Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20220861 Ver 1_401 Application_20220622Staff Review Form NORTH CAROLINA Ertrlmnmertlrtl Quality Updated September 4, 2020 Staff Review Does this application have all the attachments needed to accept it into the review process?* Yes No ID# * 20220861 Version* 1 Is this project a public transportation project?* Reviewer List:* Select Reviewing Office: * Submittal Type:* Yes No Amy Annino:eads\amannino Asheville Regional Office - (828) 296-4500 401 Application Does this project require a request for payment to be sent?* Yes No How much is owed?* $240.00 $570.00 Project Submittal Form Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk * below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all mandatory questions are answered. Project Type: * For the Record Only (Courtesy Copy) New Project Modification/New Project with Existing ID More Information Response Other Agency Comments Pre -Application Submittal Re-Issuance\Renewal Request Stream or Buffer Appeal Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on: 5/2/2022 Project Contact Information Name: Tyson Kurtz Who is submitting the information? Email Address: tyson@cwenv.com Project Information Project Name: Crabtree Mountain Road Campground Is this a public transportation project? Yes No Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? Yes No Unknown County (ies) Haywood Please upload all files that need to be submited. Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document Crabtree Mtn Campground NWP 3 39 PJD Request 6.22.22 Signed.pdf Only pdf or kmz files are accepted. Describe the attachments or comments: NWP 3 / 39, PJD, and Individual WQC application. Sign and Submit 17.02MB By checking the box and signing box below, I certify that: • I, the project proponent, hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. • I, the project proponent, hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time. • I agree that submission of this online form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act"); • I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act"); • I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND • I intend to electronically sign and submit the online form. Signature: Submittal Date: Is filled in automatically. DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 CLearWaLer An EnviroScience Company C1earWater Environmental Consultants, Inc. www.cwenv.com June 22, 2022 Mr. David Brown US Army Corps of Engineers Mr. Paul Wojoski Asheville Regulatory Field Office NC DWR, 401 Permitting & Buffer Unit 151 Patton Avenue, Room 208 512 N. Salisbury Street, 9th Floor Asheville, North Carolina 28801 Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 RE: Crabtree Mountain Road Campground (+/- 160 Ac) After -the -Fact Nationwide Permit 3 & 39, Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination, and Individual Water Quality Certification Request Haywood County, North Carolina Dear Mr. Brown and Mr. Wojoski, The attached Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) and Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) request is being submitted on behalf of the property owner Matt Bare. The project site is defined by Haywood County parcel 8659-11-3161, located at 2504 Crabtree Mountain Road in Clyde, North Carolina (35.587634,-82.864542). The applicant is seeking an after -the -fact Nationwide Permit 3 and 39, with corresponding Individual Water Quality Certifications, for permanent wetland and stream impacts associated with commercial development of a campground. Please do not hesitate to contact me at 828-698-9800 if you have any questions regarding the attached application and supplemental information. A copy of this application has been sent via email to Ms. Amy Annino, NC Division of Water Resources (Asheville Office); Byron Hamstead, US Fish and Wildlife Service (Asheville Office); and Ms. Andrea Leslie, NC Wildlife Resources Commission. Sincerely, IDocuSigned by: 7yso, Kurz 8BEIDDE05B634F5... Tyson Kurtz Biologist EQ DocuSigned by: . u�r 2,a& OA79F7DC85EE4F7... R. Clement Riddle, P.W.S. Senior Scientist Copy issued: NCDEQ Division of Water Resources Asheville Office — Amy Annino NC Wildlife Resources Commission — Andrea Leslie US Fish and Wildlife Service Asheville Office — Byron Hamstead 145 7t" Avenue West, Suite B Hendersonville, NC 28792 828-698-9800 Tel DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 Preliminary Data Entry Fields for New Actions SAW — - 1. Project Name: Crabtree Mountain Road Campground 2. Work Type: Private ❑ Institutional ❑ Government ❑ Commercial ❑� 3. Project Description / Purpose: After -the -fact NWP 3/39 and PJD request for a +/- 160 acre tract in Clyde proposed for commercial development. 4. Property Owner / Applicant: Matt Bare 5. Agent / Consultant: ClearWater Environmental Consultants, an EnviroScience Company 6. Related Action ID Number(s): n/a 7. Project Location - Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description: The project site is located at 2504 Crabtree Mountain Road in Clyde, North Carolina (35.587634, -82.864542) 8. Project Location -Tax Parcel ID: 8659-11-3161 9. Project Location — County: Haywood 10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town : Clyde 11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody: Thickety Creek (C) 12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code: French Broad / 06010106 Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ❑� Section 10 & 404 Regulatory Action Type: ❑Standard Permit ✓ Nationwide Permit # 3/39 ❑ Regional General Permit # ✓❑ Jurisdictional Determination Request ❑Pre -Application Request Unauthorized Activity 0 Compliance ❑ No Permit Required Revised 20210513 DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 Tyson Kurtz From: Tyson Kurtz Sent: Monday, May 02, 2022 8:42 AM To: Annino, Amy M Subject: 30-day prefile Notice - Crabtree Mountain Road Campground Good morning Amy, I would like to submit a 30-day prefiling notice for the Crabtree Mountain Campground Road project located in Haywood County. Preliminary details on the project are listed below. I may be submitting the Corps permit application prior to the end of the 30-day pre -file clock. If so, I will copy you on the submittal. Contact Name: Matt Bare Contact Email Address: matt.bare20@gmail.com Project Name: Crabtree Mountain Road Campground Project Location: 2504 Crabtree Mountain Road Clyde, NC 29464 Property Owner/Applicant: Matt Bare Owner Address: 674 Fishermans Bend Mount Pleasant, SC 29464 Purpose: Site is proposed to be a campground. Improvement of existing/former dirt logging roads to two-lane paved roads for site access. Improvements to the road require longer stream culverts and grading for stable slopes that result in minor wetland impacts. A Nationwide Permit 39 and an Individual 401 Water Quality Certification will be requested. Thank you, Tyson Kurtz Biologist 145 7th Avenue West, Suite B Hendersonville, NC 28792 Office: 828-698-9800 ext. 302 Mobile: 610-310-8744 tvson()cwenv.com WWW.CWENV.COM WWW.EnviroSciencelnc.COMM OH I TN I VA I WV I NC UR IM Meet our new team in North Carolina! DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 CLea_rW..­ater An EnviroStiance Companye Department of the Army Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers Attn: Scott McLendon, Chief Regulatory Division PQ Box 1890 Wilmington, NC 28402-1890 -and- NC DWR, Webscape Unit Attn: Paul Wojoski 512 North Salisbury Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 I, the current landowner/managing partner of the property identified below, hereby authorize C1earWater Environmental Consultants, Inc. (CEC) to act on my behalf as my agent during the processing of jurisdictional determination requests and permits to impact Wetlands and Water of the US subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. CEC is authorized to provide supplemental information as needed at the request of the USACE or DWR. Additionally, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, US Army Corps of Engineers to enter upon the property herein described for the purposes of conducting onsite investigations and issuing a determination associated with Wetlands and Waters of the US subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. Property Owner of Record: Matt Bare Property Owner Address: 674 Fishermans Bend Mount Pleasant, SC 29464 Phone Number: (843)475-2962 Email address: matt.bare20@gmaii.com Property Location: 2504 Crabtree Mountain Road Clyde, NC 28721 Owner/Managing partner Signature: �4=�o Owner/Managing printed name: Matt Bare Date: 145 7th Avcnuc Wcst, Suite B IlcndersonviIle. NC 28792 Phone: 828-(.)98-98()o www.cwcnv.coni DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 Report For Land Value: BARE, MATTHEW W BARE, CHRISTINA 674 FISHERMANS BND MT PLEASANT, SC 29464-8148 Account Information PIN: 8659-11-3161 Legal Ref: 1030/2483 Add Ref: 1051/1290 CABC/7832 March 31, 2022 1 inch = 1,333 feet DWELLING, DWELLING, DWELLING, DWELL dOEVNHft, DWELLING, DWE Market Value: 2504 CRABTREE MOUNTAIN RD Heated Area: 415 Year Built: 2021 Total Acreage: 159.44 Township: BeaverDam Defered Value: Assessed Value: Sale Price: Sale Date: 5/18/2021 Disclaimer: The maps on this site are not surveys. They are prepared from the inventory of real propertyfound Wthin this ju d sd ict iD n an d a re com pied from recorded deeds, plats and other public records and d ata. Users of t his site are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary information sources should be consulted for verification of any information contained on these maps. Haywood county and the website provider assume no legal LUNG DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 O Nii� Y Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. DWQ project no. Form Version 1.4 January 2009 Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: ❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit 1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 3/39 or General Permit (GP) number: 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑X Yes ❑ No 1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): ❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401 Certification: ❑ Yes ❑X No For the record only for Corps Permit: ❑ Yes ❑X No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program. ❑ Yes ❑X No 1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h below. ❑ Yes ❑X No 1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes ❑X No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Crabtree Mountain Road Campground 2b. County: Haywood 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Clyde 2d. Subdivision name: n/a 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: n/a 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Matt Bare 3b. Deed Book and Page No. 1030/2483 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if applicable): n/a 3d. Street address: 674 Fishermans Bend 3e. City, state, zip: Mount Pleasant, SC 29464 3f. Telephone no.: 843-475-2962 3g. Fax no.: n/a 3h. Email address: matt.bare20@gmail.com Page 1 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ❑X Agent ❑ Other, specify: 4b. Name: 4c. Business name (if applicable): 4d. Street address: 4e. City, state, zip: 4f. Telephone no.: 4g. Fax no.: 4h. Email address: 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: Tyson Kurtz 5b. Business name (if applicable): ClearWater Environmental Consultants — An EnviroScience Company 5c. Street address: 145 7th Avenue W; Suite B 5d. City, state, zip: Hendersonville, NC 28792 5e. Telephone no.: 828-698-9800 ext. 302 5f. Fax no.: n/a 5g. Email address: tyson@cwenv.com Page 2 of 10 DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 8659-11-3161 1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.58763 Longitude:-82.864542 1 c. Property size: 160 acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: Thickety Creek 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C 2c. River basin: French Broad / 06010106 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: The project site is mostly steep, forested slopes with an existing network of single lane dirt roads. Evidence of previous livestock and logging activites are present. Several of the previously developed dirt roads have been improved and construction of campground facilities is underway. Adjacent land use is primarily low density residential, forested land, and sparse comercial properties. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.449 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 7,950 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: To develop the existing single lane dirt roads to one and two-lane paved roads for access to a proposed campround facility on site. 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: See Additional Information following the PCN form. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / project (includingall prior phases)in the past? ❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown Comments: pJD request included in Appendix A 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Name (if known): T. Kurtz, B. Yant, J. Golladay Agency/Consultant Company: Clearwater Env. Consultants Other: 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. A Preliminary Jurisidictional Determination request is included in Appendix A. 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? El Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ❑X No 6b. If yes, explain. Page 3 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): ❑X Wetlands ❑X Streams —tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. Wetland impact number Permanent (P) or Temporary T 2b. Type of impact 2c. Type of wetland 2d. Forested 2e. Type of jurisdiction Corps (404,10) or DWQ (401, other) 2f. Area of impact (acres) W1 P Excavation Headwater Wetland Yes Corps 0.0074 W2 P Fill Headwater Wetland Yes Corps 0.0076 W3 P Excavation Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh No Corps 0.0011 W4 P Fill Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh No Corps 0.0139 W5 P Fill Headwater Wetland No Corps 0.0057 W6 Choose one Choose one Yes/No 2g. Total Wetland Impacts: 0.0358 2h. Comments: 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. Stream impact number Permanent (P) or Temporary (T) 3b. Type of impact 3c. Stream name 3d. Perennial (PER) or intermittent (INT)? 3e. Type of jurisdiction 3f. Average stream width (feet) 3g. Impact length (linear feet) S1 Choose one See table on next page S2 Choose one S3 Choose one S4 Choose one - S5 Choose one S6 Choose one 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 3i. Comments: See extended Stream Impact Table on following page. Page 4 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 Section C.3. Stream Impacts Stream impact number Permanent (P) or Temporary (T) Type of impact Stream name Perennial (PER) or intermittent (INT)? Type of jurisdiction Average stream Width (feet) Impact length (linear feet) Stream impact area (Acres) S1 P Fill SM (UT to Thickety Creek) Per Corps 2.5 31 0.0018 S2 P Culvert SL (UT to Thickety Creek) Per Corps 1.9 19.5 0.0009 S3 P Culvert Replacement SE (UT to Thickety Creek) Per Corps 2.9 127.5 0.0085 S4 P Culvert Replacement SP (UT to Thickety Creek) Per Corps 1.8 30 0.0012 S5 P Culvert SU (UT to Thickety Creek) Per Corps 1.7 86.2 0.0034 S6 P Culvert Replacement SE (UT to Thickety Creek) Per Corps 1.7 28.5 0.0011 S7 P Culvert Replacement SP (UT to Thickety Creek) Per Corps 2.9 7.6 0.0005 S8 P Culvert Replacement SK (UT to Thickety Creek) Per Corps 3.0 33.4 0.0023 Total Temp 0 0 Total Perm 363.7 0.01967 Total 363.7 0.01967 DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below. 4a. Open water impact number Permanent (P) or Temporary T 4b. Name of waterbody (if applicable) 4c. Type of impact 4d. Waterbody type 4e. Area of impact (acres) 01 P Choose one Choose O2 T Choose one Choose 03 Choose one Choose 04 Choose one Choose 4f. Total open water impacts 4g. Comments: 5. Pond or Lake Construction If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below. 5a. Pond ID number 5b. Proposed use or purpose of pond 5c. Wetland Impacts (acres) 5d. Stream Impacts (feet) 5e. Upland (acres) Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated P1 Choose one P2 Choose one 5f. Total: 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other: 6b. Buffer Impact number — Permanent (P) or Temporary T 6c. Reason for impact 6d. Stream name 6e. Buffer mitigation required? 6f. Zone 1 impact (square feet) 6g. Zone 2 impact (square feet B 1 Yes/No B2 Yes/No B3 Yes/No B4 Yes/No B5 Yes/No B6 Yes/No 6h. Total Buffer Impacts: 6i. Comments: Page 5 of 10 DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. See Additional Information following the PCN Form. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. Appropriate erosion and sediment control measures were installed to avoid unintended impacts to waters on site. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ❑ Yes ❑X No 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ❑ Mitigation bank El Payment to in -lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type: Choose one Type: Choose one Type: Choose one Quantity: Quantity: Quantity: 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: Choose one 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h. Comments: 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. Page 6 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes ❑X No buffer mitigation? 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. 6c. 6d. 6e. Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: Page 7 of 10 DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑ Yes ❑X No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. Stormwater Management Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 2% 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ Yes ❑X No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Project is below thresholds requiring a Stormwater Management Plan. 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? n/a 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject? Haywood Co. ❑X Phase II ❑ NSW 3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs ❑ USMP apply (check all that apply): ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been El Yes X❑ No attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review ❑Coastal counties ❑HQW 4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ORW (check all that apply): ❑Session Law 2006-246 ❑Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No attached? 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No Page 8 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ❑ Yes ❑X No use of public (federal/state) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes ❑ No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval ❑ Yes ❑ No letter.) Comments: 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes ❑X No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? 2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application? ❑X Yes ❑ No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): The wetland and stream impacts shown on Figure 5.0-5.9 have already been conducted. The unimproved logging road was in poor condition when construction started; several of the existing culverts were failed and the road was not accessible without a high -clearance 4x4 vehicle. Work to improve the road to allow for safe site access and replacement of failed culverts started in the second half of 2021. 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in El Yes ❑X No additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. The project only involves work inside the project boundary. This project will not result in additional development that could affect downstream water quality. Five of the eight stream impacts are culvert replacements. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. Wastewater from the be treated by campground will on -site septic systems. Page 9 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ❑ Yes ❑X No habitat? 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act 0 Yes ❑ No impacts? 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? See Additional Information following the PCN form. 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes 0 No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? NOAA's Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) Mapper. Accessed April 7, 2022 at https://www.habitat.noaa.gov/apps/efhmapper/. 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes 0 No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? See Additional Information following the PCN form. 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ❑ Yes 0 No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA's National Flood Hazard Layer Viewer; FIRM Panel: FIRM Panel 3700863800J, 3700865900J, and 3700865800J (eff. 4/3/12 - Not Printed). See Figure 6. DocuSigned by: Tyson Kurtz 'i so, Kos Y SRF1nnF05R634F5 6/22/2022 Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Date Applicant/Agent's Signature (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided. Page 10 of 10 DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 PCN Form Additional Information Section B.3e Project Description - Details The project site is proposed for development of a campground that will be open to the public, year-round. The campground will have 27 campsites with a mix of cabins and yurts. Each campsite will have a dedicated parking space and be served by on -site drinking wells and septic systems. Approximately 7,138 linear feet of 20-feet-wide two-lane roads and 400 linear feet of 10- foot-wide single -lane roads will be constructed. The alignment of these roads follows, to the maximum extent practicable, the alignment of the previously constructed single -lane dirt roads. The previously constructed single -lane dirt roads on site appear to be old logging roads or access roads to a homesite. The dirt roads required high ground clearance 4x4 vehicles to gain access to the stie. Many of the culverts along the roads were failing or of improper culvert diameter. To allow for paved, two-lane and single -lane roads, additional cut and fill was required along the road alignment. As such, longer culverts, were installed in the streams to achieve a roadbed that meets current design standards. Portions of several headwater wetlands were filled to provide the improved roadbed. Because the site was nearly inaccessible, construction of the road commenced in the second half of 2021. Improvements to the roads grade and washed-out areas allowed for work on the campground buildings and facilities to begin. An After -the -Fact Nationwide Permit 3 and 39 and associated Individual Water Quality Certification is requested to authorize these impacts. All wetland and stream impacts shown on Figure 5.0-5.9 have been conducted. Typical construction equipment will be used on site including bulldozers, excavators, dump trucks, etc. Section D.la Avoidance and Minimization - Design The project design avoids impacts to 0.414 acres of wetland (92% of wetlands on site) and 7,586 linear feet of stream (95% of stream length and 97% of stream bed acreage on site). The proposed alignment for the roads is almost entirely follows the previously constructed dirt roads. Five of the eight stream impacts were at road crossings with existing culverts in place. The remaining two stream crossing impacts are where the stream flowed directly over the previous dirt road surface, where a previously installed culvert may have been buried and unable to be located during the wetland and stream delineation. Proposed stream crossings are perpendicular to the stream channel, minimizing length of stream impact. Section F.5d Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat — Sources A Threatened and Endangered Species Review and Habitat Assessment report is included in Appendix B. Section F.7b. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources — Sources The three nearest potentially historic sites are approximately 0.7-1.5 miles from the project site. The potentially historic sites listed in order of proximity are Site ID: HW0363: Clark Farm (Status: SO), Site ID: HW0486: Rice House (Status: SO), and Site ID: HW0323: William Best House DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 (Status: SO). Of these three potentially historic sites, Clark Farm is the only one that is likely within the viewshed of the proposed project. Data gathered from NCHPO's HPOWEB 2.0 for General Audience. Accessed April 5, 2022. DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 Waters -Name 1�ate ar in_Code SA NORTH CAROLINA R3 SB NORTH CAROLINA R3 Sc NORTH CAROLINA R3 SD NORTH CAROLINA R3 SE NORTH CAROLINA R3 SF (Int) NORTH CAROLINA R4 SG NORTH CAROLINA R3 SH NORTH CAROLINA R3 SH (Int) NORTH CAROLINA R4 Si NORTH CAROLINA R3 SK NORTH CAROLINA R3 SL NORTH CAROLINA R3 SM NORTH CAROLINA R3 SN NORTH CAROLINA R3 SP NORTH CAROLINA R3 SQ NORTH CAROLINA R3 SR NORTH CAROLINA R3 SS NORTH CAROLINA R3 ST NORTH CAROLINA R3 ST (Int) NORTH CAROLINA R4 SU NORTH CAROLINA R3 SV NORTH CAROLINA R3 WA NORTH CAROLINA PSS WB NORTH CAROLINA PEM WC NORTH CAROLINA PSS WD NORTH CAROLINA PSS WE NORTH CAROLINA PEM WF NORTH CAROLINA PSS WG NORTH CAROLINA PSS WH NORTH CAROLINA PSS WJ NORTH CAROLINA PFO WK NORTH CAROLINA PFO WL NORTH CAROLINA PEM WM NORTH CAROLINA PFO WN NORTH CAROLINA PFO WP NORTH CAROLINA PFO WQ NORTH CAROLINA PFO WR NORTH CAROLINA PFO WS NORTH CAROLINA PFO WT NORTH CAROLINA PFO WU NORTH CAROLINA PFO WV NORTH CAROLINA PFO WX NORTH CAROLINA PEM WY NORTH CAROLINA PFO WZ NORTH CAROLINA PSS WAA NORTH CAROLINA PFO WBB NORTH CAROLINA PFO WCC NORTH CAROLINA PFO WDD NORTH CAROLINA PFO WEE NORTH CAROLINA PFO WFF NORTH CAROLINA PFO WGG NORTH CAROLINA PFO WHH NORTH CAROLINA PFO WJJ NORTH CAROLINA PFO WKK NORTH CAROLINA PEM WLL NORTH CAROLINA PSS WMM NORTH CAROLINA PFO HGM_Code I Meas_Type I Amount I Units I Waters_Type I Latitude I Longitude Linear 476 FOOT DELINEATE 35.59030100-82.85797100 Linear 177 FOOT DELINEATE 35.58802400-82.86072600 Linear 255 FOOT DELINEATE 35.58717200-82.86200800 Linear 368 FOOT DELINEATE 35.58688500-82.86257900 Linear 1379 FOOT DELINEATE 35.58611700-82.86585600 Linear 58 FOOT DELINEATE 35.58480500-82.86538800 Linear 731 FOOT DELINEATE 35.58152500-82.86763000 Linear 289 FOOT DELINEATE 35.58121000-82.86760500 Linear 227 FOOT DELINEATE 35.58145500-82.86835200 Linear 136 FOOT DELINEATE 35.58248600-82.87119700 Linear 1140 FOOT DELINEATE 35.58550100-82.86634000 Linear 300 FOOT DELINEATE 35.58665600-82.86756500 Linear 48 FOOT DELINEATE 35.58600600-82.86762100 Linear 43 FOOT DELINEATE 35.58653200-82.86599200 Linear 980 FOOT DELINEATE 35.58665100-82.86570800 Linear 70 FOOT DELINEATE 35.58748600-82.86556400 Linear 143 FOOT DELINEATE 35.58823300-82.86516400 Linear 794 FOOT DELINEATE 35.58774800-82.86500600 Linear 76 FOOT DELINEATE 35.58804300-82.86494200 Linear 59 FOOT DELINEATE 35.58816900-82.86494800 Linear 156 FOOT DELINEATE 35.58843800-82.86442900 Linear 45 FOOT DELINEATE 35.58659300-82.86580200 Area 0.019 ACRE DELINEATE 35.59167200-82.85914700 Area 0.024 ACRE DELINEATE 35.59153000-82.85914000 Area 0.011 ACRE DELINEATE 35.59158000-82.85882300 Area 0.006 ACRE DELINEATE 35.59150100-82.85857700 Area 0.002 ACRE DELINEATE 35.59122100-82.85840900 Area 0.005 ACRE DELINEATE 35.59084500-82.85808200 Area 0.032 ACRE DELINEATE 35.59047400-82.85806400 Area 0.009 ACRE DELINEATE 35.58838100-82.86050900 Area 0.002 ACRE DELINEATE 35.58771400-82.86185100 Area 0.002 ACRE DELINEATE 35.58739900-82.86188200 Area 0.006 ACRE DELINEATE 35.58807800-82.86247600 Area 0.018 ACRE DELINEATE 35.58728200-82.86239900 Area 0.009 ACRE DELINEATE 35.58730900-82.86254700 Area 0.002 ACRE DELINEATE 35.58663100-82.86271400 Area 0.007 ACRE DELINEATE 35.58639700-82.86276500 Area 0.01 ACRE DELINEATE 35.58627800-82.86295100 Area 0.003 ACRE DELINEATE 35.58606100-82.86307200 Area 0.009 ACRE DELINEATE 35.58645700-82.86344500 Area 0.002 ACRE DELINEATE 35.58633100-82.86328500 Area 0.002 ACRE DELINEATE 35.58515900-82.86536000 Area 0.021 ACRE DELINEATE 35.58536100-82.86571500 Area 0.05 ACRE DELINEATE 35.58613500-82.86567500 Area 0.002 ACRE DELINEATE 35.58279300-82.86803100 Area 0.002 ACRE DELINEATE 35.58200100-82.86761700 Area 0.011 ACRE DELINEATE 35.58137500-82.86793300 Area 0.024 ACRE DELINEATE 35.58155100-82.86873400 Area 0.004 ACRE DELINEATE 35.58578600-82.86697400 Area 0.014 ACRE DELINEATE 35.58608900-82.86792700 Area 0.016 ACRE DELINEATE 35.58646200-82.86803700 Area 0.001 ACRE DELINEATE 35.58669700-82.86600200 Area 0.004 ACRE DELINEATE 35.58815500-82.86460200 Area 0.037 ACRE DELINEATE 35.58831000-82.86428700 Area 0.024 ACRE DELINEATE 35.58845000-82.86382400 Area 0.055 ACRE DELINEATE 35.58884800-82.86316600 Area 0.005 ACRE DELINEATE 35.58403500-82.86571400 DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 Crabtree Mountain Campground (+/- 160.4 AC) :ree Parcel Boundary �f ,OPI % Branchesa r �a q Bra<`c U Clyde --- 74 13Co l i na-B_l v_d= (I )I Parcel Boundary 0 0.5 1 2 Miles Drawn by: JMG Date; 06.21.21 CEC Project #1205 Starve, West Canton Phillipsville o Canton 19 Haywood County, [LearWater Vicinity Map North Carolina 145 7th Ave west, suite B Figure 1 Hendersonville, North Carolina 28792 N Bed Gibsonti DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 Crabtree Mountain Campground (+/- 160.4 Acres) f Y.A e 6;: J G 1 Parcel Boundary 0 750 1,500 3,000 5 j �'1w r •' Co.pyri'gh•,Y© 20.13 N.atiora'a•I` gr , ha,c'So iet�c i=cubed Feet �a ` 4, Drawn by PG Date;'04 1.21 ' EC,Projed#1205 • - 1 `• Haywood County, [LearWater USGS Topographic Map 1:24K; Canton Quad North Carolina 145 7th Ave west, Suite B Figure 2 Hendersonville, North Carolina 28792 DocuSign Envelop5Bi 4rabtreeMountanCampground (+/- 160.4 Acres) ".77' Parcel Boundary �o < tE)Eawn j Parcel Boundary 500 1,000 2,000 Feet by: JMG Date; 06.21.21 CEC Project # ', 0( Haywood County, North Carolina pigsi . . . . . . . . . . ,VA� . [LearWater 145 7th Ave West, Suite B ;rsonville, North Carolina 28792 Aerial Imagery Map NCCGIA 2019 Figure 3 DocuSignEnveloprabtreeSBMountain 4Campground (+/- 160.4 Acres) DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 GF' 4\O �v '0 G �y Z �a VICINITY MAP (NOT TO SCALE) IMPACTS TABLE OVERALL PROJECT STREAM IMPACT: ±868 SF (0.020 AC) (t363.78 LF) OVERALL PROJECT WETLANDS IMPACT: f1,557 SF (0.035 AC) PCN EXHIBIT D i _� %✓/� /////// PCN EXHIBIT C PCN EXHIBIT B / ��/^ ^� PCN EXHIBIT A I�I �/ �� ���/ /r LM21-t- x.- CRABTREE MOUNTAIN ROAD MASTER PCN EXHIBIT JUNE 21, 2022 Figure 5.0 1° � p liMIN ``"Illi } I /l, PCN EXHIBIT I I II/ II�\\\\\\ \\\\\\�\\ ���\\\\\\\ \�Ijll I►'I III/I(/t ��� \ \��,� J,✓/, \\\\ 1))Jll/1 lli Ill�lll l / 41: ��\\\�`—� ����\ /ram /,���/ ) ( •� ��1��� PCN EXHIBIT F \ PCN EXHIBIT E PROJECT DATA PIN: ADDRESS: DEED BOOK/PAGE: SITE ACREAGE: IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS: 8659-11-3161 2504 CRABTREE MOUNTAIN ROAD 1482-1483 159.44 ACRES IMPERVIOUS PERVIOUS PRE -DEVELOPMENT: 0.00 ACRES (0%) 159.44 ACRES (100%) POST -DEVELOPMENT: 3.42 ACRES (2%) 156.02 ACRES (98%) PCN EXHIBIT H NORTH CAROLINA FIRM NUMBER C-2849 PCN EXHIBIT G GRAPHIC SCALE Advantage Civil Engineering, PA • 0 250 500 1000 MICHAEL LOVOY, P.E. Know what's below. 34 BIG BEAR TRAIL (828) 545-5393 Call before you dig. 1 inch = 1000 ft. (H) ASHEVILLE, NC 28805 mlovoy@aceasheville.com DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 6.48LF-24" HDPE ® 87.59% ,Py PROPERTY 3610-- 3610 / / I G4 / EXISTING GRADE (TYP) / / / ( / , 3620 — / O FINISHED GRADE (TYP) / �'� N 'f- 9.25LF-24" HDPE ® 60.43% o�y� G2 9ti - - / �a 3600-- 3600 SEE BY-PASS PUMING VICINITY MAP 39.59LF-24" AND DIKE DETAILS FOR (NOT TO SCALE) HDPE ® 10.49% PIPE INSTALLATION (TYP)04 / o CD c� I ro 0 W 0 15 30 60 1 inch = 30 ft. (H) 0 3 6 12 1 inch = 6 ft. (V) a PROPOSED STORMWATER z STRUCTURE (TYP) 0 z - i z y EXISTING 34 LF CULVERT TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED / WITH A 55 LF CULVERT PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT S& 33.4 LF (0.0023 AC) o H C� o PROPOSED EDGE OF n N o ;° PAVEMENT (TYP) 3590— — 3590 P0 L0 00 o n c� o n z o c� I o a r Z � ac~n0z z l / 36p0 C14 44 NLjj 0) r7 Z_ / J N I \ 1 t o M O \ : \ .: / ( / PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT S1 • 3 z_ a N z z 3580 \ 1 LF CL CLv�iF-z 1 C PERMANENT WETLAND \ �� �� o IMPACT W1: 1 074 AC PROPOSED CONTOUR (TYP) 0 S 3570 3570 1 . \ \\\ o \ �\ \ \ \ \ \ lop \ \ \ \ *owwhat'sbeloW. o � \ \ \ \ \ \ Call before you dig. + + LINEG o NORTH CAROLINA FIRM NUMBER C-2849 A 4'00� I" CRABTREE MOUNTAIN ROAD PCN EXHIBIT A ,JUNE 21, 2022 Figure 5.1 )TE: ZOSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL NOT CONTAIN PLASTIC OR NYLON MES GRAPHIC SCALE 0 10 20 40 1 inch = 20 ft. (H) DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 VICINITY MAP (NOT TO SCALE) 3640-- Z-3640 _ -- - PROPOSED 90 LF CULVERT CO / x o PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT z �6615 - S2: 19.5 LF (0.0009 AC) O LINE G-2 __- z EXISTING GRADE (TYP) 3630 3630 — FINISHED GRADE (TYP) G10 16.85LF-24" HDPE ® 69.26% / G9 O / - 8 / ) 0 / o 3620-- 3620 Np O)-H N i 7.72LF-24" HDPE ® 58.93% r 31.89LF-24" HDPE ® 14.08% 3610 / 10.90LF-24" HDPE ® 9.187. 0 15 30 60 1 inch = 30 ft. (H) 0 3 6 12 1 inch = 6 ft. (V) CRABTREE MOUNTAIN ROAD PCN EXHIBIT B JUNE 21, 2022 Figure 5.2 3600-1 f J �/L _1 L0 0 c0 LO O � cfl 0 O o0 0)o -H 0 q— N O) 0)o V) 0+r�Z000 M 3590—�+ (0 O. O > 0� ..0_ O O. 0 0 000� p) '' G8 / 6 or,)Z o CL Q a-> > oho / PROPOSED STORMWATER ILWo �5 G7 IL� / � z z � — — — - STRUCTURE (TYP) 3610 c� / o\ / / / PROPOSED CONTOUR (TYP) 10D PROPOSED EDGE OF �o J ��h / �610 PAVEMENT (TYP) ��o / / / .3600 l' C0 + (O ~ v)z> - - o � o» / G6 g z z 3600 Know what's below. Call before you dig. 0 i � O j r G5 Z NORTH CAROLINA FIRM NUMBER C-2849 ..0 / �,� 00� -H � o �(C) 0 M • • • O 3590 0 15 30 60 GRAPHIC SCALE Advantage Civil Engineering, PA — z z 00+ MICHAEL LOVOY, P.E. 1 inch = 30 ft. (H) 34 BIG BEAR TRAIL (828) 545-5393 ASHEVILLE, NC 28805 mlovoygaceasheville.com DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 3690 3690 / — a SEE BY—PASS PUMPING AND DIKE DETAILS FOR / SUBJECT PIPE INSTALLATION (TYP) � 00 / �— — � � \ — - -- -- __ __ PROPERTY 370Q — P� 39.97LF-18" HDPE ® 15.75% J3 EXISTING 40 LF CULVERT TO �j — — 3680-- 3680 BE REMOVED AND REPLACED \ WITH A 147 LF CULVERT / v — — — — — — — C) EXISTING GRADE (TYP) PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT �'_ / — — — — 3690 Z \ U S3: 127.5 LF (0.0085 AC) v° — `F FINISHED GRADE (TYP) — _- N \ 00 3670-- — 3670 j J2 PROPOSED STORMWATER -- co / /�� f / — STRUCTURE (TYP) VICINITY MAP _ (NOT TO SCALE) c� I "� / - — 04 3660-- — 36600- z o o---------------------------------- 95.18LF-18" HDPE ® 41.15% z v (D > \---------- \ J_ 0 25 50 100 -- / M oo -- N 00 0'j � c0 N0)r,n 11_� /� �� �/ v — 3670---- 1 inch = 50 ft. (H) 3650-- o _ _ 0 5 10 20 W F- 3670 O > > / CLV)F- z z ( / / 1 inch = 10 ft. (V) I \ _ _ 3660 PROPOSED CONTOUR (TYP) / / / / I ----------------- 3640-- / 3640 / / % // o/ --- ------------ 3650 — — 3650 -- / o — — — � 363 3630 / PROPOSED EDGE OF � / PAVEMENT (TYP) �J1\ I J f w v3620— 3620 z rn 04 o o U-) i EXISTING CONTOUR (TYP) v o 00 � o + + / \ 1 \ 3630 o � � � 'Know wnaesbelow. + j ` Call before you dig. o O O Q NORTH CAROLINA FIRM NUMBER C-2849 � ;z LNE J CRABTREE MOUNTAIN ROAD PCN EXHIBIT C NOTE: .J U N E 21, 2022 Figure 5.3 CONTAIN PLASTIC ORE NYLONS MESH. NOT ko 0 0 GRAPHIC SCALE Advantage Civil Engineering, PA 0 10 20 40 MICHAEL LOVOY, P.E. 1 inch = 20 ft. (H) 34 BIG BEAR TRAIL (828) 545-5393 ASHEVILLE, NC 28805 mlovoygaceasheville.com DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 VICINITY MA (NOT TO SCALE) 3740 -3740 P J6.91 LF-15" HDPE ®96.33% � 3730- / -37 61.43LF-15" HDPE O 28.03% N J EXISTING GRADE (TYP) w z d J 3720- / -3720 00 r7 � FINISHED GRADE (TYP) / 00 M J + -- / N I -- 0- J I J f w J v 0- (n Z 00 J 00 3710- -H 7 �-3710 n N M NNr7 H J + r` O n Z D O _ aN�zz - - J J 3700 3700 w " Z cD o c(o J + + r; 0 0 0 0 0 20 40 80 O M ` O _o J O+ O 1 inch = 40 ft. (H)LINE L 0 4 8 16 d (n Z 1 inch = 8 ft. (V) CRABTREE MOUNTAIN ROAD PCN EXHIBIT D NOTE: J U N E 21, 2022 Figure 5.4 EROSIOIN CONTROL MEASURES SHALL NOT �o--��-----------_�__��� - 3740 SEE BY-PASS PUMPING AND DIKE DETAILS FOR / - J L2 - PIPE INSTALLATION (TYP) L3 3735 3730�- EXISTING 47 LF CULVERT TO BE / — REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A PROPOSED STORMWATER 68 LF CULVERT. PERMANENT STREAM STRUCTURE (TYP) o IMPACT S4: 30 LF (0.0012 AC) � - - - ---- - 40 00 37 3710 L1 \ / 31-26 v v 006 i / l I Lo N - / / J • / ( to — PROPOSED CONTOUR (TYP) - - 3� o 22 '� - 3695 - ---- ---- - PROPOSED EDGE OF - / ' / Know what's below. PAVEMENT (TYP) Call before you dig. GRAPHIC SCALE 0 10 20 40 "O!!!� 1 inch = 20 ft. (H) DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 VICINITY MAP (NOT TO SCALE) m 0 0 0 \ 3775 — PROPOSED EDGE OF 0 \ \ PAVEMENT (TYP) � \ � PROPOSED STORMWATER 3>>0 F- STRUCTURE (TYP) I o \ -) \ \ \ N2 \ \ z 0 PROPOSED 81 LF CULVERT PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT 3> 60 S5:86.2 LF (0.0034 AC)CD r M 0 o � SEE BY—PASS PUMPING \ \ AND DIKE DETAILS FOR PIPE INSTALLATION (TYP) \ \\ \ \�--- — \DISO \� 0 \ \ :k-:•:::..... ........ . \ c9 — 3725 0 p ..::....' \ 1 PROPOSED CONTOUR (TYP) o •ti;• �� \ PERMANENT WETLAND cc IMPACT W2: 0.0076 AC 0 3,15\ �\ i \ • 0 20 40 80 _ \ , I 1 1 • 1 1 Know what-s below. 1 inch = 40 ft. (H) I I Cal before you dig. 0 4 8 16 1 inch = 8 ft. (V) CRABTREE MOUNTAIN ROAD PCN EXHIBIT E NOTE: J U N E 21, 2022 Figure 5.5 CONTAIN PLASTIC ORE NYLONS MESH. NOT GRAPHIC SCALE 0 10 20 40 1 inch = 20 ft. (H) U DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 SEE BULLETIN I o" SUBJECT PROPOSED EDGE OF PROPERTY \ PAVEMENT (TYP) cz P \ \ 3820 3820 PROPOSED CONTOUR (TYP) \ \ o \ [PERMANENT WETLANDQPACT W3: 0.0011 AC \ \ \ \ z �� \ 00 A A \ \ ��a EXISTING GRADE (TYP) \ �\ 04 \ c \ \ �y z 381 3810 \ \ \ \ 16.84LF-30" HDPE ® 24.56% 95 PROPOSED STORMWATER AV \ \ VICINITY MAP v STRUCTURE (TYP) v v 03 v v (NOT TO SCALE) 25.78LF-30 HDPE ® 31.77% \ \ \ � 02 FINISHED GRADE (TYP) ->�to 9� \38�0� \ \ \ \ \ �,� 00 3800 3800 \ \� \ 1 1 1 33.22LF-30" o \ \ \ \ \ I HDPE ® 2.94% o 03 o �- oo cD o o \ oo PO \ ~ \ \ \ 379 3790 0 + O Z _ O Q of \ a_ N z 3j o 0 01 N O 0 1 0 r^ O 0 1 0 I 378 w ``� o r 3780 M z o o lam\ ::::: .:.:...............:::::.. w O �\ J -H -.0-00 z v::i:..:::...........:......... . -H uLr)N f\ J O _oori 0+n� �cDrn ri \ / 01 o0n oQ�z 0 0+oo0M / CN o o> �c~n0z z CL o / 0 20 40 so 377 z 3770 of F- o _ a- cnF— Z Z / 0 °° \ / + + 1 inch = 40 ft. (H) 0 o 0 4 8 16 L NE 0 1 inch = 8 ft. (V) CRABTREE MOUNTAIN ROAD PCN EXHIBIT F NOTE: J U N E 21, 2022 EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL NOT Figure 5.6 CONTAIN PLASTIC OR NYLON MESH. 00 EXISTING 24 LF CULVERT TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A 76 LF CULVERT \ I PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT W4: 0.0139 AC \ / A Know what's below. Call before you dig. NORTH CAROLINA FIRM NUMBER C-2849 GRAPHIC SCALE Advantage Civil Engineering, PA 0 10 20 40 MICHAEL LOVOY, P.E. 1 inch = 20 ft. (H) 34 BIG BEAR TRAIL (828) 545-5393 ASHEVILLE, NC 28805 mlovoy@aceasheville.com U DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 SUBJECT / / , / / / PROPOSED PARKING PAD PROPERTY 3570 3570 o EXISTING GRADE (TYP) / / SEE BY—PASS PUMPING AND DIKE DETAILS FOR / / / / \ \� \ — / PIPE INSTALLATION (TYP) FINISHED GRADE (TYP) EXISTING 30 LF CULVERT TO BE `F 38.52LF-24" HDPE ® 1.51% / / REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A 48— � 3560 4 / / LF CULVERT PERMANENT STREAM W5 ��ti O I / / IMPACT S6: 28.5 LF (0.0011 AC) � i / / ul / // / W6 VICINITY MAP to / / PROPOSED STORMWATER / / / (NOT TO SCALE) 3 + `� / STRUCTURE (TYP) 3 3550— - 35500 a z / / / / / / � ��� ✓ / / ^ i 04 3 N �N 3 z / PROPOSED CONTOUR (TYP) / / ■ J / 3: w ur) Po -- z o -- PROPOSED PARKING PAD 00 L J -H 0 o ao W4 / th N a0 � 00 0 / / ( / / 1 0 0 3540— 3 + U-) Z) 3540 0 Q O a_ N z_ o a a > ; PROPOSED EDGE OF (if N 00 z z z_ PAVEMENT (TYP) / / oo 3530 3530 / / / / / / / , / / W3 0 00 0 0 LINE W2 0 20 40 80 / / // / / / /// // J / / / / / // / • Know what's below. 1 inch = 40 ft. (H) 0 4 8 16 "O!!!� 1 inch = 8 ft. (V) CRABTREE MOUNTAIN ROAD PCN EXHIBIT G NOTE: J U N E 21, 2022 EROSION Figure 5.7 CONTAIN PLASTIC ORE NYLONS MESH. NOT GRAPHIC SCALE 0 25 50 100 1 inch = 50 ft. (H) Call before you dig. DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 FINISHED GRADE (TYP) EXISTING GRADE (TYP) 70 26.00LF-30" HDPE ® 2.50% VICINITY MAP (NOT TO SCALE) 356 0)1 --3560 3 27.02LF-36" 3 3 01 HDPE @ 0.93% w " w 3 Z Z_ `r FINISHED GRADE (TYP) -- - J o o �O o EXISTING GRADE (TYP) o 06 LO 3 + 3 + 357 3570 355 o p - 3550� o z 0 Owl +CL N 0_H N Z + a_ N Z — — 0 0 r-. � �I 356 —3560 ENE W5 3 O � � w O N 1 Z � + + 00 J r- O O W — 4 Z J o cfl 0 o ``� o to oLINE W4 to 3+ \`,, 111�Af)�1�,, 0 O �\ 0 a_ N Z O \b� '�ESSlaN. �� rrir c~il Of z ' e�6/21 /22 0 20 40 80 - SEAL t 9938 1 inch = 40 ft. (H) 0 4 8 18 ���111t111111�1ti, 1 inch = 8 ft. (V) CRABTREE MOUNTAIN ROAD PCN EXHIBIT H NOTE: J U N E 21, 2022 Figure 5.8 EROSIOIN CONPLATROL METIC OR ASURES YLON SHALL NOT CONTA CO 80 \ x C) XISTING 21 LF CULVERT TO BE V EPLACED WITH 27 LF CULVERT x Z ERMANENT STREAM IMPACT 7: 7.6 LF (0.0005 AC) I _ _ L SEE BY-PASS PUMPING AND DIKE DETAILS FOR / PIPE INSTALLATION (TYP) / W1000 EXISTING 30 LF CULVERT TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH o o A 25 LF CULVERT o NO NET STREAM IMPACT l � W9 TO ' - 3550 \ \ \ GRAPHIC SCALE 0 25 50 100 1 inch = 50 ft. (H) h-AVLMLN I ( I TF-) Know whars below. Call before you dig. DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 VICINITY MAP (NOT TO SCALE) PROPOSED WETLANDS IMPACT \\ \ \ \ \ (SEE BULLETIN F) \\ O SEE BULLETIN F \\\ CRABTREE MOUNTAIN ROAD PCN EXHIBIT I NOTE: DUNE 21, 2022 EROSION Figure 5.9 CONTAIN PLASTIC ORE NYLONS MESH. NOT Ds PROPOSED CONTOUR (TYP) \ \ \ \ PROPOSED EDGE OF \ \ \\ \ \\ PAVEMENT (TYP) \\ \ \\ \ PERMANENT WETLAND \ \ \ \ \ IMPACT W5: 0.0057 AC \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\ \\ \\ \\\ \ V. \\ ` \ 1 1 1 \ 1 \ 1,0 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 10 20 40 1 inch = 20 ft. (H) DO x [� z 0 O z z • IS Know what's below. Call before you dig. DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 MANAGING THE WATERCOURSE: BYPASS PUMPING kWERVOI. S INKE jq k� '{ — PRWECi "OTL• tKURE TOA4h QHWALL Ptt1 s Apta PIPCS SIEGUREB f ., SUCT*N kKRSE Jy }X r � - TOP OF RACK + — OAPERVIOuSi BIKE AILDRx AREA IROM CM011LIMA DEPARTMENT OF f AMSPORtATFON 9MFe FDR C-aM5f3tUCThdI* Af10 MAINTERANCE h{:TIYITdES CRABTREE MOUNTAIN ROAD PCN DETAILS JUNE 21, 2022 Figure 5.10 WATER LEVEL (FIELD VERIFY SANDBAGS AT ANY OPENINGS PRECAST CONCRETE IMPERVIOUS DIKE (N.T.S.) BYPASS PUMPING NOTES LINER STREAM BED (FROM: BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, AUGUST 2003) CONSTRUCTION: 1. SET UP BYPASS PUMP AND TEMPORARY PIPING. PLACE OUTLET OF TEMPORARY PIPE TO MINIMIZE EROSION AT DISCHARGE SITE OR PROVIDE TEMPORARY ENERGY DISSIPATION MEASURES. FIRMLY ANCHOR PUMP AND PIPING. 2. CONSTRUCT OUTLET PROTECTION IF NEEDED. 3. CONSTRUCT IMPERVIOUS DIKE UPSTREAM OF WORK AREA TO IMPOUND WATER FOR BYPASS PUMP INTAKE. USE A FLOATING INTAKE FOR PUMPS WHERE POSSIBLE. 4. CONSTRUCT AN IMPERVIOUS DIKE DOWNSTREAM, IF NECESSARY, TO ISOLATE WORK AREA. 5. CHECK OPERATION OF PUMP AND PIPING SYSTEM. 6. UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION, REMOVE IMPERVIOUS DIKE, BYPASS PUMP, AND TEMPORARY PIPE. MAINTENANCE: 1. ROUTINELY INSPECT BYPASS PUMP AND TEMPORARY PIPING TO ENSURE PROPER OPERATION. 2. INSPECT IMPERVIOUS DIKE FOR LEAKS AND REPAIR ANY DAMAGE. 3. INSPECT DISCHARGE POINT FOR EROSION. 4. ENSURE FLOW IS ADEQUATELY DIVERTED THROUGH PIPE. a Know what's below. Cali before you dig. NOTE: EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL NOT CONTAIN PLASTIC OR NYLON MESH. DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 Crabtree Mountain Rd Tract (+/- 160 AC) r Project Boundary Flood Zones 500-Year Floodplain 100-Year Floodplain ® Floodway Q i! Project Boundary 0 0.5 1 2 Miles Drawn by: TJK 4.4.22; ES Projec7l205 FEMA Flood Zone Map Hayw ood d Count CLearWater FIRM Panels: 3700863800J, y y AnEnviroScienceCompanyP 3700865900J, 3700865800J North Carolina 145 7th Avenue West, Suite B (eff. 4/3/12 - Not Printed) Hendersonville, NC 28792 Figure 6 DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 Appendix A: Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 urisdictional Determination Reauest US Army Corps of Engineers Mmingtan District This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by assigned counties can be found on-line at: http://www. saw.usace. army.mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator. aspx, by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager. ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY FIELD OFFICES US Army Corps of Engineers 151 Patton Avenue, Room 208 Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006 General Number: (828) 271-7980 Fax Number: (828) 281-8120 RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE US Army Corps of Engineers 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587 General Number: (919) 554-4884 Fax Number: (919) 562-0421 INSTRUCTIONS: WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE US Army Corps of Engineers 2407 West Fifth Street Washington, North Carolina 27889 General Number: (910) 251-4610 Fax Number: (252) 975-1399 WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE US Army Corps of Engineers 69 Darlington Avenue Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 General Number: 910-251-4633 Fax Number: (910) 251-4025 All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G. NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H. NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s) authorized agent to be considered a complete request. NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols. NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work. Version: May 2017 Page 1 DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 Jurisdictional Determination Request A. PARCEL INFORMATION Street Address: 2504 Crabtree Mountain Road City, State: Clyde, North Carolina County: Haywood Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 8659-11-3161 B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION Name: ClearWater Environmental Consultants, an EnviroScience Co Mailing Address: 145 7th Avenue W; Suite B Hendersonville, NC 28792 Telephone Number: 828-698-9800 Electronic Mail Address: tyson@cwenv.com Select one: EI am the current property owner. aI am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant' Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase 1-1 Other, please explain. C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION' Name: See Attached Agent Authorization Mailing Address: See Attached Agent Authorization See Attached Agent Authorization Telephone Number: See Attached Agent Authorization Electronic Mail Address: See Attached Agent Authorization ' Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter. 2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record). Version: May 2017 Page 2 DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 Jurisdictional Determination Request D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4 By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on - site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property. See Attached Agent Authorization Print Name Capacity: ❑ Owner ❑✓ Authorized Agent' Date Signature E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable) I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be designed to avoid all aquatic resources. ❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority. I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting process. ❑✓ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application and the JD is to be used in the permitting process. I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities in a navigable water of the U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of the tide. ❑ A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization. ❑ I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel. ❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land. ❑ Other: For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E. If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a continuation sheet. s Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s). Version: May 2017 Page 3 DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 Jurisdictional Determination Request F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One) ❑✓ I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein. A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property. PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is "preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do not expire. ❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein. An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years (subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05- 02). ❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information to inform my decision. G. ALL REQUESTS Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the review area. ✓❑ Size of Property or Review Area +/- 160 acres. ❑ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site. Version: May 2017 Page 4 DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 Jurisdictional Determination Request H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: Longitude 35.587634 -82.864542 0 A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area. Delineation maps must be no larger than I Ix17 and should contain the following: (Corps signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been reviewed and approved).6 ■ North Arrow ■ Graphical Scale ■ Boundary of Review Area ■ Date ■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary assessment reach. For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations: ■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404 wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features. ■ Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries, impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary, open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear length of each of these features as appropriate. ■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non - jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e. "Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage or linear length of these features as appropriate. For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations: ■ Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404, Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and linear length of these features as appropriate. Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region (at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type) 6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit- Program/Jurisdiction/ Version: May 2017 Page 5 DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 Jurisdictional Determination Request zCompleted appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form • PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the Aquatic Resource Table • AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form' Vicinity Map Aerial Photograph L(] USGS Topographic Map Soil Survey Map DOther Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps) 0 Landscape Photos (if taken) NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets ❑✓ NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms ❑ Other Assessment Forms 7 www.saw.usace.gimy.mil/Portals/59/docs/re ug lator3L/readocs/JD/RGL_08-02 Ann A Prelim JD Form fillable.pdf ' Please see hlW://www.saw.usace.ariny.mil/Missions/Re ug latoiy-Permit-Proaam/Jurisdiction/ Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory authorities referenced above. Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website and on the Headquarters USAGE website. Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued. Version: May 2017 Page 6 DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM BACKGROUND INFORMATION A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: March 31, 2022 B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: See Agent Authorization Form C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: CESAW-RG-A D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: (USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES) State: NC County/parish/borough: Haywood CO. City: Clyde Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat.: 35.587634 Long.:-82.864542 Universal Transverse Mercator: NAD83 Name of nearest waterbody: Thickety Creek E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): ❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date: ❑ Field Determination. Date(s): TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY JURISDICTION. Site number Latitude (decimal degrees) Longitude (decimal degrees) Estimated amount of aquatic resource in review area (acreage and linear feet, if applicable) Type of aquatic resource (i.e., wetland vs. non -wetland waters) Geographic authority to which the aquatic resource "may be" subject (i.e., Section 404 or Section 10/404) See Table 1. on Next Page DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 Table 1. Table of Aquatic Resources in Review Area which "May be" subject to Regulatory Jurisdiction Site Number Latitude (Decimal Degrees) Longitude (Decimal Degrees) Estimated amount of aquatic resources in review area (Acreage and linear feet, if applicable) Type of aquatic resource (i.e., wetland vs. non -wetland waters) Geographic authority to which the aquatic resource "may be" subject (i.e., Section 404 or Section 10/404) SA 35.590301 -82.857971 476 LF non -wetland Section 404 SB 35.588024 -82.860726 177 LF non -wetland Section 404 SC 35.587172 -82.862008 255 LF non -wetland Section 404 SD 35.586885 -82.862579 368 LF non -wetland Section 404 SE 35.586117 -82.865856 1379 LF non -wetland Section 404 SF (Int) 35.584805 -82.865388 58 LF non -wetland Section 404 SG 35.581525 -82.867630 731 LF non -wetland Section 404 SH 35.581210 -82.867605 289 LF non -wetland Section 404 SH (Int) 35.581455 -82.868352 227 LF non -wetland Section 404 Si 35.582486 -82.871197 136 LF non -wetland Section 404 SK 35.585501 -82.866340 1140 LF non -wetland Section 404 SL 35.586656 -82.867565 300 LF non -wetland Section 404 SM 35.586006 -82.867621 48 LF non -wetland Section 404 SN 35.586532 -82.865992 43 LF non -wetland Section 404 SP 35.586651 -82.865708 980 LF non -wetland Section 404 SQ 35.587486 -82.865564 70 LF non -wetland Section 404 SR 35.588233 -82.865164 143 LF non -wetland Section 404 SS 35.587748 -82.865006 794 LF non -wetland Section 404 ST 35.588043 -82.864942 76 LF non -wetland Section 404 ST (Int) 35.588169 -82.864948 59 LF non -wetland Section 404 SU 35.588438 -82.864429 156 LF non -wetland Section 404 SV 35.586593 -82.865802 45 LF non -wetland Section 404 WA 35.591672 -82.859147 0.019 AC wetland Section 404 WB 35.591530 -82.859140 0.024 AC wetland Section 404 WC 35.591580 -82.858823 0.011 AC wetland Section 404 WD 35.591501 -82.858577 0.006 AC wetland Section 404 WE 35.591221 -82.858409 0.002 AC wetland Section 404 WF 35.590845 -82.858082 0.005 AC wetland Section 404 WG 35.590474 -82.858064 0.032 AC wetland Section 404 WH 35.588381 -82.860509 0.009 AC wetland Section 404 WJ 35.587714 -82.861851 0.002 AC wetland Section 404 WK 35.587399 -82.861882 0.002 AC wetland Section 404 WL 35.588078 -82.862476 0.006 AC wetland Section 404 WM 35.587282 -82.862399 0.018 AC wetland Section 404 WN 35.587309 -82.862547 0.009 AC wetland Section 404 WP 35.586631 -82.862714 0.002 AC wetland Section 404 WQ 35.586397 -82.862765 0.007 AC wetland Section 404 WR 35.586278 -82.862951 0.01 AC wetland Section 404 WS 35.586061 -82.863072 0.003 AC wetland Section 404 WT 35.586457 -82.863445 0.009 AC wetland Section 404 WU 35.586331 -82.863285 0.002 AC wetland Section 404 WV 35.585159 -82.865360 0.002 AC wetland Section 404 WX 35.585361 -82.865715 0.021 AC wetland Section 404 WY 35.586135 -82.865675 0.05 AC wetland Section 404 WZ 35.582793 -82.868031 0.002 AC wetland Section 404 WAA 35.582001 -82.867617 0.002 AC wetland Section 404 WBB 35.581375 -82.867933 0.011 AC wetland Section 404 WCC 35.581551 -82.868734 0.024 AC wetland Section 404 WDD 35.585786 -82.866974 0.004 AC wetland Section 404 WEE 35.586089 -82.867927 0.014 AC wetland Section 404 WFF 35.586462 -82.868037 0.016 AC wetland Section 404 WGG 35.586697 -82.866002 0.001 AC wetland Section 404 WHH 35.588155 -82.864602 0.004 AC wetland Section 404 WJJ 35.588310 -82.864287 0.037 AC wetland Section 404 WKK 35.588450 -82.863824 0.024 AC wetland Section 404 WLL 35.588848 -82.863166 0.055 AC wetland Section 404 WMM 35.584035 -82.865714 0.005 AC wetland Section 404 DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate. 2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre - construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information: DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply) Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where indicated for all checked items: ❑■ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor: Map:Vicinity, USGS Topo, Aerial, USDA Soil, Wetland/Stream Delineation, FEMA ❑E Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor. ❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report. ❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale: ❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps: ❑ Corps navigable waters' study: ❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: ❑ USGS NHD data. ❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps. ❑■ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:24,000 Scale Topo Quad: Skyland ❑ Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: ❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: ❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s): ❑■ FEMA/FIRM maps: 3700863800J, 3700865900J, 3700865800J. All eff. 4/3/12 and Not Printed ❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929) ❑■ Photographs: ❑■ Aerial (Name & Date): NCGGIA 2019 or ❑■ Other (Name & Date): Photolog (CEC 7/10, 9/3, 9/10, and 10/13/2021) ❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: 0 Other information (please specify): Property Data IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations. Signature and date of Regulatory staff member completing PJD DocuSigned by: 6/22/2022 8BEIDDE05B634F5... Signature and date of person requesting PJD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is impracticable)' 1 Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an action. DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 Crabtree Mountain Rd (+/- 160 Ac Potentially Jurisdictional Waters of the US Stream Wetland Linear Acres Acres Feet�(streambe--]d Haywood County, North Carolina CLearWaLer An EnviroScience Company(3 145 7th Avenue West, Suite B Hendersonville, NC 28792 Wetland and Stream Map Delineated July 20, September 3 & 10, 2021 Figure 5 DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT: See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a) Project/Site: Crabtree Mountain Campground City/County: Canton / Haywood Sampling Date: 10/14/21 Applicant/Owner: State: NC Sampling Point: DP -UP Investigator(s): B. Yant & J. Golladay Section, Township, Range: Canton Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 20 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR N, MLRA 130E Lat: 35.586166 Long:-82.867863 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: SdD: Saunook loam, basin 15 to 30 percent slopes, stony NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Remarks: Data point location is upland. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks (136) —Surface Water (Al) _True Aquatic Plants (1314) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) _ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) _Saturation (A3) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _Moss Trim Lines (1316) —Water Marks (61) —Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) —Sediment Deposits (132) —Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) —Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin Muck Surface (C7) —Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other (Explain in Remarks) —Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) —Iron Deposits (135) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) —Shallow Aquitard (D3) —Water-Stained Leaves (69) _ Microtopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (1313) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Fails to satisfy criteria for wetland hydrology ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP -UP Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: 1. Quercus montana 30 Yes UPL Number of Dominant Species 2. Acer rubrum 30 Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 3. Betula lenta 25 Yes FACU Total Number of Dominant 4. Species Across All Strata: 13 (B) 5. Percent of Dominant Species 6. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 15.4% (A/B) 7. Prevalence Index worksheet: 85 =Total Cover Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 50% of total cover: 43 20% of total cover: 17 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ) FACW species 0 x 2 = 0 1. Carya tomentosa 15 Yes UPL FAC species 35 x 3 = 105 2. Rosa multiflora 5 Yes FACU FACU species 60 x 4 = 240 3. UPL species 60 x 5 = 300 4. Column Totals: 155 (A) 645 (B) 5. Prevalence Index = B/A = 4.16 6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 7. _ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 8. 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 9. _ 3 - Prevalence Index is !-3.0' 20 =Total Cover _ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ) -Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 1. Packera aurea 5 Yes UPL 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 2. Polystichum acrostichoides 10 Yes FACU present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 3. Sanguinaria canadensis 5 Yes UPL 4. Ageratina altissima 5 Yes FACU Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 5. Parthenocissus quinquefolia 10 Yes FACU more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 6. Rubus 5 Yes FACU height. 7. Myrrhis odorata 5 Yes UPL Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less 8. Toxicodendron radicans 5 Yes FAC than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft 9 (1 m) tall. 10. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless 11. of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 50 =Total Cover Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 50% of total cover: 25 20% of total cover: 10 height. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15 ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Hydrophytic =Total Cover Vegetation 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Present? Yes No X Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Fails to meet criteria for hydrophytic vegetation ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 SOIL Sampling Point: DP -UP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-3 10YR 3/3 100 Loamy/Clayey 3-18 10YR 3/6 100 Loamy/Clayey 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Hydric Soil Indicators: _ Histosol (A1) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) —Black Histic (A3) —Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) —Stratified Layers (A5) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _Thick Dark Surface (Al 2) _Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) —Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) —Sandy Redox (S5) —Stripped Matrix (S6) Dark Surface (S7) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Fails to meet criteria for hydric soils. _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) —Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Redox Depressions (F8) _ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) _ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) —Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) —Red Parent Material (F21) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148) —Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) Other (Explain in Remarks) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT: See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a) Project/Site: Crabtree Mountain Campground City/County: Canton / Haywood Sampling Date: 09/03/21 Applicant/Owner: State: NC Sampling Point: DP-W1 Investigator(s): B. Yant & T. Kurtz Section, Township, Range: Canton Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 10 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR N, MLRA 130E Lat: 35.586079 Long:-82.867908 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: EdE: Edneyville-Chestnut complex, basin, 30 to 50 percent slopes, stony NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Remarks: Data point is located in wetland WA. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks (136) —Surface Water (Al) _True Aquatic Plants (1314) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) X Drainage Patterns (610) X Saturation (A3) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _Moss Trim Lines (1316) —Water Marks (61) —Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) —Sediment Deposits (132) —Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) —Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Drift Deposits (133) X Thin Muck Surface (C7) —Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other (Explain in Remarks) —Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) —Iron Deposits (135) X Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) —Shallow Aquitard (D3) —Water-Stained Leaves (69) _ Microtopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (1313) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 2 Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Wetland WA satisfies criteria for wetland hydrology ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP-W1 Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: 1 Number of Dominant Species 2. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 3. Total Number of Dominant 4. Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) 5. Percent of Dominant Species 6. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.7% (A/B) 7. Prevalence Index worksheet: =Total Cover Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: OBL species 25 x 1 = 25 Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ) FACW species 20 x 2 = 40 1. FAC species 10 x 3 = 30 2. FACU species 40 x 4 = 160 3. UPL species 0 x 5 = 0 4. Column Totals: 95 (A) 255 (B) 5. Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.68 6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 7. _ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 8. X 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 9. X 3 - Prevalence Index is !-3.0' =Total Cover 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ) -Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 1. Mimulus ringens 25 Yes OBL 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 2. Juncus effusus 20 Yes FACW present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 3. Schedonorus arundinaceus 40 Yes FACU 4. Ranunculus 10 No FAC Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 5. more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 6 height. 7. Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less 8. than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft 9 (1 m) tall. 10. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless 11. of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 95 =Total Cover Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 50% of total cover: 48 20% of total cover: 19 height. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15 ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Hydrophytic =Total Cover Vegetation 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Present? Yes X No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 SOIL Sampling Point: DP-W1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-1 10YR 4/2 100 Muck 1-16 N 3/ 92 10YR 4/6 4 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations 10YR 4/6 4 C PL Prominent redox concentrations 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Hydric Soil Indicators: _ Histosol (A1) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) —Black Histic (A3) —Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) —Stratified Layers (A5) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _Thick Dark Surface (Al 2) _Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) —Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) —Sandy Redox (S5) —Stripped Matrix (S6) Dark Surface (S7) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Wetland WA meets criteria for hydric soils. _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) —Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) X Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Redox Depressions (F8) _ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) _ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) —Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) —Red Parent Material (F21) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148) —Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) Other (Explain in Remarks) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT: See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a) Project/Site: Crabtree Mountain Campground City/County: Canton / Haywood Sampling Date: 10/14/21 Applicant/Owner: State: NC Sampling Point: DP-W2 Investigator(s): B. Yant & J. Golladay Section, Township, Range: Canton Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 1 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR N, MLRA 130E Lat: 35.586079 Long:-82.867908 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: SdD: Saunook loam, basin 15 to 30 percent slopes, stony NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Remarks: Data point is located in wetland WEE. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks (136) X Surface Water (Al) _True Aquatic Plants (1314) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) _ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) X Saturation (A3) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _Moss Trim Lines (1316) —Water Marks (61) —Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) —Sediment Deposits (132) —Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) —Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin Muck Surface (C7) —Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other (Explain in Remarks) —Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) —Iron Deposits (135) X Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) —Shallow Aquitard (D3) X Water -Stained Leaves (69) _ Microtopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (1313) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0.5 Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Wetland WEE satisfies criteria for wetland hydrology ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP-W2 Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: 1. Acer rubrum 25 Yes FAC Number of Dominant Species 2. Betula lenta 10 Yes FACU That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A) 3. Total Number of Dominant 4. Species Across All Strata: 9 (B) 5. Percent of Dominant Species 6. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 77.8% (A/B) 7. Prevalence Index worksheet: 35 =Total Cover Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 50% of total cover: 18 20% of total cover: 7 OBL species 25 x 1 = 25 Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ) FACW species 30 x 2 = 60 1. Lindera benzoin 15 Yes FAC FAC species 65 x 3 = 195 2. Acer rubrum 15 Yes FAC FACU species 20 x 4 = 80 3. Sambucus nigra 10 Yes FAC UPL species 0 x 5 = 0 4. Column Totals: 140 (A) 360 (B) 5. Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.57 6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 7. _ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 8. X 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 9. X 3 - Prevalence Index is !-3.0' 40 =Total Cover 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 50% of total cover: 20 20% of total cover: 8 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ) -Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 1. Impatiens capensis 10 Yes FACW 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 2. Pilea pumila 5 No FACW present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 3. Micranthes micranthidifolia 25 Yes OBL 4. Persicaria pensylvanica 10 Yes FACW Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 5. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 5 No FACW more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 6. Laportea canadensis 10 Yes FACU height. 7 Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less 8. than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft 9 (1 m) tall. 10. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless 11. of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 65 =Total Cover Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 50% of total cover: 33 20% of total cover: 13 height. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15 ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Hydrophytic =Total Cover Vegetation 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Present? Yes X No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Wetland WEE meets criteria for hydrophytic vegetation. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 SOIL Sampling Point: DP-W2 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-7 10YR 2/1 100 Mucky Loam/Clay 7-12 10YR 2/1 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M Mucky Loam/Clay Prominent redox concentrations 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Hydric Soil Indicators: _ Histosol (A1) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) —Black Histic (A3) —Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) —Stratified Layers (A5) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _Thick Dark Surface (Al 2) _Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) —Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) —Sandy Redox (S5) —Stripped Matrix (S6) Dark Surface (S7) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Wetland WEE meets criteria for hydric soils. _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) —Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) X Depleted Matrix (F3) X Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Redox Depressions (F8) _ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) _ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) —Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) —Red Parent Material (F21) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148) —Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) Other (Explain in Remarks) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Date: 09/10/2021 Crabtree Mountain Campground Latitude: 35.584790 Evaluator: T. Kurtz County: Haywood Longitude: - 82.865353 Total Points: Stream is at least intermittent if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30* Stream Determination: Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial Other Stream Name: SF 19.5 lIntermittent Absent Weak Moderate Strong 1. Continuity of channel bed and bank* 0 1 2 3 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 T. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple -pool sequence 0 1 2 3 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3 6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5 10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 *artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual A. Geomorphology Subtotal 8.5 12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3 B. Hydrology Subtotal 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 25. Algae 1 0 1 0.5 11 1.5 26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0 0 *perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. C. Biology Subtotal Notes: Stream is intermittent until reaching large headcut. Sketch: DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 Photo 1. Representative first order stream on site. Photo 2. Representative 2nd order stream on site DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 Photo 3. Representative 3' order stream on site. Photo 4. Representative PEM wetland on site. DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 Appendix B: Threatened and Endangered Species Review and Habitat Assessment Report DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 Crabtree Mountain Road Campground Approximately 160 Acres Haywood County, NC Threatened and Endangered Species Review and Habitat Assessment Prepared For: Matthew Bare 674 Fishermans Bend Mt Pleasant SC 29464 Prepared By CLearWaLer An EnviroSCience Company 145 7th Avenue W Suite B Hendersonville, NC 28792 May 27, 2022 DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................2 2.0 METHODOLOGY..................................................................................................2 3.0 HABITAT CLASSIFICATION.................................................................................3 3.1 Montane Rich Cove Forest......................................................................................................... 3 3.2 Montane Oak -Hickory Forest..................................................................................................... 4 3.3 Dry Chestnut Oak Forest............................................................................................................ 5 3.4 Meadow / Herbaceous Edge...................................................................................................... 5 3.5 Headwater Forest Wetland......................................................................................................... 5 3.6 Emergent Wetland....................................................................................................................... 6 3.7 Rock Outcrop................................................................................................................................ 6 3.8 Soils................................................................................................................................................6 4.0 PROTECTED SPECIES........................................................................................6 4.1 Bald Eagle..................................................................................................................................... 7 4.2 Blue Ridge Goldenrod................................................................................................................. 7 4.3 Carolina Northern Flying Squirrel.............................................................................................. 8 4.4 Gray Bat........................................................................................................................................ 8 4.5 Indiana Bat.................................................................................................................................... 9 4.6 Northern Long-eared Bat...........................................................................................................10 4.7 Rock Gnome Lichen...................................................................................................................10 4.8 Small Whorled Pogonia.............................................................................................................11 4.9 Spreading Avens.........................................................................................................................1 1 5.0 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS.......................................................12 List of Tables Table 1: US Fish and Wildlife Service IPaC - Official Species List. Table 2: USDA Soil Units occurring within the project boundary. List of Figures Figure 1: Site Vicinity Map Figure 2: USGS Topographic Map Figure 3: NCCGIA Aerial Imagery Map Figure 4: Habitat Map Figure 5: NRCS Soils Map Appendices Appendix A: US Fish and Wildlife Service IPaC - Official Species List and INC Natural Heritage Program Data Appendix B: Photolog Clearwater Environmental Consultants, an EnviroScience Company Page 1 Project #1205 — Crabtree Mountain Road Campground DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 1.0 INTRODUCTION The following report includes methods used and results for a threatened and endangered species survey and habitat assessment for the proposed approximately 160-acre project known as Crabtree Mountain Road Campground. The study area occupies a mostly forested, mountainous tract located at 2504 Crabtree Mountain Road in Clyde, Haywood County, North Carolina (Figure 1). The site ranges in elevation from 3,064 feet to 4,348 feet above mean sea level (MSL) (Figure 2). The threatened and endangered species survey was conducted to determine the occurrence of or the potential for existence of federally listed threatened and endangered animal and plant species within the study area (Figure 3). Completion of this survey was directed by and complies with three current state and federal regulations: the Federal Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 USC 1531-1543), the North Carolina Endangered Species Act (N.C.G.S. Sect. 113 article 25), and the North Carolina Plant Protection and Conservation Act of 1979 (N.C.G.S. Sect. 19b 106: 202.12-22). 2.0 METHODOLOGY The protected species surveys and habitat assessment was conducted on May 5 and 19, 2022, on the approximately 160-acre project by ClearWater Environmental Consultants, an EnviroScience Company (ClearWater) to determine the potential for occurrences of animal and plant species listed as endangered or threatened by current federal regulations. An official species list was obtained through the US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) Information and Planning and Consultation (IPaC) on March 29, 2022. This species list provides existing data concerning the presence or potential occurrence of threatened or endangered species in the defined project boundary (Appendix A). The FWS lists eight federally threatened and endangered species, in addition to the bald eagle, as occurring or potentially occurring in the project boundary. Table 1. FWS IPaC generated Official Species List for federally protected species listed as potentially occurring within the project boundary. Common Name Scientific Name Status Bald eagle Heliaeetus leucocephalus BGPA' Blue Ridge goldenrod Solidago spithamaea Threatened Carolina northern flying squirrel Glaucomys sabrinus coloratus Endangered Gray bat Myotis grisescens Endangered Indiana bat Myotis sodalis Endangered Northern long-eared bat Myotis septentrionalis Threatened Rock gnome lichen Gymnoderma lineare Endangered Small whorled pogonia Isotria medeoloides Threatened Spreading avens Geum radiatum Endangered Protected by the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. A database search from the NC Natural Heritage Program (NHP) dated March 29, 2022, provided existing data concerning the presence or potential occurrences of federal and state listed species in Haywood County, North Carolina within one mile of the site (Appendix A). Clearwater Environmental Consultants, an EnviroScience Company Page 2 Project #1205 — Crabtree Mountain Road Campground DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 The NHP indicates one medium -accuracy Element Occurrence (EO) of the federally threatened small -whorled pogonia (Isotria medeoloides) that was observed within a one - mile radius from the project site in 2002. The status of this EO is "F" meaning that follow up surveys failed to observe the target species within the EO. No other threatened or endangered species EOs were found in the NHP database as occurring within one mile of the project boundary. During pedestrian field surveys conducted by ClearWater biologists, site habitats were identified and compared with recognized habitats for nine federally protected species potentially occurring on the site. Potential flora were identified to the taxonomic unit level necessary to determine if the observed specimen was a protected species. 3.0 HABITAT CLASSIFICATION During our site visit on May 5 and 19, Tyson Kurtz, Jeff Golladay, and Caleb Green identified seven habitats: montane rich cove forest, montane oak -hickory forest, dry chestnut oak forest, meadow / herbaceous edge, headwater forest wetland, emergent wetland, and rock outcrop (Figure 4). A general overview of the site and descriptions of each habitat type are included below. The rock outcrop habitat is not shown on Figure 4. The numerous rock crops scattered across the site were occupied by the same species of the adjacent habitat type and only the species found exclusively on rock outcrops are listed in Section 3.7 below. The project site covers approximately 160 acres of steep, rocky mountain side. The site is primarily forested except for the top of the site, which appears to be abandoned pasture. Much of the forested areas on site have a very dense understory dominated by non-native and invasive shrubs, vines, and herbaceous plants. The abundance of these non-native and invasive species increases as elevation decreases. There are several old logging roads that cut across the mountain side. Several of these former single lane logging roads have been re -graded and improved to facilitate access to the site for a campground currently under construction. Yurts and cabins are being constructed in the center of the site, primarily along the former logging roads. All project work is below 4,000 ft elevation. Streams on site are unnamed tributaries to Thickety Branch. The central valley on site contains numerous, steep gradient headwater streams that confluence into a relatively large stream dominated by boulders and bedrock. Several additional headwater streams originate along the southern eastern project boundary. All streams on site have steep -pool sequencing due to topography and rocky terrain. The following is a description of each of the habitat types identified on the project site. 3.1 Montane Rich Cove Forest The forested coves on site are primarily south facing and be classified as montane rich cove forests. These coves contain a mixture of early and mid -successional canopy tress with a dense understory containing a high diversity of herbaceous plants known to occupy rich soils. Evidence of past logging activities is present throughout these coves. Clearwater Environmental Consultants, an EnviroScience Company Page 3 Project #1205 — Crabtree Mountain Road Campground DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 The tree stratum is dominated by tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), sweet birch (Betula lenta), black cherry (Prunus serotina), and red maple (Acer rubrum). Additional tree species observed include basswood (Tilia americana), black gum (Nyssa sylvatica), mockernut hickory (Carya tomentosa), white ash (Fraxinus americana), and white oak (Quercus alba). The shrub layer varied from moderately dense near the top of the site to very dense on the middle and lower elevation areas of the site, due to the presence by multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora). Additional shrubs species observed include spicebush (Lindera benzoin), smooth hydrangea (Hydrangea arborescens), sugar maple (Acer saccharum), American beech (Fagus grandifolia), and blackhaw (Viburnum prunifolium). The herbaceous layer of these coves is very dense and diverse. Diversity decreased as elevation decreases due to the abundant cover of non-native species. In general, the dominant species observed in the herbaceous stratum include hairy sweet cicily (Osmorhiza claytonia), cohosh (Actaea spp.), toothwort (Cardamine spp.), false Solomon's seal (Maianthemum racemosum), Solomon's seal (Polygonatum biflorum), Christmas fern (Polystichum acrostichoides), wild geranium (Geranium maculatum), poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), and Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia). Additional herbaceous species observed include bedstraw (Galium spp.), great white trillium (Trillium grandiflorum), wild yam (Dioscorea villosa), chickweed (Stellaria sp.), wild onion (Allium sp.), bear corn (Conopholis americana), woodland sedum (Sedum ternatum), maiden hair fern (Adiantum pedatum), broad beech fern (Phegopteris hexagonoptera), rue anemone (Thalictrum thalictroides), bloodroot (Sanguinaria canadensis), white wood aster (Eurybia divaricata), hog peanut (Amphicarpaea bracteata), robin's plantain (Erigeron pulchella), Jack in the pulpit (Arisaema triphyllum), starry Campion (Silene stellata), sedges (Carex spp.), bellwort (Uvularia sp.), garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolata), richweed (Collinsonia canadensis), may apple (Podophyllum peltatum), spiderwort (Tradescantia sp.), nodding fescue (Festuca subverticillata), New York fern (Thelypteris noveboracensis), agrimony (Agrimonia sp.) ebony spleenwort (Asplenium platyneuron), bluestem goldenrod (Solidago caesia), bee balm (Monarda sp.), lowland bladder fern (Cystopteris protrusa), showy orchis (Galearis spectabilis), roundleaf greenbrier (Smilax rotundifolia), and American jumpseed (Persicaria virginiana). The vine stratum is moderately dense. Vine species observed include muscadine (Vitis rotundifolia), dutchman's pipe (Aristolochia macrophylla), poison ivy, oriental bittersweet (Celastrus orbiculatus), and roundleaf greenbrier. 3.2 Montane Oak -Hickory Forest On slopes and ridges below approximately 3,600 feet elevation, the forest transitions from rich cove to montane oak -hickory forest along the ridges and side slopes. These stands appear to be over basic soils and are generally dry. The understory of this habitat is very dense with the non-native and invasive multiflora rose as well as several other invasive shrubs, vines, and herbaceous plants. The tree stratum is dominated by tulip poplar, sweet birch, black locust (Robinia pseudocacia), red maple, and mockernut hickory. White oak, white pine (Pinus strobus), and cherry (Prunus spp.) were also observed in this habitat. Aside from the dominant multiflora rose, observed shrubs species include flowering dogwood (Cornus florida), mapleleaf viburnum (Viburnum acerifolium), witch hazel (Hamamelis virginiana), and hawthorn (Crataegus sp.). The herbaceous layer is generally dense or sparse where multiflora rose is covering the ground surface. The dominant herbaceous species observed include poison ivy, Christmas fern, Virginia creeper, and Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica). Additional species observed in the herbaceous slayer include rattlesnake root (Nabalus sp.), hog peanut, blackberry (Rubus sp.), cinquefoil (Potentilla sp.), bee balm, bluestem goldenrod, American lopseed (Phryma leptostachya), white avens (Geum canadense), bedstraw, blue-eyed grass (Sisyrinchium sp.), wild lettuce Clearwater Environmental Consultants, an EnviroScience Company Page 4 Project #1205 — Crabtree Mountain Road Campground DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 (Lactuca sp.), leatherflower (Clematis sp.), lyreleaf sage (Salvia lyrata), violet (Viola sp.), and strawberry (Fragaria sp.). The vine stratum is dense and dominated by oriental bittersweet, roundleaf greenbrier, poison ivy, and muscadine. 3.3 Dry Chestnut Oak Forest The dry ridges and side slopes generally above 3600 feet are occupied by chestnut oak forest. This habitat is a gradual transition from the oak -hickory forest below. This habitat has relatively open understory along ridges, with fewer non-native invasive species than the other forest types on site. The canopy is dominated by mature chestnut oak (Quercus montana), sourwood (Oxydendrum arboreum), and northern red oak (Q. rubra). Additional canopy tress observed include white oak, cucumber tree (Magnolia acuminata), black locust, pignut hickory (Carya glabra), sassafras (Sassafras albidum), and red maple. The shrub stratum is relatively sparse and contains multiflora rose and white ash. The herbaceous layer is moderately dense to sparse. Observed herbaceous species include fire pink (Silene virginica), blackberry, poison ivy, stripped wintergreen (Chimaphila maculata), Virginia creeper, rattlesnake root, bellwort, grape fern (Botrychium sp.), woodrush (Luzula spp.), and blue-eyed grass. The vine stratum is relative sparse and contains muscadine and dutchman's pipe. The site also contained a couple sheltered slopes with chestnut oak dominated canopy but with a dense understory of great rhododendron (Rhododendron maximum), flame azalea (R. calendulaceum), mountain laurel (Kalmia latifolia), upland low blueberry (Vaccinium pallidum), and beetleweed (Galax urceolata). 3.4 Meadow / Herbaceous Edge The meadow and herbaceous edge habitat covers the herbaceous areas on and along the old logging roads and grassy bald around the top of the project site. The dominant herbaceous species observed include common cat's ear (Hypochaeris radicata), sweet vernal grass (Anthoxanthum odoratum), longleaf plantain (Plantago lanceolata), perennial ryegrass (Lolium sp.), lyreleaf sage, wild carrot (Daucus carota), red clover (Trifolium pratense), white clover (T. repens), vetch (Vicia sp.), Japanese stiltgrass (Microstegium vimineum), yarrow (Achillea millefolium), oxeye daisy (Leucanthemum vulgare), dandelion (Taraxacum officinale), poison ivy, velvet grass (Holcus lanatus), orchard grass (Dactylis glomerata), thistle (Cirsium sp.), horsenettle (Solanum carolinense), and mullein (Verbascum thapsus). The edges also contained sumac (Rhus sp.), black locust, multiflora rose, blackberry, and various fruit trees of the rose family. 3.5 Headwater Forest Wetland Numerus relatively small headwater forest wetlands are present along and above the headwater streams. These wetlands are forested, contain mostly mineral soils, and are occasional interspersed with wet rock outcrops. These seepy wetlands have less vegetative cover than the surrounding uplands forest. The most common tree species observed in these wetlands is red maple. The sparse shrub stratum is occupied by spicebush and multiflora rose, where present. The herbaceous layer is moderate dense and contains various sedge species (Carex spp.), richweed, buttercup (Ranunculus sp.), golden ragwort (Packera aurea), yellow jewelweed (Impatiens pallida), mountain brook lettuce (Micranthes micranthidifolia), chickweed, lowland bladder fern, mint (Mentha sp.), Clearwater Environmental Consultants, an EnviroScience Company Page 5 Project #1205 — Crabtree Mountain Road Campground DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 spiderwort, jack in the pulpit, and water cress (Nasturtium sp.). Vines are generally absent in these wetlands. 3.6 Emergent Wetland The emergent wetlands occur along the old logging roads and grassy areas near the top of the site. These wetlands have a mixture of mineral and organic soils. Herbaceous species observed in these open wetlands include Allegheny monkey flower (Mimulus ringens), soft rush (Juncus effusus), buttercup, curly doc (Rumex crispus), golden ragwort, smartweed (Persicaria sp.), fox sedge (Carex vulpinoidea), rice cutgrass (Leersia oryzoides), and swamp aster (Symphyotrichum puniceum). 3.7 Rock Outcrop Numerous rock outcrops are present throughout the site, at all elevations. The species described in the habitats above occupy the margins of these rock outcrops, but several species were observed only occurring on rock faces. These species include eastern columbine (Aquilegia canadensis), goldenrod (Solidago sp.), American alumroot (Heurchera americana), and rockcress (Borodinia sp.). Sheep sorrel (Rumex acetosella) and hawkweed (Pilosella sp.) were observed only along exposed rocks at the top of the site. 3.8 Soils Soils mapped by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Haywood County Soil Survey are listed in Table 2 and shown in Figure 5 (NRCS 2021). Table 2. USDA Soil Units occurring within the project boundary. Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name EdD Edneyville-Chestnut complex, basin, 15 to 30 percent slopes, stony EdE Edneyville-Chestnut complex, basin, 30 to 50 percent slopes, stony EdF Edneyville-Chestnut complex, 50 to 95 percent slopes, stony EvD Evard-Cowee complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes EvE Evard-Cowee complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes EwF Evard-Cowee complex, 50 to 95 percent slopes, stony PwF Plott fine sandy loam, 50 to 95 percent slopes, stony RfF Rock outcrop-Ashe-Cleveland complex, 30 to 95 percent slopes SdC Saunook loam, basin, 8 to 15 percent slopes, stony SdD Saunook loam, basin, 15 to 30 percent slopes, stony SeE Saunook loam, basin, 30 to 50 percent slopes, very stony TvE Tuckasegee-Cullasaja complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes, extremely stony 4.0 PROTECTED SPECIES The following is a brief description of each federally listed species included in the survey, its recognized habitat, and comments regarding survey results for that species. Clearwater Environmental Consultants, an EnviroScience Company Page 6 Project #1205 — Crabtree Mountain Road Campground DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 4.1 Bald Eagle Bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) were removed from the endangered species list in August 2007 because their populations recovered sufficiently. Bald and Golden eagles are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Act (Eagle Act) Distinguished by a white head and white tail feathers, bald eagles are powerful, brown birds that may weigh 14 pounds and have a wingspan of 8 feet. Male eagles are smaller, weighing as much as 10 pounds and have a wingspan of 6 feet. Sometimes confused with golden eagles, bald eagles are mostly dark brown until they are four to five years old and acquire their characteristic coloring. Bald eagles live near rivers, lakes, and marshes where they can find fish, their staple food. Bald eagles will also feed on waterfowl, turtles, rabbits, snakes, and other small animals and carrion. Bald eagles require a good food base, perching areas, and nesting sites. Their habitat includes estuaries, large lakes, reservoirs, rivers, and some seacoasts. In winter, the birds congregate near open water in tall trees for spotting prey and night roosts for sheltering. Based on a desktop review using 2019 aerial imagery, no potentially suitable feeding sources for bald eagles were identified within a one -mile radius of the project boundary. Bald eagles typically nest within 1-mile of suitable feeding sources. Additionally, no bald eagle nests were observed within the project boundary. It is the opinion of ClearWater that the proposed project is not likely to disturb nesting bald eagles. 4.2 Blue Ridge Goldenrod Federally listed as a threatened species, Blue Ridge goldenrod (Solidago spithamaea) occupies rock outcrops, ledges, and cliffs at high elevations (generally above 4,600 ft.). The soils upon which this species grows are generally shallow and acidic. Blue Ridge goldenrods usually grow in full sun. Blue Ridge goldenrod is a small perennial herb (4 to 8 inches tall). Its golden -yellow flowers appear from late July to September, and fruits form and ripen from July to October. Although there are many species of goldenrods, this one can be distinguished by its flat-topped flowers, small stature, smooth foliage, and toothed, non -clasping stem leaves. The highest elevation on site is approximately 4,348 feet above mean sea level (MSL), therefore no suitable habitat for Blue Ridge goldenrod exists within the project boundary. The rock outcrops above 4,000 feet are either within the chestnut oak forest — in shade or contain only a few feet of exposed rock on top of the grassy bald. The small patches of exposed rock on the grassy bald did not contain the shallow acidic soils, seepy hydrology, or cliff -like structure required for this species. The adjacent forests are not spruce -fir communities. Additionally, proposed development within the study area is below 4,000 feet above MSL. Clearwater Environmental Consultants, an EnviroScience Company Page 7 Project #1205 — Crabtree Mountain Road Campground DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 It is of the opinion of ClearWater that this project would have no effect on the blue ridge goldenrod. 4.3 Carolina Northern Flying Squirrel There are two species of flying squirrels in the Southern Appalachians — the northern (Glaucomys sabrinus) and southern (Glaucomys volans). Northern flying squirrels are about one-third larger than the very common southern species. Also, northern flying squirrels are brown on their backs, and their fur fades to a buff white on the belly. Southern flying squirrels are grayer on their backs with bright white bellies, and a clearly defined (usually black) line separates the fur colors. The endangered Carolina northern flying squirrel is a subspecies of the northern flying squirrel. Flying squirrels are nocturnal and have large eyes to help them see at night. They cannot actually fly, but glide by extending a fold of skin that stretches from their wrists to their ankles. The flattened tail acts as a rudder. Carolina northern flying squirrels are relicts of the last ice age. As the glaciers retreated northward and temperatures rose, remnant populations remained in the suitable habitat left behind on the high mountain tops along the ridges of the Southern Appalachian Mountains. Northern flying squirrels principally feed on certain fungi and lichens, though they do occasionally eat some fruits and nuts. They're active year-round, but more so in the warmer summer months. They nest in tree cavities in nests made almost exclusively of yellow birch bark, where two to six young are born in early spring. Groups of squirrels often occupy the same tree cavity, particularly in the colder winter months. Northern flying squirrels are typically found in areas where northern hardwoods, such as yellow birch, are adjacent to the higher -elevation red spruce -Fraser fir forest. These habitats are often moist and cool. The site does not support these higher elevation species suitable for northern flying squirrel habitat. No yellow birch or spruce -fir tree communities were observed on site. It is the opinion of Clearwater that the project would have no effect on the Carolina northern flying squirrel. 4.4 Gray Bat The gray bat (Myotis grisescens) is the largest member of its genus in the eastern United States. Its forearm measures 40-46 mm, and it weighs from 7-16 grams. It is easily distinguished from all other bats within its range by its mono -colored fur. All other eastern bats have distinctly bi-or tri-colored fur on their backs. Following molt in July or August, gray bats are dark gray, but they often bleach to chestnut brown or russet between molts (especially apparent in reproductive females during May and June). The wing membrane connects to the foot at the ankle rather than at the base of the first toe, as in other species of Myotis. Gray bats roost in caves year-round. Most winter caves are deep and vertical; all provide Clearwater Environmental Consultants, an EnviroScience Company Page 8 Project #1205 — Crabtree Mountain Road Campground DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 large volume below the lowest entrance and act as cold air traps. A much wider variety of cave types are used during spring and fall transient periods. In summer, maternity colonies prefer caves that act as warm air traps or that provide restricted rooms or domed ceilings that are capable of trapping the combined body heat from thousands of clustered individuals. No naturally occurring suitable habitat (caves) for the gray bat was observed on this site. All rock outcrops evident on site, indicated by LiDAR (light detection and ranging) were inspected and no caves were found. However, tree clearing for the proposed development has already occurred. No additional tree clearing is proposed for this project at this time. It is of the opinion of ClearWater that this project will not affect the gray bat. 4.5 Indiana Bat The Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) is federally listed as an endangered species. It is a medium-sized Myotis closely resembling the little brown bat (Myotis lucifugus) but differing in coloration. Its fur is a dull grayfish chestnut rather than bronze, with the basal portion of the hairs of the back dull lead colored. This bat's underparts are pinkish to cinnamon, and its hind feet smaller and more delicate than in M. lucifugus. The calcar is strongly keeled. This species uses limestone caves for winter hibernation. The preferred caves have a temperature averaging 37 degrees to 43 degrees Fahrenheit in midwinter, and a relative humidity averaging 87 percent. Summer records are rather scarce. A few individuals have been found under bridges and in old buildings, and several maternity colonies have been found under loose bark and in the hollows of trees. Summer foraging by females and juveniles is limited to riparian and floodplain areas. Creeks are apparently not used if riparian trees have been removed. Males forage over floodplain ridges and hillside forests and usually roost in caves. Foraging areas average 11.2 acres per animal in midsummer. This bat has a definite breeding period that usually occurs during the first 10 days of October. Mating takes place at night on the ceilings of large rooms near cave entrances. Limited mating may also occur in the spring before the hibernating colonies disperse. No naturally occurring suitable wintering habitat (large ceilinged caves) for the Indiana bat was observed on this site. All rock outcrops evident on site, indicated by LiDAR were inspected and no caves were found. Rock outcrops and snags on site may serve as unlikely potentially suitable summer habitat for male Indiana bats. Bottomland riparian corridors are not present on site, the typical summer habitat for this species. Tree clearing for the proposed development has already occurred. No additional tree clearing is proposed for this project at this time. It is the opinion of Clearwater that this project is unlikely to adversely effect the Indiana bat. Clearwater Environmental Consultants, an EnviroScience Company Page 9 Project #1205 — Crabtree Mountain Road Campground DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 4.6 Northern Long-eared Bat The northern long-eared bat (NLEB) (Myotis septentrionalis) is a medium-sized bat about 3 to 3.7 inches in length but with a wingspan of 9 to 10 inches. As its name suggests, this bat is distinguished by its long ears, particularly as compared to other bats in its genus, Myotis, which are actually bats noted for their small ears (Myotis means mouse -eared). The NLEB is found across much of the eastern and north central United States and all Canadian provinces from the Atlantic coast west to the southern Northwest Territories and eastern British Columbia. NLEBs spend winter hibernating in caves and mines, called hibernacula. They typically use large caves or mines with large passages and entrances; constant temperatures; and high humidity with no air currents. Summer habitat for the NLEB consists of the cavities, hollows, cracks, or loose bark of live or dead trees typically greater than three inches DBH (diameter at breast height). No naturally occurring suitable wintering habitat for the NLEB exists within the property boundary. Potentially suitable summer habitat for NLEBs was observed on site in the form of a few mature trees along the riparian area. ClearWater biologists did not conduct a bat survey to confirm or deny the presence of protected bat species. ClearWater consulted the FWS's interactive mapper for watersheds (HUC 12) in North Carolina known to contain hibernation or maternity sites for NLEB. The project site is approximately 10 miles from a documented NLEB occupied watershed. Because the project parcel is greater than 0.25 miles from a known hibernaculum and greater than 150 feet from a known maternity roost tree, this project satisfies the 4(d) rule and consultation with US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) is not required. It is of the opinion of ClearWater that the project is not likely to adversely affect the NLEB. 4.7 Rock Gnome Lichen Federally listed as an endangered species, rock gnome lichen (Gymnoderma lineare) occurs on rocks in areas of high humidity either at high elevations (usually vertical cliff faces) or on boulders and large rock outcrops in deep river gorges at lower elevations. Distinguishing characteristics include dense colonies of narrow (.04 inch) straps that are blue -grey on the upper surface and generally shiny -white on the lower surface. Near the base they grade to black (the similar species of Squamulose cladonias are never blackened toward the base). Fruiting bodies are borne at the tips of the straps and are black (similar Cladonia species have brown or red fruiting bodies). Flowering occurs July through September. Suitable habitat for this species was not observed within the project boundary. Numerous rock outcrops exist within the proposed project boundary; however, the highest elevation on site is 4,348 feet above MSL. None of the observed rock outcrops are considered cliff faces or adjacent to gorges. Additionally, Clearwater Environmental Consultants, an EnviroScience Company Page 10 Project #1205 — Crabtree Mountain Road Campground DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 development is only proposed below 4,000 feet. Rock gnome lichen habitat is typically above 5,000 feet. Therefore, it is the opinion of ClearWater that the proposed project would have no effect on the rock gnome lichen. 4.8 Small Whorled Pogonia Small -whorled pogonia (Isotria medeoloides) is federally listed as an endangered species. It occurs on upland sites in mixed - deciduous or mixed-deciduous/coniferous forests that are generally in second or third growth successional stages. Characteristics common to most sites include sparse to moderate ground cover in the species' microhabitat, a relatively open understory canopy, and proximity to features that create long persisting breaks in the forest canopy. Soils at most sites are highly acidic and nutrient poor, with moderately high soil moisture values. Light availability could be a limiting factor for this species. The stem is smooth, hollow pale green and 3.7-9.8 inches tall with a single whorl of 5 to 6 light green elliptical leaves 3 inches long and 1.6 inches wide. A flower is borne at the top of the stem. It is distinguished from the similar Isotria verticillata by the latter's purplish stem and long, dark sepals. Suitable habitat for the small whorled pogonia was not found on site. The forested areas have a dense understory and are generally crowded with invasive shrubs and vines. Invasive species were observed most prevalent along the forest edges and logging roads below 3600 feet, where pogonia would be expected. Furthermore, vegetative communities across the site indicate rich soil conditions, whereas small whorled pogonia habitat is very acidic. Additionally, no Isotria sp. individuals were observed during the pedestrian survey. It is the opinion of ClearWater that this project would have no effect on small whorled pogonia. 4.9 Spreading Avens Spreading avens (Geum radiatum) is a tall perennial herb growing 8 - 20 inches (in) (20.3 — 50.8 centimeters; cm) tall. Its distinctive bright yellow flowers, which are generally up to 1 in (2.5 cm) across) appear from June through September, and fruits form and ripen from August through October. This species grows in full sun on the shallow acidic soils of high -elevation cliffs (above 4,200 feet (1,280 meters)), rocky outcrops, steep slopes, and on gravelly talus. It is known to occur only on high mountain peaks in western North Carolina and eastern Tennessee. Clearwater Environmental Consultants, an EnviroScience Company Page 11 Project #1205 — Crabtree Mountain Road Campground DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 Being confined to small areas on a few rocky mountain summits, this species is extremely vulnerable to such seemingly minor threats as trampling by hikers, climbers, and sightseers, as well as to more pervasive threats such as acid precipitation, and other forms of air pollution. An exotic insect, the balsam woolly adelgid, contributes to the decline of the fir forests adjacent to the cliffs where Spreading avens grows. Although Spreading avens does not grow beneath dense forest, the death of the adjacent forests results in drier and hotter conditions, as well as increased soil erosion. All these factors threaten the last remaining Spreading avens populations. No suitable habitat for spreading avens was found on site. The rock outcrops above 4,000 feet are either within the chestnut oak forest — in shade or contain only a few feet of exposed rock on top of the grassy bald. The small patches of exposed rock on the grassy bald did not contain the shallow acidic soils, seepy hydrology, or cliff -like structure required for this species. The adjacent forests are not spruce -fir communities. The soil units documented in the USFWS recovery plan where this species is known to occur (haplumbrepts, udorthents, and entisols) are not within the project boundary (Figure 5). The Geum species on site was identified as Geum canadense (a widespread and common avens species) and was found in dense shade, below 4,000 feet. Additionally, proposed development within the study area is below 4,000 feet above MSL. It is the opinion of ClearWater that this project would not have any effect on spreading avens. 5.0 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS During completion of threatened and endangered species habitat assessments for the Crabtree Mountain Road Campground site, ClearWater observed potentially suitable summer habitat for NLEB. However, based on the project's location the project satisfies the 4(d) rule and consultation with US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) is not required. Unlikely but potentially suitable summer habitat for the Indiana bat was also observed on site. However, additional tree clearing on site is not proposed at this time. Therefore, the project is not likely to adversely affect the Indiana bat. It is of the opinion of ClearWater that the development of the Crabtree Mountain Campground is not likely to adversely affect federally protected species listed as potentially occurring within the project boundary. Potential flora were identified to the taxonomic unit level necessary to determine if the observed specimen was a protected species. Because of the transitory nature of some of the listed threatened and endangered species and the particular flower/fruiting periods of some plants; it is possible that endangered species populations and locations may change over time. Therefore, any potential findings at a later date should be fully investigated and coordinated with appropriate agencies to prevent potential adverse impacts. Clearwater Environmental Consultants, an EnviroScience Company Page 12 Project #1205 — Crabtree Mountain Road Campground DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 6.0 REFERENCES Fryer, Janet. 2019. Isotria medeoloides, small whorled pogonia and Isotria verticillata, large whorled pogonia. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). https://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/plants/forb/isospp/all.pdf. Accessed March 2022. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP). 2022. Element Occurrence Database. https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/; Accessed March 2022 North Carolina State University (NCSU). 2021. Spreading avens. Rare Plants of NC — NCSU Herbarium. https://projects.ncsu.edu/cals/plantbiology/ncsc/rare/images/Geum radiatum NH P.pdf. Accessed April 2022. NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service). 2021. Web Soil Survey for Haywood County. https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/WebSoilSurvey.aspx; Accessed June 2021. NCWRC (North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission). 2007. Carolina Northern Flying Squirrel: North Carolina Wildlife Profiles. https://www. ncwiIdlife.org/Portals/O/Learning/documents/Profiles/NFsguirrel.pdf Accessed March 2022. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1987. Blue Ridge Goldenrod Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Atlanta, Georgia. 30 pp. USFWS. 1992. Small Whorled Pogonia (Isotria medeoloides) Recovery Plan, First Revision. Newton Corner, Massachusetts. 75 pp. USFWS. 1993. Spreading Avens Recovery Plan. Atlanta, Georgia. 32 pp. USFWS. 1997. Recovery Plan for Rock Gnome Lichen (Gymnoderma lineare) (Evans) Yoshimura and Sharp. Atlanta, GA. 30 pp. USFWS. 2017. Digest of Federal Resource Laws of Interest to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service: Bald Eagle Protection Act of 1940. https://www.fws.gov/laws/lawsdigest/baldeql.html. Accessed March 2022. USFWS Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office. 2018. Optimal Survey Windows for North Carolina's Federally Threatened, Endangered, and At Risk Plants. https://connect.ncdot.gov/resources/Environmental/EAU/BSG/Documents/Table %20PIant%20Survey%20Windows%20Threatened%20Endangered%20Species %2020190524.pdf. Accessed March 2022. USFWS. 2022. Critical Habitat Interactive Mapper. https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.htmI?url=https://services.arcgis.co m/QVENGdaPbd4LUkLV/ArcGIS/rest/services/USFWS Critical Habitat/Feature Server&source=sd. Accessed March 2022. USFWS. 2022. Gray Bat. Environmental Conservation Online System. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6329; Accessed March 2022. USWFS. 2022. Northern Long-eared Bat Occupied 12 Digit HUC Interactive Mapper. https://fws.maps.arcgis.com/apps/mapviewer/index.htmI?webmap=18378e31684 a4dOc896611 a df14d935; Accessed March 2022. USFWS. 2022. Rock Gnome Lichen. Environmental Conservation Online System. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3933; Accessed March 2022. USFWS Information, Planning, and Consultation System. 2022. https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/; Accessed March 2022. Clearwater Environmental Consultants, an EnviroScience Company Page 13 Project #1205 — Crabtree Mountain Road Campground DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 Figures DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 Crabtree Mountain Campground (+/- 160.4 AC) :ree Parcel Boundary �f ,OPI % Branchesa r �a q Bra<`c U Clyde --- 74 13Co l i na-B_l v_d= (I )I Parcel Boundary 0 0.5 1 2 Miles Drawn by: JMG Date; 06.21.21 CEC Project #1205 Starve, West Canton Phillipsville o Canton 19 Haywood County, [LearWater Vicinity Map North Carolina 145 7th Ave west, suite B Figure 1 Hendersonville, North Carolina 28792 N Bed Gibsonti DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 Crabtree Mountain Campground (+/- 160.4 Acres) f Y.A e 6;: J G 1 Parcel Boundary 0 750 1,500 3,000 5 j �'1w r •' Co.pyri'gh•,Y© 20.13 N.atiora'a•I` gr , ha,c'So iet�c i=cubed Feet �a ` 4, Drawn by PG Date;'04 1.21 ' EC,Projed#1205 • - 1 `• Haywood County, [LearWater USGS Topographic Map 1:24K; Canton Quad North Carolina 145 7th Ave west, Suite B Figure 2 Hendersonville, North Carolina 28792 DocuSign Envelop5Bi 4rabtreeMountanCampground (+/- 160.4 Acres) ".77' Parcel Boundary �o < tE)Eawn j Parcel Boundary 500 1,000 2,000 Feet by: JMG Date; 06.21.21 CEC Project # ', 0( Haywood County, North Carolina pigsi . . . . . . . . . . ,VA� . [LearWater 145 7th Ave West, Suite B ;rsonville, North Carolina 28792 Aerial Imagery Map NCCGIA 2019 Figure 3 DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 DocuSignEnveloprabtree5BMountain 4Campground (+/- 160.4 Acres) DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 Appendix A: US Fish and Wildlife Service IPaC - Official Species List and NC Natural Heritage Program Data DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Asheville Ecological Services Field Office 160 Zillicoa Street Asheville, NC 28801-1082 Phone: (828) 258-3939 Fax: (828) 258-5330 http://www.fws.gov/nc-es/es/couniyfr.html In Reply Refer To: Project Code: 2022-0025552 Project Name: Crabtree Mountain March 29, 2022 Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project location or may be affected by your proposed project To Whom It May Concern: The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list. The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or designated critical habitat. A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2) DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 03/29/2022 (c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12. If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7 consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered Species Consultation Handbook" at: http://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to protect native birds from project -related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional, resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more information regarding these Acts see https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations.php. The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan (when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize the production of project -related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and their resources to the project -related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and recommended conservation measures see https://www.fws.gov/birds/bird-enthusiasts/threats-to- birds.php. In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations/ executive-orders/e0-13186.php. We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit to our office. DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 03/29/2022 Attachment(s): ■ Official Species List • Migratory Birds ■ Wetlands DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 03/29/2022 Official Species List This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed action". This species list is provided by: Asheville Ecological Services Field Office 160 Zillicoa Street Asheville, NC 28801-1082 (828) 258-3939 DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 03/29/2022 I Project Summary Project Code: 2022-0025552 Event Code: None Project Name: Crabtree Mountain Project Type: Commercial Development Project Description: Project site has been developed into a campground Project Location: Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:// www.google.com/maps/(a)35.58848185,-82.86378947849393,14z vcv ! 4 a. f Counties: Haywood County, North Carolina DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 03/29/2022 3 Endangered Species Act Species There is a total of 9 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list. Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species list because a project could affect downstream species. IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA Fisheries1, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the Department of Commerce. See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office if you have questions. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce. Mammals NAME STATUS Carolina Northern Flying Squirrel Glaucomys sabrinus coloratus Endangered No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2657 Gray Bat Myotis grisescens Endangered No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6329 Indiana Bat Myotis sodalis Endangered There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available. Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5949 Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis Threatened No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045 Insects NAME STATUS Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Candidate No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743 DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 03/29/2022 4 Flowering Plants NAME STATUS Blue Ridge Goldenrod Solidago spithamaea Threatened No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5821 Small Whorled Pogonia Isotria medeoloides Threatened Population: No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1890 Spreading Avens Geum radiatum Endangered No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6854 Lichens NAME STATUS Rock Gnome Lichen Gymnoderma lineare Endangered No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3933 Critical habitats THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S JURISDICTION. DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 03/29/2022 Migratory Birds Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act! and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act2. Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below. 1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918. 2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940. 3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a) The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be found below. For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your project area. BREEDING NAME SEASON Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention Aug 31 because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities. htWs:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626 Golden -winged Warbler Vermivora chrysoptera Breeds May 1 This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Jul 20 and Alaska. htWs:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8745 DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 ME+•O ff IVC aILPAi TMIENT OF a■■■iw NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES ■ ■■■ March 29. 2022 ClearWater Environmental Consultants, Inc. ClearWater Environmental Consultants, Inc. 145 7th Avenue West Hendersonville, INC 28792 RE: Crabtree Mtn Glamping; 1205 Dear ClearWater Environmental Consultants, Inc.: Roy Cooper, Governor 1). Reid Wilson, Secretary Misty Buchanan Deputy Director, Natural Heritage Program N CN H D E-17540 The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above. A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. These results are presented in the attached 'Documented Occurrences' tables and map. The attached 'Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report. If a Federally -listed species is documented within the project area or indicated within a one -mile radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here: https://www.fws.gov/offices/Di rectory_/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37. Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission. Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or an occurrence of a Federally -listed species is documented near the project area. If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance, please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod ney.butler(a)ncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603. Sincerely, NC Natural Heritage Program DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES 1:1 W. JONES STREET, RALEIGI 4_ MC 27603 - 1651 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEiGH. NC 27699 OFC 915707.9120 • FA 919.707.4121 DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Intersecting the Project Area Crabtree Mtn Glamping Project No. 1205 March 29, 2022 NCNHDE-17540 No Element Occurrences are Documented within the Project Area There are no documented element occurrences (of medium to very high accuracy) that intersect with the project area. Please note, however, that although the NCNHP database does not show records for rare species within the project area, it does not necessarily mean that they are not present; it may simply mean that the area has not been surveyed. The use of Natural Heritage Program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys if needed, particularly if the project area contains suitable habitat for rare species. If rare species are found, the NCNHP would appreciate receiving this information so that we may update our database. No Natural Areas are Documented within the Project Area Managed Areas Documented Within Project Area Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type Town of Canton Open Space Town of Canton Local Government NC Land and Water Fund Conservation Agreement NC DNCR, INC Land and Water Fund State Southern Appalachian Highlands Conservancy Southern Appalachian Highlands Private Easement Conservancy Canton Watershed/The Glades Registered Heritage Town of Canton Local Government Area NOTE: If the proposed project intersects with a conservation/managed area, please contact the landowner directly for additional information. If the project intersects with a Dedicated Nature Preserve (DNP), Registered Natural Heritage Area (RHA), or Federally -listed species, NCNHP staff may provide additional correspondence regarding the project. Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httos://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/help. Data query generated on March 29, 2022; source: NCNHP, Q4, January 2022. Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database. Page 2 of 5 DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area Crabtree Mtn Glamping Project No. 1205 March 29, 2022 NCNHDE-17540 Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area Taxonomic EO ID Scientific NameA Common Name WW' Last Element Accuracy Federal State Global State Group Observation Occurrence Status Status Rank Rank IN� Date Rank �` Bird 38320 Vermivora chrysoptera Golden -winged 2016-06-01 E 2-High --- Special G4 S2S3B Warbler Concern Mammal 36171 Perimyotis subflavus Tricolored Bat 1986-03-29 H 4-Low --- Significantly G3G4 S3 Rare Vascular Plant 23933 Hackelia virginiana Virginia Stickseed 1968-Pre H 5-Very --- Significantly G5 S2 Low Rare Peripheral Vascular Plant 21272 Isotria medeoloides Small Whorled 2002 F 3-Medium Threatened Threatened G2G3 S1 Pogonia Vascular Plant 23969 Orbexilum onobrychis Lanceleaf Scurfpea 1891-07-17 H 5-Very --- Special G5 SH Low Concern Historical Vascular Plant 28290 Pycnanthemum Tennessee Mountain- 2001 E 4-Low --- Significantly G3 S1 curvipes mint Rare Throughout Vascular Plant 15418 Rhododendron vaseyi Pink -shell Azalea 1979 H 3-Medium --- Significantly G3 S3 Rare Limited No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type Town of Canton Open Space Town of Canton Local Government Town of Canton Open Space Town of Canton Local Government NC Land and Water Fund Conservation Agreement NC DNCR, INC Land and Water Fund State Southern Appalachian Highlands Conservancy Southern Appalachian Highlands Private Easement Conservancy Page 3 of 5 DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type Canton Watershed/The Glades Registered Heritage Town of Canton Local Government Area Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/help. Data query generated on March 29, 2022; source: NCNHP, Q4, January 2022. Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database. Page 4 of 5 DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 NCNHDE-17540: Crabtree Mtn Glamping !o Abg Wade 9rancli \ .� a�a 4inor Creek \� ■ Ir-.. �t � Ropes A +# "' eC sI'• I m � � V lr �Yy ■ 6 o * 'tyq sfRd m R$ MQ[%NTA1N W a March 29, 2022 ❑ Project Boundary ❑ Buffered Project Boundary j Managed Area (MAREA) Giades iqd � �•\\ ♦\� S h p,0 al a y r. 0 t• h ,err 1lC+ • • r AOO Cove t yF� Buck va. AU IR , • ' �� � Creek OVO nmif y+"RIa,.Or � — Mill Mo ol,: doe log* _:. i -rr►e sa,n _ -01W rfo[in a I ■ � 1 R� Wye 4ww �Y �� Cage # r CI 1:31,187 0 0275 0-55 1.1 mi 0 0-425 0.85 1-7 km Sources: Esri, HERE, Gannnin. Inlermap, in—nnanl P Corp., GEWO, USGS. FAO, Np$, NRCAN, Geogase. IG N, Kadas[er NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri .Japan. ME71- Esri China (Hong Kong), [c] aperKlAreeWlap cpphbutprs, and the GIS User Cor Umrf Page 5 of 5 DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 NLEB Occupied HUC 12 in North Carolina - Crabtree Mtn Campground I K. ti 4/7/2022 r i 197 t- Y 6 F1 ! Hurrican iv ✓1 �' )� f% - (b Mountain „ 'hit + r o- _ F y BlaG Asheville Swannanoa Swannanoa Mountains Haywood AS�on r ' 19 " a Canton '- > -- Project Site Waynesville Royal Pines 2761. -Fletcher c � E � 406 a� Mountain Home r a Henderson Ftnwah 1:439,603 0 3 6 12mi 0 5 10 20 km Sources: Esri, Airbus DS, USGS, NGA, NASA, CGIAR, N Robinson, NCEAS, NLS, OS, NMA, Geodatastyrelsen, Rijkswaterstaat, GSA, Geoland, FEMA, DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 Appendix B: Photolog 7 4 F ?� `Ja r a 05/0.512022 10 07 i �Ir h ?La l _ k VL _05/05/2022.11'26 a DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 "Al � , tr M O�O�g��O�rOg��77 Photo 5. Typical View of Meadow — Grassy Bald. Note Rock Habitat. Photo 6. Typical View of Headwater Forest Wetland. DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 Photo 7. Typical View of Emergent Wetland. Photo 8. Typical View of Rock Outcrops. DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AA3A86F-E25B-4FB0-8DCD-30B47365C488 Photo 9. View of Stream Structure in Central Cove. V* r r 71 6 Photo 2. Typical View of White Avens (Geum canadense) Basal Leaves. Distinctly Different from Spreading Avens Basal Leaves.