20140621 Ver 1_Riparian Buffer Authorization_20140618

NCS1AI h.'UNIVi.N111 Y
A&'1'SI)1IEUNIVERSITY
COOPIERRATIVE,
®WEXFEHSiONI
! /,/plug Prople'PaJ Bran ledge in'Mork
Wake County Center
4001 -E Carya, Drive
Raleigh, NC 27610 -2914
Phone: [phone]
Fax: 919 - 250 -1097
Visit our internet site at:
www.ccs.ncsu.cdu /�►alcc
The North Carolina Cooperative
Extension is sending you material you
requested or material, which might be of
Interest to you I hope that you will find
the information helpful
If I may be of further service to you,
please contact me at the following
number or via email
919 - 250 -1112
Illll( IICII �uxxl��,u(l a ncsu cdu
Sincerely,
Mitch Woodward
Extension Area Specialized Agent
Environmental Education
Employment and program opportunities
are offered to all people regardless of
race, color;, national origin, sex, age, or
handicap. North Carolina State
University, North Carolina A &T State
University, US Department of
Agriculture, and local gov,=nents
cooperating

DWR 4 0 6#`
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources Division of Water Resources
15A NCAC 02B.0233 (8)(b),.0243 (8)(b), .0250 (11)(b),.0259 (8)(b),.0267 (11)(c),.0607 (e)(2) - Buffer Authorization
FORM: BA 10 -2013
Riparian Buffer Authorization Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Project Information
1 a.
Name of project:
v
1 b.
County:
1 c.
Nearest municipality:
1 d.
Subdivision name:
J
1 e.
Is the project located in any of North Carolina s
twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1f below.
❑Yes 4No
1f.
Is the project located within a NC Division of Coastal
Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes XNo
2.
Owner Information
2a.
Name on Recorded Deed:
2b.
Deed Book and Page No.
G p ^ -ood
2c. Map Book and Page No.
(include a copy of the recorded
map that indicates when the lot
was created):
e---) n,,
/S ov
f
2d.
Responsible Party
(for Corporations):
2e.
Street address:
Az G
2f.
City, state, zip:
G S�
2g.
Telephone no.:
-
2h.
Fax no.:
2i.
Email address:
3.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a.
Applicant is:
Agent ❑ Other, specify:
3b.
Name:
3c.
Business name
(if applicable):
3d.
Street address:
40 v
3e.
City, state, zip:
3f.
Telephone no.:
L a 2
3
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
4.
AgentlConsultant Information (if applica le)
4a.
Name:
4b.
Business name
(if applicable):
L5 !�! �? '!►� `
4c.
Street address:
is
4d.
City, state, zip:
JUN 1 8 M4 '
4e.
Telephone no.:
'
4f.
Fax no.:
a tit :--fu
wv�
4g. Email address:
r Brand,
FORM: BA 10 -2013 Page 1 of 4
,/0"
Z 76/Z)

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification s' e-
1a
Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID)
1 b
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees)
Latitude
Longitude
1 c
Property size
0, / acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project
V N
2b
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water
- _ AL S Cl--)
2c
River basin
27 _
3.
Project Description
3a
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application,
AJ
3b
Attach an 8 % x 1 excerpt from the most recent version of the I ISGS topographic map indicating the location of
the site
3c
Attach an 8 % x 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey Map
depicting the project site
3d
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property
/4 e ---/00
3e
Explain the purpose of the proposed project
�. "
3f Describe the.00verall project detail, including the type of equi ment to be u d /�-i I u S� mow+
1 CG, M l %'_ 3 : / S O� i ►� S / ( .� f Y , v , 4..{
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations X 2 t
q d Q
4a
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property/
project.(including all prior phases) in the, pasO
❑ Yes No ❑ Unknown
Comments
4b.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known)
Agency/ Consultant Company
Other
4c
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
5.
Project History
5a
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases) in the past
❑ Yes No ❑ Unknown
5b
If yes, explain and detail according to "help file" instructions
6.
Future Project Plans
6a
Is theta phased project'?
❑ Yes No
6b
If yes, explain
FORM: BA 10 -2013 Page 2 of 4
Id
�2ee 'A,i
04
C,4)4--
Lk
S-* At-s

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.
1. Buffer Impacts
1a Specifically describe measures taken to,avoid or minimize the proposed imp cts in designin project
PHI A,, � V � %c% L-;, l 6t G � � O H W , p/b� c�.� C(r�L� �Cet,�
lb
1 a Project is in which protected basin?
Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Catawba
❑ Randleman ❑ Jordan ❑ Goose Creek
lb Individually list all buffer impacts below If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this
form
Buffer impact
number —
Permanent (P)
or Tem ora T
Reason for
impact
Type of impact
(exempt, allowable,
allowable w/ mitigaton)
Stream name
Buffer
mitigation
required?
Zone 1
impact
(sq ft)
Zone,2
Impact
(sq ft)
61 P ❑ T
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet
Zone 1
,t
❑Yes No
pp
^
B2 [:]'P ❑ T
15
❑ Yes No
B3 ❑ P ❑ T
required:
2c
❑ Yes '❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
2d
B4 ❑ P ❑ T
2e
If no, then discuss what type of mitigation is proposed
'2f
❑ Yes ❑ No
85 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes ❑ No
B6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes ❑ No
Total buffer impacts
G coo
1c 'Comments
D.
Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.
Avoidance and Minimization
1a Specifically describe measures taken to,avoid or minimize the proposed imp cts in designin project
PHI A,, � V � %c% L-;, l 6t G � � O H W , p/b� c�.� C(r�L� �Cet,�
lb
Specifically escnbe measures taken ffto avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques
` 2 4 C a , ' 0 c�
2.
Buffer Mitigation
2a
Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer
mitigation?
❑ Yes P'No
2b
If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone,of the,dpanan buffer that requires mitigation and
calculate the amount of mitigation required in the table below
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
(square feet
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
15
Total buffer mitigation
required:
2c
If buffer mitigation is required, is payment to a
mitigation bank or NC EE proposed?
❑ Yes ❑ No
2d
If yes, attach the acceptance letter from the mitigation bank or NC EEP
2e
If no, then discuss what type of mitigation is proposed
'2f
Comments
FORM: BA 10 -2013 Page 3 of 4
G

E. Diffuse Flow Plan
All buffer Impacts and high ground Impacts require diffuse flow or other form of
❑ Diffuse flow
stormwater treatment Include a plan that fully documents how diffuse flow will be
❑ Other BMP
maintained If a Level Spreader is proposed, attach a Level Spreader Supplement Form.
la
If due to site constraints, a BMP other than a level spreader is proposed, please provide a
❑ Yes No
plan for stormwater treatment as outlined in Chapter 8 of the NC Stormwater BMP
public (federal /state) land?
Manual and attach a BMP Supplement Form
lb
F.
Supplementary Information
by First Class Marl via ,the US Postal Service
1.
Environmental Documentation
OR NC DWR, Transportation Permitting Unit
la
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
❑ Yes No
Raleigh, NC 27604
public (federal /state) land?
For all other projects sent by delivery service
lb
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require,preparation of an
❑ Yes ❑ No
Karen Higgins
OR
environmental document, pursuant to the requirements of the,National or State (North
NCDWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Raleigh, NC 27699 - 1650
1c
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document been finalized by the State
❑ Yes ❑ No
Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.)
Comments
2.
Violations
2a
Is the site in violation of DWR Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 02H 0500), Isolated Wetland
❑ Yes No
Rules (15A NCAC 02H 1300), DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards, or Riparian
Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 02B 0200)?
2b
Is this an after- the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes No
2c
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s)*
Applicant/ gent's Printed Name s SI ture Date
(Agent's signature is valid only d an authorization letter from the applicant is provided )
Send 3 complete sets of this form and accompanying documents to the following
For government transportation projects sent
For government transportation projects sent
by First Class Marl via ,the US Postal Service
by delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc.)
NC DWR, Transportation Permitting Unit
OR NC DWR, Transportation Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
512 N Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27699 - 1650
Raleigh, NC 27604
For all other projects sent by First Class Marl
For all other projects sent by delivery service
via the US Postal Service
(UPS, FedF,x, etc.).
Karen Higgins
Karen Higgins
OR
NCDWR — 401 & Buffer, Permitting Unit
NCDWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
512 N Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27699 - 1650
Raleigh, NC 27604
FORM- BA 10 -2013 Page 4 of 4

SAMPLE AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO. PLAN NO.
PARCEL ID: O C-) I 70
STREET ADDRESS: 'R,6 ! A _ a , , S4,
Please print:
Property Owner:
Property Owner:
I7
0
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
/»c- ;� a,
(Contractor / Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
Telephone: f1 f -649- Y,377
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
Authorized Signature
Authorized Signature
Date: Date:

BKO11139PGO0677
WAKE COUNTY, NC 664
LAURA M RIDDICK
REGISTER OF DEEDS
PRESENTED & RECORDED ON
12/1612884 AT 15:41:28
AOOY.:e11139 PAGE:e8677 - ee679
RETURN TO Warren, Perry, & Anthony, Box 204
PREPARED BY Warren Perry & Anthony PLLC
TAX IDENTIFICATION C 0017070 REVENUE STAMPS $
NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL WARRANTY DEED
This deed made this 8th day of December, 2004 by and between.
GRANTOR CHARLES D. PUTNAM
GRANTEE. CHARLES D. PUTNAM AND WIFE, DOROTHY D. PUTNAM
P O Box 921, Wake Forest, NC 27587
Grantor, for valuable consideration going to Grantee, receipt of which Is hereby acknowledged, does grant,
convey and transfer unto Grantee in fee simple the property described as follows*
TOWN OF WAKE FOREST . COUNTY OF WAKE
Being all of that 0.67 acre tract as shown on plat entitled "Recombination Survey for Charles
Putnam ", a copy of which Is recorded to Book of Maps 1997, Page 1057, Wake County Registry.
This plat was drawn by Cawthorne, Moss & Panclera, PC, RLS, dated April 29, 1997.
The above property was acquired by Grantor by instrument recorded in
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above described property and all privileges and appurtenances thereto belonging
to the Grantee in fee simple
Grantor covenants with Grantee, that Grantor is seized of the premises in fee simple, has the right to convey the
same in fee simple, that title is marketable and free and clear of all encumbrances, and that Grantor wdl'warrant
and defend the title to the property against the lawful claims of all others except for the exceptions set out below
DEEDS
fF; �
Page 1 of 2

'r r
v
BK011139PGO0678
Title to,the property, described herein is subject to the following exceptions
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has set his hand and seal, or if corporate, has caused this instrument to be
signed in its corporate name by a duly authorized officer
(SEAL)
Charles D Putnam
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, COUNTY OF WAKE
I, RYt 1� &XrK y � _, a Notary i Public for the County of Wake State
of North Carolina, certdy that Charles D. Putnam personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the
execution of the foregoing instrument.
Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, this 8th day of December, 2004
�....,, Notary Public
M Issioef�i�rres N' C)3-0'k
}Gi• � � � it
DEEDS
Page 2 of 2

USDA United States
Department of
Agriculture
MRCS
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
Wake County,
North Carolina
861 N. Main St, Wake Forest, NC
May 2, 2014

Preface
Sod surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas They
highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information about
the properties of the sods in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for many
different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban planners,
community officials, engineers, developers,'builders, and home buyers. Also,
conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste disposal,
and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand, protect, or enhance
the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment, Soil surveys identify,soil properties
that are used in making various land use or land,treatment decisions. The information
is intended to help the,�land users identify and reduce the effects of soil limitations on
various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for identifying and complying
with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some,cases.
Examples include sod quality assessments (http: / /www.nres.usda.gov /wps /portal/
nres /main /sods/health /) and certain conservation and engineering applications For
more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center (http: //
offices sc.egov.usda.gov/locator /app ?agency =nres) or your NRCS State Sod
Scientist ( http : / /www.nres.usda.govtwps/portal /nres /detail /sods /contactus /?
cid= nres142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some sods are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as septic
tank absorption fields A high water table makes a sod poorly suited to basements or
underground installations.
The National Cooperative Sod Survey is a point effort of the United States Department
of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural
Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation
Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil
Survey
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil - survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs
and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where
applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual
orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an
individual's income is derived from any public - assistance program (Not all prohibited
bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means

for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should
contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720 -2600 (voice and TDD). To file a
complaint of discrimination; write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400
Independence Avenue, SM., Washington, D.C. 20250 -9410 or call (800) 795 -3272
(voice) or (202) 720 -6382 (TDD) USDA is an equal opportunity provider and
employer.
3

Contents
Preface............. ... .......... .... ....... .. ... ...... ... .. ................... ....2
Soil Map ..................... 5
SoilMap .......................... .................. .. A
Legend.. ........................ ........ ....... 7
MapUnit Legend ....... ........... ....... ............................... ...... ... ...........8
Map Unit Descriptions .. .. ............................... ........ .................... ......8
Wake County, North Carolina ............. ............................... .........................10
MeA— Mantachie sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded... ....10
PaF— Pacolet sandy loam, 15 to 45 percent slopes ....................... . 10
4

Soil Map
The soil map,section includes the soil map for the,defined area of interest, a list of soil
map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.

z
z
m
Ki
CG9A6E
GC09S6E 05:Y3H6E
06(F)NG£ OI0995E 066936E
OL6586£
o
0
ry�
n
T:e
O
L q
NO r
LL ��
Q)
U
L
7 Q
O m
N
N
O
0
CO
A
E
O
N
7
U
ryP�
M.91 DE o9L
060996£ OL0996£ 050986£ OE0996£
z
m
0
CC
o
x
a
�
m
W
�
CfV
o
O
(1
Sa
N
ti
b
�
O
b
z
MST oSL
r`i

W
O
'3'^
VJ
CT
N
m
v
0
n
�T
N
CD
0
P.
m ®
a
° r',+
Co,
lam
3
y
m
N
O
V
O O
O
0
D
O
CL
7 m
m
O
g g
m < 7
O m
R
o
y
a
o m
A
„°� m
o o
a ?
c m
m o
m
m1 a m
° o -<
m. a
v v o
m d m
a a
m
a
°. D
C
-
m
-o
M
o o
O
c c
w CO
v
-
c >
j
3
m
d
w
w
m °
m
m
(D
a
m
w
3
a
y
r
o 3
v
0
ic
m
m
°
O
O
w
�D
V
r
m
mr
cc
m
v
D a r
°
c g m
�
o to
m Q
G
to (n
(D d
fn 0)
m
3 N
m ;°
m
W
° O
A O
cl
m ° fA
°
w
cn
m
f
(D
o
w
N
U)
m
w
3 5
Np
O'
o to
O
cntn
0
g-1
n
CA
CD 0
3:9
CD
pS 3 m
03
O L O
N
N
2
c
< w
C m mn O w
p Q c
w N
N CD C d
CD
N
m 3
v
co
c
`wG
m
O
? m fD O �'
3
O O' m
'' (D
3
m W (Dd m
(O
O
a �°
a s
CD
y
?
m
y<
c
c m
w m of
m
w
m
n m
C "n
B
c
Z
d 0
N
O
d
m 0
cc
ID
o
w 3
d w j O
n(oo
3
m
O
m W
m (O
N` CD
d
wmm m
3c
m
3'm
v
y
3
O N O
p
(D
N
Q
— N
cr
j O D N
y
lu,
m m -O..'O
w
3
d
d (D
m
n
G C
m �
(D 'N"
CD n� (D O
r C
r2
ff
m Q
m o m
`G
O
�_
(D
N O
CD Q y
(D
O
m
f�l_ (D
na
Q ..,
o-0
(D m fn
�{L, C
m?
O'
m
3 7 d `G
�
O
3
j
(D
D7 , n
N
m
ca » >
m
O '
0
a
Dl <(D
m O
C
3
mW _
0
M
C
(D
v'
N
C
(D m p m
(D a
N
m
n
m
m
G
C
(D o
2)
=
0
"O
vQ
O
°oQ N
s
3
vN m
D
r
O.
C (D
a
7
7
G
O
O
N n
3
N n
Z
m
w Q N d
p-
m
fn w
N
m p1
3
Ul
(D
c
��
''
o w
Z 3
�j
m N O
wm
m(D
wpm
=
m m a�
0
m
0
(a (D N
w
'
_
(n
m (D Tr
m
UI (�'
m m m-
m
3
O N O
G
r
m
D)
m
(D(�
C O
y w 7
-+.
O
m N O
O
Cf —
O O 7
N
_
3 N d m
a cc
D1
3
U
d
(w�yy [�1' y
a
O a
m
d
cl
m 0
cc,
2
E
w o
.Ot
ID
n y w n
p m
<
OJ N C
w. O(D
r
cn
N
O
m
w
w
(3
A
O
w
m
t0
W
O
CD
W
O
'3'^
VJ
CT
N
m
v
0
n
�T
N
CD
0
P.

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
i gY; a,-,i ,art, 5;irt� rv' „"'R,��,K,t',�°” err >- �.�ie i- 5, r` n tR�' v s `�;hn +y
fiVy,Y
I''jIY% rtd fi ""•� '�s,.
nty;�,Nart6,Garolma
£ ����{;Map�UnitSymtiol��fih�,
-£Acres•in,A01 ��.g--�'
=of'A '';x`
Percent 01���'
�%_ '�x'`�: ..wLY�FCie.ra � �= + "a'>A s-iA f+
f��t;iMap�liiiit;Namet�``��S�
4 :i .4 ,.rs^r: s.. Y'.F. �,i�r � - .;tivkie �
� ,,�����r
� � ixX v�,�u.5� - �-•r•• 1=�•k�.'r` t� •..:X,hk"}!..�
, +5i�w; Fz�+'cr ,.� aR i'e-.
MeA
Mantachle sandy loam, 0 to 2
05
311%
percent slopes, rarely flooded
PaF
Pacolet sandy loam, 15 to 45
1 1
689%
percent slopes
Totals for Area of Interest
1.7
100.0 ° /a
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed sod maps in a soil survey represent the soils
or miscellaneous areas in the'survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the
maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape,
however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic,variability
of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend
beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic
class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other'taxonomic
classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soiKor miscellaneous areas
for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes
other than those of the major soils.
Most minor sods have properties similar to those of the dommant,soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally
are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used.
Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified
by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a given area, the
contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with
some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been
observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially
where the pattern was so complex that it was impractical to make enough observations
to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness
or accuracy of the data. The-objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic
classes but rather to separate,the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. The delineation of such segments
on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans If

Custom Soil Resource Report
intensive use of small areas is planned, however, onsite investigation is needed to -
define and locate the sods and miscellaneous areas
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions. Each
description includes general facts about the unit and gives important sod properties
and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the sods of a series have major horizons
that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness, salinity,
degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such
differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the
detailed sod maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly
indicates a,feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0
to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major sods or miscellaneous areas
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups
A complex consists of two or more sods or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas1hat they cannot be shown separately,on the�maps. The
pattern and proportion of the sods or miscellaneous,areas are somewhat similar in all
areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to ,6 percent slopes, ,is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown a& one �unit on the maps. Because of present or
anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical
or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and
relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha -
Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated,group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that
could be mapped individually but,are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of
the sods or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be
made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up
of all of them. Alpha and Beta sods, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no sod material
and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
0

Custom Sod Resource Report
Wake County, North Carolina
MeA— Mantachie sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded
Map Unit Setting
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 265 days
Map Unit Composition
Mantachie and similar soils: 90 percent
Description of Mantachie
Setting
Landform. Flood plains
Landform position (two - dimensional): Toeslope
Down -slope shape. Concave
Across -s lope shape. Linear
Parent material. Loamy alluvium
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class. Somewhat poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0 57 to 5 95 in /hr)
Depth to water table- About 12 to 18 inches
Frequency of flooding: Rare
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity High (about 10 4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained
Land capability (non►rr►gated) • 2w
Hydrologic Soil Group• B/D
Typical profile
0 to 18 inches Loam
18 to 80 inches: Fine sandy loam
Pal=— Pacolet sandy loam, 15 to 45 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period• 200 to 240 days
10

t
Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Composition
Pacolet and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components. 15 percent
Description of Pacolet
Setting
Landform- Hdlslopes on ridges
Landform position (two - dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three - dimensional). Side slope
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Saprolite derived from granite and gneiss and /or schist
Properties and qualities
Slope. 15 to 45 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class. Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0 57 to 1 98 in /hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding- None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity. Moderate (about 7 4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Land capability (non►rrigated) • 6e
Hydrologic Soil Group. B
Typical profile
0 to 5 inches- Sandy loam
5 to 8 inches- Sandy loam
8 to 29 inches: Clay
29 to 38 inches Sandy clay loam
38 to 80 inches: Sandy loam
Minor Components
Madison
Percent of map unit 6 percent
Landform: Hdlslopes on ridges
Landform position (two - dimensional) • Backslope
Landform position (three - dimensional). Side slope
Down -slope shape. Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Bethlehem
Percent of map unit* 5 percent
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two - dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three- dimensional) Side slope
Down -slope shape. Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Wateree
Percent of map unit. 4 percent
11

Custom Sod Resource Report
Landform: Hdlslopes on ridges
Landform position (two - dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three - dimensional): Side slope
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
12'

ARA
O ° tto
giffila
gg'gZ
jai ,A ci oag�yc
S.
U)
R° M 4
Y.'
Z
n"ss
(M 9w- p
� s
N 8" _� III ° ``� +� JUN 1 8 2014' s
b a
p g / / • q � `� �a'" f ` D NR - WATERQUAUTY
c4ormrsW Bench
rn
� � \ f•I .?'3 \ \
4>0 mfg N'L
A
fQ R C
lz
�FfT z / olb
lool
CD
rn • ADOPTO FROM Y.M. M7, P6. 64
rn
rn \ \ \
S'kb
s� •moo
r'' p mmA o z �9
V Z Z" D m ; -�C 2 O
s n v z U
A A ' o -1 T, ; m D m
LA;u 2 � $� ®�� y n � 7 Hwy
r > < ,^
N Z D Ip N N �• `� W to a 1{ �,' N z
10 40 I n ± p tp (A
�
co L. 0 n w w A ` �{ ; �xt D
H s
to
' �ucvocn._w. -i1 J

co
�
�
z
�
�
Cl)
�
�
�
m
-n
0
2
@
lrql
z
0
� Z
-»t o
)2 ! 2)f[
\ \ } }/ƒ
\:3 ID
ID -0 0)
} \ \§}
lb
\
2,
\
\ }\
} \ \\�
\ \\

,a
cip
51 4
362 Q�
0
o 2
o m
0
Sacam DmZmo° -'mmQ _, CD at'
O
m y
-� W� DnD nN m m C' w oW
y DO�m
a
(nn° >�
m �m m m ao D cn o
N l2 Am
am,�y93
m
Qi
ZN fD �ca �_ON_N W� 00
`� °_'
�7cQ(b -'(O aL1
W (p Ohm
2 • m
Z
3 MKm CD �•� [2 Cp
CD ;u n m
�ZO�' NO
Cn N
N'
D A
OW
n
m
j
O
'
°DT�o m�i�
2100
to nom D o� -enyic
��
T. W
m0
D �
A °
a m y a`2
T x
m
C0
cn
m 2 m n o
`
mm�ma
ii
Cn
z
N m
(�
D
o c
CCD
C m ] m m
(D
m a o o a
W
_.mmmQ
y
CL ?
oa
c
O
a
O
p
T
a
` CL
m
Orp- i- I��(�tn2 ��07 ADD 0000 °��00��1�_
CL°
Sacam DmZmo° -'mmQ _, CD at'
°n?
m y
-� W� DnD nN m m C' w oW
y DO�m
a
(nn° >�
m �m m m ao D cn o
N l2 Am
QQS
3 m
N
Qi
ZN fD �ca �_ON_N W� 00
`� °_'
�7cQ(b -'(O aL1
W (p Ohm
O
Z �
CA
Z
3 MKm CD �•� [2 Cp
CD ;u n m
�ZO�' NO
Cn N
N'
D A
OW
CD Tmm007 _ N 00� W
j
O
'
°DT�o m�i�
2100
to nom D o� -enyic
��
T. W
m0
D �
A °
o C Z °Nb
r N-
T x
m
C0
cn
W
`
° X
C
S
N m
(�
D
J
CJi
m
W

Z
d
cn
cfl
-1
O
-1
(D
U)
Z
0
>-z
O
N
U7
Ui
3 O
I I
ul
O
CD
CD
0
0
m
m n f 2
a m m 3 y m
nz mxm
m m
n y m n m
0
ZL
m m c
CL b
o cci
m
O j n
o m 3 a C
N m O Q
n m
m o ti
m
a c'
m m. m
4.
,.
'i
�i
Ap
Nay
4�