20140530 Ver 1_More Info Received_20140624

WT
THE
WOOTEN
COMPANY
ENGINEERING
PLANNING
ARCHITECTURE
�r
June 18, 2014
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Attention: Mr. David Shaeffer
JUN ? 20i4
N.C. Division of Water Quality
Wetlands, Buffers, Stormwater — Compliance and Permitting Unit
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Archdale Building — 9th Floor
Attention: Ms. Karen Higgins
Reference: USACE Ref. #: SAW- 2014 - 001082
Application for Nationwide Permit No. 39
Wake County Board of Education Pine Hollow Middle School —
Leesville Church Road Stream Crossing
Raleigh, North Carolina
TWC Project No. 3153 -D
Dear Mr. Shaeffer and Ms. Higgins:
120 North Boylan Avenue
Raleigh NC 27603 -1423
919.828.0531
fax [phone]
n June 17, 2014 we received correspondence from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
egulatory Field office indicating the following:
In accordance with 2012 Nationwide Permit General Condition 3 1 (b)(4),your
pre - construction notification must include a delineation of wetlands, other special
aquatic sites, and other waters, such as lakes and ponds, and perennial,
intermittent, and ephemeral streams, on the project site. Wetland delineations
must be prepared in accordance with the current methods required by the Corps.
A jurisdictional determination was referenced in the application but no
supporting information was provided with the application (i.e. jurisdictional
determination request form, data forms, stream assessment forms, maps, etc.).
Additionally, the determination referenced in the application was conducted in
2006 and would no longer be valid. Please submit a revised delineation using the
most current methods required by the Corps.
The Wake County Public School System hired Stantec Consulting Services Inc. ( Stantec)
to perform delineation of jurisdictional waters at the subject project. This work was
performed and completed in November 2013. The data forms for jurisdictional features
delineated on the property along with a corresponding map are included with the
correspondence prepared by Stantec and are attached to this letter. This information was
inadvertently excluded from the PCN submission package. We trust that this response

and submission of this missing information adequately satisfies the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers comment.
If we can provide additional information or answer questions you may have, please feel
free to contact us at (919) 828 -0531 or email me directly at
frashg..thewootencompany.com.
Sincerely,
I li C 1 �1�.`L�Z�]I��1►[K�lu 17�►�•1
M0171h
Frederic D. Rash, PE
Project Engineer
FDR/fr
Enclosures:
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., Jurisdictional delineation supporting
documentation
cc: Mr. Tom Harden, Wake County Public School System
Mr. Hal Bowen, Ratio Architects

(3 Stantec
November 21, 2013
File: 175613040
Stantec Consulting Services Inc.
801 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 300
Raleigh NC 27606 -3394
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attention: Mr. William C. Hartley
Director - Facilities Design and Construction
Wake County Public School System
1429 Rock Quarry Road, Suite 116
Raleigh, NC 27610
Dear Mr. Hartley,
Reference: Jurisdictional Waters Delineation Green Elementary School Raleigh, NC
Stantec staff performed a jurisdictional waters delineation on November 19, 2013 on the M -8
Middle School property. The field delineation determined there to be four jurisdictional streams
within the subject property which fall under 401/404 and Neuse Buffer regulations. In addition there
were also two wetland areas delineated which are subject to 401/404 regulations. Attached
please find data forms for the jurisdictional features delineated on the property, and a map
indicating the location of our field stream and wetland flags. In accordance with the Neuse Buffer
rules a fifty foot buffer should be drawn in CAD based on a survey of our stream flags.
Please let me know if you have any questions or need us to do any additional work for this site.
Regards,
STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC.
- 2
Alex Baldwin
Environmental Scientist
Phone: 919 - 865-7583
Fax: 919 - 851 -7024
[e-mail]
Attachment: NCDWQ Stream Form, USACE Wetland Forms, Photos, and Approximate Jurisdictional
Delineation Map
c. Melissa Ruiz
Design with community in mind

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 10/04/2013
Project/Site: M-8
Latitude: 35.909492 N
Evaluator: A. Baldwin and M. Ruiz
County: Wake
Stream Determination (cir
Longitude: 78. 735726 E
Total Points:
3 9 5
Other Stream - S1
Stream is at least intermittent .
Ephemeral Intermittent erennial
e.g. Quad Name: Bayl ea f
if ? 19 or perennial if z 30*
©
2
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= 19 . 5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
,a, Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
Q
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
©
2
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool sequence
0
1
©
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
Q
3
5. Active /relict floodplain
0
1
2Q
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
0.
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
Q
3
8. Headcuts
0
Q
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
Q
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1 0.5
1
1 0
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 11.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
Q
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
1
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
(D
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
Q
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes =(
C. Bioloqy (Subtotal = 8.5
)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
Q
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
Q3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1Q
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
OQ
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
23. Crayfish
OQ
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
1
1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other =Q
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 11/19/2013
ProjectlSite: M-8
Latitude: 35.907155 N
Evaluator: A. Baldwin and M. Ruiz
County: Wake
Longitude: 78. 736270 E
Total Points:
38
Stream Determination (cir
Other Stream - S2
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermittent erennial
e.g. Quad Name: Bayl ea f
if z 19 or perennial if ? 30"
2
Q
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 2 0 . 5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
Q
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool sequence
0
1
©
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3Q
5. Active /relict floodplain
0
1
2
Q
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
©
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
Q
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
(D
1
2
3
9. Grade control
(D
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1 0.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 10
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
Q
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
Q
3
14. Leaf litter
.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
QD
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
2
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes 3
C. Biolow (Subtotal= 7. 5 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
Q
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
Q
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
Q
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
Q
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
Q
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
(D
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 Other
.perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project /Site M -8 Middle School City /County Raleigh/Wake Sampling Date 1'1/19/2013
Applicant /Owner Wake County Public School System State NC Sampling Point WA -up
Investigator(s) Alex Baldwin and Melissa Ruiz Section, Township, Range
Landform (hilislope, terrace, etc ) Floodplam Local Relief (concave, convex, none) none Slope ( %) <2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) Lat 35 907568 N Long 78 736665E Datum NAD 83
Sod Map Unit Name NWI Classification
Are climatic /hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes d (❑io,,explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation, ❑ , Sod ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ignificantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No ❑
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑iaturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OFFINDINGS - Attacn site map snowing sampling point locations, transects, important Teatures, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ❑' Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ' El No ❑' within a wetland? Yes El No El
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No El
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators.
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required, check all that apply)
❑
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑
Water - stained Leaves (69)
❑
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
❑ High.Water Table (A2)
❑
Aquatic Fauna (613)
❑
Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation,(A3)
❑
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
❑
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (Bl)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
❑ sediment 'Deposits (B2)
❑
OxidaeclAhaospheres on Living Roots,(C3)
❑
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (83)
❑
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑
Recent Iron Reduction in Tdled,Sods (C6)
❑
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑
Thin Much Surface (C7)
❑
Shallow Aqwtard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No
(]
Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No
❑'
Depth (inches)
Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No
❑�
Depth (inches)
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No ❑
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recordeclbatai(stream,gauge, monitoring well „aerial photos, previous inspections),, if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Interim Version

VWETATIUN - use scientlrlc names OT plants.
Sampung vomt WA -up
Absolute
Dominant
Indicaior
Dominance +Test Worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30 ft radius )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1
Lrrrodendron tulrprfiera
70
y
FACU _
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 2
(A)
2
Prnus taeada
15
y
FACU
Total Number-of Dominant
3
Prunus serohna
15
y
FACU
Species Across All Strata 6'
(B)
4
Percent of Dominant Species
5
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 33%
(A /B)
6
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
100
= Total Cover
OBL species 20 x 1= 20
Sapling Stratum (Plot size 30 ft radius )
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1
Prunus serotrno
10
y
FACU
FAC species 55 x3= 165
2
LUgwdombor styrac¢lua
10
y
FAC
FACU species 110 x4= 440
3
UPL species 0 x5= 0
4
Column Totals 185 (A) 625
(B)
5
Prevalence Index = B/A = 34
6
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
7
= Total Cover
Shrub Stratum (Plot size 30 ft radius )
❑ Dominance Test is > 50%
1-
Lrgmdambarstyroci luo
10
y
FAC
❑ Prevalence Index is <_ 3'0'
2
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3
4
' Indicators of hydnc sod and wetland hydrology must
5
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
6
Definitions of Vegetation Strata
7
10
= Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size ,30 ft radius )
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
1
PolysUchum acrostichoides
35
FAC
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and tin (7 6
2
Microstegwm vrmmrem
20
OBL
cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
3
_
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
4
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than
5
3 in (7 6 cm) DBH
6
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
7
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 61m) in height
8
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants „including
9
herbaceous vines, regardless of size Includes woody
10
plants, except woody vines, less than,approxirriately 3,ft
11
(1 m) in height
12
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
55
=Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratur (Plot size 30 ft radius
1
None
2
Hydrophytrc
2
2
Vegetation Yes ❑ No ❑r
2
Present?
0
= Total Cover
Remarks (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Interim Version

SOIL
ofile Description- (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture
0 -14 7 SYR 4/4 SCL
14 -16+ 7 SYR 5/6 SL
Sampling Point WA -up
Remarks
'Type C = Concentration, D = depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, CS = Covered or Coated Sand Grains
2Location PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix
Hydric SoWindicators
Indicators for Problematic Hydnc So1Is3
❑
Histosdl'(Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S,T,U)
❑
1 cm Muck,(A%(LRR O)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S,T,U)
❑
2 cm Muck (A10),(LRR,S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl) (LRR O)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑
PiedmonbFloodplain Sods (F19) (LRR P,S,T)
❑
Stratified Layers (AS)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P,T,U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P,T,U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑
Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T,U)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P,T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
❑
Depleted Ochric (Fll) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surfai:OAl2)
❑
Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O,P,T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic,vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie RedOx�(A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑
Umbnc Surface (F13) (LRR P,T,U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (51) (LRR O,S)
❑
Delta Ochnc (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Sods (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A,
153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P,S,T,U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Depth (inches)
Hydnc Sod Present? Yes ❑ No Q
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project /Site M -8 Middle School City /County Raleigh/Wake Sampling Date 11/19/2013
Applicant /Owner Wake County Pubhc +School'System State NC Sampling Point WA -wet
Investigator(s) Alex Baldwin and Melissa, Ruiz Section, Township, Range
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc ) Floodplam Local Relief (concave, convex, none) none Slope ( %) <2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) Lat 35 907568 N Long 78 736665 E Datum NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name NWI Classification
Are climatic /hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Q (❑w, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation Q , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ignificantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Q ❑
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑iaturally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS-- Attach site map snowing sampling point locations, transects, important Teatures, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑' No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric,Sod Present? Yes Q No ❑ within a wetland? Yes El No ❑
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Q No ❑
Remarks The wetland is in a floodplam area that has been timbered at some point in the past, likely > 20 years Also, there is sanitary sewer lme /easement
that bisects the maddle of the wetland Vegetation within the easement is actively managed for access dunng maintenance activities
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators-
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required, check all that apply)
❑
Surface Sod Cracks (136)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑
Water - Stained Leaves (139)
❑'
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
Q High Water Table (A2)
❑
Aquatic Fauna (613)
❑
Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
❑
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (Bl)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑D
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (82)
❑
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
❑
Crayfish Burrows 0)
❑ Drift Deposits (133)
❑
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust'(134)
❑
Recentlron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑O
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (65)
❑
Thin Much Surface (0)
❑
Shallow Agwtard'(D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Q
FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations,
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No
Q
Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes Q No
❑
Depth (inches) 9
Saturation Present? Yes Q No
❑
Depth (inches) 7
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No ❑
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe'Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Interim Version

VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point WA -wet
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot-size 30 ft radius )
% Cover
Speaes7
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1
Liqutdambarstyraafluo
15
y
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 5
(A)
2
Alnus serula_ta
20
y
FACW_
Total Number of Dominant
3
Species Across All Strata 5
(B)
4
Percent of Dominant Species
5
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 100%
(A/B)
6
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
35
= Total Cover
OBL species 100 x 1= 100
Sapling Stratum (Plot size 30 ft radius )
FACW species 37 x2= 74
1
Alnus serulata
15
y
FACW
FAC species 25 x 3 = 75
2
Ligwdamborstyraafluo
10
y
FAC
FACU species 0 x4= 0
3
UPL species 0 x 5,= 0
4
Column Totals 162 (A) 249
(B)
5
Prevalence Index = B /A'= 15
6
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
7
= Total Cover
Shrub Stratum (Plot size 30 ft radius )
Q Dominance Test is > 50%
1
Microstegium wmineum
100
y
OBL
❑✓ Prevalence Index is 15 3 0'
2
luncus`effusus
2
FACW
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3
4
' Indicators of hydric sod and wetland hydrology must
5
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
6
Definitions of Vegetation Strata
7
102
= Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size 30 ft,radius )
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
1
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in (7 6
2
cm),onlarger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
3
_
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding,woody vines,
4
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more,in height and less than
5
3 in (7 6 cm) DBH
6
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
7
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height
B
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, including
9
herbaceous vines, regardless of size Includes woody
10
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft
11
(1 m) in height
12
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
0
= Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratur (Plot size 30 ft radius
1
None
2
Hydrophytic
2
2
Vegetation Yes ❑� No ❑
2
Present?
0
=Total Cover
Remarks (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Interim Version

.T.711
ofile Description- (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture
0 -8 10YR 5/2 60 7 SYR 5/8 40 C M SCL
8 -16+ 2 5Y 4/1 90 7 5YR 5/8 10 C M SCL
Sampling Point WA -wet
Remarks
'Type C = Concentration, D = depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, CS = Covered or Coated Sand Grains
2Location PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix
Hydnc Sod Indicators
Indicators for Problematic Hydnc Sods'•
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S,T,U)
❑
1cm Muck (A9),(LRR O)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S,T,U)
❑
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl) (LRR O)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain,Sods (F39) (LRR P,S,T)
❑
Stratified Layers (AS)
❑'
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P,T,U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1538)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P,T,U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑
Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (AS) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑
Very Shallow Dark Surfacel(TF12) (LRR T,U)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P,T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
❑
Depleted Ochric (Fll) (MLRA 151)
❑
ThicktDark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O,P,T)
;indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (1`13) (LRR P,T,U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy,Mucky Mineral (Sl) (LRR O,S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Sods (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P,S,T,U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type
Depth (inches)
Hydnc
Sod Present? Yes ❑� No ❑
(Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Intenm Version

air � �I. aa: -� �C• R �1 +•!i• !.
/ ljk�.
M'
I
�• r
. c - � •�; ; n'�� �. `'� ,�+' Icy _ �s ;�4
'
p _ ♦Y
er

Photo 3 — Stream S2 facing upstream from data point
6
Photo 4 — Stream S2 facing downstream from data point
r:
r
tia

Photo 5 — Stream S3 facing downstream as it enters project study area
Photo 6 — Stream S4 facing downstream from the pond spillway

Photo 7 — Wetland WA facing northwest from data point WA -wet
JUN 2 4 2014
© N- wR auau7Y