasibility of
clean -up are warranted. Property owners must be notified, agencies notified, response
teams mobilized, site specific access and clean-up plan determined, and clean-up started.
This results in delays to the drilling operation, more impacts to the environment, and
more impacts to the public. In some cases, it has taken months to clean up inadvertent
returns due to a combination of all these factors.
As previously stated, the cost associated with HDD technology is significantly more than
traditional open cut methodology due to limited specialist drilling companies, the
aforementioned sub - surface conditions, and the cost of specialized equipment (e.g.
drilling bits for varying conditions, and specialized pipe and pipe coatings). The
likelihood of inadvertent return also adds to the cost and risk of a HHD crossing due to
the resulting extended drilling duration, additional costs for remediation, and potential for
discharge to sensitive areas that can occur with inadvertent returns. An example of a
7

Pre - Construction Notification: NWP No. 12/WCQ No. 3884 SWE Project No. 7235 -14 -013, Phase 07
Line T -021 B Pipeline Project - Alamance and Orange Counties, N.C. June 2014
drill cost analysis is provided on the following page (Table 2: Cost Differential HDD
Versus Open Cut, S 17, S 18, W1 8, and S 18A).

00
00
ri
00
rl
r
C�
Fr"
C
4
:*'
A
0
U
U
W
O
A
N
6�
cd
H
0
bin
o +, 4,
o
p U o
cp N
O }� N O o
O
22
C;J
M
N
co
° N okn
.
N U 00 00 00
d
Nt co
O O
by �.O
M M
(i
�
F+
Q 10 00
-fir
} cd O +'
Cl) T N
+, �+
U �' 3� t
000000
O O.
0
� I-
to
n
.o U � �
CD p 000
1N4
� M
N
tq
'b N n �" O
H M T
.-
r• N
N
N
O CD y O
ii011 p
�1 0 • -" ,- 0
O
M Q
0 0 0
0
O
0 0
C)
0
O
0
0
U cn 'd
"O U 01 d am- 0
�"
IO 00
O O
M
O
O
C) m
O
�-, O M
Tw
CO T in
T 0
O �O
r-
O Ld�
O
O
O
}y 00 i-•1 Vi
O
,a)
d
c °oo °OO
°o °(D
°o
°o
o0
T
C14 N N
N
N N
O
O
^'
�+
p
` I� h
h
I- 0 cD
N
T
Qr Cd
O C) — � U y 4-+ � bA
LL
O O
cd �U U bA
C 0
0000000
0
0 0
0
0
T
0 0
0
0 0
0
0
�.., 3•
N O O L:
U)
° I Ld
W w
O
LO
16 cri
N m
O
U)
LO
U p �O x cd O cn
I- 0
CO
n cD
cD
N
I-
1-4 v
4-4 cn -d U O c O 'Lt
p .. i� C �
CL
7 O O
D
o
o}¢•
r'�"+
��•' 4-i O
O
7 O
0_ Q LL (Ni '
r
N
Q p cad p �.
T 0
0
0
++ c0"j r, Q Q) � I~
; CO M x
C:) 00
C) M
d o U
cOi
�j
T T
00
T
(D
T O
00
d O y c+i En U O
+3 -°o o ;:1 � >
a
-
� 3
c
a
OV
M p cd pp �, .,
o�- fl �'d�.� �
0(DDC°waCp
0
� �
� � `l 3 -s
LD
U ¢' N �+
= o cOD
c�D
cOD
(D
�
0c U M
O b9 U
'j� N U
cd
�a
o�n 0'�
CL
o o -d x o
0 a¢a
p � � ?
V QDOU0000Di
C1 0 U f4l U
N L"
., U
C j N
c cad �� Q N
0
y O a
O
U 0 U
0(D c
O 0
U b
R 'C7 cd
U
Ol 2 U 1
" F-+ i w
cad 10 vii 'I., IU.
0

Pre - Construction Notification: NWP No. 12/WCQ No. 3884 S &ME Project No. 7235 -14 -013, Phase 07
Line T -021 B Pipeline Project - Alamance and Orange Counties, N.0 June 2014
Conventional Bore Installation
Conventional bore installation was not considered a viable crossing option for wetlands
or streams for this project. The project has been designed to install the proposed pipeline
within existing maintained ROW, or parallel to existing ROW to the extent practicable.
In areas where the proposed pipeline will be installed within existing maintained ROW
the proximity of the existing 24 -inch Cardinal and 10 -inch PSNC pipelines precludes the
safe excavation of the required bored pits. In other areas, and in general for the project
overall, many of the streams crossed are incised, making excavation of the bore pit and
stockpiling of the soils within the 50 -foot corridor difficult. As the bore pit must be
excavated to a depth at which the bore can extend beneath the substrate of a stream or
wetland, additional shoring of the pit would be necessary to meet safety standards.
Open Trench Installation
Throughout the project corridor where open -cut is proposed as the crossing methodology,
dam and pumps or flume systems will be used to divert flow away from the trench line
until the crossing is completed. Affected banks will be restored to near pre - construction
contour. Coir matting and a native riparian seed mix will be applied. Typical details for
a dam and pump and flume methodology for isolation of the trench excavation are
included in Appendix IV. In general, open -cut stream crossings will follow Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) guidance with respect to construction duration
within streams, to the extent practical. Typically, most crossings of minor streams (less
than 10 -feet wide) can be completed within 24 -hours of initiation. An intermediate -sized
water body (greater than 10 -feet and up to 100 -feet) can typically be completed between
24 -48 hours following initiation of the crossing. The most conservative of these time
frame 24 -hours would be required at all crossings where practicable. In the event that
blasting or equipment necessary for rock excavation is required, it may be necessary to
extend these time frames.
In addition to typical BMPs used for open -cut methodology, the intermediate -sized
crossings outlined in Table 1: HDD Suitability Evaluation will require additional BMPs
as outlined below. At a minimum, the following additional measures will be in place to
manage water flows and maximize successful restoration following completion of the
installation. These crossings are predominantly USGS named features and were
identified as constructible via open -cut methodology.
• Crossing will be executed in as minimal amount of time necessary. Where
possible, 24 -hour installation and restoration will be required.
• Sufficient equipment to execute the crossing in an expeditious, environmentally
responsible manner will be available on site prior to initiation of the crossing.
Where feasible, one dedicated crew, from the contractor, will conduct the
crossings specified in Table 1.
• All crossings will be conducted during anticipated low flow conditions.
10

Pre - Construction Notification: NWP No. 12/WCQ No. 3884 S &ME Project No. 7235-14 -013, Ph 07
Line T -0216 Pipeline Project - Alamance and Orange Counties, N.C. June 2014
Local weather conditions will be monitored such that, to the extent possible,
stormwater events will be avoided during and immediately following installation
of the pipe.
The Table 1 crossings will be monitored during installation by an environmental
monitor experienced in stream and wetland crossing procedures, familiar with site
conditions, and knowledgeable in North Carolina environmental regulations. The
monitor shall have the authority to stop work should conditions change and
additional or different measures be needed. This professional will be on -site from
the initiation (preparatory stages) through to the completion (e.g. implementation
of the restoration plan).
In a 24 -hour period, only one such crossing can be in progress. If more than one
of the Table 1 crossings is in progress in a 24 -hour period, then a dedicated
environmental monitor meeting the aforementioned criteria will be on -site for
each crossing as described above. Sufficient qualified staffing will be maintained
for the project duration such that compliance monitoring activities associated with
pipeline installation in other locations do not take precedence over Table 1
crossings.
• The upstream and downstream crossing points will be sealed to isolate the
crossing for pipeline installation in the dry. Clean steel plates, sand bags, or
similar measures will be inserted to temporarily dam the flow. Steel plates will be
cleaned prior to use on streams using biodegradable products or heat. On both
sides of the installed plates (both upstream and downstream) sandbags will
additionally be placed to secure the plates, reinforce the damming of water, and
provide a secondary barrier to seepage. The excavated trench will be monitored
for groundwater intrusion and, if noted, excess water will be pumped to a
discharge site located 50' -100' from the top of bank of the receiving stream. Any
discharged water from the trench will be filtered through an appropriate S &EC
measure.
• Where possible, the top 6- 12inches of bed substrate will be stockpiled separately
from the subgrade material and kept saturated during the installation.
Pumps shall be obtained and staged prior to executing the crossing. Back -up
pumps shall be kept on -site should the primary pump(s) malfunction, or to control
high flows. All pumps will have screened intakes and will be placed in
secondary - containment for the duration of the installation. In the event an
unforeseen weather event occurs during installation, pumps near the crossing will
be monitored 24 -hours a day until normal flow conditions are present.
Pump flow rates will be monitored to ensure adequate flow is achieved such that
water neither accumulates behind the upstream dam nor is discharged too rapidly
on the downstream side. At the downstream discharge location, flow discharge
rates shall be controlled such that scouring of the stream bed and/or banks does
not occur. Efforts will be made to aerate the water prior to its downstream
discharge into the receiving stream.
11

Pre - Construction Notification: NWP No. 12NVCQ No. 3884 SWE Project No. 7235 -14 -013, Ph 07
Line T -02.1 B Pipeline Project - Alarnance and Orange Counties, N.C. June 2014
• Removal of in -stream control devices will be conducted in such a manner as to
allow a gradual re- introduction of flowing water into the channel.
• Banks will be restored in a careful manner, achieving pre - construction contours to
the extent practical.
• A cover crop and specialized riparian seed mix will be applied via hydro- seeding
(where practical) for the entire length of banks disturbed by the crossing. Coir
matting with minimum shear strength of 5s or other agency approved matting will
additionally be installed to anchor the seeding and the banks.
• All Table 1 crossings will be monitored for stability for the duration of the
pipeline construction. Restoration will be considered complete when herbaceous
vegetation reaches 80- percent coverage.
Where HDD methodology is employed (Back Creek), the crossing will be monitored in
the event an inadvertent return of drilling fluid occurs. All such occurrences that affect
jurisdictional waters will be immediately contained using hay bales or other similar
physical barrier, remediated to the extent practical, and reported to the USACE within
48 -hours of detection. Please note that in the event an inadvertent release occurs outside
of the proposed construction corridor, additional coordination with land - owners,
regulatory agents, contractors, etc. may be required, and cleanup will be initiated as soon
as possible. Disturbance will be limited to the 50 -foot wide permanently- maintained
corridor. At the Back Creek location, disturbance is limited to 6,719 sf. No impacts are
expected to occur along the banks or within the stream bed at Back Creek.
All disturbed areas within wetlands or on stream banks will be seeded with a customized
seed mix, for wetlands seed mix will extend 10 -feet landward of the jurisdictional
boundary and for streams seed mix will extend 50 -feet landward of the top of bank.
Stream banks temporarily affected by trenching or placement of equipment bridges will
be stabilized with a native seed mix specifically designed for riparian areas, and will be
stabilized with biodegradable coir matting. Affected wetland areas will be seeded with a
native wetland seed mix; however no mulching or matting will occur within wetlands.
EXISTING ENVIRONMENT
The project area is located in the Piedmont physiographic province in portions of the
Haw (03030002) River Basin. General land use in the vicinity of the project corridor
consists of a mix of low density residential areas, agriculture, pasture, and forest.
Portions of the project corridor are located close to areas composed of commercial and
light industrial development. Vegetation observed within the observed land uses and/or
habitat types within or adjacent to the project corridor is identified below, and photos of
the project corridor are included in Appendix III.
Existing Maintained Utility Corridors
In general, observed species occurring within the maintained utility ROWs included
dandelion (Taraxacum officinale), big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii), dogfennel
(Eupatorium capillifolium), broomsedge (A. virginicus), various grasses (Festuca spp.),
Panicum grasses (Panicum spp.), bushy broomgrass (A. glomeratus), buckhorn plantain
12

Pre - Construction Notification: NWP No. 12/WCQ No. 3884 SWE Project No. 7235 -14 -013, Ph 07
Line T -021 B Pipeline Project - Alamance and Orange Counties, N.C. June 2014
(Plantago lanceolata), large hop clover (Trifolium campestre), vetch (Vicia spp.), white
clover (Trifolium repens), oldfield toadflax (Linaria candensis), red sorrel (Rumex
acetosella), and assorted Sorghum grasses (Sorghum spp.).
Successional Pine Forest
Observed canopy species included loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), tulip poplar (Liriodendron
tulipifera), red maple (Acer rubrum), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciva), winged elm
(Ulmus alata), and scarlet oak (Quercus coccinea). Of these, loblolly pine, tulip poplar,
and red maple were the dominant species. Understory species included beech (Fagus
grandifolia), sweet gum, red maple, tulip poplar, winged elm muscle wood (Carpinus
carolinana), and flowering dogwood (Corpus florida). Other plant species included
ground cedar (Diphasiastrum digitatum), Christmas fern (Polystichum acrostichoides),
blueberry species (Vaccinium spp.), Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia), and
Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica).
Dry Oak Hickory Hardwood Forest
Observed canopy species included white oak (Quercus alba), Shumard oak (Quercus
shumardii), tulip poplar, red maple (Acer rubrum), pignut hickory (Carya glabra),
chestnut oak (Q. prinus), blackjack oak (Q. marilandica), loblolly pine, and Eastern
redcedar (Juniperus virginiana). Understory species include sourwood (Oxydendrum
arboreum), Virginia pine (Pinus virginiana), sassafras (Sassafras albidum), and willow
oak (Q. phellos). Other plant species included blueberry species.
Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest
Observed canopy species of the mesic mixed hardwood forested areas along the project
corridor included sweet gum, tulip poplar, loblolly pine, Eastern redcedar, red maple,
white oak, and pignut hickory. Subcanopy species in these areas included muscle wood,
sourwood, beech ), red maple, pignut hickory, white oak, willow oak, yellow buckeye
(Aesculus (lava), and flowering dogwood. Other observed species include grape species
(Vitis spp.), Christmas fern, ground cedar, and Japanese honeysuckle. In areas where
disturbance had occurred, the understory additionally included autumn olive (Elaeagnus
umbellata) and Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense).
Agricultural Fields and Pastureland
In addition to the general habitat types identified above, the project corridor also passes
through areas of active agricultural land. A majority of these areas consisted of
cultivated cropland. Additional areas of active cattle and horse pasture were also
observed along the route. Species located in pastureland and at the periphery of
cultivated areas included dog fennel, crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis), golden rod
(Solidago spp.), American pokeberry (Phytolacca americana), partridge pea
(Chamaecrista fasciculata), broomsedge , morning glory (Ipomoea purpurea), ragweed
(Ambrosia artemesiifolia), little bluestem (Schizachyrium scoparioum), and various
grasses.
Other land use areas were observed along the project corridor, but occupy an insignificant
portion relative to the habitat types identified above. Such portions of the project
13

Pre - Construction Notification: NWP No. 12/WCQ No. 3884 SWE Project No. 7235 -14 -013, Ph 07
Line T -021 B Pipeline Project - Alamance and Orange Counties N.C. June 2014
corridor include landscaped or maintained lawns, roadway ROWs or lightly- developed
areas.
JURISDICTIONAL AREAS
S &ME wetland professionals delineated Waters of the U.S. within a majority of the
project corridor in March 2014 through April 2014. Additional field visits were
subsequently conducted through May 2014 to delineate re- routed areas, access roads, and
laydown areas. The delineation was conducted utilizing currently accepted methods for
wetland determination, as set forth in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation
Manual and the corresponding Eastern Mountain and Piedmont Region USACE Regional
Supplement Guide, which states that under normal circumstances, an area must
demonstrate the presence of 3 components to be considered jurisdictional: 1) hydrophytic
vegetation, 2) hydric soils, and 3) wetland hydrology. When necessary, stream
assessments were conducted in accordance with NCDWR and USACE guidelines. The
USACE (Craig Brown) and DWR (Sue Homewood) visited the project site on May 20
and 21 to approve the delineation and verify the location of features subject to the Jordan
Lake Watershed Buffer Rules.
Field review identified 58 jurisdictional wetlands, 8 jurisdictional open waters, and 74
jurisdictional streams within and adjacent to the project corridor. The boundaries of
jurisdictional areas were identified in the field using conventional surveying equipment
or Global Positioning System (GPS) units capable of sub -meter accuracy. Jurisdictional
features are depicted on the Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. and Riparian Buffer Impact
Plan drawings, included in Appendix IV (58703301 through 58703351). A Request for
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination package that includes USACE Stream
Assessment Sheets, NCDENR Stream Identification Sheets, and Routine Wetland
Determination Data forms for each general type of wetland observed was provided to the
USACE separately in May 2014.
PROPOSED PROJECT IMPACTS
The proposed project involves temporary wetland impacts that will occur as a result of
trench excavation, temporary side casting of material and placement of timber mats for
the equipment crossings. The project will result in conversion of forested wetlands to
herbaceous wetlands, but will not result in a loss of Waters of the U.S. As previously
mentioned, all wetlands impacted will be restored to their original grade and contour. It
should be noted that no temporary workspace (TWS) is proposed in wetlands or streams.
Work in wetlands and streams will be limited to a 50 -foot wide corridor throughout the
project. Clearing of new permanent easement (permanent conversion) will be limited to
the amount necessary to establish a consistent 50 -foot wide permanently maintained
easement throughout the project. Wetland, stream, and riparian buffer impacts are
identified in their respective tables in Appendix II.
Project -wide impacts (combined temporary and conversion) will be 2.99 acres, much of
which consists of herbaceous wetlands located within existing ROW. Of those total
impacts, maintenance of the new ROW project wide will result in conversion of 0.114
acres of forested wetland to herbaceous wetlands. In new virgin ROW, this will result in
14

Pre - Construction Notification: NWP No. 12MCQ No. 3884 SWE Project No. 7235 -14 -013, Ph 07
Line i -021 B Pipeline Project - Alarnance and Orange Counties N.C. June 2014
0.076 acreage of wetland conversion within a new 50 -foot maintained easement. Where
the proposed pipeline (T -021B) parallels existing maintained easements, the amount of
permanent easement to be cleared is only the amount necessary to establish a 50 -foot
ROW along T -02113. A majority of the existing maintained easement encompasses the
new proposed ROW for T -02IB, therefore the corridor width varies for permanent
maintained easement from 50 to 15 -feet wide and permanent impacts are limited to 0.114
project wide. All wetlands impacted by construction will be seeded with a native wetland
mix.
The project will result in temporary impacts to 2,519 linear feet of stream through
placement of equipment bridges and isolation crossing methods (dam and pump or dam
and flume) around a segment of stream that will be temporarily excavated for pipe
installation.
With respect to the Jordan Lake Watershed riparian buffers, the project will cumulatively
result in 112,630 square feet (sf) of impact to Zone 1. Of that impact, 16,549 sf will be
cleared and permanently - maintained. The remainder, 96,081 sf is located completely
within existing easement and, as such is exempt from Jordan Lake Watershed riparian
buffer rules. All portions of impacted buffer will be seeded with a native riparian seed
mix.
In Zone 2, 86,887 sf will be impacted, of which 13,753 sf will be maintained. The
remaining 73,134 sf is located within existing maintained easement and is exempt from
riparian buffer rules. All portions of Zone 2 will be seeded with a native riparian seed
mix.
Typical stream and wetland crossings details are depicted on Figures 28 through 33 in
Appendix IV. Following construction, temporarily- disturbed wetlands within the
permanent ROW will be restored to an herbaceous state. Affected portions of the streams
will be reconstructed to their pre - disturbance dimension and profile, and stabilized using
coir matting and native riparian seed mix, without use of riprap or hard armoring.
PROTECTED SPECIES
To comply with applicable sections of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973 (16
USC 1531- 1543), S &ME initially consulted with the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
( USFWS) and the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP). Scoping letters
with project information and maps of the proposed alignment were provided to both
agencies on February 27, 2014. Pedestrian reviews for terrestrial species were conducted
along the project corridor, concurrent with delineation efforts, between February and
May 2014.
The USFWS responded in a March 21, 2014 letter stating that the proposed pipeline is
not likely to adversely affect federally - listed endangered or threatened species, their
formally designated critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing, and that
they believed the requirements of Section 7(a) (2) of the ESA had been satisfied.
However, the USFWS also recommended that if the project corridor contains potentially -
suitable habitat for federally protected species, a review should be conducted.
15

Pre - Construction Notification: NWP No. 12NVCQ No. 3884 SWE Project No. 7235 -14 -013, Ph 07
Line T -021$ Pipeline Project - Alarnance and Orange Counties, N.C. June 2014
The USFWS further recommended that all practicable measures be taken to limit impacts
to aquatic species due to sedimentation (including directional boring methods), that
vegetated buffers adjacent to the project site be maintained, and that stringent sediment
and erosion control measures be employed.
On March 27, 2014, the NCNHP responded, via email, and identified occurrences of 2
state rare species, Etheostoma collis (Carolina darter) and Vireo gilvus (warbling vireo),
that have been documented within 100 -feet of the proposed project area. Within 1 mile
of the project area one federally protected species, Haliaeetus leucocephalus (bald eagle),
had been identified. One Significant Natural Heritage Area, Pickard's Mountain, and
several managed areas (conservation easements) were noted near or within the project
corridor.
In addition to the agency scoping, S &ME also reviewed existing records obtained from
federal and state sources. The USFWS list of federally protected species (updated
December 27, 2012) was consulted for documented (current or historic) occurrences of
protected species within Alamance and Orange Counties, North Carolina. This review
identified 5 federally protected species within Orange County. No federally protected
species were listed within Alamance County. Protected flora and fauna, and their federal
rank and county status, are identified in Table 2.
Table 2: Federally Protected Flora and Fauna Summary
Species
Federal Rank'
CountyStatus2
Haliaeetus leucocephalus (Bald eagle)
BGPA
Current
Picoides borealis (Red- cockaded woodpecker)
E
Historic
Alasmidonta heterodon (Dwarf wedgemussel)
E
Current
Rhus michauxii (Michaux's sumac)
E
Historic
Echinacea laevigata (Smooth coneflower)
E
Historic
1 BCPA = Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act; E= Endangered
2 Current = Documented in the county within the past 50 years; Historic = Species documented greater than 50 -years
ago.
S &ME reviewed the NCNHP Geographic Information Systems (GIS) files of Element
Occurrence (EO) and Natural Heritage Areas available from NC OneMap within 1 mile
of the project corridor. This review revealed the presence of a bald eagle record in the
vicinity of Cane Creek, adjacent to the 1 mile radius buffer around the project corridor.
In summary, the results of the literature of the USFWS revealed the presence of 5
federally protected species, as summarized in Table 2, of which 2 (bald eagle and dwarf -
wedgemussel) are listed as current in Orange County. The remaining species were listed
as historical occurrences in Orange County, meaning that they were last observed within
the county more than 50 years ago. Within 1 mile of the project corridor, the NCNHP
literature review revealed 1 occurrence of bald eagle in the vicinity of Cane Creek.
16

Pre - Construction Notification: NWP No. 12/WCQ No. 3884 SWE Project No. 7235 -14 -013, Ph 07
Line T -0218 Pipeline Project - Alamance and Orange Counties N.C. June 2014
Copies of these correspondences are attached as Appendix V. Locations of EO's are
depicted on the Soil Survey and Known EO Location Maps (Figures 8 -13).
Brief descriptions of the species identified in Table 2 taken from USFWS descriptions are
provided below:
Bald Eagle
Federal Status: Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
County Occurrence Status: Current
Biological Determination: No Effect
Bald eagle is a large raptor with a wingspan of approximately 7 feet. Adult individuals of
this species have a mainly dark brown plumage with a solid white head and tail. Bald
eagles develop adult plumage in the fifth or sixth year. Juveniles of the species exhibit a
chocolate brown to blackish plumage, with occasional occurrences of white mottling on
the tail, belly, and under - wings. Bald eagle's primary diet consists of fish; however, it
will feed on birds, mammals and turtles when fish are not available.
Bald eagle is associated with coasts, rivers, and lakes, usually nesting near large bodies of
water where it feeds. Nesting habitat in the Carolinas usually occurs in large pine trees
along the edge of large bodies of water. Bald eagle is listed as a current record for
Orange County. The proposed project is not expected to impact large bodies of water in
Orange County, and no areas of potential habitat for this species were observed during
field review. Accordingly, it is unlikely that bald eagle will be adversely affected by this
project.
RED - COCKADED WOODPECKER
Federal Status: Endangered
County Occurrence Status: Historic
Biological Determination: No Effect
Red - cockaded woodpecker is a black and white bird measuring approximately 7 inches
long. The bird displays black and white horizontal stripes on its back. The cheeks and
under parts are white and the sides are streaked in black. The head is distinguished by a
black cap and stripe on the throat. Males of the species have a small red spot (a cockade)
on each side of the black cap, and display a red crown patch after the first post - fledgling
molt.
Red - cockaded woodpecker habitat includes forests with trees old enough for roosting,
generally at least 60 -120 years old, depending on species of pine. The most prominent
adaptation of red - cockaded woodpecker is their use of living pines for cavity excavation.
For nesting and roosting habitat, red - cockaded woodpeckers need open stands of pine
containing trees 60 years old and older. Red - cockaded woodpeckers require live, large
older pines in which to excavate their cavities. Longleaf pines (Pinus palustris) are
preferred, but other species of southern pine are also acceptable. Dense stands (stands
that are primarily hardwoods, or that have a dense hardwood understory) are avoided.
17

Pre - Construction Notification: NWP No. 12MCQ No. 3884 S &ME Project No. 7235 -14 -013, Ph 07
Line T -021 B Pipeline Project - Alarnance and Orange Counties, N.C. June 2014
Foraging habitat is provided in pine and pine hardwood stands 30 years old or older with
foraging preference for pine trees 10 inches or larger in diameter. In good, moderately -
stocked pine habitat, sufficient foraging substrate can be provided on 80 to 125 acres.
Stands of pine were observed immediately adjacent to the pipeline corridor; however,
these stands were of uneven aged trees, and would not provide suitable nesting habitat.
No nesting cavities or birds were observed along the corridor. These areas contained a
dense understory, which is not generally suitable foraging habitat. Because the red -
cockaded woodpecker is listed as a historical occurrence, and observed pine stand areas
appear to contain marginal foraging habitat at best, it was concluded that this project
would have no effect for this species.
DWARF WEDGEMUSSEL
Federal Status: Endangered
County Occurrence Status: Current
Biological Determination: May Affect; Not Likely to Adversely Affect
Dwarf wedgemussel is a small bivalve, rarely exceeding 1.75 inches in length. Clean
young shells are usually greenish -brown with green rays. As the animal ages, the shell
color becomes obscured by diatoms or mineral deposits and appears black or brown. The
shell is thin but does thicken somewhat with age, especially toward the anterior end. The
anterior end is rounded while the posterior end is angular forming a point near the
posterio - ventral margin. The ventral margin is only slightly curved. The nacre is bluish -
white, appearing whiter in the thicker anterior end. The most distinctive shell
characteristic of dwarf wedgemussel is the arrangement of the lateral teeth. There are 2
lateral teeth in the right valve and 1 in the left valve. The typical arrangement for most
freshwater mussel species consists of 2 lateral teeth in the left valve and 1 in the right
valve. The incurrent and excurrent apertures and their associated papillae are usually
white. The foot and other organs are also white.
Dwarf wedgemussel inhabits creeks and rivers close to banks, under overhangs, and
around submerged logs. It is also known to live on firm substrates of sand, gravel, and
muddy sand with a slow to moderate current. The mussel requires clean water that is
well- oxygenated and nearly silt free.
Some of the streams that cross the project corridor may provide potentially - suitable
habitat for dwarf wedgemussel. In general, most streams were considered unsuitable due
to low flow or the degree of suspended silt, and as previously stated, aquatic surveys
were not performed within the project corridor.
To further evaluate the potential for habitat within the corridor or potential impact to this
species, S &ME requested records of this species within or near the project corridor from
the NCNHP. The NCNHP provided a GIS shapefile of documented locations of dwarf
wedgemussel in Orange County. Review of this information indicates that the nearest
location is approximately 3 miles north of the pipeline, in a watershed (Sevenmile Creek,
Eno Watershed Hydrologic Unit Code 030202010303) which drains away from the
18

Pre - Construction Notification: NWP No. 12NVCQ No. 3884 SWE Project No. 7235 -14 -013, Ph 07
Line T -021 S Pipeline project - Alamance and Orange Counties, N.C. June 2014
project corridor (see Dwarf Wedgemussel Vicinity Map, Figure 26). As such, it is
unlikely that the proposed pipeline will have an adverse effect on this species.
MICHAUX'S SUMAC
Federal Status: Endangered
County Occurrence Status: Historic
Biological Determination: No Effect
Michaux's sumac is a non - poisonous, low- growing, deciduous, densely hairy shrub. The
erect stems grow from an underground rhizome to a height of 1 to 3 feet. The compound
leaves are alternate and divided into long rows of 9 to 13 stalkless leaflets. The leaflets
are 1.6 to 3.5 inches long, oblong, winged at the base, dull on the top, hairy on the
bottoms, with toothed edges. The terminal leaflet has a 2 inch long winged petiole.
Flowers grow at the top of the plant in a dense, erect cluster, colored greenish - yellow to
white, and are 4 to 5 parted. Fruit are hairy reddish drupes, each containing 1 seed.
Leaves emerge in April to May, flowering occurs April to June, and fruiting occurs
August to October, with fruits persisting for several months. These plants are generally
dioecious. Michaux's sumac has been known to produce male flowers 1 year and female
flowers the next. Other individuals are monoecious with both male and female flowers at
1 time. Usually less than half of the stems in a subpopulation do not flower in a given
season. Even though fruit may be plentiful, seed viability is low. This may be a result of
self - incompatibility or hybridization with other species of Rhus. This species usually
produces asexually from thick, shallow horizontal rhizomes.
Michaux's sumac prefers sandy, loamy swales and depressions, acidic and circumneutral
uplands, and rocky open woods. It grows best where disturbance has maintained an open
area. Michaux's sumac has been found along roadsides, in powerline clearings, and areas
where forest canopies have been opened up by blowdowns and/or hurricane damage.
Episodic fires accentuate habitat for this species and reduce hardwood encroachment,
recycle nutrients, and aid regeneration of longleaf pine /wiregrass communities.
Pedestrian field review for Michaux's sumac was conducted along all portions of the
project corridor that are adjacent to the existing maintained easement. The current
maintained easement is primarily herbaceous due to a frequent maintenance program
Given that this species was last observed more than 50 years ago in Orange County and
the frequent maintenance schedule preventing the growth of woody vegetation, a
conclusion of "no effect" is determined for this species.
Smooth Coneflower
Federal Status: Endangered
County Occurrence Status: Historic
Biological Determination: No Effect
Smooth coneflower is a perennial herb that grows up to 3.3 feet tall from a vertical root
stock. The large elliptical to broadly lanceolate basal leaves may reach 8 inches in length
and 3 inches in width, tapering into long petioles toward the base. They are smooth to
19

Pre - Construction Notification: NWP No. 12MCQ No. 3884 SWE Project No. 7235 -14 -013, Ph 07
Line T -0216 Pipeline Project - Afarnance and ©ran a Counties N.C. June 2014
slightly rough in texture. The stems are smooth, with few leaves. The mid -stem leaves
are smaller than the basal leaves and have shorter petioles. Flower heads are usually
solitary. The rays of the flowers are light pink to purplish in color, usually drooping, and
2 to 3.2 inches long. Flowering occurs from late May through mid -July and fruits
develop from late June to September. The fruiting structures often persist through the
fall. Reproduction is accomplished both sexually and asexually.
Smooth coneflower is typically found in open woods, glades, cedar barrens, roadsides,
clear -cuts, dry limestone bluffs, and power line ROWS, usually on magnesium and
calcium rich soils associated with amphibolite, dolomite or limestone (in Virginia),
gabbro (in North Carolina and Virginia), diabase (in North Carolina and South Carolina),
and marble (in South Carolina and Georgia). Smooth coneflower occurs in plant
communities that have been described as xeric hardpan forests, diabase glades or
dolomite woodlands. Optimal sites are characterized by abundant sunlight and little
competition in the herbaceous layer. Many of the herbs associated with smooth
coneflower are also sun - loving species that depend on periodic disturbances to reduce the
shade and competition of woody plants.
Pedestrian field review for smooth coneflower habitat was conducted between February
20, 2014 and May 8, 2014, outside of the flowering season, along portions of the project
corridor where the corridor paralleled or was within existing easements or in adjacent
woodlands where tree canopy gaps may provide abundant sunlight. No individuals were
observed. Additionally, the existing corridor is limited primarily to herbaceous species
due to frequent maintenance. The amount of maintenance is likely too regular in
occurrence to allow individuals of smooth cone flower to establish. S &ME further
reviewed the NRCS Soil Survey data, which indicate that soils within or near the pipeline
are acidic to neutral. As previously mentioned, smooth coneflower is typically associated
with basic soils, therefore the soil pH is not suitable for this species. Due to frequent
maintenance of the existing easement, mapped soil pH, and because this smooth
coneflower has not been observed in Orange County within the past 50 years, a
conclusion of "no effect" is determined for this species.
HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
S &ME submitted an agency scoping letter to the North Carolina State Historic
Preservation Office (SHPO) on February 27, 2014. The SHPO responded in a March 21,
2014 letter stating that there were no historic resources that would be impacted by the
pipeline and as such had no comment.
AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION
To avoid and minimize impacts to waters of the U.S. within the project corridor, PSNC
has proposed to install the new gas pipeline within an existing maintained ROW to the
extent practicable. Where PSNC is not able to install in existing maintained ROW, the
proposed pipeline has been routed parallel to an existing, maintained pipeline ROW
wherever possible. Where install in existing maintained ROW is not possible and the
existing line cannot be paralleled by the new line, PSNC has chosen the route to reduce
the impacts to the extent practical. Direct impacts to 5 streams and 9 wetlands will be
20

Pre - Construction Notification: NWP No. 12MCQ No. 3884 S &ME Project No. 7235 -14 -013, Ph 07
Line T-021 B Pipelhng Prolgt - Alamance and Orange Counties N C June 2014
avoided by through ROW selection in non - parallel areas and 1 crossing, Back Creek; will
be installed using trenchless construction methods.
Where streams are trenched for pipe installation, impacts will be minimized by
stabilizing the temporarily- affected banks with coir matting and seeding with a native
riparian seed mix. Stream sedimentation impacts will be minimized through the use of
the dry-ditch construction methods, such as bypass pumping though silt bags or
temporary de- watering structures, or by use of dam and flumes. Wetland impacts will be
minimized during construction through the use of equipment mats at crossings and trench
plugs to prevent alterations to wetland hydrology.
Additionally, construction equipment operating within the wetland will be limited to that
equipment necessary for clearing, excavation, pipe installation and restoration activities.
Wetland vegetation will be cut at ground level, leaving existing root systems in place to
promote re- growth. To the extent practicable, wetland topsoil will be segregated from
the underlying subsoil in areas disturbed by trenching, except in areas with standing
water or saturated soils, or where no topsoil is evident. Total disturbance through streams
and wetlands is limited to a 50 -foot corridor project wide. Where a new virgin 50 -foot
ROW will be established, impacts are limited to 3 streams and 8 wetlands.
REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS
The project will comply with all applicable conditions of NWP 12 and WQC 3884, with
the exception of those noted previously. The width of the TWS and the permanent ROW
will not exceed 50 feet in wetlands and at stream crossings. The proposed alignment
makes use of existing ROW to the maximum extent practicable. While the width of the
permanently- maintained ROW will be 30 feet where the project will not parallel an
existing utility line, it should again be noted that as little 15 additional feet of new ROW
will be maintained along portions of the project that do run parallel to existing ROW.
PSNC has endeavored to limit the clearing of "virgin" 50 -foot ROW. Of the proposed
16 -miles to be constructed, only approximately 1.07 miles will be established as virgin
ROW. In non - parallel portions where new ROW must be established, routes were
selected in response to physical constraints, e.g. houses, other existing utilities, property
owner requests, and/or property owner encroachment on the existing ROW. The route
selected, following routing and engineering review, is the route with the least
environmental impact while factoring existing and adjacent property owner's needs,
natural resources, and attempting to stay as close to the existing easement as possible.
All stream work will be performed "in the dry" by isolating the work area through use of
dam and pump - around or dam and flume systems. The selected streams outlined in Table
1 will additionally require more stringent oversight during construction. To address
potential concerns regarding stabilization of the crossing, coir matting of a minimum
shear strength 5s or other agency approved matting will be installed along the banks of
these streams.
Following construction, stream and wetland crossings will be restored to original grade
and contour. The proposed project will not result in permanent changes in pre-
21

Pre - Construction Notification: NWP No. 12/WCQ No. 3884 SWE Project No. 7235 -14 -013, Ph 07
Line T -021 B Pipeline Project - Alarnance and Orange Counties N.C. June 2014
construction elcvation contours or stream dimension, pattern or profile. Excess material
will be removed to a high ground disposal area. Cleared areas will be restored in
accordance with the attached Restoration Plan (Appendix VI) following completion of
the work.
Based on our experience with similar projects involving impacts authorized under NWP
No. 12, it is our understanding that pipeline construction impacts to streams and emergent
wetlands will be considered temporary if these areas are restored to original pre -
construction contours once construction is completed, and do not involve the permanent
placement of hard armor in streams.
SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL
A separate Sedimentation and Erosion Control (S &EC) Plan will be prepared and
submitted to the North Carolina Division of Environment and Natural Resources —
Division of Land Resources (NCDENR -DLR). The S &EC plan will specify the
appropriate S &EC and Best Management Practices (BMPs) outlined in the most recent
version of the "North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design
Manual." Through early cooperation and planning with NCDENR -DLR staff, PSNC and
S &ME are currently designing an S &EC plan to employ numerous measures that meet or
exceed specifications governing the proper design, installation, operation, and
maintenance of S &EC measures and BMPs. The S &EC plan will be submitted to
NCDENR — DLR concurrently with the Section 401/404 permit applications and their
approval is anticipated on, or about, July 15, 2014.
Construction supervisors directing crews responsible for installation and maintenance of
erosion control measures will be experienced in North Carolina S &EC measures, pipeline
construction as it relates to S &EC measures and BMPs, and will be responsible for
completing the required NCDENR — Division of Water Resources (DWR) self - inspection
forms. These forms will be completed for disturbed areas at least once per 7 calendar
days and within 24 hours of a rainfall event greater than 0.5 inch per 24 -hour period.
Two rain gauges will be located along the construction corridor and monitored daily.
As per current NCDENR guidance, areas disturbed during clearing or construction
operations will be temporarily or permanently seeded and mulched when construction
activities will not occur within a period of 7 or 14 days on a particular section of the
pipeline.
Waterbars will be spaced at approximately 125 -foot intervals on slopes from 5 to 15
percent and every 75 feet on slopes greater than 15 percent where construction occurs
within a new easement and the entire 50 -foot wide easement will be denuded. Sediment
tubes (Filtrexx FilterSoxx, or Engineer approved equivalent) will be spaced at similar
intervals in areas where construction occurs within, or partially within, existing natural
gas easements. Due to the presence of 1 or more existing below - ground natural gas
pipelines, mass grading above the existing lines is not feasible, so the denuded portion of
these areas should be limited to the pipeline trench and areas immediately adjacent to it.
Water bars and sediment tubes will be installed at the base of slopes up- gradient of
streams or wetlands.
22

Pre - Construction Notification: NWP No. 12NVCQ No. 3884 SWE Project No. 7235 -14 -013, Ph 07
Line eTT- -0215 Pipeline Project - A_lamance and orange Counties. N.C. June 2014
Silt fence will be installed along the top -of -bank at streams and at wetland boundaries
maintaining a 10 -foot buffer between the silt fence and the jurisdictional feature. Silt
fence will be installed such that it, in combination with other measures approaching
streams and wetlands, dissipates and directs flow away from the crossing. Additionally,
sediment tubes or wattles will be utilized at stream and wetland crossings to provide a
sediment barrier that can be temporarily removed to allow equipment access to bridges or
timber mats. Dewatering of trenches within streams and wetlands will be discharged
through a filter bag or other temporary S &EC control structure.
Construction activities within wetlands will be conducted from timber mats. Where
clearing operations occur in wetlands, low ground pressure equipment will be used in
areas beyond those protected by timber mats. Construction activities within streams will
be conducted "in the dry" through the use of either flumes or a pump - around bypass.
Temporary spoils piles associated with stream crossings will be set back a minimum of
10 feet from the top of bank and protected with a row of silt fence on the down - gradient
portions of the stockpile. Temporary bridges will be utilized at stream crossings so that
equipment can safely cross the stream. Bridges will be wrapped in geotextile fabric and
have plywood sideboards to prevent sediment from entering the stream being crossed.
MITIGATION
Although the project will not result in a loss of Waters of the U.S., compensatory
mitigation is required for conversion of forested wetlands to herbaceous wetlands. This
conversion will be required for forested wetlands within the permanently- maintained
ROW. NCDWR requires wetland mitigation at a 1:1 ratio. The USACE have determined
that 1:1 ratio is also appropriate for the conversion impacts associated with the project.
Where conversion will take place, .114 acres are considered riparian. To satisfy their
mitigation requirement, PSNC plans to purchase the appropriate amount of mitigation
credit in the Jordan Lake Haw River 0303002 watershed through Restoration Systems,
LLC a private mitigation bank to account for conversion impacts.
Based on our conversations with NCDWR, mitigation is also required by NCDWR for
impacts to Zone 1 and Zone 2 of the Jordan Lake Watershed riparian buffers for all
impacts temporary or permanent near or within perpendicular subject stream crossings.
Further, no mitigation is required for Zone 2 impacts where the pipeline is parallel to a
subject stream. All impacts located within existing maintained easement are Exempt from
requirements of riparian buffers and as such, no mitigation is required. Accordingly, the
proposed project will require 70, 247 riparian buffer credits. PSNC plans to purchase the
buffer mitigation credit from NCEEP as there are no private mitigation banks within the
Jordan Lake Watershed.
Summaries of wetland and riparian buffer mitigation credit required, along with
statements of credit availability from Restoration Systems and a Copy of the In Lieu Fee
Request to EEP, are included in Appendix VI.
Mitigation is not generally required for herbaceous wetlands, where no conversion
impacts will take place. Stream impacts associated with the project are also temporary
23

Pre - Construction Notification: NWP No. 12/WCQ No. 3884 SWE Project No. 7235 -14 -013, Ph 07
Lire T-021 B Pipeline Project - Alamance and Orange Counties, N.C. June 2014
and do not require mitigation. The bed and banks of temporarily- affected stream
channels will be restored to their original dimension and profile, and stabilized with coir
matting. Riprap will not be employed. At both stream crossings and wetlands, PSNC
will use native seed mixes to provide soil stabilization. The Restoration Plan submitted
with this PCN outlines the seed mixes and application methods (Appendix VI).
Mitigation has also been provided by avoidance and minimization procedures
implemented during the design phase of the proposed project. Impacts to streams and
wetlands within the project corridor will be minimized by: 1) extensive installation of the
pipe within the existing, maintained ROW and parallel alignment to existing maintained
ROW requiring only enough to be cleared and maintained to achieve a 50 -wide
permanent maintained easement; 2) reduction of impacts within new virgin ROW
through avoidance; 3) Use of trenchless crossing methodology where feasible; and 4) by
eliminating temporary workspace through wetlands and streams.
SEPA COMPLIANCE
The proposed project is completely funded by PSNC private investment, and does not
involve use of public monies. With the exception of NCDOT Crossings, which are
exempt, the project will not cross state -owned land. As such, the project is not subject to
State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review.
SECONDARY AND CUMULATIVE IMPACTS
The primary purpose of the proposed pipeline is to enhance service to existing customers.
Accordingly, the project should not be considered growth- inducing in that it is unlikely to
serve as an impetus for expansion of development, and should not result in secondary
impacts, or contribute to cumulative impacts.
24

Pre - Construction Notification: NWP No. 12MCQ No. 3884 SWE Project No. 7235 -14 -013, Ph 07
Line T -0218 Pipeline Project - Alarnance and Orange Counties N.C. June 2014
CLOSING
By copy of this correspondence and completed PCN, we are requesting your written
concurrence with this NWP No. 12 permit application. If you have questions or need
additional information, please feel free to contact us at 704.523.4726.
Sincerely,
S &ME
7f�
Crystal J. x
Natural Resources Staff Professional
[e-mail]
Senior Reviewed by Chris Daves, P.W.S.
Attachments
25
py 1=& (J.y)
Joey Lawler, P.W.S.
Senior Project Manager
[e-mail]

FIGURES

��TR .� ■I� r` rfj'� Rp ` Q� Q w U
O - .K \MRS, - k "/ o ° ° c=i
ip
LU
back Creek z c�
p- _ JIM MINOR _RD. a A - +� r F w i
b � � � ..�'.,. � a �• - ��. �" 4 t V, , • �F � � i NG�1a 9�N � R` � w w z �
w z
02 4
ex jel-
S01 # F rm�+
31
01 -
Wo
REATKIN =CN
G1
JM _ Py� V
��
Z
•
FL 2-
r' 0�0 oS09 6 S'
op e �� .
1 R ORr`i �C. QJ Q qua oOSTAOQ-
,� t o — W08 ' W10 �'
GPP5�0 W06 S07
+
s < P 'Q p NG \a 4W05 Wr07 `
g
P r
S06 1163�
_ . -SAM LEE-RD A - p �lr ■ G� * * * ?,� 4 # 6I4? -
r Sta O S10 #I 91pyLN7j
-ENE q q L-BR\G �''�` •� � - ' i # '�.< - - � �j / � f �,C° "+t � � `��`,,.� � f ��,y0 � p�,P ,. ' c
y 0.
OUANpPRY LAKE LN - '-�, ,■ * ~ �,. ,Z �' A,c/ ■ ` ',, r�'�'c* • # j[ �R Ch o c
k • ' ati �r I j U O GE DR i'• { ,s� �` Sy N 2
Is
W12 S11
l "yl� ( �, �� � a � � � s. 4 � if � � � Lll � C
co
ar R i s I,/ - W13 0'` 0 co
�r1 * # Pg y - i! ��0� A `F. -' ■ i S 3 S�12 • O D ° c
Vi✓ OP s� _ °� �% a I j W14 a� cz
Jurisdictional Wetland o� o� `" °!,� P��S q< M��` /F .. _ m *+ +� a a 33
Jurisdictional Stream G2� *diP����. w ' °-\oo �ic� o �. o� eREC a N o� *,� *y 1t� _ U) E
National Hydrography Dataset f! _ A o
9 ■ Q
Approximate Delineated Stream Extents ' �eT "'+ Sto�E�. o °oR * + °vfl� �'o FRRIN'° •� +. r�sFO� o - .� +'' U'
®Approximate Delineated Wetland Extents 10 01
Proposed
y Proposed 16" T -021 B Pipeline ,, h it
• o Y Q
-- Proposed Access Road ` - ° *_ m " �� ° ° '
■ �� 4 C - f ORTN o O� RTHROQ O +
f 11 � _ FIGURE NO.
P i' F`♦ m� `x`
REFERENCE: USGS 1:24,000 QUAD SHEET(S): MEBANE [NC] 0� 000 • f tiwy 000 O� �S°
PROPOSED CENTERLINE PROVIDED BY EMS ON 6/20/2014. PLEASE NOTE THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. IT IS NOT MEANT FOR ` i '" K ,' f' =y, ~�'�7,i
DESIGN, LEGAL, OR ANY OTHER USES. THERE ARE NO GUARANTEES ABOUT ITS ACCURACY. S &ME,INC. ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY - ,f ■9 Q '� • TF' `'L ' Cka' _
DECISION MADE OR ANY ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE USER BASED UPON THIS INFORMATION. Feet` # PEER CT P �2 LINS
y ti ,`,- w, ,. Copyright ©2013 Na tir naI Ge�o�gFraphIC Soe'ety, i ubed

-
�F' +�✓ \`� .� {fir -te �1\
di CO 3 Q Y
co
1131
— FG cwi
X921 W20 7rti +t I ° R cyG r Y 4 rt 2 co
E CD
i i ] O w LL
l ♦ J O C9
S21 A -`' „ Yom? '-y _ *� w z
CX
JONES: °�
r W22 .DRg / j-
f
RD
JlM MI NORvRD =
If
p W... � I ♦ — -� }, 1111
1 00
O I w r� � N pR �'� � z
Meadow �reek� yam` • y * - LU z = #,o �FyRM' F -..s ;�
A °
Q �. re- *, ,
� s z I D U �'
t
� "
S23 _
.S22 a�
Mn
��u HEgTHER�N i 6 _
S24 j 1 W31 A C
v 31B
C
WE25
Z m L
a- o
C
W29 S26 S26A - O I— C:
Jurisdictional Wetland` p ,� 4�'_ n , t U) _ a
Jurisdictional Stream'{ E;! , ` , x r f W32 z�"
Cn 1 _ 9
National Hydrography Dataset I x .
Approximate Delineated Stream Extents` "
® Approximate Delineated Wetland Extents - - # I` • _ "I ^'^
Proposed 16"T-021B Pipeline
- -- Proposed Access Road m
THREE- FILLIES TRL� -= �
� ,r FIGURE NO.
REFERENCE: USGS 1:24,000 QUAD SHEET(S): MEBANE [NC], EFLAND [NC], WHITE CROSS [NC], SAXAPAHAW [NC] .+
+' PROPOSED CENTERLINE PROVIDED BY EMS ON 6/20/2014. PLEASE NOTE THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. IT IS NOT MEANT FOR 0 _ 1,000 2 f 00
DESIGN, LEGAL, OR ANY OTHER USES. THERE ARE NO GUARANTEES ABOUT ITS ACCURACY. S &ME,INC. ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY
DECISION MADE OR ANY ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE USER BASED UPON THIS INFORMATION. Feet + '�• �`,,,` + ' -
-1 ` , CGpY,ight:© 2013 National G'e- ag,ra,phi.. ..... i tubbed I

rl W31A
,4st?l'i B tl cRo� }k
CD
RR�.� ,. � - --' r • ,ECy '4�•, ; � ,�� .,,� ejr S' /EVER FOX. ' � � N CD } m
yy - .. • z
¢C' Q w U
.Q IDGE RD co
o
ilia FLORAS NE:DR 5 �, / o -�J- z
W32r �+ 2
� ! LU
+ + 1► h e , : , � - a. _ _� � co
W31
�` ! � Z N � w LL
flk 1 U z
% S. / I ]: 4P R j Un a w
Ur YKES GLEN TRL 1 ffDSHAVI'aUARRY-
IL —00
for
�+..�
V�
a
W
7:2 03 V)
s28
W3 l ri ane
J m f name S29 4
0 N n ,+
v S30
O
u
Cc
-'`` . W35 0.
C
_ ' !O ,— F - -y a 1 - + W •r° M N 4 c ui
t' �j /y �`a r F / M U co
Q Z
_
N D_ o
�
U O -
� � � _ � fir✓ � !F � •' � - sk - ,C s O� +f �y O � z
Jurisdictional Wetland ,` =- 4 ,/
yFz y _ f /-, V W37 J
c
:) Jurisdictional Stream £
a�.# Y = 1 " �Y �A = ' a� �Q
National Hydrography Dataset
Approximate Delineated Stream Extents
® Approximate Delineated Wetland Extents -�" � � j! ��, �' '� --�- -- _ ` � - � .� � t - �^
J
Proposed 16 "T -0218 Pipeline y � , �� a,.�� '� .�.�.,,� - t 1 ll � �"*•. � i
T
- -- Proposed Access Road
/` FIGURE NO.
REFERENCE: USGS 1:24,000 QUAD SHEET(S): WHITE CROSS [NC], EFLAND [NC].
PROPOSED CENTERLINE PROVIDED BY EMS ON 6/20/2014 PLEASE NOTE THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. IT IS NOT MEANT FOR H,0 1if000 2;000.
DESIGN, LEGAL, OR ANY OTHER USES. THERE ARE NO GUARANTEES ABOUT ITS ACCURACY. S &ME,INC. ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY
DECISION MADE OR ANY ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE USER BASED UPON THIS INFORMATION. Feet % - '� - ,�.�a
wr �t .,� = Copyri'ght:©013 Naational Geographic Society, i cube�"d

r E RD �l O
�. *y CARLISL gyp, N }
CD } m
z LU
Nk
{
J m
V\136 0
Co
O
Z
LU
1r i
U
E O
�w1
d p } r z LL
W37' oo w
I
1 s _
r A / �r r ASTURE RD
r
2Z
- � d
' S 32,
W411 " " r-�s �� Cn
Y P _
W4b S33
p, \RYLAND RD
CO
dr
.x
DAIRYLAND.R
I dill
Jr`(Y7{7�,
RD -� _ ��ar I u° fS36 - - i d
�o
— _ -
5, m
W47
Water Fork+ * ✓ d" ! .. ,.x b Z
J37 a C
LL LU C
z co
Pool— or C
jP 00, i O c
Jurisdictional Wetland o����s �° �M No °,„ �, F- S a
�i ,'G U) J c
:) Jurisdictional Stream `
(n
" V r�ONGB�r� _ E
National Hydrography Dataset a
Approximate Delineated Stream Extents
® A pp roximate Delineated Wetla nd Extents ry � � r 1 -N `;�-
`
RAMBLEwOOD'DR
Proposed 16" T -021 B Pipeline „
�•s _��� i � � '�} �' 'RIDERS„T,RL�jC �' c� �1 �.+'�.
- -- Proposed Access Road
_ d {
REFERENCE: USGS 1:24,000 QUAD SHEET(S): WHITE CROSS [NCI [ r {JJ//
FIGURE NO.
j�
1 - �
PROPOSED CENTERLINE PROVIDED BY EMS ON 6/20/2014 PLEASE NOTE THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. IT IS NOT MEANT FOR 0 1 , 000. - ,000 r'
DESIGN LEGAL, OR ANY OTHER USES. THERE ARE NO GUARANTEES ABOUT ITS ACCURACY. S &ME, INC. ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY y •�� _ - 1 _ - "+�, _''' _
DECISION MADE OR ANY ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE USER BASED UPON THIS INFORMATION. -� r -
ilFeet 6
,t _ / '� ' _ ._ - _ CopyrigfTt:� 201'3,National Ger ®graphic Society, i cubed

P I� �
�tRyLP rr
LINA•MAE LN � IL
SPRING-4\�
+ __ `ar • •
PICKARD MILL "� r° k
W48 y
J R
t ` !
l CD
J Z
�.'
�� MARLONS FORD RD
Oil
-
WOOD SA &
r �
gC \�� S42' MAPLE RIDGEIDR�
S43 �4 ��✓
RGAN
Z
z
h`s- ► o a • �� gyp\
MAZ ING GRACEt�
fff
A } s \ HIRLAWAY LN
Jurisdictional Wetland * _- -� �r y %+• IV
1 _
RET'LN
�
Jurisdictional Stream �; 4 , f DES E �
National Hydrography Dataset .� � � -- ,' •,. JLIOBO
Approximate Delineated Stream Extents r, b
�• "`��� TRIPLE CROW - .. — dg-w,
Approximate Delineated Wetland Extents - DRF' ' }.
Proposed 16" T -021 B Pipeline y
-- Proposed Access Road
� y
PROPOSED CENTERLINE PROVIDED BYYDEMS ON 6( WHITE
CROSS
MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. IT ISNOTMEANT FOR 0 w�'r. 1 f000 ""` -- . 2,000 �r
DESIGN, LEGAL, OR ANY OTHER USES. THERE ARE NO GUARANTEES ABOUT ITS ACCURACY. S &ME, INC. ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY -�
DECISION MADE OR ANYACTIONS TAKEN BY THE USER BASED UPON THIS INFORMATION. Fe et
■
L
s 7,.fri
OLD�SPRIN
• kA R
•
.0�
' *44b �
10
U
2
°o
of
•
N�
CD }
c °
}
° m
m = p
m
CD .
. Z
Z Y
Y
Q p
p U
U
co
o
C7 w
Z
cz z
z
� U
W
II L
LO -
-� CO
1 O
O M O
O
aq U
w o
U W
W LL
J w
a w
z
LU 2
EUBRD O
� � U
z W
o
o�
11`
v
c
a �� o
0 Z
S50 �� a U
EN R D O Q O m O
a U
LLI � O �
-Q� Jae, m
DEER RIDGE,DR z
p� O U N O
'E 5 a D_ 0 0
�• 4 0
QO�LEGENS DS ;AY, O
HOG'AN'HILLS Rp�{w _' J O
ATEGAN IN
4 !ZA„ C/) E
Q- \Q oGpP
o Q-
� j� o
r Q FIGURE NO.
C
.
U.

` c� ea E '�' \LbC2 I D DbB` DaC3 - - -- DbB L)DL b DbC LbB2 GaB2 Sb /GaC2 GaB GbC3 F GaC2
EcD3 a Creo —,/Me DaC3 MbB2 GaB2 CD
0> EeD q; LaD3 LaC3 WbD DbC DaC3 to - ObC2 W GbC3 Sb /� o Y
D
L
WbE Mc Sb aD3 TaC2 L D ;- C . m 2 o LL
ed *WOea EeD We N Z 0 Y
Ee 2 yea rEBC2 \ DaD3 DbB GaD2 0 0 U U
WbE _ - r6 OaB2
.0 W Ca 3 DbD aC GbC3 Ktm TaB Ld -
J DbB DbC DbC ObC2
C C'7 O
Wa Ba \ MbC2 LbC2 b g B aC Da 3 GaB2 DbB Sb o0 o N
1 0- W
Wa Sy LbC2 aC MaC3 DaD3 LaC3 W GaC2
s4 bC bG TaC2
Cg S \ A Lc DbB DbC DbB I Lb 2 GaC2 II d C, Z
DbC yys b6 A, LaD3� EcC3 Sb F W o
4 LbD LbB2 TaB2 Lc TbC3 0 w LL
DbB LbE ~�° '� DbB Sb 119 GaB2 ObB2 J 3 z
c Jim Minor Rd 'i a w
c
y�ys4 LaE3 �? DaD3 DbC �/ D TbD3 GbD3 TaC2
EcD3 DaD3 ( f bD We
DaC3 Db Ud Sb i
`. EBB - GbD3
✓;,,,M�no GaC
WbE Reatki "Ln W Da
aD3 54 ' o` LbC2 Sb LbB2 C TaB
i DaC3 Db �e °9 DaC3 DaC3 bC U
LaD Ba C W I DbB \cam DbB Sa LaD3 �' Sb Z
b � ,. GaD
WbE W WbE g DbC Sb yes Dd �e`010 c IaC2 S /eyo DaC3 �h'e Ra dC TaB2 Mf GaB2
DaD3 o Lc
dS < Sb
Ee Sb % EcC 3 '0 DbC
DbC � o`Sb a, GaC2
Lc WbD EeD2 DaC3 MbB2 ��s IaB2 DaC3 y s'ey °
m`
EeC2 La 3 oy 100y IaC2 DaD3 Sb GaB GbD3 GbD3
MbC2 \
LbC2 bB LbC �a DbC Wd PS,/ a3s� Hd GaB
Me MbB2 W TbC3
LbE DaC3 /�`�a� GbC3
Sam Lee Rd DaD3 2 /L" a ,
- EcC 3
t
o i �
LaC3 <t\ ys laB2 D o GaB
ary F WbD2 r ti� Qoa° doc MaC3 _- Sb �e Sandy Ln GaC Mf
Ar Ba � LbB2 00 +a GbC3 v J
-Cresce'f0 Bec`� Sb
ecea DbC EeC2 EcC3 DbC Sb \ R GaB2 Q N
Wba= - DaD3 s LU W
d$ MbC DaC3 " GaB o Q Z
Sb ' W �1 MaC3 \I yon MbB2 ^� s OaB2 GaC2 W W i
0a do LL. a LL w/ R
Wa DaD3 cb DaC3 laB2 MaC3 MbB2 Sb GaB2 fro HdC2 aieye `aca
_bC2 EcD3 M9 MB �� \ �`s DbB M GaB2 Cf Lc GaC2 aer� °a Ob 3 V o c
aI F k 0 O V Z
aD LbE ` uan ary Tri puandary� MaC3 IaB2 bC3 HdB2 Z u
D C3 ¢� Cf ObC2 v c
EcC 3 _ Sb 0 y� Y N C:
\ �y ObB2 C GbB3 5° Mf `tee GbC o V c
La Average Soil Map Unit pH: �y �1 r Ga Z W °D
sn Ld Mf �Me�Reld Dr e D Q
a v IL N C
�- Proposed 16" T -021 B Pipeline N I HeC3 GaB2 U) I°— C
5.0 IaB MbC2" MaC3 M GbC3 u il.
Proposed Access Road 5.0 -5.5 MbD , GaB2 GaB o Sb 7-1 GcD D W
Existing OW / y C2 GaC �EaB U W U a
g 5.5 -6.0 SQ �o GbC3 \ d \ i W a
LbC2 �°S MbB2�laBlk b GbD3 ObC \ GaC SL GaC2 w a
6.0 -6.5 MbC2 �y e'a Mf ) GaC EaC U � 0
sp "0 Lc U)
6.5 -7.0 W GaC^ \ J
Sb a
r
>7.0 o HcB2 OaB2 Ga GcD GaC N
GaC2
Lc a
o GaD
REFERENCE: la I - bC HdC2 - �? FIGURE NO.
_ SOILS DATA WAS GENERATED FROM THE USDA SOIL SURVEY GEOGRAPHIC (SSURGO) DATASET. ELEMENT OCCURENCE AND NATURAL HERITAGE O ECG�1 ,000, Y �.;� 00o Tb63 GaB2 GaC
AREAS WERE OBTAINED FROM THE NORTH CAROLINA NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM (NCNHP). PLEASE NOTE THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL I GaE Cg
_ PURPOSES ONLY IT IS NOT MEANT FOR DESIGN, LEGAL, OR ANY OTHER USES. THERE ARE NO GUARANTEES ABOUT ITS ACCURACY. S&ME, INC. 1 / \ M
Feet Sb EbC3 GbC3 y_ /
ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DECISION MADE OR ANY ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE USER BASED UPON THIS INFORMATION. ry¢, GbC3
E Sb DaC3 Gale lap, NC Ce(n?,er'r rGeogra�phic Info a ion an(3PobA_ ya sZNC <Deptitecf3TransportatioU - GIS Unit; NC �Flo�dpla b�3ppingaProgram

r �yGaC - -- - -- -- GaB2 GaC2 _ EbC3 EbD3 EaC - -- EaC2 EaB2 vGaE Cd GaC
GbC3 GaB2 Lc GcE GaD2 GbC3 Mf EaB TaB2 / TaB2 TbC3l GbC3 Sb GaB = o
GaB Lc i ?�� Co N
TaB / - Coo!, m
GaB Mf EbC3 TaB2 EbC3 Lc Sb GaC GbC3 COO!, } LL
GaB2 �; �\ GaE C3 w p o
/ GaC2 ;o *� GaC2 GaD2 dD GaC2 GaB2 GbD3 /�� GaE N a o 0 p w U 11
Lc -�_ e t ea " °e C'/ GaB2 We TaB2 ° ° c=)
—� goo` GbC3 Mf HdB
GbC3 Sb
GaC2 GcE GaB2 C GaC2 1 °0 TaB2 GaB2 _ ro o
a 1
G C3 eCa° ObB2 GaB2 Cg GaC2 OaB GcE
HdB2 W GbC3 GbC3 G TbC3 GcE GbD3 a 9 w
Cd GaC2 GbC3 Lu
HeC3
GaC GaC2 GaE ii J �
GaD2 GaD2 ithite P e Cg - z CO z
D \ ^.Dr GaB GaB2 Cd � E o
HeC3 GaC 5:;�e U w LL
A. W
\ GaB2
W, Z
Sfj�_ J
N w z
Sb ' D GbC3 r GaC2 GaC2 GbC3 E GaC Ga i
i
GcD .t GbC3 c
EaB = Sb GaC2 oy`e Mc aC Mf s Cd
GaC v GaC2 GaB2 W ° a GaB yQ< Garden, as al D
�- GbD3 GE <oA a as
a
\ EaC 2 LC e r GaC Spring C
U Mf Gb bD argon > Mf C�
Lc EbD3 � ` j GaD GcE ct °' HdC U
1 Ga EbC3 Ga or HdC2 Z
GcD GaC aC Eb °iTaB2 EbC3 ObB2 Ga-'Na9 W
GaD ';n Lc EbD3 HdB HeC3 Ga La Da6e. , �2
Minor. GaD2 EaD `OSQ Hd6 �
GaC2 - m Minor Rd Sb r r HdB
GaC Cd HdE o`
i1` Cg Gc GaD2 Cg a� °� GaB
GbD3 GaC2 GaE \ Cg EaC W H 'e5`° GaB i'
O o
GaC GbD3 Lc 9 GbD3 GaC2 GbE3 GcE GcE GaB °x67,
a
GbC3 C t,,�1 GCE GbD3 ay ct C�`ap\e� e o D Wo
GaD GbE3 Mf Mc GaC ObC Mf 2 eo GaC2 Sb EaB C00,z�aj, B2 W GaB
✓lf GaB2 Mc ofd GaB2 Ea ' HdB ., D } U)
GbC3 EaC2 1f
GbD3 dD GaE W \ � 1 aB2 t? HdD C J M
Ma GbC3 GaB2 GaC2 bD GIbL\ GaC2 GbD3 Lc f GaB Q
li EbD3 GbE3 GCE s0\\ b HdD2 HdD e ObC ObC W ,
GaB2 s GaE yRa W V M X
GaD
C2 GaB 0 Z c z
Sa Lc Ga\ F o�
HdE , 0 x W W vl
MC HeD3 jo Mf n° OaB a
GaE _ eN HeD3
LL W
of Z bD GaB TaC2 Dr c� Z = L) N
3CD\x GbE3 HdB2 HdC2 U "dery °od TaC2 (�
GCC cD �.ya.. GbC3 G / Cf ObB O (� a Z -t
\ CbD2 AdB2 / 3 HdB ObC
Z c
GaC o TaB2 D3 Lc HdD dC Y u) U z
)b ' W_ Q m
v� Average Soil Map Unit pH. HdD HdC \� o�� HdD Cf Z V m
yy W
F Oa Q a N O
3c Proposed 16" T -021 B Pipeline <5 0 TaC a HdB C kS Ln HdB HdC D Q CD -
Sb
Proposed Access Road C r� ObB2 3
Tab - y C � °' � z
5.0-5.5 �4n" z W L)
G Existing ROW a mMr \� HdB2 �=y } ~
5.5 -6.0 " ObC I ObC Rd F � W cEo
6.0 -6.5 ObB2 Jim Minor Rd E "3 Ga w Q
HdB2 Lc C U :) O M
/ V) w 4
\ 6.5 -7.0 HdD EaC ObB o o OaB J II N
HdB2 t HdC GcC n
_ >7.0 HdC HdC2\ W ObC �z GaC EaB (j) z
Q Ga132 ObB /^ EaB2 0
REFERENCE: p� I bB FIGURE NO. N
SOILS DATA WAS GENERATED FROM THE USDA SOIL SURVEY GEOGRAPHIC (SSURG O) DATAS ET. ELEMENT OCCURENCE AND NATURAL HERITAGE 000 Menw ether -,L a er aBr2 d
AREAS WERE OBTAINED FROM THE NORTH CAROLINA NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM (NCNHP). PLEASE NOTE THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL t EaC2
d6
PURPOSES ONLY. IT IS NOT MEANT FOR DESIGN, LEGAL, OR ANY OTHER USES. THERE ARE NO GUARANTEES ABOUT ITS ACCURACY. S &ME, INC. HdB aB
i ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DECISION MADE OR ANY ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE USER BASED UPON THIS INFORMATION. �.' o C
Feet NG e t of- rTrans °ortation Is Uni ; NC Flood lain Mapping Pro ram
rre ap, N(J Center_for_Geog�rapi I 4io i

IL ` !o-
` t W U
X71' a o =
Iiij! 1-41 im
uj
,t
.r
l _ r* �i u)
Lu
lk + = z N z CD CD
�r a W
uj LL
uj
f ` a •�1 „ s R ry �.y 71? . v a w
1
S. 111i.
C
•},�'... ti_" i..�i �4 •��r �- ice. ".,v .,� � -� y - ."'i6i w,. ti� �V\ A. n��Mk +y * .a fi _. F l_' ` 5 Y ' .P M S
i
12Z
^vk,
ir
4 t a
or, � *,
Is.
1• '� a'r a i 330
{ y �304 06 C =
0.
W03� �� Q
y a? W05,
fir. S05 I -E
Od
Impact Map Extents (See Appendix IV) {� W ° a
c
i a. a
Jurisdictional Wetland ,, r' d U c
1 m
,' a U J Stram ,>
Approximate lDelineated Stream Extents ,� � _ �
j.
[ " -
4 w C "
® Approximate Delineated Wetland Extentsi: `� •r+ ys,, QC —� AdML
Proposed 16"T-021B Pipeline £
- -- Proposed Access Road r. 't `•' ' N a
Workspaces
Existing ROW
Proposed ROW
TWS
� � I �,;. •. �. �� � FIGURE NO.
REFERENCE: 2010 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH C r
PROPOSED CENTERLINE AND WORKSPACE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY EMS ON 6/20/2014 PLEASE NOTE THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL O 500 * -� �0 O -
PURPOSES ONLY. IT IS NOT MEANT FOR DESIGN LEGAL, OR ANY OTHER USES THERE ARE NO GUARANTEES ABOUT ITS ACCURACY. S &ME, INC. 11 �- ',+ 1 A
ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DECISION MADE OR ANY ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE USER BASED UPON THIS INFORMATION. - Feet T
A.. Qn�e,Map,,NC.CenterforGeogradic Information a6dAnalysis, NC 911 Board

l 1 • of " j
-
_ t O
• .t O
•; m 2 ❑ LL
di Q
3307
S0.7 W10 , ' o
08 ° w
W , " r z
Lu
Ln U
Lr) Q0
S08 C)
Lu
\ �� a, w w z LL
W04 '.! �► 1 i a is +� Q o z
S06 P;
% y1-Ly da�lr 14 .4
0A jl� 11
A 0
r
w
,
i.l V
s
/ +J
- `
% , u
Y' 330
p
a� 'f ^Yir i / W12 "« ice} �yf`� r# * ' ` >, c 21 S
Impact Map Extents (See Appendix IV) +� ' ° '4! f . ��`` "r 'L ,4 { 2
0.
W .fl y
sm
Jurisdictional Wetland �+ ..'•" i a �`;# ;. i m ca
} co
Jurisdictional Stream
Approximate Delineated Stream Extents y.; ,'¢ �,. . t,; �, r , «;,r -' r. /� °. W13 > 09 w W c_
® Approximate Delineated Wetland Extents _ ►.. -� ,.'"` t,b 'r ,i�;� ,� ' / ti' j`� 33� o o co
Proposed 16"T-021B Pipeline �r ,�• ' a a " s ,' / `��� o _�
VV14 - N Q
Workspaces � ._cw� r `� �- 'h '� •. •
Existing ROW
Proposed ROW #
TWS o
FIGURE NO.
REFERENCE: 2010 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
, ` }, :fl «
PROPOSED CENTERLINE AND WORKSPACE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY EMS ON 6/20/2014. PLEASE NOTE THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL 0 500 1,000 p 5,'
PURPOSES ONLY. IT IS NOT MEANT FOR DESIGN, LEGAL, OR ANY OTHER USES. THERE ARE NO GUARANTEES ABOUT ITS ACCURACY. S &ME, INC. y ,.w,.. �A ! C
ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DECISION MADE OR ANY ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE USER BASED UPON THIS INFORMATION. Feet •� ? J
�� y� NC OneMap, NC Center for Geographic Information and Analysis,, NC 911 Board

CD
N Z Q c LL
W
! d' ui CO 3 M
LU
V4 LU
LU
3309 ` u u r
LU
t •�S13 r y�F °
/ w z
0 0
` / - ♦ - - .'",�►t': # w _ '. Tyr j y 1* a w
S12 3
,
Ilk
,' * �t s
20
514 W1.6'
,
Impact Map Extents (See Appendix IV)
. Jurisdictional Wetland '
:) Jurisdictional Stream
Approximate Delineated Stream Extents
® Approximate Delineated Wetland Extents
Proposed 16"T-021B Pipeline
— — — Proposed Access Road _ �+ •:
Workspaces t�
Existing ROW "
Tws
REFERENCE: 2010 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
PROPOSED CENTERLINE AND WORKSPACE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY EMS ON 6/20/2014. PLEASE NOTE THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL
y PURPOSES ONLY. IT IS NOT MEANT FOR DESIGN, LEGAL, OR ANY OTHER USES. THERE ARE NO GUARANTEES ABOUT ITS ACCURACY. S &ME, INC
ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DECISION MADE OR ANY ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE USER BASED UPON THIS INFORMATION.
k
n
®, /
t 'S17A '', ♦334
W1.8
Al
jFN
' 4�t �• 'XL'_ !� •. _k — — i _. .iii l.•. *tn .
w.
0 500 1,000 �<
Feet
NC OneMap, NC Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, NC 911 Board
ns
c
2 0 �
a
Q U =
(� o o
0
2O
0 U
.s O ?
�m
Q u
a
.J Z m
Q CO N I
O- O � o
W C
Q J U a
c -
O co �
T E F
o � i
N Q =
FIGURE NO.
16

a.
.� • �• F fir, N
E.
"
rjyi ! le 4 }! >_ CD
y
LU
N °' ❑
It J ` r p Q 0 V
Uj
+' N' �"..!.� w i s •+ . -, ?' tl ' iii'
co
S18A' • - .`� , }'> ei+ ,..# ` -kr #� y f *+ �i
1.� p` i f Y v Cp
�^.. ,�. 9. J _d Az ir.l.: "` a #4' h - Z N Z c-
,' 4 OOOAO��T�T,,,.,rrrrr
U w LL.
r
a 4, LU
LU
Ira
lk
• i p' - ie P 4 _ _ ' it
• #14 ! ^s ' � -,. i '> � 'ms's � � � ti x tee
a
f
� E
\ \316
tied
• y I ` S20",
20 tri
' - 'n .M "�/� 21 u 46 00
Impact Ma Extents s k T
j
p p (See Appendix IV) �,,... �r . ' =` I� U c co
IL
Jurisdictional Wetland +_ a-
F 1. , • i � �� O- o � o
:) Jurisdictional Stream 21A
-. � '- � ~ �
rt w► LU c
Approximate Delineated Stream Extents + �� - Q -' c
U a
. - -, . - 1 ... - _fit �� �.. E
® Approximate Delineated Wetland Extents ,�' � Via. _ + ` �� ,�� � r E �
Proposed 16"T-021B Pipeline ^ . + ,, �� + .. N Q -
I
- -- Proposed Access Road
Workspaces' r
Existing ROW _
TWS 1+- #' FIGURE NO. o
REFERENCE: 2010 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH s C
F
PROPOSED CENTERLINE AND WORKSPACE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY EMS ON 6/20/2014. PLEASE NOTE THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL 0 500 1,
PURPOSES ONLY. IT IS NOT MEANT FOR DESIGN, LEGAL, OR ANY OTHER USES. THERE ARE NO GUARANTEES ABOUT ITS ACCURACY. S &ME, INC.
ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DECISION MADE OR ANY ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE USER BASED UPON THIS INFORMATION. 7
Feet. l ti I
N I I n and An 1 911 Board

°` "�I rA a w�,'}y • 4yC°jr* pe�rj c -
CD
JIM
di
2
! ❑
LL
�i
1 lI' f N
U
Ilk
co
z
.
.vy Y ' r . { r r } '+iY+t ?7'. C) c— w
7 c
DE
U
..— 0 _
a
0
,
r
,
ar q j W
,
W22
y � '� � ' � 'y � � '", 3 �8 LTA �`'�• '(,, �' '" ` ,
' 'r e'r - � �� � � ,� r�1r.. ' v t 'f•�� l �'� '`'ryo.. k i t'3 ¢�' w ° „�•�• j � t�
W21 I •,�i}�, i r i�
W23 � , 320 { �ij !�i,' '� � • ' .a � � i£. 1r •° t � �' '~ � -
y
/ uy e4
ILL..
- � �� `-�' � �'� � � 'I tip' �f+ • - - � y. :,.F` +�' - ��♦ � '� �� •�� �
ALI •; A); , ` �♦� d
bL
fly
'T'yw . +� • ` � Y �;c.' ��C - _ � ,+•/."4 �' f' ' � 11. .raj, �'!•. �.F �j�. - ��♦ 'L'^L^ 'p -�
* - �L ; ♦♦♦
�i
1• -
i •
- -� r' it � #F, . ° Z�:�♦ ♦ � a Im act Map Extents See Appendix IV ) A.. =
W 4 ° a C c
�� ♦♦ z m
Jurisdictional Wetland "* '` '" ' ' rt,� M 3 *?�i Q U) N C
CD
:) Jurisdictional Stream
'n a '� - .rr ,J` - ,}I" _`�` ,N• .M j''f, ws .a -r ir..r /"/W25 W c a
Approximate Delineated Stream Extents _ d' U
; r'`" ,,S22; Q - c
® Approximate Delineated Wetland Extents wL E
Proposed 16"T-021B Pipeline r #p ": r rr`�' N a
Proposed Access Road t'4a , '` ey��:, :+�4 ' ti ' °`" #',1 qtr
Workspaces ° =T t �. t� •" W .P �+!Fr wd`
Existing ROW
TW S Or d. • x
a
� JJ
,
e r
J �F ,!
:. F �� �� r� FIGURE NO.
PROPOSED CENTERLINE BAERIAL D WORKSPACE PHOTOGRAPH INFORMATION PROVIDED BY EMS ON 6/20/2014. PLEASE NOTE THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL 0 „L 500 1 ,000
PURPOSES ONLY. IT IS NOT MEANT FOR DESIGN, LEGAL, OR ANY OTHER USES. THERE ARE NO GUARANTEES ABOUT ITS ACCURACY. S &ME, INC. ^1,y,r?'•
ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DECISION MADE OR ANY ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE USER BASED UPON THIS INFORMATION. Fee }6k 7T„�11 8 8
.N NC Cantor. Cam... Mill i lin ra,mm' tin, I, i. - N 1 Rnard

III
At 25
Aro
41 4P
�. �yQ�►+ ` }� ! S23 3322 {t
W26
74
jy + F„ }
l f r
'� ' M 8�'} 'YT 1✓ - f
N
r
O
. Impact Map Extents (See Appendix IV)
N
-
k
Jurisdictional Wetland
O
m _
❑ LL
:) Jurisdictional Stream
R
0
M
U
Approximate Delineated Stream Extents
+
W
® Approximate Delineated Wetland Extents
r`
❑
2
U
M
p
Proposed 16"T-021B Pipeline
r --
�—
Z
- -- Proposed Access Road
OI
'
Workspaces
O
O
Z
LU
LO
II
Ln
U
Existing ROW
'�
O M
c7
Proposed ROW
"k r
S1t�•,'! .' rF7' «f,y, ,u�� +,.. `
+' ,"
U
W
w LL
Z_
TWS
J
Q
N
O
a
o
w
7
REFERENCE: 2010 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
PROPOSED CENTERLINE AND WORKSPACE INFORMATION PROVIDED
BY EMS ON 6/20/2014. PLEASE NOTE THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL
PURPOSES ONLY. IT IS NOT MEANT FOR DESIGN, LEGAL, OR ANY OTHER USES. THERE ARE NO GUARANTEES ABOUT ITS ACCURACY. S &ME, INC.
ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DECISION MADE OR ANY ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE USER BASED UPON THIS INFORMATION. F
,
'� ' M 8�'} 'YT 1✓ - f
N
O
N
}
O
m _
❑ LL
Qo
0
M
U
W
p
❑
2
U
M
p
�—
Z
■■
OI
U)
r
O
O
Z
LU
LO
II
Ln
U
O M
c7
-
-
Z N
Z .—
UJ
U
W
w LL
Z_
-
J
Q
N
O
a
o
w
7
frye }: w
W�
Z
/ S24 3 ?`3 W31A
tE
kATOO
P%31C U
6A 0 21 Z
f .s �`•_y �' iS26„33 ��� c 2 W
d
co
PIP �v A32y // a o- cm) o
Ti r' p d f '! _ E
qL
jP J 4� ys P gJ'y�+E�.I
r � . } i� j „i /' ", � .. * ►�,�ir Utz i y�1 �' s e a
FIGURE NO.
-� 1,000,
19
'Feet ,
' +� ;" NC OneMap, NC Center.for Geographic Information and Analysis NC 911 Board

" ,I - ''a -`I ',��" . •w"•.� 3. + '�' �. r"• d 3 ^- 'M: J,'�, hry r .., ,- fi' :r 4 r r'
' a �
A ti_
_- -� .. � , �C . w A. 'Lr. 'flr• r - � - r
,.,r., -'q }. t . ,k . k, .. ,4 '`•yr, ^' . ,° - " a '� •P 'r�', r� -.� ,Yyr! a r •.s i O
,
Ir r
"'� 1. •l`'- �
T ►. .�yi - -�' k ,f"�, C:)
> m
I •ti A C ' ... '� r e �, "� V '1r. } " � a ( "'1 n y:.'h r a' _ "i . °.c- 0° _ ❑ U-
x' N AF
W31C 1J Y
iw. z
F � a 0 v b
d• 1w t r ]t •>b. a w
S26A "t 4., b o o v
` 1 i iv
py
* i ' �!' . 1, `, ,i. , ,'1 { + �hb
,
S, -yr. .�i- _� -{' .a.•IS., �.�, ''rti,. .+. (y O rwn
o DIYY T
Lu
u LO
L Q0
U w ,
n rs
�� • "A, .. d _ _ - # i.. . e',4�i. Fr 'i}1 '` r'i'• rt ,.4 w z Lu
LL.
'• R
w Z
• � A.,
jw
yp
•
` ��!w!�.Z�ii'Cr��� i:,�'�.. ate♦ ✓', YI{ - -d � ,�� �.
,
U
•„
,
C ;
y
+ r.
;,'�p� E" -.Iay. •1,�,' ,�5, !�v �,�,,,.. .. J � * ,� , � � - � tee.
i ¢
, t4".t �r� ► "'1�'r'ry rr «
�W33 � 7 wd s,
A
_4 S27 {.r.• iw r.;.',F"'J{,.r.�pC, i -a
� r �
Impact Map Extents (See Appendix IV)
828,
Jurisdictional Wetland r 411 11 :) Jurisdictional Stream
iod
1�,v ri ",r *` -•. .irl }ate" ".rk 1`�♦ f r�.r J I.. �M
Approximate Delineated Stream Extents irjx 1 . {� ��„- �;+
F � �- ► �� �'!j�''� � r
y,
®Proposed 16"T-021B Pipeline
Proposed Access Road Approximate Delineated Wetland Extents : AL
f ; ,�+ ' �r{ # • � "rr � „� ^ * , 1M•I -,
ry �
�b +''`�� :� :', " I'�'k.;. r' r •'S i a� ; y ,t
Existing ROW Workspaces L P-;.=�r,�' �.r'} � � � . � � ,, •E } r.� b { i ra , at°S,. -r''F. . '" �� s7,
r
•'
^ l •• i' >' ay�. ,F.r•:,.
j E
TWS • A -,. I 'If } - 4 w fl Ja Y Y`.a ""v, .1 "'f
Mi��. #'. ";., 'h`a•g 'r r .rr., _ r A - '� i•¢ �i�r
REFERENCE: 2010 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH r w° .� r w. ' T q r I ' w �; . �a`r1W r ��•
1 000 4 ��', , �J,•
PROPOSED CENTERLINE AND WORKSPACE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY EMS ON 6/20/2014. PLEASE NOTE THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL 0 500 i Y �"' �` a' N+ �' p� =, . •* .r.., h ,i d Jq;. #. T !,� t° i m,�lt. �, .1 a
r, PURPOSES ONLY. IT IS NOT MEANT FOR DESIGN, LEGAL, OR ANY OTHER USES. THERE ARE NO GUARANTEES ABOUT ITS ACCURACY. S &ME, INC. #. -_?,' ,s r� �,' .” L r� , _ . r,,-G ,yam, +''b ��' i• `�/ ^ - , ' " ': w';' `'"
ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DECISION MADE OR ANY ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE USER
jr 4 BASED UPON THIS INFORMATION. _ ' Map, NC Center for Geo"graphlC Information
NC One ation and Analysis, NC 911 Board
= o
a
Q U
(� o o
O > d Z
i- 2 � vi
O ��v `
2
a �0- C u
I
'J z m
nQ o- O o
LL ~
W c `6
Q J U a
C
O E F
N Q =
FIGURE NO.
20

. IV
ii
s� f mPf 'yA 1'
di
CO 3 p Y V
;, Qp a p w
'q33 Ilk
S28r ��9a , ,',; psi Y ,�
\/ 'fit/ O z
CD Lu
3330 .. I{`� x -. � R , _ � r � � . � x " .. -• � p, _ I
LO
I � � CEO
r
W34 \� ; y h W
w LL
NN
't 7 O
U
•s E
�� \ \333 r &
�I \ \
rir
C,
W36 0.
Impact Map Extents (See Appendix IV) :yr p �� m Q U
Jurisdictional Wetland d U m
i) Jurisdictional Stream + �•; 1. h `b A Q a- o O o
Approximate Delineated Stream Extents —=---- - -- - - -- -- _ W c `6
® Approximate Delineated Wetland Extents
1 -- p m
Proposed 16 "T -021B PipelineY. _ Fri ,4 W37 0 E F
- -- Proposed Access Road ` * y ' ' _` T 7 ` N Q
Workspaces
c
Existing ROW
Proposed ROW
At
TWS i ", + 3tt�� Ty�{!,� 4.
� '_r'ti .���4 � 1, ,..� FIGURE NO.
REFERENCE: 2010 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH 0 500'-, 000
+� C
s .' . .
PROPOSED CENTERLINE AND WORKSPACE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY EMS ON 6/20/2014. PLEASE NOTE THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL f /Ma ///��� PURPOSES ONLY. IT IS NOT MEANT FOR DESIGN, LEGAL, OR ANY OTHER USES. THERE ARE NO GUARANTEES ABOUT ITS ACCURACY. S &ME, INC. .� ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DECISION MADE OR ANY ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE USER BASED UPON THIS INFORMATION. eet , - z. y�r ` III '� NC 0,1,e NC CenteMor Oeo ra hic Information and Analysis, NC 911 Boar
r t ar P" g P Y

CD
CD
CNJ
It .: CD O Q 21 U
.t U
z
-�
E 1 I I co z
LU
s � ^�/'``'������� , ♦� c�����ZZ -���� v � + p,rfith���'� � _ -p; 1,- •. < M R ".1� -t n ���-. ti.1..M 4 �., � ."i.�r.. = z � w �
w ILL
_.
i�3 I♦ �I( ,.�, t . ftj'� , a;'�, .p w w z
W37 - 4 , I
` f 33
�0^-� �� Sj t LI 1 M M%u Y p 1 Un a w
," s
W38 ". ,w
3 6
k / e40 U
\�/ r4'��,�T fit` _.f .t• "A1t11 `•r{7' �`y ��ii » ' Z
Pj
.r
•
° t; \\ / �. aft �` , ,�, ,� d n�• � d� ,i{
p� 't`•l r r \, �' " � i �" "" a r �, r y,_ � t
1 - ' .g• �!
' i `
3
�!"� `��': /r4 o MSC i4 '�w[}'�t - +.'" _ •p - E
Alt
pe
lk
32
4 u
t r
+�' W45 / 33 S33 c
`g _ o
* 'c► Q
� �� � �`�� iw"RF„� "� i �'- '.w�.'�i tea" �, � � 4 � N � `
INC, toll
Impact Map Extents (See Appendix IV) h ' ; ,�"' , a m (-0) a
Jurisdictional Wetland �� `"� Y a a °'
I/ a y� P vet �;M1L Y Z 00
:) Jurisdictional Stream '" w ���� +', r" `- Q a- o O o
Approximate Delineated Stream Extents • �� r § " ,. ti yP W
r
,
Approximate Delineated Wetland Extents : ' ��� "} t' +� r " * ', " y', •t. Q —' v
II y p F s
Proposed 16" T -021 B Pipeline �i �' f r�" , :„� w I y, , " I ;,R fi :,, o c E F
-- Proposed Access Road r� ��. ; �•. My" '} r , N Q -
Workspaces s 1+; p -�' �+� r, i _" Y. '." yy ti
Existing ROW " rr r ,¢ }:L•
Proposed ROW , 5
TWSr
♦ xia. �. r, °fir y • �y E. 'y 5, 7(
" �r.9,. ? "• r r r t ". �Y FIGURE NO. c
REFERENCE: 2010 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH C
F
PROPOSED CENTERLINE AND WORKSPACE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY EMS ON 6/20/2014. PLEASE NOTE THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL ., 0 .w �'* E' -500 ?� f000
PURPOSES ONLY IT IS NOT MEANT FOR DESIGN, LEGAL, OR ANY OTHER USES. THERE ARE NO GUARANTEES ABOUT ITS ACCURACY. S &ME, INC. _,"
ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DECISION MADE OR ANY ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE USER BASED UPON THIS INFORMATION. ri F.i,l�B1 ., • t�. #+,• ► :,���! w-`"" � f. .W !! , rapiic fNOnM,fiC C enteG noiiation an. Analysis;ANC B^oard "

f
t t
w co V
w �,,�' ,,. + Fr 'E t'', 'r r`F',t - - a •' �.,. - ~� s • 'C k' i. �- o
,�.
.rt 0 w
/•mow fi} ��a` '� " I� 1`p , , ; v
r / Y p V w
t .w {rte!% �,; fi. y �, y�r - f * , In O
�1 r O
I'�Nr c—
J'!�rr
i .J Fy " =' • . F+ I ' ��"T ,�+ � � - T �} _� ` 1� ' � '1 " - I •, � _ 'j i5, r . Q .. O w w 7
a w rte nF 9
LL
r f
'
z
-4
12
#14
rr
Alt . R� P
mot , w •,�R4
L;
--j"L
� "� ,A '�� � r �, t� „`ai * w �!' 'f, � '.fi .�.�'4� ♦� i�` � e �� 6 e'�j.,t .:a
l
,X'
-
'e:,"q
: ` tw i, � _, � �, {. "`Ir �(. •� 1b.�+ + "' ^G•} 'x'11' + .r �` _ j��� T
?� +''"�' '4 y � +''+� Ott '� AP. +` _� „� ,' '�''! � "�/�'�� -� r `" , u ",• _
/ . _
i r
0.
It pi
r
,
I mt . , ,
�.rc' .� ":� �,y �', a ,e�.•a. o
. t
r .
Impact Ma Extents See Appendix IV + �' � ' a. a�
✓ r P rcti' � -6 m
Jurisdictional Wetland 4 +• ' "_�' �'� r F � �''} . � , t li �' —� � 0 I
Jurisdictional Stream a dz M JN
"
r 1
Approximate Delineated Stream Extents + w.' + S
�r
® Approximate Delineated Wetland Extents
Proposed 16"T-021B Pipeline
�r:>�' -W4 , '�• ":.I[
Workspaces
Existing ROW
�,t• w% P 1
Proposed ROW,
TWS r .� ` � � +n. *r�r a'.:rt k^ � ,'1�" :, r,�� •��;
a
�+ d
�r x
•' R'°s FIGURE NO c
REFERENCE: 2010 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH r' { " �i+ ]n 1' ?r'. �l V4��114� C
PROPOSED CENTERLINE AND WORKSPACE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY EMS ON 6/20/2014. PLEASE NOTE THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL 0 500 000 ;''&''1 -' "7 ; q 11f1�1Er ' r)• r, e� ;'�t''F' '?' .��„'i" p•
+ iii 1't1�F�1a .• 1 y a'
PURPOSES ONLY IT IS NOT MEANT FOR DESIGN LEGAL, OR ANY OTHER USES. THERE ARE NO GUARANTEES ABOUT ITS ACCURACY. SBME, INC. +1 ,FLa,`~P .� 1?I' '.•}' .y 'C l 1'�.�. , ":. �' T .t ,. +,. _ ��
ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DECISION MADE OR ANY ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE USER BASED UPON THIS INFORMATION. Feet tr },'Y ".t'r i ' ,' . �` - '. Y •`
NC OneMap, NC Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, NC 911 Board

t -f.,F_,J or z , .kr ,ntP , T ' • -'e rr - qv, r `•�,.1 �. . -,� •i•. - .cY i S r.G:J � •, °r�'E SR'*S., '
°t - T ' '' _ Y'•) I ' 7 , a' j: f _ V _ ':l1`. �_r ,'t, .fie. V i•.. 'v .,�.
•.;+. aM�; `T' ...,y f`' �' ,.�, ,F, � ° .4 ��^►!� .i' tl,' r ��� � r'. ;� •�a* :; #" a -`,�; r A N cr
• rr y t F_ f:F�`•r{fjfT' �, . /� / - t ',y,`{y��, {♦ ?' .r, • +. , t'. , y r L't», N
'Illy f•1 i i .. MF f'j�r }T - ' `r .•yam s, 0, ', �� e,i�'1' "� y } ,M l ,Yr >- R1
. ..�. y . +, 1! « `,I S �° `11_, �.' _ ,M . `f • 1 .1•.l. - . f . " M i ' F i� N M _ ❑ LL
ti I
..•r. i'J'�' .F i. _ r .% v a �'' f' .. 't ..' Jai" • .d W
dr+ n F �. ,¢�i. y .'.• fir'. '. r z M
'5'11I.r(%
wO v
" :�►.e•4, .c '.i+l !_ 1 . :� .f [' :•,y 'ei� j, fr,' ., ,�". e QO Q 0 W V
lM' _ •4 t 4- l"r •";' �4 i - `° r -+` -pry -�„ ry ❑ x
�{"`
�' , , � � a° � ' ' ' �"" �"` =� '� y ", , i fit' t : • ''?+`�»" r� - �',' n °... , ,y
_
_ r
#yq, &A
• 3
fj -t(4 _ '�'rr s., V•` �� ,It � .��era !7 , ±! f ,r". �. y �4Y �, - � W
f °
O
Ir1
ffi 1.
O
t
.r <
i.
�' 'co- A�� ,�s.5, #r`�.�,,`..» 'k d�* 'r.f 'M.t. +N r.i ��4, •• •..i 1 -ti X .» -, 6f�' �� �4
L U
Je4 ` ° :: CO
` ,a; "' ( .'. 3 YSr t` • �pri' 1 r, 1 _ . -' 1- o N 0
Xr'f -• r. ,II" ' :, •! +kt p�y`r r4°` N,j' d. 9 F.. _ z z c—
+, • ! :•.r
Ye'
k ,
41b 4
, a w
S38, r, r` 'r•
"#'M -•.x -r �i ' y �`,.' • ly ?�A "'rr4 'i"'7 114 _ ° rr• .'� � `.r -� �.►-
.�39 /fl�� .3 ryr'dR w ��^� =�= `=� � � 1'ar,""�� r '» "� `+•3 � {'� a � "� ,,. � ��' � `�j � `?d`r>r t N, I tr
34 d• S
`` / ` .�� `'i"�' " �I��• �t "r ' ylF° A41 i' « �try+4 '- » a.'r'ir 1• V
A S40 ;
im
• tiF ti.�.' { ' �C l , �r�.,# ���� «� �� ° "� � +'pt, � .11 ''R,r. � s r s � r �' P' -° LJJ
fA
dt
'r •
,
j
v►y w ll�s ��'�+i, � 'R t'• -Y' ` � a. :� "r� F��'' � _ � �,�•+ *.� ice' t�
. 1! \t 7�r�k
} r _ r I'�CSI
r'�•r' r f ; _.•., ,.T r •,,,. .r_ , -., •t :�� , �.3 a'++tJ'
x , arf . W , ,, � �', • � �1� k :�.. a r i4'ail • , � ,� , ��� r•'� '- + � .34 � ,
' 3 ,�} � _ irk.. � .air �!� �'� ,��' ° r` � y,'� � '�{� � `� g' ;:� `+1�•
i -.
. L. _
, � , ;� � '•,f a yr 1' .. � ti * P
••y 'nn ` ".'° .f.. ".r.`.•*.:..r .r,.0 - -.,f w aF .r. v ..
A' 4j ,+�}• L:' ° !.y1i ',! /"1 � .. 4 .�ji. A k' _airf`., .�+f. -' -.
+�. ' -� �: �'�`� •'/► A' �.,� f.uf#V` , �.� k; •�.�r r, r ! R * re��4 + : �� �'"�` �,,a #�, .a� ±i� /�`i also° � �r � r'��'� ,t
t y
SS F 5 �'• 4 t r/ Sat ° �f V , d cc
, ) r
Z
x
.. S 21 O a
,a s
Impact Map Extents (See Appendix IV)
Jurisdictional Wetland 0-
Z co
c
:) Jurisdictional Stream Y ; 33` . Q o C
46 a- Approximate Delineated Stream Extents r• . - v , • 2 S44 a,
{
W c
Approximate Delineated Wetland Extents ' �� P4 �S46 Q —' CL
— Proposed 16"T-021B Pipeline
-- Proposed Access Road
Workspaces
Existing ROW i;tiv'„ " 4
Proposed ROW
TWS
FIGURE NO,
REFERENCE: 2010 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
` PROPOSED CENTERLINE AND WORKSPACE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY EMS ON 6/20/2014. PLEASE NOTE THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL 0 5OO 1 r 000
24
PURPOSES ONLY. IT IS NOT MEANT FOR DESIGN, LEGAL, OR ANY OTHER USES. THERE ARE NO GUARANTEES ABOUT ITS ACCURACY. S &ME, INC. -��
ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DECISION MADE OR ANY ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE USER BASED UPON THIS INFORMATION. Feet ''1 - �'' f ,„ '
NtCOn`eMap!� r1c Y r"for eo i 'Inorm t'ion ,': , ^. ,4si �C S11 Soard,
i �. p �� .

E ,w, AV
' t
O
- -. .4'1 rti -;!`
❑ LL
N z I LU
Qp a 0 W b
co
� ",q i l R • rte y _. .� k, - 1 . J� _ _ O Z
:
Ta
O w
• �'�' � ' ,,.r - i '
M Z ilr` c-
1 - ax W w 1
w z
k t ! a ry N 6. 1 w
°
v
"
3346
�-
/ 50 S45/ . S4�
t
/S46 4 __W / ._ � e a a r
4
t/S48
W 52 S47 [ 33 �_ W5 1 "� 3
54 W55 ' � r t �
S49 1 �..
"
` N ' ,. erg tti'w ,�S"�'/ `` � iy � Y" F �� ✓i
i,
-
"
S50
46 At
',• __, Impact Map Extents (See Appendix IV) " ?"
Jurisdictional Wetland
r W
Jurisdictional Stream 4e �,' !` k' *11 ,''•�""6��
Approximate Delineated Stream Extents �' �• �a r
Approximate Delineated Wetland Extents t•
Proposed 16"T-021B Pipeline
Workspaces
Existing ROW,- „} "'"-.
Proposed ROW".
TWS :. r AN y
REFERENCE: 2010 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH 0 500 000,
PROPOSED CENTERLINE AND WORKSPACE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY EMS ON 6/20/2014. PLEASE NOTE THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL
PURPOSES ONLY. IT IS NOT MEANT FOR DESIGN, LEGAL, OR ANY OTHER USES. THERE ARE NO GUARANTEES ABOUT ITS ACCURACY. S &ME, INC.' .. • '!' - -,� ,�'� -a, r_ "^-+ 4 �:y'- ri
P NC OneMap, NC Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, NC 91,1 B oard
ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DECISION MADE OR ANY ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE USER BASED UPON THIS INFORMA TION. Feet
Wo
U
CU
Z
C.
a
c
= o "
a t
Q U
L)
(� 0 0
O z
ID n i
O U
��
a
.J z m
Q o o
W
Q J U i
c
O co
T E 4
O �
04 Q =
FIGURE NO.
25

INTERMEDIATE SIZED STREAM CROSSING
OPEN CUT INSTALLATION DETAILS
(SEE TABLE 1 FOR APPLICABLE STREAMS)
STEEL PLATE AND /OR SANDBAG COFFER DAM /
('SEE COFFER DAM NOTES') /
I /
I I
I
I I
SILT BAG 1
= I STAKED WATTLES
50' -100' OFF TOP OF BANK
L — — TRENCH DE-
WATERING HOSE
TOE -OF -BANK
PUMP DISCHARGE
('SEE PUMP NOTES')
TOP -OF -BANK
STREAM DIVERSION HOSE
50' CONSTRUCTION
CORRIDOR
TRENCH DEWATERING PUMP---/'
Connection
S1
SUBGRADE
S14
UT to Haw Ricer
S17
SPOIL PILE
S18 and
S18A
Haw Riker
Tom's Creek
STEEL PLATE AND /OR
Turkey Hill Creek /Wetland W34 /Cane
Creek
; �� �,�
Morgan Creek
SANDBAG COFFER DAM
Bolin Creek
( *SEE COFFER DAM NOTES')
STREAM BED
SUBSTRATE SPOILS
SILT FENCE
(TO REMAIN SATURATED)
r �
10' MIN. 10' MIN.
I I
1 I
I I �-- BACKUP PUMP
I I
UPSTREAM DIVERSION PUMP
\ \ ( *SEE PUMP NOTES')
STREAM
FLOW
COFFER DAM NOTES: PUMP NOTES:
1. COFFER DAMS TO BE CONSTRUCTED OF CLEANED STEEL PLATES
REINFORCED ON EITHER SIDE BY THE PLACEMENT OF SANDBAGS OR
OTHER SUITABLE MATERIAL APPROVED BY AGENCIES AND EM. PLATES
ARE TO BE CLEANED PRIOR TO USE WITH BIODEGRADABLE PRODUCTS
OR HEAT. IF DEEMED APPROPRIATE, COFFER DAMS MAY BE
CONSTRUCTED OF SANDBAGS COVERED WITH 20 MIL HDPE LINER.
2. THE HEIGHT OF THE COFFER DAM SHALL BE CALCULATED BY USING H/4
+ V WHERE H = HEIGHT OF STREAM BANK IN FEET WITH A 2' MINIMUM
DAM HEIGHT. VARIATION IN DAM HEIGHT AS DETERMINED BY FLOW
CONDITIONS AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION MUST BE APPROVED BY
THE EM.
3. REMOVAL OF COFFER DAMS SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN SUCH A MANNER
AS TO ALLOW FOR GRADUAL RE- INTRODUCTION OF FLOW TO THE
CHANNEL.
4. THE EXCAVATED TRENCH AND AREA BETWEEN THE COFFER DAMS
SHALL BE MONITORED FOR GROUNDWATER INTRUSION; IF NOTED,
EXCESS WATER WILL BE PUMPED TO A DISCHARGE SITE LOCATED
50' -100' FROM THE TOP -OF -BANK. DISCHARGE WATER WILL BE FILTERED
THROUGH AN APPROPRIATE S &EC MEASURE.
1. ADEQUATELY SIZED PUMPS SHALL BE OBTAINED AND STAGED PRIOR TO
EXECUTING THE CROSSING. BACKUP PUMPS CAPABLE OF HANDLING 100% OF
THE ANTICIPATED FLOW SHALL BE KEPT ON SITE SHOULD THE PRIMARY PUMP
MALFUNCTION, AND TO CONTROL HIGHER FLOWS. PUMPS SHALL BE PLACED IN
SECONDARY CONTAINMENT.
2. ALL PUMPS INTAKES WILL BE SCREENED AND WILL BE PLACED WITHIN
SECONDARY CONTAINMENT FOR THE DURATION OF THE INSTALLATION AND
MEASURES WILL BE TAKEN TO PREVENT THE SUCTION OF STREAM SUBSTRATE
MATERIALS.
3. IF AN UNFORESEEN WEATHER EVENT OCCURS DURING INSTALLATION, PUMPS
SHALL BE MONITORED CONTINUOUSLY UNTIL NORMAL FLOW CONDITIONS
RETURN.
4. PUMP FLOW RATES SHALL BE MONITORED TO ENSURE ADEQUATE FLOW IS
ACHIEVED SUCH THAT WATER NEITHER ACCUMULATES BEHIND THE UPSTREAM
DAM NOR IS DISCHARGED TOO RAPIDLY ON THE DOWNSTREAM SIDE.
5. AT THE DOWNSTREAM DISCHARGE LOCATION, FLOW RATES AND DIRECTION
SHALL BE CONTROLLED SUCH THAT SCOURING OF THE STREAM BED OR BANKS
DOES NOT OCCUR.
GENERAL NOTES:
1. ALL STREAM CROSSINGS SHOULD BE MADE PERPENDICULAR TO THE
STREAM TO THE EXTENT PRACTICAL SILT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED
PERPENDICULAR TO THE CROSSING AND 10' OFF THE TOP -OF -BANK. SILT
FENCE SHOULD EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 10' ON BOTH SIDES OF THE EDGE
OF THE CONSTRUCTION CORRIDOR. WHERE SITE CONDITIONS INDICATE
THE NEED FOR ADDITIONAL MEASURES, A SECOND ROW OF SILT FENCE
WILL BE INSTALLED 2' APART FROM THE FIRST ROW AND PERPENDICULAR
TO THE CONSTRUCTION CORRIDOR.
2. THE REMOVAL OF VEGETATION SHALL BE LIMITED TO THE CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT AREA.
3. NO WASTES, SPOILS, SOLIDS OR FILLS WILL BE PLACED WITHIN WETLANDS,
WATERS OR RIPARIAN AREAS BEYOND THE LIMITS OF THOSE DEPICTED ON
THE DRAWINGS. TO THE EXTENT PRACTICABLE, THE TOP 6 " -12" OF
CHANNEL SUBSTRATE SHALL BE STOCKPILED SEPARATELY FROM THE
SUBGRADE MATERIAL AND KEPT SATURATED.
4. ALL STREAM CROSSINGS SHALL BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL CONTOURS TO
THE FULLEST EXTENT PRACTICAL IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING PIPE
INSTALLATION.
5. IF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES REQUIRE EQUIPMENT TO CROSS THE
STREAM, TEMPORARY BRIDGING WILL BE USED.
6. ADDITIONAL MEASURES MAYBE NECESSARY IN ORDER TO PROTECT
AFFECTED CREEKS AND WETLANDS.
SPECIAL NOTES:
1. SUFFICIENT EQUIPMENT REQUIRED TO EFFECTIVELY AND EXPEDITIOUSLY
INSTALL THE CROSSING SHALL BE MOBILIZED TO THE CROSSING SITE
PRIOR TO BEGINNING CROSSING INSTALLATION. WHERE FEASIBLE, ONE
DEDICATED WORK CREW SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLATION OF
ALL INTERMEDIATE -SIZED OPEN -CUT CROSSINGS LISTED IN TABLE A
2. CROSSINGS SHALL BE EXECUTED IN THE MINIMAL AMOUNT OF TIME
NECESSARY; WHERE POSSIBLE INSTALLATION AND RESTORATION SHALL
OCCUR WITHIN A 24 -HOUR PERIOD. IN NO INSTANCE SHOULD
INSTALLATION AND RESTORATION EXCEED 48 HOURS WITHOUT
APPROVAL OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR.
3. ALL CROSSINGS WILL BE CONDUCTED DURING LOW FLOW CONDITIONS.
LOCAL WEATHER CONDITIONS SHALL BE MONITORED IN ORDER TO AVOID
ANY ANTICIPATED STORM WATER EVENTS DURING OR IMMEDIATELY
FOLLOWING INSTALLATION OF THE PIPE.
4. ALL INTERMEDIATE -SIZED OPEN -CUT CROSSINGS SHALL BE MONITORED
BY AN ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR (EM) FROM THE INITIATION
(PREPARATORY STAGES) THROUGH COMPLETION OF RESTORATION.
A) MONITORS MUST BE EXPERIENCED IN STREAM AND WETLAND
CROSSING PROCEDURES, FAMILIAR WITH SITE CONDITIONS, AND HAVE
KNOWLEDGE OF APPLICABLE LOCAL ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS.
B) MONITORS SHALL HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO STOP WORK SHOULD
CONDITIONS CHANGE AND ADDITIONAL OR DIFFERENT MEASURES BE
REQUIRED.
C) MONITORS SHALL ONLY BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING ONE
INTERMEDIATE -SIZED OPEN CUT CROSSING IN A 24 -HOUR PERIOD. IF
MORE THAN ONE OF THESE CROSSINGS OCCUR WITHIN THIS TIME
FRAME, ADDITIONAL QUALIFIED MONITORS SHALL BE USED.
D) INTERMEDIATE -SIZED OPEN CUT CROSSING MONITORING SHALL
TAKE PRECEDENT OVER OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL INSPECTION
RESPONSIBILITIES. SUFFICIENT QUALIFIED STAFFING SHALL BE
RETAINED TO COVER ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL INSPECTION TASKS
OCCURRING SIMULTANEOUSLY.
Table 1:
Feature ID
Connection
S1
Back Creek
S14
UT to Haw Ricer
S17
Haw Riker
S18 and
S18A
Haw Riker
S23
Tom's Creek
S29, and
S30
Turkey Hill Creek /Wetland W34 /Cane
Creek
S38
Morgan Creek
S47
Bolin Creek
r
O
CV j: m
ti m 2 0
LL
r Z D Y i
Q V
w
0 0 =
U
0
z
M w
T- N
O z
r w
U
,^ J
v,
r h
z L0 z r
O
Z 5 N W LL
ui w ti z
Q W z
U a w
0
r:
W
N m
cf) H J N
H
LU
N W Z
(n o J
r }
I- Z ry,
a N W
Q in W
Z
LY U a
W
Z
FIGURE NO.
27
U
U
Z

L
z
r
m m CC/)
m
nOzD
zr-
� N m m
O m m O
zm --Iz
CnOro
m D
�OCl)
OO
m D
n m ;U -n m
m otnZ
o00FC)
m N z„ m
I w N O
N
M m o
cn mz n m m m
0 r O cn r n —{ m
Z m �> A Z
r
O
^ Z7
Co m Ln
V 1 Z
/ m m� D ."0 Z
CD �m m n
O n O 1
O
Cm mm m Z
^ K O m o CA
`�) Z O m A m
m
0 y Ao a,
C
Z m n� A
z oA y y
CIOZ O Cn Ill TOp O
�/ / r m ° Z i— m
z m m z C) O T �'� ���TO INK Z m _
T cn K 00 y Z --
/V O m
A z Cn g �/ �BgNK
O y0
-_ - --
Z Cn j
Z�
T m O M Z �Nd9
/V Cn Z m o
T
,/ O � >� AO
O
V (n
c D
O
^ r
V ' m m m �_ -!l
D v z m
Z g_
N
O p N
2 C O
(n
m 0 A m -n
1 CZ) c —ml m
cl) /-� m . z
U/ X y Z
C O m Z
a
v
U) U)
m z EA i O
') T
F Z O
MN
W m m
x O
o D C)
v m m O
E Z
Z Z
m z
C
c 0
K
z O
Z
Vol
ro CD '1 0. (a + CA 1.)
IN
a
a
b
C�
O
9
Y

Ln
Z
G
r
m m m p m
�0 OzD
�m Z`�m�
mo
(nx 0 > C/)
:q m m
z mm Fz
M z0zx
vz
N m xD�� -rj
O z� mcnD0
mm T
n mm mvo�Z o
m x0 p00�0 T
gA z m m
m
z �
W z
A c 1
y 1
>1m
z
Cj m o
7 n
C ZD 7- O
M
A
T
paoi
Aly Nd
0
X
� y �� m mm
O ° m' �m
n Z T
A v o
Cn
m m
'z
c�
N
V T rm �
0 m T - �� m
m
D � � m
r
z �
� Z
V O W D L O
T
0 z m O
C')
C = m O
Z z�:Z
v z�
o
m z
0T _ _ _
N A W N c) A W N O t0 W J (P A W N m
z3D mM;a =0C �Z Oln K0 0r 52" 0�o� .000 ug) 2� pNp x
m
N mzv �Np goo pD m� m0� nmx yp,C C7 p 0 � m0 �'ocop� �� Om� Odom W000 tnmz mm z3z n r 0
zz O�- pAK m zm z y�0 m -iL � =?I r : O 0 09 culZm 0� (mi7Dp m-p° � cn�mm y0� =x ��0 x m D
pcm'lm p0cz �z °-�z Dx �mtn �D0 m0� z 4 m x��z3 m= OFD -zim0� �mpm r0 .gym x -� D x 0
m O Z m Z w xm z rz� Dxx z 1
Z 0-) �x� m� - -�� 0 m�0 xx? O D x D �m Z-Di�n Dm m�D �ODV �m�� U) o� D= �oc 0 O C C: K mzm cnm0 ,z z� zo Zz� Oz= �(pn0 17 O GzlO m�D0 �� 0m0 OmnO m�mm mmo °O �r-4 m v
DM -Di >OS DS zC Am OZ
ND� z0: N UDi z O 0O 03pz D mnfOn c�D� mm -zi 0xD z2 Dxx O p
VJ r--pm rF, D cp D 0o m� 2Mr ��pp �(nK c D N (n CI fn0*� r C)MW mzmr Dp)X> M -V Dm Cp0 M' N ;0
C 1ZN mmr m= D W Dm �A m =0m IrTlm -ZI (n O p m0 0x Om 2f�77 L7 �2Om 00 ;u zcn° =O mO:U 2 O D
pcnm c�0 0 <m �v x0 00X mx < 0 r D x0 0x0 �xr0 ODD ��m mm Or< v 9
n�° mzz w< mm 0p mD0 cccmi Oxm D m ? m W�a� O mmi ern pc�0 0�0 mziD 1_ mm
=Dp 0 A n
m 8r0 0m< mm ZX Ov <z -�xc xOD < 0 D Dm-iv O G7 c m mz 3
-ix w x-i xm O D -1 xc m r O n0 O ODD Dm -x 0- D
N zcmnz =m Dm �� �z °� � o ��x m m r fZOm -Apr 0. A�� °rD DD >K mm r w VJ
0 >z x c rm �0 Dp 8;0 12 -IOm z O W ii 0�°'O Oc0 c�0 cn- O�x ' K Dlm M,, z m fA
'TC� Ox m� 0m 10710 'dam Dam rp0 m x m 0 O�OZ ? Dxm IMT -p�m zmD ma ,'cM 0 A Z
OTx mZ 00 m0 �O �0 OAm DzO m m mn�vc 0 mOD mncn �x� 70�Am m� D�c3ii o G�
0n0 O(!7 A Om -i0 z �=z zZT < 0 p Xpzm m m=m �DN -pox D�� Om Tm� D p Z
0m m -{ xcn n- zm c x zrn Dcnm 0D qx� �m O
CZ,Z 2m < �� Oz DG) 20� p0� z O m ��D° 0 zmm mmo =z Zpm m0 OA? 0 m
Apo cm 0, 0 �y O0 m0 mx>K DA< O m zc�z z OOm Oxo�O 0Dm �?z or F<z m y In
zc� m 0 v rpm x Z O a �0D 0 x m Ov0 xxz I° 00 pmm r
ODO x -1 D3 xm v� <xm 3 rm< 0 -' O O x-��= DczilZ oCZ Amy 0 3 cai>r �Z° i r
cn mz x0 x wz O> �r x00 z > x O A O �Ozm 0mg "«m O0q m�0 m> Z�m Z n
Cm0 cOnZ m0 3r �O zOZ mG)0 =� pz ° p 2CC .Tp1mj m0D OmD °m 000 (n D
r °:p (n -1 O p� 'rpw K � -� 77- p x z _IpOx p(�r ODZ *p m?IZ 00 D,p .� r
�cnz z0 x 0m mm 0 mzp mZX v O -1 0zx <_ O �D m�0 DZC (pr° zW xx�l x
ZyO GlA D� ,3 Dz -zizm °fix x m 0 z {[Dii� z zzA z�3 m�� �mz �c O00 D D
O- pGZ� x mZ zz m� ��_� �r0 z 0 z-n0= D Zm0 �mrD- mmo mmc �� Dxczii 0 m
cnGr 0z c0 <0 OO <z 0yz m-j0 Oc m mmpz m 5>0x DDA 00Om P�m 0= mDA i
r cm O x xm z NOC y D xzA m Km m O z� Z1�C
{xD xz 0 z0 my Zo =izoCmi mzP m x m 3 xOtailx Z mmo x7Jy Dmm mxGl vA KT -j x r
�m m z m� p< m0 ��m Off{ n D ATxO D -Im mm m00 D0In �� >)z0 G 0 In mm zm o y� �Z �� Oz z�� mo m m ��9,0 D 0K 0m0 K.-11 ADD 0i 0DD m
mm x° Z 770 zG Zm of cTD 0I v m z m�00 0 m0 DZ� �m� 0�0 �x 0°m 0 r
y° fns (n m0 OD = �m� x p c 0 °��2 r m= 2 Cm� x�m m ANA - m
zz �m = co 0 IQ 0= �m 00m j r 0 mx. m < 3m m0G m3z cw° mx D-Z m A
0� 3N Z �C z xm -im W p A (mn ,'fpl Z�pC D pX �Zm (npD ��� ,_ {m-i C
-10G mm 0 �m m �x rO 0mx0 0 < MMX A �z;z -7� zp Om Dzy 0mm �v� mm 030 0 m co,
0 ;0 00 3� z ZD D DZ -,j
OO (OnmZ ° ° m ,ZDI 3n� m 2� m, '9Z W mx� �m0 O-I 20A = z
mm D0 p O 7O Z> -m m z �p� c0i� <x z3m m00 zm Ox -x' pc ai
ax vvi ° z mcn vm m> x gcnZ c> xm �'K 2wD vz, -- OR i
°m Om x-1 0D� z D m mx-+ X0 zp.p z-0 >Dx xx m0 x
OZ n O 0 r C7 Dim m v
C p � x rx m �r r D DDS In D mzcn -1mp v c zD m
�- Ox r zm oo (n �r;;�i11 D mr m� DOm m z pD �za C
px ya D = m Or �r -i0m m C7 cp try p0 00z mxC 00= �� W K.
D D mD0 x 0x0 m x- OW D m
Q 9 > K O z 0 = m z m D O ' 000 W r -m< 0 x_ � _I O (n D Z- X 8 4 * x z Z D O C O
M c p x m x G7 � Z m x W m z Z m m D m 1� y m m p� m =� P ; O Z T
z �z O O D DS.r v 0 0 z m r v mx jom �Ey zm0 z O 0 m
�l D n D z0 ;aM m 2 ��W z z0 pD CZ� (nmz m �D
■ r 0 `�° z r zOm mZ zDp �ZO nmD - p6 0
x � c?Glz D T- zv0 ?mm ODp q, ulc g
0 xxcn m 0 Z <x D0 x -10
mm V O)wAUN ! O 0 4mi .Z�1 W -ml K m K,'Dp 0y0 <C, N D m 0 x
: z = om A z ��m mcn� Om� it vm -0 z O v mz 3fir- Mail 0x -M, m0 z `" m°
9 m DT. ? OD ccD Dmm z
'v �z Z zz C) Km W m z-1
M Wo myl mmo �-0 ? c mn
O D °
cl 0 o m O = m m y m D
O W 3 z
Z
a
a
b
C�
O
9
Y

z
z
r
>m mTm
m
Dn OApn>
A m 0 ::E
m :Ll O > N cn
mm
z m 'm z
m z o z
O Z
ON m y x D cC r
I m �
Tm m
-n 0 m -0 mm m00oz O
m r0n T70 �z -n-rl om T
m �A m
m
Z m
r Z
� Z
c m j
� 1
y
�m
c
mn Tpppp pa01
C/) Z
0-7—
- - - --
�] a0 FLUME PIP
Z E m W
o
m
n
D N
O �A N
r TI
m
.� m m
r il m
C �
� z �
m lz
0I
o
W m O
Z D�
m0
E: Cl)
M
O z c
N
U
O
�C
rri v A W
_
xr mo> XmX =0c n Do '� �0 00 cp__ Omi cipr Aom moo 0 p0 m m 3
(4 mZ0 K S2,T OD mr �Zr Ofnp D��l 0
® �m� ?00 m0 00 �m r-01 0 o;O�1�71Z WmO Z O z �vDi .1
z3 z= O�� 5� ADD 0m vA z_ 1
OOm cz xmz z �Am Ay MOM z '� m x �0 �m *cm zOm mLnO z0 me O %1
Z�� ,10j :a� m� �� �� �mcn m�0 :a �1Z O D Tl D �m m "��n ZOD Der -� Dx r0 O m
�Om u»O �O z0 pm z°_z x0� mm OX m r n 3 z� K TOp m m13 0o3 o0A x0 m-�i r c D
mZO Om� Ox za z0 0�x m O 0O O xycn K DOO m D m- m m
En Dcmn� >0= D= z'K mm OAS mDrr• zcz» N z OO �� T 3pz Ln y •(/lm� �Am 3�y == nm O O n
zOcn
rp mOm Am �� �m m�� �mm mom m O Z O c Cm0 O mz Ln DOm rpDr' �m z0 m O
CnZfv m Dap DfNil W =i mm mm-zi m 0 0op= m 30 pz f/1mC Do �D m (n
vcnm coo cnx <m �0 vOm o0X m� < O O m O�0 < mtn ml xxm < n �� v f/1
0x10 m ;-, m< �m -0 mDO Cccmi 'o 'm D - m p v �AC o �O Om� ��D 0im n0 O m Z
pro om� x� X Om O D�-1 A.1010C m m r O .m r �x moon r0 -m, aX, pT xD 3
z c O D m m-i0 m DO Oro xm O G7
vmo y� Om �m 'nn Dn Rio -OjOm z A W -n zAwm �o AOm m=D OM C� y� Z T O
�C0 Om m� °m m0 �O DDS ��O m �1 m �OZ ? Dm N> maD mD CD O
-n --1 ZO ox mp rv1m DO r x D_O In m Cl) mC0 0 3K m- 0 Or (nK> O D ..
C)Mx mz O 0 �c 0, Am zzm O m -i ? x O7.lc OD mz 0mm mr mcn m o
c0 'lm rn Om W A Om� xm nZ 1 z zzm < p A r z Z2m m Om Cc _-"� 5. cm, �- o
�p0 mT O arm OO > r mxD mO� z 0 v z ArD-o O Lnx m0 zmz 0D m m z
zC� no 0 nD 0� m0 m-ar r0f<ii � Z O D � O Z � Gym 9m Om ZO Km � r
G) O� p D� n2 �T <.1m1� r� j 0 O O Q�2 -i cnZ mN 0� �C m0 = r
CO AO u �z 0r �r A00 ?zD o O A o 9 0zm c m� OZ OxO 0, xm z 0
C0.101 O-1 O r0� � W �� ��� ,1m10' O 11 - z � D OpA j �F p= 0> ;u
no �O � r
DV0 00 y-m1 �� >O zZm o�'XU m OO n 2 z <D< Z pA oO {Om z< pO �^
mTCn O0 x m� zZ �0 D0: D >o Om O z rO� D OO Dm OyO 0� mz 3 1
OczD OOp 0 zo p={ A� rz� mD� m x 0 �Ox O �' m0 zO� Oz Ocn O m
c z> OZ C TO m0 Kozm r-, 5, m O A x mOZ m x r� zrm Z ?� 0 D
0 Cm 0 p m mm zzm NOc D A D D OZA m mO Dz 2> � O zC c
xD �z O Z0 M,0 zm �nO m ?p .mn 'a m O OrD»x Z z� O 1- >A 0� m
rm ?m z �O -W c-n0 AMO 0 *� m D O - m -o y mm Om m0-xi v0 < m
0-u xA 0 z OD 00 xD mmczil 0j O m ��� m o� ��`,C Zzm mg X0m m
mm zm y� �z �� Ox mz xm o m = Z �Orn D m 30 SOD -i2 OD O
mm �o O rA Oz z� �:5 6m� O m D O .CEO O m0 pD ,10jDr �m pm m r
D0 ink O mm z� OD 0= �m -i p c o 0 � ,_ >m orm Om -1 3 m
m m O Om x O� z Dx m r O x. x < �m m-� c�0 m= �m m A
m? � y �m z xm �� AWm m O < SOT x im m� ODD Ou O� D� c
00 mN Z 3A Dm OrO K :(1 (n .Zl OC D 3X D m O= K• A
-i < m m G7 m m (i r -0 fV)n m .1'1 D 07 .11 m Z r z C m zF q M, m z m 0 0 m
01, �0 m Otn m00 �m zOm Z A X m ��m O Kz "n -0 azA -1 �z m
00 �Z zrn3 D z� mmZ 0 0 m 30- m Zv �m zm0 c,o OO x a
<, m 0 -i z D m-+m D m�1 r -j> 0� O0 0� O m
m2 D D m- m rm0 mI Z -i Z z ZOX 7J OD Tm z' � ^ K, 1.0 C
qQ D� oc p D z <z z - Oi�x 0 �Om z =� Oz m=� z� z, x
�9
8, m :a 0- Tm ON mOD Z D Z +n
�.Y Z �n O Orn �'1 -1 ODr 0 r n m r mx-i cnO �m O:a Z1 m
< O� 0 A rx mD -fir Ul r O D�1�177 O p� �� pmm D {D
D� y = fn O� -�1� -10 f�T1 m O 07 .1�1 xDD rnz Dm CO2 alp Zrn m
t 3 • z Z r O r Cl) m m m C < D O O Ocn Ccn 0 Z D m e 0
3 ! EE p 0 A m m 0 m D O m m m O z T n m m y z m cn Z x m Z T
z Dz O OD Dxr 0 0 m zmp O 0r mm F0O A0 m
D n K z0 f0 0N m � 0 O� O G)O CD r�0 >O �
r O m m DOm z �m �0� x mz O
0 11 -i Z D N
mm�lo�w+uro p c 3 -0 nmZ m OZ my -19 �D
: c O - ymczil K ccnM —m G) o� z m m
n O M D x y � m 0- O m c O p
O � z PMT Z c O z 0 D < G)
2 mD 0� m
z O T OK m �m A= mm D A O
O p .101 m O Z n m p -rim = O
3 m D x D c Z D D m m
�_ �- r
O q 3 D m 0 0 O
aI o o m Om �O �� D
x z m �m m No
big
b
C�
O
9
Y

Y
i
�C
C
C)
0
z
m
-0 (nm zmm ZU)Z 1 :EO m:ECnZCnUnnDm mTT 000 mCnmCn Dm3�DmZ mmC DTDZ '9nnZ n���� ArA
AO;amm m7Jm mm(n r -0 xm mO m m A CNi)O CDi)Z00 0 m z m-1xm m>mm mr0 Om m Om On ��1 Cn AMOCn O =,��m m0T
OZDU3 X03 n<-u D 1 O ZOO D D � Z-10m-i moz-4 3m n AC)
U�030 �<0 m m m Z =Z mrnDn OCn Or mnr -4 Cnm r�7DA Dmrno Dn� -i<O Dp�3DD (n U)D -u zxxx Cam
:U W D Z m a < pm m c v -I Z D p Z m - -- :E fait U� OC - n n mp D Gm) f3i7 M C) O UDi O Z Z :U Z n-j 2 z r 0� ,X fn U) O Z Z p --I
D zm U) ;y Ln Ci my Gzju) D0Dx G)mz -, AZ C.Q OZ -4H m, -A mx mm�m --I --1 'n M CO mm OJ vzi GZ)n� x7�J��c) 310
�Zp O� OQ <D� �� �TO��m�On am0 Cncn 0DOm a2S2 * -q� 003zOp mm3 �fn,� mxAD maa
��D�r pz DOm N Nc ZO*DNmr =Z 2z_ O =C 0Dm0 zp DD m Z- <DZ- U,ma :mmx L)--Oz fm it C3nC�0 ym0
OCa CnT >m vzz Z 03 m3F m��CD mom =�� FZ U) Oin M�2� 3mOm- D13zOp �Dn OmN Z�
mzmmZ �p mAm O = �mpmxyOmm Dr�n mmz TAZOr mOOGZ�� m pO�O��mD� z�mv n07J3 'm
�>M>n �m °vim 3 O D`<Knz -I �n ozm XA- - -I 7DAOD0 AW�AU)3 -1m- 03m c�-Im M
p 00 3< r D c m Cn 0 D r m m fn A O m i n= Z r mom O r -A Z m O m A � m A z o
mTOD 71 U) mfnm Z zOMA0mU1 W OO npa ZCnn w3Om Omm > °o >oWm07uzD3A mZm �3<, pm
Dm Z D� 3D 0� mmN�Z A - �0K DD. z TOO r' U) - ZooOEOzC0 .'fm1DZ 10 mQ aA
MM2p L7 O Ul 1 O xDOm O-I-
m ZC m DD-4 m r D- m�3Om -<O U)x0 -0;0 n �0� Dim W �p pFCCD(n03G) ZOO ?0�� r3
> --i Oz rmz D �O��XG>g *� ZnM CDjO� �DNO { =�QmT xmmZwr000 Dm0 D�cnZ vT
mm a cm <an Z m z10? ,mac �Om -1 )0m rzQ7' mz�zchF wwzm =mwo - z�D m03M O
m D W 3m <m m O >7C,IZ� =Dm co U) DOP zmCn-0 �x000cn me -,mmm -1r OD :U m;Um� M
m m < 3 W O]p W Dzm -1, ,m G%mxr Dmz C) U:E C/) cDfMit az0 rOm� a
m mm T� m Z m m O .Z1D -IO U)- CZ ,2100 D 3 p
Z D 000 m z Opnm z0 Cr G)m A OZ z 0 mF or Dm n0� C -4 zG)fnm O
AA O c O A nr Zm mDOO OO�r rrZp -i :D W x Om 7J
O �< 1 In z < m =I Cn DD zz0 z DCU ED CD W m
map y > x m CDi) z� rz0 =T00 O Dm m" z0 z m D
p
< r Z r
G
m
1
D
Z
v
n
O
Ch
CO)
Z
O
Z
O
1
m
y

z
iz
r
mm�
m
�
nOn�
z`2mr
lyl
T
D N M
�Zmm
rI
I
Zm
zoro
m
IF
Z
-III
I
o
Z0Z�
ooD
N
AI
o
III
T
m
n
mD��
--rj
T7 m Tl
O
cn
mm� °m
m°ocnz
mxD
m�Z
T
m
oz -n -rim
r z m
I
+
z
m
m
III
+
zo
z
IIII
zm
Yl
/ T�
�' D
p0�
A A
Z.)
_
jl
m
T m
_L
O
�0 IIIII�
C�
0
;6
�A
p
�
Z
y
cn
cn
m
ll
I
cn
�,
m A'
- -- _
F
ea
Nk
m
0
TI
y z m
m m
--��
c
n
o
IIII
m
o m
2
m
—
I
��
y
I I
tII I
cn
mr
,//
v
_�
Z
I1
1
A
A
.im)
.7m]iml
o
LS
r
m
o�Nd9dod0
L
—I
c
m
I�
IIII
r
m
T
z m o>
m
m
III
—I
n
IT
N
0
T
��i
m
Cri
o0D
z
° -0o
SAD
IIII
II
m_z
z
Z
o m
o °gi
Dpm
g
D
IIIII
0
jIII
oo
-n
�ZD
-III
,I
3A
o �
I
o
m 0 0
°Om
D
l
om
C n
m0
m�
x�
I
I I
m�
Z V
m
C
m
I
n
O
z
r
�
V1
�
U1
W
N
W
N
N
U) OD
N
j
N
m
O
J
OD
O
t0
W "f
J
A
DD
S
w
?
W
N
N
D
O
�nzZxZ
O
N
71
T
N
OA
-1�
Z
tDilz
mm
yozinm
r
m 0
A
G
Z
mz
mo
c)
mDprnA
y m Z 2 '�-
GI
Z
4
Z
D
D
o
m r >_ D
O
D
, C
U)
C
Z
�
v
Z
zcCi
D =�DCn
Z
O n
A _1
�
�
D
z
�p
mz
=��tn�
�pOmD
c
o Z
MI
O
�
Z
0
Z
m
W
C
�Tl
O�
�omtn °°
m n
\/
Z
2
�
�
Si
�
���mZ
z
; A
a
a
m
'o
nDOnz
D
m
M
�
m
m
cn
my
Oomnz
T 3
Z
n
O
m �,
mom_E,
�
o n
A
m
In
Z Z- O
or'�U)vAi
A
°o
o
O
z0
Z
O0'
>
n
cOn
�1
A
Om
m
vOZD
A
O Z
z
Z
D
m
—gym
c)
z
r Z
D
F
r�
xz�m
m�' z
cc n)
cn
r O
� i
ci
W
m
-m
mo m
m �m
=
r
m
p�
=A
�y C")
r
r
w
D
O
mm
mom' D
m
A
1
In
2
2
S
2
S
2 2
2
S
��
ZZmm
ui
o
m�
�o�=
m
Z
Dp
A2Mm
,
oA
O
Z
m
Z
o
_
�CO
-n
gym {°
mo
m
mm
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z Z
Z
Z
m
GI
03�c
O
Z
�
D
m
z
Dm�m
m
2
2
2
2
2
2 2
2
2
c
0
o
mo —m
3
C
C
Z
m��o
��cn�
D
v
m
m
m
m
m
m m
m
m
o
M,
mm m
n
°c
m
M
m
i
in
=Z -m K
z
A
W
o z
O
m
�
II
II
II
II
II
II II
II
II
�
n
z
m
mpzm
m
1
'
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
Vol
N
U�
U�
U�
Cr
U� U�
CT
U�
o
A
ily,�
•
N
�
r
co W
fn
r
W
(n
r
W
V1
r
W
fn
r r
co W W
fn V1
r
W
V1
r
W
(n
o
�'
D m
Mn
2
m
mX-n
N
N
N
N
V1
V1 N
fn
N
r
n
OZ_N
U)
z
0
A
m
�� o
m
CD
D
D
D
D
D D
D
D
m
to
M.AZ�
m
y
Z
v
Z
v
Z
v
Z
v
Z Z
v v
Z
v
Z
v
m
m
m
m D
�TAA
m
Z
v
n
O
m
m
DT m22
�m�a
n
v
o
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
-
��mcn
�
�
m
m
m
m
m m
m
m
Q
v
v
v
o
v v
o
0
z
o -u o
cl
v
m
m O
a
W
z
z
z
z
z z
z
z
a
b
C�
Z
c�
Z
m
Z
m
Z
m
Z
m
Z Z
m m
Z
m
Z
m
0
Ziml
m
m
s
A
A
.im)
.7m]iml
m
m

N
O
n
m
m
z
1
C
Z
O
0
O
Z
C
n
y
O
Z
0
n
O
m O
n
m0
K
mcf)
z--i
--j ;u
c
n
0
z
U)
Z
r
mT
00M
Z
z`<m
p �N
T
�zm
oz MM
M
Om D
? ° a
M cf) >
T m m
m 00
0 00
Z T
m m
m0G)cnm zmm Zco O m:Ecn Z cn co ODm mTT 000 mcn m cn Dm3�D T -0 -0 cr00DTDZ vOOZ 0�2 ArA 1
AO11 mm m7Jm mm0 r �O )< mmACNi1� cai�zOr Omz mOnG) m�mAmrO ;u 70 mOZ� �m'� -10 00T Z
OZD 12 X03 0G D -c O Z00 D D Z Om
p�0 AGO mmm Z =Z mr0y0ocnOr m0r �cnm r�7DA Dm>ODOR omm Dp -,ODD rn zv vz222 C_Dm
:0 W D zm a°mm < cn O�-I ZD OZ�rr-T��n� Km M, �_ OC�O nmp DCmj f�i1 Z7O��N nZZ.207Zn�2ZF 00 (n XF TCn OZZ pr- 0
{CZ -1 D ZD CO ;u fi f�il "n0 ��DODx G)mz zm cG)Oz ,ZmD 1m2°m �m mmOCOO-MI �m0� (/z C: cn x7�J��0 310 0
�z °o <DF p I, �TO��mOOn amG) 0� On °m a2S2��� 003zOp mmm �N1� m2AD mDD .0
r�DOr pZ n0m Cl) NC ZO�DNmr =Z <G
-j m Z� OSC �Df�T10 ODD mZ� <DZ��,ZTj =mm �.0 fill �C�p l�A -ml O Cl)
p OOT �m vz� Z 03 m�� m��cn Mom ��� �Z�� C: Am2C 3mOmD�zO0 Fyn 0m cn Z.� Z
mzmCnZ �° NAm 0 _ M,mOm2DOmc Dr�n mmz TAZ� �n00G)� n mnm c0ii0��TDD z�m� n070� om G7
OG) - pm 0O <r D O aLGmuOiz��O °�D mm AOpU ODA0D0 cn Am 0mOco�m�= ...,OKm c-4mz mo Z
p cm OD -i r 0 m�(nSZ O co --I 0mZ1 AZ 0
mTOD A0 m0m Z �117J�mCn W 00 0pD ZCnO W �Om Omm��O D <c�i�m��1zD�A mzm ��G, �m 0
Dm Z G) 3D �� mmN�z A �O� DD. z TO�r_ Cn c- nz000,OZCO ADZ vm= DA m
7J�?10 G)� O cn 1 O SDOm 0-i-
m zc m Dn-4 m P D- m��Om�O cn 20 m0K OZp cn n�mm 0 pFCCD Cn030 Z >O =0m> r3 CA
D2=cn Oz Cl) rmz D �D�AXG)��� Z0� nO� -2 DN� < =�QmT 2ZmZ�r000 Dmc DMNZ �T ..
mm a cm <ac) Z m zoo? ��c �Om tom rzQ71 mzDzN� 00nz�grmo� z�n �W�o O
co D W �m {m m p �AZ� SDM (n CZn DOS ZmO� �20000 mCi�mm1r G) -A ;U m0
m m G wm° W Dzm �� rm G)m2r DmzO�g ca�rA �u Dm G)z� rpa� D
m mm TO m Z m m O .zln -10 (n- CZ .2100 a K p
Z n 00 m Z OpOm ZO Cr G)m A OZ Z 0�Z7m OrDm 00-4 C Z00m O
> AA 0 z c O D A 0r Z� mD�O OO�r rr zp ��D W 2 Om 7J
O< 1 0 Z G m O D D z z p z a CO m 0 O D z W m
mo tmp > x m z� rz0 =Tw O Dm m" ZAO z m cn O G)
< r z r

APPENDIX I
Completed Pre - Construction Notification
(PCN)
Authorization to Act as Agent

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
Date: � D6 20(¢
Nroject intormation
S &ME Project Name: Line T -021 B Pipeline Project
Type of Project: Construction
Location: Alamance and Orange Cos., N.C.
Property Owner /Representative Information
Business Name: GNMV
Mailing Address: qW C­
City, State, Zip Code:
Telephone No.
- a�
Contact: 0kWQXf wdfd
Agent Information
Business Name
Street Address
City, State, Zip Code
Telephone No.
Contact:
S &ME, Inc.
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28273
(704) 523 -4726
Crystal Fox
Authorization:
I 616W on behalf of
(Con act Signature)
PSNC Energy hereby authorize
(Name of Landowner or Representative)
S &ME, Inc. to act as agent for the above - mentioned project.

APPENDIX 11
Wetland, Stream and
Riparian Buffer Impact Tables

Pre - Construction Notification: NWP No. 12 /WCQ No. 3884
Line T -021 B Pipeline Project
WETLAND IMPACT TABLE
SE Project No. 7235 -14 -013, Phase 07
June 2014
Page 1 of 2
Classification
Impacts
Wetland ID
Sheet No.'
Vegetative Type
Relation to
Waterbody
Temporary Impacts
Conversion
Crossing Type*
sf
ac
sf
ac
W1 (WL1)
NA
NA
Scrub Shrub-
ent
Riparian
0
0
0
0.000
Avoided
W2 (WF1)
302
Forested /Emergent
Riparian
1,516
0.035
0
0.000
Open cut
W3 (WF2)
304
Emergent
Riparian
12,565
0.288
0
0.000
Open cut
W4 (WF14)
305
Forested
Riparian
0
0.000
2,191
0.050
Open cut
W5 (WF15)
NA
Forested
Riparian
0
0.000
0
0.000
Avoided
W6 (WF16)
NA
Forested
Riparian
0
0.000
0
0.000
Avoided
W7 (WS1)
306
Forested
Riparian
0
0.000
9
0.000
Conversion
W8 (WS2)
307
Forested
Riparian
0
0.000
0
0.000
Avoided
W9 (WC27)
307
Forested
Riparian
0
0.000
0
0.000
Avoided
W10 (WC28)
307
Forested
Riparian
0
0.000
77
0.002
Conversion
W11 (WC29)
NA
Forested
Riparian
0
0.000
0
0.000
Avoided
W12 (WF3)
308
Forested /Emergent
Riparian
23,006
0.528
166
0.004
Open cut
W13 (WF4)
309
Forested
Riparian
0
0.000
0
0.000
Avoided
W14 (WF5)
310
Forested /Emergent
Non - riparian
3,751
0.086
0
0.000
Open cut
W15 (WC5)
311
Forested /Emergent
Riparian
3,306
0.076
0
0.000
Open cut
W16 (WC4)
311
Forested /Emergent
Riparian
9,806
0.225
0
0.000
Open cut
W17 (WC2)
NA
Forested
Non - riparian
0
0.000
0
0.000
Avoided
W18 (WC1)
314
Forested /Emergent
Non - riparian
14,477
0.332
0
0.000
Open cut
W19 (WC25)
316
Open Water
Non - riparian
0
0.000
0
0.000
Avoided
W20 (WC26)
317
Forested /Emergent
Riparian
2,823
0.065
47
0.001
Open cut
W21 (WFA)
318
Shrub -Scrub
Non - riparian
0
0.000
0
0.000
Avoided
W22 (WC6A)
318
Open Water
Non - riparian
0
0.000
0
0.000
Avoided
W23 (WC6)
319
Forested /Shrub-
Scrub /Emergent
Non - riparian
1,612
0.037
0
0.000
Open cut
W24 (WC27)
320
Shrub -scrub
Non - riparian
0
0.000
0
0.000
Avoided
W25 (WF6)
321
Forested /Emergent
Riparian
511
0.012
218
0.005
Conversion
W26 (WP1)
322
Forested /Emergent
Riparian
537
0.012
465
0.011
Open cut
W27 (WF34)
NA
Forested
Riparian
0
0.000
0
0.000
Avoided
W28 (WF33)
324
Forested
Riparian
0
0.000
0
0.000
Avoided
W29 (WC11)
325
Forested
Riparian
0
0.000
333
0.008
Open cut
W30 (WC11A)
325
Open Water
Non - riparian
0
0.000
0
0.000
Avoided
W31 (WC9)
326
Forested /Emergent
Riparian
2,928
0.067
0
0.000
Open cut
Page 1 of 2

Pre - Construction Notification: NWP No. 12 /WCQ No. 3884
Line T -021 B Pipeline Project
WETLAND IMPACT TABLE
SE Project No. 7235 -14 -013, Phase 07
June 2014
Totals: 1 125,081 1 2.871 1 4,975 1 0.114 1 11
1 Horizontal directional drill (HDD) that will not impact the wetland.
1 Please note, the drawing numbers depicted corespond to the last three digits of the drawing number as shown on Approximate Jurisdictional Boundaries Drawing
Page 2 of 2
Classification
Impacts
Wetland ID
Sheet No.'
Vegetative Type
Relation to
Waterbody
Temporary Impacts
Conversion
Crossing Type*
sf
ac
sf
ac
W32 (WC10)
326
Forested
Riparian
0
0.000
0
0.000
Avoided
W33 (WC13)
327
Forested /Emergent
Non - riparian
4,476
0.103
0
0.000
Open cut
W34 (WC12)
330
Forested /Emergent
Riparian
8,048
0.185
0
0.000
Open cut
W35 (WF7)
332
Emergent
Non - riparian
435
0.010
0
0.000
Open cut
W36 (WF8)
NA
Open Water
Non - riparian
0
0.000
0
0.000
Avoided
W37 (WC14A)
NA
Open Water
Non - riparian
0
0.000
0
0.000
Avoided
W38 (WC14)
334
Emergent
Riparian
6,349
0.146
0
0.000
Open cut
W39 (WC15)
335
Forested /Emergent
Riparian
3,331
0.076
264
0.006
Open cut
W40 (WC16)
336
Emergent
Non - riparian
852
0.020
0
0.000
Open cut
W41 (WC17)
337
Forested /Emergent
Riparian
443
0.010
14
0.000
Open cut
W42 (WC18)
337
Forested /Emergent
Riparian
0
0.000
12
0.000
Open cut
W43 (WC20)
337
Forested
Riparian
0
0.000
0
0.000
Avoided
W44 (WC22)
337
Forested /Emergent
Riparian
643
0.015
0
0.000
Open cut
W45 (WC21)
337
Forested /Emergent
Riparian
0
0.000
18
0.000
Open cut
W46 (WF9)
339
Forested /Emergent
Riparian
4,041
0.093
1,161
0.027
Open cut
W47 (WF10)
340
Forested /Emergent
Riparian
1,869
0.043
0
0.000
Open cut
W48(WF11)
341
Forested
Riparian
0
0.000
0
0.000
Avoided
W49 (WF12)
342
Emergent
Riparian
685
0.016
0
0.000
Open cut
W50 (WF17)
346
Forested
Riparian
0
0.000
0
0.000
Avoided
W51 (WF20)
347
Forested /Emergent
Riparian
6,536
0.150
0
0.000
Open cut
W52 (WF19)
347
Forested
Riparian
0
0.000
0
0.000
Avoided
W53 (WF21)
348
Forested /Emergent
Non - riparian
4,473
0.103
0
0.000
Open cut
W54 (WF22)
349
Forested /Emergent
Non - riparian
406
0.009
0
0.000
Open cut
W55 (WF24)
350
Forested /Emergent
Riparian
5,656
0.130
0
0.000
Avoided
W56 (WF23)
350
Open Water
Non - riparian
0
0.000
0
0.000
Open cut
Totals: 1 125,081 1 2.871 1 4,975 1 0.114 1 11
1 Horizontal directional drill (HDD) that will not impact the wetland.
1 Please note, the drawing numbers depicted corespond to the last three digits of the drawing number as shown on Approximate Jurisdictional Boundaries Drawing
Page 2 of 2

Pre - Construction Notification: NWP No. 12 /WCQ No. 3884
Line T -021 B Pipeline Project
STREAM IMPACT TABLE
SE Project No. 7235 -14 -013, Phase 07
Stream ID
Drawing No.'
Classification
Temp. Impact (If)
Crossing Type*
S1 (SL1)
301
RPW Year Round
62
HDD
S2 (SL2)
NA
RPW Seasonal Flow
0
Avoided
S3 (SF1)
302
RPW Seasonal Flow
50
Open cut
S4 (SF2)
303
RPW Year Round
54
Open cut
S5 (SF3)
304
RPW Year Round
53
Open cut
S6 (SF19)
305
RPW Year Round
77
Open cut
S7 (SF20)
305 -307
RPW Year Round
0
Avoided
S8 (SS4)
306
RPW Seasonal Flow
0
Avoided
S9 (SS2)
307
RPW Year Round
0
Avoided
S10 (SC24)
NA
RPW Seasonal Flow
0
Avoided
S11 (SF6)
308
RPW Year Round
52
Open cut
S12 (SF7)
309
RPW Year Round
50
Open cut
S13 (SF8)
309
RPW Seasonal Flow
0
Avoided
S14 (SC6)
311
RPW Year Round
50
Open cut
S15 (SC8)
311
RPW Seasonal Flow
0
Avoided
S16 (SC5)
312
RPW Seasonal Flow
63
Open cut
S17 (SC4)
313
RPW Year Round
90
Open cut
S18 (SC1)
315
RPW Year Round
50
Open cut
S18A (SC1)
315
RPW Year Round
50
Open cut
S20 (SC20)
316
RPW Year round
99
Open cut
S21 (SC21)
317
RPW Year Round
57
Open cut
S22 (SF9)
321
RPW Year Round
117
Open cut
S23 (SF 10)
322
RPW Year Round
92
Open cut
S24 (SC 12)
323
RPW Year Round
51
Open cut
S25 (SC1 1)
324
RPW Seasonal Flow
62
Open cut
S26 (SC 10)
326
RPW Year Round
53
Open cut
S27 (SC 14)
328
RPW Seasonal Flow
61
Open cut
S28 (SC 15)
329
RPW Year Round
30
Open cut
S29 (SC 13)
330
RPW Year Round
50
Open cut
S30 (SF11)
331
RPW Year Round
105
Open cut
S31 (SC17)
337
RPW Seasonal Flow
0
Open cut
S32 (SC 18)
337
RPW Seasonal Flow
51
Open cut
S33 (SC 19)
338
RPW Year Round
135
Open cut
S34 (SF13)
339
RPW Year Round
58
Open cut
S35 (SP1)
339
RPW Seasonal Flow
50
Open cut
Page 1 of 2

Pre - Construction Notification: NWP No. 12 /WCQ No. 3884
Line T -021 B Pipeline Project
STREAM IMPACT TABLE
SE Project No. 7235 -14 -013, Phase 07
Stream ID
Drawing No.'
Classification
Temp. Impact (If)
Crossing Type*
S36 (SF14)
340
RPW Year Round
56
Open cut
S37 (SF15)
341
RPW Year Round
55
Open cut
S38 (SF 16)
342
RPW Year Round
52
Open cut
S39 (SF17)
342
RPW Seasonal Flow
10
Open cut
S40 (SF 18)
343
RPW Year Round
58
Open cut
S41 (SM1)
344
RPW Year Round
58
Open cut
S42 (SM2)
345
RPW Year Round
50
Open cut
S43 (SM3)
345
RPW Seasonal Flow
142
Open cut
S44 (SF22)
346
RPW Seasonal Flow
54
Open cut
S45 (SF23)
346
RPW Seasonal Flow
50
Open cut
S46 (SF21)
346
RPW Year Round
0
Avoided
S47 (SF24)
347
RPW Year Round
54
Open cut
S48 (SF25)
347
RPW Year Round
0
Avoided
S49 (SF26)
350
RPW Year Round
49
Open cut
S50 (SF27)
351
RPW Year Round
59
Open cut
Total:
2,519
Please note, the drawing numbers depicted corespond to the last three digits of the drawing number as shown on Approximate Jurisdictional Boundaries Drawings
HDD (horizontal directional drill)- will not impact the jurisdictional feature.
Page 2 of 2

Pre - Construction Notification: NWP No. 12 /WCQ No. 3884
Line T -021 B Pipeline Project
16" T -021B PIPELINE RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT TABLE
SE Project No. 7235 -14 -013, Phase 07
June 2014
Page 1 of 4
Zone 1 Impacts (sf)
Zone 2 Impacts (sf)
Drawing
Perpendicular
Disturbance at
z
Area Within
Area of
Area Within
Area of
Stream ID
�
No.
Crossing?
Crossing
Crossing Type
Crossing Notes /Justification
Existing
Permanent
Existing
Permanent
Total Area For Mitigation
Greater than
Total Area
Maintained
Maintenance
Total Area
Maintained
Maintenance
(Zone 1 + Zone 2) (sf)2
401f
Easement
Impact
Easement
Impact
ROW aligned to parallel existing
S1 (SL1)
301
No
Yes
HDD
maintained ROW.
3,971
0
3,971
2,748
0
2,748
6,719
S2 (SL2)
NA
NA
NA
Avoided
N /A. Area will not be impacted.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Exempt from Jordan Lake Riparian
S3 (SF1)
302
Yes
Yes
Open cut
Buffers- Existing Maintained Easement
3,062
3,062
0
2,069
2,069
0
0
Located primarily within Existing
Maintained Easement. Portions will be
cleared and maintained within the
existing maintained easement are
reflected in mitigation totals. Existing
gas lines to the north limit degree of
S4 (SF2)
303
No
Yes
Open cut
crossing.
3,780
3,491
289
2,567
2,276
291
580
Exempt from Jordan Lake Riparian
S5 (SF3)
304
Yes
Yes
Open cut
Buffers - Existing Maintained Easement
3,207
3,207
0
2,146
2,146
0
0
The location of the existing Cardinal Gas
Line and stream to the north limits where
the new line can turn to cross the
S6 (SF19)
305
No
Yes
Open cut
stream.
4,107
0
4,107
2,387
0
2,387
6,494
Current route avoids direct impacts to
S7. Parallel Zone 2 Impacts not
S7 (SF20)
305 -307
NA
NA
Avoided
included in Mitigation totals
1,533
0
1,533
2,632
0
2,632
4,165
S8 (SS4)
306
NA
NA
Avoided
N /A. Area will not be impacted.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
S9 (SC22)
307
NA
NA
Avoided
N /A. Area will not be impacted.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
S10 (SC24)
NA
NA
NA
Avoided
N /A. Area will not be impacted.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Exempt from Jordan Lake Riparian
S11 (SF6)
308
Yes
Yes
Open cut
Buffers - Existing Maintained Easement
2,321
2,321
0
3,301
3,301
0
0
Exempt from Jordan Lake Riparian
S12 (SF7)
309
Yes
Yes
Open cut
Buffers - Existing Maintained Easement
3,088
3,088
0
2,095
2,095
0
0
S13 (SF8)
309
NA
NA
Avoided
N /A. Area will not be impacted.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Exempt from Jordan Lake Riparian
S14 (SC6)
311
Yes
Yes
Open cut
Buffers - Existing Maintained Easement
2,950
2,950
0
2,166
2,166
0
0
Current route avoids direct impacts to
S15 (SC8)
311
NA
NA
Avoided
S15.
9
9
0
1,967
1,967
0
0
Exempt from Jordan Lake Riparian
S16 (SC5)
312
Yes
Yes
Open cut
Buffers - Existing Maintained Easement
3,719
3,719
0
2,613
2,613
0
0
Exempt from Jordan Lake Riparian
S17 (SC4)
313
No
Yes
Open cut
Buffers - Existing Maintained Easement
3,784
3,784
0
6,447
6,447
0
0
Exempt from Jordan Lake Riparian
S18 (SC1)
315
Yes
Yes
Open cut
Buffers - Existing Maintained Easement
3,083
3,083
0
2,053
2,053
0
0
Exempt from Jordan Lake Riparian
S18A (SC1)
315
Yes
Yes
Open cut
Buffers - Existing Maintained Easement
3,020
3,020
0
2,012
2,012
0
0
Page 1 of 4

Pre - Construction Notification: NWP No. 12 /WCQ No. 3884
Line T -021 B Pipeline Project
16" T -021B PIPELINE RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT TABLE
SE Project No. 7235 -14 -013, Phase 07
June 2014
Page 2 of 4
Zone 1 Impacts (sf)
Zone 2 Impacts (sf)
Drawing
Perpendicular
Disturbance at
z
Area Within
Area of
Area Within
Area of
Stream ID
�
No.
Crossing?
Crossing
Crossing Type
Crossing Notes /Justification
Existing
Permanent
Existing
Permanent
Total Area For Mitigation
Greater than
Total Area
Maintained
Maintenance
Total Area
Maintained
Maintenance
(Zone 1 + Zone 2) (sf)2
401f
Easement
Impact
Easement
Impact
Exempt from Jordan Lake Riparian
Buffers - Existing Maintained Easement.
Culvert is within Existing Maintained
S20 (SC20)
316
Yes
Yes
Open cut
Easement.
5,755
5,755
0
5,429
5,429
0
0
Located primarily within Existing
Maintained Easement. Portions will be
cleared and maintained within the
existing maintained easement are
S21 (SC21)
317
Yes
Yes
Open cut
reflected in mitigation totals.
3,434
3,353
81
2,281
2,222
59
140
Exempt from Jordan Lake Riparian
Buffers - Existing Maintained Easement.
Existing gas line to the north limits
S22 (SF9)
321
No
Yes
Open cut
crossing angle.
6,083
6,083
0
3,087
3,087
0
0
Located primarily within Existing
Maintained Easement. New 20 -foot right -
of way parallels existing maintained
easement. Existing gas line to the north
S23 (SF10)
322
No
Yes
Open cut
limits crossing angle.
5,125
4,017
1,108
3,144
2,439
705
1,813
Located mostly within Existing
Maintained Easement. ROW aligned to
parallell and south of existing
maintained ROW to avoid further impact
with Stream S24. Existing gas line to the
S24 (SC12)
323
No
Yes
Open cut
north limits crossing angle.
3,822
3,188
634
2,338
1,936
402
1,036
Exempt from Jordan Lake Riparian
S25 (SC11)
324
Yes
Yes
Open cut
Buffers - Existing Maintained Easement
1,953
1,953
0
1,324
1,324
0
0
Exempt from Jordan Lake Riparian
S26 (SC 10)
326
Yes
Yes
Open cut
Buffers - Existing Maintained Easement
3,104
3,104
0
2,091
2,091
0
0
Exempt from Jordan Lake Riparian
S27 (SC14)
328
Yes
Yes
Open cut
Buffers - Existing Maintained Easement
3,669
3,669
0
2,515
2,515
0
0
Exempt from Jordan Lake Riparian
Buffers - Existing Maintained Easement.
Existing gas line north and south of
proposed line limit crossing angle.
Temporary workspace will impact
forested areas outside of the existing
maintained easement. The total are
impacted by temporary workspace is
reflected in mitigation totals. This area
S28 (SC 15)"
329
No
Yes
Open cut
will not be permanently maintained.
5,026
4,564
462
4,139
3,601
538
1,000
Exempt from Jordan Lake Riparian
S29 (SC13)
330
Yes
Yes
Open cut
Buffers - Existing Maintained Easement
3,095
3,095
0
2,077
2,077
0
0
Page 2 of 4

Pre - Construction Notification: NWP No. 12 /WCQ No. 3884
Line T -021 B Pipeline Project
16" T -021B PIPELINE RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT TABLE
SE Project No. 7235 -14 -013, Phase 07
June 2014
Page 3 of 4
Zone 1 Impacts (sf)
Zone 2 Impacts (sf)
Drawing
Perpendicular
Disturbance at
z
Area Within
Area of
Area Within
Area of
Stream ID
�
No.
Crossing?
Crossing
Crossing Type
Crossing Notes /Justification
Existing
Permanent
Existing
Permanent
Total Area For Mitigation
Greater than
Total Area
Maintained
Maintenance
Total Area
Maintained
Maintenance
(Zone 1 + Zone 2) (sf)2
401f
Easement
Impact
Easement
Impact
Located primarily within Existing
Maintained Easement. Portions of
buffer will be cleared and permanently
maintained and are reflected in
mitigation totals. Gas line to the north
S30 (SF11)
331
No
Yes
Open cut
limits crossing angle.
4,633
2,874
1,897
4,355
2,532
1,823
3,720
Current alignment avoids direct impacts
to S31. The alignment is located
primarily within existing maintained
easement and is exempt from Jordan
Lake Buffers, however, portions of the
buffer will be cleared and maintained
S31 (SC17)
337
NA
Yes
Avoided
and are reflected in the mitigation totals.
1,667
743
924
3,117
1,962
1,155
2,079
Located primarily within Existing
Maintained Easement. Portions will be
cleared and are reflected in mitigation
S32 (SC18)
337
Yes
Yes
Open cut
totals.
3,038
2,147
891
2,023
1,387
636
1,527
Exempt from Jordan Lake Riparian
S33 (SC19)
338
Yes
Yes
Open cut
Buffers - Existing Maintained Easement
11,051
11,051
0
5,576
5,576
0
0
Located primarily within Existing
Maintained Easement. Portions of
buffer will be cleared and permanently
maintained and are reflected in
mitigation totals. Gas line to the north
S34 (SF13)
339
No
Yes
Open cut
limits crossing angle.
2,696
2,044
652
1,522
1,145
377
1,029
S35 (SP1)
339
No
Yes
Open cut
Not Subject to Jordan Lake Buffers
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Exempt from Jordan Lake Riparian
Buffers - Existing Maintained Easement.
Gas line to the north limits crossing
S36 (SF14)
340
No
Yes
Open cut
angle.
3,409
3,409
0
2,344
2,344
0
0
Exempt from Jordan Lake Riparian
S37 (SF15)
341
Yes
Yes
Open cut
Buffers - Existing Maintained Easement
3,436
3,436
0
2,322
2,322
0
0
Located mostly within Existing
Maintained Easement. ROW aligned to
parallell and south of existing
maintained ROW to avoid further impact
with Stream S38 and Wetland W49.
Portions will be cleared and are
S38 (SF16)
342
No
Yes
Open cut
reflected in mitigation totals.
3,456
2,755
701
2,488
2,310
178
879
Not Subject to Jordan Lake Buffers.
Small area will be included in new
S39 (SF17)
342
NA
NA
Avoided
maintained 15 -foot right of way.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Page 3 of 4

Pre - Construction Notification: NWP No. 12 /WCQ No. 3884
Line T -021 B Pipeline Project
16" T -021B PIPELINE RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT TABLE
SE Project No. 7235 -14 -013, Phase 07
June 2014
Page 4 of 4
Zone 1 Impacts (sf)
Zone 2 Impacts (sf)
Drawing
Perpendicular
Disturbance at
z
Area Within
Area of
Area Within
Area of
Stream ID
�
No.
Crossing?
Crossing
Crossing Type
Crossing Notes /Justification
Existing
Permanent
Existing
Permanent
Total Area For Mitigation
Greater than
Total Area
Maintained
Maintenance
Total Area
Maintained
Maintenance
(Zone 1 + Zone 2) (sf)2
401f
Easement
Impact
Easement
Impact
Located mostly within Existing
Maintained Easement. New 15 -foot
ROW aligned to parallell and south of
existing maintained ROW. Crossing
angle limited by gas line to the north.
Potions will be cleared and are reflected
S40 (SF18)
343
No
Yes
Open cut
in mitigation totals.
3,419
2,266
1,153
3,245
1,957
1,288
2,441
Exempt from Jordan Lake Riparian
Buffers - Existing Maintained Easement.
Crossing angle at stream limited by gas
S41 (SM1)
344
No
Yes
Open cut
line to the north.
3,145
3,145
0
2,327
2,327
0
0
Exempt from Jordan Lake Riparian
S42 (SM2)
345
Yes
Yes
Open cut
Buffers - Existing Maintained Easement
3,045
3,045
0
2,108
2,108
0
0
Exempt from Jordan Lake Riparian
Buffers - Existing Maintained Easement.
Crossing angle limited by gas line to the
S43 (SM3)
345
No
Yes
Open cut
north.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Not subject to Jordan Lake Riparian
Buffers. Crossing located completely
S44 (SF22)
346
No
Yes
Open cut
within existing maintained easement.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Not subject to Jordan Lake Riparian
Buffers. Crossing located completely
S45 (SF23)
346
Yes
Yes
Open cut
within existing maintained easement.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Parallel Zone 2 impacts are completely
within existing maintained easement and
S46 (SF21)
346
NA
NA
Avoided
no change of use.
0
0
0
860
860
0
0
Exempt from Jordan Lake Riparian
Buffers - Existing Maintained Easement.
Crossing angle limited by gas line to the
north. Current alignement avoids
impacts to wetlands to the north and
S47 (SF24)
347
No
Yes
Open cut
additional buffer impacts to the south.
3,416
3,416
0
2,567
2,567
0
0
S48 (SF25)
347
NA
NA
Avoided
N /A. Area will not be impacted.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Current alignment avoids impacts to
W56. Portions will be cleared and are
S49 (SF26)
350
Yes
Yes
Open cut
reflected in mitigation totals.
5,041
4,553
488
4,483
4,483
0
488
Not subject to Jordan Lake Riparian
Buffers. Crossing located completely
within existing maintained easement.
Crossing angle limited by gas line to the
S50 (SF27)
351
No
Yes
Open cut
north.
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
Totals:1
112,630
1
16,549
1 86,887
1
13,753
1 30,302
Please note, the drawing numbers depicted corespond to the last three digits of the drawing number as shown on APPROXIMATE JURISDITIONAL BOUNDARIES IMPACT DRAWINGS.
2HDD (horizontal directional drill)- will not impact the jurisdictional feature.
" Temporary Workspace cleared will not be permanently maintained, however temporary impacts are reflected in mitigation totals
Page 4 of 4

APPENDIX III
Representative Site Photographs

Photo 1. View of Stream S1 (SL1), facing upstream.
Photo 3. View of Wetland W2 (WF1) and Stream S3 (SF1)
Photo 5. View of Stream S5 (SF3), facing upstream.
Photo 2. View of Stream S3 (SF1), facing downstream.
Photo 4. View of Stream S4 (SF2), facing upstream.
Photo 6. View of Wetland W3 (WF2), facing
northeast.
REPRESENTATIVE SITE
PHOTOGRAPHS
Line T -021B Proposed Pipeline Project
Alamance and Orange Counties, North Carolina
Photo Pg. 1 of 16

Photo 7. View of Stream S06 (SF19), facing upstream.
Photo 9. View of Wetland W04 (WF14).
Photo 11. View of Stream S07 (SF20X), facing upstream.
Photo 8. View of Stream S07 (SF20), facing upstream.
Photo 10. View of Wetland W05 (WF15).
Photo 12. View of Stream S07 (SS1), facing
upstream.
REPRESENTATIVE SITE
PHOTOGRAPHS
Line T -021 B Proposed Pipeline Project
Alamance and Orange Counties, North Carolina
Photo Pg. 1 of 16

Photo 13. View of Stream S08 (SS4), facing upstream.
Photo 15. View of Wetland W12 (WF3), facing east.
Photo 17. View of Wetland W13 (WF4), facing north.
Photo 14. View of Stream S10 (SC24), facing upstream.
Photo 16. View of Stream S11 (SF6), facing downstream.
Photo 18. View of Stream S12 (SF7), facing
downstream.
REPRESENTATIVE SITE
PHOTOGRAPHS
Line T -021B Proposed Pipeline Project
Alamance and Orange Counties, North Carolina
Photo Pg. 2 of 16

f
AN
Photo 19. View of Wetland W14 (WF5), facing south east.
Photo 21. View of Stream S15 (SC8), facing upstream.
Photo 23. View of Stream S16 (SC5), facing upstream
fl* :Y �'.
> wry -`k'
Photo 20. View of Wetland W18 (WC1), facing south east.
{
Photo 22. View of Stream S14 (SC6), facing downstream.
Photo 24. View of Wetland W17 (WC2).
REPRESENTATIVE SITE
PHOTOGRAPHS
Line T -021B Proposed Pipeline Project
Alamance and Orange Counties, North Carolina
Photo Pg. 2 of 16

t i. ..
I Tat
q1Nx;TMPW.
Photo 31. View of Wetland W20 (WC26) and Stream
S21 (SC21), facing north.
Photo 33. View of Wetland W23 (WC6).
Photo 35. View of Wetland W25 (WF6), facing east.
►'• ems, , .
_ 0..-
N� 0 i
Photo 32. View of Wetland W21 (WFA).
GI
Photo 34. View of Wetland W24 (WC7), facing south.
#L1
Photo 36. View of Stream S22 (SF9), facing
downstream.
REPRESENTATIVE SITE
PHOTOGRAPHS
Line T -021B Proposed Pipeline Project
Alamance and Orange Counties, North Carolina
Photo Pg. 4 of 16

Photo 37. View of Stream S23 (SF10), facing downstream
Photo 39. View Stream S24 (SC12), facing downstream.
Photo 41. View of Wetland 28 (WF33), facing south
west.
Photo 38. View of Wetland W26 (WP1), facing northwest.
Photo 40. View Stream 25 (SC11), facing upstream.
Photo 42. View of Wetland 27 (WF34), facing south
west.
REPRESENTATIVE SITE
PHOTOGRAPHS
Line T -021B Proposed Pipeline Project
Alamance and Orange Counties, North Carolina
Photo Pg. 5 of 16

r .aw �j�1 �j � ",?yam„- ��,t f x -yr � 4�•{
AV
Photo 43. View of Wetland W29 (WC11).
Photo 45. View of Wetland W31 (WC9).
Photo 47. View of Wetland W31 B (WL02), facing north
east.
Photo 44. View of Stream S26 (SC10), facing
downstream.
Photo 46. View of Wetland W31A (WL02A), facing north
east.
Photo 48. View of Open Water W31 C (WL02B),
facing south east.
REPRESENTATIVE SITE
PHOTOGRAPHS
Line T -021 B Proposed Pipeline Project
Alamance and Orange Counties, North Carolina
Photo Pg. 5 of 16

1
r.- 1•;`':� r � tale,- � r y�� `{,t„ K4. :, C . .;� y��. � `.
r
Will
Photo 49. View of Stream S26A (SL05), facing Photo 50. View of Wetland W33 (WC13), facing
downstream. southeast.
c ,
`�'kNft
r *�
Photo 51. View of Stream S27 (SC14), facing upstream. Photo 52. View of Stream S28 (SC15), facing downstream.
w
Photo 53. View of Wetland W34 facing south (WC 12). Photo 54. View of Stream S29 (SC13), facing
downstream.
T REPRESENTATIVE SITE
Taken by: Multiple
PHOTOGRAPHS
Checked by: CJF Line T -021B Proposed Pipeline Project
Alamance and Orange Counties, North Carolina
Date: Multiple
Project No.: 7235 -14 -013 Photo Pg. 5 of 16

Photo 55. View of Stream S30 (SF11), facing upstream.
Photo 57. View of Wetland W36 (WF8), facing east.
y� y. ` ♦�, y '�`' I�j3 'lS PIA' ;� r °
aN xV�cai�• � !� 'ri14. � � a ..,
:9
Photo 59. View of Stream (SC16), facing downstream.
Photo 56. View of Wetland W35 (WF7), facing east
Photo 58. View of Wetland W38 (WC14 /WL3), facing
north east.
`i,
M V
Photo 60. View of Wetland W39 (WC15), facing
south.
REPRESENTATIVE SITE
PHOTOGRAPHS
Line T -021 B Proposed Pipeline Project
Alamance and Orange Counties, North Carolina
1
Photo Pg. 6 of 16

y
Photo 61. View of Wetland W42 (WC18), facing south. Photo 62. View of Stream S31 (SC17), facing down stream.
ew
W
M
Y
1°
I
f' zl
n
Photo 63. View of Wetland W44 (WC22), facing south east. Photo 64. View of Stream S32 (SC18), facing upstream.
i
t
Photo 65. View of Stream S33 (SC19), facing Photo 66. View of Wetland W46 (WF9), facing south.
downstream.
T REPRESENTATIVE SITE
Taken by: Multiple
PHOTOGRAPHS
Checked by: CJF Line T -021B Proposed Pipeline Project
Alamance and Orange Counties, North Carolina
Date: Multiple
Project No.: 7235 -14 -013 Photo Pg. 6 of 16

Photo 67. View of Stream S34 (SF13), facing upstream.
Photo 69. View of Wetland W47 (WF10), facing south.
Photo 71. View of Wetland W48 (WF11), facing south
Photo 68. View of Stream S35 (SP1), facing upstream.
Photo 70. View of Stream S36 (SF14), facing down
stream .
Photo 72. View of Stream S37 (SF15), facing
upstream.
REPRESENTATIVE SITE
PHOTOGRAPHS
Line T -021B Proposed Pipeline Project
Alamance and Orange Counties, North Carolina
Photo Pg. 6 of 16

Photo 73. View of Wetland W49 (WF12), facing north.
Photo 75. View of Stream S39 (SF17).
Photo 77. View of Stream S41 (SM1), facing up stream.
Photo 74. View of Stream S38 (SF16), facing down
stream.
Photo 76. View of Stream S40 (SF18), facing down stream.
Photo 78. View of Stream S42 (SM2), facing up
stream.
REPRESENTATIVE SITE
PHOTOGRAPHS
Line T -021B Proposed Pipeline Project
Alamance and Orange Counties, North Carolina
Photo Pg. 6 of 16

Photo 79. View of Stream S43 (SM3), facing down
stream .
Photo 81. View of Stream S44 (SF22), facing down stream.
Photo 83. View of Stream S45 (SF23), facing upstream.
Photo 80. View of Stream S46 (SF21), facing down stream.
Photo 82. View of Wetland W50 (WF17), facing south.
Photo 84. View of Wetland W52 (WF19), facing north.
REPRESENTATIVE SITE
PHOTOGRAPHS
Line T -021 B Proposed Pipeline Project
Alamance and Orange Counties, North Carolina
Photo Pg. 6 of 16

Photo 85. View of Stream S47 (SF24), facing upstream.
Photo 87. View of Wetland W51 (WF20), facing south.
Photo 89. View of Wetland W54 (WF22), facing south.
Photo 86. View of Stream S48 (SF25), facing up stream.
Photo 88. View of Wetland W53 (WF21), facing south.
Photo 90. View of Stream S49 (SF26), facing up
stream.
REPRESENTATIVE SITE
PHOTOGRAPHS
Line T -021B Proposed Pipeline Project
Alamance and Orange Counties, North Carolina
Photo Pg. 6 of 16

Photo 91. View of Wetland W56 (WF23), facing north.
Photo 93. View of Stream S50 (SF27), facing down stream.
Photo 92. View of Wetland W55 (WF24), facing south east.
REPRESENTATIVE SITE
PHOTOGRAPHS
Line T -021B Proposed Pipeline Project
Alamance and Orange Counties, North Carolina
Photo Pg. 6 of 16

APPENDIX IV
Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S.
Riparian Buffer Impact Plan Drawings-
(58703301 -58703352)

EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT— — — — — —
G -
-cEXISTING G1 PSNCc T�PIPELINE c__G�
N
N
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT — — — —
"G� G
c c EXISTING 24" CAf ljlNAL PIPELIG�G / I
0
i
NEW 50' ROW
LEGEND:
EXISTING TREE LINE P / / / A�
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
NOTE:
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED
BY HDD METHOD
STREAM S1 TOTAL JORDAN LAKE BUFFER IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
PERM. IMPACT
2,630 SQ. FT.
EXISTING
(MAINTAINED) s�
1,341 SQ. FT.
STREAM
S1 50' ROW
62 L.F.
Z1 —Z1
Z7 _ �2
—
— Z2
Z
—
—
\
G
Z2 v
G Z2
cp
—G
\1
CD
CD
o v
I
G G G—
GI
GAG
I
NEW PERMANENT EASEMENT
/
PROPOSED 16" T -021 B PIPELINE
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
NOTE:
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED
BY HDD METHOD
STREAM S1 TOTAL JORDAN LAKE BUFFER IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
PERM. IMPACT
2,630 SQ. FT.
1,465 SQ. FT,
TEMP. IMPACT
1,341 SQ. FT.
1,283 SQ, FT.
NEW PERMANENT EASEMENT
STREAM S1 TOTAL IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
711 SO. FT.
0.016 AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
2,249 SO. FT.
0.052 AC.
50 25 0 50
SCALE IN FEET
X13 PS N C ENERGY DRAWN BY: CAC 06/02/14
ENERGY MANAGEMENT DRAFTING CK: SFS 06/03/14
& SERVICES CO.
CORPORATE OFFICE: APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021B PIPELINE ENVIINONMNGTACLKCK:
109 FIELDVIEW DRIVE
P.O. BOX 1007 STREAM CROSSING S1 ALIGNMENT SHT: 58701101
VERSAILLES, KY 40383
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone] DRAWING NO.:
BRANCH OFFICES: @ STATION 9 +37, M.P 0.18 58703301
HOUSTON, TX DETROIT, MI
CHARLESTON, WV • TULSA, OK ALAMANCE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA SCALE: 1" = 50 REV. A
BAY CITY, MI
www.emseng.com SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE OF PLOT: 06/20/2014

WETLAND W2 TOTAL IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
0 SQ. FT.
0.000 AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
1 ,51 6 SQ. FT.
0.035 AC.
STREAM S3 TOTAL IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
0 SQ. FT.
0.000 AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
190 SO. FT.
0.004 AC.
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT — — — —
WETLAND W2
0�
c�0
STREAM S3 TOTAL JORDAN LAKE BUFFER IMPAC_`
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
PERM. IMPACT
0 S0. FT.
0 SQ. FT.
TEMP. IMPACT
3,062 SQ. FT.
2,069 SQ. FT.
I
STREAM S3
50 L.F.
EXISTING (MAINTAINED)
50' ROW
v!
2
0
9
EXISTING 10" PSNC T -021 PIPELINE N G c cam`'
G G G G G G G G G G G
PROPOSED 16" T -021 B PIPELINE o N
Ln
EXISTING 24" CARDINAL PIPELINE r
G G G G G G G G "=G G GAG— —�
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
T- -- -- - - - - -
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
N
LEGEND:
EXISTING TREE LINE
N n
_ TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA N V
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
NOTE: 50 25 0 50
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED
BY OPEN CUT METHOD SCALE IN FEET
X13 PS N C ENERGY DRAWN BY: CAC 06/02/14
ENERGY MANAGEMENT DRAFTING CK: SFS 06/03/14
& SERVICES CO.
CORPORATE OFFICE: APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021B PIPELINE ENVIINONMNGTACLKCK:
109 FIELDVIEW DRIVE
P.O. BOX 1007
4 0383 WETLAND CROSSING W2 & STREAM CROSSING S3 ALIGNMENT sHr: 58701102
VERSAILLES, KY 4
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone] DRAWING NO.:
BRANCH OFFICES: @ STATION 30 +67, M.P 0.58 58703302
HOUSTON, TX DETROIT, MI
CHARLESTON, WV • TULSA, OK ALAMANCE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA SCALE: 1" = 50 REV. A
BAY CITY, MI
www.emseng.com SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE OF PLOT: 06/17/2014

/ z
�o
STREAM S4 TOTAL JORDAN LAKE BUFFER IMPACTS
ZONE 1 ZONE 2 30, ��
0
PERM. IMPACT 289 SO. FT. 291 SQ. FT. / F
TEMP. IMPACT 3,491 SO. FT. 2,276 SQ. FT. /
ol
ro
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE N TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
N /TT /�T /7TH
N EXISTING 24" CARDINAL PIPELINE
G G G G N G I G Gf—tS� —tiff fN G
/EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT L
LGPL-- NG 10" PSNC T -021 PIPELINE
G G G G G G G G G G G G G G
0 OSED 16" T -021 B PIPELINE Ln
,` EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
EXISTING (MAINTAINED
50' ROW
LEGEND:
EXISTING TREE LINE
_ TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
NOTE:
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED
BY OPEN CUT METHOD
ENERGY
& SERVICES CO.
CORPORATE OFFICE:
109 FIELDVIEW DRIVE
P.O. BOX 1007
VERSAILLES, KY 40383
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone]
BRANCH OFFICES:
HOUSTON, TX DETROIT, MI
CHARLESTON, WV TULSA, OK
BAY CITY, MI
www.emseng.com
N
N
A N
\ \ N
\ I
I �
I I
I �
i
50' BUFFER
I N
I
I
I
STREAM S4 TOTAL IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
0 SQ. FT.
0.000 AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
1 ,244 SO. FT.
0.029 AC.
IL STREAM S4 50 25 0 50
54 L.F.
SCALE IN FEET
PSNC ENERGY DRAWN BY: CAC 06/02/14
DRAFTING CK: SFS 06/03/14
APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021 B PIPELINE ENVIRONMENTAL CK:
ENGINEERING CK:
STREAM CROSSING S4 ALIGNMENT SHT: 58701102
DRAWING NO.:
@ STATION 47 +67, M.P 0.90 58703303
ALAMANCE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA SCALE: - 50 REV. A
SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE OF PLOT: 06/17/2014

JO
-J
O�
ti
TEMPORARY hG WORKSPACE
N
l N° G _GEXISTING G24" CARDINAL PIP CLINE c G G
i EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - — N EXISTING 10" PSNC T -021 PIPELINE
G G G G G G G G
o OSED 16" T -021 B PIPELINE
ti
N
STREAM S5
53 L.F. I N
N
N
LEGEND:
EXISTING TREE LINE
_ TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
NOTE:
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED
BY OPEN CUT METHOD
ENERGY
& SERVICES CO.
CORPORATE OFFICE:
109 FIELDVIEW DRIVE
P.O. BOX 1007
VERSAILLES, KY 40383
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone]
BRANCH OFFICES:
HOUSTON, TX DETROIT, MI
CHARLESTON, WV TULSA, OK
BAY CITY , MI
www.emseng.com
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
/ WETLAND W3
G G G
G G --aG G —
2
Q
cp
0
r
G G
G G-
EXISTING (MAINTAINED)
50' RIGHT -OF -WAY
STREAM S5 TOTAL JORDAN LAKE BUFFER IMPACTS
WETLAND W3 TOTAL IMPACTS.
ZONE 1
PERM.
IMPACT
0 SQ. FT.
0.000
AC.
TEMP.
IMPACT
12,565 SQ. FT.
0.288
AC.
STREAM S5 TOTAL IMPACTS
PERM.
IMPACT
0 SQ. FT.
0.000
AC.
/ WETLAND W3
G G G
G G --aG G —
2
Q
cp
0
r
G G
G G-
EXISTING (MAINTAINED)
50' RIGHT -OF -WAY
STREAM S5 TOTAL JORDAN LAKE BUFFER IMPACTS
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
PERM. IMPACT
0 SQ. FT.
0 S0. FT.
TEMP. IMPACT
3,207 SO. FT.
2,146 SO. FT.
50 25 0 50
TEMP. IMPACT 288 SQ. FT. 0.007 AC.
SCALE IN FEET
PSNC ENERGY DRAWN BY: CAC 05/28/14.
DRAFTING CK: SFS 05/29/14
APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021 B PIPELINE ENVIRONMENTAL CK:
ENGINEERING CK:
WETLAND CROSSING, STREAM CROSSING S5 ALIGNMENT SHT: 58701103
DRAWING NO.:
@ STATION 64 +42, M.P 1.22 58703304
ALAMANCE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA SCALE: 1° - 50 REV. A
SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE OF PLOT: 06/17/2014

O�
r
G--- /
— c�c
c c�c
LEGEND:
77YICTINI(] TRF7177 I IRI
1
1
V
STREAM S7
T2
\\ / —77 L. M S6 /Z /21 Z ND W4 NEW 50' ROW
\ \ �1'
—c
G c \ \
G-
c�c " \ \
G \
_ TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
NOTE:
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED
BY OPEN CUT METHOD
STREAM S6 TOTAL IMPACTS
WETLAND W4 TOTAL
IMPACTS
ZONE 2
PERM.
IMPACT
2,191 SO.
FT.
0.050
AC.
TEMP.
IMPACT
0 S0. FT.
0.000
AC.
STREAM S6 TOTAL
IMPACTS
PERM.
IMPACT
568 SO.
FT.
0.013
AC.
TEMP.
IMPACT
635 SQ.
FT.
0.015
AC.
O�
r
G--- /
— c�c
c c�c
LEGEND:
77YICTINI(] TRF7177 I IRI
1
1
V
STREAM S7
T2
\\ / —77 L. M S6 /Z /21 Z ND W4 NEW 50' ROW
\ \ �1'
—c
G c \ \
G-
c�c " \ \
G \
_ TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
NOTE:
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED
BY OPEN CUT METHOD
STREAM S6 TOTAL IMPACTS
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
PERM. IMPACT
4,107 SQ. FT.
2,387 SO, FT.
TEMP. IMPACT
0 SO. FT.
0 SQ. FT.
NEW PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED 16" T -021 B PIPELINE
NEW PERMANENT EASEMENT
1�
EXISTING (MAINTAINED) 50' ROW
G
Z
EXISTING T_021 PIPELINE
�c
G
EXISTING CARDINAL PIPELINE
\ c
50 25 0 50
0
5�
\ SCALE IN FEET
40� PS N C ENERGY DRAWN BY: CAC 06/02/14
ENERGY MANAGEMENT DRAFTING CK: SFS 06/o3/1
& SERVICES CO.
CORPORATE OFFICE: APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021 B PIPELINE ENVIINONMENTACLKCK:
109 FIELDVIEN DRIVE
P.O. BOX 1007 3
4 0383 WETLAND CROSSING W4 & STREAM CROSSING S6 ALIGNMENT sHT: 580,10
VERSAILLES, KY 4
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone] DRAWING NO.:
BRANCH OFFICES: @ STATION 70 +14, M.P 1.33 58703305
HOUSTON, TX DETROIT, MI
CHARLESTON, WV • TULSA, OK ALAMANCE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA SCALE: 1" = 50' REV. A
BAY CITY, MI
www.emseng.com SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE OF PLOT: 06/20/2014

WETLAND W7 TOTAL IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
9 SO. FT.
0.0002 AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
0 S0. FT.
0.000 AC.
LEGEND:
I\
EXISTING TREE LINE
STREAM S8
\ NEW 50' ROW
o \
_ TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
STREAM S7
WETLAND W7
NEW PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED 16" T -021 B PIPELINE
NEW PERMANENT EASEMENT
NOTE: 50 25 0 50
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED
BY OPEN CUT METHOD SCALE IN FEET
aKs PSNC ENERGY DRAWN BY: CAC 06/02/1A
ENERGY MENT DRAFTING CK: SFS 06/03/14
& SERVICES CO.
CORPORATE OFFICE: APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021 B PIPELINE ENVIINONMEN AL CK:
109 FIELDVIEW DRIVE
P.O. Sox 1007 ALIGNMENT SHT: 58701103
4
VERSAILLES, KY 40383
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone] DRAWING NO.:
BRANCH OFFICES: @ STATION 80 +53, M. P 1.53 58703306
HOUSTON, TX DETROIT, MI
CHARLESTON, WV • TULSA, DI( ALAMANCE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA SCALE: ' = 50' REV. A
BAY CITY, MI
www.emseng.com SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE OF PLOT: 06/17/2014
�Ov
�P
'D.
e°
NOTE: 50 25 0 50
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED
BY OPEN CUT METHOD SCALE IN FEET
aKs PSNC ENERGY DRAWN BY: CAC 06/02/1A
ENERGY MENT DRAFTING CK: SFS 06/03/14
& SERVICES CO.
CORPORATE OFFICE: APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021 B PIPELINE ENVIINONMEN AL CK:
109 FIELDVIEW DRIVE
P.O. Sox 1007 ALIGNMENT SHT: 58701103
4
VERSAILLES, KY 40383
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone] DRAWING NO.:
BRANCH OFFICES: @ STATION 80 +53, M. P 1.53 58703306
HOUSTON, TX DETROIT, MI
CHARLESTON, WV • TULSA, DI( ALAMANCE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA SCALE: ' = 50' REV. A
BAY CITY, MI
www.emseng.com SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE OF PLOT: 06/17/2014

N
O N
Zo
m
N
O
m O
M/
Z2�z2 STREAM S9
2 ,Co
STREAM S7 /
WETLAND W8-
71
ti
PARALLEL ZONE 2
IMPACTS NO
MITIGATION REQUIRED.
LEGEND:
EXISTING TREE LINE
_ TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
NOTE:
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED
BY OPEN CUT METHOD
N
STREAM S7 TOTAL JORDAN LAKE BUFFER IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
PERM. IMPACT
1,533 SO. FT.
2,632 SO. FT.
TEMP. IMPACT
0 SQ. FT.
0 SQ. FT.
WETLAND 9
�z lz —I LZ-
STREAM S7
z
z
0
a
v
z
Q
?7ETLAND W10
z
Z WETLAND W8 \�
NEW 50' ROW
;— 2
N
N
NEW PERMANENT EASEMENT N\A
PROPOSED 16" T -021 B PIPELINE
NEW PERMANENT EASEMENT
WETLAND W10 TOTAL IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
77 SO. FT.
0.002 AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
0 SO. FT.
0.000 AC.
iJ
N WETLAND W10
50 25 0 50
SCALE IN FEET
aKs PSNC ENERGY DRAWN BY: CAC 06/02'14
ENERGY DRAFTING CK: SFS 06/03/14
& SERVICES CO.
CORPORATE OFFICE: APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021 B PIPELINE ENVIINONMING ENTAL CK:
109 LES, KY DRIVE WETLAND CROSSING W8 W10 & STREAM S7
P.O. BOX ,007 ALIGNMENT SHT: 58701104
VERSAILLES, KY 40383 1
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone] DRAWING NO.:
BRANCH OFFICES: @ STATION 87 +17, M.P 1.65 58703307
HOUSTON, TX DETROIT, MI
CHARLESTON, WV Y TULSA, OK SCALE: 1 ° = 50' REV. A
6A CITY, T U ALAMANCE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
www.emseng.com SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE OF PLOT: 06/20/2014

—
G G—
G—
TEMPORARY
WORKSPACE
LEGEND:
PROPOSED 16"
T -021 B PIPELINE
G
EXISTING TREE LINE
_ TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
NOTE:
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED
BY OPEN CUT METHOD
ENERGY
& SERVICES CO.
CORPORATE OFFICE:
109 FIELDVIEW DRIVE
P.O. BOX 1007
VERSAILLES, KY 40383
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone]
BRANCH OFFICES:
HOUSTON, TX DETROIT, MI
CHARLESTON, WV TULSA, OK
BAY CITY, MI
www.emseng.com
G
WETLAND W 12 TOTAL IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
166 SO. FT.
0.004 AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
23,006 SQ. FT.
0.5 AC.
N
N i
�u
WETLAND W12
STREAM S11
52 L.F.
I/ I /,-- EXISTING (MAINTAINED)
50' ROW
EXISTING 10" PSNC T -021
PIPELINE
I _
EXISTING 24" CARDINAL
50' PIPELINE
BOFF R N N
N
30,
INF 7 �
STREAM S16 TOTAL JORDAN LAKE BUFFER IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
PERM. IMPACT
0 SQ. FT.
0 S0. FT.
TEMP. IMPACT
2,321 SO, FT.
3,301 SQ. FT.
—G —G
—_G
�o
s�
7A
.Z
EXISTING MAINTENANCE
EASEMENT
G t
c G G
_ G _ c
TEMPORARYI
WORKSPACE
STREAM S11 TOTAL IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
00 SQ, FT.
0.000 AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
240 SQ. FT.
0.006 AC.
100 50 0 100
SCALE IN FEET
PSNC ENERGY DRAWN BY: CAC 06/02/14
DRAFTING CK: SFS 06/03/14
APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021 B PIPELINE ENVIRONMENTAL CK:
ENGINEERING CK:
WETLAND CROSSING W12 ALIGNMENT SHT: 58701105,06
DRAWING NO.:
@ STATION 127 +54, M.P 2.42 58703308
ALAMANCE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA SCALE: - REV. A
SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE OF PLOT: 06/17/2014

STREAM S12 TOTAL IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
0 SO. FT,
0.000 AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
412 SQ. FT.
0.009 AC.
LEGEND:
N
WETLAND W13
E
EXISTING 10" PSNC T -021 PIPELINE
G G G G G
PROPOSED 16" T -021 B PIPELINE
G _
STREAM S18 TOTAL JORDAN LAKE BUFFER IMPACTS
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
PERM. IMPACT
0 SQ. FT.
0 SQ. FT.
TEMP. IMPACT
3,088 SQ, FT..
2,095 SQ. FT.
EXISTING G 24 "G CARDINAL PIPELINE _ _ G _ _ —I
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
EXISTING TREE LINE
_ TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
NOTE:
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED
BY OPEN CUT METHOD
STREAM S13
N
N
N G G ` \ G4G
1 ` N
N N \ \
STREAM S12 \
50 L. F. \ \
N-
'z
EXISTING (MAINTAINED)
50' ROW /
G
O
L0
0
co
ul
v7A
m
gym
_z
0
z
v
G G
—Gc c c
Ln
/1
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
50 25 0 50
SCALE IN FEET
P S N C ENERGY DRAWN BY: CAC 06/02/14
ENERGY MANAGEMENT DRAFTING CK: SFS 06/o3/1
& SERVICES CO.
CORPORATE OFFICE: APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021 B PIPELINE ENVIINONMENTACLKCK:
109 FIELDVIEW DRIVE
P.O. Box 1007 ALIGNMENT SHT: 58701106
4
VERSAILLES, KY 40383
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone] DRAWING NO.:
BRANCH OFFICES: @ STATION 146 +89, M.P 2.78 58703309
HOUSTON, TX DETROIT, MI
CHARLESTON, WV • TULSA, OK ALAMANCE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA SCALE: , = So' REV. A
BAY CITY, MI
www.emseng.com SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE OF PLOT: 06/17/2014

WETLAND W14 TOTAL IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
0 SQ. FT.
0.000 AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
3,751 SO. FT.
0.086 AC.
EXISTING (MAINTAINED)
50' ROW
— — — — EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
c c c c c G EXISTING 10" PSNC T -021 PIPELINE
O
G G G G G G
PROPOSED 16" T -021 B PIPELINE
EXISTING 24" CARDINAL PIPELINE
G G G —G - - -G G G G G G G G C
EXISTIN ��/////
ANCE EASEMENTT
WORKSPACE — � ACE
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
G
Lo
L
N TEMPORARY
LEGEND:
0
W
v�
Is
m
_Z
0
y
C
EXISTING TREE LINE
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
NOTE:
1. PIPELINE TO HE INSTALLED
BY OPEN CUT METHOD
WETLAND W14
50 25 0 50
SCALE IN FEET
is PSNC ENERGY DRAWN BY: CAC 06/02/14
ENERGY DRAFTING CK: SFS 06/03/14
& SERVICES CO.
CORPORATE OFFICE: APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021B PIPELINE ENVIINONMENTACLKCK:
109 FIELDVIEW DRIVE
P.O. BOX 4 WETLAND CROSSING W14 ALIGNMENT sHr: 58701106
VERSAILLES, KY 40383
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone] DRAWING NO.:
BRANCH OFFICES: @ STATION 153 +01, M. P 2.90 58703310
HOUSTON, TX DETROIT, MI
CHARLESTON, WV TULSA, OK SCALE: 1 = 50' REV. A
6AY CITY. MI ALAMANCE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
www.emseng.com SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE OF PLOT: 06/17/2014

STREAM S14 TOTAL IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
0 SQ. FT.
0.000 AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
1 , 652 SO. FT.
0.038 AC.
WETLAND W15 TOTAL IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
0 S0. FT.
0.000 AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
3,306 SQ. FT.
0.076 AC.
STREAM 14
1
WETLAND 15
50 ,
PROPOSED 16" gU F R
T -021 B PIPELINE I
N
N
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
G G G
G G
G G G
EG ISTING 24" CARDING L PIPELINE 22 — G
G —
T /T /T /T /T /T/
!TEMPORARY WORKSPACE L
LEGEND:
2%
ZONE
\ N
1
STREAM S15
EXISTING TREE LINE
_ TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
NOTE:
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED
BY OPEN CUT METHOD
Z2 �Z7 �z1
_ Z2
— z2
G
WETLAND W16 TOTAL IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
0 SQ. FT.
0.000 AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
9,806 S0: FT.
0.225 AC.
70
s�
7A
72�
.Z
C)
7
v
EXISTING 10" PSNC
T -021 PIPELINE
EXISTING (MAINTAINED)
50' ROW
GAG
G G G G
G G-
MPORARY WORKSPACE�7
N EXISTING MAINTENANCE
EASEMENT
WETLAND W16
STREAM S14 TOTAL JORDAN LAKE BUFFER IMPACTS
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
PERM. IMPACT
0 S0. FT.
0 SQ. FT.
TEMP. IMPACT
2,950 SO. FT.
2,166 SQ. FT.
STREAM S15 TOTAL JORDAN LAKE PUFFER IMPACTS
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
PERM. IMPACT
0 SQ. FT.
0 SQ. FT.
TEMP. IMPACT
9 S0. FT.
1,967 SQ. FT.
100 50 0 100
SCALE IN FEET
PS N C ENERGY DRAWN BY: CAC 06/02/14
ENERGY MANAGEMENT DRAFTING CK: SFS 06/03/14
& SERVICES CO.
CORPORATE OFFICE: APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021 B PIPELINE ENVIINONMENTACLKCK:
109 LES, KY DRIVE
WETLAND CROSSING W15 & W16 & STREAM CROSSING S14 & S15
P.O. BOX 1007 ALIGNMENT SHT: 58701107
VERSAILLES, KY 40383
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone] DRAWING NO.:
BRANCH OFFICES: @ STATION 173 +20, M.P 3.28 58703308
HOUSTON, TX DETROIT, MI
CHARLESTON, WV • TULSA, OK ALAMANCE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA SCALE: , = 100' REV. A
BAY CITY, MI
www.emseng.com SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE OF PLOT: 06/17/2014

—G
O
STREAM S16 TOTAL IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
0 SQ. FT.
0.000 AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
1,377 SO. FT.
0.032 AC.
� �R\
50' NBU�
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
EXISTING 10" PSNC T -021 PIPELINE
EXISTING 24" CARDINAL PIPELINE
G G G G G G G
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
zz
\r
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
2
g0'
STREAM S16
63 L. F. ;
G GAG
STREAM S16 TOTAL JORDAN LAKE BUFFER IMPACTS
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
PERM. IMPACT
0 SQ. FT.
0 SQ. FT.
TEMP. IMPACT
3,719 SQ. FT.
2,613 SO. FT.
G G G —
G G
EXISTING (MAINTAINED)
50' ROW
G G G G G
-G
_ c
��z
\ TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
LEGEND:
\ \
EXISTING TREE LINE
z \ \
_ TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA =z \
NOTE: \ z\
50 25 0 50
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED \
BY OPEN CUT METHOD SCALE IN FEET
PS N C ENERGY DRAWN BY: CAC 06/02/14
ENERGY MANAGEMENT DRAFTING CK: SFS 06/o3/1�
& SERVICES CO.
CORPORATE OFFICE: APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021 B PIPELINE ENVIINONMENTACLKCK:
109 FIELDVIEW DRIVE
P.O. BOX STREAM CROSSING S16 AALIGNMENT sHT: 5870110
4
VERSAILLES, KY 40383
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone] DRAWING NO.:
BRANCH OFFICES: @ STATION 187 +76, M.P 3.56 58703312
HOUSTON, TX MI
DETROIT,
CHARLESTON, WV • TULSA, OK ALAMANCE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA SCALE: 7I "' _ REV. A
BAY CITY, MI
www.emseng.com SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE OF PLOT: 06/17/2014
7a
of
s�
7,
2�
73
EXISTING (MAINTAINED)
50' ROW
G G G G G
-G
_ c
��z
\ TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
LEGEND:
\ \
EXISTING TREE LINE
z \ \
_ TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA =z \
NOTE: \ z\
50 25 0 50
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED \
BY OPEN CUT METHOD SCALE IN FEET
PS N C ENERGY DRAWN BY: CAC 06/02/14
ENERGY MANAGEMENT DRAFTING CK: SFS 06/o3/1�
& SERVICES CO.
CORPORATE OFFICE: APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021 B PIPELINE ENVIINONMENTACLKCK:
109 FIELDVIEW DRIVE
P.O. BOX STREAM CROSSING S16 AALIGNMENT sHT: 5870110
4
VERSAILLES, KY 40383
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone] DRAWING NO.:
BRANCH OFFICES: @ STATION 187 +76, M.P 3.56 58703312
HOUSTON, TX MI
DETROIT,
CHARLESTON, WV • TULSA, OK ALAMANCE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA SCALE: 7I "' _ REV. A
BAY CITY, MI
www.emseng.com SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE OF PLOT: 06/17/2014

STREAM S 1 7 TOTAL IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
0 S0. FT.
0.00 AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
3,591 SQ. FT.
0.08 AC.
STREAM S17 TOTAL JORDAN LAKE BUFFER IMPACTS
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
PERM. IMPACT
0 S0. FT.
0 SQ. FT.
TEMP. IMPACT
3,784 SQ. FT.
6,447 SO. FT.
MAINTENANCE
EXISTING — — —
LL
z2
L2 — —
__ —�ti
G
GZ�G —G /
i
— — PIPELINE G�
'NC T -021 G�c i
EXISTING 10 P
' SGT /
G G ti /
16" T -021 B PIPELINE — \
PROPOSED \
NCE EASEMENT /
EXISTING MAINTENA / tit
/ STREAM S17
/ 90 L.F. tit
N /
�1
i
O
s�
7A
. 2
n
7�
o�
v / EXISTING ( INTAINED) -Z2
/ \ 50' ROW
G
----- T7/-/-/
LEGEND: xNE
EXISTING TREE LINE G��
2� G/
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA / �X\S��G
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
NOTE:
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED
BY OPEN CUT METHOD
G /G
I G�/
30' �G
ONE 1 20' ZONE 2
cn
0
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
G/
G/
50 25 0 50
SCALE IN FEET
PSNC ENERGY DRAWN BY: CAC 06/02/14
ENERGY MANAGEMENT DRAFTING CK: SFS 06 /o3 /�
& SERVICES CO.
CORPORATE OFFICE: APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021 B PIPELINE ENVIINONMENTACLKCK:
109 FIELDVIEW DRIVE
P.O. Box 1007 ALIGNMENT SHT: 58701108
4
VERSAILLES, KY 40383
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone] DRAWING NO.:
BRANCH OFFICES: @ STATION 197 +87, M.P 3.75 58703313
HOUSTON, TX DETROIT, MI
CHARLESTON, WV • TULSA, OK ALAMANCE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA SCALE: , = So' REV. A
BAY CITY, MI
www.emseng.com SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE OF PLOT: 06/17/2014

WETLAND W18 TOTAL IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
0 SQ. FT.
0.000 AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
14,477 SO. FT.
0.332 AC.
EXISTING (MAINTAINED)
50' ROW
G
0
Ln
LEGEND:
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
G G G G G G G G G
EXISTING 10" PSNC T -021 PIPELINE
PROPOSED 16" T -021 B PIPELINE
EXISTING 24" CARDINAL PIPELINE
JEW -- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — G G G G G G G G
— — — — — — --
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
EXISTING TREE LINE
_ TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
NOTE:
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED
BY OPEN CUT METHOD
G
2
W
s�
Z
0
a
G
G G G—
F–- Z7—L�
TEMPORARY
WORKSPACE
WETLAND W18
50 25 0 50
SCALE IN FEET
aKs PSNC ENERGY DRAWN BY: CAC 06/02/14
ENERGY DRAFTING CK: SFS 06/03/14
& SERVICES CO.
CORPORATE OFFICE: APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021 B PIPELINE ENVIINONMING ENTAL CK:
109 FIELDVIEW DRIVE
P.O' BOX tool WETLAND CROSSING W18 ALIGNMENT SHT: 58701108
VERSAILLES, KY 40383
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone] DRAWING NO.:
BRANCH OFFICES: @ STATION 206 +07, M. P 3.90 58703314
HOUSTON, TX DETROIT, MI
CHARLESTON, WV TULSA, OK SCALE: 1 = 50 REV. A
BAY CITY, MI ALAMANCE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
www.emseng.COM SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE OF PLOT: 06/17/2014

STREAM S18 TOTAL IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
0 S0. FT.
0.000 AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
1,945 SQ. FT,
0.045 AC.
STREAM S18A TOTAL IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
0 SQ. FT.
0.000 AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
2,303 SQ, FT,
0.053 AC.
r O
I ''
IN N
zt
N I
EXISTING (MAINTAINED) I N
50' ROW , \ I N N
r_ A
N EXISTING MAINTENANCE I
EASEMEN I
\ N EXISTING 10"
G
G G G G
PSN T -021 PIPELINE G c-�G —c c G G
O N
/ PROPOSED 16" I I EXISTING 24"
T -021 B PIPELINE LCARDINAL PIPELINE
G G G G G G G c G
_ _ _ _ G
N / EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT I
TEMPORARY TEMPORARY TEMPORARY
WORKSPACE I / Z2 WORKSPACE WORKSPACE
STREAM S18
LEGEND: 50 L.F.
EXISTING TREE LINE
STREAM S18 TOTAL JORDAN LAKE BUFFER IMPACTS
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
PERM. IMPACT
0 S0. FT.
0 SO. FT,
TEMP. IMPACT
3,083 SQ. FT.
2,053 SQ. FT.
30'
I ONE 1 20'
I ZONE 2
5p' BUFFER N
_ TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA STREAM S18A
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA \
NOTE:
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED
BY OPEN C U T METHOD
STREAM S18A TOTAL JORDAN LAKE BUFFER IMPACTS
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
PERM. IMPACT
0 SQ. FT.
0 SQ. FT.
TEMP. IMPACT
3,020 SQ. FT.
2,012 SQ. FT.
/ 50 L.F.
/ A� n,
50 25 0 50
/
SCALE IN FEET
PS N C ENERGY DRAWN BY: CAC 06/02/14
ENERGY MANAGEMENT DRAFTING CK: SFS 06/o3/�
& SERVICES CO.
CORPORATE OFFICE: APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021 B PIPELINE ENVIINONMENTACLKCK:
109 FIELDVIEW DRIVE
P.O. BOX STREAM CROSSING S18 & S18A AALIGNMENT sHT: 58701109
4
VERSAILLES, KY 40383
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone] DRAWING NO.:
BRANCH OFFICES: @ STATION 214 +60, M.P 4.06 58703315
HOUSTON, TX DETROIT, MI
CHARLESTON, WV • TULSA, OK ALAMANCE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA SCALE: , = So' REV. A
BAY CITY, MI
www.emseng.com SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE OF PLOT: 06/17/2014

so
F�
N (,0,—
STREAM S20 � 99 L.F.
EXISTING (MAINTAINED)
50' ROW I I
EXISTING CULVERT---____
G G G— \ G� G
G Ii G
LEGEND:
GIG
in
N
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
EXISTING TREE LINE
_ TEMPORARY IMPACT
PERMANENT IMPACT
NOTE:
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED
BY OPEN CUT METHOD
STREAM S20 TOTAL IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
0 SO. FT.
0.000 AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
1,452 SQ. FT.
0.033 AC.
STREAM S20 TOTAL JORDAN LAKE BUFFER IMPACTS
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
PERM. IMPACT
0 SQ. FT.
0 SQ. FT,
TEMP. IMPACT
5,755 SQ, FT.
5,429 SQ. FT,
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
EXISTING 10" PSNC T -021 PIPELINE
G G G G
jk�i— G —�G G� G G��w ��
\ EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
\ \ �T
�2 2 j \
OPEN WATER \
WETLAND W19
AREA
2 Z
2\ 2j
AREA
2
7a
7A
.Z
7�
0
7
G G G G
)POSED 16" T -021 B PIPELINE
EXISTING 24"
G CARDINAL PIPELINE G
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
50 25 0 50
SCALE IN FEET
PS N C ENERGY DRAWN BY: CAC 06/02/14
ENERGY MANAGEMENT DRAFTING CK: SFS 06/o3/�
& SERVICES CO.
CORPORATE OFFICE: APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021 B PIPELINE ENVIINONMENTACLKCK:
109 FIELDVIEW DRIVE
P.O. Box 1007 ALIGNMENT SHT: 58701110,11
4
VERSAILLES, KY 40383
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone] DRAWING NO.:
BRANCH OFFICES: @ STATION 265 +24, M.P 5.02 58703316
HOUSTON, TX DETROIT, MI
CHARLESTON, WV • TULSA, OK ALAMANCE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA SCALE: , = so' REV. A
BAY CITY, MI
www.emseng.com SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE OF PLOT: 06/17/2014

WETLAND W20 TOTAL IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
47 SQ. FT.
0.001 AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
2,823 SQ. FT.
0.065 AC.
STREAM S21 TOTAL IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
0 SQ. FT.
0.000 AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
205 SQ. FT.
0.004 AC.
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
EXISTING 10" PSNC T -021 PIPELINE
G G G G G
PROPOSED 16" T -021 B PIPELINE
EXISTING 24" CARDINAL PIPELINE
G _ EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
:7
// Z 7
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
LEGEND:
EXISTING TREE LINE
_ TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
NOTE:
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED
BY OPEN CUT METHOD
ENERGY MANAGEMENT
& SERVICES CO.
CORPORATE OFFICE:
109 FIELDVIEW DRIVE
P.O. BOX 1007
VERSAILLES, KY 40383
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone]
BRANCH OFFICES:
HOUSTON, TX DETROIT, MI
CHARLESTON, WV TULSA, OK
BAY CITY, MI
www.emseng.com
—G G—
N�
—G—
tiry
i
ti^
/ otiF
N
STREAM S21
57 L, F,'
ti^
ti^
G
So.
WETLAND W20
N
ti
c G i G
0
L0
—G G G—
WETLAND W20 N
EXISTING CULVERT
�a
+Z
X5'0
2
EXISTING (MAINTAINED)
50' ROW
G G G
G G G G
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
STREAM S21 TOTAL JORDAN LAKE BUFFER IMPACTS
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
PERM. IMPACT
81 SO. FT.
59 SQ. FT.
TEMP. IMPACT
3,353 SO. FT.
2,2 ?2 (CO. FT.
// tiry ZoN1 ' 50 25 0 50
2
SCALE IN FEET
DRAWN BY: CAC 06/02/14
PS N C ENERGY
DRAFTING CK: SFS 06/ "� /1
APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021 B PIPELINE ENVIRONMENTAL CK:
ENGINEERING CK:
WETLAND CROSSING W20 & STREAM CROSSING S21 ALIGNMENT SHT: 5801111
DRAWING NO.:
@ STATION 278 +23, M.P 5.27 58703317
ALAMANCE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA SCALE: n "' = 50" 1 REV. A
SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE OF PLOT: 06/17/2014

OPEN WATER
7
WETLAND W22
F
a
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — _ _. _ —. — — — — — —
z
n
9�
0
— — — — — — — - - EXISTING (MAINTAINED)
------ - - - - -- -- —50' ROW----- - - - - --
—
— — — — — — EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT- - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ------------------
EXISTING 10" PSNC T -021 PIPELINE
G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G
PROPOSED 16" T -021 B PIPELINE
cn
0
c cEXISTING c24" CARDINAL PIPELINE G
G G G G G G G G G G G —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — —
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
LEGEND:
EXISTING TREE LINE
WETLAND W22A
_ TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
NOTE: 50 25 0 50
1. PIPELINE TO HE INSTALLED
BY OPEN CUT METHOD SCALE IN FEET
Qs PSNC ENERGY DRAWN BY: CAC 06/02/14
ENERGY DRAFTING CK: SFS 06/03/14
& SERVICES CO.
CORPORATE OFFICE: APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021B PIPELINE ENVIINONMENTACLKCK:
109 FIELDVIEW DRIVE
P.D. BOX 100 WETLAND 22 & 22A ALIGNMENT SHT: 58701112
VERSAILLES, KY 40383
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone] DRAWING NO.:
BRANCH OFFICES: @ STATION 313 +64, M.P 5.94 58703318
HOUSTON, TX DETROIT, MI
CHARLESTON, WV TULSA, OK SCALE: 1 = 50' REV. A
6AY CITY. MI ALAMANCE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
www.emseng.com SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE OF PLOT: 06/17/2014

WETLAND W23 TOTAL IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
0 SO. FT.
0.000 AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
1,162 SO. FT.
0.027 AC.
LEGEND:
G G G G G G G
G G G G G
EXISTING TREE LINE
_ TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
NOTE:
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED
BY OPEN CUT METHOD
G C
WETLAND W24
70
cl
1�k
7A
.Z
n
-�30
r
Z
7
F EXISTING 10" PSNC T -021 PIPELINE
—G —G— c c c c G
PROPOSED 16" T -021 B PIPELINE
/ — —
EXISTING G G
4" CARDNAL PIPELINE
G — c — — G — — G�
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
f,*— EXISTING CULVERT
WETLAND W23
50 25 0 50
SCALE IN FEET
aKs PSNC ENERGY DRAWN BY: CA °'02/14
ENERGY DRAFTING CK: SF`� 06/03/14
& SERVICES CO.
CORPORATE OFFICE: APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021 B PIPELINE ENVIINONMING ENTAL CK:
109 FIELDVIEW DRIVE
P.O' BOX 4 WETLAND CROSSING W24 ALIGNMENT SHT: 58701113
LES,
VERSAIL KY 40383
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone] DRAWING NO.:
BRANCH OFFICES: @ STATION 322 +44, M. P 6.11 58703319
HOUSTON, TX DETROIT, MI
CHARLESTON, WV TULSA, OK SCALE: 1 " = 50' REV. A
SAY CITY. MI ALAMANCE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
www.emseng.com SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE OF PLOT: 06/17/2014

EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
G G G G G G G G G
EXISTING 10" PSNC T -021 PIPELINE
PROPOSED 16 T -021 B PIPELINE
c c EXISTING 2G" CARDING L PIPELINE G c
L — _ _ — _ _ — EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
LEGEND:
EXISTING TREE LINE
_ TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
—G
G
G
G
G
G
s�
G
7A
G
.z
G
G
—G
G
7�0
G
r
Z
G
7
—G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
—G
G
G
G
G
G
WETLAND W24
NOTE: 50 25 0 50
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED
BY OPEN CUT METHOD SCALE IN FEET
aKs PSNC ENERGY DRAWN BY: CAC 06/02/14
ENERGY DRAFTING CK: SFS 06/03/14
& SERVICES CO.
CORPORATE OFFICE: APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021 B PIPELINE ENGINEERING AL CK:
109 FIELDVIEW DRIVE
P.O. BOX 1007 WETLAND W24 ALIGNMENT SHT: 58701113
VERSAILLES, KY 40383
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone] DRAWING NO.:
BRANCH OFFICES: @ STATION 326 +63, M.P 6.19 58703320
HOUSTON, TX DETROIT, MI
CHARLESTON, WV • TULSA, GK ALAMANCE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA SCALE: ' = 50 REV. A
BAY CITY, MI
www.emseng.com SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE OF PLOT: 06/17/2014

STREAM S22 TOTAL IMPACTS
PERM, IMPACT
0 SQ. FT.
0.000 AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
914 SO. FT.
0.021 AC.
WETLAND W25 TOTAL IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
218 SO, FT.
0.005 AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
293 SQ. FT.
0.007 AC.
TEMPORARY z2 —z2 89RL.F S22
WORKSPACE_
EXISTING 24" CARDINAL PIPELINE
in G G G G G G G —G —G G/
V
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
G G G-
0
Lo
-(WETLAND W25
LEGEND:
EXISTING 10" PSNC T -021 PIPELINE
—G G G G
G�G G� G G
PROPOSED 16" T -021 B PIPELINE \
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT _
— — —
titi z2
N
EXISTING TREE LINE
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
NOTE:
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED
BY OPEN CUT METHOD
50' /
BUFFER I
ZONE � 30,
ZONE 7
70
sA
"3
_Z
n
LGC 7
TEMPORARY
WORKSPACE
G
G G
STREAM S22 TOTAL JORDAN LAKE BUFFER IMPACTS
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
PERM. IMPACT
0 SQ. FT,
0 A0. FT.
TEMP. IMPACT
6,083 SO. FT.
3,087 SO. FT.
50 25 0 50
SCALE IN FEET
is PSNC ENERGY DRAWN BY: CAC 06/02/14
ENERGY DRAFTING CK: SFS 06/03/14
& SERVICES CO.
CORPORATE OFFICE: APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021B PIPELINE ENVIINONMENTACLKCK:
109 E WETLAND CROSSING W25 & STREAM CROSSING S22
P.O. BOX ,007 ALIGNMENT SHT: 58701114
VERSAILLLES, S, DRIVE
KY KY 40363
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone] DRAWING NO.:
BRANCH OFFICES: @ STATION 359 +63, M.P 6.81 58703321
HOUSTON, TX DETROIT, MI
CHARLESTON, WV TULSA, OK SCALE: 1 ° = 50' REV. A
6AY CITY. MI ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
www.emseng.com SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE OF PLOT: 06/20/2014

STREAM S23 TOTAL IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
0 SQ. FT.
0.000 AC.
TEMP, IMPACT
1,751 SQ. FT.
0.040 AC.
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
\\ \\
1 N G c \
LEGEND:
EXISTING TREE LINE
_ TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
NOTE:
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED
BY OPEN CUT METHOD
G
STREAM S23 TOTAL JORDAN LAKE BUFFER IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
PERM. IMPACT
1,108 SO. FT.
705 SO. FT.
TEMP. IMPACT
4,017 SQ. FT.
2,439 SQ. FT.
STREAM S23
92 L.F.
Z
vQ
w
v�
_Z
0
2
EXISTING (MAINTAINED)
30' ROW TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
EXISTING 24" CARDINAL PIPELINE
G G�
z2 EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
�z7 EXISTING 10" PSNC T -021 PIPELINE
G ^�G G G G G G
PROPOSED 16" T -021 B PIPELINE
G
\22
20'
ZONE 2
O \
OFF \
WETLAND W26 TOTAL IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
465 SO. FT.
0.011 AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
537 SQ. FT.
0.012 AC.
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT----
NEW PERMANENT EASEMENT —
NEW 20' ROW
WETLAND W26
50 25 0 50
SCALE IN FEET
os P S N C ENERGY DRAWN BY: CAC 06/02/14
ENERGY MANAGEMENT DRAFTING CK: SFS 06/03/14
& SERVICES CO.
CORPORATE OFFICE: APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021B PIPELINE ENVIINONMNGTACLKCK:
109 FIELDVIEW DRIVE
P.O. BOX 1007
4 0383 WETLAND CROSSING W26 & STREAM CROSSING S23 ALIGNMENT sHr: 580,1,5
VERSAILLES, KY 4
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone] DRAWING NO.:
BRANCH OFFICES: @ STATION 375 +69, M.P 7.12 58703322
HOUSTON, TX DETROIT, MI
CHARLESTON, WV • TULSA, OK ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA SCALE: 7I "' _ 50" REV. A
BAY CITY, MI
www.emseng.com SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE OF PLOT: 06/ 04/2014

STREAM S24 TOTAL IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
0 S0. FT.
0.00 AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
802 SO. FT,
0.018 AC.
EXISTING 24" CARDINAL PIPELINE
7Gf�� G
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT/
EXISTING 10" PSNC T -021 PIPELINE
G G G G G G-
PROPOSED 16" T -021 B PIPELINE
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
NEW PERMANENT EASEMENT
LEGEND:
EXISTING (MAINTAINED)
30' ROW
EXISTING TREE LINE
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
NOTE:
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED
BY OPEN CUT METHOD
STREAM S24
51 L.F.
N N
G r
� G
7--
I N
\ —
G 11 Q Il G G
N �
N
N
I I
30'
20' ZONE 2 ZONE 1
N N
N
I
50' BUFFER
7O
s�
.Z
v�
G
7
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
G
N G G
G G G G G
0
Lo
- EXISTING (MAINTAINED)
50' ROW
STREAM S24 TOTAL JORDAN LAKE BUFFER IMPACTS
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
PERM. IMPACT
634 SO. FT.
402 SO. FT.
I
I�
N G�
GN
G
STREAM S24
51 L.F.
N N
G r
� G
7--
I N
\ —
G 11 Q Il G G
N �
N
N
I I
30'
20' ZONE 2 ZONE 1
N N
N
I
50' BUFFER
7O
s�
.Z
v�
G
7
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
G
N G G
G G G G G
0
Lo
- EXISTING (MAINTAINED)
50' ROW
STREAM S24 TOTAL JORDAN LAKE BUFFER IMPACTS
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
PERM. IMPACT
634 SO. FT.
402 SO. FT.
TEMP. IMPACT
3,188 SO. FT.
1,936 SO. FT.
50 25 0 50
SCALE IN FEET
is PSNC ENERGY DRAWN BY: CAC 06/02/14
ENERGY DRAFTING CK: SFS 06/03/14
& SERVICES CO.
CORPORATE OFFICE: APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021B PIPELINE ENVIINONMENTACLKCK:
109 FIELDVIEW DRIVE
P.O. sox 1007 ALIGNMENT SHT: 58701115
4
VERSAILLES, KY 40363
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone] DRAWING NO.:
BRANCH OFFICES: @ STATION 398 +66, M. P 7.55 58703323
HOUSTON, TX DETROIT, MI
CHARLESTON, WV TULSA, OK SCALE: 1 = 50' REV. A
6AY CITY. MI ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
www.emseng.com SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE OF PLOT: 06/20/2014

STREAM S25 TOTAL JORDAN LAKE BUFFER IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
PERM. IMPACT
0 S0. FT.
0 S0. FT.
TEMP. IMPACT
1,953 SQ, FT.
1,324 SQ. FT,
STREAM S25 TOTAL IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
0 S0. FT.
0.000 AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
190 SO. FT.
0.004 AC.
ti
ti
STREAM S25
32 L.F.
i
N /
/ I _
/ EXISTING MAINTENANCE
�G N �I
EXISTING 24" CARDINAL PIPELINE EASEMENT
EXISTING 10" PSNC T -021 PIPELINE c c
— G G G G G G
PROPOSED 16" T -021 B PIPELINE
G G / c
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
LEGEND:
EXISTING TREE LINE
_ TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
NOTE:
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED
BY OPEN CUT METHOD
EXISTING
WETLAND W28 / CULVERT
i � tit
�T
ti � 9a
ti s�
/ 9T
30 tiN
ONF
So,
EXISTING (MAINTAINED)
30' ROW
G G G G
0
o
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
� � V
c�
50 25 0 50
SCALE IN FEET
os P S N C ENERGY DRAWN BY: CAC 06/02/14
ENERGY MANAGEMENT DRAFTING CK: SFS 06/03/14
& SERVICES CO.
CORPORATE OFFICE: APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021B PIPELINE ENVIINONMNGTACLKCK:
109 FIELDVIEW DRIVE
P.O. BOX 1007 ALIGNMENT sHr: 58701116
4
VERSAILLES, KY 40383
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone] DRAWING NO.:
BRANCH OFFICES: @ STATION 407 +60, M.P 7.72 58703324
HOUSTON, TX DETROIT, MI
CHARLESTON, WV • TULSA, OK ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA SCALE: 1" = 50 REV. A
BAY CITY, MI
www.emseng.com SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE OF PLOT: 06/17/2014

OPEN WATER
�G- s
c G 7�,
\ G/ /
G /
WETLAND W30
p
c / �
\ c� EXISTING 24, PI�cJ
\ \ NEW PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED RE— LOCATED 10" T -021 PSNC
PROPOSED 1 6" T -021 B PIPELINE
NEW PERMANENT EASEMENT
LEGEND:
EXISTING TREE LINE
WETLAND W29
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
NOTE:
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED
BY OPEN CUT METHOD
/
/
/
/
/
NEW 50' ROW
WETLAND W29 TOTAL IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
333 SO. FT.
0.008 AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
0 SO. FT.
0.000 AC.
50 25 0 50
SCALE IN FEET
is PSNC ENERGY DRAWN BY: CAC 06/02/14
ENERGY DRAFTING CK: SFS 06/03/14
& SERVICES CO.
CORPORATE OFFICE: APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021 B PIPELINE ENVIINONMING ENTAL CK:
109 FIELDVIEW DRIVE
P.O. sox tool WETLAND CROSSING W29 ALIGNMENT SHT: 587011 16
VERSAILLES, KY 40363
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone] DRAWING NO.:
BRANCH OFFICES: @ STATION 417 +85, M.P 7.91 58703325
HOUSTON, TX DETROIT, MI
CHARLESTON, WN TULSA, OK SCALE: 1 " = 50' REV. A
6AY CITY. MI ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
www.emseng.com SHEET t OF t DATE OF PLOT: 06/17/2014

STREAM S26 TOTAL JORDAN LAKE BUFFER IMPACTS
STREAM S26 TOTAL IMPACTS
WETLAND W31 TOTAL IMPACTS
o
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
PERM. IMPACT
0 SQ. FT.
0.000 AC.
PERM. IMPACT
0 S0. FT.
0.000 AC.
�
PERM. IMPACT 0 SQ. FT. 0 SQ. FT. TEMP. IMPACT 546 SO, FT. 0.013 AC. TEMP. IMPACT 2,928 SQ. FT. 0.067 AC. v�
TEMP. IMPACT 3,140 SO. FT. 2,091 SO. FT.
6�FF�R 3
50
j
CNE 1 \ \
20 \ \ EXISTING (MAINTAINED)
NE 2 \ \ 50' ROW
— EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
—
—
EXISTING 10" PSNC T -021 PIPELINE
G
G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G
\ N PROPOSED 16" T -021 B PIPELINE Lo
EXISTING 24" CARDINAL PIPELINE
MAINTENANCE EASEMENT — — — — — — — �— — —c c c c
EXISTING
I I
N
WETLAND W31
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
�I
N
N
WETLAND W32 1 /
LEGEND: /
/
EXISTING TREE LINE
STREAM S26 ti
52 L.F.
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA / /
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA tiff
/
NOTE: 50 25 0 50
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED
BY OPEN CUT METHOD SCALE IN FEET
40�
PS N C ENERGY
DRAWN BY: CAC
06/02/14
ENERGY MANAGEMENT
DRAFTING CK: SFS
06 /o3 /1�
& SERVICES CO.
APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021 B PIPELINE
ENVIINONMENTACLKCK:
CORPORATE OFFICE:
109 FIELDVIEN DRIVE
P.O. BOX 1007
WETLAND CROSSING W31 & STREAM CROSSING S26
ALIGNMENT sHT: 5870111
VERSAILLES, KY 4
4 0383
TEL:[phone] • FAX:[phone]
DRAWING NO.:
BRANCH OFFICES:
@ STATION 430 +22, M.P 8.15
58703326
HOUSTON, TX • DETROIT, MI
CHARLESTON, WV • TULSA, OK
BAY CITY, MI
ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
SCALE: , = 50' REV. A
www.emseng.com
SHEET 1 OF 1
DATE OF PLOT: 06/17/2014

G
WETLAND W33 TOTAL IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
0 SO. FT.
0.000 AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
4476 SQ. FT.
0.103 AC.
WETLAND W33
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
EXISTING 10" PSNC T -021 PIPELINE
r,
PROPOSED 16" T -021 B PIPELINE
EXISTING 24" CARDINAL PIPELINE
—G G G G G G G
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
LEGEND:
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
EXISTING TREE LINE
_ TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
G G
- EXISTING (MAINTAINED)
50' ROW
G G n0
�a
sPA
q
-Z
�3
D
G G G G G G G
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
NOTE: 50 25 0 50
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED
BY OPEN CUT METHOD SCALE IN FEET
aKs PSNC ENERGY DRAWN BY: CAC 06/02'14
ENERGY DRAFTING CK: SFS 06/03/14
& SERVICES CO.
CORPORATE OFFICE: APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021 B PIPELINE ENVIINOEERINC NMENTAL CK:
109 FIELDVIEW DRIVE
°. S, 4 WETLAND CROSSING W33 ALIGNMENT sHT: 58701118
LES,
VERSAIL KY 40383
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone] DRAWING NO.:
BRANCH OFFICES: @ STATION 488 +23, M.P 9.25 58703327
HOUSTON, TX DETROIT, MI
CHARLESTON, WV TULSA, OK SCALE: 1" = 50' REV. A
SAY CITY. MI ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
www.emseng.com SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE OF PLOT: 06/17/2014

Sp
6�FFFR
STREAM S37
VF
61/ L.F./
EXISTING (MAINTAINED)
50' ROW
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — L—L — — —
EXISTING 10" PSNC T -021 PIPELINE
—G G G G G G G G / G G G G G G G—
PROPOSED 16" T -021 B PIPELINE AI o
G c c c
EXISTING 24" CARDINAL PIPELINE G
- -
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT —
TT - - -- z2 -z2\ 2
Z2 -
_ tit
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE ti
z1 /
LEGEND: — \ \I , �
EXISTING TREE LINE
_ TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
NOTE: �?
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED
BY OPEN CUT METHOD
G G / G G G--G— G G
N
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
i
�1
/ titi
.n
STREAM S27 TOTAL JORDAN LAKE BUFFER IMPACTS
STREAM S27 TOTAL IMPACTS
3p•
/ 0
PERM. IMPACT
0 SQ. FT.
0.000 AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
182 SO. FT.
0.004 AC.
STREAM S37
VF
61/ L.F./
EXISTING (MAINTAINED)
50' ROW
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — L—L — — —
EXISTING 10" PSNC T -021 PIPELINE
—G G G G G G G G / G G G G G G G—
PROPOSED 16" T -021 B PIPELINE AI o
G c c c
EXISTING 24" CARDINAL PIPELINE G
- -
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT —
TT - - -- z2 -z2\ 2
Z2 -
_ tit
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE ti
z1 /
LEGEND: — \ \I , �
EXISTING TREE LINE
_ TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
NOTE: �?
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED
BY OPEN CUT METHOD
G G / G G G--G— G G
N
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
i
�1
/ titi
.n
STREAM S27 TOTAL JORDAN LAKE BUFFER IMPACTS
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
PERM. IMPACT
0 SQ. FT.
0 S0. FT.
TEMP. IMPACT
3,669 SO. FT.
2,515 SQ. FT,
2�
0
s
G
50 25 0 50
SCALE IN FEET
P S N C ENERGY DRAWN BY: CAC 06/02/14
ENERGY MANAGEMENT DRAFTING CK: SFS 06/o3/�
& SERVICES CO.
CORPORATE OFFICE: APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021 B PIPELINE ENVIINONMENTACLKCK:
109 FIELDVIEW DRIVE
P.O. BOX STREAM CROSSING S27 AALIGNMENT sHT: 58701119
4
VERSAILLES, KY 40383
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone] DRAWING NO.:
BRANCH OFFICES: @ STATION 496 +41, M.P 9.40 58703328
HOUSTON, TX DETROIT, MI
CHARLESTON, WV • TULSA, OK ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA SCALE: , = So' REV. A
BAY CITY, MI
www.emseng.com SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE OF PLOT: 06/17/2014

A I I
EXISTING (MAINTAINED) STREAM S28 /
50' ROW 58 L.F.
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
EXISTING 10" PSNC T -021 PIPELINE
—G G G G G G G I G G
o PROPOSED 16" T -021 B PIPELINE /
Ln / h
G EXISTING 24" CARDINAL PIPELINE
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
7— - -- - --
Y h
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE / TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
LEGEND: ✓ �G�`Sp, / // ti/
EXISTING TREE LINE
_ TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
2� titi
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
NOTE: �O� O-
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED
BY OPEN CUT METHOD
I '
-ZONE 1
462 SO. FT. 0.011 AC.
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
MITIGATION REQUIRED
I
ZONE 2 v
538 SO. FT. 0.012 AC. �o
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE 2
MITIGATION REQUIRED T v
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
r, 1G G G G
I J WORKSPACE
Of
Q
ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
3 I
2
cn I
0
m
50 25 0 50
II SCALE IN FEET
os P S N C ENERGY DRAWN BY: CAC 06/02/14
ENERGY MANAGEMENT DRAFTING CK: SFS 06/03/14
& SERVICES CO.
CORPORATE OFFICE: APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021B PIPELINE ENVIINONMNGTACLKCK:
109 FIELDVIEW DRIVE
P.O. BOX 1007 ALIGNMENT sFlr: 58701119
4
VERSAILLES, KY 40383
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone] DRAWING NO.:
BRANCH OFFICES: @ STATION 507 +73, M.P 9.62 58703329
HOUSTON, TX DETROIT, MI
CHARLESTON, WV • TULSA, OK ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA SCALE: 1" = 50 REV. A
BAY CITY, MI
www.emseng.com SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE OF PLOT: 06/17/2014
STREAM S28 TOTAL IMPACTS
STREAM S28 TOTAL IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
0 SQ. FT.
0.000 AC.
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
TEMP. IMPACT
478 SO. FT.
0.011 AC.
PERM. IMPACT
0 S0. FT.
0 SQ. FT,
TEMP, IMPACT
4,564 SO. FT.
3,601 SO. FT.
A I I
EXISTING (MAINTAINED) STREAM S28 /
50' ROW 58 L.F.
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
EXISTING 10" PSNC T -021 PIPELINE
—G G G G G G G I G G
o PROPOSED 16" T -021 B PIPELINE /
Ln / h
G EXISTING 24" CARDINAL PIPELINE
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
7— - -- - --
Y h
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE / TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
LEGEND: ✓ �G�`Sp, / // ti/
EXISTING TREE LINE
_ TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
2� titi
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
NOTE: �O� O-
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED
BY OPEN CUT METHOD
I '
-ZONE 1
462 SO. FT. 0.011 AC.
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
MITIGATION REQUIRED
I
ZONE 2 v
538 SO. FT. 0.012 AC. �o
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE 2
MITIGATION REQUIRED T v
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
r, 1G G G G
I J WORKSPACE
Of
Q
ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
3 I
2
cn I
0
m
50 25 0 50
II SCALE IN FEET
os P S N C ENERGY DRAWN BY: CAC 06/02/14
ENERGY MANAGEMENT DRAFTING CK: SFS 06/03/14
& SERVICES CO.
CORPORATE OFFICE: APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021B PIPELINE ENVIINONMNGTACLKCK:
109 FIELDVIEW DRIVE
P.O. BOX 1007 ALIGNMENT sFlr: 58701119
4
VERSAILLES, KY 40383
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone] DRAWING NO.:
BRANCH OFFICES: @ STATION 507 +73, M.P 9.62 58703329
HOUSTON, TX DETROIT, MI
CHARLESTON, WV • TULSA, OK ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA SCALE: 1" = 50 REV. A
BAY CITY, MI
www.emseng.com SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE OF PLOT: 06/17/2014

WETLAND W34 TOTAL IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
0 S0. FT.
0.000 AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
8,048 SO. FT.
0.185 AC.
STREAM S29 TOTAL IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
0 S0. FT.
0.000 AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
1 ,441 SO. FT.
0.033 AC.
STREAM S29 TOTAL JORDAN LAKE BUFFER IMPACTS
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
PERM. IMPACT
0 S0. FT.
0 SO. FT.
TEMP. IMPACT
3,095 SO. FT.
2,077 SO. FT.
WETLAND W34
EXISTING 10" PSNC T -021 PIPELINE
PROPOSED 16q, T -021 B PIPELINE
EXISTING 24" CARDINAL PIPELINE
G G G G—
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
Tzz-z �� zi
vTEMPORARY WORKSPACE
LEGEND:
EXISTING TREE LINE
G
_ TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
NOTE:
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED
BY OPEN CUT METHOD
G j G
G G G —G \ G / G
Z2/ �
WETLAND W34
3p• 2p.
a
�a
TA
.Z
�o
v
2
EXISTING (MAINTAINED)
50' ROW
G—H—�G G G
G (3 7O
G— G G G
in
N
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
'STREAM S29
I
50 L.F.
N N
N
I
50'
BUFFER
50 25 0 50
SCALE IN FEET
PS N C ENERGY DRAWN BY: CAC 06/02/14
ENERGY MANAGEMENT DRAFTING CK: SFS 06/o3/1
& SERVICES CO.
CORPORATE OFFICE: APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021 B PIPELINE ENVIINONMENTACLKCK:
109 FIELDVIEW DRIVE
P.O. BOX 1007
4 0383 WETLAND CROSSING W34 & STREAM CROSSING S29 ALIGNMENT sHT: 58701120
VERSAILLES, KY 4
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone] DRAWING NO.:
BRANCH OFFICES: @ STATION 517 +70, M.P 9.80 58703330
HOUSTON, TX DETROIT, MI
CHARLESTON, WV • TULSA, OK ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA SCALE: , = so' REV. A
BAY CITY, MI
www.emseng.com SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE OF PLOT: 06/17/2014

titi /
v
titi B� FFR / / O,vo J ti'`'
ti
Zo 20'
ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY-) N 2 NF 2
WORKSPACE N
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
G G G G G
cn
0
c�
/_ N�
Cli
G
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
LEGEND:
EXISTING TREE LINE
_ TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
NOTE:
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED
BY OPEN CUT METHOD
STREAM S30 TOTAL IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
0 SQ. FT.
0.000 AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
1,927 SQ. FT.
0.044 AC.
STREAM S30 TOTAL JORDAN LAKE BUFFER IMPACTS
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
PERM. IMPACT
1,759 SQ. FT.
1,823 SO. FT.
TEMP. IMPACT
2,874 SQ. FT.
2,532 SO. FT.
EXISTING 24" CARDINAL PIPELINE
�\
47
G' —c G - -c c _ c c�� GAG
LEXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
,— ,- - - - - --
-I-
i
cl
U'A
7A
v
z�
Z
7�
0
7
7
EXISTING 10" PSNC T -021 PIPELINE
G G G G G G G G G
'\ PROPOSED 16" T -021 B PIPELINE
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
\ EXISTING MAINTAINED
\ 50' ROW
�a — —
< — — — —
STREAM S30
22 67 L.F.
�z1
— Z1�
�2�
50 25 0 50
SCALE IN FEET
PS N C ENERGY DRAWN BY: CAC 06/02/14
ENERGY MANAGEMENT DRAFTING CK: SFS 06/o3/1
& SERVICES CO.
CORPORATE OFFICE: APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021 B PIPELINE ENVIINONMENTACLKCK:
109 FIELDVIEW DRIVE
P.O. BOX STREAM CROSSING S30 AALIGNMENT sHT: 58701120
4
VERSAILLES, KY 40383
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone] DRAWING NO.:
BRANCH OFFICES: @ STATION 528 +91, M.P 10.02 58703331
HOUSTON, TX DETROIT, MI
CHARLESTON, WV • TULSA, OK ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA SCALE: , = so' REV. A
BAY CITY, MI
www.emseng.com SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE OF PLOT: 06/20/2014

WETLAND W35 TOTAL IMPACTS.
PERM. IMPACT
0 SQ. FT,
0.000 AC.
TEMP, IMPACT
435 SQ. FT.
0.010 AC,
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
in
1
—G G G-
0
LEGEND:
WETLAND W35 EXISTING (MAINTAINED)
50' ROW
EXISTING 24" CARDINAL PIPELIN
—G— EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT G —
EXISTING 10" PSNC T -021 PIPELINE
PROPOSED 16" T -021 B PIPELINE
7a
cl
w
TA
7A
.Z
n
7�
0
7
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
—G -- G —fYG--
G - - -G — G G G G G G G G G
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
EXISTING TREE LINE
_ TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
NOTE: 50 25 0 50
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED
BY OPEN CUT METHOD SCALE IN FEET
aKs PSNC ENERGY DRAWN BY: CAC 06/02'14
ENERGY DRAFTING CK: SFS 06/03/14
& SERVICES CO.
CORPORATE OFFICE: APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021 B PIPELINE ENVIINOEERINC NMENTAL CK:
109 FIELDVIEW DRIVE
P.O. BOX WETLAND CROSSING W35 AALIGNMENT sHT: 58701121
4
VERSAILLES, KY 40383
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone] DRAWING NO.:
BRANCH OFFICES: @ STATION 554 +37, M. P 10.50 58703332
HOUSTON, TX MI DETROIT,
CHARLESTON, WV • TULSA, DI( ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA SCALE: n "' _cm" REV. A
BAY CITY, MI
www.emseng.com SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE OF PLOT: 06/17/2014

WETLAND W38 TOTAL IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
0 SQ. FT.
0.000 AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
6,349 SQ. FT,
0.146 AC.
_EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
EXISTING 10" PSNC T -021 PIPELINE
G G G G G G G
PROPOSED 16" T -021 B PIPELINE o
_ _
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
NEW PERMANENT EASEMENT
LEGEND:
EXISTING TREE LINE
_ TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
WETLAND W38
Z
0
c,+
v�
v
y
r�
c
y
EXISTING (MAINTAINED)
30' ROW
G G G G
NEW 20' ROW
NOTE:
50
25 0 50
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED
BY OPEN CUT METHOD
SCALE IN FEET
aKs
PSNC ENERGY
DRAWN BY: CAC
06/02'14
ENERGY
DRAFTING CK: SFS
06/03/14
& SERVICES CO.
APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021 B PIPELINE
ENTAL CK:
CORPORATE OFFICE:
ENVIINONMING
109 FIELDVIEW DRIVE
P.O. Box 1007
ALIGNMENT SHT: 58701123
4
VERSAILLES, KY 40383
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone]
DRAWING NO.:
BRANCH OFFICES:
@ STATION 596 +80, M. P 11.30
58703334
HOUSTON, TX DETROIT, MI
CHARLESTON, WV • TULSA, DI(
BAY CITY, MI
ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
SCALE: n "' _cm" REV. A
www.emseng.com
SHEET 1 OF 1
DATE OF PLOT: 06/17/2014

G GIG G G
- - - - - -o
LEGEND:
WETLAND W39 TOTAL IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
264 SO, FT.
0.006 AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
3,331 SO. FT,
0.076 AC.
G G/G G G
— — — — — — — — — — — — — —v—
NEW 20' ROW
WETLAND W39
70
q
7
L
7
O
Z
EXISTING (MAINTAINED)
30' ROW
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
-- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
EXISTING 10" PSNC T -021 PIPELINE
G G G G G
PROPOSED 16" T -021 B PIPELINE
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
NEW PERMANENT EASEMENT
EXISTING TREE LINE
_ TEMPORARY /
IMPACT AREA /
PERMANENT EXISTING CULVERT
IMPACT AREA
NOTE: STREAM 31
50 25 0 50
1. PIPELINE TO HE INSTALLED
BY OPEN CUT METHOD SCALE IN FEET
is PSNC ENERGY DRAWN BY: CAC 06/02/14
ENERGY DRAFTING CK: SFS 06/03/14
& SERVICES CO.
CORPORATE OFFICE: APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021B PIPELINE ENVIINONMENTACLKCK:
109 FIELDVIEW DRIVE
°. S, 4 WETLAND CROSSING W39 ALIGNMENT sHT: 5801123
LES,
VERSAIL KY 40383
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone] DRAWING NO.:
BRANCH OFFICES: @ STATION 603 +66, M.P 11.43 58703335
HOUSTON, TX DETROIT, MI
CHARLESTON, WV TULSA, OK SCALE: 1 ° = 50' REV. A
6AY CITY. MI ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
www.emseng.com SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE OF PLOT: 06/20/2014

WETLAND W40
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
-- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
EXISTING 10" PSNC T -021 PIPELINE
G G G G G G G G G G
o PROPOSED 16" T -021 B PIPELINE
— — — — — - - - - - - - - - - --
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
NEW PERMANENT EASEMENT
LEGEND:
EXISTING TREE LINE
_ TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
NOTE:
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED
BY OPEN CUT METHOD
70
C",
7A
.z
0
2
EXISTING (MAINTAINED)
30' ROW
®ice
WETLAND W40 TOTAL IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
0 S0. FT.
0.000 AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
852 SQ. FT.
0.020 AC.
NEW 20' ROW
50 25 0 50
SCALE IN FEET
aKs PSNC ENERGY DRAWN BY: CAC 06/02'14
ENERGY DRAFTING CK: SFS 06/03/14
& SERVICES CO.
CORPORATE OFFICE: APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021 B PIPELINE ENVIINONMING ENTAL CK:
109 FIELDVIEN DRIVE
P.O. Box 1007 ALIGNMENT SHT: 58701123
4
VERSAILLES, KY 40383
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone] DRAWING NO.:
BRANCH OFFICES: @ STATION 608 +48, M. P 11.52 58703336
HOUSTON, TX MI DETROIT,
CHARLESTON, WV • TULSA, DI( ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA SCALE: 1 REV. a
BAY CITY, MI
www.emseng.com SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE OF PLOT: 06/17/2014

EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
EXISTING PSNC 10" T -021 PIPELINE
G G G G G G G
PROPOSED 16" T -021 B PIPELINE --------
_
I— EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT— — — — — — —
WETLAND W44
WETLAND W41-6
G
WETLAND W43 --�
LEGEND: WETLAND W43 N�
EXISTING TREE LINE
TEMPORARY
WETLAND W42
_
IMPACT AREA STREAM S31 50'
PERMANENT 54 L.F. 6UFF�`
IMPACT AREA
NOTE:
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED
BY OPEN CUT METHOD
ENERGY
& SERVICES CO.
CORPORATE OFFICE:
109 FIELDVIEW DRIVE
P.O. BOX 1007
VERSAILLES, KY 40383
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone]
BRANCH OFFICES:
HOUSTON, TX DETROIT, MI
CHARLESTON, WV TULSA, OK
BAY CITY, MI
www.emseng.com
WETLAND W44 TOTAL IMPACTS
WETLAND W41
TOTAL IMPACTS
0.000 AC.
PERM.
IMPACT
14
SQ. FT,
0.0003
AC.
TEMP.
IMPACT
443
SQ. FT.
0.010
AC.
TEMP,
IMPACT
743 SO. FT.
1,962
SQ. FT.
STREAM
WETLAND W45
TOTAL IMPACTS
IMPACTS
PERM.
IMPACT
18
SO. FT.
0.0004
AC.
TEMP.
IMPACT
0
S0. FT.
0.000
AC.
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
EXISTING PSNC 10" T -021 PIPELINE
G G G G G G G
PROPOSED 16" T -021 B PIPELINE --------
_
I— EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT— — — — — — —
WETLAND W44
WETLAND W41-6
G
WETLAND W43 --�
LEGEND: WETLAND W43 N�
EXISTING TREE LINE
TEMPORARY
WETLAND W42
_
IMPACT AREA STREAM S31 50'
PERMANENT 54 L.F. 6UFF�`
IMPACT AREA
NOTE:
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED
BY OPEN CUT METHOD
ENERGY
& SERVICES CO.
CORPORATE OFFICE:
109 FIELDVIEW DRIVE
P.O. BOX 1007
VERSAILLES, KY 40383
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone]
BRANCH OFFICES:
HOUSTON, TX DETROIT, MI
CHARLESTON, WV TULSA, OK
BAY CITY, MI
www.emseng.com
WETLAND W44 TOTAL IMPACTS
WETLAND W42
TOTAL IMPACTS
0.000 AC.
PERM.
IMPACT
12
SO. FT.
0.0003
AC.
TEMP.
IMPACT
0
S0. FT.
0.000
AC.
TEMP,
IMPACT
743 SO. FT.
1,962
SQ. FT.
STREAM
STREAM
S32 TOTAL IMPACTS
IMPACTS
PERM.
IMPACT
115
SQ. FT.
0.002
AC.
TEMP.
IMPACT
435
SQ. FT.
0.009
AC.
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
EXISTING PSNC 10" T -021 PIPELINE
G G G G G G G
PROPOSED 16" T -021 B PIPELINE --------
_
I— EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT— — — — — — —
WETLAND W44
WETLAND W41-6
G
WETLAND W43 --�
LEGEND: WETLAND W43 N�
EXISTING TREE LINE
TEMPORARY
WETLAND W42
_
IMPACT AREA STREAM S31 50'
PERMANENT 54 L.F. 6UFF�`
IMPACT AREA
NOTE:
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED
BY OPEN CUT METHOD
ENERGY
& SERVICES CO.
CORPORATE OFFICE:
109 FIELDVIEW DRIVE
P.O. BOX 1007
VERSAILLES, KY 40383
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone]
BRANCH OFFICES:
HOUSTON, TX DETROIT, MI
CHARLESTON, WV TULSA, OK
BAY CITY, MI
www.emseng.com
WETLAND W44 TOTAL IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
0 SQ. FT.
0.000 AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
643 SO. FT.
0.015 AC.
30' 20'
ONE 1 ZONE 2
N
� N
I I
G G-
O
u7
— —7�- - - - - --
-WETLAND W451
ti
ti ti
ti
7
2
EXISTING (MAINTAINED)
I
50' ROW
G G
STREAM
S31 TOTAL JORDAN LAKE
BUFFER
IMPACTS
�
�1
V
I
/
ZONE
2
PERM.
i
924 SQ. FT.
1 ,15 5
SQ. FT.
TEMP,
IMPACT
743 SO. FT.
1,962
SQ. FT.
STREAM
S31 TOTAL JORDAN LAKE
BUFFER
IMPACTS
ZONE 1
ZONE
2
G G-
O
u7
— —7�- - - - - --
-WETLAND W451
ti
ti ti
ti
7
2
EXISTING (MAINTAINED)
I
50' ROW
G G
STREAM
S31 TOTAL JORDAN LAKE
BUFFER
IMPACTS
ZONE 1
ZONE
2
PERM.
IMPACT
924 SQ. FT.
1 ,15 5
SQ. FT.
TEMP,
IMPACT
743 SO. FT.
1,962
SQ. FT.
STREAM
S31 TOTAL JORDAN LAKE
BUFFER
IMPACTS
ZONE 1
ZONE
2
PERM.
IMPACT
891 SQ. FT.
636
SO. FT.
TEMP.
IMPACT
2,147 SQ. FT.
1,387
SO. FT.
--STREAM S32 50 25 0 50
51 L. F.
SCALE IN FEET
DRAWN BY: CAC 06/02/14
P S N C ENERGY
DRAFTING CK: SFS 06/03/14
APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021 B PIPELINE ENVIRONMENTAL CK:
ENGINEERING CK:
WETLAND CROSSING W47, W50, W51 & W52 & STREAM CROSSINGS S31 & S32 ALIGNMENT SHT: 58701124
DRAWING NO.:
@ STATION 636 +74, M.P 12.06 58703337
ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA SCALE: 1" = 50' 1 REV. A
SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE OF PLOT; 06/17/2014

STREAM S33 TOTAL JORDAN LAKE BUFFER IMPACTS
PER IMPACT
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
PERM. IMPACT
0 SQ. FT.
0 SQ. FT.
TEMP. IMPACT
1 1 ,051 SO. FT.
5,576
Z2
SQ. FT. _z2
z7
EXISTING 10" PSNC T -021 PIPELINE
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT T? Z2
2
U
7
7�O
Z
EXISTING TREE LINE
_ TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
NOTE:
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED
BY OPEN CUT METHOD
STREAM S33 TOTAL IMPACTS
PER IMPACT
0 SQ. FT.
0.000 AC.
P. IMPACT
85 SO. FT.
0.002 AC.
G G G� G -
ti
-Z1 G G
�
G------
I
\
\
'
Z2
STREAM
\ \ 135 L.F.
S33
� �
�
N PROPOSED 16" T -021 B PIPELINE
\\ \
EXISTING (MAINTAINED)
50' ROW
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
EXISTING TREE LINE
_ TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
NOTE:
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED
BY OPEN CUT METHOD
STREAM S33 TOTAL IMPACTS
PER IMPACT
0 SQ. FT.
0.000 AC.
P. IMPACT
85 SO. FT.
0.002 AC.
_ 22
27
TEM
� \ V
50 25 0 50
SCALE IN FEET
451 PSNC ENERGY DRAWN BY: CAC 06/02/14
ENERGY MANAGEMENT DRAFTING CK: SFS 06/03/14
& SERVICES CO.
CORPORATE OFFICE: APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021 B PIPELINE ENVIINONMINC ENTAL CK:
109 FIELDVIEW DRIVE
P.O. BOX STREAM CROSSING S33 ALIGNMENT sHT: 58701 124
4
VERSAILLES, KY 40383
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone] DRAWING NO.:
BRANCH OFFICES: @ STATION 646+15, M. P 12.24 58703338
HOUSTON, TX DETROIT, MI
CHARLESTON, WV TULSA, OK SCALE: it _ 50" REV. A
6AY CITY. MI ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
www.emseng.com SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE OF PLOT: 06/07/2014

STREAM S34 TOTAL IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
39 SQ. FT.
0.001 AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
253 SQ: FT.
0.006 AC.
STREAM S34 TOTAL JORDAN LAKE BUFFER IMPACTS
STREAM
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
PERM. IMPACT
652 SO. FT.
377 SO. FT.
TEMP. IMPACT
2,044 SQ. FT.
1,145 SQ, FT.
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
EXISTING 10" PSNC T -021 PIPELINE
G G G G G
PROPOSED 16" T -021 B PIPELINE
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
LEGEND: WETLAND W46
EXISTING TREE LINE
_ TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
NOTE:
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED
BY OPEN CUT METHOD TM
ENERGY MANAGEMENT
& SERVICES CO.
CORPORATE OFFICE:
109 FIELDVIEW DRIVE
P.O. BOX 1007
VERSAILLES, KY 40383
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone]
BRANCH OFFICES:
HOUSTON, TX DETROIT, MI
CHARLESTON, WV TULSA, OK
BAY CITY, MI
www.emseng.com
G
Sp.
N
N
EXISTING (MAINTAINED)
50' ROW P_
va
C",
YA
7
v3
o�
2
v
G G-- �- GG� -G�G G G o�
ti9
Si /
TREAM S34
58 L.F.
J II I I
I I N
I
STREAM S35
50 L.F.
WETLAND W46
STREAM S35 TOTAL JORDAN LAKE BUFFER IMPACTS
STREAM
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
PERM. IMPACT
0 SQ. FT.
0 SO. FT.
TEMP. IMPACT
2;231 SQ. FT.
1,040 S.Q. FT.
50 25 0 50
SCALE IN FEET
PS N C ENERGY DRAWN BY: CAC 06/02/1 4
DRAFTING CK: SFS 06/03/1
APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021 B PIPELINE ENVIRONMENTAL CK:
ENGINEERING CK:
WETLAND CROSSING W46 & STREAM CROSSINGS S34 & S35 ALIGNMENT SHT: 58701126
DRAWING NO.:
@ STATION 677 +68, M.P 12.83 58703339
ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA SCALE: 1" = 50' REV. A
SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE OF PLOT: 06/2 /2014
STREAM
S35 TOTAL
IMPACTS
PERM.
IMPACT
63 SQ.
FT.
0.001
AC.
TEMP.
IMPACT
462 SO.
FT.
0.009
AC.
WETLAND W46 TOTAL IMPACTS
PERM.
IMPACT
1,161 SQ.
FT,
0.027
AC.
TEMP.
IMPACT
4,041 SO.
FT.
0.093
AC.
50 25 0 50
SCALE IN FEET
PS N C ENERGY DRAWN BY: CAC 06/02/1 4
DRAFTING CK: SFS 06/03/1
APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021 B PIPELINE ENVIRONMENTAL CK:
ENGINEERING CK:
WETLAND CROSSING W46 & STREAM CROSSINGS S34 & S35 ALIGNMENT SHT: 58701126
DRAWING NO.:
@ STATION 677 +68, M.P 12.83 58703339
ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA SCALE: 1" = 50' REV. A
SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE OF PLOT: 06/2 /2014

STREAM S36 TOTAL JORDAN LAKE BUFFER IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
PERM. IMPACT
0 SQ. FT.
0 S0. FT.
TEMP. IMPACT
3,409 SQ. FT.
2,344 SO, FT.
WETLAND W47 TOTAL IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
0 SO. FT.
0.000 AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
1,869 SO. FT.
0.043 AC.
� EYIST,�NG MAINTENANC�E�A�EMENT,
EXISTING 10" PSNC T -021 PIPELINE
rG G G G G G
PR(1PncCrm 1 F" T —(1')1 R PIPPI INIF
LEGEND:
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
WETLAND W47
EXISTING TREE LINE
_ TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
G G G
v
ti
STREAM S3
56 L.F.
Sp.
9pF'�F
/ R
?p 30.
ti 7
�pN 0
G
ti
ti�
WETLAND W47
7
7o
m,
T,
2�
0
2
v
EXISTING (MAINTAINED)
50' ROW
_G G G G G
O
STREAM S36 TOTAL IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
0 S0. FT.
0.000 AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
592 SO. FT.
0.014 AC.
NOTE: \ I 50 25 0 50
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED
BY OPEN CUT METHOD SCALE IN FEET
4 PSNC ENERGY DRAWN BY: CAC 06/02/14
ENERGY MANAGEMENT DRAFTING CK: SFS 06/03/14
& SERVICES CO.
CORPORATE OFFICE: APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021 B PIPELINE ENVIINOERINC AL CK:
109 FIELDVIEW DRIVE
P.O. WETLAND CROSSING W47 & STREAM CROSSING S36 ALIGNMENT sHT: 5870/126
VERSAILLES, S, 4 KY 40383
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone] DRAWING NO.:
BRANCH OFFICES: @ STATION 697 +94, M.P 13.22 58703340
HOUSTON, TX DETROIT, MI
CHARLESTON, WV TULSA, OK SCALE: n "' _ 50" REV. a
6AY CITY. MI ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
www.emseng.com SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE OF PLOT: 06/17/2014

STREAM S37 TOTAL JORDAN LAKE BUFFER IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
PERM. IMPACT
0 SO, FT.
0 S0. FT.
TEMP. IMPACT
3,436 SQ. FT,
2,322 SQ. FT.
STREAM S37 TOTAL IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
0 SO. FT.
0.000 AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
481 SO. FT.
0.011 AC.
I
MAINTENANCE EASEMENT_------ - - - - --
EXISTING_ _ _ — T -021 c c c
PSNC G�
I— _CIST� 0218 PIPELINE
T
G —c PROPOSE MAINTENANCE
EASEMEN _- - - - - -- - - - -- -
EXISTING -
- PERMANE�EAEN' —
I NEW 15' ROW
LEGEND:
�vvvv� EXISTING TREE LINE
_ TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
WETLAND W48
i
Z_
7a
c
7A
STREAM S37 7
55 L.F.
G G c —
/ I
/ I
EXISTING (MAINTAINED)
/ 35' ROW
�ti
0���
NOTE: 50 25 0 50
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED \zz
BY OPEN CUT METHOD SCALE IN FEET
X13 PSNC ENERGY DRAWN BY: CAC 06/02/14
ENERGY MANAGEMENT DRAFTING CK: SFS 06/03/14
& SERVICES CO.
CORPORATE OFFICE: APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021B PIPELINE ENVIINONMNGTACLKCK:
109 FIELDVIEW DRIVE
P.O. BOX 1007 ALIGNMENT sHr: 8701127
4
VERSAILLES, KY 40383
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone] DRAWING NO.:
BRANCH OFFICES: @ STATION 718 +61, M.P 13.61 58703341
HOUSTON, TX DETROIT, MI
CHARLESTON, WV • TULSA, OK ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA SCALE: 7I "' _ 50" REV. A
BAY CITY, MI
www.emseng.com SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE OF PLOT: 06/17/2014

WETLAND W49 TOTAL IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
0 SQ. FT.
0.000 AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
685 SO. FT.
0.016 AC.
EXISTING (MAINTAINED)
35' ROW
G G1 LG G
-- - -ter --
NEW 15' ROW
LEGEND:
EXISTING TREE LINE
/ZZ� c
WETLAND W49
G G :::/G -
_ TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
NOTE:
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED
BY OPEN CUT METHOD
ENERGY
& SERVICES CO.
CORPORATE OFFICE:
109 FIELDVIEW DRIVE
P.O. BOX 1007
VERSAILLES, KY 40383
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone]
BRANCH OFFICES:
HOUSTON, TX DETROIT, MI
CHARLESTON, WV TULSA, OK
BAY CITY, MI
www.emseng.com
STREAM S39
10 L.F.
a
.
Zz
G \
G�—
— � — — — --,z
1 Z ol
STREAM S38
52 L.F.
IMPACT 0 SQ. FT. 0.000 AC. cl
IMPACT 923 SQ. FT. 0.021 AC.
C)
c�
� 50'
gUFF�R
\ — — — EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
N EXISTING 10" PSNC T -021 PIPELINE
G G G G G G
PROPOSED 16" T -021 B PIPELINE
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
NEW PERMANENT EASEMENT
STREAM S38 TOTAL JORDAN LAKE BUFFER IMPACTS
ZONE 1 ZONE 2
PERM. IMPACT 701 SQ. FT. 178 SQ. FT.
TEMP. IMPACT 2755 SQ. FT. 2,310 SQ. FT.
S38 T
TOTAL IMPACTS a
50
PERM
TEMP. S
P S N C ENERGY
DRAWN BY: CAC
06/02/14
Zz
G \
G�—
— � — — — --,z
1 Z ol
STREAM S38
52 L.F.
IMPACT 0 SQ. FT. 0.000 AC. cl
IMPACT 923 SQ. FT. 0.021 AC.
C)
c�
� 50'
gUFF�R
\ — — — EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
N EXISTING 10" PSNC T -021 PIPELINE
G G G G G G
PROPOSED 16" T -021 B PIPELINE
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
NEW PERMANENT EASEMENT
STREAM S38 TOTAL JORDAN LAKE BUFFER IMPACTS
ZONE 1 ZONE 2
PERM. IMPACT 701 SQ. FT. 178 SQ. FT.
TEMP. IMPACT 2755 SQ. FT. 2,310 SQ. FT.
50
25 0 50
SCALE IN FEET
P S N C ENERGY
DRAWN BY: CAC
06/02/14
DRAFTING CK: SFS
06/03/14
APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021 B PIPELINE
ENVIRONMENTAL CK:
ENGINEERING CK:
WETLAND CROSSING W49 & STREAMS CROSSING S38 & S39
50
25 0 50
SCALE IN FEET
P S N C ENERGY
DRAWN BY: CAC
06/02/14
DRAFTING CK: SFS
06/03/14
APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021 B PIPELINE
ENVIRONMENTAL CK:
ENGINEERING CK:
WETLAND CROSSING W49 & STREAMS CROSSING S38 & S39
ALIGNMENT SHT: 58701128
DRAWING NO.:
@ STATION 737 +24, M.P 13.96
58703342
ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
SCALE: 1" = 50' REV. A
SHEET 1 OF 1
DATE OF PLOT: 06/20/2014

STREAM S40 TOTAL IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
0 SQ. FT.
0.000 AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
502 SQ. FT,
0.012 AC.
LEGEND:
(EXISTING MAINTAINED)
35' ROW
STREAM S40 TOTAL JORDAN LAKE BUFFER IMPACTS
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
PERM. IMPACT
1,153 SO. FT.
1,288 SQ. FT.
TEMP. IMPACT
2,266 SQ. FT.
1,957 SQ. FT.
50' BUFFER
20'
I ZONE 2
30'
— — — — ZONE 1 E STjNG— M�INTEN�NC EQS MEf1T�
EXISTING 10" PSNC T -021 PIPELINE
G G c c c PROPO c
SED 16" T -021 B PIPELINE
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
t NEW PERMANENT EASEMENT
STREAM S40
38 L.F.
-Z1
�j
- - - - -- --
EXISTING TREE LINE
NEW 15' ROW
_ TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
NOTE:
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED
BY OPEN CUT METHOD
F�
s�
Fes,
Fp,
F
50 25 0 50
SCALE IN FEET
PS N C ENERGY DRAWN BY: CAC 06/02/14
ENERGY MANAGEMENT DRAFTING CK: SFS 06/o3/1�
& SERVICES CO.
CORPORATE OFFICE: APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021 B PIPELINE ENVIINONMENTACLKCK:
109 FIELDVIEW DRIVE
P.O. BOX STREAM CROSSING S40 AALIGNMENT sHT: 5870112
4
VERSAILLES, KY 40383
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone] DRAWING NO.:
BRANCH OFFICES: @ STATION 746 +00, M.P 14.13 58703343
HOUSTON, TX MI
DETROIT,
CHARLESTON, WV • TULSA, OK ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA SCALE: 7I _ REV. A
BAY CITY, MI
www.emseng.com SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE OF PLOT: 06/17/2014

STREAM S41 TOTAL IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
0 S0. FT.
0.000 AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
587 SQ. FT.
0.013 AC.
LEGEND:
EXISTING (MAINTAINED)
50' ROW
_EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
EXISTING 10" PSNC T -021 PIPELINE
G c PROPOSED 16" TG 021 B PIPELINE
_EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
EXISTING TREE LINE
_ TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
NOTE:
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED
BY OPEN CUT METHOD
/11 30'
20 ONE
ZONE 2
c
/�
/ /hh
/ 1
hh STREAM S41
58 L.F.
/ yh
I
1 ,
I � °
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I I
I
50'
STREAM S41 TOTAL JORDAN LAKE BUFFER IMPACTS
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
PERM. IMPACT
0 S0. FT.
0 SQ. FT.
TEMP. IMPACT
3,415 SO. FT.
2,327 SO. FT.
c c
2
7
c�
s�
7A
q
7
o�
G G
50 25 0 50
SCALE IN FEET
P S N C ENERGY DRAWN BY: CAC 06/02/14
ENERGY MANAGEMENT DRAFTING CK: SFS 06/o3/1
& SERVICES CO.
CORPORATE OFFICE: APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021 B PIPELINE ENVIINONMENTACLKCK:
109 FIELDVIEW DRIVE
P.O. BOX STREAM CROSSING S41 AALIGNMENT sHT: 58701129
4
VERSAILLES, KY 40383
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone] DRAWING NO.:
BRANCH OFFICES: @ STATION 765 +25, M.P 14.49 58703344
HOUSTON, TX MI
DETROIT,
CHARLESTON, WV • TULSA, OK ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA SCALE: 7I _ REV. A
BAY CITY, MI
www.emseng.com SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE OF PLOT: 06/17/2014

20 30'
ZONE 2 ONE 1
STREAM S42--lT--
50 L.F.
N
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT _
_;XISTING 10" PSNC T -021 PIPELINE
G G G
nononcun 1 a" T -000 P PIPFI INIF
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
LEGEND:
EXISTING TREE LINE
50'
BUFFER
\ N
1 1 N
ti
_ TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
NOTE:
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED
BY OPEN CUT METHOD
/ N
STREAM S42 TOTAL IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
0 SQ. FT.
0.000 AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
959 SQ. FT.
0.022 AC.
EXISTING (MAINTAINED)
50' ROW
c c c c c G
STREAM S43
142 L.F.
STREAM S42 TOTAL JORDAN LAKE BUFFER IMPACTS
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
PERM, IMPACT
0 SO. FT.
0 S0. FT.
TEMP. IMPACT
3,045 SO. FT.
2,108 SO. FT.
�a
cl
s�
q
0
v�
o�
v
c Gi
0
U7
50 25 0 50
SCALE IN FEET
X13 PS N C ENERGY DRAWN BY: CAC 06/02/14
ENERGY MANAGEMENT DRAFTING CK: SFS 06/03/14
& SERVICES CO.
CORPORATE OFFICE: APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021B PIPELINE ENVIINONMNGTACLKCK:
109 FIELDVIEW DRIVE
P.O. BOX 1007 ALIGNMENT sHr: 58701129
4
VERSAILLES, KY 40383
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone] DRAWING NO.:
BRANCH OFFICES: @ STATION 776 +00, M.P 14.70 58703345
HOUSTON, TX DETROIT, MI
CHARLESTON, WV • TULSA, OK ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA SCALE: 1" = 50' REV. A
BAY CITY, MI
www.emseng.com SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE OF PLOT: 06/29/2014

STREAM S44 TOTAL IMPACT
STREAM S45 TOTAL IMPACT
PERM. IMPACT
0 S0. FT.
0.000 AC.
PERM. IMPACT
0 S0. FT.
0.000 AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
291 SQ. FT.
0.007 AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
232 SO. FT.
0.005 AC.
STREAM S44�
54 L.F. \ \
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT \ \
1
EXISTING 10" PSNC T -021 PIPELINE
c G c G G G
PROPOSED 16" T -021 B PIPELINE \
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
tie
N Z2J
1 ti�
LEGEND:
v v v v EXISTING TREE LINE
&j
_ TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
2�
STREAM S46 TOTAL JORDAN LAKE BUFFER IMPACTS
aKs
ENERGY
& SERVICES CO.
CORPORATE OFFICE:
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
PERM, IMPACT
0 SQ. FT.
0 S0. FT.
TEMP. IMPACT
0 SQ. FT.
860 SQ. FT.
ZONE 2 PARALLEL, NO
MITIGATION REQUIRED
G G G G G G
STREAM S45
50 L.F.
G G o G
Ln
Z
�O
w
s�
�Z
.z
n
0
Z
Y
G
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
y WETLAND W50 1, \ EXISTING (MAINTAINED)
50' ROW
ti� z WETLAND W50A
�7 Z1STREAM -
_ I \ 399 S46
F.
21
�37
J�
NOTE: . N \/ 50 25 0 50
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED ('V Z1
BY OPEN CUT METHOD N� / SCALE IN FEET
aKs
ENERGY
& SERVICES CO.
CORPORATE OFFICE:
PSNC ENERGY
APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021 B PIPELINE
DRAWN BY: CAC
06/02/14
DRAFTING CK: SFS
IENVIRONMENTAL
06/03/14
K:
ENC ERINC
IN
109 FIELDVIEW DRIVE
P.O. BOX 1007
4
VERSAILLES, KY 40383
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone]
ALIGNMENT sHT: 58701130
DRAWING NO.:
BRANCH OFFICES:
@ STATION 799 +35, M.P 15.14
58703346
HOUSTON, TX DETROIT, MI
CHARLESTON, WV TULSA, OK
6AY CITY. MI
www.emseng.com
ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
SHEET 1 OF 1
SCALE: 1 ° = 50' REV. A
DATE OF PLOT: 06/20/2014

T REAM S47 TOTAL JORDAN LAKE BUFFER IMPACTS
PERM.. IMPACT
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
PERM. IMPACT
0 SQ. FT.
0 SQ. FT.
TEMP. IMPACT
3,416 SQ. FT.
2,567 SQ. FT.
WETLAND W52
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
EXISTING 10" PSNC T -021 PIPELINE
G G G G G
PROPOSED 16" T -021 B PIPELINE
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
STREAM S47
54 L.F.
LEGEND:
�vvvv� EXISTING TREE LINE
_ TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA /
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
NOTE:
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED
BY OPEN CUT METHOD
i
i i ti
i
G ti G " G
i
,M S48
STREAM S47 TOTAL IMPACTS
PERM.. IMPACT
0 SQ. FT.
0.000 AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
598 SQ- FT.
0.014 AC.
WETLAND W51 TOTAL IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
0 S0. FT.
0.000 AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
6,536 SO. FT.
0.150 AC.
ti
0
m
v
_y
�o
r
2
v
G G G G (
cn
0
50' ROW
EXISTING (MAINTAINED)
WETLAND W51
50 25 0 50
SCALE IN FEET
P S N C ENERGY DRAWN BY: CAC 06/02/14
ENERGY MANAGEMENT DRAFTING CK: SFS 06/03/1
& SERVICES CO.
CORPORATE OFFICE: APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021 B PIPELINE ENVIINONMENTACLKCK:
109 FIELDVIEW DRIVE
P.O. BOX 1007 ALIGNMENT sHT: 58701130,31
4
VERSAILLES, KY 40383
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone] DRAWING NO.:
BRANCH OFFICES: @ STATION 809 +73, M.P 15.34 58703347
HOUSTON, TX MI
DETROIT,
CHARLESTON, WV • TULSA, OK ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA SCALE: 7I _ REV. A
BAY CITY, MI
www.emseng.com SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE OF PLOT: 06/07/2014

WETLAND W53 TOTAL IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
0 S0. FT.
0.000 AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
4,473 SQ. FT.
0.103 AC.
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT.
-------------------- --
EXISTING 10" PSNC T -021 PIPELINE
—G G G G G — G —G—
PROPOSED 16" T -021 B PIPELINE
— — — — — — — — — — EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
LEGEND:
EXISTING TREE LINE
_ TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
WETLAND W53
G
G
0
s�
z
_2
0
Z
v
EXISTING (MAINTAINED)
50' ROW
— — — — — — — ---------
—G G G G G
cri
0
NOTE:
50
25 0 50
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED
BY OPEN CUT METHOD
SCALE IN FEET
aKs
PSNC ENERGY
DRAWN BY: CAC
06/02'14
ENERGY
DRAFTING CK: SFS
06/03/14
& SERVICES CO.
APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021 B PIPELINE
NMENTAL CK:
CORPORATE OFFICE:
ENVIINOEERINC
109 FIELDVIEW DRIVE
P. °.
WETLAND CROSSING W53
ALIGNMENT sHT: 58701131
S, 4
VERSAIL KY 40383
LES,
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone]
DRAWING NO.:
BRANCH OFFICES:
@ STATION 814 +29, M.P 15.42
58703348
HOUSTON, TX DETROIT, MI
CHARLESTON, WV TULSA, OK
SAY CITY. MI
ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
SCALE: 1 "' _ 50" REV. A
www.emseng.com
SHEET 1 OF 1
DATE OF PLOT: 06/17/2014

WETLAND W54 TOTAL IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
0 S0. FT.
0.000 AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
406 SQ. FT.
0.009 AC.
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
EXISTING 10" PSNC T -021 PIPELINE
G G G G G—
PROPOSED 16" T -021 B PIPELINE
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
LEGEND:
EXISTING (MAINTAINED)
50' ROW
EXISTING TREE LINE
Z
O
cp
W
ul�
v
�Z
0
Z
v
- --
- — -- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — G G G G G G G G G G G
0
- -- — — — — — — — —
_ TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA WETLAND W54
NOTE: 50 25 0 50
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED
BY OPEN CUT METHOD SCALE IN FEET
aKs PSNC ENERGY DRAWN BY: CAC 06/02'14
ENERGY DRAFTING CK: SFS 06/03/14
& SERVICES CO.
CORPORATE OFFICE: APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021 B PIPELINE ENVIINONMINC ENTAL CK:
109 FIELDVIEW DRIVE
P.O. WETLAND CROSSING W54 ALIGNMENT sHT: 58701131
VERSAILLES, S, 4 KY 40383
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone] DRAWING NO.:
BRANCH OFFICES: @ STATION 818 +37, M.P 15.50 58703349
HOUSTON, TX DETROIT, MI
CHARLESTON, WV TULSA, OK SCALE: 1 "' _ 50" REV. A
SAY CITY. MI ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
www.emseng.COM SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE OF PLOT: 06/17/2014

STREAM S49 TOTAL IMPACTS
STREAM
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
PERM. IMPACT
488 SQ. FT.
0 SQ. FT.
TEMP. IMPACT
4,553 SQ. FT.
4,483 SO. FT.
EXISTING (MAINTAINED)
50' ROW
EXISTING CULVERT
G G G sue°
OPEN WATER
Z2--\ EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
G G G
N x NEW PERMANENT EASEMENT
s0l eU �o PROPOSED 16" T -021 B PIPELINE
LEGEND: STREAM S49 49 L.F. -"J 30'
)) °Ne
EXISTING
TREE LINE
_ TEMPORARY
IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT
IMPACT AREA
NOTE:
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED
BY OPEN CUT METHOD TM
ENERGY MANAGEMENT
& SERVICES CO.
CORPORATE OFFICE:
109 FIELDVIEW DRIVE
P.O. BOX 1007
VERSAILLES, KY 40383
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone]
BRANCH OFFICES:
HOUSTON, TX DETROIT, MI
CHARLESTON, WV TULSA, OK
BAY CITY, MI
www.emseng.com
NEW PERMANENT EASEMENT
CJ
WETLAND W56
v�
�Z
.y
0
0
z
/ \ . --WETLAND W55
G G G
I
I
I
I
_ I
I
EXISTING 10" PSNC T -021 PIPELINE
/ I
o /EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
50' NEW ROW
WETLAND W65 TOTAL IMPACTS
STREAM
S49 TOTAL IMPACTS
0.000 AC.
PERM,
IMPACT
0
SQ.
FT.
0.000
AC.
TEMP.
IMPACT
644
SO.
FT.
0.015
AC.
CJ
WETLAND W56
v�
�Z
.y
0
0
z
/ \ . --WETLAND W55
G G G
I
I
I
I
_ I
I
EXISTING 10" PSNC T -021 PIPELINE
/ I
o /EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
50' NEW ROW
WETLAND W65 TOTAL IMPACTS
PERM. IMPACT
0 SQ. FT.
0.000 AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
5,656 SQ. FT,
0.130 AC.
50 25 0 50
SCALE IN FEET
PS N C ENERGY DRAWN BY: CAC 06/02/14
DRAFTING CK: SFS 06/03/1
APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021 B PIPELINE ENVIRONMENTAL CK:
ENGINEERING CK:
WETLAND CROSSING W65 STREAM CROSSING S49 ALIGNMENT SHT: 5870113/
DRAWING NO.:
@ STATION 821 +42, M.P 15.56 58703350
ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA SCALE: 7 = 5V REV. A
SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE OF PLOT: 06/17/2014

Et
LEGEND:
STREAM S50 X// 59 L.F. EXISTING (MAINTAINED) 50' ROW EXISTING CULVERT
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
EXISTING 10" PSNC T -021 PIPELINE
PROPOSED 16" T-0218 PIPELINE
—c G - -T� G
EXISTING MAINTENANCE EASEMENT /
EXISTING TREE LINE
_ TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
NOTE:
1. PIPELINE TO BE INSTALLED
BY OPEN CUT METHOD
EXISTING CULVERTS /#�/
STREAM S50 TOTAL IMPACT
PERM. IMPACT
0 SQ. FT.
0.000 AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
531 SO. FT.
0.012 AC.
a
vo
w
�Z
Z
➢o
50 25 0 50
SCALE IN FEET
aKs PSNC ENERGY DRAWN BY: CAC 06/02/14
ENERGY DRAFTING CK: SFS 06/03/14
& SERVICES CO.
CORPORATE OFFICE: APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF 16" T -021 B PIPELINE ENVIINONMING ENTAL CK:
109 FIELDVIEW DRIVE
P.O. STREAM CROSSING S50 ALIGNMENT SHT: 58701132
VERSAILLES, S, 4 KY 40383
TEL:[phone] FAX:[phone] DRAWING NO.:
BRANCH OFFICES: @ STATION 838 +76, M. P 15.89 58703351
HOUSTON, TX DETROIT, MI
CHARLESTON, WV TULSA, OK SCALE: 1 50" REV. A
6AY CITY. MI ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
www.emseng.com SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE OF PLOT: 06/17/2014

APPENDIX V
Agency Correspondence

United States Department of the Interior
Crystal Fox
S &ME, Inc.
9751 Southern Pine Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28273
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636 -3726
March 21, 2014
R : L e T"'21 Pipelme Project- Alamance and Orange Cout- sties, NC
Dear Ms. Fox;
This letter is to inform you that a list of all federally - protected endangered and threatened species
with known occurrences in North Carolina is now available on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service's (Service) web page at http: / /www.fws.gov /raleigh. Therefore, if you have projects that
occur within the Raleigh Field Office's area of responsibility (see attached county list), you no
longer need to contact the Raleigh Field Office for a list of federally - protected species.
Our web page contains a complete and frequently updated:list of all'endangered and threatened
species protected by the provisions of:the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)(Act), and a list of federal species of concern' that are known to occur in
each county in North Carolina.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non - federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally- listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally- protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or
evaluation and can be found on our web page at http: / /www.fws.gov /raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes.
' The term "federal species of concern" refers to those species which the Service believes might be in need of
concentrated conservation actions. Federal species of concern receive no legal protection and their designation does
not necessarily imply that the species will eventually be proposed for listing as a federally endangered or threatened
species. However, we recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid or minimize adverse impacts to
federal species of concern.

If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally - listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally - protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
With regard to the above - referenced project, we offer the following remarks. Our comments are
submitted pursuant to, and in accordance with, provisions of the Endangered Species Act.
Based on the information provided and other information available, it appears that the proposed
action is not likely to adversely affect any federally - listed endangered or threatened species, their
formally designated critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing, under the Act at
these sites. We believe that the requirements of section 7(a)(2) of the Act have been satisfied for
your project. Please remember that obligations under section 7 consultation must be
reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect
listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered; (2) this action is
subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review; or, (3) a new species
is listed or critical habitat determined that may be affected by the identified action.
However, the Service is concerned about the potential impacts the proposed action might have
on aquatic species. Aquatic resources are highly susceptible to sedimentation. Therefore, we
recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid adverse impacts to aquatic species,
including implementing directional boring methods and stringent sediment and erosion control
measures. An erosion and sedimentation control plan should be submitted to and approved by
the North Carolina Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section prior to construction.
Erosion and sedimentation controls should be installed and maintained between the construction
site and any nearby down - gradient surface waters. In addition, we recommend maintaining
natural, vegetated buffers on all streams and creeks adjacent to the project site.
The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission has developed a Guidance Memorandum (a
copy can be found on our website at (http: / /www.fws.gov /raleigh) to address and mitigate
secondary and cumulative impacts to aquatic acid terrestrial wildlife resources and water quality.
We recommend that you consider this document in the development of your projects and in
completing an initiation package for consultation (if necessary).
4

We hope you find our web page useful and informative and that following the process described
above will reduce the time required, and eliminate the need, for general correspondence for
species' lists. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis of this office at
(919) 856 -4520 ext. 26.
Sincerely,
P to Benjamin
Field Supervisor

List of Counties in the Service's Raleigh Field Office Area of Responsibility
Alamance
Beaufort
Bertie
Bladen
Brunswick
Camden
Carteret
Caswell
Chatham
Chowan
Columbus
Craven
Cumberland
Currituck
Dare
Duplin
Durham
Edgecombe
Franklin
Gates
Granville
Greene
Guilford
Halifax
Harnett
Hertford
Hoke
Hyde
Johnston
Jones
Lee
Lenoir
Martin
Montgomery
Moore
Nash
New Hanover
Northampton
Onslow
Orange
Pamlico
Pasquotank
Pender
4
Perquimans
Person
Pitt
Randolph
Richmond
Robeson
Rockingham
Sampson
Scotland
Tyrrell
Vance
Wake
Warren
Washington
Wayne
Wilson

A IF
NCDEN�
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Office of Land and Water Stewardship
Pat McCrory
Governor
Ms. Crystal Fox
S &ME, Inc.
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28273
cfox @smeinc.com
Bryan Gossage
Director
March 27, 2014
RE: PSNC Energy Line T021 Pipeline Project, Alamance and Orange Counties, NC
S &ME Project No. 7235 -14 -013
Dear Ms. Fox:
John E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
Thank you for the opportunity to provide information from the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program
( NCNHP) database for the proposed project referenced above, and also for the submission of GIS
shapefiles to assist us in responding to your request. The Natural Heritage Program database shows
records for rare species, important natural communities, a significant natural heritage area (SNHAs), and
several conservation /managed lands within the vicinity of the proposed project site.
We buffered the GIS shapefiles provided by 100 feet to determine what records from the NCNHP were
within close proximity to the proposed pipepline project. We also evaluated records within one mile of
the proposed project, as requested — see the attached Tables 1, 2 and 3.
Occurrences of the following rare species have been documented within or within close proximity of the
proposed project area:
SCIENTIFIC NAME
COMMON NAME
ACCURACY
NC STATUS*
USA STATUS*
Etheostoma collis
Carolina Darter
Medium
SC
FSC
Vireo gilvus
Warbling Vireo
Low
SR
- --
* For status definitions, please see the Help document at http: / /www.ncnhp.org /web /nhp /database- search.
The record for Carolina Darter indicates that this occurrence is located in Orange County, NC and
consists of Cane Creek from 1 km upstream of SR -1115 to its confluence with Hog Branch, and Hog
Branch from 1 km upstream of SR -1115 to this confluence. The record for Warbling Vireo is from a farm
on Dairyland Road, about 0.6 miles east of Orange Grove.
The NCNHP database also has occurrences of high - quality Dry - Mesic- Oak - Hickory Forest (Piedmont
Subtype) and Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont Subtype) within the Pickards Mountain SNHA;
this SNHA is located along the eastern portion of the proposed pipeline project. Pickards Mountain
SNHA is significant for the high - quality natural communities noted above, and also for the extensive
Piedmont Monadnock Forest present within the SNHA. Based on GIS data submitted with your request,
the pipeline may impact the northern portion of this SNHA.
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1601
Phone: 919 - 707 -86001 Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled 1 10% Post Consumer Paper

PSNC Energy Line T021 Pipeline Project, Alamance and Orange Counties, NC
S &ME Project No. 7235 -14 -013
March 27, 2014
Page 2
In addition, the following conservation /managed areas occur within or within close proximity to the
proposed project area:
MA
ID
MANAGED AREA NAME
OWNER
OWNER TYPE
500
Conservation Trust of North Carolina
Easement
Conservation Trust of North
Carolina
Private
1321
NC Farmland Preservation Trust Fund
Easement
NC Department of Agriculture
State
1686
Orange County Easement
Orange County
Local
Government
1686
Orange County Easement
Orange County
Local
Government
1686
Orange County Easement
Orange County
Local
Government
1686
Orange County Easement
Orange County
Local
Government
1674
Triangle Land Conservancy Easement
Triangle Land Conservancy
Private
1674
Triangle Land Conservancy Easement
Triangle Land Conservancy
Private
1674
Triangle Land Conservancy Easement
Triangle Land Conservancy
Private
5
US Fish and Wildlife Service Easement
US Fish and Wildlife Service
Federal
5
US Fish and Wildlife Service Easement
US Fish and Wildlife Service
Federal
The northern portion of the Pickards Mountain SNHA that may be directly impacted by the proposed
pipeline is under individual conservation easements with various organizations, including Orange
County, Triangle Land Conservancy, Conservation Trust of North Carolina, and the NC Department of
Agriculture. You may want to contact the landowners within this area directly. To view the boundaries
of SNHAs and conservation /managed lands (MAREAs) within or within close proximity to the proposed
project, you may wish to download GIS data from our website at www.ncnhp.org (go to the Data
Services page).
Please note that the use of Natural Heritage Program data should not be substituted for actual field
surveys, particularly if the project area contains suitable habitat for rare species or important natural
communities.
Feel free to contact me at 919 - 707 -8629 or Allison.Weaklev @ncdenr.gov if you have questions or need
additional information.
Sincerely,
Allison Schwarz Weakley, Conservation Planner
NC Natural Heritage Program

Table 1. Rare species, natural communities, and special animal habitat occurrences within one mile of the proposed Line T021 pipeline
project in Alamance and Orange counties (NCNHP, January 2014).
SCIENTIFIC NAME
COMMON NAME
ACCURACY
NC
STATUS*
USA
STATUS*
Colonial Wading Bird Colony
--
Low
--
--
Dry-Mesic Oak -- Hickory Forest (Piedmont Subtype)
--
Medium
--
--
Dry -Mesic Oak -- Hickory Forest (Piedmont Subtype)
--
High
--
--
Etheostoma collis
Carolina Darter
Medium
SC
FSC
Haliaeetus leucocephalus
Bald Eagle
Low
T
BGPA
Hemidactylium scutatum
Four -toed Salamander
Low
SC
--
Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont
Subtype)
--
High
--
--
Piedmont Monadnock Forest (Typic Subtype)
--
High
--
--
Piedmont Monadnock Forest (Typic Subtype)
--
Unknown
--
--
Pycnanthemum torreyi
Torrey's Mountain -mint
Medium
SR -T
FSC
Upland Depression Swamp Forest
--
Unknown
--
--
Vireo gilvus
Warbling Vireo
Low
SR
--
* For status definitions, please see the Help document at http: / /www.ncnhp.org /web /nhp /database- search.
Table 2. Significant Natural Heritage Areas (SNHAs) within one mile of the proposed Line T021 pipeline project in Alamance and Orange
counties (NCNHP, January 2014).
SITE NAME
OWNER*
R RATING*
C RATING*
Bald Mountain
DUKE, TLC
4- Moderate
5- General
Meadow Flats
PRV, DUKE
1- Exceptional
4- Moderate
Pickards Mountain
PRV
3 -High
5- General
Turkey Hill Creek Forest
PRV
5- General
5- General
*For more information on SNHAs, please see the SNHA document at http: / /porta1.ncdenr.org /web /nhp /gis- download.

Table 3. Conservation /managed lands (MAREAs) within one mile of the proposed Line T021 pipeline project in Alamance and Orange
counties (NCNHP, January 2014).
MA
ID
MANAGED AREA NAME
OWNER
OWNER TYPE
CATEGORY
944
Duke Forest
Duke University
Private
Fee
944
Duke Forest
Duke University
Private
Fee
944
Duke Forest
Duke University
Private
Fee
944
Duke Forest
Duke University
Private
Fee
Local
2050
Orange County Open Space
Orange County: multiple local government
Government
Fee
Local
2050
Orange County Open Space
Orange County: multiple local government
Government
Fee
Local
2050
Orange County Open Space
Orange County: multiple local government
Government
Fee
Local
2050
Orange County Open Space
Orange County: multiple local government
Government
Fee
Local
2050
Orange County Open Space
Orange County: multiple local government
Government
Fee
Orange County Water and Sewer Authority
Local
2282
Property
Orange County Water and Sewer Authority
Government
Fee
Orange County Water and Sewer Authority
Local
2282
Property
Orange County Water and Sewer Authority
Government
Fee
Orange County Water and Sewer Authority
Local
2282
Property
Orange County Water and Sewer Authority
Government
Fee
Orange County Water and Sewer Authority
Local
2282
Property
Orange County Water and Sewer Authority
Government
Fee
Orange County Water and Sewer Authority
Local
2282
Property
Orange County Water and Sewer Authority
Government
Fee
Orange County Water and Sewer Authority
Local
2282
Property
Orange County Water and Sewer Authority
Government
Fee
500
Conservation Trust of North Carolina Easement
Conservation Trust of North Carolina
Private
Easement
NC DENR, Clean Water Management Trust
1266
NC Clean Water Management Trust Fund Easement
Fund
State
Easement

MA
ID
MANAGED AREA NAME
OWNER
OWNER TYPE
CATEGORY
NC DENR, Clean Water Management Trust
1266
NC Clean Water Management Trust Fund Easement
Fund
State
Easement
NC DENR, Clean Water Management Trust
1266
NC Clean Water Management Trust Fund Easement
Fund
State
Easement
NC DENR, Clean Water Management Trust
1266
NC Clean Water Management Trust Fund Easement
Fund
State
Easement
NC DENR, Clean Water Management Trust
1266
NC Clean Water Management Trust Fund Easement
Fund
State
Easement
NC DENR, Clean Water Management Trust
1266
NC Clean Water Management Trust Fund Easement
Fund
State
Easement
NC DENR, Clean Water Management Trust
1266
NC Clean Water Management Trust Fund Easement
Fund
State
Easement
2222
NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program Easement
NC DENR, Ecosystem Enhancement Program
State
Easement
1321
NC Farmland Preservation Trust Fund Easement
NC Department of Agriculture
State
Easement
Local
1686
Orange County Easement
Orange County
Government
Easement
Local
1686
Orange County Easement
Orange County
Government
Easement
Local
1686
Orange County Easement
Orange County
Government
Easement
Local
1686
Orange County Easement
Orange County
Government
Easement
Local
1686
Orange County Easement
Orange County
Government
Easement
Local
1686
Orange County Easement
Orange County
Government
Easement
Local
1686
Orange County Easement
Orange County
Government
Easement
Orange County Water and Sewer Authority
Local
1687
Easement
Orange County Water and Sewer Authority
Government
Easement

MA
ID
MANAGED AREA NAME
OWNER
OWNER TYPE
CATEGORY
1687
Orange County Water and Sewer Authority
Easement
Orange County Water and Sewer Authority
Local
Government
Easement
1687
Orange County Water and Sewer Authority
Easement
Orange County Water and Sewer Authority
Local
Government
Easement
1674
Triangle Land Conservancy Easement
Triangle Land Conservancy
Private
Easement
1674
Triangle Land Conservancy Easement
Triangle Land Conservancy
Private
Easement
1674
Triangle Land Conservancy Easement
Triangle Land Conservancy
Private
Easement
1674
Triangle Land Conservancy Easement
Triangle Land Conservancy
Private
Easement
1674
Triangle Land Conservancy Easement
Triangle Land Conservancy
Private
Easement
5
US Fish and Wildlife Service Easement
US Fish and Wildlife Service
Federal
Easement
5
US Fish and Wildlife Service Easement
US Fish and Wildlife Service
Federal
Easement
5
US Fish and Wildlife Service Easement
US Fish and Wildlife Service
Federal
Easement
795
Bald Mountain RHA
Duke University
Private
Other

Significant Natural Heritage Area Report 19 February 2014
Name Pickards Mountain Site ID 1058
LOCATORS
County Orange (NC)
Quad White Cross Watershed Haw
Latitude 355752N
Longitude 079091OW
Directions South of SR 1177
(Dairyland Road) and east of SR 1102 (Dodson's Crossroad). Northwest of Chapel Hill.
Site Relations
OWNERS
Owner
Details Comments
Private
David Schuman, Jean F. Carver, Edward
Cameron, and 4 other landowners
SITE DESCRIPTION
Minimum Elevation:
510 Feet 155 Meters
Maximum Elevation:
785 Feet 239 Meters
Site Description Pickards Mountain is a monadnock area dissected by narrow ravines. It supports a very good occurrence of Piedmont
Monadnock
Forest. Good quality Dry- Mesic Oak -- Hickory Forest and Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest are also present. This
is an important
wildlife reservoir linking two stream corridor systems: Morgan Creek and Cane Creek. This tract is the
largest
chestnut oak forest in the county.
Land Use History
Cultural Features
SITE DESIGN
Designer
Schafale (after Sather and Hall 1988) Mapped Date
Boundary Justification
The site boundary was reviewed by Schafale, Hall, Buchanan, Amoroso, M. Jones and R. Shaw on 16 February 2011
and the existing boundary was retained (Amoroso 2011). Boundaries revised in 2008 based on 2006 and 1998 aerial
photography. Areas with houses were removed from the site. Two areas with successional pine forest were removed
to a secondary boundary. The primary area represents that remaining area of high quality communities in the
original site.
Acreage
495.61
Site Comments
405.81 acres primary. Part of the original site developed.
Ground Survey Date
1988 -08 -26 Aerial Survey Date 2010 Survey Intensity R
SITE SIGNIFICANCE
Representational Rating
R3 Collective Rating C5
Defining Element Occurrences
Piedmont Monadnock Forest (Typic Subtype)
PROTECTION
Conservation Intentions
Registry
Designation
Protection Comments
No protection status
MANAGEMENT
Management Comments
Land Use Comments
Natural Hazards
Exotics Comments

Significant Natural Heritage Area Report 19 February 2014
Name Pickards Mountain Site ID 1058
Offsite
Information Needs
Management Needs
Managed Area Relations
ELEMENT OCCURRENCES
Scientific Name Common Name G Rank S Rank EO Rank
EO ID
Dry- Mesic Oak -- Hickory Forest (Piedmont Subtype) G4G5 S4 C?
13086
Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont Subtype) G3G4 S4
15430
Piedmont Monadnock Forest (Typic Subtype) G3G4 S3 A
10161
REFERENCES
Reference Code Full Citation
U88SATO1NCUS Sather, D. and Hall, S.P. 1988. Inventory of the natural areas and wildlife habitats of Orange
County, North Carolina. Triangle Land Conservancy, Research Triangle Park, NC.
I06DOQOINCUS 2006 NAIP aerial photography
I98DOQOINCUS U.S. Geological Survey. 1998. False -color infrared aerial photography.
VERSION
Version Date 2008 -04 -30
Version Author Schafale

�.�. STATE
m. iryy (A91
V
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Pat McCrory
Secretary Susan Kluttz
March 21, 2014
Crystal Fox
S &ME, Inc.
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28273 -5560
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
Re: Line T021 Pipeline Project, S &ME 7235 -14 -013, Alamance and Orange Counties, ER 14 -0345
Dear Ms. Fox:
Thank you for your letter of February 27, 2014, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by
the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill- Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919- 807 -6579 or renee.gledhill-
earleykncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above referenced
tracking number.
Sincerely,
�5eRamona M. Bartos
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699 -4617 Telephone /Fax: (919) 807 - 6570/807 -6599

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW- 2014 -00846 County: Oran 2e U.S.G.S. Quad: NC- EFLAND
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner: PSNC Energy
Whitney Waldrop
Address: 800 Gaston Road
Gastonia, NC, 28056
Telephone Number: (704) 834 -6621
Size (Miles) 15 Miles (Approx.) Nearest Town Chapel Hill/Hillsborou6
Nearest Waterway Morgan Creek River Basin Haw. North Carolina.
USGS HUC 3030002 Coordinates Latitude: 36.0018269468284
Longitude: - 79.2379678507851
Location description: The proposed 15 mile natural gas pipeline will run alongside an existing pipeline /easement in
Alamance and Orange Counties North Carolina Pipeline origin is located at: latitude 36.0452 longitude - 79.365641;
and pipeline terminus is located at: latitude 35 9572 longitude -79.1099. Project is known as Line T -021B Pipeline
Project.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
X Based on preliminary information, there may be wetlands and streams on the above described property. We strongly
suggest you have this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA) jurisdiction. To be
considered final, a jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary determination is not an
appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). If you
wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
Also, you may provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
B. Approved Determination
_ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or
our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
_ There are waters of the U.S. including wetlands on the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ We strongly suggest you have the wetlands on your property delineated. Due to the size of your property and/or our
present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner. For a more timely
delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any delineation must be verified by the Corps.
_ The waters of the U.S. including wetlands on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been
verified by the Corps. We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be
reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to
CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
_ The waters of the U.S. including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on . Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
Page 1 of 2

published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
_ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at (252) 808 -2808 to
determine their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). If you have any questions regarding this
, please contact Cr
determination and/or the Corps regulatory programaig Brown at 919 - 554 -4884 x35 or
Craig J Brown(a,)usace.army.mil.
C. Basis for Determination: There are streams withp in th' d hank f that may be relatively permanent and/or wetlands that may exhibit
D. Remarks: USAGE site visits on May 20 and May 21, 2014.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the
particular site identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation
provisions of the Food Security Act request a 1985.
ertified wetland determination Sfrom Pthe ice of the Natural Resources
pation
in USDA programs, you should
Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B. above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional appeal nder Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed Jyou will find a
determination, you may request an p
Notification of Appeal Process a completed ) act sheet form d request
the following address: rm If ou request to appeal this
determination you must su es
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 1OM15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete,
that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP.
Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by N/A (Prelimina JD .
* *It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence.
Corps Regulatory Official: Craig Brown
Date: June 19, 2014 Expiration Date: N/A (Preliminary JD)

The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at
http: / /re tg �latory usacesurvey.com/.
Copy furnished:
Agent:
Crystal Fox
S &ME, Inc.
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28273
Phone: [phone]

A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section 11 of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the pen-nit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section 11 of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section 11 of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section 11 of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This fonn
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
File Number: SAW-2014-00846 Date: June 19, 2014
Applicant: PSNC Energy
I
Whitney Waldrop
See-Section below
Attached is:
nj
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
A -
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
B
PERMIT DENIAL
C
"I
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
ZI
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section 11 of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the pen-nit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section 11 of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section 11 of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section 11 of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This fonn
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
If you have questions regarding this decision and /or the If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact: also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Attn: Craig Brown CESAD -PDO
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -8801
Phone: [phone] X35 Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations.
Date: I Telephone number:
of appellant or
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: Craig Brown, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington,
North Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele,
Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD -PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -8801
Phone: [phone]

NC©ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
John E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
June 10, 2014
Ms. Crystal Fox
S &ME, Inc
9751 Southern Pine Blvd
Charlotte, NC 28273 -5560
Subject Property: Line T021B: Proposed Pipeline Project, Alamance & Orange Counties
On -Site Determination for Applicability to the Mitigation Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500)
On -Site Determination for Applicability to the Jordan Lake Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0267)
Dear Ms. Fox:
On May 20 and May 21, 2014, at your request and in your attendance, Sue Homewood conducted an on -site
determination to review features located on the subject project for stream determinations with regards to
the above noted state regulations. Craig Brown with the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) was also
present at the site visit.
The Division acknowledges the areas and boundaries identified as jurisdictional wetlands by the USACE. The
attached S &ME provided maps dated May 29, 2014 accurately depict all stream determinations conducted
during the site visit.
Please note that at the time of this letter, all intermittent and perennial stream channels and jurisdictional
wetlands found on the property are subject to the mitigation rules cited above. These regulations are subject
to change in the future.
The owner (or future owners) should notify the Division (and other relevant agencies) of this decision in any
future correspondences concerning this property. This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from
the date of this letter.
Winston -Salem Regional Office
Location: 585 Waughtown St. Winston - Salem, North Carolina 27107
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1- 877 - 623 -6748
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer
N�orthCarolina
Natlmal f

Crystal Fox
T021 B Proposed Pipeline
June 10, 2014
Page 2 of 2
Landowners or affected parties that dispute a determination made by the Division or Delegated Local
Authority that a surface water exists and that it is subject to the buffer rule may request a determination by
the Director. A request for a determination by the Director shall be referred to the Director in writing c/o
Wetlands and Buffers Permitting and Compliance Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1650.
Individuals that dispute a determination by the Division or Delegated Local Authority that "exempts" surface
water from the buffer rule may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that
you receive this letter. Applicants are hereby notified that the 60 -day statutory appeal time does not start
until the affected party (including downstream and adjacent landowners) is notified of this decision. The
Division recommends that the applicant conduct this notification in order to be certain that third party
appeals are made in a timely manner. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to
Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699 -6714. This determination is final and binding unless you ask for a hearing
within 60 days.
This letter only addresses the applicability to the mitigation rules and the buffer rules and does not approve
any activity within Waters of the United States or Waters of the State or their associated buffers. If you have
any additional questions or require additional information please contact me at 336 - 771 -4964 or
sue.homewood @ncdenr.gov.
Sincerely,
Sue Homewood
Winston -Salem Regional Office
Enclosures: USGS Topo Maps
S &ME Aerial /Corridor Maps
cc: Cherri Smith, DWR Raleigh Regional Office (via email)
Craig Brown, USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office (via email)
DWR, Winston -Salem Regional Office

APPENDIX VI
Restoration Plan
Mitigation Acceptance Letters

RESTORATION PLAN
Line T -021 B Pipeline Project
Alamance and Orange Counties, North Carolina
The proposed project has been designed to avoid and minimize jurisdictional impacts
where practicable. As part of mitigation for unavoidable impacts, the following plan
shall be implemented to restore temporarily- affected wetlands and streams. This plan
entails restoration of temporarily- disturbed areas to their original contours and conditions
to the degree practicable upon project completion. No fills or spoils of any kind will be
placed within wetlands or along stream banks. Further, disturbed wetland areas and
streambanks will be permanently stabilized with a native vegetative cover. The measures
outlined below will be specified in the contract documents prepared for construction of
the proposed project.
Proposed restoration activities will include the removal of placed fill material and
restoration of original pre - disturbance contours. Excavated material shall be returned to
the trench to the extent possible, and remaining material relocated and retained on an
upland site. Excavated topsoil will be stockpiled separately, kept viable, and then
replaced uniformly over the area of excavation from which it was removed. The native
seed mix identified in Table 1 below will be utilized within temporarily - disturbed
portions of the ROW comprised of wetlands.
Table 1: Wetland Seed Mix
Species
Common Name
Percentage of Mix
EI mus ri arius
Riverbank wild rye
20
A rostis stolonifera
Creeping bent grass
15
Carex vul inoidea
Fox sedge
12
Panicum vir atum
Switch grass
15
Poa palustris
Fowl bluegrass
15
Dichanthelium clandestinum
Deer tongue
08
Bidens aristosa
Bidens
04
Juncus effusus, NC Ecotype
Soft rush
04
Aster lateriflorus
Calico aster
03
Sa ittaria latifolia
Duck potato
02
Saururus cernuus
Lizards tail
02
100
• Wetland Seed Mix to be applied to all wetland areas extending 10 feet landward following construction.
• Recommended application rate: 20 -25 lbs. per acre.
At temporarily- affected streambanks and within Zone 1 and Zone 2 of the Jordan Lake
Buffer, the native riparian seed mix specified in Table 2 below shall be utilized. Stream
banks will additionally be stabilized with coir matting.

Restoration Plan
Line T -021 B Pipeline Proiect
Table 2: Riparian Seed Mix*
SWE project No. 7235 -14 -013, Ph07
June 2014
Species
Common Name
Percentage of Mix
EI mus vir inicus
Virginia wild rye
15
Panicum vir atum
Switch grass
15
A rostis stolinifera
Creeping bent grass
10
Rudbeckia hirta, NC ecotype
Black-eyed Susan
10
Coreo sis /anceolata
Lance leaf tickseed
10
Panicum clandestinum
Deer tongue
10
Andro 0 on gerardii
Big bluestem
05
Juncus effusus
Soft rush
05
Echinochloa muricata
Awned barnyard grass
05
Schizach rium sco arium
Little bluestem
05
Sor hastrum nutans
Indian grass
05
Tri sacum dact loides
Gamma
05
100
Riparian Seed Mix to be applied to all disturbed streambanks, extending 50 feet landward and within high ground
portions of the buffer. Recommended application rate: 20 -25 lbs. per acre
Substitutions to the species identified in Tables 1 and 2 may be made based on
availability and approval of an S &ME Biologist.
To provide quicker cover, the mixes specified in Tables 1 and 2 should also be
augmented with the appropriate cover /companion species, as identified in Table 3.
Table 3: Cover / Companion Crons
Species
Common
Season
Mix
Notes:
Secale cereale
Cereal or
Early Spring
30 Ibs /acre
Grows 3 -4' tall, but not a strong a
Winter rye
or Fall
com etitor.
Lolium
Perennial rye
Early Fall or
20 -50%
Shorter rye; lasts about 2 years,
erenne
Spring
then dies out.
Urocloa
Brown Top
Spring,
o
20 -50 /o
Good germination; dies off with
ramose
Millet
Summer
frost; does not tolerate mowing.
Additional information related to streambank restoration activities is included on Figures
28 -33 in this PCN.
Restoration Plan Prepared By:
S &ME, Inc.
9711 Southern Pine Blvd.
Charlotte, N.C. 28273
704.523.4726
Contact: Crystal Fox, CE
cfoxksmeinc.com
2

Restoration Plan S &ME project No. 7235 -14 -013, Ph07
Line T -021 B Pipeline Protect June 2014
Local Suppliers of native seed and plant material:
Mellow Marsh Farm
1312 Woody Store Road
Siler City, N.C. 27344
919.742.1200
919.742.1280 fax
www.mellowmarshfarm.com
Natives
550 East Westinghouse Boulevard
Charlotte, N.C. 28273
688.527.1177
688.527.1133
plantsgplantnative.net
3

Mitigation Credit Reservation Confirmation Letter
Statement of Availability
June 23, 2014
NC Division of Water Resources U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Re: Reservation of Compensatory Mitigation Credits
Project: Line T -021B Pipeline - Alamance & Orange Counties, NC
Corps AID #:
DWR Proj #:
This document confirms that PSNC (Applicant) has reserved for purchase 0.12 riparian wetland
mitigation credits from the Cripple Creek Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank.
Restoration Systems (RS) attests to the fact that 0.12 riparian wetland mitigation credits are
currently available for immediate transfer from its Official Bank Credit Ledger to Applicant and
that as of this date RS has placed 0.12 riparian wetland mitigation credits into "no- sale " -
reservation status under the name of the project referenced on this document (Project).
These credits will remain in reservation status until payment in full is received from the Applicant,
resulting in the issuance of a Transfer of Mitigation Responsibility form by RS acknowledging that
the applicant has fully secured credits from the bank and RS has accepted full responsibility for
the mitigation obligation requiring the credits. If RS does not receive payment in full for the
Mitigation Credits within thirty (30) prior to the initiation of Project construction, RS has the right
to terminate this Reservation Letter, in which case RS will have no further obligation to provide
mitigation credits to the Applicant.
PSNC — Compensatory Mitigation — RS — Page I

RS will issue the Transfer Certificate within five (S) days of receipt of the Purchase Price. RS shall
provide to Applicant the Transfer form debiting credits from the Bank Official Credit Ledger
showing the permit number and the resource type secured by the applicant, and will send an a
copy of the Transfer Certificate with an updated Official Credit Ledger to regulatory agencies
showing the proper documentation.
If any questions need to be answered, please contact me at 919 - 334 -9123
Thanks,
Tiffani Bylow
Project Manager
Restoration Systems, LLC
PSNC — Compensatory Mitigation — RS — Page 2

Reference to the Department of Army Corp of Engineers 33 CFR Parts 332 and Environmental
Protection Agency 40 CFR Part 230 Compensatory Mitigation for Losses of Aquatic Resources:
the Final Rule.
• 332.8 Section (R) Use of Credits: the district engineer will determine the number and
type of credits required to compensate for the authorized impacts, the sponsor must
provide the permit applicant with at statement of credit availability. (this is the
Reservation Letter)
• Section (1)(3)lf use of a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program is approved by the district
engineer to provide part or all of the required mitigation for a DA permit, the Permittee
retains the responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation until the
appropriate number and resource type of credits have been secured from the sponsor
and the district engineer has received documentation that confirms that the sponsor
has accepted the responsibility for providing the required compensatory mitigation. This
documentation must consist of a letter or form signed by the sponsor, with the permit
number and a statement indicating the number and resource type of credits that have
been secured from the sponsor. (this is the Transfer Certificate)
• 332.3: (K) Permit Conditions: the compensatory mitigation requirements for a DA
permit, including the amount and type of compensatory mitigation must be clearly
stated in the special conditions of the individual permit or general permit
verification. The special conditions must be enforceable.
PSNC — Compensatory Mitigation — RS — Page 3

Statement of Compliance with Session Law 2009 -337 An Act to Promote
the Use of Compensatory Mitigation Banks and SL 2011 -343.
(link to SL 2009 -337) (link to SL 2011 -343)
Prior to accessing the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) In -Lieu Fee Mitigation
Program, all applicants requesting wetlands, stream and /or riparian buffer mitigation are now
required by law to comply with Session Law 2009 -337 An Act to Promote the Use of
Compensatory Mitigation Banks and Session Law 2011 -343. All requests submitted on or
after June 27, 2011 MUST include this form signed and dated by the permit applicant or an
authorized agent. Please refer to DENR's Implementation Policy for more detailed guidance.
Compliance Statement:
I have read and understand SL- 2009 -337 and SL- 2011 -343 and have, to the best of my
knowledge, complied with their requirements. I understand that participation in the
NCEEP is voluntary and subject to approval by permitting agencies.
Please check all that apply:
❑ Applicant is a Federal or State Government Entity or a unit of local government
meeting the requirements set forth in G.S. 143 - 214.11 (as amended by SL 2011-
343) and is not required to purchase credits from a mitigation bank.
0 There are no listed mitigation banks with the credit type I need located in the
hydrologic unit where this impact will take place (link to DWR list)
❑ Mitigation bank(s) in the hydrologic unit where the impacts will occur have been
contacted and credits are not currently available.
❑ The DWR or the Corps of Engineers did not approve of the use of a mitigation
bank for the required compensatory mitigation for this project.
IIIIIIIII
This is a renewal request and the permit application is under review
credits were not available at the time the application was submitted.
Enter date permit application was submitted for review:
-�Ti17
Note: It is the applicant's responsibility to document any inquiries made to private mitigation
banks regarding credit availability.
I have read and understand EEP's refund policies (attached)
initial here
/- Digitally signed by cfox @smeinc.com
cfox @smeinc.COm DN:cn= cfox @smeinc.com
Date: 2014.06.24 12:46:39 - 04'00'
Signature of Applicant or Agent
1Jun 24, 2014
Date
Line T -021 B Pipeline Project
Project Name
Crystal Fox
Printed Name
Alamance and Orange Counties, NC
Location
Print For

Refund Policy for Fees Paid to EEP's In -Lieu Fee Programs (9/21/2009)
Purpose: The purpose of this policy is to make clear the circumstances and process under which a
permittee can obtain a refund while simultaneously balancing customer service and responsible
business practices. This policy applies to all refund requests made on or after the publication date of
this policy.
1. All refund requests must be made in writing to EEP's In -Lieu Fee Program Coordinator at
kelly.williams(a-_)ncdenr. ov.
2. All refund requests are subject to fund availability. EEP does not guarantee fund availability for
any request.
3. The request must either come from the entity that made the payment or from an authorized agent.
Third parties requesting refunds must provide written authorization from the entity that made the
payment specifying the name and address of the authorized refund recipient.
4. Refund requests related to unintended overpayments, typographical errors or incorrect invoices
should be brought the attention of the In -Lieu Fee Program Coordinator as soon as possible. Such
requests are typically approved without delay.
5. Payments made under EEP's incremental payment procedure are not eligible for refunds.
6. Refund requests made within nine months of payment to EEP will only be considered for requests
associated with projects that have been terminated or modified where the permittee's mitigation
requirements have been reduced. Such requests must be accompanied by written verification from the
permitting agency that the project has been cancelled, the permits have been rescinded or have been
modified, or the mitigation requirements have been reduced.
7. Refund requests made more than nine months from the payment date will only be considered for
permits that were terminated or modified to not require any mitigation. Such requests must be
accompanied by written verification from the permitting agency that the project has been cancelled, the
permits have been rescinded and/or mitigation is no longer required.
8. Refund requests not meeting the criteria specified above are not eligible for a refund.
9. Refund requests that meet the criteria above will be elevated to EEP Senior Management for
review. The following considerations apply to all refund requests:
a. availability of funds after consideration of all existing project and regulatory obligations
b. the date the payment was made
c. the likelihood EEP can use the mitigation procured using the payment to meet other
mitigation requirements
10. Once a refund has been approved, the refund recipient must provide a completed W -9 form to
EEP's In -Lieu fee Program Coordinator within two weeks in order to process the refund though the
State Controller's Office.
11. All decisions shall be final.