20220856 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20220620

9.1403,,
DIvIskm of Water Resaurces
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 13, 2022 Ver 4.3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
OO Yes
0 No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
0 Yes 0 No
Change only if needed.
Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
5/4/2022
BIMS # Assigned* Version# *
20220856 1
Is a payment required for this project?*
0 No payment required
O Fee received
O Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office*
Winston-Salem Regional Office - (336) 776-
9800
Information for Initial Review
What amout is owed?*
O $240.00
® $570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Sue Homewood:eads\slhomewood
la. Name of project:
Silas 100 kV Line Rebuild Project
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Jeff Goto, P.E.
1b. Primary Contact Email:* lc. Primary Contact Phone:*
[e-mail] [phone]
Date Submitted
6/20/2022
Nearest Body of Water
Named streams within the proposed project include Elisha Creek, Dutchman Creek, Buffalo Creek,
Carter Creek, and the Yadkin River.
Basin
Yadkin-PeeDee
Water Classification
The NCDWR classifies Elisha Creek, Dutchman Creek, Buffalo Creek, Carter Creek, and their
tributaries as Class C Waters. The Yadkin River and its tributary within the Study Area are classified
as WS-V Waters.
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.88755
A. Processing Information
Longitude:
-80.55665
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Davie
Forsyth
Is this a NCDMS Project
0 Yes 0 No

Is this project a public transportation project?*
0 Yes • No
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
O✓ Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
0 Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
Yes
J No
lb. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
WA Nationwide Permit (NWP)
OI Regional General Permit (RGP)
EJ Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
OYes 0.7No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
e 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
O Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
O Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
57 - Electric Utility Line and Telecommunications Activities — (frequently used)
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
tf. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
0 Yes
* No
0 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
0 Riparian Buffer Authorization
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
O Yes O No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
O Yes O No
lh. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
O Yes O No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
0Yes ENo
B. Applicant Information
OYes 0No
OYes 0No
td. Who is applying for the permit?
O Owner O Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
Co) Yes 0No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
N/A, Duke Energy Carolinas, Powerline right-of-way
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2c. Contact Person:
Jeffrey Goto

2d. Address
Street Address
526 South Church Street
Address Line 2
City
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Code
28202
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Johanna Velasquez
4b. Business Name:
HDR, Inc.
4c. Address
Street Address
440 South Church Street,
Address Line 2
Suite 1200
City
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Code
28202
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
C. Project Information and Prior Project History Q
1. Project Information
lb. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
lc. Nearest municipality / town:
Mocksville, NC
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
N/A
2c. Project Address
Street Address
5430 Dock Davis Rd
Address Line 2
City
Clemmons
Postal / Zip Code
27012
3. Surface Waters
2b. Property size:
137
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project: *
Named streams within the proposed project include Elisha Creek, Dutchman Creek, Buffalo Creek,
Carter Creek, and the Yadkin River.
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water: *
The NCDWR classifies Elisha Creek, Dutchman Creek, Buffalo Creek, Carter Creek, and their
tributaries as Class C Waters. The Yadkin River and its tributary within the Study Area are classified
as WS-V Waters.

3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Yadkin-PeeDee
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030401011404 and 030401011501
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: *
The 137-acre Study Area consists of a power line right-of-way that extends for approximately
11.1 miles between the Mocksville Main in Davie County to the Idols Tap Bent in Forsyth
County, North Carolina (Appendix A). Land use in the vicinity of the proposed Project consists of
maintained rights -of -way, agricultural fields, undeveloped forested lands, and rural residential
land. The Study Area consists of a maintained right-of-way, low density neighborhoods, and
agricultural fields. The Study Area is situated in the Southern Outer Piedmont ecoregion, which
is part of the larger Level III Piedmont ecoregion of North Carolina. The Piedmont ecoregion is
generally considered a transitional area between the mountainous ecoregions of the
Appalachians to the northwest and the relatively flat Coastal Plain to the southeast. The
Southern Outer Piedmont is characterized by "lower elevations, less relief and less precipitation
than the Southern Inner Piedmont, with mostly irregular plains rather than the plains with hills of
the Southern Inner Piedmont and Northern Inner Piedmont" (Griffith et al. 2002). The
topography in the vicinity of the Study Area consists of moderate rolling hills typical of the
region.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
0 Yes O No 0 Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
PSS = 1.26 acres PEM = 10.09 acres Total = 11.35 acres
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
Intermittent streams = 2,232 linear feet Perennial streams = 2,775 linear feet Total = 5,007 linear feet
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
Duke Energy will rebuild the existing Silas 100kV transmission line (Line Index 1W264)
that begins southeast of the town of Mocksville and continues in a northeast direction
just across the Forsyth County line.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used: *
The proposed project is located in Davie and Forsyth Counties, North Carolina, and involves
associated line work required to rebuild Duke Energy's existing Silas 100kV transmission line
(Line Index 1W264) from Mocksville substation to Idols Tap.
The project is located within Duke Energy's mowed and maintained right-of-way with a limit of
disturbance of 88.43 acres and will not change the existing land use. The initial project duration
is anticipated to start in July 2022 and be completed in June 2023. Prior to construction, a Duke
Energy construction contractor will install erosion control measures to encompass the
anticipated construction limits. Pre-existing contours will be restored, and the area will be
stabilized prior to completion of construction. An avoidance and minimization of disturbance
approach has been incorporated into the design of the erosion control measures by utilizing
existing access points and stabilized right-of-way access routes, whenever possible. Any
disturbance incurred by vehicle traffic will be stabilized within 48 hours.
Temporary construction accesses have been sited to make use of existing travel ways,
minimize ground disturbance, and to avoid excessive cutting and filling. Temporary access will
be bladed into the soil and seeded with permanent vegetation following completion of
construction. Graveled temporary construction entrances will be provided at each location
where construction traffic will exit the site onto public roads, other off -site paved areas, or where
indicated on plans. The graveled entrance will consist of 6 inches of 2-inch to 3-inch washed
ballast gravel and will be in accordance with the minimum dimensions as described on the plan.
The surface of the graveled entrance will be periodically topdressed as needed to prevent offsite
mud and sediment transport. Any tracking of sediment onto public or private pavement will
be cleaned by the contractor.
The Erosion and Sediment Control Plan has been designed to control pollution and protect
water quality during all stages of development. The project will not result in a change to the
physical, chemical, biological, or radiological integrity of downstream waters. Inspection of all
erosion control devices will be inspected at weekly intervals and after every rainfall exceeding 1"
to verify that they are functioning properly. Any accumulated sediment shall be removed and
placed in a designated spoil disposal area.
There are two (2) types of temporary construction access roads depicted in the Impact Figures
(Appendix H):
1) Temporary Gravel Access (depicted in red — Impact Figures)
Construction of new temporary access typically consists of the placement of approximately 5
inches of gravel (12 feet wide) on the land's surface. The placement of gravel is conducted
without land disturbance or other earthwork, and is considered immediate stabilization. Based
on field conditions, geotextile fabric must be installed prior to placing the gravel. In uneven
terrain, construction of the New Temporary Access may require limited spot-blading of the soil
to provide level access for pulling equipment or other specialized equipment. When spot-blading
is required, bladed areas will be immediately top -dressed with gravel in accordance with the
Clearing and Erosion Control Specifications. Temporary BMPs (e.g., wattles, silt fence,
waterbars) are depicted in — Impact Figure adjacent to New Temporary Access and are included
within the limits -of -disturbance (LOD) to account for any potential land disturbance resulting
from construction equipment while installing the gravel access. Following construction
completion, the gravel and geotextile fabric will be removed, and the area will be seeded and
stabilized, or in the case of a gravel -only road, the gravel will be bladed into the soil, and the
area will be seeded and stabilized. Preexisting contours and preexisting runoff conditions will be

2) Temporary Access to be Matted (depicted in pink — Impact Figures)
To avoid rutting in moist soil conditions, composite matting will be used in lieu of gravel access
in accordance with the attached Erosion Control Specifications. Composite matting will be
installed according to the manufacturer's specifications and will be removed following
construction completion. BMPs may be depicted in the Impact Figures adjacent to New
Temporary Access to be matted to protect a nearby wetland or stream, if present; however,
BMPs are not typically installed adjacent to New Temporary Access Roads to be matted when
matting is used to traverse a wetland due to the wetland disturbance required to trench in silt
fence, etc., and because the composite matting is considered a BMP itself. The matting will be
inspected weekly and within 24 hours after each runoff event that produces %" or more of
precipitation. Damaged sections of matting will be restored within 24 hours of inspection.
In general, the project will be constructed in three (3) phases:
1) Installation of erosion controls, matting, and construction entrances, improvement of
existing access roads, and install temporary access roads.
2) Construction of new tower/poles and linework.
3) Restoration of pre-existing contours and stabilization of all disturbed areas and access
routes.
There will be no change in impervious surface area from pre -to post -development conditions.
Pre-existing contours will be restored, and disturbed areas will be stabilized sequentially as
construction proceeds along the transmission line corridor. Disturbed areas will be seeded and
stabilized at the end of each workday. The Project will not result in a change in impervious
surface, pre -construction contours, or peak runoff rates.
Construction activities will be limited to within Duke Energy's existing maintained right-of-way.
Duke Energy's right-of-way easement agreements include ingress and egress rights to and from
the right-of-way. The Project does not involve permanent stormwater features or new
impervious surface. Installation and maintenance of temporary BMPs will be conducted in
accordance with the NC DEQ Erosion and Sediment Control Planning And Design Manual.
Construction equipment access has been sited to minimize new stream crossings and make
use of existing culverts. Where a new stream crossing is required, construction equipment
access will utilize span bridges or composite matting to cross the stream from upland to upland.
All temporary span bridges will be removed as soon as practicable after seeding. The composite
mats over stream crossings will be cleaned at the end of each day.
Four span bridges will be installed and used to allow equipment access. The bridges will be
able to withstand the anticipated loading of the construction traffic for one lane of traffic. The
bridges will have a minimum width of 7 feet and a maximum width of 14 feet. Intermittent and
perennial streams will be crossed at right angles to the access road. Stream crossings will be
stabilized with composite matting for a minimum distance of 50 feet on each side of the
crossing. Span bridges will be constructing to allow unrestricted flow and prevent sediment from
entering the streams.
Temporary dewatering bags will be used upstream and downstream of each new culvert
installation and will not cause erosion or result in silt -laden water flowing into any stream. Each
dewatering structure will be removed as soon as practicable after the completion of dewatering
activities.
The following newly constructed towers will need permanent access for routine maintenance:
T-147, T-146, T-122, T-108, and T-103.
New tower placement was chosen to reduce the number of permanent impacts. Permanent
culverts are proposed to cross the following streams: 2, 3, 11, 12, 22, and 25. No other
permanent impacts are proposed.
All impacts to wetlands throughout the project will be temporary. Composite mats will be utilized
to provide access through wetlands, which will reduce soil compaction and provide a stable
travel lane for contractors along the project ROW.
All mechanized equipment operated near surface waters or wetlands will be regularly inspected
and maintained to prevent contamination of waters and wetlands from fuels, lubricants,
hydraulic fluids or other potential toxic chemicals. Constructions shall be staged to minimize the
exposure of lubrication and general equipment maintenance will not take place within 100 feet
of a stream or wetland to prevent contamination by fuels and oils.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
@ Yes No
Comments:
From May 4-8, 2020, HDR biologists surveyed the Study Area for wetlands and jurisdictional waters
of the U.S. regulated under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA). On -site reconnaissance
activities identified 38 jurisdictional streams, 30 jurisdictional wetlands, and 2 ponds within the Study
Area. A summary of jurisdictional waters of the U.S. has been attached (Appendix C).
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? *
0 Preliminary 0 Approved @ Not Verified 0 Unknown 0 N/A
Corps AID Number:
Sc. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
Jessica Tisdale
HDR, Inc.
0 Unknown
6. Future Project Plans

6a. Is this a phased project?*
O Yes O No
6b. If yes, explain.
Phase 1: Mocksville Substation to Baltimore Tap
Phase 2: Baltimore Tap to Advance Retail
Phase 3: Advance Retail to Idols Tap
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
No.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
O Wetlands O Streams -tributaries
O Open Waters O Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
O Buffers
2a. Site #* (?)
2a1 Reason (?)
2b. impact type* (?)
2c. Type of W.*
2d. W. name
2e. Forested*
2f. Type of Jurisdicition*
(?)
2g. Impact
area*
W1
Matting
T
Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh
Wetland 5
No
Both
0.730
(acres)
W2
Matting
T
Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh
Wetland 6
No
Both
0.310
(acres)
W3
Matting
T
Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh
Wetland 7
No
Both
0.010
(acres)
W4
Matting
T
Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh
Wetland 8
No
Both
0.050
(acres)
W5
Matting
T
Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh
Wetland 10
No
Both
0.020
(acres)
W6
Matting
T
Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh
Wetland 12
No
Both
0.480
(acres)
W7
Matting
T
Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh
Wetland 13
No
Both
0.010
(acres)
W8
Matting
T
Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh
Wetland 16
No
Both
0.003
(acres)
W9
Matting
T
Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh
Wetland 29
No
Both
0.010
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
1.623
2g. Total Wetland Impact
1.623
2i. Comments:
Temporary impacts are the result of composite matting used to cross
nine wetlands for construction access. Impact locations have been attached (Appendix
G).
3. Stream Impacts
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.000
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.lmpact type*
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type*
(?)
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction*
3g. S. width
3h. Impact
length*
si
Access/Crossing
Permanent
Culvert
Stream 2
Intermittent
Both
3
Average (feet)
60
(linear feet)
S2
Dewatering
Temporary
Dewatering
Stream 2
Intermittent
Both
3
Average (feet)
20
(linear feet)
S3
Access/Crossing
Permanent
Culvert
Stream 3
Perennial
Both
9
Average (feet)
60
(linear feet)
64
Dewatering
Temporary
Dewatering
Stream 3
Intermittent
Both
3
Average (feet)
20
(linear feet)
S5
Access/Crossing
Permanent
Culvert
Stream 11
Perennial
Both
4
Average (feet)
60
(linear feet)

S6
Dewatering
Temporary
Dewatering
Stream 11
Perennial
Both
4
Average (feet)
20
(linear feet)
S7
Access/Crossing
Permanent
Culvert
Stream 12
Intermittent
Both
3
Average (feet)
60
(linear feet)
S8
Dewatering
Temporary
Dewatering
Stream 12
Intermittent
Both
3
Average (feet)
20
(linear feet)
S9
Access/Crossing
Permanent
Culvert
Stream 22
Intermittent
Both
2
Average (feet)
60
(linear feet)
S10
Dewatering
Temporary
Dewatering
Stream 22
Intermittent
Both
2
Average (feet)
20
(linear feet)
$11
Access/Crossing
Permanent
Culvert
Stream 23
Intermittent
Both
2
Average (feet)
60
(linear feet)
S12
Dewatering
Temporary
Dewatering
Stream 23
Intermittent
Both
2
Average (feet)
20
(linear feet)
S13
Access/Crossing
Permanent
Culvert
Stream 25
Intermittent
Both
2
Average (feet)
60
(linear feet)
S14
Dewatering
Temporary
Dewatering
Stream 25
Intermittent
Both
2
Average (feet)
20
(linear feet)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
420
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
560
3j. Comments:
Temporary and permanent impacts are the result of proposed culve
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
140
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Low Impact Design has been employed throughout the project, including avoidance of
permanent impacts to wetlands, utilizing existing construction access, stabilized right-of-way
access routes, stabilizing disturbance at the end of each workday, and minimizing land
disturbance.
Culverts with a diameter greater than 48 inches will be placed in streams below the elevation of
the streambed by one foot, and 20% of the culvert diameter for culverts having a diameter less
or equal to 48 inches. All culvert installations will be performed in a manner that will not alter the
original stream profile and will continue to allow for aquatic life movement during low flow
conditions.
Towers T-374, T-376, T-381, P-390, and P-391 will be removed from existing wetlands to avoid
jurisdictional impacts in the future.
Any areas too wet for construction access will be stopped and no access will be allowed until
conditions are suitable for minimal disturbance. Scheduled work at towers T-122 and T-123
near Dutchman Creek will occur in dry or summer conditions, where possible.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
One layer of composite matting will be used for all temporary impacts to wetlands and contours
will be restored to pre -construction conditions. Construction equipment access has been sited to
minimize new stream crossings and make use of existing culverts. Where a temporary stream
crossing is required, construction equipment access will utilize either a span bridge or
composite matting to cross the stream from upland to upland. Temporary construction access,
span bridges, and composite matting will be removed, preexisting contours will be
reestablished, and the area will be stabilized immediately upon completion of construction.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
O Yes ® No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Proposed impacts are minimal and under the threshold required for mitigation.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan

1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes O No
If no, explain why:
N/A
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
Yes ) No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
0• Yes 0 No
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
Yes • No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
Yes • No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
Yes • No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project is located within Duke Energy's mowed and maintained right-of-way. The
prior use of the site is transmission infrastructure, and the project will not change the
existing land use or result in additional development.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
0Yes ONo0N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
0 Yes is No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
O Yes ® No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
0 Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
0Yes ONo
• No Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
Yes • No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
0Yes ONo
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
0 Yes ® No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
0 Yes • No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
USFWS IPaC and NC Natural Heritage Database (Appendix I — J)
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)

6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
Yes O No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
https://www.habitat.noaa.gov/apps/efhmapper/?page=page_8
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
O Yes • No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
National Park Service NRHP GIS Public Data Set and the NCSHPO HPOWEB GIS
Web Service.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
O Yes O No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
Proposed project activities within the FEMA regulated floodplains are temporary in
nature and will not cause a rise in existing regulated floodplain elevations.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FEMA Map Service Center National Flood Hazard Layer
Miscellaneous
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Silas_PCN_Package_20220620.pdf 177.03MB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments
Signature
!RO By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Johanna Velasquez
Signature
Lemsareicedurfreang
Date
6/20/2022

Preliminary Data Entry Fields for New Actions
1SA W — -
1. Project Name: Silas 100 kV Line Rebuild Project
2. Work Type: Private ❑ Institutional❑ Government ❑ Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose:
Duke Energy will rebuild 11.1 miles of the existing Silas Transmission corridor (Line Index 1 W264)
between the Mocksville Main in Davie County to the Idols Tap Bent in Forsyth County, NC.
4. Property Owner / Applicant: Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC
5. Agent / Consultant: HDR Engineering of the Carolinas, LLC
6. Related Action ID Number(s):
7. Project Location - Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description:
Start: 35.88755,-80.55665
End: 35.98106,-80.3979
8. Project Location - Tax Parcel ID: N/A - powerline right-of-way
9. Project Location — County: Davie and Forsyth
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town : Mocksvl Ile, NC
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody: Yadkin River
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code: 03040101
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404❑ Section 10 & 404 ❑
Regulatory Action Type:
❑ Standard Permit
U Nationwide Permit #
❑ Regional General Permit #
❑ Jurisdictional Determination Request
❑Pre -Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
❑ Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
Revised 20210513

Appendix A
USGS Topographic Maps

I l / L •, SC:m vim,; + :r� a�rl�� L�� • S)s. _ '�
DaeFinCb l P r_J- VS,�'�'� d� `�i f";�`'. •t\�-S.�vil;.� T'
C J_•:.
LEGEND-
�r �• LLB 0...�
Study Area
USGS Quadrangles
CDATA SOURCE: USGS Topo Quadrangles:
Mocksville, NC (1969) and Advance, NC (1969) Sf 1 '1� �s xz:._ • •� -_.• _ :r���l_. 1 r- = f r••j ,_ - .
4 0 Feet 2,000 �' / � a s'' �[� _ ,(,.,�i _, • • �` .``, `� • _�}�
rn
Twm Lakes Ai
Ir
MOCKSVILLE ADVANCE°' ^
C y �.1• QUADRANGLE �`'' T � � r• S :. QUADRANGLES<=��
�. .. _
�.:P,cfvc Area
OF
Ali
I �r a •� i` >✓Jjp .,� ' � I�'i M.
l�l^j • i _ 4.1 _��lri J' i/.� j!'•��. � ,`-� ':�i ._
� r .yam -- =�" I� • •• ••'. �'� `,` � � n.- _ m+ �1 -`Jl'' -
It. 93
It
w � � , is - } 1 �� � >r' r;' �-..(�'� � \� 4 �\' 1,. - � .-•'.--, i �} -,� s., �J
\�� i1116I �7 Sf Z1 L Cr"J' m .1l
SILAS 100-kV LINE REBUILD PROJECT
ESN E USGS TOPOGRAPHIC QUADRANGLES
FN It*)
NATURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT

_ LEGEND y 1 ':�' ./�_ .� e' �: �. SlrawbBrry ^!1 4 }•` :ti :. Jt -
Study Area
Ik
USGS Quadrangles , . - l .y
DATA SOURCE: USGS Topo Quadrangles: �� -� 92t +. — -a�C/ 1� �'..s •�3 �5''-'� '' l Sc?- _.� '��.�
Mocksvi Ile, NC (1969) and Advance, NC (1969)
0 Feet 2,000 1
63
5
i - : "� - w• 7
IT—
.41
In
aj
i � •` � f i� �I?c is �.� �.•.`' - �. x i79 ! L� � r'� - `, 1 � � �i � ��'
ram•:• _ _ _ ..��..
•trl-�'..�. .s �•'S ADVANCE
't-�. QUADRANGLE t.. } ,:. l ` 1 - -a --_ .-=__•�
-L ram ;�'.1,�` ��• l,_ .� • .. •iad Y, F •�S` • H'"'aC.: -ir- ,-•' `' �. y lr
-^+ >> '.9 ti. �.� - .... _ �; Ii%-- - - =k_=_ _ram -- ,��::.. L - • �' :�
�fv440
ily• R•3 .`
i9s_ r d I.
Lc: �jf' ,c. _ � - ' ti:' ; • ; r�.•:�='t; P.
� ,. � . gag �' �.s,� .. I ✓�� _ �� ',i55�,
CO'
'ldF• Gro.1• .�ch j
�; o� �, tit:' . '� ;� r +., •( 3 . _ � �'� r 1" 1
A&ance
l� .Bixby.. 836 i
��• i `,`Ir Ad 1 + •E. £ "�� '1 l\. i r -� \ • {1
wem l 1 �+e• I i. ' ]`•� �- Vl \V_l l r` _ �• �' •�1(a� 1. C![i ` -� 1�. �` `1}l� ff ` !r ,f. _ •!; • 2
.J � �� vr�I 1•a�J� ��S•- ��'� � �,crid l 1 / I ( �f V. • � II i ��
�) 1titi++RR? I! -_ - --_-' - �1 . ,�,1 - ,1 •-._ � L+ ?, � - • l _• �' -• V�4 _ • � ':�• r: if � .�� Mock.s•li '
\ S 'i \ - r- -'--•• %`!/ 1,\ti!' `' •. ��{. +�.. f . _ ... •'•`_ n % 1 1 Ji! _ 1 ' _��.:I �i a r"+ ✓r �.
SILAS 100-kV LINE REBUILD PROJECT
ESN E USGS TOPOGRAPHIC QUADRANGLES
FN �>
NATURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT

Appendix B
NRCS Soil Survey

FCB2 r RdD ,,... s FCB2 FCB2 TaB �.r µun9'
LEGEND �. �r �j . airi;jiirFcc2 �: ..:
lik;t
ipk,
OcC2 tire," `u► ►�h FaD dD s Urr TDC2
::::nit
OD
r -/t.44.
le
) 'z'• '� -�RdC �'TaB� :err
- 16ar
1 alp
r � , �r ' �a tr
1 jr
�' + TaB2 it ti
Hydric Rating (1 32%) t �' ' y t�.� ' R� .• /7 Ud ~ , Ur rlik .`rt, . L.
m t R'� 4re - RdD . , �+y. hey ` y. y t .�'s +-
'',... c, ' A
Hydric Rating (66 - 99%) t 'ce,,,@ .•- FcC2 � r, FCC2 ° 'y 1 •■ •-i' + r�°F'••. 4.• ►. .. �. mow.
.';.ark �S'•Siw. •• pa 'r •.� t i2 •4 w * r it, sf -•�L' 'Y^ �. '.�,gr� L
DATA SOURCE:NRCS Soil Surey of Davie and Forsyth • '.� - • VP ► i.At y4' -'�"' •-'_- - w
Counties,North Carolina(2019);Bing Hybrid Aerial Imagery +. •• � :, t 7 *' FcC2 011 x :V -
1, r '. .. [l
Q.. Yr r s r
# ,... . 401111104argill.
1-1
IC.
-'' i ; - x a I' .VI.,...,.
0 Feet 1,000 A4 w 4. .E c I �.-_ �. . Y. = C1 Toe2 . CIO
•
*lc ---.._ _ . Ur/.
rot ,;.4" ,. „, , •,:: sa*-eiiiixt1d .,,,ak
/II
"1111kM111.111116**-Isc
I� * '7 1� r H ' J .. i -0,440❑ ~ ) + ■�•�-ram ilik
l FcB2 % •' + _ y' 7 Tm D °" ►-.-. : ��
4� MsD
° y"• m,'"+le 1 r� �' mo o. jlE. r lit . / CnA' .►
4i'' ap�y K �� 'fr.' ' • 1 F ie ' -., g.., TrnD - �.?-t ►' �►' -,ToB2:'' Clir
' *$r�Y =•i FcB2 r� '�• �* �FaDiUr . }r. t FaD OkBYy 1:� ',
A.
t 1111
.1 %A i-- r .•1.r.� 1. _ -� Uri f1)
r"'r� - tiO
TM 01111
rx'`�, 0
, �,.+ I„ 4. / r
- js � L�1.L7 An,,,,.!.way
so, ik
.Sv`Ss �� 4 t �f.r -- ;; ,:. '. , .� {; Y ' - On-Site Soils D
•
•i•Ir �,^•' F -Aug '-.. OkB2 - Oak Level clay loam,2 to 8 percent slopes,moderately eroded
r - r y �. _.� tl gi"s'i7 "' t,..' ;;,�. "I I _ J - • ToC2 - Tomlin clay loam,8 to 15 percent slopes,moderately eroded
avon,s rt "` 'f r i a+ .''. M • , �^ OkB2 MsC - Mocksville sandy loam,8 to 15 percent slopes
-y p _ t Zey ' S f CoA Codorus loam,0 to 2 percent slopes,frequently flooded
it •' 4 Ur ,� ToB2 Tomlin clayloam,2 to 8percent slopes,moderatelyeroded
4 � r1t''1 �. p
U�r��� 4 go r ��' (Jr RdC Rhodhiss sandy loam,8 to 15 percent slopes
�¢ft�' `� � 120
TmD - Tomlin loam,15 to 25 percent slopes
,- FcC2 '11, l - • • l FaD Fairview sand loam,15 to 45 percent slopes �•
i .� f RdD - Rhodhiss sandy loam,15 to 45 percent slopes
.- _i' t :•- V. CfB2 - D
. 5 .ir +„" n. - 1 1.• � . NaB - Nathalie sandy loam,2 to 8 percent slopes D
Yflie Ur �� Qe•_,... t ( r wn" Ud - Udorthents,loamy
r CfB2 i�AA aa •- y-- �, r,f i
CfB2 - Clifford sandy clay loam,2 to 8 percent slopes,moderately eroded 1
'.L Ie. ,, ,_. - N TaC Toast sandy loam,8 to 15 percent slopes
s FcC2 rr r 1
iw,lnape-a :'.. • �f r: a111L v. RaC - Rasalo fine sandy loam,8 to 15 percent slopes
• ?� J i * Q FAD .x. `_t. _ a y !w�� ' RaB - Rasalo fine sandy loam,2 to 8 percent slopes
'LCD 17'e •..,r '` + ' 1,r i 41LdC2 'ChA Chewacla loam,0 to 2 percent slopes,frequently flooded
O.
_ Afeq� r _ +
i< >A .ice. ta •�rv.
► FcC2 KnA Kinkora loam,0 to 2 percent slopes,occasionally flooded
" _ r ry+�� CoA aen or ( 1' +° i r IMEI FcB2 - Fairview sandy clay loam,2 to 8 percent slopes,moderately eroded
0 .' Graham St )
PcC2 - Pacolet sandy clay loam,8 to 15 percent slopes,moderately eroded
;, , k FaD }, _ _ �i MsD - Mocksville sandy loam,15 to 45 percent slopes
a NaB E - •
4 .- FcC2 - Fairview sandy clay loam,8 to 15 percent slopes,moderately eroded
a o 1 • + ram,:.- •'.,,-..-;„, EY i . :t ■W - Water
3 / +--� p' rg .S' •ChA :D.-
q r� PcB2 - Pacolet sandy clay loam,2 to 8 percent slopes,moderately eroded
.4 , w� CfB2i `S t �. A _ _ �_OkC2 Oak Level clay loam,8 to 15 percent slopes,moderately eroded
�. .10' - - • ' • LCD • - MrC2 - Mecklenburg clay loam,8 to 15 percent slopes,moderately eroded
' "° § 4.'" FCC2 + Ur Urban land
�y CPoisT �aW
rill7 ' �"-I S f TaB = Toast sandy loam,2 to 8 percent slopes
1741
F _ �. .►I LdB2 ;
r ' UdB2 �` "! ''O. 4,` LdB2 WaC PaD Pacolet sandy loam,8 to 15 percent slopes
t` AIrB2 .MrC2' r - -V--.. .. y y, ' LdC2 . MsB - Mocksville sandy loam,2 to 8 percent slopes
• •
EnC' • •� - t. ., MrB2 Mecklenburg clay loam,2 to 8 percent slopes,moderately eroded
t /f z WmD Wickham fine sand loam,mesic,10 to 15 percent slopes
I:S:� I� � a J. s- Ilit Y p p
•
t•.t ,K.,, { LdC2
! + 'a AIrB2 r ,ti Ld: DaA Dan River loam,0 to 2 percent slopes,occasionally flooded
TmB - Tomlin loam,2 to 6 percent slopes
6 , rC2.ChA MrC2 LdC2 i. °`. GEC 4 -_ �,
SILAS 100-kV LINE REBUILD PROJECT
I-) DUKE
Y� NRCS SOIL SURVEY OF DAVIE AND FORSYTH COUNTIES, NORTH CAROLINA
NATURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT

illi
CoA �• _ ?�RaC NIsD Rn RaB ,• - B
LEGEND OkC2 — . '%,�' �..'ir� C \-.? :01 � :J
vfr �� �� w .
ur' RaC RaC RaB ,
Study Area ' = CoAalp ►++ . . r R«C- , • �" RdD DkB ,CoA _ FcC2 , +! �► r. .ilk0 -R afr aC - •
Soil Map Unit CoA CIE •CoA . •
°;
If ili
Hydric Rating (1 32%) ' 1,1 —w7MsDlti _ I '
RdD n RdC .�_ '
CID
Hydric Rating (66 - 99%) Q� m d - * ,* -,r Tae . L. ':.•Af'
CoA CoA .� tee' .4 . '
DATA SOURCE:NRCS Soil Surey of Davie and Forsyth ** OkC2 -..a (LSD - •_ 1t- M�� • i •R°„ 1
Counties,North Carolina(2019);Bing Hybrid Aerial Imagery x _ ^^1�
4 - De-Ron-I I Ln,.
A °RaC '
N.?Ilk 12:
0 Feet 1,000 • r taa • RaB CoA ToB2 ' BaB S
itZt
. Col " • an ...
1) . ,
/7..) ECID tia Lw
. _
. RdD i w
?� DhA
/ li . .•. y • . i GO a t FcB2 • r•r■
rw� �!* RdC �
al: DhA r: )Cr _E
! • ., %}r }� r FcB2
! FAsC I .11tri. RaB.� .iir r
" 1:10 1r-- 116 ' 7 ....: { t •
,' 116.1 • FCB2
��, r )iipr r inilgAc RdD
L• • k FCC2 CoA r'. r
,,,,ir 'IC. s ' On-Site Soils
•W: •,'.• �''o n� RdC OkB2 = Oak Level clay loam,2 to 8 percent slopes,moderately eroded
•
ti s': :� i ToC2 Tomlin clay loam,8 to 15 percent slopes,moderately eroded
nib�:c, {� f'. ' _- -ern.- MsC - Mocksville sandy loam,8 to 15 percent slopes
"' � -r •r - -k,. - .•-ie '- Aa ~r1 - 7:+:� 7 OkC2 CoA Codorus loam,0 to 2 percent slopes,frequently flooded
TmD MD 1 Y 1".
°! CAA ` CCEI Rd ToB2 Tomlin clay loam,2 to 8 percent slopes,moderately eroded
F RdC - Rhodhiss sandy loam,8 to 15 percent slopes
• ; ., ... Ral TmD - Tomlin loam,15 to 25 percent slopes
_ FaD - Fairview sandy loam,15 to 45 percent slopes
KnA
ToB2
f pk, - RdD Rhodhiss sandy loam,15 to 45 percent slopes
x C :-;' . NaB - Nathalie sandy loam,2 to 8 percent slopes
�7 s.
4:�.'L7 - d.-w d•�e Ud Udorthents,loamy
y. 0• ti. CfB2 - Clifford sandy clay loam,2 to 8 percent slopes,moderately eroded
+ ritkkTaC - Toast sandy loam,8 to 15 percent slopes" -... g brook Trai!
-aisr• .Piaui'• — !• -{ ` FaD RaC Rasalo fine sandy loam,8 to 15 percent slopes
111
FaD .f '/ a° y TmD ToC2 ToC2 .FcB2 RaB Rasalo fine sandy loam,2 to 8 percent slopes
frF ,. ChB - Chewacln loam,0 to 2 percent slopes,frequently flooded
0000,..,.
S•-•• KnA - Kinkora loam,0 to 2 percent slopes,occasionally flooded
7 . FcB2 - Fairview sandy clay loam,2 to 8 percent slopes,moderately eroded
CoA * -. PcC2 - Pacolet sandy clay loam,8 to 15 percent slopes,moderately eroded
v T' 6 MsD - Mocksville sandy loam,15 to 45 percent slopes
r FcC2 - Fairview sandy clay loam,8 to 15 percent slopes,moderately eroded
1 FcB2
W - Water
KnA PcB2 Pacolet sandy clay loam,2 to 8 percent slopes,moderately eroded
In elp�: TOC2 ! OkC2 - Oak Level clay loam,8 to 15 percent slopes,moderately eroded
INII
✓r " nt• 4' MrC2 Mecklenburg clay loam,8 to 15 percent sopes,moderately eroded
Mil ,/ yy �r � Ur - Urban land
l , �� p CoA TaB Toast sandy loam,2 to 8 percent slopes
is k ,, a 1. �.r .•t•�-� v PaD = Pacolet sandy loam,8 to 15 percent slopes
w e .1.,
+ MsB Mocksville sandy loam,2 to 8 percent slopes
n :► r -` MrB2 Mecklenburg clay loam,2 to 8 percent slopes,moderately eroded
r' , RdC WmD Wickham fine sandy loam,mesic,10 to 15 percent slopes
M' RaB �.- "IiMill&i�TnC2 it .-_3' DaA - Dan River loam,0 to 2 percent slopes,occasionally flooded
D �� , FaD , TmB - Tomlin loam,2 to 6 percent slopes
w �� 1 � iCdA •
�RdC _ FeE1ZP" -I.-
SILAS 100-kV LINE REBUILD PROJECT
I-) tEEN RGY. NRCS SOIL SURVEY OF DAVIE AND FORSYTH COUNTIES, NORTH CAROLINA
NATURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT

c;-pid -
R
❑kB2
❑kC2
KnA V
0-
+r
"'Ud u
RaB
W
RaC .
MsC i► '
re
Jp AlE T
+� � uK�s � ■
dkB2 P�
i P _
J.OkC2 W
TOC2
Tm D
OkC:
COA
TO
Tm❑ i
W
On -Site Soils
01432 —
Oak Level clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded
ToC2 —
Tomlin clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded 1
MsC —
Mocksville sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
CoA —
Codorus loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded
ToB2 —
Tomlin clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded
RdC —
Rhodhiss sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
TmD —
Tomlin loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes
FaD —
Fairview sandy loam, 15 to 45 percent slopes
RdD —
Rhodhiss sandy loam, 15 to 45 percent slopes
A
NaB —
Nathalie sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes 81
Ud —
Udorthents, loamy
CfB2 —
Clifford sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded
TaC —
Toast sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
RaC —
Rasalo fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
RaB —
Rasalo fine sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
ChA —
Chewacla loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded
KnA —
Kinkora loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded
FcB2 —
Fairview sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded
PcC2 —
Pacolet sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded
MsD —
Mocksville sandy loam, 15 to 45 percent slopes
FcC2 —
Fairview sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded
W —
Water ]
PcB2 —
Pacolet sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded
OkC2 —
Oak Level clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded
MrC2 —
Mecklenburg clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded
Ur —
Urbanland
TaB —
Toast sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
PaD —
Pacolet sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
MsB —
Mocksville sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
MrB2 —
Mecklenburg clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded .
WmD —
Wickham fine sandy loam, mesic, 10 to 15 percent slopes
DaA —
Dan River loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded
TmB —
Tomlin loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
SILAS 100-kV LINE REBUILD PROJECT
DUKE
UENRCS SOIL SURVEY OF DAVIE AND FORSYTH COUNTIES, NORTH CAROLINA
FN *)ENERGY,
NATURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT

LEGEND
Study Area
+ Soil Map Unit
Hydric Rating (1 - 32%)
Hydric Rating (66 - 99%)
DATA SOURCE: NRCS Soil Surey of Davie and Forsyth
Counties, North Carolina (2019); Bing Hybrid Aerial Imagery
m
0 Feet 1,000
TmD �+ A. ="
TOC2
ToB2
]A BaB
COA BaB CIC CIB C14
FaF.
DaA DVA"'
C6oA
DaA
Sol
DkB
,W KnA
W� -} DkB
1
W{ I �_
TmD ! f W CoA COA
tW_
w` -
L.,� ToC2
,OkB2 L -�
Wd MsD COA
TmD
DhA
COA
Cm
WM I I
WmB� WmC
TmE
!y.
■� HaA BaB Al .
COA
B
T R Tm
IWmDi.
TmD IVFPaF; ,c■tr . vY
Wig
1.++ 7! .+• Pa�
r •.:�F� {
„r •rpCoA
�g
DF PaD .aL+ QPaC
WkB {
CeD
WkB' "AA
AS Z
y 77 w �+ BUB �r
AIsB KnA a _ -s �, ��-
OkC2 COA On -Site Soils
TDB2 ' 141 r FaD� DeB OkB2 - Oak Level clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded
A
DkB Y NaB ToC2 Tomlin clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded
ToC2 W 01 MsC — Mocksville sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
x .Wp CoA — Codorus loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded
ToB2 — Tomlin clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded ,
TmD ToC2x� _ RdC — Rhodhiss sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes EI
] •� TmD — Tomlin loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes
TmD sv, '�- TOC2 COA PaD FaD — Fairview sandy loam, 15 to 45 percent slopes
TaC RdD — Rhodhiss sandy loam, 15 to 45 percent slopes D
�, FCC2 NaB — Nathalie sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
TmD Ud — Udorthents, loamyTOC2 TOC2 W RaB CfB2 — Clifford sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded D
y #
TaC — Toast sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
RaC — Rasalo fine sand loam, 8 to 15 ercent slo es
C,, KnA RaB — Rasalo fine sandy loam 2 to 8 percent slopes
TIM COA Y p p
A1SD R ChA — Chevracla loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded
y RaC KnA — Kinkora loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded
W PCB2 PCB2 FcB2 Fairview sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded
TOC2 PcC2 — Pacolet sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded
COA
t ` ;,• � � Mocksville sandy loam, 15 to 45 percent slopes
TO �' RaB PaD MsD _ FcC2 — Fairview sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded
RaB f�
RaC W Water
—
PcB2 Pacolet sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded
PCC2 PaD OkC2 — Oak Level clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded
RaC MrC2 — Mecklenburg clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded
TDC2 CoA W Ur — Urban land
TmD r TaB Toast sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
TOB2 RaB CDA COA PaD — Pacolet sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
MsB — Mocksville sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
PaD
TOC2 ,
MrB2 - Mecklenburg clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded
`1 PCC2 I'
C •.� . WmD — Wickham fine sandy loam, mesic, 10 to 15 percent slopes
? W PCB2 DaA — Dan River loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded
xnD — Tomlin loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes 3
CB2 C2 2RaC Ok D
SILAS 100-kV LINE REBUILD PROJECT
>DU E NRCS SOIL SURVEY OF DAVIE AND FORSYTH COUNTIES, NORTH CAROLINA
FN
NATURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT

Appendix C
Summary of Delineated
Jurisdictional Waters

Appendix C. Summary of Delineated Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. within the Study Area
Streams
Stream 1
Length: 145 linear
(Tributary to
35.888162,
R3UB1/2
feet
20 C
Leonard Creek)
-80.556287
Stream 2
Length: 155 linear
(Tributary to
35.893092,
R4SB4
feet
20 C
Leonard Creek)
-80.548517
Stream 3
Length: 97 linear
(Tributary to
35.894743,
R3UB1/2
feet
20 C
Leonard Creek)
-80.545875
Stream 4
Length: 151 linear
(Tributary to
35.89571,
R3UB1/2
feet
20 C
Leonard Creek)
-80.544256
Stream 5
Length: 96 linear
(Tributary to
35.895995,
R5SB3
feet
15 C
Leonard Creek)
-80.544162
Stream 6
Length: 94 linear
(Tributary to Elisha
35.903573,
R5SB3
feet
25 C
Creek)
-80.531952
Stream 7
Length: 110 linear
(Tributary to Elisha
35.905921,
R5SB3
feet
20 C
Creek)
-80.528224
Stream 8
Length: 269 linear
(Tributary to Elisha
35.910116,
R5SB3
feet
Existing Culvert C
Creek)
-80.521334
Stream 9
35.910511,
R3UB1/2
Length: 96 linear
35 C
(Elisha Creek)
-80.520491
feet
Stream 10
Length: 122 linear
(Tributary to
35.918252,
R3UB1/2
feet
Existing Culvert C
Dutchman Creek)
-80.507856
Stream 11
Length: 107 linear
(Tributary to
35.921602,
R3UB1/2
feet
15 C
Dutchman Creek)
-80.502306
Stream 12
Length: 96 linear
(Tributary to
35.921916,
R4SB4
feet
15 C
Dutchman Creek)
-80.501807
Stream 13
35.923101,
R3UB1/2
Length: 149 linear
130 C
(Dutchman Creek)
-80.499872
feet
Stream 14
Length: 96 linear
(Tributary to Buffalo
35.925929,
R3UB1/2
feet
15 C
Creek)
-80.495335
Stream 15
35.92888,
R3UB1/2
Length: 355 linear
45 C
(Buffalo Creek)
-80.490589
feet
Stream 16
Length: 60 linear
(Tributary to Buffalo
35.929177,
R4SB4
feet
Existing Culvert C
Creek)
-80.4899
Stream 17
Length: 110 linear
(Tributary to Buffalo
35.930879,
R4SB4
feet
30 C
Creek)
-80.487352
Stream 18
Length: 128 linear
(Tributary to Buffalo
35.934388,
R4SB4
feet
20 C
Creek)
-80.481676

Stream 19
35.936216,
R3UB1/2
Length: 195 linear
35
C
(Buffalo Creek)
-80.478721
feet
Stream 20
(Tributary to Buffalo
35.936961,
R4SB4
Length: 97 linear
feet
Creek)
-80.477555
Stream 21
Length: 91 linear
(Tributary to Buffalo
35.937389,
R4SB4
feet
15
C
Creek)
-80.476852
Stream 22
(Tributary to Buffalo
35.939753,
R4SB4
Length: 191 linear
30
Am
Creek)
-80.473027
feet
Stream 23
Length: 103 linear
(Tributary to Buffalo
35.944284,
R4SB4
feet
20
C
Creek)
-80.465848
Stream 24
Length: 93 linear
(Tributary to Buffalo
35.945735,
R3UB1/2
feet
25
C
Creek)
-80.46359
Stream 25
Length: 53 linear
(Tributary to Buffalo
35.946297,
R4SB4
feet
Existing Culvert
C
Creek)
-80.462848
Stream 26
Length: 96 linear
(Tributary to Buffalo
35.947678,
R4SB4
feet
25
C
Creek)
-80.460545
Stream 27
Length: 69 linear
(Tributary to Buffalo
35.953386,
R4SB4
feet
20
C
Creek)
-80.463149
Stream 28
Length: 120 linear
(Tributary to Bailey
35.951703,
R4SB4
feet
20
C
Creek)
-80.453999
Stream 29
Length: 189 linear
(Tributary to Bailey
35.95369,
R3UB1/2
feet
25
C
Creek)
-80.450605
Stream 30
Length: 94 linear
(Tributary to Bailey
35.95750,
R3UB1/2
feet
20
C
Creek)
-80.444795
Stream 31
Length: 93 linear
(Tributary to Bailey
35.958785,
R3UB1/2
feet
25
C
Creek)
-80.442742
Stream 32
Length: 100 linear
(Tributary to Bailey
35.962976,
R3UB1/2
feet
Existing Culvert
C
Creek)
-80.436088
Stream 33
Length: 91 linear
(Tributary to Bailey
35.964102,
R4SB4
feet
20
C
Creek)
-80.434201
Stream 34
Length: 149 linear
(Tributary to Bailey
35.966082,
R4SB4
feet
20
C
Creek)
-80.427412
Stream 35
35.970856,
R3UB1/2
Length: 512 linear
45
C
(Carter Creek)
-80.404652
feet
Stream 36
Length: 91 linear
(Tributary to Carter
35.968667,
R4SB4
feet
20
C
Creek)
-80.415203
Stream 37
35.974235,
R3UB1
Length: 85 linear
600
WS-V
(Yadkin River)
-80.399612
feet
Stream 38
35.977181,
R4SB4
Length: 59 linear
20
WS-V
-80.399049
feet

(Trw""""'
River)
ive Rr
TOTAL: Length: 5,007 linear feet
Wetlands 7
35.901768,
Wetland 1
-80.534701
PSS1 B
0.15 acres
N/A
35.903558,
Wetland 2
-80.532026
PSS1 B
0.1 acres
35.91041,
Wetland 3
-80.520686
PEM2B
0.09 acres
N/A
35.91071,
0 acres
Wetland 4
-80.519922
PEM2B
(adjacent to Study Area)
N/A
35.922126,
Wetland 5
-80.501468
PEM2C
2.24 acres
N/A
35.923758,
Wetland 6
-80.498836
PEM2C
0.86 acres
N/A
35.925753,
Wetland 7
-80.49555
PEM2B
0.18 acres
N/A
35.927988,
Wetland 8
-80.492002
PEM2C
0.35 acres
N/A
35.929042,
Wetland 9
-80.490116
PEM2B
0.05 acres
N/A
35.929759,
Wetland 10
-80.489167
PEM2B
0.41 acres
N/A
35.934686,
Wetland 11
-80.481312
PSS1 B
0.08 acres
N/A
35.93693,
Wetland 12
-80.477613
PEM2B
2.82 acres
N/A
35.939319,
Wetland 13
-80.47368
PSS1 B
0.09 acres
N/A
35.939736,
Wetland 14
-80.472879
PSS1 B
0.01 acres
N/A
35.943526,
Wetland 15
-80.467156
PEM2B
0.01 acres
N/A
35.944285,
Wetland 16
-80.465858
PEM2B
0.02 acres
N/A
35.949,
Wetland 17
-80.458687
PEM2B
0.02 acres
N/A
35.953258,
Wetland 18
-80.463158
PSS1 B
0.2 acres
N/A
35.951593,
Wetland 19
-80.454227
PSS1 B
0.28 acres
N/A
35.958767,
Wetland 20
-80.442744
PEM2B
0.03 acres
N/A
35.966483,
0 acres
Wetland 21
-80.424665
PEM2C
(adjacent to Study Area)
N/A
35.968518,
Wetland 22
-80.415874
PEM2A
0.42 acres
N/A
35.968753,
Wetland 23
-80.414791
PEM2A
0.84 acres
N/A
35.969118,
Wetland 24
-80.412508
PEM2B
0.02 acres
N/A

=
Wetland 25
35.970161
MMMrO-W63 acres
IqM
-80.408058
35.970519,
Wetland 26
-80.406257
PSS1 B 0.26 acres
N/A
35.970957,
_-
Wetland 27
-80.404306
PEM2A 0.09 acres
35.9759,
Wetland 28
-80.399409
PEM2F 0.33 acres
N/A
35.977662,
Wetland 29
-80.399142
PSS1 B 0.09 acres
Wetland 30
35.979873,
PEM2E 0.68 acres
N/A
-80.398341
TOTAL: 11.35 acres
Ponds
Pond 1 35.917977, PUBHh 0.02 acres C
_-80.508327
Pond 2 35.951176, PUBHh 0.003 acres C
-80.455080
� TOTAL: 0.023 acres
PEM2A = Palustrine, emergent, nonpersistent, and temporarily flooded.
PEM2B = Palustrine, emergent, nonpersistent, and saturated.
PEM2C = Palustrine, emergent, nonpersistent, and seasonally flooded.
PEM2E = Palustrine, emergent, nonpersistent, and seasonally flooded/saturated
PEM2F = Palustrine, emergent, nonpersistent, and semi -permanently flooded.
PSS1 B = Palustrine, scrub/shrub, broad-leaved deciduous, seasonally saturated.
PUBHh = Palustrine, unconsolidated bottom, permanently flooded, impounded.
R3UB1/2 = Riverine, upper perennial, unconsolidated cobble -gravel bottom/sand.
R4SB4 = Riverine, intermittent, streambed, sand.
R5SB3 = Riverine, unknown perennial, streambed, cobble -gravel.
z C = Aquatic Life, Secondary Recreation, Freshwater. Freshwaters protected for secondary recreation, fishing, and aquatic life including propagation
and survival, and wildlife. WS-V = Waters protected as water supplies which are generally upstream and drain to Class WS-IV waters. These waters
are protected for Class C uses.

Appendix D
Maps of Delineated
Jurisdictional Waters

R
.:4
Stream 2
Intermittent
2
155 linear feet
44k
Cb
0
NOV AM
0 Feet 50
%
1 DUKE
FN It*) ENERGY.
0
tip,.. ��,� .�
Stream 5
Perennial
96 linear feet
-40 Feet 50
V-
LEGEND
Study Area
Photograph Location
HDR Delineated Stream
HDR Delineated Pond
Inside
Inside
0
0
GPS Point
Duke Substation
Outside
Outside
0
0
Upland
Duke Transmission Line
Non -JD
HDR Delineated Wetlands
0
0
Wetland
Culvert
HDR Delineated Stream
Inside
Inside
Outside
Outside
DATA SOURCE:
NCOne Map Aerial Imagery, NCIDOT Road Labels
G PS
PS POINTS WERE COLLECTED USING
0 Feet 500
TRIMBLE GE07X
AND POST -PROCESSED
rtry
SILAS 100-kV LINE
REBUILD PROJECT
DELINEATED WATERS OF THE US
PATH.11CLT-SRV021GISIPROJECTSIDUKE-ENERGY1102M680 "KV SILAS%7.2 WIRMAP D0CS%MXD%NRA%09AS1LAS-W0US.MXD - USER GMARCHICA - DAM 512912020
NATURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT

-•-roc. • >.
�>!•+x�o����ae�sr.;*Yasc
LEGEND
Study Area
Photograph Location
HDR Delineated Stream
HDR Delineated Pond
0
GPS Point �
Duke Substation
Inside
i..:.:
Inside
O
Upland
Duke Transmission Line
Outside
Outside
O
Wetland
Culvert
Non -JD
HDR Delineated Wetlands
®
Inside
HDR Delineated Stream
F
Inside
Outside
DATA SOURCE:
NCOne Map Aerial Imagery, NCDOT
Road Labels
F-
Outside
GPS POINTS WERE COLLECTED USING
0
Feet 500
TRIMBLE GE07XAND
POST -PROCESSED
�r 4 AlUi
w •b�~ "
NX
10
7 s
lri� �'.�':ai►
t q 4.
Wetland 1
0.15 acres
0
11
0 Feet 50
Stream 7
Intermittent
110 linear feet
0 Feet 50
NN
a,
rr j it, aA
M1 _ - x P
4T' A Ilk
o �!
C:o�0
r�163r:t
-.
• 5 k•� TZ� Y�'fi. 4'�
ti
�V r dP
�a� # ;4'.
Wetland 3
0.09 acres
r�
bk�
S:
Stream 9
Perennial
96 linear feet
on
Wetland 4
0.004 acres
0 •�
SILAS 100-kV LINE REBUILD PROJECT
ESN E DELINEATED WATERS OF THE US
FN ��
PATH: IICLT-SRV021GISIPROJECTSIDUKE_ENERGY1102M680_"KV_SILAS17.2_WIPIMAP_D0CSIMXDINRA109.2_SILAS_W0US.MXD - USER: GMARCHICA - DATE: 512912020 NATURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT

E
LEGENDK
Study Area Photograph Location
HDR Delineated Stream
HDR Delineated Pond*
^
a :•
Inside
Inside
0
GPS Point Duke Substation
O
Upland Duke Transmission Line
—Outside
Outside
a ._
O
Wetland �� Culvert
Non -JD
HDR Delineated Wetlands
Stream
10
®
Inside
Perennial
HDR Delineated
Stream
Inside
®
Outside
122
linear feet
DATA SOURCE: NCOne Map Aerial Imagery, NCDOT Road Labels
GPS POINTS WERE COLLECTED USING
Outside
<4
TRIMBLE GE07XAND POST -PROCESSED
0
Feet 500
A,
7--
0 Feet 50 0
s? . ...v
� rr
M
r
r�.
DUKE
ollz �nN RGY®
PATH: 11ClSRV021GISIPROJECTSIDUKE ENERGY11f/ ...fi 46KV_S IMI.2_WOMAP_MMMXDINRA1N.2M1SWOU&MXO - USER: GMAR.MA - DATE: 5.12f/2f!
11
0 Feet 100
Wetland 5
2.24 acres
Wetland 6
0.86 acres
Stream 13
Perennial
149 linear feet
SILAS 100-kV LINE REBUILD PROJECT
DELINEATED WATERS OF THE US
NATURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT

I
V.
ON IN
Pr
e
IA
)E0.86acres
r^.
"
0
Wetland 8
O
0.35 acres
11
0
1 1
0 Feet 100
Stream 14
Perennial
96 linear feet
Wetland 7
0.18 acres
0 Feet 50
E3
1
UKE
ollz �n EDN RGY.
I
x,
'v
0 Feet 100
�,
6
I,- tlllbi
J
Stream 15
Perennial
355 linear feet
Wetland 9
0.05 acres
0 Feet 200
PATH: IICLT-SRV021GISIPROJECTSIDUKE_ENERGY1102M680_44KV_SILAS17.2_WIPIMAP_D0CSIMXDINRA109.4_ SILAS_WOUS.MXD - USER: GMARCHICA - DATE: 512912020
O
O
O
o
O
O
O
O
O
°
08
O
7
O
O
Stream 16
Intermittent
60 linear feet
Wetland 1
0.41 acres
I
Stream 18
Intermittent
128 linear feet
Stream 17
Intermittent
110 linear feet
cot
>�
Ylrr �
0
o °
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Wetland 11
0.08 acres
0 Feet 50 ;'
0
I -
I
,IF,
0 Feet 50
gLd
J' nn
J LEGEND
Study Area
Photograph Location
HDR Delineated Stream
HDR Delineated Pond
°
GPS Point
Duke Substation
Inside
' ° Inside
r
O
Upland
Duke Transmission Line
Outside
Outside
Non -JD
HDR Delineated Wetlands
O
Wetland
Culvert
HDR Delineated Stream
®
Inside
Inside P77T/J Outside
Iwo
5
DATA SOURCE: NCOne Map Aerial Imagery, NCDOT Road Labels
:.
h GPS POINTS WERE COLLECTED USING Outside
TRIMBLE GE07XAND POST -PROCESSED 0 Feet 500
SILAS 100-kV LINE REBUILD PROJECT
DELINEATED WATERS OF THE US
NATURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT

Wetland 13 Stream 22
0.09 acres Intermittent
191 linear feet
o /1
O
0
0
0 Feet 100
Stream 19
Perennial
128 linear feet
O
1
-40 Feet 200
DUKE
FN SENERGY.
r3.
° Wetland 15
® , 0.01 acres
Wetland 14
0.01 acres
i
0 Feet 50
�N
Stream 20 Stream 21
Intermittent Intermittent
97 linear feet 91 linear feet
PATH: IICLT-SRV021GISIPROJECTSIDUKE_ENERGY1102M680_"KV_SILASI7.2_WIPIMAP_D0CSIMXDINRA109.5_ SILAS_WOUS.MXD - USER: GMARCHICA - DATE: 512912020
Wetland 12
2.82 acres
Stream 23
In
103 linear feet
O #2
O
1
4 O
Wetland 16
0.02 acres °
0
0
-40 Feet 50 i Ra
0.7ftm=
7 '1
x
I
Stream 24
Perennial
93 linear feet
Stream 25
Intermittent
53 linear feet
0 Feet 50
Stream 26
Intermittent
96 linear feet
x.
0 Feet 50
?e;
LEGEND
Study Area
Photograph Location
HDR Delineated Stream
HDR Delineated Pond
Inside
Inside
°
GPS Point
Duke Substation
O
Upland
Duke Transmission Line Outside
Outside
O
Wetland
Culvert
Non -JD
HDR Delineated Wetlands
®
Inside
HDR Delineated Stream
Inside
®
Outside
DATA SOURCE:
NCOne Map Aerial Imagery,
NCDOT Road Labels
Outside
GPS POINTS WERE COLLECTED USING
0
Feet
500
TRIMBLE
GE07XAND POST -PROCESSED
SILAS 100-kV LINE REBUILD PROJECT
DELINEATED WATERS OF THE US
NATURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT

i3alti�nar�+
SILAS 100-kV LINE REBUILD PROJECT
�� DUN E DELINEATED WATERS OF THE US
FN
PATH: IICLT-SRV021GISIPROJECTSIOUKE_ENERGY1102M680_"KV_SILASI7.2_WIPIMAP_O0CSIMXOINRA109.6_SILAS_W0US.MXO - USER: GMARCHICA - DAM 512912020 NATURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT

Stream 32
Perennial o
100 linear feet
0
0 Feet 50
0
Stream 33
�ntermifttrefnt
O
0 Feet 10
it
4
UKE
ollz �n EDN RGY.
PATH: IICLT-SRV021GISIPROJECTSIDUKE_ENERGY110222580_"KV_SILAS17.2_WIPIMAP_DOCSIMXDINRA109.7_SILAS_WOUS.MXD - USER: GMARCHICA - DATE: 512912020
Stream 34
Intermittent
149 linear feet
O -
0 Feet 100
Stream 35
5s Perennial
512 linear feet
0
t
`C 62 �61
Wetland 22
acres
Wetland 23
0.84 acres
0 Feet 100
Stream 36
Intermittent
91 linear feet
..;fir. .�.:_ .��,.`<. - r•..
LEGEND
Study Area Photograph Location HDR Delineated Stream HDR Delineated Pond
GPS Point Duke Substation Inside ' ° Inside
O upland — Duke Transmission Line Outside Outside
Non -JD HDR Delineated Wetlands
O wetland Culvert
HDR Delineated Stream F Inside
Inside Outside
DATA SOURCE: NCOne Map Aerial Imagery, NCDOT Road Labels Outside
GPS POINTS WERE COLLECTED USING Li`I
TRIMBLE GE07XAND POST -PROCESSED 0 Feet 500
SILAS 100-kV LINE REBUILD PROJECT
DELINEATED WATERS OF THE US
NATURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT

Wetland 22
0.42 acres
Stream 35
Perennial
512 linear feet
Wetland 25
0.63 acres
Stream 35
Perennial
512 linear feet
Stream 36
Intermittent
91 linear feet
Wetland 23
0.84 acres
e.
0 Feet 100
ierpass!d
40440 44
:� Perennial
? 85linear
ta
P
..+yr
9
- , Wetland 2�
•�.� 0.09 acres
♦ u Feet 2uu
0 Feet 100
` 512 linear feet LEGEND
Study Area Photograph Location HDR Delineated Stream HDR Delineated Pond
0 Feet 100
O upland Duke Substation Inside Inside
Wetland 26 465 O wetland Duke Transmission Line Outside F..•: Outside
0.26 acres ' o GPS Point Culvert Non -JD HDR Delineated Wetlands
HDR Delineated Stream ® Inside
r�rihr.ttaii Lrl :
�j 0 Feet 100 P.77T/J
Inside Outside
-�- DATA SOURCE: NCOne Map Aerial Imagery; NCDOT Road Labels
-; GPS POINTS WERE COLLECTED USING Outside'
TRIMBLE GE07XAND POST -PROCESSED 0 Feet 500
SILAS 100-kV LINE REBUILD PROJECT
ESN E DELINEATED WATERS OF THE US
PATH: IICLT-SRV021GISIPRGJECTSIDUKE_ENERGY110222880_"KV_SILAS17.2_WIPIMAP_D0CSIMXDINRA109.8_SILAS_W0US.MXD - USER: GMARCHICA - DATE: 512912020 NATURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT

Appendix E
Data Forms

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/4/2020
Project/Site Silas 1ookV Line Rebuild
Latitude: 35.887650
Evaluator: Jessica Tisdale
County: Davie
Longitude:-80.555234
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other Mockesville 24K
Stream is at least intermittent 29.75
Ephemeral Intermittent erennia
e.g. Quad Ndmu.
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
C2D
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
0
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
C 2D
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
CID
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
C 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 7 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2O
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
CHD
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 7.25 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
CO.5D
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0 p
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
Coop
0.5
1
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
CW = 0.7 OBL =
1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: Bank height - 2', bank full width - 6-8', water depth - 6-24",
substrate - sand, gravel, cobble, velocity - moderate, clarity, clear.
Macrobenthos - caddisflies, midges are common. Flows southeast.
Wetland plants in streambed - carex lurida

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/4/2020
Project/Site Silas 1ookV Line Rebuild
Latitude: 35.893034
Evaluator: Jessica Tisdale
County: Davie
Longitude:-80.548211
Total Points:
Stream Deter circle one)
Other Mockesville 24K
Stream is at least intermittent 28.25
Ephemeral ntermitten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name -.
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
C2D
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
0
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
C72
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
C-T-D
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No =_C>
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 7.5 _)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2O
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1D
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
CO.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
CiD1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
<Tes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 5.25 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
C2D
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
C-0775
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
CW = 0.7 OBL =
1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: Bank height - 1', bank full width - 2-3', water depth - 1-12",
substrate - clay, gravel, cobble, velocity - slow, clarity, clear.
Macrobenthos - caddisflies, midges are common. Flows southeast.
Wetland plants in streambed - boehmeria cylindrica

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/4/2020
Project/Site Silas 1ookV Line Rebuild
Latitude: 35.894712
Evaluator: Jessica Tisdale
County: Davie
Longitude:-80.545835
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle -one)
Other Mockesville 24K
Stream is at least intermittent 38.5
Ephemeral Intermitten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
C2D
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
0
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
C3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
C7
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
CZ)
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 10 _)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
0
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1 D
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
<Tes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 8
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2D
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
Cip
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: Bank height - 2', bank full width - 8-10', water depth - 2-24", substrate
cobble, boulder, bedrock, velocity - slow, clarity, clear.
Macrobenthos - caddisflies, midges are common. Flows southeast.
Wetland plants in streambed - dichanthelium clandestinum
- sand, gravel,

Preliminary Data Entry Fields for New Actions
1SA W — -
1. Project Name:
Silas 100 kV Line Rebuild Project
2. Work Type:
Private ❑ Institutional❑
Government ❑
Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose:
Duke Energy will rebuild 11.1 miles of the existing Silas Transmission corridor (Line Index 1 W264)
between the Mocksville Main in Davie County to the Idols Tap Bent in Forsyth County, NC.
4. Property Owner / Applicant:
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC
5. Agent / Consultant: HDR Engineering of the Carolinas, LLC
6. Related Action ID Number(s):
7. Project Location - Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description:
Start: 35.88755,-80.55665
End: 35.98106,-80.3979
8. Project Location - Tax Parcel ID: N/A - powerline right-of-way
9. Project Location —County: Davie and Forsyth
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town : Mocksvl Ile, NC
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody: Yadkin River
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code: 03040101
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404
Regulatory Action Type:
❑ Standard Permit
U Nationwide Permit #
❑ Regional General Permit #
❑ Jurisdictional Determination Request
❑ Section 10 & 404 ❑
❑Pre -Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
❑ Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
Revised 20210513

Appendix A
USGS Topographic Maps

I l / L •, SC:m vim,; + :r� a�rl�� L�� • S)s. _ '�
DaeFinCb l P r_J- VS,�'�'� d� `�i f";�`'. •t\�-S.�vil;.� T'
C J_•:.
LEGEND-
�r �• LLB 0...�
Study Area
USGS Quadrangles
CDATA SOURCE: USGS Topo Quadrangles:
Mocksville, NC (1969) and Advance, NC (1969) Sf 1 '1� �s xz:._ • •� -_.• _ :r���l_. 1 r- = f r••j ,_ - .
4 0 Feet 2,000 �' / � a s'' �[� _ ,(,.,�i _, • • �` .``, `� • _�}�
rn
Twm Lakes Ai
Ir
MOCKSVILLE ADVANCE°' ^
C y �.1• QUADRANGLE �`'' T � � r• S :. QUADRANGLES<=��
�. .. _
�.:P,cfvc Area
OF
Ali
I �r a •� i` >✓Jjp .,� ' � I�'i M.
l�l^j • i _ 4.1 _��lri J' i/.� j!'•��. � ,`-� ':�i ._
� r .yam -- =�" I� • •• ••'. �'� `,` � � n.- _ m+ �1 -`Jl'' -
It. 93
It
w � � , is - } 1 �� � >r' r;' �-..(�'� � \� 4 �\' 1,. - � .-•'.--, i �} -,� s., �J
\�� i1116I �7 Sf Z1 L Cr"J' m .1l
SILAS 100-kV LINE REBUILD PROJECT
ESN E USGS TOPOGRAPHIC QUADRANGLES
FN It*)
NATURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT

_ LEGEND y 1 ':�' ./�_ .� e' �: �. SlrawbBrry ^!1 4 }•` :ti :. Jt -
Study Area
Ik
USGS Quadrangles , . - l .y
DATA SOURCE: USGS Topo Quadrangles: �� -� 92t +. — -a�C/ 1� �'..s •�3 �5''-'� '' l Sc?- _.� '��.�
Mocksvi Ile, NC (1969) and Advance, NC (1969)
0 Feet 2,000 1
63
5
i - : "� - w• 7
IT—
.41
In
aj
i � •` � f i� �I?c is �.� �.•.`' - �. x i79 ! L� � r'� - `, 1 � � �i � ��'
ram•:• _ _ _ ..��..
•trl-�'..�. .s �•'S ADVANCE
't-�. QUADRANGLE t.. } ,:. l ` 1 - -a --_ .-=__•�
-L ram ;�'.1,�` ��• l,_ .� • .. •iad Y, F •�S` • H'"'aC.: -ir- ,-•' `' �. y lr
-^+ >> '.9 ti. �.� - .... _ �; Ii%-- - - =k_=_ _ram -- ,��::.. L - • �' :�
�fv440
ily• R•3 .`
i9s_ r d I.
Lc: �jf' ,c. _ � - ' ti:' ; • ; r�.•:�='t; P.
� ,. � . gag �' �.s,� .. I ✓�� _ �� ',i55�,
CO'
'ldF• Gro.1• .�ch j
�; o� �, tit:' . '� ;� r +., •( 3 . _ � �'� r 1" 1
A&ance
l� .Bixby.. 836 i
��• i `,`Ir Ad 1 + •E. £ "�� '1 l\. i r -� \ • {1
wem l 1 �+e• I i. ' ]`•� �- Vl \V_l l r` _ �• �' •�1(a� 1. C![i ` -� 1�. �` `1}l� ff ` !r ,f. _ •!; • 2
.J � �� vr�I 1•a�J� ��S•- ��'� � �,crid l 1 / I ( �f V. • � II i ��
�) 1titi++RR? I! -_ - --_-' - �1 . ,�,1 - ,1 •-._ � L+ ?, � - • l _• �' -• V�4 _ • � ':�• r: if � .�� Mock.s•li '
\ S 'i \ - r- -'--•• %`!/ 1,\ti!' `' •. ��{. +�.. f . _ ... •'•`_ n % 1 1 Ji! _ 1 ' _��.:I �i a r"+ ✓r �.
SILAS 100-kV LINE REBUILD PROJECT
ESN E USGS TOPOGRAPHIC QUADRANGLES
FN �>
NATURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT

Appendix B
NRCS Soil Survey

frLEGEND FC32
C2
Study Area
pi
Soil Map Unit RdD
Hydric Rating (1 - 32%)
Ud'
Hydric Rating (66 - 99%) q
DATA SOURCE:
NRCS Soil Surey of Davie and Forsyth
Counties, North
Carolina (2019); Bing Hybrid Aerial Imagery
m
0
Feet 1,000 Ta
Ur
o.-
2
I
A
.t w
BaB
W
CaA
`i. J�=OkBYy
TaB r : as
RdRaD FCC Ur
TuB27`
RdD •e�,,W-41C.,
'R
• a Y �
ToB2
0,00/F
Ur -
r•"s- k• f
Ur
TM
iD AIsD
r �
UsB AIsC
y - —
`C2 �MsC
TOB2 r: .•
RaB MsD
Tm ID
CnA '
IAsD
SIC
M-0—
CC2 On -Site Soils
OkB2 — Oak Level clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded
ToC2 Tomlin clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded
OkB2 MsC — Mocksville sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
—y p ;:CoA — Codorus loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded
4 it - •� Y�� Ur ToB2 — Tomlin clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded
FaD . �r- Ur r.
� �B �+ RdC Rhodhiss sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
TmD — Tomlin loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes
FaD — Fairview sandy loam, 15 to 45 percent slopes
RdD — Rhodhiss sandy loam, 15 to 45 percent slopes
NaB — Nathalie sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes D
C FCC2 Ud — Udorthents, loamy '
[ CfB2 — Clifford sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded
CfB2 is Y.._
FCC2 TaC — Toast sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
' - ' FCC2 FaD �r" 1 RaC — Rasalo fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
t . RaB — Rasalo fine sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
TaC' ti ChA — Chevracla loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded
LdC2 FCC2 KnA — Kinkora loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded
� CaA LdB2 FCB2 FcB2 — Fairview sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded
FaD 6e PcC2 — Pacolet sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded
aD MsD — Mocksville sandy loam, 15 to 45 percent slopes
FcC2 — Fairview sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded
■W — Water
PcB2 — Pacolet sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded
CfB2 OkC2 — Oak Level clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded
` CID • FCB2 MrC2 — Mecklenburg clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded
4► d Lc D �FcC2 Ur — Urban land
W
LdEl t TaB — Toast sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
LdB2 MfC2 LdB2 4 PaD — Pacolet sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
MrB_2 AIrC2 LdC2 . MsB — Mocksville sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
_ EnC --. 1 _ �
• �' 1,. MrB2 — Mecklenburg clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded
/f C' WmD — Wickham fine sandy loam, mesic, 10 to 15 percent slopes
f LdC2 Ld DaA Dan River loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded
+ 'a AlIrB2ROW TmB — Tomlin loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
coy rC2yChA MFC2 � LdC2 i. " `• ..-� it
SILAS 100-kV LINE REBUILD PROJECT
DUKE
UENRCS SOIL SURVEY OF DAVIE AND FORSYTH COUNTIES, NORTH CAROLINA
FN *)ENERGY,
NATURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT

LEGEND OkC2
Study Area
COA
Soil Map Unit
Hydric Rating (1 - 32%)
Hydric Rating (66 - 99%) RdD
if
DATA SOURCE: NRCS Soil Surey of Davie and Forsyth I w QkC;
Counties, North Carolina (2019); Bing Hybrid Aerial Imagery
mw
0 Feet 1,000
COA �?�RaC Msp RaB RRaaB� B
TOW C2 C-. j.s.. •� RaB
RdD TaB - . ��/G W
B2 COA FaD W RUC RaC RaC Rom. - RdD
FcC2 RdD MsD RdD � �Ra� DkB
COA OkB2 COA
OkC2 Rd
—yy7 MsD
RdC
- -Tag ' w
COA D COA F.cB2 TaC ;T�
FaD * TaC RdC
TaB
a x
TOB2 c TaC
MsD
B COA TOB2 BRB
COA
OC2 TaC / RdC
T
ToC2 �ToC2 1 �'
COA� DhA RdD W
,yy RxB ti s
DhA W TaB I I* RdC
r RdC - •� =. -
FeB2.
TOC2 Is C MsD I RaB:-A
�• MsC {
0
2 RdD COA FcB2 .,
- ■ FeC.�
' On -Site Soils
AM RdC OkB2 - Oak Level clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded
ToC2 - Tomlin clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded
MsC Mocksville sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
OkCFaD COA _ 2 CoA - Codorus loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded
TmD �B2 OkB2 d ToB2 - Tomlin clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded
RdC - Rhodhiss sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
` RSI TmD - Tomlin loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes
KnA FaD - Fairview sandy loam, 15 to 45 percent slopes
RdD - Rhodhiss sandy loam, 15 to 45 percent slopes
TDB2 DeB::; . NaB - Nathalie sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
TOC2 Ud - Udorthents, loamy
CfB2 - Clifford sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded
- TaC Toast sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
FaD t � FaD RaC - Rasalo fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
y, TmD TDC2 ToC2 FcB2 RaB - Rasalo fine sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
- ChA - Chewacla loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded
' KnA - Kinkora loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded
ToB2 FcB2 - Fairview sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded
COA C-I PcC2 - Pacolet sand clay loam 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderate eroded
Y Y p p N
T' Tar MsD - Mocksville sandy loam, 15 to 45 percent slopes
MsD FcC2 - Fairview sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded
FCB2 W - Water
KnA PcB2 - Pacolet sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded
TOC2 r OkC2 - Oak Level clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded
MrC2 - Mecklenburg clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded
Ur - Urbanland
TaB
W� Toast sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
COA
MSC p RdD RdC PaD - Pacolet sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
W e MsB - Mocksville sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
►. Tag MrB2 - Mecklenburg clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded
Tm D RdC
�ToC2 WmD Wickham fine sandy loam, mesic, 10 to 15 percent slopes
-
RaB DaA Dan River loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded
FaD �CnA RdC - TmB FC8ZIin loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
SILAS 100-kV LINE REBUILD PROJECT
DUKE
UENRCS SOIL SURVEY OF DAVIE AND FORSYTH COUNTIES, NORTH CAROLINA
FN *)ENERGY,
NATURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT

c;-pid -
R
❑kB2
❑kC2
KnA V
0-
+r
"'Ud u
RaB
W
RaC .
MsC i► '
re
Jp AlE T
+� � uK�s � ■
dkB2 P�
i P _
J.OkC2 W
TOC2
Tm D
OkC:
COA
TO
Tm❑ i
W
On -Site Soils
01432 —
Oak Level clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded
ToC2 —
Tomlin clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded 1
MsC —
Mocksville sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
CoA —
Codorus loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded
ToB2 —
Tomlin clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded
RdC —
Rhodhiss sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
TmD —
Tomlin loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes
FaD —
Fairview sandy loam, 15 to 45 percent slopes
RdD —
Rhodhiss sandy loam, 15 to 45 percent slopes
A
NaB —
Nathalie sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes 81
Ud —
Udorthents, loamy
CfB2 —
Clifford sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded
TaC —
Toast sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
RaC —
Rasalo fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
RaB —
Rasalo fine sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
ChA —
Chewacla loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded
KnA —
Kinkora loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded
FcB2 —
Fairview sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded
PcC2 —
Pacolet sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded
MsD —
Mocksville sandy loam, 15 to 45 percent slopes
FcC2 —
Fairview sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded
W —
Water ]
PcB2 —
Pacolet sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded
OkC2 —
Oak Level clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded
MrC2 —
Mecklenburg clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded
Ur —
Urbanland
TaB —
Toast sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
PaD —
Pacolet sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
MsB —
Mocksville sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
MrB2 —
Mecklenburg clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded .
WmD —
Wickham fine sandy loam, mesic, 10 to 15 percent slopes
DaA —
Dan River loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded
TmB —
Tomlin loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
SILAS 100-kV LINE REBUILD PROJECT
DUKE
UENRCS SOIL SURVEY OF DAVIE AND FORSYTH COUNTIES, NORTH CAROLINA
FN *)ENERGY,
NATURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT

LEGEND
Study Area
+ Soil Map Unit
Hydric Rating (1 - 32%)
Hydric Rating (66 - 99%)
DATA SOURCE: NRCS Soil Surey of Davie and Forsyth
Counties, North Carolina (2019); Bing Hybrid Aerial Imagery
m
0 Feet 1,000
TmD �+ A. ="
TOC2
ToB2
]A BaB
COA BaB CIC CIB C14
FaF.
DaA DVA"'
C6oA
DaA
Sol
DkB
,W KnA
W� -} DkB
1
W{ I �_
TmD ! f W CoA COA
tW_
w` -
L.,� ToC2
,OkB2 L -�
Wd MsD COA
TmD
DhA
COA
Cm
WM I I
WmB� WmC
TmE
!y.
■� HaA BaB Al .
COA
B
T R Tm
IWmDi.
TmD IVFPaF; ,c■tr . vY
Wig
1.++ 7! .+• Pa�
r •.:�F� {
„r •rpCoA
�g
DF PaD .aL+ QPaC
WkB {
CeD
WkB' "AA
AS Z
y 77 w �+ BUB �r
AIsB KnA a _ -s �, ��-
OkC2 COA On -Site Soils
TDB2 ' 141 r FaD� DeB OkB2 - Oak Level clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded
A
DkB Y NaB ToC2 Tomlin clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded
ToC2 W 01 MsC — Mocksville sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
x .Wp CoA — Codorus loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded
ToB2 — Tomlin clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded ,
TmD ToC2x� _ RdC — Rhodhiss sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes EI
] •� TmD — Tomlin loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes
TmD sv, '�- TOC2 COA PaD FaD — Fairview sandy loam, 15 to 45 percent slopes
TaC RdD — Rhodhiss sandy loam, 15 to 45 percent slopes D
�, FCC2 NaB — Nathalie sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
TmD Ud — Udorthents, loamyTOC2 TOC2 W RaB CfB2 — Clifford sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded D
y #
TaC — Toast sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
RaC — Rasalo fine sand loam, 8 to 15 ercent slo es
C,, KnA RaB — Rasalo fine sandy loam 2 to 8 percent slopes
TIM COA Y p p
A1SD R ChA — Chevracla loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded
y RaC KnA — Kinkora loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded
W PCB2 PCB2 FcB2 Fairview sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded
TOC2 PcC2 — Pacolet sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded
COA
t ` ;,• � � Mocksville sandy loam, 15 to 45 percent slopes
TO �' RaB PaD MsD _ FcC2 — Fairview sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded
RaB f�
RaC W Water
—
PcB2 Pacolet sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded
PCC2 PaD OkC2 — Oak Level clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded
RaC MrC2 — Mecklenburg clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded
TDC2 CoA W Ur — Urban land
TmD r TaB Toast sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
TOB2 RaB CDA COA PaD — Pacolet sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
MsB — Mocksville sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
PaD
TOC2 ,
MrB2 - Mecklenburg clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded
`1 PCC2 I'
C •.� . WmD — Wickham fine sandy loam, mesic, 10 to 15 percent slopes
? W PCB2 DaA — Dan River loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded
xnD — Tomlin loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes 3
CB2 C2 2RaC Ok D
SILAS 100-kV LINE REBUILD PROJECT
>DU E NRCS SOIL SURVEY OF DAVIE AND FORSYTH COUNTIES, NORTH CAROLINA
FN
NATURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT

Appendix C
Summary of Delineated
Jurisdictional Waters

Appendix C. Summary of Delineated Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. within the Study Area
Streams
Stream 1
Length: 145 linear
(Tributary to
35.888162,
R3UB1/2
feet
20 C
Leonard Creek)
-80.556287
Stream 2
Length: 155 linear
(Tributary to
35.893092,
R4SB4
feet
20 C
Leonard Creek)
-80.548517
Stream 3
Length: 97 linear
(Tributary to
35.894743,
R3UB1/2
feet
20 C
Leonard Creek)
-80.545875
Stream 4
Length: 151 linear
(Tributary to
35.89571,
R3UB1/2
feet
20 C
Leonard Creek)
-80.544256
Stream 5
Length: 96 linear
(Tributary to
35.895995,
R5SB3
feet
15 C
Leonard Creek)
-80.544162
Stream 6
Length: 94 linear
(Tributary to Elisha
35.903573,
R5SB3
feet
25 C
Creek)
-80.531952
Stream 7
Length: 110 linear
(Tributary to Elisha
35.905921,
R5SB3
feet
20 C
Creek)
-80.528224
Stream 8
Length: 269 linear
(Tributary to Elisha
35.910116,
R5SB3
feet
Existing Culvert C
Creek)
-80.521334
Stream 9
35.910511,
R3UB1/2
Length: 96 linear
35 C
(Elisha Creek)
-80.520491
feet
Stream 10
Length: 122 linear
(Tributary to
35.918252,
R3UB1/2
feet
Existing Culvert C
Dutchman Creek)
-80.507856
Stream 11
Length: 107 linear
(Tributary to
35.921602,
R3UB1/2
feet
15 C
Dutchman Creek)
-80.502306
Stream 12
Length: 96 linear
(Tributary to
35.921916,
R4SB4
feet
15 C
Dutchman Creek)
-80.501807
Stream 13
35.923101,
R3UB1/2
Length: 149 linear
130 C
(Dutchman Creek)
-80.499872
feet
Stream 14
Length: 96 linear
(Tributary to Buffalo
35.925929,
R3UB1/2
feet
15 C
Creek)
-80.495335
Stream 15
35.92888,
R3UB1/2
Length: 355 linear
45 C
(Buffalo Creek)
-80.490589
feet
Stream 16
Length: 60 linear
(Tributary to Buffalo
35.929177,
R4SB4
feet
Existing Culvert C
Creek)
-80.4899
Stream 17
Length: 110 linear
(Tributary to Buffalo
35.930879,
R4SB4
feet
30 C
Creek)
-80.487352
Stream 18
Length: 128 linear
(Tributary to Buffalo
35.934388,
R4SB4
feet
20 C
Creek)
-80.481676

Stream 19
35.936216,
R3UB1/2
Length: 195 linear
35
C
(Buffalo Creek)
-80.478721
feet
Stream 20
(Tributary to Buffalo
35.936961,
R4SB4
Length: 97 linear
feet
Creek)
-80.477555
Stream 21
Length: 91 linear
(Tributary to Buffalo
35.937389,
R4SB4
feet
15
C
Creek)
-80.476852
Stream 22
(Tributary to Buffalo
35.939753,
R4SB4
Length: 191 linear
30
Am
Creek)
-80.473027
feet
Stream 23
Length: 103 linear
(Tributary to Buffalo
35.944284,
R4SB4
feet
20
C
Creek)
-80.465848
Stream 24
Length: 93 linear
(Tributary to Buffalo
35.945735,
R3UB1/2
feet
25
C
Creek)
-80.46359
Stream 25
Length: 53 linear
(Tributary to Buffalo
35.946297,
R4SB4
feet
Existing Culvert
C
Creek)
-80.462848
Stream 26
Length: 96 linear
(Tributary to Buffalo
35.947678,
R4SB4
feet
25
C
Creek)
-80.460545
Stream 27
Length: 69 linear
(Tributary to Buffalo
35.953386,
R4SB4
feet
20
C
Creek)
-80.463149
Stream 28
Length: 120 linear
(Tributary to Bailey
35.951703,
R4SB4
feet
20
C
Creek)
-80.453999
Stream 29
Length: 189 linear
(Tributary to Bailey
35.95369,
R3UB1/2
feet
25
C
Creek)
-80.450605
Stream 30
Length: 94 linear
(Tributary to Bailey
35.95750,
R3UB1/2
feet
20
C
Creek)
-80.444795
Stream 31
Length: 93 linear
(Tributary to Bailey
35.958785,
R3UB1/2
feet
25
C
Creek)
-80.442742
Stream 32
Length: 100 linear
(Tributary to Bailey
35.962976,
R3UB1/2
feet
Existing Culvert
C
Creek)
-80.436088
Stream 33
Length: 91 linear
(Tributary to Bailey
35.964102,
R4SB4
feet
20
C
Creek)
-80.434201
Stream 34
Length: 149 linear
(Tributary to Bailey
35.966082,
R4SB4
feet
20
C
Creek)
-80.427412
Stream 35
35.970856,
R3UB1/2
Length: 512 linear
45
C
(Carter Creek)
-80.404652
feet
Stream 36
Length: 91 linear
(Tributary to Carter
35.968667,
R4SB4
feet
20
C
Creek)
-80.415203
Stream 37
35.974235,
R3UB1
Length: 85 linear
600
WS-V
(Yadkin River)
-80.399612
feet
Stream 38
35.977181,
R4SB4
Length: 59 linear
20
WS-V
-80.399049
feet

(Trw""""'
River)
ive Rr
TOTAL: Length: 5,007 linear feet
Wetlands 7
35.901768,
Wetland 1
-80.534701
PSS1 B
0.15 acres
N/A
35.903558,
Wetland 2
-80.532026
PSS1 B
0.1 acres
35.91041,
Wetland 3
-80.520686
PEM2B
0.09 acres
N/A
35.91071,
0 acres
Wetland 4
-80.519922
PEM2B
(adjacent to Study Area)
N/A
35.922126,
Wetland 5
-80.501468
PEM2C
2.24 acres
N/A
35.923758,
Wetland 6
-80.498836
PEM2C
0.86 acres
N/A
35.925753,
Wetland 7
-80.49555
PEM2B
0.18 acres
N/A
35.927988,
Wetland 8
-80.492002
PEM2C
0.35 acres
N/A
35.929042,
Wetland 9
-80.490116
PEM2B
0.05 acres
N/A
35.929759,
Wetland 10
-80.489167
PEM2B
0.41 acres
N/A
35.934686,
Wetland 11
-80.481312
PSS1 B
0.08 acres
N/A
35.93693,
Wetland 12
-80.477613
PEM2B
2.82 acres
N/A
35.939319,
Wetland 13
-80.47368
PSS1 B
0.09 acres
N/A
35.939736,
Wetland 14
-80.472879
PSS1 B
0.01 acres
N/A
35.943526,
Wetland 15
-80.467156
PEM2B
0.01 acres
N/A
35.944285,
Wetland 16
-80.465858
PEM2B
0.02 acres
N/A
35.949,
Wetland 17
-80.458687
PEM2B
0.02 acres
N/A
35.953258,
Wetland 18
-80.463158
PSS1 B
0.2 acres
N/A
35.951593,
Wetland 19
-80.454227
PSS1 B
0.28 acres
N/A
35.958767,
Wetland 20
-80.442744
PEM2B
0.03 acres
N/A
35.966483,
0 acres
Wetland 21
-80.424665
PEM2C
(adjacent to Study Area)
N/A
35.968518,
Wetland 22
-80.415874
PEM2A
0.42 acres
N/A
35.968753,
Wetland 23
-80.414791
PEM2A
0.84 acres
N/A
35.969118,
Wetland 24
-80.412508
PEM2B
0.02 acres
N/A

=
Wetland 25
35.970161
MMMrO-W63 acres
IqM
-80.408058
35.970519,
Wetland 26
-80.406257
PSS1 B 0.26 acres
N/A
35.970957,
_-
Wetland 27
-80.404306
PEM2A 0.09 acres
35.9759,
Wetland 28
-80.399409
PEM2F 0.33 acres
N/A
35.977662,
Wetland 29
-80.399142
PSS1 B 0.09 acres
Wetland 30
35.979873,
PEM2E 0.68 acres
N/A
-80.398341
TOTAL: 11.35 acres
Ponds
Pond 1 35.917977, PUBHh 0.02 acres C
_-80.508327
Pond 2 35.951176, PUBHh 0.003 acres C
-80.455080
� TOTAL: 0.023 acres
PEM2A = Palustrine, emergent, nonpersistent, and temporarily flooded.
PEM2B = Palustrine, emergent, nonpersistent, and saturated.
PEM2C = Palustrine, emergent, nonpersistent, and seasonally flooded.
PEM2E = Palustrine, emergent, nonpersistent, and seasonally flooded/saturated
PEM2F = Palustrine, emergent, nonpersistent, and semi -permanently flooded.
PSS1 B = Palustrine, scrub/shrub, broad-leaved deciduous, seasonally saturated.
PUBHh = Palustrine, unconsolidated bottom, permanently flooded, impounded.
R3UB1/2 = Riverine, upper perennial, unconsolidated cobble -gravel bottom/sand.
R4SB4 = Riverine, intermittent, streambed, sand.
R5SB3 = Riverine, unknown perennial, streambed, cobble -gravel.
z C = Aquatic Life, Secondary Recreation, Freshwater. Freshwaters protected for secondary recreation, fishing, and aquatic life including propagation
and survival, and wildlife. WS-V = Waters protected as water supplies which are generally upstream and drain to Class WS-IV waters. These waters
are protected for Class C uses.

Appendix D
Maps of Delineated
Jurisdictional Waters

R
.:4
Stream 2
Intermittent
2
155 linear feet
44k
Cb
0
NOV AM
0 Feet 50
%
1 DUKE
FN It*) ENERGY.
0
tip,.. ��,� .�
Stream 5
Perennial
96 linear feet
-40 Feet 50
V-
LEGEND
Study Area
Photograph Location
HDR Delineated Stream
HDR Delineated Pond
Inside
Inside
0
0
GPS Point
Duke Substation
Outside
Outside
0
0
Upland
Duke Transmission Line
Non -JD
HDR Delineated Wetlands
0
0
Wetland
Culvert
HDR Delineated Stream
Inside
Inside
Outside
Outside
DATA SOURCE:
NCOne Map Aerial Imagery, NCIDOT Road Labels
G PS
PS POINTS WERE COLLECTED USING
0 Feet 500
TRIMBLE GE07X
AND POST -PROCESSED
rtry
SILAS 100-kV LINE
REBUILD PROJECT
DELINEATED WATERS OF THE US
PATH.11CLT-SRV021GISIPROJECTSIDUKE-ENERGY1102M680 "KV SILAS%7.2 WIRMAP D0CS%MXD%NRA%09AS1LAS-W0US.MXD - USER GMARCHICA - DAM 512912020
NATURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT

-•-roc. • >.
�>!•+x�o����ae�sr.;*Yasc
LEGEND
Study Area
Photograph Location
HDR Delineated Stream
HDR Delineated Pond
0
GPS Point �
Duke Substation
Inside
i..:.:
Inside
O
Upland
Duke Transmission Line
Outside
Outside
O
Wetland
Culvert
Non -JD
HDR Delineated Wetlands
®
Inside
HDR Delineated Stream
F
Inside
Outside
DATA SOURCE:
NCOne Map Aerial Imagery, NCDOT
Road Labels
F-
Outside
GPS POINTS WERE COLLECTED USING
0
Feet 500
TRIMBLE GE07XAND
POST -PROCESSED
�r 4 AlUi
w •b�~ "
NX
10
7 s
lri� �'.�':ai►
t q 4.
Wetland 1
0.15 acres
0
11
0 Feet 50
Stream 7
Intermittent
110 linear feet
0 Feet 50
NN
a,
rr j it, aA
M1 _ - x P
4T' A Ilk
o �!
C:o�0
r�163r:t
-.
• 5 k•� TZ� Y�'fi. 4'�
ti
�V r dP
�a� # ;4'.
Wetland 3
0.09 acres
r�
bk�
S:
Stream 9
Perennial
96 linear feet
on
Wetland 4
0.004 acres
0 •�
SILAS 100-kV LINE REBUILD PROJECT
ESN E DELINEATED WATERS OF THE US
FN ��
PATH: IICLT-SRV021GISIPROJECTSIDUKE_ENERGY1102M680_"KV_SILAS17.2_WIPIMAP_D0CSIMXDINRA109.2_SILAS_W0US.MXD - USER: GMARCHICA - DATE: 512912020 NATURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT

E
LEGENDK
Study Area Photograph Location
HDR Delineated Stream
HDR Delineated Pond*
^
a :•
Inside
Inside
0
GPS Point Duke Substation
O
Upland Duke Transmission Line
—Outside
Outside
a ._
O
Wetland �� Culvert
Non -JD
HDR Delineated Wetlands
Stream
10
®
Inside
Perennial
HDR Delineated
Stream
Inside
®
Outside
122
linear feet
DATA SOURCE: NCOne Map Aerial Imagery, NCDOT Road Labels
GPS POINTS WERE COLLECTED USING
Outside
<4
TRIMBLE GE07XAND POST -PROCESSED
0
Feet 500
A,
7--
0 Feet 50 0
s? . ...v
� rr
M
r
r�.
DUKE
ollz �nN RGY®
PATH: 11ClSRV021GISIPROJECTSIDUKE ENERGY11f/ ...fi 46KV_S IMI.2_WOMAP_MMMXDINRA1N.2M1SWOU&MXO - USER: GMAR.MA - DATE: 5.12f/2f!
11
0 Feet 100
Wetland 5
2.24 acres
Wetland 6
0.86 acres
Stream 13
Perennial
149 linear feet
SILAS 100-kV LINE REBUILD PROJECT
DELINEATED WATERS OF THE US
NATURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT

I
V.
ON IN
Pr
e
IA
)E0.86acres
r^.
"
0
Wetland 8
O
0.35 acres
11
0
1 1
0 Feet 100
Stream 14
Perennial
96 linear feet
Wetland 7
0.18 acres
0 Feet 50
E3
1
UKE
ollz �n EDN RGY.
I
x,
'v
0 Feet 100
�,
6
I,- tlllbi
J
Stream 15
Perennial
355 linear feet
Wetland 9
0.05 acres
0 Feet 200
PATH: IICLT-SRV021GISIPROJECTSIDUKE_ENERGY1102M680_44KV_SILAS17.2_WIPIMAP_D0CSIMXDINRA109.4_ SILAS_WOUS.MXD - USER: GMARCHICA - DATE: 512912020
O
O
O
o
O
O
O
O
O
°
08
O
7
O
O
Stream 16
Intermittent
60 linear feet
Wetland 1
0.41 acres
I
Stream 18
Intermittent
128 linear feet
Stream 17
Intermittent
110 linear feet
cot
>�
Ylrr �
0
o °
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Wetland 11
0.08 acres
0 Feet 50 ;'
0
I -
I
,IF,
0 Feet 50
gLd
J' nn
J LEGEND
Study Area
Photograph Location
HDR Delineated Stream
HDR Delineated Pond
°
GPS Point
Duke Substation
Inside
' ° Inside
r
O
Upland
Duke Transmission Line
Outside
Outside
Non -JD
HDR Delineated Wetlands
O
Wetland
Culvert
HDR Delineated Stream
®
Inside
Inside P77T/J Outside
Iwo
5
DATA SOURCE: NCOne Map Aerial Imagery, NCDOT Road Labels
:.
h GPS POINTS WERE COLLECTED USING Outside
TRIMBLE GE07XAND POST -PROCESSED 0 Feet 500
SILAS 100-kV LINE REBUILD PROJECT
DELINEATED WATERS OF THE US
NATURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT

Wetland 13 Stream 22
0.09 acres Intermittent
191 linear feet
o /1
O
0
0
0 Feet 100
Stream 19
Perennial
128 linear feet
O
1
-40 Feet 200
DUKE
FN SENERGY.
r3.
° Wetland 15
® , 0.01 acres
Wetland 14
0.01 acres
i
0 Feet 50
�N
Stream 20 Stream 21
Intermittent Intermittent
97 linear feet 91 linear feet
PATH: IICLT-SRV021GISIPROJECTSIDUKE_ENERGY1102M680_"KV_SILASI7.2_WIPIMAP_D0CSIMXDINRA109.5_ SILAS_WOUS.MXD - USER: GMARCHICA - DATE: 512912020
Wetland 12
2.82 acres
Stream 23
In
103 linear feet
O #2
O
1
4 O
Wetland 16
0.02 acres °
0
0
-40 Feet 50 i Ra
0.7ftm=
7 '1
x
I
Stream 24
Perennial
93 linear feet
Stream 25
Intermittent
53 linear feet
0 Feet 50
Stream 26
Intermittent
96 linear feet
x.
0 Feet 50
?e;
LEGEND
Study Area
Photograph Location
HDR Delineated Stream
HDR Delineated Pond
Inside
Inside
°
GPS Point
Duke Substation
O
Upland
Duke Transmission Line Outside
Outside
O
Wetland
Culvert
Non -JD
HDR Delineated Wetlands
®
Inside
HDR Delineated Stream
Inside
®
Outside
DATA SOURCE:
NCOne Map Aerial Imagery,
NCDOT Road Labels
Outside
GPS POINTS WERE COLLECTED USING
0
Feet
500
TRIMBLE
GE07XAND POST -PROCESSED
SILAS 100-kV LINE REBUILD PROJECT
DELINEATED WATERS OF THE US
NATURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT

i3alti�nar�+
SILAS 100-kV LINE REBUILD PROJECT
�� DUN E DELINEATED WATERS OF THE US
FN
PATH: IICLT-SRV021GISIPROJECTSIOUKE_ENERGY1102M680_"KV_SILASI7.2_WIPIMAP_O0CSIMXOINRA109.6_SILAS_W0US.MXO - USER: GMARCHICA - DAM 512912020 NATURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT

Stream 32
Perennial o
100 linear feet
0
0 Feet 50
0
Stream 33
�ntermifttrefnt
O
0 Feet 10
it
4
UKE
ollz �n EDN RGY.
PATH: IICLT-SRV021GISIPROJECTSIDUKE_ENERGY110222580_"KV_SILAS17.2_WIPIMAP_DOCSIMXDINRA109.7_SILAS_WOUS.MXD - USER: GMARCHICA - DATE: 512912020
Stream 34
Intermittent
149 linear feet
O -
0 Feet 100
Stream 35
5s Perennial
512 linear feet
0
t
`C 62 �61
Wetland 22
acres
Wetland 23
0.84 acres
0 Feet 100
Stream 36
Intermittent
91 linear feet
..;fir. .�.:_ .��,.`<. - r•..
LEGEND
Study Area Photograph Location HDR Delineated Stream HDR Delineated Pond
GPS Point Duke Substation Inside ' ° Inside
O upland — Duke Transmission Line Outside Outside
Non -JD HDR Delineated Wetlands
O wetland Culvert
HDR Delineated Stream F Inside
Inside Outside
DATA SOURCE: NCOne Map Aerial Imagery, NCDOT Road Labels Outside
GPS POINTS WERE COLLECTED USING Li`I
TRIMBLE GE07XAND POST -PROCESSED 0 Feet 500
SILAS 100-kV LINE REBUILD PROJECT
DELINEATED WATERS OF THE US
NATURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT

Wetland 22
0.42 acres
Stream 35
Perennial
512 linear feet
Wetland 25
0.63 acres
Stream 35
Perennial
512 linear feet
Stream 36
Intermittent
91 linear feet
Wetland 23
0.84 acres
e.
0 Feet 100
ierpass!d
40440 44
:� Perennial
? 85linear
ta
P
..+yr
9
- , Wetland 2�
•�.� 0.09 acres
♦ u Feet 2uu
0 Feet 100
` 512 linear feet LEGEND
Study Area Photograph Location HDR Delineated Stream HDR Delineated Pond
0 Feet 100
O upland Duke Substation Inside Inside
Wetland 26 465 O wetland Duke Transmission Line Outside F..•: Outside
0.26 acres ' o GPS Point Culvert Non -JD HDR Delineated Wetlands
HDR Delineated Stream ® Inside
r�rihr.ttaii Lrl :
�j 0 Feet 100 P.77T/J
Inside Outside
-�- DATA SOURCE: NCOne Map Aerial Imagery; NCDOT Road Labels
-; GPS POINTS WERE COLLECTED USING Outside'
TRIMBLE GE07XAND POST -PROCESSED 0 Feet 500
SILAS 100-kV LINE REBUILD PROJECT
ESN E DELINEATED WATERS OF THE US
PATH: IICLT-SRV021GISIPRGJECTSIDUKE_ENERGY110222880_"KV_SILAS17.2_WIPIMAP_D0CSIMXDINRA109.8_SILAS_W0US.MXD - USER: GMARCHICA - DATE: 512912020 NATURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT

Appendix E
Data Forms

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/4/2020
Project/Site Silas 1ookV Line Rebuild
Latitude: 35.887650
Evaluator: Jessica Tisdale
County: Davie
Longitude:-80.555234
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other Mockesville 24K
Stream is at least intermittent 29.75
Ephemeral Intermittent erennia
e.g. Quad Ndmu.
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
C2D
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
0
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
C 2D
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
CID
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
C 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 7 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2O
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
CHD
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 7.25 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
CO.5D
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0 p
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
Coop
0.5
1
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
CW = 0.7 OBL =
1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: Bank height - 2', bank full width - 6-8', water depth - 6-24",
substrate - sand, gravel, cobble, velocity - moderate, clarity, clear.
Macrobenthos - caddisflies, midges are common. Flows southeast.
Wetland plants in streambed - carex lurida

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/4/2020
Project/Site Silas 1ookV Line Rebuild
Latitude: 35.893034
Evaluator: Jessica Tisdale
County: Davie
Longitude:-80.548211
Total Points:
Stream Deter circle one)
Other Mockesville 24K
Stream is at least intermittent 28.25
Ephemeral ntermitten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name -.
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
C2D
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
0
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
C72
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
C-T-D
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No =_C>
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 7.5 _)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2O
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1D
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
CO.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
CiD1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
<Tes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 5.25 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
C2D
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
C-0775
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
CW = 0.7 OBL =
1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: Bank height - 1', bank full width - 2-3', water depth - 1-12",
substrate - clay, gravel, cobble, velocity - slow, clarity, clear.
Macrobenthos - caddisflies, midges are common. Flows southeast.
Wetland plants in streambed - boehmeria cylindrica

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/4/2020
Project/Site Silas 1ookV Line Rebuild
Latitude: 35.894712
Evaluator: Jessica Tisdale
County: Davie
Longitude:-80.545835
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle -one)
Other Mockesville 24K
Stream is at least intermittent 38.5
Ephemeral Intermitten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
C2D
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
0
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
C3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
C7
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
CZ)
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 10 _)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
0
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1 D
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
<Tes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 8
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2D
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
Cip
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: Bank height - 2', bank full width - 8-10', water depth - 2-24", substrate
cobble, boulder, bedrock, velocity - slow, clarity, clear.
Macrobenthos - caddisflies, midges are common. Flows southeast.
Wetland plants in streambed - dichanthelium clandestinum
- sand, gravel,

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/4/2020
Project/Site Silas 1ookV Line Rebuild
Latitude: 35.895689
Evaluator: Jessica Tisdale
County: Davie
Longitude:-80.544249
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle -one)
Other Mockesville 24K
Stream is at least intermittent 38.5
Ephemeral Intermitten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
C3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2O
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
C7
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 9.5 _)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
0
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1 D
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
<Tes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 8
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
Cip
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.7 OBL = 1.5 they = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: Bank height - 4-5', bank full width - 10', water depth - 1-3', substrate - sand, cobble,
bedrock, velocity - fast, clarity, clear.
Macrobenthos - caddisflies, midges are common. Flows southeast.
Wetland plants in streambed - dichanthelium clandestinum, leersia oryzoides

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/4/2020
Project/Site Silas 1ookV Line Rebuild
Latitude: 35.896053
Evaluator: Jessica Tisdale
County: Davie
Longitude:-80.544119
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle -one)
Other Mockesville 24K
Stream is at least intermittent 30
Ephemeral Intermitten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = " )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
C3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2O
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
C 3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
cyp
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 6 _)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
0
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
<77
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
C0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
QL5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 6.5 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
C2p
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
Cq.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 <Ufher = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: Bank height - 2, bank full width - 8', water depth - 6"-12", substrate - silt, sand, cobble,
velocity - moderate, clarity, clear.
Macrobenthos - caddisflies, midges, mayflies are common. Flows south.
Stream connects to S4.

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/5/2020
Project/Site Silas 1ookV Line Rebuild
Latitude: 35.903562
Evaluator: Jessica Tisdale
County: Davie
Longitude:-80.531922
Total Points:
Stream Deter circle one)
Other Mockesville 24K
Stream is at least intermittent 22
Ephemeral ntermitten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_ _)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
CTD
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 6 _)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1O
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
C -OD
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
COD
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 5 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
C-0-D
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
<ap
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 they = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: Bank height - 2, bank full width
velocity - slow, clarity, turbid.
Macrobenthos - none found.
Flows southeast.
- 2', water depth
- 6"-18", substrate
- silt, sand, clay,

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/5/2020
Project/Site Silas 1ookV Line Rebuild
Latitude: 35.906002
Evaluator: Jessica Tisdale
County: Davie
Longitude:-80.528233
Total Points:
Stream Determi on (circle one)
Other Mockesville 24K
Stream is at least intermittent 25.5
Ephemeral ntermitten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_ 14.5�
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
C1.5D
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 6 _)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2O
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
C-1p
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
COD
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 5 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
C-0-D
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 they = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: Bank height - 2-8', bank full width - 4', water depth - 1-2', substrate - silt, sand, clay,
velocity - moderate, clarity, turbid.
Macrobenthos - none found.
Flows southeast, and is deeply incised at the top of reach in the ROW.

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/5/2020
Project/Site Silas 1ookV Line Rebuild
Latitude: 35.909684
Evaluator: Jessica Tisdale
County: Davie
Longitude:-80.5211361
Total Points:
Stream Determi on (circle one)
Other Mockesville 24K
Stream is at least intermittent 29.5
Ephemeral ntermitten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 15.5
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
0
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
C-0-D
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
C1.5D
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 6.5 _)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2O
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
COD
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 7.5 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
0
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
C-0-D
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
QQ.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.7 OBL =
1.573>er = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: Bank height - 2', bank full width - 4', water depth - 1-12", substrate - sand, clay,
cobble, gravel, velocity - moderate, clarity, clear.
Macrobenthos - caddisfly and midges. Wetland plants in channel, carex lurida.
Flows east through pastures, has an access road crossing and some incision.

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/5/2020
Project/Site Silas 1ookV Line Rebuild
Latitude: 35.910594
Evaluator: Jessica Tisdale
County: Davie
Longitude:-80.520227
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circ ne
Other Mockesville 24K
Stream is at least intermittent 36.5
Ephemeral Intermitte Perennia
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_ 19 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
C1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 9.5 _)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
0
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
C1.5D
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 8 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1 p
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
(ap
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1. Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: Bank height - 10-15', bank full width - 20', water depth - 2-12', substrate - sand, silt,
clay, velocity - moderate, clarity, slightly turbid.
Macrobenthos - no sample.
Flows southeast through pastures, and has good sand accretion in the adjacent
wetlands.

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/5/2020
Project/Site Silas 1ookV Line Rebuild
Latitude: 35.917667
Evaluator: Jessica Tisdale
County: Davie
Longitude:-80.507754
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circ ne
Other Mockesville 24K
Stream is at least intermittent 30.75
Ephemeral Intermitte Perennia
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_ 14 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
0
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
C2D
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1 D
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
C7D
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
C-0-D
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 6.5 _)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
O2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 10.25
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed CW = 0.7 OBL =
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
1.5 Other = 0
Notes:
Sketch: Bank height - 2', bank full width - 4', water depth - 2-12", substrate
cobble, velocity - moderate, clarity, clear.
Macrobenthos - caddisflies, midges, mayflies common.
Flows southeast.
- sand, gravel,

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/5/2020
Project/Site Silas 1ookV Line Rebuild
Latitude: 35.921665
Evaluator: Jessica Tisdale
County: Davie
Longitude:-80.502336
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circ ne
Other Mockesville 24K
Stream is at least intermittent 30.5
Ephemeral Intermitte Perennia
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_ 14.5�
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
C 3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
C-2757
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
C-0-D
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
C1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 8 _)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
O2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
<Tes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
= 1.5 Other = 0
Notes:
Sketch: Bank height - 5', bank full width - 4', water depth - 1-2', substrate - sand, silt, clay,
velocity - moderate, clarity, turbid.
Macrobenthos - none seen.
Flows southeast and abuts wetland agricultural fields and pastures. Stream has been
modified (ditching).

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/5/2020
Project/Site Silas 1ookV Line Rebuild
Latitude: 35.921906
Evaluator: Jessica Tisdale
County: Davie
Longitude:-80.501844
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other Mockesville 24K
Stream is at least intermittent 22.25
Eplhemeral<jntermitte Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_ 9.5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
C 3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
CLD
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
C-0-D
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 7 _)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
0
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
<Tes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 5.75 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
CW = 0.7 , OBL
= 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: Bank height - 4', bank full width - 3', water depth - <6", substrate - sand, silt, clay,
velocity - slow, clarity, slightly turbid.
Macrobenthos - none seen. Wetland plants in streambed, murdannia keisak.
Stream flows south, abuts active wetland agricultural fields, and has been modified
and maintained (ditching/grading/cleaning).

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/5/2020
Project/Site Silas 1ookV Line Rebuild
Latitude: 35.921722
Evaluator: Jessica Tisdale
County: Davie
Longitude:-80.500013
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other Advance 24K
Stream is at least intermittent 22.25
Ephemeral Intermitte erennia
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_ 23 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
C 2D
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
C2D
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
CL5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
es = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 10.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
O3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
C 0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
CD
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1. Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: Bank height - 8-10', bank full width - 25', water depth - 5-10', substrate - sand, silt,
clay, velocity - moderate, clarity, turbid.
Macrobenthos - none sampled for.
Stream flows south, abuts active wet agricultural fields.

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/5/2020
Project/Site Silas 1ookV Line Rebuild
Latitude: 35.926216
Evaluator: Jessica Tisdale
County: Davie
Longitude:-80.495128
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other Advance 24K
Stream is at least intermittent 32.5
Ephemeral Intermitte erennia
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_ 18 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
C 2D
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
C2D
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
C 3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
QL5,
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
C1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 7 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
O2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
CL5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 7.5 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
CID
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
C 1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
C1.5
24. Amphibians
0
CL5D
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
CO.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1. Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: Bank height - 4', bank full width - 4', water depth - 1-24", substrate - sand (majority),
gravel, cobble, velocity - moderate, clarity, clear.
Macrobenthos - caddisflies, mayflies and midges. Lots of crayfish noted.
Stream flows south and is incised.

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/5/2020
Project/Site Silas 1ookV Line Rebuild
Latitude: 35.928992
Evaluator: Jessica Tisdale
County: Davie
Longitude:-80.490517
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other Advance 24K
Stream is at least intermittent 39
Ephemeral Intermitte erennia
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_ 19.5)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
C 2D
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
0
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
C2D
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
C 3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
C-1-D
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
C-0-D
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
C1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
es = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 9 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
0
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
<Tes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 11.5 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
CID
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
C-LD
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
CO.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL
= 1. Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: Bank height - 8', bank full width - 8', water depth - 1-3',
cobble, velocity - moderate, clarity, clear.
Macrobenthos - caddisflies, and midges.
Stream flows south through pasture and is incised.
substrate -
sand, silt, gravel,

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/5/2020
Project/Site Silas 1ookV Line Rebuild
Latitude: 35.928051
Evaluator: Jessica Tisdale
County: Davie
Longitude:-80.489955
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other Advance 24K
Stream is at least intermittent 24
Ephemeral ntermitten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_ 9.5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
C 2D
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
O
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1 7D
2
3
8. Headcuts
C-0-D
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
=?1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No ___0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 7.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
0
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
Co D
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
C0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
CID
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1. Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: Bank height - <2', bank full width - 3', water depth - 1-8", substrate - sand, silt, clay
velocity - slow, clarity, turbid.
Macrobenthos - none.
Stream flows southwest and has been graded recently, it is piped into Buffalo Creek
at the confluence to provide access across pasture.

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/6/2020
Project/Site Silas 1ookV Line Rebuild
Latitude: 35.931276
Evaluator: Jessica Tisdale
County: Davie
Longitude:-80.487469
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other Advance 24K
Stream is at least intermittent 26.5
Ephemeral ntermitten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_ 13.5�
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
C 2D
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
C?p
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1 7D
2
3
8. Headcuts
C-0-D
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
C1.5D
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 6 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
0
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
COD
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
CL5D
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
C1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
Co D
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
C0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; BL
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
= 1.5 ther = 0
Notes:
Sketch: Bank height - 3', bank full width - 2', water depth - 1-8", substrate - sand, gravel,
velocity - moderate, clarity, clear.
Macrobenthos - caddisflies and midges. Wetlands in stream bed, carex lurida, salix
nigra.
Stream flows west and flows into Buffalo Creek downstream.

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/6/2020
Project/Site Silas 1ookV Line Rebuild
Latitude: 35.934496
Evaluator: Jessica Tisdale
County: Davie
Longitude:-80.481977
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other Advance 24K
Stream is at least intermittent 24
Ephemeral ntermitten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_ 13 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
C 2D
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
O2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
C 2_D
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
COD
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
C 1 D
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 5.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
0
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
COD
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
CL5D
1
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Ces = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 5.5 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
Cl D
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
Co D
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
C0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
QL5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1. Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: Bank height - 3', bank full width - 5', water depth - 2-18", substrate
cobble, velocity - slow, clarity, slightly turbid.
Macrobenthos - caddisflies and midges.
Stream flows northwest into Buffalo Creek.
- sand, gravel,

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/6/2020
Project/Site Silas 1ookV Line Rebuild
Latitude: 35.936170
Evaluator: Jessica Tisdale
County: Davie
Longitude:-80.479078
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other Advance 24K
Stream is at least intermittent 35.5
Ephemeral Intermitten erennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_ 19.5)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
C3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
es = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 7.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2O
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
<ap
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 8.5 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
C0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
QL5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL
= 1. Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: Bank height - 6', bank full width - 6', water depth - 1-3', substrate
velocity - moderate, clarity, clear.
Macrobenthos - caddisflies and midges.
Buffalo creek flows southwest in the Study Area.
- sand, gravel,

S20
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/6/2020
Project/Site Silas 1ookV Line Rebuild
Latitude: 35.937070
Evaluator: Jessica Tisdale
County: Davie
Longitude:-80.477516
Total Points:
Stream Determ' n (circle one)
Other Advance 24K
Stream is at least intermittent 23
Ephemeral QIE2itten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_ 7.5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1)
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
C OD
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No 7 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 8 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 7.5 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
Cip
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
C-0-D
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75 OBL =
1.5 they = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: Bank height - <1', bank full width - 2', water depth - 1-3", substrate
organics, velocity - slow, clarity, clear.
Macrobenthos - none. Wetland plants in streambed, carex lurida.
Stream flows northwest into Buffalo Creek outside Study Area.
- silt, clay, sand,

S21
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/6/2020
Project/Site Silas 1ookV Line Rebuild
Latitude: 35.937275
Evaluator: Jessica Tisdale
County: Davie
Longitude:-80.477251
Total Points:
Stream Determ' n (circle one)
Other Advance 24K
Stream is at least intermittent 20.5
Ephemeral QIE2itten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal=_ 11.5�
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
C-O-D
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No 7 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 7 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
0
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
Ci D
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
COTT
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 2 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
C-0-D
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.7�=
1. they = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: Bank height - <1', bank full width - 2', water depth - 1-3", substrate
velocity - slow, clarity, clear.
Macrobenthos - none. Wetland plants in streambed, carex lurida.
Stream flows west into Buffalo Creek outside Study Area.
- sand, gravel,

S22
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/6/2020
Project/Site Silas 1ookV Line Rebuild
Latitude: 35.939872
Evaluator: Jessica Tisdale
County: Davie
Longitude:-80.473156
Total Points:
Stream Determ' n (circle one)
Other Advance 24K
Stream is at least intermittent 21.75
Ephemeral QIE2itten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_ 9 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
C?p
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
CLD
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
COD
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
C 1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
N
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 6 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2O
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 6.75 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
C1 D
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
Co D
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
ACW = 0. ; OBL =
1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: Bank height - w', bank full width - 2', water depth - 1-12", substrate - sand, gravel,
velocity - slow, clarity, clear.
Macrobenthos - none. Wetland plants in streambed, sambucus canadensis.
Stream flows west into Buffalo Creek outside Study Area.

S23
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/6/2020
Project/Site Silas 1ookV Line Rebuild
Latitude: 35.944760
Evaluator: Jessica Tisdale
County: Davie
Longitude:-80.465664
Total Points:
Stream Determ' n (circle one)
Other Advance 24K
Stream is at least intermittent 22.75
Ephemeral QIE2itten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_ 12.5�
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
0
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
C-075
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
ci-D
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No 7 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 6 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2O
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 4.25 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1 p
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
ACW = 0. ; OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: Bank height - 1', bank full width - 1-3', water depth - 1-12", substrate - silt, sand,
gravel, velocity - moderate, clarity, clear.
Macrobenthos - caddisflies. Wetland plants in streambed, murdannia keisak.
Stream flows northwest.

S24
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/7/2020
Project/Site Silas 1ookV Line Rebuild
Latitude: 35.946039
Evaluator: Jessica Tisdale
County: Davie
Longitude:-80.463193
Total Points:
Stream Determination (cir a)
Other Advance 24K
Stream is at least intermittent 31
Ephemeral Intermitte Perennia
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_ 18 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
C5D
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
C3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
0
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
Ci 7D
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2)
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No 7 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 6 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2O
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 4.25 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
C735
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1. they =
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: Bank height - 4', bank full width - 8', water depth - 4-24", substrate - silt, clay, cobble,
bedrock, velocity - moderate, clarity, clear.
Macrobenthos - caddisflies. Wetland plants in streambed, murdannia keisak.
Stream flows northwest and is incised.

S25
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/7/2020
Project/Site Silas 1ookV Line Rebuild
Latitude: 35.946039
Evaluator: Jessica Tisdale
County: Davie
Longitude:-80.463193
Total Points:
Stream Determ' n (circle one)
Other Advance 24K
Stream is at least intermittent 19.5
Ephemeral QIE2itten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_ 8.5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
CL.D
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No 7 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 6 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
0
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
CID
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0)
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL
= 1. Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: Bank height - 1', bank full width - 2', water depth - 1-6", substrate
cobble, velocity - slow, clarity, clear.
Macrobenthos - caddisflies and midges are common.
Stream flows north.
- sand, gravel,

S26
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/7/2020
Project/Site Silas 1ookV Line Rebuild
Latitude: 35.948109
Evaluator: Jessica Tisdale
County: Davie
Longitude:-80.460240
Total Points:
Stream Determ' n (circle one)
Other Advance 24K
Stream is at least intermittent 19.5
Ephemeral QIE2itten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 10.5
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
C-0-D
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
CLD
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
N
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 7 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
0
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
<jes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
QO.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1. Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: Bank height - 1', bank full width - 2', water depth - 1-6", substrate -
velocity - slow, clarity, clear.
Macrobenthos - midges are common.
Stream flows northwest.
clay, silt, gravel,

S27
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/7/2020
Project/Site Silas 1ookV Line Rebuild
Latitude: 35.953387
Evaluator: Jessica Tisdale
County: Davie
Longitude:-80.463105
Total Points:
Stream Determ' n (circle one)
Other Advance 24K
Stream is at least intermittent 29
Ephemeral QIE2itten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_ 13.5�
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
0
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 9.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
(lip
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
CO
1
2
3
22. Fish
co
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
CO-D
0.5
1
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1. Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: Bank height - 1-2', bank full width - 6', water depth
velocity - moderate, clarity, slightly turbid.
Macrobenthos - none noted.
Stream flows southwest.
- 1-8", substrate
- sand, gravel,

S28
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/7/2020
Project/Site Silas 1ookV Line Rebuild
Latitude: 35.951176
Evaluator: Jessica Tisdale
County: Davie
Longitude:-80.453754
Total Points:
Stream Determ' n (circle one)
Other Advance 24K
Stream is at least intermittent 21.75
Ephemeral QIE2itten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_ 9 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
O1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
C-1-D
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1 D
2
3
8. Headcuts
Co D
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1 0.5
C71
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
N
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 6 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
0
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Ces = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 6.75 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
co
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
C71p
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
F457W_7_077
- BL =
1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: Bank height - 2', bank full width - 2', water depth - 1-12",
gravel, velocity - slow, clarity, slightly turbid.
Macrobenthos - caddisflies and mayflies common.
Stream flows east.
substrate
- clay, silt, sand,

S29
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/7/2020
Project/Site Silas 1ookV Line Rebuild
Latitude: 35.953531
Evaluator: Jessica Tisdale
County: Davie
Longitude:-80.449702
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other Advance 24K
Stream is at least intermittent 30
Ephemeral Intermitten erennia
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_ 16 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 372
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 7 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
D
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
CO.5 D
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
GO p
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.
Other =
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: Bank height - 2-3', bank full width - 4-5", water depth
boulders, bedrock, velocity - fast, clarity, clear.
Macrobenthos - caddisflies and mayflies common.
Stream flows north.
- 6-24", substrate
- sand, cobble,

S30
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/7/2020
Project/Site Silas 1ookV Line Rebuild
Latitude: 35.957187
Evaluator: Jessica Tisdale
County: Davie
Longitude:-80.444703
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other Advance 24K
Stream is at least intermittent 32.5
Ephemeral Intermitten erennia
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_ 17.5�
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
e Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 8.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
0
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
CL5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 6.5 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
GO p
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.
Other =
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: Bank height - 2', bank full width -
velocity - moderate, clarity, clear.
Macrobenthos - none noted.
Stream flows north.
4-6", water depth
- 6-18", substrate
- sand, silt

S31
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/7/2020
Project/Site Silas 1ookV Line Rebuild
Latitude: 35.958428
Evaluator: Jessica Tisdale
County: Davie
Longitude:-80.442357
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other Advance 24K
Stream is at least intermittent 31.25
Ephemeral Intermitten erennia
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 16.5
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2O
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
Ci
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 7.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
0
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
CT57
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 7.25 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
GO p
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; BL =
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
1.5 ther = 0
Notes:
Sketch: Bank height - 2', bank full width - 24, water depth - 1-6", substrate
velocity - moderate, clarity, clear.
Macrobenthos - none noted. Wetlands in streambed, carex lurida.
Stream flows north.
- sand, silt, gravel

S32
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/7/2020
Project/Site Silas 1ookV Line Rebuild
Latitude: 35.962810
Evaluator: Jessica Tisdale
County: Davie
Longitude:-80.436119
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other Advance 24K
Stream is at least intermittent 30.25
Ephemeral Intermitten erennia
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_ 14.5�
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2O
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
(ap
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
C2 D
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 8.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
0
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
C-1p
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
<Tes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 7.25 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
co
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
CW = 0.7 D OBL =
1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: Bank height - 2-3', bank full width - 5-6', water depth - 1-18", substrate - sand, silt,
clay, gravel, velocity - moderate, clarity, turbid.
Macrobenthos - none noted. Wetlands in streambed, carex lurida.
Stream flows north.

S33
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/8/2020
Project/Site Silas 1ookV Line Rebuild
Latitude: 35.96446
Evaluator: Jessica Tisdale, Sara Easterly
County: Davie
Longitude:-80.433832
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other Advance 24K
Stream is at least intermittent 23.5
Ephemeral termitten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_ )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
CLD
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 7 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
0
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
QO.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Ces = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 5.5 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
co
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.
Other =
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: Bank height - 2', bank full width - 24, water depth - 1-18", substrate
gravel, velocity - moderate, clarity, turbid.
Macrobenthos - none noted. Wetlands in streambed, carex lurida.
Stream flows northwest.
- sand, silt, clay,

S34
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/8/2020
Project/Site Silas 1ookV Line Rebuild
Latitude: 35.965855
Evaluator: Jessica Tisdale, Sara Easterly
County: Davie
Longitude:-80.427214
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other Advance 24K
Stream is at least intermittent 26.5
Ephemeral termitten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_ 12.5�
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
C2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
COD
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
C-op
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
C1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 8 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
0
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
QO.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
CID
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
co
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
COD
0.5
1
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.
Other =
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: Bank height - 3-6', bank full width - T, water depth
gravel, cobble, velocity - moderate, clarity, clear.
Macrobenthos - none noted.
Stream flows north.
- 1-10", substrate
- sand, silt,

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/8/2020
Project/Site Silas 1ookV Line Rebuild
Latitude: 35.971422
Evaluator: Jessica Tisdale, Sara Easterly
County: Davie
Longitude:-80.418211
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other Advance 24K
Stream is at least intermittent 35.5
Ephemeral Intermitten erennia
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_ 22 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1 p
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
C 0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 10.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
0
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
C1.5D
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
<jes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
CID
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
co
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
COD
0.5
1
1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.
Other =
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: Bank height - 3-T, bank full width - 15', water depth
cobble, velocity - moderate, clarity, clear.
Macrobenthos - none noted.
Carter's Creek flows southeast here.
- 8-24", substrate
- sand, gravel,

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/8/2020
Project/Site Silas 1ookV Line Rebuild
Latitude: 35.968635
Evaluator: Jessica Tisdale, Sara Easterly
County: Davie
Longitude:-80.415166
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other Advance 24K
Stream is at least intermittent 26
Ephemeral ntermitten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal=_ 11.5�
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
C 1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
Czp
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o =
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 8.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
0
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
Effi
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
C-1D
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
<Tes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
CID
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
co
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
COD
0.5
1
1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.
Other =
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: Bank height - 24, bank full width - 6', water depth
cobble, velocity - slow, clarity, clear.
Macrobenthos - none noted.
The stream flows southeast here.
- 12-24", substrate
- sand, gravel,

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/8/2020
Project/Site Silas 1ookV Line Rebuild
Latitude: 35.973863
Evaluator: Jessica Tisdale, Sara Easterly
County: Davie/Forsyth
Longitude:-80.399721
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other Advance 24K
Stream is at least intermittent 50.5
Ephemeral Intermitte erennia
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_ 27 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
0
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 11.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
0
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 12 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
CO p
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
C2D
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.
Other =
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: Bank height - 20-30', bank full width - 400-450', water depth - 5-25', substrate
silt,gravel, cobble, boulders, bedroc, velocity - fast, clarity, turbid.
Macrobenthos - no sample taken.
The Yadkin River flows southeast here.
- sand,

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/8/2020
Project/Site Silas 1ookV Line Rebuild
Latitude: 35.968635
Evaluator: Jessica Tisdale, Sara Easterly
County: Davie
Longitude:-80.415166
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other Advance 24K
Stream is at least intermittent 29
Ephemeral ntermitten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_ 13.5�
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2O
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
C3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o =
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 9.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2O
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
CID
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
co
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
COD
0.5
1
1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1. Other =
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: Bank height - <1', bank full width - 4', water depth
velocity - moderate, clarity, slightly turbid.
Macrobenthos - none noted.
The stream flows south here.
- 14", substrate
- sand, silt,

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/4/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP1-wetlandl
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Mockesville
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.902035 Long:-80.534521 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: ToC2-Tomlin clay loam, 8-15%, moderately eroded NWI classification: PEM/PSS
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 1
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP1-Wetlandl
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius )
1. Rubus argutus
2. Sambucus nigra
3. Acer rubrum
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover: 30
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
1. Juncus effusus
2. Leersia oryzoides
3. Dichanthelium clandestinum
4. Carex vulpinoidea
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 50
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1. Lonicera japonica
2.
3.
4.
5.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
_=Total Cover
20% of total cover
30 Yes FACU
20 Yes FAC
10 No FAC
60 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 12
20 Yes
FACW
40 Yes
OBL
20 Yes
FAC
20 Yes
OBL
100 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 20
30 Yes FACU
30 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover: 6
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 71.4% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP1-wetlandl
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type Lo C2
Texture Remarks
0-4 7.5YR 4/3 80
7.5YR 6/2 20 D PL
Loamy/Clayey sandy clay, red parent material
4-14 7.5YR 4/4 95
7.5YR 6/2 5 D PL
Loamy/Clayey sandy clay
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA
147, 148) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) _Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
X Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, _Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA
148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127,
1479 148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Tomlin soils are Rhodic soils with a dark red parent material
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/4/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP2-Upiandt
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Mockesville
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.902035 Long:-80.534501 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: ToC2-Tomlin clay loam, 8-15%, moderately eroded NWI classification: UPL
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP2-Uplandl
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Acer saccharinum
30
Yes
FACW
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 44.4% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
30
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
15
20% of total cover:
6
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
Rubus argutus
40
Yes
FACU
FAC species x 3 =
2.
Ligustrum sinense
10
Yes
FACU
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
_
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
50
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
25
20% of total cover:
10
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Ligustrum sinense
20
Yes
FACU
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
Solidago gigantea
10
Yes
FACW
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
3.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
30
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
15
20% of total cover:
6
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1.
Lonicera japonica
30
Yes
FACU
2.
Parthenocissus quinquefolia
10
Yes
FACU
3.
Toxicodendron radicans
10
Yes
FAC
4.
Vitis rotundifolia
10
Yes
FAC
5
Hydrophytic
60
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
30
20% of total cover:
12
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP2-Upland1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-10 7.5YR 4/4 100 Loamy/Clayey sandy clay, no redox
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/4/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP3-wetiand2
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Mockesville
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.903271 Long:-80.531876 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: ToC2-Tomlin clay loam, 8-15%, moderately eroded NWI classification: PEM/PSS
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 1
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP3-Wetland2
Absolute
Dominant
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
% Cover
Species?
1.
Acer rubrum
10
Yes
2.
Pinus taeda
10
Yes
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
20
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
10 20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius
)
1.
Liquidambar styraciflua
10
Yes
2.
Pinus taeda
20
Yes
3.
Rosa multiflora
10
Yes
4.
Rubus argutus
10
Yes
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
25 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
1.
Rubus argutus
20
Yes
2.
Dichanthelium clandestinum
20
Yes
3.
Carex lurida
20
Yes
4.
Juncus effusus
20
Yes
5.
Carex crinita
10
No
6.
Carex tribuloides
10
No
7.
Poa compressa
20
Yes
8.
9.
10.
11.
120
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
60 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
idicator
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
7 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
12 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
58.3% (A/B)
4
FAC
FAC
FACU
FACU
m
FACU
FAC
OBL
FACW
OBL
FACW
FACU
24
1. Lonicera japonica 30 Yes FACU
2.
3.
4.
5.
30 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover: 6
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP3-wetiand2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-8 10YR 4/1 80 10YR 4/6 20 C PL Loamy/Clayey silty clay
8-16 7.5YR 4/4 70 10YR 5/6 30 C PL Loamy/Clayey clay, mangenese nodules
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/4/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP2-Upiand2
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Mockesville
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.903271 Long:-80.531838 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: ToC2-Tomlin clay loam, 8-15%, moderately eroded NWI classification: UPL
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP2-Upland2
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
30' Radius ) % Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Ulmus alata
30 Yes
FACU
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 20.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
30 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover:
6
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius )
FACW species x 2 =
1. Ligustrum sinense
20 Yes
FACU
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
20 =Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover:
4
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
5' Radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Poa compressa
40 Yes
FACU
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2. Verbesina alternifolia
30 Yes
FAC
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Vicia caroliniana 10 No FACU
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
80 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover: 40 20% of total cover:
16
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1. Lonicera japonica
30 Yes
FACU
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
30 =Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover:
6
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP2-Upland2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-8 7.5YR 4/3 100 Loamy/Clayey loam red soils
8-16 7.5YR 4/4 100 Loamy/Clayey loam soils
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/5/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP5-wetiand3
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Mockesville
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.910376 Long:-80.520618 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CoA - Codorus loam, 0-2%, frequently flooded NWI classification: PEM
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
Levee back area wetland in pasture.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches): 0
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP5-Wetland3
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 60.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
=Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Holcus lanatus
80 Yes
FAC
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
Dichanthelium clandestinum
20 Yes
FAC
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Poa pratensis 20 Yes FACU
4.
Carex typhina
20 Yes
FACW
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
Carex intumescens
10 No
FACW
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6.
Valerianella umbilicata
10 No
FAC
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
160 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
80 20% of total cover:
32
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1.
Lonicera japonica
30 Yes
FACU
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
30 =Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
15 20% of total cover:
6
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP5-wetiand3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture
Remarks
0-14 7.5YR 5/4 90
7.5YR 3/3 10 C PL Loamy/Clayey sandy clay
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
X Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil
Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Red parent material with iron -manganese masses
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/5/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP6-Upiand3
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Mockesville
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.910422 Long:-80.520548 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CoA - Codorus loam, 0-2%, frequently flooded NWI classification: UPL
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Point taken on levee of Elisha Creek.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP6-Upland3
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
30' Radius ) % Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Acer rubrum
30 Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
30 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover:
6
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius )
FACW species x 2 =
1. Acer rubrum
10 Yes
FAC
FAC species x 3 =
2. Acer negundo
10 Yes
FAC
FACU species x 4 =
3. Ligustrum sinense
10 Yes
FACU
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
30 =Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover:
6
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
5' Radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Ligustrum sinense
20 Yes
FACU
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
20 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover:
4
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1. Lonicera japonica
30 Yes
FACU
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
30 =Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover:
6
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP6-Upland3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-10 10YR 6/4 100 Sandy
10-16 10YR 4/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/8/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP7-wetiand4
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Sara Easterly Section, Township, Range: Mockesville
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.910643 Long:-80.519957 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CoA - Codorus loam, 0-2% slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: PEM
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
Wetland in active pasture.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No
X Depth (inches): 9
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP7-Wetland4
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 80.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius
)
FACW species x 2 =
1. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
20 Yes
FACW
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
20 =Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
10 20% of total cover:
4
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Juncus effusus
30 Yes
FACW
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2. Ranunculus arvensis
20 Yes
FAC
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Holcus lanatus 20 Yes FAC
4. Poa pratensis
20 Yes
FACU
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
90 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
45 20% of total cover:
18
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP7-wetiand4
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-14 7.5YR 5/4 90 7.5YR 3/3 10 C PL Loamy/Clayey clay
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
X Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Red parent material
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/8/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP8-Upiand4
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Sara Easterly Section, Township, Range: Mockesville
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.910538 Long:-80.520202 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CoA - Codorus loam, 0-2%, frequently flooded NWI classification: UPL
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Point taken in active pasture.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP8-Upland4
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Holcus lanatus
30 Yes
FAC
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2. Poa pratensis
30 Yes
FACU
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Allium vineale 10 No FACU
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
70 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
35 20% of total cover:
14
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP8-Upland4
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-10 10YR 4/3 100 Loamy/Clayey loam
10-16 7.5YR 4/4 100 Loamy/Clayey loamy clay
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/5/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP9-wetiand5
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Mockesville
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.921150 Long:-80.502570 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CoA - Codorus loam, 0-2% slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: PEM
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
Wetland spans a maintained right-of-way, and active agricultural fields and pastures abutting Dutchman's Creek
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
X Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
X Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 4
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 3
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP9-Wetland5
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Agrimonia parviflora
30 Yes
FACW
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
Carex vulpinoidea
20 Yes
OBL
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Holcus lanatus 10 No FAC
4.
Solidago gigantea
20 Yes
FACW
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
Hibiscus moscheutos
10 No
OBL
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6.
Vicia sativa
10 No
FACU
height.
7.
Carex typhina
10 No
FACW
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
110 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
55 20% of total cover:
22
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP9-wetiand5
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-5 10YR 4/3 80 10YR 5/6 20 C M Loamy/Clayey silty clay
5-14 10YR 5/2 85 10YR 5/6 15 C M Loamy/Clayey silty clay
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/5/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP10-Upiand5
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Mockesville
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.921568 Long:-80.502654 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CoA - Codorus loam, 0-2%, frequently flooded NWI classification: UPL
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP10-Upland5
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 75.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
=Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Holcus lanatus
30 Yes
FAC
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
Ranunculus abortivus
10 Yes
FACW
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Valerianella radiata 10 Yes FAC
4.
Geranium carolinianum
10 Yes
UPL
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
Carex vulpinoidea
10 Yes
OBL
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6.
Vicia caroliniana
10 Yes
FACU
height.
7.
Agrimonia parviflora
10 Yes
FACW
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
Verbesina alternifolia
10 Yes
FAC
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
100 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
50 20% of total cover:
20
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP10-Upiand5
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-2 7.5YR 3/1 100 Loamy/Clayey loam
2-16 7.5YR 4/6 80 10YR 5/6 20 Loamy/Clayey clay
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/6/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP11-wenand6
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Mockesville
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.923827 Long:-80.498481 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CoA - Codorus loam, 0-2% slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: PEM
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
Wetland spans an active pasture edge and fallow agricultural field on the east side of Dutchman Creek
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 3
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 2
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP11-Wetland6
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius-)
1.
Holcus lanatus
50 Yes
2.
Juncus effusus
30 Yes
3.
Carex vulpinoidea
20 Yes
4.
Poa pratensis
20 Yes
5.
Carex typhina
20 Yes
6.
Carex squarrosa
10 No
7.
Sambucus nigra
10 No
8.
Potentilla simplex
10 No
9.
10.
11.
170 =Total Cover
50% of total cover:
85 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 80.0% (A/B)
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
- Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
_3
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
FAC
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
FACW
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
OBL
FACU
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
FACW
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
FACW
height.
FAC
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
FACU
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
34
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP11-wetlands
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-5 10YR 4/1 85 10YR 4/6 15 C PL Loamy/Clayey silty clay
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/6/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP12-UpianM
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Mockesville
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.923827 Long:-80.498210 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CoA - Codorus loam, 0-2%, frequently flooded NWI classification: UPL
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Datapoint taken in fallow past corn field
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP12-Upland6
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 33.3% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Vicia caroliniana
30 Yes
FACU
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2. Ranunculus recurvatus
10 Yes
FAC
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Valerianella radiata 10 Yes FAC
4. Geranium carolinianum
10 Yes
UPL
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5. Oenothera biennis
10 Yes
FACU
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6. Allium vineale
10 Yes
FACU
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
80 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
40 20% of total cover:
16
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP12-UpianM
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-14 7.5YR 4/6 100 Loamy/Clayey loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/6/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP13-wetland7
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Mockesville
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.926331 Long:-80.495443 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CoA - Codorus loam, 0-2% slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: PEM
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) X
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 1
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Standing water in parts of wetland.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP13-Wetland7
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
Acer rubrum
15
Yes
FAC
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
15
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
8 20% of total cover:
3
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Juncus effusus
30
Yes
FACW
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
Leersia oryzoides
30
Yes
OBL
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Carex lurida 30 Yes OBL
4.
Impatiens capensis
20
No
FACW
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
Juncus effusus
10
No
FACW
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6.
Dichanthelium clandestinum
10
No
FAC
height.
7.
Persicaria sagittata
10
No
OBL
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
Juncus conaceus
10
No
FACW
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
150
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
75 20% of total cover:
30
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP13-wetland7
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-4 2.5YR 4/1 100 7.5YR 3/3 10 C PL Loamy/Clayey saturated, no mottles seen
4-14 N 4/ 100 Loamy/Clayey color, Gley 1 4/1
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
X Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/6/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP14-Upland7
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Mockesville
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.925596 Long:-80.49554 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CoA - Codorus loam, 0-2%, frequently flooded NWI classification: UPL
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Steep sloped valley.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP14-Upland7
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
Rubus argutus
10
Yes
FACU
FAC species x 3 =
2.
Ulmus alata
10
Yes
FACU
FACU species x 4 =
3.
Ulmus alata
10
Yes
FACU
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Aesculus octandra
10
Yes
FACU
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
40
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20 20% of total cover:
8
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Rubus argutus
30
Yes
FACU
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
Eupatorium capillifolium
10
Yes
FACU
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Poa pratensis 10 Yes FACU
4.
Festuca ovina
10
Yes
UPL
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
60
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
30 20% of total cover:
12
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1.
Lonicera japonica
10
Yes
FACU
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
10
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
5 20% of total cover:
2
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP14-Upiand7
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-8 10YR 4/6 100 Loamy/Clayey loam
8-16 10YR 5/3 60 Loamy/Clayey 7.5YR 4/6 40%- 2nd color matrix
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/6/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP15-wenand8
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Mockesville
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.928470 Long:-80.491909 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CoA - Codorus loam, 0-2% slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: PEM
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No within a Wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
Dug ditch running through wetland, tower within wetland
HYDROLOGY
Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
X Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 8
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP15-Wetland8
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Eleocharis tenuis
30 Yes
FACW
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
Juncus effusus
30 Yes
FACW
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Rumex crispus 30 Yes FAC
4.
Festuca ovina
10 No
UPL
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
Ranunculus recurvatus
10 No
FAC
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6.
Persicaria pensylvanica
10 No
FACW
height.
7.
Carex vulpinoidea
10 No
OBL
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
130 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
65 20% of total cover:
26
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP15-wetiand8
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-5 10YR 4/3 80 10YR 4/6 20 C PL Loamy/Clayey clay loam
5-14 10YR 4/2 85 10YR 4/6 15 C PL Loamy/Clayey clay
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/6/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP16-Upiand8
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Mockesville
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.928470 Long:-80.491656 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CoA - Codorus loam, 0-2%, frequently flooded NWI classification: UPL
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point in pasture.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP16-Upland8
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 16.7% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
_
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
=Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Poa pratensis
30 Yes
FACU
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2. Festuca ovina
10 Yes
UPL
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Dactylis glomerata 10 Yes FACU
4. Schedonorus arundinaceus
10 Yes
FACU
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5. Allium vineale
10 Yes
FACU
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6. Ranunculus recurvatus
10 Yes
FAC
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
80 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
40 20% of total cover:
16
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP16-Upiand8
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-14 10YR 4/6 100 Loamy/Clayey loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/6/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP17-wenand9
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Mockesville
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.92973 Long:-80.4900201 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CoA - Codorus loam, 0-2% slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: PEM
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
Wetland located within planted wheat field.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
X Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 5
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP17-Wetland9
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Ranunculus recurvatus
30 Yes
FAC
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2. Juncus effusus
30 Yes
FACW
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Rumex crispus 30 Yes FAC
4. Carex lurida
10 No
OBL
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5. Ranunculus recurvatus
10 No
FAC
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
110 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
55 20% of total cover:
22
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP17-wetiand9
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 6/3 90 10YR 5/6 10 C PL Loamy/Clayey loamy coarse sand
4-14 10YR 4/1 80 5YR 4/6 20 C M Loamy/Clayey clay
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
X Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/6/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP18-Upiand9
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Mockesville
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.929177 Long:-80.490027 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CoA - Codorus loam, 0-2%, frequently flooded NWI classification: UPL
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point in wheat field.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP18-Upland9
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 1 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Triticum aestivum
90 Yes
UPL
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2. Ranunculus recurvatus
5 No
FAC
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
95 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
48 20% of total cover:
19
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP18-Upiand9
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-14 10YR 4/4 95 10YR 4/2 5 D M Loamy/Clayey clay loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/6/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP19-wenand,o
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Mockesville
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.930376 Long:-80.488944 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CoA - Codorus loam, 0-2% slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: PEM
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
Wetland located within pasture/wheat field and flows southwest to stream (SN)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 5
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP19-Wetiandlo
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius-)
1. Carex tribuloides
2. Juncus effusus
3. Holcus lanatus
4. Vernonia noveboracensis
5. Eleocharis tenuis
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 60
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
_=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
_=Total Cover
20% of total cover
40 Yes
FACW
30 Yes
FACW
30 Yes
FAC
10 No
FACW
10 No
FACW
120 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 24
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP19-wenandlo
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-5 10YR 4/1 85 10YR 5/6 15 C PL Loamy/Clayey loamy clay
5-14 10YR 4/1 80 10YR 4/6 20 C PL Loamy/Clayey clay
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/6/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP20-Uplandlo
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Mockesville
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.930466 Long:-80.48883 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CoA - Codorus loam, 0-2%, frequently flooded NWI classification: UPL
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point in pasture.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP20-Upland10
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 16.7% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
_
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
=Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Festuca rubra
20 Yes
FACU
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2. Holcus lanatus
30 Yes
FAC
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Schedonorus arundinaceus 20 Yes FACU
4. Poa compressa
20 Yes
FACU
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5. Plantago lanceolata
20 Yes
UPL
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6. Leucanthemum vulgare
20 Yes
UPL
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
130 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
65 20% of total cover:
26
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP20-Uplandlo
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-14 7.5YR 5/4 100 10YR 4/2 Loamy/Clayey sandy clay
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/6/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP21-wetland,,
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Mockesville
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.934570 Long:-80.481282 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: RdC - Rhodhiss sandy loam, 8-15%, well drained NWI classification: PEM/PSS
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
Wetland located on hillslope.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 3
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP21-Wetlandll
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 8 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 10 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 80.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
Hypericum prolificum
15
Yes
FACU
FAC species x 3 =
2.
Liquidambar styraciflua
5
Yes
FAC
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
20
=Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
10 20% of total cover:
4
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Holcus lanatus
20
Yes
FAC
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
Festuca rubra
20
Yes
FACU
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 10 Yes FACW
4.
Oenothera fruticosa
10
Yes
FAC
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
Carex tribuloides
10
Yes
FACW
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6.
Juncus coriaceus
10
Yes
FACW
height.
7.
Carexlurida
10
Yes
OBL
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
Dichanthelium scoparium
10
Yes
FACW
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
100
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
50 20% of total cover:
20
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP21-wetlandll
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 4/1 90 10YR 5/8 10 C PL Loamy/Clayey sandy clay loam, shallow to bedrock
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Hillslope with shallow soils, hit bedrock at 6"
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/6/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP22-Uplandll
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Mockesville
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.934172 Long:-80.481247 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: RdC-Rhodhiss sandy loam, 8-15%, well drained NWI classification: UPL
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point upslope of hillslope wetland
HYDROLOGY
Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP22-Uplandll
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 14.3% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
_
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
=Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Rubus argutus
20 Yes
FACU
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2. Festuca rubra
10 Yes
FACU
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Rosa multiflora 10 Yes FACU
4. Holcus lanatus
10 Yes
FAC
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5. Poa pratensis
10 Yes
FACU
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6. Ulmus alata
10 Yes
FACU
height.
7. Leucanthemum vulgare
10 Yes
UPL
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
80 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
40 20% of total cover:
16
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP22-Uplandll
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-8 10YR 3/4 100 Loamy/Clayey loam
8-16 10YR 4/3 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M Loamy/Clayey loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soil
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/6/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP23-wenandU
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Mockesville
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.937033 Long:-80.477515 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CoA-Codorus loam, 0-2%, frequently flooded NWI classification: PEM
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No within a Wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
Large floodplain wetland associated with Buffalo Creek
HYDROLOGY
Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 5
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP23-Wetland12
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 77.8% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
=Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Holcus lanatus
20 Yes
FAC
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
Carex crinita
20 Yes
OBL
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Carex lurida 10 Yes OBL
4.
Carex tribuloides
10 Yes
FACW
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
Juncus effusus
10 Yes
FACW
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6.
Juncus coriaceus
10 Yes
FACW
height.
7.
Dichanthelium scoparium
10 Yes
FACW
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
Festuca rubra
10 Yes
FACU
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9.
Schedonorus arundinaceus
10 Yes
FACU
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
110 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
55 20% of total cover:
22
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP23-wetia,d12
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-14 10YR 4/1 80 10YR 5/6 20 C M Loamy/Clayey silty clay
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/6/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP24-Upland12
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Mockesville
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.935540 Long:-80.479596 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CoA-Codorus loam, 0-2%, frequently flooded NWI classification: UPL
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point at floodplain west toe of slope
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP24-Upland12
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
1.
Poa compressa
20 Yes
2.
Festuca rubra
10 Yes
3.
Rubus argutus
10 Yes
4.
Holcus lanatus
10 Yes
5.
Poa pratensis
10 Yes
6.
Solidago altissima
10 Yes
7.
Leucanthemum vulgare
10 Yes
8.
9.
10.
11.
80 =Total Cover
50% of total cover:
40 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
)
2.
3.
4.
5.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 14.3% (A/B)
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
- Dominance Test is >50%
_2
- Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
_3
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
FACU
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
FACU
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
FACU
FAC
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
FACU
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
FACU
height.
UPL
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
16
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP24-Upland12
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-10 10YR 3/3 100 Loamy/Clayey loam
10-16 10YR 4/3 95 10YR 5/6 5 C M Loamy/Clayey loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soil
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/6/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP25-wenand13
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Bixby
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.939864 Long:-80.474199 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CoA-Codorus loam, 0-2%, frequently flooded NWI classification: PEM/PSS
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
Datapoint at toe of slope. Parts of wetland are also forested on the eastern edge of the right-of-way
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 1
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP25-Wetland13
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 62.5% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
Platanus occidentalis
20
Yes
FACW
FAC species x 3 =
2.
Pinus taeda
5
No
FAC
FACU species x 4 =
3.
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
5
No
FACW
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Acerrubrum
5
No
FAC
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
35
=Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
18 20% of total cover:
7
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Juncus effusus
20
Yes
FACW
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
Holcus lanatus
10
Yes
FAC
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Agrimonia parviflora 10 Yes FACW
4.
Carex lurida
10
Yes
OBL
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
Rubus argutus
10
Yes
FACU
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6.
Festuca rubra
10
Yes
FACU
height.
7.
Schedonorus arundinaceus
10
Yes
FACU
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
80
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
40 20% of total cover:
16
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP25-wetia,d13
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 5/2 90 10YR 5/6 10 C M Loamy/Clayey sandy loam
6-14 10YR 5/3 80 10YR 5/6 20 C M Loamy/Clayey clay loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/6/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP26-Upland13
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Bixby
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.939468 Long:-80.474199 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CoA-Codorus loam, 0-2%, frequently flooded NWI classification: UPL
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP26-Uplandl3
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 12.5% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
_
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
=Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Poa compressa
20 Yes
FACU
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
Festuca rubra
10 Yes
FACU
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Bromus arvensis 10 Yes FACU
4.
Holcus lanatus
10 Yes
FAC
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
Poa pratensis
10 Yes
FACU
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6.
Potentilla canadensis
10 Yes
UPL
height.
7.
Leucanthemum vulgare
10 Yes
UPL
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
Trifolium pratense
10 Yes
FACU
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
90 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
45 20% of total cover:
18
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP26-Upland13
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-15 10YR 4/4 100 Loamy/Clayey sandy loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/6/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP27-wenandM
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Bixby
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): flat Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.943409 Long:-80.467121 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CoA-Codorus loam, 0-2%, frequently flooded NWI classification: PSS
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
Streamside riparian wetland.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
X Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP27-Wetland14
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius )
1. Salix nigra
2. Alnus serrulata
3. Betula nigra
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover: 40
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius-)
1. Carex crinita
2. Galium aparine
3. Dulichium arundinaceum
4. Hibiscus moscheutos
5. Coreopsis major
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 40
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1. Lonicera japonica
2.
3.
4.
5.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
_=Total Cover
20% of total cover
40 Yes OBL
30 Yes OBL
10 No FACW
80 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 16
30 Yes
OBL
20 Yes
FACU
10 No
OBL
10 No
OBL
10 No
UPL
80 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 16
20 Yes FACU
20 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 60.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP27-wetia,d14
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-5 10YR 4/1 95 10YR 7/1 5 D M Loamy/Clayey sandy loam
5-14 10YR 4/2 90 10YR 5/6 10 C M Loamy/Clayey sandy loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/6/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP28-Upland14
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Bixby
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): flat Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.939707 Long:-80.473027 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CoA-Codorus loam, 0-2%, frequently flooded NWI classification: UPL
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP28-Uplandl4
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 28.6% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
Acer rubrum
15 Yes
FAC
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
15 =Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
8 20% of total cover:
3
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Poa compressa
20 Yes
FACU
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
Festuca rubra
10 Yes
FACU
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Bromus arvensis 10 Yes FACU
4.
Holcus lanatus
10 Yes
FAC
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
Poa pratensis
10 Yes
FACU
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6.
Geranium pratense
10 Yes
UPL
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
70 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
35 20% of total cover:
14
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP28-UplandU
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-16 10YR 4/4 100 Loamy/Clayey loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/7/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP2e-wenand15
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Bixby
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.943409 Long:-80.467121 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: RdD-Rhodhiss sandy loam, 15-45%, well drained NWI classification: PEM
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
Steep valley, headwater wetland.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 1
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP28-Wetland15
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.7% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is:53.0'
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Microstegium vimineum
10 Yes
FAC
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
Galium aparine
10 Yes
FACU
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Dichanthelium clandestinum 10 Yes FAC
4.
Leersia oryzoides
10 Yes
OBL
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
Athyrium asplenioides
10 Yes
FAC
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
50 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
25 20% of total cover:
10
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1.
Lonicera japonica
20 Yes
FACU
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
20 =Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
10 20% of total cover:
4
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP28-wetland15
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-14 10YR 4/1 95 10YR 7/1 5 D M Loamy/Clayey sandy loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/6/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP30-Upland15
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Bixby
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 3
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.943409 Long:-80.46713 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: RdD-Rhodhiss sandy loam, 15-45%, well drained NWI classification: UPL
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP30-Upland15
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius
)
FACW species x 2 =
1. Acer saccharinum
15 Yes
FACW
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
_
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
15 =Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
8 20% of total cover:
3
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Poa compressa
20 Yes
FACU
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2. Verbesina alternifolia
20 Yes
FAC
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Galium aparine 20 Yes FACU
4. Phytolacca americana
10 No
FACU
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5. Valerianella radiata
10 No
FAC
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
80 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
40 20% of total cover:
16
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP30-Upland15
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-5 10YR 3/3 100 Loamy/Clayey loam
5-16 10YR 3/4 100 Loamy/Clayey loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/7/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP31-wenandM
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Bixby
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.944699 Long:-80.46583 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: FaD-Fairview sandy loam, 15-45%, well drained NWI classification: PEM
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
Wetland located north of stream.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 7
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP31-Wetland16
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 62.5% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
Acer negundo
15
Yes
FAC
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
15
=Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
8 20% of total cover:
3
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Rumex crispus
20
Yes
FAC
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
Galium aparine
10
Yes
FACU
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Carex lurida 10 Yes OBL
4.
Murdannia keisak
10
Yes
OBL
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
Microstegium vimineum
10
Yes
FAC
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6.
Rubus argutus
10
Yes
FACU
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
70
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
35 20% of total cover:
14
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1.
Lonicera japonica
20
Yes
FACU
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
20
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
10 20% of total cover:
4
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP31-wetia,d16
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-8 10YR 4/2 95 10YR 5/6 5 C M Loamy/Clayey sandy loam
8-14 10YR 4/1 95 10YR 3/4 5 C PL/M Loamy/Clayey sandy loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/7/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP32-Upland16
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Bixby
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 3
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.944543 Long:-80.46584 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: RdD-Rhodhiss sandy loam, 15-45%, well drained NWI classification: UPL
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP32-Upland16
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 25.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Leucanthemum vulgare
30 Yes
UPL
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
Rubus argutus
10 Yes
FACU
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Solidago altissima 10 Yes FACU
4.
Carya glabra
10 Yes
FACU
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
Valerianella radiata
10 Yes
FAC
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6.
Holcus lanatus
10 Yes
FAC
height.
7.
Trifolium repens
10 Yes
FACU
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
90 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
45 20% of total cover:
18
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1.
Lonicera japonica
10 Yes
FACU
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
10 =Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
5 20% of total cover:
2
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP32-Upland16
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-5 10YR 4/6 100 Loamy/Clayey loamy sand
5-16 10YR 5/6 100 Loamy/Clayey loamy sand
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/7/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP33-wetland17
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Bixby
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.948423 Long:-80.458626 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: RdD-Rhodhiss sandy loam, 15-45%, well drained NWI classification: PEM
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 10
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP33-Wetland17
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.7% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
Rubus argutus
10
Yes
FACU
FAC species x 3 =
2.
Rosa multiflora
10
Yes
FACU
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
20
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
10 20% of total cover:
4
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Agrimonia parviflora
20
Yes
FACW
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
Carex vulpinoidea
20
Yes
OBL
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Carex lurida 20 Yes OBL
4.
Microstegium vimineum
20
Yes
FAC
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
Juncus effusus
20
Yes
FACW
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
100
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
50 20% of total cover:
20
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1.
Lonicera japonica
20
Yes
FACU
2.
Toxicodendron radicans
20
Yes
FAC
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
40
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20 20% of total cover:
8
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP33-wetland17
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-8 10YR 3/1 95 10YR 3/6 5 C PL/M Loamy/Clayey sandy clay loam
8-14 10YR 4/1 90 10YR 5/6 10 C PL/M Loamy/Clayey sandy clay loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
X Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/7/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP34-Upland17
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Bixby
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 3
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.948423 Long:-80.458562 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: RdD-Rhodhiss sandy loam, 15-45%, well drained NWI classification: UPL
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP34-Upland17
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 28.6% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Holcus lanatus
30 Yes
FAC
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
Festuca rubra
20 Yes
FACU
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Solidago altissima 10 Yes FACU
4.
Carya glabra
10 Yes
FACU
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
Dactylis glomerata
10 Yes
FACU
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6.
Verbesina alternifolia
10 Yes
FAC
height.
7.
Trifolium repens
10 Yes
FACU
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
Holcus lanatus
FAC
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
100 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
50 20% of total cover:
20
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP34-Upland17
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-5 5YR 3/3 100 Loamy/Clayey clay loam
5-16 5YR 4/6 100 Loamy/Clayey clay loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/8/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP35-wenand1e
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Bixby
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.952434 Long:-80.463088 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: MsC-Mocksville sandy Ioam,8-15%, well drained NWI classification: PEM/PSS
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 10
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP35-Wetland18
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius )
1.
Rubus argutus
30 Yes
2.
Sambucus nigra
20 Yes
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 25
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
1.
Agrimonia parviflora
20 Yes
2.
Persicaria hydropiper
20 Yes
3.
Carex lurida
20 Yes
4.
Microstegium vimineum
20 Yes
5.
Eupatorium perfoliatum
20 Yes
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
100 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 50
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
FACU
FAC
IN
FACW
OBL
OBL
FAC
FACW
OR
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 85.7% (A/B)
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP35-wetia,d18
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-14 10YR 4/1 95 10YR 5/6 5 C PL/M Loamy/Clayey clay
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/7/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP36-Upland18
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Bixby
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 3
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.952434 Long:-80.46287 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: MsC-Mocksville sandy Ioam,8-15%, well drained NWI classification: UPL
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP36-Uplandl8
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 16.7% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Poa pratensis
20 Yes
FACU
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2. Festuca rubra
20 Yes
FACU
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Ranunculus recurvatus 10 Yes FAC
4. Plantago lanceolata
10 Yes
UPL
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5. Dactylis glomerata
10 Yes
FACU
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6. Vicia sativa
10 Yes
FACU
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
80 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
40 20% of total cover:
16
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP36-Upland18
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-2 10YR 3/3 100 Loamy/Clayey loam
2-16 10YR 4/3 100 Loamy/Clayey loamy clay
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/7/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP37-wenand,s
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Bixby
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.951625 Long:-80.45228 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: OkC2-Oak Level clay loam, 8-15%, moderately eroded NWI classification: PEM/PSS
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP37-Wetland19
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 77.8% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
Alnus serrulata
10
Yes
OBL
FAC species x 3 =
2.
Acer negundo
10
Yes
FAC
FACU species x 4 =
3.
Sambucus nigra
10
Yes
FAC
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
30
=Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
15 20% of total cover:
6
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Glyceria striata
20
Yes
OBL
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
Persicaria hydropiper
20
Yes
OBL
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Carex vulpinoidea 20 Yes OBL
4.
Rubus argutus
20
Yes
FACU
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
Carex lurida
20
Yes
OBL
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
100
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
50 20% of total cover:
20
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1.
Lonicera japonica
10
Yes
FACU
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
10
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
5 20% of total cover:
2
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP37-wetia,d19
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-14 10YR 4/1 80 10YR 5/6 20 C M Loamy/Clayey silty loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/7/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP38-Upland19
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Bixby
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.951625 Long:-80.454374 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: OkC2-Oak level clay loam, 8-15%, mdoerately eroded NWI classification: UPL
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP38-Uplandl9
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 37.5% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
Juniperus virginiana
5 Yes
FACU
FAC species x 3 =
2.
Rubus argutus
10 Yes
FACU
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
_
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
15 =Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
8 20% of total cover:
3
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Bromus tectorum
20 Yes
UPL
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
Juncus effusus
10 Yes
FACW
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Ranunculus recurvatus 10 Yes FAC
4.
Plantago lanceolata
10 Yes
UPL
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
Oenothera fruticosa
10 Yes
FAC
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6.
Vicia sativa
10 Yes
FACU
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
70 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
35 20% of total cover:
14
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP38-Upland19
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-14 10YR 3/3 80 10YR 5/6 20 Loamy/Clayey clay
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/7/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP39-wenand20
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Bixby
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.958421 Long:-80.442709 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: TmD-Tomlin loam, 15-25%, well drained NWI classification: PEM
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 3
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP39-Wetiand2o
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 77.8% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
Alnus serrulata
10
Yes
OBL
FAC species x 3 =
2.
Acer negundo
10
Yes
FAC
FACU species x 4 =
3.
Sambucus nigra
5
Yes
FAC
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
25
=Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
13 20% of total cover:
5
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Glyceria striata
20
Yes
OBL
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
Persicaria hydropiper
20
Yes
OBL
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Carex vulpinoidea 20 Yes OBL
4.
Rubus argutus
20
Yes
FACU
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
Carex lurida
20
Yes
OBL
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
100
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
50 20% of total cover:
20
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1.
Lonicera japonica
10
Yes
FACU
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
10
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
5 20% of total cover:
2
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP39-wetia,d2o
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-14 10YR 4/1 90 10YR 5/6 10 C PL/M Loamy/Clayey sandy clay loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/7/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP40-Upland2o
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Bixby
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.959283 Long:-80.442686 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: TmD-Tomlin loam,15-25%, well drained NWI classification: UPL
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP40-Upland20
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 10 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 40.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
Liquidambar styraciflua
20
Yes
FAC
FAC species x 3 =
2.
Rubus argutus
10
Yes
FACU
FACU species x 4 =
3.
Acerrubrum
10
Yes
FAC
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
40
=Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20 20% of total cover:
8
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Bromus tectorum
20
Yes
UPL
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
Vicia sativa
10
Yes
FACU
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Ranunculus recurvatus 10 Yes FAC
4.
Plantago lanceolata
10
Yes
UPL
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
Oenothera fruticosa
10
Yes
FAC
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6.
Vicia sativa
10
Yes
FACU
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
70
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
35 20% of total cover:
14
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1.
Lonicera japonica
5
Yes
FACU
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
5
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
3 20% of total cover:
1
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP40-Upiand2o
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-15 10YR 5/6 100 10YR 5/6 Loamy/Clayey loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/7/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP41-wenand2,
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Advance
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.966635 Long:-80.442709 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: MsD-Mocksville sandy loam, 15-45%, well drained NWI classification: PEM
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
Wetland in old pond bed.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 2
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 5
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP41-Wetland21
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Juncus effusus
80 Yes
FACW
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2. Carex lurida
20 Yes
OBL
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
100 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
50 20% of total cover:
20
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP41-wetia,d2l
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 4/2 95 10YR 5/6 5 C PL/M Loamy/Clayey silty loam
3-16 10YR 4/4 75 10YR 4/1 25 C PL/M Loamy/Clayey silty loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/8/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP42-Upland2l
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Advance
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.959283 Long:-80.442686 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: MsD-Mocksville sandy loam, 15-45%, well drained NWI classification: UPL
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Wetland in old pond bed.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP42-Upland21
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius
)
FACW species x 2 =
1. Rubus argutus
20 Yes
FACU
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
_
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
20 =Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
10 20% of total cover:
4
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Eupatorium capillifolium
80 Yes
FACU
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2. Carexlurida
20 No
OBL
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Poa pratensis 20 No FACU
4. Geranium carolinianum
10 No
UPL
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
130 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
65 20% of total cover:
26
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP42-Upland21
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-8 10YR 5/6 100 Loamy/Clayey loam
8-14 10YR 4/3 70 10YR 4/6 30 C M Loamy/Clayey clay loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soil
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/8/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP43-wenand22
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Advance
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): floodplains Local relief (concave, convex, none): flat Slope (%): 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.968604 Long:-80.415792 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CoA-Codorus loam, 0-2%, frequently flooded NWI classification: PEM
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
Wetland floodplains of Carter Creek.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
X Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP43-Wetiand22
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 83.3% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
=Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Juncus effusus
20 Yes
FACW
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2. Carex lurida
20 Yes
OBL
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Rubus argutus 20 Yes FACU
4. Dichanthelium clandestinum
20 Yes
FAC
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5. Carex typhina
20 Yes
FACW
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6. Carex tribuloides
20 Yes
FACW
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
120 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
60 20% of total cover:
24
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP43-wetia,d22
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-14 5Y 4/4 95 5Y 5/6 5 C PL/M Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
X Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/8/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP44-Upland22
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Advance
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.968414 Long:-80.416060 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CoA-Codorus loam, 0-2%, somewhat poorly drained NWI classification: UPL
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP44-Upland22
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius
)
FACW species x 2 =
1. Rubus argutus
20 Yes
FACU
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
20 =Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
10 20% of total cover:
4
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Festuca rubra
30 Yes
FACU
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2. Dactylis glomerata
30 Yes
FACU
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Poa pratensis 30 Yes FACU
4. Geranium carolinianum
10 No
UPL
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
100 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
50 20% of total cover:
20
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP44-Upiand22
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-4 5Y 5/6 100 Loamy/Clayey loam
4-14 10YR 4/3 70 10YR 4/6 30 C M Loamy/Clayey clay loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soil
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/8/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP45-wenand23
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Advance
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): floodplains Local relief (concave, convex, none): flat Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.968189 Long:-80.415124 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CoA-Codorus loam, 0-2%, frequently flooded NWI classification: PEM
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
Wetland floodplains of Carter Creek.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
X Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP45-Wetiand23
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius-)
1.
Holcus lanatus
20
Yes
2.
Poa pratensis
20
Yes
3.
Agrimonia parviflora
20
Yes
4.
Carex lurida
20
Yes
5.
Carex typhina
20
Yes
6.
Carex tribuloides
20
Yes
7.
Dichanthelium clandestinum
20
Yes
8.
Verbesina alternifolia
10
No
9.
Galium aparine
10
No
10.
11.
160 =Total Cover
50% of total cover:
80
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 85.7% (A/B)
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
FAC
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
FACU
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
FACW
OBL
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
FACW
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
FACW
height.
FAC
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
FAC
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
FACU
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
32
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP45-wetia,d23
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-14 5YR 3/4 95 5Y 5/6 5 C PL/M Loamy/Clayey clay
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
X Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/8/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP46-Upland23
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Advance
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.968189 Long:-80.413956 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CoA-Codorus loam, 0-2%, somewhat poorly drained NWI classification: UPL
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP46-Upland23
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 40.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
Rubus argutus
5
Yes
FACU
FAC species x 3 =
2.
Acer rubrum
5
Yes
FAC
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
_
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
10
=Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
5 20% of total cover:
2
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Holcus lanatus
15
Yes
FAC
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
Trifolium campestre
15
Yes
UPL
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Trifolium repens 30 Yes FACU
4.
Verbesina alternifolia
10
No
FAC
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
Geranium carolinianum
10
No
UPL
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6.
Valerianella radiata
10
No
FAC
height.
7.
Vicia sativa
10
No
FACU
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
100
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
50 20% of total cover:
20
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP46-Upiand23
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 3/3 100 Loamy/Clayey loam
4-14 10YR 4/4 100 Loamy/Clayey loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/8/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP47-wenand24
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Advance
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.969776 Long:-80.41160 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: TaC-Toast sandy loam, 8-15%, well drained NWI classification: PEM
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
X Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP47-Wetiand24
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Holcus lanatus
20 Yes
FAC
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2. Poa pratensis
10 No
FACW
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Agrimonia parviflora 20 Yes FACW
4. Carex lurida
20 Yes
OBL
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
70 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
35 20% of total cover:
14
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP47-wetia,d24
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 4/2 90 10YR 5/6 10 C PL/M Loamy/Clayey loam
4-14 10YR 3/2 40 10YR 5/3 40 RM M Loamy/Clayey 10 YR 5/6 - 20% (mixed matrix)
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soil
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/8/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP48-Upland24
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Advance
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.969064 Long:-80.412865 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: TaC-Toast sandy loam, 8-15%, well drained NWI classification: UPL
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP48-Upland24
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 37.5% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
Rubus argutus
15 Yes
FACU
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
15 =Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
8 20% of total cover:
3
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Poa pratensis
15 Yes
FACW
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
Trifolium campestre
15 Yes
UPL
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Trifolium repens 10 Yes FACU
4.
Verbesina alternifolia
10 Yes
FAC
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
Geranium carolinianum
10 Yes
UPL
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6.
Valerianella radiata
10 Yes
FAC
height.
7.
Vicia sativa
10 Yes
FACU
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
80 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
40 20% of total cover:
16
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP48-Upiand24
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 4/3 100 Loamy/Clayey loam
4-14 10YR 4/4 100 Loamy/Clayey loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/8/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP49-wenand25
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Advance
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.968268 Long:-80.406073 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CoA-Codorus loam, 0-2%, frequently flooded NWI classification: PEM
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
Carter Creek floodplain wetlands.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
X Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP49-Wetiand25
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius )
1. Rubus argutus
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
_=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
25 Yes FACU
25 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 13 20% of total cover: 5
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius-)
1.
Rumex crispus
20
Yes
FAC
2.
Poa pratensis
20
Yes
FACW
3.
Agrimonia parviflora
20
Yes
FACW
4.
Carex vulpinoidea
20
Yes
OBL
5.
Lysimachia nummularia
20
Yes
FACW
6.
Carex alata
10
No
OBL
7.
Arctium minus
10
No
FACU
8.
Ranunculus recurvatus
5
No
FAC
9.
10.
is
50% of total cover: 63
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
2.
3.
4.
5.
125 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 25
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 83.3% (A/B)
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP49-wetia,d25
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-8 10YR 4/2 90 10YR 5/6 10 C PL/M Loamy/Clayey loam
8-14 10YR 5/2 98 10YR 5/6 2 C M Loamy/Clayey loamy clay
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soil
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/8/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP50-Upland25
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Advance
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): floodplains Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.970449 Long:-80.406376 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CoA-Codorus, 0-2%, frequently flooded NWI classification: UPL
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP50-Upland25
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 37.5% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
Rubus argutus
15 Yes
FACU
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
_
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
15 =Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
8 20% of total cover:
3
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Poa pratensis
15 Yes
FACW
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
Festuca rubra
15 Yes
FACU
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Trifolium repens 10 Yes FACU
4.
Verbesina alternifolia
10 Yes
FAC
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
Leucanthemum vulgare
10 Yes
UPL
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6.
Valerianella radiata
10 Yes
FAC
height.
7.
Vicia sativa
10 Yes
FACU
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
80 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
40 20% of total cover:
16
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP50-Upiand25
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 3/3 100 Loamy/Clayey loam
4-14 10YR 4/4 100 Loamy/Clayey loamy clay
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/8/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP51-wenandH
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Advance
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.968268 Long:-80.406073 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CoA-Codorus loam, 0-2%, frequently flooded NWI classification: PEM/PSS
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
Carter Creek floodplain wetlands.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
X Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP51-Wetiand26
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius )
1. Acer negundo
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
30 Yes FAC
30 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover: 6
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
1. Dulichium arundinaceum
20
Yes
OBL
2. Poa pratensis
20
Yes
FACW
3. Boehmeria cylindrica
20
Yes
FACW
4. Rumex crispus
20
Yes
FAC
5. Leersia oryzoides
20
Yes
OBL
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
is
50% of total cover: 50
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
2.
3.
4.
5.
100 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 20
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_3 - Prevalence Index is:53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP51-wetia,d26
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-16 7.5YR 3/4 80 7.5YR 4/6 20 C PL/M Loamy/Clayey clay
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
X Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/8/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP52-Upland26
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Advance
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): floodplains Local relief (concave, convex, none): flat Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.970449 Long:-80.406376 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CoA-Codorus, 0-2%, frequently flooded NWI classification: UPL
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP52-Upland26
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 42.9% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
Rubus argutus
15 Yes
FACU
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
15 =Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
8 20% of total cover:
3
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Holcus lanatus
15 Yes
FAC
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
Festuca rubra
15 Yes
FACU
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Trifolium repens 10 Yes FACU
4.
Verbesina alternifolia
10 Yes
FAC
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
Leucanthemum vulgare
10 Yes
UPL
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6.
Valerianella radiata
10 Yes
FAC
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
70 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
35 20% of total cover:
14
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP52-Upiand26
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 3/3 100 Loamy/Clayey loam
4-14 10YR 4/4 100 Loamy/Clayey loamy clay
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/8/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP53-wenand27
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Advance
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.970913 Long:-80.404243 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: PAD-Pacolet, 8-15%, well drained NWI classification: PEM
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP53-Wetiand27
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius
)
FACW species x 2 =
1. Acer negundo
20 Yes
FAC
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is:53.0'
20 =Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
10 20% of total cover:
4
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Impatiens capensis
90 Yes
FACW
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2. Carex lurida
10 No
FACW
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
100 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
50 20% of total cover:
20
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP53-wetia,d27
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-6 5YR 3/1 100 Loamy/Clayey silty clay
6-12 10YR 4/1 98 10YR 4/4 2 C M Loamy/Clayey silty clay
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/8/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP54-Upland27
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Advance
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.970913 Long:-80.404243 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: PaD-Pacolet sandy loam, 8-15%, well drained NWI classification: UPL
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP54-Upland27
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 37.5% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
Rubus argutus
15
Yes
FACU
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
15
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
8 20% of total cover:
3
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Holcus lanatus
15
Yes
FAC
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
Acer saccharinum
20
Yes
FACW
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Solidago altissima 10 Yes FACU
4.
Holcus lanatus
10
Yes
FAC
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
Rubus argutus
10
Yes
FACU
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6.
Lespedeza cuneata
10
Yes
FACU
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
75
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
38 20% of total cover:
15
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1.
Lonicera japonica
10
Yes
FACU
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
10
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
5 20% of total cover:
2
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP54-Upland27
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-14 7.5YR 4/6 100 Loamy/Clayey loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Forsyth Sampling Date: 5/8/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP55-wenand2e
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Advance
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.976497 Long:-80.399346 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: DaA-Dan River loam, 0-2%, occasionally flooded NWI classification: PEM
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP55-Wetiand28
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius )
1. Acer negundo
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
20 Yes FAC
20 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius-)
1.
Holcus lanatus
20
Yes
FAC
2.
Carex intumescens
10
Yes
FACW
3.
Carex grayi
10
Yes
FACW
4.
Carex vulpinoidea
10
Yes
OBL
5.
Juncus effusus
10
Yes
FACW
6.
Persicaria sagittata
10
Yes
OBL
7.
Lysimachia nummularia
10
Yes
FACW
8.
9.
10.
is
50% of total cover: 40
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
2.
3.
4.
5.
80 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 16
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 8 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_3 - Prevalence Index is:53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP55-wetia,d28
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-8 10YR 4/2 95 10YR 5/6 5 C M Loamy/Clayey silty clay loam
8-14 10YR 4/1 90 10YR 4/6 10 C M Loamy/Clayey loamy clay
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/8/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP56-UplandH
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Advance
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.976497 Long:-80.399334 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: DaA-Dan River loam, 0-2%, occasionally flooded NWI classification: UPL
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP56-Upland28
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 83.3% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius
)
FACW species x 2 =
1. Acer saccharinum
15 Yes
FACW
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
15 =Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
8 20% of total cover:
3
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Leucanthemum vulgare
10 Yes
FAC
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2. Eupatorium capillifolium
10 Yes
FACU
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Valerianella radiata 10 Yes FAC
4. Verbesina alternifolia
10 Yes
FAC
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
40 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
20 20% of total cover:
8
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1. Toxicodendron radicans
10 Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
10 =Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
5 20% of total cover:
2
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP56-Upiand28
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-14 7.5YR 5/6 100 Loamy/Clayey clay loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Forsyth Sampling Date: 5/8/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP57-wenand2s
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Advance
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.978032 Long:-80.399163 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: WmD-Wickham fine sandy loam, 10-15%, well drained NWI classification: PEM/PSS
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 3
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP57-Wetiand29
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius )
1.
Acernegundo
20
Yes
2.
Rubus argutus
10
Yes
3.
Salix nigra
10
Yes
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
40
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius-)
1.
Holcus lanatus
20
Yes
2.
Carex intumescens
10
Yes
3.
Carex grayi
10
Yes
4.
Carex vulpinoidea
10
Yes
5.
Juncus effusus
10
Yes
6.
Impatiens capensis
10
Yes
7.
Galium aparine
10
Yes
8.
9.
10.
11.
80
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 40
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
FAC
FACU
OBL
8
FAC
FACW
FACW
OBL
FACW
OBL
FACU
m
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 8 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 10 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 80.0% (A/B)
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP57-wetia,d29
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-14 10YR 4/1 95 10YR 5/6 5 C M Loamy/Clayey silty clay loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/8/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP58-Upland29
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Advance
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.97781 Long:-80.399117 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: WmD-Wickham fine sandy loam, 10-15%, well drained NWI classification: UPL
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP58-Upland29
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
Acer negundo
10 Yes
FAC
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
10 =Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
5 20% of total cover:
2
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Leucanthemum vulgare
20 Yes
FAC
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
Rubus argutus
20 Yes
FACU
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Valerianella radiata 10 No FAC
4.
Holcus lanatus
10 No
FAC
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
Leucanthemum vulgare
10 No
UPL
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
70 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
35 20% of total cover:
14
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1.
Lonicera japonica
10 Yes
FACU
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
10 =Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
5 20% of total cover:
2
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP58-Upiand29
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-14 5YR 4/6 100 Loamy/Clayey clay
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Forsyth Sampling Date: 5/8/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP59-wenandW
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Advance
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.9780925 Long:-80.398180 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: TmB-Tomlin loam, 2-6%, well drained NWI classification: PEM
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP59-WetiandK
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 87.5% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
Acer rubrum
10 Yes
FAC
FAC species x 3 =
2.
Rubus argutus
10 Yes
FACU
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is:53.0'
20 =Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
10 20% of total cover:
4
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Dulichium arundinaceum
20 Yes
OBL
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
Carex intumescens
10 Yes
FACW
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Carex lurida 10 Yes OBL
4.
Carex vulpinoidea
10 Yes
OBL
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
Juncus effusus
10 Yes
FACW
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6.
Dichanthelium scoparium
10 Yes
OBL
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
70 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
35 20% of total cover:
14
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP59-wetia,dW
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-14 10YR 4/1 90 10YR 5/6 10 C PL/M Loamy/Clayey silty clay loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Silas 100kV Line Rebuild City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 5/8/2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP60-Uplando
Investigator(s): Jessica Tisdale, Adrienne Warren Section, Township, Range: Advance
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.980640 Long:-80.398139 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: WmD-Wickham fine sandy loam, 10-15%, well drained NWI classification: UPL
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP60-Upland30
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 33.3% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Holcus lanatus
20 Yes
FAC
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2. Bromus inermis
20 Yes
UPL
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Festuca rubra 20 Yes FACU
4. Poa pratensis
10 No
FACU
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5. Leucanthemum vulgare
10 No
UPL
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6. Eupatorium capillifolium
10 No
FACU
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
90 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
45 20% of total cover:
18
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP60-UpiandW
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lo C2 Texture Remarks
0-14 10YR 4/4 100 Loamy/Clayey clay
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

Appendix F
Photographs

Appendix F. Photographs
Photograph 1— Stream 1 (Perennial, Facing Downstream)
Photograph 2 — Stream 2 (Intermittent, Facing Downstream)

Photograph 3 — Stream 3 (Perennial, Facing Upstream)
Photograph 4 — Stream 4 (Perennial, Facing Upstream)

lS� E
_ „'"at♦ spy ,y.
s . � 1 �! J - � iF '' 3` �,♦� s r�i 'kit 4 i r -
c -. „a� +--.♦��1 i gr �'r'�3��,��.'�z����.is�`J�1��� �„+iR� �':.
� � 114,
Tape 'C•� —Ow
�-
/•t' r�����4'i F P 991
i1� •S a N
n —
WN,

x� r
wsk�{
J t

Photograph 9 — Stream 6 (Intermittent, Facing Upstream)
Photograph 10—Stream 7 (Intermittent, Facing Upstream)

Photograph 11—Stream 8 (Intermittent, Facing Upstream)
Photograph 12 — Wetland 3 (Emergent, Facing South)

Photograph 13 — Elisha Creek, Stream 9 (Perennial, Facing Upstream)
Photograph 14 — Wetland 4 (Emergent, Facing Southeast)

Photograph 15 — Pond 1 (Facing Northeast toward Earthen Dam)
Photograph 16—Stream 10 (Perennial, Facing Upstream)

Photograph 17 — Wetland 5 (Emergent, Facing Northeast)
Photograph 18 —Stream 11 (Perennial, Facing Upstream)

Photograph 19—Stream 12 (Intermittent, Facing Upstream)
Photograph 20— Dutchman Creek, Stream 13 (Perennial, Facing Upstream)

Photograph 21— Wetland 6 (Emergent, Facing West)
1 Z
4 5^�
1
Photograph 22 — Wetland 7 (Emergent, Facing West)

Photograph 23 — Stream 14 (Perennial, Facing Upstream)
Photograph 24 — Wetland 8 (Emergent, Facing Southeast)

Photograph 25 — Buffalo Creek, Stream 15 (Perennial, Facing Downstream)
Photograph 26 — Wetland 9 (Emergent, Facing Southwest)

_.,�:.
�',
-j 1 ��

Photograph 29—Stream 17 (Intermittent, Facing Upstream)
Photograph 30— Stream 18 (Intermittent, Facing Upstream)

'J e
Photograph 31— Wetland 11 (Scrub/shrub, Facing Southwest)
Photograph 32 — Wetland 12 (Emergent, Facing Northeast)

a
��}�•�i �l��Vtia�f1 t��Yl a � �}' v�^o a � af ., �� �.ay'' �'
1 u• a. �I
ONY
Photograph 33 — Buffalo Creek, Stream 19 (Perennial, Facing Downstream)
141
M�4,u��i I� as � � Yl.�� r� e
OR
lMU
`
Photograph 34— Stream 20 (Intermittent, Facing Downstream)

Photograph 35 — Stream 21 (Intermittent, Facing Downstream)
Photograph 36 — Wetland 13, Forested Portion (Emergent/Forested, Facing West)

Photograph 37—Stream 22 (Intermittent, Facing Upstream)
Photograph 38 — Wetland 14 (Scrub/Shrub, Facing West)

a,
of }
n
.
0.
ft-
J
Photograph 39 — Wetland 15 (Emergent, Facing West)
r
i
r
.-
Photograph 40 — Wetland 16 (Emergent, Facing Southeast)

r
s r A
F
l ,
E_t

Photograph 43 — Stream 25 (Intermittent, Facing Downstream)
Photograph 44— Stream 26 (Intermittent, Facing Upstream)

Photograph 45 — Wetland 17 (Emergent, Facing West)
Photograph 46—Stream 27 (Intermittent, Facing Downstream)

Photograph 47 — Wetland 18 (Emergent, Facing West)
Photograph 48 — Pond 2, Edge of right-of-way (Facing Northwest)

i
41
c
4
� r x
I
a�R

�t 1

h
1 !
M
i

C
n.s
v
O,
e
po
kS
Photograph 55—Stream 33 (Intermittent, Facing Upstream)
t
k
k
�� 11
Photograph 56 — Stream 34 (Intermittent, Facing Downstream)

Photograph 57 — Wetland 21, Old Pond BED (Emergent, Facing East)
Photograph 58—Advance Substation (Facing East)

.p ....,,
Photograph 59 — Wetland 22, Adjacent Forested Portion (Emergent/Forested, Facing West)
Photograph 60— Carter Creek, Stream 35 (Perennial, Facing Downstream)

Photograph 61— Wetland 23 (Emergent, Facing West)
Photograph 62 — Stream 36 (Intermittent, Facing Downstream)

44
s
S'- Jat�y �y/1 •�
7.1
fit` � ... x '�;� ' IJ "\�1 ��� � V�f, r Jam-✓- � q � � 1 #�

Photograph 65 — Wetland 26 (Emergent/Scrub/Shrub, Facing West)
Photograph 66 — Wetland 27 (Emergent/Scrub/Shrub, Facing North)

�n
K�•y
t '�
.
..
...�
e:. oil
��;� e
Y^•
�
�+
,Q..�
a �,
y� 7 �
'..-
�x
�'
_
�'"
_
:;A-
a> rN.
i
_
�
i
��t
..
^ C
�
.1y Iy �� � p V
'
�
t
i
�
.,

Photograph 69 — Wetland 28 (Emergent, Facing Northeast)
Photograph 70—Stream 36 (Intermittent, Facing Upstream)

Photograph 71— Wetland 29, Rip -Rap Access, Break in Wetland (Emergent, Facing Southwest)
Photograph 72 — Wetland 30 (Emergent, Facing North)

Appendix G
Impact Locations

Appendix G. Impact Locations within the Study Area
Streams
Wetlands
P Sheet
... - Number
• .
S1 P
ff P2A
W1 T
P9A
S2 T P2A
W2 T
P9B
S3 P P2B
'
W3 T
P10A
S4 T P2B
W4 T
P10B
S5 P P9A
W5 T
P11A
S6 T P9A
W6 T
P12A— P13A
S7 P P9A
W7 T
P13A
S8 T P9A
W8 T
P14
S9 P P13A
W9 T
P25A
S10 T P13A
S11 P P14
S12 T P14
S13 P P15
S14 T P15

Appendix H
Impact Figures

PROJECT NARRATIVE
THE PROPOSED SILAS 100 KV PROJECT IS LOCATED IN DAVIE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA. THE
PROJECT INVOLVES ASSOCIATED LINE WORK REQUIRED TO REBUILD DUKE ENERGY'S EXISTING
SILAS 100KV TRANSMISSION LINE (LINE INDEX 1W264) FROM MOCKSVILLE SUBSTATION TO IDOLS
TAP. THE PROJECT IS LOCATED WITHIN DUKE ENERGY'S MOWED AND MAINTAINED RIGHT OF
WAY. THE LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE IS 88.43 ACRES. THE PRIOR USE OF THE SITE IS
TRANSMISSION INFRASTRUCTURE AND THE PROJECT WILL NOT CHANGE THE EXISTING LAND
USE. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, A DUKE ENERGY CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR WILL INSTALL
EROSION CONTROL MEASURES TO ENCOMPASS THE ANTICIPATED CONSTRUCTION LIMITS.
PREDEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS WILL BE RESTORED AND THE AREA WILL BE STABILIZED PRIOR
TO COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. AN AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION OF DISTURBANCE
APPROACH HAS BEEN INCORPORATED INTO THE DESIGN OF THE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES
BY UTILIZING EXISTING ACCESS POINTS AND STABILIZED RIGHT-OF-WAY ACCESS ROUTES,
WHENEVER POSSIBLE. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ARE INDICATED HEREIN FOR PERMITTING
USE ONLY BY NCDEQ. THE INITIAL PROJECT DURATION IS ANTICIPATED TO START IN JULY 2022
AND BE COMPLETED IN JUNE 2023.
GENERAL NOTES
1. APPROXIMATE STRUCTURE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY DUKE ENERGY LINE ENGINEER AND ARE FOR
REFERENCE ONLY. THESE DRAWINGS SHALL NOT BE USED FOR LINE CONSTRUCTION.
2. BASE DRAWINGS WERE CREATED BY GIS DATA OBTAINED FROM VARIOUS SOURCES. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY
WAS OBTAINED FROM AUTOCAD CIVIL 3D SOFTWARE AND NC ONEMAP. ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS MAY VARY
FROM THOSE SHOWN.
3. NOT ALL EXISTING UTILITIES ARE SHOWN. LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S
RESPONSIBILITY TO ACCURATELY LOCATE, BOTH VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL, EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO THE
START OF CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY NC 811 PRIOR TO EXCAVATION. CONTRACTOR
SHALL NOTIFY DUKE ENERGY IMMEDIATELY IN THE EVENT OF ENCOUNTERING ANY UNDERGROUND OBSTACLE
REQUIRING DEVIATION FROM THE PLAN. COST TO REPAIR DAMAGED UTILITIES SHALL BE BORNE BY THE
CONTRACTOR.
4. ALL UTILITIES SHALL BE PROTECTED AND REMAIN ACTIVE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. CONTRACTOR SHALL
NOT DISTURB UTILITY POLES, GUY WIRES, OR ANCHORS WITHOUT PERMISSION FROM DUKE ENERGY.
5. THE PROJECT IS LOCATED IN THE ROANOKE RIVER BASIN. THE PROJECT IS SUBJECT TO STATE -REGULATED
BUFFER REQUIREMENTS.
6. SEE SHEET PEN-01 FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL SEQUENCE AND SEEDING SCHEDULE.
7. STREAMS EXTEND BEYOND THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. APPROPRIATE BRIDGING AND MATTING OF THESE FEATURES IS
REQUIRED SHOULD THE CONTRACTOR USE ANY ACCESS ROUTES LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
8. ANY ALTERNATE ACCESS PLANNED BY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE APPROVED BY DUKE ENERGY PERMITTING
AND NCDEQ PRIOR TO USE.
9. CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES ARE SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY. HEAVY MATS MAY BE USED IN LIEU OF ROCK
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES IF DEEMED SUFFICIENT BY A DUKE ENERGY REPRESENTATIVE.
10. WETLAND MATTING SHALL BE COMPOSITE AND/OR HEAVY DUTY TIMBER "CRANE" MATS. NO LATTICE OR
TWO-PLY MATTING SHALL BE USED IN JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS AND/OR STREAMS.
11. NO OIL/FUEL-FILLED EQUIPMENT SHALL BE STORED OVERNIGHT WITHIN 125 FEET OF WETLANDS OR SURFACE
WATER WITHOUT CONTAINMENT.
12. SITE SHOULD BE "STORM READY" AT THE END OF EACH WORK DAY.
13. SECURE WRITTEN ACCESS AGREEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR ALL 3RD PARTY ACCESS AND PRIVATE DRIVES NOT
INCLUDED IN ROW DOCUMENTATION PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION.
14. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED TO SAME OR BETTER CONDITION. PERMANENT GROUND COVER
SHALL BE USED FOR STABILIZATION.
MIGRATORY BIRD HOTLINE
STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS PROTECT ALL SPECIES OF NATIVE BIRDS FOUND THROUGHOUT THE DUKE ENERGY
SERVICE AREA. INTERACTIONS OF BIRDS WITH GENERATING FACILITIES, TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTIONS,
SUBSTATIONS, OTHER STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT, AND OPERATIONS ARE POTENTIALLY HARMFUL OR FATAL TO
BIRDS. DUKE ENERGY OPERATES THESE 24-HOUR MIGRATORY BIRD HOTLINES TO ASSIST EMPLOYEES AND
CONTRACTORS WITH RELATED INCIDENTS THAT OCCUR DURING WORK ACTIVITIES.
CAROLINAS: 800.573.3853
SPILL REPORTING HOTLINE
IN ORDER TO ENSURE THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT, FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS
REQUIRE THAT CERTAIN TYPES OF SPILLS AND UNPERMITTED RELEASES BE REPORTED TO THE PROPER
REGULATORY AGENCIES AS SOON AS POSSIBLE FOLLOWING IDENTIFICATION. IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY YOUR
SUPERVISOR AND THE FIELD ENVIRONMENTAL/EHS PROFESSIONAL WHEN A SPILL OR UNPERMITTED RELEASE IS
DISCOVERED. IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO REACH THE FIELD ENVIRONMENTAL/EHS PROFESSIONAL, CONTACT ONE OF
THE DUKE ENERGY SPILL REPORTING HOTLINES AT:
CAROLINAS: 800.327.3853
CONTACTS
OWNER:
DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS
RANDY N. VELTRI, R.L.A.
526 SOUTH CHURCH ST.
CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
PH: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
[e-mail]
ENGINEER:
HDR ENGINEERING INC.
VALERIE HAYNES, P.E.
440 SOUTH CHURCH ST.
SUITE 1000
PH: [phone]
[e-mail]
01/31/22 ISSUED FOR PERMIT
07/29/21 70% ISSUED FOR PERMIT
P.DWG 04/30/21 30% SUBMITTAL
REV FILE NO. DATE REVISION
RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE:
ERIC SHOOK
PH: [phone]
[e-mail]
CAROL I NAS
SILAS 100 KV
DAVIE COUNTY, NC
START
LATITUDE: N35° 53' 15.17"
LONGITUDE: W80° 33' 23.94'1
CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY "NORTH CAROLINA ONE CALL" <B11) OR
(1—800-632-4J4J) AT LEAST 48 HOURS PR\OR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION
OR EXCAVATION TO HA\JE EXISTING UT1L\TIES LOCATED. CONTRACTOR SHALL
CONTACT ANY LOCAL U7\U1T F-S THAT PROVIDED THEIR OWN LOCATOR SERVICES
INDEPENDENT OR "NORTH CAROLINA ONE CALL". REPORT ANY DISCREPANC\ES TO
THE ENGINEER 1MMEDlATELY .
CPG/FLS BA VH
CPG/FLS
CPG/KR VH BA
DRAWN I CHECKED I APPROVED
FI\In
LATITUDE: N35° 58' 51.80"
LONGITUDE: W80° 23' 52.4411
VICINITY MAP
SCALE: 1" = 55000'
ISSUED FOR
PERMIT -
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
NORTH & SOUTH CAROLINA STATE fIAP
SHEET LIST:
TITLE SHEET
PROJECT LAYOUT SHEET- PHASE 1
PROJECT LAYOUT SHEET- PHASE 2 AND PHASE 3
PROPERTY OWNERS
PROPERTY OWNERS
PROPERTY OWNERS
PROPERTY OWNERS
PROPERTY OWNERS
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES
PHASE 1 SHEETS P1-P16
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
PHASE 2 SHEETS P17-P21
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
PHASE 3 SHEETS P22-P25
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL DETAILS
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL DETAILS
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL DETAILS
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL DETAILS
HDR Engineering Inc.
of the Carolinas
N.C.B.E.L.S. # F-0116
440 S. Church St. Suite 1200
Charlotte, NC 28202-2075
704.338.6700
DU KE
ENERGY®
CAROLINAS
526 SOUTH CHURCH STREET
CHARLOTTE N.C. 28202
TELEPHONE NO. [phone]
SHEET PTL-01
SHEET PLA-01
SHEET PLA-02
SHEET PLA-03
SHEET PLA-04
SHEET PLA-05
SHEET PLA-06
SHEET PLA-07
SHEET PEN-01
SHEET PEN-02
SHEET PEN-03
SHEET P1
SHEET P2
SHEET P3
SHEET P4
SHEET P5
SHEET P6
SHEET P7
SHEET P8
SHEET P9
SHEET P10
SHEET P11
SHEET P12
SHEET P13
SHEET P14
SHEET P15
SHEET P16
SHEET P17
SHEET P18
SHEET P19
SHEET P20
SHEET P21
SHEET P22
SHEET P23
SHEET P24
SHEET P25
SHEET P26
SHEET PED-1
SHEET PED-2
SHEET PED-3
SHEET PED-4
TITLE SILAS 100 KV
TRANSMISSION LINE REBUILD
TITLE SHEET
LINE INDEX: DRAWING SHEET
1 W264 10291756 PTL-01
w
z_
J
z
O
U)
U)
5
U)
z
Q
Y
0
0
U)
Q
J_
U)

PROJECT NARRATIVE
SEEDING SCHEDULE
EROSION CONTROL GENERAL NOTES
CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
THE PROPOSED SILAS 100 KV PROJECT IS LOCATED IN DAVIE COUNTY, NORTH
CAROLINA. THE PROJECT INVOLVES ASSOCIATED LINE WORK REQUIRED TO REBUILD
DUKE ENERGY'S EXISTING SILAS 100KV TRANSMISSION LINE (LINE INDEX 1 W264) FROM
MOCKSVILLE SUBSTATION TO IDOLS TAP.
ALL WORK WILL BE COMPLETED WITHIN DUKE ENERGY'S MOWED AND MAINTAINED
RIGHT OF WAY. ALL ACCESS SHALL BE WITHIN DUKE ENERGY'S RIGHT OF WAY OR
APPROVED EXISTING MAINTENANCE ACCESS ROUTES. THERE WILL BE NO MASS
GRADING OR NEW CONSTRUCTION ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROJECT. MINOR GRADING
FOR EQUIPMENT PADS OR ACCESS ROAD IMPROVEMENTS WILL BE THE EXTENT OF
GRADING ACTIVITIES,
PRIOR TO INITIATING TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT CONSTRUCTION PHASES ASSOCIATED
WITH NEW WORK, A DUKE ENERGY CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR WILL INSTALL EROSION
CONTROL MEASURES TO ENCOMPASS THE ANTICIPATED CONSTRUCTION LIMITS.
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
1. COORDINATE WITH DUKE ENERGY TO CONTACT IMPACTED PROPERTY OWNERS PRIOR
TO BEGINNING WORK.
2. CALL NC DEQ DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, MINERAL AND LAND (DEMLR)
(WINSTON-SALEM REGIONAL OFFICE) AT 336-776-9800 TO SCHEDULE
PRE -CONSTRUCTION MEETING AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO PROJECT
ACTIVATION.
3. INSTALL SILT FENCE, MATTING, SILT FENCE STONE OUTLETS, WATTLES, AND
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES AS SHOWN ON PLANS, PRIOR TO ANY SITE
DISTURBANCE ACTIVITIES (CLEARING, GRUBBING, GRADING, OR EXCAVATION).
4. IMPROVE EXISTING ACCESS ROADS, BEGIN CLEARING AND GRUBBING OPERATIONS
FOR ACCESS AREAS ONLY AS SHOWN ON PLANS, AND INSTALL TEMPORARY
ACCESS ROUTES.
5. INSPECT ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AT WEEKLY INTERVALS AND AFTER EVERY
RAINFALL EXCEEDING 1" TO VERIFY THAT THEY ARE FUNCTIONING PROPERLY. ANY
ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED AND PLACED IN A DESIGNATED
SPOIL DISPOSAL AREA. CONDUCT PERIODIC INSPECTIONS OF ALL EROSION AND
SEDIMENTATION CONTROLS AND MAKE ANY REPAIRS OR MODIFICATIONS NECESSARY
TO ASSURE CONTINUED EFFECTIVE OPERATION OF EACH DEVICE.
6. INSTALL TEMPORARY POLES OR H-FRAME GUARD STRUCTURES IF NEEDED.
7. PERFORM WORK AT TOWERS.
8. REMOVE TEMPORARY POLES OR H-FRAME GUARD STRUCTURES.
9. AFTER PROPOSED WORK IS COMPLETE, ENSURE ALL DISTURBED AREAS AND
ACCESS ROUTES HAVE BEEN STABILIZED AND APPROVAL HAS BEEN GIVEN FROM
THE INSPECTOR PRIOR TO REMOVING ANY SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES.
10. CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AFTER SITE IS
STABILIZED, REPAIR DISTURBED AREA FROM EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, AND
SUBMIT N.O.T. TO NC DEQ.
WETLAND CROSSING
• RESTORE PRE -CONSTRUCTION WETLAND CONTOURS TO MAINTAIN THE WETLAND HYDROLOGY.
• REVEGETATION AND PERMANENT ROW MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES AS WELL AS THE USE OF
LIME, MULCH, OR FERTILIZER IN AREAS IS ADDRESSED IN THE FERC RESTORATION AND
REHABILITATION PLAN.
• DUKE ENERGY AND ITS CONTRACTORS WILL NOT USE HERBICIDES OR PESTICIDES IN OR
WITHIN 100 FEET OF A WETLAND, EXCEPT AS ALLOWED BY THE APPROPRIATE FEDERAL OR
STATE AGENCY.
• REMOVE PROJECT -RELATED MATERIAL USED TO SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ON THE CONSTRUCTION
ROW, INCLUDING COMPOSITE MATTING AND PREFABRICATED EQUIPMENT MATS UPON
COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION.
• REMOVE TEMPORARY PERIMETER BMPS LOCATED AT THE BOUNDARY BETWEEN WETLAND AND
ADJACENT UPLAND AREAS AFTER UPLAND REVEGETATION AND STABILIZATION OF ADJACENT
UPLAND AREAS ARE SUCCESSFUL.
COMPOSITE MATS
DUKE ENERGY UTILIZES CONSTRUCTION COMPOSITE MATS TO PROVIDE ACCESS THROUGH
AREAS SUCH AS WETLANDS AND WATERBODIES, AGRICULTURAL FIELDS, AND OTHER AREAS AS
DETERMINED BY THE CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISOR. THIS PRACTICE REDUCES SOIL COMPACTION
AND PROVIDES A STABLE TRAVEL LANE FOR CONTRACTORS ALONG THE PROJECT ROW, THUS
MINIMIZING LAND DISTURBANCE. THE MATERIALS USED TO CONSTRUCT THE COMPOSITE
MATTING WILL BE ABLE TO WITHSTAND THE ANTICIPATED LOADING OF THE CONSTRUCTION
TRAFFIC. THE COMPOSITE MATS OVER WATERBODY CROSSINGS WILL BE CLEANED AT THE
END OF EACH DAY AND WHERE EXCESS ACCUMULATION OF SEDIMENT THE COMPOSITE MATS
WILL BE CLEANED OFF THROUGHOUT EACH DAY. THE USE OF COMPOSITE MATS MAY
GENERALLY NOT CONSTITUTE SOIL DISTURBANCE OR A CHANGE IN HYDROLOGY. THEREFORE,
THE INSTALLATION OF COMPOSITE MATS ACCESS ROADS AND WORK AREAS IS NOT
CONSIDERED A REGULATED LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITY.
TRENCH DEWATERING
THE PURPOSE, DEFINITION, CONDITIONS OF APPLICATION AND PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS
ARE IDENTICAL. DESIGN CRITERIA AND SPECIFICATIONS VARY BY DEWATERING BAG
MANUFACTURER; A VARIETY OF GEOTEXTILE DEWATERING BAG PRODUCTS ARE AVAILABLE ON
THE MARKET. THE MANUFACTURERS' GUIDANCE ON THE USE, DESIGN, SIZING, MAINTENANCE,
AND APPLICATION OF THE GEOTEXTILE DEWATERING BAG WILL FOLLOWED.
• CONDUCT DEWATERING (ON OR OFF THE CONSTRUCTION ROW) IN SUCH A MANNER THAT DOES NOT
CAUSE EROSION AND DOES NOT RESULT IN SILT -LADEN WATER FLOWING INTO ANY WATERBODY, OR
OFF -SITE PROPERTY.
• ELEVATE AND SCREEN THE INTAKE OF EACH HOSE USED TO WITHDRAW THE WATER FROM THE TRENCH
TO MINIMIZE PUMPING OF DEPOSITED SEDIMENTS.
• A DEWATERING BAG MAY NOT BE NEEDED IF THERE IS A WELL -STABILIZED, VEGETATED AREA ON SITE
TO WHICH WATER CAN BE DISCHARGED. THE AREA MUST BE STABILIZED SO THAT IT CAN FILTER
SEDIMENT AND AT THE SAME TIME WITHSTAND THE VELOCITY OF THE DISCHARGED WATER WITHOUT
ERODING.
• REMOVED DEWATERING STRUCTURES AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE AFTER THE COMPLETION OF
DEWATERING ACTIVITIES.
• REMOVE DEWATERING STRUCTURES AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE AFTER THE COMPLETION OF DEWATERING
ACTIVITIES, IF SEDIMENT BUILD-UP PREVENTS THE BAG FROM FUNCTIONING PROPERLY, OR THE BAG
BECOMES HALF FULL OF SEDIMENT.
STREAM CROSSING
THE TEMPORARY WATERWAY CROSSING WILL BE AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE STREAM. WHERE
APPROACH CONDITIONS DICTATE, THE CROSSING MAY VARY 15 DEGREES FROM A LINE DRAWN
PERPENDICULAR TO THE CENTER LINE OF THE STREAM AT THE INTENDED CROSSING
LOCATION.
SPAN BRIDGES MAY BE INSTALLED AND USED WHERE NEEDED TO ALLOW EQUIPMENT ACCESS
ACROSS WATERBODIES. SPAN BRIDGES WILL BE ABLE TO WITHSTAND THE ANTICIPATED
LOADING OF THE CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC, HAVE ONE TRAFFIC LANE, AND HAVE THE MINIMUM
WIDTH OF 7 FEET WITH A MAXIMUM WIDTH OF 14 FEET.
PERMANENT OR TEMPORARY SOIL STABILIZATION SHALL BE APPLIED TO DENUDED AREAS BY
THE END OF WORKDAY. THE AREAS DISTURBED DURING INSTALLATION WILL BE STABILIZED BY
THE END OF THE WORKDAY AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH NCDEQ REQUIREMENTS.
INTERMITTENT AND PERENNIAL STREAMS WILL BE CROSSED USING PROPERLY DESIGNED AND
CONSTRUCTED STRUCTURE INSTALLED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE ACCESS ROAD.
STRUCTURES WILL NOT IMPEDE FISH PASSAGE OR STREAM FLOW.
APPROACHES TO STREAM CROSSING WILL BE STABILIZED WITH COMPOSITE MATTING AND
OTHER SUITABLE MATERIAL FOR A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 50 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE
CROSSING.
CONSTRUCT AND MAINTAIN SPAN BRIDGES THAT ALLOW UNRESTRICTED FLOW AND PREVENT
SEDIMENT FROM ENTERING THE WATERBODY.
DO NOT USE SOIL TO CONSTRUCT OR STABILIZE SPAN BRIDGES.
DESIGN AND MAINTAIN SPAN BRIDGES TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM ENTERING THE
WATERBODY.
REMOVE TEMPORARY SPAN BRIDGES AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE AFTER SEEDING.
IF THERE WILL BE MORE THAN 1 MONTH BETWEEN FINAL CLEANUP AND THE BEGINNING OF
PERMANENT SEEDING AND REASONABLE ALTERNATIVE ACCESS TO THE ROW IS AVAILABLE,
REMOVE TEMPORARY SPAN BRIDGES AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE AFTER FINAL CLEANUP.
SEEDING WILL BE COMPLETED IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING SITE RECLAMATION AND PRIOR
TO PROJECT COMPLETION. TEMPORARY OR INTERMEDIATE SEEDING, MULCHING,
MATTING, OR OTHER SURFACE STABILIZATION MEASURES WILL BE PLACED ON
DISTURBED AREAS FOLLOWING INITIAL SOIL DISTURBANCE. PRIOR TO SEEDING, ALL
SURFACES SHALL BE SCARIFIED TO A DEPTH OF FOUR TO SIX INCHES TO ENHANCE
SEED GERMINATION AND HELP IMPEDE STORMWATER RUNOFF. GENERAL SEEDING
GUIDELINES ARE AS FOLLOWS:
MID-FEBRUARY THROUGH MID-APRIL:
TALL FESCUE
100 LB/ACRE
SWITCH GRASS
20 TO 30 LB/ACRE
BERMUDA GRASS
25 LB/ACRE
MID APRIL THROUGH JULY:
SWITCH GRASS
30 TO 40 LB/ACRE
TALL FESCUE
100 LB/ACRE
AUGUST THROUGH MID-FEBRUARY:
TALL FESCUE
80 TO 100 LB/ACRE
BERMUDA GRASS
25 TO 40 LB/ACRE
PERENNIAL RYE GRASS SHALL NOT BE USED. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS MAY BE ALLOWED
FOR THE USE OF RYE GRAIN ONLY WITH
THE APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER AND
SHALL BE CONSIDERED "TEMPORARY" SEEDING, ONLY, DURING WINTER MONTHS. PRIOR
TO COMPLETION OF PROJECT, ALL AREAS
SEED WITH RYE GRAIN FOR TEMPORARY
STABILIZATION SHALL BE RESEEDED FOR
PERMANENT STABILIZATION PER THE ABOVE
SCHEDULE.
NURSE CROPS SHALL BE ADDED TO AID
THE ESTABLISHMENT OF PERMANENT
VEGETATION. GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR
NURSE CROP SEEDING RATES ARE AS
FOLLOWS:
GERMAN MILLET (OR) 10 LB/ACRE
SUDANGRASS 15 LB/ACRE
MID -AUGUST THROUGH APRIL:
TALL FESCUE 80 TO 100 LB/ACRE
IN THE ABSENCE OF SOIL TESTS, FERTILIZER AND LIME WILL GENERALLY BE APPLIED
AT THE FOLLOWING RATES:
10-10-10 FERTILIZER (OR EQUIVALENT RATE OF APPLIED N) 1000
LB/ACRE
*GROUND AGRICULTURAL LIMESTONE 4000 LB/ACRE
*NOTE: LIQUID LIME MAY BE SUBSTITUTED IN VARIOUS SITUATIONS.
FERTILIZER SHALL BE 10-10-10 FERTILIZER (10 PERCENT NITROGEN, 10 PERCENT
PHOSPHATE AND 10 PERCENT TOTAL POTASH) OR APPROVED ALTERNATE. 19-19-19
FERTILIZER CAN ALSO BE USED AT AN EQUIVALENT RATE. FERTILIZER SHALL BE
STANDARD COMMERCIAL GRADE OF ORGANIC OR INORGANIC FERTILIZER OF THE KIND
AND QUALITY SPECIFIED HEREIN. IT MAY BE SEPARATE OR IN A MIXTURE CONTAINING
THE PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL NITROGEN, AVAILABLE PHOSPHORIC ACID, AND WATER
SOLUBLE POTASH IN THE AMOUNTS SPECIFIED. ALL FERTILIZERS SHALL BE FURNISHED
IN STANDARD UNOPENED CONTAINERS WITH WEIGHT, NAME OF PLANT NUTRIENTS, AND
MANUFACTURER'S GUARANTEED STATEMENT OF ANALYSIS CLEARLY MARKED, ALL IN
ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS. CONTRACTOR TO FURNISH ALL
MATERIALS.
SEEDING NOTES:
CONTRACTOR SHALL WARRANT VEGETATION GROWTH FOR ONE YEAR AFTER
ESTABLISHMENT. A MINIMUM OF 2 TONS PER ACRE OF LIME OR 3 TONS PER ACRE
FOR CLAY SOILS SHALL BE APPLIED OR OPTIMUM QUANTITY OF FERTILIZER AND LIME
SHALL BE CONFIRMED BY SOIL TEST. MULCH OR MATTING SHALL BE APPLIED TO
ALL SEEDED AREAS TO AID IN THE ESTABLISHMENT OF VEGETATION AND HELP IMPEDE
EROSION. VEGETATIVE MULCH, TYPICALLY WHEAT OR OAT STRAW, SHALL BE APPLIED
AT THE MINIMUM RATE OF 4000 LBS/ACRE AND ANCHORED WITH 400 GALLONS PER
ACRE OF ASPHALT TACK OR ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATIVE.
1. THE TOTAL PROJECT DENUDED AREA IS 88.43 AC.
2. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL AND STATE
STANDARDS -SPECIFICALLY THE NC EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL MANUAL, AND LOCAL
ORDINANCES.
3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DILIGENTLY AND CONTINUOUSLY MAINTAIN ALL EROSION & SEDIMENT
CONTROL MEASURES TO ENSURE DEVICES ARE FUNCTIONING PROPERLY TO MINIMIZE EROSION
AND SEDIMENT TRANSFER. ALL AREAS SHALL BE INSPECTED WEEKLY, OR WITHIN 24 HOURS
OF A RAIN EVENT PRODUCING 1" OR GREATER PRECIPITATION, AND DOCUMENTED ON NPDES
PERMIT MONITORING RECORDS.
1. EXISTING CONDITIONS ARE BASED ON GIS DATA AND DATA PROVIDED BY
DUKE ENERGY. CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS.
2. AERIAL IMAGES, GIS INFORMATION, AND DESIGN FILES MAY NOT ALIGN
COMPLETELY. CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW BMP PLACEMENT WITH DUKE
ENERGY ENVIRONMENTAL OVERSIGHT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
3. ANY AREAS WHERE RUTS WERE CREATED SHALL BE SMOOTHED, SEEDED,
AND RESTABILIZED WITHIN 48 HOURS OF DISTURBANCE.
4. EROSION CONTROL MATTING SHALL BE APPLIED TO ANY DISTURBED SLOPES
4. A RAIN GAUGE SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED ON SITE. SELF -INSPECTIONS AND NC STEEPER THAN 3:1.
DEQ MONITORING RECORDS SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE CONTRACTOR - SEE LINK
(http_//deg.nc.gov/about/divisions/energy-mineral-land-resources/erosion-sediment-control/forms). 5. CONSTRUCTION ACCESS SHALL UTILIZE EXISTING MAINTENANCE ACCESS
AN APPROVED COPY OF THE E&SC PLAN WITH PLACARD & APPROVAL LETTER, COPY OF THE ROUTES TO TOWERS, WITHOUT IMPROVEMENT, TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE.
NPDES PERMIT, AND A MINIMUM OF 30 DAYS OF SELF -INSPECTION REPORTS ARE TO BE BASED ON FIELD CONDITIONS AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION, WASHED
KEPT ON SITE UNTIL PROJECT CLOSURE BY NC DEQ. STONE OR MATTING ALONG ACCESS ROUTES TO PULL LOCATIONS/PADS MAY
BE NECESSARY TO PREVENT RUTTING OR EXCESSIVE DISTURBANCE AT STEEP
5. E&SC MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED AT ANY AREAS USED FOR CONTRACTOR EQUIPMENT (>20%) OR SEASONABLY WET AREAS. COORDINATE AND GAIN PRIOR
STAGING, MATERIALS LAYDOWN, SPOIL, OR WASTE AREAS. STAGING AREAS AND MATERIAL APPROVAL WITH DUKE ENERGY FOR PLANNED PLACEMENT OF
STOCKPILES FOR THIS PROJECT WILL BE LOCATED WITHIN APPROVED LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE STONE/MATTING AT LOCATIONS OTHER THAN SPECIFICALLY SHOWN ON PLANS
AND ENCOMPASSED BY SILT FENCE EXCEPT FOR THE POINTS OF ACCESS TO THE AREA. (CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE, CRANE PAD, IDENTIFIED MATTING LOCATIONS).
6. ANY DEWATERING OF SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT DEVICES FOR MAINTENANCE OR REMOVAL SHALL
BE DONE THROUGH A SILT BAG.
7. ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES MAY BE REQUIRED DUE TO FIELD CONDITIONS
INCLUDING THE USE OF MATTING ON ALL DISTURBED AREAS IF WET CONDITIONS ARE
PRESENT.
8. STABILIZATION IS THE BEST FORM OF EROSION CONTROL. TEMPORARY SEEDING IS NECESSARY
TO ACHIEVE EROSION CONTROL ON LARGE DENUDED AREAS.
9. ALL MATERIALS REQUIRED FOR INSTALLATION OF SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION CONTROL
MEASURES SHALL BE AVAILABLE ON SITE BEFORE ANY LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY IS BEGUN.
CLEARING AND CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
THE FOLLOWING ACTIVITIES SHALL BE FOLLOWED BY DUKE ENERGY AND ITS CONTRACTORS FOR
THE PROJECT.
1. ALL CONSTRUCTION ACCESS (PARTICULARLY THOSE CROSSING BRANCHES THAT ARE NOT
SHOWN ON THE APPROVED PLANS) SHALL FOLLOW THE TYPICAL DETAILS INCLUDED IN THIS
PLAN SET.
2. ALL ROAD BEDS, SLOPES, AND DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED WITHIN 15 WORKING
DAYS OR 90 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER COMPLETION OF THE ACTIVITY, WHICHEVER PERIOD IS
SHORTER.
3. MINOR FIELD ADJUSTMENTS TO THE PROPOSED SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES
(SUCH AS SHIFTING THE POSITION OR DIRECTION OF A SILT FENCE) WILL BE NECESSARY TO
ACCOUNT FOR REAL TERRAIN CONDITIONS. ADDITIONAL SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL
MEASURES COULD BE NECESSARY TO PREVENT SEDIMENT TRANSPORT OFF -SITE. IT IS THE
RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AT ALL TIMES TO PREVENT EROSIVE CONDITIONS AND
PREVENT SEDIMENT TRANSPORT OFF -SITE. SHOULD QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS ARISE
REGARDING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THESE E&SC PLANS, PLEASE CONSULT THE ENGINEER
FOR ASSISTANCE. MAJOR DEVIATIONS TO THE APPROVED E&SC PLANS MUST BE REPORTED
AND APPROVED BY NCDEQ.
4. SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MUST BE MAINTAINED ON A DAILY BASIS
DURING ALL LINE CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS.
5. INSTALLATION AND REPAIR OF ACCESS ROADS SHALL USE SILT FENCE ON THE DOWN
GRADIENT SIDE OF THE ROAD AND WATER BARS TO DIVERT DRAINAGE BACK TO EXISTING
CONDITIONS.
6. SEEDING FOR SITE STABILIZATION SHALL OCCUR IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE COMPLETION OF
ANY PHASE OF PROJECT CONSTRUCTION. SEEDING FOR STABILIZAITON (TEMPORARY OR
PERMANENT) SHALL NOT LAG CLEARING OPERATIONS BY MORE THAN 2,000 FEET.
7. ANY OFF -SITE BORROW AND WASTE REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT MUST COME FROM A SITE
WITH AN APPROVED EROSION CONTROL PLAN, A SITE REGULATED UNDER THE MINING ACT OF
1971, OR A LANDFILL REGULATED BY THE DIVISION OF SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT.
TRASH/DEBRIS FROM DEMOLITION ACTIVITIES OR GENERATED BY ANY ACTIVITIES ON SITE MUST
BE DISPOSED OF AT A FACILITY REGULATED BY THE DIVISION OF SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
OR PER DIVISION OF SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT OR DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES RULES
AND REGULATIONS 15A NCAC 413.0110.
HORIZONTAL GRAPHIC SCALE
2000 0 1000 2000 4000 8000
6. PLACEMENT AND REMOVAL OF STONE SHALL ALSO BE COORDINATED WITH
EXISTING PROPERTY OWNERS AS NECESSARY, ESPECIALLY IN ACTIVE
AGRICULTURAL AREAS AND/OR MANICURED LAWNS/GARDENS WITHIN
RESIDENTIAL AREAS, ETC.
7. GRADING AND STONE SHOWN FOR CRANE/PULL PADS IS FOR REFERENCE
ONLY TO SHOW FOOTPRINT AND TO SUPPORT THE SITING OF ALL
CONSTRUCTION MEASURES WITHIN THE PERMITTED LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE.
CONSTRUCTION OF THE CRANE/PULL PADS USING ALTERNATE MATERIALS
(WOOD, MATTING, CRIBBING, ETC.) SHALL BE BASED UPON ACTUAL FIELD
CONDITIONS AND COORDINATION WITH DUKE ENERGY CONSTRUCTION
MANAGEMENT.
8. AREAS REQUIRING STABILIZATION AND/OR GRADING FOR SEEDBED
PREPARATION THAT ARE CONSIDERED TOO WET SHALL HAVE TEMPORARY
EROSION CONTROL MEASURES INSTALLED. TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL
MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED TO MAINTAIN ALL SEDIMENT ON SITE UNTIL
THE AREA IS DRY ENOUGH TO WORK. NO CONSTRUCTION ACCESS WILL BE
ALLOWED IN AREAS WAITING ON STABILIZATION DUE TO WET CONDITIONS.
9. ALL AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED AND STABILIZED AS OFTEN AS NEEDED TO
PROVIDE PERMANENT STABILIZATION PER NCDEQ REQUIREMENTS.
10. ADDITIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE
INSTALLED AT ANY TIME IF DUKE ENVIRONMENTAL OVERSIGHT OR NCDEQ
DEEMS IT APPROPRIATE TO MAINTAIN COMPLIANCE AND GOOD STEWARDSHIP.
11. ANY AREAS TOO WET FOR LIMITED DISTURBANCE ACCESS WILL BE SHUT
DOWN AND NO ACCESS WILL BE ALLOWED UNTIL CONDITIONS ARE SUITABLE
FOR MINIMAL DISTURBANCE.
12. CONSTRUCTION ACCESS ROUTES STEEPER THAN 20% SHALL BE IMPROVED
WITH 6" CABC STONE UNDERLAIN BY GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TO ENSURE SAFE
VEHICLE ACCESS. REMOVAL AND/OR STABILIZATION OF SUCH AREAS WILL BE
AT THE DISCRETION OF NCDEQ OR THE PROPERTY OWNER.
AD D ITI 0 NAL NOTES
1. ADDITIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED AT ANY
TIME IF DUKE ENVIRONMENTAL OVERSIGHT OR NCDEQ DEEMS IT APPROPRIATE TO MAINTAIN
COMPLIANCE AND GOOD STEWARDSHIP.
2. EXCESSIVE SOILS AND DEBRIS MOST BE PLACED DIRECTLY ONTO A DUMP TRUCK, IF NOT
PLACED IMMEDIATELY ONTO A DUMP TRUCK, IT MUST BE REMOVED OFF SITE BY THE END
OF EACH WORKDAY OR PRIOR TO A RAIN EVENT OCCURRING THAT DAY.
3. EXCESSIVE SOILS AND DEBRIS REMOVED FROM SITE MUST BE TAKEN TO AN APPROVED
LANDFILL SITE.
4. ANY STREAMS OR WETLANDS IMPACTS PROPOSED THAT ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THIS PLAN
MUST BE APPROVED PRIOR TO LAND DISTURBANCE.
5. NO WASTE, SPOIL, SOLIDS, OR FILL OR ANY KIND SHALL OCCUR IN WETLANDS OR WATERS
BEYOND THE PERMITTED PLANS (INCLUDING TEMPORARY IMPACTS).
6. NO REMOVAL OF VEGETATION OR OTHER IMPACTS OF ANY KIND SHALL OCCUR TO STATE
REGULATED RIPARIAN BUFFERS BEYOND THE PERMITTED PLANS (INCLUDING TEMPORARY
I M PACTS) .
7. ALL WETLANDS, STREAMS, SURFACE WATERS, AND RIPARIAN BUFFERS LOCATED WITHIN 50
FEET OF THE CONSTRUCTION AREA ON THE PROJECT SITE SHALL BE CLEARLY MARKED
PRIOR TO ANY LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES AND MUST BE MAINTAINED ON THE PROPERTY
UNTIL THE PROJECT IS COMPLETED.
8. ALL MECHANIZED EQUIPMENT OPERATED NEAR SURFACE WATERS OR WETLANDS SHALL BE
REGULARLY INSPECTED AND MAINTAINED TO PREVENT CONTAMINATION OF WATERS AND
WETLANDS FROM FUELS, LUBRICANTS, HYDRAULIC FLUIDS OR OTHER POTENTIAL TOXIC
CHEMICALS. CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE STAGED IN ORDER TO MINIMIZE THE EXPOSURE OF
EQUIPMENT TO SURFACE WATERS TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICABLE. FUELING,
LUBRICATION AND GENERAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE SHALL NOT TAKE PLACE WITHIN 100
FEET OF A WATERBODY OR WETLANDS TO PREVENT CONTAMINATION BY FUELS AND OILS.
FUEL SHALL NOT BE STORED WITHIN 100 FEET OF A WATERBODY OR WETLAND.
ISSUED FOR
PERMIT -
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
( IN FEET)
1 inch = 2000 ft.

GROUND STABILIZATION AND MATERIALS HANDLING PRACTICES FOR COMPLIANCE WITH
THE NCGO1 CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT
Implementing the details and specifications on this plan sheet will result in the construction
activity being considered compliant with the Ground Stabilization and Materials Handling
sections of the NCG01 Construction General Permit (Sections E and F, respectively). The
permittee shall comply with the Erosion and Sediment Control plan approved by the
delegated authority having jurisdiction. All details and specifications shown on this sheet
may not apply depending on site conditions and the delegated authority having jurisdiction.
SECTION E: GROUND STABILIZATION
Required Ground Stabilization Timeframes
Stabilize within this
Site Area Description
many calendar
Timeframe variations
days after ceasing
land disturbance
(a) Perimeter dikes,
swales, ditches, and
7
None
perimeter slopes
(b) High Quality Water
7
None
(HQW) Zones
(c) Slopes steeper than
If slopes are 10' or less in length and are
3:1
7
not steeper than 2:1, 14 days are
allowed
-7 days for slopes greater than 50' in
length and with slopes steeper than 4:1
-7 days for perimeter dikes, swales,
(d) Slopes 3:1 to 4:1
14
ditches, perimeter slopes and HQW
Zones
-10 days for Falls Lake Watershed
-7 days for perimeter dikes, swales,
(e) Areas with slopes
ditches, perimeter slopes and HQW Zones
flatter than 4:1
14
-10 days for Falls Lake Watershed unless
there is zero slope
Note: After the permanent cessation of construction activities, any areas with temporary
ground stabilization shall be converted to permanent ground stabilization as soon as
practicable but in no case longer than 90 calendar days after the last land disturbing
activity. Temporary ground stabilization shall be maintained in a manner to render the
surface stable against accelerated erosion until permanent ground stabilization is achieved.
GROUND STABILIZATION SPECIFICATION
Stabilize the ground sufficiently so that rain will not dislodge the soil. Use one of the
techniques in the table below:
Temporary Stabilization
Permanent Stabilization
• Temporary grass seed covered with straw or
• Permanent grass seed covered with straw or
other mulches and tackifiers
other mulches and tackifiers
• Hydroseeding
• Geotextile fabrics such as permanent soil
• Rolled erosion control products with or
reinforcement matting
without temporary grass seed
• Hydroseeding
• Appropriately applied straw or other mulch
• Shrubs or other permanent plantings covered
• Plastic sheeting
with mulch
• Uniform and evenly distributed ground cover
sufficient to restrain erosion
• Structural methods such as concrete, asphalt or
retaining walls
• Rolled erosion control products with grass seed
POLYACRYLAMIDES (PAMS) AND FLOCCULANTS
1. Select flocculants that are appropriate for the soils being exposed during
construction, selecting from the NC DWR List of Approved PAMS/Flocculants.
2. Apply flocculants at or before the inlets to Erosion and Sediment Control Measures.
3. Apply flocculants at the concentrations specified in the NC DWR List of Approved
PAMS/Flocculants and in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.
4. Provide ponding area for containment of treated Stormwater before discharging
offsite.
5. Store flocculants in leak -proof containers that are kept under storm -resistant cover
or surrounded by secondary containment structures.
EQUIPMENT AND VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
1. Maintain vehicles and equipment to prevent discharge of fluids.
2. Provide drip pans under any stored equipment.
3. Identify leaks and repair as soon as feasible, or remove leaking equipment from the
project.
4. Collect all spent fluids, store in separate containers and properly dispose as
hazardous waste (recycle when possible).
5. Remove leaking vehicles and construction equipment from service until the problem
has been corrected.
6. Bring used fuels, lubricants, coolants, hydraulic fluids and other petroleum products
to a recycling or disposal center that handles these materials.
LITTER, BUILDING MATERIAL AND LAND CLEARING WASTE
1. Never bury or burn waste. Place litter and debris in approved waste containers.
2. Provide a sufficient number and size of waste containers (e.g dumpster, trash
receptacle) on site to contain construction and domestic wastes.
3. Locate waste containers at least 50 feet away from storm drain inlets and surface
waters unless no other alternatives are reasonably available.
4. Locate waste containers on areas that do not receive substantial amounts of runoff
from upland areas and does not drain directly to a storm drain, stream or wetland.
5. Cover waste containers at the end of each workday and before storm events or
provide secondary containment. Repair or replace damaged waste containers.
6. Anchor all lightweight items in waste containers during times of high winds.
7. Empty waste containers as needed to prevent overflow. Clean up immediately if
containers overflow.
8. Dispose waste off -site at an approved disposal facility.
9. On business days, clean up and dispose of waste in designated waste containers.
PAINT AND OTHER LIQUID WASTE
1. Do not dump paint and other liquid waste into storm drains, streams or wetlands.
2. Locate paint washouts at least 50 feet away from storm drain inlets and surface
waters unless no other alternatives are reasonably available.
3. Contain liquid wastes in a controlled area.
4. Containment must be labeled, sized and placed appropriately for the needs of site.
5. Prevent the discharge of soaps, solvents, detergents and other liquid wastes from
construction sites.
PORTABLE TOILETS
1. Install portable toilets on level ground, at least 50 feet away from storm drains,
streams or wetlands unless there is no alternative reasonably available. If 50 foot
offset is not attainable, provide relocation of portable toilet behind silt fence or place
on a gravel pad and surround with sand bags.
2. Provide staking or anchoring of portable toilets during periods of high winds or in high
foot traffic areas.
3. Monitor portable toilets for leaking and properly dispose of any leaked material.
Utilize a licensed sanitary waste hauler to remove leaking portable toilets and replace
with properly operating unit.
EARTHEN STOCKPILE MANAGEMENT
1. Show stockpile locations on plans. Locate earthen -material stockpile areas at least
50 feet away from storm drain inlets, sediment basins, perimeter sediment controls
and surface waters unless it can be shown no other alternatives are reasonably
available.
2. Protect stockpile with silt fence installed along toe of slope with a minimum offset of
five feet from the toe of stockpile.
3. Provide stable stone access point when feasible.
4. Stabilize stockpile within the timeframes provided on this sheet and in accordance
with the approved plan and any additional requirements. Soil stabilization is defined
as vegetative, physical or chemical coverage techniques that will restrain accelerated
erosion on disturbed soils for temporary or permanent control needs.
ONSITE CONCRETE WASHOUT
STRUCTURE WITH LINER
A
SANDBAGS UYP)
OR STAPLES
F
HIGH
CDHE
LOW
SOIL
0 O
O 0
0
0
10 MIL
SILT FENCE SIDE SLOPE LLASTIC INING SANDBAGS (TYP.)
(TYP.) OR STAPLES
„<< x
A;
,_.
00
60
A
CLEARLY MARKED SIGNAGE SECTION A -A
CONCRETE NOTING DEVICE (18"X24" MIN.) NOTES.
WASHOUT
1. ACTUAL LOCATION DETERMINED IN FIELD
2. THE CONCRETE WASHOUT STRUCTURES SHALL
BE MAINTAINED WHEN THE LIQUID AND/OR SOLID
REACHES 75% OF THE STRUCTURES CAPACITY
PLAN 3.CONCRETE WASHOUT STRUCTURE NEEDS TO BE
CLEARY MARKED WITH SIGNAGE NOTING DEVICE.
BELOW GRADE WASHOUT STRUCTURE
5ANDBAG5 (TYP.)
OR STAPLES
D MIL
HIGH
CDHESIVE &
PLASTIC LINING
LOW FILTRATION
-1 1 SIDE SLOP
SOIL BERM
(TYP.)
rot SECTION A
�SANDBAGA (TYP_)
NOTES:
OR STAPLES
1. ACTUAL LOCATION DETERMINED IN
FIELD
CLEARLY MARKED SIGNAGE
CONCRETE NOTING DEVICE (18"X24" MIN.)
2, THE CONCRETE WASHOUT
WASHOUT
STRUCTURES SHALL BE MAINTAINED
WHEN THE LIQUID AND/OR SOLID
REACHES 75% OF THE STRUCTURES
CAPACITY TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE
HOLDING CAPACITY WITH A MINIMUM 12
PLAN
INCHES OF FREEBOARD.
3.CONCRETE WASHOUT STRUCTURE
NEEDS TO BE CLEARY MARKED WITH
SIGNAGE NOTING DEVICE.
ABOVE GRADE WASHOUT
STRUCTURE
CONCRETE WASHOUTS
1. Do not discharge concrete or cement slurry from the site.
2. Dispose of, or recycle settled, hardened concrete residue in accordance with local
and state solid waste regulations and at an approved facility.
3. Manage washout from mortar mixers in accordance with the above item and in
addition place the mixer and associated materials on impervious barrier and within
lot perimeter silt fence.
4. Install temporary concrete washouts per local requirements, where applicable. If an
alternate method or product is to be used, contact your approval authority for
review and approval. If local standard details are not available, use one of the two
types of temporary concrete washouts provided on this detail.
5. Do not use concrete washouts for dewatering or storing defective curb or sidewalk
sections. Stormwater accumulated within the washout may not be pumped into or
discharged to the storm drain system or receiving surface waters. Liquid waste must
be pumped out and removed from project.
6. Locate washouts at least 50 feet from storm drain inlets and surface waters unless it
can be shown that no other alternatives are reasonably available. At a minimum,
install protection of storm drain inlet(s) closest to the washout which could receive
spills or overflow.
7. Locate washouts in an easily accessible area, on level ground and install a stone
entrance pad in front of the washout. Additional controls may be required by the
approving authority.
8. Install at least one sign directing concrete trucks to the washout within the project
limits. Post signage on the washout itself to identify this location.
9. Remove leavings from the washout when at approximately 75% capacity to limit
overflow events. Replace the tarp, sand bags or other temporary structural
components when no longer functional. When utilizing alternative or proprietary
products, follow manufacturer's instructions.
10. At the completion of the concrete work, remove remaining leavings and dispose of
in an approved disposal facility. Fill pit, if applicable, and stabilize any disturbance
caused by removal of washout.
HERBICIDES, PESTICIDES AND RODENTICIDES
1. Store and apply herbicides, pesticides and rodenticides in accordance with label
restrictions.
2. Store herbicides, pesticides and rodenticides in their original containers with the
label, which lists directions for use, ingredients and first aid steps in case of
accidental poisoning.
3. Do not store herbicides, pesticides and rodenticides in areas where flooding is
possible or where they may spill or leak into wells, stormwater drains, ground water
or surface water. If a spill occurs, clean area immediately.
4. Do not stockpile these materials onsite.
HAZARDOUS AND TOXIC WASTE
1. Create designated hazardous waste collection areas on -site.
2. Place hazardous waste containers under cover or in secondary containment.
3. Do not store hazardous chemicals, drums or bagged materials directly on the ground.
NCGO I GROUND STABILIZATION AND MATERIALS HANDLING
HORIZONTAL GRAPHIC SCALE
2000 0 1000 2000 4000 8000
EFFECTIVE: 04/01/19
ISSUED FOR
PERMIT -
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
( IN FEET)
1 inch = 2000 ft.

PART III
SELF -INSPECTION, RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTING
SECTION A: SELF -INSPECTION
Self -inspections are required during normal business hours in accordance with the table
below. When adverse weather or site conditions would cause the safety of the inspection
personnel to be in jeopardy, the inspection may be delayed until the next business day on
which it is safe to perform the inspection. In addition, when a storm event of equal to or
greater than 1.0 inch occurs outside of normal business hours, the self -inspection shall be
performed upon the commencement of the next business day. Any time when inspections
were delayed shall be noted in the Inspection Record.
Frequency
Inspect
(during normal
Inspection records must include:
business hours)
(1) Rain gauge
Daily
Daily rainfall amounts.
maintained in
If no daily rain gauge observations are made during weekend or
good working
holiday periods, and no individual -day rainfall information is
order
available, record the cumulative rain measurement for those un-
attended days (and this will determine if a site inspection is
needed). Days on which no rainfall occurred shall be recorded as
"zero." The permittee may use another rain -monitoring device
approved by the Division.
(2) E&SC
At least once per
1. Identification of the measures inspected,
Measures
7 calendar days
2. Date and time of the inspection,
and within 24
3. Name of the person performing the inspection,
hours of a rain
4. Indication of whether the measures were operating
event > 1.0 inch in
properly,
24 hours
5. Description of maintenance needs for the measure,
fi. Description, evidence, and date of corrective actions taken.
(3) Stormater
At least once per
1. Identification of the discharge outfalls inspected,
discharge
7 calendar days
2. Date and time of the inspection,
outfalls (SDOs)
and within 24
3. Name of the person performing the inspection,
hours of a rain
4. Evidence of indicators of stormwater pollution such as oil
event > 1.0 inch in
sheen, floating or suspended solids or discoloration,
24 hours
5. Indication of visible sediment leaving the site,
5. Description, evidence, and date of corrective actions taken.
(4) Perimeter of
At least once per
If visible sedimentation is found outside site limits, then a record
site
7 calendar days
of the following shall be made:
and within 24
1. Actions taken to clean up or stabilize the sediment that has left
hours of a rain
the site limits,
event > 1.0 inch in
2. Description, evidence, and date of corrective actions taken, and
24 hours
3. An explanation as to the actions taken to control future
releases.
(5) Streams or
At least once per
If the stream or wetland has increased visible sedimentation or a
wetlands onsite
7 calendar days
stream has visible increased turbidity from the construction
or offsite
and within 24
activity, then a record of the following shall be made:
(where
hours of a rain
1. Description, evidence and date of corrective actions taken, and
accessible)
event > 1.0 inch in
2. Records of the required reports to the appropriate Division
24 hours
Regional Office per Part III, Section C, Item (2)(a) of this permit
of this permit.
(5) Ground
After each phase
1. The phase of grading (installation of perimeter E&SC
stabilization
of grading
measures, clearing and grubbing, installation of storm
measures
drainagefacilities, completion of all land -disturbing
activity, construction or redevelopment, permanent
ground cover).
2. Documentation that the required ground stabilization
measures have been provided within the required
timeframe or an assurance that they will be provided as
soon as possible.
NOTE: The rain inspection resets the required 7 calendar day inspection requirement.
PART III
SELF -INSPECTION, RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTING
SECTION B: RECORDKEEPING
1. E&SC Plan Documentation
The approved E&SC plan as well as any approved deviation shall be kept on the site. The
approved E&SC plan must be kept up-to-date throughout the coverage under this permit.
The following items pertaining to the E&SC plan shall be documented in the manner
described:
Item to Document
Documentation Requirements
(a) Each E&SC Measure has been installed
Initial and date each E&SC Measure on a copy
and does not significantly deviate from the
of the approved E&SC Plan or complete, date
locations, dimensions and relative elevations
and sign an inspection report that lists each
shown on the approved E&SC Plan.
E&SC Measure shown on the approved E&SC
Plan. This documentation is required upon the
initial installation of the E&SC Measures or if
the E&SC Measures are modified after initial
installation.
(b) A phase of grading has been completed.
Initial and date a copy of the approved E&SC
Plan or complete, date and sign an inspection
report to indicate completion of the
construction phase.
(c) Ground cover is located and installed
Initial and date a copy of the approved E&SC
in accordance with the approved E&SC
Plan or complete, date and sign an inspection
Plan.
report to indicate compliance with approved
ground cover specifications.
(d) The maintenance and repair
Complete, date and sign an inspection report.
requirements for all E&SC Measures
have been performed.
(e) Corrective actions have been taken
Initial and date a copy of the approved E&SC
to E&5C Measures.
Plan or complete, date and sign an inspection
report to indicate the completion of the
corrective action.
2. Additional Documentation
In addition to the E&SC Plan documents above, the following items shall be kept on the
site
and available for agency inspectors at all times during normal business hours, unless the
Division provides a site -specific exemption based on unique site conditions that make this
requirement not practical:
(a) This general permit as well as the certificate of coverage, after it is received.
(b) Records of inspections made during the previous 30 days. The permittee shall record
the required observations on the Inspection Record Form provided by the Division or
a similar inspection form that includes all the required elements. Use of
electronically -available records in lieu of the required paper copies will be allowed if
shown to provide equal access and utility as the hard -copy records.
(c) All data used to complete the Notice of Intent and older inspection records shall be
maintained for a period of three years after project completion and made available
upon request. [40 CFR 122.41]
PART III
SELF -INSPECTION, RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTING
SECTION C: REPORTING
1. Occurrences that must be reported
Permittees shall report the following occurrences:
(a) Visible sediment deposition in a stream or wetland.
(b) Oil spills if:
• They are 25 gallons or more,
• They are less than 25 gallons but cannot be cleaned up within 24 hours,
• They cause sheen on surface waters (regardless of volume), or
• They are within 100 feet of surface waters (regardless of volume).
(a) Releases of hazardous substances in excess of reportable quantities under Section 311
of the Clean Water Act (Ref: 40 CFR 110.3 and 40 CFR 117.3) or Section 102 of CERCLA
(Ref: 40 CFR 302.4) or G.S. 143-215.85.
(b) Anticipated bypasses and unanticipated bypasses.
(c) Noncompliance with the conditions of this permit that may endanger health or the
environment.
2. Reporting Timeframes and Other Requirements
After a permittee becomes aware of an occurrence that must be reported, he shall contact
the appropriate Division regional office within the timeframes and in accordance with the
other requirements listed below. Occurrences outside normal business hours may also be
reported to the Division's Emergency Response personnel at [phone], (800)
858-0368 or [phone].
Occurrence
Reporting Timeframes (After Discovery) and Other Requirements
(a) Visible sediment
•
Within 24 hours, an oral or electronic notification.
deposition in a
.
Within 7 calendar days, a report that contains a description of the
stream or wetland
sediment and actions taken to address the cause of the deposition.
Division staff may waive the requirement for a written report on a
case -by -case basis.
•
If the stream is named on the NC 303(d) list as impaired for sediment -
related causes, the permittee may be required to perform additional
monitoring, inspections or apply more .stringent practices if staff
determine that additional requirements are needed to assure compliance
with the federal or state impaired -waters conditions.
(b) Oil spills and
•
Within 24 hours, an oral or electronic notification. The notification
release of
shall include information about the date, time, nature, volume and
hazardous
location of the spill or release.
substances per Item
1(b)-(c) above
(c) Anticipated
•
A report at least ten days before the date of the bypass, if possible.
bypasses [40 CFR
The report shall include an evaluation of the anticipated quality and
122.41(m)(3)]
effect of the bypass.
(d) Unanticipated
•
Within 24 hours, an oral or electronic notification.
bypasses [40 CFR
•
Within 7 calendar days, a report that includes an evaluation of the
122.41(m)(3)]
quality and effect of the bypass.
(e) Noncompliance
•
Within 24 hours, an oral or electronic notification.
with the conditions
•
Within 7 calendar days, a report that contains a description of the
of this permit that
noncompliance, and its causes, the period of noncompliance,
may endanger
including exact dates and times, and if the noncompliance has not
health or the
been corrected, the anticipated time noncompliance is expected to
environment[40
continue; and steps taken or planned to reduce, eliminate, and
CFR 122.41(1)(7)]
prevent reoccurrence of the noncompliance. [40 CFR 122.41(I)(6).
•
Division staff may waive the requirement for a written report on a
case -by -case basis.
NCGO I SELF -INSPECTION, RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTING
HORIZONTAL GRAPHIC SCALE
2000 0 1000 2000 4000 8000
EFFECTIVE: 04/01/19
ISSUED FOR
PERMIT -
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
( IN FEET)
1 inch = 2000 ft.

PHASE 1
MOCKSVILLE SUBSTATION TO BALTIMORE TAP
• {, "� TOWN OF
1 a
r 4 . MOCKSV LLE, NC
as-
P 1 A � ,�P1 B P2A P2B P 3 B P3A
0
ra
v
c�.
o�
MOCKSV EEE SUBSTAT 0
EAT: N035°53' 1 5.1 299
LONG: W080°33'26.41 ,9
P4A
�r
r
lot
HOR=NTAL GRAPHIC SCALE
2000 0 1000 2000 4000
( IN FEET)
1 inch = 2000 ft.
Moill
lill
iiiiiiiiiil
GAI'E —
� q
z
O
Q
D
z
z
O
U
WO
z LL
N
J O
2 '
Q
Q d
� W
W
2
U
N
W
U
Q
2
d
W
W
U
W
z_
J
z
O
U)
U
2
U
z
Q
Y
0
0
ISSUED FOR
Q
PERMIT - J
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION

PHASE 2
BALTIMORE TAP TO ADVANCE RETAIL
z
0
Q
z
z
0
U
w0
W
Z
J O
2 Q
Q�
w
W
2
U)
z
0
Q
z
W Z
z0
U
U a
�O
QLL
cd N
W
U)
Q
2
d
W
W
U)
LONG: W080°25' 1 7.20"
,tom
PHASE 3
ADVANCE RETA
IL
3
h
TO IDOLS TAP
HOR=NTAL GRAPHIC SCALE
500 0 250 500 1000
( IN FEET)
1 inch = 500 ft.
2000
ISSUED FOR
PERMIT -
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION

0
I
r i P I A
• P 1 B P 2 A
. � T 'o
7 18 20
6 9 10 19
O5
a
15 16 21 22 � 23
CD14 v
2 r
s �
• � � 17
MOCKSV EEE SUBSTAT ON
EAT: N035°53' 1 5.1 2" _ �c�0
LONG: W080033'26041 " �o
PHASE 1
MOCKSVILLE SUBSTATION TO BALTIMORE TAP
r
' - M
P3A P3B P4A P4B P5A _ P5B P6A P6B
ALL z
28 — 39 41 65 68 72 w O
z �
26 / 29 33 35 �I38 40 43 44 45 46 47 �� 67 v J
70
�
�► 0 42 ► =:e Q
% �w
1
w
• N
w
49 51 53 55 57 59 61 62 O 64 _ w
27 32 34 66 71 � 48 73
50 52 54 56 63 �
58 60 4ar � 69
It
PARCEL
OWNER
ADDRESS
CITY
STATE
ZIP
PIN
DEED BK PG
1
HALL WILLIAM E ETAL; HARRIS JOSEPH CARL
259 N CAROLINA CIR
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-5185
5737897493
011540522
2
CRESCENT ELECTRIC MEMB CORP
PO BOX 1831
STATESVILLE
NC
28687-0000
5738816115
001090442
3
DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION; DAVID WRIGHT
550 SOUTH TRYON ST (DEC41B)
CHARLOTTE
NC
28202-0000
5738816552
000750516
4
MARKLAND RAYMOND J; HENDRICKS CLYDE
288 NORTH HIDDEN BROOKE DRIVE
ADVANCE
NC
27006-0000
5748016116
011820825
5
LIFE RESTORED BY FAITH OUTREACH MINISTRY
113 MILL ST
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-2615
5738828110
011100575
6
SCOTT CLYDE E; SEAWRIGHT BARBARA PARKS
1995 US HIGHWAY 64 W
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-8437
5738920040
006150976
7
MAYFIELD SYANDRA
228 MILL STREET
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-0000
57389220SO
001710886
8
MAYFIELD SYANDRA
228 MILL STREET
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-0000
5738922045
001110886
9
PARKS JUANITA B
128 PARKS LANE
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-0000
5738924100
007270863
10
HORNE LESLIE
6624 EVENING SAHDE LN
LAND 0 LAKES
FL
34638
5738924108
009350859
11
MARTIN ROSA LEE
3411 OLD VINEYARD RD APT A2
WINSTON SALEM
NC
27103-1452
5738910797
004090534
12
RHYNEHARDT PAULETTE FOSTER
248 MILL ST
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-2622
5738912853
011210267
13
SCOTT CLYDE ERVIN SR
PO BOX 34
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-0000
5738912953
000840550
14
MCCLAMROCK JAMES RONALD
600 EAST LEXINGTON RD
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-2323
5738927022
001240319
15
PEEBLES CAROLYN M
3055 NC HIGHWAY 801 SOUTH
ADVANCE
NC
27006-0000
5738924000
001860445
16
CAMERON DAVID J; CAMERON RENITA L
612 EAST LEXINGTON ROAD
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028
5748010989
009200115
17
MARKLAND RAYMOND J; HENDRICKS CLYDE
288 NORTH HIDDEN BROOKE DRIVE
ADVANCE
NC
27006-0000
5748016116
011820825
18
MEARS TODD J; MEARS KHRISTEN L
PO BOX 35
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-0035
5748021808
007250397
19
MEARS TODD J
PO BOX 35
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-0035
5748024826
005210160
20
VICKERS CAROLYN K; VICKERS HAROLD
413 VALHALLA DRIVE
HARRISBURG
NC
28075-0000
5748035270
003240854
21
MEARS TODD J; MEARS KHRISTEN L
PO BOX 35
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028--0035
5748024617
007330193
22
STOREHOUSE FOR JESUS
PO BOX 216
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-0000
5748028905
004700244
23
STOREHOUSE FOR JESUS
PO BOX 216
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-0000
5748120933
005480648
24
FOLTZ ENTERPRISES; C/O DONNA FOLTZ LEONARD
504 CAROLINA BEACH AVE S; APT 21
CAROLINA BEACH
NC
28428-6222
5748336779
001730627
25
SWICEGOOD TRACY KYLE TRUSTEE; HALL WILLIAM E ETAL
125 OAK MEADOW LN
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-5504
5748258742
011430552
26
FUNDER AMERICA INC
PO BOX 729
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-0000
5748356709
009810665
27
BRJ PROPERTIES LLC
259 NORTH CAROLINA CIRCLE
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-0000
5748454401
009190894
28
MARTIN ROBERT SHAYN; MARTIN KIMBERLY BINK
135 LOWER BROOK CT
CLEMMONS
NC
27012-7453
5748451941
011410691
29
COUNTY OF DAVIE
123 SOUTH MAIN STREET
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-0000
5748453866
006971107
30
BLONDIE PRICE INC
116 LOWES FOOD DRIVE; # 193
LEWISVILLE
NC
27023
5748456833
008460365
31
VICK INVESTMENT PROPERTIES LLC
130 FUNDER DRIVE
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028
5748464236
009900578
32
WALKER PEARL C HEIRS
54 PARHAM RD
LEICESTER
NC
28748-0000
5748560148
000640231
33
A-1 INDUSTRIAL PARK INC
521 MILLING RD
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-2855
5748575136
010850667
34
MOCKSVILLE TOWN OF
171 S CLEMENT STREET
MOCKSVILLE
INC
27028-0000
5748563385
000930252
35
A-1 INDUSTRIAL PARK INC
521 MILLING RD
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-2855
5748575136
010850667
36
MOCKSVILLE TOWN OF
171 S CLEMENT STREET
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-0000
5748567624
000930252
PARCEL
OWNER
ADDRESS
CITY
STATE
ZIP
PIN
DEED BK PG
37
FAST TRACK CARPORTS LLC
81 WRIGHT LN
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-2841
5748579535
011541078
38
BUTERO JOHN E JR; BUTERO PAULA R
80 WRIGHT STREET
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-0000
5748673307
002000847
39
TARDELL ANTHONY; TARDELL SARAH
60 WRIGHT LANE
MOCKSVILLE
NC
1 27028
5748674404
009300486
40
GREGORY JO ANN D
40 WRIGHT LANE
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-0000
5748674573
000880471
41
JEFFERSON LISA
20 WRIGHT LANE
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-0000
5748675577
004720120
42
BRANNON KAREN
315 FULTON STREET
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-0000
5748677628
001860793
43
MARTINEZ MARIE REINA
315 MORSE STREET
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028
5748678748
009340002
44
CAMPBELL MARY R
314 MORSE STREET
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-2826
5748770910
001110527
45
DARNALL JOANNA J; DARNALL JOEL THOMAS
314 WHITNEY ROAD
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-2844
5748771919
008520093
46
CAUDLE JOE EDWARD JR; CAUDLE RUTH 0
325 WHITNEY ROAD
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-2844
5748783123
001040156
47
CHIQUITO CIPRIANO
2021 US HWY 158
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-0000
5748785392
003110682
48
CARTER FRANCES JEAN
181 MARCONI STREET
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-0000
5748660904
001460468
49
MCGEE MELISSA B
161 MARCONI ST
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-2831
5748670091
011190825
50
STEVENSON ATLAS D ETAL; WHITE EMMA STEVENSON
141 MARCONI STREET
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-2831
5748671077
009140034
51
LAYMAN JAMES PAUL
1933 HUSKINS STREET
STATESVILLE
NC
28677
5748672163
010000982
52
FOLEY MICHELLE ANN
101 MARCONI ST
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-0000
5748673149
007620843
53
81 MARCONI TRUST
6255 TOWNCENTER DR
CLEMMONS
NC
27012
5748674236
010550677
54
NEELY KAREN ANN
61 MARCONI STREET
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-0000
5748675312
001290720
55
JORDAN MELISSA ANN
PO BOX 684
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-0000
5748676308
004360816
56
PARKS DWAYNE 0; PARKS NORA E
PO BOX 36
GRADYVILLE
PA
19039-0000
5748676493
001670880
57
PEARCY JESSICA LEANNE; CLARK AMASA JAMES
357 FULTON STREET
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028
5748678538
030600106
58
STEELE JOHN QJR; STEELE JOYCE H
371 MORSE STREET
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-0000
5748679667
001010656
59
ETCHISON WALTER PAYNE
356 MORSE STREET
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-0000
5748771729
011000058
60
SCALES ALVIN LOUIS; SCALES CASSANDRA F
356 WHITNEY ROAD
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-0000
5748772837
001360766
61
HEAD RICHARD
PO BOX 841
CHINA GROVE
NC
28023-0000
5748784011
011890170
62
PRIM DARREN
101 META BREEZE LN
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-2849
5748786114
011820782
63
SMITH MATTHEW, SMITH LISA
103 META BREEZE LANE
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-0000
5748787211
005960072
64
PEREZ REYNALDO; MEZA GUADALUPE
360 ROLLING HILLS LN
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-2851
5748788402
011250361
65
TIGERT CHAD W; TIGERT TIFFANY N
1047 MILLING ROAD
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-2867
5748789638
006170558
66
POTTS DARREN L; POTTS STEPHANIE H
437 WILL JOSE DR
LEXINGTON
NC
27295-0313
5748886648
011210547
67
NICHOLS JACK G; NICHOLS PHYLLIS B
1090 MILLING ROAD
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-0000
5748897352
001030472
68
POTTS CHARLES RICHARD; PHIPPS SONIA/POTTS DARREN 1%
1064 MILLING RD
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-2866
5748891080
010870122
69
POTTS CHARLES RICHARD; PHIPPS SONIA/POTTS DARREN 1%
1065 MILLING RD
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-2866
5748891080
010870122
70
MINTZ FARM ENTERPRISES LLC
3275 POMACE CT
PLEASANTON
CA
94566
5748995787
009870549
71
SMALLEY CHRISTOPHER C & LIANN; SMALLEY LIV TRUST 11/23/99
414 BURTON RD
ADVANCE
NC
27006
5758184406
009190836
72
GUGLIELMI FAMILY LIMITED PART
236 SPYGLASS DRIVE
ADVANCE
NC
27006-0000
5759015275
003350933
73
MINTZ FARM ENTERPRISES LLC
3275 POMACE CT
PLEASANTON
CA
94566
5758380543
009870549
HORIZONTAL GRAPHIC SCALE
2000 0 1000 2000 4000
( IN FEET)
1 inch = 2000 ft.
.e@e
ISSUED FOR
PERMIT -
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION

PHASE 1
MOCKSVILLE SUBSTATION TO BALTIMORE TAP
P7A _ PB P8A P8B P9A P9 B
r
76
75 � 78
r
i 81 82
a
' Ir
r IWAF
PI OA p I OE �41
-Now
83
�� 88
84 85 86 87 Alt
Aw _ m
PI IA
94
OF
91
� 93
= o
89 LA9 0 92 95
PARCEL
OWNER
ADDRESS
CITY
STATE
ZIP
PIN
DEED BK PG
74
BROWN GEORGE THOMAS
PO BOX 911
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-0911
5759200493
-
75
PHILLIPS JUSTIN B; PHILLIPS DONNA B
1446 MILLING ROAD
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028
5759116454
009280770
76
PHILLIPS WESLEY TAYLOR
133 FOREST DR
ADVANCE
NC
27006-9454
5759224225
011410462
77
PHILLIPS CHARLES WAND SON INC
119 PHILLIPS LANE
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-0000
5759228205
-
78
PHILLIPS JUSTIN BURDETTE
1446 MILLING ROAD
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-4303
5759226542
003210930
79
PHILLIPS CHARLES W AND SON INC
119 PHILLIPS LANE
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-0000
5759314750
000780098
80
WOODRUFF CHRISTINE H
478 WILKESBORO STREET
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-2030
5759334990
010860309
81
WOODRUFF CHARLES W; WOODRUFF CHRISTINE HENDRICKS
478 WILKESBORO STREET
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-2031
5759536842
001130159
82
SMITH NATHAN F; SMITH PEGGY AYCOTH
214 VINEYARD LANE
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-7444
5759664062
001130458
83
HENNINGER JEREMIAH; HENNINGER L KYRIE
2076 MILLING ROAD
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028
5759760451
010541057
84
HENDRIX JANE C
2112 MILLING ROAD
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028
5759765307
001920362
85
HENDRIX JANE C
2112 MILLING ROAD
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028
5759766423
005690211
86
CARTER WILLIAM TILDEN
133 PRINCETON CT
ADVANCE
NC
27006-0000
5759767450
008290748
87
HENDRIX BILLY LESTER SR; HENDRIX REBECCA H
249 DULIN ROAD
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-7201
5759769412
004440670
88
FOSTER MATTHEW; FOSTER LAUREN M
139 RUMPLE LANE
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028
5759854813
010440334
89
FOSTER GEORGE RANDALL; FOSTER DANA JONES
3240 US HIGHWAY 601 NORTH
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-0000
5759868686
010150695
90
SHOAF JAMES A TRUSTEE, SHOAF HELEN F TRUSTEE
199 HOWARDTOWN RD
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-7334
5759964376
005400650
91
SHOAF JAMES A TRUSTEE, SHOAF HELEN F TRUSTEE
199 HOWARDTOWN RD
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-7334
5759963823
007750937
92
LAWRENCE GLENDA SMITH
2303 MILLING ROAD
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028
5759966811
010410001
93
CAMPBELL LARRY DEAN; CAMPBELL OMMIE GAIL
159 DE RON KEL LANE
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-7156
5759979251
007340444
94
POWELL ROGER MARTIN
139 DE-RON-KEL LANE
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-0000
5759978324
010530105
95
CAMPBELL LARRY DEAN; CAMPBELL OMMIE GAIL
159 DE RON KEL LANE
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-7156
5769073030
-
96
MCDANIEL TROY E JR; MCDANIEL TAMARA T
217 DE RON KEL LANE
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-0000
5769089325
007580456
97
MCDANIEL TROY E JR; MCDANIEL TAMARA T
217 DE RON KEL LANE
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-0000
5769079606
007340447
98
MARKLAND RAYMOND JULIUS
3419 US HIGHWAY 158
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028
5769196311
007670890
99
MARKLAND RAYMOND JULIUS
3419 US HIGHWAY 158
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028
5769196311
007670890
100
CHAPLIN ALVIN K
449 HILLCREST DR
ADVANCE
NC
27006-0000
5860208765
-
HORIZONTAL GRAPHIC SCALE
2000 0 1000 2000 4000
( IN FEET)
1 inch = 2000 ft.
�: 11 I
SFAS
100KV
s �
P11B 98 P12A P12B
96
i
97 100
z
O
Q
z
z
O
U
W OW
z_10
J O
Q
Qw
� W
w
U)
N
W
U
Q
0-
w
w
U
ISSUED FOR
PERMIT -
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION

z
0
Q
z
z
O
U
wO
z_w
J O
_
Q
Qw
w
w
_
U)
N
w
U)
Q
_
d
w
w
U)
PHASE 1
MOCKSVILLE SUBSTATION TO BALTIMORE TAP
113 114
0 •
�` JI
0�
116
P13A P13B P14 P15 h
108
P16A 115 .�, P16B
t 104 �
102 120
103
101 110 119 121
0
f
s
107 109 4123 126
105 112 • 124 125
BALT MORE TAP
EAT: NOJ5'56'58.9199
LONG: WOBO0 279 26.5799
122
ww
r
s 1 -
PARCEL
OWNER
ADDRESS
CITY
STATE
ZIP
PIN
DEED BK PG
101
POTTS CLETUS A LIVING TRUST, POTTS CORINNE J LIVING TRUST
7780 GARDNER DR #203
NAPLES
FL
34109-0000
5860307293
007290379
102
POTTS CLETUS A LIVING TRUST, POTTS CORINNE J LIVING TRUST
7780 GARDNER DR #203
NAPLES
FL
34109-0000
5860506782
007290377
103
DILLON JAMES ROBERTJR, DILLON SONJA C
694 HOWARDTOWN ROAD
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-7241
5860405603
001190755
104
BARBARA D SMITH FAMILY LLC
308 KLICKITAT TRAIL
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028
5860415529
009570119
105
POTTS CLETUS A LIVING TRUST, POTTS CORINNE J LIVING TRUST
7780 GARDNER DR #203
NAPLES
FL
34109-0000
5860506782
007290377
106
M & P PROPERTIES; C/O PATRICK TUCKER
841 HOWARDTOWN RD
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-0000
5860626080
003170469
107
M & P PROPERTIES; C/O PATRICK TUCKER
841 HOWARDTOWN RD
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-0000
5860626080
003170469
108
GEORGIA INDUSTRIAL REALTY CO
230 N ELM STREET
GREENSBORO
NC
27401
5860629738
000650338
109
NETHERLAND NICHOLAS A; NETHERLAND AMY C
1416 BALTIMORE ROAD
ADVANCE
NC
27006-0000
5860724506
009670680
110
STEELMAN JASON R; STEELMAN SHANNA G
199 BALTIMORE RD
ADVANCE
NC
27006
5860732381
011600348
111
BUTLER INVESTMENT PROPERTIES L
P O BOX 340
MOCKSVILLE
NC
27028-0000
5860735342
011940766
112
SMITH SCOTT A; SMITH TINA M
163 BALTIMORE DOWN ROAD
ADVANCE
NC
27006
5860737680
010590078
113
MILLER JAMES RJR; MILLER HILLARIE A
188 BALTIMORE TRAILS LN
ADVANCE
NC
27006-7991
5860646971
011410352
114
DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS LLC
PO BOX 1007
CHARLOTTE
NC
28201-1007
5860659340
009540545
115
MYDOSH JOSEPH MCCOY; MYDOSH ANDREA CHRISTINE
170 BALTIMORE DOWNS RD
ADVANCE
NC
27006-7989
5860743492
011521079
116
CRESON LARUE H; CRESON JEFFREY S
138 BALTIMORE DOWNS ROAD
ADVANCE
NC
27006-0000
5860745687
006990543
117
ASHLEY FURNITURE IND., INC
ONE ASHLEY WAY
ARCADIA
WI
54612
5860561470
008940264
118
SINK TRAVIS J; SINK KATHERINE S
1292 BALTIMORE ROAD
ADVANCE
NC
27006-0000
5860832141
006840875
119
PLANT TOMMY G; PLANT PATSY A
153 BALTIMORE DOWNS RD
ADVANCE
NC
27006-7989
5860739874
006780789
120
FRANK BOBBI THOMAS, FRANK DANIEL HALE
109 BALTIMORE DOWNS RD # 19
ADVANCE
NC
27006-7989
5860842100
011030313
121
WILSON HILARY CORNATZER
1169 BALTIMORE ROAD
ADVANCE
NC
27006-0000
5860835959
001520706
122
SMITH CHARLES M; SMITH TINA
1318 BALTIMORE RD
ADVANCE
NC
27006-7823
5860832084
007430407
123
SHAW BARRY D; SHAW BARBARA D
109 CAMDEN COURT
ADVANCE
NC
27006-0000
5860835584
005350489
124
LAILJASON PATRICK; STEWART LEAH MICHELLE
119 CAMDEN COURT
ADVANCE
NC
27006
5860837544
010030908
125
HEDRICK MATTHEW EDWARD; HEDRICK DEBRA ALBERTY
132 CAMDEN COURT
ADVANCE
NC
27006-0000
5860839512
002000718
126
DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION; DAVID WRIGHT
550 SOUTH TRYON ST (DEC4113)
CHARLOTTE
NC
28202-0000
5860836774
1 000650463
HORIZONTAL GRAPHIC SCALE
2000 0 1000 2000 4000
( IN FEET)
1 inch = 2000 ft.
�: 11 I
z
0
Q
z
z
O
U
wO
z_w
J O
_
Q
Qw
�w
w
_
U)
N
w
U)
Q
_
d
w
w
U)
ISSUED FOR
PERMIT -
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION

z
O
Q
z
z
O
U
PHASE 2
BALTIMORE TAP TO ADVANCE RETAIL
it - T
—To
_F
��
� ago,
134
z 0 128 130 136
Lo
J_ O
Q
Q _3 132
'\ 138
w
W_ i
w
U)
Q �
w
w LAS 137
\
w
100KV
MOM low
139 153
15
144 � �►� �
Not
142
A%
s 4
f
Ago
PARCEL
OWNER
ADDRESS
CITY
STATE
ZIP
PIN
DEED BK PG
127
WILSON HILARY CORNATZER
1169 BALTIMORE ROAD
ADVANCE
NC
27006-0000
5860943430
001520706
128
MILLER ALAN SCOTT; MILLER DENISE
322 BRUSHY MOUNTAIN TRAIL
ADVANCE
NC
27006
5870044511
009960707
129
MILLER A SCOTT
322 BRUSHY MOUNTAIN TRL
ADVANCE
NC
27006-7870
5870055676
005710279
130
MOCK JACQUELINE C
176 GREYSTONE WAY
ADVANCE
NC
27006-0000
5870152171
011700888
131
MILLER ALAN SCOTT; MILLER DENISE
322 BRUSHY MOUNTAIN TRAIL
ADVANCE
NC
27006
5870068175
009960707
132
SMITH KENNETH DAVID
176 GALADRIM WAY
ADVANCE
NC
27006-7253
5870154446
002010335
133
HERNANDEZ SERGIO AUGUSTO
184 GALADRIM WAY
ADVANCE
NC
27006
5870154922
010610476
134
CARTER J DAVID
PO BOX 2324
ADVANCE
NC
27006-2324
5870169189
010581103
135
CARTER CHARLES ANDERSON; CARTER PATRICIA LYON
149 MOCKS CHURCH ROAD
ADVANCE
NC
27006-0000
5870167103
001810432
136
CARTER JACK M; CARTER JANE W
142 OLD MILL ROAD
ADVANCE
NC
27006-7538
5870263199
001160114
137
PHELPS JOHN CARR; PHELPS NANCY R
123 MOCKS CHURCH ROAD
ADVANCE
NC
27006-0000
5870358683
000830342
138
BARNETTE PEGGY M IRREVOC TRUST; BARNETTE WILLIAM M/ZERYL W CO-
PO BOX 297
NEBO
NC
28761-0021
5870367446
011610146
139
MOCK LAWRENCE L
131 GW MOCK WAY
ADVANCE
NC
27006-0000
5870376489
000690055
140
SOFLEY JESSE MARTIN JR; C/O KATHY SOFLEY PFEIFFER
1748 NC HIGHWAY 801 S
ADVANCE
NC
27006-6758
5870387403
000690050
141
CORNATZER DONALD GRAY
1690 NC HIGHWAY 801 SOUTH
ADVANCE
NC
27006-0000
5870553878
005440034
142
CARTER MATTHEW B
172 APACHE ROAD
ADVANCE
NC
27006
5870469621
009490260
143
SOFLEY JESSE MARTIN JR; C/O KATHY SOFLEY PFEIFFER
1748 NC HIGHWAY 801 S
ADVANCE
NC
27006-6758
5870564954
000810435
144
CRANFILL LARRY W; CRANFILL PATRICIA M
857 NC HIGHWAY 801 SOUTH
ADVANCE
NC
27006-7804
5870575177
001540718
145
HARTMAN LUCILLE CARTER
359 BEAUCHAMP RD
ADVANCE
NC
27006-7407
5870568617
011271133
146
WINDEMERE FARMS HOA INC
2631 REYNOLDA ROAD
WINSTON SALEM
NC
27106-0000
5870597280
003430630
147
HATCHER HARRY M IV; HATCHER KRISTEN
183 HIGH MEADOWS RD
ADVANCE
NC
27006-7890
5870690312
011151044
148
MCALPINE G ANN
175 HIGH MEADOWS ROAD
ADVANCE
NC
27006-0000
5870691336
004080416
149
QUESINBERRY DANIEL; QUESINBERRYJANICE
167 HIGH MEADOWS DRIVE
ADVANCE
NC
27006-0000
5870692337
0040SO174
' r
P21A
,:W4. �s
s t)I
160 165
�* • 162 163
161
• �q
ADVANCE R ETA L
EAT: N035'5802.60" r4
LONG: W080°25' 1 7.20"
Am
I • um
PARCEL
OWNER
ADDRESS
CITY
STATE
ZIP
PIN
DEED BK PG
150
RUSSELL MICHAEL B; RUSSELL MAGAN C
149 HIGH MEADOWS RD
ADVANCE
NC
27006-7890
5870693388
011490254
151
RUSSELL KERRY G
136 HIGH MEADOWS ROAD
ADVANCE
NC
27006-0000
5870696494
006130922
152
POTTS GRAY A; POTTS BETTY
2864 CORNATZER RD
ADVANCE
NC
27006
5870697638
002050549
153
BURCHAM JAIME S; BURCHAM CHERYL E
163 WINDEMERE DRIVE
ADVANCE
NC
27006-7887
5870588998
003490892
154
CERBERUS SFR HOLDINGS II LP; FIRSTKEY HOMES LLC
1850 PARKWAY PLACE SUITE 900
MARIETTA
GA
30067
5870690170
011861150
155
SUMMERS DAVID LEE; SUMMERS AMY 0
154 WINDEMERE DRIVE
ADVANCE
NC
27006-7887
5870692151
003390293
156
HELLARD RODNEY C; HELLARD JANET L
146 WINDEMERE DRIVE
ADVANCE
NC
27006-0000
5870693171
008720730
157
BARKS RITA P
134 WINDEMERE DRIVE
ADVANCE
NC
27006
5870694192
010220269
158
PORCARI JOHN P
124 HIGH MEADOWS ROAD
ADVANCE
NC
27006-7890
5870697249
005590798
159
MILLER M DAVID; MILLER TERRI P
PO BOX 2170
ADVANCE
NC
27006
5870792456
001900128
160
WYATT RUSSELL LYNN; WYATT LERISA CARTER
147 HILLCREST DRIVE
ADVANCE
NC
27006-0000
5870797479
007180954
161
CARTER KAY LANIER; C/O BURTON KAY LANIER
165 HILLCREST DRIVE
ADVANCE
NC
27006-0000
5870882909
007041090
162
WYATT RUSSELL LYNN; WYATT LERISA CARTER
147 HILLCREST DRIVE
ADVANCE
NC
27006-0000
5870798219
011330650
163
TRIPLE P REAL ESTATE INVEST
PO BOX 2012
ADVANCE
NC
27006-0000
5870893294
010631175
164
BRUEBAKER EDWARD RAY
219 HILLCREST DRIVE
ADVANCE
NC
27006-7606
5870891668
-
165
BRUEBAKER EDWARD RAY
220 HILLCREST DRIVE
ADVANCE
NC
27006-7607
5870893528
000880587
166
JONES JEFFREY; JONES SUSAN
176 KNIGHT LN
ADVANCE
NC
27006-7537
5870892581
010530599
167
ORRELL BINNY RALPH SR; ORRELL WALTER DOUGLAS
369 HILLCREST DRIVE
ADVANCE
NC
27006
5870898679
009710538
168
ORRELL LUCILLE F
369 HILLCREST DR
ADVANCE
NC
27007
5871801512
006580475
169
DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION; DAVID WRIGHT
550 SOUTH TRYON ST (DEC416)
CHARLOTTE
NC
28202-0000
5871902134
000890241
170
BROWDER THOMAS S; BROWDER DEANA H
187 POND LN
ADVANCE
NC
27006-7984
5871902400
003920898
171
GOOD STEVEN J; GOOD DAWNE M
135 RICHMONT LANE
ADVANCE
NC
27006
5870994880
009610414
172
HARTMAN RICHARD S
1S4 RICHMONT LANE
ADVANCE
NC
27006-0000
5880096281
-
HORIZONTAL GRAPHIC SCALE
500 0 250 500 1000
( IN FEET)
1 inch = 500 ft.
% @I
ISSUED FOR
PERMIT -
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION

PHASE
ADVANCE RETAIL TO IDOLS TAP
3
179 f
J8, �� .� �� I- z- i
• P24B
O
+ _ Ak
O
i
f
1 84
177 � O
'Isk-AL _ Amok., 4b
PARCEL
OWNER
ADDRESS
CITY
STATE
ZIP
PIN
DEED BK PG
173
BROWDER THOMAS S; BROWDER DEANA H
187 POND LN
ADVANCE
NC
27006-7984
5871917448
003920901
174
BERRIER LINDA H; BERRIER ROBY G
1266 NC HIGHWAY 801 SOUTH
ADVANCE
NC
27006-0000
5881108815
001670892
175
HALL ERNESTT; HALL EDITH
1138 UNDERPASS ROAD
ADVANCE
NC
27006-0000
5881324585
001680196
176
HALL ERNESTT; HALL EDITH
1138 UNDERPASS ROAD
ADVANCE
NC
27006-0000
5881324585
001680196
177
OLIVER DEBORAH E
176 MANHATTEN LANE
ADVANCE
NC
27006-0000
5880493311
007270813
178
PIAZZA GEORGE S; PIAZZA M JILL
129 HIDE A WAY LANE
ADVANCE
NC
27006-7550
5880398696
004250944
179
PIAZZA GEORGE S; PIAZZA M JILL
129 HIDE A WAY LANE
ADVANCE
NC
27006-7550
5881306106
004250944
180
DORSEY SUZANNE SANDIFER
PO BOX 305
ADVANCE
NC
27006-0000
27006-0000
001770171
181
ROBERTSON JERRY W; ROBERTSON REBECCA BROWN
1039 UNDERPASS ROAD
ADVANCE
NC
27006-0000
5881403824
001300414
182
FORSYTH TYLER; FORSYTH CHRISTINA
178 HIDE AWAY LN
ADVANCE
NC
27006-7550
5881405700
011680001
183
JONES CLYDE LEONARD; JONES MARY NELL SHUTT
889 UNDERPASS ROAD
ADVANCE
NC
27006-0000
5881611162
009260488
184
JONES CLYDE LEONARD; JONES MARY NELL SHUTT
889 UNDERPASS ROAD
ADVANCE
NC
27006-0000
5881611162
009260488
185
COMER BOBBY KEITH
1018 UNDERPASS ROAD
ADVANCE
NC
27006-0000
5881510625
001670373
186
CITY OF WINSTON SALEM
5485 DOCK DAVIS RD
WINSTON SALEM
NC
27102
5881621957
002309-03498
187
ALEXANDER STEVEN L; ALEXANDER JACKIE M
8320 RIVERWALK DR
CLEMMONS
NC
27012
5881633871
002133-00951
pa
188
DUKE POWER CO
422 SO CHURCH ST
CHARLOTTE
NC
28202
5881750376
002133-00951
V)
189
HEWITT CAROL L; HEWITT ROBERT ANDREW
8200 IDOLS RD
CLEMMONS
NC
27012
5881555272
003412-03173
=
ISSUED FOR
PERMIT -
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
HORIZONTAL GRAPHIC SCALE
500 0 250 500 1000 2000
( IN FEET)
1 inch = 500 ft.

n
r
z
m
U)
m
m
U)
m
m
D
m
O
n
O
z
z
O
z
J
J_
uj
W
rr
W
0-
0-
Co
�fA
2
JAMES
0319
dt
5748010989
CAMERON DAVID J
CAMERON RENITA L
BK:00920 PG:0115
HORIZONTAL GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0 25 50 100 200
GATE
574801611
MARKLAND RAYMOND J
HENDRICKS CLYDE
BK:00098 PG:0367
I!
z
O
Q
�z
z
O
U
O
w
w
w
w
w
.j
w
w
z
J
er
U
er
5738924000
PEEBLES CAROLYN M
BK:00186 PG:0445
0000�
A
T-337
T7a
1
'F - SF
77
RO /
5748024617
MEARODD J
MEARS ISTEN L
BK:00733 PG:0193
LEGEND:
STRUCTURE, REMOVE
EXISTING
STRUCTURE, REMOVE AND -
REPLACE EXISTING
STRUCTURE,PROPOSED -
EXISTING TRANSMISSION LINE
RIGHT-OF-WAY CENTERLINE
PROPOSED TRANSMISSION LINE
RIGHT-OF-WAY CENTERLINE
EXISTING TRANSMISSION LINE
RIGHT-OF-WAY
FEMA 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN
EXISTING 2' CONTOURS xxx
PROPERTY LINE
30' UNDISTURBED BUFFER
(RECOMMENDED)
JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND WX
BUFFER, NO GRUB, NO MULCH
STREAM/CHANNEL
STREAM/TOP OF BANK
TOB SX
TEMPORARY BRIDGE
'
(SEE DETAIL 6/PED1)
EXISTING GRAVEL/PAVED
ACCESS
EXISTING DIRT ACCESS
TEMPORARY GRAVELED
ACCESS (SEE DETAIL 5/PED-1)
EXISTING/TEMPORARY ACCESS
TO BE MATTED (REGULATORY)
(SEE DETAIL 2/PED-1)
DISCRETIONARY MATTING
MATTED WORK AREA
FILTER BAG
(SEE DETAIL 3/PED-3)
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
CE-2
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
(SEE DETAIL 1/PED-1)
EXISTING FENCE/WALL
SAFETY FENCE
(SEE DETAIL 1/PED-3)
EXISTING CULVERT TO REMAIN
EXISTING CULVERT REPLACE
PROPOSED CULVERT
EXISTING RAILROAD
COMPOST FILTER SOCK
(SEE DETAIL 5/PED-2)
SILT FENCE
(SEE DETAIL 1/ PED-2)
ROCK OUTLET
(SEE DETAIL 4/ PED-1)
SILT FENCE J-HOOK WITH ROCK
OUTLET (SEE DETAIL 2/PED-2)
x
- SF - SF - SF
RO
.4
ROCK CHECKDAM CD
(SEE DETAIL 2/PED-3)
GENERAL NOTES:
1. BMPS ARE SHOWN FOR LOCATION REFERENCE
AND NOT TO SCALE. REFER TO EACH REFERENCED
DETAIL FOR INSTALLATION SIZE.
( IN FEET)
1 inch = 50 ft.

if
P 13'l!
\.
II \ \\ \\ \ \ \5748336779
New
•• •• •• •• \ \ \ \\�� \\ \ \ \ \ I EN_rF_DDP1qP_q Culvert
..:0017: Permanent Impact
\\ \ \ Creek .-
3 feet wide / 60 linear feet
I I 1 \ \ \ \ \\\ •.�\ \ \ Dewatering
Tributary to Leonard
Creek (perennial)
3 feet
wide
' I •• • ire\ \\ \ . \
It low
IZ
5748120933
_ \
• •• \ \
• REHOUSE FOR \ � r I:ji I 1 r •• •
\ \ I I \ II
I.T
7\
—
—
5748336779
FOLTZ ENTERPRISES
C/O DONNA FOLTZ LEON
� _ \
\ \ \\ \ : 11 PG:0627
10
b
0

LEGEND:
STRUCTURE, REMOVE
EXISTING
D
n
r
z
m
CD
m
m
CD
m
m
w
D
m
O
C)
O
z
z
C
D
O
z
J
J_
uj
W
rr
W
0-
a
N
10
D
n
2
r
z
m
U)
m
m
U)
m
m
N
W
-n
O
n
O
z
z
C
D
O
z
HORIZONTAL GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0 25 50 100
rim
FUNDER AMERICA INC
BK:00981 PG:0665
FUNDER DR
5748451941
DRYE GARY
DRYE PAMELA
BK:01141 PG:0691
Me
z
O
Q
z
z
O
U
O
Q
w
w
w
w
w
z_
J
U
Q
STRUCTURE, REMOVE AND -
REPLACE EXISTING
STRUCTURE,PROPOSED -
EXISTING TRANSMISSION LINE
RIGHT-OF-WAY CENTERLINE
PROPOSED TRANSMISSION LINE
RIGHT-OF-WAY CENTERLINE
EXISTING TRANSMISSION LINE
RIGHT-OF-WAY
FEMA 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN
EXISTING 2' CONTOURS
PROPERTY LINE
►e+4
30' UNDISTURBED BUFFER
(RECOMMENDED)
JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND WX
BUFFER, NO GRUB, NO MULCH
STREAM/CHANNEL
STREAM/TOP OF BANK
TEMPORARY BRIDGE
(SEE DETAIL 6/PED1)
EXISTING GRAVEL/PAVED
ACCESS
EXISTING DIRT ACCESS
TEMPORARY GRAVELED
ACCESS (SEE DETAIL 5/PED-1)
EXISTING/TEMPORARY ACCESS
TO BE MATTED (REGULATORY)
(SEE DETAIL 2/PED-1)
DISCRETIONARY MATTING
MATTED WORK AREA
FILTER BAG
(SEE DETAIL 3/PED-3)
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
(SEE DETAIL 1/PED-1)
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC
EXISTING FENCE/WALL
SAFETY FENCE
(SEE DETAIL 1/PED-3)
EXISTING CULVERT TO REMAIN
EXISTING CULVERT REPLACE
PROPOSED CULVERT
EXISTING RAILROAD
COMPOST FILTER SOCK
(SEE DETAIL 5/PED-2)
SILT FENCE
(SEE DETAIL 1/ PED-2)
ROCK OUTLET
(SEE DETAIL 4/ PED-1)
SILT FENCE J-HOOK WITH ROCK
OUTLET (SEE DETAIL 2/PED-2)
ROCK CHECKDAM
(SEE DETAIL 2/PED-3)
TOB SX
I
OHE
SF - SF - SF
GENERAL NOTES:
1. BMPS ARE SHOWN FOR LOCATION REFERENCE
AND NOT TO SCALE. REFER TO EACH REFERENCED
DETAIL FOR INSTALLATION SIZE.
CE-2
( IN FEET)
1 inch = 50 ft.

i
i
T-143n8 - \
� T-347
' I
0
r
z
m
Cn
m
m I _
n I
O
n
O
z F
z
c
D
z
HORIZONTAL GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0 25 50 100 200
1
1 M
5748567624
MOCKSVILLE TOWN OF
BK:00093 PG:0252
z_
J
U
on
3
"48
�46
5748676308
16 I
LEGEND:
STRUCTURE, REMOVE
EXISTING
STRUCTURE, REMOVE AND
REPLACE EXISTING
STRUCTURE,PROPOSED
EXISTING TRANSMISSION LINE
RIGHT-OF-WAY CENTERLINE
PROPOSED TRANSMISSION LINE
RIGHT-OF-WAY CENTERLINE
EXISTING TRANSMISSION LINE
RIGHT-OF-WAY
;I =11►A/_si[dow9mr_1:l 1xilelol»_l10
EXISTING 2' CONTOURS
PROPERTY LINE
30' UNDISTURBED BUFFER
(RECOMMENDED)
JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND
►e+4
BUFFER, NO GRUB, NO MULCH
STREAM/CHANNEL
STREAM/TOP OF BANK TOB SX
TEMPORARY BRIDGE '
(SEE DETAIL 6/PED1)
EXISTING GRAVEL/PAVED
ACCESS
EXISTING DIRT ACCESS
TEMPORARY GRAVELED
ACCESS (SEE DETAIL 5/PED-1)
EXISTING/TEMPORARY ACCESS
TO BE MATTED (REGULATORY)
(SEE DETAIL 2/PED-1)
DISCRETIONARY MATTING
MATTED WORK AREA
FILTER BAG
(SEE DETAIL 3/PED-3)
El
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
CE-2
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
(SEE DETAIL 1/PED-1)
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC OHE
EXISTING FENCE/WALL x x
SAFETY FENCE
(SEE DETAIL 1/PED-3)
EXISTING CULVERT TO REMAIN
EXISTING CULVERT REPLACE
PROPOSED CULVERT
EXISTING RAILROAD
COMPOST FILTER SOCK
(SEE DETAIL 5/PED-2)
SILT FENCE
(SEE DETAIL 1/ PED-2) SF - SF - SF
ROCK OUTLET
(SEE DETAIL 4/ PED-1) RO
SILT FENCE J-HOOK WITH ROCK 1
OUTLET (SEE DETAIL 2/PED-2) ��SF
ROCK CHECKDAM CD
(SEE DETAIL 2/PED-3)
GENERAL NOTES:
1. BMPS ARE SHOWN FOR LOCATION REFERENCE
AND NOT TO SCALE. REFER TO EACH REFERENCED
DETAIL FOR INSTALLATION SIZE.
( IN FEET)
1 inch = 50 ft.

NCNHDE-11811: Silas 44kV
o°",L
c
- Pudding Fdye Rd
Puddling
- _ outch�an Gt eey Rira° -
'� Golf C lub
01.
n
4f
/
4�
0
Woodward Rd
16 0
3
nyc tRv �`�
h,q r
v
a°d Crgey
r �
a
5 Ry
- Ja�v F/islra Creek
L' CP
L• tlf• _
m
0 oh Crete
u�1 0
S' Mocksville
I—tts Ra
W+E Leonard reek
April 8, 2020
Project Boundary
Buffered Project Boundary
®
NHP Natural Area (NHNA)
®
Managed Area (MAREA)
-
RBnC Wetry
�..
•. 5G :• l�Ye
896fi ClubW"..
VaN1:Y Bli,y
75-
oak
V.N.
5
� b
h F
Bail eY G� "`mRr1
Coynt(y w' hre
club
[ 9
9
o
\
a,
\
\
1
r
!
[[� y
AcIA;Ze
I
rsct
�o�
a�Mlo Cr
0
4�
e
_
1:alitle rp ko
I
'eoples Cree4 !
r
/ 6
I-,- LaAe _. I
I
Wllllams Rd
\
W \
T \
N 1
Law U
Louise °z 0,4 /
Golf i
Club
I �rG
D !"edkrn College Rd
1:85,189
0 0.75 1.5 3 mi
0 1 2 4 km
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS,
FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan,
METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community
Page 4 of 4