The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20140628 Ver 1_Application_20140618�� . STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPAR'TMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PAT MCCRORY GOVERhOR US Army Corps of Engineers Raleigh Regulatoiy Field Office Attn: Mr. David Bailey 3331 Heritage Trade Dr., Ste. 105 Wake Farest, NC 27587 ANTHONY J. TATA SECRETARY June 18, 2014 NC Division of Water Resources Winston-Salem Regional Office Attn: Mr. David Wanucha 585 Waughtown St. Winston-Salem, NC 27107 Subject: Nationwide 14 Permit and Jordan Lake Riparian Buffer Application for the replacement of Bridge No. 135 on SR 2356 (Holman Mill Road) over Reedy Branch, Alamance County, North Carolina, WBS Element No. 17BP.7.R63 Dear Mr. Bailey and Mr. Wanucha: The Noi�th Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) is proposing to replace a functionally obsolete 26' L x 20' W single span timber bridge with a new 22' W by 5' H reinforced concrete bottomless culvert. An off-site detour will be used to convey traffic during constiuction. The project will also include some minor approach work on the existing roadway. Please find enclosed a PCN application, Stormwater Management Plan, permit drawings, buffer drawings, a USGS quad map, and photographs. The North Carolina Natural Heritage Database was checked for recards of tlu•eatened and endangered species. The database lists no species for Alamance County that have federal status. The Bald eagle is protected in eveiy county in Noith Carolina under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. No suitabie feedinglwater source is located within one mile of the project study area to support Bald eagle habitat. This project was reviewed by NCDOT's Human Environment Unit in 2012 far potential affects to historical architecture and archaeology. A field survey conducted by NCDOT on July 6, 2012 supported the conclusion that no historic properties will be affected by this project. An archaeological survey conducted on August 24, 2012 determined that no az•chaeological resources will be affected by this project. NCDOT best management practices (BMPs} will be used to minimize and control sedimentation and erosion. The consiruction foreman will review the BMPs daily to ensure erosion and sedimentation is being effectively controlled. If the foreman determines the devices are not functioning as intended, they will be replaced itmnediately with better devices. Bridge No. 135 Page 2 June 18, 2014 Impacts to Waters of the United States Reedy Branch (DWR Class: WS-V; NS� is shown on the USGS topographic map as a perennial stream. Reedy Branch is well defined with a substrate primarily composed of sand, silt, and gravel and is approximately 10 to 12 feet in width. Reedy Branch flows approximately 0.4 mile to Cane Creek, which then flows approximately 16 miles to its confluence with the Haw River, which then flows approximately 16 miles into Jordan Lake. Cane Creek meets the definition of a Traditional Navigable Water. For these reasons, we believe Reedy Branch is a Relatively Permanent Water and is under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. In order to constiuct the project, it will be necessary to impact waters of the United States in the Cape Fear River Basin (HUC 03030002). Specifically, NCDOT is requesting to replace Bridge No. 135 with a reinfarced concrete bottomless culvert. The impacts are listed in the tables below: Station 12+35 to 12+61 CL 12+06 to 12+28 —LT- 12+62 to 12+88 — RT- Station 11+40 to 12+25 —LT- 12+27 to 13+05 —LT- 11+96 to 12+62 — RT- 12+77 to 13+40 — RT- Jurisdictional Impact Summary tin� Condition Pronosed Condition 26' L x 20' W single span timber bridge Jordan Lalce Buffer Type Road Crossing (Road Fill and Clearing) 22'W x 5'H RC bottomless cuvert act Summar3 Zone 1 (ftz) 3,294.0 Net Permanent: 81 Temporary: 27 Zmie 2 (ftZ) 1,012.0 Bridge No. 135 Page 3 June 18, 2014 Permits Requested NCDOT is hereby requesting authorization under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act to proceed with the construction project outlined above. By copy of this letter, �ve are requesting Mr. Travis Wilsou, Eastern NCDOT Review Coordinator of the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC}, to comment directly to pou concerning the 404 Nationwide Permit request. We are also requestiiig a 401 Water Quality CerCification and Jordan Lake Riparian Buffer Authorization fi�om the North Carolina Department of Environment uid Natural Resources (DENR), Division of Water Resources (DWR). If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Jeriy Parker at (336) 256-2063 or j�arker�ncdot.�. Your review and consideration are greatly appreciated. Sincere , /i��1J�� ' - l° J.M. ills, PE Div'sion Engineer, Division 7 Enclosures cc: Tim Powers, NCDOT Bari}� Harrington, Roadside Enviromnental Field Operations Engineer, NCDOT Jeremy Warren, NCDOT Chuck Edwards, District 1 Engineer, NCDOT o�oF wnrFROc � ��> o �c Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. DWQ project no. Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008 Pre-Construction Notification PC Form A. A licant Information 1. Processing 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: � Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit 1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number: 1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? � Yes ❑ No 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check aII that apply): � 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express � Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit: because written approvai is not required? Certification: ❑ Yes � No ❑ Yes � No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigatio� � Yes ❑ No of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-Iieu fee program. 1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h ❑ Yes � No below. 1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Replace Bridge No. 135 on SR 2356 over Reedy Branch 2b. County: Alamance 2c. Nearest municipality ( town: Snow Camp 2d. Subdivision name: NfA 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state 176P.7.R.47 project no: 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation 3b. Deed Book and Page No. N/A 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC it Division Engineer NC DOT Division 7, Mr. Mike Mills, PE applicable): 3d. Street address: PO Box 14996 3e. City, state, zip: Greensboro, NC 27415 3f. Telephone no.: (336) 3343297 3g. Fax no.: (336) 334-3637 3h. Email address: mmills@ncdot.gov Page 1 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent � Other, specify: NC DOT Highway Division 7 4b. Name: Division Engineer NC DOT Division 7, Mr. Mike Mills, PE 4c. Business name NC DOT (if applicable): 4d. Street address: PO Box 14996 4e. City, state, zip: Greensboro, NC 27475 4f. Telephone no.: (336) 334-3297 4g. Fax no.: (336) 334-3637 4h. Emailaddfess: fnillilis@nCdot.goV*nofe:pleasealsocopyMr.JerryParker,HighwayDivision7Environmenfa� Supervisor on all correspondence -%parker@/icdot.gov 5. AgentlConsultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: Mr. Jerry Parker 5b. Business name NC DOT Nighway Division 7, Division Environmental Supervisor (if applicabie): 5c. Street address: PO Box 14996 5d. City, state, zip: Greensboro, NC 27415 5e. Telephone no.: (336) 256-2063 5f. Fax no.: (336) 334-4149 5g. Email address: jparker@ncdot.gov Page 2 of 11 PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): N/A 1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude 35.889792 Longitude: -79.401590 (DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD) 1c. Property size: N/A acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Reedy Branch proposed project: 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: WS-V; NSW; 16-283; 03-06-04 2c. River basin: Cape Fear River Basin (HUC 03030002) 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: The project study area is comprised of hardwood forest to the west of SR 2356 and agriculture to the east. There are no additional jurisdictional features within the project study area other than Reedy Branch. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: N/A 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: � 108 LF of stream within the project boundaries 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: To replace a structurally deficient and functionally obsolete timber bridge. 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipme�t to be used: Traffic will be deloured off-site. Erosion and sedimentation control measures will be installed. Water will be diverted around the construction area. The old Bridge will be removed. The proposed stucture will be replaced on its existing alignment. The new culvert structure will be a reinforced concrete bottomless culvert with a width of 22 feet and a height of 5 feet. The channel will be excavated and realigned for low flow shaping, and a floodplain bench with siabilization will be esfablished on each bank. Equipment to be used includes a track hoe, dump truck, paving equipment, pumps, and various hand tools. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this properiy / � Yes � No ❑ Unknown project (including all prior phases) in the past? Comments: N/A 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type � Preliminary � Final of determination was made? 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? AgencylConsultant Company: N(A Name (if known): NIA Other: N/A 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. N/A 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes � No ❑ Unknown this project (including aII prior phases) in the past? 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. N/A Page 3 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project7 ❑ Yes � No 6b. If yes, explain. N/A Page 4 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): ❑ Wetlands � Streams - tributaries � Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non-404, other) (acres) Tem ora T W1 ❑ P � T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps � ❑ No ❑ DWQ 2g, Total wetland impacts 0 2h. Comments: There are no wetlands within the project boundaries. 3. Stream Impacts If there are perenniai or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. • f. 3g. Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact number - (PER} or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ — non-404, width (linear Temporary (� (INT)? other} (feet) feet) Excavationlchannel realignment for � pER � Corps S1 � P � T bottomless culvert, Cane Creek 11 81 floodplain bench, ❑ �NT � DWQ stabilization Temporary pipe � pER � Corps S2 ❑ P� T and impervious Cane Creek 11 27 dike ❑ INT � DWQ 3h. Total Permanent Stream and Tributary Impacts 108 3i. Comments: Of the 108 LF of stream impacts, only 81 LF are associated with permanent impacts to the stream for the purpose of stream alignment and stabilization with respect to the culvert instaliation. The 27 LF of temporary impacts are associated with the impervious dikes that will be used upstream and downstream of the proposed crossing. The dewatering of the stream will run concurrently with the construction activities (i.e. the temporary impacts associated with dewatering are within the permanent stream impact footprint location). 4. Open Water lmpacts If there are proposed impacts to Iakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individually list aIl open water impacts below. 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e. Open water Name of waterbody impact number— (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) or Tem ora 01 ❑P�T 4f. Total open water impacts 4g. Comments: No open water impacts 5. Pond or Lake Construction If ond or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below. Page 5 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 5a. 5b. 5a 5d. 5e. Wetland Impacts (acres} Stream Impacts (feet) Upland Pond ID Proposed use or purpose of (acres) number pond Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded P1 P2 5f. Total 5g. Comments: There are no ponds created for this project 5h. is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surtace area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list alI buffer impacts below. If an im acts re uire initi ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico � Other: Jordan Lake Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman 6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g. Buffer impact number— Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact Permanent (P) for Stream name mitigation (square feet} (square feet) or Tem ora im act re uired? Road fill ❑ Yes B1 � P � T and Reedy Branch � No 3,294 1,012 clearing 82 ❑P�T ❑Yes ❑ No 6h. Total buffer impacts 3,294 1,012 6i. Comments: The impacts associated with the roadway crossing and culvert installation fall under the "potentially allowable" category per the Jorda� Water Supply Buffer Rules Tabie of Uses {15A NCAC 02B .0267 (9)} D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. The proposed project is to remove and repiace a structurally deficient bridge and replace it with a bottomless culvert. Roadway approach work is minimized as much as is practical to reduce the overall project footprint. Impacts to lhe associated protected riparian buffers have also been reduced by promoting sheet flow as well as providing grass shoulders to promote infiltration. An off-site detour will be employed to avoid the need for a temporary parallel structure. Bank stabilization will be minimized to those areas where deemed necessary. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. Erosion and sedimentation BMPs will be installed prior to construction. Water will be diverted around the work area to prevent sedimentation of downstream aquatic resources. Impacts will be minimized by strict enforcement of Best Management Practices for the protection of surface waters, restrictions against the staging of equipment in or adjacent to waters of the US and coordination (including a pre-construction meeting) with the Division Environmental Supervisor. Additionally, please see the attached °Bridge to Culvert" supplemental explanation provided by the NCDOT Division 7 Bridge Program Manager. Page 6 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for � Yes ❑ No impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? 2b. If yes, mitigation is reqiaired by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ � Corps ❑ Mitigation bank 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? � Payment to in-lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. � Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: 81 LF Please note that while there will be permanent stream impacts with this bridge replacement, they are restricted primarily to the stream banks (i.e. reshaping the channel, providing a low flow channel, etc.) and NCDOT is therefore only proposing a 1:1 mitigation ratio for the necessary stream impacts. NCDOT anticipates that the USACE will notify them if a 2:1 mitigation ratio is required. 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: � warm ❑ cool �cold 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h. Comments: 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. Page 7 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? ❑ Yes � No While there are impacts to the protected Jordan Riparian area, these impacts are "allowabie" per the Table of Uses {15A NCAC 02B.0267(9)} 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. 6c. 6d. 6e. Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigaiion required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-Iieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: Page 8 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified � yes ❑ No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. Comments: The proposed structure will be a 22' by 5' bottomless culvert. There is a❑ Yes � No slight increase in impervious surface but treatment is not required. 2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A % 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? � Yes ❑ No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: Plan is attached. The increase in impervious surface is negligible with the new crossing and approaches. There are existing grassed swales which will be retained as part of the project and will continue to provide treatment. AII ditches andfor grassed swales are designed per the NCDOT BMP Toolbox and are reviewed and approved by the Roadside Environmental Unit of NC DOT. ❑ Certified Local Govemment 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program � DWQ 401 Unit 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local governmenPs jurisdiction is this project? ❑ Phase II 3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW apply (check ail that apply): ❑ USMP ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other. 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review ❑ Coastal counties ❑ HQW 4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply � ORW (check all that apply): ❑ Session Law 2006-246 ❑ Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Pian with proof of approval been attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No Page 9 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � yes ❑ No use of public (federallstate) land? 1b. If you answered °yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes � No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1c. If you answered °yes° to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No Comments: 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules {15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 26 A200)7 2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No 2c. If you answered °yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in � Yes � No additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? 3b. If you answered °yes° to the above, submit a quaiitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. Per the NC DWQ April 10, 2004 Version 2.1 Cumulative Impacts policy, small scale public transportation projects — such as widening projects, bridge replacements and intersection improvements — have a"low potential for cumulative impact since liltle (if any) new impervious surtace is added and the projects are usually in already developed locales." This proposed project is within a somewhat developed landscape (i.e. existing residential homes in the vicinity), this is not a road on a new location (i.e. there is an existing road and bridge structure and thus, the area already contains impervious surfaces) and the project drains to Reedy Branch which is Water Suppiy V(WS-�; Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSWj (i.e. not HWQ or ORW or 303(d) listed waters). We anticipate the NC DWQ will advise us if a qualitative or quantitative analysis is needed. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. It is not anticipated that this project will generate any wastewater as it is a roadway project. Page 10 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Yes � No habitat? 5b. Have you checked with lhe USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � yes ❑ No impacts? � Raleigh 5c. If yes, indicate lhe USFWS Field O�ce you have contacted. ❑ Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Criticai Habitat? North Carolina Natural Heritage Database and onsite investigation. There are no Iisted species within Alamance County that have federal status. The Bald eagle is protected in every county in North Carolina under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. No suitable feedinglwater source is located within one mile of the project study area to support Bald eagle habitat. 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? This bridge replacement project takes place in Aiamance County which is not near any coastal or tidal habitat that would support EFH (i.e. salt marshes, oyster reefs, etc.). 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes � No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology}? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? This project was submitted to the North Carolina Department of Transportation's Human Environment Unit for review in 2012. A field survey on July 6, 2012 supported that no historic properties will be affected by this project. A field survey on August 24, 2012, determined that no archaeological resources will be affected by this project. 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year fioodplain? � Yes ❑ No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: MOA 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the fioodplain determination? North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program Mr. Mike Mills, PE � � ApplicantfAgenYs Printed Name � � / pplicanUAgenYs Signature ate ( enfs sig ture is valid onty if an authorization leiter from the a licant is rovided. Page 11 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version (Version 1.2; Released September 2011) 17BP.7.R.63 County(ies):Alamance Page 1 of 1 Project Type:Date: Phone:Phone: Email:Email: County(ies): CAMA County? Design/Future:Existing: Surrounding Land Use: argicultural0.057 mi 0.13Project Built-Upon Area (ac.) Proposed Project Existing Site Project Length (lin. Miles or feet): Buffer Rules in Effect Project Description None No NCDWQ Surface Water Classification for Primary Receiving Water 303(d) Impairments: River Basin(s): Primary Receiving Water: Water Supply V (WS-V) Other Stream Classification: City/Town: 434-432-8282 NCDOT Hydraulics Unit Address: Saxapahaw 919-707-6601 Alamance ac. General Project Narrative:The project consists of replacement of Bridge 135 on SR 2356 (Holman Mill Road) over Reedy Branch and associated roadway work. The proposed structure will be a 22' x 5' bottomless culvert. The project will increase impervious surface by 2,277 ft2 (0.05 ac). The existing grass swales will be moved outward to accommodate the new structure and roadway improvement. Due to the relatively steep topography, two rock checks (as opposed to preformed scour holes) will be installed in the swales. As per NCDOT Alternative Design Criteria, rock checks are a recommended option in such circumstances. Runoff velocities are attached. Typical Cross Section Description: References 0.18 Average Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day): ac. North Carolina Department of Transportation Highway Stormwater Program STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR LINEAR ROADWAY PROJECTS Galen Cail, P.E. Bridge Replacement Raleigh, NC 27610 General Project Information Address: 5/29/2014 Haymes Brothers 1020 Birch Ridge Drive 440 Hawkins Road Chatham, VA 24531 Project/TIP No.: NCDOT Contact: Project No.:17BP.7.R.63 Contractor / Designer: rdrochelle@ncdot.gov Cape Fear 16-28-3 2 lane road with 10' travel lanes, varying shoulders (4' grassed, up to 5' paved with 3' grassed w/o guardrail, 4' to 5' paved with 3' grassed w/ guardrail) Jordan Lake NCDWQ Stream Index No.: Supplemental: Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW) Primary: Reedy Branch V = =MPH ADT INCOMPLETE PLANS DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY PLANS FUNC CLASS = 0 0 0 PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) PROJECT LENGTH RIGHT OF WAY DATE: LETTING DATE: STATE STATE PROJECT REFERENCE NO. STATE PROJ. NO.F. A. PROJ. NO.DESCRIPTION NO. TOTAL SHEETS N.C. SHEET 1 DESIGN DATA SIGNATURE: SIGNATURE: P.E. P.E. 2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS PROJECT ENGINEER PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER GRAPHIC SCALES PLANS PROFILE (VERTICAL) HYDRAULICS ENGINEER ENGINEER ROADWAY DESIGN LOCATION: TYPE OF WORK: 0 9 / 0 8 / 9 9 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA 0 00 See Sheet 1-A For Index of Sheets 1/ 2 8 / 2 0 14 R : \ N C D O T D IV IS IO N 7 B B R ID G E S \ 0 0 0 13 5 \ H y d r a u l i c s \ P E R M IT S _ E n v i r o n m e n t a l \ D r a w i n g s \ W e t l a n d s \ 13 5 _ h y d _ p r m _ t s h _ 1. d g n u s h c 0 4 4 0 7 A R T MEN N A S O H D E P T O F TRA SPORT T I O N T A TEOFN RT C AR O LI N A www.summit-engineer.com Fax: (919) 732-6776 Voice: (919) 732-3883 Hillsborough, NC 27278-8551 504 Meadowland Drive FIRM NO. P-0339 -L- STA. 12+60.70 -L- STA. 14+00.00 -L- STA. 12+35.30 -L- STA. 11+00.00 BEGIN CULVERT END CULVERT END PROJECT (GRIFFIN RD.) TO SR 2359 (Q U A K EN BU SH RD . ) TO SR 2 3 5 4 SR 2356 HOLMAN MILL RD. VICINITY MAP DETOUR ROUTE 17BP.7.R.63 Tr R d PeggNeave R d H u n t e r CreekLn TaltonTr BethelSouth Fork R d Workman Rd Griffin Rd Ma jor Hill R d Roselle Rd Quakenbush R d 2351 2356 2348 2356 2357 1004 2359 1005 2356 2351 2358 Chapel Victory 2351 1004 2351 1005 1004 2354 2354 1004 B ra n ch 2359 R E E D Y B R A N C H Site Project ALAMANCE COUNTY -L- LENGTH ROADWAY PROJECT = 0.052 MILES LENGTH STRUCTURES PROJECT = 0.005 MILES TOTAL LENGTH PROJECT = 0.057 MILES OVER REEDY BRANCH GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING AND STRUCTURE 4 See Sheet 1-B For Conventional Symbols See Sheet 1-C For Survey Control Sheet 50 25 50 100 50 25 50 100 10 5 10 20 LOCAL RURAL SUB-REGIONAL TIER Prepared in the Office of: TRACY N. PARROTT, PE BRANDON W. JOHNSON, PE 2013 460 55 H o l m a n M i l l R d Pleasant Church Rd Reedy Creek C a n e T =% *6 * TTST =3%DUAL 3% BRIDGE NO. 000135 ON SR 2356 (HOLMAN MILL RD) BEGIN PROJECT Office of: Prepared in the (919) 678-0206 (FAX) (919) 678-0035 Cary, NC 27513 15401 Weston Parkway Suite 100 NC FIRM LICENSE No: F-0891 WSP CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II. THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES. 17BP.7.R.63 17BP.7.R.63 17BP.7.R.63 NA NA NA PE R/W CONST SUBMITTAL S-006 RESPONSE S-006 25% PLANS 25% PLANS 06/27/13 07/12/13 NCDOT CONTACT: VIRGINIA MABRY NCDOT TPMU APRIL 23, 2013 APRIL 23, 2013C O N T R A C T : C 2 0 3 2 7 4 P R O J E C T : 1 7 B P . 7 . R . 6 3 N C G R ID N A D 8 3 / N S R S 2 0 0 7 5 WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT SHEET 1 OF 5 PERMIT DRAWING R E V IS I O N S DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY PLANS INCOMPLETE PLANS DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION Office of: Prepared in the NC FIRM LICENSE No: P-0339 (919) 732-3883 - (919) 732-6676 (FAX) Hillsborough, NC 27278 504 Meadowlands Drive Office of: Prepared in the (919) 678-0206 (FAX) (919) 678-0035 Cary, NC 27513 15401 Weston Parkway Suite 100 NC FIRM LICENSE No: F-0891 WSP SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO. HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER ENGINEER 217BP.7.R.63 R/W SHEET NO.8 / 1 7 / 9 9 6 / 6 / 2 0 14 R : \ N C D O T D I V I S I O N 7 B B R I D G E S \ 0 0 0 1 3 5 \ H y d r a u l i c s \ P E R M I T S _ E n v i r o n m e n t a l \ D r a w i n g s \ W e t l a n d s \ 1 3 5 _ h y d _ p r m _ p s h _ 2 . d g n u s v m 0 4 3 8 8 DESIGN DISCHARGE DESIGN FREQUENCY BASE DISCHARGE CFS YRS YRS BASE FREQUENCY OVERTOPPING ELEVATION OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE CFS CFS YRS FT FT FT DESIGN HW ELEVATION BASE HW ELEVATION CULVERT HYDRAULIC DATA = 1100 = 25 = 510.2 = 1500 = 100 = 513.03 = 1600 = >100 = 514.6 SHEET 2 OF 5 PERMIT DRAWING S S SURFACE WATER DENOTES IMPACTS IN SCALE 1"=50’ N C G R ID N A D 8 3 / N S R S 2 0 0 7 -L- SR 2356 (HOLMAN MILL ROAD) PROFILE VIEW ALONG ROADWAY ELEV. = 513.43’ PROP. 100 YR. ELEV. = 505.7’ AT CENTERLINE TOP OF FOOTING DATE: 05/30/13 NWS ELEV. = 505.1’ ELEV. = 510.2’ PROP. 25 YR. (6/12) BORING LOG ROCK LINE FROM EXISTING RD SEE DETAIL A LINE W/ PSRM STA. 13+75 -L- LT STA. 12+47 TO LATERAL ’V’ DITCH SEE DETAIL B LINE W/ RIPRAP STA. 13+75 -L- RT STA. 12+87 TO LATERAL ’V’ DITCH ( Not to Scale) LATERAL BASE DITCH 2: 1 D B b d 2:1 1"/Ft. FROM STA. 12+47 TO 13+75 -L- LT DETAIL A b= 2.0 Ft. B= 2.0 Ft. Max. d= 1.0 Ft. Min. D= 1.0 Ft. Type of Liner= PSRM Ground Natural Slope Fill LATERAL ’V’ DITCH ( Not to Scale) 2: 1 2:1 D b d 1"/Ft. FROM STA. 12+87 TO 13+75 -L- RT FROM STA. 12+25 TO STA. 12+55 -L- RT Slope Fill Type of Liner= ? Rip-Rap b= 2.0 Ft. Max. d= 1.0 Ft. Min. D= 1.0 Ft. DETAIL B Ground Natural Geotextile SEE DETAIL B LINE W/ RIPRAP 12+55 -L- RT STA. 12+25 TO LATERAL ’V’ DITCH IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER DENOTES TEMPORARY V2= 4.2 fps V10= 4.4 fps V2= 2.9 / 3.3 fps V10= 3.1 / 3.4 fps V2= 4.5 / 5.4 fps V10= 4.8 / 5.7 fps 490 500 510 520 530 550 540 480 10 11 12 13 14 490 500 510 520 530 550 540 480 PI = 11+60.00 EL = 515.09’ (-)2.4807%(-)0.4088% VC = 110’ K = 53 PI = 13+30.00 EL = 514.39’ (-)0.4088% (+)2.2620% VC = 140’ K = 52 DS = 35 DS = 35 E l = 5 11.9 4 (+) 3.8713% (+) 6.4789% E l = 5 12 .4 9 (+) 4.8054% (+) 6.8624% E L . = 5 0 8 .3 0 12 + 5 5 .0 0 - L - R T E N D D I T C H G R A D E P I = 13 + 5 0 .0 0 0 R T P I = 13 + 5 0 .0 0 0 L T E L . = 5 10 .3 6 12 + 2 5 .0 0 - L - R T B E G I N D I T C H G R A D E E L . = 5 0 7 .9 5 12 + 4 7 .0 0 - L - L T B E G I N D I T C H G R A D E E L . = 5 0 9 .4 6 12 + 8 7 .0 0 - L - R T B E G I N D I T C H G R A D E (+) 6.5989% E L . = 5 14 .14 13 + 7 5 .0 0 - L - R T E N D D I T C H G R A D E E L . = 5 13 .5 6 13 + 7 5 .0 0 - L - L T E N D D I T C H G R A D E EL=515.97 -L- STA 14+00.00 END GRADE EL=516.57 -L- STA 11+00.00 BEGIN GRADE OR EQUIVALENT 1 @ 22’ X 5.0’ CROWNSPAN T O B TO B WOODS WOODS WOODS 24" RCP 8 .5 ’ GR ELEV=548.55’ LOW POINT AERIAL LINE AERIAL AERIAL AERIAL SR 2356 - HOLMAN MILL RD19.7’ BST S 1 2 3 4 ELEV=546.56’ LOW POINT AERIAL GUY WIRE A E R IA L G U Y W IR E TO GRIFFIN RD TO QUAKENBUSH RD N 7 8 4 9 ’ 0 9 " E EXISTING R/W EXISTING R/W E X IS T IN G R / W E X IS T IN G R / W 6 0 .0 0 ’ R E E D Y B R A N C H T O B TO B WOODS ELEV=548.55’ LOW POINT AERIAL LINE SR 2356 - HOLMAN MILL RD S 4 R E E D Y B R A N C H GRAU 350 TL-3 GRAU 350 TL-3 GRAU 350 TL-3 GRAU 350 TL-3 0 18 0 18 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 1 0 4 3 0 4 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 GRAU 350 TL-3 GRAU 350 TL-3 GRAU 350 TL-3 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 4 F F F F 510 5 1 0 510 510 510 510 5 10 510 5 1 0 5 1 0 510 5 10 515 515 515 515 5 15 5 1 5 5 15 5 15515 5 1 5 515 515 5 15 520 520 520 5 2 0 520 520 5 2 0 520 5 2 0 520520520 520 525 525525 525 525 5 2 5 490 500 510 520 530 550 540 480 10 11 12 13 14 490 500 510 520 530 550 540 480 PI = 11+60.00 EL = 515.09’ (-)2.4807%(-)0.4088% VC = 110’ K = 53 PI = 13+30.00 EL = 514.39’ (-)0.4088% (+)2.2620% VC = 140’ K = 52 DS = 35 DS = 35 E l = 5 11.9 4 (+) 3.8713% (+) 6.4789% E l = 5 12 .4 9 (+) 4.8054% (+) 6.8624% E L . = 5 0 8 .3 0 12 + 5 5 .0 0 - L - R T E N D D I T C H G R A D E P I = 13 + 5 0 .0 0 0 R T P I = 13 + 5 0 .0 0 0 L T E L . = 5 10 .3 6 12 + 2 5 .0 0 - L - R T B E G I N D I T C H G R A D E E L . = 5 0 7 .9 5 12 + 4 7 .0 0 - L - L T B E G I N D I T C H G R A D E E L . = 5 0 9 .4 6 12 + 8 7 .0 0 - L - R T B E G I N D I T C H G R A D E (+) 6.5989% E L . = 5 14 .14 13 + 7 5 .0 0 - L - R T E N D D I T C H G R A D E E L . = 5 13 .5 6 13 + 7 5 .0 0 - L - L T E N D D I T C H G R A D E EL=515.97 -L- STA 14+00.00 END GRADE EL=516.57 -L- STA 11+00.00 BEGIN GRADE OR EQUIVALENT 1 @ 22’ X 5.0’ CROWNSPAN T O B TO B WOODS WOODS WOODS 24" RCP 8 .5 ’ GR ELEV=548.55’ LOW POINT AERIAL LINE AERIAL AERIAL AERIAL SR 2356 - HOLMAN MILL RD19.7’ BST S 1 2 3 4 ELEV=546.56’ LOW POINT AERIAL GUY WIRE A E R IA L G U Y W IR E TO GRIFFIN RD TO QUAKENBUSH RD N 7 8 4 9 ’ 0 9 " E EXISTING R/W EXISTING R/W E X IS T IN G R / W E X IS T IN G R / W 6 0 .0 0 ’ R E E D Y B R A N C H 510 5 10 510 510 5 10 510 5 1 0 5 1 0 510 T O B TO B WOODS ELEV=548.55’ LOW POINT AERIAL LINE SR 2356 - HOLMAN MILL RD S R E E D Y B R A N C H R E V IS I O N S DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY PLANS INCOMPLETE PLANS DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION Office of: Prepared in the NC FIRM LICENSE No: P-0339 (919) 732-3883 - (919) 732-6676 (FAX) Hillsborough, NC 27278 504 Meadowlands Drive Office of: Prepared in the (919) 678-0206 (FAX) (919) 678-0035 Cary, NC 27513 15401 Weston Parkway Suite 100 NC FIRM LICENSE No: F-0891 WSP SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO. HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER ENGINEER 317BP.7.R.63 R/W SHEET NO.8 / 1 7 / 9 9 6 / 6 / 2 0 14 R : \ N C D O T D I V I S I O N 7 B B R I D G E S \ 0 0 0 1 3 5 \ H y d r a u l i c s \ P E R M I T S _ E n v i r o n m e n t a l \ D r a w i n g s \ W e t l a n d s \ 1 3 5 _ h y d _ p r m _ p s h _ 3 . d g n u s v m 0 4 3 8 8 DESIGN DISCHARGE DESIGN FREQUENCY BASE DISCHARGE CFS YRS YRS BASE FREQUENCY OVERTOPPING ELEVATION OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE CFS CFS YRS FT FT FT DESIGN HW ELEVATION BASE HW ELEVATION CULVERT HYDRAULIC DATA = 1100 = 25 = 510.2 = 1500 = 100 = 513.03 = 1600 = >100 = 514.6 SHEET 3 OF 5 PERMIT DRAWING S S SURFACE WATER DENOTES IMPACTS IN SCALE 1"=50’ N C G R ID N A D 8 3 / N S R S 2 0 0 7 -L- SR 2356 (HOLMAN MILL ROAD) PROFILE VIEW ALONG ROADWAY ELEV. = 513.43’ PROP. 100 YR. ELEV. = 505.7’ AT CENTERLINE TOP OF FOOTING DATE: 05/30/13 NWS ELEV. = 505.1’ ELEV. = 510.2’ PROP. 25 YR. (6/12) BORING LOG ROCK LINE FROM EXISTING RD SEE DETAIL A LINE W/ PSRM STA. 13+75 -L- LT STA. 12+47 TO LATERAL ’V’ DITCH SEE DETAIL B LINE W/ RIPRAP STA. 13+75 -L- RT STA. 12+87 TO LATERAL ’V’ DITCH SEE DETAIL B LINE W/ RIPRAP 12+55 -L- RT STA. 12+25 TO LATERAL ’V’ DITCH ( Not to Scale) LATERAL BASE DITCH 2: 1 D B b d 2:1 1"/Ft. FROM STA. 12+47 TO 13+75 -L- LT DETAIL A b= 2.0 Ft. B= 2.0 Ft. Max. d= 1.0 Ft. Min. D= 1.0 Ft. Type of Liner= PSRM Ground Natural Slope Fill LATERAL ’V’ DITCH ( Not to Scale) 2: 1 2:1 D b d 1"/Ft. FROM STA. 12+87 TO 13+75 -L- RT FROM STA. 12+25 TO STA. 12+55 -L- RT Slope Fill Type of Liner= ? Rip-Rap b= 2.0 Ft. Max. d= 1.0 Ft. Min. D= 1.0 Ft. DETAIL B Ground Natural Geotextile IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER DENOTES TEMPORARY GRAU 350 TL-3 GRAU 350 TL-3 GRAU 350 TL-3 GRAU 350 TL-3 0 18 0 18 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 1 0 4 3 0 4 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 GRAU 350 TL-3 GRAU 350 TL-3 GRAU 350 TL-3 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 4 F F F F EROSION CONTROL PLAN CONSTRUCTION SHEET 4 EROSION CONTROL FOR CLEARING AND GRUBBING DRAINAGE OUTLETS. NOTE: TEMPORARY ROCK SILT CHECKS TYPE - A AT FOR CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES MANUAL REQUIREMENTS IN THE NCDOT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES BRIDGE REMOVAL AND CULVERT CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE PER SEE PROJECT SPECIAL PROVISIONS ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA N C GR ID N A D 8 3 / NS R S 2 0 0 7 -L- STA. 11+00.00 BEGIN PROJECT -L- STA. 14+00.00 END PROJECT DIKE IMPERVIOUS PIPE TEMPORARY 24 INCH CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE 22’X5’ RC BOTTOMLESS CULVERT DIKE IMPERVIOUS CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE 22’X5’ RC BOTTOMLESS CULVERT COMPLETE ROADWAY.7. SPECIAL STILLING BASIN(S). REMOVE TEMP. IMPERVIOUS DIKES, PIPE, AND 6. PRIOR TO REMOVAL OF IMPERVIOUS DIKES. RESULTED FROM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES REMOVE ALL SEDIMENT FROM STREAM THAT 5. INSTALL CLASS I RIPRAP ALONG WINGWALLS.4. CULVERT AND CONSTRUCT WINGWALLS. PLACE PRECAST SECTIONS OF BOTTOMLESS3. CONSTRUCT CHANNEL AND ARMOR CHANNEL EMBANKMENTS.2. CONSTRUCT FOOTINGS.1. STAGE II N C G R ID N A D 8 3 / N S R S 2 0 0 7 N C G R ID N A D 8 3 / N S R S 2 0 0 7 EC-4/CONST.4 HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER ENGINEER R/W SHEET NO. SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO. 17BP.7.R.47 R E E DY B R ANCH NO DEBRIS TO ENTER STREAM. REMOVE EXISTING BRIDGE ALLOWING6. BASIN(S). DEWATER CONSTRUCTION AREA INTO SPECIAL STILLING5. CONSTRUCT IMPERVIOUS DIKE DOWNSTREAM.4. AS SHOWN. PLACE TEMP. FLEXIBLE PIPE ALONG EXISTING CHANNEL 3. CONSTRUCT TEMP. IMPERVIOUS DIKE UPSTREAM.2. UTILIZE SPECIAL STILLING BASIN(S) AS NECESSARY.1. STAGE I SHEET 4 OF 5 PERMIT DRAWING WOODS WOODS 24" RCP 8 .5 ’ GR ELEV=521.68’ LOW POINT AERIAL LINE AERIAL AERIAL AERIAL SR 2356 - HOLMAN MILL RD19.7’ BST S 1 2 3 4 A E R I A L G U Y W I R E TO GRIFFIN RD DB 2743 PG 787 6 0 . 0 0 ’ R E E D Y B R A N C H 510 5 1 0 510 5 10 510 510 5 10 510 5 1 0 5 1 0 510 515 5 15 515 515 5 1 5 5 1 5 5 15 5 1 5515 5 1 5 515 515 520 520 520 5 2 0 520 520 520520 525 525 T O B TO B SR 2356 - HOLMAN MILL RD R E E D Y B R A N C H SR 2356 - HOLMAN MILL RD R E E D Y B R A N C H F C W FC W F C W GRAU 350 TL-3 GRAU 350 TL-3 GRAU 350 TL-3 GRAU 350 TL-3 0 1 8 0 1 8 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 1 0 4 3 0 4 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 F F F F Ha n d Ex i s t i n g E x i s t i n g Pe r m a n e n t T e m p . E x c a v a t i o n M e c h a n i z e d C l e a r i n g P e r m a n e n t T e m p . C h a n n e l C h a n n e l N a t u r a l Si t e S t a t i o n S t r u c t u r e F i l l I n F i l l I n i n C l e a r i n g i n S W S W I m p a c t s I m p a c t s S t r e a m No . ( F r o m / T o ) S i z e / T y p e W e t l a n d s W e t l a n d s W e t l a n d s i n W e t l a n d s W e t l a n d s i m p a c t s i m p a c t s P e r m a n e n t T e m p . D e s i g n (a c ) ( a c ) ( a c ) ( a c ) ( a c ) ( a c ) ( a c ) ( f t ) ( f t ) ( f t ) 12 + 3 5 t o 1 2 + 6 1 C L 12 + 0 6 t o 1 2 + 2 8 - L T 12 + 6 2 t o 1 2 + 8 8 - R T - ex c a v a t i o n / c h a n n e l re a l i g n m e n t f o r b o t t o m l e s s cu l v e r t , f l o o d p a i n b e n c h , st a b i l i z a t i o n a n d t e m p o r a r y p i p e an d i m p e r v i o u s d i k e s 0. 0 4 0 . 0 1 8 1 2 7 TO T A L S : 0. 0 4 0 . 0 1 8 1 2 7 AT N R e v i s e d 3 / 3 1 / 0 5 SH E E T 5 O F 5 2 / 5 / 2 0 1 4 AL A M A N C E C O U N T Y WB S - 1 7 B P . 7 . R . 6 3 ( 0 0 0 1 3 5 ) NC D E P A R T M E N T O F T R A N S P O R T A T I O N DI V I S I O N O F H I G H W A Y S W E T L A N D P E R M I T I M P A C T S U M M A R Y SU R F A C E W A T E R I M P A C T S WE T L A N D I M P A C T S Br i d g e N o . 1 3 5 O v e r R e e d y B r a n c h o n S R 2 3 5 6 H o l m a n Mill Rd V = =MPH ADT INCOMPLETE PLANS DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY PLANS FUNC CLASS = 0 0 0 PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) PROJECT LENGTH RIGHT OF WAY DATE: LETTING DATE: STATE STATE PROJECT REFERENCE NO. STATE PROJ. NO.F. A. PROJ. NO.DESCRIPTION NO. TOTAL SHEETS N.C. SHEET 1 DESIGN DATA SIGNATURE: SIGNATURE: P.E. P.E. 2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS PROJECT ENGINEER PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER GRAPHIC SCALES PLANS PROFILE (VERTICAL) HYDRAULICS ENGINEER ENGINEER ROADWAY DESIGN LOCATION: TYPE OF WORK: 0 9 / 0 8 / 9 9 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA 0 00 See Sheet 1-A For Index of Sheets 3 / 11/ 2 0 14 R : \ N C D O T D IV IS IO N 7 B B R ID G E S \ 0 0 0 13 5 \ H y d r a u l i c s \ P E R M IT S _ E n v i r o n m e n t a l \ D r a w i n g s \ B u f f e r s \ 13 5 _ h y d _ p r m _ b u f _ t s h _ 1. d g n U S R S 0 14 16 A R T MEN N A S O H D E P T O F TRA SPORT T I O N T A TEOFN RT C AR O LI N A www.summit-engineer.com Fax: (919) 732-6776 Voice: (919) 732-3883 Hillsborough, NC 27278-8551 504 Meadowland Drive FIRM NO. P-0339 -L- STA. 12+60.70 -L- STA. 14+00.00 -L- STA. 12+35.30 -L- STA. 11+00.00 BEGIN CULVERT END CULVERT END PROJECT (GRIFFIN RD.) TO SR 2359 (Q U A K EN BU SH RD . ) TO SR 2 3 5 4 SR 2356 HOLMAN MILL RD. VICINITY MAP DETOUR ROUTE 17BP.7.R.63 Tr R d PeggNeave R d H u n t e r CreekLn TaltonTr BethelSouth Fork R d Workman Rd Griffin Rd Ma jor Hill R d Roselle Rd Quakenbush R d 2351 2356 2348 2356 2357 1004 2359 1005 2356 2351 2358 Chapel Victory 2351 1004 2351 1005 1004 2354 2354 1004 B ra n ch 2359 R E E D Y B R A N C H Site Project ALAMANCE COUNTY -L- LENGTH ROADWAY PROJECT = 0.052 MILES LENGTH STRUCTURES PROJECT = 0.005 MILES TOTAL LENGTH PROJECT = 0.057 MILES OVER REEDY BRANCH 4 See Sheet 1-B For Conventional Symbols See Sheet 1-C For Survey Control Sheet 50 25 50 100 50 25 50 100 10 5 10 20 LOCAL RURAL SUB-REGIONAL TIER Prepared in the Office of: TRACY N. PARROTT, PE BRANDON W. JOHNSON, PE 2013 460 55 H o l m a n M i l l R d Pleasant Church Rd Reedy Creek C a n e T =% *6 * TTST =3%DUAL 3% BRIDGE NO. 000135 ON SR 2356 (HOLMAN MILL RD) BEGIN PROJECT Office of: Prepared in the (919) 678-0206 (FAX) (919) 678-0035 Cary, NC 27513 15401 Weston Parkway Suite 100 NC FIRM LICENSE No: F-0891 WSP CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II. THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES. 17BP.7.R.63 17BP.7.R.63 17BP.7.R.63 NA NA NA PE R/W CONST SUBMITTAL S-006 RESPONSE S-006 25% PLANS 25% PLANS 06/27/13 07/12/13 NCDOT CONTACT: VIRGINIA MABRY NCDOT TPMU APRIL 23, 2013 APRIL 23, 2013C O N T R A C T : C 2 0 3 2 7 4 P R O J E C T : 1 7 B P . 7 . R . 6 3 N C G R ID N A D 8 3 / N S R S 2 0 0 7 4 SHEET 1 OF 4 PERMIT DRAWING GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING AND CULVERT BUFFER IMPACTS PERMIT R E V IS I O N S DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY PLANS INCOMPLETE PLANS DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION Office of: Prepared in the NC FIRM LICENSE No: P-0339 (919) 732-3883 - (919) 732-6676 (FAX) Hillsborough, NC 27278 504 Meadowlands Drive Office of: Prepared in the (919) 678-0206 (FAX) (919) 678-0035 Cary, NC 27513 15401 Weston Parkway Suite 100 NC FIRM LICENSE No: F-0891 WSP SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO. HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER ENGINEER 217BP.7.R.63 R/W SHEET NO.8 / 1 7 / 9 9 6 / 6 / 2 0 14 R : \ N C D O T D I V I S I O N 7 B B R I D G E S \ 0 0 0 1 3 5 \ H y d r a u l i c s \ P E R M I T S _ E n v i r o n m e n t a l \ D r a w i n g s \ B u f f e r s \ 1 3 5 _ h y d _ p r m _ b u f _ p s h _ 2 . d g n u s v m 0 4 3 8 8 DESIGN DISCHARGE DESIGN FREQUENCY BASE DISCHARGE CFS YRS YRS BASE FREQUENCY OVERTOPPING ELEVATION OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE CFS CFS YRS FT FT FT DESIGN HW ELEVATION BASE HW ELEVATION CULVERT HYDRAULIC DATA = 1100 = 25 = 510.2 = 1500 = 100 = 513.03 = 1600 = >100 = 514.6 SHEET 2 OF 4 PERMIT DRAWING SCALE 1"=50’ N C G R ID N A D 8 3 / N S R S 2 0 0 7 -L- SR 2356 (HOLMAN MILL ROAD) PROFILE VIEW ALONG ROADWAY ELEV. = 513.43’ PROP. 100 YR. ELEV. = 505.7’ AT CENTERLINE TOP OF FOOTING DATE: 05/30/13 NWS ELEV. = 505.1’ ELEV. = 510.2’ PROP. 25 YR. (6/12) BORING LOG ROCK LINE FROM EXISTING RD ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1 ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2 SEE DETAIL A LINE W/ PSRM STA. 13+75 -L- LT STA. 12+47 TO LATERAL ’V’ DITCH SEE DETAIL B LINE W/ RIPRAP STA. 13+75 -L- RT STA. 12+87 TO LATERAL ’V’ DITCH SEE DETAIL B LINE W/ RIPRAP 12+55 -L- RT STA. 12+25 TO LATERAL ’V’ DITCH ( Not to Scale) LATERAL BASE DITCH 2: 1 D B b d 2:1 1"/Ft. FROM STA. 12+47 TO 13+75 -L- LT DETAIL A b= 2.0 Ft. B= 2.0 Ft. Max. d= 1.0 Ft. Min. D= 1.0 Ft. Type of Liner= PSRM Ground Natural Slope Fill LATERAL ’V’ DITCH ( Not to Scale) 2: 1 2:1 D b d 1"/Ft. FROM STA. 12+87 TO 13+75 -L- RT FROM STA. 12+25 TO STA. 12+55 -L- RT Slope Fill Type of Liner= ? Rip-Rap b= 2.0 Ft. Max. d= 1.0 Ft. Min. D= 1.0 Ft. DETAIL B Ground Natural Geotextile V2= 4.5 / 5.4 fps V10= 4.8 / 5.7 fps V2= 4.2 fps V10= 4.4 fps V2= 2.9 / 3.3 fps V10= 3.1 / 3.4 fps 490 500 510 520 530 550 540 480 10 11 12 13 14 490 500 510 520 530 550 540 480 PI = 11+60.00 EL = 515.09’ (-)2.4807%(-)0.4088% VC = 110’ K = 53 PI = 13+30.00 EL = 514.39’ (-)0.4088% (+)2.2620% VC = 140’ K = 52 DS = 35 DS = 35 E l = 5 11.9 4 (+) 3.8713% (+) 6.4789% E l = 5 12 .4 9 (+) 4.8054% (+) 6.8624% E L . = 5 0 8 .3 0 12 + 5 5 .0 0 - L - R T E N D D I T C H G R A D E P I = 13 + 5 0 .0 0 0 R T P I = 13 + 5 0 .0 0 0 L T E L . = 5 10 .3 6 12 + 2 5 .0 0 - L - R T B E G I N D I T C H G R A D E E L . = 5 0 7 .9 5 12 + 4 7 .0 0 - L - L T B E G I N D I T C H G R A D E E L . = 5 0 9 .4 6 12 + 8 7 .0 0 - L - R T B E G I N D I T C H G R A D E (+) 6.5989% E L . = 5 14 .14 13 + 7 5 .0 0 - L - R T E N D D I T C H G R A D E E L . = 5 13 .5 6 13 + 7 5 .0 0 - L - L T E N D D I T C H G R A D E EL=515.97 -L- STA 14+00.00 END GRADE EL=516.57 -L- STA 11+00.00 BEGIN GRADE OR EQUIVALENT 1 @ 22’ X 5.0’ CROWNSPAN T O B TO B 8 .5 ’ GR EXISTING R/W E X IS T IN G R / W E X IS T IN G R / W 6 0 .0 0 ’ R E E D Y B R A N C H T O B TO B ELEV=548.55’ LOW POINT AERIAL LINE AERIAL ************************ R/R SPIKE IN 24" OAK N 779030 E 1880928 BM#1 ELEVATION = 511.88 ************************ 4 R E E D Y B R A N C H R E V IS I O N S DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY PLANS INCOMPLETE PLANS DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION Office of: Prepared in the NC FIRM LICENSE No: P-0339 (919) 732-3883 - (919) 732-6676 (FAX) Hillsborough, NC 27278 504 Meadowlands Drive Office of: Prepared in the (919) 678-0206 (FAX) (919) 678-0035 Cary, NC 27513 15401 Weston Parkway Suite 100 NC FIRM LICENSE No: F-0891 WSP SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO. HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER ENGINEER 317BP.7.R.63 R/W SHEET NO.8 / 1 7 / 9 9 6 / 6 / 2 0 14 R : \ N C D O T D I V I S I O N 7 B B R I D G E S \ 0 0 0 1 3 5 \ H y d r a u l i c s \ P E R M I T S _ E n v i r o n m e n t a l \ D r a w i n g s \ B u f f e r s \ 1 3 5 _ h y d _ p r m _ b u f _ p s h _ 3 . d g n u s v m 0 4 3 8 8 DESIGN DISCHARGE DESIGN FREQUENCY BASE DISCHARGE CFS YRS YRS BASE FREQUENCY OVERTOPPING ELEVATION OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE CFS CFS YRS FT FT FT DESIGN HW ELEVATION BASE HW ELEVATION CULVERT HYDRAULIC DATA = 1100 = 25 = 510.2 = 1500 = 100 = 513.03 = 1600 = >100 = 514.6 SHEET 3 OF 4 PERMIT DRAWING SCALE 1"=50’ N C G R ID N A D 8 3 / N S R S 2 0 0 7 -L- SR 2356 (HOLMAN MILL ROAD) PROFILE VIEW ALONG ROADWAY ELEV. = 513.43’ PROP. 100 YR. ELEV. = 505.7’ AT CENTERLINE TOP OF FOOTING DATE: 05/30/13 NWS ELEV. = 505.1’ ELEV. = 510.2’ PROP. 25 YR. (6/12) BORING LOG ROCK LINE FROM EXISTING RD ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1 ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2 SEE DETAIL B LINE W/ RIPRAP 12+55 -L- RT STA. 12+25 TO LATERAL ’V’ DITCH SEE DETAIL B LINE W/ RIPRAP STA. 13+75 -L- RT STA. 12+87 TO LATERAL ’V’ DITCH SEE DETAIL A LINE W/ PSRM STA. 13+75 -L- LT STA. 12+47 TO LATERAL ’V’ DITCH ( Not to Scale) LATERAL BASE DITCH 2: 1 D B b d 2:1 1"/Ft. FROM STA. 12+47 TO 13+75 -L- LT DETAIL A b= 2.0 Ft. B= 2.0 Ft. Max. d= 1.0 Ft. Min. D= 1.0 Ft. Type of Liner= PSRM Ground Natural Slope Fill LATERAL ’V’ DITCH ( Not to Scale) 2: 1 2:1 D b d 1"/Ft. FROM STA. 12+87 TO 13+75 -L- RT FROM STA. 12+25 TO STA. 12+55 -L- RT Slope Fill Type of Liner= ? Rip-Rap b= 2.0 Ft. Max. d= 1.0 Ft. Min. D= 1.0 Ft. DETAIL B Ground Natural Geotextile V2= 4.5 / 5.4 fps V10= 4.8 / 5.7 fps V2= 4.2 fps V2= 2.9 / 3.3 fps V10= 3.1 / 3.4 fps V10= 4.4 fps 490 500 510 520 530 550 540 480 10 11 12 13 14 490 500 510 520 530 550 540 480 PI = 11+60.00 EL = 515.09’ (-)2.4807%(-)0.4088% VC = 110’ K = 53 PI = 13+30.00 EL = 514.39’ (-)0.4088% (+)2.2620% VC = 140’ K = 52 DS = 35 DS = 35 E l = 5 11.9 4 (+) 3.8713% (+) 6.4789% E l = 5 12 .4 9 (+) 4.8054% (+) 6.8624% E L . = 5 0 8 .3 0 12 + 5 5 .0 0 - L - R T E N D D I T C H G R A D E P I = 13 + 5 0 .0 0 0 R T P I = 13 + 5 0 .0 0 0 L T E L . = 5 10 .3 6 12 + 2 5 .0 0 - L - R T B E G I N D I T C H G R A D E E L . = 5 0 7 .9 5 12 + 4 7 .0 0 - L - L T B E G I N D I T C H G R A D E E L . = 5 0 9 .4 6 12 + 8 7 .0 0 - L - R T B E G I N D I T C H G R A D E (+) 6.5989% E L . = 5 14 .14 13 + 7 5 .0 0 - L - R T E N D D I T C H G R A D E E L . = 5 13 .5 6 13 + 7 5 .0 0 - L - L T E N D D I T C H G R A D E EL=515.97 -L- STA 14+00.00 END GRADE EL=516.57 -L- STA 11+00.00 BEGIN GRADE OR EQUIVALENT 1 @ 22’ X 5.0’ CROWNSPAN T O B TO B 8 .5 ’ GR EXISTING R/W E X IS T IN G R / W E X IS T IN G R / W 6 0 .0 0 ’ R E E D Y B R A N C H 5 1 0 510 5 10 510 510 5 10 510 5 1 0 5 1 0 510 5 10 515 515 5 1 5 5 1 5 515 5 15 520 5 2 5 T O B TO B ELEV=548.55’ LOW POINT AERIAL LINE AERIAL ************************ R/R SPIKE IN 24" OAK N 779030 E 1880928 BM#1 ELEVATION = 511.88 ************************ 4 R E E D Y B R A N C H 510 5 1 0 510 510 510 510 5 10 510 5 1 0 5 1 0 510 5 10 515 515 515 515 5 15 5 1 5 5 15 5 15515 5 1 5 515 515 5 15 520 520 520 5 2 0 520 520 5 2 0 520 5 2 0 520520520 520 525 525525 525 525 5 2 5 RO A D CR O S S I N G B R I D G E PA R A L L E L IM P A C T ZO N E 1 (f t 2) ZO N E 2 (f t 2) TO T A L (f t 2) ZO N E 1 (f t 2) ZO N E 2 (f t 2) TO T A L (f t 2) ZONE 1 (ft2)ZONE 2 (ft2) Ro a d F i l l a n d C l e a r i n g 11 + 4 0 t o 1 2 + 2 5 - L T - 12 + 2 7 t o 1 3 + 0 5 - L T - 11 + 9 6 t o 1 2 + 6 2 - R T - 12 + 7 7 t o 1 3 + 4 0 - R T - X 2 6 3 6 . 0 7 0 0 . 0 3 3 3 6 . 0 TO T A L : 26 3 6 . 0 7 0 0 . 0 3 3 3 6 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 IM P A C T BU F F E R I M P A C T S S U M M A R Y TY P E SI T E N O . ST R U C T U R E S I Z E / TY P E ST A T I O N (F R O M / T O ) AL L O W A B L E M I T I G A B L E BUFFER REPLACEMENT S H E E T 4 O F 4 PR O J E C T : 1 7 B P . 7 . R . 6 3 ( 0 0 0 1 3 5 ) 3/5/2014 N. C . D E P T . O F T R A N S P O R T A T I O N DI V I S I O N O F H I G H W A Y S AL A M A N C E C O U N T Y Br i d g e N o . 1 3 5 O v e r R e e d y B r a n c h o n S R 2 3 5 6 H o l m a n Mill Rd Rev. May 2006 LOOKING WEST UPSTREAM LOOKING EAST DOWNSTREAM 01/31/2011000135CountyALAMANCEDate:Structure Structure Photos SUPERSTRUCTURE ABUTMENT 1 01/31/2011000135CountyALAMANCEDate:Structure Structure Photos LOOKING EAST LOOKING EAST DOWNSTREAM FROM TOP 01/31/2011000135CountyALAMANCEDate:Structure Structure Photos LOOKING WEST UPSTREAM FROM TOP LOOKING WEST 01/31/2011000135CountyALAMANCEDate:Structure Structure Photos LOOKING NORTH POSTING 01/31/2011000135CountyALAMANCEDate:Structure Structure Photos